Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Requiem aeternam Полина Абрамовна Лупинская (1921–2010)
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 419-421.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59643
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Света Володина
Друг и Учитель
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 422-423.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59644
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Т.К. Рябинина
Жизнь во имя науки
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 424-426.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59645
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Алексеева Л.Б.
Некоторые проблемы пересмотра судебных решений
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 427-437.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59646
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to problems of review of court’s decisions in the
criminal trial in appeal and cassation modes. The author analyzes the bases and
an order of such review, formulates the basic problems connected with revival of
the appeal procedures in Russia.
The special attention is given also to post-appellate review, modern perspectives
of its development in the light of practice of the European Court of
Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
Ключевые слова:
надзорное производство, Европейский Суд по правам человека, окончательность судебных постановлений, апелляционное производство, кассационное производство
Abstract:
The article is devoted to problems of review of court’s decisions in the
criminal trial in appeal and cassation modes. The author analyzes the bases and
an order of such review, formulates the basic problems connected with revival of
the appeal procedures in Russia.
The special attention is given also to post-appellate review, modern perspectives
of its development in the light of practice of the European Court of
Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
Keywords:
nadzornoe proizvodstvo, Evropeiskii Sud po pravam cheloveka, apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo, kassatsionnoe proizvodstvo
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Бессарабов В.Г.
Преподавание курса «Прокурорский надзор» и развитие личности студента
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 438-447.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59647
Аннотация:
This article is dedicated to the issues of organization of training legal
professionals in legal specialty, particularly, in procedure and technique of education
of prosecutors in the prosecutorial institutes established under the Decree
No 787 of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 8, 1996.
Accent is also made on formation and developing personal and individual
qualities of lawyers related to law and order, respect and adherence to human
rights and freedoms of persons and citizens provided by domestic and international
legal instruments, intolerance to red-tape and corruption, formation of professional qualities, personal and collectivism attributes, which define its social
basis.
Ключевые слова:
прокурорский надзор, преподавание юридических дисциплин, высшее юридическое образование, кадры прокуратуры
Abstract:
This article is dedicated to the issues of organization of training legal
professionals in legal specialty, particularly, in procedure and technique of education
of prosecutors in the prosecutorial institutes established under the Decree
No 787 of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 8, 1996.
Accent is also made on formation and developing personal and individual
qualities of lawyers related to law and order, respect and adherence to human
rights and freedoms of persons and citizens provided by domestic and international
legal instruments, intolerance to red-tape and corruption, formation of professional qualities, personal and collectivism attributes, which define its social
basis.
Keywords:
prokurorskii nadzor, prepodavanie yuridicheskikh distsiplin, vysshee yuridicheskoe obrazovanie, kadry prokuratury
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Воскобитова Л.А.
Некоторые особенности расследования при заключении досудебного соглашения о сотрудничестве: уяснение смыслов
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 448-464.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59648
Аннотация:
In the article the problems of understanding and application of norms of
ch 401 of Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation which has established
the special method of rendering the decisions under pre-trial agreement on collaboration
at the conclusion of the pre-trial investigation are analyzed. The
norms regulating features of the pre-trial investigation in this special procedure
are investigated.
The conclusion is justified that the agreement can be concluded with the
person only after circumstances of a crime are established and the procedural
status of the person as suspected or accused is determined. The pre-trial agreement
is the new procedural document, therefore in the article its most important
components are analyzed. The concept of obligations which are incurred by the
person initiating its reveals. Their difference from actions which it is obliged to
make is shown. Conditions which the prosecution can offer to him are analyzed.
Features of end of the pre-trial investigation on these cases, and also new authorities
of the prosecutor in this context are shown.
Ключевые слова:
досудебное соглашение о сотрудничестве, сделка о признании вины, система уголовно-процессуального права, полномочия прокурора
Abstract:
In the article the problems of understanding and application of norms of
ch 401 of Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation which has established
the special method of rendering the decisions under pre-trial agreement on collaboration
at the conclusion of the pre-trial investigation are analyzed. The
norms regulating features of the pre-trial investigation in this special procedure
are investigated.
The conclusion is justified that the agreement can be concluded with the
person only after circumstances of a crime are established and the procedural
status of the person as suspected or accused is determined. The pre-trial agreement
is the new procedural document, therefore in the article its most important
components are analyzed. The concept of obligations which are incurred by the
person initiating its reveals. Their difference from actions which it is obliged to
make is shown. Conditions which the prosecution can offer to him are analyzed.
Features of end of the pre-trial investigation on these cases, and also new authorities
of the prosecutor in this context are shown.
Keywords:
dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve, sdelka o priznanii viny, polnomochiya prokurora
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Гречаная И.В.
Сравнительный анализ особенностей судопроизводства в отношении несовершеннолетних в Российской Федерации и в некоторых странах СНГ
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 465-473.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59649
Аннотация:
In the article it is stated that the Russian legislation regulating criminal
proceedings concerning minors, now in the majority is brought into accord with
the international law in this sphere.
For the purpose revealings of features of regulation of criminal proceedings
against minors in other countries and possible use of experience of these
countries at regulation of features of criminal proceedings against minors in
Russia in the article are analyzed Codes of Criminal Procedure of some CIS
states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, Ukraine).
Ключевые слова:
судопроизводство в отношении несовершеннолетних, законодательство стран СНГ, специализированные суды, меры пресечения
Abstract:
In the article it is stated that the Russian legislation regulating criminal
proceedings concerning minors, now in the majority is brought into accord with
the international law in this sphere.
For the purpose revealings of features of regulation of criminal proceedings
against minors in other countries and possible use of experience of these
countries at regulation of features of criminal proceedings against minors in
Russia in the article are analyzed Codes of Criminal Procedure of some CIS
states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, Ukraine).
Keywords:
sudoproizvodstvo v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh, spetsializirovannye sudy, mery presecheniya
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Диков Г.
Суд присяжных и практика Европейского Суда по правам человека по статье 6 Конвенции (право на справедливое судебное разбирательство)
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 474-490.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59650
Аннотация:
Jury trial is not a mandatory form of adjudication under the European
Сonvention. Many countries do not have juries or their competence is very limited.
However, where such courts exist, they should operate in compliance with
the requirements of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The article examines particular features of the jury trial and how they are
reflected in the case-law of the European Court. In particular, the author analyses
the notion of “impartiality” and its application to the jurors. If one of the jurors
is biased, does it make the whole panel “partial”? What can the presiding
judge do where allegations of bias are made other than dissolve the panel? What
sort of convictions or beliefs may be regarded as “prejudice”? What external
factors may make the jurors biased?
The article further touches upon the Court’s case law on “motivated
judgments.” Jury in many countries are not required to give motivated answers
to the questions put by the presiding judge. A recent case Taxquet v. Belgium
(now pending before the Grand Chamber) condemns this practice and establishes
that the criminal defendant has the right to know why the jury has declared
him guilty. The author examines practical and theoretical problems of
application of the “motivated judgement” principle in the context of jury trial.
In conclusion, the author outlines certain general approaches of the
European Court, namely its tendency to analyse the decision-making process
rather than the substance of the decisions taken at the domestic level, and the
considerable leeway given to the domestic judge in such matters.
Ключевые слова:
Конвенция о защите прав человека и основных свобод, Европейский Суд по правам человека, суд присяжных, право на справедливое судебной разбирательство
Abstract:
Jury trial is not a mandatory form of adjudication under the European
Сonvention. Many countries do not have juries or their competence is very limited.
However, where such courts exist, they should operate in compliance with
the requirements of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The article examines particular features of the jury trial and how they are
reflected in the case-law of the European Court. In particular, the author analyses
the notion of “impartiality” and its application to the jurors. If one of the jurors
is biased, does it make the whole panel “partial”? What can the presiding
judge do where allegations of bias are made other than dissolve the panel? What
sort of convictions or beliefs may be regarded as “prejudice”? What external
factors may make the jurors biased?
The article further touches upon the Court’s case law on “motivated
judgments.” Jury in many countries are not required to give motivated answers
to the questions put by the presiding judge. A recent case Taxquet v. Belgium
(now pending before the Grand Chamber) condemns this practice and establishes
that the criminal defendant has the right to know why the jury has declared
him guilty. The author examines practical and theoretical problems of
application of the “motivated judgement” principle in the context of jury trial.
In conclusion, the author outlines certain general approaches of the
European Court, namely its tendency to analyse the decision-making process
rather than the substance of the decisions taken at the domestic level, and the
considerable leeway given to the domestic judge in such matters.
Keywords:
Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod, Evropeiskii Sud po pravam cheloveka, sud prisyazhnykh
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Кипнис Н.М.
Особенности применения института оглашения показаний потерпевшего и свидетеля (ст. 281 УПК РФ) с учетом правовых позиций Европейского Суда по правам человека
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 491-512.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59651
Аннотация:
In the article judicial practice of application of institute of reading of testimonies
of the victim and the witness not was in a session of the court (s 281 of
Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation) is analyzed in light of s 6(3)(d)
of European Convention on Human Rights of 1950.
It is stated that interpretation by the Russian courts of norms of the
criminal procedure legislation in this sphere is carried out in overwhelming majority
of cases with disregard of norms of s 6(3)(d) of European Convention on
Human Rights of 1950 and extensive practice of the European Court of Human
Rights.
Generalisation of case law of the European Court of Human Rights on
interpretation of norms of s 6(3)(d) of European Convention on Human Rights
of 1950 regarding realisation by each accused of the right to cross-examination
of witnesses for the prosecution has allowed to formulate criteria which should
be considered by the Russian courts in order to avoid infringement of norms of
s 6(3)(d) of European Convention on Human Rights of 1950.
Ключевые слова:
оглашение показаний потерпевшего и свидетеля, Конвенция о защите прав человека и основных свобод, справедливость судебного разбирательства, минимальные права обвиняемого, право на перекрестный допрос, право на очную ставку, Европейский Суд по правам человека, правовые позиции, прецедентная практика
Abstract:
In the article judicial practice of application of institute of reading of testimonies
of the victim and the witness not was in a session of the court (s 281 of
Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation) is analyzed in light of s 6(3)(d)
of European Convention on Human Rights of 1950.
It is stated that interpretation by the Russian courts of norms of the
criminal procedure legislation in this sphere is carried out in overwhelming majority
of cases with disregard of norms of s 6(3)(d) of European Convention on
Human Rights of 1950 and extensive practice of the European Court of Human
Rights.
Generalisation of case law of the European Court of Human Rights on
interpretation of norms of s 6(3)(d) of European Convention on Human Rights
of 1950 regarding realisation by each accused of the right to cross-examination
of witnesses for the prosecution has allowed to formulate criteria which should
be considered by the Russian courts in order to avoid infringement of norms of
s 6(3)(d) of European Convention on Human Rights of 1950.
Keywords:
oglashenie pokazanii poterpevshego i svidetelya, Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod, pravo na perekrestnyi dopros, pravo na ochnuyu stavku, Evropeiskii Sud po pravam cheloveka, pravovye pozitsii, pretsedentnaya praktika
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Ковлер А.И.
Презумпция свободы
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 513-518.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59652
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to practice of the European Court of Human
Rights concerning pre-trial taking into custody. The author notices that the Russian courts too often apply the given measure, not always considering this practice.
In the article it is offered to approach to a choice of this measure more cautiously.
Ключевые слова:
Конвенция о защите прав человека и основных свобод, Европейский Суд по правам человека, суд присяжных, право на справедливое судебной разбирательство, меры пресечения, заключение под стражу до суда
Abstract:
The article is devoted to practice of the European Court of Human
Rights concerning pre-trial taking into custody. The author notices that the Russian courts too often apply the given measure, not always considering this practice.
In the article it is offered to approach to a choice of this measure more cautiously.
Keywords:
Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod, Evropeiskii Sud po pravam cheloveka, sud prisyazhnykh, mery presecheniya, zaklyuchenie pod strazhu do suda
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Козявин А.А.
Историко-правовое и аксиологическое соотношение уголовного процесса и борьбы с преступностью: размышления под влиянием научных взглядов П.А. Лупинской
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 519-532.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59653
Аннотация:
The article describes the significant contribution of the outstanding scientist,
professor P.A. Lupinskaya, to the development of theory about essence
and problems of criminal legal proceedings, about ideas which have allowed the
author of the article to prove from axiological, historical and legal positions systematic
independence of criminal legal proceedings in relation to the criminal
law and struggle against criminality.
To prove his position the author conducts the historic research of the
reasons and process of occurrence of criminal legal proceedings in ancient and
contemporary societies.
Further in article it is proved that criminal legal proceedings translate
ephemeral “criminality” in concrete “crime” and do not possess criminality as
the subject of action, but do possess a crime in such a subject. It is affirmed that
not only the criminality is the diverse social phenomenon, but also struggle
against it is a moral-psychological reaction of a society, and is the social phenomenon
too. Therefore criminal legal proceedings cannot have struggle against
criminality as the purpose, and urged to resolve the social conflict concerning
the committed crime. The given position has found support not only among experts
in criminal procedure law sphere, but also among criminologists, and also
in norms of the international law.
Ключевые слова:
назначение уголовного процесса, уголовное право, борьба с преступностью
Abstract:
The article describes the significant contribution of the outstanding scientist,
professor P.A. Lupinskaya, to the development of theory about essence
and problems of criminal legal proceedings, about ideas which have allowed the
author of the article to prove from axiological, historical and legal positions systematic
independence of criminal legal proceedings in relation to the criminal
law and struggle against criminality.
To prove his position the author conducts the historic research of the
reasons and process of occurrence of criminal legal proceedings in ancient and
contemporary societies.
Further in article it is proved that criminal legal proceedings translate
ephemeral “criminality” in concrete “crime” and do not possess criminality as
the subject of action, but do possess a crime in such a subject. It is affirmed that
not only the criminality is the diverse social phenomenon, but also struggle
against it is a moral-psychological reaction of a society, and is the social phenomenon
too. Therefore criminal legal proceedings cannot have struggle against
criminality as the purpose, and urged to resolve the social conflict concerning
the committed crime. The given position has found support not only among experts
in criminal procedure law sphere, but also among criminologists, and also
in norms of the international law.
Keywords:
naznachenie ugolovnogo protsessa, ugolovnoe pravo
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Колоколов Н.А.
Учебник, опередивший время
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 533-539.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59654
Аннотация:
The textbook is a significant mark in scientific activity, an indicator on
which judge a place of the teacher in the scientific world. The chair headed by
P.A. Lupinskaya, was possible manage the textbook “Criminal Procedure Law”
which not only has sustained set of editions, became the unique sample of didactics,
but also has essentially advanced time as its authors have indicated a new
direction in development of a criminal procedure science.
Ключевые слова:
уголовно-процессуальное право, судебное право, профессиональный учебник
Abstract:
The textbook is a significant mark in scientific activity, an indicator on
which judge a place of the teacher in the scientific world. The chair headed by
P.A. Lupinskaya, was possible manage the textbook “Criminal Procedure Law”
which not only has sustained set of editions, became the unique sample of didactics,
but also has essentially advanced time as its authors have indicated a new
direction in development of a criminal procedure science.
Keywords:
sudebnoe pravo
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Лазарева В.А.
Уголовный процесс как способ защиты прав и свобод человека и гражданина (назначение уголовного судопроизводства)
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 540-550.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59655
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to the analysis of one of the most important conceptual
ideas, expressed in s 6 of Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation:
the purpose of criminal procedure is in serving protection of the rights and
freedom of the person and the citizen. In the article it is noticed that if the Russian
justice is used as the instrument of the political power it does not cause trust
and has no society support. A judicial authority only then to deliver the justice to
people when it operates not in interests of society with which usually cover interests
of the state but in interests of the person.
Ключевые слова:
правосудие, уголовное судопроизводство, права человека, назначение уголовного судопроизводства
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of one of the most important conceptual
ideas, expressed in s 6 of Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation:
the purpose of criminal procedure is in serving protection of the rights and
freedom of the person and the citizen. In the article it is noticed that if the Russian
justice is used as the instrument of the political power it does not cause trust
and has no society support. A judicial authority only then to deliver the justice to
people when it operates not in interests of society with which usually cover interests
of the state but in interests of the person.
Keywords:
pravosudie, ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, prava cheloveka, naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Масленникова Л.Н.
УПК РФ и перспективы развития уголовного судопроизводства в России
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 551-567.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59656
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to P.A.Lupinskaya’s memory with whom the author
together worked in a working group on preparation new Criminal Procedure
Code of Russian Federation and to monitoring of its enactment.
In the article it is underlined that by preparation new Criminal Procedure
Code members of a working group was guided by the aspiration to create such
system of criminal justice in which the court might respect the person’s rights.
However established Criminal Procedure Code some progressive institutes
and norms are not put into practice or applied not to the full; the established
procedures are substituted for the technologies which have been not based on
Criminal Procedure Code, procedural decisions are rendered without the sufficient
bases on that.
In the article it is noticed that the quantity of federal laws by which
changes are made promptly increases, and the majority of additions in Criminal
Procedure Code (more than 50) have been accepted without preliminary expert
examination, are not verified from the point of view of a science and practice.
Some of these laws are regarded as the system errors which are not corresponding
to positions of international legal obligations.
In the article it is noticed that prospects of development of the criminal
trial are caused by prospects of development of the Russian state. Criminal trial
modernisation should be directed on creation of optimum national model of effective
investigation and proceeding, allowing not to admit or correct the procedural
errors, corresponding to a modern level of development of society.
Ключевые слова:
УПК РФ, перспективы развития, уголовное судопроизводство, публичное начало, диспозитивное начало, правоприменение
Abstract:
The article is devoted to P.A.Lupinskaya’s memory with whom the author
together worked in a working group on preparation new Criminal Procedure
Code of Russian Federation and to monitoring of its enactment.
In the article it is underlined that by preparation new Criminal Procedure
Code members of a working group was guided by the aspiration to create such
system of criminal justice in which the court might respect the person’s rights.
However established Criminal Procedure Code some progressive institutes
and norms are not put into practice or applied not to the full; the established
procedures are substituted for the technologies which have been not based on
Criminal Procedure Code, procedural decisions are rendered without the sufficient
bases on that.
In the article it is noticed that the quantity of federal laws by which
changes are made promptly increases, and the majority of additions in Criminal
Procedure Code (more than 50) have been accepted without preliminary expert
examination, are not verified from the point of view of a science and practice.
Some of these laws are regarded as the system errors which are not corresponding
to positions of international legal obligations.
In the article it is noticed that prospects of development of the criminal
trial are caused by prospects of development of the Russian state. Criminal trial
modernisation should be directed on creation of optimum national model of effective
investigation and proceeding, allowing not to admit or correct the procedural
errors, corresponding to a modern level of development of society.
Keywords:
UPK RF, perspektivy razvitiya, ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, publichnoe nachalo, dispozitivnoe nachalo, pravoprimenenie
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Матвеев С.В.
К вопросу о процессуальном оформлении (фиксации) показаний несовершеннолетних в уголовном судопроизводстве
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 568-580.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59657
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to research of one of the major conditions of admissibility
of evidence, namely their procedural registering (fixing). The author
analyzes the given problem with reference to testimonies of minors in the criminal
trial. It is established that the procedural action protocol is the basic method
of fastening of proofs. Further in the article features of the procedural action protocol
including the minor are investigated.
Ключевые слова:
уголовное судопроизводство в отношении несовершеннолетних, протоколы следственных действий, уголовно-процессуальная форма, допрос несовершеннолетнего
Abstract:
The article is devoted to research of one of the major conditions of admissibility
of evidence, namely their procedural registering (fixing). The author
analyzes the given problem with reference to testimonies of minors in the criminal
trial. It is established that the procedural action protocol is the basic method
of fastening of proofs. Further in the article features of the procedural action protocol
including the minor are investigated.
Keywords:
ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh, protokoly sledstvennykh deistvii, dopros nesovershennoletnego
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Махова Т.М.
Эффективность процессуальной деятельности в стадии подготовки уголовного дела к судебному заседанию
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 581-587.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59658
Аннотация:
In the article it is noticed that the stage of preparation for a trial will acquire
the increasing significance in the criminal trial of Russia, taking in a certain
measure on a form and content that place which to it is taken away in criminal
trial of foreign countries. The author comes to a conclusion that in a stage of
appointment of a trial will arise even more often and seriously to be discussed
questions: on returning case to the prosecutor, on stay of proceedings, on the
criminal case termination; etc.
Ключевые слова:
подготовка к судебному заседанию, уголовное дело, предварительное слушание, назначение судебного заседания, судебное разбирательство
Abstract:
In the article it is noticed that the stage of preparation for a trial will acquire
the increasing significance in the criminal trial of Russia, taking in a certain
measure on a form and content that place which to it is taken away in criminal
trial of foreign countries. The author comes to a conclusion that in a stage of
appointment of a trial will arise even more often and seriously to be discussed
questions: on returning case to the prosecutor, on stay of proceedings, on the
criminal case termination; etc.
Keywords:
podgotovka k sudebnomu zasedaniyu, ugolovnoe delo, naznachenie sudebnogo zasedaniya
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Михайловская И.Б.
Роль субъективного фактора в осуществлении правосудия
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 588-604.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59659
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to the influence of personal factors on a choice of
the decision from among offered by the law. It is noticed that the significance of
the personal factor is advanced not only personification of rendered decisions,
but also that role which play in process of criminal proceedings the discretion of
the judge, its arbitrary powers. It is impossible to the law to give complete algorithm
of activity of the judge, to formalize all variety of actual facts, situations,
etc. and to correlate them with character of rendered decisions. Thereof the principle
of evaluation of evidence on internal belief operates, etc.
It is obvious that thus the judge, operating within the law, carries out a
choice of one of possible decisions. The range of such choice advances also limits
the judicial discretion. These limits are narrowed, but cannot eliminate completely
from legal proceedings the subjective element, i.e. the discretion of the
judge.
The author comes to a conclusion that the availability at judges of arbitrary
powers stipulates significance not only their professional, but also moral
qualities.
Ключевые слова:
принятие решения, судья, профессиональное сознание, отвод судьи, независимость суда
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the influence of personal factors on a choice of
the decision from among offered by the law. It is noticed that the significance of
the personal factor is advanced not only personification of rendered decisions,
but also that role which play in process of criminal proceedings the discretion of
the judge, its arbitrary powers. It is impossible to the law to give complete algorithm
of activity of the judge, to formalize all variety of actual facts, situations,
etc. and to correlate them with character of rendered decisions. Thereof the principle
of evaluation of evidence on internal belief operates, etc.
It is obvious that thus the judge, operating within the law, carries out a
choice of one of possible decisions. The range of such choice advances also limits
the judicial discretion. These limits are narrowed, but cannot eliminate completely
from legal proceedings the subjective element, i.e. the discretion of the
judge.
The author comes to a conclusion that the availability at judges of arbitrary
powers stipulates significance not only their professional, but also moral
qualities.
Keywords:
prinyatie resheniya
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Муратова Н.Г.
Модель процессуального решения П.А. Лупинской
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 605-608.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59660
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to the analysis of P.A. Lupinskaya’s doctrine of on
the procedural decision. P.A. Lupinskaya has offered complex model of the procedural
decision and has given to this model constantly developing character.
P.A. Lupinskaia has analysed legal features of the procedural decision and has
noted the cores from them: reliability, legitimacy, validity, and motivation.
Ключевые слова:
процессуальное решение, механизм принятия решения, законность
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of P.A. Lupinskaya’s doctrine of on
the procedural decision. P.A. Lupinskaya has offered complex model of the procedural
decision and has given to this model constantly developing character.
P.A. Lupinskaia has analysed legal features of the procedural decision and has
noted the cores from them: reliability, legitimacy, validity, and motivation.
Keywords:
mekhanizm prinyatiya resheniya
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Насонов С.А.
Вердикт присяжных заседателей в контексте учения П.А. Лупинской о решениях в уголовном судопроизводстве
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 609-620.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59661
Аннотация:
The article discusses the verdict of the jury in the context of the theory
on the criminal proceedings decisions formulated by P.A. Lupinskaya in her
several publications.
To analyze the essence of the verdict of the jury the article identifies
whether it possesses the attributes of the procedural decision in the criminal proceedings
based on procedural decision definition given by P.A. Lupinskaya as
well as its attributes set forth in the abovementioned monograph.
The article discusses the following attributes of the verdict in succession:
the verdict settling only issues pertaining to the competence of the jury;
characteristics of the verdict as a main procedural decision; collegiality of the
verdict; obligatory character of the verdict for the presiding justice and parties;
unmotivated verdict; final character of the verdict; the verdict possible going
beyond the scope of the criminal law.
The article further looks at the requirements imposed by the law on the
verdict such as consistency of the verdict; completeness of the verdict; clearness
of the verdict; relevance in law of the jury’s answers; compliance with the rules
on reaching the verdict in the consultation room. Content of such requirements is
shown based on the examples taken from the court practice.
Ключевые слова:
вердикт присяжных заседателей, требования к вердикту, компетенция присяжных, противоречивость вердикта
Abstract:
The article discusses the verdict of the jury in the context of the theory
on the criminal proceedings decisions formulated by P.A. Lupinskaya in her
several publications.
To analyze the essence of the verdict of the jury the article identifies
whether it possesses the attributes of the procedural decision in the criminal proceedings
based on procedural decision definition given by P.A. Lupinskaya as
well as its attributes set forth in the abovementioned monograph.
The article discusses the following attributes of the verdict in succession:
the verdict settling only issues pertaining to the competence of the jury;
characteristics of the verdict as a main procedural decision; collegiality of the
verdict; obligatory character of the verdict for the presiding justice and parties;
unmotivated verdict; final character of the verdict; the verdict possible going
beyond the scope of the criminal law.
The article further looks at the requirements imposed by the law on the
verdict such as consistency of the verdict; completeness of the verdict; clearness
of the verdict; relevance in law of the jury’s answers; compliance with the rules
on reaching the verdict in the consultation room. Content of such requirements is
shown based on the examples taken from the court practice.
Keywords:
verdikt prisyazhnykh zasedatelei, trebovaniya k verdiktu, kompetentsiya prisyazhnykh
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Ничипоренко Т.Ю.
Непосредственность исследования показаний обвиняемого: история и современность
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 621-648.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59662
Аннотация:
The article is devoted to such traditional method of the mediated examination
of testimonies of the accused as reading of its testimonies given by him in
pre-trial stage. In the article the history of this question and its modern regulation
in Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation is analyzed.
Today as well as earlier reading of accused’s testimonies given by him
in pre-trial stage is considered as an exception of the rule and it is supposed only
in cases designated by the law.
Also it is noticed that the modern reduced procedural forms are deviation
from the principle of direct research of proofs.
Ключевые слова:
допрос, исследование, непосредственность, обвиняемый, оглашение, показания
Abstract:
The article is devoted to such traditional method of the mediated examination
of testimonies of the accused as reading of its testimonies given by him in
pre-trial stage. In the article the history of this question and its modern regulation
in Criminal Procedure Code of Russian Federation is analyzed.
Today as well as earlier reading of accused’s testimonies given by him
in pre-trial stage is considered as an exception of the rule and it is supposed only
in cases designated by the law.
Also it is noticed that the modern reduced procedural forms are deviation
from the principle of direct research of proofs.
Keywords:
dopros, issledovanie, obvinyaemyi, oglashenie, pokazaniya
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Орлов Ю.К.
К теории принятия решений в уголовном судопроизводстве
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 649-651.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59663
Аннотация:
In the article the requirements to decisions in the criminal trial – legitimacy,
validity and motivation are considered. Their concept and differentiation
is given, elements of these requirements are analyzed.
Ключевые слова:
решения, законность, обоснованность, мотивированность
Abstract:
In the article the requirements to decisions in the criminal trial – legitimacy,
validity and motivation are considered. Their concept and differentiation
is given, elements of these requirements are analyzed.
Keywords:
resheniya
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Панокин А.М.
Дифференциация процессуальной формы в уголовном судопроизводстве
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 652-659.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59664
Аннотация:
In the article the comparative legal analysis of differentiation of the
criminal procedure form in Russian and Bulgarian criminal procedures is carried
out.
Ключевые слова:
дифференциация процессуальной формы, упрощенное производство, Республика Болгария, освобождение от уголовной ответственности
Abstract:
In the article the comparative legal analysis of differentiation of the
criminal procedure form in Russian and Bulgarian criminal procedures is carried
out.
Keywords:
uproshchennoe proizvodstvo, Respublika Bolgariya, osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Подольный Н.А.
Конфликт доктрин в уголовном процессе России
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 660-671.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59665
Аннотация:
The article states that there are two doctrines in the criminal procedure at
the present time. They influence on the effective legislation and legislative process.
Different perception of criminal process by these doctrines often lead to
contradictions in legislation and in enforcement activity.
Ключевые слова:
доктрина, уголовный процесс, конфликт, суд
Abstract:
The article states that there are two doctrines in the criminal procedure at
the present time. They influence on the effective legislation and legislative process.
Different perception of criminal process by these doctrines often lead to
contradictions in legislation and in enforcement activity.
Keywords:
doktrina, ugolovnyi protsess, konflikt, sud
Архив
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Чернышова О.С.
Долгожданная реформа: что изменится в Европейском Суде по правам человека с 1 июня 2010 года?
// LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН).
2010. № 3.
С. 672-682.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59666
Аннотация:
The article covers the latest developments in the work of the European
Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg resulting from the adoption and coming
into force of the amendment to the European Convention of Human Rights –
Protocol No 14. The said Protocol has been ratified by the Russian Federation on
10 February 2010 and comes into force on 1 June 2010.
The article contains three parts. The first briefly covers the reasons for
and the history of drafting and adopting Protocol No 14, with reference to the
latest figures and the need to ensure a speedier processing of cases. It also mentions
some of the proposals for the reform that have been examined but rejected
by the working group.
The second part covers the main aspects of the Protocol, with special
emphasis on the following three: processing of inadmissible cases, new admissibility
criterion of “causing no significant disadvantage” and processing of wellfounded
applications. The author describes the amendments to the Convention
and to the Rules of the Court as well as the possible practical consequences these
may entail for the parties to the proceedings and the Court itself.
The article then goes on to cover the remaining aspects of the reform, in
particular the appointment of judges and execution of the Court’s judgments.
Finally, the article describes the Interlaken conference of February 2010
and the main conclusions contained in the Declaration. It analyses the most important
proposals for the reform of the Court and the steps which are to be taken
by the states, the European Court and the Council of Europe bodies with an aim
to maintain the effective system of the protection of human rights created under
the European Convention.
Ключевые слова:
Европейский Суд по правам человека, судопроизводство, реформа процесса, Конвенция о защите прав человека и основных свобод
Abstract:
The article covers the latest developments in the work of the European
Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg resulting from the adoption and coming
into force of the amendment to the European Convention of Human Rights –
Protocol No 14. The said Protocol has been ratified by the Russian Federation on
10 February 2010 and comes into force on 1 June 2010.
The article contains three parts. The first briefly covers the reasons for
and the history of drafting and adopting Protocol No 14, with reference to the
latest figures and the need to ensure a speedier processing of cases. It also mentions
some of the proposals for the reform that have been examined but rejected
by the working group.
The second part covers the main aspects of the Protocol, with special
emphasis on the following three: processing of inadmissible cases, new admissibility
criterion of “causing no significant disadvantage” and processing of wellfounded
applications. The author describes the amendments to the Convention
and to the Rules of the Court as well as the possible practical consequences these
may entail for the parties to the proceedings and the Court itself.
The article then goes on to cover the remaining aspects of the reform, in
particular the appointment of judges and execution of the Court’s judgments.
Finally, the article describes the Interlaken conference of February 2010
and the main conclusions contained in the Declaration. It analyses the most important
proposals for the reform of the Court and the steps which are to be taken
by the states, the European Court and the Council of Europe bodies with an aim
to maintain the effective system of the protection of human rights created under
the European Convention.
Keywords:
Evropeiskii Sud po pravam cheloveka, sudoproizvodstvo, reforma protsessa, Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod
Рус
Статья опубликована с лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) – Лицензия «С указанием авторства – Некоммерческая».
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
