Аннотация: The subject of this research is the created by Thomas More method of “indirect approach” (ductus obliquus) reasoning in his work “Utopia”, which applies irony and fantasy. This method is characteristic to the eccentric intertwinement of fiction and fact that subsequently became the foundation for the utopian genre and form of creativity. The article follows the correlation between these elements in accordance with the three main positions: real and fictional characters, toposes and events in the first book of “Utopia”; authenticity and fiction in the documental sources and materials on the New World; accent on the idea and fact in creation of the image of the ideal state in second part of the book. The author introduces into the scientific circulation the new sources based on the original translations, as well as claims that the fictional component of “Utopia” was substantiated by the attributable to the era of Renaissance and Great Geographical Discoveries “captivation by America” (J. Borges). But “Utopia” does not mirror the New World realities: More is far from “idealization of the savage”, which is characteristic for a later period. The article expresses a suggestion that More perceived America as a fragment of the historical past of humanity, and believed that further progress of people of the continents depends on their familiarization with the world cultural values.

Ключевые слова: Amerigo Vespucci, Christopher Columbus, The Discovery Of America, fiction and fact, imagination, New World, Thomas More, Utopia, social ideal, method

Библиография:
Mor T. Utopiya. M.: Nauka, 1978. 416 s.
Abellan J.L. Historia critica del pensamiento espanol. t.2. La edad de Oro. Madrid, 1986. 698 p.
Armillas Vicente J.A. Pedro Martin de Angleria, cortino real y cronista de Castilla. La invención de las Nuevas Indias / http://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/33/63/10armillas.pdf
Borges P. "Inspiración americana de la Utopia de Tomás Moro" / Mar Oceana: revista del humanismo español e iberoamericano. № 2 (1995) pp. 91-111
Briesemeister, D. Las cartas de Amerigo Vespucci sobre el Nuevo Mundo [online]: [Date of reference: 15 / septiembre / 2015] Available in: http://www.fuentesmemoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.2878/pr. 2878.pdf
Imaz E. Topia y Utopia. Estudio preliminar. En: Utopias del renacimiento^ Utopia, La Ciudad del Sol. Nueva Atlantida. Mexico, 1973. 273 p.
Colón C. Diario del primer viaje (1492). pp. 3-22. En: Historia real y fantastica del Nuevo Mundo.Caracas, Venezuela, 1992.-555 pp.
Colón C. La Carta de Cristóbal Colón anunciando el descubrimiento del Nuevo Mundo [online]: [Date of reference: 14 / julio / 2016] Available in: http://www.ensayistas.org/antologia/XV/colon/
Colón C.: Textos y documentos completos, Consuelo Varela (ed.), Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1989. LXXVII + 381 pp.
Gerzog Silva J. Las Utopías del Renacimiento. En: Antologia: conferencias, ensayos y discursos. Mexico, UNAM, 1981, pp. 52-79
Martinez Estrada E. "El Nuevo Mundo, la isla de Utopia y la isla de Cuba"/ Cuadernos americanos. №2 (1963), rr. 89-122 Martir de Angleria, P. Decadas del Nuevo Mundo, Ed. Polifemo, Madrid, 1989. 1ª Edición. (introd. R. Alba) 566 pp.
Martir de Angleria, P. Epistolario. En: Documentos Inéditos para la Historia de España (trad. J. López de Martir de Angleria, P.) Vols. IX-X. Madrid: Imprenta Góngora, 1953-1955
Modoro Leoncio R. El laberinto utopico de Tomás Moro. [online]: [Date of reference: 14 / julio / 2016] Available in: http://www.racmyp.es/R/racmyp/docs/anales/A92/A92-1.pdf
Morgan E.A. Nowheare was somewhere: How History makes Utopias and How Utopias make History. Univ. of North Chapel Hill Caroline Press, 1946
Ramos Perez, D. «Sobre el origen de la Utopía de Tomás Moro». En: Homenaje a Jose Antonio Maravall, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cieníficas, Madrid, 1985, Tomo III. 1500 pp.
Ramos Perez, D. "Influencia de los descubrimientos en la ideología europea. El origen de «La Utopía», como fruto del descubrimiento colombino" / Anales de Historia Contemporánea, Nº 8, 1991, pp. 27-43
Ramos Perez, D. "Variaciones ideologicas en torno al Descubrimiento de America.Pedro Martir de Angleria y su mentalidad". Valladolid, Cuadernos Colombinos X. Casa-Museo de Colon & Seminario Americanista, 1981-1982. 84 pp.
Vespucio, A. El Nuevo Mundo. Viajes y documentos completos. Madrid, Akal, 1985. 144 pp.
Vespucio A. El Nuevo Mundo (¿1503?). Naturaleza y costumbres de aquella gente. pp. 27-31. En: Historia real y fantastica del Nuevo Mundo.Caracas, Venezuela, 1992.-555 pp.

References (transliteration):
Mor T. Utopiya. M.: Nauka, 1978. 416 s.
Abellan J.L. Historia critica del pensamiento espanol. t.2. La edad de Oro. Madrid, 1986. 698 p.
Armillas Vicente J.A. Pedro Martin de Angleria, cortino real y cronista de Castilla. La invención de las Nuevas Indias / http://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/33/63/10armillas.pdf
Borges P. "Inspiración americana de la Utopia de Tomás Moro" / Mar Oceana: revista del humanismo español e iberoamericano. № 2 (1995) pp. 91-111
Briesemeister, D. Las cartas de Amerigo Vespucci sobre el Nuevo Mundo [online]: [Date of reference: 15 / septiembre / 2015] Available in: http://www.fuentesmemoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.2878/pr. 2878.pdf
Imaz E. Topia y Utopia. Estudio preliminar. En: Utopias del renacimiento^ Utopia, La Ciudad del Sol. Nueva Atlantida. Mexico, 1973. 273 p.
Colón C. Diario del primer viaje (1492). pp. 3-22. En: Historia real y fantastica del Nuevo Mundo.Caracas, Venezuela, 1992.-555 pp.
Colón C. La Carta de Cristóbal Colón anunciando el descubrimiento del Nuevo Mundo [online]: [Date of reference: 14 / julio / 2016] Available in: http://www.ensayistas.org/antologia/XV/colon/
Colón C.: Textos y documentos completos, Consuelo Varela (ed.), Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1989. LXXVII + 381 pp.
Gerzog Silva J. Las Utopías del Renacimiento. En: Antologia: conferencias, ensayos y discursos. Mexico, UNAM, 1981, pp. 52-79
Martinez Estrada E. "El Nuevo Mundo, la isla de Utopia y la isla de Cuba"/ Cuadernos americanos. №2 (1963), rr. 89-122 Martir de Angleria, P. Decadas del Nuevo Mundo, Ed. Polifemo, Madrid, 1989. 1ª Edición. (introd. R. Alba) 566 pp.
Martir de Angleria, P. Epistolario. En: Documentos Inéditos para la Historia de España (trad. J. López de Martir de Angleria, P.) Vols. IX-X. Madrid: Imprenta Góngora, 1953-1955
Modoro Leoncio R. El laberinto utopico de Tomás Moro. [online]: [Date of reference: 14 / julio / 2016] Available in: http://www.racmyp.es/R/racmyp/docs/anales/A92/A92-1.pdf
Morgan E.A. Nowheare was somewhere: How History makes Utopias and How Utopias make History. Univ. of North Chapel Hill Caroline Press, 1946
Ramos Perez, D. «Sobre el origen de la Utopía de Tomás Moro». En: Homenaje a Jose Antonio Maravall, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cieníficas, Madrid, 1985, Tomo III. 1500 pp.
Ramos Perez, D. "Influencia de los descubrimientos en la ideología europea. El origen de «La Utopía», como fruto del descubrimiento colombino" / Anales de Historia Contemporánea, Nº 8, 1991, pp. 27-43
Ramos Perez, D. "Variaciones ideologicas en torno al Descubrimiento de America.Pedro Martir de Angleria y su mentalidad". Valladolid, Cuadernos Colombinos X. Casa-Museo de Colon & Seminario Americanista, 1981-1982. 84 pp.
Vespucio, A. El Nuevo Mundo. Viajes y documentos completos. Madrid, Akal, 1985. 144 pp.
Vespucio A. El Nuevo Mundo (¿1503?). Naturaleza y costumbres de aquella gente. pp. 27-31. En: Historia real y fantastica del Nuevo Mundo.Caracas, Venezuela, 1992.-555 pp.

Аннотация: Is there progress in the history of philosophical thought? Have the previous philosophical ideas and systems within the coordinates of the current state of philosophy been overcome, or we should talk only about the multiple variations of one and the same, on the grand scale, content? The subject of this research is the Hellenistic philosophy in its correlation with the modern epistemological constructs. The object is the philosophical ideas of the Epicurean school considered as a remote predecessor of positivism of the brink of the modern era and contemporary history.  Special attention is given to the comparative and cross-cultural analysis of reflection of the theoretical knowledge on Epicureanism and positivism. The main conclusion consists in the complex of statements, according to which the philosophical constructs that most certainly historically belong to modern era and contemporary history, have been created and expressed approximately two thousand years earlier. The antique Epicureanism not just supersedes the positivistic tradition in the history of philosophy, the beginning of which is traditionally attributed to the origin of the modern era, but it also fairly thoroughly covers it, not yielding in its philosophical content to the “genuine” positivism.

Ключевые слова: Truth, Theoretical level of cognition, Empirical level of cognition, Minimalism, Epicureans, Scientific thinking, Positivism, Philosophy of science, Hellenistic civilization, Antique skepticism

Библиография:
Sextus Empiricus. Pyrrhoniarum institutionum Libri III // Sextus Empiricus. Opera... Tom. I. Lipsiae, 1840; Sekst Empirik. Tri knigi pirronovykh polozheniy. Per. N.V. Bryullovoy-Shaskol'skoy // Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya... T. 2. S. 205-380.
Sextus Empiricus. Adversus mathematicos sive disciplinarum professores libri VI et Adversus philosophos libri V // Sextus Empiricus. Opera Graece et Latine. Tom II. Lipsiae, 1841; Sekst Empirik. Protiv uchenykh. Per. A.F. Loseva // Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. M.: Mysl', 1976. T. 1. T. 2. S. 7-204.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm i sovremennaya filosofiya nauki // Prepodavatel'. XXI vek. 2014. № 3. Chast' 2. S. 219-225.
Schastlivtsev R.A. Parallelizm soznaniya v fenomenologii E.Gusserlya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2010. № 1. S. 305-310.
Seneca. De vita beata // Seneca. Collected works in ten volumes. II. Moral essays with an English translation by John W. Basore in three volumes. Vol.II. Camb-Lond. 1979. P. 98-180; Seneka L.A. O blazhennoy zhizni // Seneka L.A. Filosofskie traktaty. Per. T.Yu. Boroday. Izd. 2-e. SPb., 2001. S. 12-39. XIII. 4-6.
Diogenes Laertius. De vitis, dogmatis et apophthegmatis clarorum philosophorum libri X. Vol. I-II. Lipsiae, 1828-1831; Diogen Laertskiy. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov. Per. M.L. Gasparova. M.: Mysl', 1979. S. 65.
Gegel' G.F.V. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Per. B.Stolpnera. Kn. 2 // Gegel' G.F.V. Sochineniya. T. 10. M., 1932.
Pippin R.B. Kant on empirical concepts // Studies in history a. philosophy of science. L., 1979. Vol. 10, № 1.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm v istorii stanovleniya nauchnogo myshleniya. M., 2013. S. 23.
Gusev D.A. Skeptitsizm kak filosofskiy realizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. № 1. S. 20-28.
Gusev D.A. Skepticheskie elementy stoicheskoy teorii poznaniya i stanovlenie nauchnogo myshleniya v kontekste ellinisticheskoy filosofii // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Filosofiya». 2010. № 4. S. 38-45.

References (transliteration):
Sextus Empiricus. Pyrrhoniarum institutionum Libri III // Sextus Empiricus. Opera... Tom. I. Lipsiae, 1840; Sekst Empirik. Tri knigi pirronovykh polozheniy. Per. N.V. Bryullovoy-Shaskol'skoy // Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya... T. 2. S. 205-380.
Sextus Empiricus. Adversus mathematicos sive disciplinarum professores libri VI et Adversus philosophos libri V // Sextus Empiricus. Opera Graece et Latine. Tom II. Lipsiae, 1841; Sekst Empirik. Protiv uchenykh. Per. A.F. Loseva // Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. M.: Mysl', 1976. T. 1. T. 2. S. 7-204.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm i sovremennaya filosofiya nauki // Prepodavatel'. XXI vek. 2014. № 3. Chast' 2. S. 219-225.
Schastlivtsev R.A. Parallelizm soznaniya v fenomenologii E.Gusserlya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2010. № 1. S. 305-310.
Seneca. De vita beata // Seneca. Collected works in ten volumes. II. Moral essays with an English translation by John W. Basore in three volumes. Vol.II. Camb-Lond. 1979. P. 98-180; Seneka L.A. O blazhennoy zhizni // Seneka L.A. Filosofskie traktaty. Per. T.Yu. Boroday. Izd. 2-e. SPb., 2001. S. 12-39. XIII. 4-6.
Diogenes Laertius. De vitis, dogmatis et apophthegmatis clarorum philosophorum libri X. Vol. I-II. Lipsiae, 1828-1831; Diogen Laertskiy. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov. Per. M.L. Gasparova. M.: Mysl', 1979. S. 65.
Gegel' G.F.V. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Per. B.Stolpnera. Kn. 2 // Gegel' G.F.V. Sochineniya. T. 10. M., 1932.
Pippin R.B. Kant on empirical concepts // Studies in history a. philosophy of science. L., 1979. Vol. 10, № 1.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm v istorii stanovleniya nauchnogo myshleniya. M., 2013. S. 23.
Gusev D.A. Skeptitsizm kak filosofskiy realizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. № 1. S. 20-28.
Gusev D.A. Skepticheskie elementy stoicheskoy teorii poznaniya i stanovlenie nauchnogo myshleniya v kontekste ellinisticheskoy filosofii // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Filosofiya». 2010. № 4. S. 38-45.

Аннотация: This article represents a research of anthropological content of the “living metaphor” associated with hermeneutics of the “world of texts” in the theory of a prominent French scholar and philosopher Paul Ricœur. The subject of the research is the intelligible nature of the “living metaphor” delivered by the narrative intrigue, the anthropological vector of which is interpreted in the timely correspondence. Thus the article makes an attempt to introduce the anthropological importance of the “living metaphor” through the number of symbolic episodes in the texts of Paul Ricœur, in which the problematics of the world and the essences are suggested as an interpreting subject. The methodology of the research consists in the modern perspective and philosophical interpretation of the additional conceptual meanings of the text with regards to the anthropological understanding of the “living metaphor” phenomenon within the Paul Ricœur’s heritage. The author comes to the conclusion about the anthropological priorities in the “living metaphor” study in the aspect, where the metaphoric discourse is a referential moment between the initial understanding of the world of action which complies with the acquired by civilization human experience, and refiguration of the daily reality by the virtue of fluent language activity in a form of intrigue.

Ключевые слова: distancing, symbolism of evil, infinity, split of light, narrative identity, historicity, intentionality, temporal resistance, metaphoric reference, idea of plot

Библиография:
Riker P. Pamyat', istoriya, zabvenie / Per. s frants. — M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2004.-728 s.
Plutarkh. O «E» v Del'fakh.-V sb.: Isida i Osiris, per. N. B. Klyachko.-M: Eksmo, 2006.-464 s.
Aristotel'. Politika. Metafizika. Analitika / per. s drevnegrech.-M.: Eksmo; SPb.: Midgard, 2008.-960 s.
Pol' Riker. Ya-sam kak drugoy / per. s frants. – M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2008. – 416c.
A. S. Pushkin. Pesn' o veshchem Olege. // A. S. Pushkin. Poln. sobr. soch. v 16 t. T.2. – M., 1947 . S. 45.
Ricoeur, Paul. The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan, Boston: Beacon, 1967, 362 pp.
S. Aurelii Augustini. Confessiones: ad fidem codicum Lipsiensium et editionum antiquiorum recognitas. Edidit Car. Herm. Bruder, Lipsiae, 1837, 327 pp.
Ricoeur, Paul. Rule of Metaphor: The creation of meaning in language, trans. Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello, London and New York: Routledge Classics, 2003 [1977], 465 pp.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. I. Sergeevoy. M.: Medium, 1995 . S. 34.
Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976 [unpublished in French], 108 pp.
Simms, Karl. Paul Ricoeur, Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York, 2003, 155pp.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. s fr., vstup. st. i komment. I.S. Vdovinoy. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. — 695 s.
Ricoeur P. Philosophie de la volonte. Finitude et Culpabilite. II. La symbolique du mal, Paris: Auber, 1960 (English version 1967, The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan, Boston: Beacon)
Riker P. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika (Moskovskie lektsii i interv'yu) per. s fr. M., 1995.-160 s.
Pol' Riker. Vremya i rasskaz. T. 1. Intriga i istoricheskiy rasskaz; M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. – 313s.
Ricoeur, Paul. From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II, trans. Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1991 [1986], 346 pp.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filos. germenevtiki: Per. s nem./Obshch. red. i vstup. st. B. N. Bessonova.— M.: Progress, 1988.-704 s.

References (transliteration):
Riker P. Pamyat', istoriya, zabvenie / Per. s frants. — M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2004.-728 s.
Plutarkh. O «E» v Del'fakh.-V sb.: Isida i Osiris, per. N. B. Klyachko.-M: Eksmo, 2006.-464 s.
Aristotel'. Politika. Metafizika. Analitika / per. s drevnegrech.-M.: Eksmo; SPb.: Midgard, 2008.-960 s.
Pol' Riker. Ya-sam kak drugoy / per. s frants. – M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2008. – 416c.
A. S. Pushkin. Pesn' o veshchem Olege. // A. S. Pushkin. Poln. sobr. soch. v 16 t. T.2. – M., 1947 . S. 45.
Ricoeur, Paul. The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan, Boston: Beacon, 1967, 362 pp.
S. Aurelii Augustini. Confessiones: ad fidem codicum Lipsiensium et editionum antiquiorum recognitas. Edidit Car. Herm. Bruder, Lipsiae, 1837, 327 pp.
Ricoeur, Paul. Rule of Metaphor: The creation of meaning in language, trans. Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello, London and New York: Routledge Classics, 2003 [1977], 465 pp.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. I. Sergeevoy. M.: Medium, 1995 . S. 34.
Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976 [unpublished in French], 108 pp.
Simms, Karl. Paul Ricoeur, Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York, 2003, 155pp.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. s fr., vstup. st. i komment. I.S. Vdovinoy. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. — 695 s.
Ricoeur P. Philosophie de la volonte. Finitude et Culpabilite. II. La symbolique du mal, Paris: Auber, 1960 (English version 1967, The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan, Boston: Beacon)
Riker P. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika (Moskovskie lektsii i interv'yu) per. s fr. M., 1995.-160 s.
Pol' Riker. Vremya i rasskaz. T. 1. Intriga i istoricheskiy rasskaz; M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. – 313s.
Ricoeur, Paul. From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II, trans. Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1991 [1986], 346 pp.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filos. germenevtiki: Per. s nem./Obshch. red. i vstup. st. B. N. Bessonova.— M.: Progress, 1988.-704 s.

Аннотация: The object of this article is the problem of correlation between universal and individual on the example of dystopian novels emerged within the framework of cultural modernity. Special attention is given to the interpretation of the stated topic through the problem of controversy of the social progress, which is evident in almost all dystopias. The author thoroughly examines such aspects of the topic as rejection of identity and freedom, individuality and independence, in subordination to the sacral “Universal”. The main conclusions of the conducted research consist in the ideas that social happiness and welfare society within the reality of dystopia is achieved via deindividuation of identity, and devaluing it to atom, just a “bolt” in the mass social organism. The author demonstrates that the absence of social harmony, its tilt towards “universal” to the detriment of individual, originates in dystopias antagonism as a “revolt of an individual” leading to destruction in its various forms.  

Ключевые слова: Individualization, Anthropological catastrophe, Depersonification, Freedom, Dystopia, Individuality, Universality, Unification, Totality, Social harmony

Библиография:
Bredberi R. 451 gradus po Farengeytu: roman // O skitan'yakh vechnykh i o Zemle. M., Pravda, 1987. S. 7–152.
Konstantinov D.V. Antiutopii: budushchee bez cheloveka // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-№ 366.-2013-S. 42-48.
Pigulevskiy V.O. Ironiya i vymysel: ot romantizma k postmodernizmu: Rostov-na-Donu: «Foliant», 2002. – 418 s.
Khaksli O. O divnyy novyy mir // O divnyy novyy mir. Cherez mnogo let: romany / per. s angl. O. Soroki, V. Babkova ; prim. T. Shishkinoy, V. Babkova. SPb.: Amfora, 1999. S. 5–226.
Chalikova V.A. Utopiya i svoboda. M., 1994. 184 s.
Fromm E. Kommentarii k «1984» / per. s angl. A. Bogomol'skogo, 2004. http://www.orwell.ru/library/novels/1984/russian/rnt_ef.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vosstanie mass // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. № 3. S 32.
Petrikhin A.V. Antiutopiya kak sposob osoznaniya edinstva tseli i razlichiya putey ee dostizheniya gumanizmom i utopiey // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2009. T. 5. № 6. S. 136–141.
Fromm E. Afterword to George Orwell’s «1984». N.Y., 1962. R. 258-259.
Ays de Treyn. Ob utopii i antiutopii //http://dugward.ru/publ/s12.html
Shishkina S.G. Literaturnaya antiutopiya: k voprosu o granitsakh zhanra. Ivanovo, 2009. 232 s.

References (transliteration):
Bredberi R. 451 gradus po Farengeytu: roman // O skitan'yakh vechnykh i o Zemle. M., Pravda, 1987. S. 7–152.
Konstantinov D.V. Antiutopii: budushchee bez cheloveka // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-№ 366.-2013-S. 42-48.
Pigulevskiy V.O. Ironiya i vymysel: ot romantizma k postmodernizmu: Rostov-na-Donu: «Foliant», 2002. – 418 s.
Khaksli O. O divnyy novyy mir // O divnyy novyy mir. Cherez mnogo let: romany / per. s angl. O. Soroki, V. Babkova ; prim. T. Shishkinoy, V. Babkova. SPb.: Amfora, 1999. S. 5–226.
Chalikova V.A. Utopiya i svoboda. M., 1994. 184 s.
Fromm E. Kommentarii k «1984» / per. s angl. A. Bogomol'skogo, 2004. http://www.orwell.ru/library/novels/1984/russian/rnt_ef.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vosstanie mass // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. № 3. S 32.
Petrikhin A.V. Antiutopiya kak sposob osoznaniya edinstva tseli i razlichiya putey ee dostizheniya gumanizmom i utopiey // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2009. T. 5. № 6. S. 136–141.
Fromm E. Afterword to George Orwell’s «1984». N.Y., 1962. R. 258-259.
Ays de Treyn. Ob utopii i antiutopii //http://dugward.ru/publ/s12.html
Shishkina S.G. Literaturnaya antiutopiya: k voprosu o granitsakh zhanra. Ivanovo, 2009. 232 s.

Аннотация: Philosophy of history usually considers differences between epicurean, stoic and skeptical directions in Hellenistic philosophy whereas ancient skepticism localized in Pyrrho;s teaching and his followers’ doctrine is often viewed as a certain kind of relativism and agnosticism. The author makes an original attempt to pay attention to their common features that, probably without being critical for their epoch, become essential in historical perspective and allow us to view an interesting dialogue of epochs partitioned by about two millenniums. Taking into account that ancient world is the origin of Neo-European mankind, contemporary society, being is built on post-modernistic truth demonopolization, is rooted in Hellenistic epoch, the undoubted philosophic merit of which was the review of the relationship between thought and reality, nature and criteria of true knowledge. Hellenistic philosophy, being characterized first of all by “internal emigration”, out-of-the-way, even not anthropological, but “existential” turn of philosophical thought, individualistic and eudemonistic directions, in many ways anticipated modern epistemological, ethical and socio-philosophical ideas. Meanwhile its representatives viewed in broad historical context will turn out to be not “marginal” thinkers of their epoch but true prophets of the world’s philosophical thought.

Ключевые слова: post-modernism, Hellenistic epoch, phyrrhonism, skepticism, stoicism, epicureanism, epistemology, philosophy of science, contemporary society, identity

Библиография:
V.M. Rozin Prognozirovanie i metodologicheskoe osmyslenie rossiyskogo obrazovaniya i sotsial'nosti // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-3.-C. 44-56.
T.V. Zhigal'tsova Podkhody k ponyatiyam "modern" i "postmodern" v teorii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-11.-C. 102-113.
E.M. Spirova Postmodernistskaya traktovka identichnosti // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2011.-6.-C. 72-79.
Barbashin M.Yu. Issledovaniya etnogeneza v sovremennoy etnosotsiologii: obshchie voprosy metodologii // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-7.-C. 877-883. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.9101.
Shebanova M.A. Kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' kak odna iz form transnatsional'nykh identichnostey // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-8.-C. 1039-1051. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.8781.
Gatiatullina E.R., Tkhagapsoev Kh.G. Identichnost' kak kategoriya sotsial'noy filosofii. Perspektivy nauki. 2013. № 10 (49). S. 96-98.
Rybakova N.A. Fenomenologicheskie osnovy samoaktualizatsii lichnosti // Vestnik Altayskoy gosudarstvennoy pedagogicheskoy akademii. 2005. № 5-2. S. 26-37.
Flerov O.V. Korporativnoe obuchenie angliyskomu yazyku kak sposob povysheniya urovnya kommunikativnoy kompetentsii sotrudnikov mezhdunarodnykh kompaniy // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 2. S. 116-140.
Gatiatullina E.R., Taysaev D.M. Mekhanizm demarginalizatsii v sovremennykh sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Vestnik Universiteta Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. 2015. № 1. S. 68-75.
Flerov O.V. Blog kak sredstvo obucheniya angliyskomu yazyku // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2014. № 4. S. 66-73.
Gusev D.A. Docendo discimus – ucha, my uchimsya sami. Sbornik statey. M.: Direkt-Media, 2013.
Potaturov V.A. Kul'tura i tsivilizatsiya: dialektika vzaimootnosheniy (metodologicheskie aspekty) // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. № 3 (6). S. 52-62.
Gusev D.A. K voprosu o soderzhanii uchebnogo kursa filosofii v sredney i vysshey shkole // Nauka i shkola. 2002. № 4. C. 2-7.
Flerov O.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti obucheniya studentov inostrannomu yazyku na osnove kommunikativnoy metodiki. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk. M., 2013.
Gatiatullina E.R. Gorek li koren' ucheniya? Ili k voprosu o lichnosti pedagoga v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 2. S. 20-44.
Flerov O.V. Osobennosti prepodavaniya angliyskogo yazyka studentam s vysokim urovnem yazykovoy podgotovki // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 100-123.
Gusev D.A. Logicheskaya kul'tura v prepodavatel'skoy deyatel'nosti // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2005. № 1. S. 15-21.
Gusev D.A. K voprosu o ritoricheskoy kul'ture prepodavatelya vysshey shkoly // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 2. S. 141-176.
Rybakova N.A. Motivatsionnye istochniki samoaktualizatsii pedagoga v professional'noy deyatel'nosti // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 69-99.
Gusev D.A. Osnovnye printsipy effektivnogo postroeniya sistemy distantsionnogo obucheniya // Nauka i shkola. 2014. № 5. S. 106-112.
Flerov O.V. Osobennosti prepodavaniya vtorogo inostrannogo yazyka v nelingvisticheskom vuze // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 1-25.
Flerov O.V. Vliyanie sovremennykh pedagogicheskikh idealov na obuchenie inostrannym yazykam // Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya). 2011. № 8. S. 109-111.
Rybakova N.A. Manipulyativnyy stereotip professional'noy deyatel'nosti pedagoga i sposoby ego preodoleniya // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 124-142.
Flerov O.V. Rol' i znachenie sravnitel'no-istoricheskogo metoda v lingvistike // Nauka, obrazovanie, obshchestvo: tendentsii i perspektivy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii : v 5 chastyakh. M., 2014. S. 106-107.
Gusev D.A. Ekzamen – vsegda «prazdnik»? // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2003. № 2. S. 84-86.
Monteiro M., Keating E. Managing misunderstandings. The role of language in interdisciplinary scientific collaboration // Science communication. 2009. Vol. 20, № 10. P. 2-23.
Ronzoni M., Valentini L. On the meta-ethical status of constructivism: reflections on G.A.Cohen «Facts and principles» // Politics, Philosophy & Economics. L. 2008. Vol. 7. № 4. P. 403-423.
Atkinson M. Cognitive science and philosophy of mind // Understanding cognitive science. N.Y. etc., 1988. P. 46-68.
Gusev D.A. Mirovozzrencheskaya orientatsiya prepodavatelya sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh distsiplin v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. № 4 (7). S. 62-69.
Gusev D.A., Ryabov P.V., Manekin R.V. Istoriya filosofii. M.: Slovo, 2004.
Gusev D.A. Rol' i znachenie skeptitsizma v prepodavanii filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 2007. № 2. S. 168-173.
Borisov S.V. Introduktsiya ili rozhdenie klassicheskoy nauki // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 2. S. 190-230.
Borzykh S.V. Dva puti razvitiya nauki // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2014. № 8. S. 72-90.
Gusev D.A. Evolyutsiya antichnogo skeptitsizma ot Pirrona do Seksta Empirika // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 1999. № 3. S. 40-44.
Gryaznova E.V. Predmet filosofii nauki // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 6. S. 514-529.
Przhilenskiy V.I. Filosofiya nauki kak issledovatel'skaya programma: mezhdu istoriey nauki i teoriey poznaniya // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 3. S. 205-228.
Schastlivtsev R.A. Reduktsiya i epokhe v fenomenologii E.Gusserlya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2014. T. 2. № 1. S. 249-257.
Gusev D.A., Gatiatullina E.R. Logika i teoriya nauchnoy argumentatsii. Uchebnoe posobie. M., 2014.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm kak rannyaya forma refleksii teoreticheskogo znaniya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2010. T. 2. № 2. S. 204-211.
Gusev D.A. Skeptitsizm kak «pravil'naya» filosofiya, ili tri stupeni diskursivnogo realizma // Diskussiya. 2014. № 10 (51). S. 18-22.
Prokhorov M.M. Istina i deystvitel'nost' // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 6. S. 293-387.
Muzyakov S.I. Informatsionnye i mezhkul'turnye kommunikatsii cherez prizmu skepticheskoy paradigmy myshleniya // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. № 4 (7). S. 69-74.
Parker W. Franklin, Holmes, and the epistemology of computer simulation // International studies in the philosophy of science. Basingstoke, 2008. Vol. 22, № 2. P.165-183.
Sextus Empiricus. Pyrrhoniarum institutionum Libri III // Sextus Empiricus. Opera Graece et Latine. Tom. I. Lipsiae, 1840; Sekst Empirik. Tri knigi pirronovykh polozheniy. Per. N.V. Bryullovoy-Shaskol'skoy // Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. M.: Mysl', 1976. T. 2. S. 205-380.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm v perspektive evolyutsii filosofii nauki i stanovleniya morali sovremennogo obshchestva // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. 2011. № 5 S. 83-97.
Schastlivtsev R.A. Parallelizm soznaniya v fenomenologii E. Gusserlya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2010. № 1. S. 305-310.
Gusev D.A. Skeptitsizm kak vysshaya forma diskursivnogo realizma // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2014. № 9. S. 21-68.
Gusev D.A. Filosofskie i istoricheskie predposylki antichnogo skeptitsizma // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2008. № 2 S. 54-62.
Rep'eva A.M. Problemy formirovaniya natsional'noy identichnosti v SShA i Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 197-203. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.13.
D.N. Bukharov Sushchnostnye svoystva i potrebnosti kak istochnik identichnosti cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-5.-C. 709-717. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.13.
P.S. Gurevich Fenomen identichnosti v traktovke Polya Rikera // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-5.-C. 421-423. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.5.8845.
Kuznetsova A.I. Rol' natsional'noy identichnosti v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh na sovremennom etape // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 185-191. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.11.
D.G. Trunov Izmenennoe sostoyanie soznaniya kak faktor transformatsii identichnosti v «ritualakh perekhoda» // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-4.-C. 345-351. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.5.
D.S. Dokuchaev Regional'naya identichnost': ponyatie, struktura, funktsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-12.-C. 15-22.
P.S. Gurevich Zodchiy novogo pokoleniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-11.-C. 4-9.

References (transliteration):
V.M. Rozin Prognozirovanie i metodologicheskoe osmyslenie rossiyskogo obrazovaniya i sotsial'nosti // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-3.-C. 44-56.
T.V. Zhigal'tsova Podkhody k ponyatiyam "modern" i "postmodern" v teorii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-11.-C. 102-113.
E.M. Spirova Postmodernistskaya traktovka identichnosti // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2011.-6.-C. 72-79.
Barbashin M.Yu. Issledovaniya etnogeneza v sovremennoy etnosotsiologii: obshchie voprosy metodologii // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-7.-C. 877-883. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.9101.
Shebanova M.A. Kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' kak odna iz form transnatsional'nykh identichnostey // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-8.-C. 1039-1051. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.8781.
Gatiatullina E.R., Tkhagapsoev Kh.G. Identichnost' kak kategoriya sotsial'noy filosofii. Perspektivy nauki. 2013. № 10 (49). S. 96-98.
Rybakova N.A. Fenomenologicheskie osnovy samoaktualizatsii lichnosti // Vestnik Altayskoy gosudarstvennoy pedagogicheskoy akademii. 2005. № 5-2. S. 26-37.
Flerov O.V. Korporativnoe obuchenie angliyskomu yazyku kak sposob povysheniya urovnya kommunikativnoy kompetentsii sotrudnikov mezhdunarodnykh kompaniy // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 2. S. 116-140.
Gatiatullina E.R., Taysaev D.M. Mekhanizm demarginalizatsii v sovremennykh sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh // Vestnik Universiteta Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. 2015. № 1. S. 68-75.
Flerov O.V. Blog kak sredstvo obucheniya angliyskomu yazyku // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2014. № 4. S. 66-73.
Gusev D.A. Docendo discimus – ucha, my uchimsya sami. Sbornik statey. M.: Direkt-Media, 2013.
Potaturov V.A. Kul'tura i tsivilizatsiya: dialektika vzaimootnosheniy (metodologicheskie aspekty) // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. № 3 (6). S. 52-62.
Gusev D.A. K voprosu o soderzhanii uchebnogo kursa filosofii v sredney i vysshey shkole // Nauka i shkola. 2002. № 4. C. 2-7.
Flerov O.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti obucheniya studentov inostrannomu yazyku na osnove kommunikativnoy metodiki. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk. M., 2013.
Gatiatullina E.R. Gorek li koren' ucheniya? Ili k voprosu o lichnosti pedagoga v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 2. S. 20-44.
Flerov O.V. Osobennosti prepodavaniya angliyskogo yazyka studentam s vysokim urovnem yazykovoy podgotovki // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 100-123.
Gusev D.A. Logicheskaya kul'tura v prepodavatel'skoy deyatel'nosti // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2005. № 1. S. 15-21.
Gusev D.A. K voprosu o ritoricheskoy kul'ture prepodavatelya vysshey shkoly // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 2. S. 141-176.
Rybakova N.A. Motivatsionnye istochniki samoaktualizatsii pedagoga v professional'noy deyatel'nosti // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 69-99.
Gusev D.A. Osnovnye printsipy effektivnogo postroeniya sistemy distantsionnogo obucheniya // Nauka i shkola. 2014. № 5. S. 106-112.
Flerov O.V. Osobennosti prepodavaniya vtorogo inostrannogo yazyka v nelingvisticheskom vuze // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 1-25.
Flerov O.V. Vliyanie sovremennykh pedagogicheskikh idealov na obuchenie inostrannym yazykam // Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya). 2011. № 8. S. 109-111.
Rybakova N.A. Manipulyativnyy stereotip professional'noy deyatel'nosti pedagoga i sposoby ego preodoleniya // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. № 1. S. 124-142.
Flerov O.V. Rol' i znachenie sravnitel'no-istoricheskogo metoda v lingvistike // Nauka, obrazovanie, obshchestvo: tendentsii i perspektivy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii : v 5 chastyakh. M., 2014. S. 106-107.
Gusev D.A. Ekzamen – vsegda «prazdnik»? // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2003. № 2. S. 84-86.
Monteiro M., Keating E. Managing misunderstandings. The role of language in interdisciplinary scientific collaboration // Science communication. 2009. Vol. 20, № 10. P. 2-23.
Ronzoni M., Valentini L. On the meta-ethical status of constructivism: reflections on G.A.Cohen «Facts and principles» // Politics, Philosophy & Economics. L. 2008. Vol. 7. № 4. P. 403-423.
Atkinson M. Cognitive science and philosophy of mind // Understanding cognitive science. N.Y. etc., 1988. P. 46-68.
Gusev D.A. Mirovozzrencheskaya orientatsiya prepodavatelya sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh distsiplin v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. № 4 (7). S. 62-69.
Gusev D.A., Ryabov P.V., Manekin R.V. Istoriya filosofii. M.: Slovo, 2004.
Gusev D.A. Rol' i znachenie skeptitsizma v prepodavanii filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 2007. № 2. S. 168-173.
Borisov S.V. Introduktsiya ili rozhdenie klassicheskoy nauki // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 2. S. 190-230.
Borzykh S.V. Dva puti razvitiya nauki // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2014. № 8. S. 72-90.
Gusev D.A. Evolyutsiya antichnogo skeptitsizma ot Pirrona do Seksta Empirika // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 1999. № 3. S. 40-44.
Gryaznova E.V. Predmet filosofii nauki // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 6. S. 514-529.
Przhilenskiy V.I. Filosofiya nauki kak issledovatel'skaya programma: mezhdu istoriey nauki i teoriey poznaniya // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 3. S. 205-228.
Schastlivtsev R.A. Reduktsiya i epokhe v fenomenologii E.Gusserlya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2014. T. 2. № 1. S. 249-257.
Gusev D.A., Gatiatullina E.R. Logika i teoriya nauchnoy argumentatsii. Uchebnoe posobie. M., 2014.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm kak rannyaya forma refleksii teoreticheskogo znaniya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2010. T. 2. № 2. S. 204-211.
Gusev D.A. Skeptitsizm kak «pravil'naya» filosofiya, ili tri stupeni diskursivnogo realizma // Diskussiya. 2014. № 10 (51). S. 18-22.
Prokhorov M.M. Istina i deystvitel'nost' // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 6. S. 293-387.
Muzyakov S.I. Informatsionnye i mezhkul'turnye kommunikatsii cherez prizmu skepticheskoy paradigmy myshleniya // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. № 4 (7). S. 69-74.
Parker W. Franklin, Holmes, and the epistemology of computer simulation // International studies in the philosophy of science. Basingstoke, 2008. Vol. 22, № 2. P.165-183.
Sextus Empiricus. Pyrrhoniarum institutionum Libri III // Sextus Empiricus. Opera Graece et Latine. Tom. I. Lipsiae, 1840; Sekst Empirik. Tri knigi pirronovykh polozheniy. Per. N.V. Bryullovoy-Shaskol'skoy // Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. M.: Mysl', 1976. T. 2. S. 205-380.
Gusev D.A. Antichnyy skeptitsizm v perspektive evolyutsii filosofii nauki i stanovleniya morali sovremennogo obshchestva // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. 2011. № 5 S. 83-97.
Schastlivtsev R.A. Parallelizm soznaniya v fenomenologii E. Gusserlya // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2010. № 1. S. 305-310.
Gusev D.A. Skeptitsizm kak vysshaya forma diskursivnogo realizma // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2014. № 9. S. 21-68.
Gusev D.A. Filosofskie i istoricheskie predposylki antichnogo skeptitsizma // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2008. № 2 S. 54-62.
Rep'eva A.M. Problemy formirovaniya natsional'noy identichnosti v SShA i Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 197-203. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.13.
D.N. Bukharov Sushchnostnye svoystva i potrebnosti kak istochnik identichnosti cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-5.-C. 709-717. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.13.
P.S. Gurevich Fenomen identichnosti v traktovke Polya Rikera // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-5.-C. 421-423. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.5.8845.
Kuznetsova A.I. Rol' natsional'noy identichnosti v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh na sovremennom etape // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 185-191. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.11.
D.G. Trunov Izmenennoe sostoyanie soznaniya kak faktor transformatsii identichnosti v «ritualakh perekhoda» // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-4.-C. 345-351. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.5.
D.S. Dokuchaev Regional'naya identichnost': ponyatie, struktura, funktsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-12.-C. 15-22.
P.S. Gurevich Zodchiy novogo pokoleniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-11.-C. 4-9.

Аннотация: The subject under research is the phenomenon of the Beginning as part of the development of cultural self-organization. According to the author, at the turn of the century life and in the age of the mega shift, life draws a cordon around the cultural development directing the development of science and personal spiritual searches towards the Beginning and rediscovery of the initial meanings of contemporary phenomena and processes. In her article Balakina offers her own concept of essence of the phenomenon of the Beginning and its role in culture based on the comparison of scientific ideas of various spheres of knowledge and the main theses of the contemporary nonlinear probabilistic picture of the world. The Beginning is presented as the fundamental category which condensed in itself the sense and dynamics of Existential development. The author finds semantic resonances of ideas on the phenomenon of the Beginning in the sacral and secular culture field: from mythological and religious models, the most ancient scientific ideas of the world to modern discoveries in psychoanalysis, synergetics and cultural studies. Revolutionary theories of modern science have allowed to reveal new aspects of the phenomenon of the Beginning, its paradoxical complementarity as it is the purpose and the source at the same time. Through the concept of the "structure-attractor" and on the basis of I. Prigozhin's and E. Knyazeva's findings and Yu. Lotman's semotics theory, the author proves a unique conceptual provision on the key role of the Beginning (initial idea) for comprehension of the logic of self-development of culture and all elements constituting it (which include art, human and all possible forms of human manifestation in the world) within the borders of the nonlinear probabilistic picture of the world. It is the Beginning that stores all the opportunities for development of any cultural phenomenon as well as its extreme potentials. 

Ключевые слова: meaning, culture, phenomenon of the Beginning, origins, paradoxical complementarity, essence, archetype, nonlinearity, attractor, self-organization

Библиография:
Florenskiy P.A. Sobranie sochineniy. Filosofiya kul'ta (Opyt pravoslavnoy antropoditsei). M.: Mysl', 2004. 685 s.
Soesman A. Dvenadtsat' chuvstv. SPb.: Demetra, 2003. 260 s.
Prigozhin I. Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy. M.: Progress, 1986. 432 s.
Prigozhin I. Filosofiya nestabil'nosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 6. s. 46.
Knyazeva E.N. Nauchis' uchit'sya. URL: http://spkurdyumov.narod.ru/KNYAZEVA2.htm (data obrashcheniya 08.05.2014).
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Intuitsiya kak samodostraivanie // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. №2. S. 110-122.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Sinergetika: Nelineynost' vremeni i landshafty koevolyutsii. M., KomKniga, 2007. 272 s.
Leybnits G.V. Monadologiya. Perevod: E.N. Bobrova. URL: http://www.libok.net/writer/4034/kniga/11627/leybnits/_gv/read (data obrashcheniya 20.05.2015).
Pelipenko A. Kul'turnaya dinamika v zerkale khudozhestvennogo soznaniya // Chelovek. 1994. N 4. s. 58-76.
Porshnev B.F. O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii (Problemy paleopsikhologii). M.: Izdatel'stvo «Mysl'», 1974. 487 s.
Azimov A. V nachale: Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 374 s.
Aristotel'. Soch. v 4-kh tt. T.4. M.: Mysl', 1983. 830 s.
Genis A. Vavilonskaya bashnya: Iskusstvo nastoyashchego vremeni (Kniga esse). URL: http://www.vavilon.ru/texts/prim/genis4-1.html (data obrashcheniya 14.09.2014).
Grof S. «Puteshestvie v poiskakh sebya». Izmereniya soznaniya. Novye perspektivy v psikhoterapii i issledovanii vnutrennego mira. URL: http://ariom.ru/litera.html (data obrashcheniya 21.09.2014).
Kapra F. Dao fiziki. URL: http://www.alibet.net/writer/9625/books/36191/kapra_fritof/dao_fiziki/read (data obrashcheniya 20.05.2015).
Khudozhestvennaya kul'tura v dokapitalisticheskikh formatsiyakh. Strukturno-tipologicheskoe issledovanie / Nauch. red. prof. M.S. Kagan. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1984. 288 s.

References (transliteration):
Florenskiy P.A. Sobranie sochineniy. Filosofiya kul'ta (Opyt pravoslavnoy antropoditsei). M.: Mysl', 2004. 685 s.
Soesman A. Dvenadtsat' chuvstv. SPb.: Demetra, 2003. 260 s.
Prigozhin I. Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy. M.: Progress, 1986. 432 s.
Prigozhin I. Filosofiya nestabil'nosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 6. s. 46.
Knyazeva E.N. Nauchis' uchit'sya. URL: http://spkurdyumov.narod.ru/KNYAZEVA2.htm (data obrashcheniya 08.05.2014).
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Intuitsiya kak samodostraivanie // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. №2. S. 110-122.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Sinergetika: Nelineynost' vremeni i landshafty koevolyutsii. M., KomKniga, 2007. 272 s.
Leybnits G.V. Monadologiya. Perevod: E.N. Bobrova. URL: http://www.libok.net/writer/4034/kniga/11627/leybnits/_gv/read (data obrashcheniya 20.05.2015).
Pelipenko A. Kul'turnaya dinamika v zerkale khudozhestvennogo soznaniya // Chelovek. 1994. N 4. s. 58-76.
Porshnev B.F. O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii (Problemy paleopsikhologii). M.: Izdatel'stvo «Mysl'», 1974. 487 s.
Azimov A. V nachale: Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 374 s.
Aristotel'. Soch. v 4-kh tt. T.4. M.: Mysl', 1983. 830 s.
Genis A. Vavilonskaya bashnya: Iskusstvo nastoyashchego vremeni (Kniga esse). URL: http://www.vavilon.ru/texts/prim/genis4-1.html (data obrashcheniya 14.09.2014).
Grof S. «Puteshestvie v poiskakh sebya». Izmereniya soznaniya. Novye perspektivy v psikhoterapii i issledovanii vnutrennego mira. URL: http://ariom.ru/litera.html (data obrashcheniya 21.09.2014).
Kapra F. Dao fiziki. URL: http://www.alibet.net/writer/9625/books/36191/kapra_fritof/dao_fiziki/read (data obrashcheniya 20.05.2015).
Khudozhestvennaya kul'tura v dokapitalisticheskikh formatsiyakh. Strukturno-tipologicheskoe issledovanie / Nauch. red. prof. M.S. Kagan. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1984. 288 s.

Аннотация: In her article Sokolskaya studies the role of acculturation as a form of cross-cultural contact in the historical process. Historical process is defined as a progressive process of the development of culture from the lowest to the highest forms. Historical reality confined in particular spatial and time limits is being studied by the researcher as a complex structural integrity determined by the interaction of the variety of cultural phenomena and processes. Providing that the process of the development and functioning of culture of any community is the interaction of cultural achievements with cultural elements of other nations than acculturation is the trigger of cultural sustainability and self-development. In her research Sokolskaya has applied general and specific scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis, comparative, structure-functional, historical, systems and synergetic methods. According to the researcher, the cross-cultural communication of different societies and communities is in fact unlimited. It can unfold as a neverending development and creation of new meanings in the mind of everyone who gets in contact with a representative of this or that cultural community. Based on the results of the research, the author of the article concludes that acculturation is a durable cross-cultural interaction of different societies when cultural systems take each other's features, become somewhat 'alike' and create a new integrity with absolutely new features. 

Ключевые слова: culture-historical process, cross-cultural contacts, acculturation, cultural interaction, assimilation, separation, marginalization, integration, culture, culture of a community

Библиография:
Ushanova I.A. Perspektivy razvitiya teorii akkul'turatsii v globali-zovannom mire // Vestnik Novgorodskogo universiteta. – 2003.-№ 4. – S. 65-70; Petruchak L.A. Pravovaya kul'tura Rossii i mezhkul'turnyy dialog v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. –2011.-№ 4. –
Tokarev S.A. Istoriya zarubezhnoy etnografii. – M., 1978.
Toynbi A.Dzh. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii. – M., 1996.
Sukharev M.V. Dvizhenie tsivilizatsiy: Rossiya i Zapad // Politicheskie issledovaniya. –2005.-№ 1.
Sokol'skaya L.V.Retseptsiya kak istoricheskaya forma pravovoy akkul'turatsii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava.-2014.-1.-C. 47-56.
Sobolev V.G. Musul'manskie obshchiny v gosudarstvakh Evropeyskogo soyuza: Problemy i perspektivy.– SPb., 2003.
Safiullina M.I. Sinergeticheskiy podkhod k izucheniyu kul'turnykh kontaktov v etnogeneze // Metodologiya gumanitarnogo znaniya v perspektive XXI veka: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (18 maya 2001 g. Sankt-Peterburg) k 80-letiyu prof. M.S. Kagana. Ser.: «Symposium». – SPb., 2001. – Vyp. 12.
Markov G.E. Razvitie sovremennoy germanskoy burzhuaznoy etnologii // Etnografiya za rubezhom (istoriograficheskie ocherki). – M., 1979.
Malikov A.V Problemy tipologii gosudarstva: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 1998.
Kleyn L.S. Personalizm: Kul'tura i lichnost' // Razvitie lichnosti. – 2005.-№2.
D'yakonov I.M. Puti istorii. Ot drevneyshego cheloveka do nashikh dney. – M., 2007.
Ikonnikova S.N. Istoriya kul'turologii: Idei i sud'by. – SPb, 1993.
Dokuchaev I.I. Setevaya kul'tura kak istoricheskiy tip // Uchenye za-piski. – K-na-A.: GTU. – 2012.-№ 4.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. – M., 1991.
Vakhta V.M. Problema akkul'turatsii v sovremennoy etnograficheskoy literature SShA / Sovremennaya amerikanskaya etnografiya: Teoreticheskie napravleniya i tendentsii. – M., 1963.
Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kul'tury: Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v KhKhI vek. – M., 1990.
Beri D.V. Akkul'turatsiya i psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya: obzor proble-my / per. s angl. – M., 2004.
Berdyaev N.A. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoy sud'by. Parizh, 1969. Rezhim dostupa http://www.odinblago.ru/smisl_istorii
Arutyunov S.A. Bilingvizm i bikul'turalizm // Sovetskaya etnografiya. – 1978.-№ 2.
Stonequist E. The Marginal Man: A study in personality and conflict. N.Y., 1937.
Thurnwald R. The Psychology of Acculturation // American Anthropologist. 1932. V. XXXIV. P. 557–569.
Rudolf W. Der kulturelle Relativismus: Kritische Analyse einer Grund-satzfragen-Diskussion in der amerikanischen Ethnologie. – Berlin, 1968.
Redfild R., Linton R., Herskovits M., Memorandum for the study of accul-turation // American Anthropologist. 1936, Vol. 38. №1.
Parsons E.S. Some Aztec and Pueblo Parallels // American Anthropologist. V. XXXV, 1933, p. 611-631.
Kroeber A.L. Anthropology: Race, Language, Culture, Psychology, Prehis-tory. N.Y.; Burlingame, 1948.
Mannoni O. Prospero and Coliban. The Psychology of Colonisation. New York, 1950.
Herskovits M.J. African Gods and Catholic Saints in New World Negro Be-lief // American Anthropologist. New Series. Menasha, 1937. Vol. 39. № 4.
Foster G.M. Culture and Conquest. America's Spanish Heritage. NY., 1960.
Boas F. The Methods of Ethnology // American Anthropologist. 1920. N.S. Vol. 22, P. 311-322,
Beals R.L. Aboriginal Survivals in Mayo Culture // American Anthropolo-gist. V. XXXIV, 1932, p. 28-39.
Acculturation in seven American Indian tribes, ed. R. Linton, N. Y.–L., 1940.
Acculturation: An exploratory formulation. N.Y., 1954
Chuchin-Rusov A.E. Konvergentsiya kul'tur. – M., 1997.
Chuchin-Rusov A.E. Kul'turno-istoricheskiy protsess: formy i soderzhanie // Voprosy filosofii. – 1996.-№ 4.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. – M., 1993. – T. 1
Yankina N.V. Mezhkul'turnaya tolerantnost' kak komponent mezhkul'turnoy kommunikatsii // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki – 2006.-№ 1.
Yaspers K. Istoki istorii i ee tsel'. Rezhim dostupa: http://gendocs.ru/v1517/karl_yaspers

References (transliteration):
Ushanova I.A. Perspektivy razvitiya teorii akkul'turatsii v globali-zovannom mire // Vestnik Novgorodskogo universiteta. – 2003.-№ 4. – S. 65-70; Petruchak L.A. Pravovaya kul'tura Rossii i mezhkul'turnyy dialog v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. –2011.-№ 4. –
Tokarev S.A. Istoriya zarubezhnoy etnografii. – M., 1978.
Toynbi A.Dzh. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii. – M., 1996.
Sukharev M.V. Dvizhenie tsivilizatsiy: Rossiya i Zapad // Politicheskie issledovaniya. –2005.-№ 1.
Sokol'skaya L.V.Retseptsiya kak istoricheskaya forma pravovoy akkul'turatsii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava.-2014.-1.-C. 47-56.
Sobolev V.G. Musul'manskie obshchiny v gosudarstvakh Evropeyskogo soyuza: Problemy i perspektivy.– SPb., 2003.
Safiullina M.I. Sinergeticheskiy podkhod k izucheniyu kul'turnykh kontaktov v etnogeneze // Metodologiya gumanitarnogo znaniya v perspektive XXI veka: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (18 maya 2001 g. Sankt-Peterburg) k 80-letiyu prof. M.S. Kagana. Ser.: «Symposium». – SPb., 2001. – Vyp. 12.
Markov G.E. Razvitie sovremennoy germanskoy burzhuaznoy etnologii // Etnografiya za rubezhom (istoriograficheskie ocherki). – M., 1979.
Malikov A.V Problemy tipologii gosudarstva: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 1998.
Kleyn L.S. Personalizm: Kul'tura i lichnost' // Razvitie lichnosti. – 2005.-№2.
D'yakonov I.M. Puti istorii. Ot drevneyshego cheloveka do nashikh dney. – M., 2007.
Ikonnikova S.N. Istoriya kul'turologii: Idei i sud'by. – SPb, 1993.
Dokuchaev I.I. Setevaya kul'tura kak istoricheskiy tip // Uchenye za-piski. – K-na-A.: GTU. – 2012.-№ 4.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. – M., 1991.
Vakhta V.M. Problema akkul'turatsii v sovremennoy etnograficheskoy literature SShA / Sovremennaya amerikanskaya etnografiya: Teoreticheskie napravleniya i tendentsii. – M., 1963.
Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kul'tury: Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v KhKhI vek. – M., 1990.
Beri D.V. Akkul'turatsiya i psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya: obzor proble-my / per. s angl. – M., 2004.
Berdyaev N.A. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoy sud'by. Parizh, 1969. Rezhim dostupa http://www.odinblago.ru/smisl_istorii
Arutyunov S.A. Bilingvizm i bikul'turalizm // Sovetskaya etnografiya. – 1978.-№ 2.
Stonequist E. The Marginal Man: A study in personality and conflict. N.Y., 1937.
Thurnwald R. The Psychology of Acculturation // American Anthropologist. 1932. V. XXXIV. P. 557–569.
Rudolf W. Der kulturelle Relativismus: Kritische Analyse einer Grund-satzfragen-Diskussion in der amerikanischen Ethnologie. – Berlin, 1968.
Redfild R., Linton R., Herskovits M., Memorandum for the study of accul-turation // American Anthropologist. 1936, Vol. 38. №1.
Parsons E.S. Some Aztec and Pueblo Parallels // American Anthropologist. V. XXXV, 1933, p. 611-631.
Kroeber A.L. Anthropology: Race, Language, Culture, Psychology, Prehis-tory. N.Y.; Burlingame, 1948.
Mannoni O. Prospero and Coliban. The Psychology of Colonisation. New York, 1950.
Herskovits M.J. African Gods and Catholic Saints in New World Negro Be-lief // American Anthropologist. New Series. Menasha, 1937. Vol. 39. № 4.
Foster G.M. Culture and Conquest. America's Spanish Heritage. NY., 1960.
Boas F. The Methods of Ethnology // American Anthropologist. 1920. N.S. Vol. 22, P. 311-322,
Beals R.L. Aboriginal Survivals in Mayo Culture // American Anthropolo-gist. V. XXXIV, 1932, p. 28-39.
Acculturation in seven American Indian tribes, ed. R. Linton, N. Y.–L., 1940.
Acculturation: An exploratory formulation. N.Y., 1954
Chuchin-Rusov A.E. Konvergentsiya kul'tur. – M., 1997.
Chuchin-Rusov A.E. Kul'turno-istoricheskiy protsess: formy i soderzhanie // Voprosy filosofii. – 1996.-№ 4.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. – M., 1993. – T. 1
Yankina N.V. Mezhkul'turnaya tolerantnost' kak komponent mezhkul'turnoy kommunikatsii // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki – 2006.-№ 1.
Yaspers K. Istoki istorii i ee tsel'. Rezhim dostupa: http://gendocs.ru/v1517/karl_yaspers

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the life and creative work of a Persian Ismaili philosopher Nasir Khusraw (1004 - 1088). Nasir Khusraw was the author of the selection of poems excessing thousands of lines and the book about travels 'Safarnama'. Nasir Khusraw made a great contribution to the development of Persian literature and influenced the development of the poetic language. The author of the present article analyzes Nasir Khusraw's creative work and shows that the original nature of the poet's poetic heritage was determined by the missionary tasks the poet and the follower of Ismailism faced. Special attention is paid to the philosophical writings of the Persian philosopher that gave the insight into the philosopher's ideology and views on Ismaili teachings. The present article is based on the analysis of scientific researches of Nasir Khusraw's poetry, philosophical views and works on the history of Ismailism. The author of the article also makes an attempt to summarize available data about Nasir Khusraw as well as to show the mutual dependence of his life and creative work. Nasir Khusraw's life path defined the direction and special features of his creativity. Propagation tasks determined not only the themes but also the images of his poems as well as the fact that the philosopher chose to write his philosophical works in Persian. Researchers mostly focus on Nasir Khusraw's poetry while there have been no researches of his philosophical works in the Russian academic literature over the past decades. In the present article the author tries to analyze and evaluate Nasir Khusraw's heritage and to define possible directions for further researches of his creative work. 

Ключевые слова: Nasir Khusraw, Ismailism, Arabic philosophy, Safarnama, didactic religious poem, didactic predicatory qasida, Universal Mind, Universal Spirit, the hidden and the obvious, Ismaili propagation

Библиография:
Bertel's, E. E. Nasir-i Khusrau i ego vzglyad na poeziyu / E.E. Bertel's // Izbrannye trudy: Istoriya literatury i kul'tury Irana, t. 5 / E. E. Bertel's; otv.red. V. A. Livshits. – M.: Nauka, 1988 – s. 314 – 332.
Bertel's, A. E. Nasir-i Khosrov i ismailizm / A. E. Bertel's. – M.: izdatel'stvo vostochnoy literatury, 1959. – 289 s.
Nasir Khusrav. Safar-name. Kniga puteshestviya // perevod i vstupitel'naya stat'ya E. E. Bertel'sa, pod obshchey redaktsiey V. A. Gordlevskogo i ak. I. Yu. Krachkovskogo. – M. – L.: Academia, 1933. – 207 s.
Ashurov, G. A. Filosofskie vzglyady Nosiri Khisrava: (na osnove analiza traktata "Zad-al-musafirin») / G. A. Ashurov; pod red. M. Radzhabova. – Dushanbe: "Donish", 1965 g. – 113 s.
Daftari, F. Kratkaya istoriya ismaʻilizma: Traditsii musul'manskoy obshchiny / Farkhad Daftari: otv. red. O. F. Akimushkin; predisl. O. F. Akimushkina; per. s angl. L. R. Dodykhudoevoy, L. N. Dodkhudoevoy. – M.: «Ladomir», 2003 – 274 s.
Daftari, F. Traditsii ismailizma v srednie veka: sbornik statey / Farkhad Daftari: per. s angl. Z. Odzhievoy. – M.: «Ladomir», 2006 – 319 s.
Dodykhudoeva, L. Poeticheskiy yazyk kak sredstvo propovedi: kontseptsiya "Blagogo Slova" v tvorchestve Nasira Khusrava / L. R. Dodykhudoeva, M. L. Reysner. – M.: Natalis, 2007-384 s.
Kalandarov, T., Puteshestvie v stranu rubinovykh gor / T. S. Kalandarov, V. P. Terekhov. – M.: Nauka, 2006 – 285 s.
Fil'shtinskiy, I. Istoriya arabov i Khalifata (750 – 1517 gg.) / I. M. Fil'shtinskiy. – M.: AST: Vostok-Zapad, 2008 – 349 s.
Khansberger Elis K. Nasir Khusrav – rubin Badakhshana: Portret persidskogo Poeta, Puteshestvennika, Filosofa // per. L. R. Dodykhudoevoy – M.: Ladomir, 2005 – 288 s.
Nasir Khusraw. Gushaish va Rahaish / Knowledge and liberation. A treatise on Philosophical Theology // trans. By Faquir M. Hunzai, intr. And comm. Parviz Morewedge. – London: I.B.Tauris &Co Ltd, 1999. 92 p.
Nasir Khusraw. Knowledge and liberation. A treatise on Philosophical Theology // trans. By Faquir M. Hunzai, intr. And comm. Parviz Morewedge. – London: I.B.Tauris &Co Ltd, 1999.132 p.

References (transliteration):
Bertel's, E. E. Nasir-i Khusrau i ego vzglyad na poeziyu / E.E. Bertel's // Izbrannye trudy: Istoriya literatury i kul'tury Irana, t. 5 / E. E. Bertel's; otv.red. V. A. Livshits. – M.: Nauka, 1988 – s. 314 – 332.
Bertel's, A. E. Nasir-i Khosrov i ismailizm / A. E. Bertel's. – M.: izdatel'stvo vostochnoy literatury, 1959. – 289 s.
Nasir Khusrav. Safar-name. Kniga puteshestviya // perevod i vstupitel'naya stat'ya E. E. Bertel'sa, pod obshchey redaktsiey V. A. Gordlevskogo i ak. I. Yu. Krachkovskogo. – M. – L.: Academia, 1933. – 207 s.
Ashurov, G. A. Filosofskie vzglyady Nosiri Khisrava: (na osnove analiza traktata "Zad-al-musafirin») / G. A. Ashurov; pod red. M. Radzhabova. – Dushanbe: "Donish", 1965 g. – 113 s.
Daftari, F. Kratkaya istoriya ismaʻilizma: Traditsii musul'manskoy obshchiny / Farkhad Daftari: otv. red. O. F. Akimushkin; predisl. O. F. Akimushkina; per. s angl. L. R. Dodykhudoevoy, L. N. Dodkhudoevoy. – M.: «Ladomir», 2003 – 274 s.
Daftari, F. Traditsii ismailizma v srednie veka: sbornik statey / Farkhad Daftari: per. s angl. Z. Odzhievoy. – M.: «Ladomir», 2006 – 319 s.
Dodykhudoeva, L. Poeticheskiy yazyk kak sredstvo propovedi: kontseptsiya "Blagogo Slova" v tvorchestve Nasira Khusrava / L. R. Dodykhudoeva, M. L. Reysner. – M.: Natalis, 2007-384 s.
Kalandarov, T., Puteshestvie v stranu rubinovykh gor / T. S. Kalandarov, V. P. Terekhov. – M.: Nauka, 2006 – 285 s.
Fil'shtinskiy, I. Istoriya arabov i Khalifata (750 – 1517 gg.) / I. M. Fil'shtinskiy. – M.: AST: Vostok-Zapad, 2008 – 349 s.
Khansberger Elis K. Nasir Khusrav – rubin Badakhshana: Portret persidskogo Poeta, Puteshestvennika, Filosofa // per. L. R. Dodykhudoevoy – M.: Ladomir, 2005 – 288 s.
Nasir Khusraw. Gushaish va Rahaish / Knowledge and liberation. A treatise on Philosophical Theology // trans. By Faquir M. Hunzai, intr. And comm. Parviz Morewedge. – London: I.B.Tauris &Co Ltd, 1999. 92 p.
Nasir Khusraw. Knowledge and liberation. A treatise on Philosophical Theology // trans. By Faquir M. Hunzai, intr. And comm. Parviz Morewedge. – London: I.B.Tauris &Co Ltd, 1999.132 p.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the main city planning concepts since the Renaissance till the 20th century (on the example of works of such architects and public officials as Andrea Palladio, Leon Battista Alberti, Vincenzo Scamozzi, Domenico Fontana, Carlo Maderna, Claude Nicolas Ledoux, François Mansard, Baron Haussmann, etc.) which had an impact on the formation of modern cities of Western Europe such as Rome, Paris and London. In order to understand the preconditions of formation of modern cities of Western Europe it is necessary to address to the history of the urban development theory and to highlight the most important and significant phenomena of theoretical thinking, not only in the chronological way, but also according to the logic of development of urban planning ideas, many of which have emerged at the dawn of the formation of urban civilization and confirmed the ability for many centuries to come again and again, each time regenerating at a new higher level. The importance of urban studies is defined as the fundamental theoretical issues of academic science and tasks set by the scientific-applied analysis of modern social and cultural processes and practices. Under the conditions of contemporary culture distinguished by the diversity, it is growing especially important to find the ways and principles of building of the cultural space at all numerous levels. A contemporary city planner again faces the problem of creation of comfortable living conditions for citizens and preservation of their historical heritage.

Ключевые слова: city planning concepts, philosophy of architecture, Andrea Palladio, Leon Battista Alberti, Vincenzo Scamozzi, Domenico Fontana, Carlo Maderna, Claude Nicolas Ledoux, François Mansard, Baron Haussmann.

Библиография:
Stakheev O.V.,Remarchuk S.M. Retrospektivnyy analiz protsessa formirovaniya gradostroitel'noy reguliruyushchey deyatel'nosti v otechestvennoy i mirovoy praktike.// Vestnik TGASU № 2, 2008 g.
Savarenskaya, T.F. Zapadnoevropeyskoe gradostroitel'stvo XVII−XIX vv.: Esteticheskie i teoreticheskie predposylki. – M., 1987.
Rotenberg E.I. Zapadnoevropeyskoe iskusstvo XVII veka. Seriya: Pamyatniki mirovogo iskusstva. Vypusk 4 (seriya pervaya).. M., 1971.
Palladio, Andrea. Chetyre knigi ob arkhitekture: [Per. s ital.] / Andrea Palladio.-Faks. izd.-M. : Stroyizdat, 1989.
Mironov A.V.. Filosofiya arkhitektury: tvorchestvo Le Korbyuz'e. M., 2012.
Leon Batista Al'berti. Desyat' knig o zodchestve. V 2 t. V per. V. P. Zubova. M., 1935-1937.
LebedevaG.S. Noveyshiy kommentariy k traktatu Vitruviya "Desyat' knig ob arkhitekture".. M. , URSS , 2003.
Kagan M.I. Razvitie vnutrigorodskikh svyazey naseleniya v protsesse urbanizatsii. Sbornik «Gradostroitel'stvo. Teoriya i praktika», LISI, 1983 g.
Ikonnikov A.V. Khudozhestvennyy yazyk arkhitektury. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1985.
Gruza I. Teoriya goroda, M. Stroyizdat, 1972.
Dzhons K. Parizh: biografiya velikogo goroda / Kolin Dzhons; [per. s angl. D. Ishchenko]. – M.; SPb.., 2007.. – (Biografiya velikikh gorodov).
Bunin A.V. Istoriya gradostroitel'nogo iskusstva. Tom 1. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo literatury po stroitel'stvu i arkhitekture, 1953.
Alpatov M. Etyudy po istorii zapadnoevropeyskogo iskusstva. M: Iskusstvo, 1939. S.76.
Stepanov A.V., Ivanova G.I., Nechaev N.N. Arkhitektura i psikhologiya – M. 1993.
Frempton. K. Sovremennaya arkhitektura: Kriticheskiy vzglyad na istoriyu razvitiya. M., 1990.
Eko U. Funktsiya i znak (semiologiya arkhitektury)/Vil'kovskiy M. Sotsiologiya arkhitektury.-M.: Fond «Russkiy avangard»,-2010.
Yargina Z.N., Kositskiy Ya.V., Vladimirov V.V. i dr. Osnovy teorii gradostroitel'stva: Ucheb. dlya vuzov. Spets. "Arkhitektura" / Pod red. Z.N. Yaryginoy. — M.: Stroyizdat, 1986.

References (transliteration):
Stakheev O.V.,Remarchuk S.M. Retrospektivnyy analiz protsessa formirovaniya gradostroitel'noy reguliruyushchey deyatel'nosti v otechestvennoy i mirovoy praktike.// Vestnik TGASU № 2, 2008 g.
Savarenskaya, T.F. Zapadnoevropeyskoe gradostroitel'stvo XVII−XIX vv.: Esteticheskie i teoreticheskie predposylki. – M., 1987.
Rotenberg E.I. Zapadnoevropeyskoe iskusstvo XVII veka. Seriya: Pamyatniki mirovogo iskusstva. Vypusk 4 (seriya pervaya).. M., 1971.
Palladio, Andrea. Chetyre knigi ob arkhitekture: [Per. s ital.] / Andrea Palladio.-Faks. izd.-M. : Stroyizdat, 1989.
Mironov A.V.. Filosofiya arkhitektury: tvorchestvo Le Korbyuz'e. M., 2012.
Leon Batista Al'berti. Desyat' knig o zodchestve. V 2 t. V per. V. P. Zubova. M., 1935-1937.
LebedevaG.S. Noveyshiy kommentariy k traktatu Vitruviya "Desyat' knig ob arkhitekture".. M. , URSS , 2003.
Kagan M.I. Razvitie vnutrigorodskikh svyazey naseleniya v protsesse urbanizatsii. Sbornik «Gradostroitel'stvo. Teoriya i praktika», LISI, 1983 g.
Ikonnikov A.V. Khudozhestvennyy yazyk arkhitektury. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1985.
Gruza I. Teoriya goroda, M. Stroyizdat, 1972.
Dzhons K. Parizh: biografiya velikogo goroda / Kolin Dzhons; [per. s angl. D. Ishchenko]. – M.; SPb.., 2007.. – (Biografiya velikikh gorodov).
Bunin A.V. Istoriya gradostroitel'nogo iskusstva. Tom 1. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo literatury po stroitel'stvu i arkhitekture, 1953.
Alpatov M. Etyudy po istorii zapadnoevropeyskogo iskusstva. M: Iskusstvo, 1939. S.76.
Stepanov A.V., Ivanova G.I., Nechaev N.N. Arkhitektura i psikhologiya – M. 1993.
Frempton. K. Sovremennaya arkhitektura: Kriticheskiy vzglyad na istoriyu razvitiya. M., 1990.
Eko U. Funktsiya i znak (semiologiya arkhitektury)/Vil'kovskiy M. Sotsiologiya arkhitektury.-M.: Fond «Russkiy avangard»,-2010.
Yargina Z.N., Kositskiy Ya.V., Vladimirov V.V. i dr. Osnovy teorii gradostroitel'stva: Ucheb. dlya vuzov. Spets. "Arkhitektura" / Pod red. Z.N. Yaryginoy. — M.: Stroyizdat, 1986.

Аннотация: The present article is an introduction to Cholanyuk’s final thesis ‘Anthropological Meaning of the ‘Living Metaphor’ in Paul Ricoeur’s heritage’. The subject under research is the ‘living’ basis of a metaphor which anthropological meaning is being interpreted in terms of Paul Ricouer’s hermeneutics. Special attention is also paid to the provision of a general insight into the history of creation of the ‘living metaphor’ for which cause the polysemanticity of the anthropological knowledge has been substantiated and evaluated in the similarly named author’s work. Therefore, the researcher makes an attempt to describe the anthropological meaning of the living metaphor ‘in action’ by using a famous strategy of a discourse during which both communicative and transferring functions are perceived by a person who does the interpreting. Methodological and theoretical grounds of the research consist of the provisions of philosophical hermeneutics. Thus, the main research method is the hermeneutic method that involves a modern anthropological and philosophical interpretation of additional meanings of a text with reference to the ‘living metaphor’ described by Paul Ricoeur. The scientific novelty of the research and the main theoretical concept thereto are based on the following provisions: 1) the present research article is the first one in Russian philosophy to trace back the development of a diversified anthropological definition of the phenomenon of the ‘living metaphor’ in Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics; 2) the researcher establishes to which degree the phenomenological concept of the metaphor interpretation relates to the traditional anthropological tradition and constitutes an original approach to understanding the human nature during the second half of the 20th century; 3) the researcher analyzes the theoretical basis of the philosophical and scientific popular literature that can be related to the ‘living metaphor’ from the point of view of modern anthropology; 4) the researcher also makes his own attempt to study the metaphor taking into account the anthropological meaning of the ‘living metaphor’; 5) the researcher provides philosophical grounds for the poetics of the metaphor and describes the role of the metaphor in human communication and mutual understanding. At the end of the article the researcher comes to the conclusion about the dialectic singularity of a metaphoric discourse that is performed by our imagination even if we realize that a reader or a listener may have quite different interpretations of what they read or hear. Paul Ricoeur expressively relates an interpretation of a metaphor to a ‘living basis’ of such a metaphor, thus giving to a reader or a listener an opportunity to ‘think more’ based on a metaphoric plot as a previous and future imitation of human activity. Critical anthropological evaluation of the living metaphor model assumes that its living nature isn’t the only condition for the heuristic hermeneutics of the metaphoric discourse. Being a mean of expression and distribution of an idea in general anthropological terms, the living metaphor contains the reference of its author just like any other metaphor in a typical metaphoric communication.

Ключевые слова: metaphoric communication, living metaphor, polysemanticity (multiple meaning) of understanding, mimesis, mythos, transferences, references, vision as, imagination, death of an author.

Контактная информация: Cholanyuk Vasily Romanovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, st. Volkhonka, h. 14/1, bld. 5, room No. 432.

Библиография:
Simms, Karl. Paul Ricoeur. (Routledge critical thinkers) Includes bibliographical references and index. [Text]. Routledge Classics. London and New York, 2003
Ricoeur, Paul. Rule of Metaphor. The creation of meaning in language. [Text]. Translated by Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello, Routledge Classics. London and New York, (2003 [1978])
Tolstoy L. N. Zhivoy trup: Drama v 6 deystviyakh.// L. N. Tolstoy. Poln. sobr. soch. v 90 t. T.34. – M., 1952
Riker P. « Ya-sam kak drugoy» / per. s fr.; Pod obshch. red. I. S. Vdovinoy. – M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury, (Frantsuzskaya filosofiya KhKh veka), 2008. – 416 s.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. s fr., vstup. st. i komment. I. S. Vdovinoy. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. — 695 s. — (Filosofskie tekhnologii).
Pol' Riker. Vremya i rasskaz. T. 1. Intriga i istoricheskiy rasskaz; M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. 313 s. – (Kniga sveta)
Pol' Riker – filosof dialoga / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii; Otv. red. I. I. Blauberg. – M. IFRAN, 2008. – 143 s.
Platon. Gosudarstvo. Sochineniya v 4-kh tomakh. T. 3. Ch.1 / Pod obshch. red. A. F. Loseva i V. F. Asmusa; Per. s drevnegrech. – Spb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; «Izd-vo Olega Abyshko», 2007. – 752 s.
Nitsshe F. Volya k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostey / Per. s nem. E. Gertsyk i dr. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2005. – 880 s.
Nitsshe. F. Rozhdenie tragedii; Iz posmertnykh proizvedeniy: (1869-1873) Poln. sobr. soch.; T 1. Per. pod obshch. Red. Prof. F. Zelinskogo, S. Franka pri sotr. A. Belogo, V.Ya Bryusova i dr. M.: Mosk. kn. izdatel'stvo, 1912. – 414 s.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya; T 5. Pod obshch. red. V. F. Asmusa, A. V. Gulygi, T. I. Oyzermana.] Soch. v 6 t.; M., «Mysl'», 1966. – 564 s.
Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii / Per. s frantsuzskogo D. Yu. Kralechkina. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2012. – 376 s. – (Filosofskie tekhnologii)
Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla. – SPb.: Tertsiya, Kristall, 1999. – 448 s. – (B-ka mirovoy lit. Malaya seriya)
Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika: Per. s fr. / Sost., obshch. red. i vstup. st. G.K. Kosikova. – M.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Progress», «Univers», 1994 – 616 s.
Aristotel'. Poetika; Ritorika; O dushe. / Per. s drevnegrech. V. Appel'rota, N. Platonovoy i P. Popova; Vstup. st. i komment. S. Trokhacheva. – M.: Mir knigi, Literatura, 2007. – 400 s. – («Velikie mysliteli»)
Aristotel'. Ob iskusstve poezii: Bilingva drevnegrechesko-russkiy. Per. V. Appel'rota. Izd. 2-e. – M.: Knizhnyy dom «Librokom», 2012. – 104 s. – (Shkola klassicheskoy filologii)

References (transliteration):
Simms, Karl. Paul Ricoeur. (Routledge critical thinkers) Includes bibliographical references and index. [Text]. Routledge Classics. London and New York, 2003
Ricoeur, Paul. Rule of Metaphor. The creation of meaning in language. [Text]. Translated by Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello, Routledge Classics. London and New York, (2003 [1978])
Tolstoy L. N. Zhivoy trup: Drama v 6 deystviyakh.// L. N. Tolstoy. Poln. sobr. soch. v 90 t. T.34. – M., 1952
Riker P. « Ya-sam kak drugoy» / per. s fr.; Pod obshch. red. I. S. Vdovinoy. – M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury, (Frantsuzskaya filosofiya KhKh veka), 2008. – 416 s.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. s fr., vstup. st. i komment. I. S. Vdovinoy. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. — 695 s. — (Filosofskie tekhnologii).
Pol' Riker. Vremya i rasskaz. T. 1. Intriga i istoricheskiy rasskaz; M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. 313 s. – (Kniga sveta)
Pol' Riker – filosof dialoga / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii; Otv. red. I. I. Blauberg. – M. IFRAN, 2008. – 143 s.
Platon. Gosudarstvo. Sochineniya v 4-kh tomakh. T. 3. Ch.1 / Pod obshch. red. A. F. Loseva i V. F. Asmusa; Per. s drevnegrech. – Spb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; «Izd-vo Olega Abyshko», 2007. – 752 s.
Nitsshe F. Volya k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostey / Per. s nem. E. Gertsyk i dr. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2005. – 880 s.
Nitsshe. F. Rozhdenie tragedii; Iz posmertnykh proizvedeniy: (1869-1873) Poln. sobr. soch.; T 1. Per. pod obshch. Red. Prof. F. Zelinskogo, S. Franka pri sotr. A. Belogo, V.Ya Bryusova i dr. M.: Mosk. kn. izdatel'stvo, 1912. – 414 s.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya; T 5. Pod obshch. red. V. F. Asmusa, A. V. Gulygi, T. I. Oyzermana.] Soch. v 6 t.; M., «Mysl'», 1966. – 564 s.
Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii / Per. s frantsuzskogo D. Yu. Kralechkina. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2012. – 376 s. – (Filosofskie tekhnologii)
Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla. – SPb.: Tertsiya, Kristall, 1999. – 448 s. – (B-ka mirovoy lit. Malaya seriya)
Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika: Per. s fr. / Sost., obshch. red. i vstup. st. G.K. Kosikova. – M.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Progress», «Univers», 1994 – 616 s.
Aristotel'. Poetika; Ritorika; O dushe. / Per. s drevnegrech. V. Appel'rota, N. Platonovoy i P. Popova; Vstup. st. i komment. S. Trokhacheva. – M.: Mir knigi, Literatura, 2007. – 400 s. – («Velikie mysliteli»)
Aristotel'. Ob iskusstve poezii: Bilingva drevnegrechesko-russkiy. Per. V. Appel'rota. Izd. 2-e. – M.: Knizhnyy dom «Librokom», 2012. – 104 s. – (Shkola klassicheskoy filologii)

Аннотация: Throughout centuries anthropological issues of European philosophy has been having a rather invariant nature. By comparing anthropological views of Chrysippus as a famous author of Early Stoa and Posidonius as a leading philosopher of Middle Stoa (as stated by one of the major ancient surgeon and philosopher), the author demonstrates that their opinions on human nature and mental organization of human are still important and popular today. However, the author of the article underlines the specific features of the mental schemes, range of problems and intellectual environment of those times as well as takes into account the incommensurability of the ‘amount’ of philosophical experience in those times and today. Thisallowstobetterunderstandthecontinuitybetweenancient philosophy and modern philosophy as well as the connection between anthropological, psychological and ethic issues. The author makes an assumption that both Chrysippus and Posidonius wanted to create the harmony between an ‘integral’ individual (as they thought) and the universe and to give that individual the kind of skills and capabilities that would help him to overcome life troubles. The major part of sources provided by the author to illustrate the peculiarities of anthropological reflection in the ancient times is brought to the notice of the Russian audience for the first time.

Ключевые слова: historical and philosophical comparative studies, anthropology, psychology, ethics, ancient philosophy, Early Stoa, Middle Stoa, Chrysippus, Posidonius, Galen.

Контактная информация: Stolyarov Alexander Arnoldovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 507.

Библиография:
Gurevich P.S. Vektory sovremennogo postizheniya cheloveka // Filosofskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2 (11). S. 95–106.
Fillion-Lahille J. Le De ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions. Paris, 1984.
Forschner M. Die Stoische Ethik. Über den Zusammenhang von Natur, – Sprach – und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart, 1981.
Galen. On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. Edition, Translation and Commentary by Phillip De Lacy. 3 Ed. Berlin, 2005 (Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4,1,2).
Gill Ch. Did Galen Understand Platonic and Stoic Thinking on Emotions? // The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy / Ed. J.Sihvola, T.Engberg-Pedersen. Dordrecht, 1998. P. 113–148.
Glibert-Thirry A. La théorie stoïcienne de la passion chez Chrysippe et son evolution chez Posidonius // Revue Philosophique de Louvain 75. 1977. P. 393–435.
Graeser A. Zenon von Kition. Positionen und Probleme. Berlin; New York, 1975.
Inwood B. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford, 1985.
Long A.A. Hierocles on oikeiosis and self-perception // Long A.A. Stoic Studies. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2001. P. 250–263.
Pembroke S. Oikeiosis // Problems in Stoicism / Ed. A.A. Long. London, 1971. P 114–149.
Philippson R. Zur Psychologie der Stoa // Rheinisches Museum 86. 1937. S. 140 –179.
Pohlenz M. Die Stoa. Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. Bd. 1. 2 Aufl. Göttingen, 1955.
Posidonius. I. The Fragments / Ed. by L.Edelstein and I.G.Kidd. 2 Ed. Cambridge, 1989.
Rist J. Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge, 1969.
Stevens J. Posidonian Polemic and Academic Dialectic: The Impact of Carneades upon Posidonius’  // Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 34 (3). 1993. P. 229–323.

References (transliteration):
Gurevich P.S. Vektory sovremennogo postizheniya cheloveka // Filosofskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2 (11). S. 95–106.
Fillion-Lahille J. Le De ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions. Paris, 1984.
Forschner M. Die Stoische Ethik. Über den Zusammenhang von Natur, – Sprach – und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart, 1981.
Galen. On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. Edition, Translation and Commentary by Phillip De Lacy. 3 Ed. Berlin, 2005 (Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4,1,2).
Gill Ch. Did Galen Understand Platonic and Stoic Thinking on Emotions? // The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy / Ed. J.Sihvola, T.Engberg-Pedersen. Dordrecht, 1998. P. 113–148.
Glibert-Thirry A. La théorie stoïcienne de la passion chez Chrysippe et son evolution chez Posidonius // Revue Philosophique de Louvain 75. 1977. P. 393–435.
Graeser A. Zenon von Kition. Positionen und Probleme. Berlin; New York, 1975.
Inwood B. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford, 1985.
Long A.A. Hierocles on oikeiosis and self-perception // Long A.A. Stoic Studies. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2001. P. 250–263.
Pembroke S. Oikeiosis // Problems in Stoicism / Ed. A.A. Long. London, 1971. P 114–149.
Philippson R. Zur Psychologie der Stoa // Rheinisches Museum 86. 1937. S. 140 –179.
Pohlenz M. Die Stoa. Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. Bd. 1. 2 Aufl. Göttingen, 1955.
Posidonius. I. The Fragments / Ed. by L.Edelstein and I.G.Kidd. 2 Ed. Cambridge, 1989.
Rist J. Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge, 1969.
Stevens J. Posidonian Polemic and Academic Dialectic: The Impact of Carneades upon Posidonius’  // Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 34 (3). 1993. P. 229–323.

Аннотация: The author of the article views and analyzes the main approaches to the definition of the term ‘value’. The author describes the structure, hierarchy and methods of classification of values as well as problems and methods of their diagnostics in the historical retrospective. The system of values is a rather flexible structure in constant development and transformations of this structure is closely connected with the processes happening in the society. Methods for diagnostics of explorable values and elements of the value structure are chosen based on the nature of the above mentioned transformations. A particular representation of individual’s value orientations can be created with the help of a test or a method of deliberate influence and registration of results of such influence. Diagnostics of a supraindividual element include analysis of an individual element, selection of a particular research period and diagnostics of group values. In conclusion the author states that life values are the common element in all diagnostic methods that have been viewed and reflect peculiarities of value researches in the historical retrospective.

Ключевые слова: history, culture, philosophy, life values, diagnostics of values, methods used for diagnostics of values, value structure, stages of social development, succession of values, historical retrospective.

Контактная информация: Pavlenko Sergey Andreevich, 664074, Russia, Irkutsk, ul. Chernyshevskogo 15.

Библиография:
Kaptsov A. V., Karpushina L. V. Metod analiza tsennostey gruppy / A. V. Kaptsov, L. V. Karpushina // Uchenye zapiski Pedagogicheskogo instituta Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im N. G. Chernyshevskogo. Seriya «Psikhologiya. Pedagogika». – 2010. – T. 3. 1 (9). – S. 24-29.
Ivin A. A. Aksiologiya. Nauchnoe izdanie / A. A. Ivin. – M.: Vyssh. shk., 2006. – 390 c.
Blok M. Apologiya istorii ili remeslo istorika. – M.: Nauka, 1986. – S. 134.
Bespalova Yu. M. Predprinimatel'stvo i ego tsennosti (na materialakh Zapadnoy Sibiri vtoroy poloviny XIX – nachala XX vv.) / Yu. M. Bespalova // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumenskogo gos. un-ta, 2000. – Vyp. 4. – S 102–111.
Bazovye tsennosti rossiyan: Sotsial. ustanovki. Zhizn. strategii. Simvoly. Mify: Po materialam proekta «Tomskaya initsiativa» / Otv. red. Ryabov A. V., Kurbangaleeva E. Sh.; In-t kompleks. sotsial. issled. RAN [i dr.]. – M.: Dom intellektual. kn., 2003. – 445,[1] s.
Baeva L. V. Tsennosti izmenyayushchegosya mira: ekzistentsial'naya aksiologiya istorii / L. V. Baeva. – Astrakhan': Izd-vo AGU, 2004. – 277 s.
Akhiezer A. Sotsiokul'turnyy slovar' [Elektronnyy resurs] / A. Akhiezer // Natsional'naya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: sayt. – URL: http://terme.ru/dictionary/173/word/ideal. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.2013)
Kostyuk I. A. Ratsionalizm kak tsennost' v usloviyakh konflikta / I. A. Kostyuk // Sotsial'nye konflikty v istorii Rossii: materialy II Vseros. nauch. konf. Omsk, 22 okt. 2004 g. – Omsk, 2004. – S. 344-347.
Kuznetsova Yu. N. Tsennostnye determinanty soderzhaniya prinimaemykh lichnost'yu resheniy: avtoref. dis. ... kand. psikh. nauk: 19.00.05 / Yu. N. Kuznetsova; Institut pedagogiki i psikhologii professional'nogo obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. – Kazan', 2007. – 19 s.
Lebedev A. A. Tsennostnye osnovaniya chelovecheskoy deyatel'nosti: filosofskiy analiz: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.11 / A. A. Lebedev; Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy lingvisticheskiy universitet. – M., 2006. – 23 c.
Leont'ev D. A. Tsennost' kak mezhdistsiplinarnoe ponyatie: opyt mnogomernoy rekonstruktsii / D. A. Leont'ev // Voprosy filosofii. – M.: Nauka, 1996. – Vyp. 4. – S. 16-21.
Medvedev N. P. Pereotsenka tsennostey kak sotsial'nyy fenomen / N. P. Medvedev. – Stavropol': Izd-vo Stavropol'skogo un-ta, 1995. – 104 s.
Mel'nikov S. L. Blagotvoritel'naya deyatel'nost' provintsial'nogo kupechestva vo vtoroy polovine XIX veka v kontekste izmeneniya tsennostnykh dispozitsiy / S. L. Mel'nikov // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. – Izhevsk: Izd-vo Udmurtskogo gos. un-ta, 2008. – Vyp. 2. – S. 97-109.
Motkov O. I. Izuchenie vneshnikh i vnutrennikh tsennostey lichnosti. [Elektronnyy resurs] / O. I. Motkov. – URL: http://hpsy.ru/public/x5182.htm. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.13).
Oglezneva G. V. Tsennostnye orientatsii sel'skikh uchiteley Vostochnoy Sibiri na rubezhe XIX-XX vv. / G. V. Oglezneva // Intellektual'nyy i industrial'nyy potentsial regionov Rossii: II Vseros. nauch. chteniya. – Kemerovo, 2002. – S. 9-12.
Ol'shanskiy D. V. Glossariy po politicheskoy psikhologii [Elektronnyy resurs] /D. V. Ol'shanskiy // Natsional'naya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: sayt. – URL: http://vocabulary.ru/dictionary/8/word/stereotip. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.2013).
Omel'chuk R. K. Sotsiokul'turnye mekhanizmy preemstvennosti tsennostey: teoriya i praktika // Voprosy kul'turologii. M.: ID Panorama, 2013. № 7. S. 32-37.
Pal'tsev A. I. Mentalitet i tsennostnye orientatsii etnicheskikh obshchnostey (na primere subetnosa sibiryakov): monografiya / A. I. Pal'tsev. – Novosibirsk: Sibirskoe tamozhennoe upravlenie, 2001. – 140 s.
Podol'skaya E. A. Tsennostnye orientatsii i problema aktivnosti lichnosti / E. A. Podol'skaya. – Khar'kov: Izd-vo «Osnova» pri Khar'k. gos. un-te, 1991. – 163 c.
Potanin G. N. Vospominaniya / [Sost. N. N. Yanovskiy]. – Novosibirsk: Zap.-Sib. kn. Izd-vo, 1983. – 336 s. – (Literaturnoe nasledstvo Sibiri; T. 6).
Rassadina T. A. Mekhanizmy protsessa transformatsii traditsionnykh tsennostey / T. A. Rassadina // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. – 2005. – № 4. – S. 50 64.
Rassadina T.A. Transformatsii traditsionnykh russkikh tsennostey v nravstvennykh orientatsiyakh rossiyan / T.A. Rassadina; Mos. ped. gos. un-t. – M.: Prometey: MPGU, 2004. – 409 s.
Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy istoricheskiy arkhiv, f. 91, op. 3, d. 388, 401;
Shilovskiy M. V. Pobuditel'nye motivy blagotvoritel'noy deyatel'nosti sibirskikh predprinimateley / M. V. Shilovskiy // K istorii predprinimatel'stva v Sibiri: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. / Red.: Goryushkin L. M. [i dr.]. – Novosibirsk: [b. i.] – 1996. – S. 79-83.
Ershteyn L. B. Zapretnaya teoriya tsennostey: Psikhologicheskie i sotsiologicheskie sledstviya predstavleniya tsennostey kak dinamicheskikh zapretov [Elektronnyy resurs] / L. B. Ershteyn // Ekzistentsial'naya i gumanisticheskaya psikhologiya: sayt. – URL: http://hpsy.ru/public/x3725.htm. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.2013).
Yakovlev S. V. Metodologicheskie podkhody k razrabotke sredstv ob'ektivnoy diagnostiki sostoyaniya sistemy tsennostey lichnosti / S. V. Yakovlev // Izvestiya rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena. – 2008. – № 81. – S. 297-306
Prokhorov M.M. Bytie i istoriya: vzaimosvyaz' i opredelenie // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 1 - 71. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_113.html

References (transliteration):
Kaptsov A. V., Karpushina L. V. Metod analiza tsennostey gruppy / A. V. Kaptsov, L. V. Karpushina // Uchenye zapiski Pedagogicheskogo instituta Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im N. G. Chernyshevskogo. Seriya «Psikhologiya. Pedagogika». – 2010. – T. 3. 1 (9). – S. 24-29.
Ivin A. A. Aksiologiya. Nauchnoe izdanie / A. A. Ivin. – M.: Vyssh. shk., 2006. – 390 c.
Blok M. Apologiya istorii ili remeslo istorika. – M.: Nauka, 1986. – S. 134.
Bespalova Yu. M. Predprinimatel'stvo i ego tsennosti (na materialakh Zapadnoy Sibiri vtoroy poloviny XIX – nachala XX vv.) / Yu. M. Bespalova // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumenskogo gos. un-ta, 2000. – Vyp. 4. – S 102–111.
Bazovye tsennosti rossiyan: Sotsial. ustanovki. Zhizn. strategii. Simvoly. Mify: Po materialam proekta «Tomskaya initsiativa» / Otv. red. Ryabov A. V., Kurbangaleeva E. Sh.; In-t kompleks. sotsial. issled. RAN [i dr.]. – M.: Dom intellektual. kn., 2003. – 445,[1] s.
Baeva L. V. Tsennosti izmenyayushchegosya mira: ekzistentsial'naya aksiologiya istorii / L. V. Baeva. – Astrakhan': Izd-vo AGU, 2004. – 277 s.
Akhiezer A. Sotsiokul'turnyy slovar' [Elektronnyy resurs] / A. Akhiezer // Natsional'naya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: sayt. – URL: http://terme.ru/dictionary/173/word/ideal. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.2013)
Kostyuk I. A. Ratsionalizm kak tsennost' v usloviyakh konflikta / I. A. Kostyuk // Sotsial'nye konflikty v istorii Rossii: materialy II Vseros. nauch. konf. Omsk, 22 okt. 2004 g. – Omsk, 2004. – S. 344-347.
Kuznetsova Yu. N. Tsennostnye determinanty soderzhaniya prinimaemykh lichnost'yu resheniy: avtoref. dis. ... kand. psikh. nauk: 19.00.05 / Yu. N. Kuznetsova; Institut pedagogiki i psikhologii professional'nogo obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. – Kazan', 2007. – 19 s.
Lebedev A. A. Tsennostnye osnovaniya chelovecheskoy deyatel'nosti: filosofskiy analiz: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.11 / A. A. Lebedev; Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy lingvisticheskiy universitet. – M., 2006. – 23 c.
Leont'ev D. A. Tsennost' kak mezhdistsiplinarnoe ponyatie: opyt mnogomernoy rekonstruktsii / D. A. Leont'ev // Voprosy filosofii. – M.: Nauka, 1996. – Vyp. 4. – S. 16-21.
Medvedev N. P. Pereotsenka tsennostey kak sotsial'nyy fenomen / N. P. Medvedev. – Stavropol': Izd-vo Stavropol'skogo un-ta, 1995. – 104 s.
Mel'nikov S. L. Blagotvoritel'naya deyatel'nost' provintsial'nogo kupechestva vo vtoroy polovine XIX veka v kontekste izmeneniya tsennostnykh dispozitsiy / S. L. Mel'nikov // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. – Izhevsk: Izd-vo Udmurtskogo gos. un-ta, 2008. – Vyp. 2. – S. 97-109.
Motkov O. I. Izuchenie vneshnikh i vnutrennikh tsennostey lichnosti. [Elektronnyy resurs] / O. I. Motkov. – URL: http://hpsy.ru/public/x5182.htm. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.13).
Oglezneva G. V. Tsennostnye orientatsii sel'skikh uchiteley Vostochnoy Sibiri na rubezhe XIX-XX vv. / G. V. Oglezneva // Intellektual'nyy i industrial'nyy potentsial regionov Rossii: II Vseros. nauch. chteniya. – Kemerovo, 2002. – S. 9-12.
Ol'shanskiy D. V. Glossariy po politicheskoy psikhologii [Elektronnyy resurs] /D. V. Ol'shanskiy // Natsional'naya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: sayt. – URL: http://vocabulary.ru/dictionary/8/word/stereotip. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.2013).
Omel'chuk R. K. Sotsiokul'turnye mekhanizmy preemstvennosti tsennostey: teoriya i praktika // Voprosy kul'turologii. M.: ID Panorama, 2013. № 7. S. 32-37.
Pal'tsev A. I. Mentalitet i tsennostnye orientatsii etnicheskikh obshchnostey (na primere subetnosa sibiryakov): monografiya / A. I. Pal'tsev. – Novosibirsk: Sibirskoe tamozhennoe upravlenie, 2001. – 140 s.
Podol'skaya E. A. Tsennostnye orientatsii i problema aktivnosti lichnosti / E. A. Podol'skaya. – Khar'kov: Izd-vo «Osnova» pri Khar'k. gos. un-te, 1991. – 163 c.
Potanin G. N. Vospominaniya / [Sost. N. N. Yanovskiy]. – Novosibirsk: Zap.-Sib. kn. Izd-vo, 1983. – 336 s. – (Literaturnoe nasledstvo Sibiri; T. 6).
Rassadina T. A. Mekhanizmy protsessa transformatsii traditsionnykh tsennostey / T. A. Rassadina // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. – 2005. – № 4. – S. 50 64.
Rassadina T.A. Transformatsii traditsionnykh russkikh tsennostey v nravstvennykh orientatsiyakh rossiyan / T.A. Rassadina; Mos. ped. gos. un-t. – M.: Prometey: MPGU, 2004. – 409 s.
Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy istoricheskiy arkhiv, f. 91, op. 3, d. 388, 401;
Shilovskiy M. V. Pobuditel'nye motivy blagotvoritel'noy deyatel'nosti sibirskikh predprinimateley / M. V. Shilovskiy // K istorii predprinimatel'stva v Sibiri: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. / Red.: Goryushkin L. M. [i dr.]. – Novosibirsk: [b. i.] – 1996. – S. 79-83.
Ershteyn L. B. Zapretnaya teoriya tsennostey: Psikhologicheskie i sotsiologicheskie sledstviya predstavleniya tsennostey kak dinamicheskikh zapretov [Elektronnyy resurs] / L. B. Ershteyn // Ekzistentsial'naya i gumanisticheskaya psikhologiya: sayt. – URL: http://hpsy.ru/public/x3725.htm. (data obrashcheniya 26.07.2013).
Yakovlev S. V. Metodologicheskie podkhody k razrabotke sredstv ob'ektivnoy diagnostiki sostoyaniya sistemy tsennostey lichnosti / S. V. Yakovlev // Izvestiya rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena. – 2008. – № 81. – S. 297-306
Prokhorov M.M. Bytie i istoriya: vzaimosvyaz' i opredelenie // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 1 - 71. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_113.html

Аннотация: The present research is devoted to the topical issue in modern socio-humanistic studies. This issue has a cross-disciplinary nature and is a logical follow-up and development of the fundamental scientific ideas presented by Russian and foreign philosophers, cryptographers, historians and cultural researchers. The important part of the article is devoted to the role of heraldry and philosophical interpretation of the symbol in Russia during the period of 240-year dependence of Russian land on Mongol Empire. Each national culture is peculiar from other cultures. Semiotics allow to create a special view on social life of Russia during the Mongol-Tatar Yoke and define signs and symbols lying in the basis of Russian material and spiritual life back in those times. Semiotics also show what signs and symbols of the society influence individual consciousness and behavior. An important tool of semiotic analysis is the concept about connection between a symbol and a referent and how this connection influences individual consciousness and behavior.

Ключевые слова: socio-cultural space, symbolism, heraldic symbols, national mentality, symbol, referent, ‘nationality’ of culture, heraldry, coat of arms, sign.

Контактная информация: Shipovskaya Lyudmila Pavlovna, Russia, Moscow, ul. Timiryazevskaya 49.

Библиография:
Averintsev S.S., Davydov Yu.N., Turbin V.N., i dr. M.M. Bakhtin kak filosof: Sb. statey / Ros. akademiya nauk, Institut filosofii.-M.: Nauka, 1992.-S. 111-115.
Bakhtin M.M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh. Opyt filosofskogo analiza // Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva / Sost. S. G. Bocharov; Tekst podgot. G. S. Bernshteyn i L. V. Deryugina; Primech. S. S. Averintseva i S. G. Bocharova. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. — 424 s. s. 301.
Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya-k logike kul'tury : Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat' pervyy vek: M.: Politizdat, 1991. 413 s. s. 19.
Bibler V.S. Dialog. Soznanie. Kul'tura (ideya kul'tury v rabotakh M.M. Bakhtina) / V.S. Bibler // Odissey. Chelovek v istorii. — M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 23.
Beletskiy S.D. Drevneyshaya geral'dika Rusi // «Povest' vremennykh let». SPb., Vita Nova, 2012. str. 431 – 463.
Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie/Sost., vstup. st. i prim. L.A. Sugay.-M.: Respublika, 1994.-528s. – (Mysliteli XX v.)
Galanin A.V. Ariyskie traditsii // Vselennaya zhivaya [Elektronnyy resurs] – Vladivostok, 2012-2013. Adres dostupa:http://ukhtoma.ru/traditions1.htm
Gerder I. Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva. M.: Nauka, 1977. 703 s.
Danilevskiy I.N. Drevnyaya Rus' glazami sovremennikov i potomkov (IX-XII vv.). M., 2001.
Ivanov M.K. Obraz vsadnika v iskusstve: ikonograficheskiy arkhetip. Internet-resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ibif.org.ru/articles/nachalo01/01-03.pdf S. 32
Ivanov S.A. Vizantiyskoe missionerstvo: Mozhno li sdelat' iz «varvara»khristianina?. M., 2003.
Karger M.K. Drevniy Kiev // Po sledam drevnikh kul'tur: Drevnyaya Rus' / nauch. red i sost. Fedorov G. B. M., 1953.
Kozhinov V. Grekh i svyatost' russkoy istorii. – M.: Eksmo, Yauza, 2006. – 480 s.
Lakier A.B. Russkaya geral'dika [Elektronnyy resurs]. Adres dostupa: .http://www.heraldrybooks.ru/text.php?id=90
Litavrin G.G. Vvedenie khristianstva v Bolgarii (IX – nachalo X v.) // Prinyatie khristianstva narodami Tsentral'noy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropy i kreshchenie Rusi. M., 1988. S. 58-59;
Mamardashvili M.K. Vvedenie v filosofiyu // Mamardashvili M.K. Neobkhodimost' sebya. M.: «Labirint», 1996. S. 13-19.
Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul'tury. Ocherki po filosofii kul'tury.-M.: Universitetskaya kniga. 2012. 406 s. S. 311.
Pashuto V.T. Vneshnyaya politika Drevney Rusi. M., 1968.
Priselkov M.D. Ocherki po tserkovno-politicheskoy istorii Kievskoy Rusi X-XII vv. SPb., 2003.
Samokhvalov V. P. Psikhoanaliticheskiy slovar' i rabota s simvolami snovideniy i fantaziy. — Simferopol': SONAT, 1999. — s. 184
Sverdlov M.B. Kievskiy sobor sv. Sofii kak istochnik istoricheskoy informatsii // TODL. T. 55..
Soboleva N. A. Ocherki istorii rossiyskoy simvoliki. Ot tamgi do simvolov gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta-M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur: Znak, 2006.-487 s.
Chumakova T.V. «V chelovecheskom zhitel'stve mnozi obrazy zryatsya». Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi.-SPb., 2001
Chumakova T.V. Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi: opyt filosofsko-antropologicheskogo analiza: dis. ..kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.13. – SPb., 2002.
Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Per. s angl.– K.: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996. – 384 s. S. 216
Yung K.G. Noymann E. Psikhoanaliz i iskusstvo – M.: Vakler, 1998. 306 s. s. 26.
Yung K.G. Chelovek i ego simvoly – M.: Serebryanye niti, 2011. 352 s.
Eko. U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu – SPB.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998. – 432 s. S. 51
Elias N. Pridvornoe obshchestvo. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002. 314 s.
Bilous O.M. Derzhavno-tserkovni vidnosini yak ob’єkt politologichnogo analizu: Avtoref. dis. … k.polit.n. Kiïv, 2004. S. 2.
Kalevi Kull: Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones // Cognitive semiotics. Issue 4-Spring 2009-Anthroposemiotics vs. Biosemiotics
Schütz Alfred Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego» // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, March, 1942, c. 323—347
Ottfried Neubecker Heraldry: Sources, Symbols and Meaning. Tiger Books International (1997). 288 pages.
«The quest for meaning». University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2007, Toronto Buf-folo London. S. 153

References (transliteration):
Averintsev S.S., Davydov Yu.N., Turbin V.N., i dr. M.M. Bakhtin kak filosof: Sb. statey / Ros. akademiya nauk, Institut filosofii.-M.: Nauka, 1992.-S. 111-115.
Bakhtin M.M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh. Opyt filosofskogo analiza // Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva / Sost. S. G. Bocharov; Tekst podgot. G. S. Bernshteyn i L. V. Deryugina; Primech. S. S. Averintseva i S. G. Bocharova. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. — 424 s. s. 301.
Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya-k logike kul'tury : Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat' pervyy vek: M.: Politizdat, 1991. 413 s. s. 19.
Bibler V.S. Dialog. Soznanie. Kul'tura (ideya kul'tury v rabotakh M.M. Bakhtina) / V.S. Bibler // Odissey. Chelovek v istorii. — M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 23.
Beletskiy S.D. Drevneyshaya geral'dika Rusi // «Povest' vremennykh let». SPb., Vita Nova, 2012. str. 431 – 463.
Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie/Sost., vstup. st. i prim. L.A. Sugay.-M.: Respublika, 1994.-528s. – (Mysliteli XX v.)
Galanin A.V. Ariyskie traditsii // Vselennaya zhivaya [Elektronnyy resurs] – Vladivostok, 2012-2013. Adres dostupa:http://ukhtoma.ru/traditions1.htm
Gerder I. Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva. M.: Nauka, 1977. 703 s.
Danilevskiy I.N. Drevnyaya Rus' glazami sovremennikov i potomkov (IX-XII vv.). M., 2001.
Ivanov M.K. Obraz vsadnika v iskusstve: ikonograficheskiy arkhetip. Internet-resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ibif.org.ru/articles/nachalo01/01-03.pdf S. 32
Ivanov S.A. Vizantiyskoe missionerstvo: Mozhno li sdelat' iz «varvara»khristianina?. M., 2003.
Karger M.K. Drevniy Kiev // Po sledam drevnikh kul'tur: Drevnyaya Rus' / nauch. red i sost. Fedorov G. B. M., 1953.
Kozhinov V. Grekh i svyatost' russkoy istorii. – M.: Eksmo, Yauza, 2006. – 480 s.
Lakier A.B. Russkaya geral'dika [Elektronnyy resurs]. Adres dostupa: .http://www.heraldrybooks.ru/text.php?id=90
Litavrin G.G. Vvedenie khristianstva v Bolgarii (IX – nachalo X v.) // Prinyatie khristianstva narodami Tsentral'noy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropy i kreshchenie Rusi. M., 1988. S. 58-59;
Mamardashvili M.K. Vvedenie v filosofiyu // Mamardashvili M.K. Neobkhodimost' sebya. M.: «Labirint», 1996. S. 13-19.
Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul'tury. Ocherki po filosofii kul'tury.-M.: Universitetskaya kniga. 2012. 406 s. S. 311.
Pashuto V.T. Vneshnyaya politika Drevney Rusi. M., 1968.
Priselkov M.D. Ocherki po tserkovno-politicheskoy istorii Kievskoy Rusi X-XII vv. SPb., 2003.
Samokhvalov V. P. Psikhoanaliticheskiy slovar' i rabota s simvolami snovideniy i fantaziy. — Simferopol': SONAT, 1999. — s. 184
Sverdlov M.B. Kievskiy sobor sv. Sofii kak istochnik istoricheskoy informatsii // TODL. T. 55..
Soboleva N. A. Ocherki istorii rossiyskoy simvoliki. Ot tamgi do simvolov gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta-M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur: Znak, 2006.-487 s.
Chumakova T.V. «V chelovecheskom zhitel'stve mnozi obrazy zryatsya». Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi.-SPb., 2001
Chumakova T.V. Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi: opyt filosofsko-antropologicheskogo analiza: dis. ..kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.13. – SPb., 2002.
Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Per. s angl.– K.: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996. – 384 s. S. 216
Yung K.G. Noymann E. Psikhoanaliz i iskusstvo – M.: Vakler, 1998. 306 s. s. 26.
Yung K.G. Chelovek i ego simvoly – M.: Serebryanye niti, 2011. 352 s.
Eko. U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu – SPB.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998. – 432 s. S. 51
Elias N. Pridvornoe obshchestvo. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002. 314 s.
Bilous O.M. Derzhavno-tserkovni vidnosini yak ob’єkt politologichnogo analizu: Avtoref. dis. … k.polit.n. Kiïv, 2004. S. 2.
Kalevi Kull: Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones // Cognitive semiotics. Issue 4-Spring 2009-Anthroposemiotics vs. Biosemiotics
Schütz Alfred Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego» // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, March, 1942, c. 323—347
Ottfried Neubecker Heraldry: Sources, Symbols and Meaning. Tiger Books International (1997). 288 pages.
«The quest for meaning». University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2007, Toronto Buf-folo London. S. 153