Professional Ethics  for Business Relations

Тинякова Е.А.

doi:10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.9454

Статья опубликована с лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) – Лицензия «С указанием авторства – Некоммерческая».

Вернуться к содержанию

SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Правильная ссылка на статью:

Тинякова Е.А. Professional Ethics for Business Relations // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2013. № 1. С. 93-99. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.9454 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=9454

Professional Ethics for Business Relations

Тинякова Елена Александровна

кандидат философских наук

доцент, ГБПОУ МО "Сергиево-Посадский колледж", цикловая комиссия общеобразовательных, социально-гуманитарных и естественно-научных дисциплин

141300, Россия, Московская область, г. Сергиев-Посад, ул. 40 Лет Октября, 5 А

Tinyakova Elena Aleksandrovna

PhD in Philosophy

Associate professor, lecturer of the Department of General Humanitarian Disciplines at Sergiyev Posad Humanitarian Institute and Sergiyev Posad Moscow Institute Enterpreneurship and Law

141300, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Sergiev-Posad, ul. 40 Let Oktyabrya, 5 A

etinyakova@bk.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

Статья из рубрики "Economics"

DOI:

10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.9454

Дата направления статьи в редакцию:

15-02-2013

Дата публикации:

1-03-2013

Аннотация: The article on professional ethics in business is partly review type and classifying different approaches. Classic and non-classic approaches in professional ethics are characterized. The influence of philosophical branches on the content of professional ethics is shown. This way of presenting material has been chosen by the author with the aim to emphasize the most problematic and difficult points in contemporary professional ethics, particularly accountants’. Ethical considerations are psychologically grounded in some respects. The main notions of professional ethics are presented with the aim of concretisizing their content. The focuses for building professional ethics have been chosen: interaction of oppositions, social conditions of acceleration, creativity, emphasis of individual realization, respect. The most difficult problem has been pointed out: eternal moral stability and dynamic on-going of our life which demands the decision of a moment. Overwording in description of business relation is marked as a negative trait: all situations in professional ethics can’t be described. The specific traits of accountants’profession are underlined. Further prospects of discussing professional ethics are planned. The conclusions serve the respect of human labour and its quality.

Ключевые слова:

Philosophical ethics, professional ethics, the good, the evil, casuistics, labour quality, discipline, accountant, psychology, moral

Библиография

1. Л.Валла. 1989. Об истинном и ложном благе. О свободе воли. М.:Наука. 474 с.
2. England L. 2001.Why discuss international business ethics? Journal “English Teaching Forum” (USA) 2(39):40-46.
3. Jill P. 2009. A New Zealand Study Ethical Issues and Workplace Problems in Commercial Hospitality.
4. Митина И.Е.2009. Русские пословицы и поговорки и их английские аналоги. М.: КАРО.
5. Collis H. 1992. 101 American English proverbs. Publ. by Passport Books, NTC/ Contemporary Publishing Group Inc.
6. Izza M.2013. Ethics. In Principles of Taxation FA2012. Study manual. Ed. By ICAEW.Printed in the United Kingdom by Polestar Wheatons.pp.229-249.
7. Izza M.2013. Ethics,sustainability and corporate responsibility. In Business Strategy. Study manual. Ed. By ICAEW.Printed in the United Kingdom by Polestar Wheatons.pp.571-603.
8. Мотрошилова Н.В. 2006. Смысл творчества. В Мыслители России и философия запада. Мотрошилова Н.В. М.: Республика. с. 233-242.
9. Бердяев Н.А. 1997. Об иерарахии ценностей. Цели и средства. В Избранные произведения. Бердяев Н.А. Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс. с. 247-257.
10. Вечность.1997. В Философский словарь Владимира Соловьева. Ростов-на-Дону: «Феникс», Беляев Г.В. с.28-29.
11. Зло.1997. В Философский словарь Владимира Соловьева. Ростов-на-Дону: «Феникс», Беляев Г.В. с.137.
12. Кант. 1997. В Философский словарь Владимира Соловьева. Ростов-на-Дону: «Феникс», Беляев Г.В. с.184-187.
13. Антиномии. 1997. В Философский словарь Владимира Соловьева. Ростов-на-Дону: «Феникс», Беляев Г.В. с.180-181.
14. Вебер М. 2003. Протестантская этика и дух капитализма. М.
15. Пшегусова Г.С., Андреева Л.Л., Гребенникова Н.Д., Млодинская Н.В. 2013.Английский язык для экономических специальностей. Учебник. 20е изд. М.: «Дашков и К». с.67-69.
16. Монтень М.2011. Опыты. М.: АСТ.Астрель.-768 с.
17. Lyotard.J.F. 1979. La Condition Postmoderne. Paris.
18. Lyotard.J.F. 1980. Des dispositifs pulsionnels. Paris.
19. Anderson D. 1999. The keys to a civil Society. Journal “English Teaching Forum” (USA). 4(37). P.p.36-48.
20. Leech 2005. Politeness: Is there an English-West Divide? In Journal of Foreign Languages. General Serial №160. № 6.
21. Audi R. 2008. Business Ethics and Ethical Business. OZON.RU.

References

1. L.Valla. 1989. Ob istinnom i lozhnom blage. O svobode voli. M.:Nauka. 474 s.
2. England L. 2001.Why discuss international business ethics? Journal “English Teaching Forum” (USA) 2(39):40-46.
3. Jill P. 2009. A New Zealand Study Ethical Issues and Workplace Problems in Commercial Hospitality.
4. Mitina I.E.2009. Russkie poslovitsy i pogovorki i ikh angliiskie analogi. M.: KARO.
5. Collis H. 1992. 101 American English proverbs. Publ. by Passport Books, NTC/ Contemporary Publishing Group Inc.
6. Izza M.2013. Ethics. In Principles of Taxation FA2012. Study manual. Ed. By ICAEW.Printed in the United Kingdom by Polestar Wheatons.pp.229-249.
7. Izza M.2013. Ethics,sustainability and corporate responsibility. In Business Strategy. Study manual. Ed. By ICAEW.Printed in the United Kingdom by Polestar Wheatons.pp.571-603.
8. Motroshilova N.V. 2006. Smysl tvorchestva. V Mysliteli Rossii i filosofiya zapada. Motroshilova N.V. M.: Respublika. s. 233-242.
9. Berdyaev N.A. 1997. Ob ierarakhii tsennostei. Tseli i sredstva. V Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Berdyaev N.A. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks. s. 247-257.
10. Vechnost'.1997. V Filosofskii slovar' Vladimira Solov'eva. Rostov-na-Donu: «Feniks», Belyaev G.V. s.28-29.
11. Zlo.1997. V Filosofskii slovar' Vladimira Solov'eva. Rostov-na-Donu: «Feniks», Belyaev G.V. s.137.
12. Kant. 1997. V Filosofskii slovar' Vladimira Solov'eva. Rostov-na-Donu: «Feniks», Belyaev G.V. s.184-187.
13. Antinomii. 1997. V Filosofskii slovar' Vladimira Solov'eva. Rostov-na-Donu: «Feniks», Belyaev G.V. s.180-181.
14. Veber M. 2003. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. M.
15. Pshegusova G.S., Andreeva L.L., Grebennikova N.D., Mlodinskaya N.V. 2013.Angliiskii yazyk dlya ekonomicheskikh spetsial'nostei. Uchebnik. 20e izd. M.: «Dashkov i K». s.67-69.
16. Monten' M.2011. Opyty. M.: AST.Astrel'.-768 s.
17. Lyotard.J.F. 1979. La Condition Postmoderne. Paris.
18. Lyotard.J.F. 1980. Des dispositifs pulsionnels. Paris.
19. Anderson D. 1999. The keys to a civil Society. Journal “English Teaching Forum” (USA). 4(37). P.p.36-48.
20. Leech 2005. Politeness: Is there an English-West Divide? In Journal of Foreign Languages. General Serial №160. № 6.
21. Audi R. 2008. Business Ethics and Ethical Business. OZON.RU.

Журналы

Книги

Professional Ethics for Business Relations