Библиотека
|
ваш профиль |
SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Асадуллаев И.К.
THE EIGHT CHALLENGE OF MILLENNIUM? EMPTINESS IS MATTER The hypothesis of incompleteness of the principle of conservation of mass and energy
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
2013. № 1.
С. 9-16.
DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.8971 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=8971
THE EIGHT CHALLENGE OF MILLENNIUM? EMPTINESS IS MATTER The hypothesis of incompleteness of the principle of conservation of mass and energy
DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.8971Дата направления статьи в редакцию: 15-02-2013Дата публикации: 1-03-2013Аннотация: This article attempts to show incompleteness of the principle of conservation of mass and energy, on the basis of assumption of the recognition of two new for the science types of substance – being of proposition and being of perception, based on the fact that emptiness is not nothingness (nothing), but “something” – type of substance. The hypothesis proceeds also from the mutual transition of different types of matter: substances, fields and spaces, into one another in strictly defined conditions. We expect the recognition of emptiness as a type of matter to have far-reaching consequences for numerous sciences. Firstly, it “legalizes” in terms of natural scientific materialism, i.e. attaches legitimacy to the ideas of mass and energy extinction. This, however, does not mean transition of something into nothing, and by expanding conservation principle, we uphold the same position that matter does not disappear, but converses from one type into another – emptiness. The recognition of emptiness by matter brings to the cardinal conclusions about the emergence of galaxies, black holes, stars and stellar substance from space (emptiness). The hypothesis of emergence of substance in the centre of galaxies receives another indirect confirmation. Ключевые слова: energy, mass, principle of conservation, matter, galaxies, emptiness, nothing, hypothesis, being of perception, being of propositionБиблиография
1. Asadullaev I.K. Beauty, Love and Perpetual motion. 16 new categories: based on the works by Aristotle, Avicenna, Hegel. Dushanbe: Irfon, 2008;
2. Aristotle. Works in four volumes. , 1976; 3. Abu Bakr Al-Razi. Spiritual Medicine / Preface. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1990; 4. Abu Ali Ibn Sina (Avicenna) Works. Dushanbe: Donish, 2005; 5. Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic. Volume 1 / / Moscow: Thought, 1970-p. 235 6. Heisenberg W. Physics and Philosophy. Part and whole: Translation from German. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. 7. Aristotle. Works in four volumes. Moscow: Mysl, 1976 References
1. Asadullaev I.K. Beauty, Love and Perpetual motion. 16 new categories: based on the works by Aristotle, Avicenna, Hegel. Dushanbe: Irfon, 2008;
2. Aristotle. Works in four volumes. , 1976; 3. Abu Bakr Al-Razi. Spiritual Medicine / Preface. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1990; 4. Abu Ali Ibn Sina (Avicenna) Works. Dushanbe: Donish, 2005; 5. Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic. Volume 1 / / Moscow: Thought, 1970-p. 235 6. Heisenberg W. Physics and Philosophy. Part and whole: Translation from German. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. 7. Aristotle. Works in four volumes. Moscow: Mysl, 1976 |