Аннотация: At the present stage, when the development of material means of transformation of the surrounding world substantiates the possibilities of the antithetical scenarios of evolution of the planetary socio-natural Universe, the extreme relevance gain the forecasting and practical functions of social sciences, which are called to adequately reflect the changes that take place in society, as well as aim at the positive solution of the new drastically new issues arising before them. The modern social sciences, remaining in the grip of the old-fashioned worldview paradigm, are unable to handle this task. Determination of the conceptual fruitlessness of social sciences should encourage the overcoming of their stagnation. The scientific, historical-philosophical, and specific-historical methods of analysis of conception and development of the Russian philosophy and social sciences in Russia, as well as methodology of paradigm shift of Thomas Kuhn, allow defining the actual reasons of the conceptual fruitlessness of socio-humanitarian sciences that take their roots in the uncritical borrowing of the Western theories of social development, organization of the Russian science and education, and their ideological bias and niche specialization of the social scientists. The sensory-visual change of the human place and role in being of the planetary socio-natural Universe justifies the crucial need for the drastic transformation of the dominant worldview paradigm, which will inevitably lead to the qualitative reformation of the entire combination of the paradigm concepts of social sciences, as well as contribute into their development in a completely new direction for the purpose of achieving the practical goal of the limitless development of a human in space and time.

Ключевые слова: ideology, development, creativity, education, science, paradigm, worldview, philosophy, expertise, denial

Библиография:
Kasavin I.T. Sotsial'naya epistemologiya. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye problemy. – M.: Al'fa-M, 2013. – S. 467.
Oleynikov Yu.V. Stanovlenie novoy mirovozzrencheskoy paradigmy //Filosofskie nauki, 2015. № 10. – S. 53-60.
Oleynikov Yu.V., Borzova T.V. Ekologicheskoe vzaimodeystvie obshchestva s prirodoy (filosofskiy analiz). – M.: Izd-vo RGSU. – 460 s.
Panchin A. Summa biotekhnologii. Rukovodstvo po bor'be s mifami o geneticheskoy modifikatsii rasteniy, zhivotnykh i lyudey. – M.: Izd-vo AST: CORPUS, 2016. – 432 s.
Boyarintsev V.I. AntiEynshteyn. Glavnyy mif XX veka. – M.: Yauza, 2005.-320 s.
Krylova I.A. Nuzhno li reformirovat' RAN – «mozgovoy tsentr strany» /Filosofskie nauki. 2015. №4. – S. 21-31.
K. Marks, F. Engel's Sobr. soch. v 50 t. T. 1.-M., 1954.-S. 77.
Feyerabend P. Nauka v svobodnom obshchestve. – M.: AST, 2010. – S. 128, 198.
Il'enkov E. V., Korovikov V. Strasti po tezisam o predmete filosofii (1954 — 1955) /Avt.-sost. E.Illesh.-M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2016.-272 s.
Pozdnyakov E.A. Priroda i sushchnost' cheloveka (mysli mizantropa i obskuranta). – M.: Boslen. 2011. – S. 583.
Feyerabend P. Kak zashchitit' obshchestvo ot nauki //Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. T. 3. № 1. 2015. – S. 219.
Fromm E. Velichie i ogranichennost' teorii Freyda /Per. s angl. A.V. Aleksandrovoy. – M.: AST: Astrel': Poligrafizdat, 2012. – S. 9-10.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya antropologiya. – M.: Logos, 2014. – S. 188, 51.
Leotar Zh.-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna /Per. s frants. N.A. Shmatko. – SPb: Aleteyya, 1998. – S. 146.
Feyerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki /Per. s ang. i nem. A.L. Nikiforova /obshch. red. I.S. Narskogo. – M.: Progress, 1986. – S. 499.
Ivin A.A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. – M.: Gumanist. Izd. Tsentr VLADOS, 1997. – S. 68, 113, 139, 192;
Karpov A.O. Obrazovatel'nyy institut, vlast' i obshchestvo v epokhu rosta kul'tury znaniy. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2013. – S. 132.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava /Per. s nem. Red. i sost. D.A. Kerimov i V.S. Narsesyants. – M.: Mysl', 1990. – S. 56.
Atsyukovskiy V.A., Burkovich D.A. Nauku spasut diletanty. – M.: Izd-vo «Petit», 2007. – 267 s.
Monten' M. Opaty. Izbrannye glavy. – M.: Pravda, 1991. – S. 106.
Kamyu A. Zapiski buntarya. – M.: Astrel', 2011. – S. 98.
Vuds A., Grant T. Buntuyushchiy razum: Marksistskaya filosofiya i sovremennaya nauka /Per. s angl. Yu.V. Zhuliy. – M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2015. – S. 491.
Shpet G.G. Ocherk razvitiya russkoy filosofii //Shpet G.G. Sochineniya. – M.: Izd-vo «Pravda», 1989 . – S. 48-52.
Kara-Murza S.G. Krizisnoe obshchestvovedenie. V 2-kh chastyakh. – M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2012. Ch.1 – 464 s., Ch.2 – 384 s.

References (transliteration):
Kasavin I.T. Sotsial'naya epistemologiya. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye problemy. – M.: Al'fa-M, 2013. – S. 467.
Oleynikov Yu.V. Stanovlenie novoy mirovozzrencheskoy paradigmy //Filosofskie nauki, 2015. № 10. – S. 53-60.
Oleynikov Yu.V., Borzova T.V. Ekologicheskoe vzaimodeystvie obshchestva s prirodoy (filosofskiy analiz). – M.: Izd-vo RGSU. – 460 s.
Panchin A. Summa biotekhnologii. Rukovodstvo po bor'be s mifami o geneticheskoy modifikatsii rasteniy, zhivotnykh i lyudey. – M.: Izd-vo AST: CORPUS, 2016. – 432 s.
Boyarintsev V.I. AntiEynshteyn. Glavnyy mif XX veka. – M.: Yauza, 2005.-320 s.
Krylova I.A. Nuzhno li reformirovat' RAN – «mozgovoy tsentr strany» /Filosofskie nauki. 2015. №4. – S. 21-31.
K. Marks, F. Engel's Sobr. soch. v 50 t. T. 1.-M., 1954.-S. 77.
Feyerabend P. Nauka v svobodnom obshchestve. – M.: AST, 2010. – S. 128, 198.
Il'enkov E. V., Korovikov V. Strasti po tezisam o predmete filosofii (1954 — 1955) /Avt.-sost. E.Illesh.-M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2016.-272 s.
Pozdnyakov E.A. Priroda i sushchnost' cheloveka (mysli mizantropa i obskuranta). – M.: Boslen. 2011. – S. 583.
Feyerabend P. Kak zashchitit' obshchestvo ot nauki //Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. T. 3. № 1. 2015. – S. 219.
Fromm E. Velichie i ogranichennost' teorii Freyda /Per. s angl. A.V. Aleksandrovoy. – M.: AST: Astrel': Poligrafizdat, 2012. – S. 9-10.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya antropologiya. – M.: Logos, 2014. – S. 188, 51.
Leotar Zh.-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna /Per. s frants. N.A. Shmatko. – SPb: Aleteyya, 1998. – S. 146.
Feyerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki /Per. s ang. i nem. A.L. Nikiforova /obshch. red. I.S. Narskogo. – M.: Progress, 1986. – S. 499.
Ivin A.A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. – M.: Gumanist. Izd. Tsentr VLADOS, 1997. – S. 68, 113, 139, 192;
Karpov A.O. Obrazovatel'nyy institut, vlast' i obshchestvo v epokhu rosta kul'tury znaniy. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2013. – S. 132.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava /Per. s nem. Red. i sost. D.A. Kerimov i V.S. Narsesyants. – M.: Mysl', 1990. – S. 56.
Atsyukovskiy V.A., Burkovich D.A. Nauku spasut diletanty. – M.: Izd-vo «Petit», 2007. – 267 s.
Monten' M. Opaty. Izbrannye glavy. – M.: Pravda, 1991. – S. 106.
Kamyu A. Zapiski buntarya. – M.: Astrel', 2011. – S. 98.
Vuds A., Grant T. Buntuyushchiy razum: Marksistskaya filosofiya i sovremennaya nauka /Per. s angl. Yu.V. Zhuliy. – M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2015. – S. 491.
Shpet G.G. Ocherk razvitiya russkoy filosofii //Shpet G.G. Sochineniya. – M.: Izd-vo «Pravda», 1989 . – S. 48-52.
Kara-Murza S.G. Krizisnoe obshchestvovedenie. V 2-kh chastyakh. – M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2012. Ch.1 – 464 s., Ch.2 – 384 s.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the modern post-nonclassical science. The author determines some signs of the post-nonclassical paradigm (interdisciplinarity, domination of methodological anarchism, combinatorial character, oversaturation, performativity). The peculiar feature of the post-nonclassical science is that it dedicates great attention to the future. Today, the amount of projects, models, and scenarios of the future is rapidly increasing; many of them differ drastically. The increase of projects and models of the future is associated with the pragmatic orientation of the post-nonclassical science: the criterion of scientificity implies not only the concordance between the scientific research and the truth, but the leading criterion includes the practical value of the constructed model. The author’s main contribution into this work is the determination of the specific signs of the post-nonclassical science, which are yet to be thoroughly discovered in the philosophy of science. The attention is given to the introduction into the scientific discourse of the notion futuropluralism. It designates the multiplicity of projects, models, and scenarios of the future. The author evaluates the ambiguous influence of futuropluralism upon the human life. One of the means of harmonization of human being and culture is education, which encompasses the resources for human adaptation to the rapidly changing world.

Ключевые слова: Education, Futuropluralism, Performance, Text, Palimpsest, Culture, Pluralism, Rhizome, Science, Future

Библиография:
Bart, R. Ot proizvedeniya k tekstu // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 413-423
Bart, R. Smert' avtora // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 384-391
Bart, R. Tekstovoy analiz odnoy novelly Edgara Po // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 423-461
Bostrom, N. FAQ po transgumanizmu [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/6/144/#currents (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016)
Budanov, V. G. Postneklassicheskie osnovy upravleniya budushchim // Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Seriya: Sotsiologiya i upravlenie. 2014. T. 1. № 1 (1). S. 72-78.
Delez, Zh. Lukretsiy i simulyakr // Logika smysla. Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 1998. 480 s.
Delez, Zh. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; M.: Astrel', 2010. 895 s.
Stolyarov, A. M. Osvobozhdennyy Edem. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2008. 416 s.
Toffler E. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA, 2008. 569 s.
Toffler E. Shok budushchego. M.: AST, 2002. 557 s.
Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2007. 413 s.
Fuko, M. Nitsshe, Freyd, Marks [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://lib.ru/CULTURE/FUKO/nfm.txt (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016)
Khantigton, S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy? [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://ecocrisis.wordpress.com/miscellanea/clash-civilization/ (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016

References (transliteration):
Bart, R. Ot proizvedeniya k tekstu // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 413-423
Bart, R. Smert' avtora // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 384-391
Bart, R. Tekstovoy analiz odnoy novelly Edgara Po // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 423-461
Bostrom, N. FAQ po transgumanizmu [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/6/144/#currents (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016)
Budanov, V. G. Postneklassicheskie osnovy upravleniya budushchim // Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Seriya: Sotsiologiya i upravlenie. 2014. T. 1. № 1 (1). S. 72-78.
Delez, Zh. Lukretsiy i simulyakr // Logika smysla. Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 1998. 480 s.
Delez, Zh. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; M.: Astrel', 2010. 895 s.
Stolyarov, A. M. Osvobozhdennyy Edem. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2008. 416 s.
Toffler E. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA, 2008. 569 s.
Toffler E. Shok budushchego. M.: AST, 2002. 557 s.
Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2007. 413 s.
Fuko, M. Nitsshe, Freyd, Marks [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://lib.ru/CULTURE/FUKO/nfm.txt (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016)
Khantigton, S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy? [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://ecocrisis.wordpress.com/miscellanea/clash-civilization/ (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016

Аннотация: Narrative ontology is the philosophical concept the author of the article has been developing for many years. The main idea is that truth and false are considered to be illusory and replaced with the questions 'What will happen?' and 'Where is all this going to?'. Neverthetheless, the search for truth is also quite an obvious issue for narrative ontology and truth is viewed as the truth in a fictional discourse, the truth in an everyday expression, the Truth starting with the capital letter 'T', and the truth starting with the small letter 't'. In this research Rudnev also introduces his concept of the 'collapse into the truth' when a person falls into the illusion of the truth as if it were a well. The scientific novelty of the present research is caused by the fact that for the first time in the academic science Rudnev creats a new model of reality based on the ideas of narrative logic and the theory of meaning. Technically, this model is based on the mebius strip which the author thinks to be simultaneously moving in two opposite directions, i.e. towards accumulation of information ('along the life path') and accumulation of entropy ('against the life path'). In this research Rudnev has used the methods of everyday language philosophy developed by Moore, Wittgenstein, Austin and other analytical philosophers. The main conclusions of the present research are the following: 1. Truth and false are illusionary concepts created by our mind, in fact, we exist in the two parallel worlds of truth and false. 2. Narrative ontology is based on the main postulate that the meaning can be found on the mebius strip simultaneously unfolding in the opposite directions. 3. The problem of 'living against the life path' means that we live in the two opposite directions of time, towards accumulation of entropy and accumulation of information. 

Ключевые слова: truth, false, narrative ontology, reality, sense, mobius strip, information, entropy, Bion, life

Библиография:
Freydenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Rudnev V. Novaya model' bessoznatel'nogo. M.: Gnozis, 2011.
Mamardashvili M. K. Psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti. M.: Fond Meraba Mamardashvili, 2015.
Rudnev V. Initsiatsiya-k-smerti: K ponimaniyu Zerkala Tarkovskogo // Slavic Almanac, vol. 19 No 2 , 2013.
Nikoll M. Novyy chelovek // 2http://fourthway.narod.ru/lib/Morris/pritchi/1_2chapt.htm009.
Nikoll M. Tsel'. M.: STARKLAYT, 2009
Bion U. Vnimanie i interpretatsiya Spb.: Aleteyya, 2011.
Bion U. Zametki o teorii myshleniya // Idei U. R. Biona v sovremennoy psikhoterapevticheskoy praktike. M.: Rossiyskoe psikhoterapevticheskoe obshchestvo, 2008.

References (transliteration):
Freydenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Rudnev V. Novaya model' bessoznatel'nogo. M.: Gnozis, 2011.
Mamardashvili M. K. Psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti. M.: Fond Meraba Mamardashvili, 2015.
Rudnev V. Initsiatsiya-k-smerti: K ponimaniyu Zerkala Tarkovskogo // Slavic Almanac, vol. 19 No 2 , 2013.
Nikoll M. Novyy chelovek // 2http://fourthway.narod.ru/lib/Morris/pritchi/1_2chapt.htm009.
Nikoll M. Tsel'. M.: STARKLAYT, 2009
Bion U. Vnimanie i interpretatsiya Spb.: Aleteyya, 2011.
Bion U. Zametki o teorii myshleniya // Idei U. R. Biona v sovremennoy psikhoterapevticheskoy praktike. M.: Rossiyskoe psikhoterapevticheskoe obshchestvo, 2008.

Аннотация: In his article Rozin views sociality as ultimate ontology and dispositif, i.e. heterogeneous ideal construct that is used to solve methodological problems and to explain discourses on sociality. The author of the article describes the five main 'tops' in the dispositif of sociality (i.e. independent but complementary outlines of research): the method (approach, values, framework) used by a researcher to construct sociality; description (analysis) of directed and spontaneous social transformations; characteristics of interaction between subjects of social actions including society, government, communities, individuals and personalities; structure and description of a social action allowing to direct the process of social transformation; and interpretation of sociality as an organism. The author provides a description of each 'top'. Rozin has applied the methodological approach allowing to accomplish problematisation and case study and to construct the dispositif of sociality at first approximation. General theoretical provisions are based on the analysis of cases. As a result of his research, Rozin has managed to describe sociality as ultimate ontology and to define the five 'horizons' therein. The three horizons are central, social transformations that are directed by social messages and contribute to the integral development; interaction between social action subjects who ensure the progress of these transformations; and values of a researcher as well as his approach to studying sociality. 

Ключевые слова: individuals, community, society, the message, transformation, social action, sociality, personality, development, social organism

Библиография:
Rozin V.M., Golubkova L.G.. Izuchenie i priroda upravleniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. № 6. 2013.
Rozin V.M. Smena ponyatiy tipa i tipologii v arkhitekturnom proektirovanii. // Trendy i upravlenie. 2014. N 1.
Klochkov I.S. Dukhovnaya kul'tura Vavilonii: chelovek, sud'ba, vremya. M., 1989.
Arendt Kh. Istina i politika // Mezhdu proshlym i budushchem. M., 2014.
Tikhonov A.V. Sotsiologiya upravleniya. M., 2007.
Ronal'd A., Kheyfets i Donal'd L. Lauri «Rabota lidera // Liderstvo. 2009.
Rozin V.M.. Kommunikatsiya i sotsial'nost' // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. N 9.
Rozin V.M. Evolyutsiya inzhenernoy i proektnoy deyatel'nosti i mysli. Inzheneriya: stanovlenie, razvitie, tipologiya. Izd.: LENARD. 2013.
Georgiy Stotskiy Narodnoe gosudarstvo Gitlera. http://www.vaadua.org/news/narodnoe-gosudarstvo-gitlera. Istochnik: Götz Aly – "Hitlers Volkstaat. Raub, Rassenkrieg und nationaler Sozialismus.
Rozin V.M. Sotsiokul'turnyy analiz pokhodov Aleksandra Makedonskogo i razmyshlenie o sushchnosti voyny // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2015. N 3.
Rozin V.M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu. Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii. M., 2011.
Rozin V.M. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya kul'turologiya. M., 2007. S. 232-354.
http://www.dynacon.ru/content/articles/636/
Zigmunt Bauman Aktual'nost' kholokosta. M., 2010.
Bruno Latur Peresborka sotsial'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. Per. s ang. I.Polonskoy. M., 2014.
Fuko M. Volya k istine. Po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. M., 1996.
Rozin V.M.. Metodologicheskiy analiz knigi Z.Baumana «Aktual'nost' kholokosta» // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. N 12.
E.A. Popov Mezhdistsiplinarnyy opyt gumanitarnogo znaniya i sovremennoy sotsiologicheskoy nauki // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. N 4.

References (transliteration):
Rozin V.M., Golubkova L.G.. Izuchenie i priroda upravleniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. № 6. 2013.
Rozin V.M. Smena ponyatiy tipa i tipologii v arkhitekturnom proektirovanii. // Trendy i upravlenie. 2014. N 1.
Klochkov I.S. Dukhovnaya kul'tura Vavilonii: chelovek, sud'ba, vremya. M., 1989.
Arendt Kh. Istina i politika // Mezhdu proshlym i budushchem. M., 2014.
Tikhonov A.V. Sotsiologiya upravleniya. M., 2007.
Ronal'd A., Kheyfets i Donal'd L. Lauri «Rabota lidera // Liderstvo. 2009.
Rozin V.M.. Kommunikatsiya i sotsial'nost' // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. N 9.
Rozin V.M. Evolyutsiya inzhenernoy i proektnoy deyatel'nosti i mysli. Inzheneriya: stanovlenie, razvitie, tipologiya. Izd.: LENARD. 2013.
Georgiy Stotskiy Narodnoe gosudarstvo Gitlera. http://www.vaadua.org/news/narodnoe-gosudarstvo-gitlera. Istochnik: Götz Aly – "Hitlers Volkstaat. Raub, Rassenkrieg und nationaler Sozialismus.
Rozin V.M. Sotsiokul'turnyy analiz pokhodov Aleksandra Makedonskogo i razmyshlenie o sushchnosti voyny // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2015. N 3.
Rozin V.M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu. Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii. M., 2011.
Rozin V.M. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya kul'turologiya. M., 2007. S. 232-354.
http://www.dynacon.ru/content/articles/636/
Zigmunt Bauman Aktual'nost' kholokosta. M., 2010.
Bruno Latur Peresborka sotsial'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. Per. s ang. I.Polonskoy. M., 2014.
Fuko M. Volya k istine. Po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. M., 1996.
Rozin V.M.. Metodologicheskiy analiz knigi Z.Baumana «Aktual'nost' kholokosta» // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. N 12.
E.A. Popov Mezhdistsiplinarnyy opyt gumanitarnogo znaniya i sovremennoy sotsiologicheskoy nauki // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. N 4.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the crisis of physics that happened at the turn of the XIXth and the XXth centuries. The crisis is viewed in terms of the ideas suggested and proved by Thomas Kuhn in his book 'The Structure of Sientific Revolutions'. The main attention is paid to the crisis of Newtonian classical mechanics and the 'birth' of Einstein theory of relativity, the Rutherford–Bohr model of the hydrogen atom and quantum mechanics that logically proceeded therefrom.  In the course of its development natural science has reviewed the main fundamental provisions and paradigms as a result of reconsideration of previously established and adopted by the academic community logical relations such as 'cause and effect', 'reason and phenomenon', 'grounds and theory based thereupon' as well as inspirational, causal and systems determinations. The main research method used by the authors is the method of the reconstruction of cognitive representations of that epoch in terms of the modern concept of the physical picture of the world. The main conclusion is that Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific revolutions 'highlighted' a number of important methodological peculiarities of the crisis of physics at the turn of centuries and allowed to develop particular methodology based on those peculiarities and sometimes even took a new look at them and compare them to the typical peculiarities of later 'scientific revolutions'. 

Ключевые слова: classical paradigms in physics, paradigm crisis, scientific revolution, methodological reflexion, scientific paradigm, crisis of natural science, paradigm shifts, scientific world view, scientific picture of the w, physics and natural science, mathematics in natural science

Библиография:
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya: Uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. M.: Yurayt, 2012. 574 s.
Danin D. Nil's Bor // Nauka i zhizn'. 1972. №№ 1-9; 1973. №№ 4–9.
Dirak P. Lektsii po kvantovoy teorii polya / Perevod s angl. M.: LENAND, 2011. 286 s.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M.: Mir, 1961. 318 s.
Rabotnov A.S. Larchik mozhno ne otkryvat'. Kvantovyy tunnel'nyy effekt. Polveka zagadok i otkrytiy. M.: Energoatomizdat, 1983. 212 s.
Bor N. Atomnaya fizika i chelovecheskoe poznanie / Perevod s angl. V.A. Foka i A.V. Lermantovoy. M.: Izd-vo inostrannoy literatury, 1961. 186 s.
Kuhn T.S. The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis, 1961. 212 s.
Baksanskiy O.E., Korzhuev A.V. "V strukture mirozdan'ya ishchem smysl…": elektron, atom, yadro. Istoriko-filosofskie syuzhety fiziki na rubezhe stoletiy. M.: LENAND, 2014. 194 s.
Baksanskiy O.E., Korzhuev A.V. Krizis klassicheskoy paradigmy v fizike. M.: LENAND, 2014. 200 s.

References (transliteration):
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya: Uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. M.: Yurayt, 2012. 574 s.
Danin D. Nil's Bor // Nauka i zhizn'. 1972. №№ 1-9; 1973. №№ 4–9.
Dirak P. Lektsii po kvantovoy teorii polya / Perevod s angl. M.: LENAND, 2011. 286 s.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M.: Mir, 1961. 318 s.
Rabotnov A.S. Larchik mozhno ne otkryvat'. Kvantovyy tunnel'nyy effekt. Polveka zagadok i otkrytiy. M.: Energoatomizdat, 1983. 212 s.
Bor N. Atomnaya fizika i chelovecheskoe poznanie / Perevod s angl. V.A. Foka i A.V. Lermantovoy. M.: Izd-vo inostrannoy literatury, 1961. 186 s.
Kuhn T.S. The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis, 1961. 212 s.
Baksanskiy O.E., Korzhuev A.V. "V strukture mirozdan'ya ishchem smysl…": elektron, atom, yadro. Istoriko-filosofskie syuzhety fiziki na rubezhe stoletiy. M.: LENAND, 2014. 194 s.
Baksanskiy O.E., Korzhuev A.V. Krizis klassicheskoy paradigmy v fizike. M.: LENAND, 2014. 200 s.

Аннотация: In his article Ursul develops a single evolutionary information concept of the noosphere formation not only as a planetary phenomenon but also as a necessary stage of the universal process of self-organization of the matter. Ursul views the sphere of mind as a would-be but not actual future of the society and interaction between the society and nature where the global human intelligence will be the priority leading the socio-natural evolution in a safe and progressive direction. Ursul describes the process of the humankind moving towards a sustainable development, information content of the phenomenon of noosphere and formation of the core of the phenomenon, the collective noospheric intelligence. Ursul underlines that Vladimir Vernadsky developed his teaching about the noosphere based on the concept which unites globalism and the ideas of the noosphere formation into one integrated world view. Ursul views noospherogenesis as the main method and form of the human survival and the main goal of the contemporary and future civilization development including the transfer to the global sustainability, creation of the information-based civilization, globalization and other positive processes of the global development. The researcher also analyzes the new mega-trends of noospherogenesis in science, education, culture and governance considering the achievements of contemporary researches and predicated prospects of the future evolution of the world civilization. In his research Ursul has used the evolutionary (mostly universal evolutionary) approach and methods of global researches as well as the information-based approach and development criterion. The researcher also shows that within the framework of the research of the future, noospheric-futurological approach may dramatically change traditional approaches and research methods. Ursul also offers an opinion that the humankind also starts to turn into a single integrated civilization of the noosphere and this process is accompanied with the development of a totally new safe socio-natural and co-evolutionary mean of interaction. Ursul also talks about the social and socio-natural evolution creating opportunities for the development of the sphere of mind not only in the biosphere. As a future global process, noospherogenesis is a necessary step of the global evolution which, according to Ursul, will be realized in socio-natural and socio-cultural forms, first on Earth and then in the Universe.

Ключевые слова: global, global evolution, information, information criterion, culture, noosphere, noospherogenesis, noospheric intelligence, cephalization, evolutionary approach.

Библиография:
Ursul A.D. Global Studies: An Evolutionary Approach // News and Views. The Journal of the International Academy for Philosophy (New Series). Vol.3 No.3 (30) Winter. 2012.
// 3G: Globalistics, Global Studies, Globalization Studies: Scientific Digest / Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Ilyin. M.: MAKS Press. 2012.
Globalistics and Globalization Studies: Teories, Reasearch & Teaching. Yearbook. Volgograd: «Uchitel» Publishing House. 2013.
Enciclopedia of Global Stadies / Ed. H.K. Anheier, M. Juergensmeyr. Los Angeles, London and others. 2012.
Yanshina F.T. Evolyutsiya vzglyadov V.I.Vernadskogo na biosferu i razvitie ucheniya o noosfere. M.: Nauka. 1996.
Ursul A.D. Kul'tura kak informatsionnyy fenomen // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-8.-C. 295-355. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.508. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_508.html
Fresko Zh. Budushchee i za ego predelami // URL: http://tvpactivism.ru/files/Buduschee_i_za_ego_predelami_Jacque_Fresco.pdf
A.D. Ursul Informatsiya i kul'tura // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-2.-C. 64-79.
A.D. Ursul, T.A. Ursul. Global'nyy (universal'nyy) evolyutsionizm: predmetnoe pole i problemnaya orientatsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-2.-C. 6-20.
Ursul A.D. Ursul T.A., Engel' A.A., Tupalo V.G. Ustoychivoe razvitie, bezopasnost', noosferogenez. M.: RAGS. 2008.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm (kontseptsii, podkhody, printsipy, perspektivy). M.: RAGS, 2007.
Ursul A.D. Put' v noosferu. Kontseptsiya vyzhivaniya i ustoychivogo razvitiya tsivilizatsii. M.: Luch. 1993.
Universal'naya i global'naya istoriya (evolyutsiya Vselennoy, Zemli, zhizni, obshchestva). Volgograd: Uchitel'. 2012.
Teyyar de Sharden P. Fenomen cheloveka. M.: Progress. 1987.
Stepin V.S. Tsivilizatsiya i kul'tura. SPb. 2011.
Turchin A., Batin M. Futurologiya. XXI vek: bessmertie ili global'naya katastrofa // URL: http://bit.ly/dn2kNV.
Romanovich A.L., Ursul A.D. Ustoychivoe budushchee (globalizatsiya, bezopasnost', noosferogenez). M.: Zhizn'. 2006.
Popov V.P., Kraynyuchenko I.V. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm i sinergetika noosfery. Rostov n/D.: Izdatel'stvo APSN, SKNTs.2013.
Moiseev N.N. Voskhozhdenie k razumu. Lektsii po universal'nomu evolyutsionizmu i ego prilozheniyam. M.: IzdAT. 1993.
Moiseev N.N. Chelovek i noosfera. M.: Molodaya gvardiya. 1990.
Moiseev N.N. Universum. Informatsiya. Obshchestvo. M.: Ustoychivyy mir. 2001.
Kolin K.K. Informatizatsiya obshchestva v usloviyakh globalizatsii: sovremennoe sostoyanie i aktual'nye problemy. Krasnoyarsk: IPK SFU, 2009.
Kolin K.K., Ursul A.D. Informatsionnaya kul'turologiya: predmet i zadachi novogo nauchnogo napravleniya. Saarbrucken. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011.
Karmin A.S. Kul'turologiya. SPb.: Lan'. 2011.
King A., Shneyder B. Pervaya global'naya revolyutsiya. / Per. s angl. M., 1991.
Informatsiya i nauchnoe mirovozzrenie. Novaya missiya shkol'noy biblioteki v XXI veke. M., 2013.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Kalyuzhnaya D.E. Ustoychivoe razvitie i bezopasnost'. Global'noe izmerenie. Saarbrucken. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2014.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalistika i global'nye issledovaniya. Global'naya revolyutsiya v nauke. Saarbrucken. Dictus Publishing. 2014.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. M.: Moskovskiy universitet. 2012.
Gurevich I.M. O fizicheskoy informatike: Predposylki i osnovnye rezul'taty. M.: Librokom. 2014.
Gurevich I.M., Ursul A.D. Informatsiya – vseobshchee svoystvo materii: Kharakteristiki. Otsenki. Ogranicheniya. Sledstviya. M.: Librokom. 2012.
Gurevich P.S. Kul'turologiya. Uchebnoe posobie. 2-oe izd. M., 2010.
Il'in I. V., Ursul A. D. Global'nye issledovaniya i evolyutsionnyy podkhod. M.: Moskovskiy universitet. 2013.
Vernadskiy V.I. Izbrannye trudy po istorii nauki. M.: Nauka. 1981.
Vernadskiy V.I. Nauchnaya mysl' kak planetnoe yavlenie. M.: Nauka. 1991.
Vernadskiy V.I. Biosfera i noosfera. M.: Nauka. 2008.
M. I. Bocharov, T. I. Bocharova. Global'noe kommunikativnoe prostranstvo: problemy bezopasnosti obshcheniya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-4.-C. 47-51.
Borodin E.A. Razumnyy podkhod k mirovoy politike // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2015.-1.-C. 20-46. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2015.1.12668. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12668.html

References (transliteration):
Ursul A.D. Global Studies: An Evolutionary Approach // News and Views. The Journal of the International Academy for Philosophy (New Series). Vol.3 No.3 (30) Winter. 2012.
// 3G: Globalistics, Global Studies, Globalization Studies: Scientific Digest / Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Ilyin. M.: MAKS Press. 2012.
Globalistics and Globalization Studies: Teories, Reasearch & Teaching. Yearbook. Volgograd: «Uchitel» Publishing House. 2013.
Enciclopedia of Global Stadies / Ed. H.K. Anheier, M. Juergensmeyr. Los Angeles, London and others. 2012.
Yanshina F.T. Evolyutsiya vzglyadov V.I.Vernadskogo na biosferu i razvitie ucheniya o noosfere. M.: Nauka. 1996.
Ursul A.D. Kul'tura kak informatsionnyy fenomen // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-8.-C. 295-355. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.508. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_508.html
Fresko Zh. Budushchee i za ego predelami // URL: http://tvpactivism.ru/files/Buduschee_i_za_ego_predelami_Jacque_Fresco.pdf
A.D. Ursul Informatsiya i kul'tura // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-2.-C. 64-79.
A.D. Ursul, T.A. Ursul. Global'nyy (universal'nyy) evolyutsionizm: predmetnoe pole i problemnaya orientatsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-2.-C. 6-20.
Ursul A.D. Ursul T.A., Engel' A.A., Tupalo V.G. Ustoychivoe razvitie, bezopasnost', noosferogenez. M.: RAGS. 2008.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm (kontseptsii, podkhody, printsipy, perspektivy). M.: RAGS, 2007.
Ursul A.D. Put' v noosferu. Kontseptsiya vyzhivaniya i ustoychivogo razvitiya tsivilizatsii. M.: Luch. 1993.
Universal'naya i global'naya istoriya (evolyutsiya Vselennoy, Zemli, zhizni, obshchestva). Volgograd: Uchitel'. 2012.
Teyyar de Sharden P. Fenomen cheloveka. M.: Progress. 1987.
Stepin V.S. Tsivilizatsiya i kul'tura. SPb. 2011.
Turchin A., Batin M. Futurologiya. XXI vek: bessmertie ili global'naya katastrofa // URL: http://bit.ly/dn2kNV.
Romanovich A.L., Ursul A.D. Ustoychivoe budushchee (globalizatsiya, bezopasnost', noosferogenez). M.: Zhizn'. 2006.
Popov V.P., Kraynyuchenko I.V. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm i sinergetika noosfery. Rostov n/D.: Izdatel'stvo APSN, SKNTs.2013.
Moiseev N.N. Voskhozhdenie k razumu. Lektsii po universal'nomu evolyutsionizmu i ego prilozheniyam. M.: IzdAT. 1993.
Moiseev N.N. Chelovek i noosfera. M.: Molodaya gvardiya. 1990.
Moiseev N.N. Universum. Informatsiya. Obshchestvo. M.: Ustoychivyy mir. 2001.
Kolin K.K. Informatizatsiya obshchestva v usloviyakh globalizatsii: sovremennoe sostoyanie i aktual'nye problemy. Krasnoyarsk: IPK SFU, 2009.
Kolin K.K., Ursul A.D. Informatsionnaya kul'turologiya: predmet i zadachi novogo nauchnogo napravleniya. Saarbrucken. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011.
Karmin A.S. Kul'turologiya. SPb.: Lan'. 2011.
King A., Shneyder B. Pervaya global'naya revolyutsiya. / Per. s angl. M., 1991.
Informatsiya i nauchnoe mirovozzrenie. Novaya missiya shkol'noy biblioteki v XXI veke. M., 2013.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Kalyuzhnaya D.E. Ustoychivoe razvitie i bezopasnost'. Global'noe izmerenie. Saarbrucken. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2014.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalistika i global'nye issledovaniya. Global'naya revolyutsiya v nauke. Saarbrucken. Dictus Publishing. 2014.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. M.: Moskovskiy universitet. 2012.
Gurevich I.M. O fizicheskoy informatike: Predposylki i osnovnye rezul'taty. M.: Librokom. 2014.
Gurevich I.M., Ursul A.D. Informatsiya – vseobshchee svoystvo materii: Kharakteristiki. Otsenki. Ogranicheniya. Sledstviya. M.: Librokom. 2012.
Gurevich P.S. Kul'turologiya. Uchebnoe posobie. 2-oe izd. M., 2010.
Il'in I. V., Ursul A. D. Global'nye issledovaniya i evolyutsionnyy podkhod. M.: Moskovskiy universitet. 2013.
Vernadskiy V.I. Izbrannye trudy po istorii nauki. M.: Nauka. 1981.
Vernadskiy V.I. Nauchnaya mysl' kak planetnoe yavlenie. M.: Nauka. 1991.
Vernadskiy V.I. Biosfera i noosfera. M.: Nauka. 2008.
M. I. Bocharov, T. I. Bocharova. Global'noe kommunikativnoe prostranstvo: problemy bezopasnosti obshcheniya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-4.-C. 47-51.
Borodin E.A. Razumnyy podkhod k mirovoy politike // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2015.-1.-C. 20-46. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2015.1.12668. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12668.html

Аннотация: The article presents methodological grounds for developing modern strategies of environmentally safe thinking based on the theory of biology and the theory of complex adaptive systems. Being a science about interaction of living beings and their communities with the environment, today’s environmental studies go far beyond the initial borders of biology and become the core discipline in the middle of perspective inter-disciplinary synthesis of knowledge. The environmental approach appears to be quite usefully for researches of social studies and humanities. Environmentally safe action, environmentally safe mind, environmentally safe life style, knowledge and creative work, environmentally safe thought and word, environmentally safe ideas, environmentally safe communication and environmentally safe management — all these conceptual theories prove that environmentally safe thinking is becoming an important part of the humanities and social studies where it reveals possibilities for new and fresh approaches. The author of the present research article describes the meaning and importance of the term ‘Unwelt’ and the teaching about Unwelt (Umweltslehre) introduced by Jacob von Uexkull over 100 years ago, for the development of modern environmental universalism and creation of strategic imperatives of environmentally safe thinking. The concept of Unwelt as a specific world certain species and a particular living creature are adjusted to became the inter-disciplinary platform for development of the theory of environmental studies and achievement of a sensible position when discussing the sustainable development and sustainable future as well as the role of education in the global sustainable development. To develop the environmentally safe thinking, Elena Knyazeva has used the fundamental concepts of Jacob von Uexkull’s teaching about Unwelt as well as methodology of the researches of complex systems. The scientific novelty of the research is in its inter-disciplinary nature and application of theoretical biology, Uexkull’s teaching about Unwelt, theory of complex systems and newest terms of cognitive science (in particular, dynamic co-emergence and inactivism) for the development of the theory of social management and social forecasting (i.e. study of the future) and the concepts of sustainable development and environmental ethics.

Ключевые слова: interdisciplinary synthesis of knowledge, complex systems, sustainable development, evolutionary thinking, environmental ethics, environmental universalism, environmental studies, Umwelt, Umweltslehre, sustainable future.

Контактная информация: Knyazeva Elena Nikolaevna, 101000, Russia, Moscow, st. Myasnitskaya, h. 20.

Библиография:
Gete I.V. Sobr. soch. v 10 tt. T. 10. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1980.
Yonas G. Izmenivshiysya kharakter chelovecheskoy deyatel'nosti // Chelovek. 1999. № 2. S.5-19.
Kapra F. Pautina zhizni. Novoe nauchnoe ponimanie zhivykh sistem. Kiev: Sofiya; M.: ID «Gelios», 2002.
Knyazeva E.N. Tvorcheskiy put' Fransisko Varely: ot teorii avtopoezisa do novoy kontseptsii v kognitivnoy nauke // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 8. S.91-104.
Knyazeva E.N. Evolyutsionnoe myshlenie v nauke i filosofii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 11. S. 1532-1542.
Maslou A.G. Dal'nie predely chelovecheskoy psikhiki. SPb.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa Evraziya, 1997.
Bertalanffy L. von. Theoretische Biologie. 1. Band. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, 1932.
Bertholz A. Simplexité. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2009.
Kull K. Jakob von Uexküll: An Introduction // Semiotica. 2001. Vol. 134. N. 1/4. P. 1-59.
McGinn C. Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem? // Philosophy of Mind. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2003. P. 438-457.
Stella M., Kleisner K. Uexküllian Umwelt as Science and as Ideology: the Light and the Dark Side of a Concept // Theory in Biosciences. 2010. Vol. 129. P. 39-51.
Tønnessen M. Umwelt Ethics // Sign Systems Studies. 2003. Vol. 31. N 1. P. 288.
Tønnessen M. Steps to a Semiotics of Being // Biosemiotics. 2010. Vol. 3. P. 375-392.
Thompson E. Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2007.
Uexkull J. von. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Verlag von Julius, 1909.
Uexküll J. von. Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Bedeutungslehre. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag, 1970. S.12-13
Ursul A.D. Pravo ustoychivogo razvitiya: kontseptual'no-metodologicheskie problemy stanovleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 63 - 134. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.2309. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_2309.html

References (transliteration):
Gete I.V. Sobr. soch. v 10 tt. T. 10. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1980.
Yonas G. Izmenivshiysya kharakter chelovecheskoy deyatel'nosti // Chelovek. 1999. № 2. S.5-19.
Kapra F. Pautina zhizni. Novoe nauchnoe ponimanie zhivykh sistem. Kiev: Sofiya; M.: ID «Gelios», 2002.
Knyazeva E.N. Tvorcheskiy put' Fransisko Varely: ot teorii avtopoezisa do novoy kontseptsii v kognitivnoy nauke // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 8. S.91-104.
Knyazeva E.N. Evolyutsionnoe myshlenie v nauke i filosofii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 11. S. 1532-1542.
Maslou A.G. Dal'nie predely chelovecheskoy psikhiki. SPb.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa Evraziya, 1997.
Bertalanffy L. von. Theoretische Biologie. 1. Band. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, 1932.
Bertholz A. Simplexité. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2009.
Kull K. Jakob von Uexküll: An Introduction // Semiotica. 2001. Vol. 134. N. 1/4. P. 1-59.
McGinn C. Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem? // Philosophy of Mind. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2003. P. 438-457.
Stella M., Kleisner K. Uexküllian Umwelt as Science and as Ideology: the Light and the Dark Side of a Concept // Theory in Biosciences. 2010. Vol. 129. P. 39-51.
Tønnessen M. Umwelt Ethics // Sign Systems Studies. 2003. Vol. 31. N 1. P. 288.
Tønnessen M. Steps to a Semiotics of Being // Biosemiotics. 2010. Vol. 3. P. 375-392.
Thompson E. Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2007.
Uexkull J. von. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Verlag von Julius, 1909.
Uexküll J. von. Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Bedeutungslehre. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag, 1970. S.12-13
Ursul A.D. Pravo ustoychivogo razvitiya: kontseptual'no-metodologicheskie problemy stanovleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 63 - 134. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.2309. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_2309.html

Аннотация: The process of scientific development starts with the appearance of numerous unrelated branches of knowledge. Later these branches of knowledge usually are usually combined in larger spheres. However, as these spheres develop and extend, the tendency towards formation of narrower majors appears. On the contrary, different spheres of technology have been always developing interdependently. As a rule, breakthrough in one sphere of technology has been always accompanied with the breakthroughs in other spheres. However, today we can witness the intersection of a whole number of different waves of technological revolutions. In particular, there is the revolution that has been ongoing in the sphere of information and communication technologies since the 80’s of XXth century followed by the biotechnology revolution and the recent revolution in the sphere of nanotechnology. Attention should be also paid to the rapid development of cognitive science during the last decade. The interaction between information technologies, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies and cognitive science appears to be especially interesting and significant. The phenomenon was called the NBICS-convergence (where N means Nano-, B means Bio-, I means Info-, C means cognitive and S means socio-humanitarian studies and technologies). Convergent technologies mean Nano-, Bio-, Info-, Cogno and Social and Humanitarian technologies. The author of the article analyzes the risks and social and economic consequences of the development of these technologies such as the dramatic change in the picture of the world and research methodology. The scientific picture of the world demands us to return to the natural philosophy (philosophy of nature). Even Newton started with the natural philosophy 300 years ago. ‘Philosophy of nature’ covers both natural and humanitarian sciences. Convergent NBICS-technologies serve as an essential tool for solving this task. However, besides positive aspects NBICS-convergence is fraught with dangers and social and economic risks. Key risk factors in many ways depend on particular possibilities and scope of application of the convergent technologies.

Ключевые слова: convergent technologies, socio-humanitarian technologies, socio-economic risks, safety, conceptual grounds of the theory of knowledge, nano-bio-info-technology, cognitive science, scientific picture of the world, suprasectoral technology, technological revolution.

Контактная информация: Baksansky Oleg Evgenievich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 405.

Библиография:
Koval'chuk M.V. Ideologiya nanotekhnologiy, M., 2010.
Koval'chuk M.V. Nauka i zhizn': moya konvergentsiya. T.1. M., 2011.
Ogurtsov A.P., Platonov V.V. Obrazy obrazovaniya. Zapadnaya filosofiya ob-razovaniya. KhKh vek. SPb., 2004.
Kobayasi N. Vvedenie v nanotekhnologiyu, M., 2005.
Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo, kul'tura. M., GU VShE, 2000.
Kastel's M. Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya, 2004.
Gelbreyt Dzh. Novoe industrial'noe obshchestvo. M.: Progress, 1969.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo pro-gnozirovaniya. M.: Academia, 1999.
Baksanskiy O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivnyy obraz mira: prolegomeny k filo-sofii obrazovaniya, M., 2010.
Baksanskiy O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivno-sinergeticheskaya paradigma NLP: ot poznaniya k deystviyu, M., 2005.
Baksanskiy O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Nanotekhnologii. Biomeditsina. Filosofiya obrazovaniya. V zerkale mezhdistsiplinarnogo konteksta, M., 2010.
Baksanskiy O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Estestvoznanie: sovremennye kog-nitivnye kontseptsii, M., 2008.
Baksanskiy O.E. Fiziki i matematiki: analiz osnovaniya vzaimootnosheniya, M., 2009.
Baksanskiy O.E. Kognitivnye reprezentatsii: obydennye, sotsial'nye, na-uchnye, M., 2009.
http://www.transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/498/116/ednref1-Roco M., Bainbridge W . (eds) . Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotech-nology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Arlington , 2004.
Uebster F. Teoriya informatsionnogo obshchestva. M., Aspekt Press, 2004.
Khartmann U. Ocharovanie nanotekhnologii, M., 2008
O.E. Baksanskiy Metodologicheskie osnovaniya modernizatsii sovremennogo obrazovaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-9.-C. 105-111.
O.E. Baksanskiy Koevolyutsionnoe myshlenie
v kontekste konvergentnykh tekhnologiy:
ot biologii k kul'ture // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 9. - C. 1307 - 1313. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.9.7208.
Ursul A.D. Natsional'naya ideya i global'nye protsessy: bezopasnost', ustoychivoe razvitie, noosferogenez // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2013. - 2. - C. 1 - 66. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_541.html

References (transliteration):
Koval'chuk M.V. Ideologiya nanotekhnologiy, M., 2010.
Koval'chuk M.V. Nauka i zhizn': moya konvergentsiya. T.1. M., 2011.
Ogurtsov A.P., Platonov V.V. Obrazy obrazovaniya. Zapadnaya filosofiya ob-razovaniya. KhKh vek. SPb., 2004.
Kobayasi N. Vvedenie v nanotekhnologiyu, M., 2005.
Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo, kul'tura. M., GU VShE, 2000.
Kastel's M. Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya, 2004.
Gelbreyt Dzh. Novoe industrial'noe obshchestvo. M.: Progress, 1969.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo pro-gnozirovaniya. M.: Academia, 1999.
Baksanskiy O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivnyy obraz mira: prolegomeny k filo-sofii obrazovaniya, M., 2010.
Baksanskiy O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivno-sinergeticheskaya paradigma NLP: ot poznaniya k deystviyu, M., 2005.
Baksanskiy O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Nanotekhnologii. Biomeditsina. Filosofiya obrazovaniya. V zerkale mezhdistsiplinarnogo konteksta, M., 2010.
Baksanskiy O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Estestvoznanie: sovremennye kog-nitivnye kontseptsii, M., 2008.
Baksanskiy O.E. Fiziki i matematiki: analiz osnovaniya vzaimootnosheniya, M., 2009.
Baksanskiy O.E. Kognitivnye reprezentatsii: obydennye, sotsial'nye, na-uchnye, M., 2009.
http://www.transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/498/116/ednref1-Roco M., Bainbridge W . (eds) . Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotech-nology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Arlington , 2004.
Uebster F. Teoriya informatsionnogo obshchestva. M., Aspekt Press, 2004.
Khartmann U. Ocharovanie nanotekhnologii, M., 2008
O.E. Baksanskiy Metodologicheskie osnovaniya modernizatsii sovremennogo obrazovaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-9.-C. 105-111.
O.E. Baksanskiy Koevolyutsionnoe myshlenie
v kontekste konvergentnykh tekhnologiy:
ot biologii k kul'ture // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 9. - C. 1307 - 1313. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.9.7208.
Ursul A.D. Natsional'naya ideya i global'nye protsessy: bezopasnost', ustoychivoe razvitie, noosferogenez // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2013. - 2. - C. 1 - 66. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_541.html