Аннотация:   This article present an interpretation of M. Heidegger’s thesis “The Origin of the Work of Art”. Being a part of the world and having originated from it, art was always a topic of interest for the philosophers, who try to find answers to the questions “Is there truth in art?” and “How to understand the works of visual art? The author finds the key to the mystery of art in polemics of the prominent art historian M. Shapiro and philosopher M. Heidegger. In this dispute, the notions of the truth and existence (ontological field) are counterpoised to the historical and biographical details of createdness of the painting. The subject of dispute lies in Van Gogh’s painting “A Pair of Shoes”. In interpretation of the painting, M. Heidegger analyzes how it reveals the nature of the shoes. And, thanks to the rich imagination, audience through the creation of an art work, reveals the truth. Trying on the country woman’s shoes, the audience pictures her being; and the artist attempt to attract attention and cognize the truth with help of the createdness. M. Shapiro focuses attention on the historical component of the paintings and biographical motives of the artist. It originates a question, which of the aspects, namely, visual documental information or art (associations, feelings, emotions, projections) are closer to the ontological understanding of the painting as a painting. The author concludes that if a creative component is present, it moves the biographical motives and historical details to the background. Ontological understanding of the painting is possible only in aesthetic field.  

Ключевые слова: historical context, createdness, world, earth, work of art, truth, being, hermeneutics, aesthetics, visual art

Библиография:
Khaydegger M. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. 528 s.
Crowther P. Phenomenologies of Art and Vision: A Post-Analytic Turn. Bloomsbury, 2013. 195r.
Shapiro M. Natyurmort kak lichnyy ob'ekt: zametki o Khaydeggere i Van Goge (1968) // Topos. 2001. № 2-3 (5). S. 28-39.
Stepanenko S. B. Istina v slovesnom tvorenii: k voprosu o germenevtiko-fenomenologicheskom ponyatii literatury // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2006. №291. S.135-144.
Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo/Per. s nem. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. 367 s.
Khudozhestvenno-istoricheskiy muzey [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://smallbay.ru/artreness/da_vinci06.html (data obrashcheniya 25.12.2016).
Zhizn' i tvorchestvo Van Goga [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.bibliotekar.ru/isk/5.htm
E.M. Antonova Pereotsenka poeticheskogo slova. Martin Khaydeger i «poeticheskoe myshlenie» // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 36 - 42. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.01.5.

References (transliteration):
Khaydegger M. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. 528 s.
Crowther P. Phenomenologies of Art and Vision: A Post-Analytic Turn. Bloomsbury, 2013. 195r.
Shapiro M. Natyurmort kak lichnyy ob'ekt: zametki o Khaydeggere i Van Goge (1968) // Topos. 2001. № 2-3 (5). S. 28-39.
Stepanenko S. B. Istina v slovesnom tvorenii: k voprosu o germenevtiko-fenomenologicheskom ponyatii literatury // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2006. №291. S.135-144.
Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo/Per. s nem. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. 367 s.
Khudozhestvenno-istoricheskiy muzey [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://smallbay.ru/artreness/da_vinci06.html (data obrashcheniya 25.12.2016).
Zhizn' i tvorchestvo Van Goga [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.bibliotekar.ru/isk/5.htm
E.M. Antonova Pereotsenka poeticheskogo slova. Martin Khaydeger i «poeticheskoe myshlenie» // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 36 - 42. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.01.5.

Аннотация: This scientific article represents a philosophical research of the notions of space and art. The author perform the explication of the phenomenon of space and its relation to art through the interpretation of a number of work by Martin Heidegger, namely one of his late essays “Art and Space”, in which attention is turned to the art of sculpture. A new method of interpretation of this Heidegger’s work is presented. In reconstruction of Heidegger’s ideas, the author determines a hermeneutic circle that is depicted with the references to the poetic expressions of Goethe. Thanks to the motion in this circle, the space of art is being comprehended as the space of creation (place), space of reception (area), and space of existence. For the clear understanding of the essence of space of art, Heidegger conducts a step-by-step destruction of the usual phenomenon to the initiate phenomenon. The authors followed the  revealed path of Heidegger’s thought. The true essence of space is discovered in the “protolanguage” of poetry, considered by Heidegger as art as a whole. In the word, Heidegger contacts with the matter itself, or it comes through the word in its form. This research is of theoretical importance due to revelation of such crucial notions as art, space, creature, place, and truth.

Ключевые слова: Poetry, Sculpture, Existence, Truth, Creation of art, Thing, Area, Place, Space, Art

Библиография:
Khaydegger M. Parmenid / per. s nem. A.P.Shurbeleva. – SPb., 2009.
Khaydegger M. Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii / per. s nem. A.G. Chernyakova. – SPb., 2001.
Podoroga V.A. Metafizika landshafta. Kommunikativnye strategii v filosofskoy kul'ture XIX-XX vv. – M., 1993.
Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. – Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2006.
Heidegger M. Unterwegs zur Sprache. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 12. Frankfurt am Main, 1985.
Heidegger M. Vorträge und Aufsätze. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 7. Frankfurt am Main, 2000.
Heidegger M. Holzwege. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 5. Frankfurt am Main, 1977.
Heidegger M. Aus der Erfahrung des Denkens. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 13. Frankfurt am Main, 1983.
Burbulla Julia. Heideggers Schweigen. Die philosophische Raumkunst in ihrer Relevanz für die Kunst der Nachkriegszeit // Kunsttexte.de. Sektion Gegenwart. – 2011. – Nr.2.
deVries Hent. Theotopographies: Nancy, Hölderlin, Heidegger // MLN. Vol. 109. – April 1994. – № 3 – P. 445-477.
Shmitt K. Zemlya i more. Sozertsanie vsemirnoy istorii. – Leyptsig, 1942.

References (transliteration):
Khaydegger M. Parmenid / per. s nem. A.P.Shurbeleva. – SPb., 2009.
Khaydegger M. Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii / per. s nem. A.G. Chernyakova. – SPb., 2001.
Podoroga V.A. Metafizika landshafta. Kommunikativnye strategii v filosofskoy kul'ture XIX-XX vv. – M., 1993.
Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. – Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2006.
Heidegger M. Unterwegs zur Sprache. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 12. Frankfurt am Main, 1985.
Heidegger M. Vorträge und Aufsätze. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 7. Frankfurt am Main, 2000.
Heidegger M. Holzwege. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 5. Frankfurt am Main, 1977.
Heidegger M. Aus der Erfahrung des Denkens. – Gesamtausgabe. Band 13. Frankfurt am Main, 1983.
Burbulla Julia. Heideggers Schweigen. Die philosophische Raumkunst in ihrer Relevanz für die Kunst der Nachkriegszeit // Kunsttexte.de. Sektion Gegenwart. – 2011. – Nr.2.
deVries Hent. Theotopographies: Nancy, Hölderlin, Heidegger // MLN. Vol. 109. – April 1994. – № 3 – P. 445-477.
Shmitt K. Zemlya i more. Sozertsanie vsemirnoy istorii. – Leyptsig, 1942.

Аннотация: The object of this research is the court painting during the reign of Qing dynasty. The subject of this research is the images of animals and plants in the court painting of Qing dynasty. The author conducts a reasonably detailed analysis of the most interesting in historical and creative aspects paintings from the perspective of art history. Special attention is given to the demonstration of how they combine the European and Chinese elements of graphic arts, form a Sino-European style of painting while preserving the ancient Chinese symbolism of imagery. The main conclusion consists in the statement that the reception of some techniques of the Western pictorial art was not just borrowing; it has established a specific Qing royal style in painting, which seamlessly combined Chinese tradition and Western techniques. The novelty of this study is lies in the thesis that the Sino-European style of court painting of Qing era has its own remarkable artistic merits and is an organic aesthetic phenomenon of the Tianxia (All-Under-Heaven) history of art.

Ключевые слова: Sino-European style of painting, Giuseppe Castiglione, symbolism, images of animals, realism, Qing era, Court Painting, Chinese symbolism of imagery, arts of Tianxia, images of plants

Библиография:
Suraeva N.G. Dzhuzeppe Kastil'one i ego kartina «Sto loshadey»/N.G. Suraeva [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://lib.herzen.spb.ru/media/magazines/contents/1/126/suraeva_126_269_276.pdf (data obrashcheniya 22.01.2016).
Grefenshteyn Aleksandr. Kon'/Aleksandr Grefenshteyn // Kratkaya entsiklopediya simvolov [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.symbolarium.ru/index.php/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%8D%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2 (data obrashcheniya 06.01.2016).
Tszuo Butsin, Kun Syantszi. Kratkaya biografiya imperatorov tsinskoy ery/Butsin Butsin, Syantszi Kun. – Pekin: Chzhishi, 2008. – 342 s.
Toporov V.N. Lotos // Mify narodov mira [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.mifinarodov.com/l/lotos.html (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2016).

References (transliteration):
Suraeva N.G. Dzhuzeppe Kastil'one i ego kartina «Sto loshadey»/N.G. Suraeva [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://lib.herzen.spb.ru/media/magazines/contents/1/126/suraeva_126_269_276.pdf (data obrashcheniya 22.01.2016).
Grefenshteyn Aleksandr. Kon'/Aleksandr Grefenshteyn // Kratkaya entsiklopediya simvolov [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.symbolarium.ru/index.php/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%8D%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2 (data obrashcheniya 06.01.2016).
Tszuo Butsin, Kun Syantszi. Kratkaya biografiya imperatorov tsinskoy ery/Butsin Butsin, Syantszi Kun. – Pekin: Chzhishi, 2008. – 342 s.
Toporov V.N. Lotos // Mify narodov mira [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.mifinarodov.com/l/lotos.html (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2016).

Аннотация: The article investigates the basic provisions of the synthetic theory of the ideal, proposed by the Russian scientist D. Pivovarov, which became the methodological basis of the innovative concept of visual arts. D. Pivovarov analyzed and summarized the conceptual ideas of A. Losev, M. Lifshitz, E. Ilyenkov, E. Classen and D. Dubrovsky, and concluded that the main components of every ideal relationship are following: the fiducial object, the scheme of actions with it and the extrapolation of the knowledge about it in the supersensible reality. According to D. Pivovarov "ideal" is a balance of internal and external, where the "ideal" is externally (sensory) presented as "idol", and the content of the "ideal" is internally (supersensory) presented as "an idea." According to the statement of D. Pivovarov, culture is a human activity on cultivating ideals intended to facilitate the process of human being comfortable existence, comfortable communication with other people, first and second nature objects, and the universe. The comparative analyses of the sources related to the subject of the study, as well as the critical analysis of previously published works of the Russian scientists are given in the article. Methodological ideas of D. Pivovarov created the conditions for a theoretical explanation of the elite, inclusive and individual evolution aspects of the creation of an ideal; and also for studying the laws of the ideal creation process in visual arts. The author concludes that the synthetic theory of the ideal, developed by D. Pivovarov, helps to master the extremely complex mechanism of representative (through the idol) relationship of a viewer with his own soul and souls of other people, the Spirit of God and the perfection of the fullness of life by means of art-object as a complex of signs.

Ключевые слова: Spectator, Creative work, Model, Concept, Visual art, Culture, Eidos , Ideal, Synthetic theory of idealism, D. V. Pivovarov

Библиография:
Zhukovskiy V., Pivovarov, D. Works of art and visual thinking, European journal of natural history. – 2010.-№ 2, s. 38-42.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. «Diskobol» Mirona kak reprezentant dialektiki Geraklita // Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. – 2015.-№1. – S. 142-147.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Intellektual'naya vizualizatsiya sushchnosti (monografiya).-Krasnoyarsk: KGU, 1998.-222 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Rakhmatullin R. Yu. Vizual'noe myshlenie v strukture nauchnogo poznaniya. – Krasnoyarsk, 1988. – 188 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Zrimaya sushchnost'. (Vizual'noe myshlenie v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve) / V. I. Zhukovskiy, D. V. Pivovarov. – Sverdlovsk, UrGU, 1991. – 284 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Koptseva N. P., Pivovarov D. V. Vizual'naya sushchnost' religii: (monografiya).-Krasnoyarsk: KrasGU, 2006. – 460 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2011. – 496 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Ideal'noe // Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / Pod red. V. Kemerova. — M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004. – 864 s.
Lyubutin K. N., Pivovarov D. V. Dialektika sub'ekta i ob'ekta – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGU , 1993. – 415 s.
Losev, A.F. Bytie. Imya. Kosmos. – M.: Mysl'. 1993. – 958 s.
Livshits R. L. Dukhovnost' i bezdukhovnost' lichnosti. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGU, 1997. – 150 s.
Klassen E. G. Ideal'noe. – Krasnoyarsk: KrGU, 1984. – 146 s
Il'enkov E. V. Dialekticheskaya logika / E. V. Il'enkov. – M.: Politizdat, 1984. – 318 s.
Dubrovskiy D. I. Problema ideal'nogo. Sub'ektivnaya real'nost'. – M.: Kanon+, 2002.-366 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Sinteticheskaya paradigma v filosofii: izbrannye stat'i. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2011. – 536 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Problema sinteza osnovnykh definitsiy kul'tury // Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2009. № 1. S. 157—161.
Zhukovskiy V.I. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epitsentre khudozhestvennoy kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2013.-№ 11.-S.1613-1620 DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9845
Pivovarov D. V. Kul'tura i religiya. Sakralizatsiya bazovykh idealov : [monografiya]-Ekaterinburg : Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2013 .— 24 s.
Lyubutin K. N., Pivovarov D. V. Sinteticheskaya teoriya.-Ekaterinburg ; Pskov, 2000. – 207 s.

References (transliteration):
Zhukovskiy V., Pivovarov, D. Works of art and visual thinking, European journal of natural history. – 2010.-№ 2, s. 38-42.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. «Diskobol» Mirona kak reprezentant dialektiki Geraklita // Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. – 2015.-№1. – S. 142-147.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Intellektual'naya vizualizatsiya sushchnosti (monografiya).-Krasnoyarsk: KGU, 1998.-222 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Rakhmatullin R. Yu. Vizual'noe myshlenie v strukture nauchnogo poznaniya. – Krasnoyarsk, 1988. – 188 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Zrimaya sushchnost'. (Vizual'noe myshlenie v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve) / V. I. Zhukovskiy, D. V. Pivovarov. – Sverdlovsk, UrGU, 1991. – 284 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Koptseva N. P., Pivovarov D. V. Vizual'naya sushchnost' religii: (monografiya).-Krasnoyarsk: KrasGU, 2006. – 460 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2011. – 496 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Ideal'noe // Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / Pod red. V. Kemerova. — M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004. – 864 s.
Lyubutin K. N., Pivovarov D. V. Dialektika sub'ekta i ob'ekta – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGU , 1993. – 415 s.
Losev, A.F. Bytie. Imya. Kosmos. – M.: Mysl'. 1993. – 958 s.
Livshits R. L. Dukhovnost' i bezdukhovnost' lichnosti. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGU, 1997. – 150 s.
Klassen E. G. Ideal'noe. – Krasnoyarsk: KrGU, 1984. – 146 s
Il'enkov E. V. Dialekticheskaya logika / E. V. Il'enkov. – M.: Politizdat, 1984. – 318 s.
Dubrovskiy D. I. Problema ideal'nogo. Sub'ektivnaya real'nost'. – M.: Kanon+, 2002.-366 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Sinteticheskaya paradigma v filosofii: izbrannye stat'i. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2011. – 536 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Problema sinteza osnovnykh definitsiy kul'tury // Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2009. № 1. S. 157—161.
Zhukovskiy V.I. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epitsentre khudozhestvennoy kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2013.-№ 11.-S.1613-1620 DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9845
Pivovarov D. V. Kul'tura i religiya. Sakralizatsiya bazovykh idealov : [monografiya]-Ekaterinburg : Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2013 .— 24 s.
Lyubutin K. N., Pivovarov D. V. Sinteticheskaya teoriya.-Ekaterinburg ; Pskov, 2000. – 207 s.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the examination of mythopoeia of Neoacmeism within the framework of its philosophical and creative platform. Mythology is being viewed as the ontological core of “semantic poetics” of the Renaissance Acmeism, which reconstructs the original philosophy of the adherers of Acmeism and Neoacmeism, oriented at existentialism of N. Berdyaev, dialogism of S. L. Frank, and representatives of the “philosophy of life” (F. Nietzsche, W. Dilthey, G. Simmel, H. Bergson), gnoseological, anthropological, and historiosophical ideas of V. Solovyov. The author gives definition of Neoacmeism as a philosophical-cultural phenomenon of the XX century and an integral paradigm in the context of its mythology and mythopoeia; as well as follows its genesis, historically oriented on Antiquity, dialogues of Socrates and Plato, creative evolution and boundaries, “synchronic-reminiscent chronotope, which in turn supposes the detailed analysis of the poetic texts of Acmeism and Neoacmeism by the virtue of philosophical hermeneutics. This article is an attempt to build a philosophical-cultural paradigm of Neoacmeism, as well as a certain universal methodology of hermeneutic analysis of poetry in the context of synergetic co-existence of philosophy and philology (literary studies) within the space of the unified ontological discourse. The fundamentally open nature of the worldview ideas of Neoacmeism significantly complicates the task of the integral reconstruction of the creative heritage and mythology of its adherers. The author concludes that in Acmeistic works there is an integral philosophical system which could be compared by its importance with the concepts of the great creators of philosophy. Such system, the core of which consists in the specific author’s mythology, becomes a value-conceptual constant of Neoacmeism, justifying the successiveness and uniqueness of its development as an integral research strategy, which again and again allows reconstructing Neoacmeism as a philosophical-cultural paradigm within the constantly changing historical context.

Ключевые слова: Myth of Modern Times, “Antimyth” , “Myth of Akhmatova”, Cultural paradigm, “Semantic poetics”, Philosophical hermeneutics, Anthropocentrism, Ontological concept, Mythology, Neoacmeism

Библиография:
Stepin V.S. Filosofiya nauki. Obshchie problemy. M.: Gardariki, 2007.
Etkind E. Tam, vnutri: o russkoy poezii KhKh veka. SPb.: NB-Media, 1997.
Gumilev N.S. Stikhi. Pis'ma o russkoy poezii / Vstup. stat'ya Vyach. Ivanova; Sost., nauch. podgot. teksta, poslesl. N. Bogomolova. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1989.
Gorodetskiy S. Nekotorye techeniya v sovremennoy russkoy poezii // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost., vstup. st., preambuly i primech. O.A. Lekmanova. M.: Olimp; AST, 2002.
Russkie pisateli 20 veka. Biograficheskiy slovar' / Gl. red. i sost. P.A. Nikolaev. M.: RANDEVU-AM, 2000.
Akhmatova A. Sobr. soch.: V 6-i tt. M.: Ellis Lak, 1998.
Struve P. Slovo i Dukh. Parizh: YMCA-Press, 1981.
Kun N.A. Legendy i mify Drevney Gretsii. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1975.
Dante Alig'eri. Bozhestvennaya komediya / Per. s ital. M. Lozinskogo; vstup. st. K. Derzhavina. M.: Pravda, 1982.
Chukovskaya L. Zapiski ob Anne Akhmatovoy: V 3-kh tt. T. 2. 1952-1962. M.: Pravda, 1997.
Koroleva N.V. «Mogla li Biche slovno Dant tvorit'…». Problema zhenskogo obraza v tvorchestve Akhmatovoy // Akhmatovskie chteniya. Vyp. 2. Tayny remesla. M.: IMLI, 1992.
Kataeva T. Anti-Akhmatova / Predisl. V. Toporova. M.: EvroINFO, 2007.
Mandel'shtam N.Ya. Vtoraya kniga. M.: Respeks, 1990.
Leyderman N.L., Tagil'tsev A. V. Poeziya Anny Akhmatovoy: Ocherki. Ekaterinburg: Ural. gos. ped. un-t, 2005.
Zamanskaya V.V. Situatsiya odinochestva kak khudozhestvennoe samovyrazhenie A. Akhmatovoy // Zamanskaya V.V. Ekzistentsial'naya traditsiya v russkoy literature KhKh veka. M., 2002.
Sil'va El'dar, Lev Shilov. Angliyskie nedeli Anny Akhmatovoy // Akhmatovskie chteniya. Vyp. 2. Tayny remesla. M.: Nasledie, 1992.
Akhmatova bez glyantsa. Proekt Pavla Fokina / Sost. i vstup. st. P. Fokina. SPb.: Amfora, 2007.
Gorb B. Shut u trona revolyutsii: Vnutrenniy syuzhet tvorchestva i zhizni poeta i aktera Serebryanogo veka Vladimira Mayakovskogo. M.: Uliss-Media, 2001.
Gumilev bez glyantsa. Proekt Pavla Fokina / Sost. i vstup. st. P. Fokina. SPb.: Amfora, 2009.
Serova M.V. Anna Akhmatova: Kniga Sud'by (fenomen «akhmatovskogo teksta»: problema tselostnosti i logika vnutristrukturnykh vzaimodeystviy). Ekaterinburg; Izhevsk, 2005.
Lekmanov O.A. Kniga ob akmeizme. M.: AST, 1996.
Nitsshe F. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 6. M., 2009.
Pakhareva T.A. Syuzhet «moleniya o chashe» v poeticheskoy ideologii i mifologii A. Akhmatovoy // Russkiy yazyk, literatura, kul'tura v shkole i VUZe. Yubileynye chteniya k 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A.A. Akhmatovoy. № 5 (29). Kiev, 2009.
Lisnyanskaya I.L. Shkatulka, v kotoroy stikhi i proza / Inna Lisnyanskaya. M.: Russkiy mir; Moskovskiy uchebnik, 2006.
Fetisova E.E. Neoakmeizm kak filosofsko-kul'turnaya paradigma XX veka. M.: Sputnik, 2014.
Mandel'shtam O.E. Utro akmeizma // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost., vstup. st., preambuly i primech. O.A. Lekmanova. M.: Olimp; AST, 2002.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. M.: Gardariki, 1988.
Levitanskiy Yu.D. Okno, goryashchee v nochi. M.: Eksmo, 2011.
Frank S. L. Nepostizhimoe // Frank S. L. Iz istorii russkoy filosofskoy mysli kontsa 19-go – nachala 20-go veka: Antologiya. N'yu-York, 1965.
Fedotov G. Rossiya, Evropa i my. Parizh: YMCA-PRESS, 1973

References (transliteration):
Stepin V.S. Filosofiya nauki. Obshchie problemy. M.: Gardariki, 2007.
Etkind E. Tam, vnutri: o russkoy poezii KhKh veka. SPb.: NB-Media, 1997.
Gumilev N.S. Stikhi. Pis'ma o russkoy poezii / Vstup. stat'ya Vyach. Ivanova; Sost., nauch. podgot. teksta, poslesl. N. Bogomolova. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1989.
Gorodetskiy S. Nekotorye techeniya v sovremennoy russkoy poezii // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost., vstup. st., preambuly i primech. O.A. Lekmanova. M.: Olimp; AST, 2002.
Russkie pisateli 20 veka. Biograficheskiy slovar' / Gl. red. i sost. P.A. Nikolaev. M.: RANDEVU-AM, 2000.
Akhmatova A. Sobr. soch.: V 6-i tt. M.: Ellis Lak, 1998.
Struve P. Slovo i Dukh. Parizh: YMCA-Press, 1981.
Kun N.A. Legendy i mify Drevney Gretsii. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1975.
Dante Alig'eri. Bozhestvennaya komediya / Per. s ital. M. Lozinskogo; vstup. st. K. Derzhavina. M.: Pravda, 1982.
Chukovskaya L. Zapiski ob Anne Akhmatovoy: V 3-kh tt. T. 2. 1952-1962. M.: Pravda, 1997.
Koroleva N.V. «Mogla li Biche slovno Dant tvorit'…». Problema zhenskogo obraza v tvorchestve Akhmatovoy // Akhmatovskie chteniya. Vyp. 2. Tayny remesla. M.: IMLI, 1992.
Kataeva T. Anti-Akhmatova / Predisl. V. Toporova. M.: EvroINFO, 2007.
Mandel'shtam N.Ya. Vtoraya kniga. M.: Respeks, 1990.
Leyderman N.L., Tagil'tsev A. V. Poeziya Anny Akhmatovoy: Ocherki. Ekaterinburg: Ural. gos. ped. un-t, 2005.
Zamanskaya V.V. Situatsiya odinochestva kak khudozhestvennoe samovyrazhenie A. Akhmatovoy // Zamanskaya V.V. Ekzistentsial'naya traditsiya v russkoy literature KhKh veka. M., 2002.
Sil'va El'dar, Lev Shilov. Angliyskie nedeli Anny Akhmatovoy // Akhmatovskie chteniya. Vyp. 2. Tayny remesla. M.: Nasledie, 1992.
Akhmatova bez glyantsa. Proekt Pavla Fokina / Sost. i vstup. st. P. Fokina. SPb.: Amfora, 2007.
Gorb B. Shut u trona revolyutsii: Vnutrenniy syuzhet tvorchestva i zhizni poeta i aktera Serebryanogo veka Vladimira Mayakovskogo. M.: Uliss-Media, 2001.
Gumilev bez glyantsa. Proekt Pavla Fokina / Sost. i vstup. st. P. Fokina. SPb.: Amfora, 2009.
Serova M.V. Anna Akhmatova: Kniga Sud'by (fenomen «akhmatovskogo teksta»: problema tselostnosti i logika vnutristrukturnykh vzaimodeystviy). Ekaterinburg; Izhevsk, 2005.
Lekmanov O.A. Kniga ob akmeizme. M.: AST, 1996.
Nitsshe F. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 6. M., 2009.
Pakhareva T.A. Syuzhet «moleniya o chashe» v poeticheskoy ideologii i mifologii A. Akhmatovoy // Russkiy yazyk, literatura, kul'tura v shkole i VUZe. Yubileynye chteniya k 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A.A. Akhmatovoy. № 5 (29). Kiev, 2009.
Lisnyanskaya I.L. Shkatulka, v kotoroy stikhi i proza / Inna Lisnyanskaya. M.: Russkiy mir; Moskovskiy uchebnik, 2006.
Fetisova E.E. Neoakmeizm kak filosofsko-kul'turnaya paradigma XX veka. M.: Sputnik, 2014.
Mandel'shtam O.E. Utro akmeizma // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost., vstup. st., preambuly i primech. O.A. Lekmanova. M.: Olimp; AST, 2002.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. M.: Gardariki, 1988.
Levitanskiy Yu.D. Okno, goryashchee v nochi. M.: Eksmo, 2011.
Frank S. L. Nepostizhimoe // Frank S. L. Iz istorii russkoy filosofskoy mysli kontsa 19-go – nachala 20-go veka: Antologiya. N'yu-York, 1965.
Fedotov G. Rossiya, Evropa i my. Parizh: YMCA-PRESS, 1973

Аннотация: Thus article represents the experience of philosophical heritage, the goal of which is the multilevel comprehensive research of the color harmony. The main question reviewed in this work is the logic of color in art of painting from the ontological, gnoseological, and axiological aspects. The author begins with the examination of the general notions, such as structure, hierarchy, and order; and later, shifts towards the narrow-profile questions associated with color harmony and logic of color in painting, as well as explains the necessity of presence of the three of its main aspects. During the course of this research, the author comes to the following results: The ontological aspect of the logic of color is predominantly observed in the triune system that includes the three-component theory, the emerging from the latter principle of color balance,  which is in turn based on the three main colors: blue, red, and yellow; The gnoseological aspect of the logic of color consists mainly in the contextuality of the author’s concept, in the idea of its composition. The author concludes that in the creative process pertaining to the work with color, everything has importance: shape of a spot, its size and texture, intervals, background, etc., because the logic of structuring of the color harmony directly depends on the idea of composition, and the conceptual value of the substratum.  

Ключевые слова: structure, logic, axiological aspect, gnoseological aspect, ontological aspect, art, painting, color, order, harmony

Библиография:
Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 13. S. 497.
Lomonosov M. V. Slovo o proiskhozhdenii sveta, novuyu teoriyu o tsvetakh predstavlyayushchee, v publichnom sobranii Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk iyulya 1 dnya 1756 govorennoe. – Poln. sobr. soch., t.
M., Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. 3.Brill T. Svet: Vozdeystvie na proizvedeniya iskusstva. Per. s angl. – M.: Mir, 1983 – 307 s., il.
Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneyshie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya / D. N. Demenev // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. № 10 (34). S. 21-28.
Gegel' G.-V.-Fridrikh. Estetika, t. 3. M.: Iskusstvo, 1971, S. 235.
Koren' R.V. Triedinye sistemy kak metayazyk kartiny mira // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. – 2013. – № 8. – S.70-116. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.722. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_722.html.
Zaytsev A. S. Nauka o tsvete i zhivopis'. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1986. – 158 s.: il., [31] l. il.
Gurevich P. S. Ponyatie «kholona» v estetike K. Uilbera / P. S. Gurevich // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. № 10 (34). S. 5-11.
Demenev D.N. Nekotorye aspekty dialektichnosti protsessa sozdaniya zhivopisnogo proizvedeniya. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. – 2014. – № 9. – S.150-185. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.9.13549. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13549.html
Demenev, D. N. Ontologicheskie osnovaniya khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva [Tekst] : dissertatsiya na soisk. uchen. step. kan. filos. nauk / D. N. Demenev ; nauch. ruk. E. V. Degtyarev ; MaGU . – Magnitogorsk, 2011. – 167 s. – Bibliogr.: s. 153-167.
Demenev D.N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 8. - C. 109 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.8.13400. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html
S.Yu. Ivanov Strukturnye komponenty kartiny mira. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 3. - C. 86 - 97.
Pogontseva D.V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya dinamika predstavleniy o zhenskoy krasote // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 67 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14612. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14612.html
Rozin V.M. Kommentarii k knige N.N.Volkova «Tsvet v zhivopisi» // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2015. - 1. - C. 86 - 101. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.1.13677.
Demenev D.N. Nekotorye aspekty dialektichnosti protsessa sozdaniya zhivopisnogo proizvedeniya. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 9. - C. 150 - 185. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.9.13549. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13549.html
E. V. Zabelina Simul'taneizm kak proryv vizual'nykh obrazov
vo vremennoe izmerenie // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 75 - 83.
Korobeynikov A.G., Ismagilov V.S., Kopytenko Yu.A., Petrishchev M.S. Issledovanie geoelektricheskoy struktury zemnoy kory na baze analiza fazovykh skorostey ul'tranizkochastotnykh geomagnitnykh variatsiy // Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 36 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.2.8736. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_8736.html
D.N. Demenev Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneyshie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 10. - C. 21 - 28.
A.N. Lipov Zolotoe sechenie kak osnovnoy morfologicheskiy zakon // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 9. - C. 96 - 108.
N. V. Serov Tsvet, iskusstvo, kul'turologiya:
kody otnositel'noy determinatsii
sinestezii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 97 - 104.

References (transliteration):
Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 13. S. 497.
Lomonosov M. V. Slovo o proiskhozhdenii sveta, novuyu teoriyu o tsvetakh predstavlyayushchee, v publichnom sobranii Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk iyulya 1 dnya 1756 govorennoe. – Poln. sobr. soch., t.
M., Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. 3.Brill T. Svet: Vozdeystvie na proizvedeniya iskusstva. Per. s angl. – M.: Mir, 1983 – 307 s., il.
Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneyshie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya / D. N. Demenev // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. № 10 (34). S. 21-28.
Gegel' G.-V.-Fridrikh. Estetika, t. 3. M.: Iskusstvo, 1971, S. 235.
Koren' R.V. Triedinye sistemy kak metayazyk kartiny mira // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. – 2013. – № 8. – S.70-116. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.722. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_722.html.
Zaytsev A. S. Nauka o tsvete i zhivopis'. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1986. – 158 s.: il., [31] l. il.
Gurevich P. S. Ponyatie «kholona» v estetike K. Uilbera / P. S. Gurevich // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. № 10 (34). S. 5-11.
Demenev D.N. Nekotorye aspekty dialektichnosti protsessa sozdaniya zhivopisnogo proizvedeniya. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. – 2014. – № 9. – S.150-185. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.9.13549. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13549.html
Demenev, D. N. Ontologicheskie osnovaniya khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva [Tekst] : dissertatsiya na soisk. uchen. step. kan. filos. nauk / D. N. Demenev ; nauch. ruk. E. V. Degtyarev ; MaGU . – Magnitogorsk, 2011. – 167 s. – Bibliogr.: s. 153-167.
Demenev D.N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 8. - C. 109 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.8.13400. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html
S.Yu. Ivanov Strukturnye komponenty kartiny mira. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 3. - C. 86 - 97.
Pogontseva D.V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya dinamika predstavleniy o zhenskoy krasote // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 67 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14612. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14612.html
Rozin V.M. Kommentarii k knige N.N.Volkova «Tsvet v zhivopisi» // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2015. - 1. - C. 86 - 101. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.1.13677.
Demenev D.N. Nekotorye aspekty dialektichnosti protsessa sozdaniya zhivopisnogo proizvedeniya. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 9. - C. 150 - 185. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.9.13549. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13549.html
E. V. Zabelina Simul'taneizm kak proryv vizual'nykh obrazov
vo vremennoe izmerenie // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 75 - 83.
Korobeynikov A.G., Ismagilov V.S., Kopytenko Yu.A., Petrishchev M.S. Issledovanie geoelektricheskoy struktury zemnoy kory na baze analiza fazovykh skorostey ul'tranizkochastotnykh geomagnitnykh variatsiy // Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 36 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.2.8736. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_8736.html
D.N. Demenev Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneyshie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 10. - C. 21 - 28.
A.N. Lipov Zolotoe sechenie kak osnovnoy morfologicheskiy zakon // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 9. - C. 96 - 108.
N. V. Serov Tsvet, iskusstvo, kul'turologiya:
kody otnositel'noy determinatsii
sinestezii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 97 - 104.

Аннотация: The main subject of this research are taste judgments in the visual arts. Several centuries ago, German philosopher Immanuel Kant formulated his famous antinomy of taste. According to the author they remain relevant to this day. Contradictions between the public and professional and artistic (personal) preferences, the author examines how the struggle between two authoritarian systems: from the perspective of a viewer (customer) and from the perspective of the Author. The author of this study believes that it is absolutely free from any conditions the artist was at the dawn of the art in primitive society. Removing the taste of the contradictions in contemporary artistic practice, in the opinion of the author of the study, through an "action conventions". Methodological base of research is the method of the structurally functional analysis; dialectical method; a method of intellectual speculation, as well as General scientific (General logical) methods: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy. The study's author comes to the following conclusions:1. The great assumption of I. Kant about the social background of the antinomies, remains relevant today.2. A century later, from early modernist experiments, in the synthesis of the aforementioned constructs, the modern visual art comes to the measure of conditionality. The concept of "measure of conditionality" is a a so-called aurea mediocritas (Latin) – the "Golden mean" and gives a key to the synthesis of these and other opposites.

Ключевые слова: Reasoning, Contradiction, Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, Art, Authoritativeness , Measure of conditionality, Painter, Taste

Библиография:
D. Ya. Severyukhin Khudozhestvennyy rynok i samoorganizatsiya khudozhnikov Leningrada–Sankt-Peterburga v perekhodnyy period (seredina 1980-kh – seredina 2000-kh godov) // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 74 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.8.
Pogontseva D.V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya dinamika predstavleniy o zhenskoy krasote // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 67 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14612. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14612.html
Bekon F. Novyy Organon. Aforizmy ob istolkovanii prirody i tsarstva cheloveka // Sochineniya. V 2 tt. M.: Mysl', 1978. T. 2. 575 s.
Kant I. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. Tom 5. M.: Mysl', 1966. 564 s.
Trubetskoy N. S. Osnovy fonologii / N.S. Trubetskoy. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoy literatury, 1960. 372, [1] s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Pod redaktsiey V.S. Stepina: V 4 tt. M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 4. 736 s.
Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskiy B.A. Uslovnost' v iskusstve / Lotman Yu.M. // Ob iskusstve. SPb.: «Iskusstvo – SPb», 2000.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: INFRA-M, 2009. 570 s.
Demenev D. N. Dialektika iskusstva: monografiya / D.N. Demenev. Magnitogorsk: Izd-vo Magnitogorsk. gos. tekhn. un-ta im. G.I. Nosova, 2015. 146 s.
Sulzer J. G. Allgmeine Theorie der schonen Kunste, Bd. II / J. G. Sulzer. Leipzig, 1794. S. 371.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1999. 1472 s.
Karlik E. A. Edinaya teoriya svoystv – napravlenie sozdaniya novykh osnov nauki / E. A. Karlik // Ezhemesyachnyy zhurnal Evraziyskogo Soyuza Uchenykh: sb. statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Otv.red. D.P. Karkushin. Moskva, 2014. № 6 (14). Vyp. 6. S. 74-76.
Ziegenfuss, W. Di Uberwindung des Geschmacks / W. Ziegenfuss. Potsdam, 1949. S. 113.
Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneyshie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya / D. N. Demenev // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. № 10 (34). S. 21-28.
Demenev D. N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 8. S.109-139. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html (Data obrashcheniya 25.12.2015);
Demenev D.N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 8. - C. 109 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.8.13400. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html
V. S. Zhidkov O spetsifike iskusstva XXI veka // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 22 - 37.
Lipskiy V.N. O vzaimootnosheniyakh khudozhnika i vlasti v Rossii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 62 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11961.
S. M. Chervonnaya «Realizm bez beregov» Rozhe Garodi i ponyatie granits i beregov v sovetskoy ideologii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 2. - C. 87 - 94.

References (transliteration):
D. Ya. Severyukhin Khudozhestvennyy rynok i samoorganizatsiya khudozhnikov Leningrada–Sankt-Peterburga v perekhodnyy period (seredina 1980-kh – seredina 2000-kh godov) // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 74 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.8.
Pogontseva D.V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya dinamika predstavleniy o zhenskoy krasote // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 67 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14612. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14612.html
Bekon F. Novyy Organon. Aforizmy ob istolkovanii prirody i tsarstva cheloveka // Sochineniya. V 2 tt. M.: Mysl', 1978. T. 2. 575 s.
Kant I. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. Tom 5. M.: Mysl', 1966. 564 s.
Trubetskoy N. S. Osnovy fonologii / N.S. Trubetskoy. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoy literatury, 1960. 372, [1] s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Pod redaktsiey V.S. Stepina: V 4 tt. M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 4. 736 s.
Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskiy B.A. Uslovnost' v iskusstve / Lotman Yu.M. // Ob iskusstve. SPb.: «Iskusstvo – SPb», 2000.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: INFRA-M, 2009. 570 s.
Demenev D. N. Dialektika iskusstva: monografiya / D.N. Demenev. Magnitogorsk: Izd-vo Magnitogorsk. gos. tekhn. un-ta im. G.I. Nosova, 2015. 146 s.
Sulzer J. G. Allgmeine Theorie der schonen Kunste, Bd. II / J. G. Sulzer. Leipzig, 1794. S. 371.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1999. 1472 s.
Karlik E. A. Edinaya teoriya svoystv – napravlenie sozdaniya novykh osnov nauki / E. A. Karlik // Ezhemesyachnyy zhurnal Evraziyskogo Soyuza Uchenykh: sb. statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Otv.red. D.P. Karkushin. Moskva, 2014. № 6 (14). Vyp. 6. S. 74-76.
Ziegenfuss, W. Di Uberwindung des Geschmacks / W. Ziegenfuss. Potsdam, 1949. S. 113.
Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneyshie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya / D. N. Demenev // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. № 10 (34). S. 21-28.
Demenev D. N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 8. S.109-139. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html (Data obrashcheniya 25.12.2015);
Demenev D.N. Vzaimodeystvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 8. - C. 109 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.8.13400. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html
V. S. Zhidkov O spetsifike iskusstva XXI veka // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 22 - 37.
Lipskiy V.N. O vzaimootnosheniyakh khudozhnika i vlasti v Rossii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 62 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11961.
S. M. Chervonnaya «Realizm bez beregov» Rozhe Garodi i ponyatie granits i beregov v sovetskoy ideologii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 2. - C. 87 - 94.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the fundamental philosophical aesthetic ideas of Y. F. Samarin and N. V. Gogol. The author determines the characteristic to both scholars ways for solution of the problem of transcending the boundaries of art, which is most significant in Russian culture. From the thinkers’ perspective, the art has to express “national beginning” and serve it: encourage constructive powers, harmonize relationship within the society, and other. Samarin was a creatively gifted individual, while Gogol, especially in his later years, was leaning towards religious-philosophical reasoning of the world and human. Thus, the analysis of various texts (letters, articles, creative oeuvres) and correlation of the aesthetic views of the philosopher and writer are justified. According to Samarin, Gogol captured and expressed in his works main features of the Russian national character. Particularly, the remarkable Gogol’s laugh is the representation of Russian folk spirit. The author concludes that views of Samarin and Gogol on art and its role in life coincided in many aspects. They both believe that there is no that of human without that which is truly national, but the meaning of the Russian art is in its global calling.

Библиография:
Poddubnaya R. P. Samariny. Samara: Ofort, 2008. - 584 s.
Sukhov A. D. Stoletnyaya diskussiya: zapadnichestvo i samobytnost' v russkoy filosofii. M.: IFRAN, 1998. - 198 s.
Eymontova R. G. Nepriznannyy prorok primireniya. (Gogol' i prosveshchenie Rossii).// V razdum'yakh o Rossii. XIX v., M.: Arkheograficheskiy tsentr, 1996. S. 155 - 188.
Lapshin I. I. Zakony myshleniya i formy poznaniya. Spb.: Tip. V. Bezobrazova i K°, 1906. - 458 s.
Blok A.A. Intelligentsiya i revolyutsiya // A. Blok. Sobr. Soch.: V 6 t. L.: Khudozh. lit., 1982. T. 4. - 464 s.
Losev A.F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki // A.F. Losev. Iz rannikh proizvedeniy. M.: Pravda, 1990. - 656 s.
Muzykal'naya estetika Rossii v XI-XVIII vekov. M.: Muzyka, 1973. - 238 s.
Platon. Pir // Platon. Sobr. Soch.: V 4 t. M.: Mysl', 1993. T.2. S. 96.
Tolstoy L.N. Chto takoe iskusstvo? // Sobr. soch. v 22-kh tt. T. 15. M.: "Khudozhestvennaya literatura", 1983. - 430 s.
Samarin Yu. F. Stat'ya o Gogole. NIOR RGB F. 265. Op. 73. Ed. Khr. 5.
Gogol' N.V. Peterburgskie povesti. M.: Izdatel'stvo "Detskaya literatura", 2012.- 240 s.
Samarin Yu. F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: ROSSPEN, 1996. - 608 s.
Florenskiy P. A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny: V 2 t. M.: Izdatel'stvo "Pravda", 1990. T. 1. Ch. 1. - 493 s.
Samarin Yu.F. Pis'ma I. S. Aksakovu. NIOR RGB F. 265. Op. 38. Ed. Khr. 2.
Samarin Yu.F. Sochineniya Yu.F. Samarina: T. 1-10, 12. 1877-1911. T. 1. M.: Tovarishchestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, 1900. - 403 s.
Kireevskiy I. V. Kritika i estetika. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. - 440 s.
Khomyakov A.S. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 1—3. — 2-e izd. — M., 1878—1882, T. 1.
Samarin Yu. F. Knyaz'. NIOR RGB F. 265. Op. 221. Ed. Khr. 14. Rabota 1845 g.
Samarin Yu.F. Stat'i. Vospominaniya. Pis'ma (1840-1976). M.: Terra, 1997. - 280 s.
Lapshin I.I. Pushkin i russkie kompozitory. // Khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo. Pg.: Tsentral'noe kooperativnoe izdatel'stvo "Mysl'", 1923. - 336 s.
Koshelev V. A. Aleksey Stepanovich Khomyakov. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000. - 504 s.
Repin I. E. Repin ob iskusstve. M.: Akademiya khudozhestv SSSR, 1960.
Samarin Yu.F. Sochineniya: T. 1-10, 12. 1877-1911. M.: Tovarishchestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, T.12, Pis'ma 1840-1853. - 477 s.
Gogol' N.V. Vybrannye mesta iz perepiski k druz'yam. Spb.: Azbuka-Attikus, 2012. - 291 s.

References (transliteration):
Poddubnaya R. P. Samariny. Samara: Ofort, 2008. - 584 s.
Sukhov A. D. Stoletnyaya diskussiya: zapadnichestvo i samobytnost' v russkoy filosofii. M.: IFRAN, 1998. - 198 s.
Eymontova R. G. Nepriznannyy prorok primireniya. (Gogol' i prosveshchenie Rossii).// V razdum'yakh o Rossii. XIX v., M.: Arkheograficheskiy tsentr, 1996. S. 155 - 188.
Lapshin I. I. Zakony myshleniya i formy poznaniya. Spb.: Tip. V. Bezobrazova i K°, 1906. - 458 s.
Blok A.A. Intelligentsiya i revolyutsiya // A. Blok. Sobr. Soch.: V 6 t. L.: Khudozh. lit., 1982. T. 4. - 464 s.
Losev A.F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki // A.F. Losev. Iz rannikh proizvedeniy. M.: Pravda, 1990. - 656 s.
Muzykal'naya estetika Rossii v XI-XVIII vekov. M.: Muzyka, 1973. - 238 s.
Platon. Pir // Platon. Sobr. Soch.: V 4 t. M.: Mysl', 1993. T.2. S. 96.
Tolstoy L.N. Chto takoe iskusstvo? // Sobr. soch. v 22-kh tt. T. 15. M.: "Khudozhestvennaya literatura", 1983. - 430 s.
Samarin Yu. F. Stat'ya o Gogole. NIOR RGB F. 265. Op. 73. Ed. Khr. 5.
Gogol' N.V. Peterburgskie povesti. M.: Izdatel'stvo "Detskaya literatura", 2012.- 240 s.
Samarin Yu. F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: ROSSPEN, 1996. - 608 s.
Florenskiy P. A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny: V 2 t. M.: Izdatel'stvo "Pravda", 1990. T. 1. Ch. 1. - 493 s.
Samarin Yu.F. Pis'ma I. S. Aksakovu. NIOR RGB F. 265. Op. 38. Ed. Khr. 2.
Samarin Yu.F. Sochineniya Yu.F. Samarina: T. 1-10, 12. 1877-1911. T. 1. M.: Tovarishchestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, 1900. - 403 s.
Kireevskiy I. V. Kritika i estetika. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. - 440 s.
Khomyakov A.S. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 1—3. — 2-e izd. — M., 1878—1882, T. 1.
Samarin Yu. F. Knyaz'. NIOR RGB F. 265. Op. 221. Ed. Khr. 14. Rabota 1845 g.
Samarin Yu.F. Stat'i. Vospominaniya. Pis'ma (1840-1976). M.: Terra, 1997. - 280 s.
Lapshin I.I. Pushkin i russkie kompozitory. // Khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo. Pg.: Tsentral'noe kooperativnoe izdatel'stvo "Mysl'", 1923. - 336 s.
Koshelev V. A. Aleksey Stepanovich Khomyakov. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000. - 504 s.
Repin I. E. Repin ob iskusstve. M.: Akademiya khudozhestv SSSR, 1960.
Samarin Yu.F. Sochineniya: T. 1-10, 12. 1877-1911. M.: Tovarishchestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, T.12, Pis'ma 1840-1853. - 477 s.
Gogol' N.V. Vybrannye mesta iz perepiski k druz'yam. Spb.: Azbuka-Attikus, 2012. - 291 s.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the early years of the creative work of the Russian film director Vasily Grogorievich Sakhnovsky in the Komissarjevsky Theatre (1914-1919). The object is the process of formation of the creative method of Sakhnovsky. We should point out to the several subjects of research, which are usually understood as peculiarities of establishment of the creative method of the film director: influence of the theoretical concept of theatrical romanticism and stage of F. F. Komissarjevsky, influence of the cultural context of the early XX century upon the creative method of the film director (philosophy of symbolism, V. Ivanov), later self-reflection of the artist presented in the theoretical and stage works (spectacles “Requiem”, “Lulu”). Scientific novelty consists in the fact that based on the recently published and yet unpublished sources, for the first time an attempt is made to reconstruct the history of the Komissarjevsky Theatre. The author conducts a systemic analysis of the specifics of formation of the creative method of V. G. Sakhnovsky, who for a long time was out of sight within the Russian theatre historians. The author comes to the following conclusions: the theory of romantic theatre and mutual stage experience of F. F. Komissarjevsky and V. G. Sakhnovsky became the theoretic-philosophical and practical foundation of the directorial method of Sakhnovsky, as well as determined his further development; on the other hand, the analysis of independent works of Sakhnovsky and circumstances of his conflict with Komissarjevsky detected flaws in the forming directorial technique of Sakhnovsky.

Ключевые слова: creative method, directing, Komissarzhevsky, Sakhnovsky, symbolism, romanticism, theater, philosophy, Komissarjevsky Theatre, studio theater

Библиография:
Alpatova I.L. Vechnoe vo vremennom // Komissarzhevskiy F.F. Ya i teatr / Vstup. st., primech. I.L. Alpatovoy. M., 1999. S. 7-57.
Gorchakov N. M. V. G. Sakhnovskiy. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo. [Stat'ya. Varianty. Verstka. Granki] // RGALI. F. 2959. Op. 1. Ed. khr. 88.
Zagorskiy M. «Lulu» spektakl' v teatre im. V.F.Komissarzhevskoy // Teatral'nyy kur'er. M., 1918. № 1. S. 3.
Ivanov V.I. Dve stikhii v sovremennom simvolizme // Ivanov V.I. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 143-169.
Komissarzhevskiy F.F. Teatral'nye prelyudii. M., 1916. 169 s.
Markov P.A. Istoriya moego teatral'nogo sovremennika // Markov P.A. Kniga vospominaniy. M., 1983. S. 7-354.
Markov P.A. Moskovskaya teatral'naya zhizn' v 1923–1924 godakh // Markov P. A. O teatre: V 4 t. M., 1976. T. 3. S. 155-169.
Markov P.A. Pervaya studiya MKhT (Sulerzhitskiy – Vakhtangov – Chekhov) // Markov P.A. O teatre: V 4 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1974. T. 1. S. 347-417.
Pis'ma F. F. Komissarzhevskogo V. G. Sakhnovskomu, O. D. Kamenevoy, A. V. Lunacharskomu i dr. 1915 – 1919 // Mnemozina: Dokumenty i fakty iz istorii otechestvennogo teatra XX veka. M., 2009. Vyp. 4. S. 324-351.
Programma zanyatiy v stsenicheskoy studii, uchrezhdennoy F.F. Komissarzhevskim v 1910 godu // Muzey MKhAT. Fond V.G. Sakhnovskogo. № 8195.
Sakhnovskiy V.G. Pis'mo k K.S.Stanislavskomu. Khudozhestvennyy teatr i romantizm na stsene. M., 1917. 80 s.
Sakhnovskiy V.G. Teatr imeni V.F.Komissarzhevskoy. K pyatiletiyu ego khudozhestvennoy raboty // Mnemozina: Dokumenty i fakty iz istorii otechestvennogo teatra XX veka. M., 2009. Vyp. 4. S. 278-301.
Sakhnovskiy V.G. Teatral'noe skital'chestvo // Mnemozina: Dokumenty i fakty iz istorii otechestvennogo teatra XX veka. M., 2009. Vyp. 4. S. 180-254.

References (transliteration):
Alpatova I.L. Vechnoe vo vremennom // Komissarzhevskiy F.F. Ya i teatr / Vstup. st., primech. I.L. Alpatovoy. M., 1999. S. 7-57.
Gorchakov N. M. V. G. Sakhnovskiy. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo. [Stat'ya. Varianty. Verstka. Granki] // RGALI. F. 2959. Op. 1. Ed. khr. 88.
Zagorskiy M. «Lulu» spektakl' v teatre im. V.F.Komissarzhevskoy // Teatral'nyy kur'er. M., 1918. № 1. S. 3.
Ivanov V.I. Dve stikhii v sovremennom simvolizme // Ivanov V.I. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 143-169.
Komissarzhevskiy F.F. Teatral'nye prelyudii. M., 1916. 169 s.
Markov P.A. Istoriya moego teatral'nogo sovremennika // Markov P.A. Kniga vospominaniy. M., 1983. S. 7-354.
Markov P.A. Moskovskaya teatral'naya zhizn' v 1923–1924 godakh // Markov P. A. O teatre: V 4 t. M., 1976. T. 3. S. 155-169.
Markov P.A. Pervaya studiya MKhT (Sulerzhitskiy – Vakhtangov – Chekhov) // Markov P.A. O teatre: V 4 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1974. T. 1. S. 347-417.
Pis'ma F. F. Komissarzhevskogo V. G. Sakhnovskomu, O. D. Kamenevoy, A. V. Lunacharskomu i dr. 1915 – 1919 // Mnemozina: Dokumenty i fakty iz istorii otechestvennogo teatra XX veka. M., 2009. Vyp. 4. S. 324-351.
Programma zanyatiy v stsenicheskoy studii, uchrezhdennoy F.F. Komissarzhevskim v 1910 godu // Muzey MKhAT. Fond V.G. Sakhnovskogo. № 8195.
Sakhnovskiy V.G. Pis'mo k K.S.Stanislavskomu. Khudozhestvennyy teatr i romantizm na stsene. M., 1917. 80 s.
Sakhnovskiy V.G. Teatr imeni V.F.Komissarzhevskoy. K pyatiletiyu ego khudozhestvennoy raboty // Mnemozina: Dokumenty i fakty iz istorii otechestvennogo teatra XX veka. M., 2009. Vyp. 4. S. 278-301.
Sakhnovskiy V.G. Teatral'noe skital'chestvo // Mnemozina: Dokumenty i fakty iz istorii otechestvennogo teatra XX veka. M., 2009. Vyp. 4. S. 180-254.

Аннотация: The subject of the research is the problem of art's conceptuality in the aesthetics of French symbolism and description of actual contradictions. This topic is discussed by using the methods of classification and analysis of the degree of scientific development of the problem in Russian and foreign scientific and practical researches which, on the one hand, complete one another and, on the other hand, allow to define specific features of each aspect. The author of the article analyzes different approaches to studying the art of symbolism as well as describes undeveloped aspects of the topic. The main research method used by the author is the retrospective analysis. The method is used in order to see and understand the logic of the development of French symblolism as well as why it had such a strong impact and was so intensively studied by different branches of science. In her research Maslova underlines the complexity of analyzing the problem and developing the single concept of art in French symbolism. This proves the importance of the present research and allows to combine different scientific approaches to the problem. Having described, classified and analyzed the main Russian and foreign scientific researches on the research topic, Maslova offers her own procedure for developing the methodological basis of the research concerning methodological, methodic and prognostic grounds. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the researcher describes the cause-and-effect relationship between actualization of some specific features and themes of French symbolism at the end of the XIXth and XXth centuries and emphasizes the complexity of the categorical framework in the aesthetics of French symbolism. 

Ключевые слова: retrospection, problem, approach, conception, art, analysis, French symbolism, symbolism, aesthetics, symbol

Библиография:
Filologicheskie etyudy: Sb. nauch. st. molodykh uchenykh: V 3-kh ch. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta. Vyp. II, ch. II, 2008. − S. 292—295.
Loshakov, R.A. Fenomen i simvol // Vestnik Russkoy Khristianskoy Gumanitarony Akademii, 2005. — № 6. — S. 73-84.
Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka / Pod red. D.V. Dmitrieva. M.: Astrel': AST, 2003. − 1582s.
Arutyunova N. D. Obraz, metafora, simvol v kontekste zhizni i kul'tury // Res philologica. Filologicheskie issledovaniya. — M.; L.: Nauka, 1990. — 468 s.
Berdyaev, N.A. Krizis iskusstva Tekst. / N.A. Berdyaev. M. : Interprint, 1990. − 47 s.
Oblomievskiy D. D. Frantsuzskiy simvolizm. M., 1973. – 300 s.
Berdyaev, N.A. Krizis iskusstva Tekst. / N.A. Berdyaev. M. : Interprint, 1990. − 47 s.
Mamardashvili, M.K. Simvol i soznanie: Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke Tekst. / M.K. Mamardashvili, A.M. Pyatigorskiy. — M. : Shk. «Yazyki russkoy kul'tury», 1997. — 217 s.
Spirova E.M. Simvol kak ponyatie filosofskoy antropologii. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora filosofskikh nauk . Spetsial'nost': 09.00.13-Filosofskaya antropologiya, filosofiya kul'tury. Moskva, 2011. − 378 s.
Gegel', G. Raboty raznykh let Tekst. : v 2 t. / G. Gegel'. M. : Mysl', 1972-1973.-T. 1.-M., 1972.-668 s.; T. 2.-M., 1973. − 630 s.
Lazurskiy, A.F. Klassifikatsiya lichnostey Tekst. / A.F. Lazurskiy.-Pg. : Gos. izd-vo, 1921. − 401 s.
Markuze, G. Odnomernyy chelovek Tekst. / G. Markuze. M. : REFL-book, 1994. − 256 s.
Bakhtin, M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva Tekst. / M.M. Bakhtin.-M. : Iskusstvo, 1979. − 424 s.
Bibler, B.C. Na granyakh logiki kul'tury Tekst.: kniga izbrannykh ocherkov / B.C. Bibler. M. : Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo,1997. − 440 s.
Bakhtin, M.M. Avtor i geroy. K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk Tekst. / M.M. Bakhtin. SPb. : Azbuka, 2000. − 335 s.
Lavrov, A.V. Russkie simvolisty: etyudy i razyskaniya Tekst. / A.V. Lavrov. M. : Progress-Pleyada, 2007. − 632 s.
Soboleva, M. E. Sistema i metod v filosofii simvolicheskikh form E. Kassirera // Voprosy filosofii. № 2, 2000. −S. 87-100.
Fokht, B. A. Ponyatie simvolicheskoy formy i problema znacheniya v filosofii yazyka E. Kassirera // Voprosy filosofii. № 9, 1998. — S. 150—174.
Bart, R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika Tekst. / R. Bart. M. : Izd. gruppa «Progress», «Univers», 1994. − 616 s.
Moymir, G. Znakotvorchestvo: Semiotika russkogo avangarda Tekst. / G. Moymir. SPb. : Akademicheskiy proekt, Izd-vo DNK, 2007. − 519 s.
Lotman, Yu.M. Ob iskusstve Tekst. / Yu.M. Lotman. SPb. : Iskusstvo-SPB, 1998. − 704 s.
Lotman Yu.M. Lyudi i znaki. / V kn. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. — SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2010. − S. 6.
Solomonik, A. Filosofiya znakovykh sistem i yazyk. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. Mn.: MET, 2002. − 408 s.
Burd'e, P. Prakticheskiy smysl Tekst. / P. Burd'e. SPb. : Aleteyya, M.: Institut eksperimental'noy sotsiologii, 2001 g. — 562 s.
Moss, M. Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost': trudy po sotsial'noy antropologii Tekst. / M. Moss. — M. : IF «Vostochnoy literatury» RAN, 1996. − 359 s.
Kreydlin, G. Neverbal'naya semiotika: Yazyk tela i estestvennyy yazyk Tekst. / G. Kreydlin. M. : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004. − 584 s.
Lotman, Yu.M. Ob iskusstve Tekst. / Yu.M. Lotman. SPb. : Iskusstvo-SPB, 1998. − 704 s.
Anri de Ren'e. Sobranie sochineniy. T.1-19. L.: Academia, 1923—1926.
Valeri, P. [Stikhi]//B. Lifshits. Ot romantikov do syurrealistov. Antologiya frantsuzskoy poezii. L.: Vremya, 1934. S. 99 — 105.
Gumilev, N.S. O Verkharne // Gazeta «Rech'» ot 24 noyabrya 1908 g. [Stikhi]//B. Livshits. Ot romantikov do syurrealistov. Antologiya frantsuzskoy poezii. L.: Vremya, 1934. S. 99 — 105.
Poeziya Frantsii. Vek XIX. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1985. − s.382-384.
Batay, Zh. Bleyk // Batay Zh. Literatura i Zlo [: Sb. esse:]. M.: MGU, 1994.
Berdsley, O. Risunki. Proza. Stikhi. Aforizmy. Pis'ma. Vospominaniya i stat'i o Berdslee / Vstupitel'naya stat'ya, proekt al'boma, sostavlenie, podgotovka tekstov i primechaniya A. Basmanova. — M.: Igra-tekhnika, 1992. — 288 s.
Bandura, A.I. Aleksandr Skryabin.-Chelyabinsk, 2004. − 384 s.
Levaya, T.N. Kosmos Skryabina // Russkaya muzyka i XX vek. / Red.-sost. M.A. Aranovskiy.-M., 1997.
Gurevich, A.Ya. Srednevekovyy mir: kul'tura bezmolvstvuyushchego bol'shinstva Tekst. / A.Ya. Gurevich. — M. : Iskusstvo, 1990. − 395 s.
Pushkarev, L.N. Chto takoe mentalitet? Istoriograficheskie zametki Tekst. / L.N. Pushkarev // Otechestvennaya istoriya. № 3. 1995. − S. 164-165.
Butenko, A.P. Mentalitet rossiyan i evraziystvo Tekst. / A.P. Butenko, Yu.V. Kolesnichenko // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. 1996. − S. 92-102.
N. A. Khrenov Simvolizm na fone nadloma imperii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 83 - 91.
N. A. Khrenov Sintez Zapada i Vostoka
kak kul'turologicheskaya problema // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 18 - 27.

References (transliteration):
Filologicheskie etyudy: Sb. nauch. st. molodykh uchenykh: V 3-kh ch. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta. Vyp. II, ch. II, 2008. − S. 292—295.
Loshakov, R.A. Fenomen i simvol // Vestnik Russkoy Khristianskoy Gumanitarony Akademii, 2005. — № 6. — S. 73-84.
Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka / Pod red. D.V. Dmitrieva. M.: Astrel': AST, 2003. − 1582s.
Arutyunova N. D. Obraz, metafora, simvol v kontekste zhizni i kul'tury // Res philologica. Filologicheskie issledovaniya. — M.; L.: Nauka, 1990. — 468 s.
Berdyaev, N.A. Krizis iskusstva Tekst. / N.A. Berdyaev. M. : Interprint, 1990. − 47 s.
Oblomievskiy D. D. Frantsuzskiy simvolizm. M., 1973. – 300 s.
Berdyaev, N.A. Krizis iskusstva Tekst. / N.A. Berdyaev. M. : Interprint, 1990. − 47 s.
Mamardashvili, M.K. Simvol i soznanie: Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke Tekst. / M.K. Mamardashvili, A.M. Pyatigorskiy. — M. : Shk. «Yazyki russkoy kul'tury», 1997. — 217 s.
Spirova E.M. Simvol kak ponyatie filosofskoy antropologii. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora filosofskikh nauk . Spetsial'nost': 09.00.13-Filosofskaya antropologiya, filosofiya kul'tury. Moskva, 2011. − 378 s.
Gegel', G. Raboty raznykh let Tekst. : v 2 t. / G. Gegel'. M. : Mysl', 1972-1973.-T. 1.-M., 1972.-668 s.; T. 2.-M., 1973. − 630 s.
Lazurskiy, A.F. Klassifikatsiya lichnostey Tekst. / A.F. Lazurskiy.-Pg. : Gos. izd-vo, 1921. − 401 s.
Markuze, G. Odnomernyy chelovek Tekst. / G. Markuze. M. : REFL-book, 1994. − 256 s.
Bakhtin, M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva Tekst. / M.M. Bakhtin.-M. : Iskusstvo, 1979. − 424 s.
Bibler, B.C. Na granyakh logiki kul'tury Tekst.: kniga izbrannykh ocherkov / B.C. Bibler. M. : Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo,1997. − 440 s.
Bakhtin, M.M. Avtor i geroy. K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk Tekst. / M.M. Bakhtin. SPb. : Azbuka, 2000. − 335 s.
Lavrov, A.V. Russkie simvolisty: etyudy i razyskaniya Tekst. / A.V. Lavrov. M. : Progress-Pleyada, 2007. − 632 s.
Soboleva, M. E. Sistema i metod v filosofii simvolicheskikh form E. Kassirera // Voprosy filosofii. № 2, 2000. −S. 87-100.
Fokht, B. A. Ponyatie simvolicheskoy formy i problema znacheniya v filosofii yazyka E. Kassirera // Voprosy filosofii. № 9, 1998. — S. 150—174.
Bart, R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika Tekst. / R. Bart. M. : Izd. gruppa «Progress», «Univers», 1994. − 616 s.
Moymir, G. Znakotvorchestvo: Semiotika russkogo avangarda Tekst. / G. Moymir. SPb. : Akademicheskiy proekt, Izd-vo DNK, 2007. − 519 s.
Lotman, Yu.M. Ob iskusstve Tekst. / Yu.M. Lotman. SPb. : Iskusstvo-SPB, 1998. − 704 s.
Lotman Yu.M. Lyudi i znaki. / V kn. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. — SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2010. − S. 6.
Solomonik, A. Filosofiya znakovykh sistem i yazyk. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. Mn.: MET, 2002. − 408 s.
Burd'e, P. Prakticheskiy smysl Tekst. / P. Burd'e. SPb. : Aleteyya, M.: Institut eksperimental'noy sotsiologii, 2001 g. — 562 s.
Moss, M. Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost': trudy po sotsial'noy antropologii Tekst. / M. Moss. — M. : IF «Vostochnoy literatury» RAN, 1996. − 359 s.
Kreydlin, G. Neverbal'naya semiotika: Yazyk tela i estestvennyy yazyk Tekst. / G. Kreydlin. M. : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004. − 584 s.
Lotman, Yu.M. Ob iskusstve Tekst. / Yu.M. Lotman. SPb. : Iskusstvo-SPB, 1998. − 704 s.
Anri de Ren'e. Sobranie sochineniy. T.1-19. L.: Academia, 1923—1926.
Valeri, P. [Stikhi]//B. Lifshits. Ot romantikov do syurrealistov. Antologiya frantsuzskoy poezii. L.: Vremya, 1934. S. 99 — 105.
Gumilev, N.S. O Verkharne // Gazeta «Rech'» ot 24 noyabrya 1908 g. [Stikhi]//B. Livshits. Ot romantikov do syurrealistov. Antologiya frantsuzskoy poezii. L.: Vremya, 1934. S. 99 — 105.
Poeziya Frantsii. Vek XIX. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1985. − s.382-384.
Batay, Zh. Bleyk // Batay Zh. Literatura i Zlo [: Sb. esse:]. M.: MGU, 1994.
Berdsley, O. Risunki. Proza. Stikhi. Aforizmy. Pis'ma. Vospominaniya i stat'i o Berdslee / Vstupitel'naya stat'ya, proekt al'boma, sostavlenie, podgotovka tekstov i primechaniya A. Basmanova. — M.: Igra-tekhnika, 1992. — 288 s.
Bandura, A.I. Aleksandr Skryabin.-Chelyabinsk, 2004. − 384 s.
Levaya, T.N. Kosmos Skryabina // Russkaya muzyka i XX vek. / Red.-sost. M.A. Aranovskiy.-M., 1997.
Gurevich, A.Ya. Srednevekovyy mir: kul'tura bezmolvstvuyushchego bol'shinstva Tekst. / A.Ya. Gurevich. — M. : Iskusstvo, 1990. − 395 s.
Pushkarev, L.N. Chto takoe mentalitet? Istoriograficheskie zametki Tekst. / L.N. Pushkarev // Otechestvennaya istoriya. № 3. 1995. − S. 164-165.
Butenko, A.P. Mentalitet rossiyan i evraziystvo Tekst. / A.P. Butenko, Yu.V. Kolesnichenko // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. 1996. − S. 92-102.
N. A. Khrenov Simvolizm na fone nadloma imperii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 83 - 91.
N. A. Khrenov Sintez Zapada i Vostoka
kak kul'turologicheskaya problema // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 18 - 27.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the analysis of Neo Byzantium art in relation to the philosophical-religious environment at the tun of the XIXth and the XXth centuries. The main purpose of the research is to describe parallels and contradictions that can be found in researches of the leading philosophers of those times (V. Soloviev, V. Ivanov, S. Bulgakov, P. Florensky and N. Berdyaev) and to compare their views with the religious-national themes in the art of their contemporaries such as V. Vasnetsov, M. Nesterov and M. Vrubel. The subject of the research is the causes of the decline of religiosity in the society against the background of the uprise of philosophy and religion and ideology of art. The method of the comparative analysis of researches by religious philosophers of the turn of the XIXth and the XXth centuries with reference to religious art is being viewed from the point of view of the teachings of the church and representatives of true historical Christianity. Having analyzed various views of religious philosophers on the nature and purpose of theurgic creativity, the author of the article concludes that from the point of view of terminology it would be more reasonable to look at theurgy from the point of view of the medieval theological-philosophical idea of synergy. When being applied to art, this concept has the two elements that are equally important, the element of human ascension and the element of God's descent. This approach allows to better understand the spiritual essence of icon-painting and gives an opportunity to better formulate a universal definition of free spiritual art for all the time. 

Ключевые слова: Neo Byzantism, religious-philosophical worldview, crisis in art, free theurgy, art of ascension, art of descent, antinomy, sophiurgy, theanthropism, synergism

Библиография:
Akulinin V. N. Filosofiya vseedinstva: Ot V. S. Solov'eva k P. A. Florenskomu. – Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1990. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL:http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Akulin/ (data obrashcheniya 29.09.2013).
Berdyaev N. A. Krizis iskusstva. (Reprintnoe izdanie). – M. : Interprint, 1990. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL:http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Berd/Kr_Isk.php (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2013).
Berdyaev N. A. Novoe srednevekov'e. – Berlin, 1923.
Berdyaev N. A. Mutnye liki. Biblioteka «Vekhi». – 2002 g. Opubl.: Berdyaev N. «Filosofiya, tvorchestva kul'tury i iskusstva». T. 2. – M. : Iskusstvo, 1994 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/liki.htm# ftn2 (data obrashcheniya 11.11.2013).
Bulgakov C. Svet nevecherniy. Sozertsaniya i umozreniya. – M. : Put', 1917. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://magister.msk.ru/library/philos/bulgakov/bulgak05.htm (data obrashcheniya 25.10.2013).
Bychkov V. V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. – M. : Ladomir, 2007.
Bychkov V. V. Fenomen ikony: Istoriya. Bogoslovie. Estetika. Iskusstvo. – M. : Ladomir, 2009.
Bychkov V. V. Ikona i russkiy avangard nach. KhKh veka. Opublikovano : Kniga neklassicheskoy estetiki. – M. : IF RAN, 1998. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/bychkov/icon-avantg-ru.html (data obrashcheniya 22.04.2014).
Gavryushin N. K. Etyudy o razumnoy vere. – Minsk : Belorusskaya Pravoslavnaya Tserkov', 2010.
Gusakova V. O. Viktor Vasnetsov i religiozno-natsional'noe napravlenie v russkoy zhivopisi kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka. – SPb. : Avrora., 2008.
Ivanov V. I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel', 1974. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.rvb.ru/ivanov/vol2/01text/01papers/2_374.htm (data obrashcheniya 21.10.2013).
Trubetskoy Evgeniy, knyaz'. Tri ocherka o russkoy ikone: Umozrenie v kraskakh. Dva mira v drevnerusskoy ikonopisi. Rossiya v ee ikone. – M. : Info-Art, 1991.
Uspenskiy L. A. Bogoslovie ikony pravoslavnoy tserkvi. Izd. 2-e. – M. : Dar', 2008.
Florenskiy P. A. Ikonostas. – M. : AST, 2005.
Filosofiya russkogo religioznogo iskusstva XVI–XX vv. : antologiya / sost. i red. N. K. Gavryushin. – M..: Progress–Kul'tura, 1993.
Berseneva T.P. Sinergiya. Sinergetika. Dialektika. // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva. - 2013. - 5. - C. 35 - 46. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.5.9526. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_9526.html
Prokhorov M.M. Istina i deystvitel'nost' // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 6. - C. 293 - 387. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.333. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_333.html
N. A. Khrenov Russkoe iskusstvo rubezha XIX–XX vekov
v rakurse tsiklichnosti // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 380 - 397. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.8693.
Alekhina E.V. Kosmologicheskiy aspekt smysla zhizni v russkoy religioznoy filosofii (konets XIX – pervaya polovina KhKh veka) // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 6. - C. 545 - 589. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.624. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_624.html
A.A. Bliskavitskiy Epistemologicheskiy kontekst
v russkom simvolizme (na primere estetiki
Vyacheslava Ivanova). // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 6. - C. 162 - 169.

References (transliteration):
Akulinin V. N. Filosofiya vseedinstva: Ot V. S. Solov'eva k P. A. Florenskomu. – Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1990. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL:http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Akulin/ (data obrashcheniya 29.09.2013).
Berdyaev N. A. Krizis iskusstva. (Reprintnoe izdanie). – M. : Interprint, 1990. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL:http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Berd/Kr_Isk.php (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2013).
Berdyaev N. A. Novoe srednevekov'e. – Berlin, 1923.
Berdyaev N. A. Mutnye liki. Biblioteka «Vekhi». – 2002 g. Opubl.: Berdyaev N. «Filosofiya, tvorchestva kul'tury i iskusstva». T. 2. – M. : Iskusstvo, 1994 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/liki.htm# ftn2 (data obrashcheniya 11.11.2013).
Bulgakov C. Svet nevecherniy. Sozertsaniya i umozreniya. – M. : Put', 1917. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://magister.msk.ru/library/philos/bulgakov/bulgak05.htm (data obrashcheniya 25.10.2013).
Bychkov V. V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. – M. : Ladomir, 2007.
Bychkov V. V. Fenomen ikony: Istoriya. Bogoslovie. Estetika. Iskusstvo. – M. : Ladomir, 2009.
Bychkov V. V. Ikona i russkiy avangard nach. KhKh veka. Opublikovano : Kniga neklassicheskoy estetiki. – M. : IF RAN, 1998. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/bychkov/icon-avantg-ru.html (data obrashcheniya 22.04.2014).
Gavryushin N. K. Etyudy o razumnoy vere. – Minsk : Belorusskaya Pravoslavnaya Tserkov', 2010.
Gusakova V. O. Viktor Vasnetsov i religiozno-natsional'noe napravlenie v russkoy zhivopisi kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka. – SPb. : Avrora., 2008.
Ivanov V. I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel', 1974. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.rvb.ru/ivanov/vol2/01text/01papers/2_374.htm (data obrashcheniya 21.10.2013).
Trubetskoy Evgeniy, knyaz'. Tri ocherka o russkoy ikone: Umozrenie v kraskakh. Dva mira v drevnerusskoy ikonopisi. Rossiya v ee ikone. – M. : Info-Art, 1991.
Uspenskiy L. A. Bogoslovie ikony pravoslavnoy tserkvi. Izd. 2-e. – M. : Dar', 2008.
Florenskiy P. A. Ikonostas. – M. : AST, 2005.
Filosofiya russkogo religioznogo iskusstva XVI–XX vv. : antologiya / sost. i red. N. K. Gavryushin. – M..: Progress–Kul'tura, 1993.
Berseneva T.P. Sinergiya. Sinergetika. Dialektika. // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva. - 2013. - 5. - C. 35 - 46. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.5.9526. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_9526.html
Prokhorov M.M. Istina i deystvitel'nost' // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 6. - C. 293 - 387. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.333. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_333.html
N. A. Khrenov Russkoe iskusstvo rubezha XIX–XX vekov
v rakurse tsiklichnosti // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 380 - 397. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.8693.
Alekhina E.V. Kosmologicheskiy aspekt smysla zhizni v russkoy religioznoy filosofii (konets XIX – pervaya polovina KhKh veka) // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 6. - C. 545 - 589. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.624. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_624.html
A.A. Bliskavitskiy Epistemologicheskiy kontekst
v russkom simvolizme (na primere estetiki
Vyacheslava Ivanova). // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 6. - C. 162 - 169.

Аннотация: The process of creating an artwork as a playing interaction between an artist and art material is the subject of the current research. Appealing to this problem is an attempt to find effective methods of investigation of artistic ideas objectified in the work of fine arts. The author investigates the concepts of “interaction” and “playing”, defines the ontological status of playing and interaction as nonmaterial existence, and analyses the “artificiality”, “finesse” and “ordeal” of an artist and art material in the course of playing interaction. Animism as a ritual "attribution" of supernatural spiritual features to inanimate objects is claimed to reside in the creative dialogue (playing interaction) between an artist and a material of art. The chosen theme required the philosophical analysis of the range of connected problems which include: the problem of the ideal, language nature, visual thinking, and life meaning phases of an individual attitude to the world. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the creative dialogue (playing interaction) is studied through the language communication process and the scheme of acting that is an operation determined by both the peculiarities of the material and the “finesse” of the artist being the master of the language of the subject. The author concludes that objectified work of art as a result of interaction between the artist and the material to be an integral of features of finite and infinite poles of interaction. Thus, the artist engaged in the process of creating of the ideal interaction with the material of art creates new world of feelings. He is able to bring a work of art out of nowhere.

Ключевые слова: language, creative dialogue, interaction, play, art material, material of art, artist, artwork, work of art, operation, animism, the problem of the ideal

Библиография:
Zinchenko, V. P. Soznanie i tvorcheskiy akt. – M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2010-588 s.
Obrazovatel'naya funktsiya khudozhestvennoy kul'tury: monografiya / V. I. Zhukovskiy [i dr.]. – Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2013. – 222 s.
Dubrovskiy D. I. Problema ideal'nogo. – M.: Kanon, 2002. – 366 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I Igrovoy kharakter tvorcheskogo otnosheniya khudozhnika s materialom iskusstva // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya.-2009.-№ 6, ch.2. – S. 57-60.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D.V. Intellektual'naya vizualizatsiya sushchnosti. – Krasnoyarsk: KrGU, 1998. – 222 s.
Geraimchuk I. M. Teoriya tvorcheskogo protsessa. Kiev: Edel'veys, 2012. – 269 s.
Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / Pod red. V. E. Kemerova. – 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – London, Frankfurt-na-Mayne, Parizh, Lyuksemburg, Moskva, Minsk: Panprint, 1998. – 1064 s.
Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. – 423 s.
Vel'flin G. Osnovnye ponyatiya istorii iskusstv: problema evolyutsii stilya v novom iskusstve / per. s nem. A. A. Frankovskogo. – M.: V. Shevchuk, 2009. – 289 s.
Gegel' G. V. F. Nauka logiki: v 3 t. – M.: Mysl', 1971. – T. 2.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. – M.: Progress, 1988. – 699 s.
Kheyzinga Y. Homo Ludens; Stat'i po istorii kul'tury. / Per. s gol. D. V. Sil'vestrova – M.: Progress – Traditsiya, 1997. – 416 s.
Matiss A. Stat'i ob iskusstve. Pis'ma. Perepiska. Zapisi besed. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1993 – 416 s.
Dal' V. I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t., – M., 1978. – T. 2.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 4. – S. 510-515. DOI 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.9
Kheyzinga Y. Homo Ludens; Stat'i po istorii kul'tury. / Per. s gol. D. V. Sil'vestrova – M.: Progress – Traditsiya, 1997. – 416 s.
Zhukovskiy, V. I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: monografiya – SPb: Aleteyya, 2011. – 495 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Proizvedenie iskusstva: osobennosti proizvodstva i spetsifika potrebleniya // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. – 2013.-№ 4. – C. 76-79.

References (transliteration):
Zinchenko, V. P. Soznanie i tvorcheskiy akt. – M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2010-588 s.
Obrazovatel'naya funktsiya khudozhestvennoy kul'tury: monografiya / V. I. Zhukovskiy [i dr.]. – Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2013. – 222 s.
Dubrovskiy D. I. Problema ideal'nogo. – M.: Kanon, 2002. – 366 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I Igrovoy kharakter tvorcheskogo otnosheniya khudozhnika s materialom iskusstva // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya.-2009.-№ 6, ch.2. – S. 57-60.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D.V. Intellektual'naya vizualizatsiya sushchnosti. – Krasnoyarsk: KrGU, 1998. – 222 s.
Geraimchuk I. M. Teoriya tvorcheskogo protsessa. Kiev: Edel'veys, 2012. – 269 s.
Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / Pod red. V. E. Kemerova. – 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – London, Frankfurt-na-Mayne, Parizh, Lyuksemburg, Moskva, Minsk: Panprint, 1998. – 1064 s.
Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. – 423 s.
Vel'flin G. Osnovnye ponyatiya istorii iskusstv: problema evolyutsii stilya v novom iskusstve / per. s nem. A. A. Frankovskogo. – M.: V. Shevchuk, 2009. – 289 s.
Gegel' G. V. F. Nauka logiki: v 3 t. – M.: Mysl', 1971. – T. 2.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. – M.: Progress, 1988. – 699 s.
Kheyzinga Y. Homo Ludens; Stat'i po istorii kul'tury. / Per. s gol. D. V. Sil'vestrova – M.: Progress – Traditsiya, 1997. – 416 s.
Matiss A. Stat'i ob iskusstve. Pis'ma. Perepiska. Zapisi besed. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1993 – 416 s.
Dal' V. I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t., – M., 1978. – T. 2.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 4. – S. 510-515. DOI 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.9
Kheyzinga Y. Homo Ludens; Stat'i po istorii kul'tury. / Per. s gol. D. V. Sil'vestrova – M.: Progress – Traditsiya, 1997. – 416 s.
Zhukovskiy, V. I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: monografiya – SPb: Aleteyya, 2011. – 495 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Proizvedenie iskusstva: osobennosti proizvodstva i spetsifika potrebleniya // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. – 2013.-№ 4. – C. 76-79.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the Latin hymn Te Deum ('Ambrosian Hymn', the IVth century) that is still often used by composers as the source for creating concert adaptations (at the present time there are over thousand of versions of Te Deum). Despite the fact that each adaptation of Te Deum presents a composer's interpretation and has its own features that reflect the composer's style and epoch in general, genre archetypes and signs of Te Deum remain to be general features uniting similar compositions disregarding the time when they were created. In order to demonstrate genre archetypes and signs of Te Deum based on the analysis of its adaptations written at different historical periods, the author has applied the historical and comparative methods as well as the methods of analysis and synthesis, modelling, extrapolation and abstraction. In his article Trubenok has viewed the two genre archetypes of Te Deum, textual and melodic archetypes, and genre signs of 'icon', 'index' and 'symbol' acording to the theory of signs of Charles Pierce. Archetypes are often met in many leading genres of church music, however, Te Deum is unique because its textual archetypes combine themes from both the Old and New Testaments (unlike the Mass that appeals only to the New Testament). That feature is most likely to define the unique and original nature of the 'Ambrosian Hymn' and is the reason why composers have been creating new adaptations of Te Deum throughout seventeen centuries. 

Ключевые слова: Te Deum, hymn, 'Ambrosian Hymn', textual archetype, melodic archetype, Pierce's theory of signs, genre signs, 'icon' sign, 'index' sign, 'symbol' sign

Библиография:
Steiner, R. Te Deum. 1. Text. 2. Melody [Tekst] / R. Steiner, K. Falconer // The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. – London, 2001. – V. 25. – P. 191b-192b.
Urvantseva, O.A. Stilevoe modelirovanie v dukhovno-kontsertnoy muzyke russkikh kompozitorov XIX-XX vekov: dis… dok. isk.: 17.00.02 / Urvantseva Ol'ga Aleksandrovna. – Magnitogorsk, 2011. – 624 s.
Carey, P.E. An examinations of three Te Deum settings of the French Baroque. D.M.dissertation / P.E. Carey. – University of Cincinnati, 1988. – 156 p.
Davis, O.G. A selected, annotated bibliography of Te Deums in the Library of Congress, and a history of this hymn in ceremonial music since 1600. D.M.dissertation / O.G. Davis. – University of Iowa, 1967. – 215 r.
Paroissien Romain contenant La Messe et l’Office pour les dimanches et les fêtes chant Grégorien extrait de l’édition Vaticane et transcription musicale des Bénédictins de Solesmes. [Noty]. – Paris; Tournai; Rome; New York, 1956. – P. 1636-1642.
Urvantseva, O.A. Zhanrovaya model' v dukhovno-kontsertnoy muzyke (na primere Kheruvimskoy) [Tekst] / O.A. Urvantseva // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2010. – № 32 (213). Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. Vyp. 48. – S. 176–177.
Trubenok, E.A. Formul'noe stroenie grigorianskoy melodii Te Deum (opyt analiza po metodu reduktsii) [Tekst] / E.A. Trubenok // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2013. – №2/2 (78). – S. 191-197.
Trubenok, E.A. «Tebe Boga khvalim» – analog Te Deum v russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi [Tekst] / E.A. Trubenok // Nauchnyy elektronnyy arkhiv. URL: http://econf.rae.ru/article/7909 (data obrashcheniya: 13.10.2013).
Stepanov, Yu.S. Semiotika [Tekst] / Stepanov Yu.S. – M.: Nauka, 1971. – 168 s.
Lebedev, S. Musica Latina: Latinskie teksty v muzyke i muzykal'noy nauke [Tekst] / S. Lebedev, R. Pospelova. – SPb.: Kompozitor, 2000. – 256 s.
Pirs, Ch. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya [Tekst] / Ch. Pirs; per. s angl. K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze, T. Dmitrieva. – M.: LOGOS, 2000. – 448 s.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Arkhetipy politicheskoy kul'tury rossiyskikh grazhdan // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-1.-C. 153-170. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.1.332. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_332.html
Gulyaikhin V.N. Arkhetipy pravosoznaniya v sisteme pravovoy kul'tury lichnosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-1.-C. 54-74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.1.10486. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10486.html

References (transliteration):
Steiner, R. Te Deum. 1. Text. 2. Melody [Tekst] / R. Steiner, K. Falconer // The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. – London, 2001. – V. 25. – P. 191b-192b.
Urvantseva, O.A. Stilevoe modelirovanie v dukhovno-kontsertnoy muzyke russkikh kompozitorov XIX-XX vekov: dis… dok. isk.: 17.00.02 / Urvantseva Ol'ga Aleksandrovna. – Magnitogorsk, 2011. – 624 s.
Carey, P.E. An examinations of three Te Deum settings of the French Baroque. D.M.dissertation / P.E. Carey. – University of Cincinnati, 1988. – 156 p.
Davis, O.G. A selected, annotated bibliography of Te Deums in the Library of Congress, and a history of this hymn in ceremonial music since 1600. D.M.dissertation / O.G. Davis. – University of Iowa, 1967. – 215 r.
Paroissien Romain contenant La Messe et l’Office pour les dimanches et les fêtes chant Grégorien extrait de l’édition Vaticane et transcription musicale des Bénédictins de Solesmes. [Noty]. – Paris; Tournai; Rome; New York, 1956. – P. 1636-1642.
Urvantseva, O.A. Zhanrovaya model' v dukhovno-kontsertnoy muzyke (na primere Kheruvimskoy) [Tekst] / O.A. Urvantseva // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2010. – № 32 (213). Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. Vyp. 48. – S. 176–177.
Trubenok, E.A. Formul'noe stroenie grigorianskoy melodii Te Deum (opyt analiza po metodu reduktsii) [Tekst] / E.A. Trubenok // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2013. – №2/2 (78). – S. 191-197.
Trubenok, E.A. «Tebe Boga khvalim» – analog Te Deum v russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi [Tekst] / E.A. Trubenok // Nauchnyy elektronnyy arkhiv. URL: http://econf.rae.ru/article/7909 (data obrashcheniya: 13.10.2013).
Stepanov, Yu.S. Semiotika [Tekst] / Stepanov Yu.S. – M.: Nauka, 1971. – 168 s.
Lebedev, S. Musica Latina: Latinskie teksty v muzyke i muzykal'noy nauke [Tekst] / S. Lebedev, R. Pospelova. – SPb.: Kompozitor, 2000. – 256 s.
Pirs, Ch. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya [Tekst] / Ch. Pirs; per. s angl. K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze, T. Dmitrieva. – M.: LOGOS, 2000. – 448 s.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Arkhetipy politicheskoy kul'tury rossiyskikh grazhdan // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-1.-C. 153-170. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.1.332. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_332.html
Gulyaikhin V.N. Arkhetipy pravosoznaniya v sisteme pravovoy kul'tury lichnosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-1.-C. 54-74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.1.10486. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10486.html

Аннотация: Ever since the earlist period of the development of cinematography as an art, music and motion picture have been very close both in expressive means and structure. However, as the numerious aesthetic techniques have been developing in cinema art, film continues to drift apart from its usual forms in the search for cinematographic particularities of the artistic language. When the auteur cinema appeared, it became even more evident for theorists that there was the need to take a closer look at the director's personal creative vision. The present article is devoted to the research of more profound levels of the relationship between a musical form and a film. In her research Mikheeva analyzes a drama film 'Autumn Sonata' of a Swedish director Ingmar Bergman in order to demonstrate the unity between sonata and film at the ontological level. In her article Mikheeva has used the method of the comparative analysis of the elements of a musical form and film text as well as has applied the hermeneutical approach to understanding and interpreting an artwork. For the first time in the academic literature Ingmar Bergman's 'Autumn Sonata' is being analyzed for the purpose of not only defining common features of a film and sonata as a musical structure but also to get a better insight into the director's creative plan. By comparing and analysing the structure and semantic musical and cinematographic components of an art text, the researcher shows their ontological similarity. The approach applied to the analysis of Bergman's drama film may be used to analyse a number of other films. 

Ключевые слова: musical form, form of cinema, music in cinema, artistic language of cinematography, aesthetics of cinema music, auteur cinema, Ingmar Bergman, film construct, film text, script writing, ontology of an artwork

Библиография:
Serov N.V. Logika oformleniya tsvetovykh obrazov // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2012.-2.-C. 106-176. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_251.html.
Tarkovskiy A. Uroki rezhissury. M.: VIPPK, 1993.
Lotman M. Yu. Repetitsiya orkestra v razvalivayushchemsya mire // Kinovedcheskie zapiski. 1992. №15.
Lissa Z. Estetika kinomuzyki. M.: Muzyka, 1970.
Gadamer G. G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991.
Iezuitov N.M. Pudovkin. Puti tvorchestva. M., L.: Iskusstvo, 1937.
Krakauer Z. Priroda fil'ma. Reabilitatsiya fizicheskoy real'nosti. M.: Iskusstvo, 1974.
Bergman I. Zhestokiy mir kino. M.: Vagrius, 2006.
Bulgakova O. Sovetskiy slukhoglaz: kino i ego organy chuvstv. M.: NLO, 2010.
Vertov D. Stat'i, dnevniki, zamysly. M.: Iskusstvo, 1966.
Balash B. Vidimyy chelovek. M.: Vserossiyskiy proletkul't, 1925.
Balash B. Kino. Stanovlenie i sushchnost' novogo iskusstva. M.: Progress, 1968.
S. S. Sevast'yanova. Muzyka S. S. Prokof'eva na ekrane. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 6.-C. 61-70.
K. E. Razlogov. Prodolzhatel' velikoy traditsii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 3.-C. 104-106.
S. S. Sevast'yanova. Muzykal'no-biograficheskiy fil'm: problemy zhanra. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 1.-C. 88-96.
K. E. Razlogov. Kino XXI veka. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2011.-№ 4.-C. 115-120.

References (transliteration):
Serov N.V. Logika oformleniya tsvetovykh obrazov // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2012.-2.-C. 106-176. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_251.html.
Tarkovskiy A. Uroki rezhissury. M.: VIPPK, 1993.
Lotman M. Yu. Repetitsiya orkestra v razvalivayushchemsya mire // Kinovedcheskie zapiski. 1992. №15.
Lissa Z. Estetika kinomuzyki. M.: Muzyka, 1970.
Gadamer G. G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991.
Iezuitov N.M. Pudovkin. Puti tvorchestva. M., L.: Iskusstvo, 1937.
Krakauer Z. Priroda fil'ma. Reabilitatsiya fizicheskoy real'nosti. M.: Iskusstvo, 1974.
Bergman I. Zhestokiy mir kino. M.: Vagrius, 2006.
Bulgakova O. Sovetskiy slukhoglaz: kino i ego organy chuvstv. M.: NLO, 2010.
Vertov D. Stat'i, dnevniki, zamysly. M.: Iskusstvo, 1966.
Balash B. Vidimyy chelovek. M.: Vserossiyskiy proletkul't, 1925.
Balash B. Kino. Stanovlenie i sushchnost' novogo iskusstva. M.: Progress, 1968.
S. S. Sevast'yanova. Muzyka S. S. Prokof'eva na ekrane. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 6.-C. 61-70.
K. E. Razlogov. Prodolzhatel' velikoy traditsii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 3.-C. 104-106.
S. S. Sevast'yanova. Muzykal'no-biograficheskiy fil'm: problemy zhanra. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 1.-C. 88-96.
K. E. Razlogov. Kino XXI veka. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2011.-№ 4.-C. 115-120.

Аннотация: This article is focused on Roman Early Christian catacomb painting of the pre-Constantinian and early Constantinian period (III – 1st half of the IV century). It attempts to examine the impact of syntactic connections in the iconographic models of the Early Christian catacomb painting on the symbolic meaning of such models. The characteristics of the Early Christian catacomb painting make it an interesting subject for the semiotic approach. The limited amount of the visual citations of the Bible and other Early Christian texts in the pre-Constantine and early Constantine period allow to trace sustainable compositional patterns. Meanwhile, the relative flexibility of the compositional models (as compared to sarcophagi, e.g.), on the one hand, and a considerable amount of thematically isolated architectural areas (cubicula, arcosolia, loculi), on the other hand, predetermined the intense use of syntactic instruments for the development of semantic schemes. The specific characteristics of the Early Christian art stipulated the employment of the semiotic method as a principal research strategy. The semiotic method is not very popular among the Russian art historians. Meanwhile it offers wide opportunities for the study of art symbolic systems and the Early Christian art, in particular.

Ключевые слова: semiotic analysis, semiotics of art, semiotic method, Roman catacombs, funerary art, late Antiquity, catacomb painting, Early Christian art, composite laws, symbolic images

Библиография:
Zanker P. & Ewald B.C. (2012) Living with Myths. The Imagery of Roman Sarcophagi. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bisconti F. (1996) La Madonna di Priscilla: interventi di restauro ed ipotesi sulla dinamica decorativa // Rivista di Archeologia Cristiana, LXXII, 1-2
Rossi G.B. DE (1864) La Roma soterannea descritta ed illustrata. Roma: Cromo – Litografia Pontificia
Wharton A.J. (1995) Refiguring the Post Classical City. Dura Europos, Jerash, Jerusalem and Ravenna. New York: Cambridge University Press
Snyder G.F. (2003) Ante Pacem. Archaeological Evidence of Church Life before Constantine. 2nd Ed. Macon: Mercer University Press
Grabar A. (1968) Early Christian art. From the Rise of Christianity to the Death of Theodosius. New York: Odyssey Press
Pastoureau M. (2004) Une histoire symbolique du Moyen Age Occidental. Paris: Editions du Seuil
Bisconti F. (2011) Le pitture delle catacombe romane. Restauri e interpretazioni. Todi: Tau Editrice
Dunbabin, K.M. (2003) The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pavia C. (2000) Guida delle catacomb romane. Dai tituli al’Ipogeo di via Dino Compagni. Roma: Gangemi Editore
Borg B.E. (2013), Crisis & Ambition. Tombs and Burial Customs in Third-Century CE Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Tronzo W. (1986) The Via Latina Catacomb. Imitation and Discontinuity in Fourth-Century Roman Painting. The Pennsylvania State University Press
Pergola A. (2011) Il quadrante delle interpretazioni. In Bisconti F. (ed.) L’ipogeo degli Aureli in Viale Manzoni. Restauri, tutela, valorizzazione e aggiornamenti interpretativi. Citta del Vaticano. Pontificia Commissione di Archeologia Sacra
Finney P.C. (1997) The Invisible God. The Earliest Christians on Art. 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press
Nicolai V.F., Bisconti F., Mazzoleni D. (2009) The Christian Catacombs of Rome. History, Decoration, Inscriptions. 3rd Ed. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner
Jensen R.M.(2008) Dining with the Dead: From the Mensa to the Altar in Christian Late Antiquity. In Brink L., Green O.P. & D. (eds.) Commemorating the Dead. Text and Artifacts in Context. New York: de Gruyter
Dresken-Weiland J. (2010) Bild, Grab und Wort. Untersuchungen zu Jenseitsvorstellungen von Christen des 3. und 4. Jahrhunderts. Regensburg. Verlag Schnell & Steiner
Wilpert J. (1903) Die Malereien der Katakomben Roms. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herdersche Verlagshandlung
Grabar A. (1980) Christian Iconography. A Study of Its Origins. 2nd Ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Shultze V. (1880) Archaologische Studien uber altchristliche Monumente. Wien
Uspenskiy B.A. (1995) Semiotika iskusstva. Moskva, Shkola russkoy kul'tury

References (transliteration):
Zanker P. & Ewald B.C. (2012) Living with Myths. The Imagery of Roman Sarcophagi. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bisconti F. (1996) La Madonna di Priscilla: interventi di restauro ed ipotesi sulla dinamica decorativa // Rivista di Archeologia Cristiana, LXXII, 1-2
Rossi G.B. DE (1864) La Roma soterannea descritta ed illustrata. Roma: Cromo – Litografia Pontificia
Wharton A.J. (1995) Refiguring the Post Classical City. Dura Europos, Jerash, Jerusalem and Ravenna. New York: Cambridge University Press
Snyder G.F. (2003) Ante Pacem. Archaeological Evidence of Church Life before Constantine. 2nd Ed. Macon: Mercer University Press
Grabar A. (1968) Early Christian art. From the Rise of Christianity to the Death of Theodosius. New York: Odyssey Press
Pastoureau M. (2004) Une histoire symbolique du Moyen Age Occidental. Paris: Editions du Seuil
Bisconti F. (2011) Le pitture delle catacombe romane. Restauri e interpretazioni. Todi: Tau Editrice
Dunbabin, K.M. (2003) The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pavia C. (2000) Guida delle catacomb romane. Dai tituli al’Ipogeo di via Dino Compagni. Roma: Gangemi Editore
Borg B.E. (2013), Crisis & Ambition. Tombs and Burial Customs in Third-Century CE Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Tronzo W. (1986) The Via Latina Catacomb. Imitation and Discontinuity in Fourth-Century Roman Painting. The Pennsylvania State University Press
Pergola A. (2011) Il quadrante delle interpretazioni. In Bisconti F. (ed.) L’ipogeo degli Aureli in Viale Manzoni. Restauri, tutela, valorizzazione e aggiornamenti interpretativi. Citta del Vaticano. Pontificia Commissione di Archeologia Sacra
Finney P.C. (1997) The Invisible God. The Earliest Christians on Art. 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press
Nicolai V.F., Bisconti F., Mazzoleni D. (2009) The Christian Catacombs of Rome. History, Decoration, Inscriptions. 3rd Ed. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner
Jensen R.M.(2008) Dining with the Dead: From the Mensa to the Altar in Christian Late Antiquity. In Brink L., Green O.P. & D. (eds.) Commemorating the Dead. Text and Artifacts in Context. New York: de Gruyter
Dresken-Weiland J. (2010) Bild, Grab und Wort. Untersuchungen zu Jenseitsvorstellungen von Christen des 3. und 4. Jahrhunderts. Regensburg. Verlag Schnell & Steiner
Wilpert J. (1903) Die Malereien der Katakomben Roms. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herdersche Verlagshandlung
Grabar A. (1980) Christian Iconography. A Study of Its Origins. 2nd Ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Shultze V. (1880) Archaologische Studien uber altchristliche Monumente. Wien
Uspenskiy B.A. (1995) Semiotika iskusstva. Moskva, Shkola russkoy kul'tury

Аннотация: The art of the 20th century remarkably differs from the art life of the previous centuries. In her article Martynova discusses the most significant cultural phenomena that created the image of the century. Undoubtedly, surrealism was the prevailing genre in art in the first half of the 20th century. Firstly, despite its radical nature, surrealism has an extremely rich genealogy. Secondly, surrealists managed to develop a clear art concept. Thirdly, philosophy of post-modernism, the main movement of the second half of the 20th century, was based on the ideology of surrealism. 
In her article Martynova has made an attempt to analyze the main art movements of the early 20th century from the point of view of their influence on the development of surrealism. The article is devoted to the genesis of surrealism and provides a detailed description of this cultural phenomenon. There are parts of the article devoted to aesthetics of surrealism, literary and philosophical grounds of surrealism and there is also the part of the article that describes the particular influence of previous art concepts on the development of surrealism. Even though surrealism was a quite original art movement, methodology of surrealism reflected the new interpretation of previous art concepts and therefore was based on findings of these art concepts. 
Moreover, surrealist theoretical opinions were based on rather incompatible literary and philosophical sources which created versatility and paradoxes of surrealism. 

Ключевые слова: surrealism, symbolism, constructivism, futurism, expressionism, dadaism, aesthetics, phenomenology, existentialism, psychoanalysis

Библиография:
Adaskina N.L. Simvolizm v tvorchestve khudozhnikov avangarda. // Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003. – S.10-22
Azizyan I.A. Simvolistskie istoki avangarda. Simvol v poetike avangarda. // Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003. – S.23-33
Antologiya frantsuzskogo syurrealizma. 20-e gody. M., 1994
Bazilevskiy A. Deformatsiya v estetike syurrealizma i ekspressionizma.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 33-46
Balashova T. Mnogolikiy avangard.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 22-33
Busev M. Kollazh: ot kubizma k syurrealizmu.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 98-105
Gal'tsova E.D. Aspekty osvoeniya zhivopisi simvolizma v estetike Andre Bretona: sluchay Gyustava Moro.// Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003.–S.380-391
Dadaizm v Tsyurikhe, Berline, Gannovere i Kel'ne: Teksty, illyustratsii, dokumenty. Otv. red. K. Shuman. M., 2002
Dubin S. Syurrealizm v kontekste avangarda: kriterii chernogo yumora.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 54-64
Kaptereva T. Dadaizm i syurrealizm.// Modernizm. Analiz i kritika osnovnykh napravleniy. M., 1987. – S.185-214
Krauss R. Fotograficheskaya obuslovlennost' syurrealizma // Poeziya i kritika, vyp. 1, SPb., 1994;http://www.vavilon.ru/metatext/p_and_c/krauss.html
Kulikova I.S. Syurrealizm v iskusstve. M., 1970
Kshitsova D. Stil' modern – fenomen integratsii i dezintegratsii simvolizma i avangarda. // Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003.–S.51-66
Na grani tysyacheletiy. Sud'ba traditsiy v iskusstve XX v. M., 1994
Pake M. Rene Magritt. 1898-1967. Mysl', izobrazhennaya na polotne. M.,2002
Rene Magritt: al'bom/ Avt.-sost. L.A.D'yakov.-M., 1998
Rozhin A.I. Sal'vador Dali: mif i real'nost'. M., 1992.
Smolin A.A. Syurrealizm kak kvintessentsiya real'nogo i sverkhreal'nogo. Avtoreferat dis. na soiskanie uchen. stepeni kand. filosofskikh nauk. Barnaul, 2005
Turchin V.S. Po labirintam avangarda. M., 1993
Fuko M. Eto ne trubka. M., 1999
Khofman V. Osnovy sovremennogo iskusstva. Sankt-Peterburg, 2004
Shen'e-Zhandron Zh. Ponyatie poeticheskogo sub'ekta v tvorchestve syurrealistov i avangardistov. Problemy metodologii.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 9-22
Shen'e-Zhandron, Zh. Syurrealizm. M.,2002
Yakimovich A K. Realizmy dvadtsatogo veka: al'bom. M., 2000
Yakimovich A.K. Dvadtsatyy vek. Iskusstvo. Kul'tura. Kartina mira: ot impressionizma do klassicheskogo avangarda. M., 2003
Alquie F. The philosophy of Surrealism. The University of Michigan Press,1965
Balakian A. Surrealism: the road to the absolute. The noonday press, New York, 1959
Bohn W. The Rise of Surrealism. Cubism, Dada, and the Pursuit of the Marvelous. State University of New York Press, 2002
Cardinal R., Short R.S. Surrealism. Permanent Revelation. London, 1970
Caws M.A. The Surrealist Look: an erotics of encounter. The MIT Press, 1997
Fantastic Art, Dada, Surrealism. Edited by Alfred H.Barr, Jr; essays by Georges Hugnet. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1936
Four modern masters: De Chirico, Ernst, Magritte and Miro. New York, Glenbow museum, 1981
Fowlie W. Age of Surrealism. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1960
Gablik S. Magritte. Thames and Hudson, London, 1976
Gedo M.M. Looking at art from the inside out: The Psychoiconographic Approach to modern Art. Cambridge University Press, 1994
Gimferrer P. Magritte. Barcelona, 1986
Gordon D.E. Expressionism. Art and Idea. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987
Henning E.B. The Spirit of Surrealism. Catalog of an exhibition held at the Cleveland Museum of Art Oct.3 – Nov.25, 1979
Magritte, edited by David Larkin, introduction by Eddie Wolfram. London,1972
Magritte. Sarah Whitfield. London, The South Bank Centre, 1992
Matthews J.H. The imagery of surrealism. New York, Syracuse University Press, 1977
Matthews J.H. Languages of Surrealism. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, 1986
Read H. A Concise History of Modern Painting. New York, Washington, 1975
Read H. The Philosophy of Modern Art. London, Faber and Faber, 1964
Rene Magritte, text by A.M.Hammacher, translated by James Brockway. Harry N.Abrams, inc. New York
Richter H. Dada: art and anti-art. London, Thames and Hudson Ltd., 1978
Rubin W.S. Dada and Surrealist Art. New York
Sandrow N. Surrealism: theater, arts, ideas. New York,1972
Schneede U.M. Rene Magritte. Leben und Werk. Verlag M.DuMont Schauberg, Koln, 1973
Spitz E.H. Museums of the Mind. Magritte's Labyrinth and Other Essays in the Arts. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1994
Surrealists on Art. Edited by Lucy R. Lippard. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970
Twentieth century art theory: urbanism, politics, and mass culture. Edited by Richard Hertz, Norman M. Klein, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1990
Verkauf W.(ed.) Dada, Monograph of a Movement. New York: Wittenborn, 1957; 2nd edition Arthur Niggli Ltd. Teufen (AR) Switzerland, 1961
Waldberg P. Surrealism. Thames and Hudson, London, 1965, reprinted 1978

References (transliteration):
Adaskina N.L. Simvolizm v tvorchestve khudozhnikov avangarda. // Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003. – S.10-22
Azizyan I.A. Simvolistskie istoki avangarda. Simvol v poetike avangarda. // Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003. – S.23-33
Antologiya frantsuzskogo syurrealizma. 20-e gody. M., 1994
Bazilevskiy A. Deformatsiya v estetike syurrealizma i ekspressionizma.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 33-46
Balashova T. Mnogolikiy avangard.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 22-33
Busev M. Kollazh: ot kubizma k syurrealizmu.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 98-105
Gal'tsova E.D. Aspekty osvoeniya zhivopisi simvolizma v estetike Andre Bretona: sluchay Gyustava Moro.// Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003.–S.380-391
Dadaizm v Tsyurikhe, Berline, Gannovere i Kel'ne: Teksty, illyustratsii, dokumenty. Otv. red. K. Shuman. M., 2002
Dubin S. Syurrealizm v kontekste avangarda: kriterii chernogo yumora.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 54-64
Kaptereva T. Dadaizm i syurrealizm.// Modernizm. Analiz i kritika osnovnykh napravleniy. M., 1987. – S.185-214
Krauss R. Fotograficheskaya obuslovlennost' syurrealizma // Poeziya i kritika, vyp. 1, SPb., 1994;http://www.vavilon.ru/metatext/p_and_c/krauss.html
Kulikova I.S. Syurrealizm v iskusstve. M., 1970
Kshitsova D. Stil' modern – fenomen integratsii i dezintegratsii simvolizma i avangarda. // Simvolizm v avangarde. M.,2003.–S.51-66
Na grani tysyacheletiy. Sud'ba traditsiy v iskusstve XX v. M., 1994
Pake M. Rene Magritt. 1898-1967. Mysl', izobrazhennaya na polotne. M.,2002
Rene Magritt: al'bom/ Avt.-sost. L.A.D'yakov.-M., 1998
Rozhin A.I. Sal'vador Dali: mif i real'nost'. M., 1992.
Smolin A.A. Syurrealizm kak kvintessentsiya real'nogo i sverkhreal'nogo. Avtoreferat dis. na soiskanie uchen. stepeni kand. filosofskikh nauk. Barnaul, 2005
Turchin V.S. Po labirintam avangarda. M., 1993
Fuko M. Eto ne trubka. M., 1999
Khofman V. Osnovy sovremennogo iskusstva. Sankt-Peterburg, 2004
Shen'e-Zhandron Zh. Ponyatie poeticheskogo sub'ekta v tvorchestve syurrealistov i avangardistov. Problemy metodologii.// Syurrealizm i avangard. Materialy rossiysko-frantsuzskogo kollokviuma, sostoyavshegosya v Institute mirovoy literatury. M., 1999.-S. 9-22
Shen'e-Zhandron, Zh. Syurrealizm. M.,2002
Yakimovich A K. Realizmy dvadtsatogo veka: al'bom. M., 2000
Yakimovich A.K. Dvadtsatyy vek. Iskusstvo. Kul'tura. Kartina mira: ot impressionizma do klassicheskogo avangarda. M., 2003
Alquie F. The philosophy of Surrealism. The University of Michigan Press,1965
Balakian A. Surrealism: the road to the absolute. The noonday press, New York, 1959
Bohn W. The Rise of Surrealism. Cubism, Dada, and the Pursuit of the Marvelous. State University of New York Press, 2002
Cardinal R., Short R.S. Surrealism. Permanent Revelation. London, 1970
Caws M.A. The Surrealist Look: an erotics of encounter. The MIT Press, 1997
Fantastic Art, Dada, Surrealism. Edited by Alfred H.Barr, Jr; essays by Georges Hugnet. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1936
Four modern masters: De Chirico, Ernst, Magritte and Miro. New York, Glenbow museum, 1981
Fowlie W. Age of Surrealism. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1960
Gablik S. Magritte. Thames and Hudson, London, 1976
Gedo M.M. Looking at art from the inside out: The Psychoiconographic Approach to modern Art. Cambridge University Press, 1994
Gimferrer P. Magritte. Barcelona, 1986
Gordon D.E. Expressionism. Art and Idea. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987
Henning E.B. The Spirit of Surrealism. Catalog of an exhibition held at the Cleveland Museum of Art Oct.3 – Nov.25, 1979
Magritte, edited by David Larkin, introduction by Eddie Wolfram. London,1972
Magritte. Sarah Whitfield. London, The South Bank Centre, 1992
Matthews J.H. The imagery of surrealism. New York, Syracuse University Press, 1977
Matthews J.H. Languages of Surrealism. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, 1986
Read H. A Concise History of Modern Painting. New York, Washington, 1975
Read H. The Philosophy of Modern Art. London, Faber and Faber, 1964
Rene Magritte, text by A.M.Hammacher, translated by James Brockway. Harry N.Abrams, inc. New York
Richter H. Dada: art and anti-art. London, Thames and Hudson Ltd., 1978
Rubin W.S. Dada and Surrealist Art. New York
Sandrow N. Surrealism: theater, arts, ideas. New York,1972
Schneede U.M. Rene Magritte. Leben und Werk. Verlag M.DuMont Schauberg, Koln, 1973
Spitz E.H. Museums of the Mind. Magritte's Labyrinth and Other Essays in the Arts. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1994
Surrealists on Art. Edited by Lucy R. Lippard. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970
Twentieth century art theory: urbanism, politics, and mass culture. Edited by Richard Hertz, Norman M. Klein, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1990
Verkauf W.(ed.) Dada, Monograph of a Movement. New York: Wittenborn, 1957; 2nd edition Arthur Niggli Ltd. Teufen (AR) Switzerland, 1961
Waldberg P. Surrealism. Thames and Hudson, London, 1965, reprinted 1978

Аннотация: The subject under review is the concept and definition of a visual art image. Art image is viewed as the image having particular conceptual characteristics that change depending on many conditions and cultural and historical factors. Bukreeva demonstrates the same art image can be perceived very differently by the representatives of different cultures and different nations. The researcher analyzes the traditional symbols and signs that were the most typical for ancient civilizations (hand and palm) and demonstrates how the perception of personality and addressee of a sign has been changing throughout history. One of the aspects of research is the relation between a symbol and a sign, image and meaning, and epistemological conditions of the above mentioned relation (Richardson’s Triangle). The research is based on the hermeneutic approach to the analysis of the meaning of an art image and at the same time involves both traditional cultural-historical analysis and epistemological views on particular cultural images that have been formed historically in different nations. In addition, the researcher also evaluates particular symbols from the point of view of a certain religious teaching and traces back between mythological and religious understanding of these or those images. For example, the researcher analyzes the old Russian icon, its parameters and what art school of icon-painting it belonged to (Novgorod school). Bukreeva also analyzes creativity in art and concludes that cultural facilities, especially those that have plural meanings, should be viewed from the point of view of the epistemological analysis of creative work. The researcher proves that there is a certain relation between a symbol and an image, between contents of a visual image and the meaning this image conveys. Analysis of art images also involves a hermeneutic approach that allows to find the true, hidden meaning beyond the visual image or a text. Bukreeva concludes that understanding of the meaning of particular images, signs and symbols relates to their interpretation which creates the integrated visual image of an art work. In this way or another, art work is connected with the creation of art images and therefore an art image has a particular meaning (historical, traditional-cultural, semantic, mystical, symbolic, etc.)

Ключевые слова: image, symbol, sign, meaning, the ‘managing term’, visual art image, context, understanding, interpretation, creative work, perception, epistemology, philosophical hermeneutics, art.

Библиография:
I. I. Filippova Pozdnie proizvedeniya A. A. Plastova: obrazy i smysly // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-4.-C. 446-452. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.9203.
Serov N.V. Logika oformleniya tsvetovykh obrazov // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2012.-2.-C. 106-176. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_251.html
E.M. Spirova Fenomen simvola v istolkovanii cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-2.-C. 42-50.
A.M. Koval'chuk Simvol i simvolizatsiya: statichnost' yavleniya, dinamichnost' protsessa // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-9.-C. 1281-1287. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.9.9284.
Shul'ga E.N. Khudozhestvennyy obraz kak ob'ekt kognitivnoy germenevtiki // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoy kognitivnoy nauki. Ivanovo, 2013
Shul'ga E.N. Ponimanie i interpretatsiya. M.: Nauka, 2008.
Tondl L. Problemy semantiki. M.: Progress, 1975.
Florenskiy P. Ikonostas. SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2014.
Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M.: «Kanon + ROOI» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2012.
Averintsev S. Sobranie sochineniy. Sofiya-Logos. Slovar'. K.: DUKh I LITERA, 2006.
Berdyaev N.A Smysl tvorchestva: Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka. M.: AST: Astrel', 2011.
E.A. Popov. Metateoriya russkogo modernizma: obshchestvennaya situatsiya i iskusstvo KhKh veka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 219-225. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.09.9.
N. A. Khrenov. Simvolizm v istorii stanovleniya al'ternativnoy kul'tury. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 5.-C. 82-95.
N. E. Samokhina. Filosofskiy simvolizm zhivopisnogo tvorchestva N.K. Rerikha. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 4.-C. 67-74.
I.A. Nedugova. Iskusstvo, porozhdayushchee mif samogo sebya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-№ 6.-C. 119-127.
N. A. Khrenov. Simvolizm na fone nadloma imperii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 3.-C. 83-91.

References (transliteration):
I. I. Filippova Pozdnie proizvedeniya A. A. Plastova: obrazy i smysly // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-4.-C. 446-452. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.9203.
Serov N.V. Logika oformleniya tsvetovykh obrazov // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2012.-2.-C. 106-176. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_251.html
E.M. Spirova Fenomen simvola v istolkovanii cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-2.-C. 42-50.
A.M. Koval'chuk Simvol i simvolizatsiya: statichnost' yavleniya, dinamichnost' protsessa // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-9.-C. 1281-1287. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.9.9284.
Shul'ga E.N. Khudozhestvennyy obraz kak ob'ekt kognitivnoy germenevtiki // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoy kognitivnoy nauki. Ivanovo, 2013
Shul'ga E.N. Ponimanie i interpretatsiya. M.: Nauka, 2008.
Tondl L. Problemy semantiki. M.: Progress, 1975.
Florenskiy P. Ikonostas. SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2014.
Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M.: «Kanon + ROOI» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2012.
Averintsev S. Sobranie sochineniy. Sofiya-Logos. Slovar'. K.: DUKh I LITERA, 2006.
Berdyaev N.A Smysl tvorchestva: Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka. M.: AST: Astrel', 2011.
E.A. Popov. Metateoriya russkogo modernizma: obshchestvennaya situatsiya i iskusstvo KhKh veka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 219-225. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.09.9.
N. A. Khrenov. Simvolizm v istorii stanovleniya al'ternativnoy kul'tury. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 5.-C. 82-95.
N. E. Samokhina. Filosofskiy simvolizm zhivopisnogo tvorchestva N.K. Rerikha. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 4.-C. 67-74.
I.A. Nedugova. Iskusstvo, porozhdayushchee mif samogo sebya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-№ 6.-C. 119-127.
N. A. Khrenov. Simvolizm na fone nadloma imperii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-№ 3.-C. 83-91.

Аннотация: The subject under research is the musical stylizations in cinematograph based on the example of iconic Russian movies of the 1960th – 1980th. The author of the article describes the process of evolution of ways, forms and meanings of musical stylizations throughout the history of cinematograph in the 20th century. Based on the hermeneutic definition of game, the author describes peculiar stylizations used by Dmitri Shostakovich, Alfred Schnittke, Sergey Kuryokhin and other composers. These stylizations do not only characterize the composer’s style and movie director’s conception but also reflect the ideological and artistic trends of those times. The author studies stylizations in terms of the audiovisual counterpoint, polysemantic structure of a cadre and esthetics of visual absurdity. The author has used the hermeneutic method of interpreting an artwork, historical-cultural approach, method of comparative analysis of genres and styles of musical art and cinematograph. This is the first research to study musical stylizations in cinematograph based on the hermeneutic definition of play as well as hermeneutic categories of esthetical empathy, feeling and understanding and creation of a theoretical model of a piece of art. The author provides grounds for understanding musical stylizations in cinematograph as a play in the player space and makes a conclusion about the beginning of the stage of globalization in the world artistic process which is reflected, particularly, in the polycultural nature of modern musical stylizations in cinematograph.

Ключевые слова: cinematograph, screen music, musical stylization, audiovisual concept, sound track, player space, hermeneutics, esthetic mind, audiovisual counterpoint, polystylistics.

Библиография:
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. M.: Progress, 1988.
Ivashkin A.V. Besedy s Al'fredom Shnitke. M.: RIK Kul'tura, 1994.
Sevast'yanova S. S. Kul'minatsiya v proizvedeniyakh ekrannogo muzykal'nogo teatra // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-2.
Kheyzinga Y. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya. M.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Progress», «Progress – Akademiya», 1992.
Shostakovich D.D. Korol' Lir // Muzykal'naya zhizn'. 1976. № 17.
Shul'gin D.I. Gody neizvestnosti Al'freda Shnitke. M.: Delovaya Liga, 1993.
Bern E. Igry, v kotorye igrayut lyudi. Psikhologiya chelovecheskikh vzaimootnosheniy. Lyudi, kotorye igrayut v igry. Psikhologiya chelovecheskoy sud'by. SPb.: Lenizdat, 1992.

References (transliteration):
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. M.: Progress, 1988.
Ivashkin A.V. Besedy s Al'fredom Shnitke. M.: RIK Kul'tura, 1994.
Sevast'yanova S. S. Kul'minatsiya v proizvedeniyakh ekrannogo muzykal'nogo teatra // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-2.
Kheyzinga Y. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya. M.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Progress», «Progress – Akademiya», 1992.
Shostakovich D.D. Korol' Lir // Muzykal'naya zhizn'. 1976. № 17.
Shul'gin D.I. Gody neizvestnosti Al'freda Shnitke. M.: Delovaya Liga, 1993.
Bern E. Igry, v kotorye igrayut lyudi. Psikhologiya chelovecheskikh vzaimootnosheniy. Lyudi, kotorye igrayut v igry. Psikhologiya chelovecheskoy sud'by. SPb.: Lenizdat, 1992.

Аннотация: Writers, scenarists, movie directors and computer game designers often appeal to the newest scientific concepts in search for fresh ideas. In this regard, the multiverse approach has been especially famous and reflected in the greatest number of products of popular culture. However, these works usually show multiverses (or meta-universes) of a different type compared to what is usually used by cosmologists and physicists. The present article touches upon the following issues: what types of multiverses are usually depicted in modern popular culture and for what purpose. At the first stage of the research the author defines the two logical types of multiverses out of general philosophical concepts – true multiverses and para-multiverses. After that the author applies the comparative-typological method. Based on the analysis of the structural similarities and differences, the author discovers the four types of true multiverses including a multiverse with dispersing universes, travelling back through time, parallel universes and phantom universes. The author offers to base the classification of paramultiverses on the classification of propositional attitudes. The author also describes the four types of paramultiverses: multiverses created by illusions, night dreams, delusions and imagination.

Ключевые слова: virtual reality, possible worlds, popular culture, modal realism, multiverse or meta-universe, ontology, propositional attitude, travel through time, classification, screen arts.

Контактная информация: Boyko Mikhail Evgenievich, 115408, Russia, Moscow, ul. Brateevskaya 33-2, ap. 708.

Библиография:
Stalnaker R. C. Possible Worlds and Situations // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1986. № 15. P. 109–123.
Kripke S. Tozhdestvo i neobkhodimost' // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 13. Logika i lingvistika. M.: Raduga, 1982. S. 340–376.
Lotman Yu. M. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta: Struktura stikha. L.: Prosveshchenie, 1972.
Eko U. Rol' chitatelya: Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta. SPb.: Simpozium, 2007.
Adams R. Theories of Actuality // Noûs. 1974. Vol. 8. No. 3 P. 211–231.
Goodman J. C. Toward an Adequate Theory of Possible and Impossible Worlds. Rochester: University of Rochester, 2000.
Lewis D. The paradoxes of time travel // American Philosophical Quarterly 13, 1976. P. 145–152.
Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford & New York: Blackwell Publishers, 1986.
Plantinga A. C. Actualism and Possible Worlds // Theoria. 1976. Vol. 42. P. 139–160.
Doych D. Struktura real'nosti. Izhevsk: NITs «Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika», 2001.
Doych D. Nachalo beskonechnosti: Ob'yasneniya, kotorye menyayut mir. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2014.
Vilenkin A. Mir mnogikh mirov: Fiziki v poiskakh parallel'nykh vselennykh. M.: AST; Astrel'; CORPUS, 2010.
Grin B. Skrytaya real'nost': Parallel'nye miry i glubinnye zakony kosmosa. M.: URSS, LIBROKOM, 2013.
Boyko M. E. Obobshchenie teorii fabuly: temporal'nost', prichinnost', superpozitsiya // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, № 11, Ch. I, 2013. S. 31–34.
Veretennikov A. A. Filosofiya Devida L'yuisa: soznanie i vozmozhnye miry: dissertatsiya ... kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.03. M., 2007.

References (transliteration):
Stalnaker R. C. Possible Worlds and Situations // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1986. № 15. P. 109–123.
Kripke S. Tozhdestvo i neobkhodimost' // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 13. Logika i lingvistika. M.: Raduga, 1982. S. 340–376.
Lotman Yu. M. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta: Struktura stikha. L.: Prosveshchenie, 1972.
Eko U. Rol' chitatelya: Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta. SPb.: Simpozium, 2007.
Adams R. Theories of Actuality // Noûs. 1974. Vol. 8. No. 3 P. 211–231.
Goodman J. C. Toward an Adequate Theory of Possible and Impossible Worlds. Rochester: University of Rochester, 2000.
Lewis D. The paradoxes of time travel // American Philosophical Quarterly 13, 1976. P. 145–152.
Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford & New York: Blackwell Publishers, 1986.
Plantinga A. C. Actualism and Possible Worlds // Theoria. 1976. Vol. 42. P. 139–160.
Doych D. Struktura real'nosti. Izhevsk: NITs «Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika», 2001.
Doych D. Nachalo beskonechnosti: Ob'yasneniya, kotorye menyayut mir. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2014.
Vilenkin A. Mir mnogikh mirov: Fiziki v poiskakh parallel'nykh vselennykh. M.: AST; Astrel'; CORPUS, 2010.
Grin B. Skrytaya real'nost': Parallel'nye miry i glubinnye zakony kosmosa. M.: URSS, LIBROKOM, 2013.
Boyko M. E. Obobshchenie teorii fabuly: temporal'nost', prichinnost', superpozitsiya // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, № 11, Ch. I, 2013. S. 31–34.
Veretennikov A. A. Filosofiya Devida L'yuisa: soznanie i vozmozhnye miry: dissertatsiya ... kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.03. M., 2007.

Аннотация: The subject under research is the possibility of application of the term ‘metapoetics’ to music art. The purpose of the research is to define the most efficient approaches to developing metapoetics of music based on the analysis of modern concepts in literature, music theory and philosophy. The results of the research show that being oriented at corresponding opinions in the sphere of literary studies, metapoetics of music has its own specific features that are defined by the non-verbal, non-artistic but procedural nature of music. These specific features are based on the importance of a metatext. In music art the metatext is a flexible and open system of metaelements of the music composition. This shows the prevailing role of the implicit approach to metapoetics of music as a need to focus, first of all, on a musical form as the unfolding meaning associated with the considerable generalized and abstract nature of images and events represented in music. In this regard, the most correct, well-biased and promising approach to metapoetical developments in the sphere of music is the philosophy of poesis as the dialectics of formation and development comleted with the method of transflection or transference allowing to define the emergent and transparent nature of a musical composition. The aforesaid approach takes into account all specific features of music and at the same time does not contradict to any methods declared in metapoetical researches and therefore possesses the necessary heuristicity, ethics of the mutual need and openness for new knowledge. The author’s provisions and conclusions can be used in cultural-philosophical, esthetical, musical theoretical and cultural researches as well as in research activities and academic work performed by university students, Master’s Degree students, post-graduate students and young scientists. The main research method used by the author is the integrated discursive approach aimed at covering different opinions, demonstrating respect attitude to authors and researches and searching for the truth at the crossing points of different views. The novelty of the research is the following: 1) integration of different views and concepts within the framework of the metapoetic discourse has allows to describe special features of metapoetics of music and define the most promising ways of its development; 2) the author shows despite the significance influence of Western European theories including Martin Heidegger’s views, Russian researchers often overcome the anthropological orientation in their works and describe an important role of both ‘horizontal’ and ‘vertical’ chronotopos of music as the poesis of co-existence; 3) the author proves that there is also the need for explicit metapoetics, i.e. the literary heritage of a composer and his epoch, not so much to clarify a composing method but rather to define philosophical and artistic views of a composer; 4) the researcher applies both implicit and explicit approaches to metapoetics of music accompanied with the method of transference in his academic and research activity with university music students and young scientists and these methods prove to be efficient. Conclusions: methodological and technical aspects of metapoetics of music prove the novelty and theoretical and practical importance of the research. However, the topics covered by the article only outline he path for further development of this interesting and important branch of knowledge.

Ключевые слова: metapoetics, implicit, explicit, music art, music poetics, poesis, formation, development, transflection, transference.

Контактная информация: Miklina Natalya Nikolaevna, 355009, Russia, Stavropol, st. Pushkina, h. 1/A (corpus 1).

Библиография:
Surina, T. V. Poezis kak arkhetip kul'tury [Tekst] / T. V. Surina // Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. – Vyp. 316. – 2008. – S. 67-70.
Smirnov, S. A. Avtopoezis cheloveka: Iosif Brodskiy: Iz tsikla ocherkov po antropologii stikha [Elektronnyy resurs] // Elektronnyy al'manakh o cheloveke.-Rezhim dostupa : http://antropolog.ru/doc/persons/smirnov/smirnov171
Safranski, R. Khaydegger. Germanskiy master i ego vremya [Tekst] / R. Safranski ; per. s nem. T. A. Baskakovoy pri uchastii V. A. Brun-Tsekhovogo /Seriya «Zhizn' zamechatel'nykh lyudey». – Vyp. 1017 (817) – M. : Molodaya gvardiya, Serebryanye niti, 2002. – 614s.
Samokhvalova, V. I. Tvorchestvo: bozhestvennyy dar; kosmicheskiy prin¬tsip; rodovaya iden¬tichnost' cheloveka: Nauchnoe izda¬nie [Tekst] / V. I. Samokhvalova. – M. : RUDN, 2007.-538 s.
Pas, O. Poeziya. Kritika. Erotika [Tekst] / O. Pas.-M.: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996.-192s.
Orlov, D. U. Istoriya i poezis [Tekst] / D. U. Orlov // ΕΙΝΑΙ: Problemy filosofii i teologii.-№ 2 (002) 2012. – S. 43-59.
Nazaykinskiy E. V. Poetika muzykal'noy miniatyury [Elektronnyy resurs] // Izrail' XXI veka: Muzykal'nyy internet-zhurnal. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.21israel-music.com/Poetika.htm
Nemkovskaya, V. I. Personazh kak kategoriya muzykal'noy poetiki [Tekst]: diss… kand. iskusstvovedeniya: 17.00.02 / V. I. Nemkovskaya.-Moskva, 2002.-178 s.
Miklina, N. N. Russkiy lad kak printsip miroporyadka [Tekst] / N. N. Miklina.-Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2007. – 272 s.; Miklina, N. N. Kontsept lada v kontekste russkogo kul'turnogo diskursa [Tekst]: diss… dokt. filos. nauk: 09.00.13 /Miklina Natal'ya Nikolaevna. – Stavropol', 2010. – 322s.; Miklina, N. N. Mir A. F. Loseva kak mir «chistogo muzykal'nogo bytiya» [Tekst] / N. N. Miklina //Filosofskie nauki.-2008.-№ 10. – S. 131-137; Miklina, N. N. «Lad» i «ad» v russkom filosofskom diskurse [Tekst] / N. N. Miklina //Polignozis.-2008.-№ 3. – S. 120-132; i drugie.
Losev, A. F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki [Tekst] /A. F. Losev. Iz rannikh proizvedeniy. – M. : Izd-vo «Pravda», «Voprosy filosofii», 1990. – S. 195-390.
Mamardashvili M. K. Odinochestvo – moya professiya: interv'yu Uldisa Tirensa [Tekst] /M. K. Mamardashvili // Merab Mamardashvili. Ocherk sovremennoy evropeyskoy filosofii. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya. – 584 s. – S. 516-548.
Kulakov, Yu. I. Teoriya fizicheskikh struktur-matematicheskoe osnovanie fundamental'noy fiziki [Tekst] / Yu. I. Kulakov // Barantsev R. G., Vekshenov S. A., Vladimirov Yu. S. Metafizika. Vek XXI. Sbornik trudov.-M.: Binom. Laboratoriya znaniy, 2006. – 288 s.-S. 136-139.
Kiyashchenko, N. I., Kiyashchenko, L. P. Kul'tura: dispozitsiya i kompozitsiya poezisa (interval'nyy opyt istolkovaniya) [Tekst] / N. I. Kiyashchenko, L. P. Kiyashchenko // Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. – 2013. – № 4. – Tom I (Gumanitarnye nauki). – S. 288-293.
Kazantseva, L. P. Avtor v muzykal'nom soderzhanii [Tekst] /L. P. Kazantseva.-M. : RAM im. Gnesinykh, 1998.-248 c.
Il'in, I. A. Put' dukhovnogo obnovleniya /Il'in I.A. Pochemu my verim v Rossiyu: Sochineniya / I. A. Il'in. — M.: Eksmo, 2006. — 912s.
Brodskiy, I. Kniga interv'yu [Tekst]. – 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M. : Zakharov, 2005. – 784 s.
Gulyanitskaya, N. S. Poetika muzykal'noy kompozitsii : Teoreticheskie aspekty russkoy dukhovnoy muzyki XX veka [Tekst] / N. S. Gulyanitskaya. – M. : Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002. – 432s.
Bonfel'd, M. Sh. Muzyka: Yazyk. Rech'. Myshlenie [Tekst] / M. Sh. Bonfel'd. – SPb.: Kompozitor, 2006. – 648 s.
Bonfel'd, M. Sh. Muzyka: yazyk ili rech'? [Tekst] /M. Sh. Bonfel'd // Muzykal'naya kommunikatsiya: sb. nauch. tr. / Problemy muzykoznaniya.-Vyp. 8 (1996). – SPb. : RIII, 1996. – S. 15-39.
Bakhtin, M. M. Sobranie sochineniy v 7 tomakh [Tekst] : T. 1: Filosofskaya estetika 1920-kh godov / M. M. Bakhtin. – M. : Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2003. – 958 s.
Baykieva, R. M. Geroy kak kategoriya muzykal'noy poetiki v p'esakh detskogo fortepiannogo repertuara [Tekst] : diss... kand. iskusstvovedeniya: 17.00.02 / Baykieva Rimma Masgutovna. – Ufa, 2010. – 280 s.
Khaydegger, M. Raboty i razmyshleniya raznykh let [Tekst] / M. Khaydegger ; per. s nem. A. V. Mikhaylova. – M.: Gnozis, 1993. – 464 s.
Kholopova, V. N. Teoriya muzykal'nykh emotsiy: opyt razrabotki problemy [Tekst] / V. N. Kholopova // Muzykal'naya akademiya.-2009.-№ 1.-S. 12-19.
Shtayn, K. E., Petrenko, D. I. Metapoetika Lermontova [Tekst] / K. E. Shtayn, D. I. Petrenko. – Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2009. – 504 s.

References (transliteration):
Surina, T. V. Poezis kak arkhetip kul'tury [Tekst] / T. V. Surina // Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. – Vyp. 316. – 2008. – S. 67-70.
Smirnov, S. A. Avtopoezis cheloveka: Iosif Brodskiy: Iz tsikla ocherkov po antropologii stikha [Elektronnyy resurs] // Elektronnyy al'manakh o cheloveke.-Rezhim dostupa : http://antropolog.ru/doc/persons/smirnov/smirnov171
Safranski, R. Khaydegger. Germanskiy master i ego vremya [Tekst] / R. Safranski ; per. s nem. T. A. Baskakovoy pri uchastii V. A. Brun-Tsekhovogo /Seriya «Zhizn' zamechatel'nykh lyudey». – Vyp. 1017 (817) – M. : Molodaya gvardiya, Serebryanye niti, 2002. – 614s.
Samokhvalova, V. I. Tvorchestvo: bozhestvennyy dar; kosmicheskiy prin¬tsip; rodovaya iden¬tichnost' cheloveka: Nauchnoe izda¬nie [Tekst] / V. I. Samokhvalova. – M. : RUDN, 2007.-538 s.
Pas, O. Poeziya. Kritika. Erotika [Tekst] / O. Pas.-M.: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996.-192s.
Orlov, D. U. Istoriya i poezis [Tekst] / D. U. Orlov // ΕΙΝΑΙ: Problemy filosofii i teologii.-№ 2 (002) 2012. – S. 43-59.
Nazaykinskiy E. V. Poetika muzykal'noy miniatyury [Elektronnyy resurs] // Izrail' XXI veka: Muzykal'nyy internet-zhurnal. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.21israel-music.com/Poetika.htm
Nemkovskaya, V. I. Personazh kak kategoriya muzykal'noy poetiki [Tekst]: diss… kand. iskusstvovedeniya: 17.00.02 / V. I. Nemkovskaya.-Moskva, 2002.-178 s.
Miklina, N. N. Russkiy lad kak printsip miroporyadka [Tekst] / N. N. Miklina.-Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2007. – 272 s.; Miklina, N. N. Kontsept lada v kontekste russkogo kul'turnogo diskursa [Tekst]: diss… dokt. filos. nauk: 09.00.13 /Miklina Natal'ya Nikolaevna. – Stavropol', 2010. – 322s.; Miklina, N. N. Mir A. F. Loseva kak mir «chistogo muzykal'nogo bytiya» [Tekst] / N. N. Miklina //Filosofskie nauki.-2008.-№ 10. – S. 131-137; Miklina, N. N. «Lad» i «ad» v russkom filosofskom diskurse [Tekst] / N. N. Miklina //Polignozis.-2008.-№ 3. – S. 120-132; i drugie.
Losev, A. F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki [Tekst] /A. F. Losev. Iz rannikh proizvedeniy. – M. : Izd-vo «Pravda», «Voprosy filosofii», 1990. – S. 195-390.
Mamardashvili M. K. Odinochestvo – moya professiya: interv'yu Uldisa Tirensa [Tekst] /M. K. Mamardashvili // Merab Mamardashvili. Ocherk sovremennoy evropeyskoy filosofii. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya. – 584 s. – S. 516-548.
Kulakov, Yu. I. Teoriya fizicheskikh struktur-matematicheskoe osnovanie fundamental'noy fiziki [Tekst] / Yu. I. Kulakov // Barantsev R. G., Vekshenov S. A., Vladimirov Yu. S. Metafizika. Vek XXI. Sbornik trudov.-M.: Binom. Laboratoriya znaniy, 2006. – 288 s.-S. 136-139.
Kiyashchenko, N. I., Kiyashchenko, L. P. Kul'tura: dispozitsiya i kompozitsiya poezisa (interval'nyy opyt istolkovaniya) [Tekst] / N. I. Kiyashchenko, L. P. Kiyashchenko // Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. – 2013. – № 4. – Tom I (Gumanitarnye nauki). – S. 288-293.
Kazantseva, L. P. Avtor v muzykal'nom soderzhanii [Tekst] /L. P. Kazantseva.-M. : RAM im. Gnesinykh, 1998.-248 c.
Il'in, I. A. Put' dukhovnogo obnovleniya /Il'in I.A. Pochemu my verim v Rossiyu: Sochineniya / I. A. Il'in. — M.: Eksmo, 2006. — 912s.
Brodskiy, I. Kniga interv'yu [Tekst]. – 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M. : Zakharov, 2005. – 784 s.
Gulyanitskaya, N. S. Poetika muzykal'noy kompozitsii : Teoreticheskie aspekty russkoy dukhovnoy muzyki XX veka [Tekst] / N. S. Gulyanitskaya. – M. : Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002. – 432s.
Bonfel'd, M. Sh. Muzyka: Yazyk. Rech'. Myshlenie [Tekst] / M. Sh. Bonfel'd. – SPb.: Kompozitor, 2006. – 648 s.
Bonfel'd, M. Sh. Muzyka: yazyk ili rech'? [Tekst] /M. Sh. Bonfel'd // Muzykal'naya kommunikatsiya: sb. nauch. tr. / Problemy muzykoznaniya.-Vyp. 8 (1996). – SPb. : RIII, 1996. – S. 15-39.
Bakhtin, M. M. Sobranie sochineniy v 7 tomakh [Tekst] : T. 1: Filosofskaya estetika 1920-kh godov / M. M. Bakhtin. – M. : Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2003. – 958 s.
Baykieva, R. M. Geroy kak kategoriya muzykal'noy poetiki v p'esakh detskogo fortepiannogo repertuara [Tekst] : diss... kand. iskusstvovedeniya: 17.00.02 / Baykieva Rimma Masgutovna. – Ufa, 2010. – 280 s.
Khaydegger, M. Raboty i razmyshleniya raznykh let [Tekst] / M. Khaydegger ; per. s nem. A. V. Mikhaylova. – M.: Gnozis, 1993. – 464 s.
Kholopova, V. N. Teoriya muzykal'nykh emotsiy: opyt razrabotki problemy [Tekst] / V. N. Kholopova // Muzykal'naya akademiya.-2009.-№ 1.-S. 12-19.
Shtayn, K. E., Petrenko, D. I. Metapoetika Lermontova [Tekst] / K. E. Shtayn, D. I. Petrenko. – Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2009. – 504 s.

Аннотация: As Hans-Georg Gadamer noted, certain interaction between poetry and philosophy has been existing since the moment of origin of the European philosophy. Noteworthy that not only the Classical Greek culture but also the culture of the Ancient Rome is of interest when analyzing the dialectic interaction between poery and philosophy. The Ancient Rome presented different forms of interaction between philosophy and poetry. These forms are the theoretical view on the interaction between philosophy and poetry as well as their practical interaction in the form of philosophy expressed in poetic forms and poetry enriched with philosophical ideas – this comes under review in the present article. By using the hermeneutic approach, the author shows how special features of the Ancient Roman culture influenced the peculiarities of understanding the interaction between philosophy and poetry by Ancient Roman philosophers. Noteworthy that the author conducts the comparative study of the philosophical teachings of Philodemus, Cicero and Seneca as well as the most important ideas in the poetry of Lucretius, Vergil, Horatius and PubliusOvidiusNaso. The author of the article proves the assumption that the practical attitude of Romans towards philosophy emphasized anthropological, ethical and social-political ideas in poetry. On the other hand, poetry was viewed as a method of up-bringing and education first of all. The combination of these tendencies caused the confluence of the philosophical idea and poetic form in the Ancient Rome.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, poetry, Ancient Rome, interaction, morals, education, practicalism, eclecticism, stoicism, Epicureanism.

Контактная информация: Titarenko Inna Nikolaevna, 344006, Russia, Rostov-on-Don, ul. Bolshaya Sadovaya 105/42.

Библиография:
Sizemskaya I.N. «Sushchee ne delitsya na razum bez ostatka»: Otechestvennaya filosofskaya mysl' o ponyatiyno-khudozhestvennom sposobe postizhenii bytiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-2.-C. 162-172. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.10428.
Antonova E.M. Ad libitum: filosofiya i poeziya. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-1.-C. 222-242. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1596.2013.1.63. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_63.html
Smith A. The Primacy of Vision in Virgil’s Aeneid. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2005. 253 p.
Sider D. How to commit Philosophy obliquely: Philodemus’ Epigrams in the Light of his PERI PARRHESIAS // Philodemus and the New Testament World. Ed. by John T. Fitzgerald, D. Obbink, G. Holland. Leiden: Brill, 2004. 432 p. – P. 85-101.
Lacy de P. Stoic View of Poetry // American Journal of Philology. Baltimore, 1948. № 69. P. 241-271.
Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Ed. by D. Obbink. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. 316 p.
Kilpatrick R. The Poetry of Criticism: Horace, Epistles II and Ars Poetica. Alberta: The University of Alberta Press, 1990. 125 p.
Johnson W. R. Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993. 183 p.
Janko R. Introduction // Philodemus. On Poem. Book one. Ed. by Richard Janko. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 632 p.
Grube G. A. The Greek and Roman Critics. London: Methuen, 1965.
Harland R. Literary Theory from Plato to Barthes. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999. 302 p.
Clausen W. An Interpretation of the Aeneid // Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 1964. №68. P.139-149.
Gaines R. Philodemus and Cicero on Models of Rhetorical Expression // Cicéron at Philodème: la polemique en philosophie. Ed. C.Auvray-Assayas and D.Delattre. Paris: Editions rue d’Ulm, 2001. P. 259-372.
Khaydegger M. Pis'mo o gumanizme // Vremya i bytie. M.: «Respublika», 1993. 447 s.
Brink C. Horace on Poetry. Vol. I. Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.
Harland R. Literary Theory from Plato to Barthes. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999. 299 p.
Titarenko I. N. Tragedii Seneki // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Seriya «Obshchestvennye nauki». 1995. № 4. – S. 52-58.
Takho-Godi A. A. Epikureets Filodem i stoicheskaya otsenka poezii // Voprosy filologii. M.: MGPI, 1969.-S. 407-412.
Titarenko I. N. Rol' antropologicheskoy problematiki v filosofii Drevnego Rima // Nauchnaya mysl' Kavkaza. 2006. № 2.-S. 41-46.
Spektor D. M. Istoricheskie korni dramaticheskoy poetiki. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4.-S. 100-135.
Osherov S. A. Rimskaya literatura v otsenke Tsitserona // Tsitseron: Sbornik statey k 2000-letiyu so vremeni smerti Tsitserona. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1959. 175 s. – S. 145-175.
Petrovskiy F. A. Literaturno-esteticheskie vozzreniya Tsitserona // Tsitseron: Sbornik statey. Pod red. F.A. Petrovskogo. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958. 151 s. – S. 42-56.
Delez Zh. Razlichie i povtorenie. SPb.: Petropolis, 1998. 384 c.
Losev A. F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Ranniy ellinizm. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 815 c.
Gasparov M. L. Tsitseron i antichnaya ritorika // Tsitseron. Tri traktata ob oratorskom iskusstve. M.: Nauka, 1972. 471 c. – S. 7-74.
Gurevich P. S. Poet o kul'ture // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. № 2 (10). S. 99-101.
Gasparov M. L. Kompozitsiya «Poetiki» Goratsiya // Ocherki istorii rimskoy literaturnoy kritiki. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963. 310 s. – S. 97-151.
Bal'burov E. A. Vzaimodeystvie khudozhestvennogo i filosofskogo slova v aspekte diskursa // Kritika i semiotika. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vypusk 10. Novosibirsk: NGU, 2006. 192 s. – S. 46-51.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Filosofiya i poeziya // Gadamer Kh.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. 367 c. – S. 116-146.

References (transliteration):
Sizemskaya I.N. «Sushchee ne delitsya na razum bez ostatka»: Otechestvennaya filosofskaya mysl' o ponyatiyno-khudozhestvennom sposobe postizhenii bytiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-2.-C. 162-172. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.10428.
Antonova E.M. Ad libitum: filosofiya i poeziya. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-1.-C. 222-242. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1596.2013.1.63. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_63.html
Smith A. The Primacy of Vision in Virgil’s Aeneid. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2005. 253 p.
Sider D. How to commit Philosophy obliquely: Philodemus’ Epigrams in the Light of his PERI PARRHESIAS // Philodemus and the New Testament World. Ed. by John T. Fitzgerald, D. Obbink, G. Holland. Leiden: Brill, 2004. 432 p. – P. 85-101.
Lacy de P. Stoic View of Poetry // American Journal of Philology. Baltimore, 1948. № 69. P. 241-271.
Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Ed. by D. Obbink. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. 316 p.
Kilpatrick R. The Poetry of Criticism: Horace, Epistles II and Ars Poetica. Alberta: The University of Alberta Press, 1990. 125 p.
Johnson W. R. Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993. 183 p.
Janko R. Introduction // Philodemus. On Poem. Book one. Ed. by Richard Janko. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 632 p.
Grube G. A. The Greek and Roman Critics. London: Methuen, 1965.
Harland R. Literary Theory from Plato to Barthes. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999. 302 p.
Clausen W. An Interpretation of the Aeneid // Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 1964. №68. P.139-149.
Gaines R. Philodemus and Cicero on Models of Rhetorical Expression // Cicéron at Philodème: la polemique en philosophie. Ed. C.Auvray-Assayas and D.Delattre. Paris: Editions rue d’Ulm, 2001. P. 259-372.
Khaydegger M. Pis'mo o gumanizme // Vremya i bytie. M.: «Respublika», 1993. 447 s.
Brink C. Horace on Poetry. Vol. I. Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.
Harland R. Literary Theory from Plato to Barthes. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999. 299 p.
Titarenko I. N. Tragedii Seneki // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Seriya «Obshchestvennye nauki». 1995. № 4. – S. 52-58.
Takho-Godi A. A. Epikureets Filodem i stoicheskaya otsenka poezii // Voprosy filologii. M.: MGPI, 1969.-S. 407-412.
Titarenko I. N. Rol' antropologicheskoy problematiki v filosofii Drevnego Rima // Nauchnaya mysl' Kavkaza. 2006. № 2.-S. 41-46.
Spektor D. M. Istoricheskie korni dramaticheskoy poetiki. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4.-S. 100-135.
Osherov S. A. Rimskaya literatura v otsenke Tsitserona // Tsitseron: Sbornik statey k 2000-letiyu so vremeni smerti Tsitserona. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1959. 175 s. – S. 145-175.
Petrovskiy F. A. Literaturno-esteticheskie vozzreniya Tsitserona // Tsitseron: Sbornik statey. Pod red. F.A. Petrovskogo. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958. 151 s. – S. 42-56.
Delez Zh. Razlichie i povtorenie. SPb.: Petropolis, 1998. 384 c.
Losev A. F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Ranniy ellinizm. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 815 c.
Gasparov M. L. Tsitseron i antichnaya ritorika // Tsitseron. Tri traktata ob oratorskom iskusstve. M.: Nauka, 1972. 471 c. – S. 7-74.
Gurevich P. S. Poet o kul'ture // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. № 2 (10). S. 99-101.
Gasparov M. L. Kompozitsiya «Poetiki» Goratsiya // Ocherki istorii rimskoy literaturnoy kritiki. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963. 310 s. – S. 97-151.
Bal'burov E. A. Vzaimodeystvie khudozhestvennogo i filosofskogo slova v aspekte diskursa // Kritika i semiotika. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vypusk 10. Novosibirsk: NGU, 2006. 192 s. – S. 46-51.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Filosofiya i poeziya // Gadamer Kh.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. 367 c. – S. 116-146.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to peculiarities of the development of architecture in Finland during the first third of the XXth century as illustrated by creative works of a famous architect and one of the founders of the Finnish school of architecture Lars Sonck (1870–1956). The purpose of the research is to study creative works created by Lars Sonck during the transition period from Art Nouveau to Modernism (Functionalism in architecture). The significance research of Lars Sonck is conditioned with the fact that the process of the development of Art Nouveau, Neo-Classicism and Modernism in the architecture of Finland is not studied enough. The object of research is the evolution of Lars Sonck’s creativity during the above mentioned period. The subject of research is the architectural concepts that had been presented in the architecture of Finland since the end of the XXth century to the first third of the XXth century and their practical implementation in Lars Sonck’s creativity. Research methods include methods that are usually used in historical architectural, art history and comparative stylistic analysis. As a result of research, the author concludes that the Finish architect combined axial symmetry and monochromatic facade finish with certain elements of National Romanticism of the turn of the century. Lars Sonck’s Neo-Classicism of the 1910th was an intermediate stage between National Romanticism and Modernism that was already dominating in the architecture of Finland at the beginning of the 1930th which is clearly illustrated by the three famous buildings designed by of Lars Sonck.

Ключевые слова: Lars Sonck, Finnish architecture, Art Nouveau, Neo-Classicism, Modernism, culture, St. Michael’s Church, Kallio Church, Mikael Agricola Church, Church Council in Helsinki.

Контактная информация: Kabakchi Margarita Konstantinovna, 199034, Russia, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya nab. 7-9.

Библиография:
Blinova E.K. Order kak arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennaya sistema. Istoriografiya i metodologicheskie aspekty: Monografiya. – SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A.I.Gertsena, 2011. – s. 73.
Goryunov V.S., Tubli M.P. Arkhitektura epokhi moderna. Kontseptsii. Napravleniya. Mastera. – SPb.: Stroyizdat, S.-Peterburgskoe otdelenie, 1992.
Connah R. Finland. Modern Architectures in History. Reaktion Books Ltd., London, 2005.
Korvenmaa P. Innovation versus Tradition – the Architect Lars Sonck. Works and Pro-jects 1900 – 1910. – Ekenäs, 1991. – pp.73, 92, 102, 135.
Lars Sonck, 1870-1956, arkkitehti; Lars Sonck, 1870-1956, Architect. Suomenra-kennustaiteenmuseo. Helsinki 1982.
Ringbom S. Stone, Style and Truth. The Vogue for Natural Stone in Nordic Architecture 1880-1910. Finnish Association of Antiquities. Publication № 91. – Helsinki, 1987.

References (transliteration):
Blinova E.K. Order kak arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennaya sistema. Istoriografiya i metodologicheskie aspekty: Monografiya. – SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A.I.Gertsena, 2011. – s. 73.
Goryunov V.S., Tubli M.P. Arkhitektura epokhi moderna. Kontseptsii. Napravleniya. Mastera. – SPb.: Stroyizdat, S.-Peterburgskoe otdelenie, 1992.
Connah R. Finland. Modern Architectures in History. Reaktion Books Ltd., London, 2005.
Korvenmaa P. Innovation versus Tradition – the Architect Lars Sonck. Works and Pro-jects 1900 – 1910. – Ekenäs, 1991. – pp.73, 92, 102, 135.
Lars Sonck, 1870-1956, arkkitehti; Lars Sonck, 1870-1956, Architect. Suomenra-kennustaiteenmuseo. Helsinki 1982.
Ringbom S. Stone, Style and Truth. The Vogue for Natural Stone in Nordic Architecture 1880-1910. Finnish Association of Antiquities. Publication № 91. – Helsinki, 1987.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the visual thinking as an aspect of the synthetic thinking capable of changing and expressing actual relations through their visualization in art work. The author studies cognitive potentials and functions of the visual thinking allowing to understand the nature of the process of thinking in art. The author proves that in the process of creation of art work, an artist can change the art material that has the ‘primary’ sense into the art work that has the ‘secondary’ sense by using his visual thinking and skills. In order to describe the essence and nature of the visual thinking, the author of the article used empiric and theoretical methods of researching interrelated problems such as tendencies of evolution of art, nature of art creative process, artistic and expressive aspects of the art image. The author establishes that the visual thinking allows the artist to express his idea in an integrated image and the product of such creative work gains a cultural value. The author also underlines the importance and topicality of this research. According to the author, audo-visual culture is becoming an essential part of our being and the development of higher levels of visual thinking can create rich and full art images.

Ключевые слова: visual thinking, art work, the process of creation of artwork, artist, rational, sensual, cognitive functions, visual expression, language.

Контактная информация: Zhukovsky Vladimir Ilyich , 660041, Russia, Krasnoyarsk, pr. Svobodny 79.

Библиография:
O. D. Baldina Izobrazitel'no-plasticheskie formy narodnoy kul'tury v ikh vzaimodeystvii s drugimi plastami sovremennogo khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva: k postanovke problemy // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2011.-5.-C. 76-88.
Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / Pod red. V.E. Kemerova.-2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – London, Frankfurt-na-Mayne, Parizh, Lyuksemburg, Moskva, Minsk: Panprint, 1998. – 1064 s.
E. D. Yakhnin Razmyshleniya ob izobrazitel'nom iskusstve i ego vospriyatii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-6.-C. 106-114.
Demenev D.N. Ratsional'nyy uroven', kak odno iz vazhneyshikh ontologicheskikh osnovaniy khudozhestvennogo protsessa. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-11.-C. 1-49. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9505.html
V.I. Zhukovskiy Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-4.-C. 510-515. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.9.
Kholton Dzh. Tematicheskiy analiz nauki.-M: Progress, 1981.-381 s.
Khaydegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? – M.: Akad. Proekt.-2007.-351 s.
Rubinshteyn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir.-SPb.: Piter, 2003.-512 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Religiya kak sotsial'naya svyaz' (sakralizatsiya osnovaniya kul'tury).-Ekaterinburg: UrGU, 1993.-96 s.
Zinchenko V. P., Morgunov E.B. Chelovek razvivayushchiysya: ocherki rossiyskoy psikhologii.-M.: Trivola, 1994.-333 s.
Likhachev D.S. Ocherki po filosofii khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. – Spb, 1999.-191.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V., Rakhmatullin R.Yu. Vizual'noe myshlenie v strukture nauchnogo poznaniya: [monografiya]. – Krasnoyarsk: KrGU, 1988.-180 s.
Zinchenko, V. P. Soznanie i tvorcheskiy akt. – M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2010-588 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Intellektual'naya vizualizatsiya sushchnosti-Krasnoyarsk: KGU, 1998.-222 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Zrimaya sushchnost'. (Vizual'noe myshlenie v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve): [monografiya]-Sverdlovsk: UrGU, 1991. – 284 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: [monografiya].-SPb: Aleteyya,-2011.-496 s.: il.
Geraimchuk I.M. Teoriya tvorcheskogo protsessa.-Kiev: Edel'veys,-2012. – 269 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013.-№ 3. – S. 510-515.
Dubrovskiy D. I. Problema ideal'nogo. – M.: Kanon, 2002. – 366 s.
Beskova I.A. Kak vozmozhno tvorcheskoe myshlenie?-M.: IFRAN, 1993.-195 s.
Gazzaniga M. Rasshcheplennyy chelovecheskiy mozg // Khrestomatiya po neyropsikhologii.-M.: Izd-vo RPO.-1999.-s. 128-132.
Arnkheym R. Iskusstvo i vizual'noe vospriyatie.-M.: Arkhitektura-S, 2007. – 392 s.
Vygotskiy L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva.-M.: Izd-vo Sovrem. gumanitar. un-ta, 2001. – 209 s.
V.I. Zhukovskiy Proizvedenie izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: fenomen indeksnykh, ikonicheskikh i simvolicheskikh khudozhestvennykh obrazov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-11.-C. 128-135.

References (transliteration):
O. D. Baldina Izobrazitel'no-plasticheskie formy narodnoy kul'tury v ikh vzaimodeystvii s drugimi plastami sovremennogo khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva: k postanovke problemy // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2011.-5.-C. 76-88.
Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / Pod red. V.E. Kemerova.-2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – London, Frankfurt-na-Mayne, Parizh, Lyuksemburg, Moskva, Minsk: Panprint, 1998. – 1064 s.
E. D. Yakhnin Razmyshleniya ob izobrazitel'nom iskusstve i ego vospriyatii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-6.-C. 106-114.
Demenev D.N. Ratsional'nyy uroven', kak odno iz vazhneyshikh ontologicheskikh osnovaniy khudozhestvennogo protsessa. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-11.-C. 1-49. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9505.html
V.I. Zhukovskiy Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-4.-C. 510-515. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.9.
Kholton Dzh. Tematicheskiy analiz nauki.-M: Progress, 1981.-381 s.
Khaydegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? – M.: Akad. Proekt.-2007.-351 s.
Rubinshteyn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir.-SPb.: Piter, 2003.-512 s.
Pivovarov D. V. Religiya kak sotsial'naya svyaz' (sakralizatsiya osnovaniya kul'tury).-Ekaterinburg: UrGU, 1993.-96 s.
Zinchenko V. P., Morgunov E.B. Chelovek razvivayushchiysya: ocherki rossiyskoy psikhologii.-M.: Trivola, 1994.-333 s.
Likhachev D.S. Ocherki po filosofii khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. – Spb, 1999.-191.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V., Rakhmatullin R.Yu. Vizual'noe myshlenie v strukture nauchnogo poznaniya: [monografiya]. – Krasnoyarsk: KrGU, 1988.-180 s.
Zinchenko, V. P. Soznanie i tvorcheskiy akt. – M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2010-588 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Intellektual'naya vizualizatsiya sushchnosti-Krasnoyarsk: KGU, 1998.-222 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Pivovarov D. V. Zrimaya sushchnost'. (Vizual'noe myshlenie v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve): [monografiya]-Sverdlovsk: UrGU, 1991. – 284 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: [monografiya].-SPb: Aleteyya,-2011.-496 s.: il.
Geraimchuk I.M. Teoriya tvorcheskogo protsessa.-Kiev: Edel'veys,-2012. – 269 s.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013.-№ 3. – S. 510-515.
Dubrovskiy D. I. Problema ideal'nogo. – M.: Kanon, 2002. – 366 s.
Beskova I.A. Kak vozmozhno tvorcheskoe myshlenie?-M.: IFRAN, 1993.-195 s.
Gazzaniga M. Rasshcheplennyy chelovecheskiy mozg // Khrestomatiya po neyropsikhologii.-M.: Izd-vo RPO.-1999.-s. 128-132.
Arnkheym R. Iskusstvo i vizual'noe vospriyatie.-M.: Arkhitektura-S, 2007. – 392 s.
Vygotskiy L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva.-M.: Izd-vo Sovrem. gumanitar. un-ta, 2001. – 209 s.
V.I. Zhukovskiy Proizvedenie izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: fenomen indeksnykh, ikonicheskikh i simvolicheskikh khudozhestvennykh obrazov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-11.-C. 128-135.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the intellectual biography and creative work of a poet and existential philosopher Benjamin Fondane. Lev Shestov thought of him as his student and follower. The author of the article describes the milestones in Fondane’s creative development. The author analyzes the Rumanian period of his creative work, the stage when he got closer to surrealism and the stage when Shestov’s images had quite an impact on Fondane’s works and when Fondane truly admired Gaston Bachelard. The author studies the derivation of Fondane’s creativity (Jules de Gaultier’s bovarism, dadaism, surrealism, Lucien Lévy-Bruhl’s anthropology and Shestov’s philosophy) and provides an insight into the main works published by the author. The author analyzes literary, critical, philosophical, drama and poetic works written by Fondance as well as the main topics and themes discussing in his works such as motives towards persecution, refrences, loneliness and fear, anxiety and dispair, absurdity of human existence, rebellion against unjustice, opposition between faith and mind, Jerusalism and Aphines. In Addition, the purpose of the article is also to trace back the influence of Shestov’s ideas on Fondane’s world view and ideology as well as to evaluate the contribution of Fondane’s works about Shestov to the distribution of the ideas of Russian philosophy.

Ключевые слова: existential philosophy, Lev Shestov, ‘poor consciousness’, surrealism, bovarism, existential poetry, migration, pure cinematograph, paralogical thinking, infinity.

Контактная информация: Vorozhikhina Ksenia Vladimirovna, 119991, Russia, Moscow, GSP-1, Lomonosovsky prospect 27-4.

Библиография:
Baranova-Shestova N. Zhizn' L'va Shestova. V 2-kh tt. Paris, 1983.
Lovtskiy G. Lev Shestov po moim vospominaniyam // Grani. 1960-1961. №№ 45-46.
Sazeeva I.B. Ekzistentsiya i poeziya v filosofii B. Fondana // Semiozis i kul'tura. Filosofiya i antropologiya razryva (tekst, soznanie, kod): sbornik nauchnykh statey. Vypusk 6. Syktyvkar, 2010.
Stikhi poetov Rumynii 20-30 gg. M., 1975.
Shestov L. Apofeoz bespochvennosti. M., 2004.
Shestov L. Velikie kanuny. M., 2007.
Finkenthal M. Lev Shestov. Existential Philosopher and Religious Thinker. New York, 2010.
Fondane B. Baudelaire et l`experience du gouffre. Bruxelles, 1994.
Fondane B. Faux Traité d`esthétique. Paris, 1980.
Fondane B. La conscience malheureuse. Paris, 1979.
Fondane B. Le Mal des fantômes. Paris, 1980.
Fondane B. Léon Chestov et la lutte contre les evidences // Revue Philosophique de la France et de l`Étranger. 1938. T. 1. № 7/8.
Fondane B. Rencontres avec Leon Chestov. Paris, 1982.
Fondane B. Rimbaud le voyou. Bruxelles, 1994.
Fondane B. Sur les rives de l`Ilissus. Après la mort de Léon Chestov // The Lev Shestov Journal. 1997. № 1.
Hyde J. K. Benjamin Fondane. A presentation of his life and works. Genève, 1971.
Kluback W. Benjamin Fondane. A poet in Exile. New York, 1996.
Lucescu Boutcher A. Rediscovering Benjamin Fondane. New York, 2003.
Salazar-Ferrer O. Benjamin Fondane. Paris, 2004.
The Tragic Discourse. Shestov and Fondane`s Existential Thought. Bern, 2006.

References (transliteration):
Baranova-Shestova N. Zhizn' L'va Shestova. V 2-kh tt. Paris, 1983.
Lovtskiy G. Lev Shestov po moim vospominaniyam // Grani. 1960-1961. №№ 45-46.
Sazeeva I.B. Ekzistentsiya i poeziya v filosofii B. Fondana // Semiozis i kul'tura. Filosofiya i antropologiya razryva (tekst, soznanie, kod): sbornik nauchnykh statey. Vypusk 6. Syktyvkar, 2010.
Stikhi poetov Rumynii 20-30 gg. M., 1975.
Shestov L. Apofeoz bespochvennosti. M., 2004.
Shestov L. Velikie kanuny. M., 2007.
Finkenthal M. Lev Shestov. Existential Philosopher and Religious Thinker. New York, 2010.
Fondane B. Baudelaire et l`experience du gouffre. Bruxelles, 1994.
Fondane B. Faux Traité d`esthétique. Paris, 1980.
Fondane B. La conscience malheureuse. Paris, 1979.
Fondane B. Le Mal des fantômes. Paris, 1980.
Fondane B. Léon Chestov et la lutte contre les evidences // Revue Philosophique de la France et de l`Étranger. 1938. T. 1. № 7/8.
Fondane B. Rencontres avec Leon Chestov. Paris, 1982.
Fondane B. Rimbaud le voyou. Bruxelles, 1994.
Fondane B. Sur les rives de l`Ilissus. Après la mort de Léon Chestov // The Lev Shestov Journal. 1997. № 1.
Hyde J. K. Benjamin Fondane. A presentation of his life and works. Genève, 1971.
Kluback W. Benjamin Fondane. A poet in Exile. New York, 1996.
Lucescu Boutcher A. Rediscovering Benjamin Fondane. New York, 2003.
Salazar-Ferrer O. Benjamin Fondane. Paris, 2004.
The Tragic Discourse. Shestov and Fondane`s Existential Thought. Bern, 2006.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the terms ‘culture’, ‘artistic culture’ and ‘art work’. Culture is defined as human activity aimed at cultivation of ideals. Ideal production is viewed as a process of preservation and change of samples of reproduction of public life esteemed for ideals and unique culture of the individual person. It is claimed that the art culture is a subsystem of the culture capable of generating equilibrium ideals. Models according to which basic ideals of culture are formed are allocated and analyzed. The author of the article describes art work as a central element of artistic culture and defines the concepts of art work and art image as part of researches of actual problems of art. Art work is studied as an artificial and skilfully made piece of work. The author also describes the creative process of the dialogue between the artist and art material or art work and the audience and formulates the operational approach to interaction between the audience and art work.

Ключевые слова: culture, artistic culture, art work, art image, artist, art material, ideal, audience, model, finesse.

Контактная информация: Zhukovsky Vladimir Ilyich , 660041, Russia, Krasnoyarsk, pr. Svobodny 79.

Библиография:
Vlasov V.G. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: V 8 t. – SPb: LITA, 2000. – T. 3.– 847 c.
Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t.,-M., 1980. – T. 4. – 683 s.
Zhukovskiy V.I. O probleme samodvizheniya v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental'nogo obrazovaniya. – 2013.-№ 7. – S.138-139.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Operatsionnyy podkhod k probleme formirovaniya khudozhestvennogo obraza // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. – 2013.-№ 6. – S.44-46.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Proizvedenie iskusstva: osobennosti proizvodstva i spetsifika potrebleniya // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. – 2013.-№4.-C. 76-79.
Zhukovskiy V.I. Strukturnye osnovy teorii izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva //Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012.-№ 3. – S.96 – 104.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. №4. – S. 510-515.
Zhukovskiy V.I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: [monografiya]. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2011.-496 s.: il.
Zhukovskiy V.I Kharakter i osobennosti dialoga zritelya s proizvedeniem // Pedagogika iskusstva: elektron. nauch. zhurnal. – 2010.-№ 2. http://www.art-education.ru /AE-magazine/new-magazine-2-2010.htm
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.V. Priroda vizual'nogo myshleniya // Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2008. – № 1(1). – S.149-158.
Zhukovskiy, V.I., Tarasova M.V. Idealofundirovannaya sistema kul'tury: printsip stroeniya, dialektika samodvizheniya i samorazvitiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2011.-№ 6. – S. 65-72.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Tarasova M.V. Kul'tura kak idealofundirovannaya sistema // Voprosy kul'turologii. – 2013.-№1. – S.
Pivovarov D. V. Problema sinteza osnovnykh definitsiy kul'tury // Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2009. № 1. S. 157—161.
Pivovarov D.V. Filosofiya religii. – M: Akademicheskiy proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 2006 – 640 s.
Sovremennyy slovar'-spravochnik po iskusstvu / Nauch. red. i sost. A.A. Melik-Pashaev. – M.: Olimp: AST, 1999 . – 813s.
Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4 t.-M.: Progress, 1986. – T. 2. – 672 s.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.W. About a problem of is religious-art expression of an ideal of «the perfect person» in Russian art culture // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences.-2012. – № 1(1). – S. 48-55.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov V.D. Characteristics of visual thinking The // European journal of natural history. – 2009.-№ 6. – P. 38-44.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.W. The Nature of Visual Thinking // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. – 2008.-N 1(1).-P. 124-148.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.W. Works of art and visual thinking // European journal of natural history. – 2010.-№ 2. – P. 38-42.
Pivovarov D. V. Ideale and Ideelle // Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities & Social Sciences .-2012.-№ 5 (1).-S.13 – 27.
Pivovarov D.V. Problem of Synthesis of the Main Definitions of Culture //Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities & Social Sciences .-2009.-T. 2.-№ 1. S. 17―22.

References (transliteration):
Vlasov V.G. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: V 8 t. – SPb: LITA, 2000. – T. 3.– 847 c.
Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t.,-M., 1980. – T. 4. – 683 s.
Zhukovskiy V.I. O probleme samodvizheniya v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental'nogo obrazovaniya. – 2013.-№ 7. – S.138-139.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Operatsionnyy podkhod k probleme formirovaniya khudozhestvennogo obraza // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. – 2013.-№ 6. – S.44-46.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Proizvedenie iskusstva: osobennosti proizvodstva i spetsifika potrebleniya // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. – 2013.-№4.-C. 76-79.
Zhukovskiy V.I. Strukturnye osnovy teorii izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva //Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012.-№ 3. – S.96 – 104.
Zhukovskiy V. I. Tvorcheskiy protsess: khudozhnik i khudozhestvennyy material v ikh iskusnosti, iskusstvennosti i iskuse // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. №4. – S. 510-515.
Zhukovskiy V.I. Teoriya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: [monografiya]. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2011.-496 s.: il.
Zhukovskiy V.I Kharakter i osobennosti dialoga zritelya s proizvedeniem // Pedagogika iskusstva: elektron. nauch. zhurnal. – 2010.-№ 2. http://www.art-education.ru /AE-magazine/new-magazine-2-2010.htm
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.V. Priroda vizual'nogo myshleniya // Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2008. – № 1(1). – S.149-158.
Zhukovskiy, V.I., Tarasova M.V. Idealofundirovannaya sistema kul'tury: printsip stroeniya, dialektika samodvizheniya i samorazvitiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2011.-№ 6. – S. 65-72.
Zhukovskiy V. I., Tarasova M.V. Kul'tura kak idealofundirovannaya sistema // Voprosy kul'turologii. – 2013.-№1. – S.
Pivovarov D. V. Problema sinteza osnovnykh definitsiy kul'tury // Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2009. № 1. S. 157—161.
Pivovarov D.V. Filosofiya religii. – M: Akademicheskiy proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 2006 – 640 s.
Sovremennyy slovar'-spravochnik po iskusstvu / Nauch. red. i sost. A.A. Melik-Pashaev. – M.: Olimp: AST, 1999 . – 813s.
Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4 t.-M.: Progress, 1986. – T. 2. – 672 s.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.W. About a problem of is religious-art expression of an ideal of «the perfect person» in Russian art culture // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences.-2012. – № 1(1). – S. 48-55.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov V.D. Characteristics of visual thinking The // European journal of natural history. – 2009.-№ 6. – P. 38-44.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.W. The Nature of Visual Thinking // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. – 2008.-N 1(1).-P. 124-148.
Zhukovskiy V.I., Pivovarov D.W. Works of art and visual thinking // European journal of natural history. – 2010.-№ 2. – P. 38-42.
Pivovarov D. V. Ideale and Ideelle // Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities & Social Sciences .-2012.-№ 5 (1).-S.13 – 27.
Pivovarov D.V. Problem of Synthesis of the Main Definitions of Culture //Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities & Social Sciences .-2009.-T. 2.-№ 1. S. 17―22.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the difference between the status of legal crime and disturbance of traditional ways of perceiving modern actual art. In order to distinguish between transgression and crime, the author of the article appeals to Nikolay Evreinov’s theory of theatricalization of life, Michel Foucault’s methodological approaches and the relationship between ‘desire’ and ‘law’ described by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. The main thesis of the article is that art must not imitate crime by crossing certain illusory borders established by the law because the law forbids much more than such ‘crime’ may violate (Gille Deleuze and Felix Guattari). The law imposes an idea that our desires aresomething forbidden and we can satisfy our desires only if we violate a law and commit a crime. At the same time, the law forbids us illegal actions. The article is devoted to the analysis of actions by modern Russian artists in the 90’s.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, transgression, crime, desire, law, theatricalization of life, actual art, performance, actionism, illusion.

Контактная информация: Chubarov Igor Mikhailovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 429.

Библиография:
1. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. T. 1. Anti-Edip. Ekaterinburg, 2007.
2. Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyy ob'ekt ideologii. M.: KhZh, 1999.
3. Podoroga V.A. Materialy k psikhobiografii S.M. Eyzenshteyna // Avto-bio-grafiya. Tetradi po
analiticheskoy antropologii № 1 / Pod red. V.A. Podoroga. M.: Logos, 2001.
4. Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu / Per.
s frants. S. Ofertasa; pod obshch. red. V.P. Vizgina i B.M. Skuratova. M.: Praksis, 2002.
5. Eyzenshteyn S.M. Metod. T. 1. Grundproblem. M.: Muzey kino, 2002.

References (transliteration):
1. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. T. 1. Anti-Edip. Ekaterinburg, 2007.
2. Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyy ob'ekt ideologii. M.: KhZh, 1999.
3. Podoroga V.A. Materialy k psikhobiografii S.M. Eyzenshteyna // Avto-bio-grafiya. Tetradi po
analiticheskoy antropologii № 1 / Pod red. V.A. Podoroga. M.: Logos, 2001.
4. Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu / Per.
s frants. S. Ofertasa; pod obshch. red. V.P. Vizgina i B.M. Skuratova. M.: Praksis, 2002.
5. Eyzenshteyn S.M. Metod. T. 1. Grundproblem. M.: Muzey kino, 2002.

Аннотация: The article evaluates the elements of subjective idealism in the art of the anime — director Makoto Shinkai. The author analyzes a number of works of Makoto Shinkai in order to distinguish its subjective idealistic component. The author also gives analysis of the artistic value of certain works and art of Makoto Shinkai as a whole.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, idealism, art, anime, individuality, subjectivism, worldview, reality, Makoto Shinkai, Berkley.

Контактная информация: Masalskiy, Konstantin Igorevich, 49050, Ukraine, Dnepropetrovsk, ul. Gagarina, d. 72.

Библиография:
1. Berkli Dzh. Traktat o printsipakh chelovecheskogo znaniya // Berkli Dzh. Sochineniya. M., 1978. S. 149-247.
2. Berkli Dzh. Tri razgovora mezhdu Gilasom i Filonusom // Berkli Dzh. Sochineniya. M., 1978. S. 249-360.

References (transliteration):
1. Berkli Dzh. Traktat o printsipakh chelovecheskogo znaniya // Berkli Dzh. Sochineniya. M., 1978. S. 149-247.
2. Berkli Dzh. Tri razgovora mezhdu Gilasom i Filonusom // Berkli Dzh. Sochineniya. M., 1978. S. 249-360.