Аннотация: The subject of this research is the examination of the use of information technologies in judicial system of Australia. For implementation of the new ways of handling cases, improvement of the access to the system of justice and increase of its efficiency, Australia’s judicial system develops the e-court strategy, which is called to encourage the achievement of goals of procedures, as well as provides multiple new opportunities, for example: informing citizens and lawyers about the work of courts in its various manifestations; ensuring accessibility of court rulings in civil cases for broad range of public; electronic data maintenance; electronic court filing; “online court proceedings”; system of case management; communication and circulation of documents between the court and the participants of the process or parties in the judicial procedure; substantiation by the parties of their position, creation of factual material, and provision of evidence to the court in the course of the legal case. The author demonstrates that the use of information technologies allows reducing the time required to conclude the case, decrease the cost of the procedure, simplify the process, as well as ensure the openness and accessibility of the court, increase efficiency of justice on civil cases. The conclusion is made that under the current conditions, the improvement of judicial system, including Russian, is associated with the development of information and communication technologies and their impactful use in the legal field.

Ключевые слова: Parties, Court case, Australia’s judicial system, Russia’s legal system, System of electronic filing, Openness of the court, Efficiency of justice, E-justice, Information technologies, Civil process

Библиография:
Abdulvaliev A.F. Predposylki i perspektivy vnedreniya elektronnoy formy ugolovnogo dela v deyatel'nost' sudebnykh organov // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 5. - C. 150 - 164. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.5.345. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_345.html
Khaliullin A.I. Vnedrenie elektronnogo dokumentooborota v deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov gosudarstv Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 6. - C. 12 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.6.10279. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_10279.html
Bogdan V.V. Nekotorye osobennosti realizatsii prava potrebiteley na sudebnuyu zashchitu // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2015. - 2. - C. 40 - 58. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.2.14074. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_14074.html
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Federal'nogo suda Avstralii //URL:http://www.fedcourt.gov.au
Fedoseeva N. N., Chaykovskaya M. A. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Rossii i v mire // Administrator suda. 2011. № 3.
Sbornik zakonodatel'stva Sodruzhestva ComLaw // URL:http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011L01551
Izotova S. V., Batalova L. A., Shcherbina E. S., Naumov V. B. Perspektivy elektronnogo dokumentooborota v rossiyskom arbitrazhnom protsesse // Informatsionnoe pravo, 2006. № 4.
Kross R. Pretsedent v angliyskom prave / Pod red. F. M. Reshetnikova. M., 1985
Tony de la Fosse and James Popple «Escaping the Relational Database Paradigm: Case Management in the High Court of Australia» Technology for Justice Conference Presentations, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration (CD ROM), (1998)
Vakhtinskaya E. M. Vysokiy sud Avstralii: istoriya i yurisdiktsiya // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2012. № 1.
Hughes R. A., Leane G. W. G. Australian Legal Institutions. Principles, structure and organization. Melbourne, 1996.
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Federal'nogo okruzhnogo suda Avstralii //URL:http://www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au
Vinogradov V. A. Osnovy konstitutsionnogo stroya Avstralii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2004, № 11.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2013. № 1. St. 13
Pravosudie v sovremennom mire: monografiya / Pod red. V. M. Lebedeva, T. Ya. Khabrievoy. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2012. S. 229 (avtor glavy 17-Tereshchenko L. K.)
Dzhifford D. D., Dzhifford K. Kh. Pravovaya sistema Avstralii / Per. s angl. T.V. Aparova, N. A. Golovanova; Pod obshch. red. F.M. Reshetnikova. M., 1988
Vakhtinskaya E. M. Osnovnye cherty grazhdanskogo protsessa Avstralii. Avtoreferat diss. kand. yurid. nauk, M., 2013.
Mironova S.N. Ispol'zovanie vozmozhnostey seti Internet pri razreshenii grazhdansko-pravovykh sporov. M., 2010.

References (transliteration):
Abdulvaliev A.F. Predposylki i perspektivy vnedreniya elektronnoy formy ugolovnogo dela v deyatel'nost' sudebnykh organov // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 5. - C. 150 - 164. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.5.345. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_345.html
Khaliullin A.I. Vnedrenie elektronnogo dokumentooborota v deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov gosudarstv Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 6. - C. 12 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.6.10279. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_10279.html
Bogdan V.V. Nekotorye osobennosti realizatsii prava potrebiteley na sudebnuyu zashchitu // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2015. - 2. - C. 40 - 58. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.2.14074. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_14074.html
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Federal'nogo suda Avstralii //URL:http://www.fedcourt.gov.au
Fedoseeva N. N., Chaykovskaya M. A. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Rossii i v mire // Administrator suda. 2011. № 3.
Sbornik zakonodatel'stva Sodruzhestva ComLaw // URL:http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011L01551
Izotova S. V., Batalova L. A., Shcherbina E. S., Naumov V. B. Perspektivy elektronnogo dokumentooborota v rossiyskom arbitrazhnom protsesse // Informatsionnoe pravo, 2006. № 4.
Kross R. Pretsedent v angliyskom prave / Pod red. F. M. Reshetnikova. M., 1985
Tony de la Fosse and James Popple «Escaping the Relational Database Paradigm: Case Management in the High Court of Australia» Technology for Justice Conference Presentations, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration (CD ROM), (1998)
Vakhtinskaya E. M. Vysokiy sud Avstralii: istoriya i yurisdiktsiya // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2012. № 1.
Hughes R. A., Leane G. W. G. Australian Legal Institutions. Principles, structure and organization. Melbourne, 1996.
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Federal'nogo okruzhnogo suda Avstralii //URL:http://www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au
Vinogradov V. A. Osnovy konstitutsionnogo stroya Avstralii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2004, № 11.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2013. № 1. St. 13
Pravosudie v sovremennom mire: monografiya / Pod red. V. M. Lebedeva, T. Ya. Khabrievoy. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2012. S. 229 (avtor glavy 17-Tereshchenko L. K.)
Dzhifford D. D., Dzhifford K. Kh. Pravovaya sistema Avstralii / Per. s angl. T.V. Aparova, N. A. Golovanova; Pod obshch. red. F.M. Reshetnikova. M., 1988
Vakhtinskaya E. M. Osnovnye cherty grazhdanskogo protsessa Avstralii. Avtoreferat diss. kand. yurid. nauk, M., 2013.
Mironova S.N. Ispol'zovanie vozmozhnostey seti Internet pri razreshenii grazhdansko-pravovykh sporov. M., 2010.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the procedural work of magistrates introduced into the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan from the beginning of 2015. The author draws attention to the fact that the scope of authority of the new procedural figure is not sufficient for proper and independent execution of judicial control at the pretrial stage of criminal process. Portion of authority by the new Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan was also part of the competency of the court. Based on this fact, the author proposes a comprehensive solution to the issues of improving the work of the magistrate. Among the main conclusions of the conducted research are the proposals for improvements to the work of magistrates, which are not completely verified from  the perspective of scientific substantiation and practical implementation, but have the goal to attempt to examine the benefits and flaws of the new institution to ensure protection of citizens, improvement of the quality of the pretrial investigation, and judicial control at the pretrial stage of the judicial process.  

Ключевые слова: Control over investigation, Justice, Sanctioning, Judicial control, Pretrial process, Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakh, Criminal procedure, Magistrate, Judge, Court

Библиография:
Idirov E.I. Pravovoy status sledstvennogo sud'i v Respublike Kazakhstan // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2016. - 9. - C. 53 - 57. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.9.19996. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_19996.html
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231-V ZRK. "Kazakhstanskaya pravda" ot 10.07.2014 № 133(27754).
Dos'e ITS na proekt Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazakhstan. http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31122244 (data obrashcheniya 08.09.2016 goda.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 13 dekabrya 1997 goda № 206. Utratil silu Kodeksom Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231.
Golovko L.V. Sledstvennye sud'i ili ocherednoy raund «amerikanizatsii» rossiyskogo ugolovnogo protsessa? Sbornik «Apparat vlasti sledstvennoy» / Pod obshch. red. N.A. Kolokolova. M.: Yurlitinform. S. 319-324.
Kovtun N.N. Institut spetsializirovannykh sledstvennykh sudey: k diskussii o vektorakh zakonodatel'noy voli // Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy. 2015. № 2 (3). S. 174-183.
Idirov E.I. Sledstvennyy sud'ya v proekte novogo UPK Respubliki Kazakhstan // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 9. - C. 14 - 26. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.9.9555. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9555.html

References (transliteration):
Idirov E.I. Pravovoy status sledstvennogo sud'i v Respublike Kazakhstan // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2016. - 9. - C. 53 - 57. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.9.19996. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_19996.html
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231-V ZRK. "Kazakhstanskaya pravda" ot 10.07.2014 № 133(27754).
Dos'e ITS na proekt Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazakhstan. http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31122244 (data obrashcheniya 08.09.2016 goda.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 13 dekabrya 1997 goda № 206. Utratil silu Kodeksom Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231.
Golovko L.V. Sledstvennye sud'i ili ocherednoy raund «amerikanizatsii» rossiyskogo ugolovnogo protsessa? Sbornik «Apparat vlasti sledstvennoy» / Pod obshch. red. N.A. Kolokolova. M.: Yurlitinform. S. 319-324.
Kovtun N.N. Institut spetsializirovannykh sledstvennykh sudey: k diskussii o vektorakh zakonodatel'noy voli // Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy. 2015. № 2 (3). S. 174-183.
Idirov E.I. Sledstvennyy sud'ya v proekte novogo UPK Respubliki Kazakhstan // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 9. - C. 14 - 26. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.9.9555. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9555.html

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the legal relations, arising in the sphere of constitutional legal proceedings in establishing and researching the factual circumstances of the case. In comparative terms the author shows the amount of the factual circumstances, researched at various stages of the constitutional justice, and reveals the procedural specifics of their establishment, depending on the organizational form of constitutional legal proceedings and features of the concrete power of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Emphasis is made on the difference between the constitutional legal proceedings in respect to the establishment and research of the factual circumstances and other procedural forms of the judicial power. Based on an analysis of the legislation and judicial practice the author determines an auxiliary and subsidiary role of the factual circumstances in the course of the proceedings, subordinate to the Constitutional Court. Taking into account the prospects of development of justice in Russia the author demonstrates the procedural means for the establishment of these circumstances, highlights the most significant current trends regarding the impact of the need to research the factual circumstances to determine the competence of the body of constitutional control.  

Ключевые слова: justice, powers, norm, constitution, inquiry, legislation, factual circumstances, court, proceedings, process

Библиография:
Mokoseeva M.A. Resheniya organov konstitutsionnoy yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii:norma prava ili yuridicheskaya formal'nost' // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. № 9. C. 967 - 977. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.16194.
Sokolov T.V. Sushchnost' konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva v kontekste doktriny sudebnogo prava // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. № 2. C. 206 - 219. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.2.11171.
Brezhnev O.V. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti i osobennostyakh vzaimodeystviya mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i organami konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. № 6. C. 626 - 633. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15389.
Sergevnin S.L. Konstitutsionnyy normokontrol' i otdel'nye obshcheteoreticheskie problemy sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2009. № 22. S. 6-10.
Taribo E.V. K voprosu ob ustanovlenii i issledovanii fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stv v konstitutsionnom sudoproizvodstve (na primere nalogooblozheniya) // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 1. S. 7-18.
Sheynin Kh.B. Dokazatel'stva v konstitutsionnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 6. S. 51-62.
Shamshurin L.L. Dostizhenie dostovernogo znaniya o fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stvakh dela // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2014. № 6. S. 18-32.
Rossiyskiy B.V. K voprosu o konstitutsionnom sudebnom protsesse kak raznovidnosti yuridicheskogo protsessa v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2012. № 6. S. 49-50.
Narutto S.V. Konstitutsionnyy sudebnyy protsess: ponyatie, priznaki, osobennosti // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 5. S. 708-713. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.05.15.
Kozhevnikov O.A. Nekotorye problemy v razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti sporov mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i konstitutsionnymi (ustavnymi) sudami sub'ektov RF i puti ikh razresheniya // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 5. S. 897-901.
Kulapov V.L., Sardaeva O.G. Sovremennye problemy ustanovleniya fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stv pri kvalifikatsii protivopravnogo povedeniya // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2015. № 1. S. 79-85.
Dedyukina I.S. Istochniki dokazatel'stv v konstitutsionnom sudoproizvodstve // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 1999. № 2. S. 9-10.
Bachernikhina M.V. Sostav tekhniki ustanovleniya fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stv yuridicheskogo dela // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2010. № 1. S. 61-63.
Brezhnev O.V. Institut sudebnogo kontrolya za zakonnost'yu v deyatel'nosti obshchestvennykh ob'edineniy v Rossii: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. № 6. S. 8-13.

References (transliteration):
Mokoseeva M.A. Resheniya organov konstitutsionnoy yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii:norma prava ili yuridicheskaya formal'nost' // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. № 9. C. 967 - 977. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.16194.
Sokolov T.V. Sushchnost' konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva v kontekste doktriny sudebnogo prava // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. № 2. C. 206 - 219. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.2.11171.
Brezhnev O.V. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti i osobennostyakh vzaimodeystviya mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i organami konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. № 6. C. 626 - 633. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15389.
Sergevnin S.L. Konstitutsionnyy normokontrol' i otdel'nye obshcheteoreticheskie problemy sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2009. № 22. S. 6-10.
Taribo E.V. K voprosu ob ustanovlenii i issledovanii fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stv v konstitutsionnom sudoproizvodstve (na primere nalogooblozheniya) // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 1. S. 7-18.
Sheynin Kh.B. Dokazatel'stva v konstitutsionnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 6. S. 51-62.
Shamshurin L.L. Dostizhenie dostovernogo znaniya o fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stvakh dela // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2014. № 6. S. 18-32.
Rossiyskiy B.V. K voprosu o konstitutsionnom sudebnom protsesse kak raznovidnosti yuridicheskogo protsessa v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2012. № 6. S. 49-50.
Narutto S.V. Konstitutsionnyy sudebnyy protsess: ponyatie, priznaki, osobennosti // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 5. S. 708-713. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.05.15.
Kozhevnikov O.A. Nekotorye problemy v razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti sporov mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i konstitutsionnymi (ustavnymi) sudami sub'ektov RF i puti ikh razresheniya // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 5. S. 897-901.
Kulapov V.L., Sardaeva O.G. Sovremennye problemy ustanovleniya fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stv pri kvalifikatsii protivopravnogo povedeniya // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2015. № 1. S. 79-85.
Dedyukina I.S. Istochniki dokazatel'stv v konstitutsionnom sudoproizvodstve // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 1999. № 2. S. 9-10.
Bachernikhina M.V. Sostav tekhniki ustanovleniya fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stv yuridicheskogo dela // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2010. № 1. S. 61-63.
Brezhnev O.V. Institut sudebnogo kontrolya za zakonnost'yu v deyatel'nosti obshchestvennykh ob'edineniy v Rossii: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. № 6. S. 8-13.

Аннотация: This article examines the problematic issues pertaining to means of defense of civil rights. The author explores the possibility of defense against violation of rights through the means unlisted in the Russian Civil legislation, as well as the practice of their application in arbitration courts. Analysis is conducted on the points of views that exist in legal literature regarding the discussion on applicability of the norms on laches towards the demand for recognition of the right to ownership and claim to recognition absence of the real right. This work raises the issue of the possibility of application of claim to recognize the absence of real right in liability dispute. The author also examines the issue of implementation of the term of laches on claims to recognize the absence of real right, as well as the justification of the possibility to apply this term in a claim. A comparison is made between the declaratory judgment and nugatory claim.

Ключевые слова: Real estate, Laches, Dispute, Real right, Real action, Claim, Declaratory judgment , Court, Civil law, right

Библиография:
. Podshivalov T.P. Zapret obkhoda zakona v rossiyskom grazhdanskom zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoy praktike // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. – 2015. – № 2. – S. 86-115.
Lyushnya A.V. Isk o priznanii prava sobstvennosti i iskovaya davnost' // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2005. – № 11.– S. 62-66.
Podshivalov T. Iskovaya davnost' dlya negatornogo iska de lege ferenda // Khozyaystvo i pravo. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 84-87.
Podshivalov T.P. Pravila primeneniya iskovoy davnosti dlya vindikatsii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. – 2013. – № 9.– S. 20-23.
Il'ichev P. Iskovaya davnost' problemy teorii i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2014. – 171 s.
Petryaev A. Isk o priznanii prava otsutstvuyushchim // EZh-yurist. – 2014. – № 1-2 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Lapach V. Problema osparivaniya prava // Khozyaystvo i pravo. – 2007. – № 2. – S. 109-114.
Podshivalov T.P. Kriterii sootnosheniya veshchnykh i obyazatel'stvennykh iskov // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2015. – № 1. – S. 49-56.
Vitryanskiy V.V., Braginskiy M.I. Dogovornoe pravo. kniga pervaya. – M.: Statut, 2012.-847 c.
Krasnova S.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy klassifikatsii grazhdansko-pravovykh sposobov zashchity // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 170-176.
Podshivalov T.P. Pravovaya priroda iska ob osparivanii zaregistrirovannogo prava na nedvizhimost' // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 76-83.
Podshivalov T.P. Opredelenie nadlezhashchego sposoba zashchity veshchnykh prav v arbitrazhnoy praktike // Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 13-17.

References (transliteration):
. Podshivalov T.P. Zapret obkhoda zakona v rossiyskom grazhdanskom zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoy praktike // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. – 2015. – № 2. – S. 86-115.
Lyushnya A.V. Isk o priznanii prava sobstvennosti i iskovaya davnost' // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2005. – № 11.– S. 62-66.
Podshivalov T. Iskovaya davnost' dlya negatornogo iska de lege ferenda // Khozyaystvo i pravo. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 84-87.
Podshivalov T.P. Pravila primeneniya iskovoy davnosti dlya vindikatsii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. – 2013. – № 9.– S. 20-23.
Il'ichev P. Iskovaya davnost' problemy teorii i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2014. – 171 s.
Petryaev A. Isk o priznanii prava otsutstvuyushchim // EZh-yurist. – 2014. – № 1-2 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Lapach V. Problema osparivaniya prava // Khozyaystvo i pravo. – 2007. – № 2. – S. 109-114.
Podshivalov T.P. Kriterii sootnosheniya veshchnykh i obyazatel'stvennykh iskov // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2015. – № 1. – S. 49-56.
Vitryanskiy V.V., Braginskiy M.I. Dogovornoe pravo. kniga pervaya. – M.: Statut, 2012.-847 c.
Krasnova S.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy klassifikatsii grazhdansko-pravovykh sposobov zashchity // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 170-176.
Podshivalov T.P. Pravovaya priroda iska ob osparivanii zaregistrirovannogo prava na nedvizhimost' // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 76-83.
Podshivalov T.P. Opredelenie nadlezhashchego sposoba zashchity veshchnykh prav v arbitrazhnoy praktike // Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 13-17.

Аннотация: The problem of judicial lawmaking is one of the relevant for the modern legal science. The subject of this research is judicial practice and legal precedent as the possible, acceptable, and valid sources of Russian law. The goal of this work consists in development of the theoretical positions, which contain substantiation of the importance of the official recognition of judicial practice and legal precedent as the sources of law in the conditions of promotion of the judicial reform along with the work on harmonization of legislation. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that this article is first to examine a complex of questions pertaining to inclusion of the judicial practice and legal precedent into the ranks of the sources of law in light of modernization of the Russian lawmaking. The author suggests theoretical positions and practical recommendations which allow developing the doctrine of judicial practice and legal precedent in Russia.

Ключевые слова: Internationalization of legislation, Globalization of law, Judicial authority, Law enforcement, Judicial legal provisions, Sources of law, Lawmaking, Prejudice, Legal precedent, Judicial practice

Библиография:
Usanov V.E. Sudebnyy pretsedent: problemy konvergentsii v rossiyskuyu pravovuyu sistemu // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 2(7).
Smirnova M.G. Pravopolozheniya sudebnoy praktiki kak netipichnyy istochnik prava // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal.2006. № 1.
Neshataeva T.N. K voprosu ob istochnikakh prava – sudebnom pretsedente i doktrine // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2000. № 5 (90).
Marchenko M.N. Sudebnyy pretsedent: raznoobrazie ponyatiy i mnogoobrazie form proyavleniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 6.
Marchenko M.N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudeyskoe pravo. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.
Malyshev Kr. Kurs obshchego grazhdanskogo prava Rossii. T.1. SPb., 1880.
Lazarev V.V. Normativnaya priroda sudebnogo pretsedenta // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 4.
Krasina E.N. Mezhdunarodnyy sudebnyy pretsedent kak element modernizatsii pravovoy sistemy Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossiyskoy Akademii advokatury i notariata.2011. № 1(20).
Zor'kin V.D. Pretsedentnyy kharakter resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. № 12.
Dzhura V. V. O sudebnom pretsedente v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2005. № 2.
Voytovich E.P. Sudebnaya praktika v mekhanizme grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2006.
Brezhnev V. E. Sudebnyy pretsedent v Rossii: polemika i predlozheniya // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovaniy. 2011. Vyp. 9.
Bodrov S.Yu. Sudebnyy pretsedent v sisteme istochnikov rossiyskogo prava: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan', 2004.
Balasanyan A.R. Sootnoshenie obychaya delovogo oborota s sudebnym pretsedentom i sudebnoy praktikoy // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2006. № 3(31.
Fetishchev D. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava // Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal Obozrevatel'-Observer. 2008. № 5.
Markov P.V. Usloviya osushchestvleniya sudebnogo usmotreniya v stranakh kontinental'noy i anglosaksonskoy pravovoy sem'i // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 4.-S.73-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.318. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_318.html
Romanova E.V.. Sudebnaya doktrina kak istochnik (forma) prava v nalogovom prave SShA // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
V. A. Oganesyan. Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov po pravam cheloveka kak osobyy istochnik razvitiya i soblyudeniya printsipov ugolovnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
N. Yu. Erpyleva. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i formirovanie istochnikov mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 3.
Lyubchenko M.Ya.. K voprosu o znachenii postanovleniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.753
R. A. Gurbanov Vzaimodeystvie organov pravosudiya gosudarstv-chlenov ES s organami pravosudiya Evropeyskogo soyuza // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 3. - C. 128 - 143.
Sokolov T.V. Konstitutsionnoe sudoproizvodstvo – mekhanizm realizatsii sudebnoy vlasti?!. // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 3. - C. 313 - 325. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.11168.
S.V. Kodan Formirovanie istochnikovedeniya istorii gosudarstva i prava Rossii
(XVIII – pervaya chetvert' XIX vv.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 649 - 661. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.14.

References (transliteration):
Usanov V.E. Sudebnyy pretsedent: problemy konvergentsii v rossiyskuyu pravovuyu sistemu // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 2(7).
Smirnova M.G. Pravopolozheniya sudebnoy praktiki kak netipichnyy istochnik prava // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal.2006. № 1.
Neshataeva T.N. K voprosu ob istochnikakh prava – sudebnom pretsedente i doktrine // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2000. № 5 (90).
Marchenko M.N. Sudebnyy pretsedent: raznoobrazie ponyatiy i mnogoobrazie form proyavleniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 6.
Marchenko M.N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudeyskoe pravo. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.
Malyshev Kr. Kurs obshchego grazhdanskogo prava Rossii. T.1. SPb., 1880.
Lazarev V.V. Normativnaya priroda sudebnogo pretsedenta // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 4.
Krasina E.N. Mezhdunarodnyy sudebnyy pretsedent kak element modernizatsii pravovoy sistemy Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossiyskoy Akademii advokatury i notariata.2011. № 1(20).
Zor'kin V.D. Pretsedentnyy kharakter resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. № 12.
Dzhura V. V. O sudebnom pretsedente v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2005. № 2.
Voytovich E.P. Sudebnaya praktika v mekhanizme grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2006.
Brezhnev V. E. Sudebnyy pretsedent v Rossii: polemika i predlozheniya // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovaniy. 2011. Vyp. 9.
Bodrov S.Yu. Sudebnyy pretsedent v sisteme istochnikov rossiyskogo prava: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan', 2004.
Balasanyan A.R. Sootnoshenie obychaya delovogo oborota s sudebnym pretsedentom i sudebnoy praktikoy // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2006. № 3(31.
Fetishchev D. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava // Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal Obozrevatel'-Observer. 2008. № 5.
Markov P.V. Usloviya osushchestvleniya sudebnogo usmotreniya v stranakh kontinental'noy i anglosaksonskoy pravovoy sem'i // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 4.-S.73-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.318. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_318.html
Romanova E.V.. Sudebnaya doktrina kak istochnik (forma) prava v nalogovom prave SShA // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
V. A. Oganesyan. Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov po pravam cheloveka kak osobyy istochnik razvitiya i soblyudeniya printsipov ugolovnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
N. Yu. Erpyleva. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i formirovanie istochnikov mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 3.
Lyubchenko M.Ya.. K voprosu o znachenii postanovleniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.753
R. A. Gurbanov Vzaimodeystvie organov pravosudiya gosudarstv-chlenov ES s organami pravosudiya Evropeyskogo soyuza // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 3. - C. 128 - 143.
Sokolov T.V. Konstitutsionnoe sudoproizvodstvo – mekhanizm realizatsii sudebnoy vlasti?!. // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 3. - C. 313 - 325. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.11168.
S.V. Kodan Formirovanie istochnikovedeniya istorii gosudarstva i prava Rossii
(XVIII – pervaya chetvert' XIX vv.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 649 - 661. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.14.

Аннотация: This work studies the issues of proof in the court of appeals, namely the questions of examination of new evidence, which received the assessment of the court of first instance, examinations on file that were not examined by the court of first instance, as well as examinations by the same rules of new evidence presented by the parties. An important place belongs to the analysis of the normative legal regulations and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and courts of appeal of a number of the constituents of the Russian Federation on the issue of examination of new evidence in the courts of appeal. The author makes a conclusion on the need to overcome the current practice of hearing of a case in a court of appeals without examination of evidence, which does not allow to increase the level of legal protection of rights, freedoms, and legal interests of citizens and organizations involved in the sphere of criminal procedure that are guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws.

Ключевые слова: Proof, Verification of evidence, Examination of evidence, Additional materials, Cassation, New evidence, Evidence, Court of appeals, Court of first instance, Appeal

Библиография:
Solov'eva N. A., Trishina N. T. Yuridiko-fakticheskaya proverka prigovora v apellyatsionnom proizvodstve: monografiya. M., 2013. 184 S.
Shmeleva E. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie apellyatsionnogo proizvodstva v sovremennom rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monografiya. Orenburg, 2009. 322 S
Chervotkin A. S. Apellyatsiya i kassatsiya: posobie dlya sudey. M., 2013. 336 S.
Smirnov A. V. Reforma poryadka peresmotra sudebnykh resheniy po ugolovnym delam: apellyatsiya//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 2011.
Potapov V. D. Osnovnye nachala proverki sudebnykh resheniy v kontrol'no-proverochnykh stadiyakh i proizvodstvakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii: monografiya//red.: Zaytsev O. A. M., 2012. 376 S.
Panokin A. M. Poryadok rassmotreniya soobshcheniya o prestuplenii v ugolovnom protsesse//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 11 (36). S. 1461-1465.
Petrukhin I. L. Zapret povorota k khudshemu v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse//Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2006. № 3. S. 46-53.
Panokin A. M. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 4 (29). S. 483-490.
Diner A. A., Martynyakhin L. F., Senin N. N. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2003. 112 S.
Voskobitova L. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy apellyatsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 12 (37). S. 1619-1624.
Golovkov V. L. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2004. 314 S.
Voskobitova L. A. Apellyatsiya – printsipial'no novyy institut v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Apellyatsiya: realii, tendentsii i perspektivy. M., 2013. S. 35-42.
Ashirbekova M. T. Novye dokazatel'stva v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii//Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 5. S. 22-24.
Budnikov V. L. Uchastie suda v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii//Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2006. № 1. S. 13-15//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Afanas'eva S. I., Borisevich, G. Ya., Dobrovlyanina, O. V. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k glave 45.1 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Proizvodstvo v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii». Perm', 2014. 84 S.
Apellyatsiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie//red.: Ershov V. V. M., 2013. 352 S.
D.V. Danilenko. Sostyazatel'nost' — universal'nyy printsip sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 4
N. I. Manyak Obzhalovanie sudebnykh aktov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 12. - C. 2047 - 2052.
Afanas'yadi V.G. Realizatsiya rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti
v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam o nezakonnom usynovlenii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 811 - 814. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9283.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.

References (transliteration):
Solov'eva N. A., Trishina N. T. Yuridiko-fakticheskaya proverka prigovora v apellyatsionnom proizvodstve: monografiya. M., 2013. 184 S.
Shmeleva E. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie apellyatsionnogo proizvodstva v sovremennom rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monografiya. Orenburg, 2009. 322 S
Chervotkin A. S. Apellyatsiya i kassatsiya: posobie dlya sudey. M., 2013. 336 S.
Smirnov A. V. Reforma poryadka peresmotra sudebnykh resheniy po ugolovnym delam: apellyatsiya//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 2011.
Potapov V. D. Osnovnye nachala proverki sudebnykh resheniy v kontrol'no-proverochnykh stadiyakh i proizvodstvakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii: monografiya//red.: Zaytsev O. A. M., 2012. 376 S.
Panokin A. M. Poryadok rassmotreniya soobshcheniya o prestuplenii v ugolovnom protsesse//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 11 (36). S. 1461-1465.
Petrukhin I. L. Zapret povorota k khudshemu v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse//Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2006. № 3. S. 46-53.
Panokin A. M. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 4 (29). S. 483-490.
Diner A. A., Martynyakhin L. F., Senin N. N. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2003. 112 S.
Voskobitova L. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy apellyatsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 12 (37). S. 1619-1624.
Golovkov V. L. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2004. 314 S.
Voskobitova L. A. Apellyatsiya – printsipial'no novyy institut v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Apellyatsiya: realii, tendentsii i perspektivy. M., 2013. S. 35-42.
Ashirbekova M. T. Novye dokazatel'stva v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii//Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 5. S. 22-24.
Budnikov V. L. Uchastie suda v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii//Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2006. № 1. S. 13-15//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Afanas'eva S. I., Borisevich, G. Ya., Dobrovlyanina, O. V. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k glave 45.1 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Proizvodstvo v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii». Perm', 2014. 84 S.
Apellyatsiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie//red.: Ershov V. V. M., 2013. 352 S.
D.V. Danilenko. Sostyazatel'nost' — universal'nyy printsip sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 4
N. I. Manyak Obzhalovanie sudebnykh aktov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 12. - C. 2047 - 2052.
Afanas'yadi V.G. Realizatsiya rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti
v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam o nezakonnom usynovlenii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 811 - 814. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9283.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.

Аннотация: The authors consider the law enforcement aspects of the sentencing in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities as a punishment for certain crimes. In the course of the investigation the authors used the formal-logical method, systemic analysis, comparative law, questionnaires, surveys and statistical method. The authors draw attention to the need to increase the application of the penalty of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities as an additional punishment in cases of corruption offenses. It is noted that in a number of articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code specifies commission of a crime by a person using his official position is an aggravating circumstance, but the penalties do not list the aforementioned method of punishment. The authors substantiate the feasibility of introducing sanctions in a number of articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code the penalty of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities as a mandatory additional penalty. Proposals are made to appointment of punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities of punishment by restricting the scope of the prohibition, in particular by reference to the performance of specific powers (for example, healthcare workers).

Ключевые слова: imposition of sentence, criminal penalties, crime, officer, work, title, deprivation of rights, sentence, official authority, legal precedent

Библиография:
Ramazanov A.Zh. Nakazaniya, ne svyazannye s lisheniem svobody (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Ucheb. posobie / Pod obshch. red. E.V. Seredy.-SPb.: Izd-vo yurid. in-ta, 2002. – S 79.
Gorelik I.I., Tishkevich I.S. Voprosy ugolovnogo prava v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda BSSR. Minsk, 1973. S. 162.
Grigonis E.P., Leont'ev O.V. Otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya, sovershennye medrabotnikami. SPb., 2008. S. 76.
Osnovy meditsinskogo prava Rossii / Pod red. Yu.D. Sergeeva. M., 2007. S. 54
Glashev A.A. Meditsinskoe pravo: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo dlya yuristov i medikov. M., 2004. S. 51.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Khabarovskogo kraevogo suda ot 14.03.2011 № 44-u-63/2011 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus». Prigovor po delu o sluzhebnom podloge i poluchenii dolzhnostnym litsom vzyatki za nezakonnye deystviya izmenen: utochneno naznachennoe osuzhdennoy dopolnitel'noe nakazanie kak lishenie prava zanimat'sya vrachebnoy deyatel'nost'yu, svyazannoy s osushchestvleniem organizatsionno-rasporyaditel'nykh i khozyaystvennykh funktsiy, v tom chisle s pravom opredelyat' vremennuyu netrudosposobnost' patsientov i vydavat' listki netrudosposobnosti. Opredelenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 28.09.2010 № 22-6267// SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeystvie: monografiya / G.A. Esakov, T.G. Ponyatovskaya, A.I. Rarog i dr.; pod red. A.I. Raroga. M.: Prospekt, 2012. 288 s.
Kapelyushnik M.S. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2006. № 12. S. 25-27.
Lukashov A. Lishenie spetsial'nogo prava kak vid nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. № 3. S. 31.
Otchety o rabote ugolovno ispolnitel'nykh inspektsiy po forme UII-1 za 2010-2015 gg.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Strategii bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 2003. S. 202.
Krylova E.S. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu kak vid ugolovnogo nakazaniya po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: Avtoreferat diss. na soisk. uch. stepeni k.yu.n.-Kazan', 2002. S. 18.
Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 11 yanvarya 2007 goda № 2 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» v optimizatsii primeneniya lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu // Voenno-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. № 3. S. 29.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Kurs lektsiy: V 3 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast'. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2007. S. 543.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) / G.N. Borzenkov, A.V. Brilliantov, A.V. Galakhova i dr.; otv. red. V.M. Lebedev. 13-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurayt, 2013. S. 1069.
Informatsionnyy byulleten' Mezhparlamentskoy assamblei gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNGMPASNG. 1995. № 8. S. 119-185.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2015 № 58 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» // «Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF», № 2, fevral', 2016.
Kuleshova N.N. Dopolnitel'nye vidy nakazaniy: ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan', 2006. S. 143.
Bagmet A.M. Spetsial'nye mery preduprezhdeniya korruptsii v pravookhranitel'noy sisteme // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2015. - 1. - C. 36 - 39. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8681.2015.1.18591.

References (transliteration):
Ramazanov A.Zh. Nakazaniya, ne svyazannye s lisheniem svobody (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Ucheb. posobie / Pod obshch. red. E.V. Seredy.-SPb.: Izd-vo yurid. in-ta, 2002. – S 79.
Gorelik I.I., Tishkevich I.S. Voprosy ugolovnogo prava v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda BSSR. Minsk, 1973. S. 162.
Grigonis E.P., Leont'ev O.V. Otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya, sovershennye medrabotnikami. SPb., 2008. S. 76.
Osnovy meditsinskogo prava Rossii / Pod red. Yu.D. Sergeeva. M., 2007. S. 54
Glashev A.A. Meditsinskoe pravo: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo dlya yuristov i medikov. M., 2004. S. 51.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Khabarovskogo kraevogo suda ot 14.03.2011 № 44-u-63/2011 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus». Prigovor po delu o sluzhebnom podloge i poluchenii dolzhnostnym litsom vzyatki za nezakonnye deystviya izmenen: utochneno naznachennoe osuzhdennoy dopolnitel'noe nakazanie kak lishenie prava zanimat'sya vrachebnoy deyatel'nost'yu, svyazannoy s osushchestvleniem organizatsionno-rasporyaditel'nykh i khozyaystvennykh funktsiy, v tom chisle s pravom opredelyat' vremennuyu netrudosposobnost' patsientov i vydavat' listki netrudosposobnosti. Opredelenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 28.09.2010 № 22-6267// SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeystvie: monografiya / G.A. Esakov, T.G. Ponyatovskaya, A.I. Rarog i dr.; pod red. A.I. Raroga. M.: Prospekt, 2012. 288 s.
Kapelyushnik M.S. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2006. № 12. S. 25-27.
Lukashov A. Lishenie spetsial'nogo prava kak vid nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. № 3. S. 31.
Otchety o rabote ugolovno ispolnitel'nykh inspektsiy po forme UII-1 za 2010-2015 gg.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Strategii bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 2003. S. 202.
Krylova E.S. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu kak vid ugolovnogo nakazaniya po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: Avtoreferat diss. na soisk. uch. stepeni k.yu.n.-Kazan', 2002. S. 18.
Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 11 yanvarya 2007 goda № 2 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» v optimizatsii primeneniya lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu // Voenno-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. № 3. S. 29.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Kurs lektsiy: V 3 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast'. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2007. S. 543.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) / G.N. Borzenkov, A.V. Brilliantov, A.V. Galakhova i dr.; otv. red. V.M. Lebedev. 13-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurayt, 2013. S. 1069.
Informatsionnyy byulleten' Mezhparlamentskoy assamblei gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNGMPASNG. 1995. № 8. S. 119-185.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2015 № 58 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» // «Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF», № 2, fevral', 2016.
Kuleshova N.N. Dopolnitel'nye vidy nakazaniy: ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan', 2006. S. 143.
Bagmet A.M. Spetsial'nye mery preduprezhdeniya korruptsii v pravookhranitel'noy sisteme // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2015. - 1. - C. 36 - 39. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8681.2015.1.18591.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the legal regulation of the participation of the attesting witnesses in investigations. The author gives attention to the legislative changes of the institution of attesting witnesses in Russia, which prompted a discussion among both, scholars and legal professionals. The article explores various opinions of scholars and the investigative-legal practice of investigative work involving attesting witnesses. An undefined, and an important from the practical point of view factor, is the questioning of the attesting witness on the witness stand and acceptance of their statement as proof. The author comes to the conclusion that there is a need for changes in the participation of attesting witnesses in investigations with consideration of the realities of today. A guarantee of the validity of evidence will in time be ensured by use of technological means of recording of facts used by the investigators and specialists, rather than by participation of attesting witness in investigations. In order to exclude the problem of validity of the recording of evidence via technological means, it is necessary to implement Part 2 of the Article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes responsibility of the detectives and investigators for falsification of evidence.

Ключевые слова: Testimony, Investigation, Evidence, Attesting witness, Protection, Recording, Technological means, Court, Investigator, Inquiry

Библиография:
Glushchenko O.P. Razvitie ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva o privlechenii ponyatykh dlya uchastiya v sledstvennykh deystviyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2015. № 6. C. 787-792. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.6.15593.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 19.04.2011 delo № 80-011-7
Ryabtseva E.V. Zloupotreblenie pravom v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstva. M., 2013. S. 43.
Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. M., 1988. S. 122.
Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1991. S. 193-194.
Yarovenko V.V. Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie fiksatsii khoda i rezul'tatov sledstvennogo deystviya // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld. Vyp. 3. T. 32. Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2013. S. 47-50.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 4 marta 2013 g. N 23-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) // Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/70326874/#ixzz3drkVJG6O
Federal'nym zakonom ot 4 iyulya 2003 goda № 92-FZ (red. ot 02.12.2008) "O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii". https://www.referent.ru/1/121881
Seleznev M. Ponyatoy ili svidetel'? // Zakonnost'. 1998. № 1. S. 35-36.
Bykov V. Institut ponyatykh v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 3. S. 72-74
Storozheva, A.N. Ponyatoy v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Avtoref. kandidat diss. yurid. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. S. 99. http://www.dissercat.com/content/ponyatoi-v-rossiiskom-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve#ixzz3drsIj8sk
Khitrova O.V. Razvitie instituta ponyatykh v UPK RF // http://www.lawmix.ru/comm/1211. Data obrashcheniya 18.05 2015 goda.
Tsimbal L.M. Vestnik kriminalistiki. M., 2006. Vyp. 1(17). S. 78.
Efremov I.A. Iz praktiki privlecheniya advokatom spetsialistov dlya raz'yasneniya voprosov, trebuyushchikh spetsial'nykh znaniy // Advokat. 2008. № 3. S. 67.
Prikaz Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 4 maya 2011g. № 74 «Ob organizatsii raboty s obshchestvennymi pomoshchnikami sledovatelya v sisteme sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii» http://dokipedia.ru/document/5165352
Ryzhakov A.P. Raz'yasnenie pravovoy osnovy uchastiya ponyatykh v proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy // Konsul'tantPlyus, 2008. S. 43.
Osinov V.V. Est' li v Rossii sudebnyy nadzor? // Advokat. 2008. № 3. S. 65.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 21.12.2006 № 78-o06-96
Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie ot 23 iyunya 2015 goda po delu № 22-3715/2015. Primorskiy kraevoy sud, g. Vladivostok.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 dekabrya 2005 g. № 49-005-73 // SPS Konsul'tant.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 29.04.2004 delo № 49-o04-8
Federal'nyy zakon ot 5 iyunya 2007 g. N 87-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federal'nyy zakon "O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/12153934/#ixzz3drj36bSe
Kamynin I.D. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2006. № 4. S. 64.
Chupakhin R. Institut ponyatogo v ugolovnom protsesse nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii // Sledovatel'. 2003. № 4. S. 12-13.
Kicheev B. Vse li ponyatno ponyatym? // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1990. № 6. S. 34.
Rossinskiy S.B. Proizvodstvo obyska v forme spetsial'noy operatsii: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S. 85-86.
Zagvozdkin N.N. Ob uchastii ponyatykh v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Dal'nevostochnye kriminalisticheskie chteniya. Vyp. 4: Sb. nauch. tr. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostoch. un-ta, 1999. S. 58-59.
Khitrova O.V. Uchastie ponyatykh v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Spark, 1998. S. 29.
Kalugin A. Ponyatoy v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1998. № 10. S. 11.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. № 4. C. 45 - 50.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. 2013. № 2. C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V. O predmete nauki kriminalistiki // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. 2016. № 3. C. 309 - 322. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.3.18372.

References (transliteration):
Glushchenko O.P. Razvitie ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva o privlechenii ponyatykh dlya uchastiya v sledstvennykh deystviyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2015. № 6. C. 787-792. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.6.15593.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 19.04.2011 delo № 80-011-7
Ryabtseva E.V. Zloupotreblenie pravom v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstva. M., 2013. S. 43.
Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. M., 1988. S. 122.
Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1991. S. 193-194.
Yarovenko V.V. Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie fiksatsii khoda i rezul'tatov sledstvennogo deystviya // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld. Vyp. 3. T. 32. Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2013. S. 47-50.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 4 marta 2013 g. N 23-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) // Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/70326874/#ixzz3drkVJG6O
Federal'nym zakonom ot 4 iyulya 2003 goda № 92-FZ (red. ot 02.12.2008) "O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii". https://www.referent.ru/1/121881
Seleznev M. Ponyatoy ili svidetel'? // Zakonnost'. 1998. № 1. S. 35-36.
Bykov V. Institut ponyatykh v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 3. S. 72-74
Storozheva, A.N. Ponyatoy v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Avtoref. kandidat diss. yurid. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. S. 99. http://www.dissercat.com/content/ponyatoi-v-rossiiskom-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve#ixzz3drsIj8sk
Khitrova O.V. Razvitie instituta ponyatykh v UPK RF // http://www.lawmix.ru/comm/1211. Data obrashcheniya 18.05 2015 goda.
Tsimbal L.M. Vestnik kriminalistiki. M., 2006. Vyp. 1(17). S. 78.
Efremov I.A. Iz praktiki privlecheniya advokatom spetsialistov dlya raz'yasneniya voprosov, trebuyushchikh spetsial'nykh znaniy // Advokat. 2008. № 3. S. 67.
Prikaz Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 4 maya 2011g. № 74 «Ob organizatsii raboty s obshchestvennymi pomoshchnikami sledovatelya v sisteme sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii» http://dokipedia.ru/document/5165352
Ryzhakov A.P. Raz'yasnenie pravovoy osnovy uchastiya ponyatykh v proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy // Konsul'tantPlyus, 2008. S. 43.
Osinov V.V. Est' li v Rossii sudebnyy nadzor? // Advokat. 2008. № 3. S. 65.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 21.12.2006 № 78-o06-96
Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie ot 23 iyunya 2015 goda po delu № 22-3715/2015. Primorskiy kraevoy sud, g. Vladivostok.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 dekabrya 2005 g. № 49-005-73 // SPS Konsul'tant.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 29.04.2004 delo № 49-o04-8
Federal'nyy zakon ot 5 iyunya 2007 g. N 87-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federal'nyy zakon "O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/12153934/#ixzz3drj36bSe
Kamynin I.D. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2006. № 4. S. 64.
Chupakhin R. Institut ponyatogo v ugolovnom protsesse nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii // Sledovatel'. 2003. № 4. S. 12-13.
Kicheev B. Vse li ponyatno ponyatym? // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1990. № 6. S. 34.
Rossinskiy S.B. Proizvodstvo obyska v forme spetsial'noy operatsii: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S. 85-86.
Zagvozdkin N.N. Ob uchastii ponyatykh v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Dal'nevostochnye kriminalisticheskie chteniya. Vyp. 4: Sb. nauch. tr. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostoch. un-ta, 1999. S. 58-59.
Khitrova O.V. Uchastie ponyatykh v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Spark, 1998. S. 29.
Kalugin A. Ponyatoy v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1998. № 10. S. 11.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. № 4. C. 45 - 50.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. 2013. № 2. C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V. O predmete nauki kriminalistiki // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. 2016. № 3. C. 309 - 322. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.3.18372.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the judicial practice in cases that challenge the provisions of administrative regulations. In connection with the entry into force of the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation the practice is in its infancy, and we can see the transformation of the judicial interpretation of disputes in cases arising from public relations. Administrative Regulations establish the procedures for the implementation of certain types of state control, and as such, may limit the rights and legal interests of citizens and organizations. The object of this research is public relations arising in the sphere of protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens in the courts. The author carefully examines the features of the administrative regulations as regulatory legal acts. The scientific novelty of this research is substantiated by the author's approach to the establishment of the legal nature of administrative regulations, as well as identification of the prerequisites for increasing the quality of these legal regulations. Summarizing the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court, the author makes a number of proposals aimed at optimization of overcoming gaps in administrative regulations by means of judicial interpretation. Key findings of the study concern the issues of increase of efficiency of the administrative proceedings.

Ключевые слова: constitutional control, legal certainty, administrative jurisdiction, court, administrative regulations, legal regulation, normative legal act, judicial interpretation, administrative claim, public service

Библиография:
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.11.1997 № 17-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti postanovleniy Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 iyulya 1995 g. № 1090-1 GD «O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya Federal'nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O statuse sudey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii»» i ot 11 oktyabrya 1996 g. № 682-II GD «O poryadke primeneniya punkta 2 stat'i 855 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii»» // Ros. gaz. – 1997. – 22 noyab.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 31.03.2015 № 6-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 1 chasti 4 stat'i 2 Federal'nogo konstitutsionnogo zakona «O Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii» i abzatsa tret'ego podpunkta 1 punkta 1 stat'i 342 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy otkrytogo aktsionernogo obshchestva «Gazprom-neft'» // Ros. gaz. – 2015. – 3 apr.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29.11.2007 № 48 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov polnost'yu ili v chasti» // Ros. gaz. – 2007. – 2 dek.
Obshchee administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. Yu.N. Starilova. – Voronezh: VGU, 2007. – 848 s.
Administrativnyy reglament MVD Rossii po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi po vydache grazhdaninu Rossiyskoy Federatsii razresheniya na khranenie ognestrel'nogo gladkostvol'nogo dlinnostvol'nogo oruzhiya samooborony i patronov k nemu (bez prava nosheniya) : utv. prikazom MVD Rossii ot 02.05.2012 № 398 (po sost. na 30.12.2014) // Ros. gaz. – 2012. – 12 sent.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.11.2012 № AKPI12-1428 // BVS. – 2013. – № 5.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14.04.2011 № GKPI11-333.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26.02.2014 № AKPI13-1387.
Lazarev, V.V. Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya / V.V. Lazarev. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1974. – 184 s.
Kaufman, M.A. Probely v ugolovnom prave: ponyatie, prichiny, sposoby preodoleniya / M.A. Kaufman. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2007. – 304 s.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 02.02.1998 № 4-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punktov 10, 12 i 21 Pravil registratsii i snyatiya grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii s registratsionnogo ucheta po mestu prebyvaniya i po mestu zhitel'stva v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii, utverzhdennykh postanovleniem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 17 iyulya 1995 goda № 713 // Ros. gaz. – 1998. – 10 fev.
Pravila registratsii i snyatiya grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii s registratsionnogo ucheta po mestu prebyvaniya i po mestu zhitel'stva v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii : utv. post. Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.07.1995 № 713 (po sost. na 05.03.2015) // Ros. gaz. – 1995. – 27 iyulya.
O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii : post. Pravitel'stva RF ot 14.08.2002 № 599 // Ros. gaz. – 2002. – 21 avg.
Administrativnyy reglament predostavleniya Federal'noy migratsionnoy sluzhboy gosudarstvennoy uslugi po registratsionnomu uchetu grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii po mestu prebyvaniya i po mestu zhitel'stva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : utv. prikazom FMS Rossii ot 11.09.2012 № 288 (po sost. na 19.01.2015) // Ros. gaz. – 2013. – 17 apr.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Irkutskogo oblastnogo suda ot 13.08.2014 po delu № 33-6574/2014.
Reshenie po delu № 12-62/2015 / Arkhiv Laishevskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan.
Postanovlenie po delu № 12-451/2012 / Arkhiv MS SU № 1 g. Vyshnego Volochka Tverskoy oblasti.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28.12.2009 № GKPI09-1543.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Ul'yanovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 09.06.2015 po delu № 33-2350/2015.

References (transliteration):
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.11.1997 № 17-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti postanovleniy Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 iyulya 1995 g. № 1090-1 GD «O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya Federal'nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O statuse sudey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii»» i ot 11 oktyabrya 1996 g. № 682-II GD «O poryadke primeneniya punkta 2 stat'i 855 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii»» // Ros. gaz. – 1997. – 22 noyab.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 31.03.2015 № 6-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 1 chasti 4 stat'i 2 Federal'nogo konstitutsionnogo zakona «O Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii» i abzatsa tret'ego podpunkta 1 punkta 1 stat'i 342 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy otkrytogo aktsionernogo obshchestva «Gazprom-neft'» // Ros. gaz. – 2015. – 3 apr.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29.11.2007 № 48 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov polnost'yu ili v chasti» // Ros. gaz. – 2007. – 2 dek.
Obshchee administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. Yu.N. Starilova. – Voronezh: VGU, 2007. – 848 s.
Administrativnyy reglament MVD Rossii po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi po vydache grazhdaninu Rossiyskoy Federatsii razresheniya na khranenie ognestrel'nogo gladkostvol'nogo dlinnostvol'nogo oruzhiya samooborony i patronov k nemu (bez prava nosheniya) : utv. prikazom MVD Rossii ot 02.05.2012 № 398 (po sost. na 30.12.2014) // Ros. gaz. – 2012. – 12 sent.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.11.2012 № AKPI12-1428 // BVS. – 2013. – № 5.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14.04.2011 № GKPI11-333.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26.02.2014 № AKPI13-1387.
Lazarev, V.V. Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya / V.V. Lazarev. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1974. – 184 s.
Kaufman, M.A. Probely v ugolovnom prave: ponyatie, prichiny, sposoby preodoleniya / M.A. Kaufman. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2007. – 304 s.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 02.02.1998 № 4-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punktov 10, 12 i 21 Pravil registratsii i snyatiya grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii s registratsionnogo ucheta po mestu prebyvaniya i po mestu zhitel'stva v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii, utverzhdennykh postanovleniem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 17 iyulya 1995 goda № 713 // Ros. gaz. – 1998. – 10 fev.
Pravila registratsii i snyatiya grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii s registratsionnogo ucheta po mestu prebyvaniya i po mestu zhitel'stva v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii : utv. post. Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.07.1995 № 713 (po sost. na 05.03.2015) // Ros. gaz. – 1995. – 27 iyulya.
O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii : post. Pravitel'stva RF ot 14.08.2002 № 599 // Ros. gaz. – 2002. – 21 avg.
Administrativnyy reglament predostavleniya Federal'noy migratsionnoy sluzhboy gosudarstvennoy uslugi po registratsionnomu uchetu grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii po mestu prebyvaniya i po mestu zhitel'stva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : utv. prikazom FMS Rossii ot 11.09.2012 № 288 (po sost. na 19.01.2015) // Ros. gaz. – 2013. – 17 apr.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Irkutskogo oblastnogo suda ot 13.08.2014 po delu № 33-6574/2014.
Reshenie po delu № 12-62/2015 / Arkhiv Laishevskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan.
Postanovlenie po delu № 12-451/2012 / Arkhiv MS SU № 1 g. Vyshnego Volochka Tverskoy oblasti.
Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28.12.2009 № GKPI09-1543.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Ul'yanovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 09.06.2015 po delu № 33-2350/2015.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the place and role of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Soviet Union (RSFSR) and Russian Federation within judicial administration and internal systemic administration of the modern judicial authority. The author raises the question about the legal nature of the ruling positions of the Plenums of the Supreme Court of the Soviet Union (RSFSR) and Russian Federation, since there is no concurrence on this matter and the issue continues to remain controversial. The author comes to the conclusion that the status of the rulings of the of the Plenums of the Supreme Court of the Soviet Union (RSFSR) and Russian Federation is not correctly formulated within legislative acts. The competency of the Plenum – “de jure” is the interpretation and clarification of the acting legislation, while “de facto” is practically the current authority of judicial administration, which combines various branches of cognition and administration. The scientific novelty is established by the very posing of the question and by the fact that the goals and tasks in this article have not yet been approached from this perspective within Russian juridical science. The author makes an attempt to understand the process of activity of this collegial branch within judicial administration during the Soviet era and the internal systemic administration of the present time.

Ключевые слова: judicial community, modern era, Soviet, systemic administration, judicial administration, Plenum, Supreme court, juridical nature, interpretation and clarification, administrative body

Библиография:
Gusev A., Koldin V. Aktual'nye problemy informatizatsii sudov // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 3. S. 2.
Gur'ev A.A. Ob ustroenii verkhovnogo upravleniya v Rossii. SPb., 1893. S. 71.
Cherkasov K.V. K voprosu o soderzhanii ponyatiya «gosudarstvennoe upravlenie» v rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauke // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2008. № 11.
Zinov'ev A.A. Logicheskaya sotsiologiya. M., 2008. S. 102.
Gusev S.I. Rukovodyashchie raz'yasneniya Plenumov Verkhovnykh Sudov — vazhnoe sredstvo ukrepleniya sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti// Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR. 1984. №5. S.23.
Smirnov L.N. 50 let Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR // Verkhovnyy Sud SSSR. M., 1970. S. 9.
Sheynin Kh. B. Rukovodyashchie raz'yasneniya Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR — vazhnoe sredstvo ukrepleniya sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti // Verkhovnyy Sud SSSR / pod red. L.N. Smirnova, V.V. Kulikova, B.S. Nikiforova. M., 1974. S. 142. Mneniyu
Livshits R.Z. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava // Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 1997. S. 5.
Terebilov V.I. Sovetskiy sud. M., 1973. S.132.
Pigolkin A.S. Tolkovanie normativnykh aktov v SSSR. M., 1962. S. 131—150; Aleksandrov N. G. Sovetskoe trudovoe pravo. M., 1963. S. 121; Dobrovol'skaya T.N. Verkhovnyy Sud SSSR. M., 1964. S. 95.
Alekseev S. S. Problemy teorii prava. Sverdlovsk, 1972. T.2. S.196-197; Alekseev S.S. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom gosudarstve. M.,1966. S.129-130.
Bykov V.M. Novyy Zakon o sudakh obshchey yurisdiktsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnyy kommentariy (chast' 1) // Pravo i politika. 2011. N 12. S. 2042-2046.

References (transliteration):
Gusev A., Koldin V. Aktual'nye problemy informatizatsii sudov // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 3. S. 2.
Gur'ev A.A. Ob ustroenii verkhovnogo upravleniya v Rossii. SPb., 1893. S. 71.
Cherkasov K.V. K voprosu o soderzhanii ponyatiya «gosudarstvennoe upravlenie» v rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauke // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2008. № 11.
Zinov'ev A.A. Logicheskaya sotsiologiya. M., 2008. S. 102.
Gusev S.I. Rukovodyashchie raz'yasneniya Plenumov Verkhovnykh Sudov — vazhnoe sredstvo ukrepleniya sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti// Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR. 1984. №5. S.23.
Smirnov L.N. 50 let Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR // Verkhovnyy Sud SSSR. M., 1970. S. 9.
Sheynin Kh. B. Rukovodyashchie raz'yasneniya Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR — vazhnoe sredstvo ukrepleniya sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti // Verkhovnyy Sud SSSR / pod red. L.N. Smirnova, V.V. Kulikova, B.S. Nikiforova. M., 1974. S. 142. Mneniyu
Livshits R.Z. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava // Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava. M., 1997. S. 5.
Terebilov V.I. Sovetskiy sud. M., 1973. S.132.
Pigolkin A.S. Tolkovanie normativnykh aktov v SSSR. M., 1962. S. 131—150; Aleksandrov N. G. Sovetskoe trudovoe pravo. M., 1963. S. 121; Dobrovol'skaya T.N. Verkhovnyy Sud SSSR. M., 1964. S. 95.
Alekseev S. S. Problemy teorii prava. Sverdlovsk, 1972. T.2. S.196-197; Alekseev S.S. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom gosudarstve. M.,1966. S.129-130.
Bykov V.M. Novyy Zakon o sudakh obshchey yurisdiktsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnyy kommentariy (chast' 1) // Pravo i politika. 2011. N 12. S. 2042-2046.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is a review of the legal aspects of cases of «Furman v. Georgia», «Gregg v. Georgia» and other significant cases having influenced the development of the institution of the death penalty in the United States of America in the second half of the XX century. The author elaborates the history of the case of «Furman v. Georgia», discusses social and legal prerequisites for the imposition of a moratorium on the death penalty in 1972 and its abolition in 1976. A special attention is paid to the analysis of positions of judges of the Supreme Court of the United States and post-Furman trends. The main methods of the research are formal-legal and comparative-legal. The work is based on the analysis of the key cases of the Supreme Court of the United States. Significant emphasis is given to consideration of the evolution of the issue by using the historical method. The main conclusions of the research are the following: 1) the introduction of a temporary moratorium on the death penalty in the USA was a necessary stage in the legal evolution; 2) the pause was necessary for the reforming of criminal procedure legislation, solving urgent socio-legal problems connected with the death penalty. The novelty of this research consists of the fact that previously in Russian literature the issue of imposition and subsequent abolition of the moratorium on the death penalty in the United States has not been studied comprehensively. The author concludes that it is unlikely that in the future the question of the constitutionality of the death penalty in the US will come under the question, as there is a trend of improvement of legal procedure was set in the second half of the XXth century.

Ключевые слова: Furman v. Georgia, Miranda warning, Amendments to Constitution, U. S. Constitution, U. S. Supreme Court, Moratorium, Verdict, Death penalty, The United State of America, Gregg v. Georgia , Gregg v. Georgia, Furman v. Georgia, Miranda Warning, Amendments to Constitution, United States Constitution, Supreme Court, Moratorium, Sentence, Capital punishment, The United States

Библиография:
Baze v. Rees (No. 07–5439), 553 U.S. 35 (2008). URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-5439.ZS.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Brown v. Board of Education (No. 1), 347 U.S. 483 (1954). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=347&invol=483 (data obrashcheniya: 8.05.2014 g.).
Coker v. Georgia (No. 75–5444), 433 U.S. 584 (1977). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=433&page=584 (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Furman v. Georgia (No. 69–5003), 408 U.S. 238 (1972). URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=capital%20or%20death%20and%20penalty&url=/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0408_0238_ZC4.html (data obrashcheniya: 1–10.02.2014 g.).
Glass v. Louisiana (No. 84–6030), 471 U.S. 1080 (1985). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1080/ (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Gregg v. Georgia (No. 74–6257), 428 U.S. 153 (1976). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=428&page=153 (data obrashcheniya: 3–6.05.2014 g.).
In re Kemmler (No. 13 Original), 136 U.S. 436 (1890). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/136/436/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Kennedy v. Louisiana (No. 07-343), 554 U.S. 407 (2008). URL: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-343.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
McGautha v. California (No. 203), 402 U.S. 183 (1971). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/183/ (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Miranda v. Arizona (No. 759), 384 U.S. 436 (1966). URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/384/436v (data obrashcheniya: 4.05.2014 g.).
Ring v. Arizona (No. 01–488), 536 U.S. 584 (2002). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/584/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 7.02.2014 g.).
Roper v. Simmons (No. 03-633), 543 U.S. 551 (2005). URL: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-633.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 6.05.2014 g.).
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (No. 281), 402 U.S. 1 (1970).URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=402&invol=1 (data obrashcheniya: 8.05.2014 g.).
Thompson v. Oklahoma (No. 86–6169), 487 U.S. 815 (1988). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=487&page=815 (data obrashcheniya: 4.05.2014 g.).
Trop v. Dulles (No. 70), 356 U.S. 86 (1958). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=356&invol=86 (data obrashcheniya: 4.02.2014 g.).
Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/217/349/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Wilkerson v. Utah, 99 U.S. 130 (1879). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/99/130/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Banner S. The Death Penalty: an American History. USA, N.Y.: Harvard University Press, 2003. 385 p.
Garland D. America’s Death Penalty: Between Past and Present. USA, NY: New York University Press, 2011. 232 p.
Herda D.J. Furman v. Georgia: The Death Penalty Case. Enslow Publishers, Inc, 2011. 112 p.
Kaufman-Osborn T.V. From Noose to Needle: Capital Punishment and the Late Liberal State. USA: The University of Michigan Press, 2005. 251 p.
Parrish Michael E. The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment: Judging Death. USA, Washington: CQ Press, 2010. 483 p.
Roensch G. Furman v. Georgia: Cruel and Unusual Punishment (Great Supreme Court decisions). USA: Chelsea House Publishers, 2007. 112 p.
Stefoff R. Furman V. Georgia: Debating the Death Penalty. USA, NY.: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2007. 127 p.
Bedau H.A. Capital Punishment // The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics, 2005 (online — 2009).
Bye R.T. Recent History and Present Status of Capital Punishment in the United States // Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Aug., 1926), pp. 234-245.
Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The Death Penalty Cases: Furman v. Georgia, Jackson v. Georgia, Branch v. Texas, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) // 63 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 484 (1972), pp. 484–491.
Davis D.B. The Movement to Abolish Capital Punishment in America, 1787-1861 // The American Historical Review, Vol. 63, No. 1 (Oct., 1957), pp. 23–46.
Johnson D.T. American Capital Punishment in Comparative Perspective // Law & Social Inquiry, 2011, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp. 1033–1061.
Liebman James S. Slow Dancing with Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment, 1963–2006 // Columbia Law Review Vol. 107, No. 1 (Jan., 2007), pp. 1-130.
Paredes J.A. Capital Punishment in the USA // Anthropology Today, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Feb., 1993), p.16.
Polsby D.D. The Death of Capital Punishment? Furman v. Georgia // The Supreme Court Review, Vol. 1972 (1972), pp. 1-40.
NAACP LDF: [ofitsial'nyy sayt]. URL: http://www.naacpldf.org/ (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).

References (transliteration):
Baze v. Rees (No. 07–5439), 553 U.S. 35 (2008). URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-5439.ZS.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Brown v. Board of Education (No. 1), 347 U.S. 483 (1954). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=347&invol=483 (data obrashcheniya: 8.05.2014 g.).
Coker v. Georgia (No. 75–5444), 433 U.S. 584 (1977). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=433&page=584 (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Furman v. Georgia (No. 69–5003), 408 U.S. 238 (1972). URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=capital%20or%20death%20and%20penalty&url=/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0408_0238_ZC4.html (data obrashcheniya: 1–10.02.2014 g.).
Glass v. Louisiana (No. 84–6030), 471 U.S. 1080 (1985). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1080/ (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Gregg v. Georgia (No. 74–6257), 428 U.S. 153 (1976). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=428&page=153 (data obrashcheniya: 3–6.05.2014 g.).
In re Kemmler (No. 13 Original), 136 U.S. 436 (1890). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/136/436/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Kennedy v. Louisiana (No. 07-343), 554 U.S. 407 (2008). URL: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-343.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
McGautha v. California (No. 203), 402 U.S. 183 (1971). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/183/ (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Miranda v. Arizona (No. 759), 384 U.S. 436 (1966). URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/384/436v (data obrashcheniya: 4.05.2014 g.).
Ring v. Arizona (No. 01–488), 536 U.S. 584 (2002). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/584/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 7.02.2014 g.).
Roper v. Simmons (No. 03-633), 543 U.S. 551 (2005). URL: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-633.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 6.05.2014 g.).
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (No. 281), 402 U.S. 1 (1970).URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=402&invol=1 (data obrashcheniya: 8.05.2014 g.).
Thompson v. Oklahoma (No. 86–6169), 487 U.S. 815 (1988). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=487&page=815 (data obrashcheniya: 4.05.2014 g.).
Trop v. Dulles (No. 70), 356 U.S. 86 (1958). URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=356&invol=86 (data obrashcheniya: 4.02.2014 g.).
Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/217/349/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Wilkerson v. Utah, 99 U.S. 130 (1879). URL: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/99/130/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).
Banner S. The Death Penalty: an American History. USA, N.Y.: Harvard University Press, 2003. 385 p.
Garland D. America’s Death Penalty: Between Past and Present. USA, NY: New York University Press, 2011. 232 p.
Herda D.J. Furman v. Georgia: The Death Penalty Case. Enslow Publishers, Inc, 2011. 112 p.
Kaufman-Osborn T.V. From Noose to Needle: Capital Punishment and the Late Liberal State. USA: The University of Michigan Press, 2005. 251 p.
Parrish Michael E. The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment: Judging Death. USA, Washington: CQ Press, 2010. 483 p.
Roensch G. Furman v. Georgia: Cruel and Unusual Punishment (Great Supreme Court decisions). USA: Chelsea House Publishers, 2007. 112 p.
Stefoff R. Furman V. Georgia: Debating the Death Penalty. USA, NY.: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2007. 127 p.
Bedau H.A. Capital Punishment // The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics, 2005 (online — 2009).
Bye R.T. Recent History and Present Status of Capital Punishment in the United States // Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Aug., 1926), pp. 234-245.
Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The Death Penalty Cases: Furman v. Georgia, Jackson v. Georgia, Branch v. Texas, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) // 63 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 484 (1972), pp. 484–491.
Davis D.B. The Movement to Abolish Capital Punishment in America, 1787-1861 // The American Historical Review, Vol. 63, No. 1 (Oct., 1957), pp. 23–46.
Johnson D.T. American Capital Punishment in Comparative Perspective // Law & Social Inquiry, 2011, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp. 1033–1061.
Liebman James S. Slow Dancing with Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment, 1963–2006 // Columbia Law Review Vol. 107, No. 1 (Jan., 2007), pp. 1-130.
Paredes J.A. Capital Punishment in the USA // Anthropology Today, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Feb., 1993), p.16.
Polsby D.D. The Death of Capital Punishment? Furman v. Georgia // The Supreme Court Review, Vol. 1972 (1972), pp. 1-40.
NAACP LDF: [ofitsial'nyy sayt]. URL: http://www.naacpldf.org/ (data obrashcheniya: 5.05.2014 g.).

Аннотация: The article is devoted to possibilities of the disagreement of the professional judge (or a chamber) with a guilty verdict of the jury and procedural mechanisms of realization of such disagreement.The article discusses three procedural models of realization of disagreement of the professional judge with a guilty verdict of the jury: the abolishment of the verdict by a chief judge (or a chamber); the adherence of a chamber of professional judges to the minority of jurors; the annulment of the verdict in the Court of Appeal.The first model is characterized by the ability of a chief judge to cancel the jury's verdict and give a sentence contrary to it (the Anglo-American procedure in the jury trial) or discharge the jury and begin the process again (continental process).The second model is enshrined in Belgian legislation and alleges the possibility of summing up votes of professional judges with the minority of jurors (who voted for acquit) and give an acquittal verdict by a simple majority of votes. The author believes that this procedure is a guarantee following from the presumption of innocence.The third model of a disagreement with a guilty verdict of the jury arises from specifics of an appeal in countries with Anglo-Saxon type of criminal proceeding, allowing the abolition of a guilty verdict on certain foundations. The author examines the legislative regulation of the possibility of disagreement of the presiding judge with a guilty verdict according to the CPC of the Russian Federation and certain problems arising in the judicial practice.

Ключевые слова: jurors, jury verdict, incontestability of the verdict, chief judge, sentence, acquittal verdict, guilty verdict, acquittal sentence, abolishment of the verdict, judgment

Библиография:
UPK Bel'gii (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 fevralya 2016 g.).
Sud prisyazhnykh: Nauchno-prakticheskiy sbornik / Pod red. L.S. Khaldeeva. M.: Rossiyskaya pravovaya akademiya MYu RF, 1994. S. 41.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13 oktyabrya 2009 g. N 1096-O-O // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Nasonov S.A. Norvezhskaya model' proizvodstva v sude prisyazhnykh// Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii. 2015. № 45-46. S. 43.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17 noyabrya 2010 g. № 93-O10-16sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 7 oktyabrya 2010 g. № 93-O10-16sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 avgusta 2010 g. № 30-O10-5SP // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22 maya 2008 g. № 68-O08-1sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Geyntse R. Ocherk angliyskogo sudoustroystva v svyazi s sudom prisyazhnykh. SPb., 1896. S. 65.
Butov V.N. Ugolovnyy protsess Avstrii. Krasnoyarsk. 1988.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15 sentyabrya 2015 g. № 2-APU15-4sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 avgusta 2015 g. № 45-APU15-34sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Aparova T.V. Sudy i sudebnyy protsess Velikobritanii. Angliya, Uel's, Shotlandiya. M.: Institut mezhdunarodnogo prava i ekonomiki. Izdatel'stvo «Triada, Ltd», 1996. S. 90.
UPK Gruzii ot 09.10.2009 g. (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 fevralya 2016 g.).
Federal'nye pravila ugolovnogo protsessa (Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) po sostoyaniyu na 4 marta 2013 g. // URL: http://www.law.ku.edu/research/frcriVII.htm(poslednee poseshchenie – 1 fevralya 2016 g.).
Forsyth W. History of Trial by Jury. New York. 1875.

References (transliteration):
UPK Bel'gii (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 fevralya 2016 g.).
Sud prisyazhnykh: Nauchno-prakticheskiy sbornik / Pod red. L.S. Khaldeeva. M.: Rossiyskaya pravovaya akademiya MYu RF, 1994. S. 41.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13 oktyabrya 2009 g. N 1096-O-O // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Nasonov S.A. Norvezhskaya model' proizvodstva v sude prisyazhnykh// Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii. 2015. № 45-46. S. 43.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17 noyabrya 2010 g. № 93-O10-16sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 7 oktyabrya 2010 g. № 93-O10-16sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 avgusta 2010 g. № 30-O10-5SP // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22 maya 2008 g. № 68-O08-1sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Geyntse R. Ocherk angliyskogo sudoustroystva v svyazi s sudom prisyazhnykh. SPb., 1896. S. 65.
Butov V.N. Ugolovnyy protsess Avstrii. Krasnoyarsk. 1988.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15 sentyabrya 2015 g. № 2-APU15-4sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 avgusta 2015 g. № 45-APU15-34sp // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Aparova T.V. Sudy i sudebnyy protsess Velikobritanii. Angliya, Uel's, Shotlandiya. M.: Institut mezhdunarodnogo prava i ekonomiki. Izdatel'stvo «Triada, Ltd», 1996. S. 90.
UPK Gruzii ot 09.10.2009 g. (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 fevralya 2016 g.).
Federal'nye pravila ugolovnogo protsessa (Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) po sostoyaniyu na 4 marta 2013 g. // URL: http://www.law.ku.edu/research/frcriVII.htm(poslednee poseshchenie – 1 fevralya 2016 g.).
Forsyth W. History of Trial by Jury. New York. 1875.

Аннотация: The article touches upon certain issues of labor dispute-settlement with participation of a foreign element within the BRICS countries on the example of Brazil and China – two countries that have diametrically opposite views on the approaches to such a settlement, while reaching, at times, similar results. The author's attention is concentrated on the litigation and conciliation-arbitration methods of resolving disputes in the context of the court–based and out-of-court (prejudicial) forms of settlement, as well as subjective-objective predetermination of any processes. Scientific novelty of the research is determined by the fact that this work is essentially the first comprehensive and systematic study of the problems of legal framework of labor relations complicated by a foreign element within the BRICS countries in modern conditions. The problems of Russia and foreign member-states of the BRICS - Brazil, India, China and South Africa – have been recently attracting the attention of economists, scientists, and politicians. However, the article contains the results of solving fundamentally different tasks, thus current scientific material and labor laws two of the five BRICS countries have been collected and analyzed in the context of labor dispute-settlement within their legal orders.

Ключевые слова: out-of-court settlement, BRICS, Brazil, China, Labor law, Foreign element, labor disputes settlement, settlement in court, ILO Conventions, adjudication

Библиография:
Zakon KNR ot 29.12.2007 g. «O mediatsii i arbitrazhe trudovykh sporov». // Zako-nodatel'stvo Kitaya. Sotsial'noe pravo. URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/social_law/law_labour_dispute_mediation_arbitration (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015) i Law of the People's Republic of China on Labor-dispute Mediation and Arbitration (Adopted at the 31st Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Tenth National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China on December 29, 2007 and promulgated by Order of the Presi-dent of the People’s Republic of China No.80 on May 1, 2008). URL: http://www.cietac.org/index/references/Laws/47607b5418c9657f001.cms (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Razreshenie trudovykh sporov v KNR. URL: http://sbf-group.com/articles/china/labour_disputes_resolution/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Rudenko V.N. Kitay. // Uchastie grazhdan v otpravlenii pravosudiya v sovremennom mire. Kitay. URL: http://www.ifp.uran.ru/netcat_files/multifile/789/Kitay.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2015)
Vystorop E. Sud'ba liberal'nykh reform v sfere regulirovaniya truda. // Srav-nitel'noe trudovoe pravo.-2009.-№ 2. URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2010/01/20/1229135061/China_2_2009_T1_B2.pdf (data obrashcheniya 05.05.2015).
Litvinova S.F. Primirenie kak traditsionnyy metod razresheniya sporov v KNR. // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess.-2011.-№ 3.-S. 36-39.
Legal guide: business in Brazil. Coordinated by Durval de Noronha Goyos, Jr. 7. ed. São Paulo: Observador Legal, 2008. P. 187. URL: http://www.noronhaadvogados.com.br/guia/legalguide-7.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Decreto 1572/95 de 28 de julho de 1995. URL: http://presrepublica.jusbrasil.com.br/legislacao/112566/decreto-1572-95 (data obrashcheniya: 19.95.2015)
Santiago A. Cueto. The time has come to allow mediation of labour disputes in Brazil. URL: http://brazillawadvisor.com/the-time-has-come-to-allow-mediation-of-labor-disputes-in-brazil/ (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2015)
Konstitutsiya Federativnoy Respubliki Braziliya. Konstitutsii gosudarstv Ame-riki: V 3 t. / pod red. d.yu.n., prof. T.Ya. Khabrievoy. – T. 3: Yuzhnaya Amerika. – M.: Institut Zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2006.-S. 199-201.
Belikova K.M., Ifraimov V.Yu. Gosudarstvennye predpriyatiya v stranakh BRIKS: opyt Brazilii, Rossii, Kitaya i Yuzhnoy Afriki. // Advokat. – 2013.-№ 5. – S. 33-46.
Jorge Sappia. Justicia Laboral y medios alternativos de solución de conflictos colectivos e individuales del trabajo. Serie Conferencia Interamericana de Ministros del Trabajo. Proyecto CIMT-OIT. Documento de Trabajo Nº 149. P. 10. Organización Internacional del Trabajo 2002. Primera Edición. URL: http://white.oit.org.pe/cimt/documetospdf/149e.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2015)
Belikova K.M., Begdzhieva Ts.A., Romazanov A.A. Sozdanie pravovoy osnovy media-tsii v raznosstemnykh pravoporyadkakh stran BRIKS: opyt Brazilii i Indii. // Zakonodatel'-stvo i ekonomika. – 2015.-№ 4. – S. 63-68.
Kozyrin A.N. Administrativnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran: ucheb. posobie. – M.: SPARK, 1996. – S. 24, 25. (229 s.).
Kiselev A.Ya. Zarubezhnoe trudovoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya VUZov. – M.: Izd-vo NORMA (IG NORMA-INFRA-M), 2000.-S. 165-166.
Prinyat na 8-m zasedanii Postoyannogo komiteta VSNP vos'mogo sozyva 5 iyulya 1994 g. URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/social_law/law_labour (data obrashcheniya: 18.09.2014); Labour Law of the People's Republic of China (adopted at the 8th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the 8th National People's Congress on July 5, 1994 and promulgated by Order № 28 of the Presi-dent of the People's Republic of China). URL: http://www.npc.gov.cn/ englishnpc/Law/2007-12/12/content_1383754.htm (data obrashcheniya: 21.08.2014).
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Act No. 14 of 1947 [11th March, 1947]. URL: http://pblabour.gov.in/pdf/acts_rules/inustrial_disputes_act_1947.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 14.05.2015)
Vseobshchaya istoriya gosudarstva i prava noveyshego vremeni. / pod red. Kashchenko S.G.-Simferopol': DOLYa, 2006. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Pravo/katshenko/15.php (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2015)
Labour Relations Act No. 66 of 1995. (Act No. 66 of 1995), as amended 2002. URL: http://www.labour.gov.za/DOL/legislation/acts/labour-relations/read-online/amended-labour-relations-act (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015) (First publ. in Government gazette No. 16861, 13 De-cember of 1995).
Salvatore Paul. Worlds of work: Employment dispute resolution systems across the globe. Hosted by St. Johns University School of law and Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge Universi-ty. URL: http://www.proskauer.com/files/Event/f4ce52c8-78cb-4634-993f-6a188b827e63/Presentation/EventAttachment/18218ba8-fba8-4d9d-85e7-717a66791533/Agenda.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2015)
Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 197-FZ. // SZ RF ot 7 yanvarya 2002 g. № 1 (chast' I) st. 3.
Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho, aprovada pelo Decreto-Lei № 5.452, de 1º de maio de 1943 (v red. Lei n 13.015, de 21 de julho de 2014) // DOU. – 09.08.1943. URL: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2014/Lei/L13015.htm (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 noyabrya 2002 g. № 138-FZ. // SZ RF ot 18 noyabrya 2002 g. № 46 st. 4532.
Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China of 9 April 1991 (and amended for the first time according to the “Decision on Amending the ‘Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China’” as adopted at the 30th Session of the Standing Committee of the 10th National People’s Congress on 28 October 2007, and amended for the second time according to the “Deci-sion on Amending the ‘Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China’” as adopted at the 28th Session of the Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress on 31 August 2012). URL: http://www.inchinalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/PRC-Civil-Procedure-Law-2012.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2015); Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks KNR (prinyat na 4-y sessii VSNP 7-go sozyva 9 aprelya 1991 g., izmenen v sootvetstvii s Resheniem Postoyan-nogo komiteta VSNP 10-go sozyva «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks KNR» 28 oktyabrya 2007 g.). URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/procedural_law/law_civil_procedure (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2015).
Alenina I.V. Kollizii v trudovom prave. Avtoref. diss... kand. yurid. nauk.-Tomsk, 2000.
Vilkova N.G. Dogovornoe pravo v mezhdunarodnom oborote. – M.: «Statut». – 2002.-S. 96.
Zaklyuchena v g. Bryussele 27.09.1968. // Iz informatsionnogo banka «Mezhdunarod-noe pravo». URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=INT;n=4862 (19.09.2015)
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. // OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1–23.
Ermakova E.P. Unifikatsiya grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v Evropeyskom Soyuze. – M.: RUDN, 2014.-S. 32, 36 i dr.
Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe grazhdansko-protsessual'noe pravo: ponyatie, pred-met i sistema. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – 2013-№ 4. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_10362.html (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2015)

References (transliteration):
Zakon KNR ot 29.12.2007 g. «O mediatsii i arbitrazhe trudovykh sporov». // Zako-nodatel'stvo Kitaya. Sotsial'noe pravo. URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/social_law/law_labour_dispute_mediation_arbitration (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015) i Law of the People's Republic of China on Labor-dispute Mediation and Arbitration (Adopted at the 31st Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Tenth National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China on December 29, 2007 and promulgated by Order of the Presi-dent of the People’s Republic of China No.80 on May 1, 2008). URL: http://www.cietac.org/index/references/Laws/47607b5418c9657f001.cms (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Razreshenie trudovykh sporov v KNR. URL: http://sbf-group.com/articles/china/labour_disputes_resolution/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Rudenko V.N. Kitay. // Uchastie grazhdan v otpravlenii pravosudiya v sovremennom mire. Kitay. URL: http://www.ifp.uran.ru/netcat_files/multifile/789/Kitay.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2015)
Vystorop E. Sud'ba liberal'nykh reform v sfere regulirovaniya truda. // Srav-nitel'noe trudovoe pravo.-2009.-№ 2. URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2010/01/20/1229135061/China_2_2009_T1_B2.pdf (data obrashcheniya 05.05.2015).
Litvinova S.F. Primirenie kak traditsionnyy metod razresheniya sporov v KNR. // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess.-2011.-№ 3.-S. 36-39.
Legal guide: business in Brazil. Coordinated by Durval de Noronha Goyos, Jr. 7. ed. São Paulo: Observador Legal, 2008. P. 187. URL: http://www.noronhaadvogados.com.br/guia/legalguide-7.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Decreto 1572/95 de 28 de julho de 1995. URL: http://presrepublica.jusbrasil.com.br/legislacao/112566/decreto-1572-95 (data obrashcheniya: 19.95.2015)
Santiago A. Cueto. The time has come to allow mediation of labour disputes in Brazil. URL: http://brazillawadvisor.com/the-time-has-come-to-allow-mediation-of-labor-disputes-in-brazil/ (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2015)
Konstitutsiya Federativnoy Respubliki Braziliya. Konstitutsii gosudarstv Ame-riki: V 3 t. / pod red. d.yu.n., prof. T.Ya. Khabrievoy. – T. 3: Yuzhnaya Amerika. – M.: Institut Zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2006.-S. 199-201.
Belikova K.M., Ifraimov V.Yu. Gosudarstvennye predpriyatiya v stranakh BRIKS: opyt Brazilii, Rossii, Kitaya i Yuzhnoy Afriki. // Advokat. – 2013.-№ 5. – S. 33-46.
Jorge Sappia. Justicia Laboral y medios alternativos de solución de conflictos colectivos e individuales del trabajo. Serie Conferencia Interamericana de Ministros del Trabajo. Proyecto CIMT-OIT. Documento de Trabajo Nº 149. P. 10. Organización Internacional del Trabajo 2002. Primera Edición. URL: http://white.oit.org.pe/cimt/documetospdf/149e.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2015)
Belikova K.M., Begdzhieva Ts.A., Romazanov A.A. Sozdanie pravovoy osnovy media-tsii v raznosstemnykh pravoporyadkakh stran BRIKS: opyt Brazilii i Indii. // Zakonodatel'-stvo i ekonomika. – 2015.-№ 4. – S. 63-68.
Kozyrin A.N. Administrativnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran: ucheb. posobie. – M.: SPARK, 1996. – S. 24, 25. (229 s.).
Kiselev A.Ya. Zarubezhnoe trudovoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya VUZov. – M.: Izd-vo NORMA (IG NORMA-INFRA-M), 2000.-S. 165-166.
Prinyat na 8-m zasedanii Postoyannogo komiteta VSNP vos'mogo sozyva 5 iyulya 1994 g. URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/social_law/law_labour (data obrashcheniya: 18.09.2014); Labour Law of the People's Republic of China (adopted at the 8th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the 8th National People's Congress on July 5, 1994 and promulgated by Order № 28 of the Presi-dent of the People's Republic of China). URL: http://www.npc.gov.cn/ englishnpc/Law/2007-12/12/content_1383754.htm (data obrashcheniya: 21.08.2014).
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Act No. 14 of 1947 [11th March, 1947]. URL: http://pblabour.gov.in/pdf/acts_rules/inustrial_disputes_act_1947.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 14.05.2015)
Vseobshchaya istoriya gosudarstva i prava noveyshego vremeni. / pod red. Kashchenko S.G.-Simferopol': DOLYa, 2006. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Pravo/katshenko/15.php (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2015)
Labour Relations Act No. 66 of 1995. (Act No. 66 of 1995), as amended 2002. URL: http://www.labour.gov.za/DOL/legislation/acts/labour-relations/read-online/amended-labour-relations-act (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015) (First publ. in Government gazette No. 16861, 13 De-cember of 1995).
Salvatore Paul. Worlds of work: Employment dispute resolution systems across the globe. Hosted by St. Johns University School of law and Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge Universi-ty. URL: http://www.proskauer.com/files/Event/f4ce52c8-78cb-4634-993f-6a188b827e63/Presentation/EventAttachment/18218ba8-fba8-4d9d-85e7-717a66791533/Agenda.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2015)
Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 197-FZ. // SZ RF ot 7 yanvarya 2002 g. № 1 (chast' I) st. 3.
Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho, aprovada pelo Decreto-Lei № 5.452, de 1º de maio de 1943 (v red. Lei n 13.015, de 21 de julho de 2014) // DOU. – 09.08.1943. URL: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2014/Lei/L13015.htm (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015)
Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 noyabrya 2002 g. № 138-FZ. // SZ RF ot 18 noyabrya 2002 g. № 46 st. 4532.
Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China of 9 April 1991 (and amended for the first time according to the “Decision on Amending the ‘Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China’” as adopted at the 30th Session of the Standing Committee of the 10th National People’s Congress on 28 October 2007, and amended for the second time according to the “Deci-sion on Amending the ‘Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China’” as adopted at the 28th Session of the Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress on 31 August 2012). URL: http://www.inchinalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/PRC-Civil-Procedure-Law-2012.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2015); Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks KNR (prinyat na 4-y sessii VSNP 7-go sozyva 9 aprelya 1991 g., izmenen v sootvetstvii s Resheniem Postoyan-nogo komiteta VSNP 10-go sozyva «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks KNR» 28 oktyabrya 2007 g.). URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/procedural_law/law_civil_procedure (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2015).
Alenina I.V. Kollizii v trudovom prave. Avtoref. diss... kand. yurid. nauk.-Tomsk, 2000.
Vilkova N.G. Dogovornoe pravo v mezhdunarodnom oborote. – M.: «Statut». – 2002.-S. 96.
Zaklyuchena v g. Bryussele 27.09.1968. // Iz informatsionnogo banka «Mezhdunarod-noe pravo». URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=INT;n=4862 (19.09.2015)
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. // OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1–23.
Ermakova E.P. Unifikatsiya grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v Evropeyskom Soyuze. – M.: RUDN, 2014.-S. 32, 36 i dr.
Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe grazhdansko-protsessual'noe pravo: ponyatie, pred-met i sistema. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – 2013-№ 4. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_10362.html (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2015)

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the public relations pertaining to executions of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The article examines the questions of juridical power  of the decisions of the Constitutions Court of the Russian Federation, their direct effect, the legal mechanism of the execution of the decisions of the branches of constitutional review, including the duties of the competent branches on amendments to the legislation in accord with the legal positions of the Constitutional Court, as well as the questions of responsibility for failure to carry out the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The author concludes that the current legislation does not provide the order of implementation of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, but does hold responsible the government branches and officials for execution of the normative legal acts in accordance with the Constitution and the legal position of the Constitutional Court that are ruled by the court as unconstitutional. Due to this fact, there is a need for correction of the current legislation that regulates the questions of execution of the decisions of the Constitutional Court.

Ключевые слова: Rights, Responsibility, Constitution, Constitutional Court, Judicial system, Constitutional review, Judicial authority, Efficiency, Execution, Liberties

Библиография:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.10.2007 № 229-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 08.10.2007. № 41. St. 4849. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Bondar' N. S. Normativno-doktrinal'naya priroda resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF kak istochnikov prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. № 4.
Kokotov A. N. Ispolnenie resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 5. S. 90–101. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Petrov A. A. Pravovaya osnova organizatsii i deyatel'nosti Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii: tendentsii i perspektivy modernizatsii // Konstitutsionnoe pravo i politika: Sb. materialov mezhdunar. nauch. konf.: Yuridicheskiy fakul'tet MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, 28–30 marta 2012 g. / S. A. Avak'yan, D. S. Agapov, N. I. Akuev i dr.; otv. red. S. A. Avak'yan. M.: Yurist, 2012. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Omarov S. M. Problemy ispolneniya Federal'nym Sobraniem resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. № 1. S. 52–58. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Aleksandrova M. A. Puti razresheniya problemy neispolneniya aktov Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2014. № 11. S. 35–39. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Sterkin F., Ebzeev B. Za vse eti gody ni odnomu sudu ne ponadobilis' garantii neprikosnovennosti // Strana.ru. 17.12.2001. URL: http://www.strana.ru/text/stories/01/11/22/2076/94679.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Morshchakova T. G. Rossiyskoe pravosudie v kontekste sudebnoy reformy. M., 2004.
Mazurov A. V. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu konstitutsionnomu zakonu «O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii». 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Chastnoe pravo, 2009. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Troshev A. Prinyatie zakona o mekhanizme ispolneniya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe pravo: Vostochnoe obozrenie. 2002. № 2 (39). S. 40.
Federal'nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon ot 15.12.2001 № 4-FKZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Federal'nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon “O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii”» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 17.12.2001. № 51. St. 4824. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25.01.2001 № 1-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya punkta 2 stat'i 1070 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan I. V. Bogdanova, A. B. Zernova, S. I. Kal'yanova i N. V. Trukhanova» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 12.02.2001. № 7. St. 700. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 03.06.1996 № 803 «Ob Osnovnykh polozheniyakh regional'noy politiki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 03.06.1996. № 23. St. 2756. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13.11.1995 № 13-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti pyatoy stat'i 209 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa RSFSR v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan R. N. Samigullinoy i A. A. Apanasenko» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 20.11.1995. № 47. St. 4551. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Malyushin A. A. Ukaz. soch. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Akademicheskiy kurs: V 2 t. / Pod red. prof. M. N. Marchenko. M.: Zertsalo, 1998. T. 2: Teoriya prava.
Gadzhiev G. A. Realizatsiya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. Konferentsiya po monitoringu zakonodatel'stva i pravoprimeneniya v RF. Sankt-Peterburg, 25 iyunya 2010 g. URL: http://rapsinews.ru/judicial_analyst/20100629/250313343.html.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 04.04.2002 № 8-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy Federal'nogo zakona “Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii” v svyazi s zaprosami Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya (Il Tumen) Respubliki Sakha (Yakutiya) i Soveta Respubliki Gosudarstvennogo Soveta – Khase Respubliki Adygeya» // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 2002. № 5. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 19.04.2001 «Po khodataystvu polnomochnogo predstavitelya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v Privolzhskom federal'nom okruge ob ofitsial'nom raz'yasnenii opredeleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 iyunya 2000 goda po zaprosu gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy o proverke sootvetstviya Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii otdel'nykh polozheniy konstitutsiy Respubliki Adygeya, Respubliki Bashkortostan, Respubliki Ingushetiya, Respubliki Komi, Respubliki Severnaya Osetiya – Alaniya i Respubliki Tatarstan» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2001. № 20. St. 2059. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Kommentariy k Federal'nomu konstitutsionnomu zakonu «O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (postateynyy) / Yu. A. Andreeva, V. V. Balytnikov, N. S. Bondar' i dr.; pod red. G. A. Gadzhieva. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.10.1999 № 184-FZ (red. ot 25.12.2012) «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (s izm. i dop., vstupayushchimi v silu s 27.01.2013) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 18.10.1999. № 42. St. 5005. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.05.2012 № 11-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya abzatsa vtorogo chasti pervoy stat'i 446 Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan F. Kh. Gumerovoy i Yu. A. Shikunova» // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 2012. № 4. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Malyushin A. A. Konstitutsionno-sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy teorii i praktiki: Monografiya. M.: Yurist, 2013. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Vasilevich G. A. Realizatsiya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Respubliki Belarus' – vazhnoe uslovie formirovaniya sovremennoy pravovoy sistemy // Natsional'naya gosudarstvennost' i evropeyskie integratsionnye protsessy: Sb. nauch. tr. V 2 t. / Belorus. gos. un-t. Minsk, 2008. T. 1: Natsional'noe zakonodatel'stvo i ego garmonizatsiya s pravom Evropeyskogo soyuza.
Nechaeva Zh. V. Voprosy effektivnosti ispolneniya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2008. № 5. S. 24–30. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Doklad o rezul'tatakh monitoringa pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2012 god. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Doklad o rezul'tatakh monitoringa pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2013 god. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Zor'kin V. D. Rossiya i Konstitutsiya v XXI veke. Vzglyad s Il'inki. M., 2007.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 20.05.2011 № 657 (red. ot 25.07.2014) «O monitoringe pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (vmeste s «Polozheniem o monitoringe pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii») // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 23.05.2011. № 21. St. 2930. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Poslanie Prezidenta RF Federal'nomu Sobraniyu ot 05.11.2008 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 06.11.2008. № 230. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Vstavskaya I. M., Savchenko S. A. Ispolnitel'noe proizvodstvo: Ucheb. posobie. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2010. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.10.2007 № 229-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 08.10.2007. № 41. St. 4849. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Bondar' N. S. Normativno-doktrinal'naya priroda resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF kak istochnikov prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. № 4.
Kokotov A. N. Ispolnenie resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 5. S. 90–101. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Petrov A. A. Pravovaya osnova organizatsii i deyatel'nosti Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii: tendentsii i perspektivy modernizatsii // Konstitutsionnoe pravo i politika: Sb. materialov mezhdunar. nauch. konf.: Yuridicheskiy fakul'tet MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, 28–30 marta 2012 g. / S. A. Avak'yan, D. S. Agapov, N. I. Akuev i dr.; otv. red. S. A. Avak'yan. M.: Yurist, 2012. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Omarov S. M. Problemy ispolneniya Federal'nym Sobraniem resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. № 1. S. 52–58. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Aleksandrova M. A. Puti razresheniya problemy neispolneniya aktov Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2014. № 11. S. 35–39. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Sterkin F., Ebzeev B. Za vse eti gody ni odnomu sudu ne ponadobilis' garantii neprikosnovennosti // Strana.ru. 17.12.2001. URL: http://www.strana.ru/text/stories/01/11/22/2076/94679.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Morshchakova T. G. Rossiyskoe pravosudie v kontekste sudebnoy reformy. M., 2004.
Mazurov A. V. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu konstitutsionnomu zakonu «O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii». 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Chastnoe pravo, 2009. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015).
Troshev A. Prinyatie zakona o mekhanizme ispolneniya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe pravo: Vostochnoe obozrenie. 2002. № 2 (39). S. 40.
Federal'nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon ot 15.12.2001 № 4-FKZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Federal'nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon “O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii”» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 17.12.2001. № 51. St. 4824. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25.01.2001 № 1-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya punkta 2 stat'i 1070 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan I. V. Bogdanova, A. B. Zernova, S. I. Kal'yanova i N. V. Trukhanova» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 12.02.2001. № 7. St. 700. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 03.06.1996 № 803 «Ob Osnovnykh polozheniyakh regional'noy politiki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 03.06.1996. № 23. St. 2756. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13.11.1995 № 13-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti pyatoy stat'i 209 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa RSFSR v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan R. N. Samigullinoy i A. A. Apanasenko» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 20.11.1995. № 47. St. 4551. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Malyushin A. A. Ukaz. soch. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Akademicheskiy kurs: V 2 t. / Pod red. prof. M. N. Marchenko. M.: Zertsalo, 1998. T. 2: Teoriya prava.
Gadzhiev G. A. Realizatsiya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. Konferentsiya po monitoringu zakonodatel'stva i pravoprimeneniya v RF. Sankt-Peterburg, 25 iyunya 2010 g. URL: http://rapsinews.ru/judicial_analyst/20100629/250313343.html.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 04.04.2002 № 8-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy Federal'nogo zakona “Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii” v svyazi s zaprosami Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya (Il Tumen) Respubliki Sakha (Yakutiya) i Soveta Respubliki Gosudarstvennogo Soveta – Khase Respubliki Adygeya» // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 2002. № 5. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 19.04.2001 «Po khodataystvu polnomochnogo predstavitelya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v Privolzhskom federal'nom okruge ob ofitsial'nom raz'yasnenii opredeleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 iyunya 2000 goda po zaprosu gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy o proverke sootvetstviya Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii otdel'nykh polozheniy konstitutsiy Respubliki Adygeya, Respubliki Bashkortostan, Respubliki Ingushetiya, Respubliki Komi, Respubliki Severnaya Osetiya – Alaniya i Respubliki Tatarstan» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2001. № 20. St. 2059. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Kommentariy k Federal'nomu konstitutsionnomu zakonu «O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (postateynyy) / Yu. A. Andreeva, V. V. Balytnikov, N. S. Bondar' i dr.; pod red. G. A. Gadzhieva. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.10.1999 № 184-FZ (red. ot 25.12.2012) «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (s izm. i dop., vstupayushchimi v silu s 27.01.2013) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 18.10.1999. № 42. St. 5005. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.05.2012 № 11-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya abzatsa vtorogo chasti pervoy stat'i 446 Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan F. Kh. Gumerovoy i Yu. A. Shikunova» // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 2012. № 4. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Malyushin A. A. Konstitutsionno-sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy teorii i praktiki: Monografiya. M.: Yurist, 2013. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Vasilevich G. A. Realizatsiya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Respubliki Belarus' – vazhnoe uslovie formirovaniya sovremennoy pravovoy sistemy // Natsional'naya gosudarstvennost' i evropeyskie integratsionnye protsessy: Sb. nauch. tr. V 2 t. / Belorus. gos. un-t. Minsk, 2008. T. 1: Natsional'noe zakonodatel'stvo i ego garmonizatsiya s pravom Evropeyskogo soyuza.
Nechaeva Zh. V. Voprosy effektivnosti ispolneniya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2008. № 5. S. 24–30. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Doklad o rezul'tatakh monitoringa pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2012 god. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Doklad o rezul'tatakh monitoringa pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2013 god. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Zor'kin V. D. Rossiya i Konstitutsiya v XXI veke. Vzglyad s Il'inki. M., 2007.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 20.05.2011 № 657 (red. ot 25.07.2014) «O monitoringe pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (vmeste s «Polozheniem o monitoringe pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii») // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 23.05.2011. № 21. St. 2930. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Poslanie Prezidenta RF Federal'nomu Sobraniyu ot 05.11.2008 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 06.11.2008. № 230. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).
Vstavskaya I. M., Savchenko S. A. Ispolnitel'noe proizvodstvo: Ucheb. posobie. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2010. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2015).

Аннотация: This article presents the generalized analysis of the e-justice systems implemented and operating in the foreign countries, which characterize main trends of development of this process in the world. The author examines the most successful projects of e-justice systems on Singapore, Turkey, Croatia, and Belgium. The key principles of functioning of this systems, as well as characteristic features of each system are being determined. It is ascertained that the development of e-justice systems in foreign countries is taking place within the framework of such large projects as e-management, and complies with the general goal of simplification of cooperation between the citizens and government authorities. In the course of this research, the author indicates the positive, as well as the negative aspects of implementation of the e-justice system. In terms of using the e-justice, professional lawyers become practically the necessary intermediaries between the citizens and the judicial authority, which can hinder the access to justice and increase the court costs of both sides. The implementation of such systems in impossible not only without introduction of changes into the current procedural codes, but also without a thorough analysis on all levels of threats to an individual, society, and the state from spread of such conduct of court proceedings.

Ключевые слова: civil proceedings, arbitration proceedings, information society, e-management, information systems, court proceedings, e-government, e-justice, information law, justice

Библиография:
The Electronic Filing System in Singapore – Tackling the «Human» Elements // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNPAN/UNPAN031797.pdf
Turkish e‐justice project «UYAP» // [Elektronnyy istochnik] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files_epractice/sites/Turkish eJustice project 'UYAP'.pdf
Ali Rıza Çam. Turkish IT project UYAP // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/document/E-Justice_Portal/17-18_02_2009/Abstracts/13_Abstract_-_Turkish_IT_project_UYAP-_Ali_Rza_Cam.pdf
[Elektronnyy istochnik] http://www.e-hrvatska.hr/sdu/en/ProgramEHrvatska/Provebda/e-Pravosudje.html
E-government in Belgium. eGovernment factsheets. Dokument Evropeyskoy komissii. 2007 // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/egovo
Alea Fairchild, Bruno de Vuyst. The Phenix project: a case study of e-justice in Belgium. // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://www.researchgate.net/publication/
E-Justice in Europe: The cross-border use of information technology in the justice sector // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http;//www.eu2007.de/en/News/Press_Releases/January/0116BMJejustice.html

References (transliteration):
The Electronic Filing System in Singapore – Tackling the «Human» Elements // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNPAN/UNPAN031797.pdf
Turkish e‐justice project «UYAP» // [Elektronnyy istochnik] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files_epractice/sites/Turkish eJustice project 'UYAP'.pdf
Ali Rıza Çam. Turkish IT project UYAP // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/document/E-Justice_Portal/17-18_02_2009/Abstracts/13_Abstract_-_Turkish_IT_project_UYAP-_Ali_Rza_Cam.pdf
[Elektronnyy istochnik] http://www.e-hrvatska.hr/sdu/en/ProgramEHrvatska/Provebda/e-Pravosudje.html
E-government in Belgium. eGovernment factsheets. Dokument Evropeyskoy komissii. 2007 // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/egovo
Alea Fairchild, Bruno de Vuyst. The Phenix project: a case study of e-justice in Belgium. // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http://www.researchgate.net/publication/
E-Justice in Europe: The cross-border use of information technology in the justice sector // [Elektronnyy istochnik] http;//www.eu2007.de/en/News/Press_Releases/January/0116BMJejustice.html

Аннотация: This article examines the positions of Part 6 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (CCRF) on authority of the courts to lower the category of a crime, as well as the grounds and conditions for such decision. The author gives attention to the wide boundaries of the court’s discretion in making a decision in accordance with the Part 6 of Article 15, and analyzes law enforcement practice and clarification of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on this issue. This work presents criticism on the Federal Law No. 420-FZ regarding the amendment it made to the Part 6 of Article 15, which contains corruptogenic factors and contradicts Article 10 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The scientific novelty lies in the attempt to attract the attention of scientists and practicians to the problematic issues emerging in relation to the application of Part 6 of the Article 15, particularly: which procedural document should reflect the court’s decision to lower the category of a crime, and which juridical consequences could follow the court’s decision to change the category of a committed crime.

Ключевые слова: aggravating circumstances, mitigating circumstances, separation of powers, court decision, conciliation of parties, factual circumstances, conditions and grounds, crime category, categorization of crime, interpretation

Библиография:
Kolokolov N. A. Kategoriya prestupleniya-velichina peremennaya? – Mirovoy sud'ya. 2012. – N 7.
Dyad'kin D. S. Ugolovno-pravovye problemy primeneniya ch. 6 st. UK RF. – SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus"
Tolkachenko A. A. Izmenenie sudom kategorii prestupleniya na osnovanii ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF. URL: http://livelawyer.m/ugolovnyj-protsess/pravosudie/item/654-izmenenie-sudom-kategorii-prestupleniya-na-osnovanii-ch-6-st-15-uk-rf (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2015).
Epikhin A. Yu. Rasshirenie polnomochiy suda na ponizhenie kategorii prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-protsessual'nyy aspekty. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika, 2012. N 2.
Malkov V. Pravo suda na izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya. – Zakonnost'. 2013. – N 11.
Matyushov A. M., Shesler A. V. Nedopustimost' izmeneniya kategorii prestupleniya v ramkakh stat'i 15 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Novosibirsk: Materialy IV studencheskoy mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 2012.
Nikulin S. Voprosy primeneniya ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2012. – N 5; Mingalimova M. Neyasnost' v prakticheskom primenenii novykh polozheniy Obshchey chasti UK. Zakonnost'. – 2013. – N 3; Vinitskiy L., Kubrikova M. Vozmozhno li izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v poryadke gl. 40.1 UPK RF? Zakonnost', 2013. – N 8; Malkov V. Pravo suda na izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya. Zakonnost'. – 2013. – N 11; Trofimova G.A. Rasshirenie granits printsipa sudeyskogo usmotreniya. Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2014. – N 1. SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa: V 2 t. – Moskva: T. I., 1970.
Malkov V. P. Pravo suda na izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya. – SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Khaydarov A. A. Pravo suda izmenit' kategoriyu prestupleniya na menee tyazhkuyu. – SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Gorbatova M., Rusman G. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy pravoprimeneniya i obratnaya sila ugolovnogo zakona. – Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2012. – N 5.
Analiz sudebnoy praktiki primeneniya sudami oblasti polozheniy ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF ob izmenenii kategorii prestupleniya. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Tverskogo oblastnogo suda. URL: http://oblsud.twr.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=press_dep&op=3&did=63 (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2015).
Otvety na voprosy, postupivshie iz sudov, po primeneniyu Federal'nykh zakonov ot 7 marta 2011 g. N 26-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii" i ot 7 dekabrya 2011 g. N 420-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 27 iyunya 2012 g.). SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".

References (transliteration):
Kolokolov N. A. Kategoriya prestupleniya-velichina peremennaya? – Mirovoy sud'ya. 2012. – N 7.
Dyad'kin D. S. Ugolovno-pravovye problemy primeneniya ch. 6 st. UK RF. – SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus"
Tolkachenko A. A. Izmenenie sudom kategorii prestupleniya na osnovanii ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF. URL: http://livelawyer.m/ugolovnyj-protsess/pravosudie/item/654-izmenenie-sudom-kategorii-prestupleniya-na-osnovanii-ch-6-st-15-uk-rf (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2015).
Epikhin A. Yu. Rasshirenie polnomochiy suda na ponizhenie kategorii prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-protsessual'nyy aspekty. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika, 2012. N 2.
Malkov V. Pravo suda na izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya. – Zakonnost'. 2013. – N 11.
Matyushov A. M., Shesler A. V. Nedopustimost' izmeneniya kategorii prestupleniya v ramkakh stat'i 15 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Novosibirsk: Materialy IV studencheskoy mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 2012.
Nikulin S. Voprosy primeneniya ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2012. – N 5; Mingalimova M. Neyasnost' v prakticheskom primenenii novykh polozheniy Obshchey chasti UK. Zakonnost'. – 2013. – N 3; Vinitskiy L., Kubrikova M. Vozmozhno li izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v poryadke gl. 40.1 UPK RF? Zakonnost', 2013. – N 8; Malkov V. Pravo suda na izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya. Zakonnost'. – 2013. – N 11; Trofimova G.A. Rasshirenie granits printsipa sudeyskogo usmotreniya. Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2014. – N 1. SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa: V 2 t. – Moskva: T. I., 1970.
Malkov V. P. Pravo suda na izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya. – SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Khaydarov A. A. Pravo suda izmenit' kategoriyu prestupleniya na menee tyazhkuyu. – SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Gorbatova M., Rusman G. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy pravoprimeneniya i obratnaya sila ugolovnogo zakona. – Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2012. – N 5.
Analiz sudebnoy praktiki primeneniya sudami oblasti polozheniy ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF ob izmenenii kategorii prestupleniya. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Tverskogo oblastnogo suda. URL: http://oblsud.twr.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=press_dep&op=3&did=63 (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2015).
Otvety na voprosy, postupivshie iz sudov, po primeneniyu Federal'nykh zakonov ot 7 marta 2011 g. N 26-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii" i ot 7 dekabrya 2011 g. N 420-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 27 iyunya 2012 g.). SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".

Аннотация: This article examines the genesis and evolution of the continental model of jury trial proceedings. The first historical form of continental model of jury trial emerged at the end of the XVIII century in France, after which it spread throughout virtually all of Europe in the XIX century. The work reveals the particularities of the continental model emerging throughout the stages of court trials and arguments; in the system of questions faced by the jury; jury verdicts. The author notes that the subject of court trial and arguments in the continental model were extremely broad; information about the identity of the defendant was examined with participation of the jury. The continental model of jury trial had an unbalanced defense and prosecution bases: the prosecutor possessed significantly greater rights that the defense, while the court had discretional authority in the area of evidence. At the same time, the jurors had a broad arsenal of rights in the criminal procedure and were allowed to take the evidence into the deliberation room. The author makes a conclusion that the research of the historical experience of the continental model of the court proceedings involving jury is important for the search of ways to improve this form of procedure in modern Russia.

Ключевые слова: verdict, jurors, pleadings, judicial enquiry, continental model, jury trial, question list, competitiveness, questioning, witness

Библиография:
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Frantsii. Perev. N. Neklyudova. – SPb, 1860 g.
Foynitskiy I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: V 2 t. Pereizd. SPb.: Al'fa, 1996. T. 2.
Rozin N.N. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. SPb. 1914.
Sluchevskiy V.K. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Sudoustroystvo — sudoproizvodstvo. 4-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb., 1913.
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva dlya Germanskoy imperii s zakonom o vvedenii ego v deystvie 1 fevralya 1877 goda. Perev. Iv. Soboleva. SPb., 1878.
Radutnaya N.V. Sud prisyazhnykh v kontinental'noy sisteme prava // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 1.
Nasonov S.A. Evropeyskie modeli proizvodstva v sude prisyazhnykh: sud prisyazhnykh v Ispanii (sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie). Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 8.
Mikhaylov P.L. Sud prisyazhnykh vo Frantsii. SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova, 2004.
Mittermayer K.Zh.A. Evropeyskie i amerikanskie sudy prisyazhnykh, ikh deyatel'nost', dostoinstva, nedostatki i sredstva k ustraneniyu etikh nedostatkov. Vyp. 1–2. M.: D. Dril', 1869–1871.
Zakrevskiy I.P. O nastoyashchem i budushchem suda prisyazhnykh. Sbornik statey. – SPb.: Tip. I.P. Soykina, 1897.
Dudko N.A. Sud prisyazhnykh po UPK Ukrainy // Ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya na Altae: materialy ezhegodnoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 50-letiyu yuridicheskogo fakul'teta i 40-letiyu Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Barnaul. 2012, Vyp.11–12.
Brauer E. Sud prisyazhnykh po zakonodatel'stvam Germanii: Obshchiy obzor i polozhenie nemetskikh zakonodatel'stv po etomu predmetu, s kratkim ukazaniem na zakonodatel'stva drugikh gosudarstv, preimushchestvenno na frantsuzskoe, shotlandskoe i severo-amerikanskoe /Per., prim.: V. Bartenev. SPb.: Zhurn. M-va yust., 1865.
Chel'tsov-Bebutov M.A. Kurs ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. SPb.: Al'fa, 1995.
Yanevich-Yanevskiy P. O vvedenii, razvitii i sovremennom sostoyanii suda prisyazhnykh vo Frantsii // Yuridicheskie zapiski. T. 3. 1859.
Gleadow Carmen. History of trial by jury in the Spanish legal system.– Lewiston. NY.2000

References (transliteration):
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Frantsii. Perev. N. Neklyudova. – SPb, 1860 g.
Foynitskiy I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: V 2 t. Pereizd. SPb.: Al'fa, 1996. T. 2.
Rozin N.N. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. SPb. 1914.
Sluchevskiy V.K. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Sudoustroystvo — sudoproizvodstvo. 4-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb., 1913.
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva dlya Germanskoy imperii s zakonom o vvedenii ego v deystvie 1 fevralya 1877 goda. Perev. Iv. Soboleva. SPb., 1878.
Radutnaya N.V. Sud prisyazhnykh v kontinental'noy sisteme prava // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 1.
Nasonov S.A. Evropeyskie modeli proizvodstva v sude prisyazhnykh: sud prisyazhnykh v Ispanii (sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie). Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 8.
Mikhaylov P.L. Sud prisyazhnykh vo Frantsii. SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova, 2004.
Mittermayer K.Zh.A. Evropeyskie i amerikanskie sudy prisyazhnykh, ikh deyatel'nost', dostoinstva, nedostatki i sredstva k ustraneniyu etikh nedostatkov. Vyp. 1–2. M.: D. Dril', 1869–1871.
Zakrevskiy I.P. O nastoyashchem i budushchem suda prisyazhnykh. Sbornik statey. – SPb.: Tip. I.P. Soykina, 1897.
Dudko N.A. Sud prisyazhnykh po UPK Ukrainy // Ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya na Altae: materialy ezhegodnoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 50-letiyu yuridicheskogo fakul'teta i 40-letiyu Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Barnaul. 2012, Vyp.11–12.
Brauer E. Sud prisyazhnykh po zakonodatel'stvam Germanii: Obshchiy obzor i polozhenie nemetskikh zakonodatel'stv po etomu predmetu, s kratkim ukazaniem na zakonodatel'stva drugikh gosudarstv, preimushchestvenno na frantsuzskoe, shotlandskoe i severo-amerikanskoe /Per., prim.: V. Bartenev. SPb.: Zhurn. M-va yust., 1865.
Chel'tsov-Bebutov M.A. Kurs ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. SPb.: Al'fa, 1995.
Yanevich-Yanevskiy P. O vvedenii, razvitii i sovremennom sostoyanii suda prisyazhnykh vo Frantsii // Yuridicheskie zapiski. T. 3. 1859.
Gleadow Carmen. History of trial by jury in the Spanish legal system.– Lewiston. NY.2000

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the legal norms of the constituents of the Russian Federation regulating the authority of the constitutional (charter) courts pertaining to abstracts normative control and order of their implementation. In a comparative sense the author demonstrates the general and special aspects characteristic to such regulation, as well as the problems that arise in the work of regional branches of the constitutional justice in implementation of corresponding norms. The work reveals the influence of the positions of the Federal Constitutional Law “On Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation” upon the legal regulation of this authority of the judicial branches of the constitutional (charter) control of the constituents of the Federation. Taking into consideration the prospects of development of the constitutional justice in Russia and the need to solve the issues of judicial reform, the author demonstrates the positive and problematic aspects of the legislative regulation of the competency of the constitutional (charter) courts of the constituents of the Federation, and notes the most significant trends emerging in the modern approaches towards the content of this institution.

Ключевые слова: justice, authority, norm, constitution, inquiry, legislation, Abstract normative control, court, proceedings, charter

Библиография:
Bazoev M.M. Konstitutsionnyy sudebnyy normokontrol' v RF // Pravo: teoriya i praktika. – 2009.-№ 5.– S. 11-14.
Bezrukov A.V., Kazantsev A.O. O neobkhodimosti sozdaniya i sovershenstvovaniya kompetentsii konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya.-2012.-№ 2. – S. 28-34.
Zykova I.V. Opredelenie polnomochiy konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. – 2012.-№ 10. – S. 44-48.
Kazantsev A.O. Nekotorye voprosy kompetentsii konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012.-№ 4.-S. 63-66.
Kachanov R.E. Sudebnyy normokontrol' v sisteme mekhanizmov «strategicheskogo pravosudiya» // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2008.-№ 9. – S. 46-50.
Klepikova O.S. Sudebnyy normokontrol' kak sposob obespecheniya zakonnosti v sfere publichnogo upravleniya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo universiteta. – 2011.-№ 2. – S. 206-214.
Kozhevnikov O.A. Nekotorye problemy v razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti sporov mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i konstitutsionnymi (ustavnymi) sudami sub'ektov RF i puti ikh razresheniya // Pravo i politika. – 2012.-№ 5. – S. 897-901.
Nikiforova A.V. Vliyanie aktov organov konstitutsionnoy yustitsii na razvitie munitsipal'nogo prava // Pravo i politika. – 2012.-№ 10. – S. 1680-1694.
Sergevnin S.L. Konstitutsionnyy normokontrol' i otdel'nye obshcheteoreticheskie problemy sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. – 2009.-№ 22. – S. 6-10.
Khudoley K.M. Kompetentsiya konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov RF // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. – 2014.-№ 2. – S. 50-61.
Tsaliev A.M. O neobkhodimosti dal'neyshey detsentralizatsii i demokratizatsii sudebnoy vlasti v Rossii // Pravo i politika. – 2013.-№ 4. – S. 499-503. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.7.
Brezhnev O.V. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti i osobennostyakh vzaimodeystviya mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i organami konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 6. - C. 626 - 633. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15389.
Khabrieva T.Ya. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii
i razvitie zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2012. - 5. - C. 4 - 12.

References (transliteration):
Bazoev M.M. Konstitutsionnyy sudebnyy normokontrol' v RF // Pravo: teoriya i praktika. – 2009.-№ 5.– S. 11-14.
Bezrukov A.V., Kazantsev A.O. O neobkhodimosti sozdaniya i sovershenstvovaniya kompetentsii konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya.-2012.-№ 2. – S. 28-34.
Zykova I.V. Opredelenie polnomochiy konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. – 2012.-№ 10. – S. 44-48.
Kazantsev A.O. Nekotorye voprosy kompetentsii konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012.-№ 4.-S. 63-66.
Kachanov R.E. Sudebnyy normokontrol' v sisteme mekhanizmov «strategicheskogo pravosudiya» // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2008.-№ 9. – S. 46-50.
Klepikova O.S. Sudebnyy normokontrol' kak sposob obespecheniya zakonnosti v sfere publichnogo upravleniya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo universiteta. – 2011.-№ 2. – S. 206-214.
Kozhevnikov O.A. Nekotorye problemy v razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti sporov mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i konstitutsionnymi (ustavnymi) sudami sub'ektov RF i puti ikh razresheniya // Pravo i politika. – 2012.-№ 5. – S. 897-901.
Nikiforova A.V. Vliyanie aktov organov konstitutsionnoy yustitsii na razvitie munitsipal'nogo prava // Pravo i politika. – 2012.-№ 10. – S. 1680-1694.
Sergevnin S.L. Konstitutsionnyy normokontrol' i otdel'nye obshcheteoreticheskie problemy sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. – 2009.-№ 22. – S. 6-10.
Khudoley K.M. Kompetentsiya konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub'ektov RF // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. – 2014.-№ 2. – S. 50-61.
Tsaliev A.M. O neobkhodimosti dal'neyshey detsentralizatsii i demokratizatsii sudebnoy vlasti v Rossii // Pravo i politika. – 2013.-№ 4. – S. 499-503. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.7.
Brezhnev O.V. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o razgranichenii podvedomstvennosti i osobennostyakh vzaimodeystviya mezhdu sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii i organami konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 6. - C. 626 - 633. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15389.
Khabrieva T.Ya. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii
i razvitie zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2012. - 5. - C. 4 - 12.

Аннотация: The subject of this study is the positions of the resolutive part of the ruling No. 2-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which, upon examination of complaints and results of a session, rendered a number of important positions, called to define the vectors of development of science in prosecution for the foreseeable future, as well as influence the correction of law enforcement practice in the work of prosecutors carrying out the oversight of law obedience. In the process of studying the key positions of the resolutive part of the examined ruling, the author compares the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation with the current law enforcement practice, as well as the theoretical views within prosecution. The main conclusions of the conducted research come to the fact the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in its ruling confirmed the legality of a number of current behavioral models of prosecutors in carrying out oversight of law obedience, and in some instances even exceeded expectations.

Ключевые слова: Lawfulness, Law obedience, Constitutional Court, Prosecutor’s office, Prosecutor’s power, Ruling, Legal position, Inspection, Prosecutor, Prosecutor’s supervision

Библиография:
SZ RF. – 2015. – № 9. – St. 1389.
SZ RF. – 1995. – № 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 17.02.2015 № 2-P i znachimost' ego opisatel'noy chasti dlya teorii i praktiki proku-rorskogo nadzora //
SZ RF. – 1994. – № 13. – St. 1447 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Punkt 15 prikaza General'nogo prokurora RF ot 07.12.2007 № 195 «Ob organiza-tsii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov, soblyudeniem prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina» // Zakonnost'. – 2008. – № 3 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Faktor sderzhivaniya v nadzornoy deyatel'nosti prokurora // Zako-ny Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2011. – № 3.
SZ RF. – 2015. – № 10. – St. 1391.
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
SZ RF. – 2002. – № 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posled. izmeneniyami).

References (transliteration):
SZ RF. – 2015. – № 9. – St. 1389.
SZ RF. – 1995. – № 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 17.02.2015 № 2-P i znachimost' ego opisatel'noy chasti dlya teorii i praktiki proku-rorskogo nadzora //
SZ RF. – 1994. – № 13. – St. 1447 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Punkt 15 prikaza General'nogo prokurora RF ot 07.12.2007 № 195 «Ob organiza-tsii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov, soblyudeniem prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina» // Zakonnost'. – 2008. – № 3 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Faktor sderzhivaniya v nadzornoy deyatel'nosti prokurora // Zako-ny Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2011. – № 3.
SZ RF. – 2015. – № 10. – St. 1391.
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
SZ RF. – 2002. – № 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posled. izmeneniyami).

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the institution of judicial control over the adherence to the reasonable term for pretrial stages of criminal procedure. The object of this research is the principle of reasonable term for criminal procedure, its definition and criteria set by the legislation, as well as judicial control as one of the acting mechanisms of its realization. The author gives a detailed review of such aspects of this topic as efficiency of the rules on reasonableness of the term for criminal procedure, and sufficiency of the enacted criteria of said principle of the procedure. The main conclusions of the conducted research are the theses on insufficient normative regulation of the limitations of judicial control over the adherence to the reasonableness of terms for pretrial stages of criminal procedure, including during review of complaints of violation of the procedural terms, the need for additional examination of the forming judicial practice even by the highest judicial branch on criminal cases.

Ключевые слова: Reasonable term, Criminal procedure, Judicial control, Procedural terms, Pretrial stage, Review of complaints, Participants of the criminal procedure, Court, Term of examination, Term of preliminary investigation

Библиография:
O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal'nogo zakona "O kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok" kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok: feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 30 apr. 2010 g. № 69-FZ » // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2010. № 18. St. 2145.
Ob obzhalovanii v sud deystviy i resheniy, narushayushchikh prava i svobody grazhdan: feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 27 apr. 1993 g. № 4866-1-FZ » // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1993. № 89. 12 maya.
O praktike rassmotreniya sudami zhalob v poryadke stat'i 125 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkh. Suda Ros. federatsii ot 10 fev. 2009 g. № 1// Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2009. № 4.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 6-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / pod nauch. red. V.T. Tomina, M.P. Polyakova. M., 2012. 1371 s.
Kolokolov N.A. Sudebnyy kontrol' v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: real'nost' i perspektivy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1998. № 11. S. 31-39.
Melikyan A. M. Sudebnaya zashchita v khode predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya po ugolovno-protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Armavir: IP Shurygin V.E., 2011. 140 s.
Obraztsov A. V. Ot razumnykh srokov v ugolovnom protsesse k printsipu razumnosti // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. № 16. S. 32-33.
Ozhegov S. I., Shvedov N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: OOO «ITI Tekhnologii», 2003. 944 s.
Sementsov V. A., Avakov O. O. Napravleniya sudebnoy deyatel'nosti v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. 176 s.
Semchenko S. S. Printsip razumnogo sroka v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve s tochki zreniya resheniy Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka i praktiki sudov RF // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 4 (56). T. 2. S. 2016-2010.
Skoblikov P. A. Obzhalovanie v sud resheniy i deystviy (bezdeystviya) pravookhranitel'nykh organov i ikh dolzhnostnykh lits. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2011. 160 s.
Sootvetstvie razlichnykh aspektov soderzhaniya pod strazhey standartam, vyrabotannym Evropeyskim sudom po pravam cheloveka: Analit. materialy. Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy, 2005.
Tsurluy O. Yu. Osnovy sudebnogo poryadka rassmotreniya zhalob v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yurlitinform, 2012. 200 s.
Delo № 22-5781/13 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/EEbH9ozEM1xF/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22-1128/2014 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/NU6fhbDWuRle/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22KA-13/2014 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http: //sudact.ru/regular/doc/EmvrsOoUsk5j/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22k-1736-2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/qPT9yz0ouQrR/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo №22K-7216 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/QKbih65gFQgn/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22-2169 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/RFvjWtawM1ou/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-6428/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/q8sYZcJN77He/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-1898/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/GEYnEQ8dFXrp/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22k-5400/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/k3VkVRM0GjJw/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-7678/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ZavN9DH3QxJX/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-2460/2014 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/fR3Igt57zsmJ/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22k-2457 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/9XvsZRWeWIlO/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Material № 22k-4311/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/vtNcBeiKlTL1/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Material 22k – 3570/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/1ZYb2mNkOoHp/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Material № 22 –2612/13 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/GB3dwDYDV9d5/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Ugolovnoe delo № 243343 // Arkhiv Sledstvennogo otdela OMVD po g. Armaviru Krasnodarskogo kraya.

References (transliteration):
O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal'nogo zakona "O kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok" kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyy srok: feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 30 apr. 2010 g. № 69-FZ » // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2010. № 18. St. 2145.
Ob obzhalovanii v sud deystviy i resheniy, narushayushchikh prava i svobody grazhdan: feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 27 apr. 1993 g. № 4866-1-FZ » // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1993. № 89. 12 maya.
O praktike rassmotreniya sudami zhalob v poryadke stat'i 125 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkh. Suda Ros. federatsii ot 10 fev. 2009 g. № 1// Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2009. № 4.
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 6-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / pod nauch. red. V.T. Tomina, M.P. Polyakova. M., 2012. 1371 s.
Kolokolov N.A. Sudebnyy kontrol' v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: real'nost' i perspektivy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1998. № 11. S. 31-39.
Melikyan A. M. Sudebnaya zashchita v khode predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya po ugolovno-protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Armavir: IP Shurygin V.E., 2011. 140 s.
Obraztsov A. V. Ot razumnykh srokov v ugolovnom protsesse k printsipu razumnosti // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. № 16. S. 32-33.
Ozhegov S. I., Shvedov N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: OOO «ITI Tekhnologii», 2003. 944 s.
Sementsov V. A., Avakov O. O. Napravleniya sudebnoy deyatel'nosti v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. 176 s.
Semchenko S. S. Printsip razumnogo sroka v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve s tochki zreniya resheniy Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka i praktiki sudov RF // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 4 (56). T. 2. S. 2016-2010.
Skoblikov P. A. Obzhalovanie v sud resheniy i deystviy (bezdeystviya) pravookhranitel'nykh organov i ikh dolzhnostnykh lits. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2011. 160 s.
Sootvetstvie razlichnykh aspektov soderzhaniya pod strazhey standartam, vyrabotannym Evropeyskim sudom po pravam cheloveka: Analit. materialy. Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy, 2005.
Tsurluy O. Yu. Osnovy sudebnogo poryadka rassmotreniya zhalob v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yurlitinform, 2012. 200 s.
Delo № 22-5781/13 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/EEbH9ozEM1xF/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22-1128/2014 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/NU6fhbDWuRle/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22KA-13/2014 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http: //sudact.ru/regular/doc/EmvrsOoUsk5j/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22k-1736-2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/qPT9yz0ouQrR/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo №22K-7216 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/QKbih65gFQgn/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22-2169 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/RFvjWtawM1ou/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-6428/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/q8sYZcJN77He/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-1898/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/GEYnEQ8dFXrp/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22k-5400/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/k3VkVRM0GjJw/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-7678/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ZavN9DH3QxJX/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22K-2460/2014 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/fR3Igt57zsmJ/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Delo № 22k-2457 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/9XvsZRWeWIlO/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Material № 22k-4311/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/vtNcBeiKlTL1/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Material 22k – 3570/2013 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/1ZYb2mNkOoHp/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Material № 22 –2612/13 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/GB3dwDYDV9d5/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.07.2015).
Ugolovnoe delo № 243343 // Arkhiv Sledstvennogo otdela OMVD po g. Armaviru Krasnodarskogo kraya.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the legal consequences resulting from dissolution of a loan agreement. The author examines the main methods of dissolving a loan agreement. This research presents an analysis of issues that emerge in legal precedent due to dissolution of loan agreements, including the information on which violations of a loan agreement can serve as sufficient grounds to request the dissolution, while the loan agreement can be dissolved as a result of significant changes in the circumstances. The article presents legal precedent on each of the means of dissolving a loan agreement. The author proposes criteria for allowing dissolution of a loan agreement due to significant violations of the agreement or changes in the circumstances. The author concludes that there are three main ways of dissolving a loan agreement, and states that the permissibility of dissolution of the credit agreement in each specific case can only be resolved by analyzing the legal precedent. 

Ключевые слова: Legal relations, Loan agreement, Dissolution of a loan agreement, Termination of contract, Breach of contract, Change of circumstances, Early payoff , Unilateral refusal, Reimbursement of losses, Extending credit

Библиография:
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' pervaya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30 noyabrya 1994 goda № 51-FZ.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' vtoraya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 26 yanvarya 1996 goda № 14-FZ.
Grishaev S. P. Kreditnyy dogovor: soderzhanie, vidy, ispolnenie. // «Bibliotechka «Rossiyskoy gazety». Vypusk №8. 2011.
Danilenko S.A., Komissarova M.V. Bankovskoe potrebitel'skoe kreditovanie: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie.-M.: Yustitsinform, 2011.
Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 29 dekabrya 2001 goda № 65 «Obzor praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s prekrashcheniem obyazatel'stv zachetom vstrechnykh odnorodnykh trebovaniy»
Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 13 sentyabrya 2011 goda № 147 «Obzor sudebnoy praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii o kreditnom dogovore»
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 8 noyabrya 2011 goda № 46-V11-20
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 iyunya 2013 goda № 18-KG13-42
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 3 aprelya 2001 goda № 18-V01-12
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 4 marta 2013 goda № VAS-1595/13 po delu № A75-1308/2012.
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 12 dekabrya 2007 g. № 16453/07 po delu № A32-27767/2006-55/457
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 25 marta 2011 goda № KG-A40/1415-11
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 7 iyulya 2010 goda № KG-A40/6711-10
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 29 oktyabrya 2013 goda po delu № A55-35359/2012
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24 avgusta 1999 goda po delu № F04/1708-558/A45-99
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 15 iyunya 1999 goda № 1020/99
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 20 noyabrya 2008 goda № F09-8595/08-S5 po delu № A60-3213/2008-S2
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 25 maya 2010 goda № KG-A40/4667-10.
Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF chastey vtoroy i tret'ey. Pod red. Belova V. A. – M.: Yurayt, 2009.
Sevast'yanova Yu. V. Odnostoronnee rastorzhenie kreditnogo dogovora. // «Bankovskoe kreditovanie», № 3, 2014

References (transliteration):
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' pervaya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30 noyabrya 1994 goda № 51-FZ.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' vtoraya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 26 yanvarya 1996 goda № 14-FZ.
Grishaev S. P. Kreditnyy dogovor: soderzhanie, vidy, ispolnenie. // «Bibliotechka «Rossiyskoy gazety». Vypusk №8. 2011.
Danilenko S.A., Komissarova M.V. Bankovskoe potrebitel'skoe kreditovanie: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie.-M.: Yustitsinform, 2011.
Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 29 dekabrya 2001 goda № 65 «Obzor praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s prekrashcheniem obyazatel'stv zachetom vstrechnykh odnorodnykh trebovaniy»
Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 13 sentyabrya 2011 goda № 147 «Obzor sudebnoy praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii o kreditnom dogovore»
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 8 noyabrya 2011 goda № 46-V11-20
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 iyunya 2013 goda № 18-KG13-42
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 3 aprelya 2001 goda № 18-V01-12
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 4 marta 2013 goda № VAS-1595/13 po delu № A75-1308/2012.
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 12 dekabrya 2007 g. № 16453/07 po delu № A32-27767/2006-55/457
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 25 marta 2011 goda № KG-A40/1415-11
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 7 iyulya 2010 goda № KG-A40/6711-10
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 29 oktyabrya 2013 goda po delu № A55-35359/2012
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24 avgusta 1999 goda po delu № F04/1708-558/A45-99
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 15 iyunya 1999 goda № 1020/99
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 20 noyabrya 2008 goda № F09-8595/08-S5 po delu № A60-3213/2008-S2
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 25 maya 2010 goda № KG-A40/4667-10.
Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF chastey vtoroy i tret'ey. Pod red. Belova V. A. – M.: Yurayt, 2009.
Sevast'yanova Yu. V. Odnostoronnee rastorzhenie kreditnogo dogovora. // «Bankovskoe kreditovanie», № 3, 2014

Аннотация: This article examines the issues associated with the history of emergence of the principle of equal protection of the laws throughout the period since the introduction of the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution until present time. Through the prism of legal precedent, the author analyzes such phenomena as discrimination and positive discrimination, the “positive measures” policy of the US government, and mechanisms of verification of presence or absence of signs of discrimination within any given act of the branches of government. The author makes a conclusion on the existence of two types of discrimination of African-American population: direct discrimination and positive discrimination. As a mechanism for deterring discrimination, the author examines the method of “strict scrutiny” formed by the legal precedent of the Supreme Court of the United States. This mechanism could be used to prevent discrimination in other social areas, thus its application could also enrich the Russian legal science and practice.

Ключевые слова: U.S. Constitution, USA, 14th Amendment, Supreme court of the United States, positive discrimination, discrimination, equal protection, public interest, 5th Amendment, Strict scrutiny

Библиография:
Strander v. West Virginia (1880)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority (1961)
Brawn v. Board of Education (1954)
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
A.A. Mishin, V.A. Vlasikhin. Konstitutsiya SShA: politiko-pravovoy kommentariy. M. 1985. S. 296-298.
Stephen A. Siegel. The Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny. American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 48. №. 4. 2006. P. 393 – 394

References (transliteration):
Strander v. West Virginia (1880)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority (1961)
Brawn v. Board of Education (1954)
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
A.A. Mishin, V.A. Vlasikhin. Konstitutsiya SShA: politiko-pravovoy kommentariy. M. 1985. S. 296-298.
Stephen A. Siegel. The Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny. American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 48. №. 4. 2006. P. 393 – 394

Аннотация: The article states the goals and content of the legal construct of “independence of the judicial authority/court/judges” recognized as an independent legal institution. The author defines the original concepts, and lists the subjects of judicial independence, i.e. the judicial authority, courts and judges, determines their status and influence according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal legislation. A separate analysis is conducted on the concept of independence by the Russian and German doctrines, as well as the notions of “independence of the judiciary”, and “independence of judicial authority”. The article gives the classification of the norms that regulate the independence of the judiciary. The author proposes to introduce into discourse (first and foremost into scientific) the notion of “the zone of independence of the judiciary” and explains its content, meaning, and prospects for implementation in legal comparative research and improvements to the Russian legislation.

Ключевые слова: Law, Court, Judge, Independence, Guarantees, Legal institution, Judicial authority, Russia, Comparison of regulations, Procedural law

Библиография:
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. M.: Prospekt, 2008.
Baranov V.M. Tekhnika pravotvorchestva. Priroda. Osnovnye priemy. Znachenie. M.: Yuniti-Dana, Zakon i pravo, 2010.
Satarov G.A., Rimskiy V.L., Blagoveshchenskiy Yu.N. «Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie rossiyskoy sudebnoy vlasti»
Stroginovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M.: Izd-va AN SSSR, 1958. S. 111

References (transliteration):
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. M.: Prospekt, 2008.
Baranov V.M. Tekhnika pravotvorchestva. Priroda. Osnovnye priemy. Znachenie. M.: Yuniti-Dana, Zakon i pravo, 2010.
Satarov G.A., Rimskiy V.L., Blagoveshchenskiy Yu.N. «Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie rossiyskoy sudebnoy vlasti»
Stroginovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M.: Izd-va AN SSSR, 1958. S. 111

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the various aspects of sociologists’ participation in the judicial sociological investigation. It reveals the difficulties and problem areas within the development of social knowledge as a whole and sociology in particular, which can affect the quality of forensic science within the framework of a specific criminal investigation. The author presents certain methods of raising the level of forensic examination by involving professional sociologists. Expansion of the boundaries of law enforcement allows a sociologist to participate in a wide spectrum of forensic examinations. The following are some of the main conclusions made in this research: the addition of new complex multivariable notions within criminal law justifies the need for involvement into forensic investigations of professionals such as sociologists; the level of success of forensic sociological investigation depends not only on the professional competency of the expert sociologist, but also on their knowledge of the legal environment.

Ключевые слова: Society, sociology, forensic science, expert, social group, sociological investigation, commune, law enforcement, legal environment, legal norm

Библиография:
Zaryanov E.P. Teoreticheskie sotsial'no-politicheskie osnovy kontsepta «myagkoy sily» // Sotsiodinamika.-2014.-7.-C. 19-41. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2014.7.12730. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_12730.html
Kabanov P.A. Obshchestvennaya ekspertiza kak forma obshchestvennogo kontrolya za deyatel'nost'yu organov publichnoy vlasti v sfere protivodeystviya korruptsii: teoretiko-pravovoy analiz // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-10.-C. 1168-1183. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.10.12978.
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
Kabanov P.A. Nekotorye formy vzaimodeystviya institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva s organami mestnogo samoupravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-5.-C. 5-8.
Vlasova N.V., Rafalyuk E.E. Yuridicheskaya nauka v poiske pravovykh mekhanizmov protivodeystviya korruptsii. // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2012.-3.-C. 41-53.
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-8.-C. 1-47. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.8.5109. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
Dokuchaev I.V. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvovedenie: tochki soprikosnoveniya // Sotsial'no-politicheskie issledovaniya v usloviyakh krizisa nauk i nauchnosti: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Irkutsk, 2014.
Utemis I.I. Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: praktika kompleksnogo analiza i poiska istinnosti znaniya // Sotsial'no-politicheskie issledovaniya v usloviyakh krizisa nauk i nauchnosti: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Irkutsk, 2014.
Chebotarev S.G. Sovremennoe sotsial'noe poznanie mira // Kul'turologiya: Daydzhest. M., 2012. № 1 (60).
Kudryavtseva I.N. Kul'tura i sotsial'nyy meyozis: praktika prikladnogo issledovaniya i teoretizirovaniya // Chelovek. 2005. № 2.

References (transliteration):
Zaryanov E.P. Teoreticheskie sotsial'no-politicheskie osnovy kontsepta «myagkoy sily» // Sotsiodinamika.-2014.-7.-C. 19-41. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2014.7.12730. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_12730.html
Kabanov P.A. Obshchestvennaya ekspertiza kak forma obshchestvennogo kontrolya za deyatel'nost'yu organov publichnoy vlasti v sfere protivodeystviya korruptsii: teoretiko-pravovoy analiz // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-10.-C. 1168-1183. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.10.12978.
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
Kabanov P.A. Nekotorye formy vzaimodeystviya institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva s organami mestnogo samoupravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-5.-C. 5-8.
Vlasova N.V., Rafalyuk E.E. Yuridicheskaya nauka v poiske pravovykh mekhanizmov protivodeystviya korruptsii. // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2012.-3.-C. 41-53.
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-8.-C. 1-47. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.8.5109. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
Dokuchaev I.V. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvovedenie: tochki soprikosnoveniya // Sotsial'no-politicheskie issledovaniya v usloviyakh krizisa nauk i nauchnosti: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Irkutsk, 2014.
Utemis I.I. Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: praktika kompleksnogo analiza i poiska istinnosti znaniya // Sotsial'no-politicheskie issledovaniya v usloviyakh krizisa nauk i nauchnosti: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Irkutsk, 2014.
Chebotarev S.G. Sovremennoe sotsial'noe poznanie mira // Kul'turologiya: Daydzhest. M., 2012. № 1 (60).
Kudryavtseva I.N. Kul'tura i sotsial'nyy meyozis: praktika prikladnogo issledovaniya i teoretizirovaniya // Chelovek. 2005. № 2.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the modern foreign systems of formation of the judiciary. The national models of recruitment of judges differ in their methods, criteria and the stages of selection of candidates for vacant judicial posts. Their features were formed as a result of historical development, and depending on the constitutional order, the territorial structure of the country, socio-cultural and economic context. Political, legal and scientific challenge is to identify the most perfect system of selection and appointment of judges, which would ensure the appointment of judges from the best available candidates.  This work deals with the classification of modern models of recruitment of judicial personnel. As a classification attribute, the author examines the established system of methods of selection and appointment of judges. Among the conclusions is the fact that the merit selection is the predominant type of formation of the judiciary in the modern period compared with the election of judges. The paper traces the evolution of methods of formation of the judiciary in the United States. It is argued that most European countries use a system of competitive selection of judges on the basis of merit. An analysis of existing practices identified a number of problematic issues that require further modification of competitive selection models, including those associated with the definition of competitive selection criteria and processes for their expert evaluation.

Ключевые слова: best practices, models, candidate for the post of judge, criteria for selection, method, formation of the judiciary, merit selection, competitive selection, election of judges, appointment of judges

Библиография:
Van Chzhikhua, Fokov A. P. Sudebnaya vlast' v Kitayskoy Respublike // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2012. – № 6.
David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti / per. s fr. V. A. Tumanova. – M., 2009.
Kleandrov M. I. Mezhdunarodnye ob'edineniya sudey // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2013. – № 5.
Modernizatsiya statusa sud'i: sovremennye mezhdunarodnye podkhody / otv. red. T.N. Neshataeva. – M., 2011.
Sudebnaya vlast' / pod red. I. L. Petrukhina. – M., 2003.
Celeste, Mary A. The Debate over the Selection and Retention of Judges: How Judges Can Ride the Wave // Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association. – 2010. – Vol. 46.
Kiley D. Merit selection of California judges / University of the Pacific. McGeorge School of Law. Institute for Legislative Practice. March 2, 1999.
Michael R. Dimino. The Futile Quest for a System of Judicial “Merit” Selection, 67 ALB. L. REV. 803, 803 n.3 (2004).
Patricia Noonan. Salīdzinošais ziņojums: Tiesnešu atlases, amatā iecelšanas un paaugstināšanas kritēriji Latvijā. Tieslietu ministrijas un ANO Attīstības programmas projekts «Atbalsts tiesu sistēmai». – Rīga, 2003.
Thomas R. Phillips. The merits of merit selection // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. – 2009. – Vol. 32. – N. 1.

References (transliteration):
Van Chzhikhua, Fokov A. P. Sudebnaya vlast' v Kitayskoy Respublike // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2012. – № 6.
David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti / per. s fr. V. A. Tumanova. – M., 2009.
Kleandrov M. I. Mezhdunarodnye ob'edineniya sudey // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2013. – № 5.
Modernizatsiya statusa sud'i: sovremennye mezhdunarodnye podkhody / otv. red. T.N. Neshataeva. – M., 2011.
Sudebnaya vlast' / pod red. I. L. Petrukhina. – M., 2003.
Celeste, Mary A. The Debate over the Selection and Retention of Judges: How Judges Can Ride the Wave // Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association. – 2010. – Vol. 46.
Kiley D. Merit selection of California judges / University of the Pacific. McGeorge School of Law. Institute for Legislative Practice. March 2, 1999.
Michael R. Dimino. The Futile Quest for a System of Judicial “Merit” Selection, 67 ALB. L. REV. 803, 803 n.3 (2004).
Patricia Noonan. Salīdzinošais ziņojums: Tiesnešu atlases, amatā iecelšanas un paaugstināšanas kritēriji Latvijā. Tieslietu ministrijas un ANO Attīstības programmas projekts «Atbalsts tiesu sistēmai». – Rīga, 2003.
Thomas R. Phillips. The merits of merit selection // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. – 2009. – Vol. 32. – N. 1.

Аннотация: This article discusses and analyzes the different approaches to the determination of the number of criminal procedural functions in the Russian criminal trial. It is concluded that the joint criminal process associated with more than three main functions of criminal procedure. It is determined that there are three main features of criminal procedure specific to criminal proceedings in Russia. The author highlights the key arguments in favor of the qualitative differentiation of procedural functions of organs and persons in criminal proceedings and the main functions of criminal procedure as qualitative characteristics of the process. The author gives classification of criminal procedural functions. General scientific methods of gaining new scientific knowledge, in particular, systemic analysis and systemic theory, formal logical and other methods that would allow examining the correlation in legal relations in the sphere of criminal proceedings, as well as private methods - historical, comparative legal. The author determines the number by the number of criminal procedural functions inherent in the Russian criminal trial, as well as proposes an original classification. The author gives criteria of differentiation of criminal procedural functions from the functions of organs and persons, as well as the division of procedural functions into basic and advanced. The non-functional activity of the subjects of domestic criminal proceedings is being exposed.

Ключевые слова: system of functions, procedural features , competitiveness, the functions of the subjects, detective work, man functions, Criminal procedural functions, additional functions, criminal consequences, investigation

Библиография:
Bozh'ev V. Sostyazatel'nost' na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Zakonnost'. 2004. № 1. S. 4 – 6.
Bezlepkin B.T. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii. 6 – e izdanie. M: KNORUS, 2010. – 496 s.
http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28Spravka%29?OpenAgent&RN=440058 – 6
Azarov V.A., Revenko N.I., Kuzembaeva M.M. Funktsiya predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Monografiya.-Omsk: Izd-vo OmGU, 2006. – 560 s.
http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?base=LAW&n=148711&req=doc
Rezepkin A.M. Razdelenie osnovnykh ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsiy kak element printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon // Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) MGYuA. Vypusk dvenadtsatyy. Orenburg, 2010. – 369 s. S. 149–151.
Kachalov V.I. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii // Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo. Pod obshch. red. prof. V.M. Lebedeva. M., 2012. S. 49 – 52.
Shpilev V.M. Uchastniki ugolovnogo protsessa. Minsk, 1970. – 176 s.
Khaliulin A.G. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii: (Problemy osushchestvleniya v usloviyakh pravovoy reformy). Diss. ... d-ra yurid. nauk / Khaliulin A.G.-M., 1997. – 261 c.
Rakhunov R.D. Uchastniki ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. – 277 c.
Daev V.G. Protsessual'nye funktsii i printsip sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1974. S. 48 – 72.
Ugolovnyy protsess: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod obshch. red. P.A. Lupinskoy. M., 1995.-544 s.
Motovilovker Ya.O. Funktsiya osushchestvleniya pravosudiya i sostyazatel'noe postroenie sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Voprosy povysheniya effektivnosti pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam. Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik. Vyp. 9 / Otv. red.: Nazhimov V.P.; Redkol.: Lukashevich V.Z., Martinovich I.I., Prokop'eva S.I., Tsvetinovich A.L.-Kaliningrad: Izd-vo Kaliningr. un-ta, 1981. – 154 c. S. 11–19.
Gataullin 3. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokurora // Zakonnost'. 2010. N 2. S. 9-13.
Antonov I.A., Gorlenko V.A. Funktsii prokuratury v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: ponyatie, soderzhanie, «tendentsii k sokrashcheniyu» // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2008. № 20. S. 5 – 9.
Alekseev S.N. Nadzor za soblyudeniem prav i svobod uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa v sisteme konstitutsionnykh garantiy prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina i polnomochiy prokurora (dosudebnye stadii): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2002 S. 15 – 25.
Savitskiy V.M. Sterzhnevaya funktsiya prokuratury – osushchestvlenie ugolovnogo presledovaniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1994. N 10. S. 24 – 28.
Yakubovich N.A. Protsessual'nye funktsii sledovatelya // Problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1980. S. 15 – 32.
Nazhimov V.P. Psikhologicheskie osnovy ucheniya ob ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsiyakh // Pravovedenie. 1983. №5. S. 52 – 58.
Zhuk O.D. Sistema ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii // «Chernye dyry» v Rossiyskom Zakonodatel'stve. 2003. № 4. S. 416-420.
El'kind P.S. Sushchnost' sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1963.-172 c.
Romanov S.V. Ponyatie, sistema i vzaimodeystvie protsessual'nykh funktsiy v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. M., 2007. – 32 s.
Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. Tom 29. Izdanie pyatoe. – M.: Politizdat, 1973. – 783 s.
El'kind P.S. Tseli i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v sovetskom ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1976. – 143 c.
Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom V. Moskva: Sotsekgiz, 1937. – 716 s.;
Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom VII. Moskva – Leningrad: Sotsekgiz, 1934. – 380 s.
Chernyshev V.A. Problema funktsiy v rossiyskoy nauke ugolovnogo protsessa: Avtoreferat diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09. – Izhevsk, 1999. – 166 c.
Shpilev V.N. Soderzhanie i formy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU, 1974. – 144 c.
Tushev A.A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Sistema funktsiy i polnomochiy. Dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09 – Krasnodar, 2006. – 384 c.
Ugolovnyy protsess / Pod red. M.A. Chel'tsova. Vsesoyuznyy yuridicheskiy zaochnyy institut. M.: Yurid. lit.,1969. – 463 s.
Ugolovnyy protsess. Problemnye lektsii. Pod red. V.T. Tomina, I.A. Zinchenko. M., 2013. – 799 s.
Shimanovskiy V.V. K voprosu o protsessual'noy funktsii sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse // Pravovedenie. 1965. №2. S. 175–178.
Zinatullin Z.Z. Izbrannye trudy. Tom 1. Sankt-Peterburg, 2013. Izdatel'stvo: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press. – 608 s.
Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Uchebnik / Otv. red. P.A. Lupinskaya. M., 2011. – 1072 s.
Gulyaev A.P. Sledovatel' v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurid. lit., 1981. – 192 c.
Yakub M.L. O ponyatii protsessual'noy funktsii v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1973. №
S. 83 – 89. 5.Larin A.M. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: protsessual'nye funktsii. M.: Yurid. lit., 1986. – 160 c.
Fatkullin F.N. Obvinenie i sudebnyy prigovor. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta,1965. – 532 s.
Strogovich M.S. Priroda sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa i printsip sostyazatel'nosti. M., 1939. – 380 s.
Bozrov V.M. Osnovy teorii ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsiy. Obshchaya chast'. Monografiya. Obshchaya chast': Monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'skiy dom «Ural'skaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya». 2012. – 96 s.
http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_41297/
http://www.rg.ru/2005/04/01/ks – zaklyuchenie – dok.html
Foynitskiy I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. 3-e izd., peresmotr. I dop. SPb.: Senatskaya tipografiya, 1910. T. 2. S. 342-343.
Lebedev V.M. Sudebnaya zashchita svobody i lichnoy neprikosnovennosti grazhdan na predvaritel'nom sledstvii: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Gorodets, 2001. – 158 c.
http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_63693/
Motovilovker Ya.O. Osnovnye ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. Yaroslavl': Yaroslavskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 1976.-94 s.
Khaliulin A.G. Osushchestvlenie funktsii ugolovnogo presledovaniya prokuraturoy Rossii. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1997. – 223 s.
Boltoshev E.D. Funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk, M., 2002.-189 c.
Erezhipaliev D.I. Prokuror kak uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva so storony obvineniya v dosudebnykh stadiyakh. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk / Erezhipaliev D.I.-M., 2013.-200 c.
Ignatov S.D. Kontseptual'nye osnovy organizatsii advokatury v Rossii (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Monografiya. Izhevsk: Izd. dom «Udmurtskiy universitet», 2006. –280 s.
Kan M.P. Protsessual'nye funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. Tashkent, 1988.
Berova D.M. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. SPb.: Izd-vo Fond «Universitet», 2009. – 275 c.
Kryukov V.F. Prokuror v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (istoriya i sovremennost'). Kursk, 2012. – 500 c.

References (transliteration):
Bozh'ev V. Sostyazatel'nost' na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Zakonnost'. 2004. № 1. S. 4 – 6.
Bezlepkin B.T. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii. 6 – e izdanie. M: KNORUS, 2010. – 496 s.
http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28Spravka%29?OpenAgent&RN=440058 – 6
Azarov V.A., Revenko N.I., Kuzembaeva M.M. Funktsiya predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Monografiya.-Omsk: Izd-vo OmGU, 2006. – 560 s.
http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?base=LAW&n=148711&req=doc
Rezepkin A.M. Razdelenie osnovnykh ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsiy kak element printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon // Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) MGYuA. Vypusk dvenadtsatyy. Orenburg, 2010. – 369 s. S. 149–151.
Kachalov V.I. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii // Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo. Pod obshch. red. prof. V.M. Lebedeva. M., 2012. S. 49 – 52.
Shpilev V.M. Uchastniki ugolovnogo protsessa. Minsk, 1970. – 176 s.
Khaliulin A.G. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii: (Problemy osushchestvleniya v usloviyakh pravovoy reformy). Diss. ... d-ra yurid. nauk / Khaliulin A.G.-M., 1997. – 261 c.
Rakhunov R.D. Uchastniki ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. – 277 c.
Daev V.G. Protsessual'nye funktsii i printsip sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1974. S. 48 – 72.
Ugolovnyy protsess: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod obshch. red. P.A. Lupinskoy. M., 1995.-544 s.
Motovilovker Ya.O. Funktsiya osushchestvleniya pravosudiya i sostyazatel'noe postroenie sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Voprosy povysheniya effektivnosti pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam. Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik. Vyp. 9 / Otv. red.: Nazhimov V.P.; Redkol.: Lukashevich V.Z., Martinovich I.I., Prokop'eva S.I., Tsvetinovich A.L.-Kaliningrad: Izd-vo Kaliningr. un-ta, 1981. – 154 c. S. 11–19.
Gataullin 3. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokurora // Zakonnost'. 2010. N 2. S. 9-13.
Antonov I.A., Gorlenko V.A. Funktsii prokuratury v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: ponyatie, soderzhanie, «tendentsii k sokrashcheniyu» // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2008. № 20. S. 5 – 9.
Alekseev S.N. Nadzor za soblyudeniem prav i svobod uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa v sisteme konstitutsionnykh garantiy prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina i polnomochiy prokurora (dosudebnye stadii): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2002 S. 15 – 25.
Savitskiy V.M. Sterzhnevaya funktsiya prokuratury – osushchestvlenie ugolovnogo presledovaniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1994. N 10. S. 24 – 28.
Yakubovich N.A. Protsessual'nye funktsii sledovatelya // Problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1980. S. 15 – 32.
Nazhimov V.P. Psikhologicheskie osnovy ucheniya ob ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsiyakh // Pravovedenie. 1983. №5. S. 52 – 58.
Zhuk O.D. Sistema ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii // «Chernye dyry» v Rossiyskom Zakonodatel'stve. 2003. № 4. S. 416-420.
El'kind P.S. Sushchnost' sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1963.-172 c.
Romanov S.V. Ponyatie, sistema i vzaimodeystvie protsessual'nykh funktsiy v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. M., 2007. – 32 s.
Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. Tom 29. Izdanie pyatoe. – M.: Politizdat, 1973. – 783 s.
El'kind P.S. Tseli i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v sovetskom ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1976. – 143 c.
Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom V. Moskva: Sotsekgiz, 1937. – 716 s.;
Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom VII. Moskva – Leningrad: Sotsekgiz, 1934. – 380 s.
Chernyshev V.A. Problema funktsiy v rossiyskoy nauke ugolovnogo protsessa: Avtoreferat diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09. – Izhevsk, 1999. – 166 c.
Shpilev V.N. Soderzhanie i formy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU, 1974. – 144 c.
Tushev A.A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Sistema funktsiy i polnomochiy. Dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09 – Krasnodar, 2006. – 384 c.
Ugolovnyy protsess / Pod red. M.A. Chel'tsova. Vsesoyuznyy yuridicheskiy zaochnyy institut. M.: Yurid. lit.,1969. – 463 s.
Ugolovnyy protsess. Problemnye lektsii. Pod red. V.T. Tomina, I.A. Zinchenko. M., 2013. – 799 s.
Shimanovskiy V.V. K voprosu o protsessual'noy funktsii sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse // Pravovedenie. 1965. №2. S. 175–178.
Zinatullin Z.Z. Izbrannye trudy. Tom 1. Sankt-Peterburg, 2013. Izdatel'stvo: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press. – 608 s.
Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Uchebnik / Otv. red. P.A. Lupinskaya. M., 2011. – 1072 s.
Gulyaev A.P. Sledovatel' v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurid. lit., 1981. – 192 c.
Yakub M.L. O ponyatii protsessual'noy funktsii v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1973. №
S. 83 – 89. 5.Larin A.M. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: protsessual'nye funktsii. M.: Yurid. lit., 1986. – 160 c.
Fatkullin F.N. Obvinenie i sudebnyy prigovor. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta,1965. – 532 s.
Strogovich M.S. Priroda sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa i printsip sostyazatel'nosti. M., 1939. – 380 s.
Bozrov V.M. Osnovy teorii ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsiy. Obshchaya chast'. Monografiya. Obshchaya chast': Monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'skiy dom «Ural'skaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya». 2012. – 96 s.
http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_41297/
http://www.rg.ru/2005/04/01/ks – zaklyuchenie – dok.html
Foynitskiy I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. 3-e izd., peresmotr. I dop. SPb.: Senatskaya tipografiya, 1910. T. 2. S. 342-343.
Lebedev V.M. Sudebnaya zashchita svobody i lichnoy neprikosnovennosti grazhdan na predvaritel'nom sledstvii: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Gorodets, 2001. – 158 c.
http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_63693/
Motovilovker Ya.O. Osnovnye ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. Yaroslavl': Yaroslavskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 1976.-94 s.
Khaliulin A.G. Osushchestvlenie funktsii ugolovnogo presledovaniya prokuraturoy Rossii. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1997. – 223 s.
Boltoshev E.D. Funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk, M., 2002.-189 c.
Erezhipaliev D.I. Prokuror kak uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva so storony obvineniya v dosudebnykh stadiyakh. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk / Erezhipaliev D.I.-M., 2013.-200 c.
Ignatov S.D. Kontseptual'nye osnovy organizatsii advokatury v Rossii (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Monografiya. Izhevsk: Izd. dom «Udmurtskiy universitet», 2006. –280 s.
Kan M.P. Protsessual'nye funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. Tashkent, 1988.
Berova D.M. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. SPb.: Izd-vo Fond «Universitet», 2009. – 275 c.
Kryukov V.F. Prokuror v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (istoriya i sovremennost'). Kursk, 2012. – 500 c.