Аннотация: The research object is Russia’s foreign policy towards the Middle East countries at the present stage of development of international relations. Special attention is given to the problems of Russia’s transition from the defensive foreign policy to the offensive one. The authors study the Syrian direction and note that Russia’s military operation in Syria has denoted the restoration of the Middle East region as one of the top priority directions of Russia’s foreign policy. This direction needs a more detailed study of the peculiarities of political links between state and non-state actors within the Middle East region and beyond, and a certain transformation of Russia’s foreign policy in this direction for the purpose of broadening the possibilities of cooperation and interaction and more flexible responses to the new challenges and threats. The study is based on the system analysis and comparison of interrelation between Russia and the Middle East, and the comparison of various stages of development of relations with particular states in the post-bipolar period. The authors apply the method of modeling to create a model of relations with the Middle East countries which would be the most beneficial for Russia. This study is one of the first complex analyses of Russia’s relations with the Middle East in the context of a dramatic transformation of the international relations subsystem in this region, connected with a gradual reorientation of the region to the independent solution of the problems, connected, primarily, with the Islamic State. The authors suppose that Russia needs to change its policy towards the Middle East, to initiate proactive foreign policy in its relations with all states. Otherwise, in the context of interregional cooperation strengthening, Russia would lose the possibility to have an impact on the developments in the region. 

Ключевые слова: conflict in Syria, struggle against terrorism, the Middle East, Russia's foreign policy, allies in the East, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt

Библиография:
Negosudarstvennye uchastniki mirovoy politiki / Pod red. Lebedeva M.M. Kharkevich M.V. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press», 2013. 208 s.
Avatkov V.A., Skolova N.V. Arabskie volneniya i transformatsiya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: "okno vozmozhnostey" dlya Rossii // Pravo i upravlenie KhKhI vek. 2012. № 4(25). S. 80-85.
Nadein-Raevskiy V.A. Ideologicheskaya perestroyka i stolknovenie politicheskikh interesov Turtsii. Turtsiya: novye realii vo vnutrenney politike i uchastie v regional'nykh geopoliticheskikh protsessakh (materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, g. Moskva, 2 aprelya 2014 g.) / Pod red. Avatkov V.A. , Druzhilovskiy S.B., Fedorchenko A.V. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2014. S. 141-154 (Knigi i broshyury IMI).
Avatkov V.A., Badranov A.Sh. "Myagkaya sila" Turtsii vo vnutrenney politike Rossii // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2013. № 2 (27). S. 5-10.
Avatkov V.A., Chulkovskaya E.E. Tsentry turetskoy kul'tury imeni Yunusa Emre — «myagkaya sila» Turtsii // Geopolitika i bezopasnost'. 2013. № 2. S. 116-122.
Avatkov V.A., Ivanova N.A. Rossiya i Turtsiya: protivostoyanie ideologiy // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2012. № 9-10 (1635). S. 187-196
Avatkov V.A. 2014. Neoosmanizm. Bazovaya ideologema i geostrategiya Turtsii // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2014. № 3 (1645). S. 71-78.
Avatkov V.A. Kurdskaya problema na turetskom pole // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. 2012. № 2. S. 128-133
Khrustalev M.A. Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsiy i politicheskaya ekspertiza: ocherki teorii i metodologii. M.: NOFMO, 2008. S. 45.
Kasatkin P.I., Khrustalev I.M., Avatkov V.A. Evrobezopasnost', integratsiya i «myagkaya sila» migratsii v XXI veke // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. 2012. № 6(27). S. 79-93.
Vneshnepoliticheskiy diskurs vedushchikh sub'ektov turetskoy politiki (2010-leto 2015 g.) / Pod red. V.A. Avatkova. 2015. M.: OOO «Pablis», 88 s.

References (transliteration):
Negosudarstvennye uchastniki mirovoy politiki / Pod red. Lebedeva M.M. Kharkevich M.V. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press», 2013. 208 s.
Avatkov V.A., Skolova N.V. Arabskie volneniya i transformatsiya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: "okno vozmozhnostey" dlya Rossii // Pravo i upravlenie KhKhI vek. 2012. № 4(25). S. 80-85.
Nadein-Raevskiy V.A. Ideologicheskaya perestroyka i stolknovenie politicheskikh interesov Turtsii. Turtsiya: novye realii vo vnutrenney politike i uchastie v regional'nykh geopoliticheskikh protsessakh (materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, g. Moskva, 2 aprelya 2014 g.) / Pod red. Avatkov V.A. , Druzhilovskiy S.B., Fedorchenko A.V. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2014. S. 141-154 (Knigi i broshyury IMI).
Avatkov V.A., Badranov A.Sh. "Myagkaya sila" Turtsii vo vnutrenney politike Rossii // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2013. № 2 (27). S. 5-10.
Avatkov V.A., Chulkovskaya E.E. Tsentry turetskoy kul'tury imeni Yunusa Emre — «myagkaya sila» Turtsii // Geopolitika i bezopasnost'. 2013. № 2. S. 116-122.
Avatkov V.A., Ivanova N.A. Rossiya i Turtsiya: protivostoyanie ideologiy // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2012. № 9-10 (1635). S. 187-196
Avatkov V.A. 2014. Neoosmanizm. Bazovaya ideologema i geostrategiya Turtsii // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2014. № 3 (1645). S. 71-78.
Avatkov V.A. Kurdskaya problema na turetskom pole // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. 2012. № 2. S. 128-133
Khrustalev M.A. Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsiy i politicheskaya ekspertiza: ocherki teorii i metodologii. M.: NOFMO, 2008. S. 45.
Kasatkin P.I., Khrustalev I.M., Avatkov V.A. Evrobezopasnost', integratsiya i «myagkaya sila» migratsii v XXI veke // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. 2012. № 6(27). S. 79-93.
Vneshnepoliticheskiy diskurs vedushchikh sub'ektov turetskoy politiki (2010-leto 2015 g.) / Pod red. V.A. Avatkova. 2015. M.: OOO «Pablis», 88 s.

Аннотация: The cooperation potential of the relations between two great powers (especially having a common border) is significantly smaller than the potential of rivalry because of the existing objective conflicts between them. The immanent feature of the great powers’ foreign policy is an aspiration for strengthening of their influence in the world; therefore, they pay special attention to the regions which are important for their strategic interests realization. The author of this research attempts to describe the problem of cooperation and rivalry between Moscow and Beijing, which is of a big importance both for the alignment of forces in the region, and for the Russian-Chinese relations. Nowadays the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China demonstrate “strategic partnership” in their relations, but the potential and real elements of tension have not disappeared, and the probability of conflicts between them is directly proportional to the process of Russia’s role weakening in the region and the permanently strengthening position of China in Central Asia. The Russian-Chinese cooperation and rivalry exist in several spheres – security, economics, politics, and the social-cultural sphere. In all these spheres Moscow and Beijing are united by strong connections with the region both in bilateral and multilateral dimensions. Russia and China pay special attention to the security and economic and energy cooperation. The article analyzes the model of cooperation and rivalry in the Russian-Chinese relations in the region in these two dimensions.

Ключевые слова: international relations, foreign policy, China, Russia, Central Asia, cooperation, rivalry, national security, interests, energy cooperation.

Библиография:
Medeiros E.S. China’s International Behavior, Activism, Opportunism and Diversification. Santa Monica, 2009. P. 82-83
Lo Bobo. Axis of Convenience Moscow, Beijing, and The New Geopolitics. London, 2008.
Lukin A. Rossiya i Kitay segodnya i zavtra, [v:] Rossiya i Kitay. Chetyre veka vzaimodeystviya. Moskva, 2013.
Burles M. Chinese Policy Toward Russia and the Central Asian Republics. Santa Monica, 1999. R. 8-11.
Luzyanin S.G. Rossiya i Kitay v Evrazii. Mezhdunarodno-regional'nye izmereniya rossiysko-kitayskogo partnerstva. M., 2009.
Bosbotinis J. Sustaining the Dragon, Dodging the Eagle and Barring theBear? Assessing the Role and Importance of Central Asia in Chinese National Strategy // China and Eurasia Forum. Quarterly, 2010. Vol. 8. № 1. R. 68.
Olcott M.B., Udalova N. Drug Trafficking on the Great Silk Road: Security Environment in Central Asia // Working Paper. № 11. Washington, 2000;
Lubin N., Klaits A., Barsegian I. Narcotic Interdiction in Afganistan and Central Asia: Challenges for International Assistance. New York, 2002.
Czarkowska E. Rola elit władzy w kształtowaniu stosunków z Chinami // Przywództwo i elity polityczne w krajach WNP. Tom II. T. Bodio, W. Jakubowski (red.). Warszawa, 2010. S. 190.
Lachowki Z. Foreign Military Bases in Eurasia // SIPRI Policy Paper. 2007 (June). № 18. R. 47;
Luzyanin S.G. Politika Rossii i Kitaya v „klassicheskoy” Tsentral'noy Azii i formirovanie ikh obnovlennogo imidzha v regione // Kitay v mirovoy i regional'noy politike. Istoriya i sovremennost'. Vypusk XIV. M., 2009. S. 89-91.
Roy D. China’s Reaction to American Predominance // Survival. 2003 (Autumn). Vol. 45. Issue 3. P. 57-78.
Syroezhkin K.L. Problemy sovremennogo Kitaya i bezopasnost' v Tsentral'noy Azii. Almaty, 2006.
Sutter R.G. Chinese Foreign Relations. Power and Policy Since the Cold War// Lanham, 2010.
Fei Gao. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and China’s New Diplomacy. Antwerp, 2010;
Bailes A.J.K., Dunay P., Troitskiy M. The Shnaghai Cooperation Organization. Stockholm, 2007;
Chzhao Khuashen. Kitay, Tsentral'naya Aziya i Shankhayskaya Organizatsiya Sotrudnichestva // Rabochie materialy. № 5. M., 2005.
Trenin D. Contemporaty Issues in International Security: Central Asia // Central Asian Security Trends : View from Europe and Russia, Strategic Studies Institute [US Army War College]. S. Blank (ed.). 2011. R. 44;
Kuchins A. Russian Perspectives on China: Strategic Ambivalence // The Future of China-Russia Relations. J. Bellacqua (ed.). University Press of Kentucky, 2010.
Cheng J. Y. S. Chinese Perceptions of Russian Foreign Policy During the Putin Administration: U.S.-Russia Relations and “Strategic Triangle” Considerations // Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. 2009. Vol. 38. № 2. R. 155.
Vasil'ev L. Problemy bezopasnosti v Tsentral'noy Azii: bor'ba s terrorizmom, separatizmom i ekstremizmom v formate ShOS // Shankhayskaya Organizatsiya Sotrudnichestva. K novym rubezham razvitiya. M., 2008.
Weitz R. The Limits of Partnership: China, NATO and the Afghan War // China Security. 2010. Issue 16. R. 21-38;
Guang Pan. China’s Policy on the Conflict in Afghanistan // China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 8. № 3. R. 115-120.
Osnovnye dokumenty i materialy po Shankhayskoy Organizatsii Sotrudnichestva (Iyul' 2001-fevral' 2005). M., 2005. S. 28-40.
http://sectsco.org [15.06.2011].
Gleason G. The Uzbek Expultion of U.S. Forces and Realignment in Central Asia // Problems of Post-Communism. Vol. 53. № 2. 2006. R. 49-60.
Oldberg I. The War on Terrorism in Russian Foreign Policy. Stockholm, 2006.
Haliżak E. Polityka i strategia Chin w kształtowaniu międzynarodowego bezpieczeństwa // Żurawia Papers. Zeszyt 10. Warszawa 2007. S. 87;
Bondarenko V. Sin'tszyan-Uygurskiy avtonomnyy rayon Kitaya v nachale XXI veka. M., 2011.
Bovingdon G. Autonomy in Xinjiang: Han Nationalist Imperatives and Uyghur Disconent // East-West Center Policy Studies. № 11. Washington, 2004;
Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland. S.F. Starr (ed.). Armonk, New York, 2004;
Clarke M. China’s Integration of Xinjiang with Central Asia: Securing a „Silk Road” to Great Power Status? // China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 6. № 2. R. 89-111.
Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights: The Impact of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Hong Kong – New York, 2011. R. 127-212; http://www.ecrats.com/ru/normative_documents/2172[26.07.2010].
Zhu Zhiqun. China’s New Diplomacy: Rationale, Strategies, and Significance. Ashgate, 2010.
Paramonov V., Stolpovski O. Russia and Central Asia: Multilateral Security Cooperation. Defence Academy of The United Kingdom. March 2008;
Nikitina Ya.A. ODKB i ShOS: modeli regionalizma v sfere bezopasnosti. M., 2009.
Zhukov S.V., Reznikova O.B. Tsentral'naya Aziya i Kitay: ekonomicheskoe vzaimodeystvie v usloviyakh globalizatsii. M., 2009.
Graham T. The Sources of Russia’s Insecurity // Survival. 2010. Vol. 52. № 1. R. 63.
Ziegler Ch.E. Russia and China in Central Asia // The Future of China-Russia Relations. James’a Bellacqua (ed.). Kentucky, 2010. R. 252-253.
Haliżak E. Op. cit. S. 124; Zhukov S.V., Reznikova O.B. Tsit. proizv. S. 86-90.
Chow E.C., Hendrix L.E. Central Asia’s Pipelines: Field of Dreams and Reality // NBR Special Raport. (September) 2010. № 23. R. 36;
Guan Pan. China and Energy Security in Central Asia // Central Asia and Caucasus. 2007. Vol. 48. № 6. R. 85-91;
Matveev V. China’s Gas Policy in Central Asia // Central Asia and Caucasus. 2008. Vol. 53. № 5. R. 77-88.
Zweig D., Jianhai Bi. China’s Global Hunt for Energy // Foreign Affairs.(September/October) 2005. Vol. 84. № 5. R. 25-38.
Garrison J.A. China and The Energy Equation in Asia: The Determinants of Policy Choice. Boulder, London, 2009.
Gleason G. China, Russia, and Central Asia: Triangular Energy Politics // China’s Energy Relations with the Developing World. C. Liu i M. Dorraja (eds.). New York, London, 2011. R. 86.
Castes R. China’s oil and gas supply strategy in its Western Margins (Xinjiang and Central Asia) // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Tsentral'naya Aziya–Kitay: sostoyanie i perspektivy sotrudnichestva». Almaty, 2008. S. 104-105.
Blank S. China’s Emerging Energy Nexus with Central Asia // China Brief. Vol. 6. 2006. № 15.
Olkott M. Vtoroy shans Tsentral'noy Azii. Moskva – Vashington, 2005; Sotrudnichestvo i bezopasnost' v Tsentral'noy Azii v usloviyakh politicheskoy i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy transformatsii. Almaty, 2007.
«Energeticheskaya strategiya Rossii na period do 2030 goda», prinyataya pravitel'stvom 13 noyabrya 2009 g. // http://www.minenergo .gov.ru [20.12.2009]
lank S. The Strategic Implications of the Turkmenistan – China Pipeline Project // China Brief. 2010 (February 4). Vol. 10. № 3. R. 10-12.
Christofferson G. Multiple Levels of Sino-Russian Energy Relations // Eurasia’s Ascent in Energy and Geopolitics. Rivalry or Partnership for China, Russia and Central Asia? N. Swanstrom, R.E. Badeski (eds.). London – New York, 2012. R. 135-159.
Shambaugh D. China Engages Asia. Reshaping the Regional Order // International Security. 2004/05 (Winter). Vol. 29. № 3. R. 74;
Chung Chien-peng. The Shanghai Co-operation Organization:China’s Changing Influence in Central Asia // The China Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 180. R. 1007-1008.
Oldberg I. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Powerhouse or Paper Tiger? Stockholm, 2007. R. 28.
Manoylo A.V. Rol' strategiy upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 638-651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
Manoylo A.V. Ukrainskiy krizis i «upravlyaemyy khaos»: sled «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» Arabskoy Vesny. // Vlast'. 2014. №4. S. 24-28.
Manoylo A.V. Uregulirovanie i razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. //Mir i Politika. 2013. №10. S. 130-140.
Manoylo A.V. Spetsifika tsvetnykh revolyutsiy «arabskoy vesny». // Izvestiya Ural'sk. Federal'nogo Un-ta. Ser. 3. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2013. №3. S. 30-36.
Manoylo A.V. Geopoliticheskaya kartina sovremennogo mira. //Natsional'naya bezopasnost'/nota bene.-2013.-№5. – S. 149-155.
Kondakov S.A. Energeticheskaya strategiya Rossii na prostranstve SNG // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 108 - 115. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.3.5274.
S. A. Sidorov Kontseptsiya natsional'noy bezopasnosti KNR
v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy i natsional'noy
bezopasnosti Rossii. // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 9. - C. 1514 - 1524.
S. A. Nikolaev Politika SShA v Tsentral'noy Azii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 4. - C. 43 - 53.
S. A. Nikolaev Protivodeystvie vyzovam i ugrozam
mezhdunarodnoy i regional'noy
bezopasnosti v Tsentral'noy Azii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 6. - C. 46 - 54.
Kostyukhin A.A. Zapadnaya ekspertnaya otsenka vozmozhnostey
i perspektiv voennogo sotrudnichestva
s gosudarstvami Tsentral'noy Azii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 55 - 79. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.8.
S. A. Nikolaev Politika Rossii v Tsentral'no-Aziatskom regione // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 5. - C. 15 - 24.
Karpovich O.G. Afganistan — 2014
vo vneshnepoliticheskoy strategii
SShA i Kanady // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 510 - 512. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.7305.
O.G. Karpovich Osobennosti pozitsiy rossiyskikh
i amerikanskikh ekspertov po voprosam
demokratizatsii Blizhnego Vostoka // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 563 - 567. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.4.

References (transliteration):
Medeiros E.S. China’s International Behavior, Activism, Opportunism and Diversification. Santa Monica, 2009. P. 82-83
Lo Bobo. Axis of Convenience Moscow, Beijing, and The New Geopolitics. London, 2008.
Lukin A. Rossiya i Kitay segodnya i zavtra, [v:] Rossiya i Kitay. Chetyre veka vzaimodeystviya. Moskva, 2013.
Burles M. Chinese Policy Toward Russia and the Central Asian Republics. Santa Monica, 1999. R. 8-11.
Luzyanin S.G. Rossiya i Kitay v Evrazii. Mezhdunarodno-regional'nye izmereniya rossiysko-kitayskogo partnerstva. M., 2009.
Bosbotinis J. Sustaining the Dragon, Dodging the Eagle and Barring theBear? Assessing the Role and Importance of Central Asia in Chinese National Strategy // China and Eurasia Forum. Quarterly, 2010. Vol. 8. № 1. R. 68.
Olcott M.B., Udalova N. Drug Trafficking on the Great Silk Road: Security Environment in Central Asia // Working Paper. № 11. Washington, 2000;
Lubin N., Klaits A., Barsegian I. Narcotic Interdiction in Afganistan and Central Asia: Challenges for International Assistance. New York, 2002.
Czarkowska E. Rola elit władzy w kształtowaniu stosunków z Chinami // Przywództwo i elity polityczne w krajach WNP. Tom II. T. Bodio, W. Jakubowski (red.). Warszawa, 2010. S. 190.
Lachowki Z. Foreign Military Bases in Eurasia // SIPRI Policy Paper. 2007 (June). № 18. R. 47;
Luzyanin S.G. Politika Rossii i Kitaya v „klassicheskoy” Tsentral'noy Azii i formirovanie ikh obnovlennogo imidzha v regione // Kitay v mirovoy i regional'noy politike. Istoriya i sovremennost'. Vypusk XIV. M., 2009. S. 89-91.
Roy D. China’s Reaction to American Predominance // Survival. 2003 (Autumn). Vol. 45. Issue 3. P. 57-78.
Syroezhkin K.L. Problemy sovremennogo Kitaya i bezopasnost' v Tsentral'noy Azii. Almaty, 2006.
Sutter R.G. Chinese Foreign Relations. Power and Policy Since the Cold War// Lanham, 2010.
Fei Gao. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and China’s New Diplomacy. Antwerp, 2010;
Bailes A.J.K., Dunay P., Troitskiy M. The Shnaghai Cooperation Organization. Stockholm, 2007;
Chzhao Khuashen. Kitay, Tsentral'naya Aziya i Shankhayskaya Organizatsiya Sotrudnichestva // Rabochie materialy. № 5. M., 2005.
Trenin D. Contemporaty Issues in International Security: Central Asia // Central Asian Security Trends : View from Europe and Russia, Strategic Studies Institute [US Army War College]. S. Blank (ed.). 2011. R. 44;
Kuchins A. Russian Perspectives on China: Strategic Ambivalence // The Future of China-Russia Relations. J. Bellacqua (ed.). University Press of Kentucky, 2010.
Cheng J. Y. S. Chinese Perceptions of Russian Foreign Policy During the Putin Administration: U.S.-Russia Relations and “Strategic Triangle” Considerations // Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. 2009. Vol. 38. № 2. R. 155.
Vasil'ev L. Problemy bezopasnosti v Tsentral'noy Azii: bor'ba s terrorizmom, separatizmom i ekstremizmom v formate ShOS // Shankhayskaya Organizatsiya Sotrudnichestva. K novym rubezham razvitiya. M., 2008.
Weitz R. The Limits of Partnership: China, NATO and the Afghan War // China Security. 2010. Issue 16. R. 21-38;
Guang Pan. China’s Policy on the Conflict in Afghanistan // China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 8. № 3. R. 115-120.
Osnovnye dokumenty i materialy po Shankhayskoy Organizatsii Sotrudnichestva (Iyul' 2001-fevral' 2005). M., 2005. S. 28-40.
http://sectsco.org [15.06.2011].
Gleason G. The Uzbek Expultion of U.S. Forces and Realignment in Central Asia // Problems of Post-Communism. Vol. 53. № 2. 2006. R. 49-60.
Oldberg I. The War on Terrorism in Russian Foreign Policy. Stockholm, 2006.
Haliżak E. Polityka i strategia Chin w kształtowaniu międzynarodowego bezpieczeństwa // Żurawia Papers. Zeszyt 10. Warszawa 2007. S. 87;
Bondarenko V. Sin'tszyan-Uygurskiy avtonomnyy rayon Kitaya v nachale XXI veka. M., 2011.
Bovingdon G. Autonomy in Xinjiang: Han Nationalist Imperatives and Uyghur Disconent // East-West Center Policy Studies. № 11. Washington, 2004;
Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland. S.F. Starr (ed.). Armonk, New York, 2004;
Clarke M. China’s Integration of Xinjiang with Central Asia: Securing a „Silk Road” to Great Power Status? // China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 6. № 2. R. 89-111.
Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights: The Impact of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Hong Kong – New York, 2011. R. 127-212; http://www.ecrats.com/ru/normative_documents/2172[26.07.2010].
Zhu Zhiqun. China’s New Diplomacy: Rationale, Strategies, and Significance. Ashgate, 2010.
Paramonov V., Stolpovski O. Russia and Central Asia: Multilateral Security Cooperation. Defence Academy of The United Kingdom. March 2008;
Nikitina Ya.A. ODKB i ShOS: modeli regionalizma v sfere bezopasnosti. M., 2009.
Zhukov S.V., Reznikova O.B. Tsentral'naya Aziya i Kitay: ekonomicheskoe vzaimodeystvie v usloviyakh globalizatsii. M., 2009.
Graham T. The Sources of Russia’s Insecurity // Survival. 2010. Vol. 52. № 1. R. 63.
Ziegler Ch.E. Russia and China in Central Asia // The Future of China-Russia Relations. James’a Bellacqua (ed.). Kentucky, 2010. R. 252-253.
Haliżak E. Op. cit. S. 124; Zhukov S.V., Reznikova O.B. Tsit. proizv. S. 86-90.
Chow E.C., Hendrix L.E. Central Asia’s Pipelines: Field of Dreams and Reality // NBR Special Raport. (September) 2010. № 23. R. 36;
Guan Pan. China and Energy Security in Central Asia // Central Asia and Caucasus. 2007. Vol. 48. № 6. R. 85-91;
Matveev V. China’s Gas Policy in Central Asia // Central Asia and Caucasus. 2008. Vol. 53. № 5. R. 77-88.
Zweig D., Jianhai Bi. China’s Global Hunt for Energy // Foreign Affairs.(September/October) 2005. Vol. 84. № 5. R. 25-38.
Garrison J.A. China and The Energy Equation in Asia: The Determinants of Policy Choice. Boulder, London, 2009.
Gleason G. China, Russia, and Central Asia: Triangular Energy Politics // China’s Energy Relations with the Developing World. C. Liu i M. Dorraja (eds.). New York, London, 2011. R. 86.
Castes R. China’s oil and gas supply strategy in its Western Margins (Xinjiang and Central Asia) // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Tsentral'naya Aziya–Kitay: sostoyanie i perspektivy sotrudnichestva». Almaty, 2008. S. 104-105.
Blank S. China’s Emerging Energy Nexus with Central Asia // China Brief. Vol. 6. 2006. № 15.
Olkott M. Vtoroy shans Tsentral'noy Azii. Moskva – Vashington, 2005; Sotrudnichestvo i bezopasnost' v Tsentral'noy Azii v usloviyakh politicheskoy i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy transformatsii. Almaty, 2007.
«Energeticheskaya strategiya Rossii na period do 2030 goda», prinyataya pravitel'stvom 13 noyabrya 2009 g. // http://www.minenergo .gov.ru [20.12.2009]
lank S. The Strategic Implications of the Turkmenistan – China Pipeline Project // China Brief. 2010 (February 4). Vol. 10. № 3. R. 10-12.
Christofferson G. Multiple Levels of Sino-Russian Energy Relations // Eurasia’s Ascent in Energy and Geopolitics. Rivalry or Partnership for China, Russia and Central Asia? N. Swanstrom, R.E. Badeski (eds.). London – New York, 2012. R. 135-159.
Shambaugh D. China Engages Asia. Reshaping the Regional Order // International Security. 2004/05 (Winter). Vol. 29. № 3. R. 74;
Chung Chien-peng. The Shanghai Co-operation Organization:China’s Changing Influence in Central Asia // The China Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 180. R. 1007-1008.
Oldberg I. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Powerhouse or Paper Tiger? Stockholm, 2007. R. 28.
Manoylo A.V. Rol' strategiy upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 638-651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
Manoylo A.V. Ukrainskiy krizis i «upravlyaemyy khaos»: sled «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» Arabskoy Vesny. // Vlast'. 2014. №4. S. 24-28.
Manoylo A.V. Uregulirovanie i razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. //Mir i Politika. 2013. №10. S. 130-140.
Manoylo A.V. Spetsifika tsvetnykh revolyutsiy «arabskoy vesny». // Izvestiya Ural'sk. Federal'nogo Un-ta. Ser. 3. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2013. №3. S. 30-36.
Manoylo A.V. Geopoliticheskaya kartina sovremennogo mira. //Natsional'naya bezopasnost'/nota bene.-2013.-№5. – S. 149-155.
Kondakov S.A. Energeticheskaya strategiya Rossii na prostranstve SNG // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 108 - 115. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.3.5274.
S. A. Sidorov Kontseptsiya natsional'noy bezopasnosti KNR
v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy i natsional'noy
bezopasnosti Rossii. // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 9. - C. 1514 - 1524.
S. A. Nikolaev Politika SShA v Tsentral'noy Azii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 4. - C. 43 - 53.
S. A. Nikolaev Protivodeystvie vyzovam i ugrozam
mezhdunarodnoy i regional'noy
bezopasnosti v Tsentral'noy Azii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 6. - C. 46 - 54.
Kostyukhin A.A. Zapadnaya ekspertnaya otsenka vozmozhnostey
i perspektiv voennogo sotrudnichestva
s gosudarstvami Tsentral'noy Azii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 55 - 79. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.8.
S. A. Nikolaev Politika Rossii v Tsentral'no-Aziatskom regione // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 5. - C. 15 - 24.
Karpovich O.G. Afganistan — 2014
vo vneshnepoliticheskoy strategii
SShA i Kanady // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 510 - 512. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.7305.
O.G. Karpovich Osobennosti pozitsiy rossiyskikh
i amerikanskikh ekspertov po voprosam
demokratizatsii Blizhnego Vostoka // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 563 - 567. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.4.

Аннотация: The article raises the problem of identification of the most perspective strategy of the Russian foreign policy on the modern stage of the world politics evolution. The first part of the article considers the international political and intellectual context of the scientific concepts of “soft power” and “smart power” formation, analyzes the Russian specificity of their understanding. In the second part of the article the authors consider the “soft power” and “intelligent power” analyses as the international political strategies of states. Structuring these strategies, the authors correlate them with the strategies of “hard power” and “smart power”. The resources, instruments and goals of each of the four strategies are analyzed and compared to each other. In the third part of the article the authors consider several particular cases of successful use of “intelligent power” in the Russian foreign policy. In the result of the research the authors come to the conclusion that the states, competing for the world leadership, possess the ability to choose one of these four strategies. The analysis held shows that the “intelligent power” strategy corresponds to the demands of the modern world political system best of all. It gives the state the opportunity to act in the world politics as a “responsible leader” but not as a “manipulator”, to form a more stable collective decision-making system, to solve the problems of global development by means of innovative and flexible, but strategically well-thought approaches.

Ключевые слова: international relations, foreign policy, Russia, “Soft power”, strategies, “Hard power”, “Smart power”, “Intelligent power”, “responsible leadership”, security.

Библиография:
Borodin E.A. Respublika Kyrgyzstan i vozvrashchenie Rossii v Tsentral'nuyu Aziyu // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-4.-C. 613-619. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.4.7751.
Filimonov G.Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy formirovaniya strategii «myagkoy sily» vo vneshney politike Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 443-451. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9419.
Gusher A.I. Vyzovy i ugrozy bezopasnosti Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-1.-C. 64-75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10748. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10748.html
Borodin E.A. Tsentral'naya Aziya kak geostrategicheskiy proekt, obespechivayushchiy dolgosrochnye interesy Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-3.-C. 1-17. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.3.9090. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9090.html
T. P. Petrova Sovremennoe sostoyanie vneshnepoliticheskikh otnosheniy Rossii i Peru: problemy i perspektivy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-3.-C. 86-92.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii rasprostraneniyu ideologii «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» v universitetskoy studencheskoy srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 420-423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
Song L. The Discourse of EU`s Power and its Mediterranean Policy // Fudan University.-P. 1 – 15.-www.garnet-eu.org/fileadmin/documents/phd_school/6th.../Lilei.pdf
Manoylo A.V. Vooruzhennyy myatezh v Ukraine mozhet stat' dlya Rossii poslednim trevozhnym zvonkom // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-2.-C. 24-37. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.2.11137. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11137.html
Shashi Tharoor Indian Strategic Power: ‘Soft’// Global Brief, 13 May, 2009.-http://globalbrief.ca/blog/2009/05/13/soft-is-the-word/
Nye J.S. The war on soft power // Foreign policy, 12.04.2011.-http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/12/the_war_on_soft_power
Nye J. S. The future of power. – New York: PublicAffairs, 2011. – XVIII, 300 p.
Nye J.S. Cyber power // Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. Cambridge, Mass., 2010.-30 p.
Raghavan V.R. Soft Power in the Asia Pacific // The Stanley Foundation, 31.05.2007.-csa-chennai.org/Files/softpower.pdf
Nye J. S. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books, 1991.-336 p.
Nye J S. Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, 2004.-192 p.
Nossel S. Smart Power // Foreign Affairs, March/April, 2004.-P. 131-142.
Cui Liru China` s Rise vs. International Order Evolution // China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, № 18 (1), 2008.-http://www.cicir.ac.cn/tbscms/module_gjgx/layernext.asp?rid=xdgjgx_en&count=3&index0=16&index1=1
Chikharev I.A. «Umnaya moshch'» v arsenale mirovoy politiki // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. – T. 9.-№1 (25), yanvar' – aprel', 2011.-http://www.intertrends.ru/twenty-fifth/011.htm-note10
Chikharev I.A., Stoletov O.V. Metodologicheskie problemy izucheniya novykh dvizhushchikh sil mirovoy politicheskoy dinamiki // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov METOD: Moskovskiy ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin, Vyp. 1: Al'ternativnye modeli formirovaniya natsiy. / Red. i sost. vyp. Il'in M. V., M., 2012.
Putin V.V. Rossiya i menyayushchiysya mir // Moskovskie novosti, 27.02.2012.
Stoletov O.V. Trendy transformatsii vlastnykh otnosheniy v mirovoy politike: smart power? // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.-№4, 2009. – C.173-178.
Fenenko A.V. Voyny shestogo pokoleniya // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'.-№2, 2004.-http://www.obraforum.ru/pdf/art1.pdf
Ponomareva E. Sekrety «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy». Sovremennye tekhnologii smeny politicheskikh rezhimov // Svobodnaya mysl'.-№3/4 (1632), 2012. – S.43 – 59.
Lyu Tszaytsi «Myagkaya sila» v strategii razvitiya Kitaya // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.-№4, 2009. – S. 149 – 155.
Nay Dzh. «Myagkaya» sila i amerikano-evropeyskie otnosheniya// Svobodnaya mysl' – XXI.-№ 10, 2004.-http://www.situation.ru/app/j_art_1165.htm
Luzin P. Kosmos kak instrument myagkoy sily vneshney politiki Rossii // Indeks bezopasnosti.-№3-4 (102-103). – T.18. – S. 203 – 208.
Kostyrev A.G. «Razumnaya sila», obshchestvennaya diplomatiya i sotsial'nye seti kak faktory mezhdunarodnoy politiki // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.-№2, 2013. – S. 143-149.
Genyush S.V. Ekspertnaya diplomatiya: grazhdanskoe obshchestvo na sluzhbe vneshney politiki // Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie.-№5. – T.5, 2012. – S.14 – 25.-http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekspertnaya-diplomatiya-grazhdanskoe-obschestvo-na-sluzhbe-vneshney-politiki
Borodakiy Yu.V., Dobrodeev A.Yu., Butusov I.V. Kiberbezopasnost' kak osnovnoy faktor natsional'noy i mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti KhKhI veka // Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti (Chast' 1).-№1, 2013. – S. 2 – 9.-http://cnpo.ru/doc/%D0%9A%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_1-2013.pdf-page=4
Karpovich O.G.. «Myagkaya sila» v global'nykh koordinatakh vneshney politiki SShA. // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 10.-C. 1295-1297. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9652.
G. Yu. Filimonov, S. A. Tsaturyan. Sotsial'nye seti kak innovatsionnyy mekhanizm «myagkogo» vozdeystviya i upravleniya massovym soznaniem. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-№ 1.-C. 65-75.

References (transliteration):
Borodin E.A. Respublika Kyrgyzstan i vozvrashchenie Rossii v Tsentral'nuyu Aziyu // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-4.-C. 613-619. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.4.7751.
Filimonov G.Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy formirovaniya strategii «myagkoy sily» vo vneshney politike Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 443-451. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9419.
Gusher A.I. Vyzovy i ugrozy bezopasnosti Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-1.-C. 64-75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10748. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10748.html
Borodin E.A. Tsentral'naya Aziya kak geostrategicheskiy proekt, obespechivayushchiy dolgosrochnye interesy Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-3.-C. 1-17. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.3.9090. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9090.html
T. P. Petrova Sovremennoe sostoyanie vneshnepoliticheskikh otnosheniy Rossii i Peru: problemy i perspektivy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-3.-C. 86-92.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii rasprostraneniyu ideologii «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» v universitetskoy studencheskoy srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 420-423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
Song L. The Discourse of EU`s Power and its Mediterranean Policy // Fudan University.-P. 1 – 15.-www.garnet-eu.org/fileadmin/documents/phd_school/6th.../Lilei.pdf
Manoylo A.V. Vooruzhennyy myatezh v Ukraine mozhet stat' dlya Rossii poslednim trevozhnym zvonkom // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-2.-C. 24-37. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.2.11137. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11137.html
Shashi Tharoor Indian Strategic Power: ‘Soft’// Global Brief, 13 May, 2009.-http://globalbrief.ca/blog/2009/05/13/soft-is-the-word/
Nye J.S. The war on soft power // Foreign policy, 12.04.2011.-http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/12/the_war_on_soft_power
Nye J. S. The future of power. – New York: PublicAffairs, 2011. – XVIII, 300 p.
Nye J.S. Cyber power // Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. Cambridge, Mass., 2010.-30 p.
Raghavan V.R. Soft Power in the Asia Pacific // The Stanley Foundation, 31.05.2007.-csa-chennai.org/Files/softpower.pdf
Nye J. S. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books, 1991.-336 p.
Nye J S. Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, 2004.-192 p.
Nossel S. Smart Power // Foreign Affairs, March/April, 2004.-P. 131-142.
Cui Liru China` s Rise vs. International Order Evolution // China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, № 18 (1), 2008.-http://www.cicir.ac.cn/tbscms/module_gjgx/layernext.asp?rid=xdgjgx_en&count=3&index0=16&index1=1
Chikharev I.A. «Umnaya moshch'» v arsenale mirovoy politiki // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. – T. 9.-№1 (25), yanvar' – aprel', 2011.-http://www.intertrends.ru/twenty-fifth/011.htm-note10
Chikharev I.A., Stoletov O.V. Metodologicheskie problemy izucheniya novykh dvizhushchikh sil mirovoy politicheskoy dinamiki // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov METOD: Moskovskiy ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin, Vyp. 1: Al'ternativnye modeli formirovaniya natsiy. / Red. i sost. vyp. Il'in M. V., M., 2012.
Putin V.V. Rossiya i menyayushchiysya mir // Moskovskie novosti, 27.02.2012.
Stoletov O.V. Trendy transformatsii vlastnykh otnosheniy v mirovoy politike: smart power? // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.-№4, 2009. – C.173-178.
Fenenko A.V. Voyny shestogo pokoleniya // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'.-№2, 2004.-http://www.obraforum.ru/pdf/art1.pdf
Ponomareva E. Sekrety «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy». Sovremennye tekhnologii smeny politicheskikh rezhimov // Svobodnaya mysl'.-№3/4 (1632), 2012. – S.43 – 59.
Lyu Tszaytsi «Myagkaya sila» v strategii razvitiya Kitaya // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.-№4, 2009. – S. 149 – 155.
Nay Dzh. «Myagkaya» sila i amerikano-evropeyskie otnosheniya// Svobodnaya mysl' – XXI.-№ 10, 2004.-http://www.situation.ru/app/j_art_1165.htm
Luzin P. Kosmos kak instrument myagkoy sily vneshney politiki Rossii // Indeks bezopasnosti.-№3-4 (102-103). – T.18. – S. 203 – 208.
Kostyrev A.G. «Razumnaya sila», obshchestvennaya diplomatiya i sotsial'nye seti kak faktory mezhdunarodnoy politiki // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.-№2, 2013. – S. 143-149.
Genyush S.V. Ekspertnaya diplomatiya: grazhdanskoe obshchestvo na sluzhbe vneshney politiki // Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie.-№5. – T.5, 2012. – S.14 – 25.-http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekspertnaya-diplomatiya-grazhdanskoe-obschestvo-na-sluzhbe-vneshney-politiki
Borodakiy Yu.V., Dobrodeev A.Yu., Butusov I.V. Kiberbezopasnost' kak osnovnoy faktor natsional'noy i mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti KhKhI veka // Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti (Chast' 1).-№1, 2013. – S. 2 – 9.-http://cnpo.ru/doc/%D0%9A%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_1-2013.pdf-page=4
Karpovich O.G.. «Myagkaya sila» v global'nykh koordinatakh vneshney politiki SShA. // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 10.-C. 1295-1297. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9652.
G. Yu. Filimonov, S. A. Tsaturyan. Sotsial'nye seti kak innovatsionnyy mekhanizm «myagkogo» vozdeystviya i upravleniya massovym soznaniem. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-№ 1.-C. 65-75.

Аннотация: The article sets a goal for the evaluation of the Eurasian Integration Project as an alternative means for the organization of the post-Soviet territory. Taking an example of Russian-Serbian relations, the author shows the role of traditional unity of culture and values, civilization orientations, and historic memory in the modern geopolitical conditions. The analysis of the dynamics and nature of the public opinion of the Russian formed the basis for the conclusion on the special role of the Balkan peninsula in perception and evaluation of the geopolitical status and potential of the Russian Federation, as well as on the conclusion regarding the most favorable regime for the development of cooperation between Russia and Serbia, including cooperation within the framework of the new integration model. Serbia is a traditional outpost of Russia in the Balkan peninsula (and, speaking more broadly, in Europe), being its undoubted historical ally in the Balkans, while the Balkans have always been the special geopolitical and geo-economical zone for Russia, and it has been always holding on to its priorities there. Connection between Russia and Serbia, them being the mainland and the isle of the Slavic Orthodox culture, is defined by something more than just “political profit and conjuncture”, “national interests and economic pragmatism”. To begin with, it hardly was formed out of purely “pragmatic and rational basis”. This special closeness withstood the test of time and it may be inherited by the future generations.

Ключевые слова: international relations, foreign policy, Russia, Serbia, integration, diplomacy, state, interests, values, security.

Контактная информация: Arlyapova, Elena Sergeevna, 119454, Russia, Moskva, prospect Vernadskogo, 76.

Библиография:
Filimonova A. Putin: bitva za Serbiyu// Fond strategicheskoy kul'tury (elektronnoe izdanie). 24.03.2011 http://www.fondsk.ru/pview/2011/03/24/putin-bitva-za-serbiju-2549. html.
Russkiy Vestnik. 2006. 22 dekabrya; VTsIOM. Press-vypusk №1884.
Putin V. Vystuplenie na Soveshchanii poslov i postoyannykh predstaviteley RF pri mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiyakh. Moskva, 9 iyulya 2012 goda// Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №7. S. 5.
Bordachev T.V. Evraziyskiy soyuz: integratsiya radi suvereniteta// Vedomosti. 2013. 2 oktyabrya. №181 (3443); Ob'edinit'sya ili poteryat' suverenitet// Rossiya v global'noy politike. 2013. 4 oktyabrya.
Gus'kova E.Yu. Soglasie slavyanskikh stran – spasenie ot pretenziy zapada// Tanyug. 1999, 10 oktyabrya http://www. kosovo.ws/archive/guskova5.htm.
Obshchnost' istoricheskikh korney kak faktor stanovleniya Evraziyskogo soyuza. Zasedanie integratsionnogo kluba pri predsedatele Soveta Federatsii Federal'nogo Sobraniya RF 18 noyabrya 2013 g.// http://www.mgimo.ru /news/university/document243338.phtml.
The Moscow Times. 2013. July 02.
Putin V. Vystuplenie na Soveshchanii poslov i postoyannykh predstaviteley RF pri mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiyakh. Moskva, 9 iyulya 2012 goda// Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №7. S. 6.
Putin V. Novyy integratsionnyy proekt dlya Evrazii – budushchee, kotoroe rozhdaetsya segodnya// Izvestiya. 2011, 4 oktyabrya.
Luk'yanov F. Evropa vozvrashchaetsya k Amerike// Rossiya v global'noy politike. 2013. 18 iyulya.
Chizhov V. Strategicheskoe partnerstvo Rossiya – ES: evrokrizis – ne povod dlya peredyshki// Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №6. S. 28.
Ponomareva E.G. Balkany kak zona (dez)integratsii// Razvitie i ekonomika. 2013. №5. S.82.
Ivanov I. Rossiya i Evropa – vozmozhen li proryv v otnosheniyakh? // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №1. S. 2-3.
Lozansky E., Sieff M. Don’t Fear a Eurasian Union// The Moscow Times. 2013, July 02.
Clover Ch. Clinton vows to thwart new Soviet Union// Financial Times. 2012, December 6.
There is no alternative to EU membership – PM Ivica Dacic// In Serbia. June, 27. 2013.
Nasty fight ahead// The Economist. September, 28. 2013; Preening// The Economist. September, 28. 2013.
Serbian Prime Minister: We will be next to join European Union// CNN. 03 October 2013. http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/03/business/serbian-prime-minister-dacic-eu-membership/; Dačić expects "historic day for Serbia, EU"// http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?=2013&mm =06&dd=27&nav_id=86770.
Marinkov S. Serbia: Reactions and attitudes towards EU candidate status// http://civiltrust building.eu/ctb/serbia-reactions-and-attitudes-towards-eu-candidate-status/ (Local Democracy Agency Central Serbia).
Frydenborg B. Why Russia is the Tea Party of International Politics?// http://www.policymic.com/ (September 3, 2013); Larrabee S. Russia, Ukraine, and Central Europe: The Return of Geopolitics// Journal of International Affairs. Vol.63, No.2, Spring/Summer 2010: Rethinking Russia. P.33-52; Schultz W. Russia: back to superpower?// Euronews. 2012. March, 1.
Shevtsova L. Odinokaya derzhava: Pochemu Rossiya ne stala Zapadom i pochemu Rossii trudno s Zapadom/ Shevtsova L.; Mosk. Tsentr Karnegi. M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. S. 111.
Kommersant. 22 sentyabrya 2000 g. № 177.
V.V. Putin vstretilsya s rukovodstvom Narodnoy skupshchiny Respubliki Serbii. 23.03.2011// https://putin.ru/russiannews/67-putin-news-lines/17759-vvputin-vstretilsya-s-rukovodstvom-narodnoy-skupshini-respubliki-serbii.html.
NATO protiv Yugoslavii: desyat' let spustya// Khranitel' (Mediaportal o bezopasnosti). 25 marta 2009 g. http://www.psj.ru/news/detail.php?ID=16121; Dannye Vserossiyskogo oprosa VTsIOM. 13-14.09.2008// http://wciom.ru/index.php?id =269&uid=10738.
Pobochnyy effekt// Vremya novostey. 22 sentyabrya 2008 g. №174.
Dannye Vserossiyskikh oprosov VTsIOM. 15.06.1998, 15.10.1998// http://wciom.ru/zh/print_q.php?s_id=499 &q_id=36526&date=15.06.1998, http://wciom.ru/zh/print_q.php?s_id= 400&q_id=32361&date=15.10.1998; Dannye Vserossiyskogo oprosa VTsIOM. 28.02.1999 (?)// http://wciom.ru/zh/print_q.php?s_id=520&q_id =37432&date= 28.02.1999.
Manifest Nikolaya II o vstuplenii Rossii v voynu. 20 iyulya 1914 g.// http://www.rusarchives.ru/statehood/06-113-manifest-nikolay-ii.shtml.
Vuchich A. Serbiya khochet sokhranit' to, chto ey prinadlezhit// Interv'yu. Radiostantsiya «Golos Rossii». 23.05.2013. http://rus.ruvr.ru/2013_05_23/Aleksandr-Vuchich-Serbija-hochet-sohranit-to-chto-ej-prinadlezhit/.
Ponomareva E. Balkanskiy vektor energeticheskoy politiki Rossii// Portal MGIMO. 25.12.2012. http://www. mgimo.ru/news/experts/document234170.phtml; Gus'kova E.Yu. Serbiya i Balkany vo vneshney politike Rossii// Fond strategicheskoy kul'tury (elektronnoe izdanie). 11.04.2012 http://www.fondsk.ru/news/2012/04/11/serbia-i-balkany-vo-vneshnej-politike-rossii-13755 .html; Filimonova A. Serbiya: «prorossiyskiy» Nikolich protiv «prozapadnogo» Tadicha?// Fond strategicheskoy kul'tury (elektronnoe izdanie). 14.05.2012 http://www.fondsk.ru/news/2012/05/14/serbia-prorossijskij-nikolich-protiv-prozapadnogo-tadicha-14349.html; i dr.
Beketov N.A. Slovo o sodeystvii Rossii blagu Evropy// Izbrannye trudy professorov nravstvenno-politicheskogo otdeleniya Moskovskogo universiteta (1804-1835). M.: Al'fa-M, 2010. S. 98.
Bataveljic D. Serbia on the way towards a larger European Union// Problemi na natsionalnata i mezhdunarodnata sigurnost. T.3. Veliko Tyrnovo: «IVIS», 2012. S.50.
Stoyanov Zh. Sigurnostta na Balkanite i Zapadnite strategii// Problemi na natsionalnata i mezhdunarodnata sigurnost. T.3. Veliko Tyrnovo: «IVIS», 2012.S.15.
Neymatova A.Ya. MID Rossii i novaya publichnaya diplomatiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-1.-C. 80-85. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.01.9.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii rasprostraneniyu ideologii «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» v universitetskoy studencheskoy srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 420-423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
Manoylo A.V. Aktual'nye voprosy modernizatsii sovremennoy kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnoy teorii upravleniya mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami.//Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. – 2011.-№4. – S.60-66.
Manoylo A.V. Geopoliticheskaya kartina sovremennogo mira. //Natsional'naya bezopasnost'/nota bene.-2013.-№5. – S. 149-155.
Gusher A.I. Vyzovy i ugrozy bezopasnosti Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 64 - 75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10748. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10748.html
Bocharnikov I.V. Ukrainskiy krizis kak element poyasa strategicheskogo okruzheniya Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 7 - 32. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.4.11617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11617.html

References (transliteration):
Filimonova A. Putin: bitva za Serbiyu// Fond strategicheskoy kul'tury (elektronnoe izdanie). 24.03.2011 http://www.fondsk.ru/pview/2011/03/24/putin-bitva-za-serbiju-2549. html.
Russkiy Vestnik. 2006. 22 dekabrya; VTsIOM. Press-vypusk №1884.
Putin V. Vystuplenie na Soveshchanii poslov i postoyannykh predstaviteley RF pri mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiyakh. Moskva, 9 iyulya 2012 goda// Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №7. S. 5.
Bordachev T.V. Evraziyskiy soyuz: integratsiya radi suvereniteta// Vedomosti. 2013. 2 oktyabrya. №181 (3443); Ob'edinit'sya ili poteryat' suverenitet// Rossiya v global'noy politike. 2013. 4 oktyabrya.
Gus'kova E.Yu. Soglasie slavyanskikh stran – spasenie ot pretenziy zapada// Tanyug. 1999, 10 oktyabrya http://www. kosovo.ws/archive/guskova5.htm.
Obshchnost' istoricheskikh korney kak faktor stanovleniya Evraziyskogo soyuza. Zasedanie integratsionnogo kluba pri predsedatele Soveta Federatsii Federal'nogo Sobraniya RF 18 noyabrya 2013 g.// http://www.mgimo.ru /news/university/document243338.phtml.
The Moscow Times. 2013. July 02.
Putin V. Vystuplenie na Soveshchanii poslov i postoyannykh predstaviteley RF pri mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiyakh. Moskva, 9 iyulya 2012 goda// Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №7. S. 6.
Putin V. Novyy integratsionnyy proekt dlya Evrazii – budushchee, kotoroe rozhdaetsya segodnya// Izvestiya. 2011, 4 oktyabrya.
Luk'yanov F. Evropa vozvrashchaetsya k Amerike// Rossiya v global'noy politike. 2013. 18 iyulya.
Chizhov V. Strategicheskoe partnerstvo Rossiya – ES: evrokrizis – ne povod dlya peredyshki// Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №6. S. 28.
Ponomareva E.G. Balkany kak zona (dez)integratsii// Razvitie i ekonomika. 2013. №5. S.82.
Ivanov I. Rossiya i Evropa – vozmozhen li proryv v otnosheniyakh? // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2012. №1. S. 2-3.
Lozansky E., Sieff M. Don’t Fear a Eurasian Union// The Moscow Times. 2013, July 02.
Clover Ch. Clinton vows to thwart new Soviet Union// Financial Times. 2012, December 6.
There is no alternative to EU membership – PM Ivica Dacic// In Serbia. June, 27. 2013.
Nasty fight ahead// The Economist. September, 28. 2013; Preening// The Economist. September, 28. 2013.
Serbian Prime Minister: We will be next to join European Union// CNN. 03 October 2013. http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/03/business/serbian-prime-minister-dacic-eu-membership/; Dačić expects "historic day for Serbia, EU"// http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?=2013&mm =06&dd=27&nav_id=86770.
Marinkov S. Serbia: Reactions and attitudes towards EU candidate status// http://civiltrust building.eu/ctb/serbia-reactions-and-attitudes-towards-eu-candidate-status/ (Local Democracy Agency Central Serbia).
Frydenborg B. Why Russia is the Tea Party of International Politics?// http://www.policymic.com/ (September 3, 2013); Larrabee S. Russia, Ukraine, and Central Europe: The Return of Geopolitics// Journal of International Affairs. Vol.63, No.2, Spring/Summer 2010: Rethinking Russia. P.33-52; Schultz W. Russia: back to superpower?// Euronews. 2012. March, 1.
Shevtsova L. Odinokaya derzhava: Pochemu Rossiya ne stala Zapadom i pochemu Rossii trudno s Zapadom/ Shevtsova L.; Mosk. Tsentr Karnegi. M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. S. 111.
Kommersant. 22 sentyabrya 2000 g. № 177.
V.V. Putin vstretilsya s rukovodstvom Narodnoy skupshchiny Respubliki Serbii. 23.03.2011// https://putin.ru/russiannews/67-putin-news-lines/17759-vvputin-vstretilsya-s-rukovodstvom-narodnoy-skupshini-respubliki-serbii.html.
NATO protiv Yugoslavii: desyat' let spustya// Khranitel' (Mediaportal o bezopasnosti). 25 marta 2009 g. http://www.psj.ru/news/detail.php?ID=16121; Dannye Vserossiyskogo oprosa VTsIOM. 13-14.09.2008// http://wciom.ru/index.php?id =269&uid=10738.
Pobochnyy effekt// Vremya novostey. 22 sentyabrya 2008 g. №174.
Dannye Vserossiyskikh oprosov VTsIOM. 15.06.1998, 15.10.1998// http://wciom.ru/zh/print_q.php?s_id=499 &q_id=36526&date=15.06.1998, http://wciom.ru/zh/print_q.php?s_id= 400&q_id=32361&date=15.10.1998; Dannye Vserossiyskogo oprosa VTsIOM. 28.02.1999 (?)// http://wciom.ru/zh/print_q.php?s_id=520&q_id =37432&date= 28.02.1999.
Manifest Nikolaya II o vstuplenii Rossii v voynu. 20 iyulya 1914 g.// http://www.rusarchives.ru/statehood/06-113-manifest-nikolay-ii.shtml.
Vuchich A. Serbiya khochet sokhranit' to, chto ey prinadlezhit// Interv'yu. Radiostantsiya «Golos Rossii». 23.05.2013. http://rus.ruvr.ru/2013_05_23/Aleksandr-Vuchich-Serbija-hochet-sohranit-to-chto-ej-prinadlezhit/.
Ponomareva E. Balkanskiy vektor energeticheskoy politiki Rossii// Portal MGIMO. 25.12.2012. http://www. mgimo.ru/news/experts/document234170.phtml; Gus'kova E.Yu. Serbiya i Balkany vo vneshney politike Rossii// Fond strategicheskoy kul'tury (elektronnoe izdanie). 11.04.2012 http://www.fondsk.ru/news/2012/04/11/serbia-i-balkany-vo-vneshnej-politike-rossii-13755 .html; Filimonova A. Serbiya: «prorossiyskiy» Nikolich protiv «prozapadnogo» Tadicha?// Fond strategicheskoy kul'tury (elektronnoe izdanie). 14.05.2012 http://www.fondsk.ru/news/2012/05/14/serbia-prorossijskij-nikolich-protiv-prozapadnogo-tadicha-14349.html; i dr.
Beketov N.A. Slovo o sodeystvii Rossii blagu Evropy// Izbrannye trudy professorov nravstvenno-politicheskogo otdeleniya Moskovskogo universiteta (1804-1835). M.: Al'fa-M, 2010. S. 98.
Bataveljic D. Serbia on the way towards a larger European Union// Problemi na natsionalnata i mezhdunarodnata sigurnost. T.3. Veliko Tyrnovo: «IVIS», 2012. S.50.
Stoyanov Zh. Sigurnostta na Balkanite i Zapadnite strategii// Problemi na natsionalnata i mezhdunarodnata sigurnost. T.3. Veliko Tyrnovo: «IVIS», 2012.S.15.
Neymatova A.Ya. MID Rossii i novaya publichnaya diplomatiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-1.-C. 80-85. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.01.9.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii rasprostraneniyu ideologii «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» v universitetskoy studencheskoy srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 420-423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
Manoylo A.V. Aktual'nye voprosy modernizatsii sovremennoy kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnoy teorii upravleniya mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami.//Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. – 2011.-№4. – S.60-66.
Manoylo A.V. Geopoliticheskaya kartina sovremennogo mira. //Natsional'naya bezopasnost'/nota bene.-2013.-№5. – S. 149-155.
Gusher A.I. Vyzovy i ugrozy bezopasnosti Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 64 - 75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10748. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10748.html
Bocharnikov I.V. Ukrainskiy krizis kak element poyasa strategicheskogo okruzheniya Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 7 - 32. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.4.11617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11617.html

Аннотация: Review: The article is devoted to the sources, traditions and the current situation in the relations between Russia and the largest state in the South America – Brazil. The author points out the goodwill of both parties to cooperation and widening the scope of connections in all spheres. Special attention is paid to the meetings and negotiations of the leaders of the two states in the last two years, which took place in the atmosphere of mutual understanding and closeness of interests both in Russia and in Brazil. Lately Brazil is more and more often mentioned in Russia. This far and exotic state of the South America was visited by our leaders V.V. Putin and D.A. Medveded, and the Brazilian Presidents Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Dilma Roussef. Brazil has became the main trade partner of Russia in this part of the world, and the states actively develop scientific and technical cooperation, which is in part due to the appearance of new forms of such cooperation, and scientific and cultural ties between two states also become stronger.

Ключевые слова: international relations, foreign policy, Russia, Brazil, political stability, diplomacy, state, nation, security, cooperation.

Контактная информация: Sizonenko, Aleksandr Ivanovich, 101000, Russia, Moskva, ul. Bolshaya Ordynka, 21.

Библиография:
Neymatova A.Ya. MID Rossii i novaya publichnaya diplomatiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-1.-C. 80-85. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.01.9.
«Nezavisimaya gazeta», 22.11.2013 g.
A. Ya. Neymatova Formirovanie pozitivnogo imidzha gosudarstva v deyatel'nosti MID Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2012.-1.-C. 106-117.
Memorandum o vzaimoponimanii mezhdu Minekonomrazvitiya RF i tremya brazil'skimi ministerstvami – MID, Nauki, tekhnologiy i innovatsiy, a takzhe razvitiya promyshlennosti i vneshney torgovli.
Mezhpravitel'stvennoe soglashenie o voennom sotrudnichestve.
Kontrakt ob osnovnykh usloviyakh postanovki rossiyskikh vertoletov KA-62 brazil'skim partneram.
Khizrieva S.S.. Informatsionnoe obespechenie vneshney politiki Brazilii v Evrosoyuze. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-№ 3.-C. 353-355. DOI: .10.7256/2305-560X.2013.3.887

References (transliteration):
Neymatova A.Ya. MID Rossii i novaya publichnaya diplomatiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-1.-C. 80-85. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.01.9.
«Nezavisimaya gazeta», 22.11.2013 g.
A. Ya. Neymatova Formirovanie pozitivnogo imidzha gosudarstva v deyatel'nosti MID Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2012.-1.-C. 106-117.
Memorandum o vzaimoponimanii mezhdu Minekonomrazvitiya RF i tremya brazil'skimi ministerstvami – MID, Nauki, tekhnologiy i innovatsiy, a takzhe razvitiya promyshlennosti i vneshney torgovli.
Mezhpravitel'stvennoe soglashenie o voennom sotrudnichestve.
Kontrakt ob osnovnykh usloviyakh postanovki rossiyskikh vertoletov KA-62 brazil'skim partneram.
Khizrieva S.S.. Informatsionnoe obespechenie vneshney politiki Brazilii v Evrosoyuze. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-№ 3.-C. 353-355. DOI: .10.7256/2305-560X.2013.3.887

Аннотация: The article presents a conceptual position of the author on a topical issue of formation of a complex multi-level innovative “soft power” strategy in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation, recovery and development of the “soft power” of Russia in the post — Soviet area and further abroad. The text contains analysis of the conditions necessary for the formation of the Russian public diplomacy and foreign cultural and information policy of the new generation. In spite of the fact that the modern international agenda is still centered upon the use of military force by the states as a priority means to achieve security, the cultural and communications globalization, powered by the growing economic interdependency leads to complementing of the military resources with the non-military political influence factors, which can be generally referred to as the “soft power”. In the opinions of the American political scientists, the tendencies in the development of international relations shall be for greater influence of the “soft power” in the general power balance of the states, and even the largest and most developed states shall not be able to resolve their problems purely by military means. They explain it by interdependency of economics (and interdependency management becomes a key force behind the American efforts in this sphere), and lowering of the role of “military glory” among the values of modern post-industrial societies.

Ключевые слова: international relations, foreign politics, Russia, soft force, political instability, diplomacy, state, interests, values, security.

Контактная информация: Filimonov, Georgiy Yurievich, 117198, Moskva, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, d. 6.

Библиография:
1. Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki RF // URL: http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/6D84DDEDEDBF7DA644257B160051BF7F
2. Sukharev A.I. Politicheskoe stanovlenie sub'ektov setevykh gumanitarnykh vzaimodeystviy v mezhdunarodnykh
otnosheniyakh global'nogo mira: avtoref. dis. na soisk. uch. st. ... d-ra polit. nauk. M., 2011. S. 44.
3. Starchak M.A. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie na russkom yazyke kak faktor vliyaniya Rossii v Tsentral'noy Azii: chto
proiskhodit i chto delat' // URL: http://www.russkiymir.ru/russkiymir/ru/analytics/article/news0003.html
4. Dolinskiy A.V. Prakticheskie voprosy optimizatsii rossiyskoy publichnoy diplomatii // URL: http://www.
russkiymir.ru/russkiymir/ru/analytics/article/news0004.html

References (transliteration):
1. Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki RF // URL: http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/6D84DDEDEDBF7DA644257B160051BF7F
2. Sukharev A.I. Politicheskoe stanovlenie sub'ektov setevykh gumanitarnykh vzaimodeystviy v mezhdunarodnykh
otnosheniyakh global'nogo mira: avtoref. dis. na soisk. uch. st. ... d-ra polit. nauk. M., 2011. S. 44.
3. Starchak M.A. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie na russkom yazyke kak faktor vliyaniya Rossii v Tsentral'noy Azii: chto
proiskhodit i chto delat' // URL: http://www.russkiymir.ru/russkiymir/ru/analytics/article/news0003.html
4. Dolinskiy A.V. Prakticheskie voprosy optimizatsii rossiyskoy publichnoy diplomatii // URL: http://www.
russkiymir.ru/russkiymir/ru/analytics/article/news0004.html

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the current situation in the international relations between Ukraine and Poland, and the author draws a conclusion that these relations are getting worse. Then the author concludes that the tension between Kyiv and Warsaw may lead to Ukraine not sighing the Association Agreement with the EU. In this case Russia should actively pursue negotiations with the Ukraine on the issue of Ukraine joining the Eurasian Union. In November 2013 in Vilnius a summit is planned within the framework of the European Eastern Partnership. It is worth reminding that this project was formed in 2008 on the initiative of Poland, and it currently includes Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Moldova and Belarus. These states were offered to join dialogue with the EU and develop the program of actions for the European integration. Due to its demographic, economic, military and political potential, the Ukraine is key to this program, and the relations between Kyiv and Brussels considerably define the perspectives of the European initiatives in the Eastern Europe at their current stage.

Ключевые слова: international relations, foreign policy, Russia, Poland, Ukraine, diplomacy, interests, values, conflict, cooperation.

Контактная информация: Bunevich, Dmitriy Sergeevich, 125009, Moskva, ul. Mokhovaya, d. 11, str. 3v.

Библиография:
1. URL: http://www.easternpartnership.org/
2. URL: http://lb.ua/news/2013/06/13/206149_yanukovich_prichin_lishat_ukrainu.html
3. URL: http://www.day.kiev.ua/ru/article/tema-dnya-podrobnosti/plata-za-advokatskie-uslugi
4. URL: http://www.interfax.ru/print.asp?sec=0&id=313873
5. URL: http://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/economic/azarov-ne-isklyuchaet-otmeny-ogranichitelnyh-mer-naimport-
25062013112200; http://rian.com.ua/economy/20130625/337814747.html;
6. URL: http://interfax.com.ua/news/general/157588.html
7. URL: http://www.senat.gov.pl/download/gfx/senat/pl/senatuchwaly/1297/plik/335.pdf
8. URL: http://www.msz.gov.pl/pl/aktualnosci/wiadomosci/informacja_ministra_spraw_zagranicznych_o_zadaniach_
polskiej_polityki_zagranicznej_w_2013_roku
9. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/news/7586
10. «Rossiyskaya gazeta», 29.07.2013
11. URL: http://www.polska-zbrojna.pl/home/articleshow/8175?t=Rosja-sponsor-bialoruskiego-wojska
12. Rzeczpospolita, 21.06.2013
13. Trifonova I.A. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii i formirovanie pozitivnogo obraza rossiyskogo gosudarstva //
Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2011. — № 5. — C. 115-125.
14. Manoylo A.V. Tsennostnye osnovy upravleniya mezhtsivilizatsionnymi konfliktami: rossiyskaya model' //
NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2012. — № 1. — C. 32-43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2012.1.279. URL: http://
www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_279.html
15. Kondakov S.A. Truboprovodnaya diplomatiya Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2012. — № 1. — C. 128-138.

References (transliteration):
1. URL: http://www.easternpartnership.org/
2. URL: http://lb.ua/news/2013/06/13/206149_yanukovich_prichin_lishat_ukrainu.html
3. URL: http://www.day.kiev.ua/ru/article/tema-dnya-podrobnosti/plata-za-advokatskie-uslugi
4. URL: http://www.interfax.ru/print.asp?sec=0&id=313873
5. URL: http://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/economic/azarov-ne-isklyuchaet-otmeny-ogranichitelnyh-mer-naimport-
25062013112200; http://rian.com.ua/economy/20130625/337814747.html;
6. URL: http://interfax.com.ua/news/general/157588.html
7. URL: http://www.senat.gov.pl/download/gfx/senat/pl/senatuchwaly/1297/plik/335.pdf
8. URL: http://www.msz.gov.pl/pl/aktualnosci/wiadomosci/informacja_ministra_spraw_zagranicznych_o_zadaniach_
polskiej_polityki_zagranicznej_w_2013_roku
9. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/news/7586
10. «Rossiyskaya gazeta», 29.07.2013
11. URL: http://www.polska-zbrojna.pl/home/articleshow/8175?t=Rosja-sponsor-bialoruskiego-wojska
12. Rzeczpospolita, 21.06.2013
13. Trifonova I.A. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii i formirovanie pozitivnogo obraza rossiyskogo gosudarstva //
Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2011. — № 5. — C. 115-125.
14. Manoylo A.V. Tsennostnye osnovy upravleniya mezhtsivilizatsionnymi konfliktami: rossiyskaya model' //
NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2012. — № 1. — C. 32-43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2012.1.279. URL: http://
www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_279.html
15. Kondakov S.A. Truboprovodnaya diplomatiya Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2012. — № 1. — C. 128-138.