Рус Eng Cn Перевести страницу на:  
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Библиотека
ваш профиль

Вернуться к содержанию

Конфликтология / nota bene
Правильная ссылка на статью:

Zanitti F.B. Future Davos forum in Kyrgyzstan

Аннотация: This article is intended to clarify several sociopolitical issues regarding the Central Asian region. Do we detect a new approach that Russia, together with India and China, uses to form a multipolar world? Will the new Davos forum in Kyrgyzstan attract the leaders of the most influential Central Asian countries, and become as representative as its European prototype? Late 2014 was marked by the signing of several bilateral agreements during Summits involving Russia, India and China. According to numerous international experts, improved relations between Moscow and the two Asian giants (China and India), represents another big step in transforming a unipolar world order with the USA as the only leading country into a multipolar world. The analysis of the main reasons for Beijing and New Deli becoming closer with Moscow will start with the complications in Russia-US relations. One of the reasons for Russia-West relations becoming colder is the position of Russia in the Ukrainian crisis, which resulted in Russian leadership reaching a decision to expand their foreign policy vector in Eastern direction. With that said, tighter connections of Russia, China and India fully reflects long-term interests of those countries. Despite several questionable moments in Russian foreign policy in Eastern Europe and Near East, Beijing and New Deli view Russia as a reliable partner for further dialogue, cooperation and trade. The Russia-China cooperation, since 1990s, is actively developing, while strategic Russia-India partnership still maintains the image of the USSR era, when the Cold War took place. We also cannot discount the fact that Russia, India and China are already working together in many international organizations, like the BRICS forum (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and, on this basis, they already have opportunities to develop new platforms for political, economic, and military cooperation, like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. At the same time, the Russia-India-China strategic triangle already has a huge potential for combining efforts to achieve mutual goals, which can, in turn, give birth to a new model of international dialog, signature for the newly-forming multipolar world.


Ключевые слова:

politics, international security, geopolitics, trend, state, security, diplomacy, international relations, international life, interests.

Abstract: This article is intended to clarify several sociopolitical issues regarding the Central Asian region. Do we detect a new approach that Russia, together with India and China, uses to form a multipolar world? Will the new Davos forum in Kyrgyzstan attract the leaders of the most influential Central Asian countries, and become as representative as its European prototype? Late 2014 was marked by the signing of several bilateral agreements during Summits involving Russia, India and China. According to numerous international experts, improved relations between Moscow and the two Asian giants (China and India), represents another big step in transforming a unipolar world order with the USA as the only leading country into a multipolar world. The analysis of the main reasons for Beijing and New Deli becoming closer with Moscow will start with the complications in Russia-US relations. One of the reasons for Russia-West relations becoming colder is the position of Russia in the Ukrainian crisis, which resulted in Russian leadership reaching a decision to expand their foreign policy vector in Eastern direction. With that said, tighter connections of Russia, China and India fully reflects long-term interests of those countries. Despite several questionable moments in Russian foreign policy in Eastern Europe and Near East, Beijing and New Deli view Russia as a reliable partner for further dialogue, cooperation and trade. The Russia-China cooperation, since 1990s, is actively developing, while strategic Russia-India partnership still maintains the image of the USSR era, when the Cold War took place. We also cannot discount the fact that Russia, India and China are already working together in many international organizations, like the BRICS forum (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and, on this basis, they already have opportunities to develop new platforms for political, economic, and military cooperation, like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. At the same time, the Russia-India-China strategic triangle already has a huge potential for combining efforts to achieve mutual goals, which can, in turn, give birth to a new model of international dialog, signature for the newly-forming multipolar world.


Keywords:

politics, international security, geopolitics, trend, state, security, diplomacy, international relations, international life, interests.


Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав, указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.

Скачать статью

Библиография
1. www.moderndiplomacy.eu
2. Карякин В.В. Цивилизационная антропология
3. американского экспансионизма:
4. от доктрины Монро
5. к глобальному лидерству // Международные отношения. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
6. Карпович О.Г. Международные организации и их роль в предупреждении, урегулировании и разрешении этнополитических конфликтов // Национальная безопасность / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.
7. Карякин В.В. Совреемнные кризисы и конфликты: особеннсоти, сценарии развития и предотвращение // Международные отношения. - 2014. - 3. - C. 446 - 457. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11422.
8. Калачев Д.Н. Современная система международной безопасности: средовые параметры // Международные отношения. - 2014. - 4. - C. 544 - 549. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.4.13243.
9. Галвес Деролле П. Brazil – New Age // Конфликтология / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 136 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13181.
10. Фельдман П.Я. Геополитический клиентелизм в международных отношениях: стратегия и тактика Запада. // Международные отношения. - 2014. - 2. - C. 189 - 193. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11365.
11. Манойло А.В. Роль стратегий управляемого хаоса в формировании нового миропорядка // Право и политика. - 2014. - 5. - C. 638 - 651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
12. Курилкин А.В. Современные подходы к ведению информационных войн // Международные отношения. - 2014. - 1. - C. 75 - 80. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10063.
13. Виноградова Е.А. Информационные войны в Латинской Америке // Тренды и управление. - 2014. - 4. - C. 372 - 384. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.4.13080.
14. Валиуллин И.И. Эволюция понятия «информационная война» в политической науке // Международные отношения. - 2014. - 1. - C. 68 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064.
15. Карпович О.Г. Глобальные проблемы международных отношений в контексте формирующегося многополярного мира // Право и политика. - 2014. - 5. - C. 620 - 629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
16. Гуаньцюнь Л. Роль тайваньской проблемы
17. в морской политике КНР // Международные отношения. - 2013. - 4. - C. 469 - 509. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9754.
18. Афанасьев В.В. Современные локальные конфликты // Международные отношения. - 2014. - 1. - C. 56 - 61. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10061.
References
1. www.moderndiplomacy.eu
2. Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya
3. amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
4. ot doktriny Monro
5. k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
6. Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.
7. Karyakin V.V. Sovreemnnye krizisy i konflikty: osobennsoti, stsenarii razvitiya i predotvrashchenie // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 446 - 457. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11422.
8. Kalachev D.N. Sovremennaya sistema mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti: sredovye parametry // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 544 - 549. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.4.13243.
9. Galves Derolle P. Brazil – New Age // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 136 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13181.
10. Fel'dman P.Ya. Geopoliticheskiy klientelizm v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: strategiya i taktika Zapada. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 189 - 193. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11365.
11. Manoylo A.V. Rol' strategiy upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 638 - 651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
12. Kurilkin A.V. Sovremennye podkhody k vedeniyu informatsionnykh voyn // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 75 - 80. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10063.
13. Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionnye voyny v Latinskoy Amerike // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 4. - C. 372 - 384. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.4.13080.
14. Valiullin I.I. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «informatsionnaya voyna» v politicheskoy nauke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 68 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064.
15. Karpovich O.G. Global'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v kontekste formiruyushchegosya mnogopolyarnogo mira // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 620 - 629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
16. Guan'tsyun' L. Rol' tayvan'skoy problemy
17. v morskoy politike KNR // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 469 - 509. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9754.
18. Afanas'ev V.V. Sovremennye lokal'nye konflikty // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 56 - 61. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10061.