Аннотация: The subject of this research is the objective-energy structure of consciousness. The goal of this work is the formulation of the mechanism of determination of the onto-gnoseological grounds of objective consciousness as the means of constructive overcoming of the distorted forms of “Self” in human existence. The establishment of the integral structure of consciousness will provide an opportunity of conducting a gnoseological and ontological analysis of the objective determinism of culture and consciousness. It is defined that the formation of the holistic core of identity of the human Self must be built on the basis of reflection that considers context, includes a maximally ideal and distracted from the usual perception thinking. The identity suggest overcoming the “attraction of subject” and simultaneous establishment of the Self upon it as the permanent presence and highest order (identity of the fourth order). The result of this research consists in revelation of the forms of the distorted objective core of identity of the human Self as the condition for formation of the illusionary consciousness. The author formulates the model of the concept of the objectively determined existence, which is applied in philosophical, culturological, socio-philosophical, and other humanitarian studies for the analysis of cultural processes, as well as processes emerging in transformation of the objective identity of the human Self.

Ключевые слова: Intentionality, Reflection, Illusion, Existence, Consciousness, Culture, Hermeneutic circle, Identity, Self, Thingness

Библиография:
Brentano, F. Izbrannye raboty / Sostavl., perev. s nem. V. Anashvili. − M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996. −176 s. S. 124-125.
Vitgenshteyn, L. Zametki o filosofii psikhologii. T. 1. / Perevod s nem. S.D. Latushkina pod redaktsiey V.V. Anashvili. − M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 2001. −192 s. S. 77-89.
Husserl, E. Philosophie der Arithmetik : Psychologische und logische Untersuchungen. Halle a. S. : Pfeffer, 1891. S 290. S, 70-79.
Khaydegger, M. Bytie i vremya / M. Khaydegger. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 445s. S. 8-34; S.100-140.
Khaydegger, M. Veshch' / Perevod V.V. Bibikhina. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 447 s. [elektronnyy resurs]. // http://philosophy.ru/library/heideg/th.html»  Rezhim dostupa: svobodnyy.  Zagl. s ekrana.
Gusserl', E. Izbrannye raboty / Sost.: V. V. Anashvili i dr; sost. t. V. A. Kurennoy. − M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2005. − 458 s. S. 11-20; S. 340-367.
Gusserl', E. Logicheskie issledovaniya / E. Gusserl' – Riga. – 1988. – 235 s. S.8; S.12-17; S. 22-34.
Gusserl', E. Fenomenologiya / E. Gusserl' // Logos. – 1992.  № 1. – S. 6798.
Gaydenko, P.P. Problema intentsional'nosti u Gusserlya i ekzistentsialistskaya kategoriya transtsendentsii / V kn.: Sovremennyy ekzistentsializm. M.: "Mysl'", 1966, S.77-107. [elektronnyy resurs]. .// http://psylib.org.ua/books/_gaidp01.htm Rezhim dostupa: svobodnyy.  Zagl. s ekrana.
Kant, I. Kritika chistogo razuma; Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya / Kant I. Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh v 6t. − T. 2, ch. 1. S. 5-56; T. 3, s. 67 T. 4. S. 4-28. Moskva, 2001. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://philosophy.ru/library/kant/03/0.html. − Zagl. s sayta., rezhim dostupa svobodnyy.
Riker, P. Trudy Povestvovatel'naya identichnost' S. 77; S. 88. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://read.newlibrary.ru/read/riker_p_/page0/trudy.html. − Zagl. s sayta., rezhim dostupa svobodnyy.
Riker, P. Konflikt interpretatsiy: Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. s fr. I. S. Vdovina. − M.: Kanon-Press-Ts: Kuchkovo pole, 1995. − (Pereizd. v 2002). − 624s. S. 234-246.
Ivanov, E. M. Ontologiya sub'ektivnogo. Ispravlennaya i dopolnennaya elektronnaya versiya izdaniya: Ivanov E.M. Ontologiya sub'ektivnogo. − Saratov: Izdatel'skiy tsentr “Nauka“, 2007. − 200 s. [elektronnyy resurs]// http://www.proza.ru/2011/02/09/882. − Zagl. s sayta., rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 90; S. 110.
Bibler, V. S. Samosostoyanie cheloveka. «Predmetnaya deyatel'nost'» v kontseptsii Marksa i samodeterminatsiya individa / V. S. Bibler. – Kemerovo. – 1993. – 325 s. S. 25; S. 78; S. 79-83.
Frankl, V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla: Plyuralizm nauki i edinstvo cheloveka / V. Frankl. – M.: Progress, 1990. – 430 s. S. 171.
Yaspers, K. Obshchaya psikhopatologiya / K. Yaspers // Logos. – 1994. – № 5. – S. 4287.
Filosofiya: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. − M.: Gardariki. Pod redaktsiey A. A. Ivina. 2004. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/253/%D0%93%D0%95%D0%A0%D0%9C%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%95%D0%92%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90.− Zagl. s sayta. rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 167.
Marks, K. Sobranie sochineniy: v 56 t.  izd. 2.: T. 323, t. 20, s. 139 / K. Marks, F. Engel's.  M.: Izd-vo. polit. lit.  M.: 19551981.  700 s.
Dekart, R. Izbrannye proizvedeniya / R. Dekart. – M.: Gospolitizdat, 1950. – 712 s. S. 663.
Shorokhova, E. V. Problema soznaniya v filosofii i estestvoznanii / E. V. Shorokhova ; AN SSSR, In-t filosofii. − M. : Izd-vo sots.-ekon. lit., 1961. − 363 s. S. 351-354; S. 355-361.
Megrabyan, A. A. Lichnost' i soznanie: v norme i patologii / A. A. Megrabyan. – M.: Meditsina, 1978. –176 s. S. 100.
Vasilyuk, F.E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya. Analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsiy. − M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1984 [elektronnyy resurs] // http://psylib.org.ua/books/vasif01/.− Zagl. s sayta. rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 22; S. 167.
Berdyaev, N. A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka / N. A. Berdyaev. – M.: B-ka «Vekhi», 2001. – 569 s. S. 134.
Filosofiya: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. − M.: Gardariki. Pod redaktsiey A. A. Ivina. 2004. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/253/%D0%93%D0%95%D0%A0%D0%9C%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%95%D0%92%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90.− Zagl. s sayta. rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 234.
Bulgakov, S. N. Pervoobraz i obraz: soch.: v 2 t. T. 1. Svet nevecherniy / S. N. Bulgakov. – SPb.: INAPRESS; M.: Iskusstvo, 1999.  416 s. S. 67.
Ignatenko A.S. Psikhoanaliz i psikholamarkizm // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1282 - 1292. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.12.13347.
Shazhinbatyn A. Strukturnaya antropologiya K. Levi-Strossa // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 803 - 812. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.8.12572.

References (transliteration):
Brentano, F. Izbrannye raboty / Sostavl., perev. s nem. V. Anashvili. − M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996. −176 s. S. 124-125.
Vitgenshteyn, L. Zametki o filosofii psikhologii. T. 1. / Perevod s nem. S.D. Latushkina pod redaktsiey V.V. Anashvili. − M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 2001. −192 s. S. 77-89.
Husserl, E. Philosophie der Arithmetik : Psychologische und logische Untersuchungen. Halle a. S. : Pfeffer, 1891. S 290. S, 70-79.
Khaydegger, M. Bytie i vremya / M. Khaydegger. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 445s. S. 8-34; S.100-140.
Khaydegger, M. Veshch' / Perevod V.V. Bibikhina. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 447 s. [elektronnyy resurs]. // http://philosophy.ru/library/heideg/th.html»  Rezhim dostupa: svobodnyy.  Zagl. s ekrana.
Gusserl', E. Izbrannye raboty / Sost.: V. V. Anashvili i dr; sost. t. V. A. Kurennoy. − M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2005. − 458 s. S. 11-20; S. 340-367.
Gusserl', E. Logicheskie issledovaniya / E. Gusserl' – Riga. – 1988. – 235 s. S.8; S.12-17; S. 22-34.
Gusserl', E. Fenomenologiya / E. Gusserl' // Logos. – 1992.  № 1. – S. 6798.
Gaydenko, P.P. Problema intentsional'nosti u Gusserlya i ekzistentsialistskaya kategoriya transtsendentsii / V kn.: Sovremennyy ekzistentsializm. M.: "Mysl'", 1966, S.77-107. [elektronnyy resurs]. .// http://psylib.org.ua/books/_gaidp01.htm Rezhim dostupa: svobodnyy.  Zagl. s ekrana.
Kant, I. Kritika chistogo razuma; Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya / Kant I. Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh v 6t. − T. 2, ch. 1. S. 5-56; T. 3, s. 67 T. 4. S. 4-28. Moskva, 2001. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://philosophy.ru/library/kant/03/0.html. − Zagl. s sayta., rezhim dostupa svobodnyy.
Riker, P. Trudy Povestvovatel'naya identichnost' S. 77; S. 88. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://read.newlibrary.ru/read/riker_p_/page0/trudy.html. − Zagl. s sayta., rezhim dostupa svobodnyy.
Riker, P. Konflikt interpretatsiy: Ocherki o germenevtike / Per. s fr. I. S. Vdovina. − M.: Kanon-Press-Ts: Kuchkovo pole, 1995. − (Pereizd. v 2002). − 624s. S. 234-246.
Ivanov, E. M. Ontologiya sub'ektivnogo. Ispravlennaya i dopolnennaya elektronnaya versiya izdaniya: Ivanov E.M. Ontologiya sub'ektivnogo. − Saratov: Izdatel'skiy tsentr “Nauka“, 2007. − 200 s. [elektronnyy resurs]// http://www.proza.ru/2011/02/09/882. − Zagl. s sayta., rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 90; S. 110.
Bibler, V. S. Samosostoyanie cheloveka. «Predmetnaya deyatel'nost'» v kontseptsii Marksa i samodeterminatsiya individa / V. S. Bibler. – Kemerovo. – 1993. – 325 s. S. 25; S. 78; S. 79-83.
Frankl, V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla: Plyuralizm nauki i edinstvo cheloveka / V. Frankl. – M.: Progress, 1990. – 430 s. S. 171.
Yaspers, K. Obshchaya psikhopatologiya / K. Yaspers // Logos. – 1994. – № 5. – S. 4287.
Filosofiya: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. − M.: Gardariki. Pod redaktsiey A. A. Ivina. 2004. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/253/%D0%93%D0%95%D0%A0%D0%9C%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%95%D0%92%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90.− Zagl. s sayta. rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 167.
Marks, K. Sobranie sochineniy: v 56 t.  izd. 2.: T. 323, t. 20, s. 139 / K. Marks, F. Engel's.  M.: Izd-vo. polit. lit.  M.: 19551981.  700 s.
Dekart, R. Izbrannye proizvedeniya / R. Dekart. – M.: Gospolitizdat, 1950. – 712 s. S. 663.
Shorokhova, E. V. Problema soznaniya v filosofii i estestvoznanii / E. V. Shorokhova ; AN SSSR, In-t filosofii. − M. : Izd-vo sots.-ekon. lit., 1961. − 363 s. S. 351-354; S. 355-361.
Megrabyan, A. A. Lichnost' i soznanie: v norme i patologii / A. A. Megrabyan. – M.: Meditsina, 1978. –176 s. S. 100.
Vasilyuk, F.E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya. Analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsiy. − M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1984 [elektronnyy resurs] // http://psylib.org.ua/books/vasif01/.− Zagl. s sayta. rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 22; S. 167.
Berdyaev, N. A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka / N. A. Berdyaev. – M.: B-ka «Vekhi», 2001. – 569 s. S. 134.
Filosofiya: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. − M.: Gardariki. Pod redaktsiey A. A. Ivina. 2004. [elektronnyy resurs] // http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/253/%D0%93%D0%95%D0%A0%D0%9C%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%95%D0%92%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90.− Zagl. s sayta. rezhim dostupa svobodnyy. S. 234.
Bulgakov, S. N. Pervoobraz i obraz: soch.: v 2 t. T. 1. Svet nevecherniy / S. N. Bulgakov. – SPb.: INAPRESS; M.: Iskusstvo, 1999.  416 s. S. 67.
Ignatenko A.S. Psikhoanaliz i psikholamarkizm // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1282 - 1292. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.12.13347.
Shazhinbatyn A. Strukturnaya antropologiya K. Levi-Strossa // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 803 - 812. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.8.12572.

Аннотация: The paper introduces
the explanatory gap problem
 in the philosophy of mind. A review of the mainapproaches to the problem shows that the traditional materialism/physicalism encounters the principaldifficulties.
The article introduces the explanatory gap problem gap in the philosophy of mind. The author provides a brief review of the main approaches to the problem. The author focuses on attempts to overcome physical approaches, on the one hand, and critics of dualism, on the other hand. For example, Blok offered the definition of implicit physical phenomenal concepts. Papineau admitted that phenomenal concepts had a singular nature. Levin spoke of the concept of acquaintance. Varela offered to extend the scope of the traditional science and developed so called neuro-phenomenology. The research is based on the method of comparison of the main approaches to solving the explanatory gap problem. Preference is given to phenomenal realism. The author demonstrates that the traditional materialism/physicalism encounters the principal difficulties when solving the explanatory gap problem. At the same time, property dualism is an essential concept only a non-metaphysical version of naturalistic phenomenal realism, or nontraditional contextual naturalism/physicalism of Wittgenstein type may compete with. 

Ключевые слова: explanatory gap problem, hard problem, psycho-physical identities, physico-physical identities, phenomenal concepts, conceptual dualism, phenomenal realism, physicalism, property dualism, neuro-phenomenology

Библиография:
Peacocke C. Phenomenology and nonconceptual content // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2001. 62. C. 609-615.
Papineau D. What Exactly is the Explanatory Gap? // Philosophia. 2011. 39 (1). C. 5-19.
Papineau D. Phenomenal Concepts are not Demonstrative // In MM McCabe and M Textor (eds) Perspectives on Perception. 2007.
Papineau D. Phenomenal and perceptual concepts // In (T. Alter & S. Walter, eds) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press. 2006.
Papineau D. Thinking about Consciousness. Oxford University Press, 2002.
Papineau D. Philosophical Naturalism. Basil Blackwell, 1993.
Nagel T. The psychophysical nexus // New Essays on the A Priori, Paul Boghossian and Christopher Peacocke, eds. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2000.
Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? // Philosophical Review, 1974. 4. S. 435-50.
McGinn C. Can we solve the mind-body problem? // Mind, 1989. 98. C. 349-66.
McLaughlin B. P. A naturalist-phenomenal realist response to Block's harder problem // Philosophical Issues, 2003. 13. C. 163-204.
Loar B. Transparent experience and the availability of qualia // In Q. Smith and A. Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon. 2003.
Loar B. Phenomenal States II // In Ned Block, Owen Flanagan & Güven Güzeldere (eds.), The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. The Mit Press. 1997.
Loar B. Phenomenal states // Philosophical Perspectives, 1990. 4. C. 81-108.
Lewis D. An Argument for the Identity Theory // Journal of Philosophy. 1966. Tom. 63, C. 17-25.
Levine J. Phenomenal concepts and the materialist constraint // In (T. Alter & S. Walter, eds) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. 2006 b.
Levin J. What is a phenomenal concept? // In T. Alter and S. Walter, eds. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. 2006 a.
Levine J. Knowing what it's like // In Gertler, B. (ed.) Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self-Knowledge. Ashgate. 2003.
Levine J. Conceivability and the metaphysics of mind // Nous. 1998. 32:4. C. 449-480.
Levine J. Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. // Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 1983. 64. C. 354-61.
Levine J. On leaving out what it's like. // In Davies, M. and Humphreys, G. (eds.) Consciousness: Psychological and Philosophical Essays. Blackwell. 1993.
Jackson F. What Mary Didn’t Know? // Journal of Philosophy. 1986. Tom. 83. S. 291-295.
Kripke S. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
Hohwy J. Evidence, explanation and experience. On the harder problem of consciousness // Journal of Philosophy 2004. 101 (5). C. 242-254.
Dennett D. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown, 1991.
Dennett D. Quining Qualia // In A. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science (pp. 381-414). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Churchland P. M. & Churchland P. S. Functionalism, Qualia and Intentionality // Philosophical Topics, 1981. 12: 121-132
Chalmers D. J. Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap // In (T. Alter & S. Walter, eds) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press, 2006.
Chalmers D.J. Phenomenal Concepts and the Knowledge Argument // In (P. Ludlow, Y. Nagasawa, & D. Stoljar, eds) There's Something about Mary: Essays on Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument Against Physicalism. MIT Press, 2004.
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers D.J. & Jackson, F. Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation // Philosophical Review. 2001. 110. C. 315-61.
Carruthers P. Reductive explanation and the ‘explanatory gap’ // Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2004. 34 (2). C. 153-173.
Block N. Max Black's objection to mind-body identity // Oxford Review of Metaphysics. 2006. 2. C. 3-78.
Block N. The Harder Problem of Consciousness // Journal of Philosophy. 2002. 99. N 8. C. 391-425.
Bitbol M. Physique et philosophie de l’esprit. Paris : Flammarion, 2000.
Block N. & Stalnaker R. Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap // Philosophical Review. 1999. 108. C. 1-46.
Benoist J. Le bruit du sensible. Collection « Passages ». Paris: Les éditions CERF, 2013.
Benoist J. Making Ontology Sensitive // Cont. Philos. Rev. (Published online. 04 August 2012) 2012.
Benoist J. Sens et sensibilité. L’intentionalité en contexte. Paris: LeCerf, 2009.
Benoist J. Concepts. Paris : Les éditions CERF, 2010/2011.
Benoist J. Eléments de philosophie réaliste. Paris: Vrin, 2011.
Perry J. Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. MIT Press, 2001.
Searle J. R. The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, 1992.
Searle J. R. The problem of consciousness // In Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness (Ciba Foundation Symposium 174). Wiley, 1993.
Searle J.R. Why I am not a property dualist // Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2002. 9, n. 12. C. 57-64.
Stalnaker R. Doklad, sdelannyy v IJN v Parizhe v iyune 2006.
Varela F. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem // Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1995. 3. C. 330-49.
White S. Property dualism, phenomenal concepts, and the semantic premise // In Torin Alter & Sven Walter (eds.), Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press. 2006.

References (transliteration):
Peacocke C. Phenomenology and nonconceptual content // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2001. 62. C. 609-615.
Papineau D. What Exactly is the Explanatory Gap? // Philosophia. 2011. 39 (1). C. 5-19.
Papineau D. Phenomenal Concepts are not Demonstrative // In MM McCabe and M Textor (eds) Perspectives on Perception. 2007.
Papineau D. Phenomenal and perceptual concepts // In (T. Alter & S. Walter, eds) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press. 2006.
Papineau D. Thinking about Consciousness. Oxford University Press, 2002.
Papineau D. Philosophical Naturalism. Basil Blackwell, 1993.
Nagel T. The psychophysical nexus // New Essays on the A Priori, Paul Boghossian and Christopher Peacocke, eds. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2000.
Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? // Philosophical Review, 1974. 4. S. 435-50.
McGinn C. Can we solve the mind-body problem? // Mind, 1989. 98. C. 349-66.
McLaughlin B. P. A naturalist-phenomenal realist response to Block's harder problem // Philosophical Issues, 2003. 13. C. 163-204.
Loar B. Transparent experience and the availability of qualia // In Q. Smith and A. Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon. 2003.
Loar B. Phenomenal States II // In Ned Block, Owen Flanagan & Güven Güzeldere (eds.), The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. The Mit Press. 1997.
Loar B. Phenomenal states // Philosophical Perspectives, 1990. 4. C. 81-108.
Lewis D. An Argument for the Identity Theory // Journal of Philosophy. 1966. Tom. 63, C. 17-25.
Levine J. Phenomenal concepts and the materialist constraint // In (T. Alter & S. Walter, eds) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. 2006 b.
Levin J. What is a phenomenal concept? // In T. Alter and S. Walter, eds. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. 2006 a.
Levine J. Knowing what it's like // In Gertler, B. (ed.) Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self-Knowledge. Ashgate. 2003.
Levine J. Conceivability and the metaphysics of mind // Nous. 1998. 32:4. C. 449-480.
Levine J. Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. // Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 1983. 64. C. 354-61.
Levine J. On leaving out what it's like. // In Davies, M. and Humphreys, G. (eds.) Consciousness: Psychological and Philosophical Essays. Blackwell. 1993.
Jackson F. What Mary Didn’t Know? // Journal of Philosophy. 1986. Tom. 83. S. 291-295.
Kripke S. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
Hohwy J. Evidence, explanation and experience. On the harder problem of consciousness // Journal of Philosophy 2004. 101 (5). C. 242-254.
Dennett D. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown, 1991.
Dennett D. Quining Qualia // In A. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science (pp. 381-414). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Churchland P. M. & Churchland P. S. Functionalism, Qualia and Intentionality // Philosophical Topics, 1981. 12: 121-132
Chalmers D. J. Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap // In (T. Alter & S. Walter, eds) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press, 2006.
Chalmers D.J. Phenomenal Concepts and the Knowledge Argument // In (P. Ludlow, Y. Nagasawa, & D. Stoljar, eds) There's Something about Mary: Essays on Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument Against Physicalism. MIT Press, 2004.
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers D.J. & Jackson, F. Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation // Philosophical Review. 2001. 110. C. 315-61.
Carruthers P. Reductive explanation and the ‘explanatory gap’ // Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2004. 34 (2). C. 153-173.
Block N. Max Black's objection to mind-body identity // Oxford Review of Metaphysics. 2006. 2. C. 3-78.
Block N. The Harder Problem of Consciousness // Journal of Philosophy. 2002. 99. N 8. C. 391-425.
Bitbol M. Physique et philosophie de l’esprit. Paris : Flammarion, 2000.
Block N. & Stalnaker R. Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap // Philosophical Review. 1999. 108. C. 1-46.
Benoist J. Le bruit du sensible. Collection « Passages ». Paris: Les éditions CERF, 2013.
Benoist J. Making Ontology Sensitive // Cont. Philos. Rev. (Published online. 04 August 2012) 2012.
Benoist J. Sens et sensibilité. L’intentionalité en contexte. Paris: LeCerf, 2009.
Benoist J. Concepts. Paris : Les éditions CERF, 2010/2011.
Benoist J. Eléments de philosophie réaliste. Paris: Vrin, 2011.
Perry J. Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. MIT Press, 2001.
Searle J. R. The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, 1992.
Searle J. R. The problem of consciousness // In Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness (Ciba Foundation Symposium 174). Wiley, 1993.
Searle J.R. Why I am not a property dualist // Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2002. 9, n. 12. C. 57-64.
Stalnaker R. Doklad, sdelannyy v IJN v Parizhe v iyune 2006.
Varela F. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem // Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1995. 3. C. 330-49.
White S. Property dualism, phenomenal concepts, and the semantic premise // In Torin Alter & Sven Walter (eds.), Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press. 2006.

Аннотация: In his article Stepin analyzes the turn in German critical theory from Walter Benjamin to Dietmar Kamper in the second half of the 20th entury. The total mobilization of the world performed by the means of technical devices leads to the decay of aura in an artwork which means the loss of its history, unique nature and presence. New art initially inclined towards violence and propaganda aestheticizes politics. This process reaches the apogee in Nazi Germany. However, at that very moment culture experiences a fundamental change - the 'iconic' turn caused by the rapidly growing power of visual media. Aestheticization of politics is being replaced with aestheticization of activity and the death of aura is replaced with the 'commited crime'. 
The comparative research performed by Stepin is based on the two methodological concepts: hermeneutics with the elements of phenomenology and culture-historical analysis. 
Both Walter Benjamin and Dietmar Kamper come to the idea of revolution. They view revolution as a tool to 'stop' the history - the 'shutdown' of history. However, the proletariat Walter Benjamin laid his hopes on cannot get a hold of that trigge because the wall where the trigger is is not the sociality but the Reality. Only a performance artist is able to destroy the dictatorship of visibility and therefore Dietmar Kamper developes the idea of a new 'body revolution'. 
 
 

Ключевые слова: Walter Benjamin , Dietmar Kamper, aura, media, revolution, body, shutdown of history, aestheticization of reality, marginality, iconic turn

Библиография:
N. B. Kirillova Chelovek i mif v prostranstve mediareal'nosti // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-2.-C. 78-86.
T. M. Lyubimova Media-yazyk voyny v Livii: yazykovye tekhnologii, modnye vo Frantsii v etom voennom sezone // Natsional'naya bezopasnost'/nota bene.-2012.-2.-C. 96-103.
Savchuk V. Refleksivnaya spontannost' Ditmara Kampera // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.7-29.
Khaydegger M. Vremya kartiny mira // Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystuple-niya.-SPb.: Nauka, 2007.-S.58-86.
Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften Bd.1.3.-Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.-1280s.
Kamper D. Horizontwechsel: Die Sonne neu jeden Tag, nichts Neues unter der Sonne, aber…-München: Fink, 2001. – 181s.
Stepanov M. Telo, obraz, tekst, znak, sila voobrazheniya...: filosofiya tela Ditmara Kam-pera. // Khora. Zhurnal sovremennoy zarubezhnoy filosofii i filosofskoy komparativisti-ki. – 2008. – №4.-S.106-115
Riker P. Istoriya i istina.-SPb.: Aleteyya, 2002. – 400s.
Kamper D. Skhvatit'sya za stop-kran. Iskusstvo v golovokruzhenii skorostey // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.47-54.
«Tot, kto vidit telo kak konteyner, kak musornyy konteyner, tot tak zhe vidit i chelove-ka». Sm. Kamper D. Telo, znanie, golos i sled // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.93.
Kamper D. Telo, znanie, golos i sled // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.87-103.
Kamper D. «Tela-abstraktsii», antropologicheskiy chetyrekhugol'nik iz prostranstva, po-verkhnosti, linii i tochki // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.65-86
Kamper D. Dvulikiy Yanus media. Estetizatsiya deystvitel'nosti. Vozmushchenie chuvstv // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.55-57.
Kundera M. Bessmertie: Roman.-SPb.: «Azbuka-klassika», 2008.-416s.
Ben'yamin V. Kratkaya istoriya fotografii // Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. Izbrannye esse.-M.: Medium, 1996.-S.66-91.
Ben'yamin V. O ponimanii istorii. // Ben'yamin V. Ozareniya.-M.: Martis, 2000.-S.228-236.
Arendt Kh. Val'ter Ben'yamin // Arendt Kh. Lyudi v temnye vremena.-M.: Moskovskaya shko-la politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2003. – S.175-237.
Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti // Ben'-yamin V. Ozareniya.-M.: Martis, 2000.-S.122-152.

References (transliteration):
N. B. Kirillova Chelovek i mif v prostranstve mediareal'nosti // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-2.-C. 78-86.
T. M. Lyubimova Media-yazyk voyny v Livii: yazykovye tekhnologii, modnye vo Frantsii v etom voennom sezone // Natsional'naya bezopasnost'/nota bene.-2012.-2.-C. 96-103.
Savchuk V. Refleksivnaya spontannost' Ditmara Kampera // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.7-29.
Khaydegger M. Vremya kartiny mira // Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystuple-niya.-SPb.: Nauka, 2007.-S.58-86.
Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften Bd.1.3.-Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.-1280s.
Kamper D. Horizontwechsel: Die Sonne neu jeden Tag, nichts Neues unter der Sonne, aber…-München: Fink, 2001. – 181s.
Stepanov M. Telo, obraz, tekst, znak, sila voobrazheniya...: filosofiya tela Ditmara Kam-pera. // Khora. Zhurnal sovremennoy zarubezhnoy filosofii i filosofskoy komparativisti-ki. – 2008. – №4.-S.106-115
Riker P. Istoriya i istina.-SPb.: Aleteyya, 2002. – 400s.
Kamper D. Skhvatit'sya za stop-kran. Iskusstvo v golovokruzhenii skorostey // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.47-54.
«Tot, kto vidit telo kak konteyner, kak musornyy konteyner, tot tak zhe vidit i chelove-ka». Sm. Kamper D. Telo, znanie, golos i sled // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.93.
Kamper D. Telo, znanie, golos i sled // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.87-103.
Kamper D. «Tela-abstraktsii», antropologicheskiy chetyrekhugol'nik iz prostranstva, po-verkhnosti, linii i tochki // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.65-86
Kamper D. Dvulikiy Yanus media. Estetizatsiya deystvitel'nosti. Vozmushchenie chuvstv // Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol': Sbornik statey.-SPb.: RKhGA, 2010.-S.55-57.
Kundera M. Bessmertie: Roman.-SPb.: «Azbuka-klassika», 2008.-416s.
Ben'yamin V. Kratkaya istoriya fotografii // Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. Izbrannye esse.-M.: Medium, 1996.-S.66-91.
Ben'yamin V. O ponimanii istorii. // Ben'yamin V. Ozareniya.-M.: Martis, 2000.-S.228-236.
Arendt Kh. Val'ter Ben'yamin // Arendt Kh. Lyudi v temnye vremena.-M.: Moskovskaya shko-la politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2003. – S.175-237.
Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti // Ben'-yamin V. Ozareniya.-M.: Martis, 2000.-S.122-152.