Аннотация: This article examines the process of transformation of ethnic myth in the Circassian culture, starting with the antiquity era of creation of the epos of “Narta” and spanning to the modern post-Soviet period. In the first part of this work the author conceptualizes the notion of “ethnic myth”, as well as asserts the characteristics of its multilayerdness and universality as form of collective consciousness. In the context of the conducted research, the notion of “ethnic myth” becomes an instrument which allows the more detailed examination of separate segments of the ethnic pattern of the Circassians, as well as its wholeness. In other words, ethnic myth is illustrated as one of the forms of consciousness, including the modern representative of an ethnic group. To analyze the transformation processes of ethnic consciousness, the author applies methodology of G. Durand, who claims that the  world for a  man is can only be in “imaginary” form – a myth, collective and unconscious, which emerges as a primary process and consists form the imaginary, imaginer, and imagination along with the imagination process itself. The correlation of the two specific imaginary modes – day and night, expresses the peculiarities of different culture. Based on this fact the author analyzes the historical change of the boundary between the day and night segments of ethnic myth of the Circassians, which comprises the scientific novelty of this work. Based on the example of evolution of the mythical-epical understanding of ethnic values, the author makes the conclusion of the priority of the day world perception of the ancient Circassians, while the artistic heritage of antiquity already demonstrated the beans of the night mythological consciousness. The author also follows the changes in traditions and rituals, as well as brings examples of the modern forms of ethnic interactions which reflect the specificity of the day and night levels of mythological consciousness among the representatives of the ethnos.

Ключевые слова: night images, epic, Diurne/Nocturne mode, imaginary, picture of the world, ethnic myth, Circassians, ritual practices, post-Soviet sociocultural space, ethnic identity

Библиография:
Khokon S.E., Siyukhova A.M. Adygskiy etnokostyum v sotsiokul'turnoy situatsii sovremennogo polietnichnogo regiona // Chelovek i kul'tura. 2014. 5. C. 1-31. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14593. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14593.html
Seredkina N.N. Teoreticheskaya model' pozitivnoy etnicheskoy identichnosti i mekhanizmy ee formirovaniya // Sotsiodinamika. 2016. 2. C. 37-46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.2.17690. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17690.html
Napso M.D. Riski globalizatsii dlya natsional'noy traditsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. 2. C. 129 134. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.2.17374.
Khil'ko N.F. Lokalizatsiya mekhanizmov natsional'no-kul'turnoy identifikatsii v narodnykh tradtsiyakh rossiyan // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014. 3. C. 300 306. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.3.12024.
Khrenov N.A. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostey // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2013. 5. C. 544-555. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
Siyukhova A.M. Gorodskie mify i simvolicheskie prostranstva periferiynogo polikul'turnogo goroda (na primere Maykopa) // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2011. № 6. S. 51-58.
Sokolova A.N. Obrazovatel'naya sistema v izuchenii traditsionnykh kul'tur polietnicheskogo goroda (na materiale sots. issledovaniya) / A.N. Sokolova, H.A. Neflyasheva, A.M. Siyukhova // Obrazovanie goroda na puti k XXI veku. Maykop, 2000. S. 183-189.
Siyukhova A.M. Sovremennaya adygskaya pesnya v postsovetskom sotsiokul'turnom prostranstve // Kul'turnaya zhizn' Yuga Rossii. 2015. № 3 (58). S. 36-41.
Siyukhova A.M. Nochnye snovideniya kak istochnik etnicheskoy sistemy simvolov (na primere kul'tury adygov) // Observatoriya kul'tury. 2012. № 6. S. 72-81.
Mafedzev S. Kh. Adygi. Obychai, traditsii (Adyge khabze). Nal'chik: El'-fa, 2000. 359 s.
Siyukhova A.M. Drevniy adygskiy obryad u posteli bol'nogo «chapshch» kak sotsiokul'turnyy institut // Observatoriya kul'tury. 2012. № 1. S. 77-81.
Siyukhova A.M. Metafizika sakral'nogo i obydennogo v traditsionnom prostranstve adygskoy kunatskoy (khacheshch) // Vestnik Maykopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2009. № 2. S. 18-21.
Deti solntsa / [sost. A. P. Khabakhu]. Maykop: Adygeya, 2005. 45 s.
Khanakhu R.A., Tsvetkov O.M. Nekotorye tipologicheskie kharakteristiki traditsionnoy kul'tury adygov (k probleme mental'nosti) // Filosofiya i sotsiologiya. Vyp. 4. Maykop: ARIGI, 1996. S. 44-60.
Narty. Kabardinskiy epos. M., 1957. 526 s.
Dmitriev V.A. Prostranstvenno-vremennoe povedenie v traditsionnoy kul'ture narodov Severnogo Kavkaza. Avtoref. …doktora istoricheskikh nauk. SPb., 2010. 42 s.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. – 303 s. URL :http://modernlib.ru/books/losev_aleksey/dialektika_mifa/read/ (data obrashcheniya: 25.06.2016).
Dugin A.G. Logos i mifos: Sotsiologiya glubin. Kurs lektsiy. Rostov-na-Donu, 2009. URL: http://www.imaginaire.ru.k0.gfns.net/content/dugin-logos-i-mifos-sociologiya-glubin (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2012).
Durand G. Les structures anthropologiques de l'Imaginaire. Bordas, Paris, 1983 (1ère édition : Bordas, Paris, 1969). 501 p.
Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Invest-PPP, 1996. 240 s.
Bromley Yu.V. Ocherki teorii etnosa. Izd. 2-e, dop. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 436 s.
Osokin Yu.V. Sovremennaya kul'turologiya v entsiklopedicheskikh stat'yakh. M.: KomKniga, 2007. – 384 s
Mifologicheskiy slovar' / pod. red. E. M. Meletinskogo. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1991. 634 s.
Maydanov A.S. Sootnesenie mifologicheskikh i nauchnykh obrazov real'nosti kak metod ikh vzaimnoy interpretatsii // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2016. № 5. S.55-86. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2016.5.18971. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_18971.html (data obrashcheniya: 25.06.2016).

References (transliteration):
Khokon S.E., Siyukhova A.M. Adygskiy etnokostyum v sotsiokul'turnoy situatsii sovremennogo polietnichnogo regiona // Chelovek i kul'tura. 2014. 5. C. 1-31. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14593. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14593.html
Seredkina N.N. Teoreticheskaya model' pozitivnoy etnicheskoy identichnosti i mekhanizmy ee formirovaniya // Sotsiodinamika. 2016. 2. C. 37-46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.2.17690. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17690.html
Napso M.D. Riski globalizatsii dlya natsional'noy traditsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. 2. C. 129 134. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.2.17374.
Khil'ko N.F. Lokalizatsiya mekhanizmov natsional'no-kul'turnoy identifikatsii v narodnykh tradtsiyakh rossiyan // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014. 3. C. 300 306. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.3.12024.
Khrenov N.A. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostey // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2013. 5. C. 544-555. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
Siyukhova A.M. Gorodskie mify i simvolicheskie prostranstva periferiynogo polikul'turnogo goroda (na primere Maykopa) // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2011. № 6. S. 51-58.
Sokolova A.N. Obrazovatel'naya sistema v izuchenii traditsionnykh kul'tur polietnicheskogo goroda (na materiale sots. issledovaniya) / A.N. Sokolova, H.A. Neflyasheva, A.M. Siyukhova // Obrazovanie goroda na puti k XXI veku. Maykop, 2000. S. 183-189.
Siyukhova A.M. Sovremennaya adygskaya pesnya v postsovetskom sotsiokul'turnom prostranstve // Kul'turnaya zhizn' Yuga Rossii. 2015. № 3 (58). S. 36-41.
Siyukhova A.M. Nochnye snovideniya kak istochnik etnicheskoy sistemy simvolov (na primere kul'tury adygov) // Observatoriya kul'tury. 2012. № 6. S. 72-81.
Mafedzev S. Kh. Adygi. Obychai, traditsii (Adyge khabze). Nal'chik: El'-fa, 2000. 359 s.
Siyukhova A.M. Drevniy adygskiy obryad u posteli bol'nogo «chapshch» kak sotsiokul'turnyy institut // Observatoriya kul'tury. 2012. № 1. S. 77-81.
Siyukhova A.M. Metafizika sakral'nogo i obydennogo v traditsionnom prostranstve adygskoy kunatskoy (khacheshch) // Vestnik Maykopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2009. № 2. S. 18-21.
Deti solntsa / [sost. A. P. Khabakhu]. Maykop: Adygeya, 2005. 45 s.
Khanakhu R.A., Tsvetkov O.M. Nekotorye tipologicheskie kharakteristiki traditsionnoy kul'tury adygov (k probleme mental'nosti) // Filosofiya i sotsiologiya. Vyp. 4. Maykop: ARIGI, 1996. S. 44-60.
Narty. Kabardinskiy epos. M., 1957. 526 s.
Dmitriev V.A. Prostranstvenno-vremennoe povedenie v traditsionnoy kul'ture narodov Severnogo Kavkaza. Avtoref. …doktora istoricheskikh nauk. SPb., 2010. 42 s.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. – 303 s. URL :http://modernlib.ru/books/losev_aleksey/dialektika_mifa/read/ (data obrashcheniya: 25.06.2016).
Dugin A.G. Logos i mifos: Sotsiologiya glubin. Kurs lektsiy. Rostov-na-Donu, 2009. URL: http://www.imaginaire.ru.k0.gfns.net/content/dugin-logos-i-mifos-sociologiya-glubin (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2012).
Durand G. Les structures anthropologiques de l'Imaginaire. Bordas, Paris, 1983 (1ère édition : Bordas, Paris, 1969). 501 p.
Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Invest-PPP, 1996. 240 s.
Bromley Yu.V. Ocherki teorii etnosa. Izd. 2-e, dop. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 436 s.
Osokin Yu.V. Sovremennaya kul'turologiya v entsiklopedicheskikh stat'yakh. M.: KomKniga, 2007. – 384 s
Mifologicheskiy slovar' / pod. red. E. M. Meletinskogo. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1991. 634 s.
Maydanov A.S. Sootnesenie mifologicheskikh i nauchnykh obrazov real'nosti kak metod ikh vzaimnoy interpretatsii // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2016. № 5. S.55-86. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2016.5.18971. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_18971.html (data obrashcheniya: 25.06.2016).

Аннотация:  This article examines the image of Dažbog a meaningful Slavic deity of the pagan era. Many researches, fully or partially dedicated to him, do not eliminate all contradictions, which result from the universally accepted interpretations according to the primary sources (first and foremost “Primary Chronicle”, “The Tale of Igor's Campaign”, and also the Southern Slavic folklore). Another questionable fact is the attribution of the solar nature to Dažbog: if he was considered a god of sun, then why in Ancient Rus was worshiped another solar god Hors? The author suggests a new outlook upon this issue, which is mostly based on the comparative approach – comparison with the other Indo-European mythologies (Germanic, Indian, Greek, Baltic, etc.) Basing on the alternative reading of the primary sources, the author reviews the etymology of Dažbog. As a result, it results in a completely different idea about Dažbog, who was never presented in science, although several of his prerequisites were earlier proposed by the number of accomplished scholars regarding the area of etymology of his name, and from functional perspective.  The author attempts to answer the question – could or could not Dažbog become a development of Dyeu, the Indo-European God of the Shining Sky?

Ключевые слова: comparative mythology, God of Shining Sky, Dyeu Ph2ter, Dažbog , Slavic paganism, Slavic mythology, Slavic pantheon, solar gods, Hors, Svarog

Библиография:
Famintsyn A.S. Bozhestva drevnikh slavyan. SPb.: Aleteyya, 1995. 368 s.
Upanishady / Per. s sanskr. A.Ya. Syrkina. M.: Vostochnaya lit-ra, 2003. 784 s.
Toporov V.N. Ob iranskom elemente v russkoy dukhovnoy kul'ture // Svyatost' i svyatye v russkoy dukhovnoy kul'ture. M.: Gnozis, 1995. T.1. 875 s.
Titmar Merzeburgskiy. Khronika / Per. s lat. I.V. D'yakonova. M.: Russkaya Panorama, 2009. 256 s.
Tvorogov O.V. Khronika Ioanna Malaly // Slovar' knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi. L.: Nauka, 1987. Vyp. 1. S. 471–474. 496 s.
Tvorogov O.V. Materialy k istorii russkikh khronografov. 2. Sofiyskiy khronograf i «Khronika Ioanna Malaly» // TODRL. L.: Nauka, 1983. T. 37. S. 188–192. 424 s.
Tvorogov O.V. «Vlesova kniga» // TODRL. SPb.: Nauka, 1990. T. 43. S. 170–254. 446 s.
Starshaya Edda / Per. s dr.-isl. A.I. Korsuna. SPb.: Azbuka, 2001. 464 s.
Tatsit. Germaniya // Tatsit. Annaly. Malye proizvedeniya. Istoriya / Per. s lat. A.S. Bobovicha. M.: AST, 2003. 992 s.
Sokolova L.V. Dazh'bog // Entsiklopediya «Slova o polku Igoreve»: V 5 t. / Otv. red. O.V. Tvorogov. SPb.: Dmitriy Bulanin, 1995. T. 2. 334 s.
Snorri Sturluson. Mladshaya Edda / Per. s dr.-isl. O.A. Smirnitskoy. L.: Nauka, 1970. 140 s.
Slovar' russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 36. SPb.: Nauka, 2002. 348 s.
Slovo o polku Igoreve / Per. s dr.-rus. O.V. Tvorogova // Voinskie povesti Drevney Rusi. L.: Lenizdat, 1985. S. 27–44. 496 s.
Sedov V.V. Proiskhozhdenie i rannyaya istoriya slavyan. M.: Nauka, 1979. 160 s.
Rybakov B.A. Yazychestvo drevnikh slavyan. M.: Nauka, 1981. 608 s.
San'tii Vedy Peruna // Slavyano-Ariyskie Vedy. Omsk: Arkor, 2001. (T. 1) S. 13–73 (kommentarii: S. 121–134). 256 s.
Prokopiy Kesariyskiy. Voyna s gotami. M.: AN SSSR, 1950. 520 s.
Rigveda. V 3-kh t. / Per. s sanskr. T.Ya. Elizarenkova. M.: Nauka, 1989. T. 1. 768 s.
Rybakov B.A. Yazychestvo drevney Rusi. M.: Nauka, 1988. 784 s.
Pis'mennye pamyatniki istorii Drevney Rusi. Annotirovannyy katalog-spravochnik. SPb.: BLITs, 2003. 384 s.
Povest' vremennykh let / Per. s dr.-rus. O.V. Tvorogova // Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi. SPb.: Nauka, 2000. T.1. S. 62–315. 544 s.
Odisseya / Per. s grech. V.V. Veresaeva. M.: GIKhL, 1953. 320 s.
Petrukhin V.Ya., Raevskiy D.S. Ocherki istorii narodov Rossii v drevnosti i rannem srednevekov'e. M.: Znak, 2004. 416 s.
Obnorskiy S.P. Prilagatel'noe khoroshiy i ego proizvodnye v russkom yazyke // Yazyk i literatura. L.: RANION, 1929. T. 3. S. 240–258. 336 s.
Niderle L. Slavyanskie drevnosti. M.: Novyy akropol', 2010. 752 s.
Martynov V.V. Sakral'nyy mir «Slova o polku Igoreve» // Slavyanskiy i balkanskiy fol'klor: Istochniki i metody. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 61–78. 272 s.
Lovmyanskiy G. Religiya slavyan i ee upadok. SPb.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2003. 512 s.
Mansikka V.Y. Religiya vostochnykh slavyan. M.: IMLI RAN, 2005. 368 s.
Kutarev O.V. Kharakteristika Roda i Rozhanits v slavyanskoy mifologii: interpretatsii B. A. Rybakova i ego predshestvennikov // Religiovedenie. 2013. № 4. S. 170–177. 204 s.
Kutarev O.V. Neoyazychestvo Evropy // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M., 2014. № 12. S. 1806–1809. 120 s.
Kuznetsova V.S. Dualisticheskie legendy o sotvorenii mira v vostochnoslavyanskoy fol'klornoy traditsii. Novosibirsk: NITs OIGGM SO RAN, 1998. 250 s.
Kleyn L.S. Voskreshenie Peruna. K rekonstruktsii vostochnoslavyanskogo yazychestva. SPb.: Evraziya, 2004. 480 s.
Kalygin V.P. Etimologicheskiy slovar' kel'tskikh teonimov. M.: Nauka, 2006. 184 s.
Induizm. Dzhaynizm. Sikkhizm: Slovar' / Pod red. Al'bedil' M.F. i Dubyanskogo A.M. M.: Respublika, 1996. 576 s.
Indoevropeyskiy prayazyk. Etimologicheskiy sayt Igorya Garshina. E/r.: http://www.proto-indo-european.ru Ispol'zovalis' materialy praindoevropeyskikh etimologicheskikh slovarey S.A. Starostina, K. Uotkinsa, Yu. Pokornogo. (Data obrashcheniya 15.11.2015).
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. K rekonstruktsii Mokoshi kak zhenskogo personazha v slavyanskoy versii osnovnogo mifa // Balto-slavyanskie issledovaniya. 1982. M.: Indrik, 1983. S. 175–187. 288 s.
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. Issledovaniya v oblasti slavyanskikh drevnostey. M.: Nauka, 1974. 342 s.
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. Dazh'bog // Slavyanskaya mifologiya. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: Ellis Lak, 1995. S. 153–154. 416 s.
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. Baltiyskaya mifologiya // Mify narodov mira: Entsiklopediya. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1980. T. 1. S. 153–158. 654 s.
Zubov N.I. Nauchnye fantomy slavyanskogo Olimpa // Zhivaya starina. M.: GRTsRF, 1995. № 3 (7). S. 46–48. 68 s.
Zolotarev A.M. Rodovoy stroy i pervobytnaya mifologiya. M.: Nauka, 1964. 328 s.
D'yakonov I.M. Arkhaicheskie mify Vostoka i Zapada. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. 252 s.
Zaykovskiy E. Kamni na sakral'nykh pamyatnikakh Belarusi // Tainstvennaya Belarus': materialy konferentsii (g. Minsk, 25 yanv. 2015 g.) Minsk: Registr, 2015. 108 s.
Dybo V.A. Baltiyskaya sravnitel'no-istoricheskaya i litovskaya istoricheskaya aktsentologii // Aspekty komparativistiki 1. M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 2005. S. 177–211. 500 s.
Geyshtor A. Mifologiya slavyan. M.: Ves' mir, 2014. 408 s.
Gel'mol'd iz Bosau. Slavyanskaya khronika / Per. s lat. L.V. Razumovskoy // Slavyanskie khroniki. M.: Russkaya Panorama, 2011. 584 s.
Gamkrelidze T.V., Ivanov Vyach.Vs. Indoevropeyskiy yazyk i indoevropeytsy. V 2-kh t. Tbilisi: Izd-vo Tbilisskogo un-ta, 1984. T. 2. 890 s.
Gal'kovskiy N.M. Bor'ba khristianstva s ostatkami yazychestva v Drevney Rusi. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2013. 576 s.
Velesova kniga / Per. i komm. V. i Yu. Gnatyuk. M.: Amrita-Rus', 2006. 268 s.
Vey M. K etimologii drevnerusskogo «Stribog» // Voprosy yazykoznaniya M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958. №3. S. 96–99. 154 s.
Vasil'ev M.A. Yazychestvo vostochnykh slavyan nakanune kreshcheniya Rusi: Religiozno-mifologicheskoe vzaimodeystvie s iranskim mirom. Yazycheskaya reforma knyazya Vladimira. M.: Indrik, 1998. 328 s.
Bitva pri Mag Tuired / Per. s irl. S. V. Shkunaeva // Pokhishchenie byka iz Kual'nge. M.: Nauka, 1985. S. 351–380. 504 s.
Beskov A.A. Analiz mifologicheskoy sostavlyayushchey vostochnoslavyanskogo yazychestva: diss. … kand. filos. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2008. 172 s.
Anichkov E.V. Yazychestvo i Drevnyaya Rus'. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2009. 544 s.
Averintsev S.S. Ot beregov Bosfora do beregov Evfrata. M.: Miros, 1994. 352 s.
Adam Bremenskiy. Deyaniya arkhiepiskopov Gamburgskoy tserkvi / Per. s lat. I.V. D'yakonova // Slavyanskie khroniki. M.: Russkaya Panorama, 2011. 584 s.
Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Progress, 1986. Toma I–IV.
Tsezar'. Zapiski o gall'skoy voyne / Per. s lat. M.M. Pokrovskogo. M., L.: AN SSSR, 1948. 570 s.
Chernysheva M.I. O sootnoshenii slavyanskogo perevoda «Khroniki» Ioanna Malaly i ee grecheskogo teksta // TODRL. L.: Nauka, 1983. T. 37. S. 222–228. 424 s.
Shirokova N.S. Mify kel'tskikh narodov. M.: AST, 2004. 432 s.
Shustorovich E.M. Khronika Ioanna Malaly i antichnaya traditsiya v drevnerusskoy literature // TODRL. L.: Nauka, 1968. T. 23. S. 222–228. 343 s.
Yakobson R.O. Rol' lingvisticheskikh pokazaniy v sravnitel'noy mifologii // VII Mezhdunarodnyy kongress antropologicheskikh i etnograficheskikh nauk. Moskva (3–10 avgusta 1964 g.): Trudy. T.V. M.: Nauka, 1970. S. 608–619.
Brückner A. Mitologja słowiańska. Krakow: NAU, 1918. 152 s.
Saxo Grammaticus. Danorum Regum Heroumque Historia. Books X–XVI. / Transl. from Latin to English by E. Christiansen. Oxford: B.A.R., 1981. Vol. II. 347 s.
Veda Slovena. B'lgarski narodni pesni // Izd. S.I. Verkovich'. Beograd': Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1874. Kn. 1. 548 s.
Veda Slovenakh'. Obryadni pesni ot' yazichesko vrѣmya // Izd. S.I. Verkovich'. SPb.: Tipografiya M.A. Khana, 1881. Kn. 2. 584 s.
Dabog // Vila: list za zabavu, kњizhevnost i nauku. / Poslao Zh. Radoњiћ. Izd. S. Novakoviћ. Beograd: Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1866. Godina druga. S. 642. 836 s.
Iz pricha o stvoreњyu sveta // Vila: list za zabavu, kњizhevnost i nauku. / Poslao Zh. Radoњiћ. Izd. S. Novakoviћ. Beograd: Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1867. Godina treћa. S. 655–656. 836 s.
Lyaўkoў E.A. Maўklіvyya svedkі mіnuўshchyny. Minsk, 1992. 216 s.
Pesme i obichai ukupnog naroda srbskog // Skupio i izdao M.S. Miloјeviћ. Beograd: Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1869. Kњ. I: Obredne pesme. S. 1–6. 248 s.
Chajkanoviћ V. O vrkhovnom Bogu u staroj srpskoj religiji // Chajkanoviћ V. Mit i religija u srba. Beograd: Kultura, 1973. S. 307–526.
Chausidis N. Dazhbog vo khronikata na Malala i negovite relatsii so drugi srednovekovni i folklorni izvori // Studia Mythologica Slavica 3. Ljubljana: ZRC SAZU, 2000. S. 23–42. 248 s

References (transliteration):
Famintsyn A.S. Bozhestva drevnikh slavyan. SPb.: Aleteyya, 1995. 368 s.
Upanishady / Per. s sanskr. A.Ya. Syrkina. M.: Vostochnaya lit-ra, 2003. 784 s.
Toporov V.N. Ob iranskom elemente v russkoy dukhovnoy kul'ture // Svyatost' i svyatye v russkoy dukhovnoy kul'ture. M.: Gnozis, 1995. T.1. 875 s.
Titmar Merzeburgskiy. Khronika / Per. s lat. I.V. D'yakonova. M.: Russkaya Panorama, 2009. 256 s.
Tvorogov O.V. Khronika Ioanna Malaly // Slovar' knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi. L.: Nauka, 1987. Vyp. 1. S. 471–474. 496 s.
Tvorogov O.V. Materialy k istorii russkikh khronografov. 2. Sofiyskiy khronograf i «Khronika Ioanna Malaly» // TODRL. L.: Nauka, 1983. T. 37. S. 188–192. 424 s.
Tvorogov O.V. «Vlesova kniga» // TODRL. SPb.: Nauka, 1990. T. 43. S. 170–254. 446 s.
Starshaya Edda / Per. s dr.-isl. A.I. Korsuna. SPb.: Azbuka, 2001. 464 s.
Tatsit. Germaniya // Tatsit. Annaly. Malye proizvedeniya. Istoriya / Per. s lat. A.S. Bobovicha. M.: AST, 2003. 992 s.
Sokolova L.V. Dazh'bog // Entsiklopediya «Slova o polku Igoreve»: V 5 t. / Otv. red. O.V. Tvorogov. SPb.: Dmitriy Bulanin, 1995. T. 2. 334 s.
Snorri Sturluson. Mladshaya Edda / Per. s dr.-isl. O.A. Smirnitskoy. L.: Nauka, 1970. 140 s.
Slovar' russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 36. SPb.: Nauka, 2002. 348 s.
Slovo o polku Igoreve / Per. s dr.-rus. O.V. Tvorogova // Voinskie povesti Drevney Rusi. L.: Lenizdat, 1985. S. 27–44. 496 s.
Sedov V.V. Proiskhozhdenie i rannyaya istoriya slavyan. M.: Nauka, 1979. 160 s.
Rybakov B.A. Yazychestvo drevnikh slavyan. M.: Nauka, 1981. 608 s.
San'tii Vedy Peruna // Slavyano-Ariyskie Vedy. Omsk: Arkor, 2001. (T. 1) S. 13–73 (kommentarii: S. 121–134). 256 s.
Prokopiy Kesariyskiy. Voyna s gotami. M.: AN SSSR, 1950. 520 s.
Rigveda. V 3-kh t. / Per. s sanskr. T.Ya. Elizarenkova. M.: Nauka, 1989. T. 1. 768 s.
Rybakov B.A. Yazychestvo drevney Rusi. M.: Nauka, 1988. 784 s.
Pis'mennye pamyatniki istorii Drevney Rusi. Annotirovannyy katalog-spravochnik. SPb.: BLITs, 2003. 384 s.
Povest' vremennykh let / Per. s dr.-rus. O.V. Tvorogova // Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi. SPb.: Nauka, 2000. T.1. S. 62–315. 544 s.
Odisseya / Per. s grech. V.V. Veresaeva. M.: GIKhL, 1953. 320 s.
Petrukhin V.Ya., Raevskiy D.S. Ocherki istorii narodov Rossii v drevnosti i rannem srednevekov'e. M.: Znak, 2004. 416 s.
Obnorskiy S.P. Prilagatel'noe khoroshiy i ego proizvodnye v russkom yazyke // Yazyk i literatura. L.: RANION, 1929. T. 3. S. 240–258. 336 s.
Niderle L. Slavyanskie drevnosti. M.: Novyy akropol', 2010. 752 s.
Martynov V.V. Sakral'nyy mir «Slova o polku Igoreve» // Slavyanskiy i balkanskiy fol'klor: Istochniki i metody. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 61–78. 272 s.
Lovmyanskiy G. Religiya slavyan i ee upadok. SPb.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2003. 512 s.
Mansikka V.Y. Religiya vostochnykh slavyan. M.: IMLI RAN, 2005. 368 s.
Kutarev O.V. Kharakteristika Roda i Rozhanits v slavyanskoy mifologii: interpretatsii B. A. Rybakova i ego predshestvennikov // Religiovedenie. 2013. № 4. S. 170–177. 204 s.
Kutarev O.V. Neoyazychestvo Evropy // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M., 2014. № 12. S. 1806–1809. 120 s.
Kuznetsova V.S. Dualisticheskie legendy o sotvorenii mira v vostochnoslavyanskoy fol'klornoy traditsii. Novosibirsk: NITs OIGGM SO RAN, 1998. 250 s.
Kleyn L.S. Voskreshenie Peruna. K rekonstruktsii vostochnoslavyanskogo yazychestva. SPb.: Evraziya, 2004. 480 s.
Kalygin V.P. Etimologicheskiy slovar' kel'tskikh teonimov. M.: Nauka, 2006. 184 s.
Induizm. Dzhaynizm. Sikkhizm: Slovar' / Pod red. Al'bedil' M.F. i Dubyanskogo A.M. M.: Respublika, 1996. 576 s.
Indoevropeyskiy prayazyk. Etimologicheskiy sayt Igorya Garshina. E/r.: http://www.proto-indo-european.ru Ispol'zovalis' materialy praindoevropeyskikh etimologicheskikh slovarey S.A. Starostina, K. Uotkinsa, Yu. Pokornogo. (Data obrashcheniya 15.11.2015).
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. K rekonstruktsii Mokoshi kak zhenskogo personazha v slavyanskoy versii osnovnogo mifa // Balto-slavyanskie issledovaniya. 1982. M.: Indrik, 1983. S. 175–187. 288 s.
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. Issledovaniya v oblasti slavyanskikh drevnostey. M.: Nauka, 1974. 342 s.
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. Dazh'bog // Slavyanskaya mifologiya. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: Ellis Lak, 1995. S. 153–154. 416 s.
Ivanov Vyach.Vs., Toporov V.N. Baltiyskaya mifologiya // Mify narodov mira: Entsiklopediya. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1980. T. 1. S. 153–158. 654 s.
Zubov N.I. Nauchnye fantomy slavyanskogo Olimpa // Zhivaya starina. M.: GRTsRF, 1995. № 3 (7). S. 46–48. 68 s.
Zolotarev A.M. Rodovoy stroy i pervobytnaya mifologiya. M.: Nauka, 1964. 328 s.
D'yakonov I.M. Arkhaicheskie mify Vostoka i Zapada. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. 252 s.
Zaykovskiy E. Kamni na sakral'nykh pamyatnikakh Belarusi // Tainstvennaya Belarus': materialy konferentsii (g. Minsk, 25 yanv. 2015 g.) Minsk: Registr, 2015. 108 s.
Dybo V.A. Baltiyskaya sravnitel'no-istoricheskaya i litovskaya istoricheskaya aktsentologii // Aspekty komparativistiki 1. M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 2005. S. 177–211. 500 s.
Geyshtor A. Mifologiya slavyan. M.: Ves' mir, 2014. 408 s.
Gel'mol'd iz Bosau. Slavyanskaya khronika / Per. s lat. L.V. Razumovskoy // Slavyanskie khroniki. M.: Russkaya Panorama, 2011. 584 s.
Gamkrelidze T.V., Ivanov Vyach.Vs. Indoevropeyskiy yazyk i indoevropeytsy. V 2-kh t. Tbilisi: Izd-vo Tbilisskogo un-ta, 1984. T. 2. 890 s.
Gal'kovskiy N.M. Bor'ba khristianstva s ostatkami yazychestva v Drevney Rusi. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2013. 576 s.
Velesova kniga / Per. i komm. V. i Yu. Gnatyuk. M.: Amrita-Rus', 2006. 268 s.
Vey M. K etimologii drevnerusskogo «Stribog» // Voprosy yazykoznaniya M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958. №3. S. 96–99. 154 s.
Vasil'ev M.A. Yazychestvo vostochnykh slavyan nakanune kreshcheniya Rusi: Religiozno-mifologicheskoe vzaimodeystvie s iranskim mirom. Yazycheskaya reforma knyazya Vladimira. M.: Indrik, 1998. 328 s.
Bitva pri Mag Tuired / Per. s irl. S. V. Shkunaeva // Pokhishchenie byka iz Kual'nge. M.: Nauka, 1985. S. 351–380. 504 s.
Beskov A.A. Analiz mifologicheskoy sostavlyayushchey vostochnoslavyanskogo yazychestva: diss. … kand. filos. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2008. 172 s.
Anichkov E.V. Yazychestvo i Drevnyaya Rus'. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2009. 544 s.
Averintsev S.S. Ot beregov Bosfora do beregov Evfrata. M.: Miros, 1994. 352 s.
Adam Bremenskiy. Deyaniya arkhiepiskopov Gamburgskoy tserkvi / Per. s lat. I.V. D'yakonova // Slavyanskie khroniki. M.: Russkaya Panorama, 2011. 584 s.
Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Progress, 1986. Toma I–IV.
Tsezar'. Zapiski o gall'skoy voyne / Per. s lat. M.M. Pokrovskogo. M., L.: AN SSSR, 1948. 570 s.
Chernysheva M.I. O sootnoshenii slavyanskogo perevoda «Khroniki» Ioanna Malaly i ee grecheskogo teksta // TODRL. L.: Nauka, 1983. T. 37. S. 222–228. 424 s.
Shirokova N.S. Mify kel'tskikh narodov. M.: AST, 2004. 432 s.
Shustorovich E.M. Khronika Ioanna Malaly i antichnaya traditsiya v drevnerusskoy literature // TODRL. L.: Nauka, 1968. T. 23. S. 222–228. 343 s.
Yakobson R.O. Rol' lingvisticheskikh pokazaniy v sravnitel'noy mifologii // VII Mezhdunarodnyy kongress antropologicheskikh i etnograficheskikh nauk. Moskva (3–10 avgusta 1964 g.): Trudy. T.V. M.: Nauka, 1970. S. 608–619.
Brückner A. Mitologja słowiańska. Krakow: NAU, 1918. 152 s.
Saxo Grammaticus. Danorum Regum Heroumque Historia. Books X–XVI. / Transl. from Latin to English by E. Christiansen. Oxford: B.A.R., 1981. Vol. II. 347 s.
Veda Slovena. B'lgarski narodni pesni // Izd. S.I. Verkovich'. Beograd': Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1874. Kn. 1. 548 s.
Veda Slovenakh'. Obryadni pesni ot' yazichesko vrѣmya // Izd. S.I. Verkovich'. SPb.: Tipografiya M.A. Khana, 1881. Kn. 2. 584 s.
Dabog // Vila: list za zabavu, kњizhevnost i nauku. / Poslao Zh. Radoњiћ. Izd. S. Novakoviћ. Beograd: Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1866. Godina druga. S. 642. 836 s.
Iz pricha o stvoreњyu sveta // Vila: list za zabavu, kњizhevnost i nauku. / Poslao Zh. Radoњiћ. Izd. S. Novakoviћ. Beograd: Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1867. Godina treћa. S. 655–656. 836 s.
Lyaўkoў E.A. Maўklіvyya svedkі mіnuўshchyny. Minsk, 1992. 216 s.
Pesme i obichai ukupnog naroda srbskog // Skupio i izdao M.S. Miloјeviћ. Beograd: Drzhavna shtamparnya, 1869. Kњ. I: Obredne pesme. S. 1–6. 248 s.
Chajkanoviћ V. O vrkhovnom Bogu u staroj srpskoj religiji // Chajkanoviћ V. Mit i religija u srba. Beograd: Kultura, 1973. S. 307–526.
Chausidis N. Dazhbog vo khronikata na Malala i negovite relatsii so drugi srednovekovni i folklorni izvori // Studia Mythologica Slavica 3. Ljubljana: ZRC SAZU, 2000. S. 23–42. 248 s

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the phenomenon of social mythology under the conditions of modern globalization and cultural modernization processes. The main interest of the researcher is focused on the peculiarities of the mythological consciousness structure that restore archaic formations of modern social practices as their value orientations. Vlasova analyzes constitutive elements of mythological world perception and what had enrooted those elements in human activity since ancient times till our days. The researcher describes particular social and historical situations that created the 'fertile ground' for reproducing social mythology in rational creativity of a modern subject. The methodological basis of the research involves comparative analysis of the myth making process in the present and the past, social-psychological description of mythtellers from the point of view of their existence in particular socio-cultural circumstances. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author views the problem of mythological orientation both in yesterday's and today's practices, analyzes pluses and minuses of the role of myth at all times and explain that duality. Conclusions: social mythology is irremovable from the culture creation process because a subject must have emotions, moods and imagination. Being the source of ethnomental archetypes, mythology preserves unique features of individual cultures opposing to unifying tendencies of the modernization process. Modern alienation of the global culture results in distorted functions of mythology while eliminating its causes. 

Ключевые слова: social mythology, overall cultural globalization, modernized consciousness, mythological world perception, functions of myth, peculiarities of myth making, ideological manipulation, mythologization of reality, modern mythologems, prospects of myth making

Библиография:
Spirova E.M. V kolovorote obshchestvennykh illyuziy (k 30-letney godovshchine vykhoda v svet monografii P.S. Gurevicha «Sotsial'naya mifologiya») // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 2(74). S. 261-270.
Gurevich P.S. Sotsial'naya mifologiya. M.: Mysl', 1983. 175 s.
Likhachev D.S. Chto est' istina? // Ocherki po filosofii khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. SPb.: Russko-baltiyskiy informatsionnyy tsentr BLITs, 1996.
Tokarev S.A., Meletinskiy E.M. Mifologiya // Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. M.: Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1994. T. I.
Lifshits M. Antichnyy mir, mifologiya, esteticheskoe vospitanie // Lifshits M. Sobr. soch. v 3 t. M.: Izobrazitel'noe iskusstvo, 1988. T. III.
Il'enkov E.V. Ideal. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M.: Gosudarstvennoe nauchnoe izd-vo «Sovetskaya entsiklopediya», 1962. T. 2.
Levada Yu.A. Sotsial'naya priroda religii. M.: Nauka, 1965. 261 s.
Vlasova V.B. Sovremennoe rossiyskoe obrazovanie v aspekte znaniya, ponimaniya, umeniya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2010. № 4. S. 53-58.
Vlasova V.B. Traditsiya v mire dukhovnykh tsennostey. M., 1983. (Institut filosofii AN SSSR. Rukopis', deponirovannaya v INION).
Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 61-344

References (transliteration):
Spirova E.M. V kolovorote obshchestvennykh illyuziy (k 30-letney godovshchine vykhoda v svet monografii P.S. Gurevicha «Sotsial'naya mifologiya») // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 2(74). S. 261-270.
Gurevich P.S. Sotsial'naya mifologiya. M.: Mysl', 1983. 175 s.
Likhachev D.S. Chto est' istina? // Ocherki po filosofii khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. SPb.: Russko-baltiyskiy informatsionnyy tsentr BLITs, 1996.
Tokarev S.A., Meletinskiy E.M. Mifologiya // Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. M.: Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1994. T. I.
Lifshits M. Antichnyy mir, mifologiya, esteticheskoe vospitanie // Lifshits M. Sobr. soch. v 3 t. M.: Izobrazitel'noe iskusstvo, 1988. T. III.
Il'enkov E.V. Ideal. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M.: Gosudarstvennoe nauchnoe izd-vo «Sovetskaya entsiklopediya», 1962. T. 2.
Levada Yu.A. Sotsial'naya priroda religii. M.: Nauka, 1965. 261 s.
Vlasova V.B. Sovremennoe rossiyskoe obrazovanie v aspekte znaniya, ponimaniya, umeniya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2010. № 4. S. 53-58.
Vlasova V.B. Traditsiya v mire dukhovnykh tsennostey. M., 1983. (Institut filosofii AN SSSR. Rukopis', deponirovannaya v INION).
Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 61-344

Аннотация: The present article is based on the philosophical-cultural approach and is a part of the research program aimed at explication of the substantial antagonism of the archaic myth as an ‘early mirror of the world’ and modern advertisement which is almost naturally thought to be the phenomenon with mythological features. The topic of vital forces, their preservation and accumulation is one of the central ones in both classical mythology and advertising discourse which allows to view specifics of the prehistorical and contemporary market vitalism as a topical area to be studied in detail. The present research is based on the comparative method that involves the comparison of the prehistorical concept of vital forces modeled by using the ethnographic cross-cultural analysis with the most typical features of advertising vitalism. The author of the article shows that archaic views and practices represent human as a key element of the universal circulation of vital forces and a subject possessing, allocating and consuming vital forces. On the contrary, the advertising concept of vital forces turn an advertising hero into a plain buyer of a ‘packaged’ simulative dose. Extreme forms of such reductive approach makes the subjective existence to be an exclusive attribute of a marketable substance while a consumer deprived of his own vital potential represents a personification of a subjective nothing.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, culture, mythology, ceremony, advertising, vital forces, vitality, substance, subjectivity, reduction.

Библиография:
Aksenov V.P. Ozhog: Roman. M.: Izograf, 1999. 496 s.
Bart R. Mifologii. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1996. 312 s.
Berdzhes E. Zavodnoy apel'sin: Romany. L.: Khudozh. lit., 1993. 672 s.
Bulgakov M.A. Rannyaya proza: Rasskazy, povesti. M.: Sovremennik, 1990. 479 s.
Dovlatov S.D. Rasskazy iz chemodana: Rasskazy, povesti. SPb.: Azbuka, 2012. 448 s.
D'yakonova V.P. Pogrebal'nyy obryad tuvintsev kak istoriko-etnograficheskiy istochnik. L.: Nauka, 1975. 164 s.
Kosikov G.K. Sharl' Bodler mezhdu «vostorgom zhizni» i «uzhasom zhizni» // Sartr Zh.-P. Bodler. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. S. 139-174.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1999. 608 s.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: Nauka, 1983. 536 s.
Maydanov A.N. Intellekt i obraz myshleniya drevnikh ariev. Chast' I. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 4 (28). S. 26-39.
Malyarchuk N.N. Valeologiya: Uchebnoe posobie. Tyumen': Izd-vo TyumGU, 2008. 355 s.
Meletinskiy E.M. Poetika mifa. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000. 408 s.
Plakhin V.T., Korosteleva O.T. «Prostota est' ponyatie otritsatel'noe…» (mif i reklama kak tsennostno-normativnye antagonisty) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 4 (52). S. 72-77.
Popov A.A. Dusha i smert' po vozzreniyam nganasanov // Priroda i chelovek v religioznykh predstavleniyakh narodov Sibiri i Severa. L.: Nauka, 1976. S. 31-43.
Raskin I.Z. Bol'shaya entsiklopediya khuliganstvuyushchego ortodoksa. M.: Knizhnyy Klub 36.6, 2012. 656 s.
Taylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M.: Izd-vo polit. lit-ry, 1989. 573 s.
Terner V. Simvol i ritual. M.: Nauka, 1983. 277 s.
Uelsh I. Ekstazi. Tri istorii o lyubvi i khimii. SPb.: Red Fish Pablishing, 2001. 117 s.
Fitsdzheral'd F.S. Velikiy Getsbi; Noch' nezhna: Romany; Rasskazy. Frunze: Adabiyat, 1989. 672 s.
Freydenberg O.M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 1998. 800 s.
Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv'. M.: AST, 1998. 784 s.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. SPb.: Nauka, 2002. 452 s.
Eliade M. Aziatskaya alkhimiya. M.: Ladomir, 1998. 604 s.
Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000. 414 s.

References (transliteration):
Aksenov V.P. Ozhog: Roman. M.: Izograf, 1999. 496 s.
Bart R. Mifologii. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1996. 312 s.
Berdzhes E. Zavodnoy apel'sin: Romany. L.: Khudozh. lit., 1993. 672 s.
Bulgakov M.A. Rannyaya proza: Rasskazy, povesti. M.: Sovremennik, 1990. 479 s.
Dovlatov S.D. Rasskazy iz chemodana: Rasskazy, povesti. SPb.: Azbuka, 2012. 448 s.
D'yakonova V.P. Pogrebal'nyy obryad tuvintsev kak istoriko-etnograficheskiy istochnik. L.: Nauka, 1975. 164 s.
Kosikov G.K. Sharl' Bodler mezhdu «vostorgom zhizni» i «uzhasom zhizni» // Sartr Zh.-P. Bodler. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. S. 139-174.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1999. 608 s.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: Nauka, 1983. 536 s.
Maydanov A.N. Intellekt i obraz myshleniya drevnikh ariev. Chast' I. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 4 (28). S. 26-39.
Malyarchuk N.N. Valeologiya: Uchebnoe posobie. Tyumen': Izd-vo TyumGU, 2008. 355 s.
Meletinskiy E.M. Poetika mifa. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000. 408 s.
Plakhin V.T., Korosteleva O.T. «Prostota est' ponyatie otritsatel'noe…» (mif i reklama kak tsennostno-normativnye antagonisty) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 4 (52). S. 72-77.
Popov A.A. Dusha i smert' po vozzreniyam nganasanov // Priroda i chelovek v religioznykh predstavleniyakh narodov Sibiri i Severa. L.: Nauka, 1976. S. 31-43.
Raskin I.Z. Bol'shaya entsiklopediya khuliganstvuyushchego ortodoksa. M.: Knizhnyy Klub 36.6, 2012. 656 s.
Taylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M.: Izd-vo polit. lit-ry, 1989. 573 s.
Terner V. Simvol i ritual. M.: Nauka, 1983. 277 s.
Uelsh I. Ekstazi. Tri istorii o lyubvi i khimii. SPb.: Red Fish Pablishing, 2001. 117 s.
Fitsdzheral'd F.S. Velikiy Getsbi; Noch' nezhna: Romany; Rasskazy. Frunze: Adabiyat, 1989. 672 s.
Freydenberg O.M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 1998. 800 s.
Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv'. M.: AST, 1998. 784 s.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. SPb.: Nauka, 2002. 452 s.
Eliade M. Aziatskaya alkhimiya. M.: Ladomir, 1998. 604 s.
Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000. 414 s.

Аннотация: Moral statements always have a universal or generalized meaning this way or another. They are universal at least because these statements are based on standard generalizations in accordance with values that are typical for particular cultural environment. The level of universality of thinking including moral thinking develops historically and increases as the abilities for generalization and abstracting grow. The starting point in abstracting is the understanding of particular situations and communications, decision making process and evaluations. Based on the conceptual reconstruction of particular episodes from Homer’s poems the author of the article analyzes different forms of generalization made on the basis of a concrete situation. Such generalization is usually performed by the means of the following: 1) sayings that participants of particular situations address to one another; 2) advise given by other people regarding the situation; 3) participants comparing their goals and desires with the opinions of ‘imaginary others’ including ‘generalized’ and ‘sacral’ figures; 4) speech of a poet who expresses his opinion ‘above the situation’ and ‘above personalities’; 5) comparison of decisions made in particular situations with universal values; 6) expression of general sentences made on the basis of opinions that arise in a particular situation.

Ключевые слова: morals, universality, universalism, moral genealogy, universalization of valuable statements, ways of universalization, mutuality, communication, Homer, epos.

Контактная информация: Apresyan Ruben Grantovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 420.

Библиография:
Apresyan R.G. Nravoperemena Akhilla: K istokam morali arkhaicheskogo obshchestva (na materiale gomerovskogo eposa). M.: Al'fa-M, 2013.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava / Red. D.A. Kerimov, V.S. Nersesyants. M.: Mysl', 1990.
Gomer. Iliada / Per. N.I. Gnedicha. Izd. podgotovil A.I. Zaytsev. L.: Nauka, 1990.
Gomer. Iliada. Odisseya. / Per. V.V. Veresaeva. Sost., avtor vstupit. stat'i i komment. A.A. Takho-Godi. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1987.
Zaytsev A.I. Svoboda voli i bozhestvennoe rukovodstvo v gomerovskom epose // Vestnik drevney istorii. 1987. № 3.
Yeger V. Paydeyya. T. 1: Vospitanie antichnogo greka. M.: Greko-latinskiy kabinet, 2001.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Kant I. Soch.: V 6 t. T. 5 / Red. V.F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1966.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti // Kant I. Soch. v 6 t. T. 4 (1) / Red. V.F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1965.
Publiy Ovidiy Nazon. Metamorfozy // Publiy Ovidiy Nazon. Lyubovnye elegii. Metamorfozy. Skorbnye elegii / Per. s lat. S.V. Shervinskogo. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1983.
Yarkho V.N. Problema otvetstvennosti i vnutrenniy mir gomerovskogo cheloveka // Vestnik drevney istorii. 1963. № 2.
Cairns D., Homblower S. Honor // The Homer Encyclopedia: 3 Vol. / Ed. M. Finkelberg. Vol. 1. Chichester; Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Gill C. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Hare R. Universalizability [1955] // Hare R. Essays on the Moral Concept. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.
Harris W.V. Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Macintyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3d ed. Notre Dame, In.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
Whitman C.H. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 1958.
Wilson D.F. Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Zanker G. The Heart of Achilles: Characterization and Personal Ethics in the Iliad. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.

References (transliteration):
Apresyan R.G. Nravoperemena Akhilla: K istokam morali arkhaicheskogo obshchestva (na materiale gomerovskogo eposa). M.: Al'fa-M, 2013.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava / Red. D.A. Kerimov, V.S. Nersesyants. M.: Mysl', 1990.
Gomer. Iliada / Per. N.I. Gnedicha. Izd. podgotovil A.I. Zaytsev. L.: Nauka, 1990.
Gomer. Iliada. Odisseya. / Per. V.V. Veresaeva. Sost., avtor vstupit. stat'i i komment. A.A. Takho-Godi. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1987.
Zaytsev A.I. Svoboda voli i bozhestvennoe rukovodstvo v gomerovskom epose // Vestnik drevney istorii. 1987. № 3.
Yeger V. Paydeyya. T. 1: Vospitanie antichnogo greka. M.: Greko-latinskiy kabinet, 2001.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Kant I. Soch.: V 6 t. T. 5 / Red. V.F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1966.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti // Kant I. Soch. v 6 t. T. 4 (1) / Red. V.F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1965.
Publiy Ovidiy Nazon. Metamorfozy // Publiy Ovidiy Nazon. Lyubovnye elegii. Metamorfozy. Skorbnye elegii / Per. s lat. S.V. Shervinskogo. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1983.
Yarkho V.N. Problema otvetstvennosti i vnutrenniy mir gomerovskogo cheloveka // Vestnik drevney istorii. 1963. № 2.
Cairns D., Homblower S. Honor // The Homer Encyclopedia: 3 Vol. / Ed. M. Finkelberg. Vol. 1. Chichester; Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Gill C. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Hare R. Universalizability [1955] // Hare R. Essays on the Moral Concept. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.
Harris W.V. Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Macintyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3d ed. Notre Dame, In.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
Whitman C.H. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 1958.
Wilson D.F. Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Zanker G. The Heart of Achilles: Characterization and Personal Ethics in the Iliad. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.

Аннотация: The author of the article tries to answer the question if we can talk about the logic of mythological thinking and if we can, then what the logic of mythological thinking is all about? The author proves that we can’t apply the term ‘logic’ as it was understood by Aristotle here. The author also describes how the views on the logic of mythological thinking have been developing with time and defines the most promising points of view for his study. He describes the consciousness of archaic people and finds out that special features of their consciousness were conditioned by particular forms and rules of thinking. In his study the author uses the evolutionary approach, comparison methods, generalization method and the method of new typification. The author establishes that the archaic thinking was based on certain principles and specific paradigms. As a consequence, mythological thinking is a special type of thinking activity operating a great number of unique methods and techniques. Under the influence of these factors, the process of myth creation has appeared to be a rather determined, theological, efficient and psychologically and esthetically efficient.

Ключевые слова: myth, consciousness, image, concept, reality, determinants, opposition, schemes, paradigms, correlation. ETHICS

Контактная информация: Maydanov Anatoly Stepanovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 509.

Библиография:
Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV, V-VIII, IX-X / Per. T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M., 1989, 1995, 1999.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, religiya i nauka. M., 1998.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1983.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. M., 2001.
Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M., 1994.
Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: chelovek golyy. M., 2007.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M., 1994.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form: Vvedenie i postanovka problemy // Kul'turologiya. XX vek. M., 1995.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Opyt o cheloveke. M., 1998.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos. M.-SPb., 2000.
Avesta v russkikh perevodakh. SPb., 1998.
Taylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M., 1989.
Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv': issledovanie magii i religii. M., 1980.
Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M., 1987.
Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol. M., 1991

References (transliteration):
Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV, V-VIII, IX-X / Per. T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M., 1989, 1995, 1999.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, religiya i nauka. M., 1998.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1983.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. M., 2001.
Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M., 1994.
Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: chelovek golyy. M., 2007.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M., 1994.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form: Vvedenie i postanovka problemy // Kul'turologiya. XX vek. M., 1995.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Opyt o cheloveke. M., 1998.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos. M.-SPb., 2000.
Avesta v russkikh perevodakh. SPb., 1998.
Taylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M., 1989.
Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv': issledovanie magii i religii. M., 1980.
Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M., 1987.
Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol. M., 1991

Аннотация: The author of the article tries to answer the question if we can talk about the logic of mythological thinking and if we can, then what the logic of mythological thinking is all about? The author proves that we can’t apply the term ‘logic’ as it was understood by Aristotle here. The author also describes how the views on the logic of mythological thinking have been developing with time and defines the most promising points of view for his study. He describes the consciousness of archaic people and finds out that special features of their consciousness were conditioned by particular forms and rules of thinking. In his study the author uses the evolutionary approach, comparison methods, generalization method and the method of new typification. The author establishes that the archaic thinking was based on certain principles and specific paradigms. As a consequence, mythological thinking is a special type of thinking activity operating a great number of unique methods and techniques. Under the influence of these factors, the process of myth creation has appeared to be a rather determined, theological, efficient and psychologically and esthetically efficient.

Ключевые слова: myth, consciousness, image, concept, reality, determinants, opposition, schemes, paradigms, correlation.

Контактная информация: Maydanov Anatoly Stepanovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 509.

Библиография:
Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV, V-VIII, IX-X. Per T.Ya Elizarenkovoy. M. 1989, 1995, 1999.
Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa. M. 2001.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, religiya i nauka. M. 1998.
Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: chelovek golyy. M.2007.
Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M. 1994.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M. 1983.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M. 1994.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos. M.-SPb.: 2000.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form: Vvedenie i postanovka problemy // Kul'turologiya. XX vek. M. 1995.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Opyt o cheloveke. M. 1998.
Avesta v russkikh perevodakh. SPb. 1998.
Taylor E. B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M. 1989.
Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv': issledovanie magii i religii. M. 1980.
Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M. 1987.
Yung K. G. Arkhetip i simvol. M. 1991.

References (transliteration):
Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV, V-VIII, IX-X. Per T.Ya Elizarenkovoy. M. 1989, 1995, 1999.
Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa. M. 2001.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, religiya i nauka. M. 1998.
Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: chelovek golyy. M.2007.
Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M. 1994.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M. 1983.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M. 1994.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos. M.-SPb.: 2000.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form: Vvedenie i postanovka problemy // Kul'turologiya. XX vek. M. 1995.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Opyt o cheloveke. M. 1998.
Avesta v russkikh perevodakh. SPb. 1998.
Taylor E. B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M. 1989.
Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv': issledovanie magii i religii. M. 1980.
Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M. 1987.
Yung K. G. Arkhetip i simvol. M. 1991.

Аннотация: The author of the article suggests to discuss a wide circle of issues related to public ideological processes. The reason for discussion is the book ‘Social Mythology’ written by Pavel Gurevich and published about 30 years ago. The author of the present article notes that Gurevich’ book was in all appearances the first research of the phenomenon of social mythology in Russian philosophy. Back in those times Gurevich could not analyze myths of the communist ideology and therefore he could not provide a critical overview of the concept of scientific ideology. However, a reader with a sharp mind could understand that the phenomenon of social mythology was quite universal. In his later work Pavel Gurevich often touched upon the same matter again and extended the concept of public ideological processes. It can be clearly seen in the materials selected for conducting ‘Round Tables’ under the guidance of Pavel Gurevich and printed in the Analyst Bulletin Journal. In her research the author of the article uses the method of historical analysis which allows to describe different stages of formation of social mythology and understand special features of each period. The novelty of the present research is the creation of a common and clearly established understanding of the role of social mythology in this day and age. The author also touches upon particular polemic issue that could be developed further.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, politics, ideology, ‘false consciousness’, ‘ideological criticism’, re-ideologization, social mythology, idea, public spirit, social practice.

Контактная информация: Spirova Elvira Maratovna, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 432.

Библиография:
R.N. Parkhomenko Liberalizm v rossii: obzor nauchnoy literatury // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-№4.-C. 31-38. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=22698.
Popov E.A. Ponyatie gosudarstva kak tsennostno-smyslovoy sistemy v filosofii prava i filosofii gosudarstvennosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-№2.-C. 193-217. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_454.html.
Ellyul' Zh. Politicheskaya illyuziya / Otv. red. V.I. Danilenko. M., 2003
A.A. Borisenkov Osobennosti politicheskogo soznaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-№1.-C. 79-87. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.01.7. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=22842.
Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M., 2012.
Bocharnikov I.V. O gosudarstvennoy ideologii Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-№1.-C. 22-27. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.01.3. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=22968.
Kozolupenko D.P. Mifopoeticheskoe mirovospriyatie. M., 2009.
Sotsial'naya demagogiya. Kruglyy stol // Vestnik analitiki. 2013. № 4 (54). S. 87-105.
Nuzhna li nam ideologiya? Kruglyy stol // Vestnik analitiki. 2014. № 1 (55). (v pechati).
Mif i khudozhestvennoe soznanie XX veka / Otv. red. N.A. Khrenov. M., 2011.
Gurevich P.S. Sotsial'naya mifologiya. M., 1983.
Gurevich P.S. Priklyucheniya imidzha. M., 1991.
Gurevich P.S. Burzhuaznaya propaganda v poiskakh teoreticheskogo obosnovaniya. M., 1978.
Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M., 1991.
Gurevich P.S. Burzhuaznaya ideologiya i massovoe soznanie. M., 1980.
Kodan S.V., Vladimirova G.E. Politiko-ideologicheskie i organizatsionno-pravovye predposylki sozdaniya Osnovnykh gosudarstvennykh zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii (XVIII – pervaya chetvert' XIX vv.) // NB: Istoricheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-№4.-C. 134-171. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_745.html.

References (transliteration):
R.N. Parkhomenko Liberalizm v rossii: obzor nauchnoy literatury // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-№4.-C. 31-38. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=22698.
Popov E.A. Ponyatie gosudarstva kak tsennostno-smyslovoy sistemy v filosofii prava i filosofii gosudarstvennosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-№2.-C. 193-217. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_454.html.
Ellyul' Zh. Politicheskaya illyuziya / Otv. red. V.I. Danilenko. M., 2003
A.A. Borisenkov Osobennosti politicheskogo soznaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-№1.-C. 79-87. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.01.7. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=22842.
Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M., 2012.
Bocharnikov I.V. O gosudarstvennoy ideologii Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-№1.-C. 22-27. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.01.3. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=22968.
Kozolupenko D.P. Mifopoeticheskoe mirovospriyatie. M., 2009.
Sotsial'naya demagogiya. Kruglyy stol // Vestnik analitiki. 2013. № 4 (54). S. 87-105.
Nuzhna li nam ideologiya? Kruglyy stol // Vestnik analitiki. 2014. № 1 (55). (v pechati).
Mif i khudozhestvennoe soznanie XX veka / Otv. red. N.A. Khrenov. M., 2011.
Gurevich P.S. Sotsial'naya mifologiya. M., 1983.
Gurevich P.S. Priklyucheniya imidzha. M., 1991.
Gurevich P.S. Burzhuaznaya propaganda v poiskakh teoreticheskogo obosnovaniya. M., 1978.
Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M., 1991.
Gurevich P.S. Burzhuaznaya ideologiya i massovoe soznanie. M., 1980.
Kodan S.V., Vladimirova G.E. Politiko-ideologicheskie i organizatsionno-pravovye predposylki sozdaniya Osnovnykh gosudarstvennykh zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii (XVIII – pervaya chetvert' XIX vv.) // NB: Istoricheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-№4.-C. 134-171. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_745.html.

Аннотация: Indian Vedas show that their authors had a quite established concept of the cause and the driver of any natural phenomena, in other words, its actor and subject. Actors of cosmological processes and phenomena were Gods who had a number of cosmic functions allowing dynamics and unity of the world. The author of the article describes such heaven bodies and associated gods as Sun, Earth, Moon and some stars and planets from this point of view. The author describes the genealogy of such gods and their relations as world actors. The diversity of features of heaven bodies made the Vedas authors to invent diversified deification. The author of the article suggests a certain logic scheme for analyzing gods’ images. This scheme includes a number of different hypostases of gods: description of their appearance and spiritual image, cosmic and social functions and real referents. Analyzing the main gods from this point of view, the author concluded that mythological images were synthetic mental constructs consisting of components of different epistemological value. Myth-makers also shared their views on certain important universal characteristics of the reality such as the law of universal circulation, both natural and social space, time and movement within the Universe. In his article the author shares his logic of understanding the reality that is typical for the initial stage of any cognitive process including scientific one.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Universe, Sun, gods, time, movement, thinking, imagination, real, fictious.

Контактная информация: Maydanov Anatoly Stepanovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5 komn. 509.

Библиография:
1. Atkharvaveda. T. 1-3 / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2005-2010.
2. Badzh E.U. Legendy o egipetskikh bogakh. M.: Refl-buk, 1997.
3. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Slovar' k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV. M.: Nauka, 1999.
4. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Kommentarii k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly V-VIII. M.: Nauka, 1999.
5. Zubko G.V. Mif: vzglyad na mirozdanie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008.
6. Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. M.: OGI, 2003.
7. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po vediyskoy mifologii. M.: Nauka, 1986.
8. Kosarev A. Filosofiya mifa. M.: PER SE; SPb: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000.
9. Kosmicheskie legendy Vostoka / Avtor-sostavitel' S.V. Stul'ginskis. M.: Sfera, 1997.
10. Krapp E.K. Astronomiya: legendy i predaniya o solntse, lune, zvezdakh i planetakh. M.: Fair-press, 1999.
11. Kempbell Dzh. Mificheskiy obraz. M.: AST, 2004.
12. Luna, upavshaya s neba. Drevnyaya literatura Maloy Azii. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1977.
13. Myuller M. Egipetskaya mifologiya. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2007.
14. Neveleva S.L. Mifologiya drevneindiyskogo eposa. M.: Nauka; Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy lite-
ratury, 1975.
15. Norman Braun U. Indiyskaya mifologiya // Mifologii drevnego mira. M.: Nauka, 1977.
16. Platon. Soch. v 3-kh t. T. 3, ch. 2. M.: Mysl', 1972.
17. Platon. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1994.
18. Radkhakrishnan S. Indiyskaya filosofiya. M.: Mif, 1993.
19. Rigveda: Mandaly I-IV, V-VII, IX-X / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Nauka. 1999.
20. Tilak B.G. Arkticheskaya rodina v vedakh. M.: Fair-press, 2002.
21. Toporov V.N. Adzha Ekapad, Vivasvat, Soma, Sur'ya, Pushan // Mify narodov mira. T. 1-2. M.: Bol'shaya
Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1998.
22. Toporov V.N. Indoevropeyskie sootvetstviya odnomu baltiyskomu mifologicheskomu imeni // Bal-
to-slavyanskie issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1974.
23. Upanishady / Per. s sanskr. A.Ya. Syrkina. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000.
24. Khuk S. Mifologiya Blizhnego Vostoka. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2005.
25. Khenkok G. Sledy bogov: v poiskakh istokov drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. M.: Veche, 1997.
26. Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M.: Progress, 1987.
27. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000.
28. Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000.
29. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. T. 25, izdateli: F.A. Bokkgauz, I.A. Efron. SPb., 1898.
30. Erman V.G. Ocherk istorii vediyskoy literatury. M.: Nauka, 1980.
31. Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol. M.: Renessans, 1991.
32. Bhattacharji S. The Indian teogony. Cambr. 1970.
33. Dandekar R.N. Pusan the pastoral God of the Veda // New Indian Antiquary. 1942. V.5.
34. Kramrisch S. Pusan // Jornal of American Oriental Society. 1961. V. 81. № 2.
35. Lommel H. Der Mythus von Vivasvat und Saranyu // Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen
Gesellschaft. Bd. 99. 1945-1949.
36. Macdonell A.A. Vedic mithology. Strasburg. 1897.
37. Witzel M. Autochthonous Aryans? The evidence from old indian and Iranian texts // Electronic journal of
vedic studies. V. 7. 2001, issue 3.

References (transliteration):
1. Atkharvaveda. T. 1-3 / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2005-2010.
2. Badzh E.U. Legendy o egipetskikh bogakh. M.: Refl-buk, 1997.
3. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Slovar' k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV. M.: Nauka, 1999.
4. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Kommentarii k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly V-VIII. M.: Nauka, 1999.
5. Zubko G.V. Mif: vzglyad na mirozdanie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008.
6. Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. M.: OGI, 2003.
7. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po vediyskoy mifologii. M.: Nauka, 1986.
8. Kosarev A. Filosofiya mifa. M.: PER SE; SPb: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000.
9. Kosmicheskie legendy Vostoka / Avtor-sostavitel' S.V. Stul'ginskis. M.: Sfera, 1997.
10. Krapp E.K. Astronomiya: legendy i predaniya o solntse, lune, zvezdakh i planetakh. M.: Fair-press, 1999.
11. Kempbell Dzh. Mificheskiy obraz. M.: AST, 2004.
12. Luna, upavshaya s neba. Drevnyaya literatura Maloy Azii. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1977.
13. Myuller M. Egipetskaya mifologiya. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2007.
14. Neveleva S.L. Mifologiya drevneindiyskogo eposa. M.: Nauka; Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy lite-
ratury, 1975.
15. Norman Braun U. Indiyskaya mifologiya // Mifologii drevnego mira. M.: Nauka, 1977.
16. Platon. Soch. v 3-kh t. T. 3, ch. 2. M.: Mysl', 1972.
17. Platon. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1994.
18. Radkhakrishnan S. Indiyskaya filosofiya. M.: Mif, 1993.
19. Rigveda: Mandaly I-IV, V-VII, IX-X / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Nauka. 1999.
20. Tilak B.G. Arkticheskaya rodina v vedakh. M.: Fair-press, 2002.
21. Toporov V.N. Adzha Ekapad, Vivasvat, Soma, Sur'ya, Pushan // Mify narodov mira. T. 1-2. M.: Bol'shaya
Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1998.
22. Toporov V.N. Indoevropeyskie sootvetstviya odnomu baltiyskomu mifologicheskomu imeni // Bal-
to-slavyanskie issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1974.
23. Upanishady / Per. s sanskr. A.Ya. Syrkina. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000.
24. Khuk S. Mifologiya Blizhnego Vostoka. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2005.
25. Khenkok G. Sledy bogov: v poiskakh istokov drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. M.: Veche, 1997.
26. Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M.: Progress, 1987.
27. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000.
28. Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000.
29. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. T. 25, izdateli: F.A. Bokkgauz, I.A. Efron. SPb., 1898.
30. Erman V.G. Ocherk istorii vediyskoy literatury. M.: Nauka, 1980.
31. Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol. M.: Renessans, 1991.
32. Bhattacharji S. The Indian teogony. Cambr. 1970.
33. Dandekar R.N. Pusan the pastoral God of the Veda // New Indian Antiquary. 1942. V.5.
34. Kramrisch S. Pusan // Jornal of American Oriental Society. 1961. V. 81. № 2.
35. Lommel H. Der Mythus von Vivasvat und Saranyu // Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen
Gesellschaft. Bd. 99. 1945-1949.
36. Macdonell A.A. Vedic mithology. Strasburg. 1897.
37. Witzel M. Autochthonous Aryans? The evidence from old indian and Iranian texts // Electronic journal of
vedic studies. V. 7. 2001, issue 3.

Аннотация: Indian Vedas show that their authors had a quite established concept of the cause and the driver of any natural phenomena, in other words, its actor and subject. Actors of cosmological processes and phenomena were Gods who had a number of cosmic functions allowing dynamics and unity of the world. The author of the article describes such heaven bodies and associated gods as Sun, Earth, Moon and some stars and planets from this point of view. The author describes the genealogy of such gods and their relations as world actors. The diversity of features of heaven bodies made the Vedas authors to invent diversified deification. The author of the article suggests a certain logic scheme for analyzing gods’ images. This scheme includes a number of different hypostases of gods: description of their appearance and spiritual image, cosmic and social functions and real referents. Analyzing the main gods from this point of view, the author concluded that mythological images were synthetic mental constructs consisting of components of different epistemological value. Myth-makers also shared their views on certain important universal characteristics of the reality such as the law of universal circulation, both natural and social space, time and movement within the Universe. In his article the author shares his logic of understanding the reality that is typical for the initial stage of any cognitive process including scientific one.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Universe, Sun, gods, time, movement, thinking, imagination, real, fictious.

Библиография:
1. Atkharvaveda. T. 1-3 / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2005-2010.
2. Badzh E.U. Legendy o egipetskikh bogakh. M.: Refl-buk, 1997.
3. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Slovar' k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV. M.: Nauka, 1999.
4. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Kommentarii k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly V-VIII. M.: Nauka, 1999.
5. Zubko G.V. Mif: vzglyad na mirozdanie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008.
6. Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. M.: OGI, 2003.
7. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po vediyskoy mifologii. M.: Nauka, 1986.
8. Kosarev A. Filosofiya mifa. M.: PER SE; SPb: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000.
9. Kosmicheskie legendy Vostoka / Avtor-sostavitel' S.V. Stul'ginskis. M.: Sfera, 1997.
10. Krapp E.K. Astronomiya: legendy i predaniya o solntse, lune, zvezdakh i planetakh. M.: Fair-press, 1999.
11. Kempbell Dzh. Mificheskiy obraz. M.: AST, 2004.
12. Luna, upavshaya s neba. Drevnyaya literatura Maloy Azii. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1977.
13. Myuller M. Egipetskaya mifologiya. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2007.
14. Neveleva S.L. Mifologiya drevneindiyskogo eposa. M.: Nauka; Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy lite-
ratury, 1975.
15. Norman Braun U. Indiyskaya mifologiya // Mifologii drevnego mira. M.: Nauka, 1977.
16. Platon. Soch. v 3-kh t. T. 3, ch. 2. M.: Mysl', 1972.
17. Platon. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1994.
18. Radkhakrishnan S. Indiyskaya filosofiya. M.: Mif, 1993.
19. Rigveda: Mandaly I-IV, V-VII, IX-X / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Nauka. 1999.
20. Tilak B.G. Arkticheskaya rodina v vedakh. M.: Fair-press, 2002.
21. Toporov V.N. Adzha Ekapad, Vivasvat, Soma, Sur'ya, Pushan // Mify narodov mira. T. 1-2. M.: Bol'shaya
Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1998.
22. Toporov V.N. Indoevropeyskie sootvetstviya odnomu baltiyskomu mifologicheskomu imeni // Bal-
to-slavyanskie issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1974.
23. Upanishady / Per. s sanskr. A.Ya. Syrkina. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000.
24. Khuk S. Mifologiya Blizhnego Vostoka. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2005.
25. Khenkok G. Sledy bogov: v poiskakh istokov drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. M.: Veche, 1997.
26. Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M.: Progress, 1987.
27. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000.
28. Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000.
29. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. T. 25, izdateli: F.A. Bokkgauz, I.A. Efron. SPb., 1898.
30. Erman V.G. Ocherk istorii vediyskoy literatury. M.: Nauka, 1980.
31. Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol. M.: Renessans, 1991.
32. Bhattacharji S. The Indian teogony. Cambr. 1970.
33. Dandekar R.N. Pusan the pastoral God of the Veda // New Indian Antiquary. 1942. V.5.
34. Kramrisch S. Pusan // Jornal of American Oriental Society. 1961. V. 81. № 2.
35. Lommel H. Der Mythus von Vivasvat und Saranyu // Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen
Gesellschaft. Bd. 99. 1945-1949.
36. Macdonell A.A. Vedic mithology. Strasburg. 1897.
37. Witzel M. Autochthonous Aryans? The evidence from old indian and Iranian texts // Electronic journal of
vedic studies. V. 7. 2001, issue 3.

References (transliteration):
1. Atkharvaveda. T. 1-3 / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2005-2010.
2. Badzh E.U. Legendy o egipetskikh bogakh. M.: Refl-buk, 1997.
3. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Slovar' k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV. M.: Nauka, 1999.
4. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Kommentarii k Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly V-VIII. M.: Nauka, 1999.
5. Zubko G.V. Mif: vzglyad na mirozdanie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008.
6. Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. M.: OGI, 2003.
7. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po vediyskoy mifologii. M.: Nauka, 1986.
8. Kosarev A. Filosofiya mifa. M.: PER SE; SPb: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000.
9. Kosmicheskie legendy Vostoka / Avtor-sostavitel' S.V. Stul'ginskis. M.: Sfera, 1997.
10. Krapp E.K. Astronomiya: legendy i predaniya o solntse, lune, zvezdakh i planetakh. M.: Fair-press, 1999.
11. Kempbell Dzh. Mificheskiy obraz. M.: AST, 2004.
12. Luna, upavshaya s neba. Drevnyaya literatura Maloy Azii. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1977.
13. Myuller M. Egipetskaya mifologiya. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2007.
14. Neveleva S.L. Mifologiya drevneindiyskogo eposa. M.: Nauka; Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy lite-
ratury, 1975.
15. Norman Braun U. Indiyskaya mifologiya // Mifologii drevnego mira. M.: Nauka, 1977.
16. Platon. Soch. v 3-kh t. T. 3, ch. 2. M.: Mysl', 1972.
17. Platon. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1994.
18. Radkhakrishnan S. Indiyskaya filosofiya. M.: Mif, 1993.
19. Rigveda: Mandaly I-IV, V-VII, IX-X / Perevod T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Nauka. 1999.
20. Tilak B.G. Arkticheskaya rodina v vedakh. M.: Fair-press, 2002.
21. Toporov V.N. Adzha Ekapad, Vivasvat, Soma, Sur'ya, Pushan // Mify narodov mira. T. 1-2. M.: Bol'shaya
Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1998.
22. Toporov V.N. Indoevropeyskie sootvetstviya odnomu baltiyskomu mifologicheskomu imeni // Bal-
to-slavyanskie issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1974.
23. Upanishady / Per. s sanskr. A.Ya. Syrkina. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000.
24. Khuk S. Mifologiya Blizhnego Vostoka. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2005.
25. Khenkok G. Sledy bogov: v poiskakh istokov drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. M.: Veche, 1997.
26. Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M.: Progress, 1987.
27. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000.
28. Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000.
29. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. T. 25, izdateli: F.A. Bokkgauz, I.A. Efron. SPb., 1898.
30. Erman V.G. Ocherk istorii vediyskoy literatury. M.: Nauka, 1980.
31. Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol. M.: Renessans, 1991.
32. Bhattacharji S. The Indian teogony. Cambr. 1970.
33. Dandekar R.N. Pusan the pastoral God of the Veda // New Indian Antiquary. 1942. V.5.
34. Kramrisch S. Pusan // Jornal of American Oriental Society. 1961. V. 81. № 2.
35. Lommel H. Der Mythus von Vivasvat und Saranyu // Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen
Gesellschaft. Bd. 99. 1945-1949.
36. Macdonell A.A. Vedic mithology. Strasburg. 1897.
37. Witzel M. Autochthonous Aryans? The evidence from old indian and Iranian texts // Electronic journal of
vedic studies. V. 7. 2001, issue 3.

Аннотация: The Vedas authors believed in the compound character of the Universe. They saw the Universe as an organization which elements are related to one another in a certain way. To their opinion, the world consisted of the five elements including sky, earth and airspace. Vedas authors admitted that there must be another space on the other side of the sky as well as the under world. The main elements of the Universe, sky and earth were the source of physical and moral strength and a reliable life support. Views on the Universe were based on the ontological idea of the universal genesis. The sky had the structure, too, and it was viewed as an environment for all kinds of life activities. Arian Rishis came to the conclusion that one could encounter objects and phenomena of a completely different kind if going deep into the Universe. In the airspace Gods performed their activities and had contacts with people. The day and night wheel rotated around the earth and allowed the change of night and day. The Arias did not question whether there was a support holding the sky and earth. To their mind, earth had a form of a sphere and was heliocentric, i.e. it had no borders. Their picture of the world was based on the geomorphic paradigm and the dynamism principle. Rishis were also attracted to ontological ideas of development and genetic connection between elements of the Universe. In general, their picture of the world shows the unbalanced archaic type of intellect reflecting different levels of development of its particular potentials. Such type of intellect was typical for other epochs and stages in the history of spiritual development of humankind.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, cosmos, cogitation, world perception, method, space, Gods, paradigm, heliocentricism, inversion.

Библиография:
1. Avesta v russkikh perevodakh (1861-1996). SPb: Zhurnal Neva; RKhGI. 1997.
2. Atkharvaveda: v 3-kh tt. / Per. T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura»
RAN, 2005-2010.
3. Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T.2: Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. M.; SPb: Univer-
sitetskaya kniga, 2001.
4. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po veydiyskoy mifologii. M.: Nauka, 1986.
5. Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya / Per. Vyach. Vs. Ivanova. M.: Eksmo-press, 2001.
6. Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: v 4-kh tt. M., SPb, 2000-2007.
7. Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. M.: Refl-buk, 1998.
8. Mify narodov mira: v 2-kh tt. M.: Bol'shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1998.
9. Rigveda: mandaly I-IV, V-VIII, IX-X / Per. T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Nauka, 1999.
10. Tilak B.G. Arkticheskaya rodina v vedakh / Per. N.O. Gusevoy. M.: Fair-perss, 2002.
11. Temkin E., Erman V. Mify drevney Indii. M.: Atrey, AST, 2009.
12. Frakfort G., Frankfort G.A., Uilson Dzh., Yakobsen T. V preddverii filosofii: dukhovnye iskaniya
drevnego cheloveka. M.: Nauka, 1984.
13. Shri Aurobindo Otkroveniya drevney mudrosti: vedy, upanishady, bkhagavadgita. SPb: Aditi, 2001.
14. Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya: izbrannye raboty. M.: Progress, 1987.
15. Bhattachardji S. The Indian theogony. Cambr. University press, 1970.
16. Lüders H. Varuna. Bd. 1-2. Götingen, 1951-1959.

References (transliteration):
1. Avesta v russkikh perevodakh (1861-1996). SPb: Zhurnal Neva; RKhGI. 1997.
2. Atkharvaveda: v 3-kh tt. / Per. T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura»
RAN, 2005-2010.
3. Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T.2: Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. M.; SPb: Univer-
sitetskaya kniga, 2001.
4. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po veydiyskoy mifologii. M.: Nauka, 1986.
5. Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya / Per. Vyach. Vs. Ivanova. M.: Eksmo-press, 2001.
6. Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: v 4-kh tt. M., SPb, 2000-2007.
7. Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. M.: Refl-buk, 1998.
8. Mify narodov mira: v 2-kh tt. M.: Bol'shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1998.
9. Rigveda: mandaly I-IV, V-VIII, IX-X / Per. T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M.: Nauka, 1999.
10. Tilak B.G. Arkticheskaya rodina v vedakh / Per. N.O. Gusevoy. M.: Fair-perss, 2002.
11. Temkin E., Erman V. Mify drevney Indii. M.: Atrey, AST, 2009.
12. Frakfort G., Frankfort G.A., Uilson Dzh., Yakobsen T. V preddverii filosofii: dukhovnye iskaniya
drevnego cheloveka. M.: Nauka, 1984.
13. Shri Aurobindo Otkroveniya drevney mudrosti: vedy, upanishady, bkhagavadgita. SPb: Aditi, 2001.
14. Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya: izbrannye raboty. M.: Progress, 1987.
15. Bhattachardji S. The Indian theogony. Cambr. University press, 1970.
16. Lüders H. Varuna. Bd. 1-2. Götingen, 1951-1959.

Аннотация: The author describes the two main approaches in myth research: poetic (interpretative) and socio-psychological. As a part of the first approach, the author describes the three concepts originating in the Ancient World and still being used with some alternations nowadays. All of them have the same drawback: they are principally interpretive which is unacceptable when related to a myth. The advantage of the second approach is that there is an attempt to interpret myth not on the basis of research logics but to define relations and objective laws typical for mythological world perception. These laws and relations may seem awkward to a modern European but this approach tries to understand what role it could have played in the primitive society as well as what psychological and social functions the myth had.

Ключевые слова: cultural studies, myth, mythopoetics, specific nature, world perception, research, interpretation, logic, symbol, archetype.

Библиография:
1. Buslaev F.I. Narodnaya poeziya. Istoricheskie ocherki. SPb, 1887.
2. Buslaev F.I. O vliyanii khristianstva na slavyanskiy yazyk. Opyt istorii yazyka po Ostromirovu
Evangeliyu. M., 1848.
3. Vundt V. Mif i religiya. SPb, 1912.
4. Gete I.-V. Izbr. filos. sochineniya. M., 1964.
5. Devidson B. Afrikantsy. Vvedenie v istoriyu kul'tury. M.: Nauka, 1975.
6. Karleyl' T. Startor Resartus // Istoriya estetiki. Pamyatniki mirovoy esteticheskoy mysli. T. 3.
M., 1967. S. 851.
7. Levi-Bryul' L. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M.: Ateist, 1930.
8. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa // Losev A.F. Mif. Chislo. Sushchnost'. M., 1994. S. 5-217.
9. Losev A.F. Mif — razvernutoe magicheskoe imya... // Losev A.F. Mif. Chislo Sushchnost'. M., 1994.
S. 217-233.
10. Malinovskiy B. Mif v primitivnoy psikhologii // Malinovskiy B. Magiya. Nauka. Religiya. M.:
Refl-buk, 1998.
11. Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mif. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.
12. Toporkov A.L. Teoriya mifa v russkoy filologicheskoy nauke XIX veka. M., 1997.
13. Teylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, 1989.
14. Filosofiya kul'tury. Stanovlenie i razvitie. SPb: Lan', 1998.
15. Shchepkin D.M. Ob istochnikakh i formakh russkogo basnosloviya. M., 1859-1861. T. 1.
16. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Invest-Press, 1995.
17. Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Kiev, 1996.

References (transliteration):
1. Buslaev F.I. Narodnaya poeziya. Istoricheskie ocherki. SPb, 1887.
2. Buslaev F.I. O vliyanii khristianstva na slavyanskiy yazyk. Opyt istorii yazyka po Ostromirovu
Evangeliyu. M., 1848.
3. Vundt V. Mif i religiya. SPb, 1912.
4. Gete I.-V. Izbr. filos. sochineniya. M., 1964.
5. Devidson B. Afrikantsy. Vvedenie v istoriyu kul'tury. M.: Nauka, 1975.
6. Karleyl' T. Startor Resartus // Istoriya estetiki. Pamyatniki mirovoy esteticheskoy mysli. T. 3.
M., 1967. S. 851.
7. Levi-Bryul' L. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M.: Ateist, 1930.
8. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa // Losev A.F. Mif. Chislo. Sushchnost'. M., 1994. S. 5-217.
9. Losev A.F. Mif — razvernutoe magicheskoe imya... // Losev A.F. Mif. Chislo Sushchnost'. M., 1994.
S. 217-233.
10. Malinovskiy B. Mif v primitivnoy psikhologii // Malinovskiy B. Magiya. Nauka. Religiya. M.:
Refl-buk, 1998.
11. Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mif. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.
12. Toporkov A.L. Teoriya mifa v russkoy filologicheskoy nauke XIX veka. M., 1997.
13. Teylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, 1989.
14. Filosofiya kul'tury. Stanovlenie i razvitie. SPb: Lan', 1998.
15. Shchepkin D.M. Ob istochnikakh i formakh russkogo basnosloviya. M., 1859-1861. T. 1.
16. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Invest-Press, 1995.
17. Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Kiev, 1996.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to one of the most discussed and contradictory image of the Altai ancient culture — griffon which was a frequently used symbol in all Scythian myths. At the end of his study the author concludes that the image of griffon is not only an attribute of Universal mythologies but it also plays the role of a cultural constant which marks the borderline states and moments of ‘transfer’ both in the social and sacral meaning of it.

Ключевые слова: cultural studies, mythology, cosmogony, semantics, solar, chtnonic, cult, symbol, griffon, Scythians.

Библиография:
1. Abramzon S.M. Kirgizy i ikh etnogeneticheskie i istoriko-kul'turnye svyazi / S.M. Abramzon; avt.
vstup. st. S.T. Tabyshaliev. F.: Kyrgyzstan, 1990.
2. Barkova L.L. Izobrazheniya rogatykh i krylatykh tigrov v iskusstve drevnego Altaya / L.L. Barkova //
ASGE, 1985. Vyp. 26. S. 30-44.
3. Bibliya: Bytie. Gl. 1, 3.
4. Borgoyakov M.I. Ob odnom drevneyshem mifologicheskom syuzhete, ego evolyutsii i otrazhenii v
fol'klore narodov Evrazii / M.I. Borgoyakov // Voprosy drevney istorii Yuzhnoy Sibiri. Abakan:
Khakasskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut yazyka, literatury i istorii, 1984.
5. Bongrad-Levin G.M., Grantovskiy E.A. Ot Skifii do Indii. Drevnie arii: mify i istoriya / G.M.
Bongard-Levin, E.A. Grantovskiy. M.: Mysl', 1983. 208 s.
6. Grantovskiy E.A. Rannyaya istoriya iranskikh plemen Peredney Azii / E.A. Grantovskiy. M., 1970.
7. Grach A.D. Drevnie kochevniki v tsentre Azii / A.D. Grach. M.: Nauka, GRVL, 1980. 256 s.
8. Grifon / Entsiklopediya znakov i simvolov [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://sigils.
ru/symbols/grifon.html
9. Grifon / Entsiklopediya «Simvoly, znaki, emblemy» [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa:
http://slovari.yandex.ru/dict/encsym/article/SYM/sym-0176.htm
10. Doronin D., Umay / D. Doronin [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://www.seu.ru/members/
bereginya/2006/09/23-1.htm
11. Zaporozhchenko A.V., Cheremisin D.V. Arimaspy i grify: izobrazitel'naya traditsiya i indo-
evropeyskie paralleli / A.V. Zaporozhchenko, D.V. Cheremisin // Vestnik drevney istorii,
1997. № 1.
12. Katanov N.F. Khakasskiy fol'klor / N.F. Katanov. — Abakan: Khakasskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1963.
13. Kore Saryg na bulanom kone / sostavitel' i perevodchik P. Troyakov; khud. E. Gorokhovskiy // Khakasskie
narodnye skazki, predaniya i legendy. Novosibirsk: Zapadno-Sibirskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 1974.
14. Kubarev V.D. Kurgany Yustyda / V.D. Kubarev. Novosibirsk, 1991.
15. Kubarev V.D., Cheremisin D.V. Obraz ptitsy v iskusstve rannikh kochevnikov Altaya / V.D. Kubarev,
D.V. Cheremisin // Arkheologiya yuga Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka. Novosibirsk, 1984.
16. Litvinskiy B.A. Drevnie kochevniki Kryshi mira / B.A. Litvinskiy. M.: Nauka, 1972.
17. Marsadolov L.S. Grifon — khranitel' zolota Kapital-boga i ikh antinoosfernaya sushchnost' / L.S. Mar-
sadolov [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0203/001a/02030029.
htm
18. Mit'ko O.A. Obraz grifona v iskusstve narodov Evrazii v drevnetyurkskuyu epokhu // Evraziya:
kul'turnoe nasledie drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. Vyp. 2. Gorizonty Evrazii: Sb. nauch. st. / red. i sost.
O.A. Mit'ko. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGU, 1999.
19. Oynoshev V.P. Sistema mifologicheskikh simvolov v altayskom geroicheskom epose / V.P. Oynoshev.
Gorno-Altaysk: AKIN, 2006.
20. Polos'mak N.V. Pazyrykskaya kul'tura // Drevnie kul'tury Bertekskoy doliny (Gornyy Altay,
ploskogor'e Ukok) / A.P. Derevyanko, V.I. Molodin, D.G. Savinov i dr. Novosibirsk: VO «Nauka».
Sibirskaya izdatel'skaya firma, 1994.
21. Rak I.V. Imennoy i predmetnyy spravochnik-ukazatel' / I.V. Rak // Avesta v russkikh perevodakh
(1861-1996). SPb: Izd-vo: Zhurnal Neva-Letniy sad, 1998.
22. Rudenko S.I. Kul'tura naseleniya Tsentral'nogo Altaya v skifskoe vremya / S.I. Rudenko // Akad.
nauk SSSR, In-t istorii material'noy kul'tury. M.-L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1960.
23. Rudenko S.I. Sibirskaya kollektsiya Petra I / S.I. Rudenko // SAI D3-9. M.-L.: 1962. 52 s.+27 tabl.
24. Slovo «Sobaka» i nazvaniya narodov [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: //http://www.myfam.
ru/article/4nog/mifolo/clovo_cobaka_i_nazvania_narodov.htm=a96e04ddb0eaa86c61d1cd7145d490fe
25. Stepanov Yu.S. Konstanty: slovar' russkoy kul'tury: Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. / Yu.S. Stepanov. M.:
Akademicheskiy proekt, 2001. 990 s.
26. Tishkin A.A., Leonova I.Yu. Osobennosti pogrebal'nykh konstruktsiy Biykenskoy arkheologicheskoy
kul'tury i ikh semantika / A.A. Tishkin, I.Yu. Leonova [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa:
http://new.hist.asu.ru/biblio/borod4/part1-p363-371.pdf
27. Frolov Ya.V., Chekryzhova O.I. Izobrazhenie golovy fantasticheskogo khishchnika iz kurgana 1 mogil'-
nika Mikhaylovskiy VI i ego paralleli v iskusstve narodov Azii / Ya.V.Frolov, O.I. Chekryzhova
[Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://dragons-nest.ru/def/skif_altai.php?PHPSESSID
28. Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe / M. Eliade. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1994.

References (transliteration):
1. Abramzon S.M. Kirgizy i ikh etnogeneticheskie i istoriko-kul'turnye svyazi / S.M. Abramzon; avt.
vstup. st. S.T. Tabyshaliev. F.: Kyrgyzstan, 1990.
2. Barkova L.L. Izobrazheniya rogatykh i krylatykh tigrov v iskusstve drevnego Altaya / L.L. Barkova //
ASGE, 1985. Vyp. 26. S. 30-44.
3. Bibliya: Bytie. Gl. 1, 3.
4. Borgoyakov M.I. Ob odnom drevneyshem mifologicheskom syuzhete, ego evolyutsii i otrazhenii v
fol'klore narodov Evrazii / M.I. Borgoyakov // Voprosy drevney istorii Yuzhnoy Sibiri. Abakan:
Khakasskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut yazyka, literatury i istorii, 1984.
5. Bongrad-Levin G.M., Grantovskiy E.A. Ot Skifii do Indii. Drevnie arii: mify i istoriya / G.M.
Bongard-Levin, E.A. Grantovskiy. M.: Mysl', 1983. 208 s.
6. Grantovskiy E.A. Rannyaya istoriya iranskikh plemen Peredney Azii / E.A. Grantovskiy. M., 1970.
7. Grach A.D. Drevnie kochevniki v tsentre Azii / A.D. Grach. M.: Nauka, GRVL, 1980. 256 s.
8. Grifon / Entsiklopediya znakov i simvolov [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://sigils.
ru/symbols/grifon.html
9. Grifon / Entsiklopediya «Simvoly, znaki, emblemy» [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa:
http://slovari.yandex.ru/dict/encsym/article/SYM/sym-0176.htm
10. Doronin D., Umay / D. Doronin [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://www.seu.ru/members/
bereginya/2006/09/23-1.htm
11. Zaporozhchenko A.V., Cheremisin D.V. Arimaspy i grify: izobrazitel'naya traditsiya i indo-
evropeyskie paralleli / A.V. Zaporozhchenko, D.V. Cheremisin // Vestnik drevney istorii,
1997. № 1.
12. Katanov N.F. Khakasskiy fol'klor / N.F. Katanov. — Abakan: Khakasskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1963.
13. Kore Saryg na bulanom kone / sostavitel' i perevodchik P. Troyakov; khud. E. Gorokhovskiy // Khakasskie
narodnye skazki, predaniya i legendy. Novosibirsk: Zapadno-Sibirskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 1974.
14. Kubarev V.D. Kurgany Yustyda / V.D. Kubarev. Novosibirsk, 1991.
15. Kubarev V.D., Cheremisin D.V. Obraz ptitsy v iskusstve rannikh kochevnikov Altaya / V.D. Kubarev,
D.V. Cheremisin // Arkheologiya yuga Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka. Novosibirsk, 1984.
16. Litvinskiy B.A. Drevnie kochevniki Kryshi mira / B.A. Litvinskiy. M.: Nauka, 1972.
17. Marsadolov L.S. Grifon — khranitel' zolota Kapital-boga i ikh antinoosfernaya sushchnost' / L.S. Mar-
sadolov [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0203/001a/02030029.
htm
18. Mit'ko O.A. Obraz grifona v iskusstve narodov Evrazii v drevnetyurkskuyu epokhu // Evraziya:
kul'turnoe nasledie drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. Vyp. 2. Gorizonty Evrazii: Sb. nauch. st. / red. i sost.
O.A. Mit'ko. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGU, 1999.
19. Oynoshev V.P. Sistema mifologicheskikh simvolov v altayskom geroicheskom epose / V.P. Oynoshev.
Gorno-Altaysk: AKIN, 2006.
20. Polos'mak N.V. Pazyrykskaya kul'tura // Drevnie kul'tury Bertekskoy doliny (Gornyy Altay,
ploskogor'e Ukok) / A.P. Derevyanko, V.I. Molodin, D.G. Savinov i dr. Novosibirsk: VO «Nauka».
Sibirskaya izdatel'skaya firma, 1994.
21. Rak I.V. Imennoy i predmetnyy spravochnik-ukazatel' / I.V. Rak // Avesta v russkikh perevodakh
(1861-1996). SPb: Izd-vo: Zhurnal Neva-Letniy sad, 1998.
22. Rudenko S.I. Kul'tura naseleniya Tsentral'nogo Altaya v skifskoe vremya / S.I. Rudenko // Akad.
nauk SSSR, In-t istorii material'noy kul'tury. M.-L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1960.
23. Rudenko S.I. Sibirskaya kollektsiya Petra I / S.I. Rudenko // SAI D3-9. M.-L.: 1962. 52 s.+27 tabl.
24. Slovo «Sobaka» i nazvaniya narodov [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: //http://www.myfam.
ru/article/4nog/mifolo/clovo_cobaka_i_nazvania_narodov.htm=a96e04ddb0eaa86c61d1cd7145d490fe
25. Stepanov Yu.S. Konstanty: slovar' russkoy kul'tury: Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. / Yu.S. Stepanov. M.:
Akademicheskiy proekt, 2001. 990 s.
26. Tishkin A.A., Leonova I.Yu. Osobennosti pogrebal'nykh konstruktsiy Biykenskoy arkheologicheskoy
kul'tury i ikh semantika / A.A. Tishkin, I.Yu. Leonova [Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa:
http://new.hist.asu.ru/biblio/borod4/part1-p363-371.pdf
27. Frolov Ya.V., Chekryzhova O.I. Izobrazhenie golovy fantasticheskogo khishchnika iz kurgana 1 mogil'-
nika Mikhaylovskiy VI i ego paralleli v iskusstve narodov Azii / Ya.V.Frolov, O.I. Chekryzhova
[Elektronnyy resurs] — Rezhim dostupa: http://dragons-nest.ru/def/skif_altai.php?PHPSESSID
28. Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe / M. Eliade. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1994.

Аннотация: The article describes what Veda’s authors thought about cosmogenesis and analyzes the dynamics of their views. The author of the article shows how the picture of cosmogenesis successively moved from anthropomorphous to biomorphic and physiomorphic models. It is shown that the very first cosmology already formed the main topics of the future cosmology concerning fundamental features of the Universe — the beginning, genesis, structure, sources of dynamics and human as an element of the world. The author studies peculiarities of cosmological way of thinking of archaic people, methods and techniques of that type of thinking and the strategy of the Universe history knowledge that remains even nowadays. All these factors are described from the point of view of their development and role for the modern cosmological thinking. The article suggests new interpretations of a few extremely complicated but very informative images — Universal demiurges who are being analyzed from epistemological point of view.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Universe, cosmogenesis, primary reality, paradigm, model, cosmogonic ideas, method, fiction, polyvariability.

Библиография:
1. Atkharvaveda. T. 1-3. M., 2005-2010.
2. Buber M. Dva obraza very. M., 1999.
3. Vaynberg S. Pervye tri minuty. M., 2011.
4. Gorbunov D.S., Rubakov V.A. Vvedenie v teoriyu ranney Vselennoy: teoriya goryachego Bol'shogo
vzryva. M., 2012.
5. Ezhov V.V. Mify Drevnego Kitaya. M., 2003.
6. Zubko G.V. Mif: vzglyad na mirozdanie. M., 2008.
7. Kazyutinskiy V.V. Obshchie zakonomernosti evolyutsii i problema vnezemnykh tsivilizatsiy // Pro-
blema poiska zhizni vo Vselennoy. M., 1986. S. 54-56.
8. Kalevala / Per. L. Bel'skogo. M., 1977.
9. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po vediyskoy mifologii. M., 1986.
10. Maydanov A.S. Zagadochnye bogi Ashviny // Vostok. 2007. № 5. S. 5-18.
11. Mify narodov mira. T. 2. M., 1998.
12. Myuller M. Egipetskaya mifologiya. M., 2007.
13. Radkhakrishnan S. Indiyskaya filosofiya. T. 1. M., 1993.
14. Rigveda: Mandaly I-IV, V-VII, IX-X. M.: Nauka, 1999.
15. Fragmenty rannegrecheskikh filosofov. Ch. I. M., 1989.
16. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M., 2000.

References (transliteration):
1. Atkharvaveda. T. 1-3. M., 2005-2010.
2. Buber M. Dva obraza very. M., 1999.
3. Vaynberg S. Pervye tri minuty. M., 2011.
4. Gorbunov D.S., Rubakov V.A. Vvedenie v teoriyu ranney Vselennoy: teoriya goryachego Bol'shogo
vzryva. M., 2012.
5. Ezhov V.V. Mify Drevnego Kitaya. M., 2003.
6. Zubko G.V. Mif: vzglyad na mirozdanie. M., 2008.
7. Kazyutinskiy V.V. Obshchie zakonomernosti evolyutsii i problema vnezemnykh tsivilizatsiy // Pro-
blema poiska zhizni vo Vselennoy. M., 1986. S. 54-56.
8. Kalevala / Per. L. Bel'skogo. M., 1977.
9. Keyper F.B.Ya. Trudy po vediyskoy mifologii. M., 1986.
10. Maydanov A.S. Zagadochnye bogi Ashviny // Vostok. 2007. № 5. S. 5-18.
11. Mify narodov mira. T. 2. M., 1998.
12. Myuller M. Egipetskaya mifologiya. M., 2007.
13. Radkhakrishnan S. Indiyskaya filosofiya. T. 1. M., 1993.
14. Rigveda: Mandaly I-IV, V-VII, IX-X. M.: Nauka, 1999.
15. Fragmenty rannegrecheskikh filosofov. Ch. I. M., 1989.
16. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M., 2000.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of archaic mythology and modern advertising. Comparative study is focused on the problem of complexity of transformations in the center of this discussion. It is well shown that being the core of the myth as itself the process of transformation of Chaos into Cosmos requires demiurge of sacrifice and maximum exertion. Quite on the contrary, advertising texts successively transmit ideologeme of light existential and socio-cultural dynamics.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, mythology, creation, transformation, rite, initiation, advertising, socialization, simplicity, easiness.

Библиография:
1. Bart R. Mifologii. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1996. 312 s.
2. Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: Nauka, 1983. 536 s.
3. Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki. V 4-kh tt. Tom 1. Syroe i prigotovlennoe. M.; SPb: Universitetskaya
kniga, 1999. 400 s.
4. Meletinskiy E.M. Mif i skazka // Meletinskiy E.M. Izbrannye stat'i i vospominaniya. M.: Izd-
vo RGGU, 1998. S. 284-296.
5. Meletinskiy E.M. Poetika mifa. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000. 408 s.
6. Menovshchikov G.A. Ustnoe povestvovatel'noe tvorchestvo eskimosov // Eskimosskie skazki i mify.
M.: Nauka, 1988. S. 5-22.
7. Sokolova Z.P. Kul't zhivotnykh v religiyakh. M.: Nauka, 1972. 213 s.
8. Torichko R.A. Reklama kak mifologicheskaya kommunikativnaya sistema: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol.
nauk. Barnaul, 2001. 22 s.
9. Freydenberg O.M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 1998. 800 s.
10. Tsiv'yan T.V. Mifologicheskoe programmirovanie povsednevnoy zhizni // Etnicheskie stereotipy
povedeniya. L.: Nauka, 1985. S. 154-178.
11. Chesnov Ya.V. Lektsii po istoricheskoy etnologii. M.: Gardariki, 1998. 400 s.
12. Eliade M. Obrazy i simvoly // Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000. S. 127-247.
13. Eliade M. Taynye soyuzy: Obryady initsiatsii i posvyashcheniya. Kiev: Sofiya; M.: Gelios, 2002. 352 s.
14. Yuan' Ke. Mify drevnego Kitaya. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1987. 358 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Bart R. Mifologii. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1996. 312 s.
2. Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: Nauka, 1983. 536 s.
3. Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki. V 4-kh tt. Tom 1. Syroe i prigotovlennoe. M.; SPb: Universitetskaya
kniga, 1999. 400 s.
4. Meletinskiy E.M. Mif i skazka // Meletinskiy E.M. Izbrannye stat'i i vospominaniya. M.: Izd-
vo RGGU, 1998. S. 284-296.
5. Meletinskiy E.M. Poetika mifa. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2000. 408 s.
6. Menovshchikov G.A. Ustnoe povestvovatel'noe tvorchestvo eskimosov // Eskimosskie skazki i mify.
M.: Nauka, 1988. S. 5-22.
7. Sokolova Z.P. Kul't zhivotnykh v religiyakh. M.: Nauka, 1972. 213 s.
8. Torichko R.A. Reklama kak mifologicheskaya kommunikativnaya sistema: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol.
nauk. Barnaul, 2001. 22 s.
9. Freydenberg O.M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 1998. 800 s.
10. Tsiv'yan T.V. Mifologicheskoe programmirovanie povsednevnoy zhizni // Etnicheskie stereotipy
povedeniya. L.: Nauka, 1985. S. 154-178.
11. Chesnov Ya.V. Lektsii po istoricheskoy etnologii. M.: Gardariki, 1998. 400 s.
12. Eliade M. Obrazy i simvoly // Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. M.: Ladomir, 2000. S. 127-247.
13. Eliade M. Taynye soyuzy: Obryady initsiatsii i posvyashcheniya. Kiev: Sofiya; M.: Gelios, 2002. 352 s.
14. Yuan' Ke. Mify drevnego Kitaya. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1987. 358 s.

Аннотация: The article explains the role of folk art to preserve the spiritual foundations of society, the preservation of the mental characteristics of ethnic groups. We consider the conflicting views of ancient philosophers to the place of folklore in the social and artistic practice of nations. As a catalyst to do with mythology and art examines the views of ancient philosophers to the person and work of Homer. Applying the theory of the cyclical development of culture and the theory of Spengler Pareto elite, concludes that the idea of a cyclically evolving \"heart\" of the culture it is projected on the socio-cultural features of the intellectual elite of antiquity and its views on such an important cultural phenomenon, as folklore of ethnic groups.

Ключевые слова: Cultural, Society and the philosophers of antiquity, mythology, art, Homer, the social elite, the "soul" of culture.

Библиография:
1. Aristotel'. Poetika. Ob iskusstve poezii // Aristotel'. Etika. Politika. Ritorika. Poetika. Ka-
tegorii. Minsk: Literatura, 1998. S. 1064-1112. URL: http://philologos.narod.ru/classics/aristotel_poe.
htm (data obrashcheniya: 128.12.2011).
2. Berdyaev N. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. Opyt personalisticheskoy filosofii. URL: http://www.
vehi.net/berdyaev/rabstvo/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 18.12.2011).
3. Pareto Vil'fredo // Bol'shaya entsiklopediya Kirilla i Mefodiya. 2CD-ROM. M.: OOO «N'yu Media
Dzhenereyshn», 2008.
4. Gusev V.E. Problema fol'klora v istorii estetiki. M.-L.: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1963.
5. Kvint Goratsiy Flakk. Nauka poezii. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. M.-L.: Academia, 1936.
6. Kondrashov V.A., Chichina E.A. Etika. Estetika. Rostov n/D.: Feniks, 1998.
7. Platon. Dialogi. (Ckanirovano po: Platon. Dialogi. M.: Mysl', 1986.) URL: http://lib.aldebaran.
ru (data obrashcheniya 18.12.2011).
8. Tasalov V.I. Iskusstvo v sisteme Chelovek — Vselennaya, Estetika «antropnogo printsipa» na stykakh
iskusstva, religii, estestvoznaniya. M.: URSS: KomKniga, 2007.
9. Shpengler O. Zakat Zapadnogo mira. M.: Al'fa-kniga, 2010.

References (transliteration):
1. Aristotel'. Poetika. Ob iskusstve poezii // Aristotel'. Etika. Politika. Ritorika. Poetika. Ka-
tegorii. Minsk: Literatura, 1998. S. 1064-1112. URL: http://philologos.narod.ru/classics/aristotel_poe.
htm (data obrashcheniya: 128.12.2011).
2. Berdyaev N. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. Opyt personalisticheskoy filosofii. URL: http://www.
vehi.net/berdyaev/rabstvo/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 18.12.2011).
3. Pareto Vil'fredo // Bol'shaya entsiklopediya Kirilla i Mefodiya. 2CD-ROM. M.: OOO «N'yu Media
Dzhenereyshn», 2008.
4. Gusev V.E. Problema fol'klora v istorii estetiki. M.-L.: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1963.
5. Kvint Goratsiy Flakk. Nauka poezii. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. M.-L.: Academia, 1936.
6. Kondrashov V.A., Chichina E.A. Etika. Estetika. Rostov n/D.: Feniks, 1998.
7. Platon. Dialogi. (Ckanirovano po: Platon. Dialogi. M.: Mysl', 1986.) URL: http://lib.aldebaran.
ru (data obrashcheniya 18.12.2011).
8. Tasalov V.I. Iskusstvo v sisteme Chelovek — Vselennaya, Estetika «antropnogo printsipa» na stykakh
iskusstva, religii, estestvoznaniya. M.: URSS: KomKniga, 2007.
9. Shpengler O. Zakat Zapadnogo mira. M.: Al'fa-kniga, 2010.

Аннотация: The author starts with the standpoint that the specific nature of what we may define as “mytho-poetic societies” shall be not place and time (them being secondary characteristic features, which may be established after the key specificity is established), but rather specific features of social relations and links, as well as specific form-creating feature of social structure of mytho-poetic society and of the system of mytho-poetic society. The structural principle, which forms the basis for the social system of mytho-poetic society may be briefly characterized as “minimization” of category of “far” relatives, due to what it becomes possible to form the athmosphere of general “trust” to the world, as reflected to the principle of “non-indifference”.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, mytho-poetry, society, classification, structure, relation, phratry, reasonability, unification, totem

Контактная информация: Kozolupenko, Darya Pavlovna, petrovic@trtk.ru

Библиография:
Bart R. Mifologii. M., 2000.
Devidson B. Afrikantsy. Vvedenie v istoriyu kul'tury. M., 1975.
Dyurkgeym E., Moss M. O nekotorykh pervobytnykh formakh klassifikatsii / Moss M. // Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost'. M., 1996. S. 6-74.
Kozolupenko D.P. Mif na granyakh kul'tury. M., 2005.
Marks K. Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857-1895 godov / Marks K., Engel's F. // Sochineniya. T. 46. ch. 1.
Redkliff-Braun A.R. Struktura i funktsiya v primitivnom obshchestve. M., 2001.
Engel's F. Proiskhozhdenie sem'i, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva / Marks K., Engel's F. // Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M., 1948.

References (transliteration):
Bart R. Mifologii. M., 2000.
Devidson B. Afrikantsy. Vvedenie v istoriyu kul'tury. M., 1975.
Dyurkgeym E., Moss M. O nekotorykh pervobytnykh formakh klassifikatsii / Moss M. // Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost'. M., 1996. S. 6-74.
Kozolupenko D.P. Mif na granyakh kul'tury. M., 2005.
Marks K. Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857-1895 godov / Marks K., Engel's F. // Sochineniya. T. 46. ch. 1.
Redkliff-Braun A.R. Struktura i funktsiya v primitivnom obshchestve. M., 2001.
Engel's F. Proiskhozhdenie sem'i, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva / Marks K., Engel's F. // Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M., 1948.

Аннотация: Mirror is a symbol interpreted very differently in different cultures. Based on the comparative analysis of symbolic meanings of mirror, the author of the article defines the differences in how different cultures describe the world around.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, mirror, symbol, culture, reflection, twin, eidos, myth, Amaterasu, Narcissus

Контактная информация: Tarnapolskaya Galina Mikhailovna, tagami@vtomske.ru

Библиография:
Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya: v 2-kh t. / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. T. 2 M.: Ros. Entsiklopediya, 1997. 719 s.
Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya: v 2-kh t. / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. T. 1 M.: Ros. Entsiklopediya, 1997. 671 s.
Florenskiy P.A. O sueverii i chude // Florenskiy P.A. Soch. v 4- kh t. T. 1 M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 44-69.
Platon. Sobranie sochineniy v 4-kh t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 199654 s.
Estes K. P. Begushchaya s volkami. Zhenskiy arkhetip v mifakh i skazaniyakh. K.: «Sofiya», M.: ID «Gelios», 2001. 496 s.
Apokrif Ioanna // Apokrify drevnikh khristian. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 197-217.
Borkhes Kh. Kollektsiya: Rasskazy; Esse; Stikhotvoreniya. SPb.: Severo-Zapad, 1992. 639 s.
Romanenko Yu.M. Bytie i estestvo: Ontologiya i metafizika kak tipy filosofskogo znaniya. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2003. 779 s.
Plotin. O prirode i istochnike zla. // Plotin. Sochineniya. SPb.: Aleteyya, 1995. 672 s.
D'yakonova E.M. Iskusstvo illyuzii. Po materialam yaponskikh srednevekovykh zhizneopisaniy // Sad odnogo tsvetka: Sbornik statey i esse. M.: Nauka, 1991. S. 197-211.

References (transliteration):
Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya: v 2-kh t. / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. T. 2 M.: Ros. Entsiklopediya, 1997. 719 s.
Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya: v 2-kh t. / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. T. 1 M.: Ros. Entsiklopediya, 1997. 671 s.
Florenskiy P.A. O sueverii i chude // Florenskiy P.A. Soch. v 4- kh t. T. 1 M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 44-69.
Platon. Sobranie sochineniy v 4-kh t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 199654 s.
Estes K. P. Begushchaya s volkami. Zhenskiy arkhetip v mifakh i skazaniyakh. K.: «Sofiya», M.: ID «Gelios», 2001. 496 s.
Apokrif Ioanna // Apokrify drevnikh khristian. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 197-217.
Borkhes Kh. Kollektsiya: Rasskazy; Esse; Stikhotvoreniya. SPb.: Severo-Zapad, 1992. 639 s.
Romanenko Yu.M. Bytie i estestvo: Ontologiya i metafizika kak tipy filosofskogo znaniya. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2003. 779 s.
Plotin. O prirode i istochnike zla. // Plotin. Sochineniya. SPb.: Aleteyya, 1995. 672 s.
D'yakonova E.M. Iskusstvo illyuzii. Po materialam yaponskikh srednevekovykh zhizneopisaniy // Sad odnogo tsvetka: Sbornik statey i esse. M.: Nauka, 1991. S. 197-211.

Аннотация: The thesis of ‘uniform’ mysticism ignores the forms typical for paganism and developed religions. Even though mysticism still has the same nature and origin, it definitely varies greatly in forms and structures. The author defined the five ‘primary’ structures of mysticism (archetypes): unity with God, Godsend, transcendental and immanent mystical determinations and the bipolar immanent and transcendental mystical bond. According to the author, primary configurations of the mystical bond usually join in structural complexes.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, mysticism, complex, morphology, sacred, structure, archetype, transcendental, immanent

Контактная информация: Balagushkin Evgeniy Gennadievich, egbalagushkin@yandex.ru

Библиография:
Balagushkin E.G. Netraditsionnye religii v sovremennoy Rossii. Ch. — M: IF RAN. 1999.1.
Balagushkin E.G. Netraditsionnye religii v sovremennoy Rossii. Ch. — M., IF2. RAN. 2002.
Balagushkin E.G. Problemy morfologicheskogo analiza religiy. — M., IF RAN. 2003.
Knysh A.D. Musul'manskiy mistitsizm. Kratkaya istoriya. — M.-SPb., 2004.
Kravchenko V. Vestniki russkogo mistitsizma. — M.: 1997.
Merezhkovskiy D.S. Ispanskie mistiki. — Tomsk. 1997.
Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya. — M.: 1998.
Mistitsizm: problemy analiza i kritika / Vopr. nauchn. ateizma. Vyp. 3— M.: 1989.8.
Moss M. Sotsial'nye funktsii svyashchennogo. — SPb. 2000.
Uolsh R. Dukh shamanizma. — SPb. 1996.
Evans-Ventts U.Y. Velikiy yog Tibeta Milarepa. — Samara, 1998.
Entsiklopediya mistitsizma. — SPb.: Izd. «Litera». 1996.
Entsiklopediya tantry. — M., 1997.

References (transliteration):
Balagushkin E.G. Netraditsionnye religii v sovremennoy Rossii. Ch. — M: IF RAN. 1999.1.
Balagushkin E.G. Netraditsionnye religii v sovremennoy Rossii. Ch. — M., IF2. RAN. 2002.
Balagushkin E.G. Problemy morfologicheskogo analiza religiy. — M., IF RAN. 2003.
Knysh A.D. Musul'manskiy mistitsizm. Kratkaya istoriya. — M.-SPb., 2004.
Kravchenko V. Vestniki russkogo mistitsizma. — M.: 1997.
Merezhkovskiy D.S. Ispanskie mistiki. — Tomsk. 1997.
Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya. — M.: 1998.
Mistitsizm: problemy analiza i kritika / Vopr. nauchn. ateizma. Vyp. 3— M.: 1989.8.
Moss M. Sotsial'nye funktsii svyashchennogo. — SPb. 2000.
Uolsh R. Dukh shamanizma. — SPb. 1996.
Evans-Ventts U.Y. Velikiy yog Tibeta Milarepa. — Samara, 1998.
Entsiklopediya mistitsizma. — SPb.: Izd. «Litera». 1996.
Entsiklopediya tantry. — M., 1997.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the structural and analytical analysis of mysticism which allows us to fully understand its structural and functional features unlike the traditional descriptive approach. The author compared the descriptive and analytical approaches to studying mysticism and described the elements of faith. The article also contains the morphology and the discourse of mysticism.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, mysticism, religion, substrate, religious studies, morphology, discourse, ecstasy, analysis

Контактная информация: Balagushkin Evgeniy Gennadievich, egbalagushkin@yandex.ru

Аннотация: Review: the October Revolution provoked all kinds of reaction from the Russian cultural elite at the beginning of the 20th century. In this article the author analyzed what one of the leaders of the symbolic movement, Brusov B. Ya., thought of the social cataclysm. By using the context of the symbolic esthetics, the author also described how the poet’s creative views developed.
Key words: philosophy, symbolism, mythology of culture, deposition, theurgy, logo myth, decadency, mythology, Brusov.

Контактная информация: Chindin Igor Victorovich, chindin@inbox.ru

Аннотация: Resume: the author of the article analyzes the two conceptions on infinity and makes the hypothesis about periodical radicals incommensurable to integral numbers.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, irrational, rational, Pythagoras, Cantor, numbers, periodicity, sets of numbers, Zenkin.

Контактная информация: Kleschev Denis Sergeevich, nirvansky@mail.ru

Аннотация: the article is devoted to the image of sovereign cosmic power personified in the goddess of justice, Dike. She is the guarantee of the universal order. Corresponding virtue of a wise man is just her psychic projection which he consciously and often unconsciously puts into his life. Such a wise man’s actions and thoughts reflect the harmony of the higher and lower spheres Dike, the goddess of justice, is the keeper of.

Ключевые слова: Dike, fate, virtue, cosmic space, justice, fatality, custom, requital, metron, Heraclitus.

Контактная информация: Rodzinskiy, D. L., nb-media@mail.ru

Аннотация: A “transitory period” or a “breaking period” – they often talk about the modern time in these words. Just this period is marked of the rising interest to the myth and of the enlargement of the mythopoetical characters in the apprehension of the world. The mythopoetical apprehension of the world has some special characters that gave it a chance to appear in the different cultures and also to predominate in those of them that have inconstant, standing or transitory type. The nature of a myth as a “everything is possible” Principe begins to be most important in the periods of the standing or breaking social and cultural systems because mythopoetical apprehension of the world depends on an “acting person” who co-exist in it with others “acting persons”. So a mythopoetic became a remedy of a “possible madness” in the situation of the social instability and is a “creating stimuli» thanks to that we can built new social systems coming out of the “everything is possible” Principe. The mythopoetical probability and variations on that bases a mythopoetical methodology and a mythopoetical apprehension of the world ties with an inconstant socio-cultural situation.

Ключевые слова: mythopoeia, apprehension of the world, rule of the «everything is possible», contemporary society.

Контактная информация: Kosolupenko, D. P., nb-media@mail.ru

Аннотация: Aesthetics of Vyacheslav Ivanovich Ivanov (1866-1949) is very philosophical. He is truly one of the leaders of the Russian symbolism and his articles on literature are full of thoughts and ideas going beyond the borders of art and taking us to the area of understanding the World and the Human. Among the most interesting topics raised by Vyacheslav Ivanov are myths and the process of their creation.

Аннотация: The modern individual is politicized and he seems to think of everything as being political, appeal to state at all times, to think that the group problems hold more value than individual problems… We now can only imagine the society as governed by the omnipotent state, and the term “ideology” gained negative meaning. What is the correlation between ideology and myth?