Библиотека
|
ваш профиль |
SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Kostennikov, M.V., Kurakin, A.V.
Corruption prevention in state administration and civil service system in the Russian Federation
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
2013. № 1.
С. 49-60.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63071
Kostennikov, M.V., Kurakin, A.V. Corruption prevention in state administration and civil service system in the Russian FederationАннотация: the article views legal and organizational issues in corruption prevention in state administration and civil service system. The article calls attention to how most of the organizational and administrative issues cause corruption growth in the civil service system. As of today, we have to acknowledge that the existing legislative measures are not sufficient to prevent corruption, and in anticorruption policy we can see domination of the political factor and political orientation. These issues hinder the implementation of all existing legislative means aimed at corruption prevention. The question of corruption prevention throughout the activities of public authorities and state administration has acquired a global and systemwide character. Corruption is an immediate threat to the national safety. It hinders democratic and civil society institutions to develop; the citizens to realize their constitutional rights in the sphere of education, public healthcare, social maintenance and property relations. Besides, corruption has a negative impact on the growth of economic and financial sector and all infrastructure of the Russian state. It is worth accentuating that corruption in the activities of public authorities and state administration contributes to the growth of organized crime, encourages the development of extremism and terrorism, threatens realization of national projects and harms all state and legal reforms which are currently being carried out in our country. The presence of all these and some other issues proves that designing of an administrative and legal mechanism of corruption prevention throughout the activities of civil servants and building of the institute of administrative justice is objectively necessary. As we can see from the experience in carrying out state and legal reforms, as well as from the practice of law enforcement activities in the sphere of corruption prevention, corruption arises in those spheres of public authorities and civil servants activities in which the status is not fully described and where there are no administrative procedures set to provide services to the citizens and legal entities. The experience of corruption revealing shows us that it arises in the spheres where civil servants realize organizational, executiveadministrative, control and supervising, jurisdictional and licensing powers. Which is why it is necessary, especially today, to improve administrative and legal regime of activities of civil authorities and administration. Ключевые слова: corruption, prevention, fight, service, civil servant, administration, system, servant, prohibition, responsibility, control, threat.Abstract: the article views legal and organizational issues in corruption prevention in state administration and civil service system. The article calls attention to how most of the organizational and administrative issues cause corruption growth in the civil service system. As of today, we have to acknowledge that the existing legislative measures are not sufficient to prevent corruption, and in anticorruption policy we can see domination of the political factor and political orientation. These issues hinder the implementation of all existing legislative means aimed at corruption prevention. The question of corruption prevention throughout the activities of public authorities and state administration has acquired a global and systemwide character. Corruption is an immediate threat to the national safety. It hinders democratic and civil society institutions to develop; the citizens to realize their constitutional rights in the sphere of education, public healthcare, social maintenance and property relations. Besides, corruption has a negative impact on the growth of economic and financial sector and all infrastructure of the Russian state. It is worth accentuating that corruption in the activities of public authorities and state administration contributes to the growth of organized crime, encourages the development of extremism and terrorism, threatens realization of national projects and harms all state and legal reforms which are currently being carried out in our country. The presence of all these and some other issues proves that designing of an administrative and legal mechanism of corruption prevention throughout the activities of civil servants and building of the institute of administrative justice is objectively necessary. As we can see from the experience in carrying out state and legal reforms, as well as from the practice of law enforcement activities in the sphere of corruption prevention, corruption arises in those spheres of public authorities and civil servants activities in which the status is not fully described and where there are no administrative procedures set to provide services to the citizens and legal entities. The experience of corruption revealing shows us that it arises in the spheres where civil servants realize organizational, executiveadministrative, control and supervising, jurisdictional and licensing powers. Which is why it is necessary, especially today, to improve administrative and legal regime of activities of civil authorities and administration. Keywords: corruption, prevention, fight, service, civil servant, administration, system, servant, prohibition, responsibility, control, threat.
Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав,
указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.
Скачать статью Библиография
1. Koryakin V.M. Corruption in Armed Forces: theory and practice of prevention. M., 2009.
2. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Topical issues of the science of administrative law. M., 2011. 3. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrative prohibition as a means of corruption prevention in the civil service system. M., 2010. 4. Kurakin A.V. Topical issues of administrative legal regulation. M., 2011. 5. Kurakin A.V. Administrative law: theory issues and development perspectives. M., 2013. 6. Luneev V.V. Corruption in Russia // State and Law (Journal). 2007. № 11. 7. Malinovsky A.A. Professional ethics code: the notion and legal meaning // Journal of Russian Law. 2008. № 4. 8. Nozdrachev A.F. Legal means of corruption prevention // Journal of Russian Law. 2004. № 9. 9. Panova I.V. Administrative jurisdiction in Russia: search for determination, history of the question: extract // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2009. № 3. 10. Sukharenko A.N. State and society against corruption. Vladivostok 2013. 11. Khabibulin A.G. Corruption as a threat to national safety: methods, issues and ways of solving them // Journal of Russian Law. 2007. № 2 References
1. Koryakin V.M. Corruption in Armed Forces: theory and practice of prevention. M., 2009.
2. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Topical issues of the science of administrative law. M., 2011. 3. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrative prohibition as a means of corruption prevention in the civil service system. M., 2010. 4. Kurakin A.V. Topical issues of administrative legal regulation. M., 2011. 5. Kurakin A.V. Administrative law: theory issues and development perspectives. M., 2013. 6. Luneev V.V. Corruption in Russia // State and Law (Journal). 2007. № 11. 7. Malinovsky A.A. Professional ethics code: the notion and legal meaning // Journal of Russian Law. 2008. № 4. 8. Nozdrachev A.F. Legal means of corruption prevention // Journal of Russian Law. 2004. № 9. 9. Panova I.V. Administrative jurisdiction in Russia: search for determination, history of the question: extract // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2009. № 3. 10. Sukharenko A.N. State and society against corruption. Vladivostok 2013. 11. Khabibulin A.G. Corruption as a threat to national safety: methods, issues and ways of solving them // Journal of Russian Law. 2007. № 2 |