Аннотация:   The goal of this article is to demonstrate the relevance of Michel Foucault’s thinking in interpretation of the epistemological questions, which lately have become the subject of discussion, and namely the question on the processes of differentiation of knowledge and its grounds. Turning to the analysis of Foucault’s philosophy for the purpose of clarification of the aforementioned issue, the authors determine the specific dialectics that is based upon the notion of “other spaces”, within the framework of which the foundation can be established only by means of constitutive exception of its negative polis. At the same time, the authors raise the question posed in the beginning of Edmund Husserl’s Crisis: is it possible that the origin of such foundations is nothing except pure coincidence? The authors attempt to follow the stages of development of the main notions of Foucault’s philosophy in his early works. The conclusion is made that the dialectic definition of “other spaces” serves as a guide of epistemological analysis, with the help of which we can ascertain the question about the origins of humanitarian sciences. Based on interpretation of the problem of constitution of science, the link between Foucault and the late Husserl is being established.  

Ключевые слова: Dialectical relation, Apriorism , Ontogenesis of knowledge, Foundations of sciences, Of Other Spaces, Philosophy of the limit, Historical a priori, Gesture of exception, Critical epistemology, Episteme

Библиография:
Katuchchi S. Vvedenie k filosofiyu Fuko [Monografiya]. – Rim-Bari. : Latertsa, 2010. – 203 s.
Fuko M. Vvedenie k «Snu i sushchestvovaniyu» ; perevod s fr. L. Korradini // Binsvanger L. Son i sushchestvovanie ; perevod s nem. K. Dzhussani – Milan. : SE, 1993. – 122 s.
Drua Zh.-P. Besedy ; perevod s fr. Polidori F. – Milan. : Mimesis, 2007. – 67 s.
Fuko M. Milaneze K. (pod red.) Literaturnye ocherki [Sb. stat'ey];– Milan. : Feltrinelli, 1984. – 162 s.
Fuko M. Bezumie, otsutstvie tvoreniya ; perevod s fr. F. Ferruchchi // Fuko M. Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu epokhu ; perevod s fr. F. Ferruchchi – Milan. : Bur, 2010. – s .760-770.
Di Chiachchia A. Naslazhdenie u Lakana. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.lapsicoanalisi.it/psicoanalisi/index.php/per-voi/rubrica-di-antonio-di-ciaccia/132-il-godimento-in-lacan.html; (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2015).
Pachi E. Predislovie k tret'emu ital'yanskomu izdaniyu // Gusserl' E. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya. Milan. : Il Sadzhatore, 2008. – s. 5-19.
Fontana A. Vvedenie k Rozhdeniyu kliniki ; perevod s fr. A. Fontany. – Turin. : Einaudi, 1998. – 267 s.
Bashlyar G. Prikladnoy ratsionalizm ; perevod s fr. E. Serdzho. – Milan. : Yaka Buk, 2003. – 208 s.
Kangiyem D. Norma i patologiya ; perevod s fr. D. Butstsolana. – Turin. : Einaudi, 1998. – 292 s.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi ; perevod s fr. E. Painatesku – Milan. : Bur, 2009. – 439 s.
Sini K. Erakl na rasput'e. Semiotika i filosofiya [Monografiya] – Turin. : Bollati Boringieri, 2007. – s. 266.
Fuko M. Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu epokhu ; perevod s fr. F. Ferruchchi – Milan. : Bur, 2010. – 819 s.

References (transliteration):
Katuchchi S. Vvedenie k filosofiyu Fuko [Monografiya]. – Rim-Bari. : Latertsa, 2010. – 203 s.
Fuko M. Vvedenie k «Snu i sushchestvovaniyu» ; perevod s fr. L. Korradini // Binsvanger L. Son i sushchestvovanie ; perevod s nem. K. Dzhussani – Milan. : SE, 1993. – 122 s.
Drua Zh.-P. Besedy ; perevod s fr. Polidori F. – Milan. : Mimesis, 2007. – 67 s.
Fuko M. Milaneze K. (pod red.) Literaturnye ocherki [Sb. stat'ey];– Milan. : Feltrinelli, 1984. – 162 s.
Fuko M. Bezumie, otsutstvie tvoreniya ; perevod s fr. F. Ferruchchi // Fuko M. Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu epokhu ; perevod s fr. F. Ferruchchi – Milan. : Bur, 2010. – s .760-770.
Di Chiachchia A. Naslazhdenie u Lakana. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.lapsicoanalisi.it/psicoanalisi/index.php/per-voi/rubrica-di-antonio-di-ciaccia/132-il-godimento-in-lacan.html; (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2015).
Pachi E. Predislovie k tret'emu ital'yanskomu izdaniyu // Gusserl' E. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya. Milan. : Il Sadzhatore, 2008. – s. 5-19.
Fontana A. Vvedenie k Rozhdeniyu kliniki ; perevod s fr. A. Fontany. – Turin. : Einaudi, 1998. – 267 s.
Bashlyar G. Prikladnoy ratsionalizm ; perevod s fr. E. Serdzho. – Milan. : Yaka Buk, 2003. – 208 s.
Kangiyem D. Norma i patologiya ; perevod s fr. D. Butstsolana. – Turin. : Einaudi, 1998. – 292 s.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi ; perevod s fr. E. Painatesku – Milan. : Bur, 2009. – 439 s.
Sini K. Erakl na rasput'e. Semiotika i filosofiya [Monografiya] – Turin. : Bollati Boringieri, 2007. – s. 266.
Fuko M. Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu epokhu ; perevod s fr. F. Ferruchchi – Milan. : Bur, 2010. – 819 s.

Аннотация: The paper is focused on P. Ricoeur's interpretation of the personal narrative self-identity problem developed within the framework of his hermeneutical phenomenology and his understanding of the unity of identity and selfhood in the process of creating a reflexive image of 'Self' that appeared in the dialogue with analytical philosophy. Based on that, the authors of the article discuss particular features of Ricoeur's polemics with different versions of the objectivist approaches to personality and personality expression in language acts, actor and action from the point of view of semantics and pragmatics that were created within the framework of analytic philosophy and in fact led to some kind of liquidation of 'Self' desite the unique unity and timely existence of Self. In their research the authors have applied the hermeneutical strategy to interpreting the theme as well as a wide range of methods that are used in historical and philosophical analysis. The novelty of the research is caused, first and foremost, by the fact that the authors demonstrate peculiarities of the constructive dialogue that was established by Ricoeur with the leading representatives of contemporary analytical philosophy in the process of creating his own personal narrative self-identity doctrine. The program of the synthesis of analytical philosophy and hermeneutics offered by Ricoeur may be evaluated as a sufficiently valid and realizable approach when applied to the problem of the narrative identity as the expression of personal life unity.

Ключевые слова: personality, identity, Self, selfhood, action, event, pragmatics, semantics, personalism, narrative identity, hermeneutics

Библиография:
Gurevich P.S. Problema tselostnosti cheloveka. M.: IF RAN, 2004. 178 s.
Vdovina I.S. Fenomenologiya vo Frantsii. M.: Kanon + ROOI "Reabilitatsiya", 2009. 400 s.
Riker P. Ya – sam kak drugoy. M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2008. 416 s.
Strawson P.F. Individuals. An Essay of Descriptive Metaphysics. L.-N.Y: Routledge, 1996. 260 p.
Austin J.J. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. 192 p.
Searle J.R. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 281 p.
Ricoeur P. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. 314 p.
Ricoeur P. From Text to Action. N.Y.: State University of New York Press, Albany, 2008. 262 p.
Danto A.C. Analytical Philosophy of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. 226 p.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 6-ti tt. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1964. 799 c.
Ricoeur P. Temps et récit III. Le temps raconté. Paris: Points Essais, 1985. 404 p.
Ricoeur P. Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and The Involuntary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1987. 498 p.
Rayl G. Ponyatie soznaniya. M.: "Ideya-Press", Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 1999. 408 s.
Riker P. Pamyat', istoriya, zabvenie. M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2004. 728 s.
Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. 560 p.
Riker P. Vremya i rasskaz. T. 1. M.; SPb.: TsGNII INION RAN: Kul'turnaya initsiativa: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 313 s.
Kermode F. Genesis of Secrecy, on the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. 196 p.
Makintayr A. Posle dobrodeteli. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000. 384 s

References (transliteration):
Gurevich P.S. Problema tselostnosti cheloveka. M.: IF RAN, 2004. 178 s.
Vdovina I.S. Fenomenologiya vo Frantsii. M.: Kanon + ROOI "Reabilitatsiya", 2009. 400 s.
Riker P. Ya – sam kak drugoy. M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2008. 416 s.
Strawson P.F. Individuals. An Essay of Descriptive Metaphysics. L.-N.Y: Routledge, 1996. 260 p.
Austin J.J. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. 192 p.
Searle J.R. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 281 p.
Ricoeur P. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. 314 p.
Ricoeur P. From Text to Action. N.Y.: State University of New York Press, Albany, 2008. 262 p.
Danto A.C. Analytical Philosophy of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. 226 p.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 6-ti tt. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1964. 799 c.
Ricoeur P. Temps et récit III. Le temps raconté. Paris: Points Essais, 1985. 404 p.
Ricoeur P. Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and The Involuntary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1987. 498 p.
Rayl G. Ponyatie soznaniya. M.: "Ideya-Press", Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 1999. 408 s.
Riker P. Pamyat', istoriya, zabvenie. M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literatury, 2004. 728 s.
Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. 560 p.
Riker P. Vremya i rasskaz. T. 1. M.; SPb.: TsGNII INION RAN: Kul'turnaya initsiativa: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 313 s.
Kermode F. Genesis of Secrecy, on the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. 196 p.
Makintayr A. Posle dobrodeteli. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000. 384 s

Аннотация: The research subject is the preferences in clothes of a rebellious person. According to the author, a protesting person does not only tend to political opposition and active oppositional activity. Such a person also demonstrates his right to have an alternative opinion when choosing clothes and often challenges social standards. The author of the present article tries to find out whether there is a correlation between a protesting activity conducted by a citizen and his preferences in clothes. According to the author, clothes help such a person to demnstrate a protesting political writing and create a protesting political text. 
To the author's opinion, the best research method here is the method of political hermeneutics that allows to interpret political texts. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that man's opposing tendencies can be demonstated in his clothes. Clothes convey protesting political messages. 
The results of the analysis show that protests have been aestheticized at all times and in all cultures. 

Ключевые слова: power, protest, exterior level of a protest, political text, political writing, political discourse, esthetics of a protest, rebellious person, cothes , dandy

Библиография:
Skiperskikh A.V. Poverkhnosti protesta: osobennosti politicheskogo pis'ma v sovremennoy Rossii. // Politicheskaya lingvistika.-2014.-№ 1.-S. 108 – 113.
Le Goff Zh. Intellektualy v Srednie veka (Per. s fr. A.M. Rutkevicha).-SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2003.
Shlegel' K. Aziya nachinaetsya na Silezskom vokzale. // Logos.-2002.-№ 3-4 (34)-S. 169-170.
Porudominskiy V. Dal'. – M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1971. – 384 s.
Zakharov S.M. Studenchestvo kak politicheskiy aktor: teoreticheskie modeli. // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2011.-№ 2.-S. 272 – 279.
Sezina I. Skinkhedy v Rossii: osobennosti subkul'turnogo koda i identifikatory. // http://www.nlobooks.ru/node/3302 [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
http://brandshop.ru/mens-polos/ [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
http://shop.lacoste.ru/catalog/polo-i-futbolki-muzh/ [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
Litoy A., Tushkin A., Okuneva D. Fa?.. Antifa! // Antifa i natsi stali glavnymi igrokami molodezhnoy okolopolitiki. // http://www.chaskor.ru/article/fa_antifa_3441 [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
Vypuskniki ukrainskoy gimnazii v Sevastopole prishli na posledniy zvonok v vyshivankakh. // http://sevastopolnews.info/2014/05/lenta/sobytiya/069221002/ [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
Averin Yu.G., Solokhin V.A. Osobennosti formirovaniya populizma v deyatel'nosti predstavitel'nogo organa gosudarstvennoy vlasti: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz. // Vestnik MGU.-Ser. 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya.-1998.-№1.-S. 71-84.
Skiperskikh A.V. Tekhnologii politicheskoy legitimatsii. – Elets: EGU im. I.A. Bunina, 2005. – 102 s.
Aksenov V. Ostrov Krym. – M.: Eksmo, 2012. – 512 s.
Aksenov V. Yunost' bal'zakovskogo vozrasta. Vspominaniya pod gitaru. // Oktyabr'.-2013.-№ 8. // http://magazines.russ.ru/october/2013/8/6a.html [Data obrashcheniya 23.10.2014].
Voslenskiy M. Nomenklatura.-M: Zakharov, 2005.-640 s.
Dalosh D. Gost' iz budushchego. Anna Akhmatova i Isayya Berlin. Istoriya odnoy lyubvi. (Per. s vengerskogo Yu. Guseva). – M.: Tekst, 2010. – 221 s.
Kimerling A. Gorodskie klouny, ili stil'nost' po-sovetski. // 1956: nezamechennyy termidor. Ocherki provintsial'nogo byta / O. Leybovich, A. Koldushko, V. Shabalin, S. Shevyrin, A. Chashchukhin, A. Bushmakov, A. Kazankov, A. Kimerling. – Perm': Perm. gos. in-t iskusstva i kul'tury, 2012. – 248 s.
Sharp D. Ot diktatury k demokratii.-Ekaterinburg: Ul'tra. Kul'tura, 2005. – 224 s.
Skiperskikh A.V. «Eletskie kruzheva»: problemy legitimatsii vlasti v sovremennoy rossiyskoy provintsii // Sotsiodinamika. - 2014. - 6. - C. 57 - 69. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.6.12335. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_12335.html
P.S. Gurevich Posledstviya seksual'noy revolyutsii // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 4 - 7.
Skiperskikh A.V. Homo Politicus: mezhdu buntom i podchineniem // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 682 - 688. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12285.

References (transliteration):
Skiperskikh A.V. Poverkhnosti protesta: osobennosti politicheskogo pis'ma v sovremennoy Rossii. // Politicheskaya lingvistika.-2014.-№ 1.-S. 108 – 113.
Le Goff Zh. Intellektualy v Srednie veka (Per. s fr. A.M. Rutkevicha).-SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2003.
Shlegel' K. Aziya nachinaetsya na Silezskom vokzale. // Logos.-2002.-№ 3-4 (34)-S. 169-170.
Porudominskiy V. Dal'. – M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1971. – 384 s.
Zakharov S.M. Studenchestvo kak politicheskiy aktor: teoreticheskie modeli. // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2011.-№ 2.-S. 272 – 279.
Sezina I. Skinkhedy v Rossii: osobennosti subkul'turnogo koda i identifikatory. // http://www.nlobooks.ru/node/3302 [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
http://brandshop.ru/mens-polos/ [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
http://shop.lacoste.ru/catalog/polo-i-futbolki-muzh/ [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
Litoy A., Tushkin A., Okuneva D. Fa?.. Antifa! // Antifa i natsi stali glavnymi igrokami molodezhnoy okolopolitiki. // http://www.chaskor.ru/article/fa_antifa_3441 [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
Vypuskniki ukrainskoy gimnazii v Sevastopole prishli na posledniy zvonok v vyshivankakh. // http://sevastopolnews.info/2014/05/lenta/sobytiya/069221002/ [Data obrashcheniya 24.10.2014].
Averin Yu.G., Solokhin V.A. Osobennosti formirovaniya populizma v deyatel'nosti predstavitel'nogo organa gosudarstvennoy vlasti: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz. // Vestnik MGU.-Ser. 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya.-1998.-№1.-S. 71-84.
Skiperskikh A.V. Tekhnologii politicheskoy legitimatsii. – Elets: EGU im. I.A. Bunina, 2005. – 102 s.
Aksenov V. Ostrov Krym. – M.: Eksmo, 2012. – 512 s.
Aksenov V. Yunost' bal'zakovskogo vozrasta. Vspominaniya pod gitaru. // Oktyabr'.-2013.-№ 8. // http://magazines.russ.ru/october/2013/8/6a.html [Data obrashcheniya 23.10.2014].
Voslenskiy M. Nomenklatura.-M: Zakharov, 2005.-640 s.
Dalosh D. Gost' iz budushchego. Anna Akhmatova i Isayya Berlin. Istoriya odnoy lyubvi. (Per. s vengerskogo Yu. Guseva). – M.: Tekst, 2010. – 221 s.
Kimerling A. Gorodskie klouny, ili stil'nost' po-sovetski. // 1956: nezamechennyy termidor. Ocherki provintsial'nogo byta / O. Leybovich, A. Koldushko, V. Shabalin, S. Shevyrin, A. Chashchukhin, A. Bushmakov, A. Kazankov, A. Kimerling. – Perm': Perm. gos. in-t iskusstva i kul'tury, 2012. – 248 s.
Sharp D. Ot diktatury k demokratii.-Ekaterinburg: Ul'tra. Kul'tura, 2005. – 224 s.
Skiperskikh A.V. «Eletskie kruzheva»: problemy legitimatsii vlasti v sovremennoy rossiyskoy provintsii // Sotsiodinamika. - 2014. - 6. - C. 57 - 69. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.6.12335. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_12335.html
P.S. Gurevich Posledstviya seksual'noy revolyutsii // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 4 - 7.
Skiperskikh A.V. Homo Politicus: mezhdu buntom i podchineniem // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 682 - 688. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12285.

Аннотация: In her article Pilyugina analyzes the grounds and the development of interpretation methods during ancient times. Interpretation started to develop at the earliest stage of ancient philosophy because it was closely connected with cognition and understanding. As a condition for genuine understanding, interpretation can be quite successful because it applies certain methods and techniques. The research objective is to answer the question about sources of interpretatio and development of interpretative methodology. The problem of interpetation is being viewed in terms of the development of humanitarian branches of science and philosophy. 
The research is based on the methodology of the historical and philosophical analysis. The author has also applied the hermeneutical method as the main approach to the analysis of interpretation. The nature of the research topic has also required to apply the multidisciplinary approach and involve researches on history of philosophy, hermeneutics, argumentation theory and philology. The author shows that this topic is very important for practical philosophy and development of this topic is caused by social and cultural factors. In its turn, the development of the problem of interpretation created particular branches of knowledge. With time those branches became independent sciences and disciplines. Most of interpretative methods and techniques started to develop in the ancient times and are successfully used today. 

Ключевые слова: cognition, understanding, interpretation, knowledge, method, meaning, language, name, myth, argumentation

Библиография:
Ado P'er. Dukhovnye uprazhneniya i antichnaya filosofiya / M., SPb. Izd-vo «Stepnoy veter»; ID «Kolo», 2005. – 448 s.
Aristotel'. Ob istolkovanii/ Aristotel' Sochineniya v 4 tt., t. 2.-M.: Mysl'.-1978.-S. 91-117.
Zelinskiy F.F. Ellinskaya religiya. Minsk. Ekonompress, 2003. – 330 s.
Kasavin I.T. Traditsii i interpretatsii: Fragmenty istoricheskoy epistemologii. Moskva – SPb., Izdatel'stvo RKhGI, 2000. – 320 s.
Koshkina E. G. Evolyutsiya, ili «dreyf» yazyka, osnovnye tendentsii ego razvitiya (na primere leksiko-semanticheskoy sistemy) // V kn.: Sovremennyy nemetskiy yazyk: sostoyanie i razvitie / Otv. red.: L. Nefedova. Vyp. 2. M. : MAKS Press, 2010. S. 18-33.
Kuznetsov V.G. Germenevtika i ee put' ot konkretnoy metodiki do filosofskogo napravleniya. // Logos, № 10(20), 1999. S. 43-88.
Losev A.F. Kommentarii k dialogu «Kratil» / Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T.1. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; «Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko». 2006. – S. 602-622.
Mikirtumov I.B. Teoriya smysla i intensional'naya logika. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2006. – 351 s.
Pilyugina M.A. Ritorika i teoriya argumentatsii // Modeli rassuzhdeniy – 5: Argumentatsiya, kommunikatsiya, obshchestvo. – Kaliningrad, 2012. S. 176-187.
Platon. Kratil/ Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta: «Izd-vo Olega Abyshko», 2006.— S. 421-502.
Slesinskiy R. Poiski v ponimanii. Vvedenie v filosofskuyu germenevtiku. [WWW document]. URL http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/slesinsky_poiski_v_ponimanii.pdf
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2000. – 744s.
Torshilov D. O. Etimologiya i allegoriya v tolkovanii mifa (u dosokratikov i rannikh stoikov) // SOFIYa: Al'manakh: Vyp. 2: P. A. Florenskiy i A. F. Losev: rod, mif, istoriya. Ufa: Izdatel'stvo «Zdravookhranenie Bashkortostana», 2007. S. 233-238.
Shul'ga E.N. Kognitivnaya germenevtika, M., IF RAN, 2002.-235 s.
Shul'ga E.N. Logicheskaya germenevtika o protivorechivosti filosofskikh sistem // Mysli i iskusstvo argumentatsii. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2003. S. S. 191-211.

References (transliteration):
Ado P'er. Dukhovnye uprazhneniya i antichnaya filosofiya / M., SPb. Izd-vo «Stepnoy veter»; ID «Kolo», 2005. – 448 s.
Aristotel'. Ob istolkovanii/ Aristotel' Sochineniya v 4 tt., t. 2.-M.: Mysl'.-1978.-S. 91-117.
Zelinskiy F.F. Ellinskaya religiya. Minsk. Ekonompress, 2003. – 330 s.
Kasavin I.T. Traditsii i interpretatsii: Fragmenty istoricheskoy epistemologii. Moskva – SPb., Izdatel'stvo RKhGI, 2000. – 320 s.
Koshkina E. G. Evolyutsiya, ili «dreyf» yazyka, osnovnye tendentsii ego razvitiya (na primere leksiko-semanticheskoy sistemy) // V kn.: Sovremennyy nemetskiy yazyk: sostoyanie i razvitie / Otv. red.: L. Nefedova. Vyp. 2. M. : MAKS Press, 2010. S. 18-33.
Kuznetsov V.G. Germenevtika i ee put' ot konkretnoy metodiki do filosofskogo napravleniya. // Logos, № 10(20), 1999. S. 43-88.
Losev A.F. Kommentarii k dialogu «Kratil» / Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T.1. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; «Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko». 2006. – S. 602-622.
Mikirtumov I.B. Teoriya smysla i intensional'naya logika. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2006. – 351 s.
Pilyugina M.A. Ritorika i teoriya argumentatsii // Modeli rassuzhdeniy – 5: Argumentatsiya, kommunikatsiya, obshchestvo. – Kaliningrad, 2012. S. 176-187.
Platon. Kratil/ Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta: «Izd-vo Olega Abyshko», 2006.— S. 421-502.
Slesinskiy R. Poiski v ponimanii. Vvedenie v filosofskuyu germenevtiku. [WWW document]. URL http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/slesinsky_poiski_v_ponimanii.pdf
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2000. – 744s.
Torshilov D. O. Etimologiya i allegoriya v tolkovanii mifa (u dosokratikov i rannikh stoikov) // SOFIYa: Al'manakh: Vyp. 2: P. A. Florenskiy i A. F. Losev: rod, mif, istoriya. Ufa: Izdatel'stvo «Zdravookhranenie Bashkortostana», 2007. S. 233-238.
Shul'ga E.N. Kognitivnaya germenevtika, M., IF RAN, 2002.-235 s.
Shul'ga E.N. Logicheskaya germenevtika o protivorechivosti filosofskikh sistem // Mysli i iskusstvo argumentatsii. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2003. S. S. 191-211.