Аннотация: The subject of this research is the addressee of knowingly false reports of a crime or an individual committing it, since designation of such addressee does not exist in the Russian Criminal Code (Article 306). A special attention is given to the scientific discourse on this issue, which has gone on for several years. The author carefully examines different versions of branches and officials to which a knowingly false report should be directed in order to qualify the crime according to Article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, suggested by the Russian legal experts. The author justifies the proposal to introduce changes in the disposition of the Article 306 of the CCRF pertaining to the department for handling knowingly false reports. It is proposed to express the disposition of the Part 1 of the Article 306 of the CCRF in the following way: “knowingly false report to an agency or an official authorized to carry out criminal investigation and/or enforce law, and equally the court on commission of a crime”.

Ключевые слова: legal authorities, false accusation, crime, justice, motive, purpose, false accusation, court, false report, lie

Библиография:
Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya / Pod red. Galakhovoy A.V. M.: Norma, 2005. 416 c.
Anuchina A.I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii i dokazyvaniya // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 2(58). S.73-77.
Fedorov A.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya (voprosy istorii, ponyatiya i klassifikatsii) / Otv. redaktor A.I.Chuchaev. Kaluga: Izd-vo AKF «Politop», 2004. 284 c.
Sinel'nikov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot osushchestvleniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i prinyatiya mer k ego obespecheniyu: problemy zakonodatel'noy reglamentatsii i differentsiatsii / Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, 2010. 210 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Shtata Tekhas / Nauch. Red. I.D. Kozochkin. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2006. 576 c.
Sinel'nikov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot osushchestvleniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i prinyatiya mer k ego obespecheniyu: problemy zakonodatel'noy reglamentatsii i differentsiatsii / Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, 2010. 210 c.
North Dakota Century Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/t12-1.html (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
North Carolina General Statutes [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/statutes/statutestoc.pl?Chapter=0014 (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
Arizona Revised Statutes Title 13. Criminal Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-13-criminal-code/az-rev-st-sect-13-2907-01.html (data obrashcheniya: 13 oktyabrya 2015 goda).
Kentucky Legislature [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/chapter.aspx?id=39389 (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Moldovy [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.crimpravo.ru/page/zar-uk/(data obrashcheniya 22.05.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki San-Marino / Nauch. red. S.V. Maksimova. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2002. – 251 c.
Florida Penal Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/2005/ TitleXLVI/ch0837.html) (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Litovskoy respubliki / Nauch. red. N.I. Mantseva. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. 468 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ukrainy [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.crimpravo.ru/page/zar-uk/ (data obrashcheniya 21.08.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks FRG. M.: Izd-vo «Zertsalo-M», 2001. 208 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ispanii / Nauch. red. N.F. Kuznetsova, F.M. Reshetnikov. M. Izd-vo «Zertsalo», 1998. 219 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Bel'gii / Nauch. red. N.I. Mantsev. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2004. 559 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Norvegii / Nauch. red. Yu.V. Golika. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. 272 c.
Novyy Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii. M.: Yuridicheskiy kolledzh MGU, 1993. 212 c.
Dvoryanskov I.V. Prestupleniya, narushayushchie protsessual'nye usloviya polucheniya dokazatel'stv // «Chernye dyry» v ros. zakonodatel'stve. 2003. № 2. S. 226-245.
Dvoryanskov I.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana interesov sudebnoy vlasti. Monografiya. M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr RGU nefti i gaza imeni I.M. Gubkina, 2013. 377 s.
Khloptseva E.Yu. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana pravosudiya. Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 1995. 210 c.
Smolin S.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za zavedomo lozhnyy donos: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 234 c.
Fargiev I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: (aktual'nye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki) / Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 5. S. 61-65.
Gorelik A.S., Lobanova L.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. SPb.: Izd-vo «Yur. tsentr Press», 2005. 491 c.
Kul'berg Ya.M. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1962. 63 c.
Khabibullin M.Kh. Otvetstvennost' za zavedomo lozhnyy donos i zavedomo lozhnoe pokazanie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Kazan', 1975. 160 c.
Fargiev I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: (aktual'nye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 5. S. 61-65.
Brilliantov A. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: voprosy kvalifikatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. № 3 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Efremov V.P. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: voprosy kvalifikatsii v aspekte vzaimosvyazi norm ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. № 3 S. 45-49.

References (transliteration):
Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya / Pod red. Galakhovoy A.V. M.: Norma, 2005. 416 c.
Anuchina A.I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii i dokazyvaniya // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 2(58). S.73-77.
Fedorov A.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya (voprosy istorii, ponyatiya i klassifikatsii) / Otv. redaktor A.I.Chuchaev. Kaluga: Izd-vo AKF «Politop», 2004. 284 c.
Sinel'nikov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot osushchestvleniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i prinyatiya mer k ego obespecheniyu: problemy zakonodatel'noy reglamentatsii i differentsiatsii / Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, 2010. 210 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Shtata Tekhas / Nauch. Red. I.D. Kozochkin. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2006. 576 c.
Sinel'nikov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot osushchestvleniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i prinyatiya mer k ego obespecheniyu: problemy zakonodatel'noy reglamentatsii i differentsiatsii / Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, 2010. 210 c.
North Dakota Century Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/t12-1.html (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
North Carolina General Statutes [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/statutes/statutestoc.pl?Chapter=0014 (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
Arizona Revised Statutes Title 13. Criminal Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-13-criminal-code/az-rev-st-sect-13-2907-01.html (data obrashcheniya: 13 oktyabrya 2015 goda).
Kentucky Legislature [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/chapter.aspx?id=39389 (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Moldovy [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.crimpravo.ru/page/zar-uk/(data obrashcheniya 22.05.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki San-Marino / Nauch. red. S.V. Maksimova. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2002. – 251 c.
Florida Penal Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/2005/ TitleXLVI/ch0837.html) (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Litovskoy respubliki / Nauch. red. N.I. Mantseva. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. 468 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ukrainy [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.crimpravo.ru/page/zar-uk/ (data obrashcheniya 21.08.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks FRG. M.: Izd-vo «Zertsalo-M», 2001. 208 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ispanii / Nauch. red. N.F. Kuznetsova, F.M. Reshetnikov. M. Izd-vo «Zertsalo», 1998. 219 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Bel'gii / Nauch. red. N.I. Mantsev. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2004. 559 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Norvegii / Nauch. red. Yu.V. Golika. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. 272 c.
Novyy Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii. M.: Yuridicheskiy kolledzh MGU, 1993. 212 c.
Dvoryanskov I.V. Prestupleniya, narushayushchie protsessual'nye usloviya polucheniya dokazatel'stv // «Chernye dyry» v ros. zakonodatel'stve. 2003. № 2. S. 226-245.
Dvoryanskov I.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana interesov sudebnoy vlasti. Monografiya. M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr RGU nefti i gaza imeni I.M. Gubkina, 2013. 377 s.
Khloptseva E.Yu. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana pravosudiya. Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 1995. 210 c.
Smolin S.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za zavedomo lozhnyy donos: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 234 c.
Fargiev I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: (aktual'nye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki) / Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 5. S. 61-65.
Gorelik A.S., Lobanova L.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. SPb.: Izd-vo «Yur. tsentr Press», 2005. 491 c.
Kul'berg Ya.M. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1962. 63 c.
Khabibullin M.Kh. Otvetstvennost' za zavedomo lozhnyy donos i zavedomo lozhnoe pokazanie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Kazan', 1975. 160 c.
Fargiev I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: (aktual'nye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 5. S. 61-65.
Brilliantov A. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: voprosy kvalifikatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. № 3 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Efremov V.P. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: voprosy kvalifikatsii v aspekte vzaimosvyazi norm ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. № 3 S. 45-49.

Аннотация: This article gives briefly describes the South European penitentiary type, which is characterized by the weak manifestation of the elements of progressive penitentiary system, wide use of the practice of volunteer and social work of the inmates outside the correctional facility, and active application of medical therapy with realization of subsequent rehabilitation programs. Attention is given to the fact that on the background of active support of progressive standards of inmate treatment in prisons, the reports of members of the CPT who have visited Italy, San-Marino, Malta, and Cyprus reflect separate violation of rights of inmates or other deficiencies in organization of the work of prisons. The novelty of this research is justified by the significant lack of research of penitentiary practices of these states. A conclusion is made that in the conditions of the ambiguous reform of the Russian penal system the analysis of the South European penitentiary type justifies appropriate scientific interest towards further typological comparative legal research of the entire European penitentiary map.

Ключевые слова: Central prison, Prison rules, Type of penitentiary system, Resocialization, Housing regime, Prevention of torture, Drugs, Execution of criminal punishment, Inmate, Corradino Correctional Facility

Библиография:
Report to the Government of Cyprus on the visit to Cyprus carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 12 to 19 May 2008. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/cyp/2012-34-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 27.01.2016).
Response of the Government of San Marino to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to San Marino from 29 January to 1 February 2013. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/smr/2014-34-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Rapport au Gouvernement de Saint-Marin relatif à la visite effectuée à Saint-Marin par le Comité européen pour la prevention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 29 janvier au 1er février 2013. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/smr/2014-33-inf-fra.pdf (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Prison populations in Europe-looking at the numbers. URL: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Prison+populations+in+Europe--looking+at+the+numbers.-a0166693437 (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).; Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Space I – 2012 / Marcelo F. Aebi, Natalia Delgrande. Switzerland: University of Lausanne, 2014. URL: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2014/apr/coe-space-i-april-2014.pdf (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Response of the Government of San Marino to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to San Marino from 8 to 11 February 2005. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/smr/2008-10-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 28.04.2014).
Natsional'nyy doklad Gosudarstvennogo departamenta SShA po pravam cheloveka 2014: Italiya (U.S. Department of State. Human Rights Report 2014: Italy). URL: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236750.pdf (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Report to the Maltese Government on the visit to Malta carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 26 to 30 September 2011. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/mlt/2013-12-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 28.04.2014).
Sovet po pravam cheloveka. Rezyume, podgotovlennoe Upravleniem Verkhovnogo komissara Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy po pravam cheloveka v sootvetstvii s punktom 15 s) prilozheniya k rezolyutsii 5/1 i punktom 5 prilozheniya k rezolyutsii 16/21 Soveta po pravam cheloveka: Italiya, 4 avgusta 2014, A/HRC/WG.6/20/ITA/3. URL: http://www.refworld.org.ru/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?page=search&docid=55b741984&skip=0&query=tyur'makh&coi=ITA (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 13 to 25 May 2012. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/ita/2013-32-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 28.04.2014).
Verdot C., Godin-Blandeau E., Grémy I., Develay, A.-E. Monitoring systems and national surveys on prison health in France and abroad // European Journal of Public Health. 2014. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 167-172.
Malkin D.A. Psikhiatricheskie resursy i printsipy lecheniya zaklyuchennykh s psikhicheskimi rasstroystvami v zarubezhnykh stranakh // Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e. 2010. T. 8. № 5 (48). S. 58-68.
World Health Organization. Health in prisons. A WHO guide to the essentials in prison health. URL: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0009/99018/E90174.pdf (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI). Prison and drug use: management, costs and criteria Enhancing prevention and treatment and promoting alternative measures. URL: http://www.unicri.it/news/article/2015-09-23_ (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction. Statistical bulletin 2013. URL: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/stats13/duptab2b (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction. Prisons and drugs in Europe: the problem and responses. URL: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/selected-issues/prison (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
Marietti S. Prison conditions in Italy. European Prison Observatory. Detention conditions in the European Union. URL: http://www.prisonobservatory.org/upload/Italy_Peniten.pdf (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
World Health Organization. Regional office for Europe. URL: http://www.euro.who.int/en/countries/malta (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
Cyprus Prisons Department. URL: http://www.cyprusnet.com/article_cyprus-prisons-department (data poseshcheniya 14.01.2016).
London Shakespeare Workout (LSW). URL: http://www.lswproductions.co.uk/theirvoicereport.htm (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
Presentation Italian prison system. URL: http://www.lpps.eu/pdf/italian_prison_system.pdf (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Tyur'my Italii. URL: http://www.tyurma.com/tyurma-za-rubezhom/tyurma-v-italii (data poseshcheniya 2.04.2014).
Cyprus looks to a public-private partnership to build a new prison. URL: http://www.balkans.com/open-news.php?uniquenumber=194601 (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
International Centre for Prison Studies. URL: http://www.prisonstudies.org/map/europe (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt ispravitel'nogo uchrezhdeniya «Korradio». URL: https://homeaffairs.gov.mt/en/MHAS-Departments/Corradino-Correctiona (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Ministerstva yustitsii i vnutrennikh del Mal'ty. URL: http://www.mjha.gov.mt (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
European Commission. Justice. Study on the functioning of judicial systems in the EU Member States. Facts and figures from the CEPEJ questionnaires 2010-2012-2013. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effective-justice/files/cepj_study_scoreboard_2015_en.pdf (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Gosudarstvennogo Sekretariata vnutrennikh del i yustitsii Respubliki San-Marino. URL: http://www.interni.segreteria.sm/on-line/home/istituzioni (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Penitentsiarnoy politsii Italii. URL: http://www.polizia-penitenziaria.it/ (data poseshcheniya 16.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Ministerstva yustitsii i obshchestvennogo poryadka Respubliki Kipr. URL: http://www.mjpo.gov.cy/mjpo/mjpo.nsf/page25_en/page25_en?OpenDocument (data poseshcheniyam 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Departamenta penitentsiarnykh uchrezhdeniy Ministerstva yustitsii Italii. URL: http://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/ (data poseshcheniya 16.01.2016).
Zakon Mal'ty o tyur'makh. URL: http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8753&l=1 (data poseshcheniya 14.01.2016).
Ugolovnyy kodeks San-Marino. URL: http://law.edu.ru/norm/norm.asp?normID=1253084&subID=100116531,100116532#texthttp://law.edu.ru/norm/norm.asp?normID=1253084&subID=100116531,100116532#text (data poseshcheniya 15.01.2016).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Mal'ty. URL: http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8574 (data poseshcheniya 14.01.2016).
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Dinamika pravovykh sistem v usloviyakh integratsii gosudarstv // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2014. № 4. S. 706-713.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii № 1772-r ot 14 oktyabrya 2010 goda «O Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda» (red. ot 23.09.2015) // SZ RF. 2010. № 43. St. 5544.
Report to the Government of Cyprus on the visit to Cyprus carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 23 September to 1 October 2013. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/cyp/2014-31-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 27.01.2016).
Zaklyuchitel'nye zamechaniya Komiteta po pravam cheloveka: Kipr, 30 aprelya 2015, CCPR/C/CYR/4. URL: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/CYP/CO/4&Lang=En (data poseshcheniya 27.01.2016).
Al'pern L. Tyur'my v Italii. URL: http://www.russ.ru/pole/Tyur-my-v-Italii (data poseshcheniya 29.04.2014).
Kireeva N.V. Sotsial'noe integrirovanie i integrirovannyy sotsium: integratsiya kak protsess i struktura // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 651 - 665. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.5.10931.

References (transliteration):
Report to the Government of Cyprus on the visit to Cyprus carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 12 to 19 May 2008. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/cyp/2012-34-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 27.01.2016).
Response of the Government of San Marino to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to San Marino from 29 January to 1 February 2013. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/smr/2014-34-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Rapport au Gouvernement de Saint-Marin relatif à la visite effectuée à Saint-Marin par le Comité européen pour la prevention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 29 janvier au 1er février 2013. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/smr/2014-33-inf-fra.pdf (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Prison populations in Europe-looking at the numbers. URL: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Prison+populations+in+Europe--looking+at+the+numbers.-a0166693437 (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).; Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Space I – 2012 / Marcelo F. Aebi, Natalia Delgrande. Switzerland: University of Lausanne, 2014. URL: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2014/apr/coe-space-i-april-2014.pdf (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Response of the Government of San Marino to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to San Marino from 8 to 11 February 2005. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/smr/2008-10-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 28.04.2014).
Natsional'nyy doklad Gosudarstvennogo departamenta SShA po pravam cheloveka 2014: Italiya (U.S. Department of State. Human Rights Report 2014: Italy). URL: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236750.pdf (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Report to the Maltese Government on the visit to Malta carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 26 to 30 September 2011. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/mlt/2013-12-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 28.04.2014).
Sovet po pravam cheloveka. Rezyume, podgotovlennoe Upravleniem Verkhovnogo komissara Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy po pravam cheloveka v sootvetstvii s punktom 15 s) prilozheniya k rezolyutsii 5/1 i punktom 5 prilozheniya k rezolyutsii 16/21 Soveta po pravam cheloveka: Italiya, 4 avgusta 2014, A/HRC/WG.6/20/ITA/3. URL: http://www.refworld.org.ru/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?page=search&docid=55b741984&skip=0&query=tyur'makh&coi=ITA (data poseshcheniya 24.01.2016).
Report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 13 to 25 May 2012. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/ita/2013-32-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 28.04.2014).
Verdot C., Godin-Blandeau E., Grémy I., Develay, A.-E. Monitoring systems and national surveys on prison health in France and abroad // European Journal of Public Health. 2014. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 167-172.
Malkin D.A. Psikhiatricheskie resursy i printsipy lecheniya zaklyuchennykh s psikhicheskimi rasstroystvami v zarubezhnykh stranakh // Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e. 2010. T. 8. № 5 (48). S. 58-68.
World Health Organization. Health in prisons. A WHO guide to the essentials in prison health. URL: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0009/99018/E90174.pdf (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI). Prison and drug use: management, costs and criteria Enhancing prevention and treatment and promoting alternative measures. URL: http://www.unicri.it/news/article/2015-09-23_ (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction. Statistical bulletin 2013. URL: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/stats13/duptab2b (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction. Prisons and drugs in Europe: the problem and responses. URL: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/selected-issues/prison (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
Marietti S. Prison conditions in Italy. European Prison Observatory. Detention conditions in the European Union. URL: http://www.prisonobservatory.org/upload/Italy_Peniten.pdf (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
World Health Organization. Regional office for Europe. URL: http://www.euro.who.int/en/countries/malta (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
Cyprus Prisons Department. URL: http://www.cyprusnet.com/article_cyprus-prisons-department (data poseshcheniya 14.01.2016).
London Shakespeare Workout (LSW). URL: http://www.lswproductions.co.uk/theirvoicereport.htm (data poseshcheniya 22.01.2016).
Presentation Italian prison system. URL: http://www.lpps.eu/pdf/italian_prison_system.pdf (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Tyur'my Italii. URL: http://www.tyurma.com/tyurma-za-rubezhom/tyurma-v-italii (data poseshcheniya 2.04.2014).
Cyprus looks to a public-private partnership to build a new prison. URL: http://www.balkans.com/open-news.php?uniquenumber=194601 (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
International Centre for Prison Studies. URL: http://www.prisonstudies.org/map/europe (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt ispravitel'nogo uchrezhdeniya «Korradio». URL: https://homeaffairs.gov.mt/en/MHAS-Departments/Corradino-Correctiona (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Ministerstva yustitsii i vnutrennikh del Mal'ty. URL: http://www.mjha.gov.mt (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
European Commission. Justice. Study on the functioning of judicial systems in the EU Member States. Facts and figures from the CEPEJ questionnaires 2010-2012-2013. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effective-justice/files/cepj_study_scoreboard_2015_en.pdf (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Gosudarstvennogo Sekretariata vnutrennikh del i yustitsii Respubliki San-Marino. URL: http://www.interni.segreteria.sm/on-line/home/istituzioni (data poseshcheniya 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Penitentsiarnoy politsii Italii. URL: http://www.polizia-penitenziaria.it/ (data poseshcheniya 16.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Ministerstva yustitsii i obshchestvennogo poryadka Respubliki Kipr. URL: http://www.mjpo.gov.cy/mjpo/mjpo.nsf/page25_en/page25_en?OpenDocument (data poseshcheniyam 21.01.2016).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Departamenta penitentsiarnykh uchrezhdeniy Ministerstva yustitsii Italii. URL: http://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/ (data poseshcheniya 16.01.2016).
Zakon Mal'ty o tyur'makh. URL: http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8753&l=1 (data poseshcheniya 14.01.2016).
Ugolovnyy kodeks San-Marino. URL: http://law.edu.ru/norm/norm.asp?normID=1253084&subID=100116531,100116532#texthttp://law.edu.ru/norm/norm.asp?normID=1253084&subID=100116531,100116532#text (data poseshcheniya 15.01.2016).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Mal'ty. URL: http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8574 (data poseshcheniya 14.01.2016).
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Dinamika pravovykh sistem v usloviyakh integratsii gosudarstv // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2014. № 4. S. 706-713.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii № 1772-r ot 14 oktyabrya 2010 goda «O Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda» (red. ot 23.09.2015) // SZ RF. 2010. № 43. St. 5544.
Report to the Government of Cyprus on the visit to Cyprus carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 23 September to 1 October 2013. URL: http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/cyp/2014-31-inf-eng.pdf (data poseshcheniya 27.01.2016).
Zaklyuchitel'nye zamechaniya Komiteta po pravam cheloveka: Kipr, 30 aprelya 2015, CCPR/C/CYR/4. URL: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/CYP/CO/4&Lang=En (data poseshcheniya 27.01.2016).
Al'pern L. Tyur'my v Italii. URL: http://www.russ.ru/pole/Tyur-my-v-Italii (data poseshcheniya 29.04.2014).
Kireeva N.V. Sotsial'noe integrirovanie i integrirovannyy sotsium: integratsiya kak protsess i struktura // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 651 - 665. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.5.10931.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the questions of ensuring the legality of the investigative actions regarding or with participation of minors by the procedural and organizational means of prosecutor’s supervision, as well as through prosecutor’s participation in coordination of the work of law enforcement bodies in the struggle against crime. The subject of this research is the norms of the Criminal Procedural Law of the Russian Federation, Federal Law “On the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation”, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, organizational and administrative documents of the General Prosecutor of Russia, judicial practice, as well as scientific literature on this topic. The author concludes that the reported in recent time growth in the number of minors involved in the criminal court procedures, which in turn substantiates the increase of the amount of violations committed by investigators during the process of investigation with participation of minors, predetermines the need for activation of the national institutions for protection of rights and freedoms of the minors, among which a special place belong to the prosecutor’s supervision. At the same time, for realistic and complete protection of right of the minors in criminal procedure, the prosecutor’s office must use their entire procedural and organizational potential within the framework of realization of supervision over the legality of the work of investigators.

Ключевые слова: Fight against crime, Coordination of work, Preliminary investigation, Criminal procedure, Investigative agencies, Prosecutor’s office, Minors, Investigative actions, Supervision over investigation, Prosecutor’s supervision

Библиография:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 2202-1 «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 18.04.1996 № 567 «O koordinatsii deyatel'nosti pravookhranitel'nykh organov po bor'be s prestupnost'yu» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Prikaz Genprokuratury RF ot 26.11.2007 № 188 «Ob organizatsii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov o nesovershennoletnikh i molodezhi» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Anisimov G.G. Organizatsiya prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov pri privlechenii litsa v kachestve obvinyaemogo: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2010. S. 86.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Kabardino-Balkarskoy Respubliki ot 29 dekabrya 2015 goda po delu № 22-840/2015. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/szdAx8J2HExj/?regular-txt=®ular-case_doc=22-840%2F2015+®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=1031®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1477321027711 (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2016).
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Volgogradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 02 marta 2016 goda po delu № 22-1036/2016. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/nbUR7F3Coprq/?regular-txt=®ular-case_doc=22-1036%2F2016®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=1002®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1477320833973 (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2016).
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Nizhegorodskoy oblasti po primeneniyu v 2014 godu polozheniy st. 237 UPK RF pri razreshenii voprosa o vozvrashchenii ugolovnogo dela prokuroru dlya ustraneniya prepyatstviy k rassmotreniyu dela sudom, utv. Prezidiumom Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda 15.07.2015 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 24.10.2016).

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 2202-1 «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 18.04.1996 № 567 «O koordinatsii deyatel'nosti pravookhranitel'nykh organov po bor'be s prestupnost'yu» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Prikaz Genprokuratury RF ot 26.11.2007 № 188 «Ob organizatsii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov o nesovershennoletnikh i molodezhi» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Anisimov G.G. Organizatsiya prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov pri privlechenii litsa v kachestve obvinyaemogo: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2010. S. 86.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Kabardino-Balkarskoy Respubliki ot 29 dekabrya 2015 goda po delu № 22-840/2015. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/szdAx8J2HExj/?regular-txt=®ular-case_doc=22-840%2F2015+®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=1031®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1477321027711 (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2016).
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Volgogradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 02 marta 2016 goda po delu № 22-1036/2016. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/nbUR7F3Coprq/?regular-txt=®ular-case_doc=22-1036%2F2016®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=1002®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1477320833973 (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2016).
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Nizhegorodskoy oblasti po primeneniyu v 2014 godu polozheniy st. 237 UPK RF pri razreshenii voprosa o vozvrashchenii ugolovnogo dela prokuroru dlya ustraneniya prepyatstviy k rassmotreniyu dela sudom, utv. Prezidiumom Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda 15.07.2015 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 24.10.2016).

Аннотация: During the hearing of a criminal case with accelerated prosecution there is a question of the bases of qualification of a crime, whether it may be proved not only by set of facts of the case and components of crime, but also agreement between the sides for the purpose of stimulation of the accused (suspect) to reach a compromise. This work examines this issue taking into account the legal nature of the considered institution, which seems somewhat ambiguous because of the unresolved issue of a possibility of its definition as a deal (agreement). The author uses general scientific and private methods of cognition, including methods of formal legal, legal comparative, systemic and structural analysis. As a result of the research the author acknowledges the necessity to define and formalize this institution as a “deal”, because of existence of signs of a deal (agreement), which characterize this concept in private law, and also due to coinciding criminal procedure experience of foreign countries. Proceeding from it, and also in view of the purposes of this institution – acceleration of consideration of criminal case and (or) assistance to justice – in making decision on application of some type of special process, it is necessary to allow for the possibility of qualification of the crime on the basis of the reached agreement. However in this case it is necessary to attach special significance to the legality of making of all legally valid decisions on application of this procedure and ensuring the right for protection for the accused (suspect).

Ключевые слова: confession, validity of charge, principle of expediency, principle of legality, qualification of crimes, expedited investigation, plea deal, accelerated prosecution, proving, plea bargain

Библиография:
Bykov V.M., Bykov A.M. Storona zashchity pri zaklyuchenii s prokurorom dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 9. S. 18 – 22.
Lazareva V.A. Legalizatsiya sdelok o priznanii viny // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1999. № 5. S. 41-44.
Rarog A.I. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: prakticheskoe posobie– M.: Prospekt, 2006. – 224 s.
Kruglikov A.P. Dopolnenie UPK RF novoy glavoy o doznanii v sokrashchennoy forme i nekotorye problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 7. S. 45-50.
Panokin A.M. Doznanie v sokrashchennoy forme // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 5. S. 914-918.
Aleksandrov A.S., Kuchin A.F., Smolin A.G. Pravovaya priroda instituta, reglamentirovannogo glavoy 40 UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2007. № 7. S. 16-18.
Lazareva V.A., Kuvaldina Yu.V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i primeneniya instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Biblioteka kriminalista: Nauchnyy zhurnal. Vyp. 3 (4). 2012. S. 221-231.
Apostolova N.N. Tselesoobraznost' (diskretsionnost') v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2010. 62 s.
Kuznetsova N.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: Lektsii po spetskursu «Osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy» – M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Gorodets». 2007. – 336 s.
Tolkachenko A.A. Osobyy poryadok sudoproizvodstva-mezhdistsiplinarnyy institut // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2011. № 8. S. 36-39.
Petrukhin G.I. Rol' priznaniya obvinyaemogo v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. № 2. S. 24-26.
Turner Jenia L. Prosecutors and Bargaining in Weak Cases: A Comparative View. // Erik Luna, Marianne Wade The prosecutor in transnational perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. S. 102-115.
Bakhnovskiy A. V. Sdelka s pravosudiem: osobennosti anglosaksonskoy i kontinental'noy pravovoy traditsii. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2008. 19 c.
Golovko L.V. Al'ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu kak forma protsessual'noy differentsiatsii (sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya). Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2003. 54 c.
Dervan Lucian E. Bargained Justice: Plea Bargaining's Innocence Problem and the Brady Safety-Valve // Utah Law Review Forthcoming. 2012. P. 51-97.
Turner Jenia L. Plea Bargaining across borders: criminal procedure. – Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; New York : Aspen Publishers, 2009. – 294 s.
Piyuk A.V. Tipologiya sovremennogo ugolovnogo protsessa i problemy primeneniya uproshchennykh form razresheniya ugolovnykh del v sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 264 c.
Muratova N.G., Chelyshev M.Yu. O mezhotraslevoy teorii protsessual'nykh soglasheniy: voprosy grazhdanskogo prava, tsivilisticheskogo i ugolovnogo protsessa // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2012. № 4. S. 10-27
Eliseev N.G. Protsessual'nyy dogovor – M.: Statut, 2015. – 368 s.
Sudebnaya statistika. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo Departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii // URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (data obrashcheniya: 08.04.2016).
Klenova T.V. O sovmestimosti publichnogo i chastnogo interesov v ugolovnom prave // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 2. S. 41 – 45.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ // Parlamentskaya gazeta, № 241-242, 22.12.2001, Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 249, 22.12.2001, Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 24.12.2001, № 52 (ch. I), st. 4921.

References (transliteration):
Bykov V.M., Bykov A.M. Storona zashchity pri zaklyuchenii s prokurorom dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 9. S. 18 – 22.
Lazareva V.A. Legalizatsiya sdelok o priznanii viny // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1999. № 5. S. 41-44.
Rarog A.I. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: prakticheskoe posobie– M.: Prospekt, 2006. – 224 s.
Kruglikov A.P. Dopolnenie UPK RF novoy glavoy o doznanii v sokrashchennoy forme i nekotorye problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 7. S. 45-50.
Panokin A.M. Doznanie v sokrashchennoy forme // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 5. S. 914-918.
Aleksandrov A.S., Kuchin A.F., Smolin A.G. Pravovaya priroda instituta, reglamentirovannogo glavoy 40 UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2007. № 7. S. 16-18.
Lazareva V.A., Kuvaldina Yu.V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i primeneniya instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Biblioteka kriminalista: Nauchnyy zhurnal. Vyp. 3 (4). 2012. S. 221-231.
Apostolova N.N. Tselesoobraznost' (diskretsionnost') v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2010. 62 s.
Kuznetsova N.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: Lektsii po spetskursu «Osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy» – M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Gorodets». 2007. – 336 s.
Tolkachenko A.A. Osobyy poryadok sudoproizvodstva-mezhdistsiplinarnyy institut // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2011. № 8. S. 36-39.
Petrukhin G.I. Rol' priznaniya obvinyaemogo v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. № 2. S. 24-26.
Turner Jenia L. Prosecutors and Bargaining in Weak Cases: A Comparative View. // Erik Luna, Marianne Wade The prosecutor in transnational perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. S. 102-115.
Bakhnovskiy A. V. Sdelka s pravosudiem: osobennosti anglosaksonskoy i kontinental'noy pravovoy traditsii. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2008. 19 c.
Golovko L.V. Al'ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu kak forma protsessual'noy differentsiatsii (sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya). Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2003. 54 c.
Dervan Lucian E. Bargained Justice: Plea Bargaining's Innocence Problem and the Brady Safety-Valve // Utah Law Review Forthcoming. 2012. P. 51-97.
Turner Jenia L. Plea Bargaining across borders: criminal procedure. – Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; New York : Aspen Publishers, 2009. – 294 s.
Piyuk A.V. Tipologiya sovremennogo ugolovnogo protsessa i problemy primeneniya uproshchennykh form razresheniya ugolovnykh del v sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 264 c.
Muratova N.G., Chelyshev M.Yu. O mezhotraslevoy teorii protsessual'nykh soglasheniy: voprosy grazhdanskogo prava, tsivilisticheskogo i ugolovnogo protsessa // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2012. № 4. S. 10-27
Eliseev N.G. Protsessual'nyy dogovor – M.: Statut, 2015. – 368 s.
Sudebnaya statistika. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo Departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii // URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (data obrashcheniya: 08.04.2016).
Klenova T.V. O sovmestimosti publichnogo i chastnogo interesov v ugolovnom prave // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 2. S. 41 – 45.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ // Parlamentskaya gazeta, № 241-242, 22.12.2001, Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 249, 22.12.2001, Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 24.12.2001, № 52 (ch. I), st. 4921.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the examination of the legal ground and practice of prosecutor’s participation in the lawmaking process of legislative (representative) bodies of state authority of the constituents of the Russian Federation. The object and subject of this research became the social relations in the area of implementation of legislative initiative by the prosecutors of the constituents of the Russian Federation, as well as the established practice of interaction between the prosecution agencies and regional parliaments. The goal of this work consists in substantiation of the prosecutor’s special role in legislative process, which is aimed ensuring the unity of the legal space and legal order. Based on the dialectical materialism as the foundation of rational cognition, the author conducts an analysis of the modern practice of prosecutor’s participation in lawmaking activity in the legislative (representative) bodies of state authority of the constituents of the Russian Federation. The conclusion is made that participation of the prosecutor in lawmaking activity contributes into provision of the unity of the legal space in the Russian Federation. The author proposes an original explanation of the reasonableness of vesting the prosecutors of the constituents of the Russian Federation with the right of legislative initiative in the representative (legislative) bodies of state authority of the Russian Federation. The author highlights the main directions of the lawmaking activity of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation.

Ключевые слова: Legislative bill, Lawmaking, Deputy, Legal order, Normative legal act , Unity of the legal space, Charter, Constitution, Regional parliament, Prosecutor

Библиография:
Zhidkikh A.A. Uchastie prokuratury v obespechenii konstitutsionnoy zakonnosti v formirovanii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-11.-C. 51-63. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9685. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9685.html
M.N. Fedorets Razmyshleniya o stanovlenii federalizma v sovremennoy Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2012.-11.-C. 1806-1815.
Petrova L.I., Alborova E.Yu. Uchastie prokurorov sub'ektov Federatsii v pravotvorchestve regional'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i organov mestnogo samoupravleniya // Zakonnost'. 2013. № 1.
Manakova S.G., Petrova L.I. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnykh ustanovleniy organami prokuratury v pravotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti // Zakonnost'. 2013. № 12.
Zavrazhnov E.V. Pravotvorcheskaya funktsiya organov prokuratury // Zakonnost'. 2014. № 7.
Kovin V.A. Uchastie prokuratury v pravotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i organov mestnogo samoupravleniya // Zakonnost'. 2013. №
Zhidkikh A.A. Pravotvorchestvo. Zakonnost'. Prokuratura. – M.: Yurlitinform. 2010.
Erpylev V.N. Ispol'zovanie organami prokuratury prava zakonodatel'noy initsiativy // Zakonnost'. 2014. № 1.
Bessarabov V.G., Pashtov D.R. Uchastie prokuratury v zakonotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti sub'ektov Federatsii // Zakonnost'. 2012. № 4.
Vinokurov Yu.E., Pleshakov A.M. Uchastie v pravotvorchestve kak samostoyatel'noe napravlenie prokurorskoy deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. № 12.
Khabrieva T.Ya. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i razvitie zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2012.-5.-C. 4-12.
Stashchenko V.D.. Deyatel'nost' prokurora po preduprezhdeniyu narusheniy zakonov v sfere okhrany atmosfernogo vozdukha // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
P. V. Deryabin. Formy i nekotorye perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya uchastiya prokurora v grazhdanskom protsesse po delam, voznikayushchim iz zhilishchnykh pravootnosheniy // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
Nugaeva A.I.. K voprosu o prave grazhdan na postuplenie na sluzhbu v prokuraturu // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8899
Vinokurov A.Yu.. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov politsiey: predmet i predely osushchestvleniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.7998
Anokhin S.A.. Rol' organov vnutrennikh del v osushchestvlenii pravovoy okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10431
Tokareva E.V.. Zashchita prokurorom publichnogo interesa v grazhdanskom protsesse // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.1132
Lapina M.A., Dolgikh I.S. Vedomstvennoe normotvorchestvo MVD Rossii: analiz sostoyaniya i perspektivy razvitiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 3. - C. 233 - 239. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.03.6.
Kabanov P.A. PRAVOVYE SREDSTVA FORMIROVANIYa I OBESPEChENIYa REALIZATsII GOSUDARSTVENNOY POLITIKI PROTIVODEYSTVIYa KORRUPTsII V SUB'EKTAKh ROSSIYSKOY FEDERATsII: nekotorye voprosy povysheniya kachestva // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - 8. - C. 36 - 47. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.8.12004. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_12004.html
Zhidkikh A.A. Uchastie prokuratury v obespechenii konstitutsionnoy zakonnosti v formirovanii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 11. - C. 51 - 63. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9685. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9685.html

References (transliteration):
Zhidkikh A.A. Uchastie prokuratury v obespechenii konstitutsionnoy zakonnosti v formirovanii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-11.-C. 51-63. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9685. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9685.html
M.N. Fedorets Razmyshleniya o stanovlenii federalizma v sovremennoy Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2012.-11.-C. 1806-1815.
Petrova L.I., Alborova E.Yu. Uchastie prokurorov sub'ektov Federatsii v pravotvorchestve regional'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i organov mestnogo samoupravleniya // Zakonnost'. 2013. № 1.
Manakova S.G., Petrova L.I. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnykh ustanovleniy organami prokuratury v pravotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti // Zakonnost'. 2013. № 12.
Zavrazhnov E.V. Pravotvorcheskaya funktsiya organov prokuratury // Zakonnost'. 2014. № 7.
Kovin V.A. Uchastie prokuratury v pravotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i organov mestnogo samoupravleniya // Zakonnost'. 2013. №
Zhidkikh A.A. Pravotvorchestvo. Zakonnost'. Prokuratura. – M.: Yurlitinform. 2010.
Erpylev V.N. Ispol'zovanie organami prokuratury prava zakonodatel'noy initsiativy // Zakonnost'. 2014. № 1.
Bessarabov V.G., Pashtov D.R. Uchastie prokuratury v zakonotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti sub'ektov Federatsii // Zakonnost'. 2012. № 4.
Vinokurov Yu.E., Pleshakov A.M. Uchastie v pravotvorchestve kak samostoyatel'noe napravlenie prokurorskoy deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. № 12.
Khabrieva T.Ya. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i razvitie zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2012.-5.-C. 4-12.
Stashchenko V.D.. Deyatel'nost' prokurora po preduprezhdeniyu narusheniy zakonov v sfere okhrany atmosfernogo vozdukha // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
P. V. Deryabin. Formy i nekotorye perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya uchastiya prokurora v grazhdanskom protsesse po delam, voznikayushchim iz zhilishchnykh pravootnosheniy // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
Nugaeva A.I.. K voprosu o prave grazhdan na postuplenie na sluzhbu v prokuraturu // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8899
Vinokurov A.Yu.. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov politsiey: predmet i predely osushchestvleniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.7998
Anokhin S.A.. Rol' organov vnutrennikh del v osushchestvlenii pravovoy okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10431
Tokareva E.V.. Zashchita prokurorom publichnogo interesa v grazhdanskom protsesse // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.1132
Lapina M.A., Dolgikh I.S. Vedomstvennoe normotvorchestvo MVD Rossii: analiz sostoyaniya i perspektivy razvitiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 3. - C. 233 - 239. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.03.6.
Kabanov P.A. PRAVOVYE SREDSTVA FORMIROVANIYa I OBESPEChENIYa REALIZATsII GOSUDARSTVENNOY POLITIKI PROTIVODEYSTVIYa KORRUPTsII V SUB'EKTAKh ROSSIYSKOY FEDERATsII: nekotorye voprosy povysheniya kachestva // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - 8. - C. 36 - 47. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.8.12004. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_12004.html
Zhidkikh A.A. Uchastie prokuratury v obespechenii konstitutsionnoy zakonnosti v formirovanii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 11. - C. 51 - 63. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9685. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9685.html

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the system of norms of criminal legislation that defines the boundaries of its jurisdiction. The author sequentially refers to the norms of Russian and foreign legislation in order to provide a comprehensive analysis of this topic. In this particular case the author uses German criminal code and compares it with its current Russian counterpart. For this purpose we have examined the examples of formalization of the territorial, personal, passive personal, real and universal principles in the German Criminal Code. The scientific novelty of this research consists in the fact that the author is first to base the analysis on both, the current criminal laws of Russia and Germany, as well as the historical sources (Criminal Code of the RSFSR and Criminal Code of the GDR), which undoubtedly affected the doctrine of criminal law. The author was able to determine the certain regularities in development of German criminal law, which distinguish it from Russian legislation, as well as legislation of the countries of Common Law.

Ключевые слова: territorial jurisdiction, Ort der Tat, cybercrime, jurisdiction, StGB, Strafgesetzbuch, Internet, Germany, phishing, German Democratic Republic

Библиография:
D.K. Chirkov, A.Zh. Sarkisyan Prestupnost' v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: tendentsii i perspektivy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2013. № 1. C. 20 - 26. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.3.
Komarov A.A. Problema pravovogo regulirovaniya Internet v tselyakh presecheniya pravonarusheniy, sovershaemykh v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh. // Voprosy bezopasnosti. 2015. № 4. C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2015.4.17103. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_17103.html
Gertsenzon A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo. Chast' obshchaya. M., 1948. 496 s.
Traynin A.N. Izbrannye trudy. SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2004. 898 s.
Komarov A.A. O vozmozhnosti primeneniya territorial'nogo printsipa deystviya ugolovnogo zakona v prostranstve, primenitel'no k prestupleniyam v Internet // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 8. S. 17-26.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2006. 560 s.
Apellyatsionnyy sud Berlina. Appelyatsionnoe reshenie Az. 3 StR 88/14 ot 19 avgusta 2014. [Elektron. resurs] – URL: http://openjur.de/u/747188.html (data obrashcheniya: 10 sentyabrya 2016).
Spahr S. Internet und Recht: 3. aufl. Zurich: vdf, Hochsch. Verl. An der ATH, 2002. 167 s.
Komarov A.A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya ugolovnogo prava primenitel'no k prestupleniyam, sovershaemym v Internet // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. 2016. № 2. C. 26 - 37. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2016.2.19355. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_19355.html
Apellyatsionnyy sud Berlina. Delo № 2 ARs 91/13. (BGH, 23.04.2013 - 2 ARs 91/13). [Elektron. resurs] – URL: http://openjur.de/u/632526.html (data obrashcheniya: 10 sentyabrya 2016).
Komarov A.A. Kriminologicheskie aspekty moshennichestva v global'noy seti Internet: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Pyatigorsk, 2011. 262 s.
Apellyatsionnyy sud Berlina. Delo № 4 Ws 52/06. (KG, 24.03.2006 - 1 AR 323/06). [Elektron. resurs] – URL: www.judicialis.de/Kammergericht-Berlin_4-Ws-52-06_Beschluss_24.03.2006.html (data obrashcheniya: 10 sentyabrya 2016).
Malinovskiy A.A. Ugolovno-pravovye sistemy: voprosy klassifikatsii // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2008. № 3. S. 14-19.
Malinovskiy A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. M., 1998. 128 s.
Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava: Chasti obshchaya i osobennaya: S primechaniyami, prilozheniyami i dopolneniyami po istorii russkogo prava i zakonodatel'stvu polozhitel'nomu. Chast' obshchaya. T. 1 / Berner A.F.; Prim.: N. Neklyudov, magistr ugolov. prava. SPb.: Tip. N. Tiblena i komp., 1865. 941 s.
Bukhgol'ts E., Lekshis I. Novoe ugolovnoe pravo Germanskoy Demokraticheskoy Respubliki – sotsialisticheskoe pravo // Novoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnykh sotsialisticheskikh stran Evropy / Pod red.: Gel'fer M.A. (Vstup. st.), Kriger G.A. (Vstup. st.), Kuznetsova N.F. (Vstup. st.), Men'shagin V.D. (Vstup. st.). M.: Yurid. lit., 1974. 288 c.

References (transliteration):
D.K. Chirkov, A.Zh. Sarkisyan Prestupnost' v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: tendentsii i perspektivy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2013. № 1. C. 20 - 26. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.3.
Komarov A.A. Problema pravovogo regulirovaniya Internet v tselyakh presecheniya pravonarusheniy, sovershaemykh v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh. // Voprosy bezopasnosti. 2015. № 4. C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2015.4.17103. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_17103.html
Gertsenzon A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo. Chast' obshchaya. M., 1948. 496 s.
Traynin A.N. Izbrannye trudy. SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2004. 898 s.
Komarov A.A. O vozmozhnosti primeneniya territorial'nogo printsipa deystviya ugolovnogo zakona v prostranstve, primenitel'no k prestupleniyam v Internet // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 8. S. 17-26.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2006. 560 s.
Apellyatsionnyy sud Berlina. Appelyatsionnoe reshenie Az. 3 StR 88/14 ot 19 avgusta 2014. [Elektron. resurs] – URL: http://openjur.de/u/747188.html (data obrashcheniya: 10 sentyabrya 2016).
Spahr S. Internet und Recht: 3. aufl. Zurich: vdf, Hochsch. Verl. An der ATH, 2002. 167 s.
Komarov A.A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya ugolovnogo prava primenitel'no k prestupleniyam, sovershaemym v Internet // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. 2016. № 2. C. 26 - 37. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2016.2.19355. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_19355.html
Apellyatsionnyy sud Berlina. Delo № 2 ARs 91/13. (BGH, 23.04.2013 - 2 ARs 91/13). [Elektron. resurs] – URL: http://openjur.de/u/632526.html (data obrashcheniya: 10 sentyabrya 2016).
Komarov A.A. Kriminologicheskie aspekty moshennichestva v global'noy seti Internet: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Pyatigorsk, 2011. 262 s.
Apellyatsionnyy sud Berlina. Delo № 4 Ws 52/06. (KG, 24.03.2006 - 1 AR 323/06). [Elektron. resurs] – URL: www.judicialis.de/Kammergericht-Berlin_4-Ws-52-06_Beschluss_24.03.2006.html (data obrashcheniya: 10 sentyabrya 2016).
Malinovskiy A.A. Ugolovno-pravovye sistemy: voprosy klassifikatsii // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2008. № 3. S. 14-19.
Malinovskiy A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. M., 1998. 128 s.
Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava: Chasti obshchaya i osobennaya: S primechaniyami, prilozheniyami i dopolneniyami po istorii russkogo prava i zakonodatel'stvu polozhitel'nomu. Chast' obshchaya. T. 1 / Berner A.F.; Prim.: N. Neklyudov, magistr ugolov. prava. SPb.: Tip. N. Tiblena i komp., 1865. 941 s.
Bukhgol'ts E., Lekshis I. Novoe ugolovnoe pravo Germanskoy Demokraticheskoy Respubliki – sotsialisticheskoe pravo // Novoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnykh sotsialisticheskikh stran Evropy / Pod red.: Gel'fer M.A. (Vstup. st.), Kriger G.A. (Vstup. st.), Kuznetsova N.F. (Vstup. st.), Men'shagin V.D. (Vstup. st.). M.: Yurid. lit., 1974. 288 c.

Аннотация: This article focuses on the issues of legal and organizational character associated with the improvement of prescribing practices for certain punishments for crimes of corruption in the social sphere. The author carefully considers the aspects of the topic such as improving the practice of sentencing for crimes of corruption in the Russian Federation. Analysis is conducted on the practice of application of these penalties in recent years. It is noted that the practice of sentencing for corruption (including for crimes of corruption in the social sphere) constantly changed, which is linked to the constant reform of the criminal law in terms of punishment for corruption according to the criminal code. This work also analyzes the judicial practice in this sphere. The main contribution made by the author in this article is that the key directions of improving the practice of sentencing for crimes of corruption in the social sphere should be reduction in the use of the penalty of imprisonment. The author concludes that the systemic application of prison sentences for this category of crime should be replaced with a systemic application of punishment in form of confiscation, revocation of the right to hold any public office, and apply a more flexible and differentiated approach.

Ключевые слова: Responsibility, designation, trial, practice, social, punishment, property, bribe, crime, corruption

Библиография:
Bukalerova L.A., Fortuna K.A. K voprosu o nakazaniyakh za korruptsionnye sluzhebnye podlogi // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 17 - 25.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 10 - 16.
Bukalerova L.A., Fortuna K.A. K voprosu o nakazaniyakh za korruptsionnye sluzhebnye podlogi // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 17 - 25.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 65 - 83. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.1.735. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_735.html
Kozlova N. Bastrykin prosit vernut' radikal'nye mery protiv korruptsii / /Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 24 noyabrya 2014.
Durnev A.E. Kriminologicheskie i ugolovno-pravovye mery bor'by s korystnymi prestupleniyami protiv sobstvennosti. Diss…kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. 162 s.
Arkhiv suda Leninskogo rayona g. Saratova. 2009 god.
Moiseenko V.P. Lishenie spetsial'nogo, voinskogo ili pochetnogo zvaniya, klassnogo china i gosudarstvennykh nagrad kak vid nakazaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave :Ugolovnyy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty. Diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – 2000. – Rostov-na-Donu. – s. 165
M.V. Kostennikov, A.V. Kurakin, I.N. Koshelev Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie obespecheniya sobstvennoy bezopasnosti i protivodeystviya korruptsii v organakh vnutrennikh del (ch. 2) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 2. - C. 38 - 45.
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 9 iyulya 2013 g. № 24 «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve i drugim korruptsionnym prestupleniyam» utochnil (p. 36), chto «…sudam sleduet obsuzhdat' vopros o neobkhodimosti naznacheniya vinovnomu v sovershenii korruptsionnogo prestupleniya litsu dopolnitel'nogo nakazaniya v vide lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu, imeya v vidu, chto takoy vid nakazaniya mozhet byt' naznachen nezavisimo ot togo, predusmotren li on sanktsiey ugolovnogo zakona, po kotoromu kvalifitsirovany deystviya osuzhdennogo».
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Arkhiv suda Leninskogo rayona g. Saratova. 2009 god.
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Plokhov S.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v sotsial'noy sfere (na primere zdravookhraneniya i obrazovaniya Volgogradskoy i Saratovskoy oblastey). Diss… kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov. – 2013. s. 89
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Reshenie Leninskogo rayonnogo suda g. Rostova-na-Donu//URL: http://www. rospravosudie.com/ court-leninskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-rostova-na-donu-rostovskaya-oblast-s/act-103211142
Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel'nosti federal'nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey za 2013 g. («Otchet o rabote sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii po rassmotreniyu del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh № 1-AP»)// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=2361
Borovykh L. Problemy praktiki primeneniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva RF ob otvetstvennosti za vzyatochnichestvo, kommercheskiy podkup i inye korruptsionnye prestupleniya// Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 5. S. 39-40
Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 8 marta 2015 g. № 40-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii"//Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 11 marta 2015 g.
Borisova E.A. Korruptsiya v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: perspektivy sotsial'nogo kontrolya, regional'nyy aspekt: diss. ... kand. sots. nauk. – Moskva, 2013. – 220 s.
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Plokhov S.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v sotsial'noy sfere (na primere zdravookhraneniya i obrazovaniya Volgogradskoy i Saratovskoy oblastey). Diss… kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov. – 2013. s. 85, 86.
Plokhov S.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v sotsial'noy sfere (na primere zdravookhraneniya i obrazovaniya Volgogradskoy i Saratovskoy oblastey). Diss… kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov. – 2013. s. 85, 86.
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Utverzhden Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiĭskoĭ Federatsii 10 oktyabrya 2012 g.// Byuyuleten' Verkhovnogo suda. – № 1. – 2013.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo suda. – № 9. – 2013.
Perechen' prestupleniy korruptsionnoy napravlennosti № 23//Prilozhenie k Ukazaniyu General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii i № 52-11/2 i MVD Rossiyskoy Federatsii № 2 ot 15 fevralya 2012 g. «O vvedenii v deystvie perechney statey Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ispol'zuemykh pri formirovanii statisticheskoy otchetnosti»
Arkhiv suda Leninskogo rayona g. Saratova. 2009 god.
Astaf'eva T.A., Filonenko T.V. Korruptsiya v sfere obrazovaniya / Vladivostokskiy tsentr issledovaniya organizovannoy prestupnosti//www.crime.vl.ru/index.php?p=3636
Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 4 maya 2011 g. № 97-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii" //Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 6 maya 2011 g.
Avdeev V.A. Prinuditel'nye raboty kak novyy vid nakazaniya v sisteme mer ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera // Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. 2012. № 6. S. 100.
Ukaz Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR ot 20 fevralya 1962 g. «Ob usilenii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za vzyatochnichestvo»//SZ SSSR. 1990. T. 10. – s. 564.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 65 - 83. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.1.735. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_735.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 10 - 16.

References (transliteration):
Bukalerova L.A., Fortuna K.A. K voprosu o nakazaniyakh za korruptsionnye sluzhebnye podlogi // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 17 - 25.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 10 - 16.
Bukalerova L.A., Fortuna K.A. K voprosu o nakazaniyakh za korruptsionnye sluzhebnye podlogi // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 17 - 25.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 65 - 83. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.1.735. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_735.html
Kozlova N. Bastrykin prosit vernut' radikal'nye mery protiv korruptsii / /Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 24 noyabrya 2014.
Durnev A.E. Kriminologicheskie i ugolovno-pravovye mery bor'by s korystnymi prestupleniyami protiv sobstvennosti. Diss…kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. 162 s.
Arkhiv suda Leninskogo rayona g. Saratova. 2009 god.
Moiseenko V.P. Lishenie spetsial'nogo, voinskogo ili pochetnogo zvaniya, klassnogo china i gosudarstvennykh nagrad kak vid nakazaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave :Ugolovnyy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty. Diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – 2000. – Rostov-na-Donu. – s. 165
M.V. Kostennikov, A.V. Kurakin, I.N. Koshelev Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie obespecheniya sobstvennoy bezopasnosti i protivodeystviya korruptsii v organakh vnutrennikh del (ch. 2) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 2. - C. 38 - 45.
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 9 iyulya 2013 g. № 24 «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve i drugim korruptsionnym prestupleniyam» utochnil (p. 36), chto «…sudam sleduet obsuzhdat' vopros o neobkhodimosti naznacheniya vinovnomu v sovershenii korruptsionnogo prestupleniya litsu dopolnitel'nogo nakazaniya v vide lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoy deyatel'nost'yu, imeya v vidu, chto takoy vid nakazaniya mozhet byt' naznachen nezavisimo ot togo, predusmotren li on sanktsiey ugolovnogo zakona, po kotoromu kvalifitsirovany deystviya osuzhdennogo».
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Arkhiv suda Leninskogo rayona g. Saratova. 2009 god.
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Plokhov S.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v sotsial'noy sfere (na primere zdravookhraneniya i obrazovaniya Volgogradskoy i Saratovskoy oblastey). Diss… kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov. – 2013. s. 89
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Reshenie Leninskogo rayonnogo suda g. Rostova-na-Donu//URL: http://www. rospravosudie.com/ court-leninskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-rostova-na-donu-rostovskaya-oblast-s/act-103211142
Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel'nosti federal'nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey za 2013 g. («Otchet o rabote sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii po rassmotreniyu del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh № 1-AP»)// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=2361
Borovykh L. Problemy praktiki primeneniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva RF ob otvetstvennosti za vzyatochnichestvo, kommercheskiy podkup i inye korruptsionnye prestupleniya// Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 5. S. 39-40
Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 8 marta 2015 g. № 40-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii"//Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 11 marta 2015 g.
Borisova E.A. Korruptsiya v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: perspektivy sotsial'nogo kontrolya, regional'nyy aspekt: diss. ... kand. sots. nauk. – Moskva, 2013. – 220 s.
Razdel 6 formy № 10.4.1 «Otchet o rezul'tatakh rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del po otdel'nym stat'yam Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vstupivshim v zakonnuyu silu prigovoram i drugim sudebnym postanovleniyam, v tom chisle po prestupleniyam korruptsionnoy napravlennosti»// http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=150&item=2881
Plokhov S.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v sotsial'noy sfere (na primere zdravookhraneniya i obrazovaniya Volgogradskoy i Saratovskoy oblastey). Diss… kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov. – 2013. s. 85, 86.
Plokhov S.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v sotsial'noy sfere (na primere zdravookhraneniya i obrazovaniya Volgogradskoy i Saratovskoy oblastey). Diss… kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov. – 2013. s. 85, 86.
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Statisticheskie i analiticheskie materialy o sostoyanii raboty po vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy, sledstviya i prokurorskogo nadzora za ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sfere bor'by s korruptsiey v 2012 g.// http://genproc.gov.ru/anticor/doks/document-81540/
Utverzhden Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiĭskoĭ Federatsii 10 oktyabrya 2012 g.// Byuyuleten' Verkhovnogo suda. – № 1. – 2013.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo suda. – № 9. – 2013.
Perechen' prestupleniy korruptsionnoy napravlennosti № 23//Prilozhenie k Ukazaniyu General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii i № 52-11/2 i MVD Rossiyskoy Federatsii № 2 ot 15 fevralya 2012 g. «O vvedenii v deystvie perechney statey Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ispol'zuemykh pri formirovanii statisticheskoy otchetnosti»
Arkhiv suda Leninskogo rayona g. Saratova. 2009 god.
Astaf'eva T.A., Filonenko T.V. Korruptsiya v sfere obrazovaniya / Vladivostokskiy tsentr issledovaniya organizovannoy prestupnosti//www.crime.vl.ru/index.php?p=3636
Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 4 maya 2011 g. № 97-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii" //Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 6 maya 2011 g.
Avdeev V.A. Prinuditel'nye raboty kak novyy vid nakazaniya v sisteme mer ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera // Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. 2012. № 6. S. 100.
Ukaz Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR ot 20 fevralya 1962 g. «Ob usilenii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za vzyatochnichestvo»//SZ SSSR. 1990. T. 10. – s. 564.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 65 - 83. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.1.735. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_735.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 10 - 16.

Аннотация: This research explores the following: norms of criminal and criminal procedural legislation that regulate the key positions on prison crimes; normative legal acts that regulate the order of functionality of correctional facilities; materials from surveys of employees of correctional facilities; disciplinary practice of correctional facilities and personal profiles of inmates who committed crimes while in prison; criminogenic determinants that contribute to commission of crime in correctional facilities, the system of measures on their prevention, as well as court cases on this category of crimes; materials from cell searches and personal cases on inmates; financial records. Based on examination of the empirical material and analysis of the statistical data, the author determines the key issues of correctional facilities in the area of crime prevention. The author proposes measures for individual prevention of actions aimed at disorganizing the work of facilities that provide isolation from society. A claim is made that there is a need to consider factors that contribute to commission of crime and devise certain measures on their prevention. The author proposes introduction of new approaches towards individual crime prevention and job placement for inmates for the purpose of their resocialization and prevention of prison crimes.  

Ключевые слова: Imprisonment, Punishment, Violence, Criminal identity, Work placement , Video surveillance, Convict , Crime, Preventative measures, Prison crime

Библиография:
Abel'tsev S.N. Lichnost' prestupnika i problemy kriminal'nogo nasiliya. M., 2010
Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh. — M.: Firma «Stels», 1995.
Kazak B.B. Voprosy teorii i praktiki upravleniya v usloviyakh reformirovaniya UIS: Sb. nauch. tr. – Ryazan', Akademiya prava i upravleniya Minyusta Rossii, 2001.
Kursom ukrepleniya pravoporyadka i zakonnosti // Vedomosti UIS, № 9, 2008.
Mikhlin A.S. Lichnost' osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i problemy ikh ispravleniya i perevospitaniya. Frunze, 1980
Sturova M.P. Vospitatel'naya sistema ispravitel'no-trudovykh uchrezhdeniy (teoretiko-pedagogicheskiy i organizatsionnyy aspekty): Dis. … d-ra ped. nauk v forme nauch. dok. M., 1991.
Opyt gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva UFSIN Rossii po respublike Komi : analit. obzor. / S.A Khokhrin S.N. Smirnov. – Ryazan': Akademiya FSIN Rossii, 2014.

References (transliteration):
Abel'tsev S.N. Lichnost' prestupnika i problemy kriminal'nogo nasiliya. M., 2010
Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh. — M.: Firma «Stels», 1995.
Kazak B.B. Voprosy teorii i praktiki upravleniya v usloviyakh reformirovaniya UIS: Sb. nauch. tr. – Ryazan', Akademiya prava i upravleniya Minyusta Rossii, 2001.
Kursom ukrepleniya pravoporyadka i zakonnosti // Vedomosti UIS, № 9, 2008.
Mikhlin A.S. Lichnost' osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i problemy ikh ispravleniya i perevospitaniya. Frunze, 1980
Sturova M.P. Vospitatel'naya sistema ispravitel'no-trudovykh uchrezhdeniy (teoretiko-pedagogicheskiy i organizatsionnyy aspekty): Dis. … d-ra ped. nauk v forme nauch. dok. M., 1991.
Opyt gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva UFSIN Rossii po respublike Komi : analit. obzor. / S.A Khokhrin S.N. Smirnov. – Ryazan': Akademiya FSIN Rossii, 2014.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the issues of the legal and organizational nature associated with implementation of fines for corruption crimes in social sphere. The author carefully examines such aspects of the topic as improvements to the practice of application of these measures over the recent years. A conclusion is made that the practice of issuing fines for corruption (including corruption crimes in the social sphere) are always undergoing change, which is closely tied to the constant reforms in the criminal law with regards to corruption crimes. The author’s contribution into the research of this topic is the discovery of the need to improve the practice of assignment of punishments for corruption crimes in form of fines. The author concludes that the systemic application of imprisonment as form of punishment for corruption crimes is not ideal due to various reasons, including economic, the threat of a systematic replace of the unimplemented and most popular method of punishment for such crimes – fines, can become an effective means in the fight against the “uncollectability” of the ladder.

Ключевые слова: Execution, problem, improvement, criminality, crime, corruption, social, sphere, responsibility, fine

Библиография:
Burlakov V.N., Pryakhina N.I. Effektivnost' nakazaniya za vzyatochnichestvo // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 92.
Latypov R. Rassmotrenie ugolovnykh del korruptsionnoy napravlennosti, po kotorym primenyalas' mera nakazaniya v vide shtrafa // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 34.
Bugaevskaya N.V. Naznachenie nakazaniya v vide shtrafa, kratnogo summe vzyatki, kak otrazhenie antikorruptsionnoy politiki v novykh finansovo-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Izvestiya tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 43.
R. N. Ghosh, M. A. B. Siddique. Corruption, Good Governance and Economic Development: Contemporary Analysis and Case Studies.-World Scientific. – 2014. – 284 p.
Pavlinov A.V. Monitoring effektivnosti primeneniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya za prestupleniya korruptsionnoy napravlennosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 111.
http://www.korupcii.net/index.php?s=4&id=70
Kozlovtsev A.A. Prichiny i usloviya korruptsii (po materialam Stavropol'skogo kraya) // Problemy organizatsii i osushchestvleniya prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva o protivodeystvii korruptsii. – M., 2009. – S. 111
Bugaevskaya N.V. Naznachenie nakazaniya v vide shtrafa, kratnogo summe vzyatki, kak otrazhenie antikorruptsionnoy politiki v novykh finansovo-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Izvestiya tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 43.
Kozlova N. Bastrykin prosit vernut' radikal'nye mery protiv korruptsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2014. – 24 noyabrya
Sichinava I.M. Ugolovno-pravovye mery protivodeystviya korruptsionnym prestupleniyam: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – S. 174.
Andreeva L.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnykh nakazaniy za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii. – 2014. – № 33. – S. 18.
Bugaevskaya N.V. Naznachenie nakazaniya v vide shtrafa, kratnogo summe vzyatki, kak otrazhenie antikorruptsionnoy politiki v novykh finansovo-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Izvestiya tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 47.
Khanipova R. Sh. Teoriya i praktika primeneniya uslovnogo osuzhdeniya // Vestnik TISBI. – 2004. – № 4. – S. 19.
Skoblikov P. Korruptsiya i ee uslovnoe osuzhdenie // Yurist. – 2003. – № 33. – S. 5.
Mosienko V.P. Lishenie spetsial'nogo, voinskogo ili pochetnogo zvaniya, klassnogo china i gosudarstvennykh nagrad kak vid nakazaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: Ugolovnyy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty: Dis…kand. yurid. nauk. – Rostov-na-Donu. 2000. – S. 165.
Mel'nikov M.G. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak mera ugolovno-pravovogo obremeneniya: pravovaya priroda i zakonodatel'naya reglamentatsiya // Obshchestvo i pravo. – 2010. – № 4 (31). – S. 44.
M.V. Kostennikov K voprosu o protivodeystvii korruptsii v politsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 49 - 50. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.01.9.

References (transliteration):
Burlakov V.N., Pryakhina N.I. Effektivnost' nakazaniya za vzyatochnichestvo // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 92.
Latypov R. Rassmotrenie ugolovnykh del korruptsionnoy napravlennosti, po kotorym primenyalas' mera nakazaniya v vide shtrafa // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 34.
Bugaevskaya N.V. Naznachenie nakazaniya v vide shtrafa, kratnogo summe vzyatki, kak otrazhenie antikorruptsionnoy politiki v novykh finansovo-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Izvestiya tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 43.
R. N. Ghosh, M. A. B. Siddique. Corruption, Good Governance and Economic Development: Contemporary Analysis and Case Studies.-World Scientific. – 2014. – 284 p.
Pavlinov A.V. Monitoring effektivnosti primeneniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya za prestupleniya korruptsionnoy napravlennosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 111.
http://www.korupcii.net/index.php?s=4&id=70
Kozlovtsev A.A. Prichiny i usloviya korruptsii (po materialam Stavropol'skogo kraya) // Problemy organizatsii i osushchestvleniya prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva o protivodeystvii korruptsii. – M., 2009. – S. 111
Bugaevskaya N.V. Naznachenie nakazaniya v vide shtrafa, kratnogo summe vzyatki, kak otrazhenie antikorruptsionnoy politiki v novykh finansovo-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Izvestiya tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 43.
Kozlova N. Bastrykin prosit vernut' radikal'nye mery protiv korruptsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2014. – 24 noyabrya
Sichinava I.M. Ugolovno-pravovye mery protivodeystviya korruptsionnym prestupleniyam: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – S. 174.
Andreeva L.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnykh nakazaniy za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii. – 2014. – № 33. – S. 18.
Bugaevskaya N.V. Naznachenie nakazaniya v vide shtrafa, kratnogo summe vzyatki, kak otrazhenie antikorruptsionnoy politiki v novykh finansovo-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Izvestiya tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 47.
Khanipova R. Sh. Teoriya i praktika primeneniya uslovnogo osuzhdeniya // Vestnik TISBI. – 2004. – № 4. – S. 19.
Skoblikov P. Korruptsiya i ee uslovnoe osuzhdenie // Yurist. – 2003. – № 33. – S. 5.
Mosienko V.P. Lishenie spetsial'nogo, voinskogo ili pochetnogo zvaniya, klassnogo china i gosudarstvennykh nagrad kak vid nakazaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: Ugolovnyy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty: Dis…kand. yurid. nauk. – Rostov-na-Donu. 2000. – S. 165.
Mel'nikov M.G. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak mera ugolovno-pravovogo obremeneniya: pravovaya priroda i zakonodatel'naya reglamentatsiya // Obshchestvo i pravo. – 2010. – № 4 (31). – S. 44.
M.V. Kostennikov K voprosu o protivodeystvii korruptsii v politsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 49 - 50. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.01.9.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the criminal law norms that regulate the responsibility for tax violations in the CIS countries. The author explores the objective and subjective elements of these violations, its qualifications, as well as the questions of exemption from criminal responsibility for these offences. A peculiar attention is given to the questions of legislative regulation of the norms on criminal evasion from taxes. The scientific novelty of this research consists in the complex research of the norms on criminal tax evasion, as well as determination of the legislative gaps and formulation of the ways to fix them. Among the main conclusions are the author’s highlights of the positive and negative aspects of the legal regulation of criminal responsibility for tax violations in the CIS countries.

Ключевые слова: Model Criminal Code of the CIS, Elements of crime, Criminal evasion, Taxation, Foreign countries, Criminal Code, CIS countries, Criminal responsibility , Tax evasion, Taxes

Библиография:
Dolotov R.O. Kvaziugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits za posobnichestvo v nalogovykh prestupleniyakh // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (29-30 yanvarya 2015 g.). – Moskva: RG-Press, 2015. S. 159-162.
Naukovo-praktichniy komentar Krimіnal'nogo kodeksu Ukraїni.-4-te vid., pererobl. ta dopovn. / Za red. M. І. Mel'nika, M. І. Khavronyuka.-K.: Yuridichna dumka, 2007. S. 601.
O.G. Karpovich Protivodeystvie nalogovym prestupleniyam po zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Aktual'nye voprosy // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus».
Tegetaeva O.R. Optimizatsiya nalogooblozheniya VS uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 10. - C. 889 - 893. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.10.12707.
Bayteryakov R.E. O vozmozhnosti vvedeniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits (na primere krupneyshikh nalogoplatel'shchikov) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 231 - 234. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15778.
Khachatryan A.K. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 9. - C. 846 - 855. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.9.13059.
Salkazanov A.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2013. - 11. - C. 852 - 859. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961.
Akopdzhanova M.O. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana poryadka uplaty sborov v byudzhet: novoe v zakonodatel'stve // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2015. - 3. - C. 224 - 229. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2015.3.14463.

References (transliteration):
Dolotov R.O. Kvaziugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits za posobnichestvo v nalogovykh prestupleniyakh // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (29-30 yanvarya 2015 g.). – Moskva: RG-Press, 2015. S. 159-162.
Naukovo-praktichniy komentar Krimіnal'nogo kodeksu Ukraїni.-4-te vid., pererobl. ta dopovn. / Za red. M. І. Mel'nika, M. І. Khavronyuka.-K.: Yuridichna dumka, 2007. S. 601.
O.G. Karpovich Protivodeystvie nalogovym prestupleniyam po zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Aktual'nye voprosy // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus».
Tegetaeva O.R. Optimizatsiya nalogooblozheniya VS uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 10. - C. 889 - 893. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.10.12707.
Bayteryakov R.E. O vozmozhnosti vvedeniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits (na primere krupneyshikh nalogoplatel'shchikov) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 231 - 234. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15778.
Khachatryan A.K. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 9. - C. 846 - 855. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.9.13059.
Salkazanov A.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2013. - 11. - C. 852 - 859. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961.
Akopdzhanova M.O. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana poryadka uplaty sborov v byudzhet: novoe v zakonodatel'stve // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2015. - 3. - C. 224 - 229. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2015.3.14463.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the three fundamental concepts of the Russian Criminal Penal Law – “classification of convicts”, “progressive system of execution and serving of the sentence”, and “degree of correction of a convict”. The author examines the concept of “classification of convicts”, which lies at the basis of the separate housing of inmates to ensure isolation of various groups of inmates in order to avoid negative influence of the more dangerous criminals upon the less dangerous. The “progressive system” means that the inmates must be divided into several classes, and that based on the progression of their sentence their position must progressively improve. This defines the interconnection between the concepts of “progressive system” and “degree of correction”. Based on the study of the views of various scholars on the current and previous versions of the penal legislation, the author makes proposals for improving the approaches towards the modern progressive system, classification of convicts, and determination of the degree of their correction.

Ключевые слова: punishment conditions, social adaptation, housing of inmates outside of prison, classification of convicts, progressive system, degree of correction, change of conditions, correction, convict, relapse prevention

Библиография:
Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva, V.E. Eminova. M., 2000. – 512 s.
Skakov A.B. Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda progressivnoy sistemy ispolneniya nakazaniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2003. № 5. S. 31-35.
Brilliantov, A.V. Differentsiatsiya nakazaniya i stepen' ispravleniya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody. M., 1997. – 132 s.
Ispolnenie nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody: uchebnoe posobie. / pod red. dok-ra yurid. nauk., professora V.A. Utkina. Tomsk, 2005. – 45 s.
Klassifikatsiya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i opredelenie im vida ispravitel'no-trudovoy kolonii / Bryzgalov V.N., Struchkov N.A. Kiev, 1967. – 110 s.
Sovetskoe ispravitel'no-trudovoe pravo Osobennaya chast': uchebnik pod red. Melent'eva M.P., Struchkova N. A. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1987. – 351 s.
Belyaev N. A. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v ispravitel'no-trudovykh uchrezhdeniyakh: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. L., 1963. 31 s.
Perkov I.M. Klassifikatsiya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i raspredelenie ikh po ITU. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR, 1978. – 39 s.
Tumanov G. A. Nekotorye voprosy klassifikatsii prestupnikov i lits, osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody / Trudy VNI SSSR M. 1963. № 9. S. 105 – 110.
Poznyshev S.V. Ocherki tyur'movedeniya. M., 1915. – 320 s.
Bryzgalov V.N. Klassifikatsiya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i vopros o progressivnoy sisteme // Materialy Vsesoyuznogo seminara prepodavateley ispravitel'no-trudovogo prava yuridicheskikh fakul'tetov universitetov, yuridicheskikh institutov, vysshikh i srednikh spetsial'nykh uchebnykh zavedeniy Ministerstva okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka SSSR. 6-10 fevralya 1967 goda.-M.: NIiRIO VSh MOOP SSSR, 1968.-S. 42-49.
Skakov A.B. Progressivnaya sistema ispolneniya lisheniya svobody i ee otrazhenie v novom zakonodatel'stve respubliki Kazakhstan. Astana. 2004. – 225 s.
Kharakteristika osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody (po materialam spetsial'noy perepisi 1999 g.). M., 2001. – 464 s.
Tkachevskiy Yu.M. Osvobozhdenie ot otbyvaniya nakazaniy po deystvuyushchemu sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Avtoref. … diss. dokt. yurid nauk. M., 1965. – 65 s
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. K voprosu o klassifikatsii administrativno-profilakticheskikh mer // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 9. - C. 913 - 920. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.15782.
Belyaeva G.S. K voprosu o sushchnosti i sisteme pravovykh sredstv // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 3. - C. 306 - 312. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.3.14347.
Aynur Turisbek Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie funktsiy v razlichnykh vidakh gosudarstvennoy sluzhby. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 3. - C. 8 - 12.
Belov V.I., Belova E.Yu. Sotsial'naya adaptatsiya nesovershennoletnikh osuzhdennykh v nekotorykh zarubezhnykh stranakh // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2014. - 2. - C. 115 - 125. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8681.2014.1.12966.
I.L. Trunov Politicheskie prava lits soderzhashchikhsya pod strazhey i osuzhdennykh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 2. - C. 5 - 11.

References (transliteration):
Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva, V.E. Eminova. M., 2000. – 512 s.
Skakov A.B. Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda progressivnoy sistemy ispolneniya nakazaniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2003. № 5. S. 31-35.
Brilliantov, A.V. Differentsiatsiya nakazaniya i stepen' ispravleniya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody. M., 1997. – 132 s.
Ispolnenie nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody: uchebnoe posobie. / pod red. dok-ra yurid. nauk., professora V.A. Utkina. Tomsk, 2005. – 45 s.
Klassifikatsiya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i opredelenie im vida ispravitel'no-trudovoy kolonii / Bryzgalov V.N., Struchkov N.A. Kiev, 1967. – 110 s.
Sovetskoe ispravitel'no-trudovoe pravo Osobennaya chast': uchebnik pod red. Melent'eva M.P., Struchkova N. A. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1987. – 351 s.
Belyaev N. A. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v ispravitel'no-trudovykh uchrezhdeniyakh: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. L., 1963. 31 s.
Perkov I.M. Klassifikatsiya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i raspredelenie ikh po ITU. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR, 1978. – 39 s.
Tumanov G. A. Nekotorye voprosy klassifikatsii prestupnikov i lits, osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody / Trudy VNI SSSR M. 1963. № 9. S. 105 – 110.
Poznyshev S.V. Ocherki tyur'movedeniya. M., 1915. – 320 s.
Bryzgalov V.N. Klassifikatsiya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i vopros o progressivnoy sisteme // Materialy Vsesoyuznogo seminara prepodavateley ispravitel'no-trudovogo prava yuridicheskikh fakul'tetov universitetov, yuridicheskikh institutov, vysshikh i srednikh spetsial'nykh uchebnykh zavedeniy Ministerstva okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka SSSR. 6-10 fevralya 1967 goda.-M.: NIiRIO VSh MOOP SSSR, 1968.-S. 42-49.
Skakov A.B. Progressivnaya sistema ispolneniya lisheniya svobody i ee otrazhenie v novom zakonodatel'stve respubliki Kazakhstan. Astana. 2004. – 225 s.
Kharakteristika osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody (po materialam spetsial'noy perepisi 1999 g.). M., 2001. – 464 s.
Tkachevskiy Yu.M. Osvobozhdenie ot otbyvaniya nakazaniy po deystvuyushchemu sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Avtoref. … diss. dokt. yurid nauk. M., 1965. – 65 s
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. K voprosu o klassifikatsii administrativno-profilakticheskikh mer // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 9. - C. 913 - 920. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.15782.
Belyaeva G.S. K voprosu o sushchnosti i sisteme pravovykh sredstv // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 3. - C. 306 - 312. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.3.14347.
Aynur Turisbek Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie funktsiy v razlichnykh vidakh gosudarstvennoy sluzhby. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 3. - C. 8 - 12.
Belov V.I., Belova E.Yu. Sotsial'naya adaptatsiya nesovershennoletnikh osuzhdennykh v nekotorykh zarubezhnykh stranakh // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2014. - 2. - C. 115 - 125. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8681.2014.1.12966.
I.L. Trunov Politicheskie prava lits soderzhashchikhsya pod strazhey i osuzhdennykh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 2. - C. 5 - 11.

Аннотация: The subject of this work is a comprehensive study of the rules of domestic and foreign penal legislation, which codifies the implementation of preventative measures for inmates serving a sentence in penitentiaries, which include isolation, protective custody, supervision, measures of disciplinary responsibility, realization of educational activities, organizational-administrative and rapid search measures; in lawful cases application of security measures, ensuring that inmates carry out their responsibilities; separation of different categories of inmates; measures of prevention and thwarting violations. The author determines inconsistencies in the formulation of the preventative measures, and as part of the conclusion gives an original classification of preventative measures in penitentiaries:1.     Actions that prevent crimes; measures aimed at prevention of violations to the regime of serving the sentence, as well as security measures;2.     Means implemented based on the court ruling, as well as the means that are based on the inmates’ evasive behavior.

Ключевые слова: the system of elements of punishment, preventative process, penal regime, deprivation of liberty, prisons, preventative measures, convicts, prevention of offenses, target penitentiary law, content of punishment

Библиография:
Ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 08.01.1997 № 1-FZ (red. ot 20.04.2015) / Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 13.01.1997. № 2. st. 198.
Sevryugin A.S. Analiticheskie metody upravleniya operativno-rezhimnoy sluzhboy ITU: Ucheb. posobie. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1978. 127 s.
Artem'ev N.S. Nekrasov A.P. Retsidivnaya prestupnost' v mestakh lisheniya svobody: kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie.-Samara: Samarskiy yurid. institut FSIN Rossii. 2007. 195 s.
Shamis A.V. Pravovye i organizatsionnye osnovy deyatel'nosti VTK: Ucheb. posobie / Pod red. N.S. Kir'yakova. M. 1975. 159 s.
Zaytseva E.N. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar. 1998. 175 s.
Minenko P.V. O roli ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniy v preduprezhdenii retsidivnoy prestupnosti osuzhdennykh za prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2006. № 1. S. 288-293.
Ponomarev S.A. Osobennosti organizatsii nadzora za osuzhdennymi, sostoyashchimi na profilakticheskom uchete // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo. 2011. № 1. S. 53-56.
Belyaev N.A. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya. Izd. Leningradskogo universiteta. 1963. 185 s.
Martsev A.I. Spetsial'noe preduprezhdenie prestupleniy. Uchebnoe posobie. Omsk. 1977. 84 s.
Antonyan Yu.M., Kolyshnitsyna E.N. Motivatsiya povedeniya osuzhdennykh. M. 2009. 144 s.
Kostyuk M.F. Preduprezhdenie prestupleniy, sovershaemykh v mestakh lisheniya svobody // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 27 (281). S. 96-98.
Eleonskiy V.A. Lishenie svobody kak nakazanie, soedinennoe s ispravitel'no-trudovym vozdeystviem. Ryazan': Ryaz. vyssh. shk. MVD SSSR. 1975. 55 s.
Drovosekov G.V. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v ispravitel'no-trudovykh uchrezhdeniyakh. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1985. 39 s.
Talakin K.V. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie prestupleniy protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka, sovershaemykh osuzhdennymi v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan'. 2004. 185 s.
Generalov B.C., Yakovlev A.I. Spetsial'noe (chastnoe) preduprezhdenie prestupleniy v protsesse ispolneniya nakazaniya v ITU. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1987. 46 s.
Struchkov N.A. Kurs ispravitel'no-trudovogo prava. Problemy osobennoy chasti. M. 1985. 240 s.
Yuzhanin V.E. Spetsial'no-predupreditel'naya deyatel'nost' administratsii ITU: Ucheb. posobie. Ryazan'. 1990. 100 s.
Sovetskoe ispravitel'no-trudovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Uchebnik. Ryazan'. 1987. 391 s.
Zakon RF ot 21.07.1993 № 5473-1 (red. ot 06.04.2015) «Ob uchrezhdeniyakh i organakh, ispolnyayushchikh ugolovnye nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody» // Vedomosti SND i VS RF. 19.08.1993. № 33. st. 1316.
Kommentariy v Ispravitel'no-trudovomu kodeksu RSFSR / Pod redaktsiey V.M. Blinova. M. Yuridicheskaya literatura. 1973. 280 s.
Zakhtsev E.M. Mery bezopasnosti v sisteme sredstv obespecheniya rezhima v ITU // Aktual'nye problemy pravovedeniya v sovremennyy period. Tomsk. 1991. S. 205.
Prikaz Minyusta Rossii ot 20.05.2013 № 72 «Ob utverzhdenii Instruktsii po profilaktike pravonarusheniy sredi lits, soderzhashchikhsya v uchrezhdeniyakh ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 119. 05.06.2013

References (transliteration):
Ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 08.01.1997 № 1-FZ (red. ot 20.04.2015) / Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 13.01.1997. № 2. st. 198.
Sevryugin A.S. Analiticheskie metody upravleniya operativno-rezhimnoy sluzhboy ITU: Ucheb. posobie. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1978. 127 s.
Artem'ev N.S. Nekrasov A.P. Retsidivnaya prestupnost' v mestakh lisheniya svobody: kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie.-Samara: Samarskiy yurid. institut FSIN Rossii. 2007. 195 s.
Shamis A.V. Pravovye i organizatsionnye osnovy deyatel'nosti VTK: Ucheb. posobie / Pod red. N.S. Kir'yakova. M. 1975. 159 s.
Zaytseva E.N. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar. 1998. 175 s.
Minenko P.V. O roli ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniy v preduprezhdenii retsidivnoy prestupnosti osuzhdennykh za prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2006. № 1. S. 288-293.
Ponomarev S.A. Osobennosti organizatsii nadzora za osuzhdennymi, sostoyashchimi na profilakticheskom uchete // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo. 2011. № 1. S. 53-56.
Belyaev N.A. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya. Izd. Leningradskogo universiteta. 1963. 185 s.
Martsev A.I. Spetsial'noe preduprezhdenie prestupleniy. Uchebnoe posobie. Omsk. 1977. 84 s.
Antonyan Yu.M., Kolyshnitsyna E.N. Motivatsiya povedeniya osuzhdennykh. M. 2009. 144 s.
Kostyuk M.F. Preduprezhdenie prestupleniy, sovershaemykh v mestakh lisheniya svobody // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 27 (281). S. 96-98.
Eleonskiy V.A. Lishenie svobody kak nakazanie, soedinennoe s ispravitel'no-trudovym vozdeystviem. Ryazan': Ryaz. vyssh. shk. MVD SSSR. 1975. 55 s.
Drovosekov G.V. Tseli nakazaniya i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v ispravitel'no-trudovykh uchrezhdeniyakh. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1985. 39 s.
Talakin K.V. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie prestupleniy protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka, sovershaemykh osuzhdennymi v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan'. 2004. 185 s.
Generalov B.C., Yakovlev A.I. Spetsial'noe (chastnoe) preduprezhdenie prestupleniy v protsesse ispolneniya nakazaniya v ITU. Ryazan': RVSh MVD SSSR. 1987. 46 s.
Struchkov N.A. Kurs ispravitel'no-trudovogo prava. Problemy osobennoy chasti. M. 1985. 240 s.
Yuzhanin V.E. Spetsial'no-predupreditel'naya deyatel'nost' administratsii ITU: Ucheb. posobie. Ryazan'. 1990. 100 s.
Sovetskoe ispravitel'no-trudovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Uchebnik. Ryazan'. 1987. 391 s.
Zakon RF ot 21.07.1993 № 5473-1 (red. ot 06.04.2015) «Ob uchrezhdeniyakh i organakh, ispolnyayushchikh ugolovnye nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody» // Vedomosti SND i VS RF. 19.08.1993. № 33. st. 1316.
Kommentariy v Ispravitel'no-trudovomu kodeksu RSFSR / Pod redaktsiey V.M. Blinova. M. Yuridicheskaya literatura. 1973. 280 s.
Zakhtsev E.M. Mery bezopasnosti v sisteme sredstv obespecheniya rezhima v ITU // Aktual'nye problemy pravovedeniya v sovremennyy period. Tomsk. 1991. S. 205.
Prikaz Minyusta Rossii ot 20.05.2013 № 72 «Ob utverzhdenii Instruktsii po profilaktike pravonarusheniy sredi lits, soderzhashchikhsya v uchrezhdeniyakh ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 119. 05.06.2013

Аннотация: The object of this research is the public relations in the area of use of physical force by the members of Voluntary People's Druzhina. A special attention is given to the legality and grounds for use of physical force by druzhinniks in self-defense, protection of third parties, and execution of their tasks. The author carefully examines the questions of correlation of the necessary defense within the frameworks of the Federal Law “On Participation of Citizens in Maintenance of Public Order” and Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the questions of legality of detention of individuals caught by druzhinniks at the scene of the crime. The author conducted comparative analysis of the legislation that regulates the work of druzhinniks with the law “On Police”, and used the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses for the purposes of studying the possibilities of use of physical force by druzhinniks and correspondence of this use with the legislation. The work presents the research on the legal precedent from the moment the law went into force, as well as review of the foreign precedent (Belarus, Tajikistan, Japan, and UK) on cases of use of physical force by members of law enforcement.

Ключевые слова: Voluntary People's Druzhina, Necessary defense, Absolute necessity, Measures, Druzhinnik, Use of force, Responsibility, Public order, Detention, Compulsion measures

Библиография:
Boskhamdzhieva N.A., Kashkina E.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie vzaimodeystviya organov vnutrennikh del s institutami grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sfere preduprezhdeniya pravonarusheniy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 9. - C. 13 - 17.
Reshenie Odintsovskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti po delu № 12-871/14 // https://odintsovo--mo.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=119887882&delo_id=1502001&new=&text_number=1(data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Mozhginskogo rayonnogo suda (Udmurtskaya respublika) ot 3 marta 2016 g. po delu № 12-24/2016 // https://mozhginskiygor--udm.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=48071391&delo_id=1502001&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Krasnogvardeyskogo rayonnogo suda g. Sankt-Peterburga № 12-374/14 ot 14 noyabrya 2014 g. //https://kgv--spb.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=55803738&delo_id=1502001&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Traktorozavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Volgograda ot 11 dekabrya 2015 g. po delu № 12-331/2015; // https://trac--vol.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=79506240&delo_id=1502001&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Postanovlenie Tsentral'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Sochi (Krasnodarskiy kray) № 1-123/2016 1-126/2016 ot 9 marta 2016 g. po delu № 1-123/2016 // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/zTEISvfNE765/?regular-txt=®ular-case_doc=1-123%2F2016+®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=1001®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1467966797642 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Postanovlenie № 1 Avtozavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Tol'yatti (Samarskaya oblast') 975/2015 ot 27 noyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-975/2015 // https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocument.html?id=9967eeec59efe98b6cf1ef48cf85daa9&shard=Ugolovnye dela&fieldName=court_document_documentext1_tag&from=p (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Dzerzhinskogo rayonnogo suda g. Volgograda № 12-74/2016 12-805/2015 ot 14 yanvarya 2016 g. po delu № 12-74/2016 // https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocument.html?id=8a2289e127afab1e7db781b6518f0c85&shard=Administrativnye dela&fieldName=court_document_documentext1_tag&from=p(data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Oktyabr'skogo gorodskogo suda (Samarskaya oblast') № 1-93/2015 ot 1 oktyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-93/2015 // https://oktiabrsky--sam.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=33061988&delo_id=1540006&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Pervoural'skogo gorodskogo suda (Sverdlovskaya oblast') № 1-60/2015 1-618/2014 ot 19 marta 2015 g. po delu № 1-60/2015 // https://pervouralsky--svd.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=56153564&delo_id=1540006&new=&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Postanovlenie Novoaltayskogo gorodskogo suda (Altayskiy kray) № 5-1245/2015 ot 3 oktyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 5-1245/2015 // https://novaltaisky--alt.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=23938036&delo_id=1500001&new=&text_number=1&case_id=23625963 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Anapskogo gorodskogo suda (Krasnodarskiy kray) № 1-172/2015 ot 11 dekabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-172/2015 // http://sudebnyeresheniya.rf/bsr/case/7686941 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Vyselkovskogo rayonnogo suda (Krasnodarskiy kray) № 1-182/2015 ot 11 noyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-182/2015 // https://viselkovsky--krd.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=73574330&delo_id=1540006&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Nechevina N.D.. Pravovoe Regulirovanie uchastiya grazhdan v obespechenii pravoporyadka v sovremennyy period // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - M.: [b.n.], 2005 g. - № 7. S. 43
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo suda Udmurtskoy respubliki № 4A-24/2016 4A-852/2015 ot 26 yanvarya 2016 g. po delu № 4A-24/2016 // https://vs--udm.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=788412&delo_id=2550001&new=&text_number=1&case_id=744154 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Syzranskogo gorodskogo suda (Samarskaya oblast') № 1-44/2016 1-702/2015 ot 27 yanvarya 2016 g. po delu № 1-44/2016 // https://syzransky--sam.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=40307902&delo_id=1540006&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Zakon respubliki Tadzhikistan "Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka" № 566 ot 03.12.2009 // antitip.tj›ru/files/uchastgrazhdan.doc (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2016)
Egoryshev S.V. Iz zarubezhnogo opyta vzaimodeystviya pravookhranitel'nykh organov s obshchestvennost'yu// Vestnik Ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. - M. : Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2008 g. S.121-125
Kapinus O.S. Neobkhodimaya oborona i kraynyaya neobkhodimost' po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh stran // Vestnik Akademii general'noy Prokuratury. - M.: 2008 g.- № 3-5 S.41
Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 26 iyunya 2003 goda №214-Z «Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane pravoporyadka» (red. ot 04.01.2014) // http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=3691 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2016)
Kornev A.S. Ob ustranenii i vospolnenii probelov v pravev svyazi s ustarevaniem deystvuyushchego zakonodatel'stva // Voprosy ekonomiki i prava.-2014 g.-№ 76 S. 7-9.
Shcherbakov O.N. Otdel'nye aspekty uchastiya grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2016. - 5. - C. 382 - 386. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.5.16772.
Gorbunov V.Yu. Defekty mekhanizma realizatsii grazhdanami politseyskikh polnomochiy v oblasti okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka i obespecheniya obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika.-Tyumen': Tyumenskiy institut povysheniya kvalifikatsii sotrudnikov MVD RF, 2015 g.-№ 4 (34), S. 140-147
Beketov O.I.; Shukhman N.V. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 2 aprelya 2014 g. № 44-FZ «Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka" (podgotovlen dlya sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus») // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
p. 18-19 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27 sentyabrya 2012 g. № 19 «O primenenii sudami zakonodatel'stva o neobkhodimoy oborone i prichinenii vreda pri zaderzhanii litsa, sovershivshego prestuplenie» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii, noyabr' 2012 g., № 11
St.st. 19, 20-23 Federal'nogo zakona ot 07.02.2011 № 3-FZ (red. ot 23.06.2016) «O politsii» // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus»
Federal'nyy zakon ot 2 aprelya 2014 g. № 44-FZ «Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 7 aprelya 2014 g. N 14 st. 1536
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 02.06.2016) // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus»

References (transliteration):
Boskhamdzhieva N.A., Kashkina E.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie vzaimodeystviya organov vnutrennikh del s institutami grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sfere preduprezhdeniya pravonarusheniy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 9. - C. 13 - 17.
Reshenie Odintsovskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti po delu № 12-871/14 // https://odintsovo--mo.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=119887882&delo_id=1502001&new=&text_number=1(data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Mozhginskogo rayonnogo suda (Udmurtskaya respublika) ot 3 marta 2016 g. po delu № 12-24/2016 // https://mozhginskiygor--udm.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=48071391&delo_id=1502001&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Krasnogvardeyskogo rayonnogo suda g. Sankt-Peterburga № 12-374/14 ot 14 noyabrya 2014 g. //https://kgv--spb.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=55803738&delo_id=1502001&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Traktorozavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Volgograda ot 11 dekabrya 2015 g. po delu № 12-331/2015; // https://trac--vol.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=79506240&delo_id=1502001&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Postanovlenie Tsentral'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Sochi (Krasnodarskiy kray) № 1-123/2016 1-126/2016 ot 9 marta 2016 g. po delu № 1-123/2016 // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/zTEISvfNE765/?regular-txt=®ular-case_doc=1-123%2F2016+®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=1001®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1467966797642 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Postanovlenie № 1 Avtozavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Tol'yatti (Samarskaya oblast') 975/2015 ot 27 noyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-975/2015 // https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocument.html?id=9967eeec59efe98b6cf1ef48cf85daa9&shard=Ugolovnye dela&fieldName=court_document_documentext1_tag&from=p (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Reshenie Dzerzhinskogo rayonnogo suda g. Volgograda № 12-74/2016 12-805/2015 ot 14 yanvarya 2016 g. po delu № 12-74/2016 // https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/showDocument.html?id=8a2289e127afab1e7db781b6518f0c85&shard=Administrativnye dela&fieldName=court_document_documentext1_tag&from=p(data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Oktyabr'skogo gorodskogo suda (Samarskaya oblast') № 1-93/2015 ot 1 oktyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-93/2015 // https://oktiabrsky--sam.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=33061988&delo_id=1540006&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Pervoural'skogo gorodskogo suda (Sverdlovskaya oblast') № 1-60/2015 1-618/2014 ot 19 marta 2015 g. po delu № 1-60/2015 // https://pervouralsky--svd.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=56153564&delo_id=1540006&new=&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Postanovlenie Novoaltayskogo gorodskogo suda (Altayskiy kray) № 5-1245/2015 ot 3 oktyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 5-1245/2015 // https://novaltaisky--alt.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=23938036&delo_id=1500001&new=&text_number=1&case_id=23625963 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Anapskogo gorodskogo suda (Krasnodarskiy kray) № 1-172/2015 ot 11 dekabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-172/2015 // http://sudebnyeresheniya.rf/bsr/case/7686941 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Vyselkovskogo rayonnogo suda (Krasnodarskiy kray) № 1-182/2015 ot 11 noyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-182/2015 // https://viselkovsky--krd.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=73574330&delo_id=1540006&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Nechevina N.D.. Pravovoe Regulirovanie uchastiya grazhdan v obespechenii pravoporyadka v sovremennyy period // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - M.: [b.n.], 2005 g. - № 7. S. 43
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo suda Udmurtskoy respubliki № 4A-24/2016 4A-852/2015 ot 26 yanvarya 2016 g. po delu № 4A-24/2016 // https://vs--udm.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=doc&srv_num=1&number=788412&delo_id=2550001&new=&text_number=1&case_id=744154 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Prigovor Syzranskogo gorodskogo suda (Samarskaya oblast') № 1-44/2016 1-702/2015 ot 27 yanvarya 2016 g. po delu № 1-44/2016 // https://syzransky--sam.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=40307902&delo_id=1540006&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrashcheniya 08.07.2016)
Zakon respubliki Tadzhikistan "Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka" № 566 ot 03.12.2009 // antitip.tj›ru/files/uchastgrazhdan.doc (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2016)
Egoryshev S.V. Iz zarubezhnogo opyta vzaimodeystviya pravookhranitel'nykh organov s obshchestvennost'yu// Vestnik Ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. - M. : Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2008 g. S.121-125
Kapinus O.S. Neobkhodimaya oborona i kraynyaya neobkhodimost' po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh stran // Vestnik Akademii general'noy Prokuratury. - M.: 2008 g.- № 3-5 S.41
Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 26 iyunya 2003 goda №214-Z «Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane pravoporyadka» (red. ot 04.01.2014) // http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=3691 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2016)
Kornev A.S. Ob ustranenii i vospolnenii probelov v pravev svyazi s ustarevaniem deystvuyushchego zakonodatel'stva // Voprosy ekonomiki i prava.-2014 g.-№ 76 S. 7-9.
Shcherbakov O.N. Otdel'nye aspekty uchastiya grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2016. - 5. - C. 382 - 386. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.5.16772.
Gorbunov V.Yu. Defekty mekhanizma realizatsii grazhdanami politseyskikh polnomochiy v oblasti okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka i obespecheniya obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika.-Tyumen': Tyumenskiy institut povysheniya kvalifikatsii sotrudnikov MVD RF, 2015 g.-№ 4 (34), S. 140-147
Beketov O.I.; Shukhman N.V. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 2 aprelya 2014 g. № 44-FZ «Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka" (podgotovlen dlya sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus») // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
p. 18-19 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27 sentyabrya 2012 g. № 19 «O primenenii sudami zakonodatel'stva o neobkhodimoy oborone i prichinenii vreda pri zaderzhanii litsa, sovershivshego prestuplenie» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii, noyabr' 2012 g., № 11
St.st. 19, 20-23 Federal'nogo zakona ot 07.02.2011 № 3-FZ (red. ot 23.06.2016) «O politsii» // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus»
Federal'nyy zakon ot 2 aprelya 2014 g. № 44-FZ «Ob uchastii grazhdan v okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 7 aprelya 2014 g. N 14 st. 1536
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 02.06.2016) // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus»

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the analysis of the criminal law characteristics of the Article 243 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation amended in 2013. As the subject, the author selected objects of cultural heritage as objects of crime in the aforementioned Article. The issue is examined according to the classic approach of “object-objective side-subjective side-subject”, where in each paragraph of the Article the author draws certain scientific conclusions. The work substantiates the relevance of this subject of research, presents the analysis of the current national legislation and legal precedent, as well as doctrinal views. The author finds it legitimate to include the Article 243 into the chapter 25 of the Criminal code on bases of the object of a criminal offence. Characteristics are given to the object of cultural heritage as new objects of crime. The author formulates the rules for classification of acts according to Article 243 of the CCRF, as well as reviews cases of competition between the norms of Articles 243 and 167 of the CCRF and delimits the composition of crime by Articles 243 and 214 of the CCRF. The author substantiates the possibility of inclusion of indirect intent into the subjective side as form of guilt with consideration of theoretical position on material component of crime.

Ключевые слова: competition of the statements, problems of qualification, corpus delicti, protection of the cultural heritage, criminal law, object of cultural heritage, public morals, cultural heritage, monuments of history, monuments of culture

Библиография:
Panfilov A.N. Okhranitel'nye normy administrativno-deliktnogo
zakonodatel'stva sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 6. C. 784-797. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8099.
Popova N.N. Primenenie mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya za narusheniya trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva o pravovom rezhime ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2015. № 2. C. 284-290. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15893.
Akopdzhanova M.O. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana ustanovlennogo zakonom poryadka osushchestvleniya arkheologicheskikh raskopok: novoe v zakonodatel'stve // Pravo i politika. 2015. № 2. C. 208-212. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.2.13830.
Prigovor Azovskogo gorodskogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti po delu № 1-53-11 ot 01 iyulya 2011g. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-azovskij-gorodskoj-sud-rostovskaya-oblast-s/act-101946813/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016)
Shalagin E.A. Otvetstvennost' za unichtozhenie ili povrezhdenie pamyatnikov istorii i kul'tury po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. 2012. № 3. S. 284-289.
Sklyarov K.A. Problemy razgranicheniya vandalizma (ch. 1 st. 214 UK RF) i unichtozheniya ili povrezhdeniya pamyatnikov istorii, kul'tury, pri-rodnykh kompleksov ili ob'ektov, vzyatykh pod okhranu gosudarstva, a takzhe predmetov ili dokumentov, imeyushchikh istoricheskuyu ili kul'turnuyu tsennost'(ch. 1 st. 243 UK RF) // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2012. № 3(22). S. 107-112.
Naumov A.V. Praktika primeneniya Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki. M., 2005. 1069 s.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. Zhalinskogo A.E. M., 2010. 1120 s.
Klebanov L.R. Pamyatniki istorii i kul'tury: pravovoy status i okhrana. M., 2015. 160 s.
Gruzinskaya E.I. Prestupnost' i nakazuemost' deyaniy, posyagayushchikh na kul'turnoe nasledie Rossii (na primere st. 243 UK RF) // Nauchnyy poisk. 2014. № 3.2. S. 2-5.
Lopashenko N.A. Posyagatel'stvo na sobstvennost': monografiya. M., 2012. 528 s.
Prigovor Velikoustyugskogo rayonnogo suda Vologodskoy oblasti ot 06.12.2011 po delu № 1-103/2011 // URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/4IvD78PqYwZW/ (data obrashcheniya: 24.04.2016).
Prikaz Minkul'tury RF ot 17.12.2008 № 267 "Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii sokhraneniya i razvitiya nematerial'nogo kul'turnogo naslediya narodov Rossiyskoy Federatsii na 2009-2015 gody" // SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast': uchebnik / Pod red. Inogamovoy-Khegay L.V., Raroga A.I., Chuchaeva A.I. M., 2008. 786 s.
Medvedev E.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: Diss. … kand. yur. nauk. Ul'yanovsk, 2003. 203 s.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. Lebedeva V.M. M., 2013. 1069 s.
Sabitov T.R. Okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: Diss. … kand. yur. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2002. 196 s.
Millerov E.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana nravstvennosti: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yur. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2006. 26 s.
Polyanskaya M.P. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana obshchestvennoy nravstvennosti v sfere polovoy morali. Avtoref. diss… kand. yur. nauk. Vladivostok, 2009. 25 s.
Klebanov L.R. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: Avtoref. diss... d.yur.nauk. M., 2012. 48 s.
Opros: Spas na Krovi v Peterburge obognal Al'gambru po populyar-nosti sredi turistov. URL: http://tass.ru/kultura/3293112 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Kulygin V.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: Monografiya. URL: https://www.lawmix.ru/commlaw/1232 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Bespal'ko V.G. Ponyatie i priznaki kul'turnykh tsennostey kak predmetov prestupleniy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 3. S. 71-78.
V Moskve snosyat Taganskuyu ATS. URL: http://ria.ru/moscow/20160424/1418728316.html#ixzz46mRkZ3UX (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Na Rublevke khotyat unichtozhit' memorial'nuyu liniyu oborony Moskvy. URL: http://www.newsmsk.com/article/31mar2016/rubl_pobeda.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
V Peterburge zavershaetsya restavratsiya kolonnady Kazanskogo sobora. URL: http://www.tvc.ru/news/show/id/74424 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Sumachev A.V. K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostey i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 12. C. 2074 - 2079.
Piotrovskiy: osvobozhdenie Pal'miry stalo primerom silovoy zashchity kul'tury. URL: http://tass.ru/kultura/3292700 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25.06.2002 № 73-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) "Ob ob'ektakh kul'turnogo naslediya (pamyatnikakh istorii i kul'tury) narodov Rossiyskoy Federatsii" // SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus" (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).

References (transliteration):
Panfilov A.N. Okhranitel'nye normy administrativno-deliktnogo
zakonodatel'stva sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 6. C. 784-797. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8099.
Popova N.N. Primenenie mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya za narusheniya trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva o pravovom rezhime ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2015. № 2. C. 284-290. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15893.
Akopdzhanova M.O. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana ustanovlennogo zakonom poryadka osushchestvleniya arkheologicheskikh raskopok: novoe v zakonodatel'stve // Pravo i politika. 2015. № 2. C. 208-212. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.2.13830.
Prigovor Azovskogo gorodskogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti po delu № 1-53-11 ot 01 iyulya 2011g. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-azovskij-gorodskoj-sud-rostovskaya-oblast-s/act-101946813/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016)
Shalagin E.A. Otvetstvennost' za unichtozhenie ili povrezhdenie pamyatnikov istorii i kul'tury po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. 2012. № 3. S. 284-289.
Sklyarov K.A. Problemy razgranicheniya vandalizma (ch. 1 st. 214 UK RF) i unichtozheniya ili povrezhdeniya pamyatnikov istorii, kul'tury, pri-rodnykh kompleksov ili ob'ektov, vzyatykh pod okhranu gosudarstva, a takzhe predmetov ili dokumentov, imeyushchikh istoricheskuyu ili kul'turnuyu tsennost'(ch. 1 st. 243 UK RF) // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2012. № 3(22). S. 107-112.
Naumov A.V. Praktika primeneniya Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki. M., 2005. 1069 s.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. Zhalinskogo A.E. M., 2010. 1120 s.
Klebanov L.R. Pamyatniki istorii i kul'tury: pravovoy status i okhrana. M., 2015. 160 s.
Gruzinskaya E.I. Prestupnost' i nakazuemost' deyaniy, posyagayushchikh na kul'turnoe nasledie Rossii (na primere st. 243 UK RF) // Nauchnyy poisk. 2014. № 3.2. S. 2-5.
Lopashenko N.A. Posyagatel'stvo na sobstvennost': monografiya. M., 2012. 528 s.
Prigovor Velikoustyugskogo rayonnogo suda Vologodskoy oblasti ot 06.12.2011 po delu № 1-103/2011 // URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/4IvD78PqYwZW/ (data obrashcheniya: 24.04.2016).
Prikaz Minkul'tury RF ot 17.12.2008 № 267 "Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii sokhraneniya i razvitiya nematerial'nogo kul'turnogo naslediya narodov Rossiyskoy Federatsii na 2009-2015 gody" // SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast': uchebnik / Pod red. Inogamovoy-Khegay L.V., Raroga A.I., Chuchaeva A.I. M., 2008. 786 s.
Medvedev E.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: Diss. … kand. yur. nauk. Ul'yanovsk, 2003. 203 s.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. Lebedeva V.M. M., 2013. 1069 s.
Sabitov T.R. Okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: Diss. … kand. yur. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2002. 196 s.
Millerov E.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana nravstvennosti: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yur. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2006. 26 s.
Polyanskaya M.P. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana obshchestvennoy nravstvennosti v sfere polovoy morali. Avtoref. diss… kand. yur. nauk. Vladivostok, 2009. 25 s.
Klebanov L.R. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: Avtoref. diss... d.yur.nauk. M., 2012. 48 s.
Opros: Spas na Krovi v Peterburge obognal Al'gambru po populyar-nosti sredi turistov. URL: http://tass.ru/kultura/3293112 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Kulygin V.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: Monografiya. URL: https://www.lawmix.ru/commlaw/1232 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Bespal'ko V.G. Ponyatie i priznaki kul'turnykh tsennostey kak predmetov prestupleniy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 3. S. 71-78.
V Moskve snosyat Taganskuyu ATS. URL: http://ria.ru/moscow/20160424/1418728316.html#ixzz46mRkZ3UX (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Na Rublevke khotyat unichtozhit' memorial'nuyu liniyu oborony Moskvy. URL: http://www.newsmsk.com/article/31mar2016/rubl_pobeda.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
V Peterburge zavershaetsya restavratsiya kolonnady Kazanskogo sobora. URL: http://www.tvc.ru/news/show/id/74424 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Sumachev A.V. K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostey i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 12. C. 2074 - 2079.
Piotrovskiy: osvobozhdenie Pal'miry stalo primerom silovoy zashchity kul'tury. URL: http://tass.ru/kultura/3292700 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25.06.2002 № 73-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) "Ob ob'ektakh kul'turnogo naslediya (pamyatnikakh istorii i kul'tury) narodov Rossiyskoy Federatsii" // SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus" (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2016).

Аннотация: This work is dedicated to the research on the penalty of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities as an important means of criminal law to affect the legal status of the offender. The authors carried out a detailed analysis of the norms of international and domestic criminal and penal legislation concerning the designation of issues and execution of criminal punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities. The authors come to a conclusion that there is a need to make amendments and changes to the Part 2 of the Article 34 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation as follows: "to comply with the order and conditions of execution of the penalties provided in this Code; notify the correctional inspection of any evasion from punishment verbally for the first 24 hours, and then in writing within three days; provide all support in ensuring the proper carrying out of punishment." The authors propose a new version of Article 37 Criminal Enforcement Code. Argument is made on the feasibility of changing the severity of the punishment, to reconsider its place in Article 44 of the Criminal Code, as well as modify its term as main or additional punishment, revise the legal conditions for expunging the criminal record after serving the punishment, as well as to make an amendment to Part 1 of the Article 47 of the Criminal Code on the coverage of the punishment to include persons performing executive functions in a commercial or other organizations.

Ключевые слова: sentencing, criminal punishment, official, work, title, deprivation of the right, verdict, execution of punishment, disqualification, crime

Библиография:
Klepikov S.N., Klepikova O.S. Administrativno-deliktnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii i printsipy ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 801 - 806. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.11432.
Opredelenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 07.08.2012 № 22-5456/2012 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2015 № 58 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» // «Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF», № 2, fevral', 2016.
Konventsiya ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za korruptsiyu (zaklyuchena v g. Strasburge 27.01.1999) // «Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov», № 9, 2009, S. 15 – 29.
Konventsiya Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy protiv korruptsii (prinyata v g. N'yu-Yorke 31.10.2003 Rezolyutsiey 58/4 na 51-om plenarnom zasedanii 58-oy sessii General'noy Assamblei OON) // «Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov», 2006, № 10, oktyabr'. S. 7 – 54.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.03.2013 № 9-D13-5 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Batanov A.N. Inye mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera-samostoyatel'nyy institut Rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva? // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2011. № 5. S. 155-158.
Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo: Uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov / Pod red. V.I. Seliverstova. 5-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2008. S. 154.
Ukazanie Genprokuratury Rossii № 65/11, MVD Rossii № 1 ot 01.02.2016 «O vvedenii v deystvie perechney statey Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ispol'zuemykh pri formirovanii statisticheskoy otchetnosti» // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».

References (transliteration):
Klepikov S.N., Klepikova O.S. Administrativno-deliktnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii i printsipy ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 801 - 806. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.11432.
Opredelenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 07.08.2012 № 22-5456/2012 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2015 № 58 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» // «Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF», № 2, fevral', 2016.
Konventsiya ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za korruptsiyu (zaklyuchena v g. Strasburge 27.01.1999) // «Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov», № 9, 2009, S. 15 – 29.
Konventsiya Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy protiv korruptsii (prinyata v g. N'yu-Yorke 31.10.2003 Rezolyutsiey 58/4 na 51-om plenarnom zasedanii 58-oy sessii General'noy Assamblei OON) // «Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov», 2006, № 10, oktyabr'. S. 7 – 54.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.03.2013 № 9-D13-5 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Batanov A.N. Inye mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera-samostoyatel'nyy institut Rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva? // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2011. № 5. S. 155-158.
Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo: Uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov / Pod red. V.I. Seliverstova. 5-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2008. S. 154.
Ukazanie Genprokuratury Rossii № 65/11, MVD Rossii № 1 ot 01.02.2016 «O vvedenii v deystvie perechney statey Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ispol'zuemykh pri formirovanii statisticheskoy otchetnosti» // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».

Аннотация: Taking into account the identified causes and conditions of development of modern crime, the author speaks about improving the efficiency of crime investigation procedures as a necessary measure to counter that can affect the increase in the crime detection. As a prerequisite for improving the efficiency of crime investigation, the author proposes further improvements of criminal procedural law, in particular adaptation to modern realities of legal rules governing the procedure as the execution of urgent investigative actions and the legal status of the subjects of their execution. The study used a general scientific dialectical method and empirical knowledge, private scientific methods: analysis and synthesis of the historical method. The author studied statistics showing the individual aspects of the tax authorities and the prosecution authorities of the Russian Federation in the period from 2013 to 2015, as well as foreign legislation and opinions of national law enforcers on the issue in question. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that the author carefully examined the entire regulatory framework, which determines the terms and powers of the subjects of the execution of urgent investigative actions at the present stage of development of domestic legislation on criminal procedure. Based on the nature of urgent investigative actions in view of the major threats to national and public security of the Russian Federation at the present stage of development, the priorities of combating crime, as well as a number of other factors are made and the author's justified proposals for expanding the list of subjects of the production of urgent investigative actions and to clarify their legal status.

Ключевые слова: crime detection, procedural powers, destruction of evidence, prosecution authorities, tax authorities, proof, office of inquiry, urgent investigative actions, tax audit, prosecutors supervision

Библиография:
Osnovnye sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2009-2015 [Elektronnyy resurs]: Institut kompleksnykh strategicheskikh issledovaniy (IKSI), ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL: http://www.icss.ac.ru/macro/ (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Buyakova G.A. Osobennosti vyyavleniya prestupleniy v sfere netselevogo raspredeleniya i raskhodovaniya byudzhetnykh sredstv // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. № 2-2. S. 102-109.
Metodika i taktika provedeniya prokurorskoy proverki: uch. posobie / Pod red. O.N. Korshunovoy. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut (filial) Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2014. 240 s.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov politsiey: predmet i predely osushchestvleniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. 2013. № 3. C. 204-210. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.7998.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 01.05.2016) [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL:http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?base=LAW&n=197508&dst=4294967295&req=doc&rnd=208987.3111616034 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 05.06.2007 № 87-FZ (red. ot 22.12.2014) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federal'nyy zakon «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=172577 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 14.01.2011 № 38 (red. ot 31.12.2015) «Voprosy deyatel'nosti Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (vmeste s «Polozheniem o Sledstvennom komitete Rossiyskoy Federatsii») [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=191729 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Rekomendatsiya Komiteta ministrov Soveta Evropy ot 6 oktyabrya 2000 g. № R (2000) 19 «Komitet ministrov-gosudarstvam-chlenam o roli prokuratury v sisteme ugolovnogo pravosudiya» (prinyata Komitetom Ministrov Soveta Evropy 6 oktyabrya 2000 g. na 724-m zasedanii predstaviteley Ministrov) [Elektronnyy resurs]: Elektronnyy fond pravovoy i normativno-tekhnicheskoy dokumentatsii. – URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/90199642 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 11.03.2003 № 306 (red. ot 27.10.2011) «Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=120973 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.06.2007 № 90-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=55537 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Statisticheskie dannye ob osnovnykh pokazatelyakh deyatel'nosti organov prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii za yanvar'-dekabr' 2015 g. [Elektronnyy resurs]: General'naya prokuratura Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL: http://genproc.gov.ru/stat/data/1054853/(data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 2202-1 (red. ot 28.11.2015) «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/ cgi/ online.cgi? req=doc&base=LAW&n=189623 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Statisticheskie dannye ob osnovnykh pokazatelyakh deyatel'nosti organov prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii za yanvar'-dekabr' 2014 g. [Elektronnyy resurs]: General'naya prokuratura Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL: http://genproc.gov.ru/stat/data/602117/(data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Nalogovyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 31.07.1998 № 146-FZ (red. ot 26.04.2016) [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/ cgi/ online.cgi? base=LAW &n=196452 &dst=4294967295&req=doc&rnd=208987.2851230967 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Kharakteristika rezul'tatov gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) v 2015 godu po vidam raboty iz Doklada ob osushchestvlenii Federal'noy nalogovoy sluzhboy gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) v sootvetstvuyushchikh sferakh deyatel'nosti i ob effektivnosti takogo kontrolya (nadzora) v 2015 godu [Elektronnyy resurs]: Ofitsial'nyy sayt FNS Rossii. – URL: https://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.new.nalog.ru/doc/doclad_fnskont15.pdf (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Zakon RF ot 21.03.1991 № 943-1 (red. ot 02.04.2014) «O nalogovykh organakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL:http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=161248 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Strategiya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 31.12.2015 № 683 «O Strategii natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/cgi/ online.cgi?req= doc&base=LAW&n=191669 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Abzats 2 punkta 4 Polozheniya o Federal'noy nalogovoy sluzhbe, utverzhdennogo Postanovleniem Pravitel'stva RF ot 30.09.2004 № 506 «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o Federal'noy nalogovoy sluzhbe» (red. ot 13.04.2016) [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/ cgi/ online.cgi?req= doc&base= LAW&n=196907 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Zadachi Sluzhboy pochtovoy inspektsii SShA (The mission of the U. S. Postal Inspection Service) [Elektronnyy resurs]: Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sluzhby pochtovoy inspektsii SShA (The U.S. Postal Inspection Service) – URL: https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/aboutus/mission.aspx (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Zadachi Sluzhby ugolovnykh rassledovaniy Upravleniya po sanitarnomu nadzoru za kachestvom pishchevykh produktov i medikamentov SShA (The mission of the Office of Criminal Investigations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) [Elektronnyy resurs]: Ofitsial'nyy sayt Upravleniya po sanitarnomu nadzoru za kachestvom pishchevykh produktov i medikamentov SShA (The U.S. Food and Drug Administration). – URL: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/CriminalInvestigations/ucm123027.htm (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Kriminalistika: uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod. red. zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki RF, prof. R.S. Belkina. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2006. 992 s.
Polozhenie o Ministerstve vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: utverzhdeno Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 01.03.2011 №248 (red. ot 05.04.2016) «Voprosy Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=196338&rnd=208987 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Israel, Jerold H.; Kamisar, Yale; LaFave, Wayne R. Criminal procedure and the Constitution: leading supreme court cases and introductory text. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing., 1989.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 12.08.1995 № 144-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/cgi/ online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=181943&fld=134&dst=100118,0&rnd=0.9872710758347258 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod obshch. red. A.I. Bastrykina. M.: Volters Kluver, 2008. 944 s.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 05.04.2016 № 156 «O sovershenstvovanii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sfere kontrolya za oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov i v sfere migratsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=196285&fld=134&dst=1000000001,0&rnd=0.3191525030651332 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Vasil'chenko E.I., Prokof'eva S.M. K voprosu o proizvodstve neotlozhnykh sledstvennykh deystviy sotrudnikami organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. № 4(68). S. 111-116.
Vasil'chenko E.I. O nekotorykh voprosakh proizvodstva organom doznaniya neotlozhnykh sledstvennykh deystviy // Pravo i politika. 2015. № 8. S. 1099-1104. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.8.16020.
Kriminologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. prof. V.D. Malkova. 27-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: ZAO «Yustitsinform», 2006. 528 s. (Seriya «Obrazovanie»).
Avanesov G.A. Populyarnaya kriminologiya. Ocherki obshchey chasti: uch. posobie dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nosti «Yurisprudentsiya». M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2014. 159 s.
Vystuplenie Prezidenta Rossii V. Putina na rasshirennom zasedanii kollegii MVD Rossii 15 marta 2016 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: Prezident Rossii, ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL:http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51515 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2015 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL:https://mvd.ru/folder/101762/item/7087734/ (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-mart 2016 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL:https://mvd.ru/folder/101762/item/7572658/ (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).

References (transliteration):
Osnovnye sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2009-2015 [Elektronnyy resurs]: Institut kompleksnykh strategicheskikh issledovaniy (IKSI), ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL: http://www.icss.ac.ru/macro/ (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Buyakova G.A. Osobennosti vyyavleniya prestupleniy v sfere netselevogo raspredeleniya i raskhodovaniya byudzhetnykh sredstv // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. № 2-2. S. 102-109.
Metodika i taktika provedeniya prokurorskoy proverki: uch. posobie / Pod red. O.N. Korshunovoy. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut (filial) Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2014. 240 s.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov politsiey: predmet i predely osushchestvleniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. 2013. № 3. C. 204-210. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.7998.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 01.05.2016) [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL:http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?base=LAW&n=197508&dst=4294967295&req=doc&rnd=208987.3111616034 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 05.06.2007 № 87-FZ (red. ot 22.12.2014) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federal'nyy zakon «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=172577 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 14.01.2011 № 38 (red. ot 31.12.2015) «Voprosy deyatel'nosti Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (vmeste s «Polozheniem o Sledstvennom komitete Rossiyskoy Federatsii») [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=191729 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Rekomendatsiya Komiteta ministrov Soveta Evropy ot 6 oktyabrya 2000 g. № R (2000) 19 «Komitet ministrov-gosudarstvam-chlenam o roli prokuratury v sisteme ugolovnogo pravosudiya» (prinyata Komitetom Ministrov Soveta Evropy 6 oktyabrya 2000 g. na 724-m zasedanii predstaviteley Ministrov) [Elektronnyy resurs]: Elektronnyy fond pravovoy i normativno-tekhnicheskoy dokumentatsii. – URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/90199642 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 11.03.2003 № 306 (red. ot 27.10.2011) «Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=120973 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.06.2007 № 90-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=55537 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Statisticheskie dannye ob osnovnykh pokazatelyakh deyatel'nosti organov prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii za yanvar'-dekabr' 2015 g. [Elektronnyy resurs]: General'naya prokuratura Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL: http://genproc.gov.ru/stat/data/1054853/(data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 2202-1 (red. ot 28.11.2015) «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/ cgi/ online.cgi? req=doc&base=LAW&n=189623 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Statisticheskie dannye ob osnovnykh pokazatelyakh deyatel'nosti organov prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii za yanvar'-dekabr' 2014 g. [Elektronnyy resurs]: General'naya prokuratura Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL: http://genproc.gov.ru/stat/data/602117/(data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Nalogovyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 31.07.1998 № 146-FZ (red. ot 26.04.2016) [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/ cgi/ online.cgi? base=LAW &n=196452 &dst=4294967295&req=doc&rnd=208987.2851230967 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Kharakteristika rezul'tatov gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) v 2015 godu po vidam raboty iz Doklada ob osushchestvlenii Federal'noy nalogovoy sluzhboy gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) v sootvetstvuyushchikh sferakh deyatel'nosti i ob effektivnosti takogo kontrolya (nadzora) v 2015 godu [Elektronnyy resurs]: Ofitsial'nyy sayt FNS Rossii. – URL: https://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.new.nalog.ru/doc/doclad_fnskont15.pdf (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Zakon RF ot 21.03.1991 № 943-1 (red. ot 02.04.2014) «O nalogovykh organakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL:http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=161248 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Strategiya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 31.12.2015 № 683 «O Strategii natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/cgi/ online.cgi?req= doc&base=LAW&n=191669 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Abzats 2 punkta 4 Polozheniya o Federal'noy nalogovoy sluzhbe, utverzhdennogo Postanovleniem Pravitel'stva RF ot 30.09.2004 № 506 «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o Federal'noy nalogovoy sluzhbe» (red. ot 13.04.2016) [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/ cgi/ online.cgi?req= doc&base= LAW&n=196907 (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Zadachi Sluzhboy pochtovoy inspektsii SShA (The mission of the U. S. Postal Inspection Service) [Elektronnyy resurs]: Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sluzhby pochtovoy inspektsii SShA (The U.S. Postal Inspection Service) – URL: https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/aboutus/mission.aspx (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Zadachi Sluzhby ugolovnykh rassledovaniy Upravleniya po sanitarnomu nadzoru za kachestvom pishchevykh produktov i medikamentov SShA (The mission of the Office of Criminal Investigations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) [Elektronnyy resurs]: Ofitsial'nyy sayt Upravleniya po sanitarnomu nadzoru za kachestvom pishchevykh produktov i medikamentov SShA (The U.S. Food and Drug Administration). – URL: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/CriminalInvestigations/ucm123027.htm (data obrashcheniya 25.05.2016).
Kriminalistika: uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod. red. zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki RF, prof. R.S. Belkina. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2006. 992 s.
Polozhenie o Ministerstve vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: utverzhdeno Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 01.03.2011 №248 (red. ot 05.04.2016) «Voprosy Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=196338&rnd=208987 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Israel, Jerold H.; Kamisar, Yale; LaFave, Wayne R. Criminal procedure and the Constitution: leading supreme court cases and introductory text. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing., 1989.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 12.08.1995 № 144-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http:// base.consultant.ru/ cons/cgi/ online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=181943&fld=134&dst=100118,0&rnd=0.9872710758347258 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod obshch. red. A.I. Bastrykina. M.: Volters Kluver, 2008. 944 s.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 05.04.2016 № 156 «O sovershenstvovanii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sfere kontrolya za oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov i v sfere migratsii» [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=196285&fld=134&dst=1000000001,0&rnd=0.3191525030651332 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Vasil'chenko E.I., Prokof'eva S.M. K voprosu o proizvodstve neotlozhnykh sledstvennykh deystviy sotrudnikami organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. № 4(68). S. 111-116.
Vasil'chenko E.I. O nekotorykh voprosakh proizvodstva organom doznaniya neotlozhnykh sledstvennykh deystviy // Pravo i politika. 2015. № 8. S. 1099-1104. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.8.16020.
Kriminologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. prof. V.D. Malkova. 27-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: ZAO «Yustitsinform», 2006. 528 s. (Seriya «Obrazovanie»).
Avanesov G.A. Populyarnaya kriminologiya. Ocherki obshchey chasti: uch. posobie dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nosti «Yurisprudentsiya». M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2014. 159 s.
Vystuplenie Prezidenta Rossii V. Putina na rasshirennom zasedanii kollegii MVD Rossii 15 marta 2016 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: Prezident Rossii, ofitsial'nyy sayt. – URL:http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51515 (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2015 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL:https://mvd.ru/folder/101762/item/7087734/ (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-mart 2016 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL:https://mvd.ru/folder/101762/item/7572658/ (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2016).

Аннотация: This article gives a detailed examination to the issues of pre-trial agreement to cooperate. The authors present a brief analysis of the problematic issues of the legal regulation of this institution that emerged as a necessity for counteracting organized forms of crime, which has high latency and loyalty among its members. The idea of deals, made between the defense and the prosecution during the first stages of judicial process, is rather promising, as it simplifies and eases the process of the court proceedings, and reflects the tasks of preliminary investigation on establishing all circumstances of the criminal act with simultaneous increase in efficiency of counteraction of the criminal activity as a whole. The materials of the investigative and prosecutorial practice confirmed that the cooperating suspects and defendants are in fact parties to organized crimes with the following qualifications: “group of people”, “group of people based on conspiracy”, “organized group”. The authors make the conclusion that the Chapter 40.1 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation does not contain the positions on the specificity of protection of the rights of the victim in cases of cooperation with a suspect (defendant) of the pre-trial cooperation agreement.

Ключевые слова: responsibility, prosecutor, suspect, accused, victim, petition, court, pre-trial agreement, punishment, sentence

Библиография:
Khamidullin R.S. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve - ob'ektivnaya istina ili kompromiss? // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2016. - 3. - C. 16 - 22. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.3.17925. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_17925.html
Khamidullin R.S. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve kak taktiko-kriminalisticheskiy element bor'by s organizovannoy prestupnost'yu // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2014. - 3. - C. 250 - 255. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8681.2014.4.15610.
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 3. - C. 9 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2015.3.15617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_15617.html
Stovpovoy A.. Tyunin V. Ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-protsessual'nyy aspekty dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3. S.118-123.
Grankin K., Mil'tova E. Problemy primeneniya norm UPK RF, reguliruyushchikh dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 76-79.
Machul'skaya E.A. Yuridicheskie aspekty yavki s povinnoy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2008, №9, S. 142-151.
Blagov E. Naznachenie nakazaniya v sluchae zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 21-26.
Zhuravleva E. Yavka s povinnoy v sudebnoy praktike, kak obstoyatel'stvo, smyagchayushchee nakazanie osuzhdennogo // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №5, S. 30-32.
Ivanov A. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch.6 st. 15 UK // Zakonnost', 2014, №8. S. 39-40.
Aleksandrov A.S., Kuchin A.F., Smolin A.G. Pravovaya priroda instituta, reglamentirovannogo glavoy 40 UPK RF // Ros. sud'ya, 2007, №7, S. 17.
Pavlova E.Yu. Osnovaniya i usloviya izmeneniya kategorii prestupleniya na menee tyazhkuyu // Zakonodatel'stvo, 2014, №2, S. 57-64.
Vinitskiy L., Kubrikova M. Vozmozhno li izmenenie kategorii pri rassmotrenii ugolovnogo dela v poryadke glavy 40.1 UPK RF? // Zakonnost', 2013, №3, S. 42-45.
Morozov V. Ugolovno-pravovoe obespechenie instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: problemy i resheniya // Ugolovnoe prava, 2010, №1, S. 22-24.
Meshkov M.V., Goncharov V.V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: problemy i perspektivy // Zakon i pravo, 2011, №1, S. 92-93.
Khaliulin A., Bulanova N., Konyarova Zh. Polnomochiya prokurora po zaklyucheniyu dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 98-102.
Novikov S.A. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve kak osnovanie dlya vydeleniya ugolovnogo dela // Ros. sud'ya, 2012, №11, s. 21-24.
Smirnov A.V. Osobyy poryadok praktiki sudebnogo resheniya, pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnyy protsess, 2009, №10, S. 5-14.
Loshkobanova Ya.V. Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov podozrevaemogo, obvinyaemogo i poterpevshego pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. – Krasnodar, 2015, S. 23.
Chabukiani O.A. Garantii prav poterpevshikh pri zaklyuchenii storonoy obvineniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve s podozrevaemym (obvinyaemym) // Ros. yustitsiya, 2012, №4, S. 35-36.
Khomitskaya T.P. Kommentariy k postanovleniyu Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii o primenenii sudami norm glavy 401 UPK RF // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2012. № 9. S. 76.
Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya / Pod red. F.F. Zinnurova, G.B. Mirzoeva. – M..: YuNITI DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2014, S. 21-27.
Timoshenko A. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve s otsenkoy effektivnosti protsessual'nogo instituta // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №4, S. 105-111.
Grichanichenko A. Osobyy poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya: sravnitel'nyy analiz soderzhaniya glavy 40 i 40.1 UPK RF, problemy ikh primeneniya // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №1. S. 81-85.
Abshchilava G. Kombinatorika ugolovno-protsessual'nykh form pri realizatsii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 73-75.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22 dekabrya 2015 g. № 58 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=190932;fld=134;dst=1000000001,0;rnd=0.5017763487749336
Manova N.S. Uproshchennye sudebnye protsedury i sdelki o priznanii viny // Zakon, 2009. №1, S. 69-73.
Golovko L.V. Institut ugolovno-pravovoy mediatsii i ego perspektivy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zakon, 2009, №4, S. 127-135.
Gurshumov I. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve – sdelka s pravosudiem? // Zakonnost', 2010, №4. S. 36-37.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 iyunya 2012 g №16 «O praktike primeneniya sudami osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva ugolovnykh del pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF, 2012, №9. S. 2-5.
Dneprovskaya M., Stepanenko D. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo. – M.: ANO "Yuridicheskie programmy", 2013, № 4.-S. 90-95.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015). – M.: Prospekt, KnoRus, 2015.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12. 2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 02. 03.2016). – M.: Prospekt, KnoRus, 2016.
Aleksandrov A.S.. Aleksandrova I.A. Soglashenie o dosudebnom sotrudnichestve so sledstviem: pravovaya sushchnost' i voprosy tolkovaniya norm, vkhodyashchikh v glavu 40.1 UPK RF // Ugolovnyy protsess, 2009, №8, S. 3-11.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29 iyunya 2009 g. №141-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 2009, №26, St. 3139.

References (transliteration):
Khamidullin R.S. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve - ob'ektivnaya istina ili kompromiss? // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2016. - 3. - C. 16 - 22. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.3.17925. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_17925.html
Khamidullin R.S. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve kak taktiko-kriminalisticheskiy element bor'by s organizovannoy prestupnost'yu // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2014. - 3. - C. 250 - 255. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8681.2014.4.15610.
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 3. - C. 9 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2015.3.15617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_15617.html
Stovpovoy A.. Tyunin V. Ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-protsessual'nyy aspekty dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3. S.118-123.
Grankin K., Mil'tova E. Problemy primeneniya norm UPK RF, reguliruyushchikh dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 76-79.
Machul'skaya E.A. Yuridicheskie aspekty yavki s povinnoy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2008, №9, S. 142-151.
Blagov E. Naznachenie nakazaniya v sluchae zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 21-26.
Zhuravleva E. Yavka s povinnoy v sudebnoy praktike, kak obstoyatel'stvo, smyagchayushchee nakazanie osuzhdennogo // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №5, S. 30-32.
Ivanov A. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch.6 st. 15 UK // Zakonnost', 2014, №8. S. 39-40.
Aleksandrov A.S., Kuchin A.F., Smolin A.G. Pravovaya priroda instituta, reglamentirovannogo glavoy 40 UPK RF // Ros. sud'ya, 2007, №7, S. 17.
Pavlova E.Yu. Osnovaniya i usloviya izmeneniya kategorii prestupleniya na menee tyazhkuyu // Zakonodatel'stvo, 2014, №2, S. 57-64.
Vinitskiy L., Kubrikova M. Vozmozhno li izmenenie kategorii pri rassmotrenii ugolovnogo dela v poryadke glavy 40.1 UPK RF? // Zakonnost', 2013, №3, S. 42-45.
Morozov V. Ugolovno-pravovoe obespechenie instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: problemy i resheniya // Ugolovnoe prava, 2010, №1, S. 22-24.
Meshkov M.V., Goncharov V.V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: problemy i perspektivy // Zakon i pravo, 2011, №1, S. 92-93.
Khaliulin A., Bulanova N., Konyarova Zh. Polnomochiya prokurora po zaklyucheniyu dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 98-102.
Novikov S.A. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve kak osnovanie dlya vydeleniya ugolovnogo dela // Ros. sud'ya, 2012, №11, s. 21-24.
Smirnov A.V. Osobyy poryadok praktiki sudebnogo resheniya, pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnyy protsess, 2009, №10, S. 5-14.
Loshkobanova Ya.V. Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov podozrevaemogo, obvinyaemogo i poterpevshego pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. – Krasnodar, 2015, S. 23.
Chabukiani O.A. Garantii prav poterpevshikh pri zaklyuchenii storonoy obvineniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve s podozrevaemym (obvinyaemym) // Ros. yustitsiya, 2012, №4, S. 35-36.
Khomitskaya T.P. Kommentariy k postanovleniyu Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii o primenenii sudami norm glavy 401 UPK RF // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2012. № 9. S. 76.
Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya / Pod red. F.F. Zinnurova, G.B. Mirzoeva. – M..: YuNITI DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2014, S. 21-27.
Timoshenko A. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve s otsenkoy effektivnosti protsessual'nogo instituta // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №4, S. 105-111.
Grichanichenko A. Osobyy poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya: sravnitel'nyy analiz soderzhaniya glavy 40 i 40.1 UPK RF, problemy ikh primeneniya // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №1. S. 81-85.
Abshchilava G. Kombinatorika ugolovno-protsessual'nykh form pri realizatsii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, S. 73-75.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22 dekabrya 2015 g. № 58 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=190932;fld=134;dst=1000000001,0;rnd=0.5017763487749336
Manova N.S. Uproshchennye sudebnye protsedury i sdelki o priznanii viny // Zakon, 2009. №1, S. 69-73.
Golovko L.V. Institut ugolovno-pravovoy mediatsii i ego perspektivy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zakon, 2009, №4, S. 127-135.
Gurshumov I. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve – sdelka s pravosudiem? // Zakonnost', 2010, №4. S. 36-37.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 iyunya 2012 g №16 «O praktike primeneniya sudami osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva ugolovnykh del pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF, 2012, №9. S. 2-5.
Dneprovskaya M., Stepanenko D. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo. – M.: ANO "Yuridicheskie programmy", 2013, № 4.-S. 90-95.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015). – M.: Prospekt, KnoRus, 2015.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12. 2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 02. 03.2016). – M.: Prospekt, KnoRus, 2016.
Aleksandrov A.S.. Aleksandrova I.A. Soglashenie o dosudebnom sotrudnichestve so sledstviem: pravovaya sushchnost' i voprosy tolkovaniya norm, vkhodyashchikh v glavu 40.1 UPK RF // Ugolovnyy protsess, 2009, №8, S. 3-11.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29 iyunya 2009 g. №141-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 2009, №26, St. 3139.

Аннотация:  The subject of this research is the norms of the penal law that regulate the conditions for finding a convict to be a gross violator of the set order of serving a sentence and the legal consequences of this juridical fact. This work examines the following consequences: disciplinary measures, transfer into a more strict area of serving a sentence, and transfer into a higher security correctional facility. In addition to the legal consequences, the law enforcement practice also may have the following consequences: exclusion from possibility of parole, exclusion from amnesty, restriction of work outside of the penitentiary without guards or supervision, etc. The scientific novelty of this work is defined by the fact that the author determines specific legal consequence of finding a convict to be gross violator of the set order of serving a sentence, elucidates some issues with their realization in practice of correctional facility, and proposes ways of solving them on the legislative and law enforcement levels.

Ключевые слова: Convict, Gross violator, Order of punishment, Disciplinary misconduct, Disciplinary action, Isolation, Cell block, Solitary confinement, Incarceration, Punishment

Библиография:
Kazak I.B. Nekotorye teoreticheskie i pravovye aspekty priznaniya osuzhdennogo zlostnym narushitelem ustanovlennogo poryadka otbyvaniya nakazaniya // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2007.№ 5.
Epaneshnikov V.S. Distsiplinarnoe proizvodstvo v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2012. № 14.
Epaneshnikov V.S. Ponyatie distsiplinarnogo prostupka osuzhdennogo k lisheniyu svobody i ego zakreplenie v ugolovno-ispolnitel'nom zakonodatel'stve /// Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 7.
Pavlov I.N. Nekotorye aspekty realizatsii printsipa differentsiatsii i individualizatsii ispolneniya nakazaniy v ugolovno-ispolnitel'nom prave // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2006. № 6.
Pautov D. Otvetstvennost' osuzhdennykh za narusheniya trudovoy distsipliny // Zakonnost'. 2010. № 3.
Temirkhanov M.A. Tsel' ispravleniya osuzhdennogo na stadii ego otbyvaniya // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2014. № 12.
Teplyashin P.V. Perspektivy sudebnogo pretsedenta v sfere ispolneniya ugolovnykh nakazaniy // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2010. № 10.
Tkachevskiy Yu.M. Rossiyskaya progressivnaya sistema ispolneniya ugolovnykh nakazaniy. MGU im. Lomonosova.
Utkin V.A. Rol' «tyuremnykh nachal» v sovremennoy penitentsiarnoy sisteme Rossii // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2005. № 3.
Delo № 1-142/07. Materialy IK-27 po khodataystvu osuzhdennogo K. ob uslovno-dosrochnom osvobozhdenii ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya // Arkhiv federal'nogo suda Sovetskogo rayona g. Krasnoyarska.

References (transliteration):
Kazak I.B. Nekotorye teoreticheskie i pravovye aspekty priznaniya osuzhdennogo zlostnym narushitelem ustanovlennogo poryadka otbyvaniya nakazaniya // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2007.№ 5.
Epaneshnikov V.S. Distsiplinarnoe proizvodstvo v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2012. № 14.
Epaneshnikov V.S. Ponyatie distsiplinarnogo prostupka osuzhdennogo k lisheniyu svobody i ego zakreplenie v ugolovno-ispolnitel'nom zakonodatel'stve /// Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 7.
Pavlov I.N. Nekotorye aspekty realizatsii printsipa differentsiatsii i individualizatsii ispolneniya nakazaniy v ugolovno-ispolnitel'nom prave // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2006. № 6.
Pautov D. Otvetstvennost' osuzhdennykh za narusheniya trudovoy distsipliny // Zakonnost'. 2010. № 3.
Temirkhanov M.A. Tsel' ispravleniya osuzhdennogo na stadii ego otbyvaniya // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2014. № 12.
Teplyashin P.V. Perspektivy sudebnogo pretsedenta v sfere ispolneniya ugolovnykh nakazaniy // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2010. № 10.
Tkachevskiy Yu.M. Rossiyskaya progressivnaya sistema ispolneniya ugolovnykh nakazaniy. MGU im. Lomonosova.
Utkin V.A. Rol' «tyuremnykh nachal» v sovremennoy penitentsiarnoy sisteme Rossii // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2005. № 3.
Delo № 1-142/07. Materialy IK-27 po khodataystvu osuzhdennogo K. ob uslovno-dosrochnom osvobozhdenii ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya // Arkhiv federal'nogo suda Sovetskogo rayona g. Krasnoyarska.

Аннотация: The object of this research is the public relation in the area of correctional facilities and detention centers on prevention of escapes. The subject of this research is the criminal legal norms that regulate public relations forming in the process of escape prevention from correctional facilities. For the purpose of optimization of the Russian legislation in the corresponding area, it seems necessary to examine the foreign experience in the criminal law regulation of the notion of crime and its public danger related to escape and criminal responsibility for escape. The author examines the aspects of holding individuals criminally responsible for escape or aiding and abetting an escapee whether on the part of correctional officers or other individuals. This research is based on the comparative analysis of foreign legislation from the perspective of the stance on public safety. The legislators and criminal law doctrine of foreign countries overall acknowledge the categories of “public harm” and “public danger” of crime, but at the same time, there is not a single opinion on the form of their reflection in the criminal legislation.

Ключевые слова: Public harm, Complicity in a crime, Public danger, Foreign legislation, Responsibility of employees, Criminal responsibility, Detention centers, Correctional centers, Escape, Punishment avoidance, partnership in a crime, public danger, legislation of foreign countries, responsibility of employees, criminal liability, imprisonment places, correctional facility, escape, public harm, evasion from punishment

Библиография:
Antonov A. G. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya: uchebnoe posobie – Novokuznetsk: FKOU VPO Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2013. – 39 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii / Nauch. redaktirovanie kand. yurid. nauk, dots. L. V. Golovko, kand. yurid. nauk, dots. N. E. Krylovoy; perevod s frantsuzskogo i predislovie kand. yurid. nauk, dots. N. E. Krylovoy. — SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2002. — 650 s. ISBN 5-94201-065-3
Ugolovnyy kodeks Federativnoy Respubliki Germanii-SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003.-524 s.
Antonov A. G. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya: uchebnoe posobie – Novokuznetsk: FKOU VPO Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2013. – 39 s.
Elektronnyy resurs: www.fsin.su – Ofitsial'nyy sayt FSIN Rossii.
Internet resurs: Ugolovnyy kodeks versiya, zakreplennaya kodeksom 15 noyabrya 2014. Izdanie: 2014-11-23 Produktsiya droit.org. http://codes.droit.org/cod/penal.pdf?ts=1399650503
Antonov A. G. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya: uchebnoe posobie – Novokuznetsk: FKOU VPO Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2013. – 39 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki / Pol red. dokt. yurid. nauk, prof. A.I.Korobeeva, per. s kitayskogo D.V.Vichikova. — SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2001.-303s
A.Yu. Epikhin «Zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnykh stran, obespechivayushchee bezopasnost' uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» Syktyvkarskiy universitet, Syktyvkar; 2003.
Primernyy ugolovnyy kodeks SShA [Tekst] ofitsial'nyy proekt Instituta amerikanskogo prava: per. s angl. / pod red. i s predisl. B. S. Nikiforova.-Moskva: Progress, 1969.-303 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks shtat Tekhas s izm. i dop. na 1 iyulya 2003 g. / Nauchnoe redaktirovanie i predislovie professora I.D. Kozochkina. Sankt-Peterburg. Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2006.
Zakonodatel'stvo amerikanskikh shtatov po traditsii angliyskogo prava delit prestupleniya na dve kategorii: felonii i misdiminory. Razlichie mezhdu etimi gruppami provodit zakonodatel', iskhodya iz razmera grozyashchego nakazaniya libo vida mesta zaklyucheniya. K feloniyam Svod zakonov SShA (§ 1 ch. I razd. 18) otnosit lyuboe posyagatel'stvo, karaemoe smertnoy kazn'yu ili tyuremnym zaklyucheniem na srok bolee goda. Lyubye drugie posyagatel'stva otneseny k klassu misdiminorov. Feloniyu klassa A federal'noe zakonodatel'stvo v Svode zakonov (§ 3559 ch. II razd. 18) opredelyaet kak deyanie, za kotoroe maksimal'no predusmotreny pozhiznennoe tyuremnoe zaklyuchenie ili smertnaya kazn'. Esli maksimal'nyy srok tyuremnogo zaklyucheniya sostavlyaet 20 let i bolee, eto feloniya klassa V, ot 10 do 20 let — klassa S, ot 5 do 10 let — klassa D, ot 1 do 5 let — klassa E
Akopdzhanova M.O. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty kriminalizatsii obshchestvenno opasnykh posyagatel'stv // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'.-2014.-3.-C. 1-5. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2014.3.13920. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_13920.html

References (transliteration):
Antonov A. G. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya: uchebnoe posobie – Novokuznetsk: FKOU VPO Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2013. – 39 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii / Nauch. redaktirovanie kand. yurid. nauk, dots. L. V. Golovko, kand. yurid. nauk, dots. N. E. Krylovoy; perevod s frantsuzskogo i predislovie kand. yurid. nauk, dots. N. E. Krylovoy. — SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2002. — 650 s. ISBN 5-94201-065-3
Ugolovnyy kodeks Federativnoy Respubliki Germanii-SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003.-524 s.
Antonov A. G. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya: uchebnoe posobie – Novokuznetsk: FKOU VPO Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2013. – 39 s.
Elektronnyy resurs: www.fsin.su – Ofitsial'nyy sayt FSIN Rossii.
Internet resurs: Ugolovnyy kodeks versiya, zakreplennaya kodeksom 15 noyabrya 2014. Izdanie: 2014-11-23 Produktsiya droit.org. http://codes.droit.org/cod/penal.pdf?ts=1399650503
Antonov A. G. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya: uchebnoe posobie – Novokuznetsk: FKOU VPO Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2013. – 39 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki / Pol red. dokt. yurid. nauk, prof. A.I.Korobeeva, per. s kitayskogo D.V.Vichikova. — SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2001.-303s
A.Yu. Epikhin «Zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnykh stran, obespechivayushchee bezopasnost' uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» Syktyvkarskiy universitet, Syktyvkar; 2003.
Primernyy ugolovnyy kodeks SShA [Tekst] ofitsial'nyy proekt Instituta amerikanskogo prava: per. s angl. / pod red. i s predisl. B. S. Nikiforova.-Moskva: Progress, 1969.-303 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks shtat Tekhas s izm. i dop. na 1 iyulya 2003 g. / Nauchnoe redaktirovanie i predislovie professora I.D. Kozochkina. Sankt-Peterburg. Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2006.
Zakonodatel'stvo amerikanskikh shtatov po traditsii angliyskogo prava delit prestupleniya na dve kategorii: felonii i misdiminory. Razlichie mezhdu etimi gruppami provodit zakonodatel', iskhodya iz razmera grozyashchego nakazaniya libo vida mesta zaklyucheniya. K feloniyam Svod zakonov SShA (§ 1 ch. I razd. 18) otnosit lyuboe posyagatel'stvo, karaemoe smertnoy kazn'yu ili tyuremnym zaklyucheniem na srok bolee goda. Lyubye drugie posyagatel'stva otneseny k klassu misdiminorov. Feloniyu klassa A federal'noe zakonodatel'stvo v Svode zakonov (§ 3559 ch. II razd. 18) opredelyaet kak deyanie, za kotoroe maksimal'no predusmotreny pozhiznennoe tyuremnoe zaklyuchenie ili smertnaya kazn'. Esli maksimal'nyy srok tyuremnogo zaklyucheniya sostavlyaet 20 let i bolee, eto feloniya klassa V, ot 10 do 20 let — klassa S, ot 5 do 10 let — klassa D, ot 1 do 5 let — klassa E
Akopdzhanova M.O. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty kriminalizatsii obshchestvenno opasnykh posyagatel'stv // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'.-2014.-3.-C. 1-5. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2014.3.13920. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_13920.html

Аннотация: Latin America remains one of the most criminalized regions of the world. At the same time, the states of the regions possess a vast experience in successfully counteracting crime. The subject of this research is the work of the public institutions of the Latin American countries on control over crime. On the examples of Guatemala, Columbia, and Peru the author analyzes the experience of the fight of the Latin American society against crime in the conditions of weakness of the law enforcement apparatus of the respective countries. This work explores the approaches of the Latin American authorities towards public institutions of crime prevention and demonstrates the evolution of these approaches towards the end of the XX and beginning of the XXI centuries. The author elucidates the various forms of answers of the civil society towards the challenges related to domestic armed conflicts and growth in crime. The author makes conclusions on the importance of the social organization in the condition of the weakness of state institutions; on the fact that the optimal form of such organizations is communities; on the need of state to rely on public strength for conducting a successful criminal law policy.  

Ключевые слова: Criminal law policy, Ensuring order, Crime counteraction, Fight against crime, Society and state, Community, Communal justice, Legal pluralism, Latin America, Domestic armed conflict, penal politics, law enforcement, crime counteraction, fighting crime, state and society, community, community justice, legal pluralism, Latin America, internal armed conflict

Библиография:
Komitet protiv pytok: rassmotrenie dokladov, predstavlennykh gosudarstvami-uchastnikami v sootvetstvii so stat'ey 19 Konventsii. Kolumbiya. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain/opendocpdf.pdf?reldoc=y&docid=49ae4fbe2
Kostogryzov P. I. Obshchinnaya yustitsiya v Kolumbii. // Pravovaya sistema Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost': materialy VI mezhvuzovskoy (mezhdunarodnoy) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M., 2013. S. 89-93.
Milyukov S. F. O lzhedemokratizme rossiyskoy ugolovno-pravovoy politiki. // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2014. № 8. S. 274-282.
Ardila E. Justicia comunitaria y sociedad nacional. [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.justgovernancegroup.org/es/documentos_ del_group/justicia/justicia_1.pdf.
Ball P.; Kobrak, P.; Spirer, H. Violencia institucional en Guatemala, 1960 a 1996: Una reflexión cuantitativa. Washington, 1999.
Bazán Seminario, C. Estado plural de derecho. Bases para una redefinición del concepto Estado de derecho a la luz de la pluralidad jurídica. Lima, 2012.
Colombia. Ministerio de Defensa Nacional. (2009, enero). Logros de la Política de Consolidación de la Seguridad Democrática. Bogotá. 2009.
Constitución Política del Perú de 1993. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/RelatAgenda/constitucion.nsf/constitucion
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-572/97. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1997/C-572-97.htm
Crime and Development in Central America. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2007.
DECRETO 356 DE 1994. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=1341
Entrevista del Presidente con ‘La W’ [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.presidencia.gov.co/prensa_new/sne/2006/diciembre/04/09042006.htm
Gonzáles Serna, A. C. y otros. Estado del arte sobre administración de justicia, justicia pública y privada, y guerra y justicia. Opinión juridica, vol. 6, número 11.
Guerra sin cuartel. Colombia y el derecho internacional humanitario. (New York: Human Rights Watch, 1998) [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.hrw.org/legacy/spanish/informes/1998/guerra3C.html#P961_240845
Huamaní, G.; Moscoso, M.; Urteaga, P. Rondas campesinas de Cajamarca: la construcción de una alternativa. Debate Agrario. Jul-Set 1988. (no.3) p. 63-86.
Intentional homicide count and rate per 100,000 population, by country/territory (2000-2012). // United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Korsbaek L. Los tipos de rondas campesinas en el Perú: tema con variaciones. [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http: //www.pacarinadelsur.com/home/indoamerica/158-los-tipos-de-rondas-campesinas-en-el-peru-tema-con-variaciones
Ley 812 de 2003. // Diario Oficial 45.231/ 27.06.2003.
Piccoli, E. El pluralismo jurídico y político en Perú: el caso de las Rondas Campesinas de Cajamarca. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 2008, Issue 31, p. 27-41.
Piccoli E. Las rondas campesinas y su reconocimiento estatal, dificultades y contradicciones de un encuentro: un enfoque antropologico sobre el caso de cajamarca; Perú. Nueva Antropología: Revista de Ciencias Sociales. jul-dic2009, Vol. 22 Issue 71, p. 93-113.
Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2006-2010. T. 1. Estado Comunitario: desarrollo para todos. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 2007.
Sandoval Forero, E. A. La Guardia Indígena Nasa y el Arte de la Resistencia Pacífica. Bogotá. 2008.
Semana, Bogotá.
Sixth United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, covering the period 1995 – 1997. // United Nations crime reduction and analysis branch, office for drug control and crime prevention.
Tercer informe sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en Colombia.// Comision Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http: www.cidh.oas.org/countryrep/colom99sp/capitulo-1.htm#%2813%29
El Tiempo, Bogotá.
Yrigoyen Fajardo, R. Rondas Campesinas y desafíos del pluralismo legal en el Perú. Pp.17-32 [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http: www.jus.unitn.it/cardozo/Review/2008/Fajardo.pdf

References (transliteration):
Komitet protiv pytok: rassmotrenie dokladov, predstavlennykh gosudarstvami-uchastnikami v sootvetstvii so stat'ey 19 Konventsii. Kolumbiya. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain/opendocpdf.pdf?reldoc=y&docid=49ae4fbe2
Kostogryzov P. I. Obshchinnaya yustitsiya v Kolumbii. // Pravovaya sistema Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost': materialy VI mezhvuzovskoy (mezhdunarodnoy) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M., 2013. S. 89-93.
Milyukov S. F. O lzhedemokratizme rossiyskoy ugolovno-pravovoy politiki. // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2014. № 8. S. 274-282.
Ardila E. Justicia comunitaria y sociedad nacional. [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.justgovernancegroup.org/es/documentos_ del_group/justicia/justicia_1.pdf.
Ball P.; Kobrak, P.; Spirer, H. Violencia institucional en Guatemala, 1960 a 1996: Una reflexión cuantitativa. Washington, 1999.
Bazán Seminario, C. Estado plural de derecho. Bases para una redefinición del concepto Estado de derecho a la luz de la pluralidad jurídica. Lima, 2012.
Colombia. Ministerio de Defensa Nacional. (2009, enero). Logros de la Política de Consolidación de la Seguridad Democrática. Bogotá. 2009.
Constitución Política del Perú de 1993. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/RelatAgenda/constitucion.nsf/constitucion
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-572/97. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1997/C-572-97.htm
Crime and Development in Central America. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2007.
DECRETO 356 DE 1994. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=1341
Entrevista del Presidente con ‘La W’ [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.presidencia.gov.co/prensa_new/sne/2006/diciembre/04/09042006.htm
Gonzáles Serna, A. C. y otros. Estado del arte sobre administración de justicia, justicia pública y privada, y guerra y justicia. Opinión juridica, vol. 6, número 11.
Guerra sin cuartel. Colombia y el derecho internacional humanitario. (New York: Human Rights Watch, 1998) [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL – http://www.hrw.org/legacy/spanish/informes/1998/guerra3C.html#P961_240845
Huamaní, G.; Moscoso, M.; Urteaga, P. Rondas campesinas de Cajamarca: la construcción de una alternativa. Debate Agrario. Jul-Set 1988. (no.3) p. 63-86.
Intentional homicide count and rate per 100,000 population, by country/territory (2000-2012). // United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Korsbaek L. Los tipos de rondas campesinas en el Perú: tema con variaciones. [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http: //www.pacarinadelsur.com/home/indoamerica/158-los-tipos-de-rondas-campesinas-en-el-peru-tema-con-variaciones
Ley 812 de 2003. // Diario Oficial 45.231/ 27.06.2003.
Piccoli, E. El pluralismo jurídico y político en Perú: el caso de las Rondas Campesinas de Cajamarca. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 2008, Issue 31, p. 27-41.
Piccoli E. Las rondas campesinas y su reconocimiento estatal, dificultades y contradicciones de un encuentro: un enfoque antropologico sobre el caso de cajamarca; Perú. Nueva Antropología: Revista de Ciencias Sociales. jul-dic2009, Vol. 22 Issue 71, p. 93-113.
Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2006-2010. T. 1. Estado Comunitario: desarrollo para todos. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 2007.
Sandoval Forero, E. A. La Guardia Indígena Nasa y el Arte de la Resistencia Pacífica. Bogotá. 2008.
Semana, Bogotá.
Sixth United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, covering the period 1995 – 1997. // United Nations crime reduction and analysis branch, office for drug control and crime prevention.
Tercer informe sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en Colombia.// Comision Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http: www.cidh.oas.org/countryrep/colom99sp/capitulo-1.htm#%2813%29
El Tiempo, Bogotá.
Yrigoyen Fajardo, R. Rondas Campesinas y desafíos del pluralismo legal en el Perú. Pp.17-32 [Elektronnyy resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: http: www.jus.unitn.it/cardozo/Review/2008/Fajardo.pdf

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the threats to the safety of the functionality of mass transit and their reflection in the legislation and criminal legal doctrine that are considered debatable in the theory of criminal law. The author carefully examines the threats aimed at: 1) safety of movement or use of transit or means of transportation; 2) execution of work that ensures safety of the transportation in general; 3) conditions that ensure safe functionality of transport: a) verifying that  the requirements are met for  ensuring safety at the objects of transportation infrastructure; b) inspection of construction and maintenance of the transportation vehicles; c) checking for transportation vehicles with technical issues; d) inspecting the state of transportation infrastructure; e) monitoring violation of rules of use of the airspace. The scientific novelty consists in the fact that based on the mechanism of the corresponding violations, the author highlights the threats to the safety of the functionality of all means of transportation and performs classification of the norms on transportation crimes provided by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, including the norms that ensure safety of movement or use of transportation – Article 263 (excluding employee’s refusal to perform their work duties), 264, 268, 269 (including use of mainlines), and others.

Ключевые слова: Transportation, Transportation safety, Security threats, Classification of threats, Criminal legal norms, Classification of norms, Legal gaps, Elimination of gaps, Reflection of threats, Mass transit

Библиография:
Korobeev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya i transportnaya prestupnost'. M., 2015. S. 61.
Grinberg M. Ob'ekt prestupleniya v oblasti ispol'zovaniya tekhniki // Problemy pravovedeniya. Novosibirsk, 1967. S. 115–134.
Zhulev V.I. Transportnye prestupleniya. M., 2001. S. 29–180.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti / pod red. V.K. Duyunova. M., 2012. S. 557.
Blagov E.V. Prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka. M., 2011. S. 64.
Polnyy kurs ugolovnogo prava: V 5 t. T. IV: Prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti / pod red. A.I. Korobeeva. SPb., 2008. S. 533.
Korobeev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya. SPb., 2003. S. 61.
Kurs ugolovnogo prava. V 5 t. Osobennaya chast'. T. 4 / pod red. G.N. Borzenkova, V.S. Komissarova. M., 2002. S. 42.
Gracheva Yu.V., Chuchaev A.I. Dopolnitel'nye ugolovno-pravovye mery obespecheniya bezopasnosti avtotransporta // Ugolovnoe pravo 2015. № 3. S. 23; Gracheva Yu.V., Korobeev A.I., Chuchaev A.I. Novyy vid transportnogo prestupleniya kak modifitsirovannyy variant khorosho zabytogo starogo // Lex Russica 2015. № 4. S. 76.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya / pod red. A.I. Raroga. M., 2013. S. 418.
Chuchaev A.I. Sistema transportnykh prestupleniy v novom Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Uchenye zapiski Ul'yanovskogo universiteta. 1997. № 2. S. 3–15; Chuchaev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya: novoe reshenie – novye problemy // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 1997. № 2. S. 84–89.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast' / pod red. A.I. Raroga. M., 1996. S. 311.
Chuchaev A.I. Prestupleniya protiv bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transporta. S. 19.
Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. V 2-kh t. T. 2. Nizhniy Novgorod, 1996. S. 356.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii / pod obshch. red. R.A. Adel'khanyana. M., 2004. S. 567.
Kuznetsov A.P., Marshakova N.N. Osobennaya chast' Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sistema prestupleniy i ikh klassifikatsiya. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2008. S. 43.
Chuchaev A.I. Bezopasnost' zheleznodorozhnogo, vodnogo i vozdushnogo transporta. Saratov, 1988 S. 85–102.
Penezhko G.I. Bezopasnost' dvizheniya na avtomobil'nom transporte. M., 1976. S. 88–130.
Chuchaev A.I. Sub'ekt prestupleniya, sovershaemogo na vodnom transporte // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1984. № 12. S. 25.
Chuchaev A.I. Mekhanizm transportnogo prestupleniya. Saratov, 1991. C. 65.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti / pod obshch. red. M.P. Zhuravleva, S.I. Nikulina. M., 2007. S. 532.
Knyazeva N.A. Piratstvo: ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika i voprosy preduprezhdeniya. M., 2012. S. 27–37.
Knyaz'kina A.K. Konventsionnye prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ponyatie, vidy, obshchaya kharakteristika / pod red. A.I. Chuchaeva. M., 2010. S. 83.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast' / pod red. A.I. Chuchaeva. M., 2012. S. 494–498.

References (transliteration):
Korobeev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya i transportnaya prestupnost'. M., 2015. S. 61.
Grinberg M. Ob'ekt prestupleniya v oblasti ispol'zovaniya tekhniki // Problemy pravovedeniya. Novosibirsk, 1967. S. 115–134.
Zhulev V.I. Transportnye prestupleniya. M., 2001. S. 29–180.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti / pod red. V.K. Duyunova. M., 2012. S. 557.
Blagov E.V. Prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka. M., 2011. S. 64.
Polnyy kurs ugolovnogo prava: V 5 t. T. IV: Prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti / pod red. A.I. Korobeeva. SPb., 2008. S. 533.
Korobeev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya. SPb., 2003. S. 61.
Kurs ugolovnogo prava. V 5 t. Osobennaya chast'. T. 4 / pod red. G.N. Borzenkova, V.S. Komissarova. M., 2002. S. 42.
Gracheva Yu.V., Chuchaev A.I. Dopolnitel'nye ugolovno-pravovye mery obespecheniya bezopasnosti avtotransporta // Ugolovnoe pravo 2015. № 3. S. 23; Gracheva Yu.V., Korobeev A.I., Chuchaev A.I. Novyy vid transportnogo prestupleniya kak modifitsirovannyy variant khorosho zabytogo starogo // Lex Russica 2015. № 4. S. 76.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya / pod red. A.I. Raroga. M., 2013. S. 418.
Chuchaev A.I. Sistema transportnykh prestupleniy v novom Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Uchenye zapiski Ul'yanovskogo universiteta. 1997. № 2. S. 3–15; Chuchaev A.I. Transportnye prestupleniya: novoe reshenie – novye problemy // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 1997. № 2. S. 84–89.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast' / pod red. A.I. Raroga. M., 1996. S. 311.
Chuchaev A.I. Prestupleniya protiv bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transporta. S. 19.
Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. V 2-kh t. T. 2. Nizhniy Novgorod, 1996. S. 356.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii / pod obshch. red. R.A. Adel'khanyana. M., 2004. S. 567.
Kuznetsov A.P., Marshakova N.N. Osobennaya chast' Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sistema prestupleniy i ikh klassifikatsiya. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2008. S. 43.
Chuchaev A.I. Bezopasnost' zheleznodorozhnogo, vodnogo i vozdushnogo transporta. Saratov, 1988 S. 85–102.
Penezhko G.I. Bezopasnost' dvizheniya na avtomobil'nom transporte. M., 1976. S. 88–130.
Chuchaev A.I. Sub'ekt prestupleniya, sovershaemogo na vodnom transporte // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1984. № 12. S. 25.
Chuchaev A.I. Mekhanizm transportnogo prestupleniya. Saratov, 1991. C. 65.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti / pod obshch. red. M.P. Zhuravleva, S.I. Nikulina. M., 2007. S. 532.
Knyazeva N.A. Piratstvo: ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika i voprosy preduprezhdeniya. M., 2012. S. 27–37.
Knyaz'kina A.K. Konventsionnye prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ponyatie, vidy, obshchaya kharakteristika / pod red. A.I. Chuchaeva. M., 2010. S. 83.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast' / pod red. A.I. Chuchaeva. M., 2012. S. 494–498.

Аннотация: This article examines the criminal law and criminal procedure aspects of the application of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the CCRF. The author carefully examines such aspects as consequences of the conciliation of parties in the case of changing the category of a crime; application of the positions from Article 11 of the CCRF in cases of changes in the category of a crime; limits of the authority of the cassation court during implementation of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the CCRF; changes to the category of a crime during criminal hearing in accordance with Chapter 40.1 of the Criminal Procedural Code and during execution of the verdict, and the issue of changes to the category of a crime should be resolved via cassation or supervisory method. The main conclusion of the research is the fact that due to the application of the Criminal law and criminal procedure aspects of the application of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation arises a number of criminal law and criminal procedure issues, which can produce corruption in the work of the courts during the assessment of the gravity of a crime. Criminal law and criminal procedure aspects of the application of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the CCRF expands the boundaries of the principle of judicial discretion and defines a dispositional regulation of the criminal legal relations.  

Ключевые слова: court of cassation, reconciliation of parties, convict, suspended sentence, factual circumstances, correctional institution, probationary early release, judicial discretion, crime category, criminal record

Библиография:
N.E. Mullakhmetova. Primirenie storon pri izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.V. Grinenko. Kategorizatsiya prestupleniy i polozheniya obshchey chasti ugolovnogo kodeksa RF v svete gumanizatsii zakonodatel'stv. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.L. Ivanov. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch.6 st. 15 UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.N. Kravtsova. Predely polnomochiy suda kassatsionnoy instantsii po primeneniyu chasti 6 stat'i 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kudryavtseva A.V., Voronin Yu.A. Ugolovno-protsessual'nye aspekty izmeneniya kategorii prestupleniy v sootvetstvii s ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo". N 20(279). Vyp. 30. S. 50.
L.V. Vinitskiy. M.E. Kubrikova. Vozmozhno li izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v poryadke glavy 40.1 UPK RF? SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2013. N 8.
A.L. Ivanov. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch 6 stat'i 15 UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.V. Grinenko. Kategorizatsiya prestupleniy i polozheniya obshchey chasti ugolovnogo kodeksa RF v svete gumanizatsii zakonodatel'stv. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.A. Khaydarov. Pravo suda izmenit' kategoriyu prestupleniya na menee tyazhkuyu. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
M.F. Mingalimova. Neyasnost' v prakticheskom primenenii novykh polozheniy obshchey chasti UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie ot 29 maya 2014 g. N 9. O praktike naznacheniya i izmeneniya sudami vidov ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniy. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
T.D. Ustinova. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' i ee vliyanie (uchet) pri konstruirovanii norm obshchey chasti UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
N.E. Mullakhmetova. Uchet mneniya i poluchenie soglasiya poterpevshego pri prinyatii protsessual'nykh resheniy. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
V.V. Pitetskiy. O nedostatkakh voploshcheniya printsipa spravedlivosti v deystvuyushchem Ugolovnom kodekse RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
V.V. Pitetskiy. Novye pravila ustanovleniya kategorii prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivost. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ermakova K.P. Ponyatie i sub'ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. N 8. S. 91.
Ermakova K.P. Ponyatie i sub'ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. N 8. S. 50.
Larina L.Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2013. N 2. S. 57.
Dzhagrunov A.A. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy i protivorechiya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. N 8-1. S. 80-81.
Larina L.Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2013. N 2. S. 57-58.
Bavsun M.V. Sudebnoe usmotrenie pri naznachenii nakazaniya i problemy ego ogranicheniya v UK RF // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. N 9. S. 105-106
Laktaeva A.Yu. Garantii i vozmozhnosti realizatsii printsipa ravenstva pri naznachenii nakazaniya // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2011. N 75. S. 66.
Martyshkin V.N., Gavin A.S., Dement'eva T.A. Pravovye i nravstvennye kriterii sudebnogo usmotreniya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2008. N 1. S. 21.
G.A. Trofimova. Printsip sudebnogo usmotreniya: rasshirenie granits pravoprimeneniya. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Yu.Yu. Semin. S.V. Plokhov. Implementatsiya mezhdunarodnykh norm-protsess slozhnyy. O privedenii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodnymi standartami ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

References (transliteration):
N.E. Mullakhmetova. Primirenie storon pri izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.V. Grinenko. Kategorizatsiya prestupleniy i polozheniya obshchey chasti ugolovnogo kodeksa RF v svete gumanizatsii zakonodatel'stv. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.L. Ivanov. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch.6 st. 15 UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.N. Kravtsova. Predely polnomochiy suda kassatsionnoy instantsii po primeneniyu chasti 6 stat'i 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kudryavtseva A.V., Voronin Yu.A. Ugolovno-protsessual'nye aspekty izmeneniya kategorii prestupleniy v sootvetstvii s ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo". N 20(279). Vyp. 30. S. 50.
L.V. Vinitskiy. M.E. Kubrikova. Vozmozhno li izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v poryadke glavy 40.1 UPK RF? SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2013. N 8.
A.L. Ivanov. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch 6 stat'i 15 UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.V. Grinenko. Kategorizatsiya prestupleniy i polozheniya obshchey chasti ugolovnogo kodeksa RF v svete gumanizatsii zakonodatel'stv. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
A.A. Khaydarov. Pravo suda izmenit' kategoriyu prestupleniya na menee tyazhkuyu. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
M.F. Mingalimova. Neyasnost' v prakticheskom primenenii novykh polozheniy obshchey chasti UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie ot 29 maya 2014 g. N 9. O praktike naznacheniya i izmeneniya sudami vidov ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniy. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
T.D. Ustinova. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' i ee vliyanie (uchet) pri konstruirovanii norm obshchey chasti UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
N.E. Mullakhmetova. Uchet mneniya i poluchenie soglasiya poterpevshego pri prinyatii protsessual'nykh resheniy. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
V.V. Pitetskiy. O nedostatkakh voploshcheniya printsipa spravedlivosti v deystvuyushchem Ugolovnom kodekse RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
V.V. Pitetskiy. Novye pravila ustanovleniya kategorii prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivost. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ermakova K.P. Ponyatie i sub'ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. N 8. S. 91.
Ermakova K.P. Ponyatie i sub'ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. N 8. S. 50.
Larina L.Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2013. N 2. S. 57.
Dzhagrunov A.A. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy i protivorechiya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. N 8-1. S. 80-81.
Larina L.Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2013. N 2. S. 57-58.
Bavsun M.V. Sudebnoe usmotrenie pri naznachenii nakazaniya i problemy ego ogranicheniya v UK RF // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. N 9. S. 105-106
Laktaeva A.Yu. Garantii i vozmozhnosti realizatsii printsipa ravenstva pri naznachenii nakazaniya // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2011. N 75. S. 66.
Martyshkin V.N., Gavin A.S., Dement'eva T.A. Pravovye i nravstvennye kriterii sudebnogo usmotreniya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2008. N 1. S. 21.
G.A. Trofimova. Printsip sudebnogo usmotreniya: rasshirenie granits pravoprimeneniya. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Yu.Yu. Semin. S.V. Plokhov. Implementatsiya mezhdunarodnykh norm-protsess slozhnyy. O privedenii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodnymi standartami ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

Аннотация: This article examines certain questions of qualification of the action of organizers and members of a criminal enterprise in the process of application of Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Such questions include: 1) questions pertaining to qualification by the rules of actual accumulation of crimes; 2) questions pertaining to possession of weapons by the members of the criminal enterprise; 3) questions that pertain to forceful participation in the criminal organization. The object of this research is the norms of criminal law and legal literature on this topic. The author formulates the corresponding rules of qualification for each of the aforementioned situations, which can be used as a certain methodological base in the work of the law enforcement agencies and courts, as well as for future research in the science of criminal law. The author also makes recommendations on possible changes to the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation.

Ключевые слова: compulsion, objective imputation, incitement, organized crime, questions of qualification, criminal enterprise, criminal association, weapon possession , qualifying sign, criminal law

Библиография:
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 goda № 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015g.) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 10 iyunya 2010 goda № 12 «O sudebnoy praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem (ney)» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Petrov S.V. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo kak forma souchastiya: problemy teorii i praktiki: monogr. / S.V. Petrov. – N.Novgorod: NIU RANKhiGS, 2013;
Gaukhman L.D., Maksimov S.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii). Kommentariy – M.: Uchebno-konsul'tatsionnyy tsentr «YurInfoR», 1997;
Glazkova L.V. Banditizm i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy razgranicheniya: monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013;
Agapov P. Organizatsiya prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii): nekotorye problemy yuridicheskoy otsenki // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 2;
Arutyunov A. Organizovannye gruppy i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy kvalifikatsii // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2002. № 9 (221);
Danilenko N.N. Ponyatie i kharakteristika organizovannykh prestupnykh formirovaniy // Zakon. 2006. № 5;
Baleev S.A. Priznaki organizovannoy gruppy: problemy doktrinal'nogo i sudebnogo tolkovaniya // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2008. № 4;
Galiakbarov R.R. Bor'ba s gruppovymi prestupleniyami. Voprosy kvalifikatsii. Kubanskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2000;
Savel'ev D.V. Prestupnaya gruppa v sfere ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2000;
Viden'kina Zh.V. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva ili uchastie v nem // Zakon i pravo. 2013. № 12;
Ermakova T.N. Banda i prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya) kak formy souchastiya: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009;
Kozlov A.P. Souchastie: traditsii i real'nost'. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2001;
Agapov P.V. Nuzhna li v Ugolovnom kodekse RF otvetstvennost' za sozdanie organizovannoy prestupnoy gruppy? // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2006. № 3;
Glazkova L. Sovershenie prestupleniy vooruzhennymi uchastnikami prestupnykh soobshchestv (prestupnykh organizatsiy) // Zakonnost'. 2011. № 10;
Tsvetkov Yu.A. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya): ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy analiz: Diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004;
prigovor Orenburgskogo oblastnogo suda ot 29 yanvarya 2013 goda № 2-89/2012. [Elektronnyy resurs] http://www.sudrf.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.03.2015g.);
Chernyy A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii, Belarusi i Ukrainy: sravnitel'nyy analiz: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan', 2005;
Skotinina V.N. Komparativistskoe issledovanie sostava organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii): vnutrigosudarstvennyy, mezhdunarodnyy i zarubezhnyy aspekty: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.

References (transliteration):
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 goda № 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015g.) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 10 iyunya 2010 goda № 12 «O sudebnoy praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem (ney)» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Petrov S.V. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo kak forma souchastiya: problemy teorii i praktiki: monogr. / S.V. Petrov. – N.Novgorod: NIU RANKhiGS, 2013;
Gaukhman L.D., Maksimov S.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii). Kommentariy – M.: Uchebno-konsul'tatsionnyy tsentr «YurInfoR», 1997;
Glazkova L.V. Banditizm i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy razgranicheniya: monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013;
Agapov P. Organizatsiya prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii): nekotorye problemy yuridicheskoy otsenki // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 2;
Arutyunov A. Organizovannye gruppy i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy kvalifikatsii // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2002. № 9 (221);
Danilenko N.N. Ponyatie i kharakteristika organizovannykh prestupnykh formirovaniy // Zakon. 2006. № 5;
Baleev S.A. Priznaki organizovannoy gruppy: problemy doktrinal'nogo i sudebnogo tolkovaniya // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2008. № 4;
Galiakbarov R.R. Bor'ba s gruppovymi prestupleniyami. Voprosy kvalifikatsii. Kubanskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2000;
Savel'ev D.V. Prestupnaya gruppa v sfere ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2000;
Viden'kina Zh.V. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva ili uchastie v nem // Zakon i pravo. 2013. № 12;
Ermakova T.N. Banda i prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya) kak formy souchastiya: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009;
Kozlov A.P. Souchastie: traditsii i real'nost'. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2001;
Agapov P.V. Nuzhna li v Ugolovnom kodekse RF otvetstvennost' za sozdanie organizovannoy prestupnoy gruppy? // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2006. № 3;
Glazkova L. Sovershenie prestupleniy vooruzhennymi uchastnikami prestupnykh soobshchestv (prestupnykh organizatsiy) // Zakonnost'. 2011. № 10;
Tsvetkov Yu.A. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya): ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy analiz: Diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004;
prigovor Orenburgskogo oblastnogo suda ot 29 yanvarya 2013 goda № 2-89/2012. [Elektronnyy resurs] http://www.sudrf.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.03.2015g.);
Chernyy A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii, Belarusi i Ukrainy: sravnitel'nyy analiz: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan', 2005;
Skotinina V.N. Komparativistskoe issledovanie sostava organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii): vnutrigosudarstvennyy, mezhdunarodnyy i zarubezhnyy aspekty: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the work of prosecutors, particularly in ensuring rights and legal interests of sides of criminal proceedings during the pre-trial stages. Problems in this field of prosecutorial work consist in the theoretic uncertainty and practical difficulties of realizing the authority that is aimed at protecting, defending, and in if necessary, restoring the violated rights of the sides of criminal proceedings. At the same time, the key characteristics of prosecutorial work (essence, means, and limits) remain debatable. The author makes a conclusion on the fulfilment of the legal enforcement by several empowered subjects of the criminal procedural relations. At the same time, law enforcement in prosecutorial work differs in a unique combination of traits and attributes. Law enforcement by a prosecutor represents practical realization of initiative, independent actions in determining violations of rights of the parties in criminal proceedings and application of authority in their resolution (means of law enforcement).

Ключевые слова: defense, protection, rights, participants, law enforcement, prosecutor, criminal proceedings, restoration, prosecutor's office , compensation

Библиография:
Kapinus N.I. Protsessual'nye garantii prav lichnosti pri prime-nenii mer presecheniya v ugolovnom protsesse: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. – M., 2001
Bagautdinov F.N. Obespechenie publichnykh i lichnykh interesov pri rassledovanii prestupleniy. – M. – 2004. – S. 60–62.
Gladysheva O.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy obespecheniya zakonnykh inte-resov lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M., 2012. – S. 34.
Nekenova S.B. Printsip obespecheniya prava litsa na razumnyy srok ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Volgo-grad, 2015. – S. 12, 14.
Sheyfer M.M. Yavlyaetsya li zashchitnik polnopravnym sub'ektom doka-zyvaniya v ugolovnom protsesse? // Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb., 2010. http://www.iuaj.net/taxonomy/term/38.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 17 yanvarya 1992 g. № 2202-1 (red. ot 22 dekabrya 2014 g., s izm. ot 17 fevralya 2015 g.) «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii»// Vedomosti SND RF i VS RF. 1992.№ 8.St. 366
Bessarabov V.G., Kashaev K.A. Zashchita rossiyskoy prokuraturoy prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina. – M.: Gorodets, 2007. – S. 10.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 29 iyunya 2004 g. № 13-P«O proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy statey 7, 15, 107, 234 i 450 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy» // SPS «Konsul'tan-tPlyus».
Kurochkina L.A. Problema obespecheniya prokurorom prav uchastnikov sudebnogo razbiratel'stva: dis…. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2003. – S. 11.
Samoylova T.N.Pravozashchitnaya funktsiya prokurora v ugolovnom su-doproizvodstve // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. – 2008. Vyp. 2. – S. 56

References (transliteration):
Kapinus N.I. Protsessual'nye garantii prav lichnosti pri prime-nenii mer presecheniya v ugolovnom protsesse: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. – M., 2001
Bagautdinov F.N. Obespechenie publichnykh i lichnykh interesov pri rassledovanii prestupleniy. – M. – 2004. – S. 60–62.
Gladysheva O.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy obespecheniya zakonnykh inte-resov lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M., 2012. – S. 34.
Nekenova S.B. Printsip obespecheniya prava litsa na razumnyy srok ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Volgo-grad, 2015. – S. 12, 14.
Sheyfer M.M. Yavlyaetsya li zashchitnik polnopravnym sub'ektom doka-zyvaniya v ugolovnom protsesse? // Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb., 2010. http://www.iuaj.net/taxonomy/term/38.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 17 yanvarya 1992 g. № 2202-1 (red. ot 22 dekabrya 2014 g., s izm. ot 17 fevralya 2015 g.) «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii»// Vedomosti SND RF i VS RF. 1992.№ 8.St. 366
Bessarabov V.G., Kashaev K.A. Zashchita rossiyskoy prokuraturoy prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina. – M.: Gorodets, 2007. – S. 10.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 29 iyunya 2004 g. № 13-P«O proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy statey 7, 15, 107, 234 i 450 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy» // SPS «Konsul'tan-tPlyus».
Kurochkina L.A. Problema obespecheniya prokurorom prav uchastnikov sudebnogo razbiratel'stva: dis…. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2003. – S. 11.
Samoylova T.N.Pravozashchitnaya funktsiya prokurora v ugolovnom su-doproizvodstve // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. – 2008. Vyp. 2. – S. 56

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the methods of restitution for damages to victims of crimes in general, as well as legal entity that has suffered as result of a crime in particular. The object of the research is the proposals existing in specialized literature on the issues of improvements to the legislative regulation of restitution for damages to a legal entity that has suffered as a result of a crime. A special attention is given to the formulation of specific proposals for Russia’s criminal legislation on solution to the problem of restitution for damages suffered as a result of a crime. Proposal is made to implement a new type of punishment into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation – “Obligation to cover damages”. In addition to that, a proposal is made to place the responsibility for solution to the problem of restitution for damages onto the victims in form of a voluntary (and perhaps mandatory) insurance. Among the main conclusions are the formulation of specific proposals for criminal legislation of the Russian Federation on solution to the problem of restitution for damages, including implementation of a new type of punishment “Obligation to cover damages” into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Article 46-1. Author’s special contribution into the research of this topic is the proposal to devise a version of a voluntary (and perhaps mandatory) insurance.

Ключевые слова: insurance, punishment, restitution, legal entity, private party, victim, harm, crime, criminal law, state responsibility

Библиография:
Anisimkova N.V. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem: ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty problemy: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol', 2008. 20 s.
Anoshchenkova S.V. Uchenie o poterpevshem v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov: Saratovskiy YuI MVD Rossii, 2004. 32 s.
Deklaratsiya osnovnykh printsipov pravosudiya dlya zhertv prestupleniy i zloupotrebleniya vlast'yu prinyataya rezolyutsiey General'noy Assamblei OON 40/34 ot 11 dekabrya 1985 g. // Mezhdunarodnye soglasheniya i rekomendatsii Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy v oblasti zashchity prav cheloveka i bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Vyp. I. M.: Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1989. 172 s.
Mazalov A.G., Savitskiy V.M. Nereshennaya problema vozmeshcheniya vreda poterpevshemu ot prestupleniya // Pravovedenie. 1977. № 3. S.47-54.
Sumachev A.V. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave (analiz osnovnykh problem): Monografiya. Nizhnevartovsk: Filial Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta v g. Nizhnevartovske, 2005. 235 s.
Sumacheva A.V. Postradavshiy kak sub'ekt ugolovnogo pravootnosheniya: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan': Ryazanskiy in-t prava i ekonomiki MVD Rossii, 1997. 178 s.
Suslin A.V. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva obespecheniya vozmeshcheniya vreda poterpevshim: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg: Ural'sk. gos. yurid. akademiya, 2005. 24 s.
Ferri E. Ugolovnaya sotsiologiya. Chast' II. / Per. s 4-go ital. izd. s predisl. k russkomu izd. E. Ferri, D.A. Dridya. SPb.: Knigoizdatel'skoe Tovarishchestvo «Prosveshchenie», 1908. 478 s.

References (transliteration):
Anisimkova N.V. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem: ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyy aspekty problemy: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol', 2008. 20 s.
Anoshchenkova S.V. Uchenie o poterpevshem v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov: Saratovskiy YuI MVD Rossii, 2004. 32 s.
Deklaratsiya osnovnykh printsipov pravosudiya dlya zhertv prestupleniy i zloupotrebleniya vlast'yu prinyataya rezolyutsiey General'noy Assamblei OON 40/34 ot 11 dekabrya 1985 g. // Mezhdunarodnye soglasheniya i rekomendatsii Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy v oblasti zashchity prav cheloveka i bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Vyp. I. M.: Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1989. 172 s.
Mazalov A.G., Savitskiy V.M. Nereshennaya problema vozmeshcheniya vreda poterpevshemu ot prestupleniya // Pravovedenie. 1977. № 3. S.47-54.
Sumachev A.V. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave (analiz osnovnykh problem): Monografiya. Nizhnevartovsk: Filial Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta v g. Nizhnevartovske, 2005. 235 s.
Sumacheva A.V. Postradavshiy kak sub'ekt ugolovnogo pravootnosheniya: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan': Ryazanskiy in-t prava i ekonomiki MVD Rossii, 1997. 178 s.
Suslin A.V. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva obespecheniya vozmeshcheniya vreda poterpevshim: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg: Ural'sk. gos. yurid. akademiya, 2005. 24 s.
Ferri E. Ugolovnaya sotsiologiya. Chast' II. / Per. s 4-go ital. izd. s predisl. k russkomu izd. E. Ferri, D.A. Dridya. SPb.: Knigoizdatel'skoe Tovarishchestvo «Prosveshchenie», 1908. 478 s.

Аннотация: This article presents the analysis of the special subjects of crimes under the paragraphs 1 and 4 of Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (CCRF): “individual having influence upon the members of organized groups” and “individual holding the highest post within the criminal hierarchy”. The object of the research is the social relations forming in the area of provision of public safety and protection of society from the destructive actions of criminal enterprises (criminal organizations). The author examines various positions expressed in the scientific community regarding the understanding of features of the stated special subjects. The author proposes an original guideline for qualification by characteristics of subjects of crime that can be used in law enforcement practice. In conclusion the author substantiates the need to remove the characteristics of the special objects in question from the text of criminal legislation, and defends the thesis that the fight against the leaders of criminal underworld should be waged by setting criminal responsibility for actions committed by such leaders.

Ключевые слова: criminal law, criminal hierarchy, organized group, leaders of criminal underworld, special subject, criminal organization, criminal enterprise, characteristics of the special subjects, qualification, criminal authority

Библиография:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 3 noyabrya 2009 goda № 245-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i v stat'yu 100 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 goda № 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015g.) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 10 iyunya 2010 goda № 12 «O sudebnoy praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem (ney)» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Belotserkovskiy S. Novyy Federal'nyy zakon ob usilenii bor'by s prestupnymi soobshchestvami: kommentariy i problemy primeneniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 2;
Topil'skaya E.V. Nekotorye problemy realizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti po stat'e 210 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Advokatskaya praktika. 2013. № 4;
Shesler A.V. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo i sudebnaya praktika o prestupnom soobshchestve // Akademicheskiy vestnik. 2011. № 1;
Mondokhonov A. Spetsial'nyy sub'ekt organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastiya v nem (ney) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 5;
Nikitenko I., Yakusheva T. Organizatsiya prestupnogo soobshchestva: problemy kvalifikatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 5;
Ragulin A., Fefelov V. O ponyatii litsa, zanimayushchego vysshee polozhenie v prestupnoy ierarkhii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 5;
Glazkova L.V. Banditizm i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy razgranicheniya: monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013;
Kuznetsova N.F. Otvetstvennost' za prestupnye soobshchestva: problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya novatsiy, vnesennykh FZ ot 3 noyabrya 2009g. v UK RF // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 2011. № 1;
Mondokhonov A. Voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 2;
Doroshkov V.V. Otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva i uchastie v nem // Ugolovnyy protsess. Iyul' 2010. № 7;
Viden'kina Zh.V. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva ili uchastie v nem // Zakon i pravo. 2013. № 12;
Petrov S.V. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo kak forma souchastiya: problemy teorii i praktiki: monogr. / S.V. Petrov. – N.Novgorod: NIU RANKhiGS, 2013;
Agapov P.V. Osnovy protivodeystviya organizovannoy prestupnoy deyatel'nosti: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2013;
Bykov V.M. Problemy primeneniya st. 210 UK RF v novoy redaktsii Federal'nogo zakona RF ot 3 noyabrya 2009g. № 245-FZ // Pravo i politika. 2011. № 1;
Greben'kov A.A. Problemnye voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (30-31 yanvarya 2014g.). – Moskva: Prospekt, 2014.

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 3 noyabrya 2009 goda № 245-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i v stat'yu 100 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 goda № 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015g.) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 10 iyunya 2010 goda № 12 «O sudebnoy praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem (ney)» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
Belotserkovskiy S. Novyy Federal'nyy zakon ob usilenii bor'by s prestupnymi soobshchestvami: kommentariy i problemy primeneniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 2;
Topil'skaya E.V. Nekotorye problemy realizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti po stat'e 210 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Advokatskaya praktika. 2013. № 4;
Shesler A.V. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo i sudebnaya praktika o prestupnom soobshchestve // Akademicheskiy vestnik. 2011. № 1;
Mondokhonov A. Spetsial'nyy sub'ekt organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastiya v nem (ney) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 5;
Nikitenko I., Yakusheva T. Organizatsiya prestupnogo soobshchestva: problemy kvalifikatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 5;
Ragulin A., Fefelov V. O ponyatii litsa, zanimayushchego vysshee polozhenie v prestupnoy ierarkhii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 5;
Glazkova L.V. Banditizm i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy razgranicheniya: monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013;
Kuznetsova N.F. Otvetstvennost' za prestupnye soobshchestva: problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya novatsiy, vnesennykh FZ ot 3 noyabrya 2009g. v UK RF // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 2011. № 1;
Mondokhonov A. Voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 2;
Doroshkov V.V. Otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva i uchastie v nem // Ugolovnyy protsess. Iyul' 2010. № 7;
Viden'kina Zh.V. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva ili uchastie v nem // Zakon i pravo. 2013. № 12;
Petrov S.V. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo kak forma souchastiya: problemy teorii i praktiki: monogr. / S.V. Petrov. – N.Novgorod: NIU RANKhiGS, 2013;
Agapov P.V. Osnovy protivodeystviya organizovannoy prestupnoy deyatel'nosti: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2013;
Bykov V.M. Problemy primeneniya st. 210 UK RF v novoy redaktsii Federal'nogo zakona RF ot 3 noyabrya 2009g. № 245-FZ // Pravo i politika. 2011. № 1;
Greben'kov A.A. Problemnye voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (30-31 yanvarya 2014g.). – Moskva: Prospekt, 2014.

Аннотация: The focal point of this article became a positivist-sociological and constructionist analysis of criminalization based on the example of “infamous” criminal law of the recent years “on drunk driving” (Federal Law of the Russian Federation of February 13, 2009 No. 20-FZ “on the Amendment to Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation” and Federal Law of December 31, 2014 No. 528-FZ “On Amendments to Separate Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation on the Question of Enhancing Criminal Responsibility for Violation of the Traffic Code”. The authors suggest using two analytical models of researching the selected analytical case – positivist-sociological and constructionist. The scientific novelty consists in simultaneous application of the two analytical models in the context of the legal material “on drunk driving”, which allows making the following conclusions: 1) There are different ways of analyzing the process of criminalization. The use of the traditional to Russian jurisprudence methodology of the theory of criminalization makes it possible to establish the presence or absence of the grounds for criminalization. The constructionist approach allows “capturing” certain realities of the legislative process. 2) With regards to the examined case both, the Soviet theory of criminalization and the alternative constructionist approach provide their strategic potential: the first detected the flaws of criminalization arguments, and the second – means of promotion of the legislative act

Ключевые слова: Legislative process, Criminalization, Discourse, Statistical analysis, Sociologism, Constructionism, Analytical models of research, Criminal law, Traffic code violations, Alcohol intoxication

Библиография:
Grinberg L. Perenos i strakh analitika (perevod Eliseevoy N.V.) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2011.-6.-C. 39-48.
Rozin V.M. K ponimaniyu osnovaniy obshchestvenno-politicheskogo diskursa // Filosofskaya mysl'.-2013.-4.-C. 30-52. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_380.html
Stenograficheskiy otchet o zasedanii Soveta Bezopasnosti, posvyashchennom meram po realizatsii Poslaniya Federal'nomu Sobraniyu 20 iyunya 2006 goda. Moskva, Kreml'. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2006/06/20/1708_type63378type63381type82634_107461.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Ibarra P., Kits'yuz Dzh. Diskurs vydvizheniya utverzhdeniy-trebovaniy i prostorechnye resursy // Sotsial'nye problemy: konstruktsionistskoe prochtenie. Khrestomatiya.-Kazan', 2007.-S 55-114.
Vstupitel'noe slovo na zasedanii prezidiuma Gosudarstvennogo soveta «O sostoyanii bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya i merakh po sovershenstvovaniyu gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» 15 noyabrya 2005 goda. Moskva, Kreml'. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2005/11/15/1728_type63374type63378type82634_97169.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Nachalo vstrechi s rukovodstvom Vserossiyskoy politicheskoy partii «Edinaya Rossiya» 17 noyabrya 2006 goda. Novo-Ogarevo. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2006/11/17/2345_type63376_113994.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Dunyaeva M.M. Rol' i znachenie sredstv massovoy kommunikatsii v sovremennykh politicheskikh protsessakh // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-10.-C. 1252-1257.
Poslanie Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii 10 maya 2006 goda. Moskva, Kreml', Mramornyy zal URL:http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2006/05/10/1357_type63372type63374type82634_105546.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2008/2704 (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2015).
Avtoforum Izhevska, tema «GIBDD aktivno lovit p'yanykh za rulem!». URL: http://izhevsk.ru/forum_light_message/12/4003238.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2015); Avtoforum71.ru, tema «P'yanyy za rulem?! Syadesh' pozhiznenno! URL: http://avtoforum71.ru/topic/5162-pianyj-za-rulem-siadesh-pozhiznenno (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2015) i dr.
Geyko Yu. Poslednyaya kaplya // Rossiyskaya gazeta-Federal'nyy vypusk.-2015.-6637 (66).-30 marta. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2015/03/30/alcohol.html (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2015).
Informatsiya iz elektronnoy registratsionnoy karty zakonoproekta № 93181-5. URL: http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/(SpravkaNew)?OpenAgent&RN=93181-5&02 (data obrashcheniya: 23.06.2012).
URL: http://elibrary.ru/titles_compare.asp (data obrashcheniya: 22.03.2014).
URL: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/yandex.ru (data obrashcheniya: 22.03.2014).
Vstupitel'noe slovo na zasedanii prezidiuma Gosudarstvennogo soveta «O sostoyanii bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya i merakh po sovershenstvovaniyu gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» 15 noyabrya 2005 goda. Moskva, Kreml'. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2005/11/15/1728_type63374type63378type82634_97169.shtml (data obrashcheniya 07.04.2014).
Kirdina S.G., Rubinshteyn, Tolmacheva I.V. Nekotorye kolichestvennye otsenki institutsional'nykh izmeneniy: opyt issledovaniya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva // TERRA ECONOMICUS.-2010.-T. 8.-№ 3.-S. 8-22.
Alekseev A.I., Ovchinskiy V.S., Pobegaylo E.F. Rossiyskaya ugolovnaya politika: preodolenie krizisa.-M., 2006.-144 s.; Luneev V.V. O kriminologo-analiticheskom i sistemnom podkhode k zakonotvorchestvu // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra.-2014.-4 (35).-S. 15-25; Gilinskiy Ya.I. Ugolovnoe pravo: komu ono nuzhno? URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/386.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013); Golovko L.V. Global'naya instrumentalizatsiya ugolovnogo prava URL: http://zakon.ru/Blogs/globalnaya_instrumentalizaciya_ugolovnogo_prava_chast_1/6955,http://zakon.ru/Blogs/globalnaya_instrumentalizaciya_ugolovnogo_prava_chast_2/7019 (data obrashcheniya: 03.10.2013); Luneev V.V. Vse zagovorili o novom UK RF URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/353.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013); Ego zhe. O nauchnoy baze rossiyskogo zakonotvorchestva (Chetvertye Kudryavtsevskie chteniya) URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/1008.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013); Ego zhe. Poroki ugolovnogo zakonotvorchestva (Komu sluzhit UK). URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/2263.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013).
Piter G. Solomon-ml. Sozdanie ugolovnogo prava v Rossii i na Zapade: protsess razrabotki politiki i rol' ekspertov. URL: http://sartraccc.ru/i.php?oper=read_file&filename=Pub/crcr.htm (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2012).
Blumer G. Sotsial'nye problemy kak kollektivnoe povedenie // Sotsial'nye proble-my: konstruktsioniststkoe prochtenie. Khrestomatiya.-Kazan', 2007.-S. 11-25.
Osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta (kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya) /Otv. redaktory Kudryavtsev V.N., Yakovlev A.M.-M., 1982.-304 s.
Demidov Yu.A. Sotsial'naya tsennost' i otsenka v ugolovnom prave.-M., 1975.-182 s.
Galiakbarov R.R. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik.-Krasnodar, 2005.-512 s.
Naumov A. V. Forma ugolovnogo zakona i ee sotsial'naya obuslovlennost' // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakona.-M., 1994.-S. 18-27.
Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti: Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya / Per. s angl. Rutkevich E.; Mosk. filos. fond.-M., 1995.-323 s.
Gilinskiy Ya.I. Deviantnost', prestupnost' i sotsial'nyy kontrol' v «novom mire». Sbornik statey.-SPb., 2012.-352 s.
Sotsial'nye problemy: konstruktsionistskoe prochtenie. Khrestomatiya / Sost. Yasaveev I. G.-Kazan', 2007.-276 s.

References (transliteration):
Grinberg L. Perenos i strakh analitika (perevod Eliseevoy N.V.) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2011.-6.-C. 39-48.
Rozin V.M. K ponimaniyu osnovaniy obshchestvenno-politicheskogo diskursa // Filosofskaya mysl'.-2013.-4.-C. 30-52. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_380.html
Stenograficheskiy otchet o zasedanii Soveta Bezopasnosti, posvyashchennom meram po realizatsii Poslaniya Federal'nomu Sobraniyu 20 iyunya 2006 goda. Moskva, Kreml'. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2006/06/20/1708_type63378type63381type82634_107461.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Ibarra P., Kits'yuz Dzh. Diskurs vydvizheniya utverzhdeniy-trebovaniy i prostorechnye resursy // Sotsial'nye problemy: konstruktsionistskoe prochtenie. Khrestomatiya.-Kazan', 2007.-S 55-114.
Vstupitel'noe slovo na zasedanii prezidiuma Gosudarstvennogo soveta «O sostoyanii bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya i merakh po sovershenstvovaniyu gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» 15 noyabrya 2005 goda. Moskva, Kreml'. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2005/11/15/1728_type63374type63378type82634_97169.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Nachalo vstrechi s rukovodstvom Vserossiyskoy politicheskoy partii «Edinaya Rossiya» 17 noyabrya 2006 goda. Novo-Ogarevo. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2006/11/17/2345_type63376_113994.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
Dunyaeva M.M. Rol' i znachenie sredstv massovoy kommunikatsii v sovremennykh politicheskikh protsessakh // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-10.-C. 1252-1257.
Poslanie Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii 10 maya 2006 goda. Moskva, Kreml', Mramornyy zal URL:http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2006/05/10/1357_type63372type63374type82634_105546.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2014).
URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2008/2704 (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2015).
Avtoforum Izhevska, tema «GIBDD aktivno lovit p'yanykh za rulem!». URL: http://izhevsk.ru/forum_light_message/12/4003238.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2015); Avtoforum71.ru, tema «P'yanyy za rulem?! Syadesh' pozhiznenno! URL: http://avtoforum71.ru/topic/5162-pianyj-za-rulem-siadesh-pozhiznenno (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2015) i dr.
Geyko Yu. Poslednyaya kaplya // Rossiyskaya gazeta-Federal'nyy vypusk.-2015.-6637 (66).-30 marta. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2015/03/30/alcohol.html (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2015).
Informatsiya iz elektronnoy registratsionnoy karty zakonoproekta № 93181-5. URL: http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/(SpravkaNew)?OpenAgent&RN=93181-5&02 (data obrashcheniya: 23.06.2012).
URL: http://elibrary.ru/titles_compare.asp (data obrashcheniya: 22.03.2014).
URL: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/yandex.ru (data obrashcheniya: 22.03.2014).
Vstupitel'noe slovo na zasedanii prezidiuma Gosudarstvennogo soveta «O sostoyanii bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya i merakh po sovershenstvovaniyu gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» 15 noyabrya 2005 goda. Moskva, Kreml'. URL: http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2005/11/15/1728_type63374type63378type82634_97169.shtml (data obrashcheniya 07.04.2014).
Kirdina S.G., Rubinshteyn, Tolmacheva I.V. Nekotorye kolichestvennye otsenki institutsional'nykh izmeneniy: opyt issledovaniya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva // TERRA ECONOMICUS.-2010.-T. 8.-№ 3.-S. 8-22.
Alekseev A.I., Ovchinskiy V.S., Pobegaylo E.F. Rossiyskaya ugolovnaya politika: preodolenie krizisa.-M., 2006.-144 s.; Luneev V.V. O kriminologo-analiticheskom i sistemnom podkhode k zakonotvorchestvu // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra.-2014.-4 (35).-S. 15-25; Gilinskiy Ya.I. Ugolovnoe pravo: komu ono nuzhno? URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/386.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013); Golovko L.V. Global'naya instrumentalizatsiya ugolovnogo prava URL: http://zakon.ru/Blogs/globalnaya_instrumentalizaciya_ugolovnogo_prava_chast_1/6955,http://zakon.ru/Blogs/globalnaya_instrumentalizaciya_ugolovnogo_prava_chast_2/7019 (data obrashcheniya: 03.10.2013); Luneev V.V. Vse zagovorili o novom UK RF URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/353.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013); Ego zhe. O nauchnoy baze rossiyskogo zakonotvorchestva (Chetvertye Kudryavtsevskie chteniya) URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/1008.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013); Ego zhe. Poroki ugolovnogo zakonotvorchestva (Komu sluzhit UK). URL: http://crimpravo.ru/blog/2263.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.04.2013).
Piter G. Solomon-ml. Sozdanie ugolovnogo prava v Rossii i na Zapade: protsess razrabotki politiki i rol' ekspertov. URL: http://sartraccc.ru/i.php?oper=read_file&filename=Pub/crcr.htm (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2012).
Blumer G. Sotsial'nye problemy kak kollektivnoe povedenie // Sotsial'nye proble-my: konstruktsioniststkoe prochtenie. Khrestomatiya.-Kazan', 2007.-S. 11-25.
Osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta (kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya) /Otv. redaktory Kudryavtsev V.N., Yakovlev A.M.-M., 1982.-304 s.
Demidov Yu.A. Sotsial'naya tsennost' i otsenka v ugolovnom prave.-M., 1975.-182 s.
Galiakbarov R.R. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik.-Krasnodar, 2005.-512 s.
Naumov A. V. Forma ugolovnogo zakona i ee sotsial'naya obuslovlennost' // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakona.-M., 1994.-S. 18-27.
Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti: Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya / Per. s angl. Rutkevich E.; Mosk. filos. fond.-M., 1995.-323 s.
Gilinskiy Ya.I. Deviantnost', prestupnost' i sotsial'nyy kontrol' v «novom mire». Sbornik statey.-SPb., 2012.-352 s.
Sotsial'nye problemy: konstruktsionistskoe prochtenie. Khrestomatiya / Sost. Yasaveev I. G.-Kazan', 2007.-276 s.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the Russian amnesty as a factor in commission of a crime. The author examines the possibility of this correlation regardless of its realistic degree of incidence. The subject of this research is the ability of amnesties given in the Russian Federation to define commission of a crime, giving a perception of impunity. The goal of this article is to determine the degree of the amnesty’s ability to influence the commission of a crime in this scheme, and propose recommendations for reduction of possible influence of amnesty upon the commission of a crime. The research presents the analysis of the practice of amnesty in the Russian Federation, including bills on amnesty. The author makes a conclusion that the predictability of release through amnesty is rather low, but can still influence commission of crime due to lack of perception of the level of its predictability. The author proposes for the amnesty to cover only the acts that are committed prior to the date on which the text of the bill about amnesty becomes public (for example, the date that the project is introduced to the State Duma), or any other prior date.

Ключевые слова: project of amnesty, category of amnesty, term of announcement, predictability, impunity, commission of crime, factor, bill on amnesty, amnesty, public access to a project

Библиография:
Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh / sost. i predisl. V. S. Ovchinskogo. M., 2009. 183 s.
Skuratov Yu. I., Churilov S. N., Grudinin N. S. Gosudarstvennaya politika v sfere amnistii i pomilovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: tendentsii i protivorechiya // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal BGUEP. 2015. N 1(31) // URL: http//cj.isea.ru/reader/article.asp?id=20046 (data obrashcheniya 18 iyunya 2015 g.).
Tsit. po: Komol'tseva A. A., Ivashkina E. A. Institut amnistii: pravovaya priroda i problemy primeneniya v sovremennoy Rossii // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2012. N 3 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Borshevskiy A. P. Institut amnistii v Moldove: istoriko-pravovye osnovy // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2009. N 4 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Sm., naprimer: Nesterenko I. V. Amnistiya kak institut dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya: prinyatie i posledstviya ispolneniya: avtoref. diss… kand. yur. nauk.: 12.00.08. Rostov na Donu. 2006 // URL: http://lawtheses.com/amnistiya-kak-institut-dosrochnogo-osvobozhdeniya (data obrashcheniya 8 avgusta 2015 g.).
Sm., naprimer: Marogulova I. Federal'nyy zakon ob amnistii i pomilovanii (proekt) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 1998. №2. S. 37 – 40.
O rasprostranenii deystviya postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 1997 goda N 1199-II GD "Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya v svyazi s vooruzhennym konfliktom v Chechenskoy Respublike" na lits, uklonivshikhsya ot voennoy sluzhby: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10.06.1998 № 2580-II GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1998. 24 iyunya.
p. 1 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608.
p. 2-5 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608.
p. 8 i 9 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608.
pp. «a» p. 2 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
pp. «v» p.2. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608; pp. «v» p. 2 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
p. 1 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
p. 3 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608; p. 3 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (V red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
Sm. p. 8 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608; p. 11, 12 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 60-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 20 aprelya 2005 goda N 1761-IV GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2005. 26 aprelya.
p. 7 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 65-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 16 aprelya 2010 goda N 3519-5 GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2010. 21 aprelya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 70-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 aprelya 2015 goda N 6576-6 GD // Ofitsial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii (www.pravo.gov.ru) ot 24.4.2015 g. (№ 0001201504240051).
Vopros zadannyy T. G. Morshchakovoy na Abramkinskikh chteniyakh «Prestupleniya i nakazaniya v sovremennoy Rossii». // URL: http://www.prison.org/content/abramkinskie-chteniya-prestupleniya-i-nakazaniya-v-sovremennoy-rossii-0 (data obrashcheniya 25 iyulya 2015 g.).
Vopros zadannyy T. G. Morshchakovoy na Abramkinskikh chteniyakh «Prestupleniya i nakazaniya v sovremennoy Rossii» i ee otvet. // URL: http://www.prison.org/content/abramkinskie-chteniya-prestupleniya-i-nakazaniya-v-sovremennoy-rossii-0 (data obrashcheniya 25 iyulya 2015 g.)
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 fevralya 1994 g. // URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3239/ (data obrashcheniya 22 marta 2015 g.)
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 17 dekabrya 2013 goda // URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3979/ (data obrashcheniya 2 maya 2015 g.).
URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?start_search&fattrib=1 (data obrashcheniya 28 maya 2015 g.).
Rezul'tat poiska v Informatsionno-pravovoy sisteme «Zakonodatel'stvo Rossii» po zaprosu so sleduyushchimi parametrami: vid akta – postanovlenie, prinyavshiy organ – Gosudarstvennaya Duma, nazvanie-amnistiya. // URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=1&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%FF&a0=&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&a23=&a23type=1&a23value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 28 maya 2015 g.).
Naprimer, Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19.04.2006 № 3039-IV GD «O proekte postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii N 285320-4 "Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi so 100-letiem uchrezhdeniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy v Rossii"» // SZ RF. 2006. N 18. St. 1938.
URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=1&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%FF&a0=%E2%F2%EE%F0%EE%E5+%F7%F2%E5%ED%E8%E5&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&a23=&a23type=1&a23value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 5 avgusta 2015 g.).
URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=1&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%FF&a0=&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&a23=&a23type=1&a23value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 5 avgusta 2015 g.).

References (transliteration):
Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh / sost. i predisl. V. S. Ovchinskogo. M., 2009. 183 s.
Skuratov Yu. I., Churilov S. N., Grudinin N. S. Gosudarstvennaya politika v sfere amnistii i pomilovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: tendentsii i protivorechiya // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal BGUEP. 2015. N 1(31) // URL: http//cj.isea.ru/reader/article.asp?id=20046 (data obrashcheniya 18 iyunya 2015 g.).
Tsit. po: Komol'tseva A. A., Ivashkina E. A. Institut amnistii: pravovaya priroda i problemy primeneniya v sovremennoy Rossii // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2012. N 3 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Borshevskiy A. P. Institut amnistii v Moldove: istoriko-pravovye osnovy // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2009. N 4 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Sm., naprimer: Nesterenko I. V. Amnistiya kak institut dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya: prinyatie i posledstviya ispolneniya: avtoref. diss… kand. yur. nauk.: 12.00.08. Rostov na Donu. 2006 // URL: http://lawtheses.com/amnistiya-kak-institut-dosrochnogo-osvobozhdeniya (data obrashcheniya 8 avgusta 2015 g.).
Sm., naprimer: Marogulova I. Federal'nyy zakon ob amnistii i pomilovanii (proekt) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 1998. №2. S. 37 – 40.
O rasprostranenii deystviya postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 1997 goda N 1199-II GD "Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya v svyazi s vooruzhennym konfliktom v Chechenskoy Respublike" na lits, uklonivshikhsya ot voennoy sluzhby: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10.06.1998 № 2580-II GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1998. 24 iyunya.
p. 1 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608.
p. 2-5 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608.
p. 8 i 9 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608.
pp. «a» p. 2 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
pp. «v» p.2. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608; pp. «v» p. 2 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
p. 1 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
p. 3 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608; p. 3 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (V red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
Sm. p. 8 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 50-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 19 aprelya 1995 goda N 713-I GD // SZ RF. 1995. N 18. St. 1608; p. 11, 12 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 26 maya 2000 goda N 398-III GD (v red. Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2000 g. N 492-III GD) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 maya; Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 30 iyunya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 60-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 20 aprelya 2005 goda N 1761-IV GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2005. 26 aprelya.
p. 7 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 65-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» ot 16 aprelya 2010 goda N 3519-5 GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2010. 21 aprelya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 70-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 aprelya 2015 goda N 6576-6 GD // Ofitsial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii (www.pravo.gov.ru) ot 24.4.2015 g. (№ 0001201504240051).
Vopros zadannyy T. G. Morshchakovoy na Abramkinskikh chteniyakh «Prestupleniya i nakazaniya v sovremennoy Rossii». // URL: http://www.prison.org/content/abramkinskie-chteniya-prestupleniya-i-nakazaniya-v-sovremennoy-rossii-0 (data obrashcheniya 25 iyulya 2015 g.).
Vopros zadannyy T. G. Morshchakovoy na Abramkinskikh chteniyakh «Prestupleniya i nakazaniya v sovremennoy Rossii» i ee otvet. // URL: http://www.prison.org/content/abramkinskie-chteniya-prestupleniya-i-nakazaniya-v-sovremennoy-rossii-0 (data obrashcheniya 25 iyulya 2015 g.)
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 fevralya 1994 g. // URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3239/ (data obrashcheniya 22 marta 2015 g.)
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 17 dekabrya 2013 goda // URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3979/ (data obrashcheniya 2 maya 2015 g.).
URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?start_search&fattrib=1 (data obrashcheniya 28 maya 2015 g.).
Rezul'tat poiska v Informatsionno-pravovoy sisteme «Zakonodatel'stvo Rossii» po zaprosu so sleduyushchimi parametrami: vid akta – postanovlenie, prinyavshiy organ – Gosudarstvennaya Duma, nazvanie-amnistiya. // URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=1&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%FF&a0=&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&a23=&a23type=1&a23value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 28 maya 2015 g.).
Naprimer, Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19.04.2006 № 3039-IV GD «O proekte postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii N 285320-4 "Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi so 100-letiem uchrezhdeniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy v Rossii"» // SZ RF. 2006. N 18. St. 1938.
URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=1&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%FF&a0=%E2%F2%EE%F0%EE%E5+%F7%F2%E5%ED%E8%E5&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&a23=&a23type=1&a23value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 5 avgusta 2015 g.).
URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=1&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%FF&a0=&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&a23=&a23type=1&a23value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 5 avgusta 2015 g.).

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the responsibility for violations in the area of illegal prescription drug trade. The object of the research is the legislation of the Russian Federation, which sets the responsibility for violation of any rules in the sphere of prescription drugs. The author turns his attention to the vectors of fight against counterfeit prescription medication on the territory of Russian Federation. The relevance of this research is justified by the statistical data that records a high mortality rate caused by counterfeit medicines, and a very low percentage of indictments. Among the main conclusions are the proposals to systematize the work in the area of toughening the punishment for crimes and violations of manufacturing, sale, or trafficking of fake, counterfeit, and low-grade or unregistered medicines, and trade of medical products and dietary supplements on the territory of the Russian Federation, as well as the demarcation of criminal and administrative responsibility.

Ключевые слова: health, responsibility limits, criminal liability, administrative liability, medecine, drugs, violation of the law, liability, counterfeit drugs, legislation change

Библиография:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.01.2000 N 29-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) «O kachestve i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov», st. 1 // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 10.01.2000, N 2, st. 150.
M.A. Murashko. Itogi raboty Federal'noy sluzhby po nadzoru v sfere zdravookhraneniya i ee territorial'nykh organov po sub'ektam Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2013 g. (po materialam itogovoy kollegii Roszdravnadzora). // Vestnik Roszdravnadzora, №2, 2014. S. 7-17.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25.11.2013 N 317-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii i priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel'nykh polozheniy zakonodatel'nykh aktov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosam okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 02.12.2013, N 48, st. 6165.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 05.02.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 31.12.2014 N 532-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti protivodeystviya oborotu fal'sifitsirovannykh, kontrafaktnykh, nedobrokachestvennykh i nezaregistrirovannykh lekarstvennykh sredstv, meditsinskikh izdeliy i fal'sifitsirovannykh biologicheski aktivnykh dobavok» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.01.2015, N 1 (chast' I), st. 85.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.11.2011 N 323-FZ (red. ot 01.12.2014) «Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 28.11.2011, N 48, st. 6724.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 12.04.2010 N 61-FZ (red. ot 22.10.2014) «Ob obrashchenii lekarstvennykh sredstv» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 19.04.2010, N 16, st. 1815.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 23.01.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, N 25, st. 2954.

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.01.2000 N 29-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) «O kachestve i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov», st. 1 // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 10.01.2000, N 2, st. 150.
M.A. Murashko. Itogi raboty Federal'noy sluzhby po nadzoru v sfere zdravookhraneniya i ee territorial'nykh organov po sub'ektam Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2013 g. (po materialam itogovoy kollegii Roszdravnadzora). // Vestnik Roszdravnadzora, №2, 2014. S. 7-17.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25.11.2013 N 317-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii i priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel'nykh polozheniy zakonodatel'nykh aktov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosam okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 02.12.2013, N 48, st. 6165.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 05.02.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 31.12.2014 N 532-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti protivodeystviya oborotu fal'sifitsirovannykh, kontrafaktnykh, nedobrokachestvennykh i nezaregistrirovannykh lekarstvennykh sredstv, meditsinskikh izdeliy i fal'sifitsirovannykh biologicheski aktivnykh dobavok» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.01.2015, N 1 (chast' I), st. 85.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.11.2011 N 323-FZ (red. ot 01.12.2014) «Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 28.11.2011, N 48, st. 6724.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 12.04.2010 N 61-FZ (red. ot 22.10.2014) «Ob obrashchenii lekarstvennykh sredstv» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 19.04.2010, N 16, st. 1815.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 23.01.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, N 25, st. 2954.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the analysis of the subjective side of a crime and guilt as its central category within criminal-legal and psychological aspects, determination of the controversial questions of the content of guilt and the subjective side, and the correlation between them. The essence of guilt is being examined through such intrinsic components of the inner psychological processes as conscience, will, reasoning, and intellect. The relevance of this research is justified by the fact that these issues are in high demand within the theory and practice of criminal law. The multifacetedness and controversy of the problem of psychological and legal within the content of guilt makes it complex, but at the same time prospective. Without allowing for excessive psycologization of the criminal law, the author nevertheless recommends to devote more attention to the psychological and social nature of the elements of the subjective side. For example, the author proposes a consensus in the resolution of the question of the correlation of psychological and legal in examination of the subjective side of a criminal act by using the psychological and sociological data as the methodological basis of the research.

Ключевые слова: Criminal-legal understanding of guilt, Psychological understanding of guilt, Motive, Intent, Emotions, Conscience, Will, Intellect, Subjective side, Reasoning

Библиография:
Sklyarov S.V. Vina i prestupnye motivy. SPb.: Yurid. tsentr Press, 2004.-326 s.
Sitkovskaya O.D. Psikhologiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. M.: Norma, 1998.-285 s.
Rubinshteyn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. M.: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1957. – 328 s.
Rarog A.I. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M.: Prospekt, 2011. – 224 s.
Pinchuk V.I. Vina. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut gen.prokuratury RF, 1998. – 32 s.
Piazhe Zh. Psikhologiya intellekta. SPb.: Piter, 2004. — 192 s.
Pikurov N.I. Kvalifikatsiya sledovatelem prestupleniy so smeshannoy protivopravnost'yu. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1988. – 56 s.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Kurs lektsiy. T.1. Obshchaya chast'. M.: Yurid. lit., 2004. – 496 s.
Nazarenko G.V. Vina v ugolovnom prave. Orel: VShch MVD RF, 1996. – 96 s.
Muzdybaev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti. L.: Nauka, 1983.-240 s.
Malkov V.P. Sub'ektivnye osnovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995. № 1. S. 91 – 99.
Makashvili V.G. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za neostorozhnost'. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1957.-209 s.
Luneev V.V. Sub'ektivnoe vmenenie. M.: Spartak, 2000. – 70 s.
Luneva O.V. Sotsial'nyy intellekt – uslovie uspeshnoy kar'ery // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2006. № 1. S. 53 – 58.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Bor'ba motivov v prestupnom povedenii. M.: Norma, 2012.-126 s.
Zelinskiy A.F. Osoznavaemoe i neosoznavaemoe v prestupnom povedenii. Khar'kov: Vishcha shkola, 1986. – 168.
Druzhinin V.N. Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostey. SPb.: Piter, 2006. – 249 s.
Dagel' P.S., Kotov D.P. Sub'ektivnaya storona prestupleniya i ee ustanovlenie. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1974.-244 s.
Dagel' P.S. Neostorozhnost': ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy. M.: Yurid. lit., 1977.-144 c.
Vygotskiy L.S. Sobranie sochineniy. T.1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii / pod red. A.R. Luriya, M.G. Yaroshevskogo. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – 488 s.
Volkov B.S. Problema voli i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. Kazan': izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 1965. – 98 s.
Vekker L.M. Psikhicheskie protsessy. T. 2. Myshlenie i intellekt. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1976. – 342 s.
Andreeva I.N. Emotsional'nyy intellekt: issledovanie fenomena // Voprosy psikhologii. 2006. № 3. S. 78 – 86.
Agaev I.B. Sostav prestupleniya. M.: Yurist', 2008. – 335 s.
Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. Eksperimental'nye issledovaniya. SPb.: Piter, 2001.-288 s.
Tolkachenko A.A. Problemy sub'ektivnoy storony prestupleniya. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2005. – 176 s.
Ugrekhelidze M.G. Problema neostorozhnoy viny v ugolovnom prave. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1976. – 131 s.
Utevskiy B.S. Vina v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. M.: Yurizdat, 1950. – 318 s.
Feynberg Ts.M. Uchenie o vmenyaemosti v razlichnykh shkolakh ugolovnogo prava i v sudebnoy psikhiatrii. M.: Yurlitizdat, 1946. – 328 s.
Fel'dshteyn G.S. Priroda umysla // Sbornik pravovedeniya obshchestvennykh znaniy. M.: Tovarishchestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, 1898. – 410 s.
Salkazanov A.E.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy.. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2013.-№ 11.-C. 852-859. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961
Nitsenko R.A.. Smyagchenie i usilenie nakazaniya pri ego Naznachenii v Rossiyskom ugolovnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.9942.
Palyulin A.Yu.. «Moral' i dogma» o zakone i spravedlivosti. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-№ 9.-C. 1177-1185. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8696.2013.9.9392
Dubovik O.L.. Osnovnye napravleniya reformy ugolovno-ekologicheskogo zakonodatel'stva Germanii. // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 6.-C. 836-842. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8304
Kupreev S.S., Dorofeev R.O.. Administrativno-pravovye sredstva profilaktiki prestupleniy, primenyaemye v sfere obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy bezopasnosti. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 116-120. DOI: .10.7256/2222-1964.2013.02.8
A.A. Panenkov. Podkhod k resheniyu problem bor'by s finansirovaniem terrorizma kak odnogo iz vazhneyshikh napravleniy profilaktiki v bor'be s terrorizmom. Pravovaya osnova Programmy po vyyavleniyu i rassledovaniyu prestupleniy, svyazannykh s finansirovaniem terrorizma. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 242-254. DOI: .10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.4
Akopdzhanova M.O.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za neispolnenie obyazannostey nalogovogo agenta (st.1991 UK RF). // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2013.-№ 5.-C. 382-389. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8688.2013.5.8387
M.O. Akopdzhanova. Dispozitsiya stat'i 199 ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossii ob otvetstvennosti za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i sborov s organizatsii. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 128-136. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8688.2013.02.5
N.A. Silaeva. Pravovye aspekty preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy, posyagayushchikh na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossii. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 140-151. DOI: .10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.14
D.K. Chirkov, A.Zh. Sarkisyan. Prestupnost' v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: tendentsii i perspektivy. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 20-26. DOI: .10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.
Korchagin A.G., Fedotova N.P. Kvalifikatsiya i sub'ektivnye predposylki otvetstvennosti za prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 83 - 107. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_776.html

References (transliteration):
Sklyarov S.V. Vina i prestupnye motivy. SPb.: Yurid. tsentr Press, 2004.-326 s.
Sitkovskaya O.D. Psikhologiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. M.: Norma, 1998.-285 s.
Rubinshteyn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. M.: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1957. – 328 s.
Rarog A.I. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M.: Prospekt, 2011. – 224 s.
Pinchuk V.I. Vina. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut gen.prokuratury RF, 1998. – 32 s.
Piazhe Zh. Psikhologiya intellekta. SPb.: Piter, 2004. — 192 s.
Pikurov N.I. Kvalifikatsiya sledovatelem prestupleniy so smeshannoy protivopravnost'yu. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1988. – 56 s.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Kurs lektsiy. T.1. Obshchaya chast'. M.: Yurid. lit., 2004. – 496 s.
Nazarenko G.V. Vina v ugolovnom prave. Orel: VShch MVD RF, 1996. – 96 s.
Muzdybaev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti. L.: Nauka, 1983.-240 s.
Malkov V.P. Sub'ektivnye osnovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995. № 1. S. 91 – 99.
Makashvili V.G. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za neostorozhnost'. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1957.-209 s.
Luneev V.V. Sub'ektivnoe vmenenie. M.: Spartak, 2000. – 70 s.
Luneva O.V. Sotsial'nyy intellekt – uslovie uspeshnoy kar'ery // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2006. № 1. S. 53 – 58.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Bor'ba motivov v prestupnom povedenii. M.: Norma, 2012.-126 s.
Zelinskiy A.F. Osoznavaemoe i neosoznavaemoe v prestupnom povedenii. Khar'kov: Vishcha shkola, 1986. – 168.
Druzhinin V.N. Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostey. SPb.: Piter, 2006. – 249 s.
Dagel' P.S., Kotov D.P. Sub'ektivnaya storona prestupleniya i ee ustanovlenie. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1974.-244 s.
Dagel' P.S. Neostorozhnost': ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy. M.: Yurid. lit., 1977.-144 c.
Vygotskiy L.S. Sobranie sochineniy. T.1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii / pod red. A.R. Luriya, M.G. Yaroshevskogo. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – 488 s.
Volkov B.S. Problema voli i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. Kazan': izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 1965. – 98 s.
Vekker L.M. Psikhicheskie protsessy. T. 2. Myshlenie i intellekt. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1976. – 342 s.
Andreeva I.N. Emotsional'nyy intellekt: issledovanie fenomena // Voprosy psikhologii. 2006. № 3. S. 78 – 86.
Agaev I.B. Sostav prestupleniya. M.: Yurist', 2008. – 335 s.
Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. Eksperimental'nye issledovaniya. SPb.: Piter, 2001.-288 s.
Tolkachenko A.A. Problemy sub'ektivnoy storony prestupleniya. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2005. – 176 s.
Ugrekhelidze M.G. Problema neostorozhnoy viny v ugolovnom prave. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1976. – 131 s.
Utevskiy B.S. Vina v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. M.: Yurizdat, 1950. – 318 s.
Feynberg Ts.M. Uchenie o vmenyaemosti v razlichnykh shkolakh ugolovnogo prava i v sudebnoy psikhiatrii. M.: Yurlitizdat, 1946. – 328 s.
Fel'dshteyn G.S. Priroda umysla // Sbornik pravovedeniya obshchestvennykh znaniy. M.: Tovarishchestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, 1898. – 410 s.
Salkazanov A.E.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy.. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2013.-№ 11.-C. 852-859. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961
Nitsenko R.A.. Smyagchenie i usilenie nakazaniya pri ego Naznachenii v Rossiyskom ugolovnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.9942.
Palyulin A.Yu.. «Moral' i dogma» o zakone i spravedlivosti. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-№ 9.-C. 1177-1185. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8696.2013.9.9392
Dubovik O.L.. Osnovnye napravleniya reformy ugolovno-ekologicheskogo zakonodatel'stva Germanii. // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 6.-C. 836-842. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8304
Kupreev S.S., Dorofeev R.O.. Administrativno-pravovye sredstva profilaktiki prestupleniy, primenyaemye v sfere obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy bezopasnosti. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 116-120. DOI: .10.7256/2222-1964.2013.02.8
A.A. Panenkov. Podkhod k resheniyu problem bor'by s finansirovaniem terrorizma kak odnogo iz vazhneyshikh napravleniy profilaktiki v bor'be s terrorizmom. Pravovaya osnova Programmy po vyyavleniyu i rassledovaniyu prestupleniy, svyazannykh s finansirovaniem terrorizma. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 242-254. DOI: .10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.4
Akopdzhanova M.O.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za neispolnenie obyazannostey nalogovogo agenta (st.1991 UK RF). // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2013.-№ 5.-C. 382-389. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8688.2013.5.8387
M.O. Akopdzhanova. Dispozitsiya stat'i 199 ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossii ob otvetstvennosti za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i sborov s organizatsii. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 128-136. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8688.2013.02.5
N.A. Silaeva. Pravovye aspekty preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy, posyagayushchikh na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossii. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 140-151. DOI: .10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.14
D.K. Chirkov, A.Zh. Sarkisyan. Prestupnost' v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: tendentsii i perspektivy. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 20-26. DOI: .10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.
Korchagin A.G., Fedotova N.P. Kvalifikatsiya i sub'ektivnye predposylki otvetstvennosti za prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 83 - 107. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_776.html

Аннотация: On the example of detective and investigative work by the branches of internal affairs of the Russian Federation on cases of illegal drug trade, the author gives a detail examination to the possibility of optimizing the procedure of preliminary investigation. Through the prism of the idea of procedural economy, the author reviews the norms of the criminal procedural code of the Russian Federation, which regulates the work of the investigative branch related to procedure up to the moment of indictment. Analysis is conducted on the statistics that reflect separate aspects of the work of the branches of internal affairs of the Russian Federation during the period of 2012-2014. The scientific novelty of this research consist in the fact that the author studied the contradiction of the norms of criminal procedural code of the Russian Federation, according to which the investigative branch up until the moment of indictment, which warrants preliminary investigation, lacks the right to conduct any investigative actions even if there is a need to secure pertinent information from possible loss or tempering. The author accents his attention on the possibility of optimizing the process of procedural recording of pertinent information should there be future improvements to the legal norms that regulate the procedure of high-priority investigative work.

Ключевые слова: internal affairs, pertinent information, forensic inquiry, criminal case, high-piority cases, procedural economy, indictment, investigative branch, initial stage of investigation, illegal drug trade

Библиография:
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 20 noyabrya 1864 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS GARANT. – URL: http://base.garant.ru/57791498/17/#block_20200#ixzz3MmFAuEbq (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2015).
Ct. 216 i st. 219 UPK RSFSR 1922 goda, utverzhdennogo postanovleniem VTsIK ot 25.05.1922. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ESU_4006/ (data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015);
Ct. 215 UPK RSFSR 1923 goda, utverzhdennogo postanovleniem VTsIK ot ot 15.02.1923. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ESU_3551/ (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2015).
Punkt «s» chasti 3 stat'i 14 Mezhdunarodnogo Pakta ot 16.12.1966 «O grazhdanskikh i politicheskikh pravakh» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. – 1994. – №12.
Punkt 3 stat'i 5 Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod (Zaklyuchena v g. Rime 04.11.1950) // Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov. – 2001. – №3.
Prokof'eva S.M. Kontseptsiya gumanizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Monografiya / Pod obshch. red. V.P. Sal'nikova. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii. 2002. – 448 s.
Gurevich M. A. Printsipy sovetskogo grazhdansko-protsessual'nogo prava// Trudy Vsesoyuznogo yuridicheskogo zaochnogo instituta. – .M., 1965. T.3.
Pashkevich P. F. Protsessual'nyy zakon i effektivnost' ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 1984. – 176 c.
Sokol P.Ya. Protsessual'nye garantii bystroty predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya. – Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. Nauk. – M., 1990.
Polyakov M.P., Smolin A.Yu. Printsip protsessual'noy ekonomii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Monografiya / N. Novgorod.: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii. 2011. – 152 s.
P. 21 i p. 22 st. 1 Federal'nogo zakona ot 02.12.2008 №226-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –08.12.2008. – № 49. – St. 5724.
P. 19 i p. 20 st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 04.03.2013 № 23-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –04.03.2013. – № 9. – St. 875.
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2012 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/804701/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015).
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2013 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/1609734/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015);
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2014 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/2994866/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 13.07.2015 № 356 «O vnesenii izmeneniya v Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 5 maya 2014 g. № 300 «O nekotorykh voprosakh Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii»//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –20.07.2015. – № 29 (chast' II). – St. 4472.
Stat'ya 11 Federal'nogo zakona ot 12.08.1995 N 144-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti». [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=181943 (data obrashcheniya 25.07.2015).
Ob utverzhdenii Nastavleniya po organizatsii ekspertno-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel'nosti v sisteme MVD Rossii: Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 11 yanvarya 2009 № 7. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=EXP;n=451495 (data obrashcheniya 25.07.2015).
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 04.02.1999 № 18-O «Po zhalobe grazhdan M.B. Nikol'skoy i M.I. Sapronova na narushenie ikh konstitutsionnykh prav otdel'nymi polozheniyami Federal'nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»// Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. – 1999. – №3.
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 23.12.2009 po delu № A56-33508/2009 IFNS nepravomerno otkazala OOO v vozmeshchenii NDS, soslavshis' na podpisanie schetov-faktur neustanovlennym litsom, poskol'ku spravki ekspertno-kriminalisticheskogo tsentra GUVD o rezul'tatakh operativnogo issledovaniya, provedennogo v ramkakh ORM, ne mogut byt' priznany nadlezhashchimi dokazatel'stvami po dannomu delu.
Prigovor Nevskogo rayonnogo suda Sankt-Peterburga v suda po delu № 1-780/11 [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt UFSKN po Sankt-Peterburgu i Leningradskoy oblasti. – URL: http://www.gnk.spb.ru/prigovor2012/13.htm (data obrashcheniya 23.07.2015).
Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29 iyunya 2005 № 511 (v red. ot 15 oktyabrya 2012). [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=141831 (data obrashcheniya 20.07.2015).
V. N. Grigor'ev Nachalo ugolovnogo proizvodstva: sistema sderzhek i protivovesov // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2013. - 2. - C. 17 - 21.

References (transliteration):
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 20 noyabrya 1864 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS GARANT. – URL: http://base.garant.ru/57791498/17/#block_20200#ixzz3MmFAuEbq (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2015).
Ct. 216 i st. 219 UPK RSFSR 1922 goda, utverzhdennogo postanovleniem VTsIK ot 25.05.1922. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ESU_4006/ (data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015);
Ct. 215 UPK RSFSR 1923 goda, utverzhdennogo postanovleniem VTsIK ot ot 15.02.1923. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ESU_3551/ (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2015).
Punkt «s» chasti 3 stat'i 14 Mezhdunarodnogo Pakta ot 16.12.1966 «O grazhdanskikh i politicheskikh pravakh» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. – 1994. – №12.
Punkt 3 stat'i 5 Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod (Zaklyuchena v g. Rime 04.11.1950) // Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov. – 2001. – №3.
Prokof'eva S.M. Kontseptsiya gumanizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Monografiya / Pod obshch. red. V.P. Sal'nikova. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii. 2002. – 448 s.
Gurevich M. A. Printsipy sovetskogo grazhdansko-protsessual'nogo prava// Trudy Vsesoyuznogo yuridicheskogo zaochnogo instituta. – .M., 1965. T.3.
Pashkevich P. F. Protsessual'nyy zakon i effektivnost' ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 1984. – 176 c.
Sokol P.Ya. Protsessual'nye garantii bystroty predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya. – Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. Nauk. – M., 1990.
Polyakov M.P., Smolin A.Yu. Printsip protsessual'noy ekonomii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Monografiya / N. Novgorod.: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii. 2011. – 152 s.
P. 21 i p. 22 st. 1 Federal'nogo zakona ot 02.12.2008 №226-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –08.12.2008. – № 49. – St. 5724.
P. 19 i p. 20 st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 04.03.2013 № 23-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –04.03.2013. – № 9. – St. 875.
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2012 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/804701/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015).
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2013 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/1609734/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015);
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2014 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/2994866/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015).
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 13.07.2015 № 356 «O vnesenii izmeneniya v Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 5 maya 2014 g. № 300 «O nekotorykh voprosakh Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii»//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –20.07.2015. – № 29 (chast' II). – St. 4472.
Stat'ya 11 Federal'nogo zakona ot 12.08.1995 N 144-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti». [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=181943 (data obrashcheniya 25.07.2015).
Ob utverzhdenii Nastavleniya po organizatsii ekspertno-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel'nosti v sisteme MVD Rossii: Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 11 yanvarya 2009 № 7. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=EXP;n=451495 (data obrashcheniya 25.07.2015).
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 04.02.1999 № 18-O «Po zhalobe grazhdan M.B. Nikol'skoy i M.I. Sapronova na narushenie ikh konstitutsionnykh prav otdel'nymi polozheniyami Federal'nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»// Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. – 1999. – №3.
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 23.12.2009 po delu № A56-33508/2009 IFNS nepravomerno otkazala OOO v vozmeshchenii NDS, soslavshis' na podpisanie schetov-faktur neustanovlennym litsom, poskol'ku spravki ekspertno-kriminalisticheskogo tsentra GUVD o rezul'tatakh operativnogo issledovaniya, provedennogo v ramkakh ORM, ne mogut byt' priznany nadlezhashchimi dokazatel'stvami po dannomu delu.
Prigovor Nevskogo rayonnogo suda Sankt-Peterburga v suda po delu № 1-780/11 [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt UFSKN po Sankt-Peterburgu i Leningradskoy oblasti. – URL: http://www.gnk.spb.ru/prigovor2012/13.htm (data obrashcheniya 23.07.2015).
Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29 iyunya 2005 № 511 (v red. ot 15 oktyabrya 2012). [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=141831 (data obrashcheniya 20.07.2015).
V. N. Grigor'ev Nachalo ugolovnogo proizvodstva: sistema sderzhek i protivovesov // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2013. - 2. - C. 17 - 21.

Аннотация: This article presents the analysis of the institution of excluding parties from participating in public procurement due to corruption violations. The author defines the notion, legal nature, and types of exclusion of parties from public procurement according to the law of the European Union, Great Britain, United States, and Russian Federation. A special attention is given to the comparative analysis of the basis and terms of exclusion within Russian and foreign legislations, including removal from participation for third-party corruption violations. The author determines possible ways to improve this institution within Russian legislation, and notes the need to broaden the bases for exclusion from participation due to corruption violations. For information purposes it is reasonable to create and maintain a registry of participants of public procurement that have previously been excluded due to corruption or other violations.

Ключевые слова: state needs, exclusion of suppliers, contract system, contracting, government contract, public procurement, government procurement, state order, corruption, fighting corruption

Библиография:
United States v. Bizzell, 921 F2d 263 (10th Cir 1990).
Trepte, P. Regulating Procurement : Understanding the Ends and Means of Public Procurement Regulation. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2004. – 432 p.
The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Regulation 57). [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/102/regulation/57/made (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
Piselli, E. The Scope for Excluding Providers Who Have Committed Criminal Offences under the EU Procurement Directives // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2000. – Vol. 6. – pp. 267 – 286.
Schooner, S. The Paper Tiger Stirs : Rethinking Exclusion and Debar-ment // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 13. – № 5. – pp. 211 – 217.
Sope, W.-El. Fighting Corruption in Public Procurement : A Comparative Analysis of Disqualification or Debarment Measures. – Oxford-Portland : Hart Publishing, 2012. – xlix + 306 p.
Tillipman, J. A House of Cards Falls : Why "Too Big to Debar" is All Slogan and Little Substance // Fordham Law Review Res Gestae. – 2012. – Vol. 80. – Paper 7. – pp. 49 – 58.
Hamdani, A., Klement, A. Corporate Crime and Deterrence // Stanford Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 61. – № 2. – pp. 271 – 310.
Mandatory Exclusion : Office of Government Commerce Guidance on the Mandatory Exclusion of Economic Operators in the New Procurement Regulations. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110601212617/http:/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Mandatory_Exclusion_Guidance_-_February_2010_Update_on_new_template_(2).pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
Federal Acquisition Regulation [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
Bae v. Shalala, 44 F3d 489 (7th Cir 1995).
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC // Official Journal of the European Union. – 2014. – L 94/65.
Arrowsmith, S. The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement. – London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2005. – cxxxviii + 1547 p.
Rol' predprinimatel'skikh struktur v protivodeystvii korruptsii [Tekst] : nauch. –prakt. posob. / otv. red. N.G. Semilyutina, E.I. Spektor. – M.: IZiSP, Kontrakt, 2012. – 240 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ros. Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 1996. – № 25, st. 2954.
Khramkin, A.A. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v goszakupkakh [Tekst] : monogr. / A.A. Khramkin. – M. : Yurisprudentsiya, 2011. – 152 s.
Anechiarico, F., Jacobs, J. Purging Corruption from Public Contracting : The Solutions are Now Part of the Problem // New York Law School Law Review. – 1995. – Vol. 40. – pp. 143 – 175.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy podpunkta 1 punkta 3 i abzatsa pervogo punkta 6 stat'i 9 Zakona Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O vynuzhdennykh pereselentsakh» v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina M.A. Mkrtychana : postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 21 noyab. 2002 g. № 15-P // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – № 48, st. 4829.
Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Lazareva Sergeya Fedorovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniem chasti vtoroy stat'i 331 Trudovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii : opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 26 yanv. 2010 g. № 127-O-O. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument ofitsial'no opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravov. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd : fed. zakon ot 5 apr. 2013 g. № 44-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2013. – № 14, st. 1652.
Yukins, C. Suspension and Debarment : Re-examing the Process // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 13. – № 5. – pp. 255 – 259
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dek. 2001 g. № 195-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' 1), st. 1; 2008. – № 52 (chast' 1), st. 6235.
Antonova, E.Yu. Sovremennye kontseptsii korporativnoy (kollektivnoy) ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [Tekst] / E.Yu. Antonova // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 135 – 140.

References (transliteration):
United States v. Bizzell, 921 F2d 263 (10th Cir 1990).
Trepte, P. Regulating Procurement : Understanding the Ends and Means of Public Procurement Regulation. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2004. – 432 p.
The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Regulation 57). [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/102/regulation/57/made (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
Piselli, E. The Scope for Excluding Providers Who Have Committed Criminal Offences under the EU Procurement Directives // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2000. – Vol. 6. – pp. 267 – 286.
Schooner, S. The Paper Tiger Stirs : Rethinking Exclusion and Debar-ment // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 13. – № 5. – pp. 211 – 217.
Sope, W.-El. Fighting Corruption in Public Procurement : A Comparative Analysis of Disqualification or Debarment Measures. – Oxford-Portland : Hart Publishing, 2012. – xlix + 306 p.
Tillipman, J. A House of Cards Falls : Why "Too Big to Debar" is All Slogan and Little Substance // Fordham Law Review Res Gestae. – 2012. – Vol. 80. – Paper 7. – pp. 49 – 58.
Hamdani, A., Klement, A. Corporate Crime and Deterrence // Stanford Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 61. – № 2. – pp. 271 – 310.
Mandatory Exclusion : Office of Government Commerce Guidance on the Mandatory Exclusion of Economic Operators in the New Procurement Regulations. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110601212617/http:/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Mandatory_Exclusion_Guidance_-_February_2010_Update_on_new_template_(2).pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
Federal Acquisition Regulation [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
Bae v. Shalala, 44 F3d 489 (7th Cir 1995).
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC // Official Journal of the European Union. – 2014. – L 94/65.
Arrowsmith, S. The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement. – London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2005. – cxxxviii + 1547 p.
Rol' predprinimatel'skikh struktur v protivodeystvii korruptsii [Tekst] : nauch. –prakt. posob. / otv. red. N.G. Semilyutina, E.I. Spektor. – M.: IZiSP, Kontrakt, 2012. – 240 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ros. Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 1996. – № 25, st. 2954.
Khramkin, A.A. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v goszakupkakh [Tekst] : monogr. / A.A. Khramkin. – M. : Yurisprudentsiya, 2011. – 152 s.
Anechiarico, F., Jacobs, J. Purging Corruption from Public Contracting : The Solutions are Now Part of the Problem // New York Law School Law Review. – 1995. – Vol. 40. – pp. 143 – 175.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy podpunkta 1 punkta 3 i abzatsa pervogo punkta 6 stat'i 9 Zakona Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O vynuzhdennykh pereselentsakh» v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina M.A. Mkrtychana : postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 21 noyab. 2002 g. № 15-P // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – № 48, st. 4829.
Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Lazareva Sergeya Fedorovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniem chasti vtoroy stat'i 331 Trudovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii : opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 26 yanv. 2010 g. № 127-O-O. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument ofitsial'no opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravov. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd : fed. zakon ot 5 apr. 2013 g. № 44-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2013. – № 14, st. 1652.
Yukins, C. Suspension and Debarment : Re-examing the Process // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 13. – № 5. – pp. 255 – 259
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dek. 2001 g. № 195-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' 1), st. 1; 2008. – № 52 (chast' 1), st. 6235.
Antonova, E.Yu. Sovremennye kontseptsii korporativnoy (kollektivnoy) ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [Tekst] / E.Yu. Antonova // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 135 – 140.

Аннотация: The main goal of this article is to devise conceptual approaches towards the introduction of criminal offence into Ukrainian criminal legislation. The Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, passed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on April 13, 2012, introduced a notion of “criminal violation”, the content of which encompasses a criminal offence and crime. A special attention is given to foreign precedent and national traditions, as well as to the study of positions of researches in determination of the place of criminal offense within the system of legal violations. Based on the conducted analysis, the author formulates a conclusion on the need to introduce criminal offence into criminal legislation for the purpose of further humanization of criminal responsibility for separate crimes of minor gravity. By examining the correlation between the criminal offence with such institutions of criminal law as multiple offences, conspiracy to commit crime, and others, the author proposes and substantiates conceptual approaches of introduction of criminal offence into Ukrainian criminal legislation.

Ключевые слова: Criminal law, Criminal offence, Crime, Criminal responsibility, Legal violation, Criminal legislation, System of legal violations, Criminal violation, Humanization of responsibility, Law

Библиография:
Frіs P.L. Pitannya krimіnal'nogo prava v kontekstі krimіnal'no-pravovoї polіtiki //Pravo Ukraїni. – 2010.-№ 9. – S. 73-80.
Khavronyuk M. І. Kontseptsіyu viznacheno:admіnіstrativnі prostupki, krimіnal'nі prostupki, zlochini. Nastav chas rozmezhuvati / Osnovnі napryami rozvitku krimіnal'nogo prava ta shlyakhi vdoskonalennya zakonodavstva Ukraїni pro krimіnal'nu vіdpovіdal'nіst' : mater. mіzh nar. nauk.-prakt. konf., 11-12 zhovt. 2012 r. / redkol. : V. Ya. Tatsіy (golov. red..), V. І. Borisov (zast.. golov. red..) ta іn.. – Kh. : Pravo, 2012. – S. 182.
Epifanova E.V. Prestuplenie kak pravovaya kategorіya v nauke i zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoriya i osobennosti sovremennogo sostoyaniya : monografiya / pod nauch. red. V.V. Momotova. – M.: Yurliinform, 2013. – S. 316.
Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyy prostupok v sisteme differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / E.V. Rogova. – Irkutsk, 2011. – S. 47-48.
Strel'tsov Є. L. Problemi klasifіkatsії suspіl'no nebezpechnikh dіyan' / Problemi vprovadzhennya іnstitutu krimіnal'nogo prostupku» (na osnovі proektu Zakonu «Pro vnesennya zmіn do Krimіnal'nogo kodeksu Ukraїni shchodo vvedennya іnstitutu krimіnal'nikh prostupkіv» № 10136 vіd 03.03.2012 r. : mater. Vseukraїns'koї Іnternet-konferentsії, 10 lipnya 2012 r., m. Kharkіv / [Elektronnyy resurs] . – Rezhim dostupa : http : www/ ivps.com.ua.
Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyy prostupok v sisteme differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / E.V. Rogova. – Irkutsk, 2011. – S. 13.
Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyy prostupok v sisteme differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / E.V. Rogova. – Irkutsk, 2011. – S. 3, 114.
Krivochenko L. M. Klassifіkatsіya zlochinіv za stupenem tyazhkostі u Krimіnal'nomu kodeksі Ukraїni: monografіya / ,L. M. Krivochenko. – K. : Yurіnkom Іnter, 2010-S. 69-74.
Tatsіy V.Ya., Borisov V.І., Tyutyugіn V.І. Aktual'nі problemi suchasnogo rozvitku krimіnal'nogo prava Ukraїni // Pravo Ukraїni. – 2010. – № 9. – S. 12;
Frіs P. L. Deyakі zauvazhennya shchodo kontseptsії derzhavnoї polіtiki u sferі krimіnal'noї yustitsії ta zabezpechennya pravoporyadku v Ukraїnі / P. L. Frіs // Aktual'nі problemi udoskonalennya krimіnal'nogo zakonodavstva Ukraїni : tezi dopovіdey mіzhvіd. nauk.-prakt. konferentsії (Kiїv, 25 travnya 2007 r.) / red. kol.: Є. M. Moіseєv, O. M. Dzhuzha, O. M. Kostenko ta іn. – K. : KNUVS, 2007. – S. 190-194;
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie obshchestvennoy opasnosti deyaniy / N.F. Kuznetsova // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2010.-№ 6. – S. 67-75;
Epifanova E.V. Prestuplenie kak pravovaya kategoriya v nauke i zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoriya i osobennosti sovremennogo sostoyaniya : monografiya / pod nauch. red. V.V. Momotova. – M.: Yurliinform, 2013. – 400 s.
Zagorodnikov N. I. Sovershenstvovanie sovetskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva ob okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka / N. I. Zagorodnikov // Trudi Moskov. vyssh. shkoly militsii MVO SSSR, 1978. – Vyp. 3. – S. 92; Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1961.-№ 4; Voprosy obshchego ucheniya o nakazanii v period razvernutogo stroitel'stva kommunizma. – L. : Izd-vo Leningrad. un-ta, 1961. – S. 77-78.

References (transliteration):
Frіs P.L. Pitannya krimіnal'nogo prava v kontekstі krimіnal'no-pravovoї polіtiki //Pravo Ukraїni. – 2010.-№ 9. – S. 73-80.
Khavronyuk M. І. Kontseptsіyu viznacheno:admіnіstrativnі prostupki, krimіnal'nі prostupki, zlochini. Nastav chas rozmezhuvati / Osnovnі napryami rozvitku krimіnal'nogo prava ta shlyakhi vdoskonalennya zakonodavstva Ukraїni pro krimіnal'nu vіdpovіdal'nіst' : mater. mіzh nar. nauk.-prakt. konf., 11-12 zhovt. 2012 r. / redkol. : V. Ya. Tatsіy (golov. red..), V. І. Borisov (zast.. golov. red..) ta іn.. – Kh. : Pravo, 2012. – S. 182.
Epifanova E.V. Prestuplenie kak pravovaya kategorіya v nauke i zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoriya i osobennosti sovremennogo sostoyaniya : monografiya / pod nauch. red. V.V. Momotova. – M.: Yurliinform, 2013. – S. 316.
Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyy prostupok v sisteme differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / E.V. Rogova. – Irkutsk, 2011. – S. 47-48.
Strel'tsov Є. L. Problemi klasifіkatsії suspіl'no nebezpechnikh dіyan' / Problemi vprovadzhennya іnstitutu krimіnal'nogo prostupku» (na osnovі proektu Zakonu «Pro vnesennya zmіn do Krimіnal'nogo kodeksu Ukraїni shchodo vvedennya іnstitutu krimіnal'nikh prostupkіv» № 10136 vіd 03.03.2012 r. : mater. Vseukraїns'koї Іnternet-konferentsії, 10 lipnya 2012 r., m. Kharkіv / [Elektronnyy resurs] . – Rezhim dostupa : http : www/ ivps.com.ua.
Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyy prostupok v sisteme differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / E.V. Rogova. – Irkutsk, 2011. – S. 13.
Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyy prostupok v sisteme differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / E.V. Rogova. – Irkutsk, 2011. – S. 3, 114.
Krivochenko L. M. Klassifіkatsіya zlochinіv za stupenem tyazhkostі u Krimіnal'nomu kodeksі Ukraїni: monografіya / ,L. M. Krivochenko. – K. : Yurіnkom Іnter, 2010-S. 69-74.
Tatsіy V.Ya., Borisov V.І., Tyutyugіn V.І. Aktual'nі problemi suchasnogo rozvitku krimіnal'nogo prava Ukraїni // Pravo Ukraїni. – 2010. – № 9. – S. 12;
Frіs P. L. Deyakі zauvazhennya shchodo kontseptsії derzhavnoї polіtiki u sferі krimіnal'noї yustitsії ta zabezpechennya pravoporyadku v Ukraїnі / P. L. Frіs // Aktual'nі problemi udoskonalennya krimіnal'nogo zakonodavstva Ukraїni : tezi dopovіdey mіzhvіd. nauk.-prakt. konferentsії (Kiїv, 25 travnya 2007 r.) / red. kol.: Є. M. Moіseєv, O. M. Dzhuzha, O. M. Kostenko ta іn. – K. : KNUVS, 2007. – S. 190-194;
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie obshchestvennoy opasnosti deyaniy / N.F. Kuznetsova // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2010.-№ 6. – S. 67-75;
Epifanova E.V. Prestuplenie kak pravovaya kategoriya v nauke i zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoriya i osobennosti sovremennogo sostoyaniya : monografiya / pod nauch. red. V.V. Momotova. – M.: Yurliinform, 2013. – 400 s.
Zagorodnikov N. I. Sovershenstvovanie sovetskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva ob okhrane obshchestvennogo poryadka / N. I. Zagorodnikov // Trudi Moskov. vyssh. shkoly militsii MVO SSSR, 1978. – Vyp. 3. – S. 92; Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1961.-№ 4; Voprosy obshchego ucheniya o nakazanii v period razvernutogo stroitel'stva kommunizma. – L. : Izd-vo Leningrad. un-ta, 1961. – S. 77-78.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the content of the descriptive part of the ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation from 02.17.2015 No. 2-P, in which certain positions of Articles 6, 21, and 22 of the Federal Law “On Prosecutor’s Office the Russian Federation” are subjected to a rigorous assessment from the perspective of constitutionality. These Articles regulate the issues pertaining to prosecutors exercising their authority within the framework of obtaining statistical and other information from the supervised branches, as well as inspections to ensure adherence to the laws within the corresponding branches. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that the author is first to conduct a detailed analysis of the legal position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the most problematic issues that come up in law enforcement practice; the author expresses a critical opinion on the objectiveness of the theses contained in the ruling of the branch of constitutional control, and underlines the most important approaches for the theory and practice of prosecutors supervision.

Ключевые слова: Legality, Upholding the law, Constitutional Court, Prosecutor’s office, Prosecutor’s authority, Court ruling, Legal position, Inspection, Prosecutor, Prosecutors supervision

Библиография:
SZ RF. – 2015. – № 9. – St. 1389.
SZ RF. – 1995. – № 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Postanovleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 11.04.2000 № 6-P «Po delu o pro-verke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy punkta 2 stat'i 1, punkta 1 stat'i 21 i punkta 3 stat'i 22 Federal'nogo zakona «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» v svyazi s zaprosom Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Fe-deratsii» (SZ RF. – 2000. – № 16. – St. 1774) i ot 18.07.2003 № 13-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy statey 115 i 231 GPK RSFSR, statey 26, 251 i 253 GPK Rossiyskoy Federatsii, statey 1, 21 i 22 Federal'nogo zakona «O prokurature Rossiy-skoy Federatsii» v svyazi s zaprosami Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya – Kurultaya Respubliki Bashkortostan, Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Respubliki Tatarstan i Verkhovnogo Suda Res-publiki Tatarstan» (SZ RF. – 2003. – № 30. – St. 3101).
O znachenii etogo ponyatiya sm.: Vinokurov A.Yu. Prokurorskaya nauka: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2014. – № 9. – S. 125-130.
Bessarabov V.G., Zhmakin A.S. Mesto prokuratury v politicheskoy sisteme // Za-konnost'. – 2009. – № 11; Veliev I.V. Mesto prokuratury v sisteme organov gosudarst-vennoy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2005. – № 10 i dr.
Baykin I.M. K voprosu o gosudarstvenno-vlastnykh polnomochiyakh prokuratury // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. – 2011. – № 4.
Podcherknem, chto s tochki zreniya prokurorskoy nauki nadzornaya funktsiya odna i v Zakone o prokurature ona oboznachena kak prokurorskiy nadzor.
Takoy funktsii u prokuratury net, poskol'ku nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov yav-lyaetsya otrasl'yu (sostavnoy chast'yu) funktsii prokurorskogo nadzora.
SZ RF. – 2008. – № 51 (ch. 1). – St. 6228 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Gulyagin A.Yu. Prokuratura v sisteme pravookhranitel'nykh organov administra-tivnoy yurisdiktsii: monografiya. – M.: Yurist, 2012 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
SZ RF. – 2003. – № 40. – St. 3822 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Talipov D.Kh., Boldyrev D.Yu. Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov: podmena funktsiy kontroliruyushchikh organov ili koordinatsiya ikh deyatel'nosti // Zakonnost'. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 28-33.
SZ RF. – 2008. – № 52 (ch. 1). – St. 6249 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Polnomochiya prokurora po nadzoru za ispolneniem zakonov // Za-konnost'. – 2006. – № 8.
Vinokurov A.Yu. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii pravovogo regulirovaniya nad-zornoy i inoy deyatel'nosti prokurorov // Aktual'nye voprosy rossiyskogo prava: sb. nauch. statey. – M.: MosGU, 2010. – Vyp. 17. – S. 16.
Zakonnost'. – 2011. – № 12.
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Zakonnost'. – 2008. – № 3 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Obraztsy dokumentov prokurorskoy praktiki: prakt. posobie /pod obshch. red. A.E. Buksmana i O.S. Kapinus. – M.: Yurayt, 2014. – S. 35-36.
Bondarenko V.A., Ershova V.A. Zakonnost' osparivaniya predstavleniya prokurora // Zakonnost'. – 2014. – № 6. – S. 9-12; Glukhov E.A. O vozmozhnosti osparivaniya aktov pro-kurorskogo reagirovaniya // Pravo v Vooruzhennykh Silakh. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 99-109 i dr.

References (transliteration):
SZ RF. – 2015. – № 9. – St. 1389.
SZ RF. – 1995. – № 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Postanovleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 11.04.2000 № 6-P «Po delu o pro-verke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy punkta 2 stat'i 1, punkta 1 stat'i 21 i punkta 3 stat'i 22 Federal'nogo zakona «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» v svyazi s zaprosom Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Fe-deratsii» (SZ RF. – 2000. – № 16. – St. 1774) i ot 18.07.2003 № 13-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy statey 115 i 231 GPK RSFSR, statey 26, 251 i 253 GPK Rossiyskoy Federatsii, statey 1, 21 i 22 Federal'nogo zakona «O prokurature Rossiy-skoy Federatsii» v svyazi s zaprosami Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya – Kurultaya Respubliki Bashkortostan, Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Respubliki Tatarstan i Verkhovnogo Suda Res-publiki Tatarstan» (SZ RF. – 2003. – № 30. – St. 3101).
O znachenii etogo ponyatiya sm.: Vinokurov A.Yu. Prokurorskaya nauka: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2014. – № 9. – S. 125-130.
Bessarabov V.G., Zhmakin A.S. Mesto prokuratury v politicheskoy sisteme // Za-konnost'. – 2009. – № 11; Veliev I.V. Mesto prokuratury v sisteme organov gosudarst-vennoy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2005. – № 10 i dr.
Baykin I.M. K voprosu o gosudarstvenno-vlastnykh polnomochiyakh prokuratury // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. – 2011. – № 4.
Podcherknem, chto s tochki zreniya prokurorskoy nauki nadzornaya funktsiya odna i v Zakone o prokurature ona oboznachena kak prokurorskiy nadzor.
Takoy funktsii u prokuratury net, poskol'ku nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov yav-lyaetsya otrasl'yu (sostavnoy chast'yu) funktsii prokurorskogo nadzora.
SZ RF. – 2008. – № 51 (ch. 1). – St. 6228 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Gulyagin A.Yu. Prokuratura v sisteme pravookhranitel'nykh organov administra-tivnoy yurisdiktsii: monografiya. – M.: Yurist, 2012 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
SZ RF. – 2003. – № 40. – St. 3822 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Talipov D.Kh., Boldyrev D.Yu. Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov: podmena funktsiy kontroliruyushchikh organov ili koordinatsiya ikh deyatel'nosti // Zakonnost'. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 28-33.
SZ RF. – 2008. – № 52 (ch. 1). – St. 6249 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Polnomochiya prokurora po nadzoru za ispolneniem zakonov // Za-konnost'. – 2006. – № 8.
Vinokurov A.Yu. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii pravovogo regulirovaniya nad-zornoy i inoy deyatel'nosti prokurorov // Aktual'nye voprosy rossiyskogo prava: sb. nauch. statey. – M.: MosGU, 2010. – Vyp. 17. – S. 16.
Zakonnost'. – 2011. – № 12.
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Zakonnost'. – 2008. – № 3 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Obraztsy dokumentov prokurorskoy praktiki: prakt. posobie /pod obshch. red. A.E. Buksmana i O.S. Kapinus. – M.: Yurayt, 2014. – S. 35-36.
Bondarenko V.A., Ershova V.A. Zakonnost' osparivaniya predstavleniya prokurora // Zakonnost'. – 2014. – № 6. – S. 9-12; Glukhov E.A. O vozmozhnosti osparivaniya aktov pro-kurorskogo reagirovaniya // Pravo v Vooruzhennykh Silakh. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 99-109 i dr.

Аннотация: This article analyzes the procedural and non-procedural safety measures implemented in legal cases in order to protect life, health and/or property of the parties involved in criminal procedure and other individuals. A conclusion is made on development of the institution of safety measures: new safety measures are being introduced (exclusion of personal information of the victim from the text of court decisions when they are published online; differentiated prohibition on distribution in mass media of details on victims that are minors, including the nature of their injuries, etc.); the requirements for decisions on safety measures are being increased (filing a report with participation of a victim, their representative or a witness without including their personally-identifying information, since January 10, 2014 requires confirmation from the head of the investigative department). Analysis is conducted on the current legislation, explanation of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and law enforcement practice. The author substantiates a conclusion on the unacceptability of safety measures that are not conducted in accordance with the law (trial in a different region of the Russian Federation, separating the convicts from each other within the court room, etc.), as this can lead to the violation of the right and liberties of both, the defendants, and other participants of criminal proceedings.

Ключевые слова: Criminal procedure, Criminal proceedings, Principle, Safety measures, Guarantees, Rights and liberties, Defendant, Court, Prosecutor, Investigator

Библиография:
Admiralova I.A., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i mekhanizm ikh realizatsii politsiey v tselyakh obespecheniya prav i svobod grazhdan // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 351 - 359. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11434.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh
v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa
o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 32 - 37.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
P. P. Ushakov Stanovlenie i razvitie prav cheloveka v Rossii. // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 11. - C. 143 - 152.
Kirichek E.V. Vzaimodeystvie politsii s obshchestvennymi ob'edineniyami i inymi institutami grazhdanskogo obshchestva v usloviyakh realizatsii printsipa soblyudeniya i uvazheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1139 - 1147. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10198.
Admiralova I.A., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i mekhanizm ikh realizatsii politsiey v tselyakh obespecheniya prav i svobod grazhdan // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 351 - 359. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11434.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh
v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa
o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 32 - 37.
S. P. Shcherba Problemy normativnogo opredeleniya sushchnosti i soderzhaniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov.-2013.-2.-C. 150-153.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'.-2012.-4.-C. 32-37.
– S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9743 10. Antonovich E.K., Bozhenok S.Ya., Volkov A.I. i dr. Zarubezhnyy opyt pravovogo regulirovaniya i praktika ego primeneniya po voprosam zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva / Pod obshch. red. V.V. Chernikova.-M.: Tipografiya MVD Rossii, 2000.
Shevchuk P.P.. Aktualizatsiya printsipov ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – №
Sokolov T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstv: sovremennoe sostoyanie // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9496
Nafikova G.A.. Pravozashchitnyy aspekt mekhanizma realizatsii printsipa okhrany prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.5001
Glushkov A.I.. Rol' prokurora v obespechenii realizatsii printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.05.14
T.R. Ustov. Sledstvennye deystviya: kharakternye priznaki i osobennosti obespecheniya prav uchastnikov pri proizvodstve v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
– S. 104-107. 4.M.N. Sklizkov. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya sushchnosti sudebnogo resheniya kak yuridicheskogo fakta v grazhdanskom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A.. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – №
Selednikova O.N.. Nekotorye problemy vozmeshcheniya imushchestvennogo vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem, na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 104-107.
Zhigul'skikh A.N.. Prokuror v grazhdanskom protsesse: pozitsiya Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 7. – S. 104-107.
Kirichek E.V. Vzaimodeystvie politsii s obshchestvennymi ob'edineniyami i inymi institutami grazhdanskogo obshchestva v usloviyakh realizatsii printsipa soblyudeniya i uvazheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1139 - 1147. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10198.
P. P. Ushakov Stanovlenie i razvitie prav cheloveka v Rossii. // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 11. - C. 143 - 152.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html

References (transliteration):
Admiralova I.A., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i mekhanizm ikh realizatsii politsiey v tselyakh obespecheniya prav i svobod grazhdan // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 351 - 359. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11434.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh
v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa
o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 32 - 37.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
P. P. Ushakov Stanovlenie i razvitie prav cheloveka v Rossii. // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 11. - C. 143 - 152.
Kirichek E.V. Vzaimodeystvie politsii s obshchestvennymi ob'edineniyami i inymi institutami grazhdanskogo obshchestva v usloviyakh realizatsii printsipa soblyudeniya i uvazheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1139 - 1147. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10198.
Admiralova I.A., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i mekhanizm ikh realizatsii politsiey v tselyakh obespecheniya prav i svobod grazhdan // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 351 - 359. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11434.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh
v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa
o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 32 - 37.
S. P. Shcherba Problemy normativnogo opredeleniya sushchnosti i soderzhaniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov.-2013.-2.-C. 150-153.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'.-2012.-4.-C. 32-37.
– S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9743 10. Antonovich E.K., Bozhenok S.Ya., Volkov A.I. i dr. Zarubezhnyy opyt pravovogo regulirovaniya i praktika ego primeneniya po voprosam zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva / Pod obshch. red. V.V. Chernikova.-M.: Tipografiya MVD Rossii, 2000.
Shevchuk P.P.. Aktualizatsiya printsipov ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – №
Sokolov T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstv: sovremennoe sostoyanie // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9496
Nafikova G.A.. Pravozashchitnyy aspekt mekhanizma realizatsii printsipa okhrany prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.5001
Glushkov A.I.. Rol' prokurora v obespechenii realizatsii printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.05.14
T.R. Ustov. Sledstvennye deystviya: kharakternye priznaki i osobennosti obespecheniya prav uchastnikov pri proizvodstve v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
– S. 104-107. 4.M.N. Sklizkov. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya sushchnosti sudebnogo resheniya kak yuridicheskogo fakta v grazhdanskom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A.. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – №
Selednikova O.N.. Nekotorye problemy vozmeshcheniya imushchestvennogo vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem, na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 104-107.
Zhigul'skikh A.N.. Prokuror v grazhdanskom protsesse: pozitsiya Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 7. – S. 104-107.
Kirichek E.V. Vzaimodeystvie politsii s obshchestvennymi ob'edineniyami i inymi institutami grazhdanskogo obshchestva v usloviyakh realizatsii printsipa soblyudeniya i uvazheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1139 - 1147. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10198.
P. P. Ushakov Stanovlenie i razvitie prav cheloveka v Rossii. // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 11. - C. 143 - 152.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html

Аннотация: The article attempts to reveal the main novelties in the regulation of measures in criminal-procedural compulsion using the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (CPCRK) effective January 1, 2015 in the context of the need to study foreign experience in devising prospective vectors for improving the institution of the measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in the modern criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Prior to January 1st of 2015, the Republic of Kazakhstan used the Criminal Procedure Code of 1997, which with the exception of a few specific norms represented the continuation of the traditions of the Soviet criminal procedure. A significant step towards reform of the institution of measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in Kazakhstan was made in 2014 due to introduction of the new Criminal Procedure Code, which borrowed from the experience of various countries, including Russia. Regulation of this institution in Kazakhstan is very detailed, but in many cases controversial. As a result of the conducted research, the author formulates positions that would allow adopting the norms of the CPCRK in Russia after being critically reworked.

Ключевые слова: House arrest, bail, preventive measure, detention of a suspect, measures of procedural compulsion, comparative legal method, custody, delivery, Criminal Procedure Code of Kazakhstan, criminal proceedings

Библиография:
Vyong T.L., Chan T.T. Vidy i kharakteristika ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zaderzhaniya v prave Sotsialisticheskoy Respubliki V'etnam // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law.-2014.-5.-C. 884-886.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 24 dekabrya 2014 goda № 1369 «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil, usloviy i osnovaniy primeneniya elektronnykh sredstv slezheniya» // URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31648720&doc_id2=31648720#pos=1;-39&sub_id2=100&sel_link=1004391166 (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 15 iyulya 1995 g. №103-FZ «O soderzhanii pod strazhey podozrevaemykh i obvinyaemykh v sovershenii prestupleniy» (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 22 dekabrya 2014 g.) // URL: http://base.garant.ru/1305540/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Tsokolova O.I. Fakticheskoe zaderzhanie // Zakonnost'.-2006.-№ 3.-S. 25-28.
Gaynov I.D. K voprosu o pravomernosti zaderzhaniya podozrevaemykh do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Nauchnye trudy Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii: vyp. 9 / Pod red. k.i.n., dotsenta S.N. Mironova. – Kazan': Kazanskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2009. S. 4-10.
Abdrakhmanov R.S. Problemy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zaderzhaniya // Zakonnost'.-2003.-№ 3.-S. 21-22.
V Tatarstane pred'yavleny obvineniya byvshim politseyskim po delu o smerti zaderzhannogo // URL: http://www.tatar-inform.ru/news/2012/03/14/308057/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. №63-FZ (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 30.03.2015 g.) // URL: http://base.garant.ru/10108000/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 dekabrya 2001 g. №174-FZ (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 30.03.2015 g.) // URL: http://base.garant.ru/12125178/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 13 dekabrya 1997 goda №206-I. Almaty: Yurist, 2009. 08 s.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231-V (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 07.11.2014 g.) // URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852#pos=177;6 (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Bykov V.M. Novyy zakon o domashnem areste podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo: nauchnyy kommentariy // Pravo i politika.-2012.-№3.-C. 481-486.
Bykov V.M. Zakon o domashnem areste podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo: nauchnyy kommentariy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-№3.-C. 14-20.

References (transliteration):
Vyong T.L., Chan T.T. Vidy i kharakteristika ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zaderzhaniya v prave Sotsialisticheskoy Respubliki V'etnam // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law.-2014.-5.-C. 884-886.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 24 dekabrya 2014 goda № 1369 «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil, usloviy i osnovaniy primeneniya elektronnykh sredstv slezheniya» // URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31648720&doc_id2=31648720#pos=1;-39&sub_id2=100&sel_link=1004391166 (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 15 iyulya 1995 g. №103-FZ «O soderzhanii pod strazhey podozrevaemykh i obvinyaemykh v sovershenii prestupleniy» (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 22 dekabrya 2014 g.) // URL: http://base.garant.ru/1305540/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Tsokolova O.I. Fakticheskoe zaderzhanie // Zakonnost'.-2006.-№ 3.-S. 25-28.
Gaynov I.D. K voprosu o pravomernosti zaderzhaniya podozrevaemykh do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Nauchnye trudy Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii: vyp. 9 / Pod red. k.i.n., dotsenta S.N. Mironova. – Kazan': Kazanskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2009. S. 4-10.
Abdrakhmanov R.S. Problemy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zaderzhaniya // Zakonnost'.-2003.-№ 3.-S. 21-22.
V Tatarstane pred'yavleny obvineniya byvshim politseyskim po delu o smerti zaderzhannogo // URL: http://www.tatar-inform.ru/news/2012/03/14/308057/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. №63-FZ (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 30.03.2015 g.) // URL: http://base.garant.ru/10108000/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 dekabrya 2001 g. №174-FZ (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 30.03.2015 g.) // URL: http://base.garant.ru/12125178/ (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 13 dekabrya 1997 goda №206-I. Almaty: Yurist, 2009. 08 s.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231-V (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 07.11.2014 g.) // URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852#pos=177;6 (data obrashcheniya 04.05.2015).
Bykov V.M. Novyy zakon o domashnem areste podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo: nauchnyy kommentariy // Pravo i politika.-2012.-№3.-C. 481-486.
Bykov V.M. Zakon o domashnem areste podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo: nauchnyy kommentariy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-№3.-C. 14-20.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the concept of criminal repression and the modern approaches of theoreticians, practicians, and citizens of the country towards its content. The author underlines the fact that the opinion formed in the Russian society about criminality and its main indexes does not depend upon the objective state of law and order within the country. This article presents a critical assessment of a number of legislative initiatives, resulting in criminalization of new acts or increase in severity of the punishment for the existing elements of crime. The author makes a conclusion that criminal repression must be based on the knowledge of active laws, consider the scales of criminal activity, and be constructed upon a unified concept of criminal policy. The author proposes research on the practice of application of norms introduced into criminal legislation in order to determine their effectiveness and criminological validity.

Ключевые слова: capital punishment, criminality, criminalization, fraud, punishment, crime, prevention of crime, criminal repression, criminal policy, restorative justice

Библиография:
Avdeev V.A., Avdeeva O.A. Osnovnye napravleniya realizatsii ugolovno-pravovoy politiki RF v sfere protivodeystviya prestupnosti: sravnitel'nyy analiz federal'nykh i regional'nykh nachal // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2014. № 2.
Belyaev N.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika i puti ee realizatsii. L., 1986.
VS RF: Sudy osvobodili kazhdogo chetvertogo podsudimogo [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://www.rg.ru/2015/02/10/sudi-site.html (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Gaukhman L.D. Moshennichestvo: novelly ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 3.
Dallakyan L.G. Mediatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse kak tsentral'nyy element kontseptsii vosstanovitel'nogo pravosudiya // Vektor nauki TGU. № 2(2). 2010.
Issledovanie: Kur'er 2013-03 / Edinyy arkhiv ekonomicheskikh i sotsiologicheskikh dannykh [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://sophist.hse.ru/dbp/S=3244/Q=13/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Issledovanie: Kur'er 2013-03 / Edinyy arkhiv ekonomicheskikh i sotsiologicheskikh dannykh [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://sophist.hse.ru/dbp/S=3395/Q=52/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Koretskiy D.A., Milyukov S.F. Ekonomicheskie prestupniki – druz'ya ili vragi naroda? // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 3.
Koryagina S.A. Semeynaya mediatsiya v rannem preduprezhdenii prestupnosti nesovershennoletnikh // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2012. № 2(20).
Krasnova K.A., Volkova M.A. Istoricheskiy aspekt razvitiya otechestvennogo zakonodatel'stva ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za banditizm // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2011. № 20.
Kratkaya kharakteristika sostoyaniya prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za yanvar' – dekabr' 2013 goda [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/1609734/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Kratkaya kharakteristika sostoyaniya prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, v tom chisle v Krymskom federal'nom okruge za yanvar' – dekabr' 2014 goda [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/2994866/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Kuri Kh., Il'chenko O.Yu. Mediatsiya i vosstanovitel'noe pravosudie kak sovremennye tendentsii ugolovnogo protsessa: rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2015. Tom 9. № 1.
Lesnikov G.Yu. Problemy sootnosheniya ugolovnoy politiki i ugolovnogo prava // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Belgorod: Izd-vo BelGU, 2008. № 8(48). Vyp. 4.
Lesnikov G.Yu. Ugolovnaya politika sovremennoy Rossii: metodologicheskie, pravovye i organizatsionnye osnovy: Avtoref. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/ugolovnaya-politika-sovremennoi-rossii-metodologicheskie-pravovye-i-organizatsionnye-osnovy (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2015).
Milyukov S.F. Lzhedemokratizm rossiyskoy ugolovno-pravovoy politiki // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2014. № 1(32).
Milyukov S.F. Nadvigayushchayasya finansovo-ekonomicheskaya katastrofa v rakurse ugolovno-pravovoy politiki // Ugolovnoe pravo v epokhu finansovo-ekonomicheskikh peremen. M., 2014.
Mokrinskiy S.P. Nakazanie, ego tseli i predpolozheniya. M., 1902.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Kurs lektsiy. V dvukh tomakh. T. 1. Obshchaya chast'. M., 2004.
Pudovochkin Yu.E. Uchenie o prestuplenii: izbrannye lektsii. M., 2008.
Rarog A.I. Repressivnyy kren rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2014. № 3.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.11.2012 № 207-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 49. St. 6752.
Shestakov D.A. Rossiyskaya ugolovno-pravovaya politika pod uglom zreniya istoricheskoy tendentsii k smyagcheniyu repressii // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 1998. № 4(223).
P. Tornudd K realisticheskim tselyam ugolovnoy politiki // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2011. - 5. - C. 85 - 92.
Kobets P.N. O preduprezhdenii prestupleniy — kak slozhnom, mnogogrannom protsesse, obladayushchem opredelennymi priznakami tselostnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 4. - C. 56 - 60.
Vasil'ev A.M. Smertnaya kazn' v Rossii: vysshaya, isklyuchitel'naya mera nakazaniya, ustrashenie ili politika? // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 159 - 195. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.4.674. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_674.html
G. Yu. Lesnikov Ugolovnaya politika kak strategiya i taktika bor'by s prestupnost'yu // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2013. - 2. - C. 31 - 34.

References (transliteration):
Avdeev V.A., Avdeeva O.A. Osnovnye napravleniya realizatsii ugolovno-pravovoy politiki RF v sfere protivodeystviya prestupnosti: sravnitel'nyy analiz federal'nykh i regional'nykh nachal // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2014. № 2.
Belyaev N.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika i puti ee realizatsii. L., 1986.
VS RF: Sudy osvobodili kazhdogo chetvertogo podsudimogo [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://www.rg.ru/2015/02/10/sudi-site.html (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Gaukhman L.D. Moshennichestvo: novelly ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 3.
Dallakyan L.G. Mediatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse kak tsentral'nyy element kontseptsii vosstanovitel'nogo pravosudiya // Vektor nauki TGU. № 2(2). 2010.
Issledovanie: Kur'er 2013-03 / Edinyy arkhiv ekonomicheskikh i sotsiologicheskikh dannykh [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://sophist.hse.ru/dbp/S=3244/Q=13/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Issledovanie: Kur'er 2013-03 / Edinyy arkhiv ekonomicheskikh i sotsiologicheskikh dannykh [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://sophist.hse.ru/dbp/S=3395/Q=52/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Koretskiy D.A., Milyukov S.F. Ekonomicheskie prestupniki – druz'ya ili vragi naroda? // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 3.
Koryagina S.A. Semeynaya mediatsiya v rannem preduprezhdenii prestupnosti nesovershennoletnikh // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2012. № 2(20).
Krasnova K.A., Volkova M.A. Istoricheskiy aspekt razvitiya otechestvennogo zakonodatel'stva ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za banditizm // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2011. № 20.
Kratkaya kharakteristika sostoyaniya prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za yanvar' – dekabr' 2013 goda [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/1609734/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Kratkaya kharakteristika sostoyaniya prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, v tom chisle v Krymskom federal'nom okruge za yanvar' – dekabr' 2014 goda [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/2994866/ (data obrashcheniya 07.05.2015)
Kuri Kh., Il'chenko O.Yu. Mediatsiya i vosstanovitel'noe pravosudie kak sovremennye tendentsii ugolovnogo protsessa: rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2015. Tom 9. № 1.
Lesnikov G.Yu. Problemy sootnosheniya ugolovnoy politiki i ugolovnogo prava // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Belgorod: Izd-vo BelGU, 2008. № 8(48). Vyp. 4.
Lesnikov G.Yu. Ugolovnaya politika sovremennoy Rossii: metodologicheskie, pravovye i organizatsionnye osnovy: Avtoref. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/ugolovnaya-politika-sovremennoi-rossii-metodologicheskie-pravovye-i-organizatsionnye-osnovy (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2015).
Milyukov S.F. Lzhedemokratizm rossiyskoy ugolovno-pravovoy politiki // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2014. № 1(32).
Milyukov S.F. Nadvigayushchayasya finansovo-ekonomicheskaya katastrofa v rakurse ugolovno-pravovoy politiki // Ugolovnoe pravo v epokhu finansovo-ekonomicheskikh peremen. M., 2014.
Mokrinskiy S.P. Nakazanie, ego tseli i predpolozheniya. M., 1902.
Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Kurs lektsiy. V dvukh tomakh. T. 1. Obshchaya chast'. M., 2004.
Pudovochkin Yu.E. Uchenie o prestuplenii: izbrannye lektsii. M., 2008.
Rarog A.I. Repressivnyy kren rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2014. № 3.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.11.2012 № 207-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 49. St. 6752.
Shestakov D.A. Rossiyskaya ugolovno-pravovaya politika pod uglom zreniya istoricheskoy tendentsii k smyagcheniyu repressii // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 1998. № 4(223).
P. Tornudd K realisticheskim tselyam ugolovnoy politiki // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2011. - 5. - C. 85 - 92.
Kobets P.N. O preduprezhdenii prestupleniy — kak slozhnom, mnogogrannom protsesse, obladayushchem opredelennymi priznakami tselostnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 4. - C. 56 - 60.
Vasil'ev A.M. Smertnaya kazn' v Rossii: vysshaya, isklyuchitel'naya mera nakazaniya, ustrashenie ili politika? // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 159 - 195. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.4.674. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_674.html
G. Yu. Lesnikov Ugolovnaya politika kak strategiya i taktika bor'by s prestupnost'yu // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2013. - 2. - C. 31 - 34.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the amnesty as it is, rather than as it should be according to law or theory. The subject of this research is the aim of the amnesties given by the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation and the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation throughout the existence of the Russian Federation. The purpose of this article is to verify the presumptions that the amnesties given over the period of the existence of the Russian Federation lacked the intent to correct the flaws in implementation of criminal law. The result of this work is the confirmation by our own empirical data of the validity of the proposed presumption on the lack of the intent to correct the flaws in implementation of criminal law in the Russian amnesties. The author’s contribution consists in creation of the research blueprint that can be used to research amnesties given in other periods of time, and in other countries (providing that there are no obstacles for such use due to specificity of a country or the timeframe).

Ключевые слова: facts established by law enforcement, point of the enactment, consideration of the position of law enforcement , enactment of amnesty, correction, application of criminal law, intent of amnesties, amnesty, law enforcement measures, confirmation of validity

Библиография:
Zhalinskiy A. E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2009. // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Khartulari K. F. Pravo suda i pomilovaniya kak prerogativy rossiyskoy derzhavnosti (sravnitel'noe istoriko-zakonodatel'noe issledovanie). Obshchaya i osobennaya chasti. S.-Pb., 1899. // SPS «Garant»).
URL:http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=2&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%E8&a0=&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 16.01.2015 g.)
Ob amnistii: Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.06.1992 № 3075-I (v red. ot 13.11.1992 № 3889-I) // Vedomosti S'ezda narodnykh deputatov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1992. N 27. St. 1565; Vedomosti S'ezda narodnykh deputatov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1992 g. N 47 , St. 2671.
O rasprostranenii deystviya postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 1997 goda N 1199-II GD "Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya v svyazi s vooruzhennym konfliktom v Chechenskoy Respublike" na lits, uklonivshikhsya ot voennoy sluzhby: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10.06.1998 № 2580-II GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1998. 24 iyunya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya v svyazi s vooruzhennym konfliktom v Chechenskoy Respublike: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 1997 goda N 1199-II GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1997. 15 marta.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s prinyatiem Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 fevralya 1994 goda N 63-I GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1994. 26 fevralya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 iyulya 2013 goda N 2559-6 GD // Ofitsial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii (http://www.pravo.gov.ru). 2013. 3 iyulya.
Khachatryan A. K. Amnistiya kak vid osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. 2014 . № 10 (89).
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, uchastvovavshikh v protivopravnykh deystviyakh, svyazannykh s vooruzhennym konfliktom na territorii Respubliki Dagestan v yanvare 1996 goda: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy ot 9 fevralya 1996 goda N 60-II GD // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. N 8. St. 722.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 60-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 20 aprelya 2005 goda N 1761-IV GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2005. 26 aprelya.
Ob ob'yavlenii politicheskoy i ekonomicheskoy amnistii: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 fevralya 1994 goda N 65-I GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1994. 26 fevralya.
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 17 fevralya 1994 g. URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3237/ (data obrashcheniya 22.03.2015 g.).
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 fevralya 1994 goda / URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3233/ (data obrashcheniya 22.03.2015 g.)
Stenogramma zasedaniya 11 fevralya 1994 goda. URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3241/ ( data obrashcheniya 22.03.2015 g.

References (transliteration):
Zhalinskiy A. E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2009. // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Khartulari K. F. Pravo suda i pomilovaniya kak prerogativy rossiyskoy derzhavnosti (sravnitel'noe istoriko-zakonodatel'noe issledovanie). Obshchaya i osobennaya chasti. S.-Pb., 1899. // SPS «Garant»).
URL:http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?searchres=&bpas=cd00000&a3=102000496&a3type=1&a3value=%CF%EE%F1%F2%E0%ED%EE%E2%EB%E5%ED%E8%E5&a6=102000045&a6type=1&a6value=%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%E0%FF+%C4%F3%EC%E0+%D4%E5%E4%E5%F0%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E3%EE+%D1%EE%E1%F0%E0%ED%E8%FF&a15=&a15type=1&a15value=&a7type=1&a7from=&a7to=&a7date=&a8=&a8type=2&a1=%E0%EC%ED%E8%F1%F2%E8%E8&a0=&a16=&a16type=1&a16value=&a17=&a17type=1&a17value=&a4=&a4type=1&a4value=&textpres=&sort=7 (data obrashcheniya 16.01.2015 g.)
Ob amnistii: Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.06.1992 № 3075-I (v red. ot 13.11.1992 № 3889-I) // Vedomosti S'ezda narodnykh deputatov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1992. N 27. St. 1565; Vedomosti S'ezda narodnykh deputatov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1992 g. N 47 , St. 2671.
O rasprostranenii deystviya postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 1997 goda N 1199-II GD "Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya v svyazi s vooruzhennym konfliktom v Chechenskoy Respublike" na lits, uklonivshikhsya ot voennoy sluzhby: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10.06.1998 № 2580-II GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1998. 24 iyunya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deyaniya v svyazi s vooruzhennym konfliktom v Chechenskoy Respublike: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 1997 goda N 1199-II GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1997. 15 marta.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s prinyatiem Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 fevralya 1994 goda N 63-I GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1994. 26 fevralya.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 iyulya 2013 goda N 2559-6 GD // Ofitsial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii (http://www.pravo.gov.ru). 2013. 3 iyulya.
Khachatryan A. K. Amnistiya kak vid osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. 2014 . № 10 (89).
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii lits, uchastvovavshikh v protivopravnykh deystviyakh, svyazannykh s vooruzhennym konfliktom na territorii Respubliki Dagestan v yanvare 1996 goda: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy ot 9 fevralya 1996 goda N 60-II GD // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. N 8. St. 722.
Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 60-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 20 aprelya 2005 goda N 1761-IV GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2005. 26 aprelya.
Ob ob'yavlenii politicheskoy i ekonomicheskoy amnistii: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 fevralya 1994 goda N 65-I GD // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1994. 26 fevralya.
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 17 fevralya 1994 g. URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3237/ (data obrashcheniya 22.03.2015 g.).
Stenogramma zasedaniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Federal'nogo sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 fevralya 1994 goda / URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3233/ (data obrashcheniya 22.03.2015 g.)
Stenogramma zasedaniya 11 fevralya 1994 goda. URL: http://transcript.duma.gov.ru/node/3241/ ( data obrashcheniya 22.03.2015 g.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the social bases of positive legal responsibility, without which building a legal state and forming a civil society is impossible. The author defends the legal nature of positive legal responsibility using the rich social and philosophical material. The author simultaneously conducts a polemic with scientists-sociologists and philosophers, who while devising the general concepts of social responsibility, do not take into consideration the specificity of legal responsibility. The subject of the research also includes various types of social norms, including juridical, which contain positive responsibility. The work presents results of polling. The article gives original definitions to social and legal responsibility, presents the polling data from different categories of citizens and experts (legal scholars) on the issues of positive legal responsibility and its regulatory impact. The author justifies a unified character of legal responsibility, which includes the positive (voluntary) and negative (state mandatory) forms of realization. The statutory (unified) responsibility is the responsibility (requirement) to uphold the legal rules by the parties of legal relations that is objectively justified, and set by the law, which if violated, forces the violator to suffer judgement, limitation of rights of property or personal non-property nature.

Ключевые слова: necessity, debt, legal liability, forms of responsibility implementation, positive responsibility, social responsibility, free will, negative responsibility, statutory responsibility, legal debt

Библиография:
Matuzov N.I. Pravo kak mera svobody i otvetstvennosti lichnosti: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. // Atrium. Ser. «Yurisprudentsiya». − Tol'yatti: Izd-vo MA-BiBD, 1999. – № 1. − S. 20-26.
Chernykh E.V. O normativnom kharaktere yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Voprosy teorii gosudarstva i prava. Vyp. 1(10). − Saratov: Izd-vo SGAP, 1998.
Shaburov A.S. Politicheskie i pravovye aspekty sotsial'noy otvetstvenno-sti lichnosti: Dis. … d-ra. yurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 1992.
Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. – Krasnoyarsk, 1985
Mironenko M.B. Printsipy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v sisteme prin-tsipov prava: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2001.
Medushevskiy A.N. Istoriya russkoy sotsiologii. – M., 1993.
Trofimova M.P. Funktsii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2000.
Safarov. N.S. Problema moral'noy otvetstvennosti. − Baku: RIO DGU, 1985.
Plakhotnyy A.F. Svoboda i otvetstvennost' (sotsiologicheskiy aspekt) − Khar'kov: Izd–vo Khar'kov. un-ta, 1972.
Orekhovskiy A.I. Otvetstvennost' i ee sotsial'naya priroda (metodologiche-skiy aspekt). – Tomsk, 1978.
Kudryavtsev V. N. Zakon, postupok, otvetstvennost'. – M.: Nauka, 1986
Speranskiy V.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' v sisteme obshchestvennykh ot-nosheniy (sotsial'nyy aspekt): Avtoref. dis. d-ra. … filos. nauk. – M., 1990
Chermenina A. P. Problema otvetstvennosti v etike: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk. – L., 1965.
Il'in I.A. Put' k ochevidnosti. – M., 1993.
Tsar'kov I.I. Filosofskie i gosudarstvenno-pravovye vzglyady Dzhona Lok-ka. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo MABiBD, 1996.
Gryadunova L.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' lichnosti v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma. – Kiev, 1979.
Marchenko N.M., Leyst O.E. i dr. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akade-micheskiy kurs lektsiy / Pod red. M.N. Marchenko T. 2. – M., 1998.
Kosolapov R., Markov V. Svoboda i otvetstvennost'. – M.: Izd-vo Polit. lit-ry, 1969.
Kant I. Sochineniya. V 6 t. T. 4. – M.: Mysl', 1965. Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Filosofiya. –M.: Izd-vo Prospekt, 2003. Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. – Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoyar-skogo un-ta, 1985.
Filatova T.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' kak faktor preodoleniya ot-chuzhdeniya lichnosti: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filos. nauk. − Khar'kov, 1990.
Senyakin I.N. Spetsializatsiya i unifikatsiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva: Avtoref. dis. …d-ra yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 1993.
Chernykh E.V., Lipinskiy D.A. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak tselostnoe pravovoe yavlenie // Vestnik Samarskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. – Samara, 2005. – № 1. S. 75-87.

References (transliteration):
Matuzov N.I. Pravo kak mera svobody i otvetstvennosti lichnosti: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. // Atrium. Ser. «Yurisprudentsiya». − Tol'yatti: Izd-vo MA-BiBD, 1999. – № 1. − S. 20-26.
Chernykh E.V. O normativnom kharaktere yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Voprosy teorii gosudarstva i prava. Vyp. 1(10). − Saratov: Izd-vo SGAP, 1998.
Shaburov A.S. Politicheskie i pravovye aspekty sotsial'noy otvetstvenno-sti lichnosti: Dis. … d-ra. yurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 1992.
Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. – Krasnoyarsk, 1985
Mironenko M.B. Printsipy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v sisteme prin-tsipov prava: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2001.
Medushevskiy A.N. Istoriya russkoy sotsiologii. – M., 1993.
Trofimova M.P. Funktsii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2000.
Safarov. N.S. Problema moral'noy otvetstvennosti. − Baku: RIO DGU, 1985.
Plakhotnyy A.F. Svoboda i otvetstvennost' (sotsiologicheskiy aspekt) − Khar'kov: Izd–vo Khar'kov. un-ta, 1972.
Orekhovskiy A.I. Otvetstvennost' i ee sotsial'naya priroda (metodologiche-skiy aspekt). – Tomsk, 1978.
Kudryavtsev V. N. Zakon, postupok, otvetstvennost'. – M.: Nauka, 1986
Speranskiy V.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' v sisteme obshchestvennykh ot-nosheniy (sotsial'nyy aspekt): Avtoref. dis. d-ra. … filos. nauk. – M., 1990
Chermenina A. P. Problema otvetstvennosti v etike: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk. – L., 1965.
Il'in I.A. Put' k ochevidnosti. – M., 1993.
Tsar'kov I.I. Filosofskie i gosudarstvenno-pravovye vzglyady Dzhona Lok-ka. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo MABiBD, 1996.
Gryadunova L.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' lichnosti v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma. – Kiev, 1979.
Marchenko N.M., Leyst O.E. i dr. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akade-micheskiy kurs lektsiy / Pod red. M.N. Marchenko T. 2. – M., 1998.
Kosolapov R., Markov V. Svoboda i otvetstvennost'. – M.: Izd-vo Polit. lit-ry, 1969.
Kant I. Sochineniya. V 6 t. T. 4. – M.: Mysl', 1965. Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Filosofiya. –M.: Izd-vo Prospekt, 2003. Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. – Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoyar-skogo un-ta, 1985.
Filatova T.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' kak faktor preodoleniya ot-chuzhdeniya lichnosti: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filos. nauk. − Khar'kov, 1990.
Senyakin I.N. Spetsializatsiya i unifikatsiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva: Avtoref. dis. …d-ra yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 1993.
Chernykh E.V., Lipinskiy D.A. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak tselostnoe pravovoe yavlenie // Vestnik Samarskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. – Samara, 2005. – № 1. S. 75-87.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the issues of defining, establishing, and applying the universal jurisdiction within Russian criminal law. The author examines the questions of forming a universal jurisdiction in the Lotus and Arrest Warrant cases; its problematic issues such as trial in absence of the defendant are being reviewed. The main subject of the article focuses on the problems of universal jurisdiction due to crimes of terroristic nature. A research is conducted on the possible vectors of future development of the Russian criminal law in the area of universal jurisdiction, including the aspect of adhering to the norms of international law. The main conclusions of the conducted research pertain to the determination of the place, significance, and future prospects for development of the universal jurisdiction within Russian law. The author determines possible directions for improving criminal legislation, reveals possible complications and proposes the ways to solve them in accordance with the positions of international law and practice of international courts.

Ключевые слова: International Court of Justice, international law, terroristic crimes, citizenship, applicability of criminal legislation, universal jurisdiction, Lotus principle, jurisdiction, trial in absentia, criminal law

Библиография:
Sienkho Yii. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya: ponyatie, teoriya i praktika // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. № 4.
Rusinova V. N. Presledovanie narusheniy mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava na osnovanii printsipa universal'nosti // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2005. № 6.
Rusinova V. N. Presledovanie voennykh prestupleniy, sovershennykh v nemezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh, na osnove universal'nogo printsipa yurisdiktsii // Voenno-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2006. № 5.
Ledyakh I. A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya kak printsip ugolovnogo presledovaniya i nakazaniya v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom i mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave // Yurist-mezhdunarodnik. 2008. № 2.
Korolev G. A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya: opredelenie, osnovaniya primeneniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 3.
Korolev G. A. Problemy primeneniya universal'noy yurisdiktsii in absentia // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 107
David E. Printsipy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov / per. s fr. 2-e izd., M., 2011.
Shaw M. N. International Law. 6th ed. Cambridge, 2008.
Verle G. Printsipy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava / per. s angl. S. V. Sayapina. Odessa; M., 2011.
Mandat d’arrêt du 11 avril 2000 (République démocratique du Congo c. Belgique), C.I.J. Recueil 2002.
Kreß C. Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Insti-tut de Droit international // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4.
Cassese’s International Criminal Law. 3rd ed. / revised by A. Cassese et al. Oxford, 2013.
Affaire du Lotus, 1927, C.P.J.I. Recueil série A, nº 10.
Cassese A. Is the Bell Tolling for Universality? A Plea for a Sensible Notion of Universal Jurisdiction // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2003. Vol. 1.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / pod red. V. S. Komissarova, N. E. Krylovoy, I. M. Tyazhkovoy. M., 2012.
Shturma P. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya i nakazanie za ser'eznye narusheniya Zhenevskikh konventsiy 1949 g. // Pravovedenie. 2010. № 4.

References (transliteration):
Sienkho Yii. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya: ponyatie, teoriya i praktika // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. № 4.
Rusinova V. N. Presledovanie narusheniy mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava na osnovanii printsipa universal'nosti // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2005. № 6.
Rusinova V. N. Presledovanie voennykh prestupleniy, sovershennykh v nemezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh, na osnove universal'nogo printsipa yurisdiktsii // Voenno-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2006. № 5.
Ledyakh I. A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya kak printsip ugolovnogo presledovaniya i nakazaniya v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom i mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave // Yurist-mezhdunarodnik. 2008. № 2.
Korolev G. A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya: opredelenie, osnovaniya primeneniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 3.
Korolev G. A. Problemy primeneniya universal'noy yurisdiktsii in absentia // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 107
David E. Printsipy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov / per. s fr. 2-e izd., M., 2011.
Shaw M. N. International Law. 6th ed. Cambridge, 2008.
Verle G. Printsipy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava / per. s angl. S. V. Sayapina. Odessa; M., 2011.
Mandat d’arrêt du 11 avril 2000 (République démocratique du Congo c. Belgique), C.I.J. Recueil 2002.
Kreß C. Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Insti-tut de Droit international // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4.
Cassese’s International Criminal Law. 3rd ed. / revised by A. Cassese et al. Oxford, 2013.
Affaire du Lotus, 1927, C.P.J.I. Recueil série A, nº 10.
Cassese A. Is the Bell Tolling for Universality? A Plea for a Sensible Notion of Universal Jurisdiction // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2003. Vol. 1.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / pod red. V. S. Komissarova, N. E. Krylovoy, I. M. Tyazhkovoy. M., 2012.
Shturma P. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya i nakazanie za ser'eznye narusheniya Zhenevskikh konventsiy 1949 g. // Pravovedenie. 2010. № 4.

Аннотация: The development of criminal procedure has lately been defined by the search for the more effective mechanisms of resolving criminal legal arguments that incorporate such aspects as compensation of damages to a victim, restoration of the right violated in the process of a crime, and restoration of a normal life of a victim of a crime. The article examines the questions pertaining to the participation of officials and authorities – detective, investigator, prosecutor and court who initiated the mediation procedure in the criminal proceedings and later recording its results in order to resolve the conflict. The modernization of criminal policy currently taking place in the Russian Federation poses a question of a broader implementation of conciliation procedures in the resolution of criminal legal conflicts. The improvements to the legislation and the practice of its implementation are impossible without a thorough doctrinal understanding of the problems of alternative methods of resolving criminal cases. Currently, there is a gradual accumulation of scientific knowledge on this issue, as the theory of criminal proceedings still has a significant amount of gaps. The scientific research points to the value of the restorative justice as a development of the criminal proceedings, as well as proposes subjects that are suitable to carry out the duties of a mediator in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.

Ключевые слова: officials, humanization, resocialization, criminal process, victim, mediation, restorative justice, appeal, compromise, compensation of damages

Библиография:
Rekomendatsiya № R (99) 19 ot 15 sentyabrya 1999 g. "Posrednichestvo v ugolovnykh delakh", prinyata Komitetom ministrov Soveta Evropy, posvyashchena posrednichestvu v ugolovnykh delakh // SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Shirkin A.A. Osobennosti i podgotovka posrednika, uchastvuyushchego v mediatsii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2013. № 10.
URL: http://www.zakonia.ru.
Udalova N.P. Prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela publichnogo obvineniya v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii v svyazi s primireniem podsudimogo s poterpevshim // Apellyatsiya: realii, tendentsii i perspektivy(sbornik nauchnykh statey) M: Aktion-Media. 2013.
Smirnova I.G. Mediatsiya: ternistyy put' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravo. 2011. № 1.
Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / pod red. G.V. Osipova. M. 1998.
Kuvaldina Yu.V. Otdel'nye elementy yuvenal'noy yustitsii uzhe seychas mogut byt' vnedreny v ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo po delam v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2014. № 1.
Arutyunyan A.A. Mediatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Infotropik Media, 2013.
Buchneva I.A. Uchastie advokata v primirenii storon ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Advokatskaya praktika. 2013. № 3.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 27.12.2012 № 1406 (red. ot 15.08.2014) "O federal'noy tselevoy programme "Razvitie sudebnoy sistemy Rossii na 2013-2020» Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 07.01.2013, № 1, st. 13

References (transliteration):
Rekomendatsiya № R (99) 19 ot 15 sentyabrya 1999 g. "Posrednichestvo v ugolovnykh delakh", prinyata Komitetom ministrov Soveta Evropy, posvyashchena posrednichestvu v ugolovnykh delakh // SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Shirkin A.A. Osobennosti i podgotovka posrednika, uchastvuyushchego v mediatsii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2013. № 10.
URL: http://www.zakonia.ru.
Udalova N.P. Prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela publichnogo obvineniya v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii v svyazi s primireniem podsudimogo s poterpevshim // Apellyatsiya: realii, tendentsii i perspektivy(sbornik nauchnykh statey) M: Aktion-Media. 2013.
Smirnova I.G. Mediatsiya: ternistyy put' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravo. 2011. № 1.
Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / pod red. G.V. Osipova. M. 1998.
Kuvaldina Yu.V. Otdel'nye elementy yuvenal'noy yustitsii uzhe seychas mogut byt' vnedreny v ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo po delam v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2014. № 1.
Arutyunyan A.A. Mediatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Infotropik Media, 2013.
Buchneva I.A. Uchastie advokata v primirenii storon ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Advokatskaya praktika. 2013. № 3.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 27.12.2012 № 1406 (red. ot 15.08.2014) "O federal'noy tselevoy programme "Razvitie sudebnoy sistemy Rossii na 2013-2020» Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 07.01.2013, № 1, st. 13

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the aspects that characterize the concept of a legal entity that has become a victim of a crime and therefore, the criminal legal status of such entity. The object of this research is the public relations in the sphere of criminal legal protection and ensuring the rights of legal entities that became a victim of a crime. On the basis of generalization of signs of a victimized individual in the criminal law and their refraction in relation to a legal entity, becomes the basis for the definition of the legal entity as a victim of a crime. It is noted that the research on the issue of criminal legal status of the legal entity that became a victim of a crime in the theory of criminal law carries a fragmentary character. In this regard, besides by means of the analysis of criminal legal status of the injured natural person are defined to the subjective rights of the legal entity of the victim from a crime characterizing criminal legal status of such associations. Research is based on the dialectic method of scientific knowledge. Other methods include structural, systemic- logical and formal-legal methods. The main conclusions of the conducted research is that the author's concept of the legal entity of a victim of a crime which is understood as a legal entity that suffered from a crime by either directly harm to property and (or) business reputation or an infringement upon its rights, including an attempted (planned) crime. This work also defines the criminal legal status of such victims.

Ключевые слова: legal responsibilities, subjective rights, legal entity, individual, victim, damages, crime, legal status, information help, criminal prosecution

Библиография:
Sumachev A.V. Postradavshiy kak sub'ekt ugolovnogo pravootnosheniya: Uchebnoe posobie. Tyumen': Tyumenskiy YuI MVD Rossii, 1999. 116 s.
Sumacheva A.V. Postradavshiy kak sub'ekt ugolovnogo pravootnosheniya: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan': Ryazanskiy in-t prava i ekonomiki MVD Rossii, 1997. 178 s.
Ratinov A. Uchastie poterpevshego v predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1959. № 4. S.32-34.
Smol'yanov E.S. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva bor'by s prestupleniyam, sovershennymi s ispol'zovaniem organizatsionno-pravovykh form yuridicheskogo litsa: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. 17 s.
Poterpevshiy ot prestupleniya (tematicheskiy sbornik). T.85. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostoch. un-ta, 1974. 216 s.
Polubinskiy V.I. Viktimologicheskie aspekty profilaktiki prestupleniy. M.: Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1980. 78 s.
Nikiforov A.S. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. M., 2002. 204 s.
Nikiforov A.S. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. № 8. S.18-27.
Nikiforov A. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2000. № 2. S.50-55.
Lakeev A.A. K probleme ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 1994. № 2. S.23-26.
Kuritsina E. Yuridicheskoe litso kak orudie prestupleniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. № 2. S.42-43.
Krasikov A.N. Sushchnost' i znachenie soglasiya poterpevshego v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Saratov: Saratov. gos. un-t, 1976. 121 s.
Kelina S.G. Otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits v proekte novogo UK Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo: novye idei. M.: IGPAN, 1994. S.68-82.
Zhevlakov E.N. K voprosu ob otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits za sovershenie ekologicheskikh prestupleniy // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 1. S.10-13.
Zhalinskiy A.E Zakonodatel'stvo o dolzhnostnykh prestupleniyakh nuzhdaetsya v izmenenii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1988. № 1. S.99-105.
Dorokhov V. Osnovaniya priznaniya litsa poterpevshim // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1976. № 14. S.8-9.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR. 1989. № 1.
Vinogradova E. Yuridicheskie litsa dolzhny nesti otvetstvennost' za ekologicheskie prestupleniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. №8 S.62.
Brusnitsin L.V. Poterpevshiy: ugolovno-protsessual'nye aspekty // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995. № 9. S.67-70.
Batyukova V.E. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave: Avtoref. dis... kand. yurid. nauk. M.: Yuridicheskiy in-t MVD Rossii, 1995. 24 s.
Bondarenko I.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe ponyatie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem, i problemy ego vozmeshcheniya: Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan': Ryazanskiy institut prava i ekonomiki MVD Rossii, 1995. 158 s.
Antonova E.Yu. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya: opyt zarubezhnykh stran i perspektivy primeneniya v Rossii: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Vladivostok, 1998. 153 s.
Anoshchenkova S.V. Uchenie o poterpevshem v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov: Saratovskiy YuI MVD Rossii, 2004. 32 s.
Sumachev A.V. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave (analiz osnovnykh problem): Monografiya. Nizhnevartovsk: Filial Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta v g. Nizhnevartovske, 2005. 235 s.
Traynin A.N. Sostav prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1951. 212 s.
Erdelevskiy A.M. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda: analiz i kommentariy zakonodatel'stva i sudebnoy praktiki. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Izd-vo BEK, 2000. 256 s.
Yani P. Zakonodatel'noe opredelenie poterpevshego ot prestupleniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 4. S.40-41.

References (transliteration):
Sumachev A.V. Postradavshiy kak sub'ekt ugolovnogo pravootnosheniya: Uchebnoe posobie. Tyumen': Tyumenskiy YuI MVD Rossii, 1999. 116 s.
Sumacheva A.V. Postradavshiy kak sub'ekt ugolovnogo pravootnosheniya: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan': Ryazanskiy in-t prava i ekonomiki MVD Rossii, 1997. 178 s.
Ratinov A. Uchastie poterpevshego v predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1959. № 4. S.32-34.
Smol'yanov E.S. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva bor'by s prestupleniyam, sovershennymi s ispol'zovaniem organizatsionno-pravovykh form yuridicheskogo litsa: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. 17 s.
Poterpevshiy ot prestupleniya (tematicheskiy sbornik). T.85. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostoch. un-ta, 1974. 216 s.
Polubinskiy V.I. Viktimologicheskie aspekty profilaktiki prestupleniy. M.: Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1980. 78 s.
Nikiforov A.S. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. M., 2002. 204 s.
Nikiforov A.S. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. № 8. S.18-27.
Nikiforov A. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2000. № 2. S.50-55.
Lakeev A.A. K probleme ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 1994. № 2. S.23-26.
Kuritsina E. Yuridicheskoe litso kak orudie prestupleniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. № 2. S.42-43.
Krasikov A.N. Sushchnost' i znachenie soglasiya poterpevshego v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Saratov: Saratov. gos. un-t, 1976. 121 s.
Kelina S.G. Otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits v proekte novogo UK Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo: novye idei. M.: IGPAN, 1994. S.68-82.
Zhevlakov E.N. K voprosu ob otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits za sovershenie ekologicheskikh prestupleniy // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 1. S.10-13.
Zhalinskiy A.E Zakonodatel'stvo o dolzhnostnykh prestupleniyakh nuzhdaetsya v izmenenii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1988. № 1. S.99-105.
Dorokhov V. Osnovaniya priznaniya litsa poterpevshim // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1976. № 14. S.8-9.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR. 1989. № 1.
Vinogradova E. Yuridicheskie litsa dolzhny nesti otvetstvennost' za ekologicheskie prestupleniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. №8 S.62.
Brusnitsin L.V. Poterpevshiy: ugolovno-protsessual'nye aspekty // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995. № 9. S.67-70.
Batyukova V.E. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave: Avtoref. dis... kand. yurid. nauk. M.: Yuridicheskiy in-t MVD Rossii, 1995. 24 s.
Bondarenko I.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe ponyatie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem, i problemy ego vozmeshcheniya: Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan': Ryazanskiy institut prava i ekonomiki MVD Rossii, 1995. 158 s.
Antonova E.Yu. Yuridicheskoe litso kak sub'ekt prestupleniya: opyt zarubezhnykh stran i perspektivy primeneniya v Rossii: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Vladivostok, 1998. 153 s.
Anoshchenkova S.V. Uchenie o poterpevshem v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov: Saratovskiy YuI MVD Rossii, 2004. 32 s.
Sumachev A.V. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave (analiz osnovnykh problem): Monografiya. Nizhnevartovsk: Filial Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta v g. Nizhnevartovske, 2005. 235 s.
Traynin A.N. Sostav prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1951. 212 s.
Erdelevskiy A.M. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda: analiz i kommentariy zakonodatel'stva i sudebnoy praktiki. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Izd-vo BEK, 2000. 256 s.
Yani P. Zakonodatel'noe opredelenie poterpevshego ot prestupleniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 4. S.40-41.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the questions of criminal legal protection of cultural and archeological heritage of the Russian Federation. The research is conducted based on the analysis of the changes to the current Russian legislation on protection of the objects of cultural heritage and changes to the criminal legislation on protection of these objects made by the Federal Law #245-FZ from July 23, 2013. It examines the objective and subjective definitions of a crime provided by the article #2433 introduced into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A review is given to the issues of implementation of criminal legislation and the law on the protection of cultural heritage based on the new changes stated above. The article analyzes the key relevant aspects of implementing the dispositions of the norms of criminal law on the responsibility of protection of cultural and archeological heritage. The conclusion made in this article can be useful for the law enforcement agencies in investigation and review of criminal cases pertaining to this category, students, post-graduate students, as well as all who are interested in the issues of jurisprudence.

Ключевые слова: Criminal legal protection, Archeological heritage, Cultural heritage, Legislation on culture, Criminal law, Disposition of criminal legal norm, Signs of criminal activity, Criminal liability, Circumstances that exampt from liability, Archeological field work.

Библиография:
Anisimov I.O. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «podvodnoe kul'turnoe nasledie» i «vsemirnoe kul'turnoe i prirodnoe nasledie» // Pravo i politika. – 2014.-№ 7. – S. 996-1004.
Zubenko Yu.S. Pravovye problemy okhrany arkheologicheskikh nakhodok v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: istoriya i sovremennost' // Pravo i politika. – 2010.-№ 1. – S. 36-41.
Kazakova Yu.A. Evolyutsiya gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya sfery kul'tury // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2011.-№
– S. 8-17. 4.Martynenko I.E. Problema povysheniya effektivnosti pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti po predotvrashcheniyu nezakonnogo prisvoeniya kul'turnykh tsennostey, poluchennykh v rezul'tate nelegal'nykh raskopok // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. – 2010.-№ 3. – S. 76-81.
Rabotkevich A.V. Normativnoe obespechenie deyatel'nosti po okhrane ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Kul'tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo. – 2010.-№ 3. – S. 2-3.
A.V. Sumachev K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostey
i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo
rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 2074 - 2079.
Dubovik O.L. Fundamental'noe issledovanie prestupleniya i nakazaniya v istorii i kul'ture Rossii (Retsenziya na knigu: Naumov A.V. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v istorii Rossii. V 2 ch. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. Ch. I. – 752 s., Ch. II. – 656 s.). // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 651 - 658. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12381.
Akopdzhanova M.O. O roli ugolovno-pravovoy nauki v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 76 - 81. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9217.

References (transliteration):
Anisimov I.O. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «podvodnoe kul'turnoe nasledie» i «vsemirnoe kul'turnoe i prirodnoe nasledie» // Pravo i politika. – 2014.-№ 7. – S. 996-1004.
Zubenko Yu.S. Pravovye problemy okhrany arkheologicheskikh nakhodok v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: istoriya i sovremennost' // Pravo i politika. – 2010.-№ 1. – S. 36-41.
Kazakova Yu.A. Evolyutsiya gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya sfery kul'tury // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2011.-№
– S. 8-17. 4.Martynenko I.E. Problema povysheniya effektivnosti pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti po predotvrashcheniyu nezakonnogo prisvoeniya kul'turnykh tsennostey, poluchennykh v rezul'tate nelegal'nykh raskopok // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. – 2010.-№ 3. – S. 76-81.
Rabotkevich A.V. Normativnoe obespechenie deyatel'nosti po okhrane ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Kul'tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo. – 2010.-№ 3. – S. 2-3.
A.V. Sumachev K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostey
i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo
rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 2074 - 2079.
Dubovik O.L. Fundamental'noe issledovanie prestupleniya i nakazaniya v istorii i kul'ture Rossii (Retsenziya na knigu: Naumov A.V. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v istorii Rossii. V 2 ch. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. Ch. I. – 752 s., Ch. II. – 656 s.). // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 651 - 658. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12381.
Akopdzhanova M.O. O roli ugolovno-pravovoy nauki v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 76 - 81. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9217.

Аннотация: One of the problems of the legislative work of the Parliament is the reflection of the perception of legal order adhered to by the law abiding citizens of the country. In forming the criminal legislation, the Parliament relies on the main foundations and ideas that they consider dominant. As a result of the conducted research, the author discovered the following key foundations (principles) of the legislative regulation of the criminal legal relations: the principle of the dynamics of criminal legal elements; the principle of non-obligation (conditionality) of holding someone liable; the principle of reduction or limitation of liability; the principle of court discretion; the principle of monetary compensations for the damages caused by the crime; the principle of inequality in the damages caused by the crime and the punishment for it; the principle of priority of humane treatment of a person that has committed a crime; the principle of differentiation of criminal liability; the principle of relative equality of the citizens. The author also underlines the connection of the highlighted principles, their consequences for reflection of such classic legal principles as unavoidability of responsibility, justice, and equality of citizens before the law.

Ключевые слова: Principe of unavoidability of liability, Criminal liability, Legislative activity, Rights and liberties, Restoration of social fairness, Principles of law, Principles of legal regulation, Principle of humanism, Lawmaking, Constitutional guarantees.

Библиография:
Akopdzhanova M.O. Voploshchenie printsipa verkhovenstva prava v zakonodatel'stve i pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-2.-C. 186-189. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.10825.
Usmanova R.M. Politicheskie traditsii i politicheskie normy: ikh rol' v publichnom regulirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-2.-C. 25-48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_139.html
Sumachev A.V. O «poteryannom» printsipe zakonnosti v zakonodatel'stve ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-12.-C. 84-87.
Larina L. Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka.-2013.-№ 2.
Mal'tsev V. Printsip gumanizma v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2002.-№ 7.
Pitetskiy V. V. Novye pravila ustanovleniya kategorii prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivosti // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2012.-№ 3.
Tasakov S. V. Reforma ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svete poslednikh izmeneniy // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2012.-№ 4.
Kudryavtsev V. N., Kuznetsova N. F., Komissarov V. S., Luneev V. V. Konstitutsiya – eto zakon i dlya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2007.-№ 5.
Kalinkin S. V. Obratnaya sila ugolovnogo zakona i printsip neotvratimosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.-2008.-№ 1.-S. 73.
Dyadyun K. V. Uchet printsipov spravedlivosti i gumanizma pri naznachenii nakazaniya za retsidiv prestupleniy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.-2011.-№ 7.
Dzhagrunov A. A. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy i protivorechiya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki.-2013.-№ 8-1.
Gladkikh V. I. Eshche raz o krizise rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Voprosy pravovedeniya.-2013.-№ 4.
Gavrilov B. Ya. O korruptsionnosti ugolovnogo zakona // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'.-2012.-№ 1.
Galaktionov S. A. Printsip spravedlivosti (ugolovno-pravovoy aspekt). Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Ryazan', 2004.
Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh.-M., 2004.
Borzenkov G. Ob uchete printsipov ugolovnogo prava v zakonotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti // Ugolovnoe pravo.-2011.-№
Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E.A.. Poryadok i sroki vstupleniya v zakonnuyu silu postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.9099
Kashkina E.V., Khandogina A.V.. Administrativnyy nadzor za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody: problemy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10133
Salkazanov A.E.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2013. – № 11. –
Nikiforov A.V.. Ugolovno-pravovye riski nalogovykh agentov: novyy poryadok vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnykh del // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.S.
Nikiforov A.V.. Polnomochiya nalogovykh organov pri primenenii otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.9912
Titov P.S.. Ob uchastii zashchitnika v sobiranii dokazatel'stv // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.8077
Astanin V.V.. Protivodeystvie korruptsii: perspektivnye podkhody k preduprezhdeniyu i vozmeshcheniyu ushcherba // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9084
R.R. Khalilov. Pooshchrenie kak forma pozitivnogo stimulirovaniya v ugolovnom prave // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.01.
Sumachev A.V. O «poteryannom» printsipe zakonnosti v zakonodatel'stve ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 12. - C. 84 - 87.
Badulin A.D., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'
za pravonarusheniya
na rynke alkogolya
i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 227 - 244. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9438.

References (transliteration):
Akopdzhanova M.O. Voploshchenie printsipa verkhovenstva prava v zakonodatel'stve i pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-2.-C. 186-189. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.10825.
Usmanova R.M. Politicheskie traditsii i politicheskie normy: ikh rol' v publichnom regulirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-2.-C. 25-48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_139.html
Sumachev A.V. O «poteryannom» printsipe zakonnosti v zakonodatel'stve ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-12.-C. 84-87.
Larina L. Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka.-2013.-№ 2.
Mal'tsev V. Printsip gumanizma v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2002.-№ 7.
Pitetskiy V. V. Novye pravila ustanovleniya kategorii prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivosti // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2012.-№ 3.
Tasakov S. V. Reforma ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svete poslednikh izmeneniy // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2012.-№ 4.
Kudryavtsev V. N., Kuznetsova N. F., Komissarov V. S., Luneev V. V. Konstitutsiya – eto zakon i dlya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2007.-№ 5.
Kalinkin S. V. Obratnaya sila ugolovnogo zakona i printsip neotvratimosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.-2008.-№ 1.-S. 73.
Dyadyun K. V. Uchet printsipov spravedlivosti i gumanizma pri naznachenii nakazaniya za retsidiv prestupleniy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.-2011.-№ 7.
Dzhagrunov A. A. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy i protivorechiya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki.-2013.-№ 8-1.
Gladkikh V. I. Eshche raz o krizise rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Voprosy pravovedeniya.-2013.-№ 4.
Gavrilov B. Ya. O korruptsionnosti ugolovnogo zakona // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'.-2012.-№ 1.
Galaktionov S. A. Printsip spravedlivosti (ugolovno-pravovoy aspekt). Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Ryazan', 2004.
Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh.-M., 2004.
Borzenkov G. Ob uchete printsipov ugolovnogo prava v zakonotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti // Ugolovnoe pravo.-2011.-№
Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E.A.. Poryadok i sroki vstupleniya v zakonnuyu silu postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.9099
Kashkina E.V., Khandogina A.V.. Administrativnyy nadzor za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody: problemy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10133
Salkazanov A.E.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2013. – № 11. –
Nikiforov A.V.. Ugolovno-pravovye riski nalogovykh agentov: novyy poryadok vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnykh del // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.S.
Nikiforov A.V.. Polnomochiya nalogovykh organov pri primenenii otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.9912
Titov P.S.. Ob uchastii zashchitnika v sobiranii dokazatel'stv // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.8077
Astanin V.V.. Protivodeystvie korruptsii: perspektivnye podkhody k preduprezhdeniyu i vozmeshcheniyu ushcherba // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9084
R.R. Khalilov. Pooshchrenie kak forma pozitivnogo stimulirovaniya v ugolovnom prave // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.01.
Sumachev A.V. O «poteryannom» printsipe zakonnosti v zakonodatel'stve ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 12. - C. 84 - 87.
Badulin A.D., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'
za pravonarusheniya
na rynke alkogolya
i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 227 - 244. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9438.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the research of the criteria for effectiveness of a disposition of a criminal legal norm that is regulated by the legislation and developed by the juridical science and law enforcement practice. It reflects the basis of criminal responsibility (committing an act that contains all characteristics of a crime) and principles thereof (principle of legality, principle of equality of citizens before the law, principle of guilt, principle of justice, principle of humanism), and circumstances that eliminate, mitigate, or aggravate criminal responsibility. This research also includes the stages of functioning of a disposition of a criminal legal norm and the issues of social determination to construct it. In the course of research the author reveals the structure of the disposition of a criminal legal norm and examines the questions of its usefulness, quality, necessity, and efficiency. The following were attributed to the effectiveness of a disposition of a criminal legal norm: timeliness of enacting or abolishing a criminal legal norm; precision with which it reflects the most important criteria of the social danger of a delict; determination of the type and size of a sanction based on its impact upon a specific act; timeliness of implementation of the criminal legal norm towards specific acts; precision of qualification; fairness of punishment.

Ключевые слова: Disposition, criminal law, norm, criteria, effectiveness, regulation, legislation, practice, principles.

Библиография:
Zharikov Yu.S. Effektivnost' ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya kak neobkhodimaya predposylka povysheniya preventivnogo potentsiala ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2010.-№ 1. – S. 34-39.
Maksurov A.A. K voprosu ob effektivnosti yuridicheskoy praktiki // http://www.maksurov.ru.
Nersesyants V.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Paragraf 7.1. «Ponyatie, mekhanizm i effektivnost' deystviya prava». M.: INFRA-M, 1999. S. 475–482.
Ekonomicheskaya teoriya prestupnoy i pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti. Referativnyy zhurnal. Vypusk 1 / pod red. L.M. Timofeeva i Yu.V. Latovoy. M., 1999.
Kudashkin A.V., Dmitriev D.A. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya provedeniya organami prokuratury antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy v tselyakh povysheniya ee effektivnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 87 - 91.
Tyurina S.Yu., Borisov N.I. Obrashcheniya grazhdan kak instrument povysheniya effektivnosti vzaimodeystviya naseleniya i vlasti: normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie i praktika // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 10. - C. 12 - 19.
A. A. Engel'gardt Osnovaniya primeneniya norm ob ideal'noy sovokupnosti prestupleniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 282 - 287.
R. M. Usmanova Rol' politicheskikh norm v publichnom regulirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 3. - C. 535 - 540.
Polishchuk D.A. Kriterial'naya baza otsenki effektivnosti pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 1 - 8. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9270.html
A.S. Smbatyan Kriterii effektivnosti organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 6. - C. 87 - 93.
D.V. Morozov Publichnoe pravo i kollizionnoe regulirovanie (sravnitel'no–pravovoy analiz zakonodatel'stva o mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 2. - C. 166 - 169.

References (transliteration):
Zharikov Yu.S. Effektivnost' ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya kak neobkhodimaya predposylka povysheniya preventivnogo potentsiala ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2010.-№ 1. – S. 34-39.
Maksurov A.A. K voprosu ob effektivnosti yuridicheskoy praktiki // http://www.maksurov.ru.
Nersesyants V.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Paragraf 7.1. «Ponyatie, mekhanizm i effektivnost' deystviya prava». M.: INFRA-M, 1999. S. 475–482.
Ekonomicheskaya teoriya prestupnoy i pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti. Referativnyy zhurnal. Vypusk 1 / pod red. L.M. Timofeeva i Yu.V. Latovoy. M., 1999.
Kudashkin A.V., Dmitriev D.A. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya provedeniya organami prokuratury antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy v tselyakh povysheniya ee effektivnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 87 - 91.
Tyurina S.Yu., Borisov N.I. Obrashcheniya grazhdan kak instrument povysheniya effektivnosti vzaimodeystviya naseleniya i vlasti: normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie i praktika // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 10. - C. 12 - 19.
A. A. Engel'gardt Osnovaniya primeneniya norm ob ideal'noy sovokupnosti prestupleniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 282 - 287.
R. M. Usmanova Rol' politicheskikh norm v publichnom regulirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 3. - C. 535 - 540.
Polishchuk D.A. Kriterial'naya baza otsenki effektivnosti pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 1 - 8. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9270.html
A.S. Smbatyan Kriterii effektivnosti organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 6. - C. 87 - 93.
D.V. Morozov Publichnoe pravo i kollizionnoe regulirovanie (sravnitel'no–pravovoy analiz zakonodatel'stva o mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 2. - C. 166 - 169.

Аннотация: This article analyzes the systemic approach in the science of criminology that is used in researching criminality. Criminality is being viewed as a systemic phenomenon, consisting of interconnected elements – types of criminal acts and specific crimes. The author examines the situational approach that is used in philosophy and other sciences, and claims that criminality differs by the elements of contingency. Taking this fact into consideration, the author proposes to define a new type of criminality, more precisely – a situational criminality. He analyzes its current state and claims that approximately 1/3 of the crimes that are being committed presently carry a situational character, and taking this into account, the crime prevention should be structured accordingly. Criminality within criminology is traditionally being viewed as a system (combination) of all committed crimes. At the same time, it is not being considered that many crimes and criminality as a whole carry a contingency (situational) character, and the author therefore proposes to highlight such separate type of criminality as a situational criminality, which accounts for at least 1/3 of all crimes committed in Russia.

Ключевые слова: Systemic approach, criminality as a system, situational approach, role of the situation, situational crimes, crime prevention.

Библиография:
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii.-M., 1968.
Bafiya E. Problemy kriminologii (dialektika kriminologicheskoy situatsii).-M., 1983.
Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'.-M., 1985.
Antonyan Yu.M. Rol' konkretnoy zhiznennoy situatsii v sovershenii prestupleniya.-M., 1973.
Fal'ko A.N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za predumyshlennoe ubiystvo. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Omsk, 2006. S. 8.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka.-M., 2007.
Solodukho N.M. Manifest situatsionnogo dvizheniya// Vestnik Tatarskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy ekologicheskoy akademii.-Kazan', 2003. №3. S. 3.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik / Pod red. A.I. Dolgovoy.-M., 1997.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik / Pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva i V.E. Eminova.-M., 1995.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik.-M., 1976.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik (izd. 2-e, isp. i dop.).-M., 1968.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik.-M., 1966.
Kudryavtsev V.N., Luneev V.V. O kriminologicheskoy klassifikatsii prestupleniy // Gos-vo i pravo. 2005.-№ 6. S. 55.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik/Pod red. A.I. Dolgovoy.-M., 2005.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik/Pod red N.F. Kuznetsovoy, G.M. Min'kovskogo.-M., 1994.
Sabirzyanov A.M. Situatsionnaya kartina mira// http://filosofkai.tw1.ru/situaciya.php.
Kudryavtsev V.N.Genezis prestupnogo povedeniya. Opyt kriminologicheskogo modelirovaniya.-M., 1998.
Pleshakov V.A. Kontseptsiya kriminologicheskoy teorii situatsiy ili situatsionnoy kriminologii // Rossiya: uroki reform / nauchnye trudy IMPE im. A.S. Griboedova.-M., 2008. S. 150-159.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Strategii bor'by s prestupnost'yu.-M., 2003. S. 313.
Akopdzhanova M.O. Osnovnye kharakteristiki i parametry preodoleniya nalogovoy prestupnosti // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.25-36. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.3.8396. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/flc/article_8396.html
Silaeva N.A. Normativno-pravovoe obespechenie preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy, posyagayushchikh na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.88-111. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.2.692. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_692.html
Silaeva N.A. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika (1991-2011 gg.) // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2014.-№ 2.-S.128-152. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2014.2.11672. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_11672.html
Chirkov D.K., Litvinov A.A., Antonov-Romanovskiy G.V. Ob osobennostyakh prestupnosti migrantov-inostrantsev v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.189-200. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.3.672. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_672.html
Kabanov P.A. Politicheskaya prestupnost' v Rossii: kriminologicheskiy analiz istoricheskogo razvitiya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.285-304. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.1.474. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_474.html
Chirkov D.K., Sarkisyan A.Zh. Prestupnost' v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: tendentsii i perspektivy // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.160-181. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.2.608. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_608.html
Astishina T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' prestupleniy protiv obshchestvennoy nravstvennosti s inymi vidami prestupleniy // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.1077
Chirkov D.K., Litvinov A.A., Antonov-Romanovskiy G.V., Koimshidi G.F. Sel'skaya prestupnost' v Rossii: sovremennye tendentsii i mery protivodeystviya // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 155 - 222. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.6.10530. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_10530.html
Chirkov D.K., Litvinov A.A., Antonov-Romanovskiy G.V., Koimshidi G.F., Chirkov D.K. Sovremennye tendentsii prestupnosti v sel'skoy mestnosti: nauchnyy podkhod k dannoy problematike // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 4 - 20. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.10462.
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoy politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu - zalog uspekha v bor'be s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem v Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2012. - 1. - C. 1 - 54. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_109.html
Akopdzhanova M.O. Osnovnye kharakteristiki i parametry preodoleniya nalogovoy prestupnosti // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 25 - 36. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.3.8396. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_8396.html
Tishchenko V.N. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 21 - 31. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.9709.

References (transliteration):
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii.-M., 1968.
Bafiya E. Problemy kriminologii (dialektika kriminologicheskoy situatsii).-M., 1983.
Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'.-M., 1985.
Antonyan Yu.M. Rol' konkretnoy zhiznennoy situatsii v sovershenii prestupleniya.-M., 1973.
Fal'ko A.N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za predumyshlennoe ubiystvo. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Omsk, 2006. S. 8.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka.-M., 2007.
Solodukho N.M. Manifest situatsionnogo dvizheniya// Vestnik Tatarskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy ekologicheskoy akademii.-Kazan', 2003. №3. S. 3.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik / Pod red. A.I. Dolgovoy.-M., 1997.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik / Pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva i V.E. Eminova.-M., 1995.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik.-M., 1976.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik (izd. 2-e, isp. i dop.).-M., 1968.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik.-M., 1966.
Kudryavtsev V.N., Luneev V.V. O kriminologicheskoy klassifikatsii prestupleniy // Gos-vo i pravo. 2005.-№ 6. S. 55.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik/Pod red. A.I. Dolgovoy.-M., 2005.
Kriminologiya. Uchebnik/Pod red N.F. Kuznetsovoy, G.M. Min'kovskogo.-M., 1994.
Sabirzyanov A.M. Situatsionnaya kartina mira// http://filosofkai.tw1.ru/situaciya.php.
Kudryavtsev V.N.Genezis prestupnogo povedeniya. Opyt kriminologicheskogo modelirovaniya.-M., 1998.
Pleshakov V.A. Kontseptsiya kriminologicheskoy teorii situatsiy ili situatsionnoy kriminologii // Rossiya: uroki reform / nauchnye trudy IMPE im. A.S. Griboedova.-M., 2008. S. 150-159.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Strategii bor'by s prestupnost'yu.-M., 2003. S. 313.
Akopdzhanova M.O. Osnovnye kharakteristiki i parametry preodoleniya nalogovoy prestupnosti // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.25-36. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.3.8396. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/flc/article_8396.html
Silaeva N.A. Normativno-pravovoe obespechenie preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy, posyagayushchikh na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.88-111. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.2.692. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_692.html
Silaeva N.A. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika (1991-2011 gg.) // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2014.-№ 2.-S.128-152. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2014.2.11672. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_11672.html
Chirkov D.K., Litvinov A.A., Antonov-Romanovskiy G.V. Ob osobennostyakh prestupnosti migrantov-inostrantsev v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.189-200. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.3.672. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_672.html
Kabanov P.A. Politicheskaya prestupnost' v Rossii: kriminologicheskiy analiz istoricheskogo razvitiya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.285-304. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.1.474. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_474.html
Chirkov D.K., Sarkisyan A.Zh. Prestupnost' v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: tendentsii i perspektivy // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.160-181. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.2.608. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_608.html
Astishina T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' prestupleniy protiv obshchestvennoy nravstvennosti s inymi vidami prestupleniy // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.1077
Chirkov D.K., Litvinov A.A., Antonov-Romanovskiy G.V., Koimshidi G.F. Sel'skaya prestupnost' v Rossii: sovremennye tendentsii i mery protivodeystviya // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 155 - 222. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.6.10530. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_10530.html
Chirkov D.K., Litvinov A.A., Antonov-Romanovskiy G.V., Koimshidi G.F., Chirkov D.K. Sovremennye tendentsii prestupnosti v sel'skoy mestnosti: nauchnyy podkhod k dannoy problematike // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 4 - 20. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.10462.
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoy politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu - zalog uspekha v bor'be s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem v Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2012. - 1. - C. 1 - 54. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_109.html
Akopdzhanova M.O. Osnovnye kharakteristiki i parametry preodoleniya nalogovoy prestupnosti // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 25 - 36. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.3.8396. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_8396.html
Tishchenko V.N. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 21 - 31. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.9709.

Аннотация: Research on the subjects of social influence as the main correctional means for convicts is defined by the controversial nature of criminal punishment: on one hand, it is a measure of state enforcement, on the other – a measure of correction a criminal. Solution of such complicated issue is impossible using only the power of an institution or authority that carries out the criminal punishment, without involving a broad range of the members of the community. Criminal enforcement legislation does not clearly outline the circle of the subjects of social influence mentioning only a few forms of social groups and representatives of public. Based on the analysis of the Russian legislation and the practice of the correctional institutions on the cooperation with public organizations, the author offers a classification of the subjects of social influence by their organizational and legal forms, member structure, extent of authority, etc. Programs such as work release and community service as a form of social influence is being widely implemented within correctional work and have potential for future development.

Ключевые слова: Social influence, correction, criminal punishment, means of correction, enforcement of punishment, classification of subjects, convicts, public organizations, society.

Библиография:
Yavich L.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. L., 1976. S.214
Andreeva G.N. Pravovye osnovy uchastiya negosudarstvennykh organizatsiy v vospitatel'noy rabote s nesovershennoletnimi, otbyvayushchimi ugolovnoe nakazanie v vide lisheniya svobody. [Tekst]: dis…k.yu.n., M., 1998. S.15
st.7 Federal'nogo zakona ot 19.05.1995 g. № 82-FZ (red. ot 20.07.2012 g.) «Ob Obshchestvennykh ob'edineniyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st.5 Federal'nogo zakona ot 10.06.2008 g. № 76-FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) «Ob obshchestvennom kontrole za obespecheniem prav cheloveka v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya i o sodeystvii litsam, nakhodyashchimsya v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya» » [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st.2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 12.01.1996 № 7-FZ (red. ot 11.02.2013 g. № 8-FZ) «O nekommercheskikh partnerstvakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st. 13 Federal'nogo zakona ot 19.05.1995 g. № 82-FZ (red. ot 20.07.2012 g.) «Ob obshchestvennykh ob'edineniyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
Bagriy-Shakhmatov L.V. Uchastie obshchestvennosti v deyatel'nosti gosudarstva, ispolnyayushchikh nakazanie, svyazannye s ispravitel'no-trudovym vozdeystviem // Sovetskoe ispravitel'no-trudovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik dlya vuzov MVD SSSR/ Pod red. N.A.Struchkova i dr. – M., 1977. S.254-255
Ispravitel'no-trudovoy kodeks RSFSR (utv. VS RSFSR 18.12.1970 g.) (v red.ot 21.12.1996 g. № 160-FZ) [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
Naprimer: Eleonskiy V.A., Bagriy-Shakhmatov L.V., Karpets I.I., Melent'ev M.P., Shamis A.V. i drugie
Eleonskiy V.A., M.P.Prokopov Rol' obshchestvennosti v nravstvennom vospitanii osuzhdennykh. M., 1976. S.11-12
Karaulova V. Sotsial'naya rabota, provodimaya v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh //Prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2005. № 8. S.15.
ch.2 st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 12.01.1996 g. № 7-FZ (red. ot 11.02.2013 g.) «O nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru. (data obrashcheniya 15.04.2013 g.)
st.st.7,8 Federal'nogo zakona ot 26.09.1997 № 125-FZ (v red. ot 01.07.2011) «O svobode sovesti i religioznykh ob'edineniyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st.1 Federal'nogo zakona ot 10.06.2008 g. № 76-FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) «Ob obshchestvennom kontrole za obespecheniem prav cheloveka v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya i o sodeystvii litsam, nakhodyashchimsya v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya» » [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 11.08.1995 g. № 135-FZ (red. ot 23.12.2010 g.) «O blagotvoritel'noy deyatel'nosti i blagotvoritel'nykh organizatsiyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru. (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
Obshchestvennaya palata RF. Sayt. Razdel: Mesta prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya. Ofitsial'nyy sayt 2008-2012. [ Elektronnyy resurs]-Rezhim dostupa-URL: http:www.oprf.ru (data obrashcheniya 02.04.2013)
Volkov V.V. Obshchestvennost': zabytaya praktika grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Elektronnyy resurs]. Universitetskaya informatsionnaya sistema Rossiya // Zhurnal «Pro et Contra». Seriya «Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo». – T.2. – 1997. №4. – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.uisrussia.msu.ru/docs/nov/pec/1997/4/ (data obrashcheniya 07.02.2013 g.)
Perminov O.G. Sotsial'no-pravovye
voprosy privlecheniya obshchestvennosti
k deyatel'nosti organov i uchrezhdeniy,
ispolnyayushchikh ugolovnoe nakazanie // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). - 2005. - 1. - C. 86 - 96.

References (transliteration):
Yavich L.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. L., 1976. S.214
Andreeva G.N. Pravovye osnovy uchastiya negosudarstvennykh organizatsiy v vospitatel'noy rabote s nesovershennoletnimi, otbyvayushchimi ugolovnoe nakazanie v vide lisheniya svobody. [Tekst]: dis…k.yu.n., M., 1998. S.15
st.7 Federal'nogo zakona ot 19.05.1995 g. № 82-FZ (red. ot 20.07.2012 g.) «Ob Obshchestvennykh ob'edineniyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st.5 Federal'nogo zakona ot 10.06.2008 g. № 76-FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) «Ob obshchestvennom kontrole za obespecheniem prav cheloveka v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya i o sodeystvii litsam, nakhodyashchimsya v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya» » [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st.2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 12.01.1996 № 7-FZ (red. ot 11.02.2013 g. № 8-FZ) «O nekommercheskikh partnerstvakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st. 13 Federal'nogo zakona ot 19.05.1995 g. № 82-FZ (red. ot 20.07.2012 g.) «Ob obshchestvennykh ob'edineniyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
Bagriy-Shakhmatov L.V. Uchastie obshchestvennosti v deyatel'nosti gosudarstva, ispolnyayushchikh nakazanie, svyazannye s ispravitel'no-trudovym vozdeystviem // Sovetskoe ispravitel'no-trudovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik dlya vuzov MVD SSSR/ Pod red. N.A.Struchkova i dr. – M., 1977. S.254-255
Ispravitel'no-trudovoy kodeks RSFSR (utv. VS RSFSR 18.12.1970 g.) (v red.ot 21.12.1996 g. № 160-FZ) [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
Naprimer: Eleonskiy V.A., Bagriy-Shakhmatov L.V., Karpets I.I., Melent'ev M.P., Shamis A.V. i drugie
Eleonskiy V.A., M.P.Prokopov Rol' obshchestvennosti v nravstvennom vospitanii osuzhdennykh. M., 1976. S.11-12
Karaulova V. Sotsial'naya rabota, provodimaya v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh //Prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2005. № 8. S.15.
ch.2 st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 12.01.1996 g. № 7-FZ (red. ot 11.02.2013 g.) «O nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru. (data obrashcheniya 15.04.2013 g.)
st.st.7,8 Federal'nogo zakona ot 26.09.1997 № 125-FZ (v red. ot 01.07.2011) «O svobode sovesti i religioznykh ob'edineniyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st.1 Federal'nogo zakona ot 10.06.2008 g. № 76-FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) «Ob obshchestvennom kontrole za obespecheniem prav cheloveka v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya i o sodeystvii litsam, nakhodyashchimsya v mestakh prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya» » [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 11.08.1995 g. № 135-FZ (red. ot 23.12.2010 g.) «O blagotvoritel'noy deyatel'nosti i blagotvoritel'nykh organizatsiyakh» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus». – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.consultant.ru. (data obrashcheniya 19.02.2013 g.)
Obshchestvennaya palata RF. Sayt. Razdel: Mesta prinuditel'nogo soderzhaniya. Ofitsial'nyy sayt 2008-2012. [ Elektronnyy resurs]-Rezhim dostupa-URL: http:www.oprf.ru (data obrashcheniya 02.04.2013)
Volkov V.V. Obshchestvennost': zabytaya praktika grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Elektronnyy resurs]. Universitetskaya informatsionnaya sistema Rossiya // Zhurnal «Pro et Contra». Seriya «Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo». – T.2. – 1997. №4. – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: http:www.uisrussia.msu.ru/docs/nov/pec/1997/4/ (data obrashcheniya 07.02.2013 g.)
Perminov O.G. Sotsial'no-pravovye
voprosy privlecheniya obshchestvennosti
k deyatel'nosti organov i uchrezhdeniy,
ispolnyayushchikh ugolovnoe nakazanie // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). - 2005. - 1. - C. 86 - 96.

Аннотация: This article examines reference books that are intended for a proper and full description of the objects and traces found during an inspection, as a component of providing investigators with valid evidence and criminological information. The authors note that even if a protocol of an inspection is properly and procedurally documented but violates criminological guidelines on description, than it leads to the significance of the evidence being reduced due the doubts of their validity; in other words, their relevance. Based on the data from the examined literature on the acting legislation and investigations, the authors prepared and published a criminologist’s guide, which contains references and informational material in the form of a description in the protocol of individual characteristics of objects, as well as photos and fragments of description of trace evidence located on various objects, which ensures their quality visual perception. It is worth mentioning that implementation of this guide will contribute to the increase in effectiveness of recording criminological information, and in doing so will improve the information and analytical work of the investigators and experts. This handbook can also be used during interrogations, when there is a need to compile a detailed indirect description of individual characteristics of various objects based on the testimony of the person being interrogated.

Ключевые слова: Reference books, inspection, description, objects, trace evidence, validity of evidence, incompetent evidence, criminology, investigator, expert.

Аннотация: The object and subject of this research consist in a content of legal regulation and practice of implementation of the structure of a continuous crime as a type of a complex instantaneous crime. The particular relevance of this research lies in the fact that this article examines the question of distinguishing the continuous crime from the multiplicity of crimes. The author establishes a system of general criteria of distinguishing between the evaluated criminal acts, and offers specific signs that if taken into account in the cases of certain traditional types of crimes (accepting bribes, for example) would allow to differentiate the multiplicity of crimes from a continuous act. The problem of criteria of distinguishing a continuous crime from the multiplicity is reviewed in detail in article on the example of committing crimes in the sphere of computer information (chapter 28 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). The article reviews the acting orders of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the assessment of their positions within criminal law literature.

Ключевые слова: Instantaneous crime, continuous crime, multiplicity of crimes, implementation of criminal legal norms, normative unity, criteria of assessment, computer information, illegal access, contradicting court rulings.

Аннотация: The processes of globalization are accompanied by the growth in crime rate, on both the national and international levels. Authors believe that one of the causes of this phenomenon is the insufficient scientific work on the concept of criminal law, which at times leads to the underestimation of the science of criminal law. One of the links in the chain of distortion of the concept became the change in the name of the legal branch from “Correctional” to “Penal”. Because of this, the criminal law seems more like the subject of: how people become criminals. Rectifying this f law can have a positive effect on the improvement of criminal legislation and law enforcement practice of Russian Federation. The authors provide analysis of the concept of criminal law, considering the changes caused by the progress of globalization processes, and include the forms of criminal activities, which quickly overwhelm practically all social areas that lack regulation.

Ключевые слова: Human rights, criminal law, criminology, crime, civil society, globalization, international law, national law, legal system, responsibility.

Библиография:
Plotnikova L.Yu. Primirenie v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: argumenty «za» i «protiv».// Zakon, 2010, №3, s.97-102.
Baburin V.V. Risk kak osnovanie differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti.// Avtoref… kand. yurid. nauk. – Omsk, 2009, s.8-13.
Begaeva A.A. Pravovaya priroda al'ternativnykh sposobov uregulirovaniya korporativnykh sporov. (Sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz zarubezhnoy i otechestvennoy praktiki). // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2009, №2, s.37-47.
Golovko L.V. Institut ugolovno-pravovoy mediatsii i ego perspektivy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii.// Zakon, 2009, №4, s.127-135.
Yanushko A.A. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti.// Avtoref… kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2005, s.23.
Tarbagaev A., Tarbagaeva E. Osobennosti primeneniya blanketnykh norm pri kvalifikatsii prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh gl.22 UK RF// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №2, s.73-76.
Zhuraleva E. Yavka s povinnoy v sudebnoy praktike.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №5, s.33-37.
Machul'skaya E.A. Yuridicheskie aspekty yavki s povinnoy.// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2008, №9, s.142-151.
Torkunov M. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya i lichnosti prestupnika pri rassmotrenii del v osobom poryadke zakonodatelem ne uchteno.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2006, №3, s.85-87.
Blagov E. Naznachenie nakazaniya v sluchae zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №3, s.21-26.
Kirin A.V. Ugolovnoe i administrativno-deliktnoe pravo: partnerstvo, a ne paternalizm.// Biblioteka kriminalista, 2013, №2, s.126-135.
Kaufman M.A. Prestuplenie i administrativnoe pravonarushenie: problemy sootnosheniya i kvalifikatsii.// Biblioteka kriminalista, 2013, №2, s.109-118.
Ivanov L.O. V zakonodatel'nom regulirovanii otvetstvennosti za sovershenie administrativnykh pravonarusheniy nakopilos' mnogo problem, trebuyushchikh resheniya.// Biblioteka kriminalista, 2013, №2, s.91-97.
Sklyarov S. O sistemnosti postroeniya ugolovnogo i administrativnogo zakonodatel'stva v kontekste ustanovleniya otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №5, s.134-137.
Markuntsov S.A. Filosofiya ugolovnogo zapreta.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №4, s.53-60.
Boyko A.I. Predusloviya sistematizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013, №1, s.20-35.
Golovko L.V. Granitsy ugolovnogo prava: ot formal'nogo k funktsional'nomu podkhodu.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №2, s.77-90.
Ugolovnyy zakon. Opyt teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya./ Otv. red. V.N. Kudryavtsev, S.G. Kelina. – M., 1987, s.7-8.
Kondratyuk L.V., Ovchinskiy V.S. Kriminologicheskoe izmerenie. – M., 2008, s.94-101.
Klepitskiy I.A. Prestuplenie, administrativnoe pravonarushenie i nakazanie v Rossii v svete Evropeyskoy konventsii o pravakh cheloveka.// Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2000, №3, s.66-69.
Esakov G.A. Ot administrativnykh pravonarusheniy k ugolovnym prostupkam, ili o sushchestvovanii ugolovnogo prava v «shirokom» smysle.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №1, s.37-45.
Nomokonov V.A. «Kriminalizatsiya» administrativnogo prava ili administrativnyy proizvol kriminalizatsii// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №2, s.208-213.
Pudovochkin Yu. Legitimatsiya ugolovnogo prava.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №6, s.38-42.
Rakhmanova E.N. Zashchita prav cheloveka ot kriminal'nykh ugroz v usloviyakh globalizatsii: kriminologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy analiz. – M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008, s.78-144.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. – 2-e izd. pererab. i dop. – M.: Prospekt, 2009, s.8-13.
Babaev M.M., Pudovochkin Yu.V. Printsipy ugolovnogo prava i osnovaniya ego ustoychivogo razvitiya.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2012, №1, s.5-16.
Pobegaylo E. Krizis sovremennoy rossiyskoy politiki.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2004, №4, s.112-117.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Nauku ugolovnogo prava pora modernizirovat'.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2006, №5, s.130.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Nemetskaya ugolovno-pravovaya nauka na smene tysyacheletiy.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2002, №4, s.136-139.
Dubovik O.L. Krizis ugolovnogo prava i ugolovno-pravovoy teorii.// Pravo i politika, 2001, №2, s.63-66.
Zhalinskiy A. Pravoobrazuyushchee deystvie sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam: voprosy sovershenstvovaniya.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №4, s.127-130.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie: razvitie kontseptsiy i obshchestvennoy praktiki.// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2006, №6, s.3-15.
Kibal'nik A.G. Osnovnye polozheniya Obshchey chasti ugolovnogo prava zarubezhnykh stran. – M., 2008, s.126.
Esakov G.A. Osnovy sravnitel'nogo ugolovnogo prava: Monografiya. – M: OOO Izdatel'stvo «Elit», 2007, s.1-157.
Nomokonov V.A. Sovremennaya kriminologiya: traditsionnye podkhody i novye napravleniya.// Organizovannaya prestupnost', migratsiya, politika. – M., 2002, s.136.
Lukashuk I.I. Globalizatsiya, gosudarstvo, pravo, XXI vek. – M., 2000, s.173.
Luneev V.V., Kudryavtsev V.N., Petrishchev V.E. Terrorizm i organizovannaya prestupnost' v usloviyakh globalizatsii.// Bor'ba s terrorizmom. – M., 2004, s.12.
Eminov V.E. Kontseptsiya bor'by s organizovannoy prestupnost'yu v Rossii.// Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2010, №2, s.261-283
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovno-pravovye transnatsional'nye konflikty v sfere ekonomiki.// Zakon, 2011, №9, s.57-63.
Eliseev R.A. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo.//Avtoref… kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2011, s.10-14.
Korchagin A.G., Kultyshev S.B., Tursunova Yu.S. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya v usloviyakh global'nogo finansovogo krizisa. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2009, s.6-28.
Lupu A.A., Os'kina I.Yu. Transnatsional'noe ugolovnoe pravo: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Delo i Servis, 2012, s.307-340.
Korchagin A.G., Ivanov A.M. Obshcheteoreticheskaya kontseptsiya prav cheloveka kak vektor, opredelyayushchiy napravlenie sovershenstvovaniya pravovoy politiki v Rossii.// Pravo i politika 2013, №7, s.880-888.
Enrico Ferri. Criminal Sociology. – New York, D.Appleton and Company, 1897. Pp.92 et al.
Uwe Murmann. Kritik des funkzionalen Strafrechts.// Heinz Koriath, Ralf Krack, Henning Radtke, Joerg-Martin Jehle (Hg.) Grundfragen des Strafrechts, Rechtsphilosophie und die Reform der Juristenausbildung. – Goettingen, Universitaetsverlag, 2010. S.189-208.
Sm.: Ivanov A.M. Kratkiy kurs Kanonicheskogo prava Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi (dlya studentov-teologov zaochnogo otdeleniya Instituta istorii i filosofii DVGU): Uchebnoe posobie// Pravo – Politika – Zakon, № 3 (13), 2005. – 180 s.
Henry M. Boies. The Science of Penology. The Defence of Society against Crime. – New York, London, 1901. p.V.
Democracy, Values, and Violence: Paradoxes, Tensions, and Comparative Advantages of Liberal Inclusion by Susanne Karstedt// The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2006. Pp.50-81.
Ivanov A.M. Svoboda sovesti (i veroispovedaniya) ili prava individuuma protiv prav (so)obshchestva?// Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke, 2004, №4 (4), Khabarovsk, 2004. S.64-78.
Ivanov A.M. K voprosu ob ushcherbnosti sovremennoy pravovoy politiki// Pravovaya real'nost' v fokuse yuridicheskoy nauki i universitetskogo prosveshcheniya. Mat. mezhdunar. nauchno-praktich. konferentsii./ Otv. red. A.I. Korobeev – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2009. – S. 49 – 50;
Panova I.V. Mediatsiya: problemy i puti ikh resheniya.// Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2011, №10, s.73-83.
Korchagin A.G., Fedotova N.P. Kvalifikatsiya i sub'ektivnye predposylki otvetstvennosti za prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 5.-S.83-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.776. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_776.html
Manna A.A., Bukalerova L.A.. Istochniki musul'manskogo ugolovnogo prava // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 1174-1179. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10418.
Salkazanov A.E.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 852-859. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961.
M.O. Akopdzhanova. Dispozitsiya stat'i 164 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossii ob otvetstvennosti za prestuplenie protiv bezopasnosti v kul'turnoy sfere // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 131-134. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.12
Fedorchenko A.A. Primenenie mezhdunarodnogo prava prav cheloveka k uchastnikam mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo protsessa // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. - 2014. - 2. - C. 64 - 72. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2014.2.11703. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_11703.html

References (transliteration):
Plotnikova L.Yu. Primirenie v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: argumenty «za» i «protiv».// Zakon, 2010, №3, s.97-102.
Baburin V.V. Risk kak osnovanie differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti.// Avtoref… kand. yurid. nauk. – Omsk, 2009, s.8-13.
Begaeva A.A. Pravovaya priroda al'ternativnykh sposobov uregulirovaniya korporativnykh sporov. (Sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz zarubezhnoy i otechestvennoy praktiki). // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2009, №2, s.37-47.
Golovko L.V. Institut ugolovno-pravovoy mediatsii i ego perspektivy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii.// Zakon, 2009, №4, s.127-135.
Yanushko A.A. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti.// Avtoref… kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2005, s.23.
Tarbagaev A., Tarbagaeva E. Osobennosti primeneniya blanketnykh norm pri kvalifikatsii prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh gl.22 UK RF// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №2, s.73-76.
Zhuraleva E. Yavka s povinnoy v sudebnoy praktike.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №5, s.33-37.
Machul'skaya E.A. Yuridicheskie aspekty yavki s povinnoy.// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2008, №9, s.142-151.
Torkunov M. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya i lichnosti prestupnika pri rassmotrenii del v osobom poryadke zakonodatelem ne uchteno.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2006, №3, s.85-87.
Blagov E. Naznachenie nakazaniya v sluchae zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №3, s.21-26.
Kirin A.V. Ugolovnoe i administrativno-deliktnoe pravo: partnerstvo, a ne paternalizm.// Biblioteka kriminalista, 2013, №2, s.126-135.
Kaufman M.A. Prestuplenie i administrativnoe pravonarushenie: problemy sootnosheniya i kvalifikatsii.// Biblioteka kriminalista, 2013, №2, s.109-118.
Ivanov L.O. V zakonodatel'nom regulirovanii otvetstvennosti za sovershenie administrativnykh pravonarusheniy nakopilos' mnogo problem, trebuyushchikh resheniya.// Biblioteka kriminalista, 2013, №2, s.91-97.
Sklyarov S. O sistemnosti postroeniya ugolovnogo i administrativnogo zakonodatel'stva v kontekste ustanovleniya otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №5, s.134-137.
Markuntsov S.A. Filosofiya ugolovnogo zapreta.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №4, s.53-60.
Boyko A.I. Predusloviya sistematizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013, №1, s.20-35.
Golovko L.V. Granitsy ugolovnogo prava: ot formal'nogo k funktsional'nomu podkhodu.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №2, s.77-90.
Ugolovnyy zakon. Opyt teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya./ Otv. red. V.N. Kudryavtsev, S.G. Kelina. – M., 1987, s.7-8.
Kondratyuk L.V., Ovchinskiy V.S. Kriminologicheskoe izmerenie. – M., 2008, s.94-101.
Klepitskiy I.A. Prestuplenie, administrativnoe pravonarushenie i nakazanie v Rossii v svete Evropeyskoy konventsii o pravakh cheloveka.// Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2000, №3, s.66-69.
Esakov G.A. Ot administrativnykh pravonarusheniy k ugolovnym prostupkam, ili o sushchestvovanii ugolovnogo prava v «shirokom» smysle.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №1, s.37-45.
Nomokonov V.A. «Kriminalizatsiya» administrativnogo prava ili administrativnyy proizvol kriminalizatsii// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, №2, s.208-213.
Pudovochkin Yu. Legitimatsiya ugolovnogo prava.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №6, s.38-42.
Rakhmanova E.N. Zashchita prav cheloveka ot kriminal'nykh ugroz v usloviyakh globalizatsii: kriminologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy analiz. – M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008, s.78-144.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. – 2-e izd. pererab. i dop. – M.: Prospekt, 2009, s.8-13.
Babaev M.M., Pudovochkin Yu.V. Printsipy ugolovnogo prava i osnovaniya ego ustoychivogo razvitiya.// Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2012, №1, s.5-16.
Pobegaylo E. Krizis sovremennoy rossiyskoy politiki.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2004, №4, s.112-117.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Nauku ugolovnogo prava pora modernizirovat'.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2006, №5, s.130.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Nemetskaya ugolovno-pravovaya nauka na smene tysyacheletiy.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2002, №4, s.136-139.
Dubovik O.L. Krizis ugolovnogo prava i ugolovno-pravovoy teorii.// Pravo i politika, 2001, №2, s.63-66.
Zhalinskiy A. Pravoobrazuyushchee deystvie sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam: voprosy sovershenstvovaniya.// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №4, s.127-130.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie: razvitie kontseptsiy i obshchestvennoy praktiki.// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2006, №6, s.3-15.
Kibal'nik A.G. Osnovnye polozheniya Obshchey chasti ugolovnogo prava zarubezhnykh stran. – M., 2008, s.126.
Esakov G.A. Osnovy sravnitel'nogo ugolovnogo prava: Monografiya. – M: OOO Izdatel'stvo «Elit», 2007, s.1-157.
Nomokonov V.A. Sovremennaya kriminologiya: traditsionnye podkhody i novye napravleniya.// Organizovannaya prestupnost', migratsiya, politika. – M., 2002, s.136.
Lukashuk I.I. Globalizatsiya, gosudarstvo, pravo, XXI vek. – M., 2000, s.173.
Luneev V.V., Kudryavtsev V.N., Petrishchev V.E. Terrorizm i organizovannaya prestupnost' v usloviyakh globalizatsii.// Bor'ba s terrorizmom. – M., 2004, s.12.
Eminov V.E. Kontseptsiya bor'by s organizovannoy prestupnost'yu v Rossii.// Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2010, №2, s.261-283
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovno-pravovye transnatsional'nye konflikty v sfere ekonomiki.// Zakon, 2011, №9, s.57-63.
Eliseev R.A. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo.//Avtoref… kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2011, s.10-14.
Korchagin A.G., Kultyshev S.B., Tursunova Yu.S. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya v usloviyakh global'nogo finansovogo krizisa. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2009, s.6-28.
Lupu A.A., Os'kina I.Yu. Transnatsional'noe ugolovnoe pravo: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Delo i Servis, 2012, s.307-340.
Korchagin A.G., Ivanov A.M. Obshcheteoreticheskaya kontseptsiya prav cheloveka kak vektor, opredelyayushchiy napravlenie sovershenstvovaniya pravovoy politiki v Rossii.// Pravo i politika 2013, №7, s.880-888.
Enrico Ferri. Criminal Sociology. – New York, D.Appleton and Company, 1897. Pp.92 et al.
Uwe Murmann. Kritik des funkzionalen Strafrechts.// Heinz Koriath, Ralf Krack, Henning Radtke, Joerg-Martin Jehle (Hg.) Grundfragen des Strafrechts, Rechtsphilosophie und die Reform der Juristenausbildung. – Goettingen, Universitaetsverlag, 2010. S.189-208.
Sm.: Ivanov A.M. Kratkiy kurs Kanonicheskogo prava Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi (dlya studentov-teologov zaochnogo otdeleniya Instituta istorii i filosofii DVGU): Uchebnoe posobie// Pravo – Politika – Zakon, № 3 (13), 2005. – 180 s.
Henry M. Boies. The Science of Penology. The Defence of Society against Crime. – New York, London, 1901. p.V.
Democracy, Values, and Violence: Paradoxes, Tensions, and Comparative Advantages of Liberal Inclusion by Susanne Karstedt// The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2006. Pp.50-81.
Ivanov A.M. Svoboda sovesti (i veroispovedaniya) ili prava individuuma protiv prav (so)obshchestva?// Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke, 2004, №4 (4), Khabarovsk, 2004. S.64-78.
Ivanov A.M. K voprosu ob ushcherbnosti sovremennoy pravovoy politiki// Pravovaya real'nost' v fokuse yuridicheskoy nauki i universitetskogo prosveshcheniya. Mat. mezhdunar. nauchno-praktich. konferentsii./ Otv. red. A.I. Korobeev – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2009. – S. 49 – 50;
Panova I.V. Mediatsiya: problemy i puti ikh resheniya.// Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2011, №10, s.73-83.
Korchagin A.G., Fedotova N.P. Kvalifikatsiya i sub'ektivnye predposylki otvetstvennosti za prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 5.-S.83-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.776. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_776.html
Manna A.A., Bukalerova L.A.. Istochniki musul'manskogo ugolovnogo prava // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 1174-1179. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10418.
Salkazanov A.E.. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 852-859. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961.
M.O. Akopdzhanova. Dispozitsiya stat'i 164 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossii ob otvetstvennosti za prestuplenie protiv bezopasnosti v kul'turnoy sfere // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 131-134. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.12
Fedorchenko A.A. Primenenie mezhdunarodnogo prava prav cheloveka k uchastnikam mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo protsessa // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. - 2014. - 2. - C. 64 - 72. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2014.2.11703. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_11703.html

Аннотация: The object of studies involves the practice of application of norms with estimate standards by the courts of general jurisdiction in the sphere of implementation of punishments. The article provides an evaluation of description of specific estimate terms in the norms of criminal penal law of the Russian Federation. Based upon the information collected by the Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Service for the Execution of Punishments of the Russian Federation in 2013 on the most complicated and debatable issues, the author points out the unity of opinions of the territorial divisions of the criminal penal service system regarding the problem of estimate standards in the Criminal Penal Law of the Russian Federation as an acute and topical one. The courts of general jurisdiction play a great role in the sphere of application of norms of criminal penal law with the use of estimate standards, since they revise the legal practice of the criminal penal system in the process of challenging of specific acts and decisions. In the process of studies the author used theoretical and empiric methods (methods of analysis, generalization, synthesis, deduction, analogy and modeling), as well as formal logical and comparative legal methods. The scientific novelty is obvious, since the study of the problem of estimate standards in the criminal penal law never drew enough attention in the Russian legal science. Concerning the practice of legal application of estimate terms in the sphere of application of punishments by the courts of general jurisdiction with specific examples of specific cases, this is an unique study. The author draws a conclusion that some estimate terms should be excluded from the text of the Criminal Penal Code of the Russian Federation while some times need to be made more specific. It is a positive tendency that the courts (mostly, at the regional level) start to express their opinions regarding various estimate categories more clearly, defining contents of the said terms, including the situation of the absence of legal interpretation on the part of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

Ключевые слова: Estimate terms, court practice, criminal penal law, interpretation of estimate terms, judicial discretion, evaluation criteria, execution of punishments, problems of execution of punishments, Criminal Penal Code of the Russian Federation, criminal penal system.

Библиография:
Postanovlenie Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 03.08.2006 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 28.10.2010 "Delo "Rudakov (Rudakov) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (zhaloba N 43239/04) Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta
Opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 07.02.2007 po delu N 22-1357/2007 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 27.04.2012 po delu N 22-2950/2012 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Opredelenie Leningradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 14.10.2010 N 22-1610/2010 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Kirovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 11.08.2011 po delu N 33-2834 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Ivanovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 19.07.2012 po delu N 22-1744 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Novosibirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 16.01.2012 po delu N 22-411-2012 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Suda Yamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga ot 22.05.2014 po delu N 33-1183/2014 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 20.11.2013 po delu N 33-14259/2013 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 16.06.2014 po delu N 10-7415/14 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Lipetskogo oblastnogo suda ot 13.02.2014 po delu N 22-98/2014 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Otsenochnye priznaki v ugolovnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnoe i sudebnoe tolkovanie / Pod red. A.V. Galakhovoy. – M.: Norma, 2014. – 736 s.
«Glossariy ponyatiy i terminov ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo prava», razrabotannyy NII FSIN Rossii (ofitsial'no ne publikovalsya)
Belyaeva O.M. Otsenochnye kategorii v konstruktsiyakh pravovykh norm: osobennosti tolkovaniya i pravoprimeneniya // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. №7 (ch. 2),-s. 135.
Levina D.N. Teoreticheskie problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya otsenochnykh ponyatiy / Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk-Nizhniy Novgorod, 2007.-36 s.
Malan'in V.S., Litvishkov V.M. Osnovy protsessa obucheniya v uchebnykh tsentrakh FSIN Rossii // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-№ 3.-S.1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2014.3.11655. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_11655.html
Minyazeva T.F.. Zadachi Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy v svete Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 g. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
Popova E.E. K voprosu ob uchastii dukhovenstva v formirovanii instituta obshchestvennogo vozdeystviya kak sredstva ispravleniya osuzhdennykh v XIX – nachale XX vekov. // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 11.-S.105-111. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.10055. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10055.html
Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. K voprosu o predostavlenii otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10038
Solov'eva T.V. Ob otsutstvii edinogo normativno zakreplennogo poryadka privedeniya v ispolnenie postanovleniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 4.-S.184-200. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.4.2507. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2507.html
Nikiforov A.V.. Polnomochiya nalogovykh organov pri primenenii otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.9912
Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E.A.. Voprosy vstupleniya v zakonnuyu silu postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9099
Shurukhnov N.G.. Problemy realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za peredachu, libo popytku peredachi sredstv svyazi, a takzhe komplektuyushchikh, obespechivayushchikh ikh rabotu, litsam, soderzhashchimsya v uchrezhdeniyakh ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.
Minyazeva T.F. Zadachi Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy v svete Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 g. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 55 - 58.
Berezhnova N.D. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy upravleniya psikhologicheskimi sluzhbami Federal'noy
sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy Rossii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 5. - C. 53 - 56.

References (transliteration):
Postanovlenie Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 03.08.2006 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 28.10.2010 "Delo "Rudakov (Rudakov) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (zhaloba N 43239/04) Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta
Opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 07.02.2007 po delu N 22-1357/2007 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 27.04.2012 po delu N 22-2950/2012 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Opredelenie Leningradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 14.10.2010 N 22-1610/2010 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Kirovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 11.08.2011 po delu N 33-2834 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Ivanovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 19.07.2012 po delu N 22-1744 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Novosibirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 16.01.2012 po delu N 22-411-2012 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Suda Yamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga ot 22.05.2014 po delu N 33-1183/2014 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 20.11.2013 po delu N 33-14259/2013 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 16.06.2014 po delu N 10-7415/14 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Lipetskogo oblastnogo suda ot 13.02.2014 po delu N 22-98/2014 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
Otsenochnye priznaki v ugolovnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnoe i sudebnoe tolkovanie / Pod red. A.V. Galakhovoy. – M.: Norma, 2014. – 736 s.
«Glossariy ponyatiy i terminov ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo prava», razrabotannyy NII FSIN Rossii (ofitsial'no ne publikovalsya)
Belyaeva O.M. Otsenochnye kategorii v konstruktsiyakh pravovykh norm: osobennosti tolkovaniya i pravoprimeneniya // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. №7 (ch. 2),-s. 135.
Levina D.N. Teoreticheskie problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya otsenochnykh ponyatiy / Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk-Nizhniy Novgorod, 2007.-36 s.
Malan'in V.S., Litvishkov V.M. Osnovy protsessa obucheniya v uchebnykh tsentrakh FSIN Rossii // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-№ 3.-S.1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2014.3.11655. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_11655.html
Minyazeva T.F.. Zadachi Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy v svete Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 g. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
Popova E.E. K voprosu ob uchastii dukhovenstva v formirovanii instituta obshchestvennogo vozdeystviya kak sredstva ispravleniya osuzhdennykh v XIX – nachale XX vekov. // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 11.-S.105-111. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.10055. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10055.html
Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. K voprosu o predostavlenii otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10038
Solov'eva T.V. Ob otsutstvii edinogo normativno zakreplennogo poryadka privedeniya v ispolnenie postanovleniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 4.-S.184-200. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.4.2507. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2507.html
Nikiforov A.V.. Polnomochiya nalogovykh organov pri primenenii otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.9912
Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E.A.. Voprosy vstupleniya v zakonnuyu silu postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9099
Shurukhnov N.G.. Problemy realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za peredachu, libo popytku peredachi sredstv svyazi, a takzhe komplektuyushchikh, obespechivayushchikh ikh rabotu, litsam, soderzhashchimsya v uchrezhdeniyakh ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.
Minyazeva T.F. Zadachi Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy v svete Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 g. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 55 - 58.
Berezhnova N.D. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy upravleniya psikhologicheskimi sluzhbami Federal'noy
sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy Rossii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 5. - C. 53 - 56.

Аннотация: The author analyzes the system of administrative legal regulation of organization of betting activities in bookmaking offices and totalizators in order to reveal conflicts of laws in legislation. Special attention is paid to the procedure of licensing of the activities in bookmaking offices and totalizators. Via systemic analysis of the definitions of bookmaking office and totalizator the author provides an additional element differentiating a bookmaking office from a totalizator based upon the procedure for calculating the winnings. The article also includes analysis of the practice of application of Art. 61 p.2 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on liquidation of legal entities in respect to legal entities implementing unlawful gambling activities. The author also expresses an opinion on the need to limit territorial position of bookmaking offices and totalizators. Within the framework of the study the author systematized the judicial practice regarding administrative responsibility for unlawful organization of betting in bookmaking offices and totalizators under Art. 14.1 p.2 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and p. 2 of Art. 14.1.1 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation.

Ключевые слова: Bookmaking office, totalizator, winnings, licensing, placement of betting company, liquidation of a legal entity, gambling machines, legislation, legal collision, gambling.

Контактная информация: Izyumova, Evgenia Sergeevna, 169600, Russia, Pechora, ul. Rusanova, 43-191.

Библиография:
L. S. Kirina Ispol'zovanie imitatsionnogo modelirovaniya
v sisteme gosudarstvennogo nalogovogo
prognozirovaniya i planirovaniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2012. - 1. - C. 4 - 7.
Tregubova E.V. K voprosu o modernizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh
v oblasti predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti (printsipy, zaprety, ogranicheniya i otvetstvennost') // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 10. - C. 63 - 73.
Kurakin A.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie bankovskoy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (administrativno-pravovoy aspekt) // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 11. - C. 69 - 100. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.11.10603. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10603.html
Pavlov P.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie prigranichnoy torgovli // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 72 - 80.
Shirokova E.K. Problemy likvidatsii yuridicheskogo litsa po resheniyu suda v sluchae osushchestvleniya deyatel'nosti, zapreshchennoy zakonom,-organizatsii i provedenii azartnykh igr vne igornykh zon // Advokat. 2012. № 5.
Shovkrinskiy A.Yu. Vidy osnovaniy dlya isklyucheniy iz normy ob ischerpanii vnutrennikh sredstv pravovoy zashchity, priznannykh v mezhdunarodnom prave // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-№ 5.-S.69-91. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.5.11876. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11876.html
Izyumova E.S.. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnuyu organizatsiyu igornoy deyatel'nosti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11299
Tyutyunnikov Yu.K. «Formirovanie igornogo biznesa kak novogo elementa rossiyskoy ekonomiki i metody ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya» Avtoreferat dis. dlya kyun. g. Moskva, 2010.
T. V. Kerimova. Risk sostoyaniya zavisimosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
Spektor E.I. O pravomernosti osushchestvleniya agentom v interesakh i ot imeni printsipala (litsenziata) uslugi po priemu platezhey i osushchestvleniya im vyplat klientam bez polucheniya litsenzii na osushchestvlenie deyatel'nosti po organizatsii i provedeniyu azartnykh igr v bukmekerskikh kontorakh i totalizatorakh // «Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika», 2012, N 5.
A.A. Tomtosov. Istoriya pravovogo regulirovaniya loterey v Rossii // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.01.16
Pshenichnaya N.A.. Poryadok ischisleniya i uplaty uchastnikami loterey naloga na dokhody fizicheskikh lits po vyigrysham // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2005. – № 1.
Ovchinnikova N.A. Pravovaya reglamentatsiya organizatsii i provedeniya azartnykh igr cherez bukmekerskie kontory i totalizatory v sfere professional'nogo sporta // «Sport: ekonomika, pravo, upravlenie», 2011, № 3.
Natal'ya Mitina. Igra v loto – zabytaya forma dosuga // Istoricheskiy zhurnal. – 2010. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
Tomtosov A.A. Stanovlenie i razvitie zakonodatel'stva o lotereyakh v rossiyskom gosudarstve: istoriko-pravovoy aspekt. // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 5.-S.171-195. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.5.414. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_414.html

References (transliteration):
L. S. Kirina Ispol'zovanie imitatsionnogo modelirovaniya
v sisteme gosudarstvennogo nalogovogo
prognozirovaniya i planirovaniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2012. - 1. - C. 4 - 7.
Tregubova E.V. K voprosu o modernizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh
v oblasti predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti (printsipy, zaprety, ogranicheniya i otvetstvennost') // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 10. - C. 63 - 73.
Kurakin A.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie bankovskoy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (administrativno-pravovoy aspekt) // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 11. - C. 69 - 100. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.11.10603. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10603.html
Pavlov P.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie prigranichnoy torgovli // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 72 - 80.
Shirokova E.K. Problemy likvidatsii yuridicheskogo litsa po resheniyu suda v sluchae osushchestvleniya deyatel'nosti, zapreshchennoy zakonom,-organizatsii i provedenii azartnykh igr vne igornykh zon // Advokat. 2012. № 5.
Shovkrinskiy A.Yu. Vidy osnovaniy dlya isklyucheniy iz normy ob ischerpanii vnutrennikh sredstv pravovoy zashchity, priznannykh v mezhdunarodnom prave // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-№ 5.-S.69-91. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.5.11876. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11876.html
Izyumova E.S.. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnuyu organizatsiyu igornoy deyatel'nosti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11299
Tyutyunnikov Yu.K. «Formirovanie igornogo biznesa kak novogo elementa rossiyskoy ekonomiki i metody ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya» Avtoreferat dis. dlya kyun. g. Moskva, 2010.
T. V. Kerimova. Risk sostoyaniya zavisimosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
Spektor E.I. O pravomernosti osushchestvleniya agentom v interesakh i ot imeni printsipala (litsenziata) uslugi po priemu platezhey i osushchestvleniya im vyplat klientam bez polucheniya litsenzii na osushchestvlenie deyatel'nosti po organizatsii i provedeniyu azartnykh igr v bukmekerskikh kontorakh i totalizatorakh // «Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika», 2012, N 5.
A.A. Tomtosov. Istoriya pravovogo regulirovaniya loterey v Rossii // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.01.16
Pshenichnaya N.A.. Poryadok ischisleniya i uplaty uchastnikami loterey naloga na dokhody fizicheskikh lits po vyigrysham // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2005. – № 1.
Ovchinnikova N.A. Pravovaya reglamentatsiya organizatsii i provedeniya azartnykh igr cherez bukmekerskie kontory i totalizatory v sfere professional'nogo sporta // «Sport: ekonomika, pravo, upravlenie», 2011, № 3.
Natal'ya Mitina. Igra v loto – zabytaya forma dosuga // Istoricheskiy zhurnal. – 2010. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
Tomtosov A.A. Stanovlenie i razvitie zakonodatel'stva o lotereyakh v rossiyskom gosudarstve: istoriko-pravovoy aspekt. // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 5.-S.171-195. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.5.414. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_414.html

Аннотация: The object of studies in this article involves criminological substantiation of the recent amendments into the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The analysis involved norms of part. 2, 3 of Art. 171.1, part 3,4 of Art. 327.1, Art. 325.1, Art. 217.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The further study of the said norms is devoted to uncovering the specific features of criminalization of acts prohibited by them. Attention is paid to the criminological theoretical basis of the new criminal law prohibitions. The method of analytical study allowed to establish that these norms are double prevention norms. Comparative approach allowed to suppose that these criminalization patterns correspond to the main provisions of the concept of situational crime prevention. The main idea of this concept is influencing the criminal motivation. It is recommended by the General Assembly of the United Nations Organization as the main strategy for the prevention of criminal encroachments. The article discusses specific features of preventive mechanism for each of the norms, which are aimed at lowering the amount of possibility for committing crimes. As a result the study shows that the main specific feature of these criminal law norms is their pragmatic mission in the sphere of crime prevention.

Ключевые слова: Criminal policy, double prevention, Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, situational prevention of crime, rational behavior, criminal motivation, threat of punishment, higher risk, material interest, pragmatic mission.

Контактная информация: Chuklina, Elena Yurievna, 344002, Russia, Rostov-na-Donu, ul. M. Gorkogo, 88.

Библиография:
Silaeva N.A. Normativno-pravovoe obespechenie preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy, posyagayushchikh na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-2.-C. 88-111. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.2.692. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_692.html
Shestakov D. A. Kriminologiya: Novye podkhody k prestupleniyu i prestupnosti. Kriminogennye zakony i kriminologicheskoe zakonodatel'stvo. Protivodeystvie prestupnosti v izmenyayushchemsya mire: Uchebnik. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2006. – 561 s.
Sarkisova E.A. Predupreditel'naya rol' ugolovnogo zakona. Mn.: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1979. – 146 s.;
Revin V. P. O razrabotke kontseptsii ugolovnoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii i sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'stva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. Yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. № 1. S. 262 – 264;
Pototskiy N. K. Znachenie norm ugolovnogo i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo prava kak instrumentov obespecheniya preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2006. № 5. S. 112 – 117;
Obrazhiev K.V. Ugolovno-pravovye normy s dvoynoy preventsiey // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. 2010. № 3. S. 167-171;
Kuznetsova N. F., Tyazhkova I. M. (red.) Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Tom I. Obshchaya chast'. Uchenie o prestuplenii. M., 2002. – 624 s.;
Luneev V. V. Kurs mirovoy i rossiyskoy kriminologii: uchebnik. V 2 t. T I. Obshchaya chast'. M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2011. – 1003 s.;
Kolosova V.I. Spetsial'nye normy ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v bor'be s ekonomicheskimi i smezhnymi s nimi prestupleniyami (primenenie norm s «dvoynoy preventsiey» i pooshchritel'nykh norm) // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. № 2 (1). S. 293 – 298;
Gilinskiy Ya. I. Kriminologiya. Kurs lektsiy. SPb.: Piter, 2002. – 384 s.;
Arkhipov A.A., Sharapov R.D. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya, svyazannye s fal'sifikatsiey nomernykh registratsionno-uchetnykh parametrov transportnykh sredstv: monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2012. – 144 s.
Clarke R. Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. New York. Harrow and Heston Publishers. 1997. – 43 p.;
Cornish D., Clarke R. Opportunities, Precipitators and Criminal Decisions: a Replay to Wortley’s Critique of Situational Crime Prevention // Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 16 (2003). Pp. 41 – 93;
Antokhina A.B. Mery bezopasnosti v romano-germanskoy (kontinental'noy) pravovoy sisteme // Pravo i politika.-2014.-4.-C. 447-451. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11620.
Ayrikh V.A. Sootnoshenie obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti i preventsii v politseyskom prave FRG // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.254-289. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.1.312. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_312.html
Prokof'ev K.G.. Rol' politsii v realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o sobraniyakh, mitingakh, demonstratsiyakh, shestviyakh i piketirovanii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11921
Izyumova E.S.. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnuyu organizatsiyu igornoy deyatel'nosti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11299
Borovkov M.S.. Kompleks preventivnykh mer po zashchite biznesa ot vrazhdebnogo pogloshcheniya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.10471
Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A.. Mekhanizm primeneniya mer administrativnogo presecheniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.10641
Igonin D.I.. Opredelenie strategicheskikh prioritetov v gosudarstvennoy migratsionnoy politike Rossii kak preventivnaya mera sotsial'noy dezadaptatsii. // Trendy i upravlenie. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.4.4880
N.S. Kiselev. Preventivnaya zashchita ot reyderskikh atak // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.18
M.O. Akopdzhanova. Protivodeystvie ukloneniyu ot uplaty transportnogo naloga // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 104-107.
V.A. Ayrikh. Preventsiya v kontekste politseyskogo prava // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
Akopdzhanova M.O.. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika nalogovoy prestupnosti // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
D. G. Alekseeva. Pravovoe regulirovanie monitoringa finansovoy ustoychivosti bankov v tselyakh obespecheniya bankovskoy bezopasnosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
Kobets P.N.. O preduprezhdenii prestupleniy — kak slozhnom, mnogogrannom protsesse, obladayushchem opredelennymi priznakami tselostnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 104-107
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 8. - C. 1 - 47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.8.5109. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 94 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html

References (transliteration):
Silaeva N.A. Normativno-pravovoe obespechenie preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy, posyagayushchikh na politicheskuyu sistemu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-2.-C. 88-111. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.2.692. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_692.html
Shestakov D. A. Kriminologiya: Novye podkhody k prestupleniyu i prestupnosti. Kriminogennye zakony i kriminologicheskoe zakonodatel'stvo. Protivodeystvie prestupnosti v izmenyayushchemsya mire: Uchebnik. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2006. – 561 s.
Sarkisova E.A. Predupreditel'naya rol' ugolovnogo zakona. Mn.: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1979. – 146 s.;
Revin V. P. O razrabotke kontseptsii ugolovnoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii i sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'stva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. Yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. № 1. S. 262 – 264;
Pototskiy N. K. Znachenie norm ugolovnogo i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo prava kak instrumentov obespecheniya preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2006. № 5. S. 112 – 117;
Obrazhiev K.V. Ugolovno-pravovye normy s dvoynoy preventsiey // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. 2010. № 3. S. 167-171;
Kuznetsova N. F., Tyazhkova I. M. (red.) Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Tom I. Obshchaya chast'. Uchenie o prestuplenii. M., 2002. – 624 s.;
Luneev V. V. Kurs mirovoy i rossiyskoy kriminologii: uchebnik. V 2 t. T I. Obshchaya chast'. M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2011. – 1003 s.;
Kolosova V.I. Spetsial'nye normy ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v bor'be s ekonomicheskimi i smezhnymi s nimi prestupleniyami (primenenie norm s «dvoynoy preventsiey» i pooshchritel'nykh norm) // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. № 2 (1). S. 293 – 298;
Gilinskiy Ya. I. Kriminologiya. Kurs lektsiy. SPb.: Piter, 2002. – 384 s.;
Arkhipov A.A., Sharapov R.D. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya, svyazannye s fal'sifikatsiey nomernykh registratsionno-uchetnykh parametrov transportnykh sredstv: monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2012. – 144 s.
Clarke R. Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. New York. Harrow and Heston Publishers. 1997. – 43 p.;
Cornish D., Clarke R. Opportunities, Precipitators and Criminal Decisions: a Replay to Wortley’s Critique of Situational Crime Prevention // Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 16 (2003). Pp. 41 – 93;
Antokhina A.B. Mery bezopasnosti v romano-germanskoy (kontinental'noy) pravovoy sisteme // Pravo i politika.-2014.-4.-C. 447-451. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11620.
Ayrikh V.A. Sootnoshenie obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti i preventsii v politseyskom prave FRG // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.254-289. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.1.312. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_312.html
Prokof'ev K.G.. Rol' politsii v realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o sobraniyakh, mitingakh, demonstratsiyakh, shestviyakh i piketirovanii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11921
Izyumova E.S.. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnuyu organizatsiyu igornoy deyatel'nosti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11299
Borovkov M.S.. Kompleks preventivnykh mer po zashchite biznesa ot vrazhdebnogo pogloshcheniya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.10471
Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A.. Mekhanizm primeneniya mer administrativnogo presecheniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.10641
Igonin D.I.. Opredelenie strategicheskikh prioritetov v gosudarstvennoy migratsionnoy politike Rossii kak preventivnaya mera sotsial'noy dezadaptatsii. // Trendy i upravlenie. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.4.4880
N.S. Kiselev. Preventivnaya zashchita ot reyderskikh atak // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.18
M.O. Akopdzhanova. Protivodeystvie ukloneniyu ot uplaty transportnogo naloga // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 104-107.
V.A. Ayrikh. Preventsiya v kontekste politseyskogo prava // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
Akopdzhanova M.O.. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika nalogovoy prestupnosti // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
D. G. Alekseeva. Pravovoe regulirovanie monitoringa finansovoy ustoychivosti bankov v tselyakh obespecheniya bankovskoy bezopasnosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
Kobets P.N.. O preduprezhdenii prestupleniy — kak slozhnom, mnogogrannom protsesse, obladayushchem opredelennymi priznakami tselostnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 104-107
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 8. - C. 1 - 47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.8.5109. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 94 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html

Аннотация: Currently the scale of illegal turnover of narcotic substances and psychoactive substances in the territory of the Russian Federation poses a serious threat to the health of the nation, social, political and economic stability, security of the state. The growing rate of drug abuse among the population caused the growth of general crime level. The growth of crime rate is not limited to the crimes in the sphere of illegal turnover of narcotic substances, it also involves crimes, which are committed by addicted persons in order to gain money to buy narcotics. The staff of law-enforcement and judicial bodies face difficulties with distinguishing crimes and administrative offences in this sphere. That is why there is a close link between the positive results in the sphere of fighting these crimes and clear distinction of related offences. The article provides criteria for distinguishing related offences under the Russian criminal and administrative law, taking examples of Art. 228.1 part 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 6.16.1 part 1 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation. The methodology of this work involves the following research methods: comparative legal, special legal, dialectic, formal logical, structural systemic and analytical methods. The study involves theoretical and practical blocks including analysis of distinguishing related offences on illegal turnover of narcotic and psychoactive substances in criminal and administrative law, as well as analysis of distinction of crimes and offences under Art. 228.1 part 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 6.16.1 part 1 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation in court. The author points out that there is need for the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to provide interpretation on distinction of related offences in its official interpretations.

Ключевые слова: Turnover, drugs, precursors, offences, crimes, elements, criteria, danger, responsibility, counteraction.

Контактная информация: Vitovskaya, Evgenia Sergeevna, 390036, Russia, Ryazan, Sennaya, 1.

Библиография:
Karpov Ya.S.. Osobennosti vvoza v Rossiyskuyu Federatsiyu i vyvoza iz Rossiyskoy Federatsii narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov, a takzhe sil'nodeystvuyushchikh i yadovitykh veshchestv v usloviyakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 7. – S. 104-107
Ya.S. Karpov. Analogi i proizvodnye narkoticheskikh sredstv i psikhotropnykh veshchestv: aktual'nye problemy opredeleniya, kvalifikatsii i kontrolya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. K voprosu o predostavlenii otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10038
Rukasov A.V.. Ob ob'ekte issledovaniya problem bor'by s nezakonnym oborotom narkotikov v regional'nom aspekte // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9149
Chirkov D.K., Evlanova O.A., Koimshidi G.F.. Regional'nye osobennosti i razlichiya prestupleniy v sfere nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.6.9679
Bazulev K.I.. Osobennosti sostava administrativnogo pravonarusheniya, predu-smotrennogo st. 6.13 KoAP (propaganda ili reklama narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv libo ikh prekursorov, rasteniy, soder-zhashchikh narkoticheskie sredstva, psikhotropnye veshchestva libo ikh pre-kursory, ili ikh chastey, soderzhashchikh narkoticheskie sredstva, psikho-tropnye veshchestva libo ikh prekursory) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.1.10107
Kukharuk V.V. Opasnye vozdeystviya na psikhicheskie funktsii cheloveka i problemy ikh ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 5.-S.64-82. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.783. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_783.html
Kaymak E.V.. Pravovye osnovy bor'by s organizovannoy narkoprestupnost'yu vo vzaimosvyazi s sistemoy obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.4.11840
Kukharuk V.V. Otsrochka otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey: voprosy teorii i realizatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.148-165. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.1.366. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_366.html
Popov E.A. Chelovek, obshchestvo i narkoticheskie sredstva: sotsial'nyy, obshchepravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty otnosheniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 1.-S.35-68. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.1.48. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_48.html
Yakuba, O.M. Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast' / O.M. Yakuba.-Kiev, 1975.
Shergin, A.P. Administrativno-deliktnoe zakonodatel'stvo Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy, perspektivy / A.P. Shergin // Administrativnoe pravo i administrativnyy protsess: aktual'nye problemy / Otv. red. L.L. Popov, M.S. Studenikina.-M., 2004.
Kuznetsova, I.F. Prestuplenie i prestupnost'. Izbr. trudy / I.F. Kuznetsova.-SPb., 2003.
Shavyrina, A.S. Voprosy sootnosheniya prestupleniy i smezhnykh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy / A.S. Shavyrina // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve.-2010.-№ 1.
Konstantinov, P.Yu. Vzaimosvyaz' administrativnykh pravonarusheniy i prestupleniy: problemy teorii i praktiki / P.Yu. Konstantinov, A.K. Solov'eva, A.P. Stukanov // Pravovedenie.-2005.-№ 3.
Belyaev N.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika i puti ee realizatsii. Izbr. trudy / N.A. Belyaev.-SPb., 2003.
Alekhin, A.P. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Uchebnik / A.P. Alekhin, A.A. Karmolitskiy, Yu.M, Kozlov.-M., 1996.
Bakhrakh, D.N. Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya vuzov / D.N. Bakhrakh.-M., 1996.

References (transliteration):
Karpov Ya.S.. Osobennosti vvoza v Rossiyskuyu Federatsiyu i vyvoza iz Rossiyskoy Federatsii narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov, a takzhe sil'nodeystvuyushchikh i yadovitykh veshchestv v usloviyakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 7. – S. 104-107
Ya.S. Karpov. Analogi i proizvodnye narkoticheskikh sredstv i psikhotropnykh veshchestv: aktual'nye problemy opredeleniya, kvalifikatsii i kontrolya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. K voprosu o predostavlenii otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10038
Rukasov A.V.. Ob ob'ekte issledovaniya problem bor'by s nezakonnym oborotom narkotikov v regional'nom aspekte // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9149
Chirkov D.K., Evlanova O.A., Koimshidi G.F.. Regional'nye osobennosti i razlichiya prestupleniy v sfere nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.6.9679
Bazulev K.I.. Osobennosti sostava administrativnogo pravonarusheniya, predu-smotrennogo st. 6.13 KoAP (propaganda ili reklama narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv libo ikh prekursorov, rasteniy, soder-zhashchikh narkoticheskie sredstva, psikhotropnye veshchestva libo ikh pre-kursory, ili ikh chastey, soderzhashchikh narkoticheskie sredstva, psikho-tropnye veshchestva libo ikh prekursory) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.1.10107
Kukharuk V.V. Opasnye vozdeystviya na psikhicheskie funktsii cheloveka i problemy ikh ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 5.-S.64-82. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.783. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_783.html
Kaymak E.V.. Pravovye osnovy bor'by s organizovannoy narkoprestupnost'yu vo vzaimosvyazi s sistemoy obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.4.11840
Kukharuk V.V. Otsrochka otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey: voprosy teorii i realizatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.148-165. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.1.366. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_366.html
Popov E.A. Chelovek, obshchestvo i narkoticheskie sredstva: sotsial'nyy, obshchepravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty otnosheniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 1.-S.35-68. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.1.48. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_48.html
Yakuba, O.M. Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast' / O.M. Yakuba.-Kiev, 1975.
Shergin, A.P. Administrativno-deliktnoe zakonodatel'stvo Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy, perspektivy / A.P. Shergin // Administrativnoe pravo i administrativnyy protsess: aktual'nye problemy / Otv. red. L.L. Popov, M.S. Studenikina.-M., 2004.
Kuznetsova, I.F. Prestuplenie i prestupnost'. Izbr. trudy / I.F. Kuznetsova.-SPb., 2003.
Shavyrina, A.S. Voprosy sootnosheniya prestupleniy i smezhnykh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy / A.S. Shavyrina // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve.-2010.-№ 1.
Konstantinov, P.Yu. Vzaimosvyaz' administrativnykh pravonarusheniy i prestupleniy: problemy teorii i praktiki / P.Yu. Konstantinov, A.K. Solov'eva, A.P. Stukanov // Pravovedenie.-2005.-№ 3.
Belyaev N.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika i puti ee realizatsii. Izbr. trudy / N.A. Belyaev.-SPb., 2003.
Alekhin, A.P. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Uchebnik / A.P. Alekhin, A.A. Karmolitskiy, Yu.M, Kozlov.-M., 1996.
Bakhrakh, D.N. Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya vuzov / D.N. Bakhrakh.-M., 1996.

Аннотация: The article contains analysis of pardon in its interdisciplinary and procedural aspects. The opinion is expressed that pardon holds a special place within the system of procedural acts, and that sometimes it does not serve as evidence of guilt of a person in a crime. The author evaluates the possible meanings of pardon in their criminal law aspect within the proceedings in a criminal case. The decree on pardon for the convict does not prevent improvement of the position of the convict, including acquittal. At the same time reversal of a conviction judgment does not require that the decree on pardon of a convict be abolished, since it is adopted for a convicted person, and being secondary to the judgment, it does not have any further special legal standing. There is need for a special pardon procedure for some categories of crimes.

Ключевые слова: Jurisprudence, pardon, mechanism of criminal law regulation, correlation of material and procedural criminal law, President of the Russian Federation, Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, claim for pardon, claim against pardon, pardon of a suspect, accused, admission of guilt.

Контактная информация: Kozubenko, Yuri Vyacheslavovich, 620137, Russia, Sverdlovsaya oblast, Ekaterinburg, Komsomolskaya, 21.

Библиография:
1. Bulgakov M.A. Master i Margarita. M.: AST: Poligrafizdat; SPb.: Astrel'-SPb., 2012.
2. Lazarev L.V. Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii. – M.: Gorodets, Formula prava, 2003.
3. Luk'yanova E. Prosit' nel'zya pomilovat' // Vlast'. 2011. 28 marta.
4. Postateynyy kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod obshchey red. Yu.V. Kudryavtseva. – M.: Fond «Pravovaya kul'tura», 1996.
5. Proshlyakov A.D. Vzaimosvyaz' material'nogo i protsessual'nogo ugolovnogo prava. Ekaterinburg, 1997.

References (transliteration):
1. Bulgakov M.A. Master i Margarita. M.: AST: Poligrafizdat; SPb.: Astrel'-SPb., 2012.
2. Lazarev L.V. Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii. – M.: Gorodets, Formula prava, 2003.
3. Luk'yanova E. Prosit' nel'zya pomilovat' // Vlast'. 2011. 28 marta.
4. Postateynyy kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod obshchey red. Yu.V. Kudryavtseva. – M.: Fond «Pravovaya kul'tura», 1996.
5. Proshlyakov A.D. Vzaimosvyaz' material'nogo i protsessual'nogo ugolovnogo prava. Ekaterinburg, 1997.

Аннотация: The study concerns legalization of income attained by criminal means in accordance with the current criminal legislation. Attention is paid to the fact that several hundred thousand economic crimes are registered in Russia annually, and among these crimes tens of thousands of crimes are related to large and extra large criminal income (in 2010 – 51 969, in 2011 – 40 315, in 2012 – 36 083), which provides for their connection with “money laundering”. At the same time the correlation of these crimes and the crimes under the legalization of criminal income under Art. 174, 174.1 of the Criminal Code is just several per cent ( 3 per cent in 2010, 1,7 per cent in 2011, 1,4 per cent in 2012). Latent legalization of criminal income is related to the changing means of committing these crimes, complications with proving them, making revealing and investigation of such crimes difficult. In the opinion of the author the instability of criminal legislation and constant changes in the norms on criminal responsibility for the legalization of criminal income has a negative influence upon the use of proven preventive and interceptive measures against such crimes. The article contains analysis of practice and current legislation of Russia, allowing to use legal systems of credit and finances relations for the illegal purposes. Therefore, the investigation quality in the cases regarding legalization of criminal income, as guaranteed by revealing all circumstances, requiring proof, allows to uncover the factors facilitating money laundering and to solve the problems regarding destruction of the very economic basis for the crime, minimization of its development and reproduction. At the same time prophylactic measures are implemented both based on specific criminal cases, and upon the results of analysis of groups of cases, which is held in order to collect a wider range of information on crime and organization of activities of law-enforcement bodies in the sphere of fighting legalization of criminal profits. Improvement oft information guarantees also provides efficient means for fighting this type of criminal activities, since it allows for uncovering the sources for legalization of criminal income. To an extent, the Federal Financial Monitoring Service is an information and analytical body, which receives most of the information regarding suspicious deals and operations.

Ключевые слова: legalization of income, latency, counteraction, legalization factors, security, responsibility, damage, crime, transnational, economics.

Библиография:
Panenkov A.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya natsional'noy sistemy protivodeystviya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma i oruzhiya massovogo unichtozheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie.-2014.-1.-C. 13-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.8110. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_8110.html
Aslanyan L.S. Protivodeystvie legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovanii terrorizma. Rostov-na-Donu, 2014. S. 15-17. [el. resurs]: http://www.scienceforum.ru/2014/pdf/6685.pdf. Data obrashcheniya 12.04.2014.
Kiselev I.A. Gryaznye den'gi: Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za otmyvanie prestupnykh dokhodov i ee primenenie v bor'be s prestupnost'yu i korruptsiey. M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2009.
Kirilenko V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika legalizatsii (otmyvaniya) denezhnykh sredstv ili inogo imushchestva, priobretennykh prestupnym putem: avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk, Rostov-na-Donu, 2012. S.6.
Zhubrin R.V. Osnovy profilaktiki legalizatsii prestupnykh dokhodov: avtoreferat dis. … doktora yurid. nauk, M., 2013. S. 11.
Bash'yan N. A. Protivodeystvie organizovannoy legalizatsii dokhodov ot moshennichestva: Kriminologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy aspekty : avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 10.
Korchagin O.N. Administrativno-pravovye osnovy protivodeystviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoreferat dis. kand. yurid. nauk., M., 2010. S. 8-9.
Korchagin O.N., Kolesnikov K.A. Organizatsiya protivodeystviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, v tom chisle ot nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov / Pod red. I.I. Batyrshina; uchebnoe posobie. M., 2013. S. 19..
Kocharyan A.M Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya mera protivodeystviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) denezhnykh sredstv ili inogo imushchestva, priobretennykh prestupnym putem: Avtoref. dis. … kand, yurid. nauk. M., 2003. S. 8-9.
Larichev V.D. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva o bor'be s «otmyvaniem» deneg, poluchennykh prestupnym putem // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. №
S. 100. 2.Aliev V.M. Legalizatsiya (otmyvanie) dokhodov, poluchennykh nezakonnym putem. Ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie: Monografiya. M.: Institut sovremennogo prava, 2001. S. 16
Len'shin D.I. Ugolovnye nakazaniya za prestupleniya ekstremistskoy napravlennosti: problemy zakonodatel'nogo zakrepleniya i realizatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-4.-C. 38-42.
Panenkov A.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya natsional'noy sistemy protivodeystviya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma i oruzhiya massovogo unichtozheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie. — 2014.-№ 1.-S.13-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.8110. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/etc/article_8110.html
Lopatina V.V.. Problemy narkotrafika i legalizatsiya narkotikov v Latinskoy Amerike // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10242
Ivanov A.G.. Legalizatsiya dragotsennykh metallov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem: problemy privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.18
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskie podkhody k resheniyu problem bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem i osobennosti prokurorskogo nadzora. Nekotorye predlozheniya po optimizatsii bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem na osnove nauchnykh issledovaniy // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.17-135. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.3.8754. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_8754.html
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoy politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu yavlyaetsya zalogom uspekha obespecheniya federal'noy bezopasnosti Rossii, a takzhe bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-№ 2.-S.188-236. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.2.90. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_90.html
Muradyan S.V. Institutsional'nye osnovy bor'by s finansirovaniem terrorizma v Evropeyskom soyuze // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.77-90. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.800. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_800.html
Panenkov A.A. Predvaritel'nyy analiz reagirovaniya pravookhranitel'nykh organov i spetssluzhb na prestupleniya terroristicheskoy napravlennosti v 2012 godu i prognoz na 2013 god v Rossii. Rezul'taty nauchnykh issledovaniy 2010-2012 gg. po bor'be s istochnikami finansirovaniya terrorizma v Respublike Ingushetiya (vyvody i predlozheniya) // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.153-253. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.1.326. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_326.html
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoy politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu-zalog uspekha v bor'be s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem v Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-№ 1.-S.1-54. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.1.109. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_109.html
Panenkov A.A. Bor'ba s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem ostanetsya aktual'noy i dolgovremennoy problemoy dlya Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 4.-S.19-77. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.4.187. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_187.html
Malyshenko N.G.. Biznes-monitoring – sovremennyy instrument ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti federal'nogo avtonomnogo vuza // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9556
A.A. Panenkov. Napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem (po rezul'tatam provedennykh issledovaniy) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/.2013.1.4806
Astanin V.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii:
perspektivnye podkhody
k preduprezhdeniyu
i vozmeshcheniyu ushcherba // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 719 - 722. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9084.
Antonova E.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' korporativnogo (kollektivnogo) sub'ekta za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 192 - 220. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.568. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_568.html
Akopdzhanova M.O. Formirovanie sovremennogo zakonodatel'stva
Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti
za prestupleniya protiv ustanovlennogo poryadka
uplaty nalogov i sborov // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 8. - C. 1022 - 1026. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.8390.

References (transliteration):
Panenkov A.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya natsional'noy sistemy protivodeystviya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma i oruzhiya massovogo unichtozheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie.-2014.-1.-C. 13-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.8110. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_8110.html
Aslanyan L.S. Protivodeystvie legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovanii terrorizma. Rostov-na-Donu, 2014. S. 15-17. [el. resurs]: http://www.scienceforum.ru/2014/pdf/6685.pdf. Data obrashcheniya 12.04.2014.
Kiselev I.A. Gryaznye den'gi: Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za otmyvanie prestupnykh dokhodov i ee primenenie v bor'be s prestupnost'yu i korruptsiey. M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2009.
Kirilenko V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika legalizatsii (otmyvaniya) denezhnykh sredstv ili inogo imushchestva, priobretennykh prestupnym putem: avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk, Rostov-na-Donu, 2012. S.6.
Zhubrin R.V. Osnovy profilaktiki legalizatsii prestupnykh dokhodov: avtoreferat dis. … doktora yurid. nauk, M., 2013. S. 11.
Bash'yan N. A. Protivodeystvie organizovannoy legalizatsii dokhodov ot moshennichestva: Kriminologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy aspekty : avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 10.
Korchagin O.N. Administrativno-pravovye osnovy protivodeystviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoreferat dis. kand. yurid. nauk., M., 2010. S. 8-9.
Korchagin O.N., Kolesnikov K.A. Organizatsiya protivodeystviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, v tom chisle ot nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov / Pod red. I.I. Batyrshina; uchebnoe posobie. M., 2013. S. 19..
Kocharyan A.M Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya mera protivodeystviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) denezhnykh sredstv ili inogo imushchestva, priobretennykh prestupnym putem: Avtoref. dis. … kand, yurid. nauk. M., 2003. S. 8-9.
Larichev V.D. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva o bor'be s «otmyvaniem» deneg, poluchennykh prestupnym putem // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. №
S. 100. 2.Aliev V.M. Legalizatsiya (otmyvanie) dokhodov, poluchennykh nezakonnym putem. Ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie: Monografiya. M.: Institut sovremennogo prava, 2001. S. 16
Len'shin D.I. Ugolovnye nakazaniya za prestupleniya ekstremistskoy napravlennosti: problemy zakonodatel'nogo zakrepleniya i realizatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-4.-C. 38-42.
Panenkov A.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya natsional'noy sistemy protivodeystviya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma i oruzhiya massovogo unichtozheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie. — 2014.-№ 1.-S.13-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.8110. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/etc/article_8110.html
Lopatina V.V.. Problemy narkotrafika i legalizatsiya narkotikov v Latinskoy Amerike // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10242
Ivanov A.G.. Legalizatsiya dragotsennykh metallov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem: problemy privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.18
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskie podkhody k resheniyu problem bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem i osobennosti prokurorskogo nadzora. Nekotorye predlozheniya po optimizatsii bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem na osnove nauchnykh issledovaniy // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.17-135. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.3.8754. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_8754.html
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoy politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu yavlyaetsya zalogom uspekha obespecheniya federal'noy bezopasnosti Rossii, a takzhe bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-№ 2.-S.188-236. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.2.90. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_90.html
Muradyan S.V. Institutsional'nye osnovy bor'by s finansirovaniem terrorizma v Evropeyskom soyuze // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.77-90. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.800. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_800.html
Panenkov A.A. Predvaritel'nyy analiz reagirovaniya pravookhranitel'nykh organov i spetssluzhb na prestupleniya terroristicheskoy napravlennosti v 2012 godu i prognoz na 2013 god v Rossii. Rezul'taty nauchnykh issledovaniy 2010-2012 gg. po bor'be s istochnikami finansirovaniya terrorizma v Respublike Ingushetiya (vyvody i predlozheniya) // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.153-253. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.1.326. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_326.html
Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoy politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu-zalog uspekha v bor'be s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem v Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-№ 1.-S.1-54. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.1.109. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_109.html
Panenkov A.A. Bor'ba s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem ostanetsya aktual'noy i dolgovremennoy problemoy dlya Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 4.-S.19-77. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.4.187. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_187.html
Malyshenko N.G.. Biznes-monitoring – sovremennyy instrument ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti federal'nogo avtonomnogo vuza // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9556
A.A. Panenkov. Napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem (po rezul'tatam provedennykh issledovaniy) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/.2013.1.4806
Astanin V.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii:
perspektivnye podkhody
k preduprezhdeniyu
i vozmeshcheniyu ushcherba // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 719 - 722. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9084.
Antonova E.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' korporativnogo (kollektivnogo) sub'ekta za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 192 - 220. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.568. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_568.html
Akopdzhanova M.O. Formirovanie sovremennogo zakonodatel'stva
Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti
za prestupleniya protiv ustanovlennogo poryadka
uplaty nalogov i sborov // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 8. - C. 1022 - 1026. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.8390.

Аннотация: The article involves the study of patterns in the sphere of functioning of the institution of the state protection in Russia, including its modern state, functioning, perspectives and directions of its development. The practice of application of certain security measures towards the persons under the protection of the state deserves special attention. The author provides the studies of the current legislation, regulating the social relations arising in the process of functioning of the state protection mechanism, offering the possible solutions for the revealed problems in the close relation to the practice of application of certain security measures. For the sake of collection, studying and generalization of theoretical and empirical materials the author used general logical, scientific and specialized research methods, analysis, synthesis, observation, comparison, documental studies, formal logical, evaluation, generalization of data, etc., historical and comparative legal methods. The author provided a complex study of the modern state, legal regulation, organization and tactics of the activities of the operative divisions of internal affairs bodies regarding revealing the persons, prevention and interception of encroachments upon the life, health, and property of persons under state protection. The author provided his own interpretation of a number of provisions, which were early insufficiently developed or were not sufficiently developed in the theory of operative investigation activities and theory of criminal law. In particular, the studies concern the issues of organization and tactics of prevention and solving of crimes within the context of protection guarantees by the special operative divisions of internal affairs bodies.

Ключевые слова: state protection, security measures, encroachments, counteraction, real threat, personal security, temporary placement, movement, confidentiality of the information, provision of weapons.

Библиография:
Dubonosov E. S. Teoreticheskie i pravovye problemy operativno-rozysknogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy funktsii zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa: avtoref. dis… d-ra yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. S. 14.
Zaytsev O.A. Teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. dis… d-ra yurid. nauk. – M., 1999.
Kobtsova T. S., Kobtsov P. V., Smushkin A. B. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 20 avgusta 2004 g. № 119-FZ «O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» (postateynyy) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2006.
Kolodkin L. M. Vzaimodeystvie pravookhranitel'nykh organov v profilaktike (preventsii) prestupleniy: problemy i perspektivy // Problemy sotsial'noy i kriminologicheskoy profilaktiki prestupleniy v sovremennoy Rossii: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (18-20 aprelya 2002 g.). Vyp. 1. M.: MI MVD Rossii. 2002. S. 192-198.
Chernykh S. B. Voprosy organizatsii gosudarstvennoy zashchity sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del // Aktual'nye problemy raboty organov vnutrennikh del: sb. nauch. tr. ad'yunktov i soiskateley. M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2001. S. 116.
Shurygin P. A. Teoriya i praktika gosudarstvennoy zashchity sudey, dolzhnostnykh lits pravookhranitel'nykh, kontroliruyushchikh organov i uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Monografiya. – M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2007. S. 145.
Fedorchenko A.A.. Pravovoe polozhenie zhertvy prestupleniya kak svidetelya v mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom protsesse // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11556
Lukichev K.E. K voprosu o poryadke dopuska dolzhnostnykh lits i grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii k gosudarstvennoy tayne // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-№ 2.-S.103-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.2.249. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_249.html
Kurakin A.V. Sotsial'naya politika i rossiyskaya politsiya // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.1-23. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.3.8914. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_8914.html
Pinchuk P.V. O neobkhodimosti normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya gosudarstvennoy zashchity ekspertov gosudarstvennykh sudebno-ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniy rossiyskoy federatsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2014.-№ 1.-S.125-134. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2014.1.9911. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9911.html
Fedorchenko A.A. Protsessual'nye prava postradavshikh v sudebnykh razbiratel'stvakh mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov ad hoc // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-№ 4.-S.208-224. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.4.11695. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11695.html
Davydov S. I., Chechetin A. E. Operativno-rozysknye meropriyatiya v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: TsOKR MVD Rossii, 2009. S. 37.
Kabanov P.A. Kriminal'naya politicheskaya viktimologiya kak mezhotraslevaya kriminologicheskaya teoriya: ponyatie, predmet, struktura i perspektivy razvitya v sovremennoy Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 5.-S.218-232. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.5.201. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_201.htm
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh
v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa
o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 32 - 37.
R. P. Sipok Aktual'nye voprosy effektivnosti
ugolovno-pravovykh norm // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 9. - C. 1551 - 1559.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Bezopasnost' professional'noy deyatel'nosti yurista // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 64 - 72. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2014.2.11189. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_11189.html

References (transliteration):
Dubonosov E. S. Teoreticheskie i pravovye problemy operativno-rozysknogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy funktsii zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa: avtoref. dis… d-ra yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. S. 14.
Zaytsev O.A. Teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. dis… d-ra yurid. nauk. – M., 1999.
Kobtsova T. S., Kobtsov P. V., Smushkin A. B. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 20 avgusta 2004 g. № 119-FZ «O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» (postateynyy) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2006.
Kolodkin L. M. Vzaimodeystvie pravookhranitel'nykh organov v profilaktike (preventsii) prestupleniy: problemy i perspektivy // Problemy sotsial'noy i kriminologicheskoy profilaktiki prestupleniy v sovremennoy Rossii: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (18-20 aprelya 2002 g.). Vyp. 1. M.: MI MVD Rossii. 2002. S. 192-198.
Chernykh S. B. Voprosy organizatsii gosudarstvennoy zashchity sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del // Aktual'nye problemy raboty organov vnutrennikh del: sb. nauch. tr. ad'yunktov i soiskateley. M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2001. S. 116.
Shurygin P. A. Teoriya i praktika gosudarstvennoy zashchity sudey, dolzhnostnykh lits pravookhranitel'nykh, kontroliruyushchikh organov i uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Monografiya. – M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2007. S. 145.
Fedorchenko A.A.. Pravovoe polozhenie zhertvy prestupleniya kak svidetelya v mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom protsesse // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11556
Lukichev K.E. K voprosu o poryadke dopuska dolzhnostnykh lits i grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii k gosudarstvennoy tayne // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-№ 2.-S.103-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.2.249. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_249.html
Kurakin A.V. Sotsial'naya politika i rossiyskaya politsiya // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.1-23. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.3.8914. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_8914.html
Pinchuk P.V. O neobkhodimosti normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya gosudarstvennoy zashchity ekspertov gosudarstvennykh sudebno-ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniy rossiyskoy federatsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2014.-№ 1.-S.125-134. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2014.1.9911. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9911.html
Fedorchenko A.A. Protsessual'nye prava postradavshikh v sudebnykh razbiratel'stvakh mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov ad hoc // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-№ 4.-S.208-224. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.4.11695. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11695.html
Davydov S. I., Chechetin A. E. Operativno-rozysknye meropriyatiya v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: TsOKR MVD Rossii, 2009. S. 37.
Kabanov P.A. Kriminal'naya politicheskaya viktimologiya kak mezhotraslevaya kriminologicheskaya teoriya: ponyatie, predmet, struktura i perspektivy razvitya v sovremennoy Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 5.-S.218-232. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.5.201. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_201.htm
Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Otsenka real'nosti ugroz postupayushchikh
v adres uchastnika ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstva pri reshenii voprosa
o primenenii mer bezopasnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 32 - 37.
R. P. Sipok Aktual'nye voprosy effektivnosti
ugolovno-pravovykh norm // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 9. - C. 1551 - 1559.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Bezopasnost' professional'noy deyatel'nosti yurista // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 64 - 72. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2014.2.11189. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_11189.html

Аннотация: The article concerns topical issues of legal regulation of security measures in criminal legislation of the states within the system of Continental law. According to part 2 of the Art. 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 1996 reaction of a state on a commission of a crime is assigning a punishment or other criminal legal measures to such a person. The criminal aw measures are provided both in the Russian legislation and in the legislations of most of the states in the world. Critical analysis of the legislation of the states of the Roman-German legal system allows us to draw a number of conclusions and make a number of notes. Just like in the Russian legislation, in these states security measures are alternative to the punishment. At the same time, it is a common defect of the Russian law and the law of the European states that there is no unified legislative definition of the criminal law measures. Finding a solution to this problem would allow to resolve a number of theoretical and practical problems. It would allow for unification of the said criminal law measures, for the provision of general bases for their application and for the distinction between such measures and related forms of implementation of criminal responsibility (suspended sentence, release on parole, deferral of sentence, etc.). The comparative legal method of studies was used. Generally, the comparative analysis of the criminal law measures in Russian and European law allows one to state that in the Russian Federation this institution is not sufficiently developed and it acts within the limited scope of application, including only confiscation of property and the compulsory measures of medical character.

Ключевые слова: Security measures, criminal codes of foreign states, Roman-German legal system, criminal law measures, the Criminal Code of Germany, the Criminal Code of Austria, the Criminal Code of Spain, the Criminal Code of Poland, the Criminal Code of Switzerland, security.

Контактная информация: Antohina, Alena Borisovna, 355000, Russia, Stavropolskiy krai, Stavropol, ulitsa Lenina, 484 a – 97.

Библиография:
Dolgopolov K.A.. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya norm o vidakh souchastnikov // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – №
Nitsenko R.A.. Smyagchenie i usilenie nakazaniya pri ego Naznachenii v Rossiyskom ugolovnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.9942.
Astishina T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' prestupleniy protiv obshchestvennoy nravstvennosti s inymi vidami prestupleniy // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.10778.
Kibal'nik A.G. Osnovnye polozheniya Obshchey chasti ugolovnogo prava zarubezhnykh stran. M: Ileksa, 2008. S. 46.
Veklenko S. V., Karpov K. N. Sistematizatsiya inykh mer ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya kak sredstvo povysheniya effektivnosti ugolovnogo zakona // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 6. S. 93.
Voronin Yu.A. Tendentsii sovremennoy burzhuaznoy ugolovnoy politiki. Voronezh, 1983. S. 122
Dodonov V.N. Sravnitel'noe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'.M: Yurlitinform, 2009. S. 268.
Kupreev S.S.. Obyazatel'nye raboty kak novyy vid administrativnogo nakazaniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.01.5.
– S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.6238. 8. Dubovik O.L.. Osnovnye napravleniya reformy ugolovno-ekologicheskogo zakonodatel'stva Germanii // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8304.
Akopdzhanova M.O.. O blanketnosti dispozitsii normy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva o nalogovom prestuplenii, predusmotrennom st. 199.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – №
Kobets P.N.. Zakonodatel'naya reglamentatsiya, osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za iznasilovanie v stranakh postsovetskogo prostranstva, ryade evropeyskikh gosudarstv, stranakh Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona i sravnitel'nyy analiz s rossiyskim zakonodatel'stvom // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
N. P. Fedotova. Kvalifikatsiya tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu po sovokupnosti prestupleniy i problema konkurentsii norm // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
L. I. Romanova. Retsenziya. Van Shichzhou. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik. Pekin: Izd-vo Pekinskogo universiteta, 2011. 330 s. ISBN 978-7-301-19493-5 // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
– S. 104-107. 11. R. P. Sipok. Aktual'nye voprosy effektivnosti ugolovno-pravovykh norm // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107.
Khe Bingsun. O zashchite prav cheloveka. Otsenka i pereosmyslenie traditsionnykh teoriy nakazaniya // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
Kuz'min A.V.. Pravovaya reglamentatsiya metodov protivodeystvii rasprostraneniyu ekstremizma v molodezhnoy srede // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107
Demidova L.N. Sistemno-funktsional'nyy podkhod i zakon o zolotoy proportsii v ugolovnom prave // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 177 - 192. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8802.html
Tishchenko V.N. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 21 - 31. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.9709.

References (transliteration):
Dolgopolov K.A.. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya norm o vidakh souchastnikov // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – №
Nitsenko R.A.. Smyagchenie i usilenie nakazaniya pri ego Naznachenii v Rossiyskom ugolovnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.9942.
Astishina T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' prestupleniy protiv obshchestvennoy nravstvennosti s inymi vidami prestupleniy // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.10778.
Kibal'nik A.G. Osnovnye polozheniya Obshchey chasti ugolovnogo prava zarubezhnykh stran. M: Ileksa, 2008. S. 46.
Veklenko S. V., Karpov K. N. Sistematizatsiya inykh mer ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya kak sredstvo povysheniya effektivnosti ugolovnogo zakona // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 6. S. 93.
Voronin Yu.A. Tendentsii sovremennoy burzhuaznoy ugolovnoy politiki. Voronezh, 1983. S. 122
Dodonov V.N. Sravnitel'noe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'.M: Yurlitinform, 2009. S. 268.
Kupreev S.S.. Obyazatel'nye raboty kak novyy vid administrativnogo nakazaniya // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.01.5.
– S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.6238. 8. Dubovik O.L.. Osnovnye napravleniya reformy ugolovno-ekologicheskogo zakonodatel'stva Germanii // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8304.
Akopdzhanova M.O.. O blanketnosti dispozitsii normy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva o nalogovom prestuplenii, predusmotrennom st. 199.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – №
Kobets P.N.. Zakonodatel'naya reglamentatsiya, osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za iznasilovanie v stranakh postsovetskogo prostranstva, ryade evropeyskikh gosudarstv, stranakh Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona i sravnitel'nyy analiz s rossiyskim zakonodatel'stvom // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
N. P. Fedotova. Kvalifikatsiya tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu po sovokupnosti prestupleniy i problema konkurentsii norm // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
L. I. Romanova. Retsenziya. Van Shichzhou. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik. Pekin: Izd-vo Pekinskogo universiteta, 2011. 330 s. ISBN 978-7-301-19493-5 // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
– S. 104-107. 11. R. P. Sipok. Aktual'nye voprosy effektivnosti ugolovno-pravovykh norm // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107.
Khe Bingsun. O zashchite prav cheloveka. Otsenka i pereosmyslenie traditsionnykh teoriy nakazaniya // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
Kuz'min A.V.. Pravovaya reglamentatsiya metodov protivodeystvii rasprostraneniyu ekstremizma v molodezhnoy srede // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107
Demidova L.N. Sistemno-funktsional'nyy podkhod i zakon o zolotoy proportsii v ugolovnom prave // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 177 - 192. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8802.html
Tishchenko V.N. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 21 - 31. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.1.9709.

Аннотация: The article provides a detailed analysis of elements of the subject of drug crime, for whom the provisions on deferral of serving a sentence for the persons suffering from drug addiction applied under Art. 82.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. As a result of a comparative study of the said norm of the criminal law, the author found out significant aberrations from the requirements of the Strategy of State Anti-Narcotic Policy of the Russian Federation till 2020 in part of proposed criminal law measures on lowering the amount of illegal distribution and non-medical intake of drugs. The author discusses the nature of medical legal discrepancy in the terms “drug addiction (narcotic addiction)”, and “addition to toxic substances” in the Russian law in the ICD-10 and the legislation of the foreign states. It is shown how the normative practice of the Government of the Russian Federation on forming the list of drugs defines instability of the diagnosing “narcotic drug addiction”, making possible to transfer it into “addiction to toxic substances” and limiting the scope of application of Art. 82.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with the type of the psychoactive substance. Taking an example of some topical issues of implementation of the new criminal law institution of deferral of serving the sentences for the persons suffering from narcotic drug addiction, including its criminal procedural aspect, the author offers rational ways of its improvement.

Ключевые слова: Jurisprudence, narcotic drug substances, psychoactive substances, potent and poisonous substances, psychoactive substances, narcotic drug and toxic substance addictions, narcotic-infected, obligatory medical treatment, narcotic crimes, narcotic-articles, anti-narcotic.

Контактная информация: Kuharuk, Vladimir Vasilievich, 413100, Russia, Saratovskaya obl., g. Engels, ul. Berezhnaya, d.40.

Библиография:
1. Bol'shoy meditsinskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'/Pod red. V.I. Borodulina. – Izd. 4-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. – M.: RIPOL klassik, 2007.
2. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya bolezney desyatogo peresmotra (MKB-10). [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://aeli.altai.ru/conferenc/1999/turina.html.
3. Shabanov V.B., Shtakel'berg O.Yu. Narkomanii: patopsikhologiya, klinika, reabilitatsiya. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. /Pod red. A.Ya. Grinenko, – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Lan'», 2001.
4. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik. Izdanie vtoroe pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / Pod red. doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Raroga, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Chuchaeva. – M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «KONTRAKT»: INFRA-M, 2008. – 560 s.
5. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 22.02.2012 g. №144 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federa tsii v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem kontrolya za oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov» //RG. 6.03.2012 g. №48.
6. Dannye Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude RF. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://crimpravo.ru/page/sudstatistic/.

References (transliteration):
1. Bol'shoy meditsinskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'/Pod red. V.I. Borodulina. – Izd. 4-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. – M.: RIPOL klassik, 2007.
2. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya bolezney desyatogo peresmotra (MKB-10). [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://aeli.altai.ru/conferenc/1999/turina.html.
3. Shabanov V.B., Shtakel'berg O.Yu. Narkomanii: patopsikhologiya, klinika, reabilitatsiya. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. /Pod red. A.Ya. Grinenko, – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Lan'», 2001.
4. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik. Izdanie vtoroe pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / Pod red. doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Raroga, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Chuchaeva. – M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «KONTRAKT»: INFRA-M, 2008. – 560 s.
5. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 22.02.2012 g. №144 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federa tsii v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem kontrolya za oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov» //RG. 6.03.2012 g. №48.
6. Dannye Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude RF. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://crimpravo.ru/page/sudstatistic/.

Аннотация: Criminal law is regarded as one of the strongest means against negative social manifestations. In Russia it is easily amended. At the same time, the criminal statistical data in the last 40 years make one doubt its capability of positive influence upon the situation in the sphere of negligent crimes. The main causes for the protective and regulatory malfunction of the criminal law are shortcomings of the legal construction, which serves as the basis for the most articles in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on negligent crimes. The use of structural-functional approach and some linguistic methods allow to uncover the main defects of the legal construction of negligent crimes, as well as negative matters in judicial and investigative practice due to its application. The current provisions of criminal law allow to substantiate for the legal responsibility in various situations of negligent causation of harm, however, it fails to give due regard to the important features of social and individual conscience of the addressees. The semantic focus of the criminal legal prohibition was moved away from the voluntary activity units and social psychological settings, which need to be pressed out of the social practice. It leads to application of criminal law through the rules of the strict liability and lowering of its general preventive potential, as well as to the number of other undesirable consequences. In the final part of the article the author formulates six propositions for the improvement of legal construction, allowing to make criminal law more efficient for the purpose of protection of social relation from negligent violations.

Ключевые слова: Criminal responsibility, differentiation of responsibility, legal constructions, negligence, protective functions, criminal law, legal technique, negligent crime, causal link, strict liability.

Контактная информация: Shihanov, Vladimir Nikolaevich, 664035, Russia, Irkutsk, Shevtsova, 1.

Библиография:
Yuridicheskie konstruktsii i simvoly v ugolovnom prave/ L. L. Kruglikov, O. E. Spiridonova. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2005. – 336 s
Yu.V. Kozubenko Issledovanie mekhanizma ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya na mezhotraslevom urovne // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON).-2013.-6.-C. 655-661.
A.I. Komarov, T.V. Yarovenko. Nekotorye problemy proverki versii prichineniya smerti iz ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya po neostorozhnosti // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 7.
Cherdantsev, A. F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v prave, yuridicheskoy nauke i praktike/ A. F. Cherdantsev. – Ekaterinburg, 1993. – 192 s.
Sitnikova, A. I. Zakonodatel'naya tekstologiya ugolovnogo prava: monografiya/ A. I. Sitnikova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2011. – 344 s.
Problemy prichiny i prichinnoy svyazi v institutakh Obshchey i Osobennoy chastey ugolovnogo prava: voprosy teorii, operativno-sledstvennoy i sudebnoy praktiki/ I. Ya. Kozachenko, V. N. Kurchenko, Ya. M. Zlochenko. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. – 791 s.
Pan'ko K.K. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii kak kategorii vnutrenney formy (struktury) ugolovnogo prava// Pravo i politika. – 2005. – № 3. – S. 19 – 28
Naumov, A. V. Forma ugolovnogo zakona i ee sotsial'naya obuslovlennost'/ A. V. Naumov, IGPAN // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva. – M., 1984. – S. 18 – 27
Luneev, V. V. Prestupnost' XX veka: mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendentsii/ V. V. Luneev. – Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2005. – 912 s.
Lopashenko, N. A. Ugolovnaya politika/ N. A. Lopashenko. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2009. – 608 s.
Kristi, N. Predely nakazaniya / N. Kristi, per. s angl. V.M. Kogana, pod. red. Z.I. Lukovnikova. – M.: Progress, 1985. – 198 s.
Zhalinskiy, A. E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz/ A. E. Zhalinskiy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Prospekt, 2009. – 400 s.
Esakov, G. A. Mens rea v ugolovnom prave SShA: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie/ G. A. Esakov, predisl. O.F. Shishova. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. – 553 s.
Dorozhno-transportnaya prestupnost': zakonomernosti, prichiny, sotsial'nyy kontrol'/ A.Yu. Kravtsov, A.I. Sirokhin, R.V. Skomorokhov, V.N. Shikhanov, pod red. V.V. Luneeva. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2011. – 474 s.
Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave/ L. L. Kruglikov, A. V. Vasil'evskiy. – SPb.: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2003. – 298 s.
Gilinskiy, Ya. I. Kriminologiya: teoriya, istoriya, empiricheskaya baza, sotsial'nyy kontrol'/ Ya. I. Gilinskiy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2009. – 504 s.
Alekseev, S. S. Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniya/ S. S. Alekseev. – M.: NORMA, 2001. – 752 s.
Antonov, A.D. Teoreticheskie osnovy kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii : Dis… kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.08 / A. D. Antonov. – M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2001. – 182 s.
M.F. Luk'yanenko. «Dobrosovestnost'»: zakon i praktika primeneniya. Chast' vtoraya. Okonchanie // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 7.
M. F. Luk'yanenko. «Dobrosovestnost'»: zakon i praktika primeneniya. Chast' 1 // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 6.
V.A. Kalinovskiy, A.I. Komarov. Proverka versii obvinyaemoy o prichinenii smerti po neostorozhnosti. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – № 8.
Aliev Nazim Kazim ogly. Nekotorye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya norm o ponyatii i priznakakh souchastiya v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Azerbaydzhana // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.8.
Pan'shin D.L.. Nekotorye aktual'nye voprosy primeneniya lisheniya prava upravleniya transportnymi sredstvami za administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9112.
Bashirova A.F., Istratov A.A.. Pravovoe regulirovanie profilaktiki dorozhno-transportnogo travmatizma // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
Moskvina Yu.V.. O prichinenii material'nogo ushcherba v rezul'tate dorozhno-transportnogo proisshestviya kak obstoyatel'stve, otyagchayushchem administrativnuyu otvetstvennost' // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2011. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
Boreyko Yu.A.. Formirovanie sistemy ucheta administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
Ayvar L.K., Trunov I.L.. Narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan pri dorozhno-transportnykh proisshestviyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2010. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
Esaulov S.V.. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy printsipa prezumptsii nevinovnosti v ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti politsii. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 1. – S. 104-107
Akopdzhanova M.O. O roli ugolovno-pravovoy nauki v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 76 - 81. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9217.

References (transliteration):
Yuridicheskie konstruktsii i simvoly v ugolovnom prave/ L. L. Kruglikov, O. E. Spiridonova. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2005. – 336 s
Yu.V. Kozubenko Issledovanie mekhanizma ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya na mezhotraslevom urovne // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON).-2013.-6.-C. 655-661.
A.I. Komarov, T.V. Yarovenko. Nekotorye problemy proverki versii prichineniya smerti iz ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya po neostorozhnosti // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 7.
Cherdantsev, A. F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v prave, yuridicheskoy nauke i praktike/ A. F. Cherdantsev. – Ekaterinburg, 1993. – 192 s.
Sitnikova, A. I. Zakonodatel'naya tekstologiya ugolovnogo prava: monografiya/ A. I. Sitnikova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2011. – 344 s.
Problemy prichiny i prichinnoy svyazi v institutakh Obshchey i Osobennoy chastey ugolovnogo prava: voprosy teorii, operativno-sledstvennoy i sudebnoy praktiki/ I. Ya. Kozachenko, V. N. Kurchenko, Ya. M. Zlochenko. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. – 791 s.
Pan'ko K.K. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii kak kategorii vnutrenney formy (struktury) ugolovnogo prava// Pravo i politika. – 2005. – № 3. – S. 19 – 28
Naumov, A. V. Forma ugolovnogo zakona i ee sotsial'naya obuslovlennost'/ A. V. Naumov, IGPAN // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva. – M., 1984. – S. 18 – 27
Luneev, V. V. Prestupnost' XX veka: mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendentsii/ V. V. Luneev. – Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2005. – 912 s.
Lopashenko, N. A. Ugolovnaya politika/ N. A. Lopashenko. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2009. – 608 s.
Kristi, N. Predely nakazaniya / N. Kristi, per. s angl. V.M. Kogana, pod. red. Z.I. Lukovnikova. – M.: Progress, 1985. – 198 s.
Zhalinskiy, A. E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz/ A. E. Zhalinskiy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Prospekt, 2009. – 400 s.
Esakov, G. A. Mens rea v ugolovnom prave SShA: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie/ G. A. Esakov, predisl. O.F. Shishova. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. – 553 s.
Dorozhno-transportnaya prestupnost': zakonomernosti, prichiny, sotsial'nyy kontrol'/ A.Yu. Kravtsov, A.I. Sirokhin, R.V. Skomorokhov, V.N. Shikhanov, pod red. V.V. Luneeva. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2011. – 474 s.
Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave/ L. L. Kruglikov, A. V. Vasil'evskiy. – SPb.: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2003. – 298 s.
Gilinskiy, Ya. I. Kriminologiya: teoriya, istoriya, empiricheskaya baza, sotsial'nyy kontrol'/ Ya. I. Gilinskiy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2009. – 504 s.
Alekseev, S. S. Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniya/ S. S. Alekseev. – M.: NORMA, 2001. – 752 s.
Antonov, A.D. Teoreticheskie osnovy kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii : Dis… kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.08 / A. D. Antonov. – M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2001. – 182 s.
M.F. Luk'yanenko. «Dobrosovestnost'»: zakon i praktika primeneniya. Chast' vtoraya. Okonchanie // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 7.
M. F. Luk'yanenko. «Dobrosovestnost'»: zakon i praktika primeneniya. Chast' 1 // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 6.
V.A. Kalinovskiy, A.I. Komarov. Proverka versii obvinyaemoy o prichinenii smerti po neostorozhnosti. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – № 8.
Aliev Nazim Kazim ogly. Nekotorye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya norm o ponyatii i priznakakh souchastiya v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Azerbaydzhana // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.8.
Pan'shin D.L.. Nekotorye aktual'nye voprosy primeneniya lisheniya prava upravleniya transportnymi sredstvami za administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9112.
Bashirova A.F., Istratov A.A.. Pravovoe regulirovanie profilaktiki dorozhno-transportnogo travmatizma // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
Moskvina Yu.V.. O prichinenii material'nogo ushcherba v rezul'tate dorozhno-transportnogo proisshestviya kak obstoyatel'stve, otyagchayushchem administrativnuyu otvetstvennost' // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2011. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
Boreyko Yu.A.. Formirovanie sistemy ucheta administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
Ayvar L.K., Trunov I.L.. Narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan pri dorozhno-transportnykh proisshestviyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2010. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
Esaulov S.V.. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy printsipa prezumptsii nevinovnosti v ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti politsii. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 1. – S. 104-107
Akopdzhanova M.O. O roli ugolovno-pravovoy nauki v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 76 - 81. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9217.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the specific features of proof in pre-trial proceedings on criminal cases concerning unlawful passing of the state border of the Russian Federation. The author discusses a number of topical practical issues, regarding the elements of crime. He substantiates the statements that the goal of proof in the pre-trial proceedings on criminal cases within this category is formation of the final document of the preliminary investigation, which should be sufficient for the further judicial proceedings on a case. The author provides his own definition of the term “proof in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case”. The operative investigation practice of the procedural divisions of the border guard bodies proves that the criminal cases initiated due to elements of unlawful crossing of the state border of the Russian Federation (Art. 322 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) form over 50% of all of the criminal cases investigated by the border guard bodies. The proof in pre-trial proceedings on a criminal case is the cognitive process implemented equally by the participants of the judicial proceedings on the sides of defense and accusation, including collection of factual information necessary for the correct resolution of a criminal case, their examination and study for the purpose of making a final decision of a preliminary procedural stage, which is sufficient for the further judicial proceedings on a criminal case.

Ключевые слова: state border of the Russian Federation, due unlawful passing, goal of proof, pre-trial proceedings, terrorist organizations, extremist activities, international contractual registration, migration processes, economic zones, continental shelf.

Контактная информация: Gilfanov, Andrey Ruslanovich, 119571, Russia, Moskva, prospect Vernadskogo, 82, str.1.

Библиография:
Yanchurkin O.V., Kamchatov K.V., Zhuravleva A.S. Prokurorskiy nadzor za protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu organov doznaniya i predvaritel'nogo sledstviya po ugolovnym delam v sfere torgovli lyud'mi // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 11. - C. 64 - 77. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9839. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9839.html
Olimpiev A.Yu. O sub'ektakh predvaritel'nogo
sledstviya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 6. - C. 39 - 41.
O. G. Ivanova Ponyatie i vidy
ugolovno-protsessual'nykh proizvodstv // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 7. - C. 30 - 38.
Shemetov M.N.. Problemy realizatsii mer ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za kontrabandu. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 1. – S. 104-107
S. N. Tikhonova. Pravovoy analiz sovremennogo sostoyaniya mezhdunarodno-pravovogo oformleniya gosudarstvennoy granitsy Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2010. – № 9.
V. M. Bondarenko. Nekotorye aspekty okhrany Gosudarstvennoy granitsy Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak usloviya obespecheniya natsional'noy bezopasnosti. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2010. – № 9.
Narutto S.V.. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoy granitsy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
A. A. Molchanov. K voprosu o rasshiritel'nom tolkovanii norm ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie tamozhennykh pravil // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 5.
A.R. Gil'fanov. O nekotorykh problemakh pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti podrazdeleniy doznaniya pogranichnykh organov FSB Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.11
Narutto S.V. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoy granitsy // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013.-№ 12.-S.35-50. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.12.10698. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/al/article_10698.html
Terekhov M.Yu.. Obespechenie organami predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya okhranyaemoy federal'nym zakonom tayny vo vzaimodeystvii so sredstvami massovoy informatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 1971.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.62-76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Savitskiy V.M. Gosudarstvennoe obvinenie v sude. M., 1971
Ratinov A.R. Voprosy poznaniya v sudebnom dokazyvanii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. M., 1964. № 8. – S. – 107.
Birmamitova S.A. Dokazyvanie na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa po delam o prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh osuzhdennymi v ispravitel'nykh koloniyakh. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007.
Abdulvaliev A.F. Predposylki i perspektivy vnedreniya elektronnoy formy ugolovnogo dela v deyatel'nost' sudebnykh organov // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 150 - 164. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.345. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_345.html
Khaliullin A.I. Vnedrenie elektronnogo dokumentooborota v deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov gosudarstv Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // NB: Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 6. - C. 12 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.6.10279. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_10279.html

References (transliteration):
Yanchurkin O.V., Kamchatov K.V., Zhuravleva A.S. Prokurorskiy nadzor za protsessual'noy deyatel'nost'yu organov doznaniya i predvaritel'nogo sledstviya po ugolovnym delam v sfere torgovli lyud'mi // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 11. - C. 64 - 77. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9839. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9839.html
Olimpiev A.Yu. O sub'ektakh predvaritel'nogo
sledstviya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 6. - C. 39 - 41.
O. G. Ivanova Ponyatie i vidy
ugolovno-protsessual'nykh proizvodstv // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 7. - C. 30 - 38.
Shemetov M.N.. Problemy realizatsii mer ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za kontrabandu. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 1. – S. 104-107
S. N. Tikhonova. Pravovoy analiz sovremennogo sostoyaniya mezhdunarodno-pravovogo oformleniya gosudarstvennoy granitsy Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2010. – № 9.
V. M. Bondarenko. Nekotorye aspekty okhrany Gosudarstvennoy granitsy Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak usloviya obespecheniya natsional'noy bezopasnosti. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2010. – № 9.
Narutto S.V.. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoy granitsy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
A. A. Molchanov. K voprosu o rasshiritel'nom tolkovanii norm ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie tamozhennykh pravil // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 5.
A.R. Gil'fanov. O nekotorykh problemakh pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti podrazdeleniy doznaniya pogranichnykh organov FSB Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.11
Narutto S.V. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoy granitsy // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013.-№ 12.-S.35-50. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.12.10698. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/al/article_10698.html
Terekhov M.Yu.. Obespechenie organami predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya okhranyaemoy federal'nym zakonom tayny vo vzaimodeystvii so sredstvami massovoy informatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 1971.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.62-76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Savitskiy V.M. Gosudarstvennoe obvinenie v sude. M., 1971
Ratinov A.R. Voprosy poznaniya v sudebnom dokazyvanii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. M., 1964. № 8. – S. – 107.
Birmamitova S.A. Dokazyvanie na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa po delam o prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh osuzhdennymi v ispravitel'nykh koloniyakh. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007.
Abdulvaliev A.F. Predposylki i perspektivy vnedreniya elektronnoy formy ugolovnogo dela v deyatel'nost' sudebnykh organov // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 150 - 164. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.345. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_345.html
Khaliullin A.I. Vnedrenie elektronnogo dokumentooborota v deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov gosudarstv Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // NB: Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 6. - C. 12 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.6.10279. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_10279.html

Аннотация: We investigated the criminal liability for various types of fraud in modern Russia with regard to their differentiation: according to the mechanism of possession of property and various methods of committing. We drew attention to the competition problem of criminal law, providing various types of fraud for adjacent elements of crime and fraud qualification along with other crimes: in lending, upon receipt of payments, in the insurance industry, in the field of computer information, in the field of entrepreneurship, bribery and modern corruption. The article describes the current practice and legislation of the Russian Federation (namely, the Criminal Code) in comparison with several foreign countries, such as Italy, Germany, Holland and Spain. According to the authors, the law must provide for a rule according to which the criminal case on nonexonerative base requires the consent of not only the person called to account, but also the victim. Criminal law should create favorable conditions for the fair market participants and minimize the harm to the economy caused by deception and abuse.

Ключевые слова: fraud, ways of committing, responsibility, qualifications, Insurance Institute, the borrower, payment cards, competition of standards, bribery, corruption.

Библиография:
Skoblikov P.A. Mezhotraslevaya i vnutriotraslevaya preyuditsiya prigovorov i svyazannykh s nimi sudebnykh aktov // Zakon. 2013. №8. S. 59-65.
Bochkarev S., Radchenko O I vse-taki: moshennichestvo ili vzyatochnichestvo //Zakonnost'. 2013. №1. S. 35-38
Gorbatovich D. O sootnoshenii moshennichestva i nezakonnogo predprinimatel'stva, sovershennogo s ispol'zovaniem tovarnogo znaka // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №3. S. 21-24.
Susloparov A.V., Tarbagaev A.N. Otvetstvennost' za nepravomernyy dostup k komp'yuternoy informatsii: ugolovno-pravovoy i administrativno-pravovoy aspekty // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta «Seriya Pravo». 2012. №2. S. 188-194.
Boytsov A.I. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press». 2002. S. 388.
Dikova N.V. Osobennost' rassledovaniya prestupleniy, sovershaemykh s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh plastikovykh sredstv i sistem // Avtoref. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – Voronezh. 2011. S. 12.
Malumov G. Moshennicheskie deystviya v sfere kreditovaniya // Pravo i ekonomika. 2008. №3. S. 55-64.
Shesler A. Moshennichestvo: problemy realizatsii zakonodatel'nykh novell // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №2. S. 67-71.
Tyunin V. «Restrukturizatsiya» ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za moshennichestvo // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №2. S. 35-41.
Savkina M.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana ekonomicheskikh interesov // Avtoref. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – N.-Novgorod. 2006. S. 10-14.
Stepanov-Egiyants V.G. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika v sfere bor'by s komp'yuternymi prestupleniyami // Rossiyskiy sledovatel', 2012. №24. S. 43-46.
Skoblikov P.A. Sovremennye problemy vozmeshcheniya vreda litsam, postradavshim ot prestupleniy, i zakonodatel'noe reshenie // Zakon. 2012. №8. S. 87-92.
Levshits D.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za finansovoe moshennichestvo po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Avtoref. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2007. S. 21.
Aryamov A.A. K voprosu ob obshchestvennoy opasnosti strakhovogo moshennichestva i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nego // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2012. №2. S. 5-9.
Moyle A., Pershin A. Vidy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za poddelku dokumentov v FRG // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. №5. S. 47-51.
Timoshin N.V. Novye normy o moshennichestve v UK RF: rekomendatsii po primeneniyu // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2013. №1. S. 12-13.
Klepitskiy I. Imushchestvennye prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave Rossii i FRG // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №1. S. 38.
Gabov A.V., Molotnikov A.E. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya strakhovaniya otvetstvennosti rukovoditeley khozyaystvennykh obshchestv // Zakon. 2012. №9. S. 162-178.
Martynenko S.M. Vzyskanie ubytkov s direktorov kompaniy. VAS RF uvelichil shansy kreditorov na pobedu // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2013. №10. S. 60-66.
Gabov A.V. Ob otvetstvennosti chlenov organov upravleniya yuridicheskikh lits // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. 2013. №7. S. 36-79.
Gavlo V.K., Belitskiy V.Yu. Problemy izucheniya sposobov soversheniya moshennichestv, deystvuyushchikh po printsipu «finansovykh» piramid // Rossiyskiy sledovatel', 2012, №1, S. 15-17.
Mestnikov V.A. Bor'ba s korporativnym moshennichestvom v SShA // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2009. №4. S. 72-81.

References (transliteration):
Skoblikov P.A. Mezhotraslevaya i vnutriotraslevaya preyuditsiya prigovorov i svyazannykh s nimi sudebnykh aktov // Zakon. 2013. №8. S. 59-65.
Bochkarev S., Radchenko O I vse-taki: moshennichestvo ili vzyatochnichestvo //Zakonnost'. 2013. №1. S. 35-38
Gorbatovich D. O sootnoshenii moshennichestva i nezakonnogo predprinimatel'stva, sovershennogo s ispol'zovaniem tovarnogo znaka // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №3. S. 21-24.
Susloparov A.V., Tarbagaev A.N. Otvetstvennost' za nepravomernyy dostup k komp'yuternoy informatsii: ugolovno-pravovoy i administrativno-pravovoy aspekty // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta «Seriya Pravo». 2012. №2. S. 188-194.
Boytsov A.I. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press». 2002. S. 388.
Dikova N.V. Osobennost' rassledovaniya prestupleniy, sovershaemykh s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh plastikovykh sredstv i sistem // Avtoref. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – Voronezh. 2011. S. 12.
Malumov G. Moshennicheskie deystviya v sfere kreditovaniya // Pravo i ekonomika. 2008. №3. S. 55-64.
Shesler A. Moshennichestvo: problemy realizatsii zakonodatel'nykh novell // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №2. S. 67-71.
Tyunin V. «Restrukturizatsiya» ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za moshennichestvo // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №2. S. 35-41.
Savkina M.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana ekonomicheskikh interesov // Avtoref. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – N.-Novgorod. 2006. S. 10-14.
Stepanov-Egiyants V.G. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika v sfere bor'by s komp'yuternymi prestupleniyami // Rossiyskiy sledovatel', 2012. №24. S. 43-46.
Skoblikov P.A. Sovremennye problemy vozmeshcheniya vreda litsam, postradavshim ot prestupleniy, i zakonodatel'noe reshenie // Zakon. 2012. №8. S. 87-92.
Levshits D.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za finansovoe moshennichestvo po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Avtoref. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2007. S. 21.
Aryamov A.A. K voprosu ob obshchestvennoy opasnosti strakhovogo moshennichestva i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nego // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2012. №2. S. 5-9.
Moyle A., Pershin A. Vidy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za poddelku dokumentov v FRG // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. №5. S. 47-51.
Timoshin N.V. Novye normy o moshennichestve v UK RF: rekomendatsii po primeneniyu // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2013. №1. S. 12-13.
Klepitskiy I. Imushchestvennye prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave Rossii i FRG // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №1. S. 38.
Gabov A.V., Molotnikov A.E. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya strakhovaniya otvetstvennosti rukovoditeley khozyaystvennykh obshchestv // Zakon. 2012. №9. S. 162-178.
Martynenko S.M. Vzyskanie ubytkov s direktorov kompaniy. VAS RF uvelichil shansy kreditorov na pobedu // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2013. №10. S. 60-66.
Gabov A.V. Ob otvetstvennosti chlenov organov upravleniya yuridicheskikh lits // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. 2013. №7. S. 36-79.
Gavlo V.K., Belitskiy V.Yu. Problemy izucheniya sposobov soversheniya moshennichestv, deystvuyushchikh po printsipu «finansovykh» piramid // Rossiyskiy sledovatel', 2012, №1, S. 15-17.
Mestnikov V.A. Bor'ba s korporativnym moshennichestvom v SShA // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2009. №4. S. 72-81.

Аннотация: In this article the author studies a topical and complicated issue regarding the main causes of corruption development in Russia. The author also expresses his opinion and provides analysis of the most important causes, which become barriers in the way of development of the anti-corruption policy of the state. The article evaluates position of the Russian Federation in the international arena and among the “Big Twenty” states in the sphere of activities against corruption risks. The methodology of studies is based upon structural and functional analysis, allowing to evaluate various objects within the social system from the standpoint of their functions in regard to the broader interpretation of corruption. The study has shown that in spite of the fact that key causes of appearance and growth of corruption in Russia are economic, they should not be viewed outside the scope of other factors, since they are all directly related.

Ключевые слова: corruption, corruption-related, modern condition, definition, causes and conditions, means and methods, spread of corruption, interrelation, analysis, fighting.

Контактная информация: Ivanov, Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich, 420059, Russia, Respublika Tatarstan, g. Kazan, Orenburgskiy trakt, d. 128.

Библиография:
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v mekhanizme protivodeystviya korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 137-157. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9954.html
Bakradze A.A. Ugolovno-pravovoy analiz proekta postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve, kommercheskom podkupe i inykh korruptsionnykh prestupleniyakh» // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-5.-C. 165-180. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_793.html
Kabanov P.A. Prezidium Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii i obrazuemye im rabochie organy kak vysshie federal'nye spetsializirovannye antikorruptsionnye uchrezhdeniya: voprosy povysheniya kachestva pravovogo regulirovaniya i effektivnosti ikh deyatel'nosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 91-104. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_370.html
Astanin V.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii i vozmeshchenie ushcherba ot nee // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 88-99. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9924.html
But S.S. Sistema administrativno-pravovykh sredstv protivodeystviya korruptsii v tamozhennykh organakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-9.-C. 88-98. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10137.html
Golovanov E.I. Pravovye sredstva bor'by s korruptsiey v Rossii XVI-XIXvv. (istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie): dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2002.
Ilyukhin V.I. O korruptsii i ee prichinakh // Pravo i bezopasnost'. 2008. № 4. S.68-72.
Internet-interv'yu s rukovoditelem apparata Komiteta Gosudarstvennoy Dumy po bezopasnosti i protivodeystviyu korruptsii Solov'evym I.N. "O sovremennom sostoyanii antikorruptsionnogo zakonodatel'stva" (29 yanvarya 2013 g.) // SPS «Garant». Versiya ot 28.07.2013 g.
Lakhman A.G. Korruptsiya i protivodeystvie korruptsii: problemy pravoponimaniya // Vlast' i upravlenie na Vostoke Rossii. 2013. № 1. S. 129-134
Poslanie Prezidenta RF D.A. Medvedeva Federal'nomu Sobraniyu RF ot 5 noyabrya 2008 g. // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2008. № 23.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-1.-C. 65-83. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_735.html
Alekseev S.V., Mostovaya I.V. Sotsial'naya obuslovlennost' korruptsii // Vestnik YuRGTU (NPI). 2013. № 1 S.181-188.
Gosteva S.R. Protivodeystvie korruptsii – vazhneyshee uslovie ukrepleniya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossii.// Yuridicheskiy mir. 2011. № 1.
Andreev M.V. Konstitutsionnye i mezhdunarodnye politiko-pravovye printsipy obespecheniya natsional'noy bezopasnosti [tekst] / M.V. Andreev / Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 6 (162)-s. 803-80

References (transliteration):
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v mekhanizme protivodeystviya korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 137-157. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9954.html
Bakradze A.A. Ugolovno-pravovoy analiz proekta postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve, kommercheskom podkupe i inykh korruptsionnykh prestupleniyakh» // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-5.-C. 165-180. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_793.html
Kabanov P.A. Prezidium Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii i obrazuemye im rabochie organy kak vysshie federal'nye spetsializirovannye antikorruptsionnye uchrezhdeniya: voprosy povysheniya kachestva pravovogo regulirovaniya i effektivnosti ikh deyatel'nosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 91-104. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_370.html
Astanin V.V. Protivodeystvie korruptsii i vozmeshchenie ushcherba ot nee // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 88-99. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9924.html
But S.S. Sistema administrativno-pravovykh sredstv protivodeystviya korruptsii v tamozhennykh organakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-9.-C. 88-98. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10137.html
Golovanov E.I. Pravovye sredstva bor'by s korruptsiey v Rossii XVI-XIXvv. (istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie): dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2002.
Ilyukhin V.I. O korruptsii i ee prichinakh // Pravo i bezopasnost'. 2008. № 4. S.68-72.
Internet-interv'yu s rukovoditelem apparata Komiteta Gosudarstvennoy Dumy po bezopasnosti i protivodeystviyu korruptsii Solov'evym I.N. "O sovremennom sostoyanii antikorruptsionnogo zakonodatel'stva" (29 yanvarya 2013 g.) // SPS «Garant». Versiya ot 28.07.2013 g.
Lakhman A.G. Korruptsiya i protivodeystvie korruptsii: problemy pravoponimaniya // Vlast' i upravlenie na Vostoke Rossii. 2013. № 1. S. 129-134
Poslanie Prezidenta RF D.A. Medvedeva Federal'nomu Sobraniyu RF ot 5 noyabrya 2008 g. // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2008. № 23.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativno-pravovoe protivodeystvie korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov politsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-1.-C. 65-83. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_735.html
Alekseev S.V., Mostovaya I.V. Sotsial'naya obuslovlennost' korruptsii // Vestnik YuRGTU (NPI). 2013. № 1 S.181-188.
Gosteva S.R. Protivodeystvie korruptsii – vazhneyshee uslovie ukrepleniya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossii.// Yuridicheskiy mir. 2011. № 1.
Andreev M.V. Konstitutsionnye i mezhdunarodnye politiko-pravovye printsipy obespecheniya natsional'noy bezopasnosti [tekst] / M.V. Andreev / Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 6 (162)-s. 803-80

Аннотация: This article includes complex analysis of the influence of political, economic, international legal factors on the decision-making in the sphere of criminal law. The author discusses the issues of development of criminal policy in order to avoid passing non-systemic, fragmented criminal law solutions. The accent is made on the need to develop criminal political science as an independent science, which should be based upon the traditions of the Russian criminal law science and use the theoretic and instrumental approach, as it was formed within the system of criminal law sciences. It is stated that the tendencies of development of norms of criminal law regulating the relations in the sphere of economics are aimed at minimizing criminal law influence upon the economic subject. Within this article the author pays attention to the influence of society upon decision-making in the criminal sphere, and on criminal law-making in particular. Application of criminal law norms has consequences, which in some sense may be more significant than in any other branch of law. It is related to the vital interests and it is an expression of power in its strictest form – via prohibition and coercion.

Ключевые слова: criminal policy, criminal political science, criminal legal thought, criminal law-making, legislative initiative, social factor, economic factor, political factor, modernization of criminal law.

Контактная информация: Barysheva, Ksenia Aleksandrovna, 119017, Russia, Moskva, ul. Malaya Ordynka, d. 17, kom. 306.

Библиография:
Zhalinskiy A. E. Ugolovnaya politologiya: stanovlenie i razvitie // Pravo i politika. 2010. № 5. S. 826-834.
Barysheva K. Ways of the modern criminal law development. Justitias Welt. Ausgabe 22, November 2013 http://justitiaswelt.com/Aufsaetze/AS86_201311_KB.pdf
G.Yu. Lesnikov. Problemy sootnosheniya ugolovnoy politiki i ugolovnogo prava // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. №4. – 2008. S. 74.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo. T.1. Obshchaya chast' / Pod red. d-r yurid. nauk, prof., zasl. deyatelya nauki RF A.E. Zhalinskogo. – M.: Izd. Dom «Gorodets», 2011. – 864 s.
Kibal'nik, A. G. Vliyanie mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava na rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo :Avtoref. Avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk . 12.00.08. Institut gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk.-M.,2003.-52s.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. – M.: Prospekt, 2008. S. 5.
N. I. Kostenko Organizatsiya Ob'edinennykh Natsiy v razvitii mezhdunarodnoy ugolovnoy yustitsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. - 2012. - 3. - C. 71 - 82.

References (transliteration):
Zhalinskiy A. E. Ugolovnaya politologiya: stanovlenie i razvitie // Pravo i politika. 2010. № 5. S. 826-834.
Barysheva K. Ways of the modern criminal law development. Justitias Welt. Ausgabe 22, November 2013 http://justitiaswelt.com/Aufsaetze/AS86_201311_KB.pdf
G.Yu. Lesnikov. Problemy sootnosheniya ugolovnoy politiki i ugolovnogo prava // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. №4. – 2008. S. 74.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo. T.1. Obshchaya chast' / Pod red. d-r yurid. nauk, prof., zasl. deyatelya nauki RF A.E. Zhalinskogo. – M.: Izd. Dom «Gorodets», 2011. – 864 s.
Kibal'nik, A. G. Vliyanie mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava na rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo :Avtoref. Avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk . 12.00.08. Institut gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk.-M.,2003.-52s.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. – M.: Prospekt, 2008. S. 5.
N. I. Kostenko Organizatsiya Ob'edinennykh Natsiy v razvitii mezhdunarodnoy ugolovnoy yustitsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. - 2012. - 3. - C. 71 - 82.

Аннотация: This article identifies the conditions necessary to ensure the constitutional principle of free and fair elections/ referenda. Analysis of the Constitution of the Russian Federation reveals that its articles provide the required basis and the necessary list of legal means by which to establish the conditions to ensure the constitutional principle of free and fair elections/referenda; that is, that the outcome of an election/referendum is free from any major flaws and is not doubted by the populace. The Constitution of the Russian Federation indirectly leads to the deduction that the results of elections/ referenda, as determined by the authorities organizing such, have to be (and are able to be) audited by any voter so that the errors may be corrected. It is possible to establish the conditions necessary for the organization of a voting system that would embody the constitutional principle of free and fair elections while preserving the secrecy of the ballot. Such conditions are: 1 ) the existence of a mechanism by which voters can verify a record of their vote; 2 ) the existence of a mechanism by which voters can safeguard their vote in case of discrepancies; 3 ) the existence of a mechanism by which voters can verify the authenticity of the voting results; 4) the existence of a mechanism for the protection of voters of an election/referendum in case of discrepancies; and 5 ) the existence of mechanism by which a political party can verify the reliability of the voting results; 6) the existence of a mechanism for the protection of a political party involved in an election/ referendum in case of discrepancies; 7) the existence of a mechanism to punish individuals who are identified and confirmed in court as being responsible for interfering with an election/referendum; and 8 ) the existence of a mechanism to encourage responsible and concerned individuals to detect and prove in court evidence of electoral interference.

Ключевые слова: constitution, constitutional principles, conditions of a constitutional principle, populace, elections, verification, election commissions, voting results, election results, source of power

Контактная информация: Kravchenko, Oleg Aleksandrovich, 355003, Russia, Stavropol Krai, Stavropol, Lenin St, 328-5, Apt 27

Библиография:
Thucydides, Complete Writings: The Peloponnesian War. New York: Random Hause, 1951.
Nudnenko L.A. Teoriya demokratii. M.: Yurist', 2001.
Kravchenko O.A. Protsessual'nye garantii obespecheniya dostovernosti voleiz'yavleniya naroda: voprosy praktiki // Sovetnik yurista. 2013. № 5.
Kravchenko O.A. Voprosy protsessual'nykh garantiy voleiz'yavleniya naroda pri formirovanii institutov narodnogo predstavitel'stva // Advokatskaya praktika. 2013. № 1.
Kravchenko O.A. Pooshchritel'nye (pozitivnye) mery obespecheniya dostovernosti voleiz'yavleniya naroda // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2013. № 3 (99).
Kravchenko O.A. Otvetstvennost' za iskazhenie voleiz'yavleniya naroda // Advokat. 2013. № 2.
Kravchenko O.A. Suverenitet i volya naroda (izbirateley) // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 13. Seriya «Pravo». Vypusk 34.
Kravchenko O.A. Demokratiya kak dostovernoe voleiz'yavlenie naroda // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. Vypusk 1(19).
Kravchenko O.A Voprosy iskazheniya voleiz'yavleniya naroda pri podvedenii itogov golosovaniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 9 (34).
Kravchenko O.A. Ponyatie i klassifikatsiya iskazheniy voleiz'yavleniya naroda // Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 3 (53).
Kolyushin E.I. Vybory i izbiratel'noe pravo v zerkale sudebnykh resheniy: monografiya. 2-e izdanie pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012.
Ivanchenko A.V. Izbiratel'nye komissii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. (Monograficheskoe issledovanie). M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 1996.
Dal' R. O demokratii / Per s angl. A.S. Bogdanovskogo; pod red. O.A. Alyakrinskogo. M.: Aspekt Press, 2000.
Baglay M.V., Gabrichidze B.N. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M.: 1996.
Alekseev S.S. Demokraticheskie reformy i konstitutsiya. M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr gazety «Pozitsiya», 1992.

References (transliteration):
Thucydides, Complete Writings: The Peloponnesian War. New York: Random Hause, 1951.
Nudnenko L.A. Teoriya demokratii. M.: Yurist', 2001.
Kravchenko O.A. Protsessual'nye garantii obespecheniya dostovernosti voleiz'yavleniya naroda: voprosy praktiki // Sovetnik yurista. 2013. № 5.
Kravchenko O.A. Voprosy protsessual'nykh garantiy voleiz'yavleniya naroda pri formirovanii institutov narodnogo predstavitel'stva // Advokatskaya praktika. 2013. № 1.
Kravchenko O.A. Pooshchritel'nye (pozitivnye) mery obespecheniya dostovernosti voleiz'yavleniya naroda // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2013. № 3 (99).
Kravchenko O.A. Otvetstvennost' za iskazhenie voleiz'yavleniya naroda // Advokat. 2013. № 2.
Kravchenko O.A. Suverenitet i volya naroda (izbirateley) // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 13. Seriya «Pravo». Vypusk 34.
Kravchenko O.A. Demokratiya kak dostovernoe voleiz'yavlenie naroda // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. Vypusk 1(19).
Kravchenko O.A Voprosy iskazheniya voleiz'yavleniya naroda pri podvedenii itogov golosovaniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 9 (34).
Kravchenko O.A. Ponyatie i klassifikatsiya iskazheniy voleiz'yavleniya naroda // Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 3 (53).
Kolyushin E.I. Vybory i izbiratel'noe pravo v zerkale sudebnykh resheniy: monografiya. 2-e izdanie pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012.
Ivanchenko A.V. Izbiratel'nye komissii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. (Monograficheskoe issledovanie). M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 1996.
Dal' R. O demokratii / Per s angl. A.S. Bogdanovskogo; pod red. O.A. Alyakrinskogo. M.: Aspekt Press, 2000.
Baglay M.V., Gabrichidze B.N. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M.: 1996.
Alekseev S.S. Demokraticheskie reformy i konstitutsiya. M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr gazety «Pozitsiya», 1992.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the study of the criminal law guarantees of substance turnover within the framework of international law (conventional) obligations of a state and law-making traditions in the sphere of health safety of the population. The substance turnover is recognized as an element to a factor complex, which expresses itself by formation and development of illnesses and other harmful consequences, which are dangerous for life or health of persons. The author analyses the entire list of substances, which may be objects of crimes, as provided for in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Taking psychoactive substance under Chapter 25 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as an example, the author follows the history of development of criminal legislation in the sphere of public health safety in the international legal and comparative legal contexts, and shows the contradictions within the spheres of criminal legal regulation of the public health protection, which inevitable appeared and continued to express themselves when the generally recognized terms of international law were not implemented. Based upon a retrospective analysis of the definition-related specific features of psychoactive drugs, the author expresses an opinion on the need to create a theory of criminal law classification of substance harmful to the population, where one of the criteria for this group should be psychoactive nature of a substance.

Ключевые слова: precursor, intoxicating substances, psychoactive substances, psychedelic substances, analogues to narcotic substances, narcotic substances, illegal turnover, public health, criminal policy

Контактная информация: Kukharuk, Vladimir Vasilievich, 413100, Russia, Saratovskaya obl., Engels, ul. Berezhnaya, d. 40.

Библиография:
1. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.03.1999 g. «O sanitarno-epidemiologicheskom blagopoluchii naseleniya»//RG. 6.04.1999. № 64-65.
2. Federal'nyy zakon ot 10.01.2002 g. «Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy»//RG. 12.01.2002. № 6.
3. Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.01.1998 № 3-FZ «O narkoticheskikh sredstvakh i psikhotropnykh veshchestvakh» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 12.01.1998. № 2. St. 219.
4. Federal'nyy zakon ot 21 iyulya 1997 g. № 116-FZ «O promyshlennoy bezopasnosti opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob'ektov». //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 28.07.1997. № 30. St. 3588.
5. Federal'nyy zakon ot 19.05.2010 N 87-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosu kul'tivirovaniya rasteniy, soderzhashchikh narkoticheskie sredstva ili psikhotropnye veshchestva libo ikh prekursory" // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 24.05.2010. № 21. St. 2525.
6. Federal'nyy zakon ot 8 dekabrya 2003 goda N 162-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 252. 16.12.2003.
7. Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.11.1995 №170-FZ «Ob ispol'zovanii atomnoy energii»//RG. № 230. 28.11.1995.
8. Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.12.1998 №191-FZ «Ob isklyuchitel'noy ekonomicheskoy zone Rossiyskoy Federatsii» //RG. № 244. 24.12.1998.
9. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 30.06.1998. № 681 «Ob utverzhdenii perechnya narkoticheskikh sredstvakh, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov, podlezhashchikh kontrolyu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii».//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. № 27. 06.07.1998. St. 3198.
10. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 29.12.2007 № 964 «Ob utverzhdenii Spiskov sil'nodeystvuyushchikh i yadovitykh veshchestv dlya tseley stat'i 234 i drugikh statey ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, a takzhe krupnogo razmera sil'nodeystvuyushchikh i yadovitykh veshchestv dlya tseley stat'i 234 ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 14.01.2008. № 2. St. 89.
11. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 4.02.2013 №78 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii»//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 11.02.2013. N 6. St. 558.
12. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 09.03.2010 № 132 «Ob obyazatel'nykh trebovaniyakh v otnoshenii otdel'nykh vidov produktsii i svyazannykh s trebovaniyami k ney protsessov proektirovaniya (vklyuchaya izyskaniya), proizvodstva, stroitel'stva, montazha, naladki, ekspluatatsii, khraneniya, perevozki, realizatsii i utilizatsii, soderzhashchikhsya v tekhnicheskikh reglamentakh Respubliki Kazakhstan, yavlyayushcheysya gosudarstvom-uchastnikom tamozhennogo soyuza»//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 15.03.2010. № 11. St.1221.
13. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 12.03.2002 g. № 5 «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel'stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv»//RG. 19.03.2002. № 48.
14. Postanovlenie VTsIK ot 01.06.1922 "O vvedenii v deystvie Ugolovnogo Kodeksa R.S.F.S.R." (vmeste s "Ugolovnym Kodeksom R.S.F.S.R.")//Sobranie uzakoneniy i rasporyazheniy RKP RSFSR. 1922. №15. St. 153.
15. Sobranie uzakoneniy i rasporyazheniy RKP RSFSR. 1925. №5. St. 33.
16. Kodeks RSFSR ot 22.11.1926//SU RSFSR. 1926. №80. St. 600.
17. Kodeks RSFSR ot 27.10.1960 // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. 1960. № 40. St.591.
18. Spisok odurmanivayushchikh veshchestv (po sostoyaniyu na 1.11.2005 g.) (utv. na zasedanii PKKN 9.10. 1996 g.) // Novye lekarstvennye preparaty. 2005. № 11.
19. Kosevich I.A. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya: uchebnik/pod red. A.V. Brilliantova.-M.: Prospekt, 2009. S.517.
20. Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob Administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (postateynyy) s postateynymi materialami. 9-izdanie pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. Avtor kommentariev i sostavitel' – V.S. Chizhevskiy – M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2008. S.187.
21. Tkachevskiy Yu.M. Pravovye aspekty bor'by s narkomaniey i alkogolizmom.– M.:Profizdat,1990. S.3.

References (transliteration):
1. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.03.1999 g. «O sanitarno-epidemiologicheskom blagopoluchii naseleniya»//RG. 6.04.1999. № 64-65.
2. Federal'nyy zakon ot 10.01.2002 g. «Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy»//RG. 12.01.2002. № 6.
3. Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.01.1998 № 3-FZ «O narkoticheskikh sredstvakh i psikhotropnykh veshchestvakh» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 12.01.1998. № 2. St. 219.
4. Federal'nyy zakon ot 21 iyulya 1997 g. № 116-FZ «O promyshlennoy bezopasnosti opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob'ektov». //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 28.07.1997. № 30. St. 3588.
5. Federal'nyy zakon ot 19.05.2010 N 87-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosu kul'tivirovaniya rasteniy, soderzhashchikh narkoticheskie sredstva ili psikhotropnye veshchestva libo ikh prekursory" // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 24.05.2010. № 21. St. 2525.
6. Federal'nyy zakon ot 8 dekabrya 2003 goda N 162-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 252. 16.12.2003.
7. Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.11.1995 №170-FZ «Ob ispol'zovanii atomnoy energii»//RG. № 230. 28.11.1995.
8. Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.12.1998 №191-FZ «Ob isklyuchitel'noy ekonomicheskoy zone Rossiyskoy Federatsii» //RG. № 244. 24.12.1998.
9. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 30.06.1998. № 681 «Ob utverzhdenii perechnya narkoticheskikh sredstvakh, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov, podlezhashchikh kontrolyu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii».//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. № 27. 06.07.1998. St. 3198.
10. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 29.12.2007 № 964 «Ob utverzhdenii Spiskov sil'nodeystvuyushchikh i yadovitykh veshchestv dlya tseley stat'i 234 i drugikh statey ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, a takzhe krupnogo razmera sil'nodeystvuyushchikh i yadovitykh veshchestv dlya tseley stat'i 234 ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 14.01.2008. № 2. St. 89.
11. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 4.02.2013 №78 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii»//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 11.02.2013. N 6. St. 558.
12. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 09.03.2010 № 132 «Ob obyazatel'nykh trebovaniyakh v otnoshenii otdel'nykh vidov produktsii i svyazannykh s trebovaniyami k ney protsessov proektirovaniya (vklyuchaya izyskaniya), proizvodstva, stroitel'stva, montazha, naladki, ekspluatatsii, khraneniya, perevozki, realizatsii i utilizatsii, soderzhashchikhsya v tekhnicheskikh reglamentakh Respubliki Kazakhstan, yavlyayushcheysya gosudarstvom-uchastnikom tamozhennogo soyuza»//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 15.03.2010. № 11. St.1221.
13. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 12.03.2002 g. № 5 «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel'stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv»//RG. 19.03.2002. № 48.
14. Postanovlenie VTsIK ot 01.06.1922 "O vvedenii v deystvie Ugolovnogo Kodeksa R.S.F.S.R." (vmeste s "Ugolovnym Kodeksom R.S.F.S.R.")//Sobranie uzakoneniy i rasporyazheniy RKP RSFSR. 1922. №15. St. 153.
15. Sobranie uzakoneniy i rasporyazheniy RKP RSFSR. 1925. №5. St. 33.
16. Kodeks RSFSR ot 22.11.1926//SU RSFSR. 1926. №80. St. 600.
17. Kodeks RSFSR ot 27.10.1960 // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. 1960. № 40. St.591.
18. Spisok odurmanivayushchikh veshchestv (po sostoyaniyu na 1.11.2005 g.) (utv. na zasedanii PKKN 9.10. 1996 g.) // Novye lekarstvennye preparaty. 2005. № 11.
19. Kosevich I.A. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya: uchebnik/pod red. A.V. Brilliantova.-M.: Prospekt, 2009. S.517.
20. Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob Administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (postateynyy) s postateynymi materialami. 9-izdanie pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. Avtor kommentariev i sostavitel' – V.S. Chizhevskiy – M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2008. S.187.
21. Tkachevskiy Yu.M. Pravovye aspekty bor'by s narkomaniey i alkogolizmom.– M.:Profizdat,1990. S.3.

Аннотация: The problem of definition of criminal policy is fundamental for the theory of state and law, and branches of legal science (criminal law, criminal procedural law, penal law). The article concerns the issue of inclusion of the criminal cycle legislation into the system of elements of the normative basis of criminal policy. The author studies a retrospective of criminal policy and provides a new definition of such a policy.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, politics, criminal, legislation, criminal cycle, normative basis, criminal procedural, penal, interrelations, law.

Контактная информация: Goncharov, Denis Yurievich, 620034, Russia, Ekaterinburg, ul. Opalikhinskaya, d. 40.

Библиография:
1. Gogel' S.K. Kurs ugolovnoy politiki v svyazi s ugolovnoy sotsiologiey. SPb., 1910.
2. Chubinskiy M.P. Kurs ugolovnoy politiki. SPb., 1912.
3. Vladimirov L.E. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. M., 1908.
4. Feuerbach A. Versuch einer Criminaljurisprudenz des Koran, 1804.
5. Luneev V.V. Prestupnost' KhKh veka. Mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendentsii. M.: Izdatel'stvo NORMA, 1999.
6. Piontkovskiy A.A. Nauka ugolovnogo prava: ego predmet, zadachi i znachenie. Odessa, 1892.
7. Piontkovskiy A. A. Marksizm i ugolovnoe pravo. - 2-e izd. - M.: Yurid. izd-vo NKYu RSFSR, 1929.
8. Piontkovskiy A. A. Sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Obshchaya chast'. M.: Yurid. izd-vo NKYu, 1928.
9. Volkov G.I. Klassovaya priroda prestup¬leniy i sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. M.: Sovetskoe zakonodatel'stvo, 1935.
10. Volkov G.I. Ugolovnaya politika epokhi promyshlennogo kapitalizma. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1932.
11. Bulatov S.Ya. Ugolovnaya politika epokhi imperializma. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1933.
12. Karatel'naya politika kapitalisticheskikh stran. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1933.
13. Piontkovskiy A.A. Ugolovnaya politika Yaponii. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1936.
14. BSE. M., 1956. T. 43.
15. Ismailov I.A. Ugolovnaya politika kak slozhnaya sistema // Uchen. zap. / Azerbaydzhanskiy universitet. Seriya yuridicheskikh nauk. Baku, 1975. Vyp. 1.
16. Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost' i ugolovnaya politika // XXVI s'ezd KPSS i ukreplenie zakonnosti i pravoporyadka. M.: IGP AN SSSR, 1982.
17. Lesnikov G.Yu. Ugolovnaya politika sovremennoy Rossii (metodologicheskie, pravovye i organizatsionnye aspekty). Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk. M. 2005.
18. Zagorodnikov N.I., Struchkov N.A. Napravleniya izucheniya sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 7.
19. Gertsenzon A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo i sotsiologiya. M., 1970.
20. Gal'perin I.M., Kurlyandskiy V.I. Predmet ugolovnoy politiki i osnovnye napravleniya ee izucheniya // Osnovnye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 1975.
21. Kovalev M.I., Voronin Yu.A. Kriminologiya i ugolovnaya politika. Sverdlovsk, 1980.
22. Dagel' P.S. Znachenie XXVI s'ezda KPSS dlya sovetskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Problemy povysheniya effektivnosti bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Irkutsk, 1983.
23. Struchkov N.A. Ispravitel'no-trudovaya politika i ee rol' v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. Saratov, 1970.
24. Zagorodnikov N.I. Sovetskaya ugolovnaya politika. M., 1979.
25. Zhalinskiy A.E. Soderzhanie ugolovnoy politiki // Ugolovnaya politika v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. Sverdlovsk, 1986.
26. Borodin S.V. Bor'ba s prestupnost'yu: teoreticheskaya model' kompleksnoy programmy. M.: Nauka, 1990.
27. Ismailov I.A. Prestupnost' i ugolovnaya politika (aktual'nye problemy organizatsii bor'by s prestupnost'yu). Baku, 1990.
28. Gaukhman L.D., Lyapunov Yu.I. Ponyatie sovetskoy ugolovnoy politiki i ee osnovnye napravleniya. M., 1980.
29. Belyaev N.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika i puti ee realizatsii. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1986.
30. Boskholov S.S. Osnovy ugolovnoy politiki: konstitutsionnyy, kriminologicheskiy, ugolovno-pravovoy i informatsionnyy aspekty. – M.: YurInfoR, 1999.
31. Korobeev A.I., Uss A.V., Golik Yu.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika: tendentsii i perspektivy. Krasnoyarsk, 1991.
32. Zvecharovskiy I.E. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: ponyatie, printsipy, politika. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2001.
33. Min'kovskiy G.M., Revin V.P. Ugolovnaya politika i ee realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del // Metodicheskie materialy. M.: Akademiya MVD Rossii, 1996.
34. Dagel' P.S. Problemy sovetskoy ugolovnoy politiki. Vladivostok: Dal'nevostochn. un-t, 1982.
35. Barinova L.V., Martynenko N.E., Revin V.P. Slovar' terminov i skhem po kursam: «Ugolovnaya politika i ee realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del» i «Organizatsiya profilakticheskoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del». M.: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2000.
36. Aleksandrov A.I. Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnyy protsess v rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: istoriya, sovremennost', perspektivy, problemy / Pod red. V.Z. Lukashevicha. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Pb. un-ta, 2003.
37. Federal'nyy zakon ot 18.12.2001 g. № 177–FZ «O vvedenii v deystvie Ugolovno–protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2001. - 22 dekabrya. - № 249.
38. Shcherbakov V.F. Teoreticheskie osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki protivodeystviya ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti. Nizhniy Novgorod. 2005.
39. Kleymenov M.P. Kriminologiya: uchebnik. M. 2008.
40. Lesnikov G.Yu. Problemy realizatsii ugolovnoy politiki. M. 2005.

References (transliteration):
1. Gogel' S.K. Kurs ugolovnoy politiki v svyazi s ugolovnoy sotsiologiey. SPb., 1910.
2. Chubinskiy M.P. Kurs ugolovnoy politiki. SPb., 1912.
3. Vladimirov L.E. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. M., 1908.
4. Feuerbach A. Versuch einer Criminaljurisprudenz des Koran, 1804.
5. Luneev V.V. Prestupnost' KhKh veka. Mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendentsii. M.: Izdatel'stvo NORMA, 1999.
6. Piontkovskiy A.A. Nauka ugolovnogo prava: ego predmet, zadachi i znachenie. Odessa, 1892.
7. Piontkovskiy A. A. Marksizm i ugolovnoe pravo. - 2-e izd. - M.: Yurid. izd-vo NKYu RSFSR, 1929.
8. Piontkovskiy A. A. Sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Obshchaya chast'. M.: Yurid. izd-vo NKYu, 1928.
9. Volkov G.I. Klassovaya priroda prestup¬leniy i sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. M.: Sovetskoe zakonodatel'stvo, 1935.
10. Volkov G.I. Ugolovnaya politika epokhi promyshlennogo kapitalizma. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1932.
11. Bulatov S.Ya. Ugolovnaya politika epokhi imperializma. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1933.
12. Karatel'naya politika kapitalisticheskikh stran. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1933.
13. Piontkovskiy A.A. Ugolovnaya politika Yaponii. M.: Sov. zakonodatel'stvo, 1936.
14. BSE. M., 1956. T. 43.
15. Ismailov I.A. Ugolovnaya politika kak slozhnaya sistema // Uchen. zap. / Azerbaydzhanskiy universitet. Seriya yuridicheskikh nauk. Baku, 1975. Vyp. 1.
16. Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost' i ugolovnaya politika // XXVI s'ezd KPSS i ukreplenie zakonnosti i pravoporyadka. M.: IGP AN SSSR, 1982.
17. Lesnikov G.Yu. Ugolovnaya politika sovremennoy Rossii (metodologicheskie, pravovye i organizatsionnye aspekty). Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk. M. 2005.
18. Zagorodnikov N.I., Struchkov N.A. Napravleniya izucheniya sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 7.
19. Gertsenzon A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo i sotsiologiya. M., 1970.
20. Gal'perin I.M., Kurlyandskiy V.I. Predmet ugolovnoy politiki i osnovnye napravleniya ee izucheniya // Osnovnye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 1975.
21. Kovalev M.I., Voronin Yu.A. Kriminologiya i ugolovnaya politika. Sverdlovsk, 1980.
22. Dagel' P.S. Znachenie XXVI s'ezda KPSS dlya sovetskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Problemy povysheniya effektivnosti bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Irkutsk, 1983.
23. Struchkov N.A. Ispravitel'no-trudovaya politika i ee rol' v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. Saratov, 1970.
24. Zagorodnikov N.I. Sovetskaya ugolovnaya politika. M., 1979.
25. Zhalinskiy A.E. Soderzhanie ugolovnoy politiki // Ugolovnaya politika v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. Sverdlovsk, 1986.
26. Borodin S.V. Bor'ba s prestupnost'yu: teoreticheskaya model' kompleksnoy programmy. M.: Nauka, 1990.
27. Ismailov I.A. Prestupnost' i ugolovnaya politika (aktual'nye problemy organizatsii bor'by s prestupnost'yu). Baku, 1990.
28. Gaukhman L.D., Lyapunov Yu.I. Ponyatie sovetskoy ugolovnoy politiki i ee osnovnye napravleniya. M., 1980.
29. Belyaev N.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika i puti ee realizatsii. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1986.
30. Boskholov S.S. Osnovy ugolovnoy politiki: konstitutsionnyy, kriminologicheskiy, ugolovno-pravovoy i informatsionnyy aspekty. – M.: YurInfoR, 1999.
31. Korobeev A.I., Uss A.V., Golik Yu.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika: tendentsii i perspektivy. Krasnoyarsk, 1991.
32. Zvecharovskiy I.E. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: ponyatie, printsipy, politika. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2001.
33. Min'kovskiy G.M., Revin V.P. Ugolovnaya politika i ee realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del // Metodicheskie materialy. M.: Akademiya MVD Rossii, 1996.
34. Dagel' P.S. Problemy sovetskoy ugolovnoy politiki. Vladivostok: Dal'nevostochn. un-t, 1982.
35. Barinova L.V., Martynenko N.E., Revin V.P. Slovar' terminov i skhem po kursam: «Ugolovnaya politika i ee realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del» i «Organizatsiya profilakticheskoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del». M.: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2000.
36. Aleksandrov A.I. Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnyy protsess v rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: istoriya, sovremennost', perspektivy, problemy / Pod red. V.Z. Lukashevicha. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Pb. un-ta, 2003.
37. Federal'nyy zakon ot 18.12.2001 g. № 177–FZ «O vvedenii v deystvie Ugolovno–protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2001. - 22 dekabrya. - № 249.
38. Shcherbakov V.F. Teoreticheskie osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki protivodeystviya ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti. Nizhniy Novgorod. 2005.
39. Kleymenov M.P. Kriminologiya: uchebnik. M. 2008.
40. Lesnikov G.Yu. Problemy realizatsii ugolovnoy politiki. M. 2005.

Аннотация: The article for the first time in the Russian legal science includes analysis of the issues of quality improvement of legal regulation of anti-corruption propaganda at the regional level, this type of propaganda being one of the most efficient instruments of the modern Russian regional state anti-corruption policy. The author provides critical evaluation of the current situation in legal regulation of anti-corruption propaganda in one of the constituent subjects of the Russian Federation – the Republic of Tatarstan. He shows the reasons for the low quality of legal regulation (underestimation of this instrument of anti-corruption policy by the stat government body, selective implementation of recommendations on its development) and makes propositions for the improvement of the situation. Among the key directions for the improvement of legal regulation of anti-corruption propaganda the author offers the following: a) to review the legal definition of the “anticorruption propaganda”; b) to form an inter-departmental working group in order to draft a normative legal act on organization and implementation of anti-corruption propaganda at the regional level, to draft, discuss and adopt this complex codified act.

Ключевые слова: corruption, f ighting corruption, anti-corruption propaganda, anti-corruption policy, anticorruption education, anti-corruption agitation, anti-corruption information, anti-corruption worldview, anti-corruption awareness, the Republic of Tatarstan.

Контактная информация: Kabanov, Pavel Aleksandrovich, 423808, Russia, Kazan, Moskovskiy pr. d.42

Библиография:
1. Bikeev I.I., Gorshenkov G.N., Kabanov P.A., Rakhimov S.F. Antikorruptsionnaya propaganda: voprosy organizatsii i osushchestvleniya (uchebnaya programma kursa) // Sledovatel'. – 2012. – №10.
2. Gorshenkov G.N. Antikorruptsionnaya propaganda kak instrument protivodeystviya korruptsii: ponyatie i sushchnostnoe soderzhanie // Sledovatel'. – 2010. – №10.
3. Gorshenkov G.N. Antikorruptsionnaya propaganda: ponyatie i soderzhanie // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. – 2010. – №4 (16).
4. Lopatin V.N. O sistemnom podkhode k antikorruptsionnoy politike // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2001. – №7.
5. Ageev V.N. Pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya korruptsii v Respublike Tatarstan // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-№1.

References (transliteration):
1. Bikeev I.I., Gorshenkov G.N., Kabanov P.A., Rakhimov S.F. Antikorruptsionnaya propaganda: voprosy organizatsii i osushchestvleniya (uchebnaya programma kursa) // Sledovatel'. – 2012. – №10.
2. Gorshenkov G.N. Antikorruptsionnaya propaganda kak instrument protivodeystviya korruptsii: ponyatie i sushchnostnoe soderzhanie // Sledovatel'. – 2010. – №10.
3. Gorshenkov G.N. Antikorruptsionnaya propaganda: ponyatie i soderzhanie // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. – 2010. – №4 (16).
4. Lopatin V.N. O sistemnom podkhode k antikorruptsionnoy politike // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2001. – №7.
5. Ageev V.N. Pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya korruptsii v Respublike Tatarstan // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-№1.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the topical problem regarding improvement of norms on the types of co-participation in crimes. The author evaluates the issue of qualification of intermediary acts in bribery. It is offered to amend the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation by adding an intermediary as a separate type of co-participator in crime. The author shows the necessity to also introduce a provoker as a new type of co-participator in crime .The author offers a novel draft of Art. 33 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with an added paragraph 6. He also shows the advisability of amending the Criminal Code with a novel Art. 304.1

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, co-participation, punishment, instigator, accomplice, perpetrator, intermediary, qualification, bribe, provoker.

Контактная информация: Dolgopolov, Kirill Andreevich, 355008, Russia, Stavropol, pr. Kulakova, d.8

Библиография:
1. Anikin A. Otvetstvennost' za vzyatochnichestvo po novomu UK // Zakonnost'. 1997. № 6. S. 33.
2. Arutyunov A. Provokatsiya prestupleniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2002. № 8;
3. Arutyunov A.A. Podstrekatel' prestupleniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 11
4. Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. - M., 2000. S. 246 - 247.
5. Ivanov V. Provokatsiya ili pravomernaya deyatel'nost'? // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2001. № 3. S. 65.
6. Kachmazov O. Kh. Otvetstvennost' za vzyatochnichestvo po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu pravu. - Vladikavkaz, 2009. S. 152.
7. Krasnopeeva E. Kvalifikatsiya posrednichestva i souchastiya vo vzyatochnichestve // Zakonnost'. 2002. № 2. S. 39.
8. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Osobennaya chast'. T. 5 / Pod red. G. I. Borzenkova i V. S. Komissarova. - M., 2009. S. 136.
9. Svyatenyuk N. Otvetstvennost' za sovmestnoe uchastie v ubiystve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. № 4. S. 48
10. Slovar' po ugolovnomu pravu / Otv. red. A. V. Naumov. - M., 1997. S. 371

References (transliteration):
1. Anikin A. Otvetstvennost' za vzyatochnichestvo po novomu UK // Zakonnost'. 1997. № 6. S. 33.
2. Arutyunov A. Provokatsiya prestupleniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2002. № 8;
3. Arutyunov A.A. Podstrekatel' prestupleniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 11
4. Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. - M., 2000. S. 246 - 247.
5. Ivanov V. Provokatsiya ili pravomernaya deyatel'nost'? // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2001. № 3. S. 65.
6. Kachmazov O. Kh. Otvetstvennost' za vzyatochnichestvo po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu pravu. - Vladikavkaz, 2009. S. 152.
7. Krasnopeeva E. Kvalifikatsiya posrednichestva i souchastiya vo vzyatochnichestve // Zakonnost'. 2002. № 2. S. 39.
8. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Osobennaya chast'. T. 5 / Pod red. G. I. Borzenkova i V. S. Komissarova. - M., 2009. S. 136.
9. Svyatenyuk N. Otvetstvennost' za sovmestnoe uchastie v ubiystve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. № 4. S. 48
10. Slovar' po ugolovnomu pravu / Otv. red. A. V. Naumov. - M., 1997. S. 371

Аннотация: In order to efficiently fight tax crimes, it is first of all necessary to develop legislative basis, which would meet the needs of the existing reality of implementation and development of economic activities. The above-mentioned matter is especially topical in regard to the formation of the current legislation of the Russian Federation on criminal responsibility for the crimes against the established order of payment of taxes and levies. This article is devoted to the above-mentioned issue.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, formation, legislation, tendency, taxes, levies, taxpayer, crime, accused, responsibility.

Контактная информация: Akopdzhanova, Marianna Olegovna, 350072 Russia, Krasnodar, ul. 40 let Pobedy, d.33

Библиография:
1. Volzhenkin B.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii / B.V. Volzhenkin. – SPb, 2007.
2. Efimychev P.S. Predmet i predely dokazyvaniya po ugolovnym delam o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh / P.S. Efimychev // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2001. - №9.
3. Kucherov I.I. Prestupleniya v sfere nalogooblozheniya. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy u UK RF / I.I. Kucherov. – M., 1999.
4. Kucherov I. Nalogi i kriminal: Istoriko-pravovoy analiz / I.I. Kucherov. - M., 2000.
5. Lopashenko N.A. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti. Kommentariy k glave 22 UK RF. – Rostov-na-Donu, 1999.
6. Makarov D. G. Tenevaya ekonomika i ugolovnyy zakon / D.G. Makarov. M., 2003.
7. Mamilov K.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe osnovanie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Izhevsk, 2002.
8. Minskaya V.S. Nalogovaya prestupnost': problemy zakonodatel'stva i praktiki primeneniya / V.S. Minskaya // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2001. - №1.
9. Pishchulin V.G. Nalogovye prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 1999.
10. Sergeev V.I. Ob'ektivnaya storona – odin iz vazhneyshikh priznakov sostava nalogovogo prestupleniya / V.I. Sergeev // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2001. - №8.

References (transliteration):
1. Volzhenkin B.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii / B.V. Volzhenkin. – SPb, 2007.
2. Efimychev P.S. Predmet i predely dokazyvaniya po ugolovnym delam o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh / P.S. Efimychev // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2001. - №9.
3. Kucherov I.I. Prestupleniya v sfere nalogooblozheniya. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy u UK RF / I.I. Kucherov. – M., 1999.
4. Kucherov I. Nalogi i kriminal: Istoriko-pravovoy analiz / I.I. Kucherov. - M., 2000.
5. Lopashenko N.A. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti. Kommentariy k glave 22 UK RF. – Rostov-na-Donu, 1999.
6. Makarov D. G. Tenevaya ekonomika i ugolovnyy zakon / D.G. Makarov. M., 2003.
7. Mamilov K.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe osnovanie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Izhevsk, 2002.
8. Minskaya V.S. Nalogovaya prestupnost': problemy zakonodatel'stva i praktiki primeneniya / V.S. Minskaya // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2001. - №1.
9. Pishchulin V.G. Nalogovye prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 1999.
10. Sergeev V.I. Ob'ektivnaya storona – odin iz vazhneyshikh priznakov sostava nalogovogo prestupleniya / V.I. Sergeev // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2001. - №8.

Аннотация: The general guarantees of criminal process provide for the complex of conditions, facilitating the comprehensive and objective procedure on criminal cases. The further development of the guarantees may be found in the measures regarding support of rights and freedoms of person and citizen in the criminal judicial procedure. The problem of implementation of the principle of protection of rights of persons and citizens is related to the guarantees of subjective rights and lawful interests of an individual. One of the key guarantees for the witness and victim on criminal case is a guarantee of security throughout the process on criminal case, including the judicial stages. This security guarantee should include protection and psychological support.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, witness, victim, interrogation, security, visual, observation, choleric, melancholic, sanguine, phlegmatic.

Контактная информация: Nafikova, Gulnara Aidarovna, 420107, Russia, Kazan, ul. Peterburgskaya, d. 12

Библиография:
1. Khalikov A.Obespechenie bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v stadii sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2008. – № 4. – S. 17.
2. Stetsovskiy Yu.I. Sudebnaya vlast'. – M.: Delo, 2000. – S. 149.
3. Brusnitsyn L.V. Poterpevshie i svideteli pod psevdonimom: natsional'noe zakonodatel'stvo i pretsedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2002. – № 2. – S. 125–127.
4. Belyaev M.V. Rassledovanie i sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo del o banditizme: ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie voprosy. – Kazan': Kazan. gos. un-t, 2009. – S. 140;
5. Sidorova N.V. Pokazaniya svidetelya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: Ucheb. posobie. – Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumen. gos. un-ta, 2007. – S. 91.
6. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-5/2006 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Tatarstan za 2006 g.
7. Belyaev M.V. Ukaz. soch. – S. 140–141.
8. Novikova M.V. Institut bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i puti ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2007. – № 7. – S. 38–41.
9. Yakimov I.N., Mikheev P.P. Dopros. – M., 1930 g. – S. 29
10. Zorin G.A. Rukovodstvo po taktike doprosa. – M., 2001. – S. 235
11. Koni A.F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. – M., 1965. – S. 160.
12. Vasil'ev V.L. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – SPb.: Piter, 2009. – S. 557.
13. Ugolovnoe delo № 119344 // Arkhiv Prokuratury Respubliki Tatarstan za 1999 g.
14. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 1991. – S. 24–25.
15. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 8 iyulya 2004 g. № 32-O04-37sp // BVS RF. – 2005. – № 8. – S. 21–22.
16. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. № 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant».
17. Brusnitsyn L. Psevdonimy v ugolovnom protsesse // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – № 1.
18. Epikhin A. Pravovoe regulirovanie mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov protsessa // Zakonnost'. – 2003. – № 5. – S. 47.
19. Malov A.A., Timoshenko A.A. Sostoyanie zakonnosti i problemnye aspekty primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zashchity k poterpevshim, svidetelyam i inym uchastnikam ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Gen. prokuratura RF, 2008. – S. 17.
20. Spravka Upravleniya po obespecheniyu uchastiya prokurorov v rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del sudami General'noy prokuratury RF o primenenii norm UPK RF, obespechivayushchikh bezopasnost' uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 24 dekabrya 2003 g. iskh. № 12/12-03 // Arkhiv NII problem ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka pri General'noy prokurature RF.
21. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. № 24-D04-9 // BVS RF. – 2006. – № 6. – S. 29.
22. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. № 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant».
23. Opredelenie SK po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. № 24-D04-9 «Kazhdyy obvinyaemyy v sovershenii ugolovnogo prestupleniya soglasno p. 16 ch. 4 st. 47, st. 247, ch. 3 st. 278 UPK RF vprave doprashivat' pokazyvayushchikh protiv nego svideteley» (izvlechenie) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2006. – № 6.
24. Brusnitsyn L.V. Kommentariy zakonodatel'stva ob obespechenii bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Yustitsinform, 2009. – S. 178.
25. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. - M., 1991. - S. 24 - 25.

References (transliteration):
1. Khalikov A.Obespechenie bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v stadii sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2008. – № 4. – S. 17.
2. Stetsovskiy Yu.I. Sudebnaya vlast'. – M.: Delo, 2000. – S. 149.
3. Brusnitsyn L.V. Poterpevshie i svideteli pod psevdonimom: natsional'noe zakonodatel'stvo i pretsedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2002. – № 2. – S. 125–127.
4. Belyaev M.V. Rassledovanie i sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo del o banditizme: ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie voprosy. – Kazan': Kazan. gos. un-t, 2009. – S. 140;
5. Sidorova N.V. Pokazaniya svidetelya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: Ucheb. posobie. – Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumen. gos. un-ta, 2007. – S. 91.
6. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-5/2006 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Tatarstan za 2006 g.
7. Belyaev M.V. Ukaz. soch. – S. 140–141.
8. Novikova M.V. Institut bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i puti ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2007. – № 7. – S. 38–41.
9. Yakimov I.N., Mikheev P.P. Dopros. – M., 1930 g. – S. 29
10. Zorin G.A. Rukovodstvo po taktike doprosa. – M., 2001. – S. 235
11. Koni A.F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. – M., 1965. – S. 160.
12. Vasil'ev V.L. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – SPb.: Piter, 2009. – S. 557.
13. Ugolovnoe delo № 119344 // Arkhiv Prokuratury Respubliki Tatarstan za 1999 g.
14. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 1991. – S. 24–25.
15. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 8 iyulya 2004 g. № 32-O04-37sp // BVS RF. – 2005. – № 8. – S. 21–22.
16. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. № 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant».
17. Brusnitsyn L. Psevdonimy v ugolovnom protsesse // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – № 1.
18. Epikhin A. Pravovoe regulirovanie mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov protsessa // Zakonnost'. – 2003. – № 5. – S. 47.
19. Malov A.A., Timoshenko A.A. Sostoyanie zakonnosti i problemnye aspekty primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zashchity k poterpevshim, svidetelyam i inym uchastnikam ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Gen. prokuratura RF, 2008. – S. 17.
20. Spravka Upravleniya po obespecheniyu uchastiya prokurorov v rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del sudami General'noy prokuratury RF o primenenii norm UPK RF, obespechivayushchikh bezopasnost' uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 24 dekabrya 2003 g. iskh. № 12/12-03 // Arkhiv NII problem ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka pri General'noy prokurature RF.
21. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. № 24-D04-9 // BVS RF. – 2006. – № 6. – S. 29.
22. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. № 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant».
23. Opredelenie SK po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. № 24-D04-9 «Kazhdyy obvinyaemyy v sovershenii ugolovnogo prestupleniya soglasno p. 16 ch. 4 st. 47, st. 247, ch. 3 st. 278 UPK RF vprave doprashivat' pokazyvayushchikh protiv nego svideteley» (izvlechenie) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2006. – № 6.
24. Brusnitsyn L.V. Kommentariy zakonodatel'stva ob obespechenii bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Yustitsinform, 2009. – S. 178.
25. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. - M., 1991. - S. 24 - 25.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the studies of specific features of the modern criminal law policy of the Russian Federation and the key directions for its improvement. It is noted in the article, that the criminal law policy of the state should be formed with due consideration for the scientific recommendation, and it should be based upon the theoretical positions of scientists, especially those specializing in forensic studies. The modern condition of the Russian criminal law policy has many specific features, which are not typical for the previous stages of development of the Russian science of criminal law. One of such specific features is a complicated multi-faceted character of the state anti-criminal policy, which was formed as a reaction to the evolution of crime. The strengthening of the social element of the modern legal policy, development of sciences (both humanitarian and technical), which allow to uncover the traces of crime may provide due response to the modern crime. The article includes the conclusion that the modern criminal law policy is a complex multi-aspect activity of the state bodies, which is aimed upon solution of the criminal law goals on protection of individuals, society and state from the criminal encroachments.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, politics, legislation, reforms, development, principles, guarantees, categories, crimes, legal order.

Контактная информация: Akopdzhanova, Marianna Olegovna, 350072 Russia, Krasnodar, ul. 40 let Pobedy, 33

Библиография:
1. Aleksandrov A.I. Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnyy protsess v rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: istoriya, sovremennost', perspektivy, problemy / Pod red. V.Z. Lukashevicha. SPb., 2003.
2. Babaev M., Pudovochkin Yu. Kontseptsiya ugolovno-pravovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2012. - № 4. – S. 4-12.
3. Boskholov S.S. Osnovy ugolovnoy politiki: konstitutsionnyy, kriminologicheskiy, ugolovno-pravovoy i informatsionnyy aspekty. M., 1999.
4. Zubareva O.V. Teoriya ugolovnoy politiki: stanovlenie i razvitie // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2011. - № 1.
5. Ivanov S.V. Ugolovnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kriminologo-politologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy aspekty: Dis.... k.yu.n. Ekaterinburg, 2006.
6. Kolesnikov V.V. Effektivnost' ugolovnoy politiki v fokuse ekonomicheskoy teorii prava // Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sb. materialov konferentsii. SPb., 2008.
7. Lesnikov G.Yu. Ugolovnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii (problemy teorii i praktiki). M., 2004.
8. Tret'yakov I.L. Ugolovnaya politika Rossii: obshcheteoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy: Dis. ... d.yu.n. SPb., 2006.
9. Kharitonov A.N. Gosudarstvennyy kontrol' nad prestupnost'yu: teoreticheskie i pravovye problemy. Omsk, 1997.

References (transliteration):
1. Aleksandrov A.I. Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnyy protsess v rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: istoriya, sovremennost', perspektivy, problemy / Pod red. V.Z. Lukashevicha. SPb., 2003.
2. Babaev M., Pudovochkin Yu. Kontseptsiya ugolovno-pravovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2012. - № 4. – S. 4-12.
3. Boskholov S.S. Osnovy ugolovnoy politiki: konstitutsionnyy, kriminologicheskiy, ugolovno-pravovoy i informatsionnyy aspekty. M., 1999.
4. Zubareva O.V. Teoriya ugolovnoy politiki: stanovlenie i razvitie // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2011. - № 1.
5. Ivanov S.V. Ugolovnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kriminologo-politologicheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy aspekty: Dis.... k.yu.n. Ekaterinburg, 2006.
6. Kolesnikov V.V. Effektivnost' ugolovnoy politiki v fokuse ekonomicheskoy teorii prava // Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sb. materialov konferentsii. SPb., 2008.
7. Lesnikov G.Yu. Ugolovnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii (problemy teorii i praktiki). M., 2004.
8. Tret'yakov I.L. Ugolovnaya politika Rossii: obshcheteoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy: Dis. ... d.yu.n. SPb., 2006.
9. Kharitonov A.N. Gosudarstvennyy kontrol' nad prestupnost'yu: teoreticheskie i pravovye problemy. Omsk, 1997.

Аннотация: The author studies topical issues regarding the interactions among the Plenipotentiary Representatives of the President of the Russian Federation with the lawenforcement bodies under the Russian legislation, and makes conclusions. The mechanisms of interaction in the public law can be regarded as a combination of organizational elements, allowing to implement the state powers based on mutual cooperation of two or more empowered subjects, holding equal position within the system of public power. This issue has been an object of scientific studies for the last decade. The authors pay much attention to the issues of functioning of the Plenipotentiary Representatives of the President of the Russian Federation in the federal districts, supporting the thesis on the need to strengthen their role. Since the provisions of various normative acts vary, the organs tend to stand apart from each other, each of them following its own normative basis. This is hardly an acceptable, sufficient or sustainable position. Due to the absence of detailed legislative regulation the study of interactions between the Plenipotentiary Representatives of the President of the Russian Federation in the federal districts and the executive bodies could facilitate the studies of the mechanisms of their interaction with the police, investigation and prosecution bodies.

Ключевые слова: Russian legislation, President, the Russian Federation, Plenipotentiary Representative, federal district, law-enforcement bodies, interaction, public law, plenipotentiary, power.

Контактная информация: Maksimova, Kristina Aleksandrovna, 123022, Russia, Moskva, 2 Zvenigorodksaya ul. D. 15

Библиография:
1. Eleonskiy V.A. Pooshchritel'nye normy ugolovnogo prava. Khabarovsk, 1984. – 108 s.
2. Eleonskiy V.O. Idealy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i prava grazhdan // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2009. № 8. S. 33 – 50.
3. Krasnov M.A. O nekotorykh konstitutsionno pravovykh aspektakh sozdaniya instituta polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta RF v federal'nykh okrugakh // Materialy seminara NIISS MGU na temu «Institut polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta v federal'nykh okrugakh i reformirovanie sistemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya». M., 2001.
4. Krasnykh O.V. Institut polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v kontekste razvitiya federativnykh otnosheniy. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / O.V. Krasnykh. M., 2001. – 23 s.
5. Makanova I.Yu. Institut polnomochnogo predstavitelya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nom okruge. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / I.Yu. Makanova. M., 2002. – 23 c.
6. Putin V.V. Kakuyu Rossiyu my stroim. Poslanie Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii 8 iyulya 2000 goda // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 11 iyulya.
7. Syskova I.V. Stanovlenie, razvitie i funktsional'noe soderzhanie instituta polnomochnogo predstavitelya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nom okruge. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / I.V. Syskova. M., 2004. – 20 c.
8. Semenov A.V. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya instituta polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nykh okrugakh // Teoreticheskiy filosofskiy zhurnal. Kredo. 2001. № 3 (27).
9. Tarkhanov I.A. Pooshchrenie pozitivnogo povedeniya v ugolovnom prave. Kazan', 2001. – 330 s.
10. Tsyretorov A.I. Polnomochnyy predstavitel' Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nom okruge: institutsional'noe obnovlenie // Vestnik Povolzhskoy akademii gosudarstvennoy sluzhby. Saratov, 2010. № 3. S. 11 – 16.
11. Yunda A.A. Polnomochnyy predstavitel' Prezidenta Rossii v Federal'nom okruge kak vazhneyshee zveno regional'nogo kontrolya // Yuridicheskie zapiski studencheskogo nauchnogo obshchestva. Sbornik statey. Yaroslavl', 2004. Vyp. 4. S. 25-26.

References (transliteration):
1. Eleonskiy V.A. Pooshchritel'nye normy ugolovnogo prava. Khabarovsk, 1984. – 108 s.
2. Eleonskiy V.O. Idealy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i prava grazhdan // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2009. № 8. S. 33 – 50.
3. Krasnov M.A. O nekotorykh konstitutsionno pravovykh aspektakh sozdaniya instituta polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta RF v federal'nykh okrugakh // Materialy seminara NIISS MGU na temu «Institut polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta v federal'nykh okrugakh i reformirovanie sistemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya». M., 2001.
4. Krasnykh O.V. Institut polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v kontekste razvitiya federativnykh otnosheniy. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / O.V. Krasnykh. M., 2001. – 23 s.
5. Makanova I.Yu. Institut polnomochnogo predstavitelya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nom okruge. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / I.Yu. Makanova. M., 2002. – 23 c.
6. Putin V.V. Kakuyu Rossiyu my stroim. Poslanie Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii 8 iyulya 2000 goda // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2000. 11 iyulya.
7. Syskova I.V. Stanovlenie, razvitie i funktsional'noe soderzhanie instituta polnomochnogo predstavitelya Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nom okruge. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / I.V. Syskova. M., 2004. – 20 c.
8. Semenov A.V. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya instituta polnomochnykh predstaviteley Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nykh okrugakh // Teoreticheskiy filosofskiy zhurnal. Kredo. 2001. № 3 (27).
9. Tarkhanov I.A. Pooshchrenie pozitivnogo povedeniya v ugolovnom prave. Kazan', 2001. – 330 s.
10. Tsyretorov A.I. Polnomochnyy predstavitel' Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii v federal'nom okruge: institutsional'noe obnovlenie // Vestnik Povolzhskoy akademii gosudarstvennoy sluzhby. Saratov, 2010. № 3. S. 11 – 16.
11. Yunda A.A. Polnomochnyy predstavitel' Prezidenta Rossii v Federal'nom okruge kak vazhneyshee zveno regional'nogo kontrolya // Yuridicheskie zapiski studencheskogo nauchnogo obshchestva. Sbornik statey. Yaroslavl', 2004. Vyp. 4. S. 25-26.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to enforcing administrative responsibility for violations in the sphere of cultural heritage preservation by the means of the Russian Federation constituents ’ legal acts. Based on the analysis of a wide range of legal resources, the author makes a conclusion about invasion of the regional law-maker into the competence of federal authorities. Constituents’ administrative laws often set out administrative responsibility for violating rules and regulations described by federal legal acts. Preventive acts of regional laws often either contradict to federal regulations or copy them. Due to adopting the Federal law of May 7, 2013 on changes in the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation which shall come into force already in August 2013, there shall be serious transformations and changes in administrative delictual legislation of the Russian Federation constituents.

Ключевые слова: Law studies, cultural heritage resources, historical and cultural memorials, items of historical and cultural meaning, administrative offence, administrative responsibility, administrative fines, set of elements of an administrative offence, wrongful actions, administrative procedure.

Библиография:

1. Vakhitov A.K. Administrativno-pravovaya okhrana ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya: avtoref. dis. … kand.yurid.nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2007.
2. Gavrilova L.V. Sistematizatsiya zakonodatel'stva sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: opyt i problemy // Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. № 4 (34).
3. Kazantsev M.F. Regional'noe zakonodatel'stvo: trudnosti rosta // Vestnik Ural'skogo otdeleniya RAN. 2009. № 2 (28).
4. Maslennikov M.Ya. O legitimnosti nekotorykh polozheniy zakonov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Politseyskoe pravo. 2006. № 1.
5. Maslennikov M.Ya. Obstoyatel'naya kontseptsiya neobkhodima kazhdomu regional'nomu zakonu ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2007. № 6.
6. Rogacheva O.S. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti modernizatsii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2011. № 11.
7. Rogacheva O.S. Effektivnost' norm administrativno-deliktnogo prava: monografiya. Voronezh: Izdatel'stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011.
8. Salishcheva N.G. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossii v sovremennyy period // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. № 5.

References (transliteration):

1. Vakhitov A.K. Administrativno-pravovaya okhrana ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya: avtoref. dis. … kand.yurid.nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2007.
2. Gavrilova L.V. Sistematizatsiya zakonodatel'stva sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: opyt i problemy // Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. № 4 (34).
3. Kazantsev M.F. Regional'noe zakonodatel'stvo: trudnosti rosta // Vestnik Ural'skogo otdeleniya RAN. 2009. № 2 (28).
4. Maslennikov M.Ya. O legitimnosti nekotorykh polozheniy zakonov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Politseyskoe pravo. 2006. № 1.
5. Maslennikov M.Ya. Obstoyatel'naya kontseptsiya neobkhodima kazhdomu regional'nomu zakonu ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2007. № 6.
6. Rogacheva O.S. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti modernizatsii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2011. № 11.
7. Rogacheva O.S. Effektivnost' norm administrativno-deliktnogo prava: monografiya. Voronezh: Izdatel'stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011.
8. Salishcheva N.G. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossii v sovremennyy period // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. № 5.

Аннотация: The article provides the detailed analysis of the subjects of drug crimes, to whom the provisions of Art. 82.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on suspension of sentence apply. As a result of the comparative study of this norms, the author shows considerable deviations from the requirements of the Strategy of the State Anti-Narcotic Policy of the Russian Federation for the period till 2020 in part of the offered criminal legal measures for the curtailment of the unlawful distribution and non-medical consumption of drugs. The author shows the non-conformity of medical and legal elements in the terms “narcomania” and “toxicomania” (drug abuse) in the Russian legislation and in the requirements of the ICD-10 and the foreign legislation. The author also shows how the normative practice of the Government of the Russian Federation on the formation of lists of drugs gives ground to the lack of stability to the diagnosis of “narcomania” (drug addiction) and allows it to transform into the toxicomania and vice versa, therefore, it limits the possibility of the application of Art. 82.1 of the Criminal Code depending on the type of psychoactive drug. Taking some topical issues of implementation of a novel criminal law institution of suspension of sentence to the drug addicted drug criminals, the author views them from the criminal procedural aspect, offers rational ways for improvement of the situation.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, narcotic substances and psychoactive substances, potent and poisonous substances, psychoactive substances, narcomania and toxicomania, narco-infected, compulsory medical treatment, drug-related articles, anti-narcotic.

Контактная информация: Kukharuk, Vladimir Vasilievich, 410012, Russia, Saratov, ul. Moskovskaya, d. 156

Библиография:
1. Bol'shoy meditsinskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'/ Pod red. V.I. Borodulina. – Izd. 4-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. – M.: RIPOL klassik, 2007.
2. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya bolezney desyatogo peresmotra (MKB-10). [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://aeli.altai.ru/conferenc/1999/turina.html.
3. Shabanov V.B., Shtakel'berg O.Yu. Narkomanii: patopsikhologiya, klinika, reabilitatsiya. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. /Pod red. A.Ya. Grinenko, – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Lan'», 2001.
4. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik. Izdanie vtoroe pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / Pod red. doktora yuridiche-skikh nauk, professora L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Raroga, doktora yuridi-cheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Chuchaeva. — M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «KONTRAKT»: INFRA-M, 2008. — 560 s.
5. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 22.02.2012 g. №144 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem kontrolya za oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov» //RG. 6.03.2012 g. №48.
6. Dannye Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude RF. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://crimpravo.ru/page/sudstatistic/

References (transliteration):
1. Bol'shoy meditsinskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'/ Pod red. V.I. Borodulina. – Izd. 4-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. – M.: RIPOL klassik, 2007.
2. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya bolezney desyatogo peresmotra (MKB-10). [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://aeli.altai.ru/conferenc/1999/turina.html.
3. Shabanov V.B., Shtakel'berg O.Yu. Narkomanii: patopsikhologiya, klinika, reabilitatsiya. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. /Pod red. A.Ya. Grinenko, – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Lan'», 2001.
4. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik. Izdanie vtoroe pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / Pod red. doktora yuridiche-skikh nauk, professora L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Raroga, doktora yuridi-cheskikh nauk, professora A.I. Chuchaeva. — M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «KONTRAKT»: INFRA-M, 2008. — 560 s.
5. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 22.02.2012 g. №144 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem kontrolya za oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov» //RG. 6.03.2012 g. №48.
6. Dannye Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude RF. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://crimpravo.ru/page/sudstatistic/

Аннотация: The article includes analysis of some issues of qualification and legislative regulation regarding crimes related to the illegal turnover of pornography. The position of the author is based first of all on the need to guarantee the due legal regulation of lawful activities on turnover of pornographic products, which shall allow to deal with the criminal law problems regarding qualification of such crimes. The author points out, that the key steps in this direction include the legislative provisions for the criteria for the absolutely prohibited pornographic products (juvenile sex, sex with animals, sex with violence), and for the relatively allowed pornographic products, which may be used with some limitations. The author analyzes the definitions of pornographic materials and objects, as provided in the latest studies on these issues. Much attention is paid to the legislative elements of pornography, qualifications of the elements of its production and keeping.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, pornography, legalization, Internet, production, spread, keeping, juvenile, qualification, responsibility.

Контактная информация: Avdeeva, Maria Viktorovna, 123995, Russia, Moskva, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d.9

Библиография:
1. Valentonis A.S., «Kriminologicheskie i ugolovno-pravovye aspekty protivodeystviya oborotu predmetov ili materialov s pornograficheskimi izobrazheniyami nesovershennoletnikh», avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk, Tambov, 2010 g.
2. Denisenko M.V., «Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe rasprostranenie pornograficheskikh materialov ili predmetov», avtoreferat na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk, Moskva, 2004 g.
3. Dzhindzholiya R.S., Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe rasprostranenie pornograficheskikh materialov ili predmetov, Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet servisa, filial v g. Sochi, Moskva-Sochi, 2001 g.
4. Isaev N.A., Seksual'nye prestupleniya kak ob'ekt kriminologii, Sankt-Peterburg, Izdatel'stvo
R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr PRESS», 2007 g.
5. Kapinus O.S., Dodonov V.N., «Otvetstvennost' za pornografiyu v sovremennom ugolovnom prave» // Pravo i politika - № 12 - 2006 g.
6. Pol'shikov A.V., «Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie mery bor'by s izgotovleniem i oborotom materialov s pornograficheskimi izobrazheniyami nesovershennoletnikh v seti «Internet», avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk, Tambov, 2009 g.
7. Torosyan R.V., «Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe izgotovlenie i rasprostranenie pornograficheskikh predmetov v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: istoricheskaya preemstvennost' i evolyutsiya», Rossiyskiy sledovatel', № 24, 2009 g.

References (transliteration):
1. Valentonis A.S., «Kriminologicheskie i ugolovno-pravovye aspekty protivodeystviya oborotu predmetov ili materialov s pornograficheskimi izobrazheniyami nesovershennoletnikh», avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk, Tambov, 2010 g.
2. Denisenko M.V., «Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe rasprostranenie pornograficheskikh materialov ili predmetov», avtoreferat na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk, Moskva, 2004 g.
3. Dzhindzholiya R.S., Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe rasprostranenie pornograficheskikh materialov ili predmetov, Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet servisa, filial v g. Sochi, Moskva-Sochi, 2001 g.
4. Isaev N.A., Seksual'nye prestupleniya kak ob'ekt kriminologii, Sankt-Peterburg, Izdatel'stvo
R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr PRESS», 2007 g.
5. Kapinus O.S., Dodonov V.N., «Otvetstvennost' za pornografiyu v sovremennom ugolovnom prave» // Pravo i politika - № 12 - 2006 g.
6. Pol'shikov A.V., «Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie mery bor'by s izgotovleniem i oborotom materialov s pornograficheskimi izobrazheniyami nesovershennoletnikh v seti «Internet», avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk, Tambov, 2009 g.
7. Torosyan R.V., «Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe izgotovlenie i rasprostranenie pornograficheskikh predmetov v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: istoricheskaya preemstvennost' i evolyutsiya», Rossiyskiy sledovatel', № 24, 2009 g.

Аннотация: Complicity in crime is one of the most topical theoretical issues and complicated matters in legal pratice among the institutes of criminal law. The disputes among the legal scholars on co-participation has been ongoing for a long time, and the judicial practice lacks the unified approach to this issue. The article includes analysis of the term complicity in crime in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Code of Republic of Azerbaijan, then the author establishes its elements as follows: performance of crime by two or more persons, collegial participation in crime, purposeful character of the activities of co-participants. Then the author offers to amend some norms on the term and characteristic features of complicity in the criminal law of Azerbaijan.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, complicity, elements of participation, inefficient complicity, causal link, negligent co-infliction, complicity in crime, responsibility for the complicity, complicity, participation of two or more persons.

Контактная информация: Aliyev, Nazim Kazim-ogly, Az1001, 10, Istiglaliyyat str., Baku, Azerbaijan Republic

Библиография:
1. Ignatov A.N., Krasikov Yu.A Kurs rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava: V 2 t. T.1. Obshchaya chast'.– M.: Izdatel'stvo NORMA (Izdatel'skaya gruppa NORMA – INFRA. M), 2001. – 560 s.
2. A.P.Kozlov. Souchastie: traditsii i real'nost'. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2001. – 362 s.
3. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast'. Tom 1: Uchenie o prestuplenii. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Pod red. N.F.Kuznetsovoy i I.M.Tyazhkovoy. – M.: IKD «Zertsalo-M», 2002. – 624 s.
4. Naumov S.N. Otsenochnye priznaki souchastiya v prestuplenii. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Krasnodar, 2009, 26 s.
5. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: V 2 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / G.N.Borzenkov (i dr.); pod red. L.V.Inogamovoy-Khegay, V.S.Komissarova, A.I.Raroga. – Moskava : Prospekt, 2011. – 528 s.
6. Ugolovnoe pravo. Istoriya yuridicheskoy nauki. Otv. red. V.N.Kudryavtsev. M., Izd-vo «Nauka».
1978. 310 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Ignatov A.N., Krasikov Yu.A Kurs rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava: V 2 t. T.1. Obshchaya chast'.– M.: Izdatel'stvo NORMA (Izdatel'skaya gruppa NORMA – INFRA. M), 2001. – 560 s.
2. A.P.Kozlov. Souchastie: traditsii i real'nost'. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2001. – 362 s.
3. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast'. Tom 1: Uchenie o prestuplenii. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Pod red. N.F.Kuznetsovoy i I.M.Tyazhkovoy. – M.: IKD «Zertsalo-M», 2002. – 624 s.
4. Naumov S.N. Otsenochnye priznaki souchastiya v prestuplenii. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Krasnodar, 2009, 26 s.
5. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: V 2 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / G.N.Borzenkov (i dr.); pod red. L.V.Inogamovoy-Khegay, V.S.Komissarova, A.I.Raroga. – Moskava : Prospekt, 2011. – 528 s.
6. Ugolovnoe pravo. Istoriya yuridicheskoy nauki. Otv. red. V.N.Kudryavtsev. M., Izd-vo «Nauka».
1978. 310 s.

Аннотация: The author analyzes the offence in its relation to the legal responsibility. He focuses on the most controversial elements of an offence, their differences in the theory of state and law and specific branches of law and legal science. The author carries out a comparative analysis of legislative formulae of the concept of breach of law in the domestic and foreign legal instruments.

Ключевые слова: legal responsibility; legal fact; the offence; the elements of the offence; the occurrence of legal liability

Контактная информация: Lipinskiy, Dmitry Anatolievich, 445667, Russia, Tolyatti, ul. Belorusskaya, d.14

Библиография:
1. Carvell I., Green E., Swinfen. Criminal Law and Procedure. – London, 1970. –321. P.
2. Ingraham Baton L. Political in Europe. A comparative study of France, Germany and England University of California, press. 1979. –134 P
3. Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh. – M.: Yurizdat, 1939. – 320 s.
4. Belov V.A. Grazhdanskoe pravo. – M.: YurInfoR, 2003. – 639 s..
5. Beloshapko Yu.N. Pravonarushenie i otvetstvennost' v finansovom prave // Pravovedenie. – 2001. – № 5.
6. Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo: Obshchie polozheniya. M.: Statut, 1998. – 786 s.
7. Butnev V.V. Grazhdanskiy protsess kak odna iz form realizatsii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v epokhu razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – L., 1981. – 19 s.
8. Butnev V.V. Realizatsiya otvetstvennosti v grazhdanskom protsesse. – Yaroslavl', 1985. – 129 s.
9. Vedyakhin V.M., Galuzin A.F. Rynochnaya ekonomika i pravonarusheniya // Atrium: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. Ser. «Yurisprudentsiya». – Vyp. 4. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo MABiBD, 1996. S. 11–14.
10. Vinogradov V.A. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost': voprosy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. – M., 2002. – 287 s.
11. Gogin A.A. Teoretiko-pravovye voprosy nalogovoy otvetstvennosti. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo VUiT, 2003. S. 118 s.
12. Gromov N.A, Polunin S.A. Sanktsii v ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave Rossii. – M.: Gorodets, 1998. – 152 s.
13. Gryzunova E.V. Pravonarushenie i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' v ikh sootnoshenii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2002. – 23 s.
14. Denisov Yu.A. Obshchaya teoriya pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennosti. – L.: LGU, 1983. – 144 s.
15. Zus' L.B. Pravovoe regulirovanie v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 1984. – S. 41–42.
16. Kolosova N.M. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M.: Gorodets, 2000.– 192 s.
17. Komarov S.A. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. – M.: Manuskript, 1996. – 384 s.
18. Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava. – Spb., 1909. – 417s.
19. Krasavchikov O.A. Teoriya yuridicheskikh faktov v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Sverdlovsk, 1950.
20. Kropachev N.M. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya: Dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk v forme nauchnogo doklada. – SPb, 2000. – 41 s.
21. Lipinskiy D.A. Formy realizatsii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo VUiT, 1999. – 144 s.
22. Khachaturov R.L., Yagutyan R.G. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. – Tol'yatti, 1995 – 200 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Carvell I., Green E., Swinfen. Criminal Law and Procedure. – London, 1970. –321. P.
2. Ingraham Baton L. Political in Europe. A comparative study of France, Germany and England University of California, press. 1979. –134 P
3. Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh. – M.: Yurizdat, 1939. – 320 s.
4. Belov V.A. Grazhdanskoe pravo. – M.: YurInfoR, 2003. – 639 s..
5. Beloshapko Yu.N. Pravonarushenie i otvetstvennost' v finansovom prave // Pravovedenie. – 2001. – № 5.
6. Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo: Obshchie polozheniya. M.: Statut, 1998. – 786 s.
7. Butnev V.V. Grazhdanskiy protsess kak odna iz form realizatsii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v epokhu razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – L., 1981. – 19 s.
8. Butnev V.V. Realizatsiya otvetstvennosti v grazhdanskom protsesse. – Yaroslavl', 1985. – 129 s.
9. Vedyakhin V.M., Galuzin A.F. Rynochnaya ekonomika i pravonarusheniya // Atrium: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. Ser. «Yurisprudentsiya». – Vyp. 4. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo MABiBD, 1996. S. 11–14.
10. Vinogradov V.A. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost': voprosy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. – M., 2002. – 287 s.
11. Gogin A.A. Teoretiko-pravovye voprosy nalogovoy otvetstvennosti. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo VUiT, 2003. S. 118 s.
12. Gromov N.A, Polunin S.A. Sanktsii v ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave Rossii. – M.: Gorodets, 1998. – 152 s.
13. Gryzunova E.V. Pravonarushenie i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' v ikh sootnoshenii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2002. – 23 s.
14. Denisov Yu.A. Obshchaya teoriya pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennosti. – L.: LGU, 1983. – 144 s.
15. Zus' L.B. Pravovoe regulirovanie v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 1984. – S. 41–42.
16. Kolosova N.M. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M.: Gorodets, 2000.– 192 s.
17. Komarov S.A. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. – M.: Manuskript, 1996. – 384 s.
18. Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava. – Spb., 1909. – 417s.
19. Krasavchikov O.A. Teoriya yuridicheskikh faktov v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Sverdlovsk, 1950.
20. Kropachev N.M. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya: Dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk v forme nauchnogo doklada. – SPb, 2000. – 41 s.
21. Lipinskiy D.A. Formy realizatsii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. – Tol'yatti: Izd-vo VUiT, 1999. – 144 s.
22. Khachaturov R.L., Yagutyan R.G. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. – Tol'yatti, 1995 – 200 s.

Аннотация: The problem of the narcotic addition of the people draws attention of many social and humanitarian sciences and disciplines, the forensic science, medicine and social science being among the most prominent ones. The article is devoted to the social aspect of the problem, related to the speciÞ c features of the activities of various services, which Þ ght narcotic addictions of the people in Russia. The article includes the variety of expert opinions, which establish the grounds for the efÞ cient or inefÞ cient activities of such services. The key conclusion is that there is need to provide such services with a special social and legal status.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, narcotization, dependency, society, counter-measures, narcotic drug consuming, abuse, healing, rehabilitation.

Библиография:
1. Borodkin, F.M. Preodolenie sotsial'noy eksklyuzii: novye podkhody / F.M. Borodkin // Rossiya, kotoruyu my obretaem / Otv. red. T.I. Zaslavskaya, Z.I. Kalugina. – Novosibirsk, 2003. S. 507-537.
2. Vliyanie narkomanii na sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie obshchestva / Pod red. V.I. Starodubova, A.I. Tatarkina. – M.; Ekaterinburg, 2006. - 380 s.
3. Voronin, A.V. Sotsial'nye prichiny narkotizatsii naseleniya v Altayskom regione / A.V. Voronin. – Barnaul, 2007. – 135 s.
4. Mozgovaya, A.V. Sotsiologiya riska: vozmozhnost' sinteza teorii i empiricheskogo znaniya / A.V. Mozgovaya // Risk v sotsial'nom prostranstve / Pod red. A.V. Mozgovoy. – I-t sotsiologii RAN. – M., 2001. S. 13-37.
5. Moiseeva, V.V. Metodologo-metodicheskie aspekty issledovaniya konfessional'nykh faktorov v provedenii profilakticheskoy raboty / V.V. Moiseeva // Deviantnoe povedenie: metodologiya i metodika issledovaniya / Pod red. M.E. Pozdnyakovoy. – M., 2006.
6. Omel'chenko, D.A. Faktory modernizatsii sotsial'nogo mekhanizma protivodeystviya narkotizatsii molodezhi v sovremennom rossiyskom agropromyshlennom regione: diss…kand. sotsiol. nauk / D.A. Omel'chenko. – Barnaul, 2007. – 217 s.
7. Omel'chenko, E.L. Molodezhnye kul'tury i subkul'tury / E.L. Omel'chesnko. – M., 2000. – 261 s.
8. Prestupnost' v izmenyayushchemsya mire: sb. st. / Otv. red. Yu. Saar. – Tartu, 1998. – 111 s.
9. Prestupnost' i pravonarusheniya (1991-1995 gg.): stat. sb. / Min-vo vnutr. del Rossiyskoy Federatsii; Min-vo yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Mezhgoskomstat SNG. – M.: Finansy i statistika, 1996. – 173 s.
10. Pyatnitskaya, I.N. Narkomanii: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey / I.N. Pyatnitskaya. – M.: Meditsina, 1994.
11. Gerstein, D. Treating Drug Problems, vol. 1 / D. Gerstein, H. Harwood. – Washington D.C., National Academy Press, 1990.
12. Mattick, R. P. Are detoxification programmes effective? / R. P. Mattick, W. Hall // Lancet. – 2001. - № 347. – R. 97-100.

References (transliteration):
1. Borodkin, F.M. Preodolenie sotsial'noy eksklyuzii: novye podkhody / F.M. Borodkin // Rossiya, kotoruyu my obretaem / Otv. red. T.I. Zaslavskaya, Z.I. Kalugina. – Novosibirsk, 2003. S. 507-537.
2. Vliyanie narkomanii na sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie obshchestva / Pod red. V.I. Starodubova, A.I. Tatarkina. – M.; Ekaterinburg, 2006. - 380 s.
3. Voronin, A.V. Sotsial'nye prichiny narkotizatsii naseleniya v Altayskom regione / A.V. Voronin. – Barnaul, 2007. – 135 s.
4. Mozgovaya, A.V. Sotsiologiya riska: vozmozhnost' sinteza teorii i empiricheskogo znaniya / A.V. Mozgovaya // Risk v sotsial'nom prostranstve / Pod red. A.V. Mozgovoy. – I-t sotsiologii RAN. – M., 2001. S. 13-37.
5. Moiseeva, V.V. Metodologo-metodicheskie aspekty issledovaniya konfessional'nykh faktorov v provedenii profilakticheskoy raboty / V.V. Moiseeva // Deviantnoe povedenie: metodologiya i metodika issledovaniya / Pod red. M.E. Pozdnyakovoy. – M., 2006.
6. Omel'chenko, D.A. Faktory modernizatsii sotsial'nogo mekhanizma protivodeystviya narkotizatsii molodezhi v sovremennom rossiyskom agropromyshlennom regione: diss…kand. sotsiol. nauk / D.A. Omel'chenko. – Barnaul, 2007. – 217 s.
7. Omel'chenko, E.L. Molodezhnye kul'tury i subkul'tury / E.L. Omel'chesnko. – M., 2000. – 261 s.
8. Prestupnost' v izmenyayushchemsya mire: sb. st. / Otv. red. Yu. Saar. – Tartu, 1998. – 111 s.
9. Prestupnost' i pravonarusheniya (1991-1995 gg.): stat. sb. / Min-vo vnutr. del Rossiyskoy Federatsii; Min-vo yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Mezhgoskomstat SNG. – M.: Finansy i statistika, 1996. – 173 s.
10. Pyatnitskaya, I.N. Narkomanii: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey / I.N. Pyatnitskaya. – M.: Meditsina, 1994.
11. Gerstein, D. Treating Drug Problems, vol. 1 / D. Gerstein, H. Harwood. – Washington D.C., National Academy Press, 1990.
12. Mattick, R. P. Are detoxification programmes effective? / R. P. Mattick, W. Hall // Lancet. – 2001. - № 347. – R. 97-100.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation of the Republic of France, which regulates the disciplinary responsibility of the territorial public ofÞ cials, in particular, its procedure and sanctions, as well as procedural guarantees and control over the application of disciplinary responsibility measures. The author studied the laws of the French Republic and other legislative acts on disciplinary responsibility of the public service ofÞ cials, which were accepted during last 25 years. The French legislation lacks the deÞ nition of the “disciplinary offence”, it is viewed as a violation of one of professional or deontological obligations, as prescribed by the General Statute on Public Service or the judicial practice. It should also be noted that the disciplinary offence of a public servant may be constituted by his behavior in his private life, such as alcoholism or drunk driving. There is a scale of disciplinary punishment for the territorial ofÞ cials, and the application of disciplinary punishment is very strictly regulated. It includes the obligatory study of the dossier of an accused ofÞ cial by that ofÞ cial, his ability to use representatives of his choice, obligatory report of the disciplinary council (which is not obligatory for the territorial ofÞ cials). Under the Law N 94-1134 of 27.12.1994 the Departmental and Inter- Departmental Appeals Disciplinary Councils are formed, and they serve as an appellate instance. Accordingly the application of disciplinary responsibility to the territorial public service ofÞ cials in France is characterized by a number of procedural guarantees and double control by the judiciary, which may end up in the disciplinary sanction being cancelled. In spite of lack of legislative deÞ nition of the “disciplinary offence’ the French legislation includes a clear scale of disciplinary sanctions.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, territorial service, control, sanctions, offence, punishment, advise, guarantees, investiga tions, public servant.

Библиография:
1. Bolle S. L'engagement des poursuites disciplinaires dans la fonction publique. Un regime introuvable. //Revue Francaise de Droit Administratif.2001. R.421.
2. Conseil d'Etat 14-1-1916, №599619, Camino// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). p.15.
3. Conseil d'Etat sect.11-5-1979, №2499, Dupouy //Actualite Juridique-Droit Administratif (ed.Dalloz).1980.R.196.
4. Conseil d'Etat sect., 9-6-1978, Lebon// Actualite Juridique-Droit Administratif (ed.Dalloz). 1978.P.573, concl.Genevois.
5. Conseil d'Etat 27-1-1982, №29738, Pelletier// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.36.
6. Conseil d'Etat 24-1-1986, №64142, Ville de Mantes-La-Jolie// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.20.
7. Conseil d'Etat 14-1-1987, №77770, Commissaire de la Republique du Calvados// Revue Francaise de Droit Administratif.1988 R.71, note J.-P. Negrin.
8. Conseil d'Etat 21-6-1996, №140775, Cne de Bucheres c/Collery// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). p.235.
9. Conseil d'Etat 10-11-1997, №119940, Cne de Saint-Martin-le-Vinoux// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.278.
10. Conseil d'Etat ass. 26-10-2001, №197018, Ternon// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.497.
11. Cour administrative d'appel Nantes, 19 avr.2001, CCAS de Loudeac, №98NT00622.
12. Decret №89-677 du 18 septembre 1989 relatif a la procedure disciplinaire applicable aux fonctionnaires territoriaux// Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise du 19 septembre 1989 page 11818
13. Delacour E. Les consequences de l'annulation par juge administratif d'une mesure d'eviction d'un fonctionnaire// Gazette des communes 18 juillet.2000.P.58.
14. Fitte-Duval A. Droits et obligations des agents communaux. Paris : Editions Dalloz, 2011. P.447 ; Aubin E. La fonction publique territoriale. Paris : Gualino editeur. 2012. P.427.
15. Loi du 22 avril 1905 portant fixation du budget des depenses et des recettes de l'exercice 1905// Recueil Duvergier. page 268
16. Loi № 83-634 du 13 juillet 1983 portant droits et obligations des fonctionnaires //Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise du 14 juillet 1983 P. 2174
17. Loi № 84-53 du 26 janvier 1984 portant dispositions statutaires relatives a la fonction publique territoriale// Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise du 27 janvier 1984 P. 441.
18. Loi № 94-1134 du 27 decembre 1994 modifiant certaines dispositions relatives a la fonction publique territoriale//Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise №300 du 28 decembre 1994 page 18527
19. Loi № 2007-209 du 19 fevrier 2007 relative a la fonction publique territoriale// Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise №44 du 21 fevrier 2007 page 3041 texte № 1
20. Peuchot E. Le regime disciplinaire applicable aux fonctionnaires territoriaux.// Les Petites Affiches.1999.6 mars. P.10 ; Rouquet Ph. Instantane de jurisprudences administratives en matiere de sanctions disciplinaires : vers une responsabilisation accrue des fonctionnaires?//Revue Lamy des collectivites Territoriales.2006.№18.R.27.
21. Rihal H. Les trente ans de la jurisprudence Lebon. L'usage de l'erreur manifeste contre les sanctions disciplinaires arbitraires. Paris : Dalloz, 2008.P.511.

References (transliteration):
1. Bolle S. L'engagement des poursuites disciplinaires dans la fonction publique. Un regime introuvable. //Revue Francaise de Droit Administratif.2001. R.421.
2. Conseil d'Etat 14-1-1916, №599619, Camino// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). p.15.
3. Conseil d'Etat sect.11-5-1979, №2499, Dupouy //Actualite Juridique-Droit Administratif (ed.Dalloz).1980.R.196.
4. Conseil d'Etat sect., 9-6-1978, Lebon// Actualite Juridique-Droit Administratif (ed.Dalloz). 1978.P.573, concl.Genevois.
5. Conseil d'Etat 27-1-1982, №29738, Pelletier// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.36.
6. Conseil d'Etat 24-1-1986, №64142, Ville de Mantes-La-Jolie// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.20.
7. Conseil d'Etat 14-1-1987, №77770, Commissaire de la Republique du Calvados// Revue Francaise de Droit Administratif.1988 R.71, note J.-P. Negrin.
8. Conseil d'Etat 21-6-1996, №140775, Cne de Bucheres c/Collery// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). p.235.
9. Conseil d'Etat 10-11-1997, №119940, Cne de Saint-Martin-le-Vinoux// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.278.
10. Conseil d'Etat ass. 26-10-2001, №197018, Ternon// Recueil des arrets du Conseil d'Etat (Lebon). R.497.
11. Cour administrative d'appel Nantes, 19 avr.2001, CCAS de Loudeac, №98NT00622.
12. Decret №89-677 du 18 septembre 1989 relatif a la procedure disciplinaire applicable aux fonctionnaires territoriaux// Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise du 19 septembre 1989 page 11818
13. Delacour E. Les consequences de l'annulation par juge administratif d'une mesure d'eviction d'un fonctionnaire// Gazette des communes 18 juillet.2000.P.58.
14. Fitte-Duval A. Droits et obligations des agents communaux. Paris : Editions Dalloz, 2011. P.447 ; Aubin E. La fonction publique territoriale. Paris : Gualino editeur. 2012. P.427.
15. Loi du 22 avril 1905 portant fixation du budget des depenses et des recettes de l'exercice 1905// Recueil Duvergier. page 268
16. Loi № 83-634 du 13 juillet 1983 portant droits et obligations des fonctionnaires //Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise du 14 juillet 1983 P. 2174
17. Loi № 84-53 du 26 janvier 1984 portant dispositions statutaires relatives a la fonction publique territoriale// Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise du 27 janvier 1984 P. 441.
18. Loi № 94-1134 du 27 decembre 1994 modifiant certaines dispositions relatives a la fonction publique territoriale//Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise №300 du 28 decembre 1994 page 18527
19. Loi № 2007-209 du 19 fevrier 2007 relative a la fonction publique territoriale// Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise №44 du 21 fevrier 2007 page 3041 texte № 1
20. Peuchot E. Le regime disciplinaire applicable aux fonctionnaires territoriaux.// Les Petites Affiches.1999.6 mars. P.10 ; Rouquet Ph. Instantane de jurisprudences administratives en matiere de sanctions disciplinaires : vers une responsabilisation accrue des fonctionnaires?//Revue Lamy des collectivites Territoriales.2006.№18.R.27.
21. Rihal H. Les trente ans de la jurisprudence Lebon. L'usage de l'erreur manifeste contre les sanctions disciplinaires arbitraires. Paris : Dalloz, 2008.P.511.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the legal relations between an investigator and a head of investigative body, which are formed based on the new Federal Law of the Russian Federation of December 28, 2010 N. 404 –FZ. Due to this the author criticizes a number of provisions of the new law, and points out that the legislator failed to pay due attention to this type of relations, and they still need further improvement.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, new law, investigator, head of an investigative body, investigative body, rights of a head of an investigative body, rights of a prosecutor, recommendations of a prosecutor, independence of an investigator, improvement of the law, amendments.

Библиография:
Balakshin V. Nezavisimyy-zavisimyy sledovatel'. //Zakonnost'. 2011. №10. S. 34.
Bozh'ev V. Protsessual'noe rukovodstvo proizvodstvom predvaritel'nogo sledstviya. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008.
№3. S. 68.
Bykov V.M. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks RF i problemy raskrytiya prestupleniya (polemicheskie zametki).
//Pravo i politika. 2002. №9. S. 66-72.
Bykov V. M. Sudebnyy kontrol' za predvaritel'nym sledstviem. //Ugolovnyy protsess. 2007. №1. S. 35-38.
Bykov V.M. Pravovoe polozhenie sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii (chast' 2). //Pravo i politika. 2012.
№6. S. 1079-1085.
Bykov V. Sledovatel' kak uchastnik ugolovnogo protsessa so storony obvineniya. //Zakonnost'. 2012. №7.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2007. 8 iyunya.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2011. №1. St. 16.

References (transliteration):
Balakshin V. Nezavisimyy-zavisimyy sledovatel'. //Zakonnost'. 2011. №10. S. 34.
Bozh'ev V. Protsessual'noe rukovodstvo proizvodstvom predvaritel'nogo sledstviya. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008.
№3. S. 68.
Bykov V.M. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks RF i problemy raskrytiya prestupleniya (polemicheskie zametki).
//Pravo i politika. 2002. №9. S. 66-72.
Bykov V. M. Sudebnyy kontrol' za predvaritel'nym sledstviem. //Ugolovnyy protsess. 2007. №1. S. 35-38.
Bykov V.M. Pravovoe polozhenie sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii (chast' 2). //Pravo i politika. 2012.
№6. S. 1079-1085.
Bykov V. Sledovatel' kak uchastnik ugolovnogo protsessa so storony obvineniya. //Zakonnost'. 2012. №7.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2007. 8 iyunya.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2011. №1. St. 16.

Аннотация: The goal of this article is to show the key problems of application of criminal law, which has a number of gaps and shortcomings, which in turn negatively infl uence its effi ciency in the sphere of lowering the level of crime in the modern society. The object of this article is the relations of the government and the state in the sphere of compliance to the legal norms, as well as the guarantees of state security and legal order. The key value of this article is that it lays the grounds for the introduction of preliminary legal expertise of legislative drafts into the Russian practice. He considers that the effi ciency of law much depends on its preliminary evaluation, and then he offers to include the institution of legal expertise of laws as an obligatory element of legislative process. The author also offers to introduce the practice of planning and forecasting to the existing Russian legislation. The main conclusion of this article is that the scientifi c analysis of legal problems regarding stability of legislative acts should have considerable priority in the Russian legal science.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, criminality, security, protection, norm, law, legal conscience, state, punishment, encroachment.

Библиография:
Alekseev S.S. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve. – M., 1966. S. 34.
Alikperov X.D. Problemy dal'neyshego sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovykh norm, dopuskayushchikh kompro-
miss v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. – Baku, 1992. S. 60.
Grishanin P.F. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovoy bor'by s prestupnost'yu // Trudy Akademii MVD RF, 1997.
Zlobin G.A. O metodologii izucheniya effektivnosti ugolovnogo nakazaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave i
kriminologii//Voprosy preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti. Vyp. 1. – M., 1961. S. 64.
Kazimirchuk V.P., Polenina S.V. i dr. Kontseptsiya stabil'nosti zakona. – M.: Prospekt, 2000. – 175s.
Kandalov P.M., Solonin A.Yu. O tselesoobraznosti instituta pravovoy ekspertizy proektov normativnykh pra-
vovykh aktov // Vestnik RGAZU. 2009. Vypusk 3: Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie.-M.: FGOU VPO RGAZU, 2009.
Maksimov S.V. Effektivnost' obshchego preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy. – M.: Akademiya MVD RF, 1992.
– 132s.
Podturetskiy A. Ocherk sotsiologii prava. – M., 1974. S. 318-319.
Shargorodskiy M.D. Nakazanie, ego tseli i effektivnost'. – L., 1973. S. 69.
Yakovlev A. M. Vzaimodeystvie lichnosti i obshchestva v sisteme sotsial'nogo kontrolya//Sotsial'naya psikhologiya
lichnosti. – M., 1979. S. 164.

References (transliteration):
Alekseev S.S. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve. – M., 1966. S. 34.
Alikperov X.D. Problemy dal'neyshego sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovykh norm, dopuskayushchikh kompro-
miss v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. – Baku, 1992. S. 60.
Grishanin P.F. Mekhanizm ugolovno-pravovoy bor'by s prestupnost'yu // Trudy Akademii MVD RF, 1997.
Zlobin G.A. O metodologii izucheniya effektivnosti ugolovnogo nakazaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave i
kriminologii//Voprosy preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti. Vyp. 1. – M., 1961. S. 64.
Kazimirchuk V.P., Polenina S.V. i dr. Kontseptsiya stabil'nosti zakona. – M.: Prospekt, 2000. – 175s.
Kandalov P.M., Solonin A.Yu. O tselesoobraznosti instituta pravovoy ekspertizy proektov normativnykh pra-
vovykh aktov // Vestnik RGAZU. 2009. Vypusk 3: Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie.-M.: FGOU VPO RGAZU, 2009.
Maksimov S.V. Effektivnost' obshchego preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy. – M.: Akademiya MVD RF, 1992.
– 132s.
Podturetskiy A. Ocherk sotsiologii prava. – M., 1974. S. 318-319.
Shargorodskiy M.D. Nakazanie, ego tseli i effektivnost'. – L., 1973. S. 69.
Yakovlev A. M. Vzaimodeystvie lichnosti i obshchestva v sisteme sotsial'nogo kontrolya//Sotsial'naya psikhologiya
lichnosti. – M., 1979. S. 164.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to analysis of the measures for fi ghting corruption in the governing and managing bodies. The author points out the problems in the sphere of formation of legal and organizational bases for the implementation of legislation against corruption. The author offers to amend the existing laws in the sphere of confl ict of interests. The author also offers to amend the Federal Law “On State Civil Service in the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law “On Municipal Service in the Russian Federation” in order to improve the legal mechanism in order to better avoid confl ict of interests. The author also offers to make the responsibility of offi cers for the violations of legislation on civil and municipal service more severe.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, corruption, responsibility, legislation, state, confl ict, offi cer, municipal, responsibility, violations, civil.

Библиография:
Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. Slovar' /Pod red. M.Yu. Kondrat'eva // Psikhologicheskiy leksikon. Entsiklopedicheskiy
slovar'. V 6 t. / Red.-sost. L.A. Karpenko / Pod red. A.V. Petrovskogo. M.: PER SE, 2006.
Konventsiya Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy po protivodeystviyu korruptsii, odobrennaya Pravitel'stvom
RF 20 oktyabrya 2005 g. // Kommersant'. 21.10.2005. Konventsiya ratifitsirovana 8 marta 2006 g. FZ №40 «O rati-
fikatsii Konventsii OON protiv korruptsii».
Tsirin A.M. Formirovanie institutsional'noy osnovy protivodeystviya korruptsii v federal'nykh organakh
ispolnitel'noy vlasti // Zhurnal ros. prava. 2009. N 3
Dement'ev A.N., Kachushkin S.V. Institut konflikta interesov i predotvrashchenie korruptsii na gosudarstven-
noy grazhdanskoy sluzhbe // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2008. N 2.

References (transliteration):
Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. Slovar' /Pod red. M.Yu. Kondrat'eva // Psikhologicheskiy leksikon. Entsiklopedicheskiy
slovar'. V 6 t. / Red.-sost. L.A. Karpenko / Pod red. A.V. Petrovskogo. M.: PER SE, 2006.
Konventsiya Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy po protivodeystviyu korruptsii, odobrennaya Pravitel'stvom
RF 20 oktyabrya 2005 g. // Kommersant'. 21.10.2005. Konventsiya ratifitsirovana 8 marta 2006 g. FZ №40 «O rati-
fikatsii Konventsii OON protiv korruptsii».
Tsirin A.M. Formirovanie institutsional'noy osnovy protivodeystviya korruptsii v federal'nykh organakh
ispolnitel'noy vlasti // Zhurnal ros. prava. 2009. N 3
Dement'ev A.N., Kachushkin S.V. Institut konflikta interesov i predotvrashchenie korruptsii na gosudarstven-
noy grazhdanskoy sluzhbe // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2008. N 2.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the legal relations between an investigator and a prosecutor, which are formed based on the new Federal Law of the Russian Federation of December 28, 2010 N. 404 –FZ. Due to this the author criticizes a number of provisions of the new law, and points out that the legal relations between a prosecutor and an investigator were better regulated by Art. 127 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR, and then the author offers to use the experience of the criminal procedural legislation of the RSFSR.

Ключевые слова: new law, investigator, prosecutor, criminal case, starting a case, recommendations of a prosecutor, independence of an investigator, head of the investigative body, improvement of the law.

Библиография:
Budchenko V. Proverka povodov dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela.//Zakonnost'. 2008. №11. S. 52-53.
Bykov V. M. Novyy zakon o proverke sledovatelem soobshcheniya o prestuplenii. //Pravo i politika. 2011. №7.
S.1115-1121.
Gorlenko V. A.Problemy ustanovleniya balansa polnomochiy sledovatelya i prokurora v reshenii voprosa o vozbuzh-
denii ugolovnogodela. //Sledovatel'. 2011. №3. S. 16.
Grigor'ev V. Postanovlenie prokurora - novyy povod dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogodela? //Zakonnost'. 2011. №8.
S. 47.
Erezhepaliev D. Polnomochiya prokurora v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. №4.
S.84.
Kruglikov A.P. Problemy protsessual'nykh otnosheniy prokurora so sledovatelem i rukovoditelem sledstvennogo
organa. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2011. №10. S. 29.
Solov'ev A., Tokareva M. Neobkhodimo vosstanovit' vlastno-rasporyaditel'nye polnomochiya prokurora v dosudebnykh
stadiyakh rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. №4. S. 102.

References (transliteration):
Budchenko V. Proverka povodov dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela.//Zakonnost'. 2008. №11. S. 52-53.
Bykov V. M. Novyy zakon o proverke sledovatelem soobshcheniya o prestuplenii. //Pravo i politika. 2011. №7.
S.1115-1121.
Gorlenko V. A.Problemy ustanovleniya balansa polnomochiy sledovatelya i prokurora v reshenii voprosa o vozbuzh-
denii ugolovnogodela. //Sledovatel'. 2011. №3. S. 16.
Grigor'ev V. Postanovlenie prokurora - novyy povod dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogodela? //Zakonnost'. 2011. №8.
S. 47.
Erezhepaliev D. Polnomochiya prokurora v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. №4.
S.84.
Kruglikov A.P. Problemy protsessual'nykh otnosheniy prokurora so sledovatelem i rukovoditelem sledstvennogo
organa. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2011. №10. S. 29.
Solov'ev A., Tokareva M. Neobkhodimo vosstanovit' vlastno-rasporyaditel'nye polnomochiya prokurora v dosudebnykh
stadiyakh rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. №4. S. 102.

Аннотация: This article includes criminal legal evaluation of a certain type of abuse of right, which is forging the protocols of the general assemblies of the owners of the apartment in the apartment buildings and their unlawful use. Such violations often happen in the sphere of housing and public utilities, and they infringe upon the due functioning of the home-owners associations, the home-construction co-operatives, rights and lawful interests of home-owners and the bases of state regulation in this sphere. In the author’s point of view such activities should become objects of pre-investigation checks under Art. 144 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The author notes the lack of legal defi nition of an “offi cial document” in the criminal legal sphere, which creates diffi culties in cases of qualifi cation of crimes in this sphere. Then the author provides some information on the practical application of Art. 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the sphere of forging protocols and using forged protocols of general assemblies.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, law, home-owners association, housing co-operative, guarding, protection, forged, protocol, assembly, owner.

Библиография:
«Zhilishchnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 29.12.2004 g. №188-FZ (red. ot 04.06.2011 g.). Pervonachal'nyy
tekst opublikovan v izdanii: «Rossiyskaya gazeta», №1 ot 12.01.2005 g. Tekst vzyat iz elektronnoy pravovoy
sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
«Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 13.06.1996 g. №63-FZ (red. ot 01.03.2012 g.). Pervonachal'nyy
tekst opublikovan v izdanii: «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», №25 ot 17.06.1996 g. St. 2954. Tekst vzyat iz
elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
«Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 18.12.2001 g. №174-FZ (red. ot 01.03.2012 g.).
Pervonachal'nyy tekst opublikovan v izdanii: «Rossiyskaya gazeta», №249 ot 22.12.2001 g. Tekst vzyat iz elek-
tronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
Federal'nyy zakon ot 04.06.2011 g. №123-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Zhilishchnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii
i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii». «Rossiyskaya gazeta». №121 ot 07.06.2011 g.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.08.2001 g. №129-FZ (red. ot 01.04.2012) «O gosudarstvennoy registratsii yuridiches-
kikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley». Pervonachal'nyy tekst dokumenta opublikovan v izdanii
«Rossiyskaya gazeta», №№153-154 ot 10.08.2001 g. Tekst vzyat iz elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant
Plyus»
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.1994 g. №77-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2008 g.). «Ob obyazatel'nom ekzemplyare dokumentov».
Pervonachal'nyy tekst dokumenta opublikovan v izdanii «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», №1 ot 02.01.1995 g.
St. 1. Tekst vzyat iz elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 19.05.2009 g. №534-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhalo-
by grazhdanki Kostevoy Eleny Nikolaevny na narushenie ee konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami chasti tret'ey
stat'i 327 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii». Tekst vzyat s ofitsial'nogo sayta Konstitutsionnogo
Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii - http://www.ksrf.ru
Postanovlenie prezidiuma Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 17.01.2007 g. №32 po delu №44g-478/07. Tekst vzyat
iz elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
«Po rezul'tatam proverki Korsakovskoy gorodskoy prokuratury vozbuzhdeno ugolovnoe delo po faktu pod-
delki protokola obshchego sobraniya sobstvennikov pomeshcheniy mnogokvartirnogo doma». Stat'ya ot 02.02.2012
g. Tekst vzyat s ofitsial'nogo sayta prokuratury Sakhalinskoy oblasti po ssylke: http://www.sakhalinprokur.
ru/news.php?id=5126
Ugolovnoe pravo. Uchebnik. Tom 1. Obshchaya chast'. Pod obshch.red. d.yu.n. prof. A.E. Zhalinskogo. Izdatel'stvo
– «Izdatel'skiy Dom «Gorodets». Moskva, 2011 g.
«Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast'». Uchebnik pod red.A.I. Raroga. Izdatel'stvo – «OOO «Izdatel'stvo
«Eksmo». Moskva, 2009 g.
Shashkova O.V. «Tovarishchestvo sobstvennikov zhil'ya: kommentariy k izmeneniyam v Zhilishchnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy
Federatsii». Izdatel'stvo – «OOO «KnoRus». Moskva, 2011 g.

References (transliteration):
«Zhilishchnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 29.12.2004 g. №188-FZ (red. ot 04.06.2011 g.). Pervonachal'nyy
tekst opublikovan v izdanii: «Rossiyskaya gazeta», №1 ot 12.01.2005 g. Tekst vzyat iz elektronnoy pravovoy
sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
«Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 13.06.1996 g. №63-FZ (red. ot 01.03.2012 g.). Pervonachal'nyy
tekst opublikovan v izdanii: «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», №25 ot 17.06.1996 g. St. 2954. Tekst vzyat iz
elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
«Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 18.12.2001 g. №174-FZ (red. ot 01.03.2012 g.).
Pervonachal'nyy tekst opublikovan v izdanii: «Rossiyskaya gazeta», №249 ot 22.12.2001 g. Tekst vzyat iz elek-
tronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
Federal'nyy zakon ot 04.06.2011 g. №123-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Zhilishchnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii
i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii». «Rossiyskaya gazeta». №121 ot 07.06.2011 g.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.08.2001 g. №129-FZ (red. ot 01.04.2012) «O gosudarstvennoy registratsii yuridiches-
kikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley». Pervonachal'nyy tekst dokumenta opublikovan v izdanii
«Rossiyskaya gazeta», №№153-154 ot 10.08.2001 g. Tekst vzyat iz elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant
Plyus»
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.1994 g. №77-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2008 g.). «Ob obyazatel'nom ekzemplyare dokumentov».
Pervonachal'nyy tekst dokumenta opublikovan v izdanii «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», №1 ot 02.01.1995 g.
St. 1. Tekst vzyat iz elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 19.05.2009 g. №534-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhalo-
by grazhdanki Kostevoy Eleny Nikolaevny na narushenie ee konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami chasti tret'ey
stat'i 327 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii». Tekst vzyat s ofitsial'nogo sayta Konstitutsionnogo
Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii - http://www.ksrf.ru
Postanovlenie prezidiuma Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 17.01.2007 g. №32 po delu №44g-478/07. Tekst vzyat
iz elektronnoy pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus»
«Po rezul'tatam proverki Korsakovskoy gorodskoy prokuratury vozbuzhdeno ugolovnoe delo po faktu pod-
delki protokola obshchego sobraniya sobstvennikov pomeshcheniy mnogokvartirnogo doma». Stat'ya ot 02.02.2012
g. Tekst vzyat s ofitsial'nogo sayta prokuratury Sakhalinskoy oblasti po ssylke: http://www.sakhalinprokur.
ru/news.php?id=5126
Ugolovnoe pravo. Uchebnik. Tom 1. Obshchaya chast'. Pod obshch.red. d.yu.n. prof. A.E. Zhalinskogo. Izdatel'stvo
– «Izdatel'skiy Dom «Gorodets». Moskva, 2011 g.
«Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast'». Uchebnik pod red.A.I. Raroga. Izdatel'stvo – «OOO «Izdatel'stvo
«Eksmo». Moskva, 2009 g.
Shashkova O.V. «Tovarishchestvo sobstvennikov zhil'ya: kommentariy k izmeneniyam v Zhilishchnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy
Federatsii». Izdatel'stvo – «OOO «KnoRus». Moskva, 2011 g.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the preliminary judicial control by the court over the procedural decisions and actions of an investigator. The author supposes that in some cases preliminary control of a court over procedural and investigative activities is not necessary, and consequent judicial control would be suffi cient in some cases.

Ключевые слова: investigator, investigative activities, control of a court, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, legislator, law, judicial practice, legality, guarantees.

Библиография:
Adigamova G. Z. Sledstvennye deystviya, provodimye po sudebnomu resheniyu i s sanktsii prokurora. Avtoref.
diss… kand. yur. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2004.S. 21.
Azarov V.A., Revenko N. I., Kuzembaeva M. M. Funktsii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i
praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Monografiya. – Omsk: Izd-vo Omgu, 2006. S. 69.
Antonova E. E. Funktsional'naya kharakteristika dosudebnogo proizvodstva v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse.
Avtoref. diss….kand. yurid. nauk. – Omsk, 2006. S.8.
Bozh'ev V. P. O sootnoshenii norm UPK RF, reguliruyushchikh protsess dokazyvaniya. //Materialy mezhdunar.
nauch. – prakt. konf. «Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: voprosy teorii, zakonodatel'stva,
praktiki primeneniya» (k 5-letiyu UPK RF).- M., 2007. S. 212-213.
Borodinov V. V. Nevostrebovannyy potentsial sudebnogo kontrolya. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2006. №5. S.
37-41.
Bykov V. M. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks RF i problemy raskrytiya prestupleniy (polemicheskie zametki).
//Pravo i politika. 2002. №9. S. 66-72.
Bykov V. M. Sudebnyy kontrol' za predvaritel'nym sledstviem. //Ugolovnyy protsess. 2007. №1. S. 35-38.
Bykov V. Novyy zakon o zaloge kak mere presecheniya //Zakonnost'. 2010. №9. S. 26-30.
Zherebyat'ev I. V. Predmet sudebnogo kontrolya na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. //Ugolovnyy
protsess. 2005. №10. S. 33-39.
Zherebyat'ev I. Sudebnyy poryadok vydachi razresheniya na proizvodstvo otdel'nykh protsessual'nykh deystviy.
//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2005. №2. S. 85.
Izmaylov I. V. Sudebnyy kontrol' pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy bez sudebnogo resheniya. Ugolovnyy
protsess. 2005. №5. S. 33-36.
Kal'nitskiy V. «Sanktsionirovanie» i proverka sudom zakonnosti sledstvennykh deystviy v khode dosudebnogo
proizvodstva ne effektivny. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. №1. S. 73-75.
Karetnikov A. S., Arzamastseva K. A. Yavlyaetsya li deyatel'nost' suda po rassmotreniyu i razresheniyu khodataystv
dolzhnostnykh lits organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sudebnym kontrolem? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. №4.
S. 68.
Korolev G. Reorganizatsiya dosudebnogo proizvodstva: problemy i perspektivy. //Zakonnost'. 2008. №1. S. 8.
Kuznetsova O. D. Sudebnyy kontrol' za deystviyami i resheniyami dolzhnostnykh lits organov rassledovaniya.
//Ugolovnyy protsess. 2005. №3. S. 25-27.
Nikiforov S., Bochkarev A. Provodit' obysk ili zhdat'? //Zakonnost'. 2005. №4. S. 37-39.
Serebrov D. O. Sudebnyy kontrol' za zakonnost'yu i obosnovannost'yu proizvodstva sledstvennykh deystviy,
ogranichivayushchikh konstitutsionnye prava i svobody lichnosti. Avtoref. diss… kand. yur. nauk. – Nizhniy
Novgorod, 2004. S. 5.

References (transliteration):
Adigamova G. Z. Sledstvennye deystviya, provodimye po sudebnomu resheniyu i s sanktsii prokurora. Avtoref.
diss… kand. yur. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2004.S. 21.
Azarov V.A., Revenko N. I., Kuzembaeva M. M. Funktsii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i
praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Monografiya. – Omsk: Izd-vo Omgu, 2006. S. 69.
Antonova E. E. Funktsional'naya kharakteristika dosudebnogo proizvodstva v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse.
Avtoref. diss….kand. yurid. nauk. – Omsk, 2006. S.8.
Bozh'ev V. P. O sootnoshenii norm UPK RF, reguliruyushchikh protsess dokazyvaniya. //Materialy mezhdunar.
nauch. – prakt. konf. «Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: voprosy teorii, zakonodatel'stva,
praktiki primeneniya» (k 5-letiyu UPK RF).- M., 2007. S. 212-213.
Borodinov V. V. Nevostrebovannyy potentsial sudebnogo kontrolya. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2006. №5. S.
37-41.
Bykov V. M. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks RF i problemy raskrytiya prestupleniy (polemicheskie zametki).
//Pravo i politika. 2002. №9. S. 66-72.
Bykov V. M. Sudebnyy kontrol' za predvaritel'nym sledstviem. //Ugolovnyy protsess. 2007. №1. S. 35-38.
Bykov V. Novyy zakon o zaloge kak mere presecheniya //Zakonnost'. 2010. №9. S. 26-30.
Zherebyat'ev I. V. Predmet sudebnogo kontrolya na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. //Ugolovnyy
protsess. 2005. №10. S. 33-39.
Zherebyat'ev I. Sudebnyy poryadok vydachi razresheniya na proizvodstvo otdel'nykh protsessual'nykh deystviy.
//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2005. №2. S. 85.
Izmaylov I. V. Sudebnyy kontrol' pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy bez sudebnogo resheniya. Ugolovnyy
protsess. 2005. №5. S. 33-36.
Kal'nitskiy V. «Sanktsionirovanie» i proverka sudom zakonnosti sledstvennykh deystviy v khode dosudebnogo
proizvodstva ne effektivny. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. №1. S. 73-75.
Karetnikov A. S., Arzamastseva K. A. Yavlyaetsya li deyatel'nost' suda po rassmotreniyu i razresheniyu khodataystv
dolzhnostnykh lits organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sudebnym kontrolem? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. №4.
S. 68.
Korolev G. Reorganizatsiya dosudebnogo proizvodstva: problemy i perspektivy. //Zakonnost'. 2008. №1. S. 8.
Kuznetsova O. D. Sudebnyy kontrol' za deystviyami i resheniyami dolzhnostnykh lits organov rassledovaniya.
//Ugolovnyy protsess. 2005. №3. S. 25-27.
Nikiforov S., Bochkarev A. Provodit' obysk ili zhdat'? //Zakonnost'. 2005. №4. S. 37-39.
Serebrov D. O. Sudebnyy kontrol' za zakonnost'yu i obosnovannost'yu proizvodstva sledstvennykh deystviy,
ogranichivayushchikh konstitutsionnye prava i svobody lichnosti. Avtoref. diss… kand. yur. nauk. – Nizhniy
Novgorod, 2004. S. 5.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the current situation with the legal regulation of medical activity in the Russian Federation after the new law “On bases of health protection for the citizens of Russia” due to the need to form an effi cient mechanism for the criminal legal protection of life and health of citizens in the situation of provision of health services. The professional medical activity is analyzed as one of the types of economical activity, which satisfi es the specifi c needs of people, ad which is irreplaceable among the issues of supporting health in the modern world. The author points out the need for the subject-oriented understanding of medical practice and its refl ection in the legislation, which in turn should help with further understanding of the topicality of medical law, its relation to the criminal law and overcoming of certain practical problems. The article includes analysis of foreign (French and American) experience of legal regulation and criminal legal protection of medical activity, the author then analyzes application of criminal law in Russia and abroad. Based on the study the author comes to a conclusion on the need to develop new approaches to this problem.

Ключевые слова: law, medicine, regulation, protection, the USA, France, health, instrumental, subject-oriented.

Библиография:
Marcia A. Lewis, Carol D. Tamparo. Medical law, ethics and bioethics. 6 edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company,
2007.
Truchet Didier. Code de la santé publique. 25 edition. Paris: Dallos, 2011.
Bayda A. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnuyu lechebnuyu deyatel'nost'. Khar'kov: Odissey, 2009.
Barinov N.A. Meditsinskie uslugi // Vlast' zakona. 2010. №3.
Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. M.: Yurist', 2000.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Modernizatsiya mekhanizma deystviya ugolovnogo prava: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie pro-
blemy / v kn. Ugolovnoe pravo i sovremennost'. Sbornik statey. Vyp. 3 / Otv. red. A.E. Zhalinskiy. M., 2011.
Zhalinskiy A.E. O postroenii obshchey instrumental'no tselevoy teorii ugolovnogo prava // Pravo. Zhurnal
Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2011. №4.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Otv. red. A.E. Zhalinskiy. 3-e izd. M.: Izdatel'skiy
Dom «Gorodets», 2010.
Kontseptsiya modernizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v ekonomicheskoy sfere. M.: Fond «Liberal'naya mis-
siya», 2010.
Kudashov A.N. Problemnye voprosy privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe zanyatie chast-
noy meditsinskoy praktikoy ili chastnoy farmatsevticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i
praktika. 2008. №7.
Malakhova M.M. Nezakonnoe zanyatie chastnoy meditsinskoy praktikoy ili chastnoy farmatsevticheskoy deyatel'-
nost'yu: avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008.
Nagornaya I.I. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe zanyatie meditsinskoy praktikoy: opyt
Rossii i SShA (sravnitel'noe issledovanie) // 20 let Nezavisimosti Respubliki Kazakhstan: dostizheniya i
perspektivy razvitiya: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2-kh tomakh. Karaganda:
Karagandinskaya akademiya MVD RK im. B. Baysenova, 2011.
Rerikht A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy meditsinskogo prava: Problemy formirovaniya i razvitiya: Monografiya /
Otv. red. E.V. Alferova, N.Yu. Khamaneva. M., 2011.
Syreyshchikova I.A. Osnovaniya vozniknoveniya pravootnosheniy, svyazannykh s okazaniem meditsinskoy pomoshchi
// Yurist. 2008. №11.
Tikhomirov V.A. Meditsinskaya usluga: pravovye aspekty // Zdravookhranenie. 1999. №8.
Ugolovnaya politika v sfere ekonomiki: ekspertnye otsenki. M.: Fond «Liberal'naya missiya», 2011.
Ugolovnoe pravo: V 3 t. T. 1 Obshchaya chast' / Pod obshch. red. A.E. Zhalinskogo. M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Gorodets»,
2010.
Frolov A.S. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe zanyatie chastnoy meditsinskoy praktikoy
ili chastnoy farmatsevticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. 2006. №3/4.
Yani P.S. Razgranichenie sluzhebnykh funktsiy i professional'nykh obyazannostey dolzhnostnogo litsa pri kva-
lifikatsii vzyatochnichestva // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2009. №1 (33).

References (transliteration):
Marcia A. Lewis, Carol D. Tamparo. Medical law, ethics and bioethics. 6 edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company,
2007.
Truchet Didier. Code de la santé publique. 25 edition. Paris: Dallos, 2011.
Bayda A. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnuyu lechebnuyu deyatel'nost'. Khar'kov: Odissey, 2009.
Barinov N.A. Meditsinskie uslugi // Vlast' zakona. 2010. №3.
Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. M.: Yurist', 2000.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Modernizatsiya mekhanizma deystviya ugolovnogo prava: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie pro-
blemy / v kn. Ugolovnoe pravo i sovremennost'. Sbornik statey. Vyp. 3 / Otv. red. A.E. Zhalinskiy. M., 2011.
Zhalinskiy A.E. O postroenii obshchey instrumental'no tselevoy teorii ugolovnogo prava // Pravo. Zhurnal
Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2011. №4.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Otv. red. A.E. Zhalinskiy. 3-e izd. M.: Izdatel'skiy
Dom «Gorodets», 2010.
Kontseptsiya modernizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v ekonomicheskoy sfere. M.: Fond «Liberal'naya mis-
siya», 2010.
Kudashov A.N. Problemnye voprosy privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe zanyatie chast-
noy meditsinskoy praktikoy ili chastnoy farmatsevticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i
praktika. 2008. №7.
Malakhova M.M. Nezakonnoe zanyatie chastnoy meditsinskoy praktikoy ili chastnoy farmatsevticheskoy deyatel'-
nost'yu: avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008.
Nagornaya I.I. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe zanyatie meditsinskoy praktikoy: opyt
Rossii i SShA (sravnitel'noe issledovanie) // 20 let Nezavisimosti Respubliki Kazakhstan: dostizheniya i
perspektivy razvitiya: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2-kh tomakh. Karaganda:
Karagandinskaya akademiya MVD RK im. B. Baysenova, 2011.
Rerikht A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy meditsinskogo prava: Problemy formirovaniya i razvitiya: Monografiya /
Otv. red. E.V. Alferova, N.Yu. Khamaneva. M., 2011.
Syreyshchikova I.A. Osnovaniya vozniknoveniya pravootnosheniy, svyazannykh s okazaniem meditsinskoy pomoshchi
// Yurist. 2008. №11.
Tikhomirov V.A. Meditsinskaya usluga: pravovye aspekty // Zdravookhranenie. 1999. №8.
Ugolovnaya politika v sfere ekonomiki: ekspertnye otsenki. M.: Fond «Liberal'naya missiya», 2011.
Ugolovnoe pravo: V 3 t. T. 1 Obshchaya chast' / Pod obshch. red. A.E. Zhalinskogo. M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Gorodets»,
2010.
Frolov A.S. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe zanyatie chastnoy meditsinskoy praktikoy
ili chastnoy farmatsevticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. 2006. №3/4.
Yani P.S. Razgranichenie sluzhebnykh funktsiy i professional'nykh obyazannostey dolzhnostnogo litsa pri kva-
lifikatsii vzyatochnichestva // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2009. №1 (33).

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the novel issues, which arose in the criminal process: is the investigator part of the accusation, what are his basic rights and obligations, what is the new procedural fi gure of “ forensic investigator”? The author provides a number of recommendations on the further development of criminal procedure on these issues.

Ключевые слова: investigator, accusation, functions of investigator, rights of investigator, forensic investigator, forensic actions, legality, permissibility of evidence, recommendations for the legislator.

Библиография:
Andreyanov V. A. Obvinenie v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: ponyatie, sushchnost', znachenie i teoreticheskie
problemy realizatsii. Avtoref. diss…. kand. yurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 2009. S. 7.
Bozh'ev V. P. Konstitutsionnye printsipy ugolovnogo protsessa. //Ugolovnyy protsess: Uchebnik dlya studentov
vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nosti «Yurisprudentsiya» /Pod red. V. P. Bozh'eva. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.:
Spark, 2004. S. 89.
Bozh'ev V. Sushchnost' izmeneniy v UPK RF ot 2 dekabrya 2008 g. //Zakonnost'. 2009. №5. S. 5.
Bykov V. Pravovye osnovaniya proizvodstva sledstvennykh deystviy po UPK RF. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. №1. S.
150-158.
Bykov V. M. Protsessual'nye funktsii sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. //Pravo i politika. 2011. №6.
S. 952-958.
Gurin A. Protsessual'nyy status prokurora-kriminalista. //Zakonnost'. 2008. №11. S. 44.
Zazhitskiy V. I. O protsessual'nom polozhenii sledovatelya. //Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. №6. S. 46, 47.
Isaenko V. Protsessual'nye polnomochiya prokurora-kriminalista. //Zakonnost'. 2005. №7. S. 19.
Meshkov M. V., Gonchar V. V. Sledovatel' v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: ponyatiyno-pravovye problemy. //Rossiyskiy
sledovatel'. 2011. №23. S. 18.
Piyuk A. V. Pravovoe polozhenie sledovatelya v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.
2011. №3. S. 36.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2007. 8 iyunya.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2008. 5 dekabrya.
Shagieva Z. Kh. Funktsiya obvineniya v sovremennoy modeli rossiyskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Avtoref. diss… kand.
yurid. nauk. – Izhevsk, 2007. S. 9-10.
Sheyfer S. A. Rossiyskiy sledovatel' – issledovatel' ili presledovatel'? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. №11. S. 35.

References (transliteration):
Andreyanov V. A. Obvinenie v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: ponyatie, sushchnost', znachenie i teoreticheskie
problemy realizatsii. Avtoref. diss…. kand. yurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 2009. S. 7.
Bozh'ev V. P. Konstitutsionnye printsipy ugolovnogo protsessa. //Ugolovnyy protsess: Uchebnik dlya studentov
vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nosti «Yurisprudentsiya» /Pod red. V. P. Bozh'eva. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.:
Spark, 2004. S. 89.
Bozh'ev V. Sushchnost' izmeneniy v UPK RF ot 2 dekabrya 2008 g. //Zakonnost'. 2009. №5. S. 5.
Bykov V. Pravovye osnovaniya proizvodstva sledstvennykh deystviy po UPK RF. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. №1. S.
150-158.
Bykov V. M. Protsessual'nye funktsii sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. //Pravo i politika. 2011. №6.
S. 952-958.
Gurin A. Protsessual'nyy status prokurora-kriminalista. //Zakonnost'. 2008. №11. S. 44.
Zazhitskiy V. I. O protsessual'nom polozhenii sledovatelya. //Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. №6. S. 46, 47.
Isaenko V. Protsessual'nye polnomochiya prokurora-kriminalista. //Zakonnost'. 2005. №7. S. 19.
Meshkov M. V., Gonchar V. V. Sledovatel' v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: ponyatiyno-pravovye problemy. //Rossiyskiy
sledovatel'. 2011. №23. S. 18.
Piyuk A. V. Pravovoe polozhenie sledovatelya v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.
2011. №3. S. 36.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2007. 8 iyunya.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2008. 5 dekabrya.
Shagieva Z. Kh. Funktsiya obvineniya v sovremennoy modeli rossiyskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Avtoref. diss… kand.
yurid. nauk. – Izhevsk, 2007. S. 9-10.
Sheyfer S. A. Rossiyskiy sledovatel' – issledovatel' ili presledovatel'? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. №11. S. 35.

Аннотация: Based on the analysis of the norms of international law, the Criminal Procedural Code of the RSFSR of 1960 and the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation of 2001 the author studies the problems of redress of harm, which is caused to the victim of a crime, and proof of a claim in a criminal case. The author points out that timely and full compensation of material harm is only possible when all of the circumstances of crime have been fully and clearly evaluated, including those related to the character and amount of harm. The author offers to amend pp. 2 of p.2 of Art. 74 of the CPC of the Russian Federation: “2. statement of victim, witness, civil claimant, civil respondent”.

Ключевые слова: victim, person affected, harm, compensation, civil claim, proof, statement.

Библиография:
Deklaratsiya osnovnykh printsipov pravosudiya dlya zhertv prestupleniy i zloupotrebleniya vlast'yu, prinyata
Rezolyutsiey 40/34 General'noy Assamblei OON 29 noyabrya 1985 g. // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1992. №9–10.
Evropeyskaya konventsiya o vozmeshchenii ushcherba zhertvam nasil'stvennykh prestupleniy ot 24 noyabrya 1983 g. // www.
law.edu.ru
O sostoyanii zakonnosti i pravoporyadka v 2010 g. i o prodelannoy rabote po ikh ukrepleniyu / doklad General'nogo
prokurora RF na zasedanii Soveta Federatsii 27 aprelya 2011 g. // www.genproc.gov.ru.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 5 marta 2004 g. №1 «O primenenii sudami Ugolovno-protsessu-
al'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sbornik Postanovleniy Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF / pod. red. V.A.
Radchenko. M.: Nauka, 2005.
Pravovye i sotsial'nye osnovy problem zashchity zhertv prestupleniy / sb. nauch. tr. M.: Akademii MVD RF,
1997.
Rezolyutsiya 1Kh Kongressa OON po preduprezhdeniyu prestupnosti i obrashcheniyu s pravonarushitelyami. Kair ot
29 aprelya–8 maya 1995 g. // www.un.org/russian.
Smirnov A.V. Modeli ugolovnogo protsessa. S-Pb.: Nauka, 2000.

References (transliteration):
Deklaratsiya osnovnykh printsipov pravosudiya dlya zhertv prestupleniy i zloupotrebleniya vlast'yu, prinyata
Rezolyutsiey 40/34 General'noy Assamblei OON 29 noyabrya 1985 g. // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1992. №9–10.
Evropeyskaya konventsiya o vozmeshchenii ushcherba zhertvam nasil'stvennykh prestupleniy ot 24 noyabrya 1983 g. // www.
law.edu.ru
O sostoyanii zakonnosti i pravoporyadka v 2010 g. i o prodelannoy rabote po ikh ukrepleniyu / doklad General'nogo
prokurora RF na zasedanii Soveta Federatsii 27 aprelya 2011 g. // www.genproc.gov.ru.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 5 marta 2004 g. №1 «O primenenii sudami Ugolovno-protsessu-
al'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sbornik Postanovleniy Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF / pod. red. V.A.
Radchenko. M.: Nauka, 2005.
Pravovye i sotsial'nye osnovy problem zashchity zhertv prestupleniy / sb. nauch. tr. M.: Akademii MVD RF,
1997.
Rezolyutsiya 1Kh Kongressa OON po preduprezhdeniyu prestupnosti i obrashcheniyu s pravonarushitelyami. Kair ot
29 aprelya–8 maya 1995 g. // www.un.org/russian.
Smirnov A.V. Modeli ugolovnogo protsessa. S-Pb.: Nauka, 2000.

Аннотация: The author views the issues of criminal responsibility for distribution of counterfeit bank cards, taking the foreign experience into account. The author offers to amend the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with an article, providing criminal responsibility for theft with the use of bank cards. By such an amendment the scientifi c legal discussion on correlation of terms “distribution of bank card” and “use of bank card”.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, bank cards, fi nancial services, payment, responsibility, fraud, counterfeit cards, theft, qualifi cation, responsibility.

Библиография:
Klechenova E.G. Regulirovanie raschetov s ispol'zovaniem bankovskikh kart. // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika.
2004, №12.
O deyatel'nosti po priemu platezhey, osushchestvlyaemykh platezhnymi agentami: Federal'nyy zakon ot 3 iyunya
2009 g.№103-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2009. 10 iyunya.
Lukashevich S.V. K voprosu ob individualizatsii fizicheskikh lits. // Zakonodatel'stvo, 2011,№10, s.12-17;
Kukushkin V. Primenenie zakonodatel'stva o personal'nykh dannykh v bankovskoy deyatel'nosti: problemy
novogo regulirovaniya. // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2011, №11, s.94-100.
Rukavishnikova I. Chto ostalos' za predelami Federal'nogo zakona «O deyatel'nosti po priemu platy fizi-
cheskikh lits, osushchestvlyaemoy platezhnymi agentami?» // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2010, №1, s.3-10.
Fokin V., Yadykin A. Ogranichenie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti banka pri nezakonnom ispol'zovanii ban-
kovskikh kart klienta tret'imi litsami. // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2003, №3, s.64.
Burykin D. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya raschetov bankovskimi kartami. // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2008,
№3.
Potapenko N.S. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy, sovershaemykh v sfere vypuska i obrashcheniya bankovskikh kart. //
Avtoref. … dis.kand.yurid.nauk. – M., 2006.
Petryanin A.V. Otvetstvennost' za izgotovlenie ili sbyt poddel'nykh deneg ili tsennykh bumag. // Avtoref. …
kand.yurid.nauk. – N.Novogorod, 2003.
Lapshin V.F. Finansovye prestupleniya. Uchebnoe posobie. – M., 2009.
Petrov S.V. Otvetstvennost' za izgotovlenie ili sbyt kreditnykh ili raschetnykh kart i inykh platezhnykh
dokumentov. // Avtoref. … dis.kand.yurid.nauk. – N.Novgorod, 2004.
Truntsevskiy Yu.V., Petrosyan O.Sh. Ekonomicheskie i finansovye prestupleniya. – M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon
i pravo, 2008.
Volzhenkin B.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii. – SPb.,
2007.
Tyunin V.I. Nekotorye aspekty tolkovaniya, primeneniya i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva,
okhranyayushchego otnosheniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti. – SPb., 2002.
Volzhenina V., Stroyankova K. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii deyaniy, svyazannykh s poddelkoy kart. // Ugolovnoe
pravo, 2009, №1.
Potapenko N.O. O problemakh ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya s ispol'zovaniem bankovskikh kart.
// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №4.
Cherkashin E.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii izgotovleniya ili sbyta poddel'nykh deneg ili tsennykh bumag. //
Avtoref. … kand.yurid.nauk. – Ekatenburg, 2008.
Garmaev Yu.P. Protivodeystvie prestupnosti v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nosti protsessa: gotov li deystvuyushchiy i
budushchiy pravoprimenitel'? // Ugolovno-protsessual'noe i kriminalisticheskie chteniya na Altae: materialy
ezhegodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 15-letiyu deyatel'nosti suda prisyazhnykh na Altae
/ Pod red. V.K. Gavlo - Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. Un-ta, 2009. – Vyp.9.
Sumin A.E. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh na rynke tsennykh bumag. // Avtoref….
kand.dis.yurid.nauk. – N.Novgorod, 2011.
Dikova N.V.Osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy, sovershennykh s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh platezhnykh
sredstv i sistem. // Avtoref. … kandyurid.nauk. – Voronezh, 2011.
Bazhenok S.A. Zarubezhnyy opyt ugolovno-pravovoy bor'by s prestupleniyami, sovershaemymi s ispol'zovaniem
bankovskikh kart. // Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2006, №4.

References (transliteration):
Klechenova E.G. Regulirovanie raschetov s ispol'zovaniem bankovskikh kart. // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika.
2004, №12.
O deyatel'nosti po priemu platezhey, osushchestvlyaemykh platezhnymi agentami: Federal'nyy zakon ot 3 iyunya
2009 g.№103-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2009. 10 iyunya.
Lukashevich S.V. K voprosu ob individualizatsii fizicheskikh lits. // Zakonodatel'stvo, 2011,№10, s.12-17;
Kukushkin V. Primenenie zakonodatel'stva o personal'nykh dannykh v bankovskoy deyatel'nosti: problemy
novogo regulirovaniya. // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2011, №11, s.94-100.
Rukavishnikova I. Chto ostalos' za predelami Federal'nogo zakona «O deyatel'nosti po priemu platy fizi-
cheskikh lits, osushchestvlyaemoy platezhnymi agentami?» // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2010, №1, s.3-10.
Fokin V., Yadykin A. Ogranichenie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti banka pri nezakonnom ispol'zovanii ban-
kovskikh kart klienta tret'imi litsami. // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2003, №3, s.64.
Burykin D. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya raschetov bankovskimi kartami. // Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2008,
№3.
Potapenko N.S. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy, sovershaemykh v sfere vypuska i obrashcheniya bankovskikh kart. //
Avtoref. … dis.kand.yurid.nauk. – M., 2006.
Petryanin A.V. Otvetstvennost' za izgotovlenie ili sbyt poddel'nykh deneg ili tsennykh bumag. // Avtoref. …
kand.yurid.nauk. – N.Novogorod, 2003.
Lapshin V.F. Finansovye prestupleniya. Uchebnoe posobie. – M., 2009.
Petrov S.V. Otvetstvennost' za izgotovlenie ili sbyt kreditnykh ili raschetnykh kart i inykh platezhnykh
dokumentov. // Avtoref. … dis.kand.yurid.nauk. – N.Novgorod, 2004.
Truntsevskiy Yu.V., Petrosyan O.Sh. Ekonomicheskie i finansovye prestupleniya. – M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon
i pravo, 2008.
Volzhenkin B.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii. – SPb.,
2007.
Tyunin V.I. Nekotorye aspekty tolkovaniya, primeneniya i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva,
okhranyayushchego otnosheniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti. – SPb., 2002.
Volzhenina V., Stroyankova K. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii deyaniy, svyazannykh s poddelkoy kart. // Ugolovnoe
pravo, 2009, №1.
Potapenko N.O. O problemakh ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya s ispol'zovaniem bankovskikh kart.
// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, №4.
Cherkashin E.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii izgotovleniya ili sbyta poddel'nykh deneg ili tsennykh bumag. //
Avtoref. … kand.yurid.nauk. – Ekatenburg, 2008.
Garmaev Yu.P. Protivodeystvie prestupnosti v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nosti protsessa: gotov li deystvuyushchiy i
budushchiy pravoprimenitel'? // Ugolovno-protsessual'noe i kriminalisticheskie chteniya na Altae: materialy
ezhegodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 15-letiyu deyatel'nosti suda prisyazhnykh na Altae
/ Pod red. V.K. Gavlo - Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. Un-ta, 2009. – Vyp.9.
Sumin A.E. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh na rynke tsennykh bumag. // Avtoref….
kand.dis.yurid.nauk. – N.Novgorod, 2011.
Dikova N.V.Osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy, sovershennykh s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh platezhnykh
sredstv i sistem. // Avtoref. … kandyurid.nauk. – Voronezh, 2011.
Bazhenok S.A. Zarubezhnyy opyt ugolovno-pravovoy bor'by s prestupleniyami, sovershaemymi s ispol'zovaniem
bankovskikh kart. // Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2006, №4.

Аннотация: The article contains analysis of the qualifi cation of purposeful infl iction of harm. The author offers to use the former defi nitions of repeated character and cumulative offences. However dangerous a crime might be, one should not violate the rules of qualifi cation in order for it to be more convenient.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, qualifi cation, competition, grave harm, repeated character, social danger, punishment, attempted crime, fairness.

Библиография:
Sharapov R.D. Fizicheskoe nasilie v ugolovnom prave. – SPb., 2001.
Matsnev N.I., Sharapov R.D. Osnovy kvalifikatsii slozhnykh nasil'stvennykh prestupleniy po sovokupnosti
ugolovno-pravovykh norm i pri ikh konkurentsii// Pravovedenie, 2005.
Babiy N.A. Nasilie, opasnoe dlya zhizni i zdorov'ya: teoreticheskie problemy kvalifikatsii i kriminalizatsii
// Pravovedenie, 2004. №6.
Kuznetsova N.F. Kvalifikatsiya slozhnykh sostavov prestupleniy// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2000, №1.
Inogamova-Khegay L.V. Konkurentsiya ugolovno-pravovykh norm pri kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. – M., 2002.
Komissarov V.S. Nekotorye problemy primeneniya novogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva/ / Prestupnost' i
ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: realii, tendentsii, vzaimovliyanie: Sb. nauch. tr./ Pod red. N.A. Lopashenko.
– Saratov, 2004.
Komissarov V.S. Izmeneniya v UK RF i ikh primenenie v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. //
Izmeneniya v UK RF 1996 g.: sostoyanie, tendentsiy i problemy primeneniya. / Otv. red. S.V. Zemlyukov. – Barnaul.:
izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2005.
Plaksina T.A. Sotsial'nye osnovaniya kvalifitsiruyushchikh ubiystvo obstoyatel'stv i ikh priznaki, vyrazhennye
v priznakakh sostava prestupleniya. – Barnaul, 2006.
Rarog A.I. Novaya traktovka instituta mnozhestvennosti prestupleniy // Prestupnost' i ugolovnoe zakonoda-
tel'stvo: realii, tendentsii, vzaimovliya¬nie: Sb. nauch. tr. / Pod red. N.A. Lopashenko. - Saratov, 2004.
Galyukova M.I. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy protiv cheloveka s pozitsii sudebnoy praktiki.
// Zakon i pravo, 2010, №12.
Polikarpova I.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za umyshlennoe prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu. - M.,
Yurlitinform, 2010.
Kozlov A.P. Edinichnye prestupleniya: ponyatie, klassifikatsiya, kvalifikatsiya: uchebnoe posobie. – Krasnoyarsk:
Izd-vo Krasnoyarsk. gos. agrar. un-ta., 2007.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M., 1999.
Inogamova-Khegay L.V. Konkurentsiya norm ugolovnogo prava: Avtoref. dis. dok. yurid. nauk. – M., 1999.
Lapin V.O. Rassledovanie prestupnykh posyagatel'stv na zhizn', zdorov'e, chest' i imushchestvo lits, vyyavlyayushchikh
i rassleduyushchikh nalogovye pravonarusheniya. / Pod red. prof. V.P. Lavrova. – M.: Izd-vo «Yurlitinform»,
2006.
Krasikov A.N. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana prav i svobod cheloveka v Rossii. – Saratov, 1996.
Blagov E.V. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy (teoriya i praktika). – Yaroslavl', 2003.
Sharapov R.D. Fizicheskoe nasilie v ugolovnom prave. - SPb., 2001.

References (transliteration):
Sharapov R.D. Fizicheskoe nasilie v ugolovnom prave. – SPb., 2001.
Matsnev N.I., Sharapov R.D. Osnovy kvalifikatsii slozhnykh nasil'stvennykh prestupleniy po sovokupnosti
ugolovno-pravovykh norm i pri ikh konkurentsii// Pravovedenie, 2005.
Babiy N.A. Nasilie, opasnoe dlya zhizni i zdorov'ya: teoreticheskie problemy kvalifikatsii i kriminalizatsii
// Pravovedenie, 2004. №6.
Kuznetsova N.F. Kvalifikatsiya slozhnykh sostavov prestupleniy// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2000, №1.
Inogamova-Khegay L.V. Konkurentsiya ugolovno-pravovykh norm pri kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. – M., 2002.
Komissarov V.S. Nekotorye problemy primeneniya novogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva/ / Prestupnost' i
ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: realii, tendentsii, vzaimovliyanie: Sb. nauch. tr./ Pod red. N.A. Lopashenko.
– Saratov, 2004.
Komissarov V.S. Izmeneniya v UK RF i ikh primenenie v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. //
Izmeneniya v UK RF 1996 g.: sostoyanie, tendentsiy i problemy primeneniya. / Otv. red. S.V. Zemlyukov. – Barnaul.:
izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2005.
Plaksina T.A. Sotsial'nye osnovaniya kvalifitsiruyushchikh ubiystvo obstoyatel'stv i ikh priznaki, vyrazhennye
v priznakakh sostava prestupleniya. – Barnaul, 2006.
Rarog A.I. Novaya traktovka instituta mnozhestvennosti prestupleniy // Prestupnost' i ugolovnoe zakonoda-
tel'stvo: realii, tendentsii, vzaimovliya¬nie: Sb. nauch. tr. / Pod red. N.A. Lopashenko. - Saratov, 2004.
Galyukova M.I. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy protiv cheloveka s pozitsii sudebnoy praktiki.
// Zakon i pravo, 2010, №12.
Polikarpova I.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za umyshlennoe prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu. - M.,
Yurlitinform, 2010.
Kozlov A.P. Edinichnye prestupleniya: ponyatie, klassifikatsiya, kvalifikatsiya: uchebnoe posobie. – Krasnoyarsk:
Izd-vo Krasnoyarsk. gos. agrar. un-ta., 2007.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M., 1999.
Inogamova-Khegay L.V. Konkurentsiya norm ugolovnogo prava: Avtoref. dis. dok. yurid. nauk. – M., 1999.
Lapin V.O. Rassledovanie prestupnykh posyagatel'stv na zhizn', zdorov'e, chest' i imushchestvo lits, vyyavlyayushchikh
i rassleduyushchikh nalogovye pravonarusheniya. / Pod red. prof. V.P. Lavrova. – M.: Izd-vo «Yurlitinform»,
2006.
Krasikov A.N. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana prav i svobod cheloveka v Rossii. – Saratov, 1996.
Blagov E.V. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy (teoriya i praktika). – Yaroslavl', 2003.
Sharapov R.D. Fizicheskoe nasilie v ugolovnom prave. - SPb., 2001.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the new Federal Law on Home Arrest. The author points out that the new law provides more detailed regulation of use of home arrest as a means of pre-trial restrictions. At the same time this new law has some quite questionable issues. The author then offers the ways to amend and improve the law, which in the author’s opinion, should be passed with due amendments.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, pre-trial restrictions, home arrest, court, terms of arrest, deposit, prohibitions and limitation, decision of the court, control, police.

Библиография:
Bagautdinov F. Novaya mera presecheniya v UPK RF – domashniy arest. //Zakonnost'. 2002. №10. S. 14-16.
Bykov V. M., Liskov D. A. Domashniy arest kak novaya mera presecheniya po UPK RF. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2004.
№4. S. 12-14.
Bykov V. Novyy zakon o zaloge kak mere presecheniya. //Zakonnost'. 2010. №9. S. 26-30.
Dzhuzhoma V. V. «Kontroliruemaya svoboda» - domashniy arest s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh sredstv nablyudeniya
i kontrolya za osuzhdennym: al'ternativnoe ugolovnoe nakazanie ili ocherednoy primer neudachnogo zaimstvovaniya
inostrannogo opyta? //Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy akademii. 2009. №1. S. 64-67.
Kalinkin S. Primenenie sudami mer presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu, zaloga i domashnego aresta.
//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. №2.
Karetnikov A. S., Arzamastseva K. A. Yavlyaetsya li deyatel'nost' suda po rassmotreniyu i razresheniyu khodataystv
dolzhnostnykh lits organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sudebnym kontrolem? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. №4. S.
68.
Kolokolov N. A. Zalog, domashniy arest: stanovlenie praktiki. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. №11. (Stat'ya 2).
Mel'nikov V. Yu. Problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta kak mery presecheniya. //Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.
2007. №3. S. 72.
Ovchinnikov Yu. G., Zagvozdkin N. N. Osnovaniya dlya izbraniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta v ugolov-
nom protsesse Rossii. //Sledovatel'. 2004. №1. S. 14-21.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 8 fevralya.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 9 dekabrya.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 21 dekabrya.
Saltykov E. V. Otmena ili izmenenie mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta. //Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy
akademii. 2008. №2. S. 35-37.
Solov'ev I. N. Problemnye voprosy ispolneniya domashnego aresta. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2010. №13.
Sterkhov P., Sterkhova I. Sudebnyy kontrol' i problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta i zaloga v kachestve mer
presecheniya. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008. №3. S. 79-82.

References (transliteration):
Bagautdinov F. Novaya mera presecheniya v UPK RF – domashniy arest. //Zakonnost'. 2002. №10. S. 14-16.
Bykov V. M., Liskov D. A. Domashniy arest kak novaya mera presecheniya po UPK RF. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2004.
№4. S. 12-14.
Bykov V. Novyy zakon o zaloge kak mere presecheniya. //Zakonnost'. 2010. №9. S. 26-30.
Dzhuzhoma V. V. «Kontroliruemaya svoboda» - domashniy arest s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh sredstv nablyudeniya
i kontrolya za osuzhdennym: al'ternativnoe ugolovnoe nakazanie ili ocherednoy primer neudachnogo zaimstvovaniya
inostrannogo opyta? //Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy akademii. 2009. №1. S. 64-67.
Kalinkin S. Primenenie sudami mer presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu, zaloga i domashnego aresta.
//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. №2.
Karetnikov A. S., Arzamastseva K. A. Yavlyaetsya li deyatel'nost' suda po rassmotreniyu i razresheniyu khodataystv
dolzhnostnykh lits organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sudebnym kontrolem? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. №4. S.
68.
Kolokolov N. A. Zalog, domashniy arest: stanovlenie praktiki. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. №11. (Stat'ya 2).
Mel'nikov V. Yu. Problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta kak mery presecheniya. //Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.
2007. №3. S. 72.
Ovchinnikov Yu. G., Zagvozdkin N. N. Osnovaniya dlya izbraniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta v ugolov-
nom protsesse Rossii. //Sledovatel'. 2004. №1. S. 14-21.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 8 fevralya.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 9 dekabrya.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 21 dekabrya.
Saltykov E. V. Otmena ili izmenenie mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta. //Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy
akademii. 2008. №2. S. 35-37.
Solov'ev I. N. Problemnye voprosy ispolneniya domashnego aresta. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2010. №13.
Sterkhov P., Sterkhova I. Sudebnyy kontrol' i problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta i zaloga v kachestve mer
presecheniya. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008. №3. S. 79-82.

Аннотация: The article pays much attention to the topical issues of judicial sociological expertise. The accent is not on the procedural issue of its assignment and implementation, but rather on its use within the framework of specific scientific terms and categories. The author actualizes the scientific research potential of modern sociological knowledge, in which many methodological positions and definitions are topical and ambiguous. The article includes analysis of various topical issues, which predefine the peculiarities of the expert opinion of a sociologist. The author then pays attention to the high qualification of an expert in the sphere of sociology or closely related spheres, which would allow to avoid “guessing” the methodological position, within which this or that key term or category shall be viewed.

Ключевые слова: expertise, social studies, sociology, group, society, sociality, system, transformation, reflecting, responsibility.

Библиография:
1. Golenkova Z.T., Igitkhanyan E.D. Sotsial'naya struktura obshchestva: v poiske adekvatnykh otvetov // Sotsiol. issledovaniya.
2008. №7.
2. Zborovskiy G.E. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya izucheniya sotsial'noy obshchnosti // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2010. №4.
3. Kiskina E.E. Zaklyuchenie eksperta kak akt kommunikatsii // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2009. №3.
4. Koshelev A.V. Sostoyanie ponyatiynogo apparata sotsiologii (obshchesotsiologicheskiy uroven') // Sotsiol. issledovaniya.
2010. №5.
5. Marks G. O professional'noy deyatel'nosti sotsiologa — 37 moral'nykh imperativov // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2008. №1 / Sokr. perevod s angl. L.G. Titarenko i A.A. Shirokanovoy.
6. Pashinskiy V.V. Otsenka dostovernosti zaklyucheniya eksperta // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2009. №1.
7. Pashinskiy V.V. Formy vyvodov v zaklyuchenii eksperta // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2009. №2.
8. Popov E.A. Obraz sotsiologa v sovremennoy real'nosti // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2009. №2.
9. Romanovskiy N.V. Ponyatiynye problemy sotsiologii: poisk adekvatnoy interpretatsii // Sotsiol. issledovaniya.
2010. №4.
10. Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya: V 2 t. T. 1 / Natsional'nyy obshchestvenno-nauchn. fond / Rukovoditel' nauchnogo proekta G.Yu. Semigin; Glavnyy redaktor V.N. Ivanov. M., 2003.

References (transliteration):
1. Golenkova Z.T., Igitkhanyan E.D. Sotsial'naya struktura obshchestva: v poiske adekvatnykh otvetov // Sotsiol. issledovaniya.
2008. №7.
2. Zborovskiy G.E. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya izucheniya sotsial'noy obshchnosti // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2010. №4.
3. Kiskina E.E. Zaklyuchenie eksperta kak akt kommunikatsii // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2009. №3.
4. Koshelev A.V. Sostoyanie ponyatiynogo apparata sotsiologii (obshchesotsiologicheskiy uroven') // Sotsiol. issledovaniya.
2010. №5.
5. Marks G. O professional'noy deyatel'nosti sotsiologa — 37 moral'nykh imperativov // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2008. №1 / Sokr. perevod s angl. L.G. Titarenko i A.A. Shirokanovoy.
6. Pashinskiy V.V. Otsenka dostovernosti zaklyucheniya eksperta // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2009. №1.
7. Pashinskiy V.V. Formy vyvodov v zaklyuchenii eksperta // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2009. №2.
8. Popov E.A. Obraz sotsiologa v sovremennoy real'nosti // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2009. №2.
9. Romanovskiy N.V. Ponyatiynye problemy sotsiologii: poisk adekvatnoy interpretatsii // Sotsiol. issledovaniya.
2010. №4.
10. Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya: V 2 t. T. 1 / Natsional'nyy obshchestvenno-nauchn. fond / Rukovoditel' nauchnogo proekta G.Yu. Semigin; Glavnyy redaktor V.N. Ivanov. M., 2003.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to theoretical and legal studies of the unclear issues of application of the “non bis in idem” principle, when applying qualification and assigning punishment in case of ideal aggregation of crimes – that is when one act contains elements of two or more crimes. The author analyzes the legal positions of the Constitutional Court, which are relevant for this problem, then expresses his vision on the fairness and predictability of application of this concept.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, criminal legislation, ideal aggregation of crimes, normative characteristics, legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the principle of fairness, criminal legal evaluation, judicial practice, qualification, application of punishment.

Библиография:
1. Arendarenko A.V. Printsip sotsial'noy spravedlivosti v sisteme ugolovnogo prava Rossiyskoy Federatsii//Advokat. 2007. №5.
2. Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. – M.: Prospekt, 2008.
3. Pudovochkin Yu. Priznaki sovokupnosti prestupleniy v sovremennoy sudebnoy praktike//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. №4.
4. Rogova N. Otdel'noe (edinichnoe) prestuplenie kak sostavnaya chast' sovokupnosti prestupleniy//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. №4.
5. Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lektsii. Chast' obshchaya. T.2.- M.: Nauka. 1994.
6. Ugolovnoe pravo: Uchebnik. V 3t. T.1. Obshchaya chast'.- M.: Gorodets. 2011.
7. Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T.3. Ponyatie prestupleniya.- SPb., 2005 (avtory paragrafa - V.P.Malkov i E.G. Shkredova).

References (transliteration):
1. Arendarenko A.V. Printsip sotsial'noy spravedlivosti v sisteme ugolovnogo prava Rossiyskoy Federatsii//Advokat. 2007. №5.
2. Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz. – M.: Prospekt, 2008.
3. Pudovochkin Yu. Priznaki sovokupnosti prestupleniy v sovremennoy sudebnoy praktike//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. №4.
4. Rogova N. Otdel'noe (edinichnoe) prestuplenie kak sostavnaya chast' sovokupnosti prestupleniy//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. №4.
5. Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lektsii. Chast' obshchaya. T.2.- M.: Nauka. 1994.
6. Ugolovnoe pravo: Uchebnik. V 3t. T.1. Obshchaya chast'.- M.: Gorodets. 2011.
7. Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T.3. Ponyatie prestupleniya.- SPb., 2005 (avtory paragrafa - V.P.Malkov i E.G. Shkredova).

Аннотация: Currently the issues of growing level of crime is topical for the society as a whole. One should note that anti-social qualities of the crime are shown in the harmful consequences, that is the crime does not end at the time of certain action or lack of action, rather it continues to include the harm, which is caused by this action (lack of action). This article is devoted to the role of such criminal consequences for the qualifi cation of crimes under the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The author shows various points of view in this sphere, as well as the author’s view on this issue.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, society, crime, consequences, structure, responsibility, behavior, act, person, Kazakhstan.

Библиография:
Ugolovnyy Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan
Sbornik postanovleniy Plenuma, Prezidiuma i opredeleniy Kollegii po Ugolovnym Delam Verkhovnogo Suda
RK, 1994-1997g., Almaty, 1997g., s.232.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RK 1994g.№4, 1997g. №3, s. 10.
Durmanov N.D. Stadii soversheniya prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu, M., 1955 g., s. 269
Karpets N.I. Naznachenie nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu, kand. diss. L., 1954g., s.96.
Korzhanskiy N.I. Ob'ekt i predmet ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany, M.,1980g., s.162.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob'ektivnaya storona prestupleniya, M., 1960g., str. 167, 173, 137-143,7-8.
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie prestupnykh posledstviy dlya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, M., 1958g., s. 10, 106.
Mikhlin A.S. Posledstviya prestupleniya, M., 1969g., s. 12-14, 16, 17, 38,51,62, 79.
Frolov E.A. Ob'ekt i prestupnye posledstviya pri posyagatel'stve na sots. sobstvennost'//Uchenye zapiski
Sverdlovskogo universiteta//1968., s. 111.

References (transliteration):
Ugolovnyy Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan
Sbornik postanovleniy Plenuma, Prezidiuma i opredeleniy Kollegii po Ugolovnym Delam Verkhovnogo Suda
RK, 1994-1997g., Almaty, 1997g., s.232.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RK 1994g.№4, 1997g. №3, s. 10.
Durmanov N.D. Stadii soversheniya prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu, M., 1955 g., s. 269
Karpets N.I. Naznachenie nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu, kand. diss. L., 1954g., s.96.
Korzhanskiy N.I. Ob'ekt i predmet ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany, M.,1980g., s.162.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob'ektivnaya storona prestupleniya, M., 1960g., str. 167, 173, 137-143,7-8.
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie prestupnykh posledstviy dlya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, M., 1958g., s. 10, 106.
Mikhlin A.S. Posledstviya prestupleniya, M., 1969g., s. 12-14, 16, 17, 38,51,62, 79.
Frolov E.A. Ob'ekt i prestupnye posledstviya pri posyagatel'stve na sots. sobstvennost'//Uchenye zapiski
Sverdlovskogo universiteta//1968., s. 111.

Аннотация: In this article the author singles out the role of the prosecution in protection of rights in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity by supervision over the relevant controlling bodies, showing the key goals and objects of prosecutors’ supervision. The author also attempts to classify the government bodies, working in the sphere of enteperpreneurial control, depending on their legal standing, forms, the way they deal with their issues, sphere of their competence, provides their general characteristics. The author also views the self-regulated organizations as governing bodies in the sphere of entrepreneurial activities, pays attention to the lack of normative regulation of supervision in the sphere of interaction between the prosecution and the self-regulated organizations, then the author shows the potential for their advanced cooperation in order to form a favorable legal fi eld for the economic activities of the people and for the attraction of the foreign investors.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, state, prosecution, supervision, legality, entrepreneur, management, control, organization, interaction.

Библиография:
Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Uchebnik. 1 chast' / A.P.Alekhin, Yu.M. Kozlov. – M.: TEIS,
1995.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik T.1. / Pod. red. E.A. Sukhanova. – 3-e izd. pererab i dop. - M.: BEK, 2004.
Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva: Uchebnik / Pod. red. V.V.Lazareva. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurist',
2001.
Prokurorskiy nadzor. Rossiyskaya prokuratura v pravovom demokraticheskom gosudarstve: uchebnik / Pod. red.
A.Ya. Sukharev. – M.: Norma, 2008.
Osobennosti organizatsii i osushchestvleniya prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov o dolevom stro-
itel'stve mnogokvartirnykh domov // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
2009. №1 (9).

References (transliteration):
Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Uchebnik. 1 chast' / A.P.Alekhin, Yu.M. Kozlov. – M.: TEIS,
1995.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik T.1. / Pod. red. E.A. Sukhanova. – 3-e izd. pererab i dop. - M.: BEK, 2004.
Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva: Uchebnik / Pod. red. V.V.Lazareva. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurist',
2001.
Prokurorskiy nadzor. Rossiyskaya prokuratura v pravovom demokraticheskom gosudarstve: uchebnik / Pod. red.
A.Ya. Sukharev. – M.: Norma, 2008.
Osobennosti organizatsii i osushchestvleniya prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov o dolevom stro-
itel'stve mnogokvartirnykh domov // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
2009. №1 (9).

Аннотация: This article is devoted to the role of criminal consequences for the establishment of punishment in the criminal law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The author shows various points of view in this sphere, as well as his own. It should be noted that currently the issues of growth of criminal activities are topical for the society as a whole. It should be noted that anti-social characteristics of the crime are not limited to action or lack of action, it continues in the harm, which is caused by this behavior.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, society, crime, consequences, responsibility, behavior, action, punishment, Kazakhstan.

Библиография:
Ugolovnyy Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan
Sbornik postanovleniy Plenuma, Prezidiuma i opredeleniy Kollegii po Ugolovnym Delam Verkhovnogo Suda
RK, 1994-1997g., Almaty, 1997g., s.232.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RK 1994g.№4, 1997g. №3, s. 10.
Karpets N.I. Naznachenie nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu, kand. diss. L., 1954g., s.96.
Korzhanskiy N.I. Ob'ekt i predmet ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany, M.,1980g., s.162.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob'ektivnaya storona prestupleniya, M., 1960g., str. 167, 173, 137-143,7-8.
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie prestupnykh posledstviy dlya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, M., 1958g., s. 10, 106.
Mikhlin A.S. Posledstviya prestupleniya, M., 1969g., syu 12-14, 16, 17, 38,51,62, 79.
Frolov E.A. Ob'ekt i prestupnye posledstviya pri posyagatel'stve na sots. sobstvennost'//Uchenye zapiski
Sverdlovskogo universiteta//1968., s. 111.

References (transliteration):
Ugolovnyy Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan
Sbornik postanovleniy Plenuma, Prezidiuma i opredeleniy Kollegii po Ugolovnym Delam Verkhovnogo Suda
RK, 1994-1997g., Almaty, 1997g., s.232.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RK 1994g.№4, 1997g. №3, s. 10.
Karpets N.I. Naznachenie nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu, kand. diss. L., 1954g., s.96.
Korzhanskiy N.I. Ob'ekt i predmet ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany, M.,1980g., s.162.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob'ektivnaya storona prestupleniya, M., 1960g., str. 167, 173, 137-143,7-8.
Kuznetsova N.F. Znachenie prestupnykh posledstviy dlya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, M., 1958g., s. 10, 106.
Mikhlin A.S. Posledstviya prestupleniya, M., 1969g., syu 12-14, 16, 17, 38,51,62, 79.
Frolov E.A. Ob'ekt i prestupnye posledstviya pri posyagatel'stve na sots. sobstvennost'//Uchenye zapiski
Sverdlovskogo universiteta//1968., s. 111.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the problem of construction of sanctions for the willfully causing the grave harm to human health. The science of criminal law did not pay enough attention to this issue. The need for a new study is due to the amendments in the criminal legislation. The author establishes the position for the optimization of sanctions, e.g. for the sanction of 3-4 years of imprisonment, taking into account the degree of social danger and the personality of the criminal.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, sanctions, legislation, health, grave harm, system, punishment, person, convict, social danger.

Библиография:
Prokhorov L.A. Obshchie nachala naznacheniya i preduprezhdeniya retsidivnoy prestupnosti. – Omsk, 1980. S.20.
Polikarpova I.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za umyshlennoe prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu. – M., 2009.
S.111.
Kozlov A.P. Ugolovno-pravovye sanktsii (problemy postroeniya, klassifikatsii i izmereniya). – Krasnoyarsk,
1989. S.71.
Naumov A.O. O ser'eznoy uyazvimosti odnogo iz poslednikh zakonoproektov o vnesenii popravok v UK RF. //
Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №1. S.38-39.
Kibal'nik A. K chemu privedet «gumanizatsiya» ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva? // Zakonnost', 2011, №9.
S..22-25.
Martsev A., Mikhan' O. Ugolovno-pravovaya klassifikatsiya prestupleniy. // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2005, №5,
S.49-51.
Pitetskiy V.V. Kategoriya prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivosti v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve. // Gosudarstvo
i pravo, 2005, №4. S.91-94.
Verina G. Ogranichenie svobody kak vid nakazaniya v svete zakonodatel'nykh novell. // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010,
№5. S.8-10.
Artemenko N., Karasova A. Ogranichenie svobody: zakonodatel'nyy potentsial i vozmozhnosti primeneniya. //
Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №4, S.4-8.
Brilliantov A.V. Differentsiatsiya nakazaniya: ugolovno-pravovye i ispolnitel'nye problem. // Avtoref…dok.
yurid.nauk. – M., 1998. S.33.
Rakhmanov E.N. Zashchita prav cheloveka ot kriminal'nykh ugroz v usloviyakh globalizatsii: kriminologicheskiy i
ugolovno-pravovoy analiz. – M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008. S.279-280.
Artemenko A. Tekhnologii naznacheniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya: teoreticheskie i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty.
// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, ch.4-8.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. – M.: TK. Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2004, S.308-309.
Antonov I.M. Penalizatsiya prestupleniy, prichinyayushchikh vred zdorov'yu. // Avtoref. dis…kand.yurid.nauk.
– Vladivostok, 2004. S.9, 23.
Borodin S.V. Prestupleniya protiv zhizni. – M.: Yurist', 1999. S.347-348.

References (transliteration):
Prokhorov L.A. Obshchie nachala naznacheniya i preduprezhdeniya retsidivnoy prestupnosti. – Omsk, 1980. S.20.
Polikarpova I.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za umyshlennoe prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu. – M., 2009.
S.111.
Kozlov A.P. Ugolovno-pravovye sanktsii (problemy postroeniya, klassifikatsii i izmereniya). – Krasnoyarsk,
1989. S.71.
Naumov A.O. O ser'eznoy uyazvimosti odnogo iz poslednikh zakonoproektov o vnesenii popravok v UK RF. //
Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №1. S.38-39.
Kibal'nik A. K chemu privedet «gumanizatsiya» ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva? // Zakonnost', 2011, №9.
S..22-25.
Martsev A., Mikhan' O. Ugolovno-pravovaya klassifikatsiya prestupleniy. // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2005, №5,
S.49-51.
Pitetskiy V.V. Kategoriya prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivosti v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve. // Gosudarstvo
i pravo, 2005, №4. S.91-94.
Verina G. Ogranichenie svobody kak vid nakazaniya v svete zakonodatel'nykh novell. // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010,
№5. S.8-10.
Artemenko N., Karasova A. Ogranichenie svobody: zakonodatel'nyy potentsial i vozmozhnosti primeneniya. //
Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №4, S.4-8.
Brilliantov A.V. Differentsiatsiya nakazaniya: ugolovno-pravovye i ispolnitel'nye problem. // Avtoref…dok.
yurid.nauk. – M., 1998. S.33.
Rakhmanov E.N. Zashchita prav cheloveka ot kriminal'nykh ugroz v usloviyakh globalizatsii: kriminologicheskiy i
ugolovno-pravovoy analiz. – M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008. S.279-280.
Artemenko A. Tekhnologii naznacheniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya: teoreticheskie i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty.
// Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, ch.4-8.
Zhalinskiy A.E. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. – M.: TK. Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2004, S.308-309.
Antonov I.M. Penalizatsiya prestupleniy, prichinyayushchikh vred zdorov'yu. // Avtoref. dis…kand.yurid.nauk.
– Vladivostok, 2004. S.9, 23.
Borodin S.V. Prestupleniya protiv zhizni. – M.: Yurist', 1999. S.347-348.

Аннотация: This article deals with the problems of improving interaction between the investigative and operational units in the detection and investigation of crimes related to intellectual property. Among the major factor negatively affecting the effectiveness of the fi ght against crimes in the area of intellectual property is the lack of contemporary evidence-based investigation into these crimes. The current concept of procedural law entities authorized to carry out operational-search activity, in many respects contradictory. It was noted that planning is a principle and as a means of infl uencing the behavior of interacting entities with their specifi c functions. Improving the planning of joint work of operational units and the investigative body, as appropriate, in our view, include the issues of interaction in the structure of the current semi-annual plan of internal affairs in general. To implement the process of harmonization of national administrative and criminal legislation proposed to use the model of international cooperation on measures to identify and document the crimes in the area of intellectual property concepts in the light of emerging models of EEC, Russia and Belarus, the CIS and perspectives of use of databases in international space.

Ключевые слова: interaction of investigative and operational units, the effectiveness of combating crimes, criminal action, investigation and search operations, planning of joint activities, criminal copyright infringement, the harmonization of national legislation, a model of international cooperation

Библиография:
Federal'nyy zakon «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 15 iyulya 1995 goda -№101 - FZ //
SZ RF. -1995. - №29. - St. 2757.
Belkin R.S. Kriminalistika: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy. Obshchaya i chastnye teorii. - M., 1987.
Dulov A.V: Takticheskie operatsii pri rassledovanii prestupleniy. - Minsk, 1979.
Zhuravlev SYu. Rassledovanie ekonomicheskikh prestupleniy. - M., 2005.
Klimenko I.I. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya i organa doznaniya pri provedenii takticheskikh operatsiy //Vestnik
Barnaul'skogo yuridicheskogo instituta. - Barnaul: Barnaul'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2004.
- №7. - S. 17.
Larin A.M. Ot sledstvennoy versii k istine.- M., 1976.
Lubin A.F. Organizatsionno - takticheskie osobennosti vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya s organami doznaniya
pri rassledovanii otdel'nykh vidov prestupleniy // Osobennosti rassledovaniya otdel'nykh vidov i grupp
prestupleniy: Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. - Sverdlovsk, 1980.
Luzgin I.M. Metodologicheskie problemy rassledovaniya. - M., 1973.
Perevozchikov A.V. Yuridicheskie versii: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk-
N.Novgorod, 2005.
Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya: Uchebnoe posobie / Pod red. A.M. Stolyarenko,- M., 2001.
Pshenichnov M.A. Konstitutsiya Rossii i mezhdunarodnoe pravo: problemy vzaimodeystviya: Avtoref. dis…
kand.yurid.nauk.-N.Novgorod, 1998.
Rapkin L.Ya. Osnovy teorii sledstvennykh situatsiy - Sverdlovsk., 1987.
Chuvilev A.N. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya organov vnutrennikh del s militsiey - M., 1981.

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 15 iyulya 1995 goda -№101 - FZ //
SZ RF. -1995. - №29. - St. 2757.
Belkin R.S. Kriminalistika: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy. Obshchaya i chastnye teorii. - M., 1987.
Dulov A.V: Takticheskie operatsii pri rassledovanii prestupleniy. - Minsk, 1979.
Zhuravlev SYu. Rassledovanie ekonomicheskikh prestupleniy. - M., 2005.
Klimenko I.I. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya i organa doznaniya pri provedenii takticheskikh operatsiy //Vestnik
Barnaul'skogo yuridicheskogo instituta. - Barnaul: Barnaul'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2004.
- №7. - S. 17.
Larin A.M. Ot sledstvennoy versii k istine.- M., 1976.
Lubin A.F. Organizatsionno - takticheskie osobennosti vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya s organami doznaniya
pri rassledovanii otdel'nykh vidov prestupleniy // Osobennosti rassledovaniya otdel'nykh vidov i grupp
prestupleniy: Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. - Sverdlovsk, 1980.
Luzgin I.M. Metodologicheskie problemy rassledovaniya. - M., 1973.
Perevozchikov A.V. Yuridicheskie versii: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk-
N.Novgorod, 2005.
Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya: Uchebnoe posobie / Pod red. A.M. Stolyarenko,- M., 2001.
Pshenichnov M.A. Konstitutsiya Rossii i mezhdunarodnoe pravo: problemy vzaimodeystviya: Avtoref. dis…
kand.yurid.nauk.-N.Novgorod, 1998.
Rapkin L.Ya. Osnovy teorii sledstvennykh situatsiy - Sverdlovsk., 1987.
Chuvilev A.N. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya organov vnutrennikh del s militsiey - M., 1981.

Аннотация: Lack of some terms used in the operative investigation activity in the Federal Law of August 12, 1995 n. 144-FZ “On Operative Investigation Activity” allows the practitioners to interpret the same term in various ways. The article includes analysis of some legal articles in the sphere of operative investigation activity in order to establish the subject of “interview” as an operative investigation matter. The authors then offer their own defi nition of the object of interview.

Ключевые слова: jurisprudence, operative investigation activity, operative investigation bodies, customs bodies, interview, subject of an interview, operative offi cer, participants, Law on OIA.

Библиография:
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 dekabrya 1993 goda // Ros. gaz.-1993.25 dek.
Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: feder. zakon ot 12 avg. 1995 g. №144-FZ // SZ RF. - 1995. - №33.
- St. 3349.
Smirnov M.P. Kommentariy operativno-rozysknogo zakonodatel'stva RF i zarubezhnykh stran. Uchebnoe posobie
/ M.P. Smirnov- M. Izdatel'stvo «Ekzamen», 2002.
Goryainov K.K., Kvasha Yu.F., Surkov K.V. Federal'nyy zakon «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»:
Kommentariy.- M.: Novyy yurist, 1997.
Dubonosov E.S. Osnovy operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti kurs lektsiy/ pod red. Sinilova G.K. - M.: YuI
MVD RF, Knizhnyy mir, 2002
Federal'nyy zakon «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy / pod. red.
V.V. Nikolyuka, 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M: Spark, 2002.
Meshkov V.M., Popov V.L. Operativno-rozysknaya taktika i osobennosti legalizatsii poluchennoy informatsii
v khode predvaritel'nogo sledstviya: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Shchit-M,1999.
Mikhaylov V.I. Kontroliruemaya postavka kak operativno-rozysknaya operatsiya: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie.
Pod red.dokt. yurid. nauk A.Yu.Shumilova. M.: Izdatel' Shumilova I.I.1998.
Karpukhin S.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie oprosa v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk.
SPb., 2005.
Abidov A.S. Opros kak operativno-rozysknoe meropriyatie i ispol'zovanie ego rezul'tatov: Dis. kand. yurid.
nauk. Vladimir 2006.
Shumilov A.Yu. Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie «operativno-rozysknaya deyatel'nost': voprosy i otvety» M.,
2010.

References (transliteration):
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 dekabrya 1993 goda // Ros. gaz.-1993.25 dek.
Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: feder. zakon ot 12 avg. 1995 g. №144-FZ // SZ RF. - 1995. - №33.
- St. 3349.
Smirnov M.P. Kommentariy operativno-rozysknogo zakonodatel'stva RF i zarubezhnykh stran. Uchebnoe posobie
/ M.P. Smirnov- M. Izdatel'stvo «Ekzamen», 2002.
Goryainov K.K., Kvasha Yu.F., Surkov K.V. Federal'nyy zakon «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»:
Kommentariy.- M.: Novyy yurist, 1997.
Dubonosov E.S. Osnovy operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti kurs lektsiy/ pod red. Sinilova G.K. - M.: YuI
MVD RF, Knizhnyy mir, 2002
Federal'nyy zakon «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy / pod. red.
V.V. Nikolyuka, 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M: Spark, 2002.
Meshkov V.M., Popov V.L. Operativno-rozysknaya taktika i osobennosti legalizatsii poluchennoy informatsii
v khode predvaritel'nogo sledstviya: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Shchit-M,1999.
Mikhaylov V.I. Kontroliruemaya postavka kak operativno-rozysknaya operatsiya: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie.
Pod red.dokt. yurid. nauk A.Yu.Shumilova. M.: Izdatel' Shumilova I.I.1998.
Karpukhin S.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie oprosa v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk.
SPb., 2005.
Abidov A.S. Opros kak operativno-rozysknoe meropriyatie i ispol'zovanie ego rezul'tatov: Dis. kand. yurid.
nauk. Vladimir 2006.
Shumilov A.Yu. Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie «operativno-rozysknaya deyatel'nost': voprosy i otvety» M.,
2010.