Аннотация: In the context of the philosophy of M. Bakhtin and M. Heidegger, this article demonstrates the conditions of establishment of the authorship responsible for its creative work and life action in general. The understanding of its own wholeness separated from everything else, as well as the presence of interconnected boundaries, suggests the presence of the author of the composition and responsible life. Authorship represents self-establishment in unity of responsibility and claiming yourself through the action. The phenomenon of the visual illustration of a book is being views as the example of presence or absence of the visible boundaries between semantic worlds. The article uses the method of intermediate analysis aimed at determination of various ways of interaction of heterogeneous creative discourses in space of their conceptual intersection; hermeneutic method of understanding and interpretation of the test, as well as the “dialogical” concept of M. M. Bakhtin for detection of the organic interlink of the visual practices with the language and style. This work is first to attempt to signify the general core of M. Bakhtin’s philosophy through the “author-interpreter-reader” link. The author introduces the notion of “fractal” into the philosophical circulation, which defines the structure of interpretation of a text. The conclusion is made that the authorship of the word and image leads to the mutual enrichments and responsible creative position; while the anonymity leads to simplification, blurring of the boundaries, and irresponsibility.

Ключевые слова: Dialogue, Kunstdasein, Dasein, Philosophy of illustration, Cognition, Author, Interpretation, Fractal, Language, Text

Библиография:
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: Per. s nem. – M.: Respublika, 1993.
Yung K. Pis'ma. URL: http://castalia.ru/perewody/karl-gustav-yung-perevody/2757-karl-gustav-yung-pisma-ot-1935-g.html.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike./Per. s fr. vstup. st. i komment. I.S. Vdovinoy. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008.
Bibikhin V. Germenevtika. URL: http://www.bibikhin.ru/germenevtika.
Bakhtin M. K filosofii postupka. URL: https://vk.com/doc280125750_353419680?hash=6003dcfdb62201a574&dl=8f8c35a2ae15b93a05.
Ordine N. Granitsa teni. Literatura, filosofiya i zhivopis' u Dzhordano Bruno. – SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2008.
Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1979.
Abdrashitova I.V. Prolegomeny k filosofii illyustratsii. // Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta «Kul'tura. Filosofiya. Istoriya. Pravo». 2015. – №3. – S. 5-19.
Gurevich P.S. Muki dialoga (o tvorchestve M.M. Bakhtina). // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2011. - №2. - C. 63 - 71. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=15019.

References (transliteration):
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: Per. s nem. – M.: Respublika, 1993.
Yung K. Pis'ma. URL: http://castalia.ru/perewody/karl-gustav-yung-perevody/2757-karl-gustav-yung-pisma-ot-1935-g.html.
Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike./Per. s fr. vstup. st. i komment. I.S. Vdovinoy. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008.
Bibikhin V. Germenevtika. URL: http://www.bibikhin.ru/germenevtika.
Bakhtin M. K filosofii postupka. URL: https://vk.com/doc280125750_353419680?hash=6003dcfdb62201a574&dl=8f8c35a2ae15b93a05.
Ordine N. Granitsa teni. Literatura, filosofiya i zhivopis' u Dzhordano Bruno. – SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2008.
Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1979.
Abdrashitova I.V. Prolegomeny k filosofii illyustratsii. // Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta «Kul'tura. Filosofiya. Istoriya. Pravo». 2015. – №3. – S. 5-19.
Gurevich P.S. Muki dialoga (o tvorchestve M.M. Bakhtina). // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2011. - №2. - C. 63 - 71. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=15019.

Аннотация: In his article Tyugashev reconstructs Hume's model of philosophy taking into account the importance of the practical aspect of Hume's philosophy which is expressed in the orientation at reformation of philosophy based on empirism and application of the experimental approach. The fundamental provision is Hume's concept of human as an intelligent, active and social creature. As a result of imperfection and limitation of human mind, it is necessary to prove philosophical insights by the facts of everyday life and philosophical conclusions should be evaluated from the point of view of social consequences of their practical implementation. Hume outlined the practical turn of metaphilosophy towards the provisions of ancient philosophy when spiritual and practical aspects of philosophy were integral. The author of the article reconstructs David Hume's metaphilosophy by using the socio-philosophical model of the genesis of spiritual activity according to which particular branches of philosophy (science, art, religion, mythology, etc.) are being viewed as a result of the reflection of social practice. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author defines and systematizes David Hume's views on the structure of philosophy as a spiritual activity constituting part of social life. The author shows that David Hume differentiated between fundamental philosophy and applied philosophy, philosophical theory and empirical philosophy (observational and experimental philosophies) and described everyday philosophy, popular philosophy and folk philosophy which conclusions proved to be true in the course of social progress. 

Ключевые слова: Hume, metaphilosophy, practical philosophy, applied philosophy, empirical philosophy, experimental philosophy, philosophy, folk philosophy, pragmatic turn, practice

Библиография:
Experimental Moral Philosophy // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/experimental-moral.
Livingston D.W. Hume’s Philosophy of Common Life.-Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 485 p.
Yum D. Estestvennaya istoriya religiy // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 2.-S. 3¬15-378.
Fofanov V.P. Sotsial'naya deyatel'nost' i teoreticheskoe otrazhenie.-Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.-189 s.
Yum D. O vozniknovenii i razvitii iskusstv i nauk // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 2.-S. 537¬-560.
Stepin V. S. Filosofiya // Entsiklopediya epistemolopsh i filosofii nauki. — M: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009.-S. 1050-1053.
Livingston D.W. Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium: Hume’s Pathology of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. 433p.
Yum D. Traktat o chelovecheskoy prirode, ili popytka primenit' osnovannyy na opyte metod rassuzhdeniya k moral'nym predmetam // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 1.-S. 53-656.
Yum D. Issledovanie o chelovecheskom poznanii // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 2.-S. 3¬-144.
Wiley J. Theory and practice in the philosophy of David Hume.-Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.-328 p.
Borisov E.V., Inishev I.N., Furs V.N. Prakticheskiy povorot v postmetafizicheskoy filosofii.-Vil'nyus: Izd-vo Evropeyskogo gumanitarnogo un-ta, 2008.-212 s.
Philosophy as a Way of Life: Ancients and Moderns / Ed. by M. Chase, S. R. L. Clark, M. McGhee.-Wiley Blackwell, 2013.-340 p.
Savkin N.S. Prikladnaya filosofiya: predmet, struktura, funktsiya // Gumanitariy. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnoy nauki i obrazovaniya.-2010.-№ 1.-S. 4-10.
Rehabilitierung der Praktischen Philosophie. 2 Bände / M. Riedel (Hrsg.).-Freiburg im Br. 1972/74.
Prinz J.J. Empirical Philosophy and Experimental Philosophy // Experimental philosophy.-N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008. P. 189-208.
Delez Zh. Empirizm i sub'ektivnost': opyt o chelovecheskoy prirode po Yumu. Kriticheskaya filosofiya Kanta: uchenie o sposobnostyakh. Bergsonizm. Spinoza.-M.: PER SE, 2001.-480 s.
Porus V.N. Filosofiya — prostranstvo svobody // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-№ 7.-S. 62-71.
Tyugashev E.A. Filosofiya kak opyt svobody // Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Filosofiya.-2012.-Vyp. 4.-S. 46-51

References (transliteration):
Experimental Moral Philosophy // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/experimental-moral.
Livingston D.W. Hume’s Philosophy of Common Life.-Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 485 p.
Yum D. Estestvennaya istoriya religiy // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 2.-S. 3¬15-378.
Fofanov V.P. Sotsial'naya deyatel'nost' i teoreticheskoe otrazhenie.-Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.-189 s.
Yum D. O vozniknovenii i razvitii iskusstv i nauk // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 2.-S. 537¬-560.
Stepin V. S. Filosofiya // Entsiklopediya epistemolopsh i filosofii nauki. — M: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009.-S. 1050-1053.
Livingston D.W. Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium: Hume’s Pathology of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. 433p.
Yum D. Traktat o chelovecheskoy prirode, ili popytka primenit' osnovannyy na opyte metod rassuzhdeniya k moral'nym predmetam // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 1.-S. 53-656.
Yum D. Issledovanie o chelovecheskom poznanii // Yum D. Sochineniya v 2 t.-M.: Mysl', 1996.-T. 2.-S. 3¬-144.
Wiley J. Theory and practice in the philosophy of David Hume.-Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.-328 p.
Borisov E.V., Inishev I.N., Furs V.N. Prakticheskiy povorot v postmetafizicheskoy filosofii.-Vil'nyus: Izd-vo Evropeyskogo gumanitarnogo un-ta, 2008.-212 s.
Philosophy as a Way of Life: Ancients and Moderns / Ed. by M. Chase, S. R. L. Clark, M. McGhee.-Wiley Blackwell, 2013.-340 p.
Savkin N.S. Prikladnaya filosofiya: predmet, struktura, funktsiya // Gumanitariy. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnoy nauki i obrazovaniya.-2010.-№ 1.-S. 4-10.
Rehabilitierung der Praktischen Philosophie. 2 Bände / M. Riedel (Hrsg.).-Freiburg im Br. 1972/74.
Prinz J.J. Empirical Philosophy and Experimental Philosophy // Experimental philosophy.-N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008. P. 189-208.
Delez Zh. Empirizm i sub'ektivnost': opyt o chelovecheskoy prirode po Yumu. Kriticheskaya filosofiya Kanta: uchenie o sposobnostyakh. Bergsonizm. Spinoza.-M.: PER SE, 2001.-480 s.
Porus V.N. Filosofiya — prostranstvo svobody // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-№ 7.-S. 62-71.
Tyugashev E.A. Filosofiya kak opyt svobody // Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Filosofiya.-2012.-Vyp. 4.-S. 46-51

Аннотация: The research subject is the quantum world being formed and the fact that there are no concepts that could describe it. The quantum world is replacing the classical world and post-modern world. The classical world was based on the philosophy of Enlightenment. The post-modern world is based on the ideas of post-modernistic philosophy. However, at the present moment there are no concepts that could constitute the paradigm of the quantum world. The quantum world is described as the world that denies universal standards and questions the common sense. 'Quantum' means a strange, difficult, instable, uncertain and multidimensional world. The quantum world brings a whole number of actors to the international arena and all these actors follow their own interests. The author of the article makes an attempt to outline the countours of the quantum concept through the analysis of the problems creating it. 
The research method is the modeling. Taking into account that the quantum world hasn't been formed yet, it is partly viewed as a 'black box' which can be studied only through analyzing the arising problems. The author of the article also uses the idealization method when the aising problems are deliberately exaggerated. The scientific novelty of the article is caused by the fact that the countours of the quantum world are outlined by analyzing these problems and related values. In particular, the author describes the following properties of the quantum world: instability, uncertainty, multidimensionality and artificial nature of the quantum world. These properties create problems that have important social consequences. The author also underlines that the quantum world can change the system of values completely. The quantum world means a transfer to post-economic values and 'new seriosity'. All this would certainly change the life style of people as well.  

Ключевые слова: classical world, post-modern world, instability, multidimensionality, innovations, superposition, post-economic world, artificial world, new seriosity, creativity

Библиография:
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Problema formirovaniya innovatsionnoy lichnosti v sovremennom obshchestve // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika.-2013.-8.-C. 21-70. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_10493.html
V.Ya. Yakovlev Metafizika bytiya prirody i cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-9.-C. 7-16.
Wolf M. A much-maligned engine of innovations.// Financial Times, August 4,2013.
Yong S. Why Obama's Brain-Mapping Project Matters.//MIT Tecnology Review, April 8, 2013.[rezhim dostupa:www.technologyreview.com/nes/513011/why-obama-brain-mapping-project-matters].
M. V. Shugurov Innovatsionnoe razvitie v sovremennom mire: priroda i kontury disproportsiy // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-8.-C. 37-52.
Manyika I, Chui M, Buquess I,Dobbs R, Bisson Pand Marrs A. Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business and glodal economy.// Mckinsey Global Institute, May 4,2013. [rezhim dostupa:www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/disruptive_technologies].
Toffler e, Toffler Kh. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo.-M.: AST:Profizdat,2008.S.1-576.
Asimov I. Foundation.-N.Y.: Bantam Books, 2004. P.1-296.
Florida R. Bol'shaya perezagruzka. Kak krizis izmenit nash obraz zhizni i rynok truda.-M.:Klassika-KhKhI. S.1-238.
Chernigovskaya T.V. Eto ne ya-eto moy mozg...//Otechestvennye zapiski. 2013,№1.
Bekon F. Novyy Organon. Soch:V 2t. T.2-M.:Mysl',1978 S.1-384.
Derlug'yan G.M.Kak ustroen etot mir. Nabroski na makrosotsiologicheskie temy.-M.: Izdatel'stvo instituta Gaydara, 2013. S.1-382.

References (transliteration):
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Problema formirovaniya innovatsionnoy lichnosti v sovremennom obshchestve // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika.-2013.-8.-C. 21-70. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_10493.html
V.Ya. Yakovlev Metafizika bytiya prirody i cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-9.-C. 7-16.
Wolf M. A much-maligned engine of innovations.// Financial Times, August 4,2013.
Yong S. Why Obama's Brain-Mapping Project Matters.//MIT Tecnology Review, April 8, 2013.[rezhim dostupa:www.technologyreview.com/nes/513011/why-obama-brain-mapping-project-matters].
M. V. Shugurov Innovatsionnoe razvitie v sovremennom mire: priroda i kontury disproportsiy // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-8.-C. 37-52.
Manyika I, Chui M, Buquess I,Dobbs R, Bisson Pand Marrs A. Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business and glodal economy.// Mckinsey Global Institute, May 4,2013. [rezhim dostupa:www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/disruptive_technologies].
Toffler e, Toffler Kh. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo.-M.: AST:Profizdat,2008.S.1-576.
Asimov I. Foundation.-N.Y.: Bantam Books, 2004. P.1-296.
Florida R. Bol'shaya perezagruzka. Kak krizis izmenit nash obraz zhizni i rynok truda.-M.:Klassika-KhKhI. S.1-238.
Chernigovskaya T.V. Eto ne ya-eto moy mozg...//Otechestvennye zapiski. 2013,№1.
Bekon F. Novyy Organon. Soch:V 2t. T.2-M.:Mysl',1978 S.1-384.
Derlug'yan G.M.Kak ustroen etot mir. Nabroski na makrosotsiologicheskie temy.-M.: Izdatel'stvo instituta Gaydara, 2013. S.1-382.

Аннотация: Today philosophy as well as other humanitarian and natural sciences are focused on overcoming limitations of classical and nonclassical approaches (as defined by V. Stepin). Although a great research has been carried out in this sphere, there are still a lot of unclear and undeveloped aspects left. One of them is the process of meaning-making when the whole range of knowledge is being established. These are the important issues the given article is devoted to. Based on a number of works written by great scientific researchers (in particular, a contemporary French philosopher Gilles Deleuze and a Russian philosopher Yakov Svirsky) and the author’s predecessors, the author compares different points of view on the phenomenon of meaning-making. Noteworthy that the author also analyzes the relation between the meaning-making process and the process of defining whether information created as a result of successful completion of the former process is true or false. As the final result, the author develops a methodological outline of the general scheme for describing meaning-making processes in all types of knowledge. Meanings (according to Deleuze’s hypotheses which were later developed by Yakov Svirsky) have been linked to Deleuze’s concept of surface. There the proliferation and some kind of recession.

Ключевые слова: Gilles Deleuze, Yakov Iosifovich Svirsky, surface, meaning, logic, transdisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, types of knowledge, scientific theories, proliferation.

Библиография:
Bad'yu A. Apostol Pavel. Obosnovanie universalizma / Per. s fr. O. Golovoy. — M.: Moskovskiy filosofskiy fond; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1999.
Bad'yu A. Manifest filosofii / Sost. i per. s frants. V.E. Lapitskogo.-SPb.: Machina, 2003.
Bad'yu A. Delez. Shum bytiya. / Per. s frants. D. Skopina.-M.: Fond nauchnykh issledovaniy «Pragmatika kul'tury», izdatel'stvo «Logos-Al'tera» / «Esse homo», 2004.
Bad'yu A. Etika: Ocherk o soznanii Zla / Per. s frants. V.E. Lapitskogo.-Spb., Machina, 2012.
Vitgenshteyn. L. Izbrannye raboty / Per. s nem. i angl. V. Rudneva. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2005.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla –-M.: «Raritet», Ekaterinburg: «Delovaya kniga», 1998.
Delez Zh. «Razlichie i povtorenie».-TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998.
Kusliy P.S. Ponyatie istiny v logike i epistemologii: predely mezhdistsiplinarnosti // Mezhdistsiplinarnost' v naukakh i filosofii [Tekst] / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii; Otv. Red I.T. Kasavin.-M.: IF RAN, 2010.
Markova L.A. Neytral'nost' smysla // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. XVIII, № 4.
Markova L.A. Perspektiva nauki: smysl kak al'ternativa istine // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2009. T. KhKhII, № 4.
Nikiforov A.L. Ponyatie istiny v teorii poznanii // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. KhVI, № 2.
Nikiforov A.L. Priroda filosofii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 3 (7).
Pozer Kh. Iskusstvo nablyudeniya kak iskusstvo izobreteniya // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2007. T. XIII, № 3.
Svirskiy Ya.I. Nelineynyy mir postneklassicheskoy nauki i tvorcheskoe nasledie Zh.Deleza.-M., RAN, 2004.
Badiou A. L’Etre et l'Événement. — Paris: Seuil, coll.L’ordre philosophique, 1988

References (transliteration):
Bad'yu A. Apostol Pavel. Obosnovanie universalizma / Per. s fr. O. Golovoy. — M.: Moskovskiy filosofskiy fond; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1999.
Bad'yu A. Manifest filosofii / Sost. i per. s frants. V.E. Lapitskogo.-SPb.: Machina, 2003.
Bad'yu A. Delez. Shum bytiya. / Per. s frants. D. Skopina.-M.: Fond nauchnykh issledovaniy «Pragmatika kul'tury», izdatel'stvo «Logos-Al'tera» / «Esse homo», 2004.
Bad'yu A. Etika: Ocherk o soznanii Zla / Per. s frants. V.E. Lapitskogo.-Spb., Machina, 2012.
Vitgenshteyn. L. Izbrannye raboty / Per. s nem. i angl. V. Rudneva. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2005.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla –-M.: «Raritet», Ekaterinburg: «Delovaya kniga», 1998.
Delez Zh. «Razlichie i povtorenie».-TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998.
Kusliy P.S. Ponyatie istiny v logike i epistemologii: predely mezhdistsiplinarnosti // Mezhdistsiplinarnost' v naukakh i filosofii [Tekst] / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii; Otv. Red I.T. Kasavin.-M.: IF RAN, 2010.
Markova L.A. Neytral'nost' smysla // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. XVIII, № 4.
Markova L.A. Perspektiva nauki: smysl kak al'ternativa istine // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2009. T. KhKhII, № 4.
Nikiforov A.L. Ponyatie istiny v teorii poznanii // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. KhVI, № 2.
Nikiforov A.L. Priroda filosofii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 3 (7).
Pozer Kh. Iskusstvo nablyudeniya kak iskusstvo izobreteniya // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2007. T. XIII, № 3.
Svirskiy Ya.I. Nelineynyy mir postneklassicheskoy nauki i tvorcheskoe nasledie Zh.Deleza.-M., RAN, 2004.
Badiou A. L’Etre et l'Événement. — Paris: Seuil, coll.L’ordre philosophique, 1988

Аннотация: The subject under research is the phenomenon of transgression in the scientific discourse as a source of scientific work. Scientific work has its own bifurcation points at which completeness and order of scientific discourse are broken. In such crisis situations scientific discourse turns into the transgressive regime of existence. The present regime is described by the neutralization of the existential-conceptual framework established by scientific discourse. As a result it becomes possible to discover other configurations of meaning and existence in scientific discourse. According to the author, transformation of scientific discourse into the transgressive regime of existence is a specific ontological condition of scientific work. In his research the author uses standard methods of ontological research that are usually used in both classical ontology and modern non-classical ontology. He also uses a few research methods offered by the synergetic approach. The transgressive regime is not typical for science, even for modern post-neoclassical science. However, transgression is a necessary condition of scientific work. Scientific discourse transforms into the transgressive regime, firstly, when a modified variant of scientific discourse has a crisis and secondly, when scientific discourse approaches to philosophical discourse. Both cases are the ‘bifurcation points’ at which scientific discourse loses its balanced nature and established constitution.

Ключевые слова: scientific discourse, transgression, transcendence, existential-conceptual perspective, bifurcation, modified variant, transgressive regime, paradoxical element, scientific work, constitution.

Контактная информация: Faritov Vyacheslav Tavisovich, 432027, Russia, Ulyanovsk, str. Severny Venets 32.

Библиография:
Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. – M.: Pravda, 1989. – 608 s.
Ver G. Karl Gustav Yung. – Chelyabinsk: «Ural LTD», 1998. – 216 s.
Vernadskiy V.I. Izbrannye trudy. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. – 744 s.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2011. – 472 s.
Geyzenberg V. Fizika i filosofiya. – M.: Nauka, 1989. – 132 s.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. – M.: Progress, 1977. – 304 s.
Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. – M.: AST; Khranitel', 2007. – 413 s.
Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya. – Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 1996. – 208 s.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. – SPb.: A-cad, 1994. – 408 s.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. – 744 s.
Yung K.G. O prirode psikhe. Sbornik. – M.: «Refl-buk», K.: «Vakler», 2002. – 414 s.
Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. – M.: «Universitetskaya kniga», AST, 1998. – 720 s.

References (transliteration):
Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. – M.: Pravda, 1989. – 608 s.
Ver G. Karl Gustav Yung. – Chelyabinsk: «Ural LTD», 1998. – 216 s.
Vernadskiy V.I. Izbrannye trudy. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. – 744 s.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2011. – 472 s.
Geyzenberg V. Fizika i filosofiya. – M.: Nauka, 1989. – 132 s.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. – M.: Progress, 1977. – 304 s.
Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. – M.: AST; Khranitel', 2007. – 413 s.
Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya. – Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 1996. – 208 s.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. – SPb.: A-cad, 1994. – 408 s.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. – 744 s.
Yung K.G. O prirode psikhe. Sbornik. – M.: «Refl-buk», K.: «Vakler», 2002. – 414 s.
Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. – M.: «Universitetskaya kniga», AST, 1998. – 720 s.

Аннотация: The purpose of the present article is to find out whether the contemporary antiphysicalism has a positive program and to analyze anti-physical solutions of the mind-body problem in the contemporary philosophy of mind. Using the approaches of such cotemporary analytical philosophers as Colin McGinn, Joseph Levine, Noam Chomsky, Thomas Nagel and David Chalmers, the author evaluates the ratio of negative and positive component in modern anti-physical approaches and determines the role of skepticism in their theories. Research methodology includes the historical descriptive method and the method of comparative studies which, within the framework of the present research, involves the comparison of physicalistic and antiphysicalistic approaches to the mind-body issues. The present research is based on contemporary English and American antiphysicalistic programs in the philosophy of mind including substantial dualism and different kinds of substantial dualism, property dualism or naturalistic dualism, epistemological skepticism, interactionism, qualitatism and a few others. The conclusions are the following: although today antiphysicalism gives very serious criticism of physicalism, the positions of the later are still strong. Whether this situation will change depends on how convincing the positive program of antiphysicalists will turn out to be. The results of the research allow to better understand a number of important writings on physicalistic and antiphysicalistic programs in contemporary analytical philosophy of mind. The novelty and originality of the research is in viewing antiphysicalistic programs in terms of contemporary English-American philosophy of mind, critical analysis of the main thought processes and key arguments of contemporary English-American antiphysicalism and description of many works that have been written by modern English and American philosophers recently but haven’t been translated into Russian yet.

Ключевые слова: the mind-body problem, skepticism, anti-physicalism, physicalism, cognitive closure, explanatory gap, mysteries and problems, mysterianism, philosophy of the mind, qualitatism.

Контактная информация: Gasparyan Diana Edikovna, 109028, Russia, Moscow, Maliy Trekhsvyatitelsky pereulok 8/2.

Библиография:
Gasparyan D.E. Psikhofizicheskaya problema kak razdel sovremennoy filosofii soznaniya, Molodoy uchenyy. 2009. № 12. S. 199-205.
Gasparyan D. E. Pozitsii dualizma v sovremennykh antifizikalistskikh strategiyakh analiticheskoy filosofii soznaniya // Vox. Filosofskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 15. S. 3-23.
Chalmers, D. (1997). Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness//.Explaining Consciousness The "Hard Problem". Ed. by J. Shear. Cambridge (Mass.), 9-30.
Chalmers, D. (2003). Consciousness and its Place in Nature. The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, edited by Stephen Stich and Fritz Warfield, Blackwell, 44-57
Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language, NY Pantheon.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge, 2000.
Levine, J. (1983). ‘Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 354-361.
McGinn, S. (1989). Can We Solve the Mind--Body Problem? Mind, New Series, Volume 98, Issue 391, 349-366.
McGinn C. (1999). Mysterious Flame: Conscious Minds in a Material World. N. Y.
Rosenthal, D. (2002). ‘Explaining Consciousness’, in D. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 406–421.

References (transliteration):
Gasparyan D.E. Psikhofizicheskaya problema kak razdel sovremennoy filosofii soznaniya, Molodoy uchenyy. 2009. № 12. S. 199-205.
Gasparyan D. E. Pozitsii dualizma v sovremennykh antifizikalistskikh strategiyakh analiticheskoy filosofii soznaniya // Vox. Filosofskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 15. S. 3-23.
Chalmers, D. (1997). Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness//.Explaining Consciousness The "Hard Problem". Ed. by J. Shear. Cambridge (Mass.), 9-30.
Chalmers, D. (2003). Consciousness and its Place in Nature. The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, edited by Stephen Stich and Fritz Warfield, Blackwell, 44-57
Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language, NY Pantheon.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge, 2000.
Levine, J. (1983). ‘Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 354-361.
McGinn, S. (1989). Can We Solve the Mind--Body Problem? Mind, New Series, Volume 98, Issue 391, 349-366.
McGinn C. (1999). Mysterious Flame: Conscious Minds in a Material World. N. Y.
Rosenthal, D. (2002). ‘Explaining Consciousness’, in D. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 406–421.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to constructivist models of philosophizing in terms of their succession and interdependence in accordance with particular historically developed traditions of philosophizing. The author of the article defines the three types of constructivist models of philosophizing: constructivist hylomorphism, constructivist eidetics and constructivist hermeneutics. In constructivist hylomorphism the basic constructs are a priori forms of cognition that create prerequisites for subjectivity, in constructivist eidetics – phenomena of consciousness that ensure the subjectivity of the world and in constructivist hermeneutics – communication means that create conditions for inter-subjectivity.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, subject, epistemology, knowledge, constructivism, philosophizing, typology, hylomorphism, eidetic, hermeneutics.

Библиография:
1. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii zna-
niya. M.: Medum, 1995.
2. Vitgenshteyn L. O dostovernosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 2. S. 67–120.
3. Gutner G. B. Gileomorfizm, eydetika i kommunikativnye praktiki // Nauka: ot metodologii
k ontologii. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 152–167.
4. Kasavin I. T. Konst ru k tivizm: za yavlennye prog rammy i nereshennye problemy //
Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. X V. № 1. S. 5–14.
5. Knyazeva E. N. Epistemologicheskiy konstruktivizm // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 12: Fenomen
soznaniya. M.: IF RAN, 2006. S. 133–152.
6. Konstruktivizm v teorii poznaniya / O tv. red. V. A. Lektorskiy. M.: IF RAN, 2008.
7. Konstruktivistskiy podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke / Otv. red. V. A. Lektorskiy.
M.: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009.
8. Konstruktivizm v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke: (materialy «Kruglogo stola») //
Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 3. S. 18.
9. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: EKSMO-Press, 2001.
10. Lektorskiy V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2009.
11. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya. M.:
Progress-Traditsiya, 2001.
12. Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999.
1 3 . O b s u zh d aem s t at 'i o kons t r u k t i vi zme (V. P. F i l at ov, I. T. K as a vi n, G. I. R u z a vi n,
A . Yu. A n t o n o v s k i y) // E p i s t e m o l o g i ya & f i l o s o f i ya n a u k i . 2 0 0 9 . T. X X . № 2 .
S . 1 4 4 –1 5 6 .
14. Ulanovskiy A. M. Konstruktivizm, radikal'nyy konstruktivizm, sotsial'nyy konstrukti-
vizm: mir kak interpretatsiya // Voprosy psikhologii. 2009. № 2. S. 35–45.
15. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste
biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M., 1998.

References (transliteration):
1. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii zna-
niya. M.: Medum, 1995.
2. Vitgenshteyn L. O dostovernosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 2. S. 67–120.
3. Gutner G. B. Gileomorfizm, eydetika i kommunikativnye praktiki // Nauka: ot metodologii
k ontologii. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 152–167.
4. Kasavin I. T. Konst ru k tivizm: za yavlennye prog rammy i nereshennye problemy //
Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. X V. № 1. S. 5–14.
5. Knyazeva E. N. Epistemologicheskiy konstruktivizm // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 12: Fenomen
soznaniya. M.: IF RAN, 2006. S. 133–152.
6. Konstruktivizm v teorii poznaniya / O tv. red. V. A. Lektorskiy. M.: IF RAN, 2008.
7. Konstruktivistskiy podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke / Otv. red. V. A. Lektorskiy.
M.: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009.
8. Konstruktivizm v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke: (materialy «Kruglogo stola») //
Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 3. S. 18.
9. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: EKSMO-Press, 2001.
10. Lektorskiy V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2009.
11. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya. M.:
Progress-Traditsiya, 2001.
12. Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999.
1 3 . O b s u zh d aem s t at 'i o kons t r u k t i vi zme (V. P. F i l at ov, I. T. K as a vi n, G. I. R u z a vi n,
A . Yu. A n t o n o v s k i y) // E p i s t e m o l o g i ya & f i l o s o f i ya n a u k i . 2 0 0 9 . T. X X . № 2 .
S . 1 4 4 –1 5 6 .
14. Ulanovskiy A. M. Konstruktivizm, radikal'nyy konstruktivizm, sotsial'nyy konstrukti-
vizm: mir kak interpretatsiya // Voprosy psikhologii. 2009. № 2. S. 35–45.
15. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste
biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M., 1998.

Аннотация: The development of evolutionary thinking is under consideration in the article; heuristic possibilities and possible limits for interdisciplinary synthesis of knowledge are estimated. It is justified that synthetic, integrative and holistic trends – in contrast to disciplinary differentiation of science in the epoch of Modern time – are predominant in science of the XXI century. Evolutionary thinking which is understood in the broadest sense of the word is based nowadays not only on the theory of biological evolution, but also on the modern theory of complex adaptive systems, network science and nonlinear dynamics. Such a form of thinking becomes a foundation of a new naturalism which allows us to formulate strategies of evolutionary, naturalistic explanations in epistemology, ethics, politics, esthetics. Taking as an example evolutionary epistemology, the author analyses its modern trends of development and demonstrates how this field meets interdisciplinary challenges of the modern scientific knowledge.

Ключевые слова: interdisciplinarity, naturalism, non-linear, synthesis, complexity, holism, evolutionary epistemology, evolutionary thinking, evolution, emergence.

Контактная информация: Knyazeva Elena Nikolaevna , 101000, Russia, Moscow, ul. Myasnitskaya 20.

Библиография:
Beskova I.A. Evolyutsiya i soznanie: novyy vzglyad. M.: Indrik, 2002.
Darvin Ch. Proiskhozhdenie vidov putem estestvennogo otbora. SPb.: Nauka, 2001.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Sinergetika: nelineynost' vremeni i landshafty koevolyutsii. M., 2007 (2-e izd. M.: URSS, 2011).
Knyazeva E.N., Turobov A.L. Edinaya nauka o edinoy prirode. // Novyy mir. 2000. № 3. S.161-178.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Myslitel' epokhi mezhdistsiplinarnosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2009, № 9. S. 116-131.
Mayntser K. Slozhnosistemnoe myshlenie: Materiya, razum, chelovechestvo. Novyy sintez. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2009.
Pink D. Budushchee za pravym polushariem. Chto delat' i kak byt' v vek novogo tvorcheskogo myshleniya. M.: RIPOL klassik: Otkrytyy mir, 2009.
Rot G. Neyrobiologicheskiy bazis soznaniya u cheloveka i zhivotnykh / Per. E.N. Knyazevoy // Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. M., 2012. S.441-470.
Foll'mer G. Evolyutsiya i proektsiya. Nachala sovremennoy teorii poznaniya / Perevod E.N. Knyazevoy // Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. M.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012. S.205-224.
Tsimmer K. Evolyutsiya: triumf idei. M.: Al'pina-non-fikshn, 2012.
Sheffer Zh.-M. Konets chelovecheskoy isklyuchitel'nosti. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010.
Evolyutsiya: kosmicheskaya, biologicheskaya, sotsial'naya /Otv. red. L.E. Grinin, A.V. Markov, A.V. Korotaev. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2009.
Edel'man Dzh. Soznanie: pomnimoe nastoyashchee / Per. I.A. Beskovoy // Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. M., 2012. S. 418-438.
Callebaut W. The Dialectics of Dis/Unity in the Evolutionary Synthesis and its Extensions. // Evolution: The Extended Synthesis / Ed. by Pigliuci M., Müller G.B. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 2010. P. 443-482.
Dennett D. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. N.Y., London, etc.: Simon & Schuster, 1995.
Favareau D. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. Heidelberg, etc.: Springer, 2010.
Holland J.H. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Readings (MA), 1995.
Thompson E. Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2007.
Tommasi L., Nadel L., Peterson M.A. Cognitive Biology: The New Cognitive Sciences // Cognitive Biology: Evolutionary and Developmental Perspectives on Mind, Brain, and Behavior / Ed. by Luca Tommasi, Mary A. Peterson, and Lynn Nadel. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009.
Zwin H.P. Les Systèmes complexes. Mathématique et biologie. P., 2006.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Universal'nyy (global'nyy) evolyutsionizm i global'nye issledovaniya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 46 - 101. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.1.116. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_116.html

References (transliteration):
Beskova I.A. Evolyutsiya i soznanie: novyy vzglyad. M.: Indrik, 2002.
Darvin Ch. Proiskhozhdenie vidov putem estestvennogo otbora. SPb.: Nauka, 2001.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Sinergetika: nelineynost' vremeni i landshafty koevolyutsii. M., 2007 (2-e izd. M.: URSS, 2011).
Knyazeva E.N., Turobov A.L. Edinaya nauka o edinoy prirode. // Novyy mir. 2000. № 3. S.161-178.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Myslitel' epokhi mezhdistsiplinarnosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2009, № 9. S. 116-131.
Mayntser K. Slozhnosistemnoe myshlenie: Materiya, razum, chelovechestvo. Novyy sintez. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2009.
Pink D. Budushchee za pravym polushariem. Chto delat' i kak byt' v vek novogo tvorcheskogo myshleniya. M.: RIPOL klassik: Otkrytyy mir, 2009.
Rot G. Neyrobiologicheskiy bazis soznaniya u cheloveka i zhivotnykh / Per. E.N. Knyazevoy // Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. M., 2012. S.441-470.
Foll'mer G. Evolyutsiya i proektsiya. Nachala sovremennoy teorii poznaniya / Perevod E.N. Knyazevoy // Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. M.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012. S.205-224.
Tsimmer K. Evolyutsiya: triumf idei. M.: Al'pina-non-fikshn, 2012.
Sheffer Zh.-M. Konets chelovecheskoy isklyuchitel'nosti. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010.
Evolyutsiya: kosmicheskaya, biologicheskaya, sotsial'naya /Otv. red. L.E. Grinin, A.V. Markov, A.V. Korotaev. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2009.
Edel'man Dzh. Soznanie: pomnimoe nastoyashchee / Per. I.A. Beskovoy // Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. M., 2012. S. 418-438.
Callebaut W. The Dialectics of Dis/Unity in the Evolutionary Synthesis and its Extensions. // Evolution: The Extended Synthesis / Ed. by Pigliuci M., Müller G.B. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 2010. P. 443-482.
Dennett D. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. N.Y., London, etc.: Simon & Schuster, 1995.
Favareau D. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. Heidelberg, etc.: Springer, 2010.
Holland J.H. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Readings (MA), 1995.
Thompson E. Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2007.
Tommasi L., Nadel L., Peterson M.A. Cognitive Biology: The New Cognitive Sciences // Cognitive Biology: Evolutionary and Developmental Perspectives on Mind, Brain, and Behavior / Ed. by Luca Tommasi, Mary A. Peterson, and Lynn Nadel. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009.
Zwin H.P. Les Systèmes complexes. Mathématique et biologie. P., 2006.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Universal'nyy (global'nyy) evolyutsionizm i global'nye issledovaniya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 46 - 101. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.1.116. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_116.html