Аннотация:  The subject of this research is the analysis of methodological approaches towards examination of the urban space. The goal of this work consists in development of the methodological complex that combines various angles of the review and approaches towards explanation of the phenomenon of city. Special attention is given to the concept of topos, idea of the contingency of space, analysis of the notion of “objectness”, which form the foundation of the topology of urban space. The city is presented as a derivative of sustainable multiplicities and relation networks. The author suggest the original concept of “palimpsest of the urban space”. The process of “erasing” physical objects of the city leads to the changes in the associated with them processes and projections. Application of the new text does not always thoroughly cover up the previous inscriptions, compelling to read the extruding text. The flatness attains the depth, and combination of the prospects becomes a vital demand. The conclusion is made that the urban space possesses the characteristic of the objectness, which is the correlation of the dynamic objects. The author determines the types of palimpsest: civilizational palimpsest; palimpsests of the ethnically controversial territories; and palimpsest of the previous capital.  

Ключевые слова: topos, objectness, text, palimpsest, Actor-Network Theory, urban space, city, urban study, topology, contingency

Библиография:
Adorno V. Teodor. Esteticheskaya teoriya. / per. s nem. A. V. Dranova. M.: Respublika, 2001. 527 s.
Aristotel'. Fizika // Soch. v 4 t. M: Mysl', 1981. – T. 3. S. 59-262.
Artemenko A. P. Topologіya Ya v merezherikh strukturakh sotsіumu. — Kharkіv: Persha tsifrova drukarnya, 2013. – 344 s.
Vakhshtayn V. S. Peresborka goroda: mezhdu yazykom i prostranstvom // Sotsiologiya a.Vlasti. 2014 № 2 S. 9-38.
Vakhshtayn V. S. Metafory goroda i metaforika gorodskikh issledovaniy: samoopisanie vs. metaopisanie // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2015. 1. C. 32-49. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.1.13173.
Gadamer G.-Kh. Istina i metod. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1988. 704 s.
Zimmel' G. Ruina // Izbrannoe T. 2. Sozertsanie zhizni. – M.: Yurist, 1996. S. 227-233.
Zimmel' G. Rama kartiny. Esteticheskiy opit. // Sotsiologiya veshchey: sbornik statey / pod red. V. Vakhshtayna. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. S. 48-54.
Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura /per. s angl. O. Shkaratana. M.: GUVESh, 2000. 608 s.
Knorr-Tsetina K. Sotsial'nost' i ob'ekty. Sotsial'nye otnosheniya v postsotsial'nykh obshchestvakh znaniya. // Sotsiologiya veshchey: sbornik statey / pod red. V. Vakhshtayna. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. S. 267-306.
Koptseva N.P., Sertakova E.A. Summa metodov sovremennoy urbanisticheskoy antropologii: postanovka problemy // Urbanistika. 2015. № 2. S.40-53. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2015.2.16354. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/urb/article_16354.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016)
Lo Dzh. Ob'ekty i prostranstva. //Sotsiologiya veshchey: sbornik statey / pod red. V. Vakhshtayna – M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. – S. 223-244.
Lefevr A. Idei dlya kontseptsii novogo urbanizma.// Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2002 2 (3). C. 19-27.
Linch K. Obraz goroda / per. s angl. V. L. Glazycheva. M.: Stroyizdat, 1982. 328 s.
Mamardashvili M. Kantianskie variatsii. – M.: «Agraf», 1997. 320 s.
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya SPb.: «Yuventa»-«Nauka», 1999. 608 s.
Serto M. de Izobretenie povsednevnosti. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2013. 330s.
Serto M. Po gorodu peshkom // Communitas. – 2005. –№ 2.– S. 80-87.
Sitnikova A. A. K voprosu o metodologii issledovaniy kul'tury kak sotsial'no-antropologicheskoy sistemy // Sotsiodinamika. – 2015. 1. C. 75-100. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2015.1.14237. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_14237.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016)
Fil'ko A. Izuchenie fenomena goroda i gorodskogo prostranstva v sovremennykh sotsial'nykh issledovaniyakh (istoriograficheskiy obzor) // Sotsiodinamika. 2015. 7. C. 51-64. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2015.7.15933. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_15933.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016

References (transliteration):
Adorno V. Teodor. Esteticheskaya teoriya. / per. s nem. A. V. Dranova. M.: Respublika, 2001. 527 s.
Aristotel'. Fizika // Soch. v 4 t. M: Mysl', 1981. – T. 3. S. 59-262.
Artemenko A. P. Topologіya Ya v merezherikh strukturakh sotsіumu. — Kharkіv: Persha tsifrova drukarnya, 2013. – 344 s.
Vakhshtayn V. S. Peresborka goroda: mezhdu yazykom i prostranstvom // Sotsiologiya a.Vlasti. 2014 № 2 S. 9-38.
Vakhshtayn V. S. Metafory goroda i metaforika gorodskikh issledovaniy: samoopisanie vs. metaopisanie // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2015. 1. C. 32-49. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.1.13173.
Gadamer G.-Kh. Istina i metod. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1988. 704 s.
Zimmel' G. Ruina // Izbrannoe T. 2. Sozertsanie zhizni. – M.: Yurist, 1996. S. 227-233.
Zimmel' G. Rama kartiny. Esteticheskiy opit. // Sotsiologiya veshchey: sbornik statey / pod red. V. Vakhshtayna. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. S. 48-54.
Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura /per. s angl. O. Shkaratana. M.: GUVESh, 2000. 608 s.
Knorr-Tsetina K. Sotsial'nost' i ob'ekty. Sotsial'nye otnosheniya v postsotsial'nykh obshchestvakh znaniya. // Sotsiologiya veshchey: sbornik statey / pod red. V. Vakhshtayna. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. S. 267-306.
Koptseva N.P., Sertakova E.A. Summa metodov sovremennoy urbanisticheskoy antropologii: postanovka problemy // Urbanistika. 2015. № 2. S.40-53. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2015.2.16354. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/urb/article_16354.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016)
Lo Dzh. Ob'ekty i prostranstva. //Sotsiologiya veshchey: sbornik statey / pod red. V. Vakhshtayna – M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. – S. 223-244.
Lefevr A. Idei dlya kontseptsii novogo urbanizma.// Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2002 2 (3). C. 19-27.
Linch K. Obraz goroda / per. s angl. V. L. Glazycheva. M.: Stroyizdat, 1982. 328 s.
Mamardashvili M. Kantianskie variatsii. – M.: «Agraf», 1997. 320 s.
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya SPb.: «Yuventa»-«Nauka», 1999. 608 s.
Serto M. de Izobretenie povsednevnosti. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2013. 330s.
Serto M. Po gorodu peshkom // Communitas. – 2005. –№ 2.– S. 80-87.
Sitnikova A. A. K voprosu o metodologii issledovaniy kul'tury kak sotsial'no-antropologicheskoy sistemy // Sotsiodinamika. – 2015. 1. C. 75-100. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2015.1.14237. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_14237.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016)
Fil'ko A. Izuchenie fenomena goroda i gorodskogo prostranstva v sovremennykh sotsial'nykh issledovaniyakh (istoriograficheskiy obzor) // Sotsiodinamika. 2015. 7. C. 51-64. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2015.7.15933. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_15933.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the phenomenon of ideology and its understanding in the modern philosophical discourse. The author systematizes the main ideas about ideology established in philosophy; formulates the peculiarities of interpretations of the phenomenon of ideology depending on the scientific tradition; determines the most popular approaches towards understanding of the phenomenon of ideology that we formed within the modern philosophical discourse. During the course of this research, the author analyzes the modern philosophical interpretations of the phenomenon of ideology in the context of globalization as the dominant vector of development of the relations between the social groups at the modern stage of development pf society. The conclusion was made that the modern philosophical discourse is characterized by the attempt to establish the structure and functions of ideology, which in turn, is recognized as the objective phenomenon of social reality and viewed in the context of globalization. At the same time, the understanding of ideology within the modern philosophical discourse is based on the experience of studying this phenomenon in philosophy beginning from the XVIII century. In the result of this work, the author formulates the main directions in study of ideology throughout the XVIII-XXI centuries, as well as determines the succession in examination of the phenomenon of ideology within the philosophical discourse.

Ключевые слова: Worldview, History philosophy, Social reality, Open society, Marxism, Society, History of ideas, Social theory, Globalization, Ideology

Библиография:
Marks K., Engel's F. Nemetskaya ideologiya // Sobranie sochineniy. T. 3. M.: Politizdat, 1955. 689 s.
Engel's F. Pis'mo Frantsu Meringu // Sobranie sochineniy. T. 39. M.: Politizdat, 1966. 715 s.
Gramshi A. Tyuremnye tetradi. // Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v trekh tomakh. T. 3. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1959. 569 s.
Khorkkhaymer M., Adorno T. Dialektika Prosveshcheniya: Filosofskie fragmenty. M.-SPb.: Medium-Yuventa, 1997. 312 s.
Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. URL: http://lib.ru/PSIHO/FROMM/fromm02.txt_with-big-pictures.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Manngeym K. Ideologiya i utopiya. URL: http://socialistica.lenin.ru/txt/m/manheim_1.htm (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Al'tyusser L. Za Marksa. M.: Praksis, 2006. 392 s.
Al'tyusser L. Ideologiya i ideologicheskie apparaty gosudarstva. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2011/3/al3.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. URL: http://gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Culture/fuko_slv/index.php (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyy ob'ekt ideologii. M.: Khudozhestvennyy zhurnal, 1999. 236 s.
Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. URL: http://gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Popp/index.php (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii? URL: http://ckp.ru/biblio/f/hist_ends.htm (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Pisarenko A. Transformatsiya politicheskikh ideologiy v postbipolyarnom mire. URL: http://antonpisarenko.blogspot.ru/2013/05/blog-post_29.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Derlug'yan G. Ideynaya evolyutsiya stoletiya kraynostey. URL: http://expert.ru/expert/2011/01/dejnaya-evolyutsiya-stoletiya-krajnostej (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Maslova E. Evolyutsiya predstavleniy ob ideologii v politicheskoy teorii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. — 2011. №6 (1). S. 315–319.
Chesnokov A. Rol' Ideologii v usloviyakh globalizatsii. URL: http://intelros.ru/index.php?newsid=349 (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Khorina G. Globalizm kak ideologiya. // Globalizatsiya i gumanitarnoe znanie. — 2005. №1. S. 71-78.
Amin S. Virus liberalizma: permanentnaya voyna i amerikanizatsiya mira. M.: Evropa, 2007. 168 s.
Postol E. Modifikatsiya ideologicheskoy arkhitektoniki globalizma i al'ternativnye paradigmy preodoleniya krizisa kapitalizma. // PolitBook — 2013. №2. S. 142-154.
Kondil'yak Et'en Bonno de Opyt o proiskhozhdenii chelovecheskikh znaniy. // Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1980. 334 s.
Kondil'yak Et'en Bonno de Traktat ob oshchushcheniyakh. // Sochineniya v trekh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1982. 541 s.
Destutt de Tracy Antoine Louis Claude Éléments d'idéologie. Partie 1 / par le citoyen Destutt-Tracy. Paris: P. Didot l'aîné; Courcier, 1800-1815. 359 p. URL: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k41799v (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Borisenkov A.A. O politicheskom soznanii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013. №4. S.1-29. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.4.227. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_227.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Belyaev V.A. Modernistskaya «kritika kul'tury» i dialektika «kul'turnogo-postkul'turnogo-interkul'turnogo» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014. №5. S.90-178. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.5.12355. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_12355.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015

References (transliteration):
Marks K., Engel's F. Nemetskaya ideologiya // Sobranie sochineniy. T. 3. M.: Politizdat, 1955. 689 s.
Engel's F. Pis'mo Frantsu Meringu // Sobranie sochineniy. T. 39. M.: Politizdat, 1966. 715 s.
Gramshi A. Tyuremnye tetradi. // Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v trekh tomakh. T. 3. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1959. 569 s.
Khorkkhaymer M., Adorno T. Dialektika Prosveshcheniya: Filosofskie fragmenty. M.-SPb.: Medium-Yuventa, 1997. 312 s.
Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. URL: http://lib.ru/PSIHO/FROMM/fromm02.txt_with-big-pictures.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Manngeym K. Ideologiya i utopiya. URL: http://socialistica.lenin.ru/txt/m/manheim_1.htm (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Al'tyusser L. Za Marksa. M.: Praksis, 2006. 392 s.
Al'tyusser L. Ideologiya i ideologicheskie apparaty gosudarstva. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2011/3/al3.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. URL: http://gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Culture/fuko_slv/index.php (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyy ob'ekt ideologii. M.: Khudozhestvennyy zhurnal, 1999. 236 s.
Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. URL: http://gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Popp/index.php (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii? URL: http://ckp.ru/biblio/f/hist_ends.htm (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Pisarenko A. Transformatsiya politicheskikh ideologiy v postbipolyarnom mire. URL: http://antonpisarenko.blogspot.ru/2013/05/blog-post_29.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Derlug'yan G. Ideynaya evolyutsiya stoletiya kraynostey. URL: http://expert.ru/expert/2011/01/dejnaya-evolyutsiya-stoletiya-krajnostej (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Maslova E. Evolyutsiya predstavleniy ob ideologii v politicheskoy teorii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. — 2011. №6 (1). S. 315–319.
Chesnokov A. Rol' Ideologii v usloviyakh globalizatsii. URL: http://intelros.ru/index.php?newsid=349 (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Khorina G. Globalizm kak ideologiya. // Globalizatsiya i gumanitarnoe znanie. — 2005. №1. S. 71-78.
Amin S. Virus liberalizma: permanentnaya voyna i amerikanizatsiya mira. M.: Evropa, 2007. 168 s.
Postol E. Modifikatsiya ideologicheskoy arkhitektoniki globalizma i al'ternativnye paradigmy preodoleniya krizisa kapitalizma. // PolitBook — 2013. №2. S. 142-154.
Kondil'yak Et'en Bonno de Opyt o proiskhozhdenii chelovecheskikh znaniy. // Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1980. 334 s.
Kondil'yak Et'en Bonno de Traktat ob oshchushcheniyakh. // Sochineniya v trekh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1982. 541 s.
Destutt de Tracy Antoine Louis Claude Éléments d'idéologie. Partie 1 / par le citoyen Destutt-Tracy. Paris: P. Didot l'aîné; Courcier, 1800-1815. 359 p. URL: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k41799v (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Borisenkov A.A. O politicheskom soznanii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013. №4. S.1-29. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.4.227. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_227.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015)
Belyaev V.A. Modernistskaya «kritika kul'tury» i dialektika «kul'turnogo-postkul'turnogo-interkul'turnogo» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014. №5. S.90-178. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.5.12355. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_12355.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.12.2015

Аннотация: This article is devoted to the study of the principles of the socio-economic structure of society in the philosophical concept of global constitutionalism. The author argues that any socially-philosophical concept involves building your own model of socio-economic structure of society. Contemporary socio-philosophical concept, designing our own model of socio-economic structure of society must be defined with the basic principles of formation and functioning of its economic basis (at the level of the nation state and in planetary scale) and socio-political superstructure. The author identifies the main principles of the socio-economic structure of society in the philosophical conception of global constitutionalism: the increasing complexity of the socio-economic structure of society; the establishment of law as the Foundation of the socio-economic structure of society; the consolidation of the system of democratic values of the Western sample as the Supreme value of the socio-economic structure of society; the establishment of competition and market selection (the free market) as the basis of socio-economic structure of society. The paper examines criticism of the socio-economic structure of society in the philosophical conception of global constitutionalism formulated by supporters of alternative conceptions of globalization (e.g., alter), as well as the opponents of globalization "on the left" (proletarian internationalists, Marxists), and "on the right" (anti-globalists).In this scientific article the author used a number of scientific research methods, in particular: comparative law; formal logic; statistics; legal history; modeling; description.

Ключевые слова: anti-globalization, Marxism, global constitutionalism, philosophical concept, society, structure, economic, social, principles, alter-globalization

Библиография:
Popov E.A. Mirovoe ustroystvo i mekhanizmy obespecheniya sotsial'noy bezopasnosti // Sotsiodinamika.-2016.-№ 5.-S. 8-14.
Volkova A.V. Upravlyaemost' gosudarstva v usloviyakh globalizatsii: problema formirovaniya publichnykh tsennostey // Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS.-2013.-T. 9.-№ 4.-S. 70-82.
Martynenko S.V. Demokratizatsiya kak global'nyy politicheskiy proekt // Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. – 2011.-№ 5. – S. 181-183.
Atamanchuk G.V. Teoriya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya.-M., 1997.-S. 302.
Nutsubidze T.Sh. Globalizatsiya i demokratiya // Nauchnyy zhurnal Vlast' i obshchestvo (Istoriya, Teoriya, Praktika).-2009.-T. 12.-№ 4.-S. 12-20.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chast' obshchaya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Otv. red. prof. L.L. Kruglikov.-M.: BEK, 1999.-S. 109.
Sultanova L.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' v usloviyakh globalizatsii (sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz): diss. … kandidata filosofskikh nauk.-Ufa, 2010-148 s.
Vitman M.Yu., Nevorotov B.K. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' i globalizatsiya / V sbornike: Sovremennye problemy i tendentsii razvitiya ekonomiki i upravleniya. Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii.-2016.-S. 181-184.
Khalimova A.R. Problema otvetstvennosti gosudarstv za narushenie prav cheloveka v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal.-2011.-№ 10 (41).-S. 24-26.
Chirkin V.E. Legalizatsiya i legitimatsiya gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-1995.-№ 8.-S. 65, 66.
Tarasova N.L. Printsip zakonnosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii / V sbornike: «…I pomnit mir spasennyy…» Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2-kh tomakh. Otvetstvennyy redaktor N.S. Yashin.-2015.-S. 254-255.
Rodina G.A. Vozdeystvie globalizatsii na ekonomiku autsayderov pozdneindustrial'nogo razvitiya // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii.-2012.-T. 163.-S. 531-542.
Mirgorod D.A., Panin V.N., Alimuradov O.A. Dikhotomiya regional'nogo razvitiya v kontekste globalizatsionnykh preobrazovaniy // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta.-2015.-№ 4.-S. 317-319.
Fursov A. I. Mirovaya bor'ba. Anglosaksy protiv planety.-M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2016.-S. 29, 101-102.
Trubina E. Tsentr i periferiya: mezhdu rostom i razvitiem // Filosofsko-literaturnyy zhurnal Logos.-2013.-№ 4 (94).-S. 237-266.
Vallerstayn I. Sushchestvuet li v deystvitel'nosti Indiya? // Logos.-2006.-№ 5.-S. 3-8.
Al'pidovskaya M.L. K voprosu o neravnomernosti v sotsial'no-ekonomicheskom razvitii stran v epokhu globalizatsii mirovoy ekonomiki // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'.-2012.-№ 19.-S. 2-8.
Beketov N.V. Mezhdunarodnaya makroekonomika: internatsionalizatsiya, globalizatsiya i vzaimozavisimost' khozyaystva // Finansy i kredit.-2007.-№ 45 (285).-S. 2-5.
Kozlov A. Mir v 2030 godu: odnopolyarnost' ili mnogopolyarnost' mira? // Biznes. Obshchestvo. Vlast'.-2008.-№ 2 (2).-S. 47-65.
Reznikova N.V. Rol' gosudarstva i rynka v diskurse globalizatsii: vyzovy vzaimozavisimosti // Finansovye issledovaniya.-2014.-№ 2 (43).-S. 15-22.
Litvinenko I.L. K voprosu o vzaimovliyanii i vzaimozavisimosti protsessov transnatsionalizatsii i globalizatsii // Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiyskogo universiteta.-2007.-№ 4.-S. 125-128.
Dureeva N.S. Globalizatsiya kak konstruirovanie novogo mirovogo poryadka // Filosofiya obrazovaniya.-2008.-№ 4.-S. 227-233.
Sabinin V.E., Kovalev S.G. Globalizatsiya kak etap ekonomicheskoy tsivilizatsii: monografiya.-Sankt-Peterburg, 2013.-67 s.
Andreeva A.V. Yavlenie globalizatsii kak ekzogennyy faktor razvitiya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya.-2013. № 1.-S. 37.
Navrotskaya N.A., Sopilko N.Yu. Transformatsiya investitsionno-proizvodstvennogo prostranstva kak uslovie ekonomicheskoy integratsii // Voprosy regional'noy ekonomiki.-2013.-T. 15.-№ 2.-S. 63-69.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik / Pod red. M.N. Marchenko.-M: Izdatel'stvo «Zertsalo», 2004. (Klassicheskiy universitetskiy uchebnik).-S. 20-31.
Mises L. von. Liberalismus. 1927.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://econlibrary.ru/books/13/146/mises_lib11_app.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).-Tsitiruetsya v perevode Goncharova V.V.
Kuchuradi I. Globalizatsiya svobodnogo rynka s filosofsko-eticheskoy tochki zreniya // Vek globalizatsii. 2008. № 2. S. 21-29.
Tret'yakova S.A. Al'terglobalizm i neoliberal'naya globalizatsiya v sovremennom politicheskom protsesse // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki.-2010.-№ 4.-S. 414-415.
Antiglobalizm.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: https://ru.wikipedia.org (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
Zyuganov G.A. Globalizatsiya i sud'ba chelovechestva.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://library.ua (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
A.V. Leopa Istoricheskoe soznanie kak metod nauchnogo poznaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 3. - C. 108 - 114.

References (transliteration):
Popov E.A. Mirovoe ustroystvo i mekhanizmy obespecheniya sotsial'noy bezopasnosti // Sotsiodinamika.-2016.-№ 5.-S. 8-14.
Volkova A.V. Upravlyaemost' gosudarstva v usloviyakh globalizatsii: problema formirovaniya publichnykh tsennostey // Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS.-2013.-T. 9.-№ 4.-S. 70-82.
Martynenko S.V. Demokratizatsiya kak global'nyy politicheskiy proekt // Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. – 2011.-№ 5. – S. 181-183.
Atamanchuk G.V. Teoriya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya.-M., 1997.-S. 302.
Nutsubidze T.Sh. Globalizatsiya i demokratiya // Nauchnyy zhurnal Vlast' i obshchestvo (Istoriya, Teoriya, Praktika).-2009.-T. 12.-№ 4.-S. 12-20.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chast' obshchaya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Otv. red. prof. L.L. Kruglikov.-M.: BEK, 1999.-S. 109.
Sultanova L.I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' v usloviyakh globalizatsii (sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz): diss. … kandidata filosofskikh nauk.-Ufa, 2010-148 s.
Vitman M.Yu., Nevorotov B.K. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' i globalizatsiya / V sbornike: Sovremennye problemy i tendentsii razvitiya ekonomiki i upravleniya. Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii.-2016.-S. 181-184.
Khalimova A.R. Problema otvetstvennosti gosudarstv za narushenie prav cheloveka v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal.-2011.-№ 10 (41).-S. 24-26.
Chirkin V.E. Legalizatsiya i legitimatsiya gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-1995.-№ 8.-S. 65, 66.
Tarasova N.L. Printsip zakonnosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii / V sbornike: «…I pomnit mir spasennyy…» Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2-kh tomakh. Otvetstvennyy redaktor N.S. Yashin.-2015.-S. 254-255.
Rodina G.A. Vozdeystvie globalizatsii na ekonomiku autsayderov pozdneindustrial'nogo razvitiya // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii.-2012.-T. 163.-S. 531-542.
Mirgorod D.A., Panin V.N., Alimuradov O.A. Dikhotomiya regional'nogo razvitiya v kontekste globalizatsionnykh preobrazovaniy // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta.-2015.-№ 4.-S. 317-319.
Fursov A. I. Mirovaya bor'ba. Anglosaksy protiv planety.-M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2016.-S. 29, 101-102.
Trubina E. Tsentr i periferiya: mezhdu rostom i razvitiem // Filosofsko-literaturnyy zhurnal Logos.-2013.-№ 4 (94).-S. 237-266.
Vallerstayn I. Sushchestvuet li v deystvitel'nosti Indiya? // Logos.-2006.-№ 5.-S. 3-8.
Al'pidovskaya M.L. K voprosu o neravnomernosti v sotsial'no-ekonomicheskom razvitii stran v epokhu globalizatsii mirovoy ekonomiki // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'.-2012.-№ 19.-S. 2-8.
Beketov N.V. Mezhdunarodnaya makroekonomika: internatsionalizatsiya, globalizatsiya i vzaimozavisimost' khozyaystva // Finansy i kredit.-2007.-№ 45 (285).-S. 2-5.
Kozlov A. Mir v 2030 godu: odnopolyarnost' ili mnogopolyarnost' mira? // Biznes. Obshchestvo. Vlast'.-2008.-№ 2 (2).-S. 47-65.
Reznikova N.V. Rol' gosudarstva i rynka v diskurse globalizatsii: vyzovy vzaimozavisimosti // Finansovye issledovaniya.-2014.-№ 2 (43).-S. 15-22.
Litvinenko I.L. K voprosu o vzaimovliyanii i vzaimozavisimosti protsessov transnatsionalizatsii i globalizatsii // Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiyskogo universiteta.-2007.-№ 4.-S. 125-128.
Dureeva N.S. Globalizatsiya kak konstruirovanie novogo mirovogo poryadka // Filosofiya obrazovaniya.-2008.-№ 4.-S. 227-233.
Sabinin V.E., Kovalev S.G. Globalizatsiya kak etap ekonomicheskoy tsivilizatsii: monografiya.-Sankt-Peterburg, 2013.-67 s.
Andreeva A.V. Yavlenie globalizatsii kak ekzogennyy faktor razvitiya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya.-2013. № 1.-S. 37.
Navrotskaya N.A., Sopilko N.Yu. Transformatsiya investitsionno-proizvodstvennogo prostranstva kak uslovie ekonomicheskoy integratsii // Voprosy regional'noy ekonomiki.-2013.-T. 15.-№ 2.-S. 63-69.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik / Pod red. M.N. Marchenko.-M: Izdatel'stvo «Zertsalo», 2004. (Klassicheskiy universitetskiy uchebnik).-S. 20-31.
Mises L. von. Liberalismus. 1927.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://econlibrary.ru/books/13/146/mises_lib11_app.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).-Tsitiruetsya v perevode Goncharova V.V.
Kuchuradi I. Globalizatsiya svobodnogo rynka s filosofsko-eticheskoy tochki zreniya // Vek globalizatsii. 2008. № 2. S. 21-29.
Tret'yakova S.A. Al'terglobalizm i neoliberal'naya globalizatsiya v sovremennom politicheskom protsesse // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki.-2010.-№ 4.-S. 414-415.
Antiglobalizm.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: https://ru.wikipedia.org (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
Zyuganov G.A. Globalizatsiya i sud'ba chelovechestva.-[Elektronnyy resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://library.ua (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
A.V. Leopa Istoricheskoe soznanie kak metod nauchnogo poznaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 3. - C. 108 - 114.

Аннотация:   The author substantiates the position that ideology as a socio-philosophical phenomena represents an intrinsic property of social being characteristic to any society, which objectivizes social reality by means of the human spiritual activity by sense-making through the generalization of separate uncertainties of social being with the following cooperation into an integrated system that allows determining the content of social development in the unified system of coordinated of the notions and values during a specific period of time and manifesting as a worldview core of society on peculiar stage of its development, as well as a system of criteria through which the individual understand social being as a whole, self-identification in the surrounding social reality along with formation of their attitude towards it. The article is dedicated to the examination of global constitutionalism as an ideology. The author studies the notions of ideology, state ideology, global constitutionalism, as well as gives their original definitions. The specificities of social being of the ideology of global constitutionalism in the modern world are being analyzed.    

Ключевые слова: society, power, concept, ideology, global constitutionalism, social being, government, people, socio-philosophical, progress

Библиография:
Krivenkova M.V. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstva za iskazhenie istoricheskikh faktov: mezhdunarodno-pravovoy aspekt // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 5. - C. 605 - 609. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.5.14826.
Poyarkov S.Yu. Konstitutsionalizm kak osnova ratsional'noy politicheskoy sistemy sovremennogo obshchestva // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 13. - C. 1882 - 1890. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.10094.
Poyarkov S.Yu. Vklad konstitutsionalizma v soderzhanie i dinamiku politicheskogo rezhima // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 4. - C. 482 - 492. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.4.11186.
Poyarkov S.Yu. Problemy realizatsiya kontseptsii konstitutsionalizma na nadgosudarstvennom urovne // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 7. - C. 824 - 836. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.7.11595.
Aubakirova I.U. Ponyatie i sushchnost' instituta
gosudarstvennogo upravleniya:
filosofsko-pravovoy podkhod // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 612 - 619. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.3.
Shendrik A.I. Globalizatsiya v sisteme kul'turologicheskikh koordinat (nachalo) // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2004. № 1. S. 59-71.
Eagleton T. Ideology. Z. N.Y., 1991. 172 p.
Chernyshev A.I. Neobkhodimost' primeneniya sovremennykh elektronnykh kommunikatsiy organami gosudarstvennoy vlasti v Rossii // Sotsiodinamika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 132 - 138. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2014.8.13134. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_13134.html
Khmelinin A.A., Rusakova O.F. Ideologicheskaya mobil'nost' sovremennogo neoliberalizma: metodologicheskiy analiz // Diskurs-Pi. 2013. T. 10. № 3. S. 88-91.
Khmylev V.L. Ideologiya kak teoriya sotsial'nogo bytiya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2005. № 287. S. 153-156.
Khorina G.P. Globalizatsiya kak ideologiya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2005. № 1. S. 71-78.
Fel'dman V.R. Ideologiya: osnovnye formy prostranstvenno-vremennogo bytiya // Vestnik Tuvinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 1 (20). S. 102-111.
Furs V.A. Global'nyy predposylki konservativno-liberal'nogo konsensusa // Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. Religiovedenie. 2016. T. 15. S. 7-13.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. N.I. Mal'tuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: «Yurist'», 2001. 776 s.
Sorokin P.A. Golod kak faktor. Vliyanie goloda na povedenie lyudey, sotsial'nuyu organizatsiyu i obshchestvennuyu zhizn'. M., 2003. 684 s.
Rastorguev V.N. Izydiologiya dlya Rossii // Russkaya tsivilizatsiya. – 22.10.2011. [Elektronnyy istochnik] Rezhim dostupa: http://ruskline.ru/analitika/2011/10/22/izydiologiya_dlya_rossii (data obrashcheniya 19.07.2016). S. 1-3.
Pigalev S.A. Globalizatsiya i finalistskie kontseptsii sotsial'nogo razvitiya: diss. … kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Volgograd: Volgogradskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2015. 22 s.
Pfanenshtil' I.A. Sovremennye protsessy globalizatsii v sisteme osnovnykh proektov nauki: sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz: avtoreferat dis. ... doktora filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Krasnoyarsk: Sib. aerokosm. akad. im. akad. M.F. Reshetneva, 2006. 47 s.
Medvedeva I.Ya., Shishova T.L. Logika globalizma // Nash sovremennik. 2001. № 11. S. 13.
Molchanova E.B. Germanskiy neokonservatizm: filosofiya, ideologiya, politika: avtoreferat diss… na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.03. Moskva: MGU, 1995. 19 s.
Loginov A.V. Ideologiya kak atribut sotsial'nogo bytiya: diss. … kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2004. 26 s.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 19.12.1993. № 273.
Ideologiya / G. Yu. Semigin // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. / pred. nauch.-red. soveta V. S. Stepin. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M. : Mysl', 2010. 744 s. / 634,[2] s. / 692,[2] s. / 736 s.
Katsapova I.A. Globalizatsiya i natsional'nye idei: vektor peresecheniya (filosofsko-pravovoy aspekt) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. №11. C. 1724-1733.
Kelle V.Zh. Protsessy globalizatsii i dinamika kul'tury // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2005. № 1. S. 69-70.
Kolin K.K. Neoglobalizm i kul'tura: novye ugrozy dlya natsional'noy bezopasnosti // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2005. № 2. S. 104-111.
Zinov'ev A. Ideologiya partii budushchego [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.lib.ru. (data obrashcheniya: 19.07.2016).
Zolotarev S.P. Ideologiya liberalizma kak faktor transformatsii rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: teoriya i praktika: avtoreferat dis. ... doktora filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2011. 277 s.
Zhilina V.A. Ideologiya kak atribut sotsial'nogo bytiya: diss. … doktora filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Chelyabinsk: ChelGU, 2010. 333 s.
Zhuravlev V.V. Globalizatsiya: vyzovy istorii i otvety teorii // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2004. № 1. S. 43-46.
Zhilina V.A. Problema opredeleniya ideologicheskogo sub'ekta // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 29. S. 44-50.
Drashkovich V., Drashkovich M. Neoliberal'nyy mif o «minimal'nom gosudarstve» // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. 2012. № 3 (58). S. 7-15.
Gutorov V.A. Teoriya demokratii kak istoricheskaya problema: k postanovke voprosa // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2014. № 4. S. 114-126.
Grinin L.E. Globalizatsiya i natsional'nyy suverenitet // Istoriya i sovremennost'. 2005. № 1. S. 6-31.
Gromyko A. Metamormozy amerikanskogo neokonservatizma // Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal Obozrevatel' Observer. 2007. № 8. S. 56-67.
Vallerstayn I. Ni patriotizm, ni kosmopolitizm // Logos. 2006. № 2. S. 126-127.
Brink Lindsi. Globalizatsiya: povtorenie proydennogo. neopredelennoe budushchee global'nogo kapitalizma / Lindsi Brink. Per. s angl. M.: Al'pina biznes buks, 2006. 416 s.
Baranets N.G., Ershova O.V. Vliyanie ideologii na normy filosofskoy deyatel'nosti v SSSR v pervoy polovine 20 veka // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii. 2011. № 3. S. 131-135.

References (transliteration):
Krivenkova M.V. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstva za iskazhenie istoricheskikh faktov: mezhdunarodno-pravovoy aspekt // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 5. - C. 605 - 609. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.5.14826.
Poyarkov S.Yu. Konstitutsionalizm kak osnova ratsional'noy politicheskoy sistemy sovremennogo obshchestva // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 13. - C. 1882 - 1890. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.10094.
Poyarkov S.Yu. Vklad konstitutsionalizma v soderzhanie i dinamiku politicheskogo rezhima // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 4. - C. 482 - 492. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.4.11186.
Poyarkov S.Yu. Problemy realizatsiya kontseptsii konstitutsionalizma na nadgosudarstvennom urovne // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 7. - C. 824 - 836. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.7.11595.
Aubakirova I.U. Ponyatie i sushchnost' instituta
gosudarstvennogo upravleniya:
filosofsko-pravovoy podkhod // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 612 - 619. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.3.
Shendrik A.I. Globalizatsiya v sisteme kul'turologicheskikh koordinat (nachalo) // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2004. № 1. S. 59-71.
Eagleton T. Ideology. Z. N.Y., 1991. 172 p.
Chernyshev A.I. Neobkhodimost' primeneniya sovremennykh elektronnykh kommunikatsiy organami gosudarstvennoy vlasti v Rossii // Sotsiodinamika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 132 - 138. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2014.8.13134. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_13134.html
Khmelinin A.A., Rusakova O.F. Ideologicheskaya mobil'nost' sovremennogo neoliberalizma: metodologicheskiy analiz // Diskurs-Pi. 2013. T. 10. № 3. S. 88-91.
Khmylev V.L. Ideologiya kak teoriya sotsial'nogo bytiya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2005. № 287. S. 153-156.
Khorina G.P. Globalizatsiya kak ideologiya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2005. № 1. S. 71-78.
Fel'dman V.R. Ideologiya: osnovnye formy prostranstvenno-vremennogo bytiya // Vestnik Tuvinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 1 (20). S. 102-111.
Furs V.A. Global'nyy predposylki konservativno-liberal'nogo konsensusa // Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. Religiovedenie. 2016. T. 15. S. 7-13.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. N.I. Mal'tuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: «Yurist'», 2001. 776 s.
Sorokin P.A. Golod kak faktor. Vliyanie goloda na povedenie lyudey, sotsial'nuyu organizatsiyu i obshchestvennuyu zhizn'. M., 2003. 684 s.
Rastorguev V.N. Izydiologiya dlya Rossii // Russkaya tsivilizatsiya. – 22.10.2011. [Elektronnyy istochnik] Rezhim dostupa: http://ruskline.ru/analitika/2011/10/22/izydiologiya_dlya_rossii (data obrashcheniya 19.07.2016). S. 1-3.
Pigalev S.A. Globalizatsiya i finalistskie kontseptsii sotsial'nogo razvitiya: diss. … kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Volgograd: Volgogradskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2015. 22 s.
Pfanenshtil' I.A. Sovremennye protsessy globalizatsii v sisteme osnovnykh proektov nauki: sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz: avtoreferat dis. ... doktora filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Krasnoyarsk: Sib. aerokosm. akad. im. akad. M.F. Reshetneva, 2006. 47 s.
Medvedeva I.Ya., Shishova T.L. Logika globalizma // Nash sovremennik. 2001. № 11. S. 13.
Molchanova E.B. Germanskiy neokonservatizm: filosofiya, ideologiya, politika: avtoreferat diss… na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.03. Moskva: MGU, 1995. 19 s.
Loginov A.V. Ideologiya kak atribut sotsial'nogo bytiya: diss. … kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2004. 26 s.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 19.12.1993. № 273.
Ideologiya / G. Yu. Semigin // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. / pred. nauch.-red. soveta V. S. Stepin. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M. : Mysl', 2010. 744 s. / 634,[2] s. / 692,[2] s. / 736 s.
Katsapova I.A. Globalizatsiya i natsional'nye idei: vektor peresecheniya (filosofsko-pravovoy aspekt) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. №11. C. 1724-1733.
Kelle V.Zh. Protsessy globalizatsii i dinamika kul'tury // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2005. № 1. S. 69-70.
Kolin K.K. Neoglobalizm i kul'tura: novye ugrozy dlya natsional'noy bezopasnosti // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2005. № 2. S. 104-111.
Zinov'ev A. Ideologiya partii budushchego [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.lib.ru. (data obrashcheniya: 19.07.2016).
Zolotarev S.P. Ideologiya liberalizma kak faktor transformatsii rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: teoriya i praktika: avtoreferat dis. ... doktora filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2011. 277 s.
Zhilina V.A. Ideologiya kak atribut sotsial'nogo bytiya: diss. … doktora filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.11. Chelyabinsk: ChelGU, 2010. 333 s.
Zhuravlev V.V. Globalizatsiya: vyzovy istorii i otvety teorii // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2004. № 1. S. 43-46.
Zhilina V.A. Problema opredeleniya ideologicheskogo sub'ekta // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 29. S. 44-50.
Drashkovich V., Drashkovich M. Neoliberal'nyy mif o «minimal'nom gosudarstve» // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. 2012. № 3 (58). S. 7-15.
Gutorov V.A. Teoriya demokratii kak istoricheskaya problema: k postanovke voprosa // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2014. № 4. S. 114-126.
Grinin L.E. Globalizatsiya i natsional'nyy suverenitet // Istoriya i sovremennost'. 2005. № 1. S. 6-31.
Gromyko A. Metamormozy amerikanskogo neokonservatizma // Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal Obozrevatel' Observer. 2007. № 8. S. 56-67.
Vallerstayn I. Ni patriotizm, ni kosmopolitizm // Logos. 2006. № 2. S. 126-127.
Brink Lindsi. Globalizatsiya: povtorenie proydennogo. neopredelennoe budushchee global'nogo kapitalizma / Lindsi Brink. Per. s angl. M.: Al'pina biznes buks, 2006. 416 s.
Baranets N.G., Ershova O.V. Vliyanie ideologii na normy filosofskoy deyatel'nosti v SSSR v pervoy polovine 20 veka // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii. 2011. № 3. S. 131-135.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the analysis of the absurd as a spatial constant of the glamorous social from the perspective of philosophical reflection. In the modernity, the absurd has become the universe, having taken over all spheres of the social, and submitted the life of humanity to its logic. The absurd, having claimed about itself ontologically, affected the gnoseological and axiological constants of the being of individual, which significantly have transformed not only the subjective, but the objective as well. Double standards start to seep through the social, where the superiority belongs to the Nothing. Moreover, the ideology of the glamour itself appears to be absurd due to postulation of timelessness of the beauty, youth, and wealth within the limits of human life. The analysis of the absurd demonstrated its multifacetedness and expanding scale, which allows speaking about the universe of the absurd in the space of the glamorous. The subjective and the objective of the absurd are dialectically interconnected and justify each other. Paradoxicality of the situation consists in the fact that the Nothing in form of the absurd attains a status of the real, starting to live its own life.

Ключевые слова: echo, intentionality, paradoxicality, simulation, oxymoron, absurd, ideology of the glamour, feedback, a glamorous individual, manipulation

Библиография:
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. V gushche grozy// Inostrannaya literatura. 1998. № 3. S. 247.
Shenkman Ya. Logika absurda Kharms: otechestvennyy tekst i mirovoy kontekst // Voprosy literatury. 1998. №4. S. 54-80.
Bashlyar G. Poetika prostranstva. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 352 s.
Kamyu A. Mif o Sizife. M.: AST, 2009. 318 s.
Kolyadko V.I. Predislovie// Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. M.: AST Moskva, 2009. S. 5-28.
Sartr Zh.-P. Toshnota. M.: AST Moskva, 2010. 317 s.
Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. M.: AST Moskva, 2009. 925 s.
Perek Zh. Prosto prostranstva. Dnevnik pol'zovatelya. SPb.: Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha, 2012. 152 s.
Ivanova S.A., Nagibina N.L. Modelirovanie sub'ektivnogo prostranstva «Telo, dusha, Ya» // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2015. - 2. - C. 194 - 204. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.2.14082.

References (transliteration):
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. V gushche grozy// Inostrannaya literatura. 1998. № 3. S. 247.
Shenkman Ya. Logika absurda Kharms: otechestvennyy tekst i mirovoy kontekst // Voprosy literatury. 1998. №4. S. 54-80.
Bashlyar G. Poetika prostranstva. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 352 s.
Kamyu A. Mif o Sizife. M.: AST, 2009. 318 s.
Kolyadko V.I. Predislovie// Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. M.: AST Moskva, 2009. S. 5-28.
Sartr Zh.-P. Toshnota. M.: AST Moskva, 2010. 317 s.
Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. M.: AST Moskva, 2009. 925 s.
Perek Zh. Prosto prostranstva. Dnevnik pol'zovatelya. SPb.: Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha, 2012. 152 s.
Ivanova S.A., Nagibina N.L. Modelirovanie sub'ektivnogo prostranstva «Telo, dusha, Ya» // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2015. - 2. - C. 194 - 204. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.2.14082.

Аннотация: The subject of research in the article is a philosophical analysis of the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia. Understanding the social and cultural space of post-Soviet Russia is presented in recognition of his phenomenological, geographical, social and anthropological bases. A significant aspect of the study is building a philosophical analysis of the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia as a category and the phenomenon.The subject of the study is specified in the following sections of this article: Social and cultural space of post-Soviet Russia: an attempt categorical certainty "; "The structure and mechanisms of the dynamics of socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia: an attempt of modeling"; "The man in the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russian system: the attempt to comprehend."Research methodology is defined by a combination of comparative aksiological, socio-cultural and socio-ontological approaches. Understanding the content and structural processes of socio-cultural dynamics of post-Soviet Russia space conducted by conjugation of philosophical research methodology with categorical apparatus and methods of social psychology, social cognitive science.The scientific novelty of the research is to identify some of the key characteristics of the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia: 1) socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia can be defined as an integral phenomenon, ontologically centered on a geographical and social reality of our country, combining the key parameters of its cultural and social development; 2) in the hierarchy of social spiritual phenomena - social and cultural space is the primary and most far-reaching, including defining such cultural phenomena as language, social memory, mentality, social unconscious, social consciousness, social and cultural identity, habitus; 3) along with defining cultural phenomenon in the structure of the socio-cultural space includes significant images (for example, the image of a vast geographical area of Russia; the image of the Motherland) and the types of social and cultural interaction (eg installation on the perception of the head of state as the protector of the people, traditionalism structure of everyday life); 4) the main mechanisms of the dynamics of socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia are: fixation, conflict, integration, deactualization actualization; 5) significant ontological attribute socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia is its anthropological in nature, for it is man in his epistemological and social (in all aspects) activity is, firstly, the main actor of its constituent phenomena (images, types of interaction), and secondly - the main carrier these key parameters.

Ключевые слова: Post-Soviet Russia, Structure, Mechanisms of dynamics, Consciousness, Culture, Human, Society, Images, Types of cooperation, Sociocultural space

Библиография:
Khrapov S. A. Transformatsiya soznaniya rossiyskogo obshchestva v kontekste ego sotsiokul'turnoy dinamiki [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vlast'.-Moskva : OOO Redaktsiya zhurnala «Vlast'»-2009.-№ 9. – S. 50-53.
Shabunova A.A. Aktual'nye problemy sotsiokul'turnoy modernizatsii regionov Rossii [Tekst] / A.A. Shabunova // Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz.-№ 6.-2013 g.-S. 167-171.
Khrapov S. A. Transformatsiya soznaniya rossiyskogo obshchestva v kontekste sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy dinamiki potrebleniya [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vlast'.-Moskva : OOO Redaktsiya zhurnala «Vlast'»-2010.-№ 2. – S. 56-58.
Khrapov S. A. Transformatsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya sovremennoy Rossii: sotsiokul'turnye osnovaniya i krizisnye tendentsii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya. – M.: ORPI RGSU, 2008.-№ 3 – S. 231-245.
Khrapov S.A. Tekhnogennyy chelovek: problemy sotsiokul'turnoy ontologizatsii[Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Voprosy filosofii. — M.: Nauka.-2014.-№ 9.-S. 66-75.
Khrapov S. A. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii: monografiya [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov. – M.: Sotsial'no-politicheskaya mysl', 2010. – 160 s.
Khrapov S.A. Sotsial'no-filosofskiy podkhod k probleme destruktivnosti v psikhoanaliticheskoy traditsii sovremennoy zapadnoy filosofii [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya.-2006.-№ 1.-S. 22-25.
Khrapov S.A. Sovremennyy sotsiokul'turnyy kontekst deval'vatsii klassicheskikh aksiologicheskikh modeley «Bytie» i «Bog» [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014.-№ 8.-S.1208-1215. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.8.12486
Sorokin, P. A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Tekst] / P. A. Sorokin.-M.: Politizdat, 1992.-543 s.
Khrapov S.A. Aksiodinamika obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii: sotsiokul'turnyy analiz [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2015.-№ 5.-C. 752-761. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.5.14234
Popkov, Yu.V., Kostyuk, V.G. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika: kontseptual'nye podkhody [Tekst]/ Yu.V. Popkov, V.G. Kostyuk // Vestnik NGU. Seriya filosofiya.-T. 11.-Vypusk 2.-S 68-74.
Panarin A. S. Protsessy modernizatsii i mentalitet: po materialam kruglogo stola «Rossiyskaya mental'nost'» soderzhanie [Tekst] / A.S. Panarin // Voprosy filosofii. — M. : Nauka, 1994. –№1 – S. 33-38.
Krupnitskiy S.V. Pervichnoe sotsial'noe prostranstvo : vremya i protyazhennost' // [Elektronnyy resurs] /S. V. Krupnitskiy.-Rezhim dostupa : http://humanus.by.ru/studia/tempex.htm#b1#b1, svobodnyy. – Zaglavie s ekrana. – Yaz. rus. 1.Lapin, N. I. Problema sotsiokul'turnoy transformatsii [Tekst]/ N. I. Lapin // Voprosy filosofii. — M. : Nauka, 2000.-№ 6.-S. 3–17.
Chuchin-Rusov, A. E. Kul'turno-istoricheskiy protsess: forma i soderzhanie [Tekst] / A. E. Chuchin-Rusov // Voprosy filosofii. – M.: Nauka.-1996.-№4.-S. 5-7.
Demetradze M.R. Sotsiokul'turnye mekhanizmy modernizatsii. Adaptatsionno-dogonyayushchaya strategiya politiki perekhodnogo perioda postsovetskikh obshchestv // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 12. - C. 1597 - 1602. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.12.17220.
R.V. Koren' Triedinaya passionarno-etnicheskaya struktura obshchestva kak predmet vedeniya sotsiologii i sotsial'noy filosofii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 66 - 75. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.01.8.
E. A. Orlova Sinergeticheskie idei v izuchenii sotsiokul'turnoy mikrodinamiki // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 18 - 31.
L.P. Bueva Mekhanizm identifikatsii v kul'ture // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 11. - C. 41 - 49.

References (transliteration):
Khrapov S. A. Transformatsiya soznaniya rossiyskogo obshchestva v kontekste ego sotsiokul'turnoy dinamiki [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vlast'.-Moskva : OOO Redaktsiya zhurnala «Vlast'»-2009.-№ 9. – S. 50-53.
Shabunova A.A. Aktual'nye problemy sotsiokul'turnoy modernizatsii regionov Rossii [Tekst] / A.A. Shabunova // Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz.-№ 6.-2013 g.-S. 167-171.
Khrapov S. A. Transformatsiya soznaniya rossiyskogo obshchestva v kontekste sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy dinamiki potrebleniya [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vlast'.-Moskva : OOO Redaktsiya zhurnala «Vlast'»-2010.-№ 2. – S. 56-58.
Khrapov S. A. Transformatsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya sovremennoy Rossii: sotsiokul'turnye osnovaniya i krizisnye tendentsii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya. – M.: ORPI RGSU, 2008.-№ 3 – S. 231-245.
Khrapov S.A. Tekhnogennyy chelovek: problemy sotsiokul'turnoy ontologizatsii[Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Voprosy filosofii. — M.: Nauka.-2014.-№ 9.-S. 66-75.
Khrapov S. A. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii: monografiya [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov. – M.: Sotsial'no-politicheskaya mysl', 2010. – 160 s.
Khrapov S.A. Sotsial'no-filosofskiy podkhod k probleme destruktivnosti v psikhoanaliticheskoy traditsii sovremennoy zapadnoy filosofii [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya.-2006.-№ 1.-S. 22-25.
Khrapov S.A. Sovremennyy sotsiokul'turnyy kontekst deval'vatsii klassicheskikh aksiologicheskikh modeley «Bytie» i «Bog» [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014.-№ 8.-S.1208-1215. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.8.12486
Sorokin, P. A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Tekst] / P. A. Sorokin.-M.: Politizdat, 1992.-543 s.
Khrapov S.A. Aksiodinamika obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii: sotsiokul'turnyy analiz [Tekst] / S.A. Khrapov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2015.-№ 5.-C. 752-761. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.5.14234
Popkov, Yu.V., Kostyuk, V.G. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika: kontseptual'nye podkhody [Tekst]/ Yu.V. Popkov, V.G. Kostyuk // Vestnik NGU. Seriya filosofiya.-T. 11.-Vypusk 2.-S 68-74.
Panarin A. S. Protsessy modernizatsii i mentalitet: po materialam kruglogo stola «Rossiyskaya mental'nost'» soderzhanie [Tekst] / A.S. Panarin // Voprosy filosofii. — M. : Nauka, 1994. –№1 – S. 33-38.
Krupnitskiy S.V. Pervichnoe sotsial'noe prostranstvo : vremya i protyazhennost' // [Elektronnyy resurs] /S. V. Krupnitskiy.-Rezhim dostupa : http://humanus.by.ru/studia/tempex.htm#b1#b1, svobodnyy. – Zaglavie s ekrana. – Yaz. rus. 1.Lapin, N. I. Problema sotsiokul'turnoy transformatsii [Tekst]/ N. I. Lapin // Voprosy filosofii. — M. : Nauka, 2000.-№ 6.-S. 3–17.
Chuchin-Rusov, A. E. Kul'turno-istoricheskiy protsess: forma i soderzhanie [Tekst] / A. E. Chuchin-Rusov // Voprosy filosofii. – M.: Nauka.-1996.-№4.-S. 5-7.
Demetradze M.R. Sotsiokul'turnye mekhanizmy modernizatsii. Adaptatsionno-dogonyayushchaya strategiya politiki perekhodnogo perioda postsovetskikh obshchestv // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 12. - C. 1597 - 1602. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.12.17220.
R.V. Koren' Triedinaya passionarno-etnicheskaya struktura obshchestva kak predmet vedeniya sotsiologii i sotsial'noy filosofii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 66 - 75. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.01.8.
E. A. Orlova Sinergeticheskie idei v izuchenii sotsiokul'turnoy mikrodinamiki // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 18 - 31.
L.P. Bueva Mekhanizm identifikatsii v kul'ture // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 11. - C. 41 - 49.

Аннотация: The subject of research is a critical concept of "alienation", which was popular in social philosophy. In the rame of the Hegelian tradition it was regarded as a part of the dialectical mechanism that should facilitate the transition to a new organization of society. In XX century the concept of "alienation" has evolved, going beyond political economy and purchasing a humanistic interpretation. The author proposesto re-consider the phenomenon of "alienation", which acquired the immaterial, subjectivist elements. It allows to speak of it as a symbol of the relationship, and not as a real mechanism. The study observed a balance between the traditional dialectics and methods of modern science of self-organization. The author embarks to the concept of "entropy of social processes", illustrates the scientific narrattion by various statistical examples. The novelty of the study consists in examination of the question of "alienation" in the context of science on self-organization. Then it can be interpreted as a deviation to the very critical state, in which the behavior of the economic system becomes unstable and under the influence of some random factors can radically change. In this sense, the dialectic prediction about the impact of "alienation" in the course of social history can not come true, if the system transforms into a state of chaos, and "alienation" itself will not become a mechanism, but only a symbol of a particular stage of historical development of the society.

Ключевые слова: self-organization, labor, social indifference, economic crisis, social philosophy, entropy, alienation, synergetics, creative economy, quality

Библиография:
Gurevich P.S. Gegelevskaya traktovka truda // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016. № 3. S. 315-319. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.3.1828
Khaken G. Sinergetika. Ierarkhii neustoychivostey v samoorganizuyushchikhsya sistemakh i ustroystvakh. M.: Mir, 1985. 424 s.
Orlova E.A. Sinergeticheskie idei v izuchenii sotsiokul'turnoy mikrodinamiki // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2012. № 4. C. 18 - 31.
Zubareva I. Kak pod kopirku // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 1028(49). Dostup k resursu 15.05.2016 g.: http://rg.ru/2015/12/15/rinki.html
Debt and (not much) deleveraging. McKinsey Global Institute, February 2015. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/employment-and-growth/debt-and-not-much-deleveraging
Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra: Nravstvennaya filosofiya. M.: Respublika, 1996. 479 s.
Bulgakov S.N. Filosofiya khozyaystva / S.N. Bulgakov. M.: Institut Russkoy Tsivilizatsii, 2009. 600 s.
Cultural times: the first global map of cultural and creative industries. Ernst&Young Study, December 2015. 120 p. Available at: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-cultural-times-2015/$FILE/ey-cultural-times-2015.pdf
Avtonomov V.S. Avstriyskaya shkola v politicheskoy ekonomii: K. Menger, E. Bem-Baverk, F. Vizer. M.: Ekonomika, 1992. 492 s.
Tolstoy L.N. Sobranie sochineniy v dvenadtsati tomakh. T. VII / L. Tolstoy. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1984. 494 s.
Shatalov-Davydov D.Yu. Vozniknovenie kontseptsii ustoychivogo razvitiya: analiz ekologicheskogo i politicheskogo diskursov // Vestnik nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I.Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nye nauki. 2010. № 4(20). S. 187-194.
Glazunov A.V. Kachestvo-eto pokazatel' urovnya chelovecheskikh otnosheniy v obshchestve // Metody menedzhmenta kachestva. 2013. № 11. S. 1-3.
Epshteyn M. Informatsionnyy vzryv i travma postmoderna // Zvezda. 1999. № 11. S. 216-227.
Fromm E. Dusha cheloveka. M.: «Respublika», 1992. S. 375-414.
Sayers S. Creative activity and alienation in Hegel and Marx // Historical Materialism. 2003. T. 11. № 1. S. 107-128.
Adorno T. O tekhnike i gumanizme // Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG. M., 1989. S. 364-371.
Marks Karl. Kapital: kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. T. 1: [per.s nem., fr., angl.] / Karl Marks. M.: Eksmo, 2011. 1200 s.

References (transliteration):
Gurevich P.S. Gegelevskaya traktovka truda // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016. № 3. S. 315-319. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.3.1828
Khaken G. Sinergetika. Ierarkhii neustoychivostey v samoorganizuyushchikhsya sistemakh i ustroystvakh. M.: Mir, 1985. 424 s.
Orlova E.A. Sinergeticheskie idei v izuchenii sotsiokul'turnoy mikrodinamiki // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2012. № 4. C. 18 - 31.
Zubareva I. Kak pod kopirku // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 1028(49). Dostup k resursu 15.05.2016 g.: http://rg.ru/2015/12/15/rinki.html
Debt and (not much) deleveraging. McKinsey Global Institute, February 2015. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/employment-and-growth/debt-and-not-much-deleveraging
Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra: Nravstvennaya filosofiya. M.: Respublika, 1996. 479 s.
Bulgakov S.N. Filosofiya khozyaystva / S.N. Bulgakov. M.: Institut Russkoy Tsivilizatsii, 2009. 600 s.
Cultural times: the first global map of cultural and creative industries. Ernst&Young Study, December 2015. 120 p. Available at: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-cultural-times-2015/$FILE/ey-cultural-times-2015.pdf
Avtonomov V.S. Avstriyskaya shkola v politicheskoy ekonomii: K. Menger, E. Bem-Baverk, F. Vizer. M.: Ekonomika, 1992. 492 s.
Tolstoy L.N. Sobranie sochineniy v dvenadtsati tomakh. T. VII / L. Tolstoy. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1984. 494 s.
Shatalov-Davydov D.Yu. Vozniknovenie kontseptsii ustoychivogo razvitiya: analiz ekologicheskogo i politicheskogo diskursov // Vestnik nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I.Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nye nauki. 2010. № 4(20). S. 187-194.
Glazunov A.V. Kachestvo-eto pokazatel' urovnya chelovecheskikh otnosheniy v obshchestve // Metody menedzhmenta kachestva. 2013. № 11. S. 1-3.
Epshteyn M. Informatsionnyy vzryv i travma postmoderna // Zvezda. 1999. № 11. S. 216-227.
Fromm E. Dusha cheloveka. M.: «Respublika», 1992. S. 375-414.
Sayers S. Creative activity and alienation in Hegel and Marx // Historical Materialism. 2003. T. 11. № 1. S. 107-128.
Adorno T. O tekhnike i gumanizme // Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG. M., 1989. S. 364-371.
Marks Karl. Kapital: kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. T. 1: [per.s nem., fr., angl.] / Karl Marks. M.: Eksmo, 2011. 1200 s.

Аннотация: The subject of this work is the systemic analysis of dialectic correlation between patriotism and cosmopolitism within the modern society. In the author’s opinion, in the conditions of globalization, this issue gains new essences and aspects, as well as includes news questions which lead to the involvement of new disciplines for its solution. The goal of this work is the formation of such model of understanding of the global political and cultural space, which will encourage a maximal productive dialogue of cultures and its carriers, but produce minimal damage for the uniqueness of each culture and consider the rights of a human. The author concludes that the problem of interrelation and interaction between patriotism and cosmopolitism in order to reach the maximal efficiency, have to be solved systemically and comprehensively, or the attempt to improve the situation without taking into account one or another factors or parameter can negatively affect the social system. At the same time, a special role belongs to understanding, “empathy” into the cultural and historical specificity of the conflicting sides, which besides the practical implementation of these knowledge, carries an important social and pedagogical aspect in educating the current and future generations. In order to prevent interchange of the terms patriotism, nationalism, and Nazism, these aspects should be better explained; and in order to prevent the spread of extremism among youth, the should know the real life of other nations alongside their living conditions, which will increase tolerance on one hand, and also preserve patriotism as love and pride for their own country, but eliminating the hatred towards other nations, on the other. The scientific novelty consists in the systemic approach and integration of various issues into e unified complex, which allows lowering the risks of the improper solution of the problem, as well as the possible negative consequences during the course of its solution.

Ключевые слова: fascism, humanism, tolerance, systems approach, patriotism, cosmopolitanism, social philosophy, modern society, policy, global problems

Библиография:
Thom Brooks The Global Justice Reader February 2008 , © 2008 , Wiley-Blackwel 768p.
Nussbaum M. patriotizm i kosmopolitizm //M. Nussbaum logos.-2006.-№2.-S. 110-119.
Kanarsh G.Yu. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost': filosofskie kontseptsii i rossiyskaya situatsiya / G.Yu. Kanarsh – M.: izd-vo MGU, 2011. – 236s.
Slovar' filosofskikh terminov / Nauchnaya redaktsiya professora V.G. Kuznetsova – M.: INFRA-M, 2010. – XVI, 731s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. / In-t filosofii RAN; Nats. obshchestv.-nauch. fond; Preds. nauchno-red. soveta V.S. Stepin. — M.: Mysl', 2000—2001

References (transliteration):
Thom Brooks The Global Justice Reader February 2008 , © 2008 , Wiley-Blackwel 768p.
Nussbaum M. patriotizm i kosmopolitizm //M. Nussbaum logos.-2006.-№2.-S. 110-119.
Kanarsh G.Yu. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost': filosofskie kontseptsii i rossiyskaya situatsiya / G.Yu. Kanarsh – M.: izd-vo MGU, 2011. – 236s.
Slovar' filosofskikh terminov / Nauchnaya redaktsiya professora V.G. Kuznetsova – M.: INFRA-M, 2010. – XVI, 731s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. / In-t filosofii RAN; Nats. obshchestv.-nauch. fond; Preds. nauchno-red. soveta V.S. Stepin. — M.: Mysl', 2000—2001

Аннотация: The research’s object is the model of ideal society by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. This one is part of his project of proper development for India. Author analyzes the key ideas of his project and depicts traditional Hindu components in his social philosophy. Gandhi represents development of society as process of permanent creating the auspicious external conditions for people's spiritual development. Gandhi's model of ideal society is presented as interim stage at the path to the finish goal of Hinduism – moksha (spiritual freedom). Based on analysis of the categories, author investigates the content of the most important Gandhi's terms («true civilization», Ramarajya, Swaraj, Sarvodaya) and relations between them. Comparative approach helps to determine correlation of Hindu and Western ideas in Indian philosopher's model of ideal society. Firstly in Russian science is investigated the question about sources of different ideas, determined Gandhi's model of society, based on a justice. As a result in his project of social development is found both universal ground, applied to any society, and national component, applied to India.

Библиография:
Gandi M. K. [Izbrannye trudy] / Makhatma Gandi. Sost. i avt. perdisl. V. A. Vasilenko. – M.: Izd. Dom Shalvy Amonashvili, 1998. – 224 s.
Roy R. Self and Society: A Study in Gandhian Thought. – New Delhi: Sage Publicatinos, 1985. – 205 p.
Desai M. The Gospel of Selfless Action or The Gita according to Gandhi. – Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1946. – 390 p.
Skorokhodova T. G. Bengal'skoe Vozrozhdenie. Ocherki istorii sotsiokul'turnogo sinteza v indiyskoy filosofskoy mysli Novogo vremeni. – SPb.: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, 2008. – 320 s.
Bkhagavadgita / Per. s sanskr., issled. i primech. V. S. Sementsova. – M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1999. – 256 s.
Vasil'ev L. S. Istoriya Vostoka: V 2 t. T. 2. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1993. – 495 s.
Gandhi M. K. Towards Non-Violent Socialism. – Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1951. – 165 p.
Kutsenkov A. A. Evolyutsiya indiyskoy kasty. – M.: Nauka, 1983. – 326 s.
Al'bedil' M. F. Indiya: bespredel'naya mudrost'. – M.: Aleteya, 2005. – 416 s.
Kripalani J. B. Gandhi. His Life and Thought. – New Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1970. – 508 p.
Rigveda. Mandaly IX–X / Per. s sanskr. T. Ya. Elizarenkovoy. – M.: Nauka, 1999. – 559 s.
Gangal S. C. Gandhian Thought and Techniques in the Modern World. – New Delhi: Criterion Publications, 1988. – 187 p.
Eyzenshtadt Sh. Revolyutsiya i preobrazovanie obshchestv. Sravnitel'noe izuchenie tsivilizatsiy / Per. s angl. – M.: Aspekt Press, 1999. – 416 s.
Dhawan G. The Political Philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi. – Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing Trust, 1962. – 365 p.
Gandhi Mahatma. The Collected Works. In 100 vols. – New Delhi: Government of India. The Publications Division. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 1958–1994.

References (transliteration):
Gandi M. K. [Izbrannye trudy] / Makhatma Gandi. Sost. i avt. perdisl. V. A. Vasilenko. – M.: Izd. Dom Shalvy Amonashvili, 1998. – 224 s.
Roy R. Self and Society: A Study in Gandhian Thought. – New Delhi: Sage Publicatinos, 1985. – 205 p.
Desai M. The Gospel of Selfless Action or The Gita according to Gandhi. – Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1946. – 390 p.
Skorokhodova T. G. Bengal'skoe Vozrozhdenie. Ocherki istorii sotsiokul'turnogo sinteza v indiyskoy filosofskoy mysli Novogo vremeni. – SPb.: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, 2008. – 320 s.
Bkhagavadgita / Per. s sanskr., issled. i primech. V. S. Sementsova. – M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1999. – 256 s.
Vasil'ev L. S. Istoriya Vostoka: V 2 t. T. 2. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1993. – 495 s.
Gandhi M. K. Towards Non-Violent Socialism. – Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1951. – 165 p.
Kutsenkov A. A. Evolyutsiya indiyskoy kasty. – M.: Nauka, 1983. – 326 s.
Al'bedil' M. F. Indiya: bespredel'naya mudrost'. – M.: Aleteya, 2005. – 416 s.
Kripalani J. B. Gandhi. His Life and Thought. – New Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1970. – 508 p.
Rigveda. Mandaly IX–X / Per. s sanskr. T. Ya. Elizarenkovoy. – M.: Nauka, 1999. – 559 s.
Gangal S. C. Gandhian Thought and Techniques in the Modern World. – New Delhi: Criterion Publications, 1988. – 187 p.
Eyzenshtadt Sh. Revolyutsiya i preobrazovanie obshchestv. Sravnitel'noe izuchenie tsivilizatsiy / Per. s angl. – M.: Aspekt Press, 1999. – 416 s.
Dhawan G. The Political Philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi. – Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing Trust, 1962. – 365 p.
Gandhi Mahatma. The Collected Works. In 100 vols. – New Delhi: Government of India. The Publications Division. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 1958–1994.

Аннотация: This article examines government as a specific constituent of the historical action, its interrelation with the nation and civil society, as well as characteristic to it algorithms of perception of reality and the effect upon it. A special attention is given to the analysis of the common to government type of rationality and formed by it worldview. An important place belongs to the characteristic of the two types of governments – creative and reactive. A special attention is given to the functioning of the reactive government, ways of its self-preservation, mechanisms of providing control over the society, as well as the prospects of the development of society itself under the similar circumstances. The author differentiates the notions of “state” and “government”, which allows him to identify a number of typological conflicts between the state (as a combination of institutions) and the government (as a political regime). Scientific novelty of the methodological approach consists in the ability to annihilate the whole layer of government mythology, which particularly suggests to identify the government and the state, and detect an entire chain of conflicts, without understanding of which it is impossible to establish control of the civil society over the government, as well as full functionality of the government institutions.

Ключевые слова: government, state, society, rationality, goal-setting, reactivity, worldview, creativity, reality, national idea

Библиография:
Korolev S. A. «Natsional'naya ideya» kak instrument elektoral'nogo vozdeystviya: upravlyaemaya demokratiya v poiskakh ideologicheskoy opory // Rezhim Putina: idei i praktika. M.: V. Sekachev, 2005. S. 79–193.
Buldakov V. P. Khaos i etnos. Etnicheskie konflikty v Rossii, 1917–1918 gg. Usloviya vozniknoveniya, khronika, kommentariy, analiz. M.: Novyy khronograf, 2010. 1096 s.
Bessoznatel'noe vlasti. Beseda s V. A. Podorogoy // Byurokratiya i obshchestvo / Otv. red. S. A. Korolev. M.: Filosofskoe obshchestvo SSSR, 1991. S. 50–104.
Podoroga V. A. Rossiya. XX vek. Vlast'. Besedu vedet S. A. Korolev // Druzhba narodov. 1994. № 3. S. 136–150.
Menyayushchayasya sotsial'nost': kontury budushchego. Kruglyy stol zhurnala «Polis» i Instituta filosofii RAN // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 1. S. 97–121.
Vlast' i real'nost'. Kruglyy stol // Vestnik analitiki. 2010. № 2. S. 89–111.
Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast'. Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. M.: Praksis, 2002. 384 s.
Veber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 644–706.

References (transliteration):
Korolev S. A. «Natsional'naya ideya» kak instrument elektoral'nogo vozdeystviya: upravlyaemaya demokratiya v poiskakh ideologicheskoy opory // Rezhim Putina: idei i praktika. M.: V. Sekachev, 2005. S. 79–193.
Buldakov V. P. Khaos i etnos. Etnicheskie konflikty v Rossii, 1917–1918 gg. Usloviya vozniknoveniya, khronika, kommentariy, analiz. M.: Novyy khronograf, 2010. 1096 s.
Bessoznatel'noe vlasti. Beseda s V. A. Podorogoy // Byurokratiya i obshchestvo / Otv. red. S. A. Korolev. M.: Filosofskoe obshchestvo SSSR, 1991. S. 50–104.
Podoroga V. A. Rossiya. XX vek. Vlast'. Besedu vedet S. A. Korolev // Druzhba narodov. 1994. № 3. S. 136–150.
Menyayushchayasya sotsial'nost': kontury budushchego. Kruglyy stol zhurnala «Polis» i Instituta filosofii RAN // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 1. S. 97–121.
Vlast' i real'nost'. Kruglyy stol // Vestnik analitiki. 2010. № 2. S. 89–111.
Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast'. Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. M.: Praksis, 2002. 384 s.
Veber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 644–706.

Аннотация: The subject of the present research is information as the reason and content of global transformations in the fields of science, technology and human existence. The author shows that information has ceased to play a supportive role and has become the main resource of social development. In this regard, in this paper the author proves the legitimacy and necessity of the information approach to the analysis of the surroundings. The author examines the relationship between the development of information, the emergence of post-industrial information society and the changes in lifestyle of a person. In this article, the author relies on the work of classical philosophical thought and modern scholars, analyzes the works of Russian and foreign philosophers. The article uses the methods of comprehensive analysis of the social reality, ascent from the abstract to the concrete and substantiation of the theoretical conclusions by empirical data. The content of the article is presented in the form of problem definitions. The author substantiates the conclusion that, despite the rapid development of specific science about information (information science), technically, information is not studied sufficiently and information studies do not provide a complete understanding of the role and importance of information in society and life of an individual. It is still necessary to answer a philosophical answer to the question "What is information and how information can be used for the benefits of a person, minimizing the negative effects of informational development?" The author emphasizes the need for the development of philosophy of information, focusing on the meaning, content and value of information in the modern information society. The article presents specific features of knowledge, which arises in the process of obtaining and interpreting information.

Ключевые слова: post-industrial society, information society, information technology, philosophy of information, information, philosophy, information approach, knowledge, science, semantics of information

Библиография:
Solov'ev I.V., Kochetkova L.N. Filosofiya informatsii kak vseobshchaya metodologiya razvitiya. // Elektronnyy setevoy nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal «Vestnik MGTU MIREA». 2014. – №3(4). – S. 29 – 38
Surma I.V. Sovremennoe informatsionnoe obshchestvo i aktual'nye voprosy upravleniya znaniyami // Kibernetika i programmirovanie.-2015.-3.-C. 30-46. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2015.3.15001. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_15001.html
Nazarenko M.A. Modernizatsiya ekonomiki i traditsii rossiyskogo obrazovaniya v usloviyakh sovremennogo miroporyadka: kriticheskiy analiz. /Trudy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Innovatsionnye strategii razvitiya nauki, tekhniki i obshchestva. Sotsial'naya innovatika-2014» – M.: VNIIgeosistem, 2014, s. 28 – 32
Kudzh S.A., Nazarenko M.A. Filosofskie aspekty upravleniya kachestvom innovatsiy. /Trudy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Innovatsionnye strategii razvitiya nauki, tekhniki i obshchestva. Sotsial'naya innovatika-2014» – M.: VNIIgeosistem, 2014, s. 5 – 12
Zaytseva L.A. Kvantovyy mir i vakuum idey. //Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. – №3. – S. 355 – 363
Dokinz R. Rasshirennyy fenotip: dlinnaya ruka gena. Moskva. AST Corpus, 2010. – 514 s.
Kochetkova L.N. Filosofskiy diskurs o sotsial'nom gosudarstve. M.: Infra-M, 2012 – 216 s.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. M. Academia, 1999 – 790 c.
Mumford Lewis. The Myth of the Machine. Vol. 2. The Pentagon of Power. New York. Harcourt, Brace, 1970 – 496 p.
Toffler E., Toffler Kh. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo. M.: AST: Profizdat, 2008. – 545 s.
Rossiyskoe transgumanisticheskoe dvizhenie: Rezhim dostupa: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/
Loewenstein, Werner R. The Touchstone of Life: Molecular Information, Cell communication and the foundations of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999 – 384 p.
Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. SPb: Piter, 2008. – 239 s.
Kochetkov V.V., Kochetkova L.N. K voprosu o genezise postindustrial'nogo obshchestva. //Voprosy filosofii. 2010. – №2. – S. 23–34
Dawkins Richard. The Blind Watchmaker, New York, Norton, 1986 – 340 p.
Kudzh S.A. O filosofii informatsii. //Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2013. – №6. – S. 9 – 13
Shannon, Claude Elwood. The mathematical theory of communication. //The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379-423 & 623-656, July & October, 1948

References (transliteration):
Solov'ev I.V., Kochetkova L.N. Filosofiya informatsii kak vseobshchaya metodologiya razvitiya. // Elektronnyy setevoy nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal «Vestnik MGTU MIREA». 2014. – №3(4). – S. 29 – 38
Surma I.V. Sovremennoe informatsionnoe obshchestvo i aktual'nye voprosy upravleniya znaniyami // Kibernetika i programmirovanie.-2015.-3.-C. 30-46. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2015.3.15001. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_15001.html
Nazarenko M.A. Modernizatsiya ekonomiki i traditsii rossiyskogo obrazovaniya v usloviyakh sovremennogo miroporyadka: kriticheskiy analiz. /Trudy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Innovatsionnye strategii razvitiya nauki, tekhniki i obshchestva. Sotsial'naya innovatika-2014» – M.: VNIIgeosistem, 2014, s. 28 – 32
Kudzh S.A., Nazarenko M.A. Filosofskie aspekty upravleniya kachestvom innovatsiy. /Trudy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Innovatsionnye strategii razvitiya nauki, tekhniki i obshchestva. Sotsial'naya innovatika-2014» – M.: VNIIgeosistem, 2014, s. 5 – 12
Zaytseva L.A. Kvantovyy mir i vakuum idey. //Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. – №3. – S. 355 – 363
Dokinz R. Rasshirennyy fenotip: dlinnaya ruka gena. Moskva. AST Corpus, 2010. – 514 s.
Kochetkova L.N. Filosofskiy diskurs o sotsial'nom gosudarstve. M.: Infra-M, 2012 – 216 s.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. M. Academia, 1999 – 790 c.
Mumford Lewis. The Myth of the Machine. Vol. 2. The Pentagon of Power. New York. Harcourt, Brace, 1970 – 496 p.
Toffler E., Toffler Kh. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo. M.: AST: Profizdat, 2008. – 545 s.
Rossiyskoe transgumanisticheskoe dvizhenie: Rezhim dostupa: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/
Loewenstein, Werner R. The Touchstone of Life: Molecular Information, Cell communication and the foundations of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999 – 384 p.
Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. SPb: Piter, 2008. – 239 s.
Kochetkov V.V., Kochetkova L.N. K voprosu o genezise postindustrial'nogo obshchestva. //Voprosy filosofii. 2010. – №2. – S. 23–34
Dawkins Richard. The Blind Watchmaker, New York, Norton, 1986 – 340 p.
Kudzh S.A. O filosofii informatsii. //Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2013. – №6. – S. 9 – 13
Shannon, Claude Elwood. The mathematical theory of communication. //The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379-423 & 623-656, July & October, 1948

Аннотация: In the process of social development culture performs the function of 'crystallisation' of economic changes. At the time of social revolutions antagonism between different classes reaches the point when it can't be overcome and, as a result, culture and social values happen to be in different coordinate systems which leads to more misunderstanding between classes. Consequently, values that used to unite people of different social groups stop existing in the period of revolutions. The broken balance of values is expressed at the three levels, structural, cultural-historical and individual ones, which agrees to Marx' triad 'general-particular-singular'. The aforesaid disharmony is the subject of the present research. The research is based on the concept of socioeconomic formations that is used to study social development. Classical Marxism is enriched with the author admitting a more active role of the cultural 'superstructure' in the hsitorical process. The main method of the research is the historical comparative analysis. The author of the article describes the three groups of values. According to the author,  the balance between these groups of values 'crystallise' the interaction between the formal historical and specific historical logics of social development. Not only a specific culture changes the course of history but so does the historical memory of a nation, general symbols and myths that express the entire system of values of a community. The system of values legitimate (or reject) this or that form of social restructuring which makes it to be one of the drivers of social development. In some countries Peasants' War never turns into revolution (like in Germany of the XVIth century) and in other countries it does lead to a revolution or even an execution of a king (England of the XVIIth century). 

Ключевые слова: specific historical logic, socioeconomic formation, social development, social revolution, cultural and historical values, structural values, individual values, formal historical rule, bourgeois revolution, balance of values

Библиография:
Smith A., Myths and memories of the nation, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 288p.
Engel's F., Anti-Dyuring // K. Marks, F. Engel's, Sochineniya [T.20], Izdanie vtoroe – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1961. 828s.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Redkol: S.S.Averintsev, E.A. Arab-Ogly, L.F. Il'ichev i dr.-2-e izd. – M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1989. 815s. – Slovarnye stat'i: Lichnost', tsennost'.
Sorokin P.A., Sotsiologiya revolyutsii. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», ROSSPEN, 2005. 704s.
Simoniya N.A., Strany Vostoka: puti razvitiya. M.:Nauka,1975. 152s.
Parsons T., Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv / Per. s angl. L.A. Sedova i A.D.Kovaleva. Pod red. M.S. Kovalevoy. M.: Aspekt Press, 1997. 270s.
Merton R., Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2006. 873s.
Mishin V., Obshchestvennyy progress. Gor'kiy: Volgo-vyatskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1970. 296s.
Parsons T., O sotsial'nykh sistemakh / Pod red. V.F. Chesnokovoy i S.A. Belanovskogo. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2002. 832s.
Leninskaya teoriya sotsialisticheskoy revolyutsii i sovremennost' /P.N. Fedoseev, S.V. Aleksandrov, A.P. Butenko i dr.; Redkol.: P.N. Fedoseev i dr. 3-e izd., dop. M.Politizdat, 1980. 528s.
Marks. K., K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii // K. Marks, F. Engel's, Sochineniya [T.13], Izdanie vtoroe – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1959. 771s.
Lenin V.I., Doklad na II Vserossiyskom s'ezde kommunisticheskikh organizatsiy narodov Vostoka 22 noyabrya 1919g. // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy V.I. Lenina [T.39], 5-e izdanie, M., Politizdat, 1970. 623s.
Istoriya srednikh vekov. V 2 t. T.2; Ucheb. dlya vuzov po spets «Istoriya» / Pod red. Z.V.Udal'tsovoy i S.P. Karpova. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1991. 400s.
Gramshi A., Izbrannye proizvedeniya v trekh tomakh [T.3] / A. Gramshi. – M.: Izd-vo inostrannoy literatury, 1959. 567s.
Indiya: strana i ee regiony // pod red. E.Yu. Vaninoy. – M.: Editorial URSS 2000. 360 s.
Barg M.A., Velikaya angliyskaya revolyutsiya v portretakh ee deyateley. M.: Mysl', 1991. 397s.
Vanina E.Yu., Razrushiteli imperii, sozidateli natsii (Makharashtra glazami Indii) // V Indiyu dukha…: sb. st., posv. 70-letiyu R.B. Rybakova/ sost. I.V. Zaytsev, G.M. Kuznetsova, T.L. Shaumyan; In-t vostokovedeniya RAN. – M.: Vost. Lit., 2008. 542s.

References (transliteration):
Smith A., Myths and memories of the nation, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 288p.
Engel's F., Anti-Dyuring // K. Marks, F. Engel's, Sochineniya [T.20], Izdanie vtoroe – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1961. 828s.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Redkol: S.S.Averintsev, E.A. Arab-Ogly, L.F. Il'ichev i dr.-2-e izd. – M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1989. 815s. – Slovarnye stat'i: Lichnost', tsennost'.
Sorokin P.A., Sotsiologiya revolyutsii. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», ROSSPEN, 2005. 704s.
Simoniya N.A., Strany Vostoka: puti razvitiya. M.:Nauka,1975. 152s.
Parsons T., Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv / Per. s angl. L.A. Sedova i A.D.Kovaleva. Pod red. M.S. Kovalevoy. M.: Aspekt Press, 1997. 270s.
Merton R., Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2006. 873s.
Mishin V., Obshchestvennyy progress. Gor'kiy: Volgo-vyatskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1970. 296s.
Parsons T., O sotsial'nykh sistemakh / Pod red. V.F. Chesnokovoy i S.A. Belanovskogo. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2002. 832s.
Leninskaya teoriya sotsialisticheskoy revolyutsii i sovremennost' /P.N. Fedoseev, S.V. Aleksandrov, A.P. Butenko i dr.; Redkol.: P.N. Fedoseev i dr. 3-e izd., dop. M.Politizdat, 1980. 528s.
Marks. K., K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii // K. Marks, F. Engel's, Sochineniya [T.13], Izdanie vtoroe – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1959. 771s.
Lenin V.I., Doklad na II Vserossiyskom s'ezde kommunisticheskikh organizatsiy narodov Vostoka 22 noyabrya 1919g. // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy V.I. Lenina [T.39], 5-e izdanie, M., Politizdat, 1970. 623s.
Istoriya srednikh vekov. V 2 t. T.2; Ucheb. dlya vuzov po spets «Istoriya» / Pod red. Z.V.Udal'tsovoy i S.P. Karpova. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1991. 400s.
Gramshi A., Izbrannye proizvedeniya v trekh tomakh [T.3] / A. Gramshi. – M.: Izd-vo inostrannoy literatury, 1959. 567s.
Indiya: strana i ee regiony // pod red. E.Yu. Vaninoy. – M.: Editorial URSS 2000. 360 s.
Barg M.A., Velikaya angliyskaya revolyutsiya v portretakh ee deyateley. M.: Mysl', 1991. 397s.
Vanina E.Yu., Razrushiteli imperii, sozidateli natsii (Makharashtra glazami Indii) // V Indiyu dukha…: sb. st., posv. 70-letiyu R.B. Rybakova/ sost. I.V. Zaytsev, G.M. Kuznetsova, T.L. Shaumyan; In-t vostokovedeniya RAN. – M.: Vost. Lit., 2008. 542s.

Аннотация: In this article Chepyuk analyzes the thesis about the transfer of a modern society to a new stage of development that is defined as the innovation society or knowledge society in literature. The present stage of technological development is characterized by the leading role of information and communication technologies and involvement of a human into new social relations or so called media reality. The author of the article raises a question about how our views on culture and economics are being transformed within the framework of the innovative paradigm of social development and gives a qualitative assessment of this process from the point of view of the entropy approach. The research method integrates several types of analysis, ethical-philosophical, cultural and dialectical analysis. One of the basic scientific approaches used by the author is the synergetic approach that has allowed to define similar tendencies in the development of society, culture and economics of modern social life. In this article the author proposes a thesis that innovation society does not present a new paradigm of social development. In fact, it represents the process of embodiment of the socio-cultural phenomenon. Moreover, growing IT and media industry are just the means of producing intangible forms of social life that have become the object of purchase and sale in the modern innovation society. The author also makes a suggestion that these processes can relate to entropic phenomena in the capitalist economy. 

Ключевые слова: innovation society, media reality, information and communication technologies, entropy, knowledge economy, contemporary culture, capitalism, memory, cultural values, intangible assets

Библиография:
P.S. Gurevich Globalizatsiya i mul'tikul'turalizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-8.-C. 4-5
V.V. Zhabina Riski innovatsionnoy transformatsii obshchestva v usloviyakh globalizatsii. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-6.-C. 20-30.
P.I. Babochkin, E.Sh. Kamaldinova Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya real'nost' sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-8.-C. 41-45.
Sommer D. S. Moral' XXI veka //M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Sofiya. – 2004.
Berdyaev, N. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha / N.Berdyaev.– M.: Respublika, 1994, s.425.
V. V. Zhabina Innovatsionnaya kul'tura kak faktor sbalansirovannogo innovatsionnogo razvitiya obshchestva i cheloveka // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-7.-C. 39-50.
Giddens, E. Uskol'zayushchiy mir. Kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn'. – M.-2004.
Bauman Z. Globalizatsiya. Posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obshchestva / Per. s angl. Korobochkina M. L. – M.: Ves' Mir, 2004.
Nesbit, Dzh.Chto nas zhdet v 90-e gody. Megatendentsii, god 2000 / Dzh.Nesbit, P.Eburdin.-M.:OGI, 1992.
Chep'yuk O.R. Entropiya kak merilo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya // Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2014.-№6.
Mamardashvili M.K. Filosofskie chteniya //SPb.: Azbuka-klassika. – 2002. – T.5.
Fortunatov A.N. Vzaimodeystvie sub'ektov sotsial'noy kommunikatsii v mediareal'nosti //N. Novgorod: NNGASU. – 2009.
Fasmer, M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4-kh t.: Per. s nem. Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch / Perevod i dopolneniya O.N. Trubacheva. — 4-e izd. — M.: Astrel' — AST, 2004. — T. 4. — 860 s.
Haddow, D. Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization / D. Haddow // Adbusters.– №79.– [Elektronnyy resurs].– Rezhim dostupa: https://www.adbusters.org/magazine/79/ hipster.html
Gurevich, P. S. Kul'turologiya: ucheb. dlya vuzov /P. S. Gurevich. – M.: Gardariki, 2008. – 290 s.
Maksimović, J. Hipsters : the End of Counterculture / J. Maksimović, J.// by admin on Jan.15, 2009, under Cover story.– [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.whitecity.rs/?p=74.
Bell, D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya / Bell D., Inozemtsev V.-M.: Academia, 1999.-300 s.

References (transliteration):
P.S. Gurevich Globalizatsiya i mul'tikul'turalizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-8.-C. 4-5
V.V. Zhabina Riski innovatsionnoy transformatsii obshchestva v usloviyakh globalizatsii. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-6.-C. 20-30.
P.I. Babochkin, E.Sh. Kamaldinova Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya real'nost' sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-8.-C. 41-45.
Sommer D. S. Moral' XXI veka //M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Sofiya. – 2004.
Berdyaev, N. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha / N.Berdyaev.– M.: Respublika, 1994, s.425.
V. V. Zhabina Innovatsionnaya kul'tura kak faktor sbalansirovannogo innovatsionnogo razvitiya obshchestva i cheloveka // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-7.-C. 39-50.
Giddens, E. Uskol'zayushchiy mir. Kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn'. – M.-2004.
Bauman Z. Globalizatsiya. Posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obshchestva / Per. s angl. Korobochkina M. L. – M.: Ves' Mir, 2004.
Nesbit, Dzh.Chto nas zhdet v 90-e gody. Megatendentsii, god 2000 / Dzh.Nesbit, P.Eburdin.-M.:OGI, 1992.
Chep'yuk O.R. Entropiya kak merilo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya // Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2014.-№6.
Mamardashvili M.K. Filosofskie chteniya //SPb.: Azbuka-klassika. – 2002. – T.5.
Fortunatov A.N. Vzaimodeystvie sub'ektov sotsial'noy kommunikatsii v mediareal'nosti //N. Novgorod: NNGASU. – 2009.
Fasmer, M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4-kh t.: Per. s nem. Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch / Perevod i dopolneniya O.N. Trubacheva. — 4-e izd. — M.: Astrel' — AST, 2004. — T. 4. — 860 s.
Haddow, D. Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization / D. Haddow // Adbusters.– №79.– [Elektronnyy resurs].– Rezhim dostupa: https://www.adbusters.org/magazine/79/ hipster.html
Gurevich, P. S. Kul'turologiya: ucheb. dlya vuzov /P. S. Gurevich. – M.: Gardariki, 2008. – 290 s.
Maksimović, J. Hipsters : the End of Counterculture / J. Maksimović, J.// by admin on Jan.15, 2009, under Cover story.– [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.whitecity.rs/?p=74.
Bell, D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya / Bell D., Inozemtsev V.-M.: Academia, 1999.-300 s.

Аннотация: In his article Deryabin views body as the message rendered at the pre-grammatical level, i.e. the agrammatical message. Discovery of this type of message allows to see human in a new light as an ambivalent creature who combines the natural biological and social beginnings. As a rule, the statement that human has a dual nature takes a research to biological and anatomic features of human. However, by no means these features reveal the essential or conceptual (social) nature of human. The present research discovers the dual nature of human in messages rendered by human body, i.e. through social and communication expressions. The natural (biological) state of human and human body is being viewed as some kind of a message conveying social meanings. These meanings are important and should be understood by both human and his surroundings. Essential features of human body can be discovered when human body demonstates its limits (birth, dead body, sportsman, disabled or Paralympian body). This allows to discover the borders of possible messages from human body. The researcher views different states and transformations of human body as well as their influence on the agrammatical message of body. In his article Deryabin underlines the importance of the environment around human body in the process of creation of an arammatical body message.  The researcher shares his views on the communicative abilities of human body and meanings that human body represents through existence. According to the author, the research of human body as an agrammatical message could lead to the revision of some provisions of such applied sciences as sports economics, Olympic and Paralympic Games. 

Ключевые слова: agrammatical message, agrammatism, body, physicality, social meaning, sport, Paralympic Games, communication environment, sportsman, disabled person

Библиография:
Agamben Dzh. Gryadushchee soobshchestvo. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2008 . 144 c.
Agamben Dzh. Iskusstvo, bez-deyatel'nost', politika // URL: http://www.gif.ru/themes/society/biennale-konf/agamben. (data obrashcheniya 15 iyunya 2014 g.).
Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast' i golaya zhizn'. M.: Izd-vo «Evropa», 2011. 256 c.
Bart R. Voyna yazykov // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika. M. 1994. S. 538-540.
Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost' / Per. s angl. pod red. Yu.V. Asochakova. SPb.: Piter. 2008. 240 s.
Bogdanova M.A. Telo cheloveka kak mnemoorganicheskoe ustroystvo // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 358. S. 18-20
Bushmakina O. N. Konstruirovanie real'nosti v diskurse sotsial'nogo konstruktivizma//Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. 2004, № 2. S. 89-96.
Bushmakina O. N. Ontologiya postsovremennogo myshleniya. «Metafora postmoderna». Izhevsk: Izd-vo Udmurt. un-ta, 1998. 270 s
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. 880 s.
Gumbrekht Kh.U Pokhvala krasote sporta / Per. c angl. V. Feshchenko. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009. 176 s.
Gumbrekht Kh. U. Proizvodstvo prisutstviya: chego ne mozhet peredat' znachenie. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006. 180 s.
Dvoretskiy I. Kh. Drevnegrechesko-russkiy slovar' M., 1958. // URL: http://www.dicipedia.com/dic-gr-ru-old-term-537.htm (data obrashcheniya 10.05.2014).
Deryabin M. L. Samoreferentsiya sotsial'noy real'nosti v reklamnom diskurse: avtoref. diss. kand. filosof. nauk:spets. 09.00.11. M.: MPGU, 2009. 16 s.
‘”Doktor Smert'” otkryl pervyy v mire muzey plastinirovannykh trupov v N'yu-Yorke’(2013) // URL: Newsru.com viewed 26 July 2013, http://www.newsru.com/cinema/26jul2013/hagens.html (data obrashcheniya: 06.05.2014).
Zvereva V. Spetsializirovannye tela v massovoy kul'ture: bodibilding.// URL: http://culturca.narod.ru/Bodybuild0.htm, (data obrashcheniya 10 iyunya 2014 g.).
Kamper D. Telo, znanie, golos i sled. // KhORA. 2009. № 1 (7) // URL: http://www.jkhora.narod.ru/2009-01-04.pdf, (data obrashcheniya 02.06.2014)
Lakan Zh. Instantsiya bukvy v bessoznatel'nom ili sud'ba razuma posle Freyda. M: Logos. 1997. 184 s.
‘Myulegg: mnoyu rukovodyat prishel'tsy...’ (2002) BBC Russian.com viewed 26 February 2002, // URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/special_report/bbcrussian/2002_03/newsid_1842000/1842947.stm,-(data obrashcheniya 10.05.2014).
Nansi Zh.-L. Corpus. M.: Izd-vo «Ad Marginem», 1999 255 s.
Polyakova N.B. Konstruirovanie diskursa vlasti: germenevticheskiy aspekt: monografiya. Izhevsk. Izdatel'stvo «Udmurtskiy universitet», 2009, 141 s.
Riker P. Ya-sam kak drugoy. M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury. 2008. 416 s.
Solovey I.V. Filosofskie smysly polya politiki. // URL: http://proxima.school.udsu.ru/files/1327446958.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 22.05.2014).
Cash, T. F. The body image workbook: An 8-step guide for learning to like your looks. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger. 1997. 221 pp.
Goldfield, G., S., Harper, D. W., & Blouin, A. G. Are bodybuilders at risk for an eating disorder? // Eating Disorders, 1998. № 6, R.133-158.
Gumbrecht H. U. Production of Presence: what meaning cannot convey.-Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 2004, 200 pp.
Kamper D. Der Körper, das Wissen, die Stimme und die Spur / Quel corps?: Eine Frage der Repräsentation. Hrsg. Hans Belting, Dietmar Kamper. München: Fink, 2002. P. 167–174.
Pogontseva D.V. Predstavleniya o telesnoy krasote v sovremennoy kul'ture // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 8. - C. 71 - 79. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2013.8.10582. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_10582.html

References (transliteration):
Agamben Dzh. Gryadushchee soobshchestvo. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2008 . 144 c.
Agamben Dzh. Iskusstvo, bez-deyatel'nost', politika // URL: http://www.gif.ru/themes/society/biennale-konf/agamben. (data obrashcheniya 15 iyunya 2014 g.).
Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast' i golaya zhizn'. M.: Izd-vo «Evropa», 2011. 256 c.
Bart R. Voyna yazykov // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika. M. 1994. S. 538-540.
Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost' / Per. s angl. pod red. Yu.V. Asochakova. SPb.: Piter. 2008. 240 s.
Bogdanova M.A. Telo cheloveka kak mnemoorganicheskoe ustroystvo // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 358. S. 18-20
Bushmakina O. N. Konstruirovanie real'nosti v diskurse sotsial'nogo konstruktivizma//Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. 2004, № 2. S. 89-96.
Bushmakina O. N. Ontologiya postsovremennogo myshleniya. «Metafora postmoderna». Izhevsk: Izd-vo Udmurt. un-ta, 1998. 270 s
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. 880 s.
Gumbrekht Kh.U Pokhvala krasote sporta / Per. c angl. V. Feshchenko. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009. 176 s.
Gumbrekht Kh. U. Proizvodstvo prisutstviya: chego ne mozhet peredat' znachenie. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006. 180 s.
Dvoretskiy I. Kh. Drevnegrechesko-russkiy slovar' M., 1958. // URL: http://www.dicipedia.com/dic-gr-ru-old-term-537.htm (data obrashcheniya 10.05.2014).
Deryabin M. L. Samoreferentsiya sotsial'noy real'nosti v reklamnom diskurse: avtoref. diss. kand. filosof. nauk:spets. 09.00.11. M.: MPGU, 2009. 16 s.
‘”Doktor Smert'” otkryl pervyy v mire muzey plastinirovannykh trupov v N'yu-Yorke’(2013) // URL: Newsru.com viewed 26 July 2013, http://www.newsru.com/cinema/26jul2013/hagens.html (data obrashcheniya: 06.05.2014).
Zvereva V. Spetsializirovannye tela v massovoy kul'ture: bodibilding.// URL: http://culturca.narod.ru/Bodybuild0.htm, (data obrashcheniya 10 iyunya 2014 g.).
Kamper D. Telo, znanie, golos i sled. // KhORA. 2009. № 1 (7) // URL: http://www.jkhora.narod.ru/2009-01-04.pdf, (data obrashcheniya 02.06.2014)
Lakan Zh. Instantsiya bukvy v bessoznatel'nom ili sud'ba razuma posle Freyda. M: Logos. 1997. 184 s.
‘Myulegg: mnoyu rukovodyat prishel'tsy...’ (2002) BBC Russian.com viewed 26 February 2002, // URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/special_report/bbcrussian/2002_03/newsid_1842000/1842947.stm,-(data obrashcheniya 10.05.2014).
Nansi Zh.-L. Corpus. M.: Izd-vo «Ad Marginem», 1999 255 s.
Polyakova N.B. Konstruirovanie diskursa vlasti: germenevticheskiy aspekt: monografiya. Izhevsk. Izdatel'stvo «Udmurtskiy universitet», 2009, 141 s.
Riker P. Ya-sam kak drugoy. M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoy literatury. 2008. 416 s.
Solovey I.V. Filosofskie smysly polya politiki. // URL: http://proxima.school.udsu.ru/files/1327446958.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 22.05.2014).
Cash, T. F. The body image workbook: An 8-step guide for learning to like your looks. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger. 1997. 221 pp.
Goldfield, G., S., Harper, D. W., & Blouin, A. G. Are bodybuilders at risk for an eating disorder? // Eating Disorders, 1998. № 6, R.133-158.
Gumbrecht H. U. Production of Presence: what meaning cannot convey.-Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 2004, 200 pp.
Kamper D. Der Körper, das Wissen, die Stimme und die Spur / Quel corps?: Eine Frage der Repräsentation. Hrsg. Hans Belting, Dietmar Kamper. München: Fink, 2002. P. 167–174.
Pogontseva D.V. Predstavleniya o telesnoy krasote v sovremennoy kul'ture // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 8. - C. 71 - 79. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2013.8.10582. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_10582.html

Аннотация: The article deals with the problem «Russia – Europe» as is was put in the history of Russian philosophical thought and in the works of a prominent Russian cultural scientist and historian living outside Russia Vladimir Veydle in connection with his analysis of the European sources of Russian culture. According to the author, the works of Veydle, centered around the theme of historical formation and development of the cultural unity between Russian and Europe, is in tune with sociocultural problems faced nowadays by modern Russia. The underlying reason for the author’s turning to this topic is the acknowledgement of the extremely strong influence of spiritual culture (art, literature, poetry) on the development of society. Culture does not reflect the being of people but exists as their other-being, and therefore the fate of culture and the historical fate of a nation are inseparable. This methodological attitude has determined the direction of the research analysis. Attention is paid to the prevailing themes in Veydle’s creative works. 1. Adoption of Christianity, the Byzantine religion, determined the vector of historical movement and spiritual development of Russia and included it into the European cultural space «as a part and whole», i.e. predetermined to be Europe not only as a territory but also as a culture. 2. Inheritance of ancient Greek traditions from Byzantium that gave way for development of Orthodox national self-sufficiency distinguished Russian spirituality from the cultural world of Europe. That created the feeling of certain alienation of faith, ways of life and values, to which Europe did not object though contradistinction of Russia has always threatened with closure in its own being: losing itself in Russia, Europe was losing a historically established integrity of its cultural outlook. Therefore, the question about Russia’s place in Europe initially rose not only as the Russian question. 3. The most important outcome of Peter the First's activities was the appearance of the culture of Russian nobility that combined «Westernness» and «Russianness». To the most degree, according to Veydle, that could be said about Pushkin. In this sense, the fate of Russia was reflected in Pushkin's works more than in all subsequent overturns and revolutions. 4. The Silver Age of Russian culture that actualized the problem of the traditional and the new in creative works and its relation to religious consciousness coincided in time with the crisis of spirituality experienced by European art and accompanied by the predominance of the consumer and aesthetic standards of popular culture. Veydle in his essay «The dying of art» ponders about the fate of literature and artistic creation under these conditions and this topic is also reflected in the present article. 5. October 1917 introduced a split into Russian culture but both outside Russia and under new circumstances the best representatives of Russian culture maintained the relationship with the accumulated spiritual experience, established traditions of artistic creation and preserved Russian culture as a whole. Even though they lived and created in the violently divided world, Akhmatova and Merezhkovskiy, Tsvetaeva and Khodasevich, Nabokov and Pasternak equally introduced Russian culture. 6. The author of the article pays special attention to Veydle’s attitude to the Eurasian theme. Veydle took Eurasian interpretation of the sources of Russian culture and history as the desire to separate Russia from Europe and the attempt that did not meet the task of scientific interpretation of real cultural relations between Russia and Europe. Veydle's critical objections was dictated by the belief that Russian culture was born and developed in Europe and not in Asia, and therefore its «removal», even partial, from the cultural European space is violent to the spiritual life and history of both Russia and Europe.

Ключевые слова: Eurasianism, new religious consciousness, Silver Age, spiritual tradition, artistic creation, Russian culture, European cultural space, Christianity, Russia and Europe, Pushkin

Библиография:
Frank S.L. Russkoe mirovozzrenie / Vstup. st. A.A. Ermicheva. SPb.: Nauka, 1996
Leont'ev K.N. Vostok, Rossiya i slavyanstvo. Filosofskaya i politicheskaya publitsistika. M.: Respublika, 1996.
Belyy A. Simvolizm: Kniga statey. M.: Respublika, 2010.
Berdyaev N.A. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obshchestvennost'. SPb., 1907.
Kara-Murza A.A. Intellektual'nye portrety. Ocherki o russkikh politicheskikh myslitelyakh XIX-XX vv. M.: IF RAN, 2006.
Florovskiy G.V. Evraziyskiy soblazn // Mir Rossii – Evraziya. Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vvodnogo ocherka L.I. Novikova, I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 1995. S. 354-386.
Savitskiy P.N. Step' i osedlost' // Mir Rossii – Evraziya: Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vvodnogo ocherka L.I. Novikova, I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 1995. S. 58-67.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. Vzglyad na kul'turnye i politicheskie otnosheniya slavyanskogo mira k Germano-romanskomu. SPb., 1995.
Trubetskoy N.S. Obshcheevraziyskiy natsionalizm // Mir Rossii – Evraziya: Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vvodnogo ocherka L.I. Novikova, I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 1995. S. 190-201.
Evraziystvo. Opyt sistematicheskogo izlozheniya. Parizh, 1926.
Gippius Z. Dmitriy Merezhkovskiy. Parizh, 1957.
Levitskiy S.A. Ocherki po istorii russkoy filosofii. V 2-kh tt. T. 2. Dvadtsatyy vek. M., 1996. (http://azbyka.ru/library/levickij_ocherki_po_istorii_russkoj_filosofii.shtml#50).
Zen'kovskiy Russkie myslitelya i Evropa. M., 1997.
Veydle V.V. Granitsy Evropy // Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. M., 2001. S. 117-125.
Veydle V.V. Rossiya i Zapad // Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. M., 2001. S. 144-152.
Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. Razmyshleniya o sud'be literaturnogo i khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva // Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. M., 2001. S. 7-77.
Struve G. Russkaya literatura v izgnanii. 2-e izd. Parizh, 1984.
Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva / Sost. i avtor predisl. V.M. Tolmachev. M., 2001.
Solov'ev V.S. Natsional'nyy vopros v Rossii. Vyp. Pervyy // Solov'ev V.S. Sochineniya v 2-kh tt. T. 1. M., 1989. S. 259-397.

References (transliteration):
Frank S.L. Russkoe mirovozzrenie / Vstup. st. A.A. Ermicheva. SPb.: Nauka, 1996
Leont'ev K.N. Vostok, Rossiya i slavyanstvo. Filosofskaya i politicheskaya publitsistika. M.: Respublika, 1996.
Belyy A. Simvolizm: Kniga statey. M.: Respublika, 2010.
Berdyaev N.A. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obshchestvennost'. SPb., 1907.
Kara-Murza A.A. Intellektual'nye portrety. Ocherki o russkikh politicheskikh myslitelyakh XIX-XX vv. M.: IF RAN, 2006.
Florovskiy G.V. Evraziyskiy soblazn // Mir Rossii – Evraziya. Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vvodnogo ocherka L.I. Novikova, I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 1995. S. 354-386.
Savitskiy P.N. Step' i osedlost' // Mir Rossii – Evraziya: Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vvodnogo ocherka L.I. Novikova, I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 1995. S. 58-67.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. Vzglyad na kul'turnye i politicheskie otnosheniya slavyanskogo mira k Germano-romanskomu. SPb., 1995.
Trubetskoy N.S. Obshcheevraziyskiy natsionalizm // Mir Rossii – Evraziya: Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vvodnogo ocherka L.I. Novikova, I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 1995. S. 190-201.
Evraziystvo. Opyt sistematicheskogo izlozheniya. Parizh, 1926.
Gippius Z. Dmitriy Merezhkovskiy. Parizh, 1957.
Levitskiy S.A. Ocherki po istorii russkoy filosofii. V 2-kh tt. T. 2. Dvadtsatyy vek. M., 1996. (http://azbyka.ru/library/levickij_ocherki_po_istorii_russkoj_filosofii.shtml#50).
Zen'kovskiy Russkie myslitelya i Evropa. M., 1997.
Veydle V.V. Granitsy Evropy // Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. M., 2001. S. 117-125.
Veydle V.V. Rossiya i Zapad // Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. M., 2001. S. 144-152.
Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. Razmyshleniya o sud'be literaturnogo i khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva // Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva. M., 2001. S. 7-77.
Struve G. Russkaya literatura v izgnanii. 2-e izd. Parizh, 1984.
Veydle V.V. Umiranie iskusstva / Sost. i avtor predisl. V.M. Tolmachev. M., 2001.
Solov'ev V.S. Natsional'nyy vopros v Rossii. Vyp. Pervyy // Solov'ev V.S. Sochineniya v 2-kh tt. T. 1. M., 1989. S. 259-397.

Аннотация: The author develops and substantiates the concept of the co-existence of nations and ethnoses in the course of historical process. The author views nation and ethnos as essentially different social phenomena that have their peculiar genesis, socio-dynamic development and ontological grounds. According to the author, ontological differences between nation and ethnos are not always clearly seen based on the materials of the previous two or three centuries of the European history. These differences are much better seen based on the examples of the development of early political communities of the Ancient times and Classical Antiquity. According to the author, the periods of the rise and decline of a state institution has been evidently accompanied with the periodic (cyclic) actualization and de-actualization of ethnoses and ethnic identities. The periods of the progressive development and rise of political communities (state institutions and civilizations) have been accompanied with the cyclic weakening of ethnic groups and ethnic identity. The author offers the terms ‘early nation’ and ‘proto-nation’ to describe early political communities. The methodological base of the present research is the comparative social and philosophical analysis of the main theories and concepts of socio-genesis combined with the comparative study of the early forms of state institutions and social communities of the political genesis that were created by particular forms of state institutions and were different from the initial ethnic substrate. The fact that the early states had a developed system of evident class, estate and cast groups which genesis and reproduction were directly related to the state and governmental institutions allows to make an assumption that the early states also had a system-forming social community which genesis was also related to the political sphere. According to the author, these communities called ‘early nation’ or ‘proto-nation’ were created when the common social space of a traditional community was split and elites of warriors and hierophants became independent and led to the formation of political institutions. Early political communities started to differentiate from the early ethnos as a result of objective differentiation of different spheres of human existence. Early political communities that appeared as a result of the formation of the first urban localities as political, cultural and trading centers demonstrated a more obvious difference from the initial ethnic substrate that existed in the form of a traditional rural community. This proves the author’s hypothesis according to which national and ethnos are long-coexisting but at the same time esse ntially different social phenomena that have their peculiar genesis, socio-dynamic development and ontological grounds.

Ключевые слова: ethnos, nation, early nation, proto-nation, socio-genesis, globalization, primordialism, constructivism, ethnocultural fragmentation, state institution.

Контактная информация: Safonov Andrey Leonidovich, 115280, Russia, Moscow, Avtozavodskaya str. 16.

Библиография:
Safonov A.L. Natsiya i etnos, kak sushchnostno razlichnye sotsial'nye fenomeny: novaya paradigma sotsiogeneza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014.-№ 7.-S.1006-1012. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.7.12208
Safonov A.L., Orlov A.D. Etnos i natsiya kak sub'ekty globalizatsii.//Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya № 4, 2011, S 218-232, M., 2011
Safonov A.L. Globalizatsiya kak regress: ot natsional'nogo gosudarstva k etnosu?-Innovatsii v ekonomike, proektnom menedzhmente, obrazovanii, yurisprudentsii, sotsiologii, meditsine, ekologii, filosofii, psikhologii, fizike, tekhnike i matematike: sbornik statey po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 29-30 aprelya 2013 goda, g. Sankt-Peterburg.-SPb.: Izd-vo «Kul'tInformPress», 2013 – S. 207-212
Orlov A.D., Safonov A.L. Krizis natsional'nogo gosudarstva: globalizatsiya i nasledie «osevogo vremeni»// Vserossiyskaya nauchnaya konferentsiya «Nravstvennoe gosudarstvo kak imperativ gosudarstvennoy evolyutsii» Otdelenie obshchestvennykh nauk RAN. Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN, Institut nauchnoy informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN, Tsentr problemnogo analiza i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskogo proektirovaniya. Sektsiya «Aktual'nye problemy evolyutsii sovremennogo gosudarstva. – Moskva, 2011.-S. 25.
Orlov A.D. Identichnost' v usloviyakh globalizatsii: sotsial'no-gruppovoy podkhod-Innovatsii v ekonomike, proektnom menedzhmente, obrazovanii, yurisprudentsii, sotsiologii, meditsine, ekologii, filosofii, psikhologii, fizike, tekhnike i matematike: sbornik statey po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 29-30 aprelya 2013 goda, g. Sankt-Peterburg.-SPb.: Izd-vo «Kul'tInformPress», 2013 – S. 188-193
Safonov A.L. Osevoe Vremya-2: vozvrashchenie k istokam ili pogruzhenie vo t'mu? // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 14 (Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya). – Ulan-Ude, 2012, S.34-42.
Safonov A.L. Natsional'noe i etnicheskoe: fenomen odnovremennogo uchastiya //Mezhnatsional'nye i mezhkonfessional'nye otnosheniya v usloviyakh globalizatsii: sb. nauchnykh trudov v 2 ch. Ch.1/ nauch. red. D.Sh. Tsyrendorzhievoy. – Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo Buryatskogo gosuniversiteta. 2012, S 13-16
Orlov A.D. Safonov A.L. Sotsial'naya priroda etnicheskoy i natsional'noy identichnosti v kontekste globalizatsii // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 6 (Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya). – Ulan-Ude, 2013, S.5-9.
Safonov A.L. Natsiya i etnos v kotle globalizatsii – Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, №1, 2013,S 273-289, Moskva,2013
Safonov A.L. Atributy globalizatsii – Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 14a (Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya). – Ulan-Ude, 2012, S.32-39
M. B. Bekbosynov Etnopoliticheskie problemy
razvitiya rossiyskogo federalizma // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 12. - C. 102 - 108.

References (transliteration):
Safonov A.L. Natsiya i etnos, kak sushchnostno razlichnye sotsial'nye fenomeny: novaya paradigma sotsiogeneza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014.-№ 7.-S.1006-1012. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.7.12208
Safonov A.L., Orlov A.D. Etnos i natsiya kak sub'ekty globalizatsii.//Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya № 4, 2011, S 218-232, M., 2011
Safonov A.L. Globalizatsiya kak regress: ot natsional'nogo gosudarstva k etnosu?-Innovatsii v ekonomike, proektnom menedzhmente, obrazovanii, yurisprudentsii, sotsiologii, meditsine, ekologii, filosofii, psikhologii, fizike, tekhnike i matematike: sbornik statey po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 29-30 aprelya 2013 goda, g. Sankt-Peterburg.-SPb.: Izd-vo «Kul'tInformPress», 2013 – S. 207-212
Orlov A.D., Safonov A.L. Krizis natsional'nogo gosudarstva: globalizatsiya i nasledie «osevogo vremeni»// Vserossiyskaya nauchnaya konferentsiya «Nravstvennoe gosudarstvo kak imperativ gosudarstvennoy evolyutsii» Otdelenie obshchestvennykh nauk RAN. Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN, Institut nauchnoy informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN, Tsentr problemnogo analiza i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskogo proektirovaniya. Sektsiya «Aktual'nye problemy evolyutsii sovremennogo gosudarstva. – Moskva, 2011.-S. 25.
Orlov A.D. Identichnost' v usloviyakh globalizatsii: sotsial'no-gruppovoy podkhod-Innovatsii v ekonomike, proektnom menedzhmente, obrazovanii, yurisprudentsii, sotsiologii, meditsine, ekologii, filosofii, psikhologii, fizike, tekhnike i matematike: sbornik statey po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 29-30 aprelya 2013 goda, g. Sankt-Peterburg.-SPb.: Izd-vo «Kul'tInformPress», 2013 – S. 188-193
Safonov A.L. Osevoe Vremya-2: vozvrashchenie k istokam ili pogruzhenie vo t'mu? // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 14 (Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya). – Ulan-Ude, 2012, S.34-42.
Safonov A.L. Natsional'noe i etnicheskoe: fenomen odnovremennogo uchastiya //Mezhnatsional'nye i mezhkonfessional'nye otnosheniya v usloviyakh globalizatsii: sb. nauchnykh trudov v 2 ch. Ch.1/ nauch. red. D.Sh. Tsyrendorzhievoy. – Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo Buryatskogo gosuniversiteta. 2012, S 13-16
Orlov A.D. Safonov A.L. Sotsial'naya priroda etnicheskoy i natsional'noy identichnosti v kontekste globalizatsii // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 6 (Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya). – Ulan-Ude, 2013, S.5-9.
Safonov A.L. Natsiya i etnos v kotle globalizatsii – Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, №1, 2013,S 273-289, Moskva,2013
Safonov A.L. Atributy globalizatsii – Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 14a (Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya). – Ulan-Ude, 2012, S.32-39
M. B. Bekbosynov Etnopoliticheskie problemy
razvitiya rossiyskogo federalizma // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 12. - C. 102 - 108.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the issues of creation and development of a civil society under the conditions of fast modernization. The author pays attention to the relation between these two processes and believes culture to be the uniting element between them. When the civil society is missing this element, social tension occurs and modernization processes slow down. The author of the present article appeals to the historical experience of Russia of the second half of the 19th — beginning of the 20th century and shows that during that period modernization of the country’s life style involved economic, institutional and socio-cultural transformations. That provided for a balanced and efficient modernization on one hand and the development of a civil society according to the pattern that was different from the European modernization and involved social and cultural factors. Civil society demonstrated itself through the development of zemstvos (district councils) which realized the self-government principle and self-organization principle under the control of the government. In parallel the author appeals to the history of the development of social philosophy of that period and demonstrates how the concepts of the law-governed state that were formed in the sphere of the Russian liberal thought (philosophy of law) including the concept of the legal socialism introduced by Kistyakov and Gessen with their idea of extended human rights influenced the practical implementation of modernization models and the process of the development of the Russian civil society. The author of the article also provides a full description of the features that defined the nature and directions of interaction in the opposition and consent with the state authorities. The author also views today’s issues of the development of the civil society and outlines the ‘painful points’ of this process. The author proves that it is necessary to view the aforesaid problems from the point of view of social philosophy.

Ключевые слова: modernization, state of law, power, civil society, self-government, culture, responsible freedom, commodity exchange, legal awareness, tolerance.

Контактная информация: Sizemskaya Irina Nikolaevna, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Volkhonka str., h. 14/1, bld. 5, room No. 427–428.

Библиография:
Khorina G.P. Demokratiya v sovremennoy rossiyskoy kul'ture: ideal i real'nost' // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-4.-C. 1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.4.6973. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_6973.html28. Sysoeva E.K.. Podgotovka reformy sistemy obrazovaniya 1864 g.: vlast' i obshchestvo. // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 45-57. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.1.12181
Novikov S.G. VOSPITANIE SUB'EKTA MODERNIZATsII ROSSII: VZGLYaD NA SOVREMENNUYu PROBLEMU SKVOZ' PRIZMU OPYTA 1920-1930-kh GODOV // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-4.-C. 54-73. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2013.4.10105. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_10105.html
V.A. Oseychuk Ob ideale i konstitutsionno-pravovom aspekte modernizatsii rossiyskogo gosudarstva // Pravo i politika.-2012.-12.-C. 1982-1989.
R. F. Aynutdinov Politologicheskie aspekty sovremennoy rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-9.-C. 21-30.
V. V. Shelokhaev Stolypinskiy tip modernizatsii Rossii // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-3.-C. 34-41.
Popov E.A., Maksimova S.G. Sovremennoe grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: problemy stanovleniya i regional'nogo razvitiya // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-1.-C. 1-20. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_38.html
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
Demetradze M.R. Problemy nesootvetstviya sotsiokul'turnoy politiki Rossii protsessov global'noy modernizatsii // Pravo i politika.-2014.-1.-C. 23-30. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.1.9546.
Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz modernizatsii: teorii, modeli, opyt / Otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M., 2013.
Chelovek i kul'tura v stanovlenii grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii. Materialy 2-y Vserossiyskoy konferentsii. Moskva-Tambov, 21-23 maya 2007 goda / Pod obshchey redaktsiey S.A. Nikol'skogo. M., 2008
Pirumova N.M. Zemskoe liberal'noe dvizhenie. M., 1977.
Problemy sotsiokul'turnoy modernizatsii regionov / Pod red. N.I. Lapina i L.A. Belyaevoy. M., 2013.
Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra. Nravstvennaya filosofiya // Solov'ev V.S. Soch.: v 2-kh tt. T. 1. M., 1988.
Novikova L.I., Sizemskaya I.N. Rossiyskie ritmy sotsial'noy istorii. M., 2004.
Petrazhitskiy Ya.V. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva. SPb., 1907.
Motroshilova N.V. Tsivilizatsiya i varvarstvo. M., 2010.
Neretina S., Ogurtsov A. Kontsepty politicheskoy kul'tury. M., 2011.
Novgorodtsev P.I. Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava. SPb., 2000.
Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava // Korkunov N.M. Izbrannoe. M., 2010.
Kul'tura imeet znache6nie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / Pod red. L. Kharrisa i S. Khantingtona. M., 2002.
Kistyakovskiy S.I. Sushchnost' gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Kistyakovskiy B.A. Izbrannoe. M., 2000.
Kistyakovskiy B.A. Gosudarstvo pravovoe i sotsialisticheskoe // Kistyakovskiy B.A. Izbrannoe. M., 2000.
Gessen S.I. Problemy pravovogo sotsializma // Gessen S.I. Izbrannoe. M., 2000.
Aristotel'. Politika. M., 2002.
Bibler V.S. O grazhdanskom obshchestve i obshchestvennom dogovore // Bibler V.S. Na granyakh logiki i kul'tury. M., 1997.
Valitskiy A. Intellektual'naya traditsiya dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1991. № 1.
Aksakov K.S. Zapiska «O vnutrennem sostoyanii Rossii», predstavlennaya Gosudaryu imperatoru Aleksandru II // Russkaya istoriosofiya. Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vstupitel'nogo ocherka L.I. Novikova i I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 2006.
Shapinskaya E.N.. Esteticheskoe vospitanie v sotsiokul'turnom kontekste sovremennoy Rossii: krizis tsennostey i puti ego preodoleniya. . // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2014.-№ 2.-C. 245-253. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.2.12299
Popov E.A. Kul'tura, obshchestvo i chelovek v ob'ektno-predmetnom pole sovremennoy sotsial'noy kul'turologii i sotsiologii kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.170-204. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.3.415. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_415.html
Popov E.A., Bobina G.S.. Sotsial'no-pravovye fenomeny i ikh osmyslenie v tsennostno-normativnoy sisteme rossiyskogo obshchestva. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 4-10. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.896

References (transliteration):
Khorina G.P. Demokratiya v sovremennoy rossiyskoy kul'ture: ideal i real'nost' // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-4.-C. 1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.4.6973. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_6973.html28. Sysoeva E.K.. Podgotovka reformy sistemy obrazovaniya 1864 g.: vlast' i obshchestvo. // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 45-57. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.1.12181
Novikov S.G. VOSPITANIE SUB'EKTA MODERNIZATsII ROSSII: VZGLYaD NA SOVREMENNUYu PROBLEMU SKVOZ' PRIZMU OPYTA 1920-1930-kh GODOV // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-4.-C. 54-73. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2013.4.10105. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_10105.html
V.A. Oseychuk Ob ideale i konstitutsionno-pravovom aspekte modernizatsii rossiyskogo gosudarstva // Pravo i politika.-2012.-12.-C. 1982-1989.
R. F. Aynutdinov Politologicheskie aspekty sovremennoy rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-9.-C. 21-30.
V. V. Shelokhaev Stolypinskiy tip modernizatsii Rossii // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-3.-C. 34-41.
Popov E.A., Maksimova S.G. Sovremennoe grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: problemy stanovleniya i regional'nogo razvitiya // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-1.-C. 1-20. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_38.html
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
Demetradze M.R. Problemy nesootvetstviya sotsiokul'turnoy politiki Rossii protsessov global'noy modernizatsii // Pravo i politika.-2014.-1.-C. 23-30. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.1.9546.
Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz modernizatsii: teorii, modeli, opyt / Otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M., 2013.
Chelovek i kul'tura v stanovlenii grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii. Materialy 2-y Vserossiyskoy konferentsii. Moskva-Tambov, 21-23 maya 2007 goda / Pod obshchey redaktsiey S.A. Nikol'skogo. M., 2008
Pirumova N.M. Zemskoe liberal'noe dvizhenie. M., 1977.
Problemy sotsiokul'turnoy modernizatsii regionov / Pod red. N.I. Lapina i L.A. Belyaevoy. M., 2013.
Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra. Nravstvennaya filosofiya // Solov'ev V.S. Soch.: v 2-kh tt. T. 1. M., 1988.
Novikova L.I., Sizemskaya I.N. Rossiyskie ritmy sotsial'noy istorii. M., 2004.
Petrazhitskiy Ya.V. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva. SPb., 1907.
Motroshilova N.V. Tsivilizatsiya i varvarstvo. M., 2010.
Neretina S., Ogurtsov A. Kontsepty politicheskoy kul'tury. M., 2011.
Novgorodtsev P.I. Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava. SPb., 2000.
Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava // Korkunov N.M. Izbrannoe. M., 2010.
Kul'tura imeet znache6nie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / Pod red. L. Kharrisa i S. Khantingtona. M., 2002.
Kistyakovskiy S.I. Sushchnost' gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Kistyakovskiy B.A. Izbrannoe. M., 2000.
Kistyakovskiy B.A. Gosudarstvo pravovoe i sotsialisticheskoe // Kistyakovskiy B.A. Izbrannoe. M., 2000.
Gessen S.I. Problemy pravovogo sotsializma // Gessen S.I. Izbrannoe. M., 2000.
Aristotel'. Politika. M., 2002.
Bibler V.S. O grazhdanskom obshchestve i obshchestvennom dogovore // Bibler V.S. Na granyakh logiki i kul'tury. M., 1997.
Valitskiy A. Intellektual'naya traditsiya dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1991. № 1.
Aksakov K.S. Zapiska «O vnutrennem sostoyanii Rossii», predstavlennaya Gosudaryu imperatoru Aleksandru II // Russkaya istoriosofiya. Antologiya / Sost. i avtory vstupitel'nogo ocherka L.I. Novikova i I.N. Sizemskaya. M., 2006.
Shapinskaya E.N.. Esteticheskoe vospitanie v sotsiokul'turnom kontekste sovremennoy Rossii: krizis tsennostey i puti ego preodoleniya. . // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2014.-№ 2.-C. 245-253. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.2.12299
Popov E.A. Kul'tura, obshchestvo i chelovek v ob'ektno-predmetnom pole sovremennoy sotsial'noy kul'turologii i sotsiologii kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.170-204. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.3.415. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_415.html
Popov E.A., Bobina G.S.. Sotsial'no-pravovye fenomeny i ikh osmyslenie v tsennostno-normativnoy sisteme rossiyskogo obshchestva. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 4-10. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.896

Аннотация: The authors of the article analyze tendencies in modern urban studies from the point of view of the controversion ‘rationally manageable — spontaneous’. The researchers offer their evaluation of such tendencies in urban development as de-urbanization, de-industrialization, comprehensive planning, legal regulation of economic issues and conversion of urban industrial enterprises. Evaluation of modern social phenomena are carried out based on the theory of the automated society offered by Adam Schaff. The tendencies and directions in the development of modern post-industrial city as these are viewed by the researchers demonstrate that there is a whole range of unsolved problems in modern urban studies. The direction of this socio-cultural dynamics is rather controversial and contradictory. According to the authors, only time will show which tendency — spontaneous development or planned development — prevails. There is only one thing which is quite clear though: today’s architects and architectonic experts have failed to control the spontaneous development or manage the processes that have been going on in cities over the last decades by engineering or municipal governance. We still have to answer the challenges of the industrial age.

Ключевые слова: social philosophy, architectonics, automated society, suburb migration, urbanization, conversion, de-industrialization, urban development, industrial city, post-industrial city.

Контактная информация: Boltaevsky Andrey Andreevich, 125080, Russia, Moscow, Volokamskoe schosse, h. 11.

Библиография:
Ellul J. Le bluff technologique. – P., Hachette, 1988. – 489 p.
Sakharov A. Postindustrial'nyy gorod. URL: http // www. club2050. ru // 2010 / 04 / postindustrial-city. Data obrashcheniya 20. 03. 2013.
Rossiya 2012: stat. spravochnik. – M.: Rosstat, 2012. – 59 s.
Mastera arkhitektury ob arkhitekture. Izbrannye otryvki iz pisem, statey, vystupleniy i traktatov / pod obshchey redaktsiey A.V. Ikonnikova, I.L. Matsa, G.M. Orlova. – M.: «Iskusstvo», 1972. – 610 s.
Park R. Gorod kak sotsial'naya laboratoriya // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2002. T. 2. № 3. S. 4.
Iudin A.A., Shpilev D.A. Sovremennaya nemetskaya sotsiologiya (Obzor). Problemy razvitiya goroda. – N. Novgorod: izd. NISOTs, 2010. – 58 s.
Gorod i izmeneniya klimata: napravleniya strategii. Global'nyy doklad o naselennykh punktakh 2011 goda. Sokrashchennaya versiya. Programma OON po naselennym punktam. – London, Vashington, 2011. URL: http // www. un. org / ga / habitat / docs. shtml. Data obrashcheniya 20. 03. 2013.
V SShA predlozhili uprazdnit' gorod Detroyt. URL: http // www. varjag – 2007. livegournal. com / 4069321. html. Data obrashcheniya 21. 03. 2013.
Vazhdaeva N. I tak i syak…// Itogi. Ezhenedel'nyy zhurnal. – 2012. – № 39. – S. 53 – 55.
Biryukov B.V. Strogost' terminologii i stil' myshleniya // Psikhologiya protsessov khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. L.: Nauka, 1980. S.261—265.
Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 301-350. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html
Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 4. - C. 301 - 350. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html

References (transliteration):
Ellul J. Le bluff technologique. – P., Hachette, 1988. – 489 p.
Sakharov A. Postindustrial'nyy gorod. URL: http // www. club2050. ru // 2010 / 04 / postindustrial-city. Data obrashcheniya 20. 03. 2013.
Rossiya 2012: stat. spravochnik. – M.: Rosstat, 2012. – 59 s.
Mastera arkhitektury ob arkhitekture. Izbrannye otryvki iz pisem, statey, vystupleniy i traktatov / pod obshchey redaktsiey A.V. Ikonnikova, I.L. Matsa, G.M. Orlova. – M.: «Iskusstvo», 1972. – 610 s.
Park R. Gorod kak sotsial'naya laboratoriya // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2002. T. 2. № 3. S. 4.
Iudin A.A., Shpilev D.A. Sovremennaya nemetskaya sotsiologiya (Obzor). Problemy razvitiya goroda. – N. Novgorod: izd. NISOTs, 2010. – 58 s.
Gorod i izmeneniya klimata: napravleniya strategii. Global'nyy doklad o naselennykh punktakh 2011 goda. Sokrashchennaya versiya. Programma OON po naselennym punktam. – London, Vashington, 2011. URL: http // www. un. org / ga / habitat / docs. shtml. Data obrashcheniya 20. 03. 2013.
V SShA predlozhili uprazdnit' gorod Detroyt. URL: http // www. varjag – 2007. livegournal. com / 4069321. html. Data obrashcheniya 21. 03. 2013.
Vazhdaeva N. I tak i syak…// Itogi. Ezhenedel'nyy zhurnal. – 2012. – № 39. – S. 53 – 55.
Biryukov B.V. Strogost' terminologii i stil' myshleniya // Psikhologiya protsessov khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. L.: Nauka, 1980. S.261—265.
Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 301-350. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html
Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 4. - C. 301 - 350. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html

Аннотация: The author of the article studies the problem of definition of the term ‘art’ in social philosophy. She analyzes the social and humanizing meaning of art and views factors of mutual interaction between art and society. According to the author, art is a special social world of sensual images created by using a particular form and material. This world can socialize and humanize, i.e. form a socially important personality. In art the world is felt through a dialogue and co-existence. Noteworthy that art is perceived as one’s experience and part of Self but not only the external image. Art directly influences our feelings and mind but this is not the only effect of art. Art influences one’s inner world through feelings, ‘gates of art’. Conclusions are made based on both theoretical sources and modern media technologies (the researcher carried out the survey on the Internet asking ‘Was the spiritual crisis of the society caused by art?’). From the point of view of the social and philosophical paradigm, art is a mean of interpersonal communication and the ‘personality-personality’ (subject-subject) coordinate system. It is the ‘dialogue of understanding’ being developed against the background of the historical development of the society. Social functions of art are in the fact that art is the dialogue between Self and You and co-existence of two personalities. This dialogue between an artist and the audience is the door to understanding, however, such understanding is not ‘complete’. It is an interpretation, experience of feelings and what an artist leaves for ‘co-creation’ or some kind of a ‘sensual area for interpretation’. Art is a personified intellectual social emotion, social ‘feeling of the thought’ and the ‘sixth sense’.

Ключевые слова: social philosophy, art, social, ‘feeling of the thought’, socialization, humanization, society, personality, dialogue, culture.

Контактная информация: Zakhovaeva Anna Georgievna, 153012, Russia, Ivanovo Region, Ivanovo, Sheremetevsky prospect 8.

Библиография:
Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. T.5.-M., 1970.
Rezhim dostupa: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/1434
Mamardashvili M.K. Problema cheloveka v filosofii. //Chelovecheskoe v cheloveke. –M., 1990.
Nemov R.S. Psikhologiya: V 2 kn. Kn. 1.-M., 1994.
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. M.: AO «Aspekt Press», 1994. .
Adorno T. Izbrannoe: sotsiologiya muzyki. M.-SPb., 1998.
Rerikh N.K. Vrata v budushchee. [Pezhim dostupa] culture-into-life.ru/…h/Rerih_Vrata_v_buduschee.doc
Rezhim dostupa: http://otvet.mail.ru/question/56055666/opros/ Otvety.Mail.ru (filosofiya), http://otvet.mail.ru/question/56119862/opros/ Otvety.Mail.ru (iskusstvo i kul'tura), http://otvet.mail.ru/question/56174959/ Otvety.Mail.ru (obshchestvo, politika).
Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo i obshchestvo: vinovato li iskusstvo v dukhovnom krizise obshchestva? Filosofiya i obshchestvo.№3. 2012. S. 79-84.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Degumanizatsiya iskusstva. // Samosoznanie evropeyskoy kul'tury KhKh veka. M., 1991.
Vygotskiy L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1968.
Bolee podrobno avtor rassmatrivaet etu problemu v rabotakh: Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo i ego gumaniziruyushchaya rol'. M.:«Mezhdunarodnaya pedagogicheskaya akademiya».2001. 141s.; Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo: sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz. M.: KomKniga. 2005. 208 s.; Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo kak gumaniziruyushchiy fenomen: sotsial'no-filosofskaya traktovka. 2005 god. (doktorskaya dissertatsiya).
Bakhtin M.M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve. Raboty 1920-kh godov. Kiev. 1994.
Buber M. Ya i Ty. [Pezhim dostupa] http://modernlib.ru/books/martin_buber/ya_i_ti/read/

References (transliteration):
Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. T.5.-M., 1970.
Rezhim dostupa: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/1434
Mamardashvili M.K. Problema cheloveka v filosofii. //Chelovecheskoe v cheloveke. –M., 1990.
Nemov R.S. Psikhologiya: V 2 kn. Kn. 1.-M., 1994.
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. M.: AO «Aspekt Press», 1994. .
Adorno T. Izbrannoe: sotsiologiya muzyki. M.-SPb., 1998.
Rerikh N.K. Vrata v budushchee. [Pezhim dostupa] culture-into-life.ru/…h/Rerih_Vrata_v_buduschee.doc
Rezhim dostupa: http://otvet.mail.ru/question/56055666/opros/ Otvety.Mail.ru (filosofiya), http://otvet.mail.ru/question/56119862/opros/ Otvety.Mail.ru (iskusstvo i kul'tura), http://otvet.mail.ru/question/56174959/ Otvety.Mail.ru (obshchestvo, politika).
Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo i obshchestvo: vinovato li iskusstvo v dukhovnom krizise obshchestva? Filosofiya i obshchestvo.№3. 2012. S. 79-84.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Degumanizatsiya iskusstva. // Samosoznanie evropeyskoy kul'tury KhKh veka. M., 1991.
Vygotskiy L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1968.
Bolee podrobno avtor rassmatrivaet etu problemu v rabotakh: Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo i ego gumaniziruyushchaya rol'. M.:«Mezhdunarodnaya pedagogicheskaya akademiya».2001. 141s.; Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo: sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz. M.: KomKniga. 2005. 208 s.; Zakhovaeva A.G. Iskusstvo kak gumaniziruyushchiy fenomen: sotsial'no-filosofskaya traktovka. 2005 god. (doktorskaya dissertatsiya).
Bakhtin M.M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve. Raboty 1920-kh godov. Kiev. 1994.
Buber M. Ya i Ty. [Pezhim dostupa] http://modernlib.ru/books/martin_buber/ya_i_ti/read/

Аннотация: The author of the article analyzes economic culture as an object of social and philosophical reflection. Based on the legacy of classical philosophers, the author tries to define the nature of interaction between cultural and economic spheres of social life and describe this interaction as an individual branch of social reality. This becomes possible after the author explains the distinction between culture and economy and emphasizes economic culture as the connecting link between culture and economy. The author also describes functions of the esthetical in culture and touches upon the origin of the myth and ritual as well as their role in the genesis of religion and their connection with the public production. Moreover, the author describes the nature of values, their connection with labor and material and spiritual displays. The results of the author’s research prove the economic approach to have its own limits and therefore not allowing to take into account all the variety of determinants of the economic relations in a society. The author also emphasizes the need for philosophical reflection in solving economic issues.

Ключевые слова: economic culture, values, production, labor, experience, esthetic, economics, life, spirit, harmonization.

Контактная информация: Lopatkin German Vasilievich, 424000, Russia, Yoshkar-Ola, pl. Lenina 1.

Библиография:
Rorti P. Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta, 1997.
Panferov K.N. Ekonomicheskaya kul'tura (sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz): Dis. … dokt. filos. nauk. M., 2000.
Nor A.V. Ekonomicheskaya kul'tura obshchestva: problemy teorii i metodologii: Dis. ... d. ekon. nauk. Rostov n/D., 2004.
Marks K. Kapital. Kniga Pervaya. Protsess proizvodstva kapitala. / K. Marks, F. Engel's Sochineniya: v 50 t. T. 23. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1960.
Kant I. Traktaty i pis'ma. M.: «Nauka», 1980.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M.: «Mysl'», 1990.
Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe: v 2 t. T. 1. M.: «Yurist», 1996.
Vitgenshteyn L. Filosofskie raboty. Chast' I. M.: «Gnozis», 1994.
Avtonomova N.S. Filosofskie problemy strukturnogo analiza v gumanitarnykh naukakh. M.: «Nauka», 1977.
Tkachev P.H. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 2. M.: «Mysl'», 1976.
Fikhte I. Fakty soznaniya. Naznachenie cheloveka. Haukouchenie. M.: AST, 2000.
Shitszin: Kniga pesen i gimnov. / Per. s kit. A.A. Shtukina. M.: Khud. lit., 1987

References (transliteration):
Rorti P. Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta, 1997.
Panferov K.N. Ekonomicheskaya kul'tura (sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz): Dis. … dokt. filos. nauk. M., 2000.
Nor A.V. Ekonomicheskaya kul'tura obshchestva: problemy teorii i metodologii: Dis. ... d. ekon. nauk. Rostov n/D., 2004.
Marks K. Kapital. Kniga Pervaya. Protsess proizvodstva kapitala. / K. Marks, F. Engel's Sochineniya: v 50 t. T. 23. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1960.
Kant I. Traktaty i pis'ma. M.: «Nauka», 1980.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M.: «Mysl'», 1990.
Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe: v 2 t. T. 1. M.: «Yurist», 1996.
Vitgenshteyn L. Filosofskie raboty. Chast' I. M.: «Gnozis», 1994.
Avtonomova N.S. Filosofskie problemy strukturnogo analiza v gumanitarnykh naukakh. M.: «Nauka», 1977.
Tkachev P.H. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 2. M.: «Mysl'», 1976.
Fikhte I. Fakty soznaniya. Naznachenie cheloveka. Haukouchenie. M.: AST, 2000.
Shitszin: Kniga pesen i gimnov. / Per. s kit. A.A. Shtukina. M.: Khud. lit., 1987

Аннотация: The author of the present article analyzes the main ideas shared by John Rawls in his book ‘A Theory of Justice’. John Rawl was one of the most famous modern philosophers who studied justice. The author of the article also studies the principles of distributive justice. The author also provides a brief analysis of the main ideas and conclusions made by Rawls in his later theory of political liberalism. The author views Rawls’ views as reflecting the reality of the modern society and tries to find particular points in Rawls’ theory that could have been used for the implementation of the principles of justice in the modern society. The author studies the problem of justice from the point of view of the unity of all spheres of social life, causal and functional relations and interconnection of needs, interests and values. Rawls’ theory is viewed as the ‘contract theory’. Theoretical ground of Rawls’ theory of justice is the deontological liberalism. Rawls’ theory has certain advantages, for example, his recommended measures to achieve the social consent, and disadvantages: the author does not see any interdependence between the must and the benefit, needs, interests and values or relation between the main spheres of social life and economic and ideological relations in Rawls’ studies.

Ключевые слова: justice, freedom, equality, deontology, the must, needs, interests, values, benefit, social contract.

Контактная информация: Ismailov Nurmagomed Omarovich, 352901, Russia, Krasnodar Region, Armavir, ul. R. Luksemburg, d. 159.

Библиография:
O. V. Petrenko Kontseptsiya prav budushchikh pokoleniy v mezhdunarodnom i natsional'nom prave: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy // Pravo i politika.-2011.-12.-C. 2077-2083.
N.I. Kudrinskaya Aksiologicheskie osnovaniya spravedlivosti // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-1.-C. 71-79.
Lapaeva V.V. Privatizatsiya sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti: konstitutsionno-pravovoy i filosofsko-pravovoy analiz // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-2.-C. 1-46. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.2.10985. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10985.html
Ezeeva I.R. Neravenstva dokhodov v Rossii // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie.-2013.-3.-C. 1-6. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.3.8837. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_8837.html
Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 301-350. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.661. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html
G.Yu. Kanarsh Teoriya spravedlivosti v zerkale natsional'nogo kharaktera (o nekotorykh zapadnykh i rossiyskikh osobennostyakh moral'nogo myshleniya). // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-11.-C. 93-102.
Lapaeva V.V. Privatizatsiya sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti kak konstitutsionno-pravovaya problema // Pravo i politika.-2014.-2.-C. 140-152. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10901.
Rawls J., Political Liberalism. New-York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Rawls J., A Theory of Justice || «Social Justice and Distribution». New-York, 1978, p. 18 – 52.
Rolz D. Teoriya spravedlivosti. – Novosibirsk, Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta. 1995. 536 s.
Lessnoff M. H., Capitalism, Socialism and Justice / «Social Justice and Distribution». New-York, 1978, p. 139-149.
Kovalev A.M. Spravedlivoe obshchestvo – utopiya ili vozmozhnost'. M., Sovremennye tetradi, 2005. – 698 s.
Ismailov N. O. Spravedlivost' kak mera ravenstva // Sotsiologiya vlasti. M., 2009, № 8. S. 95-103.
Kashnikov B. N. Liberal'nye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii. – Velikiy Novgorod, NovGu. 2004. – 260 s.
Ismailov N. O. K voprosu o sootnoshenii spravedlivosti i nravstvennosti // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki.-Rostov-na-Donu, 2010, № 1. S. 25 – 29.
Guseynov A. A. Chto takoe etika nenasiliya? // Idei nenasiliya v XXI veke: Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo gos. tekh. un-ta, 2006. S. 10–18.
Gavrilova I. N. Zapadnye traktovki sotsial'noy spravedlivosti: obzor kontseptsiy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 3. S. 36-44.
S. E. Samenkova. Spravedlivost': ideya, norma, real'nost'. // Pravo i politika.-2012.-№ 8.-C. 1400-1404.

References (transliteration):
O. V. Petrenko Kontseptsiya prav budushchikh pokoleniy v mezhdunarodnom i natsional'nom prave: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy // Pravo i politika.-2011.-12.-C. 2077-2083.
N.I. Kudrinskaya Aksiologicheskie osnovaniya spravedlivosti // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-1.-C. 71-79.
Lapaeva V.V. Privatizatsiya sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti: konstitutsionno-pravovoy i filosofsko-pravovoy analiz // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-2.-C. 1-46. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.2.10985. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10985.html
Ezeeva I.R. Neravenstva dokhodov v Rossii // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie.-2013.-3.-C. 1-6. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.3.8837. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_8837.html
Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 301-350. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.661. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html
G.Yu. Kanarsh Teoriya spravedlivosti v zerkale natsional'nogo kharaktera (o nekotorykh zapadnykh i rossiyskikh osobennostyakh moral'nogo myshleniya). // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-11.-C. 93-102.
Lapaeva V.V. Privatizatsiya sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti kak konstitutsionno-pravovaya problema // Pravo i politika.-2014.-2.-C. 140-152. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10901.
Rawls J., Political Liberalism. New-York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Rawls J., A Theory of Justice || «Social Justice and Distribution». New-York, 1978, p. 18 – 52.
Rolz D. Teoriya spravedlivosti. – Novosibirsk, Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta. 1995. 536 s.
Lessnoff M. H., Capitalism, Socialism and Justice / «Social Justice and Distribution». New-York, 1978, p. 139-149.
Kovalev A.M. Spravedlivoe obshchestvo – utopiya ili vozmozhnost'. M., Sovremennye tetradi, 2005. – 698 s.
Ismailov N. O. Spravedlivost' kak mera ravenstva // Sotsiologiya vlasti. M., 2009, № 8. S. 95-103.
Kashnikov B. N. Liberal'nye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii. – Velikiy Novgorod, NovGu. 2004. – 260 s.
Ismailov N. O. K voprosu o sootnoshenii spravedlivosti i nravstvennosti // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki.-Rostov-na-Donu, 2010, № 1. S. 25 – 29.
Guseynov A. A. Chto takoe etika nenasiliya? // Idei nenasiliya v XXI veke: Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo gos. tekh. un-ta, 2006. S. 10–18.
Gavrilova I. N. Zapadnye traktovki sotsial'noy spravedlivosti: obzor kontseptsiy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 3. S. 36-44.
S. E. Samenkova. Spravedlivost': ideya, norma, real'nost'. // Pravo i politika.-2012.-№ 8.-C. 1400-1404.

Аннотация: The present article is devoted to the analysis of theoretical concepts of Eurasian philosophy on the phenomenon of violence. The main issue in focus is the theoretical concept about the difference of Western and Eurasian civilizations as introduced by the followers of Eurasianism. The author of the article underlines the theoretical importance and potential of Eurasianism philosophical ideas in further researches of the phenomenon of violence in a modern society. Violence in a modern society continues to be an extremely topical issue and very important field of research. Russian philosophers have already tried to explain why images of violence are so spread in popular culture and acts of violence are so frequent in everyday life. Eurasian concept of violence being related to the core civilization processes raises new issues and creates new perspectives for their solutions. It is quite obvious that further researches in this sphere should necessarily take into account all the ideas and concepts offered by classical Eurasianism and developed by traditional Russian philosophy.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Eurasianism, civilization, violence, culture, intuition, phenomenon, solution, life, issues in focus.

Контактная информация: Bocharova Viktoria Viktorovna, Russia 399770, Lipetsk Region, Yelets, ul. Kommunarov 28.

Библиография:
Avanesova G.A. Osobennosti evraziyskogo analiza kul'tury // Nauka o kul'ture: Itogi i perspektivy. M., 1998. Vyp. 4. S. 28-50.
Vandalkovskaya M. G. Istoricheskaya nauka rossiyskoy emigratsii: "evraziyskiy soblazn". M., 1997. S. 248-307.
Vanchugov V. V. Status filosofii v evraziyskom dvizhenii.-Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya "Filosofiya". M., 1999, № 1, S.64-75. S izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami v sbornike: "Evraziyskaya ideya i sovremennost'". M., 2002, S. 104-120.
Dugin A.G Preodolenie zapada [Elektronnyy resurs]: Filosofskiy portal «Arktogeya» rezhim dostupa: http://arcto.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=937 (data obrashcheniya 14.03.13)
Kal'sin M. G. Dvizhenie evraziytsev pervoy poloviny 20-kh godov: Opyt osmysleniya fenomena Rossii // Traditsii russkoy istoricheskoy mysli: Istoriofilosofiya. M., 1997. S. 50-76.
Karsavin L.P. Fenomenologiya revolyutsii // Klyuchnikov S. Russkiy uzel evraziystva. Vostok v russkoy mysli. Sbornik trudov evraziytsev. – M.: Belovod'e, 1997. – C. 141-201.
Klyuchnikov S. Russkiy uzel evraziystva. Vostok v russkoy mysli. Sbornik trudov evraziytsev. – M.: Belovod'e, 1997. – 525 s.
Kolesnichenko Yu.V. Lichnost' v evraziystve. Gnoseologicheskie osnovaniya. – M.: Al'fa-M, 2008. – 144 s.
Melikh Yu.B. Personalizm L.P. Karsavina i evropeyskaya filosofiya. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. – 272 s.
Ozhogin V. I. Paradigma evraziyskoy kul'turosofii // Evraziya: kul'turnoe nasledie drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. Novosibirsk, 1999. Vyp. 1. Kul'turnyy kosmos Evrazii. S. 6-17.
Savitskiy P.N. Evraziystvo // Klyuchnikov S. Russkiy uzel evraziystva. Vostok v russkoy mysli. Sbornik trudov evraziytsev. – M.: Belovod'e, 1997.-C. 76-94.
Bassin M. Classical Eurasianism And The Geopolitics of Russian Identity [Elektronnyy resurs]: www.cesran.org rezhim dostupa: http://www.cesran.org/Dosyalar/MAKALELER/MARK_BASSIN_CLASSICAL_EURASIANISM_AND_THE_GEOPOLITICS_OF_RUSSIAN_IDENTITY.pdf (data obrashcheniya 17.04.13)

References (transliteration):
Avanesova G.A. Osobennosti evraziyskogo analiza kul'tury // Nauka o kul'ture: Itogi i perspektivy. M., 1998. Vyp. 4. S. 28-50.
Vandalkovskaya M. G. Istoricheskaya nauka rossiyskoy emigratsii: "evraziyskiy soblazn". M., 1997. S. 248-307.
Vanchugov V. V. Status filosofii v evraziyskom dvizhenii.-Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya "Filosofiya". M., 1999, № 1, S.64-75. S izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami v sbornike: "Evraziyskaya ideya i sovremennost'". M., 2002, S. 104-120.
Dugin A.G Preodolenie zapada [Elektronnyy resurs]: Filosofskiy portal «Arktogeya» rezhim dostupa: http://arcto.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=937 (data obrashcheniya 14.03.13)
Kal'sin M. G. Dvizhenie evraziytsev pervoy poloviny 20-kh godov: Opyt osmysleniya fenomena Rossii // Traditsii russkoy istoricheskoy mysli: Istoriofilosofiya. M., 1997. S. 50-76.
Karsavin L.P. Fenomenologiya revolyutsii // Klyuchnikov S. Russkiy uzel evraziystva. Vostok v russkoy mysli. Sbornik trudov evraziytsev. – M.: Belovod'e, 1997. – C. 141-201.
Klyuchnikov S. Russkiy uzel evraziystva. Vostok v russkoy mysli. Sbornik trudov evraziytsev. – M.: Belovod'e, 1997. – 525 s.
Kolesnichenko Yu.V. Lichnost' v evraziystve. Gnoseologicheskie osnovaniya. – M.: Al'fa-M, 2008. – 144 s.
Melikh Yu.B. Personalizm L.P. Karsavina i evropeyskaya filosofiya. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. – 272 s.
Ozhogin V. I. Paradigma evraziyskoy kul'turosofii // Evraziya: kul'turnoe nasledie drevnikh tsivilizatsiy. Novosibirsk, 1999. Vyp. 1. Kul'turnyy kosmos Evrazii. S. 6-17.
Savitskiy P.N. Evraziystvo // Klyuchnikov S. Russkiy uzel evraziystva. Vostok v russkoy mysli. Sbornik trudov evraziytsev. – M.: Belovod'e, 1997.-C. 76-94.
Bassin M. Classical Eurasianism And The Geopolitics of Russian Identity [Elektronnyy resurs]: www.cesran.org rezhim dostupa: http://www.cesran.org/Dosyalar/MAKALELER/MARK_BASSIN_CLASSICAL_EURASIANISM_AND_THE_GEOPOLITICS_OF_RUSSIAN_IDENTITY.pdf (data obrashcheniya 17.04.13)

Аннотация: The article concerns specific features of fundamental historic processes in Russia (colonization, modernization, globalization). The author singles out such specific features as: hypertrophy of historical subject, persistent lack of resources, climatic determination, stadial violations, discrete character of these processes, their fragmentary and non-systemic character, reversibility of results, excessive costs, growing heterogenic character of the area. The author also analyzes the problems of social and cultural determination of the fundamental social transformations, such as phenomena of Russian ascesis and fellow elders. Much attention is paid to the influence of pseudo-morphosis and pseudo-morphic type of development upon the fundamental historic processes in Russia. Finally, the article includes analysis of the secular element of global historical processes, as well as the changes, which hypothetical transition of Russia into the phase of post-secular development and de-secularization have caused. Finally, the author points out the failure of the direct historical optimism, since history contains much more ambiguous and paradoxical matters, than its followers may imagine. In the point of view of the author, Russia does not firmly follow the path of the progress, rather its development is sinusoidal, and at times spiral.

Ключевые слова: colonization, modernization, globalization, pseudo-morphosis, Russian ascesis, secularization, de-secularization, religion, church, progress.

Контактная информация: Korolev, Sergey Alekseevich, 119991, Russia, Moskva, ul. Volkhonka, d. 14/1, str. 5, komn. 432.

Библиография:
1. Ageev A.D. Sibir' i amerikanskiy Zapad: dvizhenie frontirov. M.: Aspekt-Press, 2005.
2. Brodel' F. Material'naya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV–XVIII vv. T. 1. Struktury po-
vsednevnosti: vozmozhnoe i nevozmozhnoe. M.: Ves' mir, 1986.
3. Bessoznatel'noe vlasti. Beseda s V.A. Podorogoy // Byurokratiya i obshchestvo / otv. red. S.A. Korolev.
M.: Filosofskoe obshchestvo SSSR, 1991.
4. Gaydar E.T. Gibel' imperii. Uroki dlya sovremennoy Rossii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006.
5. Garadzha V.I. Sotsiologiya religii. M.: INFRA-M, 2005.
6. Goncharov, Ioann, protoierey. Pochemu my otstaem ot «progressa»? // http://pravpiter.ru/pspb/n137/
ta016.htm
7. Ionin L. Novaya magicheskaya epokha // Logos. 2005. № 2.
8. Korolev S.A. Beskonechnoe prostranstvo. Geo-i sotsiograficheskie obrazy vlasti v Rossii. M.: IF
RAN, 1997.
9. Korolev S.A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiyskoy istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'-
tura. 2009. № 1.
10. Korolev S.A. Ot «Apostola» do «Arkhipelaga»: sotsiokul'turnye transformatsii v Rossii //
Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 1.
11. Korolev S.A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchay Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 6.
12. Korolev S.A. Sopas kak fenomen vlasti // Chelovek mezhdu Tsarstvom i Imperiey. Sbornik materi-
alov mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. M., 2003.
13. Kyrlezhev A. Postsekulyarnaya epokha // Kontinent. 2004. № 120.
14. Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / Pod
red. L. Kharrisona i S. Khantingtona. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2002.
15. Mel'kov A.S. Tserkovnaya reforma Petra I kak opyt gosudarstvennoy sekulyarizatsii // http://www.
hist.msu.ru/Science/LMNS2002/04.htm
16. Mezhduvlastie. Zigmunt Bauman beseduet s Vinchentso della Sala // Rossiya v global'noy politike.
2012. № 6.
17. Melioranskiy B. Sekulyarizatsiya v Rossii // Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' Brokgauza i Efrona.
T. XXIX.
18. Menyayushchayasya sotsial'nost': novye formy modernizatsii i progressa / otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M.:
IF RAN, 2010.
19. Milov L.V. Osobennosti istoricheskogo protsessa v Rossii // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk.
2003. T. 73. № 9.
20. Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya / Pod red. P. Bergera i S. Khantingtona. M.: Aspekt Press, 2004.
21. Morozov A. Religiya i politicheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Klyuch-S», 2004.
22. Savel'ev E.P. Drevnyaya istoriya kazachestva. M.: Veche, 2004
23. Sobolev S. Sekulyarizatsiya // http://www.archipelag.ru/geoculture/religions/religio-sekulario/
secularization/
24. Uzlaner D. Stanovlenie neoklassicheskoy modeli sekulyarizatsii v zapadnoy sotsiologii religii
vtoroy poloviny XX v. // Religiovedenie. 2008. № 2.
25. Khabermas Yu. Vera i znanie // Khabermas Yu. Budushchee chelovecheskoy prirody. M.: Ves' mir, 2002.
26. Khabermas Yu., Rattsinger Y. Dialektika sekulyarizatsii. O razume i religii. M.: Bibleysko-
bogoslovskiy institut sv. apostola Andreya, 2006.
27. Khantington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoy natsional'noy identichnosti. M.: AST, 2008.
28. Chelovek v ekonomike i drugikh sotsial'nykh sredakh / otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M.: IF RAN, 2008.
29. Bell D. The Sultural Sontradictions of Sapitalism. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1976.
30. Berger P.L., Berger B., Kellner H. The Homeless Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1974.
31. The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics (ed. P.L. Berger). Washington,
D. C.: Grand Rapids, 1999.
32. Huntington S. The Change to Change: Modernization, Development, and Politics // Comparative Politics.
Vol. 3. Issue 3 (Apr., 1971).
33. Luckman T. The Invisible Religion. N.Y.: Macmillan, 1966.
34. Parsons T. Religions and Economic Symbolism in the Western World // Religion’s Change and Continuity.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1979.
35. Robertson R. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. L.: Sage, 1992.
36. Wilson B. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979.

References (transliteration):
1. Ageev A.D. Sibir' i amerikanskiy Zapad: dvizhenie frontirov. M.: Aspekt-Press, 2005.
2. Brodel' F. Material'naya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV–XVIII vv. T. 1. Struktury po-
vsednevnosti: vozmozhnoe i nevozmozhnoe. M.: Ves' mir, 1986.
3. Bessoznatel'noe vlasti. Beseda s V.A. Podorogoy // Byurokratiya i obshchestvo / otv. red. S.A. Korolev.
M.: Filosofskoe obshchestvo SSSR, 1991.
4. Gaydar E.T. Gibel' imperii. Uroki dlya sovremennoy Rossii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006.
5. Garadzha V.I. Sotsiologiya religii. M.: INFRA-M, 2005.
6. Goncharov, Ioann, protoierey. Pochemu my otstaem ot «progressa»? // http://pravpiter.ru/pspb/n137/
ta016.htm
7. Ionin L. Novaya magicheskaya epokha // Logos. 2005. № 2.
8. Korolev S.A. Beskonechnoe prostranstvo. Geo-i sotsiograficheskie obrazy vlasti v Rossii. M.: IF
RAN, 1997.
9. Korolev S.A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiyskoy istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'-
tura. 2009. № 1.
10. Korolev S.A. Ot «Apostola» do «Arkhipelaga»: sotsiokul'turnye transformatsii v Rossii //
Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 1.
11. Korolev S.A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchay Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 6.
12. Korolev S.A. Sopas kak fenomen vlasti // Chelovek mezhdu Tsarstvom i Imperiey. Sbornik materi-
alov mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. M., 2003.
13. Kyrlezhev A. Postsekulyarnaya epokha // Kontinent. 2004. № 120.
14. Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / Pod
red. L. Kharrisona i S. Khantingtona. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2002.
15. Mel'kov A.S. Tserkovnaya reforma Petra I kak opyt gosudarstvennoy sekulyarizatsii // http://www.
hist.msu.ru/Science/LMNS2002/04.htm
16. Mezhduvlastie. Zigmunt Bauman beseduet s Vinchentso della Sala // Rossiya v global'noy politike.
2012. № 6.
17. Melioranskiy B. Sekulyarizatsiya v Rossii // Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' Brokgauza i Efrona.
T. XXIX.
18. Menyayushchayasya sotsial'nost': novye formy modernizatsii i progressa / otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M.:
IF RAN, 2010.
19. Milov L.V. Osobennosti istoricheskogo protsessa v Rossii // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk.
2003. T. 73. № 9.
20. Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya / Pod red. P. Bergera i S. Khantingtona. M.: Aspekt Press, 2004.
21. Morozov A. Religiya i politicheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Klyuch-S», 2004.
22. Savel'ev E.P. Drevnyaya istoriya kazachestva. M.: Veche, 2004
23. Sobolev S. Sekulyarizatsiya // http://www.archipelag.ru/geoculture/religions/religio-sekulario/
secularization/
24. Uzlaner D. Stanovlenie neoklassicheskoy modeli sekulyarizatsii v zapadnoy sotsiologii religii
vtoroy poloviny XX v. // Religiovedenie. 2008. № 2.
25. Khabermas Yu. Vera i znanie // Khabermas Yu. Budushchee chelovecheskoy prirody. M.: Ves' mir, 2002.
26. Khabermas Yu., Rattsinger Y. Dialektika sekulyarizatsii. O razume i religii. M.: Bibleysko-
bogoslovskiy institut sv. apostola Andreya, 2006.
27. Khantington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoy natsional'noy identichnosti. M.: AST, 2008.
28. Chelovek v ekonomike i drugikh sotsial'nykh sredakh / otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M.: IF RAN, 2008.
29. Bell D. The Sultural Sontradictions of Sapitalism. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1976.
30. Berger P.L., Berger B., Kellner H. The Homeless Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1974.
31. The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics (ed. P.L. Berger). Washington,
D. C.: Grand Rapids, 1999.
32. Huntington S. The Change to Change: Modernization, Development, and Politics // Comparative Politics.
Vol. 3. Issue 3 (Apr., 1971).
33. Luckman T. The Invisible Religion. N.Y.: Macmillan, 1966.
34. Parsons T. Religions and Economic Symbolism in the Western World // Religion’s Change and Continuity.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1979.
35. Robertson R. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. L.: Sage, 1992.
36. Wilson B. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979.

Аннотация: The article contains an attempt to reveal nature, causes and forms of processes of de-individualization of a human being in the situation of global social and anthropological crisis. A human being in a modern age becomes dependent upon various forms of de-individualization (political, economic, media, religious, everyday). The variety of economic offers and political pluralism do not guarantee individual freedom. Rather, they mask the lack of freedom. The thinkers, who wrote about de-individualization of a human being pointed out that the main reason for it was lack of ability and wish to follow the high values. Aiming solely for success, an individual cannot find himself. Neither hypertrorphy Ego, nor dissolved Ego may bring happiness to a person. Such a tragic alternative serves as a basis for deviations, which are so common in the modern society. The nature of the de-individualization processes is that mass society forces a person to make his personality into the means for achieving success, which makes self-development a secondary factor.

Ключевые слова: global social and anthropological crisis, human individuality, alienation, manipulation, freedom, dialogue, Fromm, Ortega-i-Gasset, Heyzinga, Buber, Markuze.

Контактная информация: Frolova, Maria Ivanovna, 127137, Russia, Moskva, ul. Pravdy, d. 26.

Библиография:
1. Anchel E. Mify potryasennogo soznaniya. M., 1979.
2. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. M., 2000.
3. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. M., 1990.
4. Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. 2-izd. T. 42.
5. Markuze G. Odnomernyy chelovek. M., 1994.
6. Mun'e E. Personalizm. M., 1992.
7. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Degumanizatsiya iskusstva. M., 1991.
8. Fromm E. Psikhoanaliz i etika. M., 1993.
9. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. M., 1990.
10. Fromm E. Muzhchina i zhenshchina. M., 1998.
11. Kheyzinga Y. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya. M., 1992.
12. Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1994.
13. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M., 1991.

References (transliteration):
1. Anchel E. Mify potryasennogo soznaniya. M., 1979.
2. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. M., 2000.
3. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. M., 1990.
4. Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. 2-izd. T. 42.
5. Markuze G. Odnomernyy chelovek. M., 1994.
6. Mun'e E. Personalizm. M., 1992.
7. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Degumanizatsiya iskusstva. M., 1991.
8. Fromm E. Psikhoanaliz i etika. M., 1993.
9. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. M., 1990.
10. Fromm E. Muzhchina i zhenshchina. M., 1998.
11. Kheyzinga Y. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya. M., 1992.
12. Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1994.
13. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M., 1991.