Bochkarev S.А. Difficulty Understanding the Being of Criminal Law

Аннотация: The article attempts to bridge the gap between philosophic and legal experience and theory of criminal law on cognition of the nature of this law and highlights the complications of their rapprochement. The article raises the problem of comparability and synthesis of these two lines of legal thought. In this respect, the research reviews the narrative of philosophic and legal thoughts in the sphere of cognition of the Being. The author stresses the role of modernity in interpreting the Mode and the Being of criminal law as a reason for reflection and as a timely object of understanding the philosophic and legal thought. In general, thoughts apprehend themselves and understand their self-sufficiency. The same is with the so called modern thought. Whatever its dreadful state, it remains a means of social linkage. Each of these thoughts finally constructs its own Babylon. Mutual misunderstanding is then referred to the imperfection of its nature or prejudices of its subjects. However the stumbling point is in the level of aloofness of thoughts from each other and from a man in general. They no longer weigh and counterbalance, but divide it. In their interpretation the subject seizes to possess its own being.

Ключевые слова:

Abstract: The article attempts to bridge the gap between philosophic and legal experience and theory of criminal law on cognition of the nature of this law and highlights the complications of their rapprochement. The article raises the problem of comparability and synthesis of these two lines of legal thought. In this respect, the research reviews the narrative of philosophic and legal thoughts in the sphere of cognition of the Being. The author stresses the role of modernity in interpreting the Mode and the Being of criminal law as a reason for reflection and as a timely object of understanding the philosophic and legal thought. In general, thoughts apprehend themselves and understand their self-sufficiency. The same is with the so called modern thought. Whatever its dreadful state, it remains a means of social linkage. Each of these thoughts finally constructs its own Babylon. Mutual misunderstanding is then referred to the imperfection of its nature or prejudices of its subjects. However the stumbling point is in the level of aloofness of thoughts from each other and from a man in general. They no longer weigh and counterbalance, but divide it. In their interpretation the subject seizes to possess its own being.

Keywords: