Рус Eng Cn Перевести страницу на:  
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Библиотека
 ваш профиль
Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC Статья опубликована с лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) – Лицензия «С указанием авторства – Некоммерческая».
Вернуться к содержанию

SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Правильная ссылка на статью:

Difficulty Understanding the Being of Criminal Law

Бочкарёв Сергей Александрович

кандидат юридических наук

заместитель начальника управления, Генеральная прокуратура Российской Федерации

Москва, Б. Дмитровка, 15а

Bochkarev Sergei Aleksandrovich

PhD in Law

Moscow, B. Dmitrovka, 15a

bochkarvs@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 
 
Статья из рубрики "Law"

DOI:

10.7256/1339-3057.2014.2.12463

Дата направления статьи в редакцию:

16-07-2014

Дата публикации:

30-07-2014

Аннотация: The article attempts to bridge the gap between philosophic and legal experience and theory of criminal law on cognition of the nature of this law and highlights the complications of their rapprochement. The article raises the problem of comparability and synthesis of these two lines of legal thought. In this respect, the research reviews the narrative of philosophic and legal thoughts in the sphere of cognition of the Being. The author stresses the role of modernity in interpreting the Mode and the Being of criminal law as a reason for reflection and as a timely object of understanding the philosophic and legal thought. In general, thoughts apprehend themselves and understand their self-sufficiency. The same is with the so called modern thought. Whatever its dreadful state, it remains a means of social linkage. Each of these thoughts finally constructs its own Babylon. Mutual misunderstanding is then referred to the imperfection of its nature or prejudices of its subjects. However the stumbling point is in the level of aloofness of thoughts from each other and from a man in general. They no longer weigh and counterbalance, but divide it. In their interpretation the subject seizes to possess its own being.


Ключевые слова:

criminal law, the due, being, philosophic thought, sense, legal thought, nature, existence, the real, ontological thought
Библиография
1. Kanke V.A. Filosofija. Moscow, 2000.
2. Ojzermann T.I., Ambivalentnost philosofii, Moscow, 2011.
3. Ojzermann T.I. Metaphilosophija. Teorija istoriko-filosofskogo processa, Moscow, 2009.
4. Matuzov N.I. Aktualnije problem teorii prava. Saratov, 2003.
5. Mur D. Principi etiki. Moscow, 1924.
6. Bochkarev S.A. Ideja ugolovnogo prava i yeyo filosofskoe iamerenije/Aktualnije problem rossijskogo prava, 2012,#1.
7. Feuchtwanger L. Mudrost chudaka, ili smert I probrajhenije Jan-Jaka Rousseau. Moscow, 1965.
8. Berdiaev N.A. Sudba Rossii. Moscow, 1990.
9. Heidegger M. Bitie I vremya/translated from german by Bibikhina V.V. Moscow, Akademichesky prospect, 2011.
10. Berman G.G. Zapadnaya tradicija prava: epokha formirovanija. Moscow, 1994.
11. Korkunov N.M. Istorija filosofii prava. 7th Edition, Moscow, Krasand Publishers, 2011.
12. Permiakov Y.E. Vozvrashenije k metafizike v nauchnom poznanii prava//Pravo I obschestvo v epokhu peremen, Moscow, 2008.
13. Chestnov I.L. Obsheje I osobennoje v prave//Gosudarstvo I pravo na rubejhe vekov. Saint –Petersberg, 2000.
14. Fromm E. Chelovek dlia sebya. Revolutsija nadejhdi. Imet ili bit (translated from english and german/Erich Fromm, Moscow, AST publishers, 2007).
15. Sartre J.-P. Bitie I nichto. Opit fenomenologicheskoj ontologii (translated from french)/Jean-Paul Sartre, Moscow, AST publishers: ASTREL, 2012.
16. Sellars R.W. The essentials of Philosophy. University of Michigan. The Macmillan Company. 1917.
17. Rauh F. Essai sur le fondement metaphysique de la morale. Paris, 1891.
18. Berman G.J. Zapadnaya tradicija prava: epokha formirovanija. Moscow, 1994.
19. Jhalinsky A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ojhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumentalnij analiz. Moscow, 2008.
20. Popper K. Normalnaya nauka I opasnosti, sviazannie s nej//Filosofija nauki, 1997, #3.
21. Pierre Bourdieu. (translation in russian) Prakticheskij smisl. Moscow, 2011.
22. Aristoteles. Metafizika. Translations into Russian, commentaries and interpretations/edited by Yeremeev S.I. Saint-Petersberg, Aleteja publishers, and Kiev, Elga publishers, 2002.
23. Chestnov I.L. Sovremennie tipi pravoponimanija: fenomenologija, germenevtika, antropologija, sinergetika prava. Saint-Petersberg, 2001.
24. Bachinin V.A. Antroposociologija I metafizika portreta//Chelovek, 2004, #4.
25. Gorelov A.A., Gorelov T.A. “A man divided” and the idea of Unity//Chelovek, 2004, #5.
26. Popov E.A. Zennostno-smislovoj rakurs struktur povsednevnosti//Filosofija I kultura, 2011, #12 (48).
27. Hegel G.W.F. Filosofija prava. Moscow, 2007.
28. Chukin S.G. Pluralism, solidarnost spravedlisvost. K problem identichnost filosofsko-pravovogo diskursa v situatsii postmoderna. Saint-Petersberg, 2000.
29. Kerimov D.A. Metodologija prava: predmet, funktsii, problem filosofii prava. Edition 5th, Moscow, 2009 Chukin S.G. Pluralism, solidarnost spravedlisvost. K problem identichnost filosofsko-pravovogo diskursa v situatsii postmoderna. Saint-Petersberg, 2000.
30. Alekseev S.S. Filosofija prava. Moscow, NORMA publishers, 1998.
31. Yu.M. Reznik The metaphysics of man: images of being // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. - 2014. - 1. - C. 25 - 33. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2014.1.10847.
32. Алпатов А.А. On interconnection between positive and natural law // Право и политика. - 2014. - 3. - C. 278 - 283. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.9680.
References
1. Kanke V.A. Filosofija. Moscow, 2000.
2. Ojzermann T.I., Ambivalentnost philosofii, Moscow, 2011.
3. Ojzermann T.I. Metaphilosophija. Teorija istoriko-filosofskogo processa, Moscow, 2009.
4. Matuzov N.I. Aktualnije problem teorii prava. Saratov, 2003.
5. Mur D. Principi etiki. Moscow, 1924.
6. Bochkarev S.A. Ideja ugolovnogo prava i yeyo filosofskoe iamerenije/Aktualnije problem rossijskogo prava, 2012,#1.
7. Feuchtwanger L. Mudrost chudaka, ili smert I probrajhenije Jan-Jaka Rousseau. Moscow, 1965.
8. Berdiaev N.A. Sudba Rossii. Moscow, 1990.
9. Heidegger M. Bitie I vremya/translated from german by Bibikhina V.V. Moscow, Akademichesky prospect, 2011.
10. Berman G.G. Zapadnaya tradicija prava: epokha formirovanija. Moscow, 1994.
11. Korkunov N.M. Istorija filosofii prava. 7th Edition, Moscow, Krasand Publishers, 2011.
12. Permiakov Y.E. Vozvrashenije k metafizike v nauchnom poznanii prava//Pravo I obschestvo v epokhu peremen, Moscow, 2008.
13. Chestnov I.L. Obsheje I osobennoje v prave//Gosudarstvo I pravo na rubejhe vekov. Saint –Petersberg, 2000.
14. Fromm E. Chelovek dlia sebya. Revolutsija nadejhdi. Imet ili bit (translated from english and german/Erich Fromm, Moscow, AST publishers, 2007).
15. Sartre J.-P. Bitie I nichto. Opit fenomenologicheskoj ontologii (translated from french)/Jean-Paul Sartre, Moscow, AST publishers: ASTREL, 2012.
16. Sellars R.W. The essentials of Philosophy. University of Michigan. The Macmillan Company. 1917.
17. Rauh F. Essai sur le fondement metaphysique de la morale. Paris, 1891.
18. Berman G.J. Zapadnaya tradicija prava: epokha formirovanija. Moscow, 1994.
19. Jhalinsky A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ojhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumentalnij analiz. Moscow, 2008.
20. Popper K. Normalnaya nauka I opasnosti, sviazannie s nej//Filosofija nauki, 1997, #3.
21. Pierre Bourdieu. (translation in russian) Prakticheskij smisl. Moscow, 2011.
22. Aristoteles. Metafizika. Translations into Russian, commentaries and interpretations/edited by Yeremeev S.I. Saint-Petersberg, Aleteja publishers, and Kiev, Elga publishers, 2002.
23. Chestnov I.L. Sovremennie tipi pravoponimanija: fenomenologija, germenevtika, antropologija, sinergetika prava. Saint-Petersberg, 2001.
24. Bachinin V.A. Antroposociologija I metafizika portreta//Chelovek, 2004, #4.
25. Gorelov A.A., Gorelov T.A. “A man divided” and the idea of Unity//Chelovek, 2004, #5.
26. Popov E.A. Zennostno-smislovoj rakurs struktur povsednevnosti//Filosofija I kultura, 2011, #12 (48).
27. Hegel G.W.F. Filosofija prava. Moscow, 2007.
28. Chukin S.G. Pluralism, solidarnost spravedlisvost. K problem identichnost filosofsko-pravovogo diskursa v situatsii postmoderna. Saint-Petersberg, 2000.
29. Kerimov D.A. Metodologija prava: predmet, funktsii, problem filosofii prava. Edition 5th, Moscow, 2009 Chukin S.G. Pluralism, solidarnost spravedlisvost. K problem identichnost filosofsko-pravovogo diskursa v situatsii postmoderna. Saint-Petersberg, 2000.
30. Alekseev S.S. Filosofija prava. Moscow, NORMA publishers, 1998.
31. Yu.M. Reznik The metaphysics of man: images of being // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. - 2014. - 1. - C. 25 - 33. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2014.1.10847.
32. Alpatov A.A. On interconnection between positive and natural law // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 3. - C. 278 - 283. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.9680.
Издательство
 
Авторам
 
Услуги
 
Разное
 
Наши сайты

© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.