Аннотация: This article examines the question on the need of substantiation of such new section in philosophy as the philosophy of anti-language. This rises a problem of anti-language existence as a semiotic reality, on the surface of which there are natural human languages, nominating within the being only what is subjected to the signifying titling. Outside of the natural human languages is the area of unnamed and unnamable, which comprises the concept and methodology of the anti-language. The author interprets the anti-language as a combination of classes of anti-words, which allow nominating various spheres of presemiotic.  Problematization of the ontological status of the words, taking into account the action of the principle “initial delay” within the metaphysical tradition of presence/absence, is the main task for the solution of the anti-language methodology. The article claims the new philosophical discipline – the philosophy of anti-language, the subject of which became the studying of the foundations and limits of the semiotic nomination on the natural human language and dependencies of the cognitive process of the anti-language. On the example of the three types of anti-words, the author demonstrates the significative inappropriateness of a language (in particular, Russian languages) for the purpose of working with the corresponding referents.

Ключевые слова: Language philosophy, Anti-language philosophy, Anti-language, Anti-word, Type of anti-words, Derrida , Principle of “initial delay”, Descombes, Inappropriateness, Genealogism

Библиография:
Kutyrev V. A., Nilogov A. S. Pro et contra innovatsionizma: za sokhranenie antropomorfnoy realizatsii vozmozhnykh mirov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-2.-C. 180-189. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.10515.
Kutyrev V. A. O lingvisticheskoy kontrrevolyutsii, ee prichine i postchelovecheskikh perspektivakh (razmyshleniya nad knigoy A. Nilogova «Filosofiya antiyazyka» SPb., «Aleteyya». 2013) // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-3.-C. 1-27. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1596.2013.3.10077. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_10077.html.
Chernykh P. Ya. Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: V 2 t. T. 1. – 3-e izd., stereotip. – M., 1999. – 624 s
Nilogov A. S. Filosofiya antiyazyka.-SPb., 2013.-216 s.
Nilogov A. S. Antiyazykovaya nominatsiya bol'shikh chisel (V nachale bylo Chislo, i Chislo bylo u Boga, i Chislo bylo Bog) // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 266–274. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.3.9645 (http://nbpublish.com/fmag/contents_2013_3.html).
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya / Sost., per. s nem. i komm. V. V. Bibikhina. – M., 1993. – 448 s.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / Per. s nem. V. V. Bibikhina. – Khar'kov, 2003. – 512 s.
Gurko E. N. Dekonstruktsiya: teksty i interpretatsiya. Derrida Zh. Ostav' eto imya (Postskriptum), Kak izbezhat' razgovora: denegatsii. – Minsk, 2001. – 320 s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t. T. 4 / In-t filosofii Rossiyskoy akad. nauk, Natsional'nyy obshchestvenno-nauchnyy fond; nauch.-red. sovet.: V. S. Stepin (pred. soveta) i dr. – M., 2010. – S. 238–240.
Dekomb V. Sovremennaya frantsuzskaya filosofiya: [Sbornik]. / Perevod s fr. – M., 2000. – 344 s.
Yazykoznanie. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Gl. red. V. N. Yartseva. – 2-e izd. – M., 1998. – 686 s.
Filosofiya yazyka / Red.-sost. Dzh. R. Serl: Per. s angl. – M., 2004. – 208 s.
Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya: Slovar'. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Sost. i otvet. red.: V. S. Malakhov, V. P. Filatov. – M., 2000. – 544 s. – S. 446–447.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_language.
http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/754957/philosophy-of-language.
http://vslovare.ru/slovo/filosofija-jazjyka.
Kutyrev V. A., Nilogov A. S. Ob ekspansii vysokikh (postchelovecheskikh) tekhnologiy, ee perspektive, ikh tvortsakh i zhertvakh // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2014.-1.-C. 164-202. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1.10676. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10676.html

References (transliteration):
Kutyrev V. A., Nilogov A. S. Pro et contra innovatsionizma: za sokhranenie antropomorfnoy realizatsii vozmozhnykh mirov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-2.-C. 180-189. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.10515.
Kutyrev V. A. O lingvisticheskoy kontrrevolyutsii, ee prichine i postchelovecheskikh perspektivakh (razmyshleniya nad knigoy A. Nilogova «Filosofiya antiyazyka» SPb., «Aleteyya». 2013) // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-3.-C. 1-27. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1596.2013.3.10077. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_10077.html.
Chernykh P. Ya. Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: V 2 t. T. 1. – 3-e izd., stereotip. – M., 1999. – 624 s
Nilogov A. S. Filosofiya antiyazyka.-SPb., 2013.-216 s.
Nilogov A. S. Antiyazykovaya nominatsiya bol'shikh chisel (V nachale bylo Chislo, i Chislo bylo u Boga, i Chislo bylo Bog) // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 266–274. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.3.9645 (http://nbpublish.com/fmag/contents_2013_3.html).
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya / Sost., per. s nem. i komm. V. V. Bibikhina. – M., 1993. – 448 s.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / Per. s nem. V. V. Bibikhina. – Khar'kov, 2003. – 512 s.
Gurko E. N. Dekonstruktsiya: teksty i interpretatsiya. Derrida Zh. Ostav' eto imya (Postskriptum), Kak izbezhat' razgovora: denegatsii. – Minsk, 2001. – 320 s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t. T. 4 / In-t filosofii Rossiyskoy akad. nauk, Natsional'nyy obshchestvenno-nauchnyy fond; nauch.-red. sovet.: V. S. Stepin (pred. soveta) i dr. – M., 2010. – S. 238–240.
Dekomb V. Sovremennaya frantsuzskaya filosofiya: [Sbornik]. / Perevod s fr. – M., 2000. – 344 s.
Yazykoznanie. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Gl. red. V. N. Yartseva. – 2-e izd. – M., 1998. – 686 s.
Filosofiya yazyka / Red.-sost. Dzh. R. Serl: Per. s angl. – M., 2004. – 208 s.
Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya: Slovar'. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Sost. i otvet. red.: V. S. Malakhov, V. P. Filatov. – M., 2000. – 544 s. – S. 446–447.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_language.
http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/754957/philosophy-of-language.
http://vslovare.ru/slovo/filosofija-jazjyka.
Kutyrev V. A., Nilogov A. S. Ob ekspansii vysokikh (postchelovecheskikh) tekhnologiy, ee perspektive, ikh tvortsakh i zhertvakh // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2014.-1.-C. 164-202. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1.10676. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10676.html

Аннотация: Proper names and surnames are a special subsystem in the system of vocabulary where linguistic laws change quite specifically like a ray of light when it is transferred from one medium to another. This subsystem has the patterns that cannot be met outside the sphere of proper names. The author of the article studies surnames in languages of different systems. She underlines that surnames are created based on the linguistic rules and therefore reflect the history of language. Azerbaijani, English and German surnames also reflect the history of nation. Languages of different systems have similar and different anthroponyms that allow to understand the connection between cultures of different nations. This provides an opportunity to establish that surnames are part of the history of nation and culture. Inheriting communication media that were created long time ago, each speech community develops and improves these media depending on their growing needs. Languages of different systems – Azerbaijani, English and German – have particular differences and similarities in surnames that allow to understand the relation between cultures of different nations and common roots of these cultures. This provides an opportunity to establish that surnames are part of the culture and history of nation.

Ключевые слова: proper names, language, surnames (last names), scientific researches, anthroponomical models, nickname, history of language, history of nation, component.

Библиография:
Çobanov M. Familiya. Təxəllüs. T, 1987.
Qurbanov A. Türk antroponimlərinin inkişaf dövrləri. B., 2000,
Qurbanova F. Antroponimiyanın nəzəri məsələlərinə dair. B., 2001.
Həsənov H. Söz və ad. B., 1984.
Tanrıverdiyev Ə. Türk mənşəli Azərbaycan antroponimləri. B., 1996. b) (na russkom yazyke)
Il'ish B.A., « Istoriya angliyskogo yazyka», Izd. 4-e, Izd-vo lit-ry na in. yazykakh, M., 1958
Makovskiy M.M. «Angliyskaya etimologiya», M., Vysshaya shkola, 1986
Sistema lichnykh imen u narodov mira. M., 1986. v) (na angliyskom yazyke)
Mathews C.M. English Surnames. London, 1966,
Reaney P.N. A Dictionary of British Surnames. London, 1958. g) (na nemetskom yazyke)
Das große Buch der Vornamen (über 5000 Vornamen) Tosa Verlag. Wien, 2003.
Familiennamenbuch (Herausgegeben von Horst Nauman). VEB Bibliograp¬hi¬sches Institut Leipzig. 1987.

References (transliteration):
Çobanov M. Familiya. Təxəllüs. T, 1987.
Qurbanov A. Türk antroponimlərinin inkişaf dövrləri. B., 2000,
Qurbanova F. Antroponimiyanın nəzəri məsələlərinə dair. B., 2001.
Həsənov H. Söz və ad. B., 1984.
Tanrıverdiyev Ə. Türk mənşəli Azərbaycan antroponimləri. B., 1996. b) (na russkom yazyke)
Il'ish B.A., « Istoriya angliyskogo yazyka», Izd. 4-e, Izd-vo lit-ry na in. yazykakh, M., 1958
Makovskiy M.M. «Angliyskaya etimologiya», M., Vysshaya shkola, 1986
Sistema lichnykh imen u narodov mira. M., 1986. v) (na angliyskom yazyke)
Mathews C.M. English Surnames. London, 1966,
Reaney P.N. A Dictionary of British Surnames. London, 1958. g) (na nemetskom yazyke)
Das große Buch der Vornamen (über 5000 Vornamen) Tosa Verlag. Wien, 2003.
Familiennamenbuch (Herausgegeben von Horst Nauman). VEB Bibliograp¬hi¬sches Institut Leipzig. 1987.

Аннотация: Jacques Derrida and Aurelius Augustinus have been traditionally thought to be representing the opposing tendencies: the former attracted attetion at what he called the phonetic writing or logocentrism and the latter followed the onto-theological approach which was based on the idea of the World being created by Word. However, the analysis of relations between an item and a sign, designator and designatum, writing and sound, as described in Augustinus’ diaologue ‘About the Teacher’, shows that both philosophers had much in common.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, item, sign, writing, sound, designatum, meaning, nothing, logo-centrism, grammatology.

Контактная информация: Neretina Svetlana Sergeevna, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn 515.

Библиография:
1. Avreliy Avgustin. Ispoved'. M., 1991.
2. Avreliy Avgustin. Ob uchitele / Per. V.V. Bibikhina // Pamyatniki srednevekovoy latinskoy lite-
ratury IV-VII vv. M., 1998.
3. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M., 2000.
4. Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii. M., 2012.
5. Savel'ev A.L. Istoriya idei universal'noy grammatiki. SPb., 2006.

References (transliteration):
1. Avreliy Avgustin. Ispoved'. M., 1991.
2. Avreliy Avgustin. Ob uchitele / Per. V.V. Bibikhina // Pamyatniki srednevekovoy latinskoy lite-
ratury IV-VII vv. M., 1998.
3. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M., 2000.
4. Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii. M., 2012.
5. Savel'ev A.L. Istoriya idei universal'noy grammatiki. SPb., 2006.