Аннотация: The object of the research is the image of Hamlet in the eponymous tragedy after W. Shakespeare. The subject of the research is the philosophy of the Prince of Denmark represented by a system of values the character puts to the test by his own life. The author examines thoroughly why the wisdom of Hamlet can be understood as philosophy in the sense of worldview and mindset, as well as analyzes the values that influenced the way the protagonist accomplished his mission. These values include the belief in God, love, power, glory, honour. A particular emphasis is given to proving the pan-human importance of "the Hamlet doctrine" as interpreted by the author. The methods applied are the historical-cultural reconstruction of the imagery, the systems approach to the research topic, the philosophical interpretation of the literary text, extrapolation, axiological analysis, ethical synthesis. The main research findings are: Hamlet's philosophizing can be characterized as a special type of worldview philosophy known as "philosophy of life"; in his conduct, Hamlet follows certain values that are put to the test in the accomplishment of the mission imposed on the protagonist. The author's particular contribution to the researched topic is the demonstration of the contradictory nature of influence these values have on Hamlet's personality and actions. The academic novelty of the research is found in the approach to the contemplations of the Prince of Denmark based on the analysis of his philosophy as manifestation of the certain system of values.

Ключевые слова: the doctrine of Hamlet, ethics of duty, ethics of revenge, honor, glory, power, faith in God, love, the system of values, Hamlet as a philosopher

Библиография:
Karasev L.V. Fleyta Gamleta // Karasev L.V. Fleyta Gamleta: Ocherk ontologicheskoy poetiki. M.: Znak, 2009. S. 111-133.
Nitsshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii iz dukha muzyki. Predislovie k Rikhardu Vagneru // Nitsshe F. Soch. v 2 tt. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 57-157.
Rikkert G. O sisteme tsennostey // Rikkert G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul'ture / Per. s nem. A.F. Zotova. M.: Respublika, 1998. S. 363-391.
Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mir sagi / Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mir sagi. Stanovlenie literatury. Leningrad: Nauka, 1984. S. 3-140.
Annenskiy I. Problema Gamleta // Annenskiy I. Knigi otrazheniy. M.: Nauka, 1979. S. 162-172.
Sakson Grammatik. Deyaniya datchan (Saxo Grammaticus. Gesta Danorum). Kn. 4. URL: http://ulfdalir.narod.ru/sources/Iceland-Scandinavia/Gesta_Danorum/book4.htm [Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2016].
Florenskiy P.A. Gamlet // Florenskiy P.A. Soch.: V 4 t. – M.: Mysl', 1994. – S. 250-280.
Bekon F. O dostoinstve i priumnozhenii nauk // Bekon F. Soch. v 2 t. M.: Mysl', 1971. S. 85-546.
Losev A.F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya. Istoricheskiy smysl estetiki Vozrozhdeniya. M.: Mysl', 1998. 750 s.
Solov'ev V.S. Zhiznennaya drama Platona // Solov'ev V.S. Soch. v 2 t. 2-e izd. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 582-625.
Anikst A. Gamlet, prints Datskiy // Shekspir U. Poln. sobr. soch. v 8 tt. T. 6. M.: Iskusstvo, 1960. S. 571-627.
Kantor V.K. Gamlet kak «khristianskiy voin» // Voprosy filosofii. 2008, № 5. S. 32-46.
Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po estetike. Kn. 1 // Gegel' G.V.F. Soch. v 14 tt. T. 12. M.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izd-vo, 1938. 472 s.
Gete I.V. Gody ucheniya Vil'gel'ma Meystera // Gete I.V. Soch. v 10 tt. T.7. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978. 526 s.
Critchley S., Webster J. The Hamlet Doctrine: Knowing Too Much, Doing Nothing. London – New York: Verso Books, 2013. 288 p.
Tolstoy L.N. O Shekspire i o drame // Tolstoy L.N. Poln. sobr. soch. v 90 tt. T. 35. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1950. S. 216-272.

References (transliteration):
Karasev L.V. Fleyta Gamleta // Karasev L.V. Fleyta Gamleta: Ocherk ontologicheskoy poetiki. M.: Znak, 2009. S. 111-133.
Nitsshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii iz dukha muzyki. Predislovie k Rikhardu Vagneru // Nitsshe F. Soch. v 2 tt. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 57-157.
Rikkert G. O sisteme tsennostey // Rikkert G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul'ture / Per. s nem. A.F. Zotova. M.: Respublika, 1998. S. 363-391.
Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mir sagi / Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mir sagi. Stanovlenie literatury. Leningrad: Nauka, 1984. S. 3-140.
Annenskiy I. Problema Gamleta // Annenskiy I. Knigi otrazheniy. M.: Nauka, 1979. S. 162-172.
Sakson Grammatik. Deyaniya datchan (Saxo Grammaticus. Gesta Danorum). Kn. 4. URL: http://ulfdalir.narod.ru/sources/Iceland-Scandinavia/Gesta_Danorum/book4.htm [Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2016].
Florenskiy P.A. Gamlet // Florenskiy P.A. Soch.: V 4 t. – M.: Mysl', 1994. – S. 250-280.
Bekon F. O dostoinstve i priumnozhenii nauk // Bekon F. Soch. v 2 t. M.: Mysl', 1971. S. 85-546.
Losev A.F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya. Istoricheskiy smysl estetiki Vozrozhdeniya. M.: Mysl', 1998. 750 s.
Solov'ev V.S. Zhiznennaya drama Platona // Solov'ev V.S. Soch. v 2 t. 2-e izd. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 582-625.
Anikst A. Gamlet, prints Datskiy // Shekspir U. Poln. sobr. soch. v 8 tt. T. 6. M.: Iskusstvo, 1960. S. 571-627.
Kantor V.K. Gamlet kak «khristianskiy voin» // Voprosy filosofii. 2008, № 5. S. 32-46.
Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po estetike. Kn. 1 // Gegel' G.V.F. Soch. v 14 tt. T. 12. M.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izd-vo, 1938. 472 s.
Gete I.V. Gody ucheniya Vil'gel'ma Meystera // Gete I.V. Soch. v 10 tt. T.7. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978. 526 s.
Critchley S., Webster J. The Hamlet Doctrine: Knowing Too Much, Doing Nothing. London – New York: Verso Books, 2013. 288 p.
Tolstoy L.N. O Shekspire i o drame // Tolstoy L.N. Poln. sobr. soch. v 90 tt. T. 35. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1950. S. 216-272.

Аннотация: The field of philosophical problems generated by the study of the hesychast mystico-ascetical practice is structured into three principal domains: Hesychasm and Phenomenology, Hesychasm and Energy, Hesychasm and the Anthropological Unlocking. The first of these domains is analyzed, in which problems of methodology, epistemology and heuristics of spiritual and philosophical experience are collected. Comparative study of hesychast and phenomenological (intentional) experience demonstrates that these two kinds of experience possess close resemblance and structural parallels. Namely, the triadic structure of the way of spiritual ascension in hesychasm corresponds to three stages of the phenomenological act of the grasping of the intentional object (phenomenological reduction – intentional grasping – noesis). The hesychast principle of soberness (nepsis) is characterized as a specific modus of consciousness, which coincides with intentional consciousness in all principal features.

Ключевые слова: phenomenological reduction, intentionality, anachoresis, ascesis, hesychasm, phenomenology, philosophy, noesis, soberness, attention

Библиография:
Shpet G.G. Mudrost' ili razum? // Mysl' i slovo. I. M., 1917. S. 46, 48.
Khoruzhiy S.S. Fonar' Diogena. Kriticheskaya retrospektiva evropeyskoy antropologii. M., 2010. S. 426-473, 487-491.
Shpet G.G. Pis'mo k E. Gusserlyu ot 14.XII.1913 // Logos. 1996. № 7. S. 125.
Prep. Ioann Lestvichnik. Lestvitsa 2,1; 27,46. Sergiev Posad, 1894. S. 28, 238

References (transliteration):
Shpet G.G. Mudrost' ili razum? // Mysl' i slovo. I. M., 1917. S. 46, 48.
Khoruzhiy S.S. Fonar' Diogena. Kriticheskaya retrospektiva evropeyskoy antropologii. M., 2010. S. 426-473, 487-491.
Shpet G.G. Pis'mo k E. Gusserlyu ot 14.XII.1913 // Logos. 1996. № 7. S. 125.
Prep. Ioann Lestvichnik. Lestvitsa 2,1; 27,46. Sergiev Posad, 1894. S. 28, 238

Аннотация: The modern condition of philosophy as a special sphere of research and training course is considered, the concept of 'belief of philosophers' as a self-confidence and faith in themselves and their 'internal person' is applied. Russian professional philosophers knew about such belief, many followed that belief, too, but privately. In their classrooms they spoke of other things such as politics, art, laws of existence and cognition. Thus, true philosophical themes were replaced with the philosophical problems of politics, science, art, etc. There is an opinion that philosophy of culture will be the last philosophy 'of something' and be replaced only with the philosophy of human. In their research the authors have used the analytical and comparative research methods which was determined by the need to define the ideological essence in understanding the real value and problem status of philosophy. The authors conclude that a new idea of philosophy will be education culture as a form of existence created by its carrier and defining, therefore, all originality of humankind. Strictly speaking, even in the systematised modern philosophy of culture still remains within the borders outlined by Hegel. Logically, in the future it will be replaced with philosophy of the person. In this article it is underlined that it should be philosophy not 'about' the person but 'of' the person created by his independent thinking. 

Ключевые слова: philosophy of culture, idea of philosophy, philosophy, culture, education, standard training, science, belief of philosophers, supression of philosophy, philosophy of the person

Библиография:
I.N. Sizemskaya Problemy obrazovaniya v kontekste otechestvennogo filosofsko-pedagogicheskogo naslediya // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2012. - 3. - C. 7 - 15.
P.S. Gurevich Obrazovanie i budushchee cheloveka // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 104 - 113. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.2.9123.
Polishchuk V. I. Stsenariy dlya mirovoy istorii i kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. № 10 (46).
Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M., 2011.
Gumerova G.A. Ideynye istoki russkoy filosofii kul'tury XX veka // Vestnik Ishimskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta im. P. P. Ershova. 2014. № 3 (15).
Larin Yu.V. Priroda cheloveka v proektsii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 11 (83).
Gurevich P.S. Filosofskaya interpretatsiya cheloveka. M., 2013.
Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Kn. 1. SPb.: «Nauka», 1993.
Prigozhin I.Filosofiya nestabil'nosti //Voprosy filosofii. 1991. №6.
Gulyga A.V. Gegel'. M., «Molodaya gvardiya», 1970.
L.Wittgenstein. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Fr. a. M., 1971.
Oyzerman T.I. Burzhuaznyy mif o smerti filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 1979. № 9.
Gegel' G. V. F. Raboty raznykh let. V dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M., «Mysl'», 1970.
Terminispol'zovan iz statey I. Yakhota pod obshchim nazvaniem «Podavlenie filosofii v SSSR (20-30-e gody)». Sm.: Voprosy filosofii. 1991. №№ 9–11
Popper Karl R. Kakoy mne viditsya filosofiya // Perspektivnye problemy filosofskikh issledovaniy za rubezhom. M.: IFAN, 1991.
Latynina A. N. Voprosy chelovecheskoy sud'by // Voprosy filosofii. 1984. № 2.
Mikhaylov A.B. Problema teksta // Voprosy filosofii. 1984. № 2.
Mendeleev D.I. Narodnoe prosveshchenie i vysshee obrazovanie // D.I, Mendeleev. Soch., t.23. JI.-M., 1952.
Vanchugov V. V. Ocherk filosofii «samobytno-russkoy». M.: RITs «PILIGRIM», 1994.
Revunenkova N. V. Renessansnoe svobodomyslie i ideologiya Reformatsii. M.: «Mysl'», 1988.
Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu // Merab Mamardashvili. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. M.: Progress, 1990.

References (transliteration):
I.N. Sizemskaya Problemy obrazovaniya v kontekste otechestvennogo filosofsko-pedagogicheskogo naslediya // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2012. - 3. - C. 7 - 15.
P.S. Gurevich Obrazovanie i budushchee cheloveka // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 104 - 113. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.2.9123.
Polishchuk V. I. Stsenariy dlya mirovoy istorii i kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. № 10 (46).
Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M., 2011.
Gumerova G.A. Ideynye istoki russkoy filosofii kul'tury XX veka // Vestnik Ishimskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta im. P. P. Ershova. 2014. № 3 (15).
Larin Yu.V. Priroda cheloveka v proektsii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 11 (83).
Gurevich P.S. Filosofskaya interpretatsiya cheloveka. M., 2013.
Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Kn. 1. SPb.: «Nauka», 1993.
Prigozhin I.Filosofiya nestabil'nosti //Voprosy filosofii. 1991. №6.
Gulyga A.V. Gegel'. M., «Molodaya gvardiya», 1970.
L.Wittgenstein. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Fr. a. M., 1971.
Oyzerman T.I. Burzhuaznyy mif o smerti filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 1979. № 9.
Gegel' G. V. F. Raboty raznykh let. V dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M., «Mysl'», 1970.
Terminispol'zovan iz statey I. Yakhota pod obshchim nazvaniem «Podavlenie filosofii v SSSR (20-30-e gody)». Sm.: Voprosy filosofii. 1991. №№ 9–11
Popper Karl R. Kakoy mne viditsya filosofiya // Perspektivnye problemy filosofskikh issledovaniy za rubezhom. M.: IFAN, 1991.
Latynina A. N. Voprosy chelovecheskoy sud'by // Voprosy filosofii. 1984. № 2.
Mikhaylov A.B. Problema teksta // Voprosy filosofii. 1984. № 2.
Mendeleev D.I. Narodnoe prosveshchenie i vysshee obrazovanie // D.I, Mendeleev. Soch., t.23. JI.-M., 1952.
Vanchugov V. V. Ocherk filosofii «samobytno-russkoy». M.: RITs «PILIGRIM», 1994.
Revunenkova N. V. Renessansnoe svobodomyslie i ideologiya Reformatsii. M.: «Mysl'», 1988.
Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu // Merab Mamardashvili. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. M.: Progress, 1990.

Аннотация: The conversation with S. S. Neretina has been recorded within the framework of the editorial project 'Who creates philosophy in Russia today' and devoted to the modern trends of the Russian philosophical thought. The conversation referred to the works written by S. S. Neretina, A. P. Ogurtsov and other Russian philosophers who discussed the status of Russian philosophy and problematic philosophical self-identification. S. S. Neretina believes that one of the most essential features of cogitation is the probability so evauation of this probability should be the main goal of modern philosophy. During their conversation A. S. Nilogov and S. S. Neretina used the methods of historical analysis that allowed to define the tendencies in understanding philosophy and the history of philosophy. They also used the hermeneutic approach that allowed to describe the contemporary situation in Russian philosophy. S. S. Neretina insists that man himself creates forms of communication that are not established by traditions. Our contemporaries have initiated the creation of social networks, some kind of democracy where everyone has a right to speak out. This is the hidden-outspoken democracy and a new form of philosophy. 

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Russian philosophy, democracy, universals, Ogurstov, Bibikhin, conceptualism, double-interpretation, medievalism (medieval philosophy), thropology

Библиография:
Malevich K. S. Ot kubizma i futurizma k suprematizmu. Novyy zhivopisnyy realizm. M. 1916.
Gete I. V., Shiller F. Perepiska v 2-kh tomakh. T. II. M., 1988.
Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. T. II. Vremya lzheprorokov. M. 1992.
Takho-Godi A. A. Ioniysko-atticheskoe ponimanie termina «istoriya» // Voprosy klassicheskoy filologii. Vyp. II. M., 1969.
Takho-Godi A. A. Ellinskoe ponimanie termina «istoriya» // Voprosy klassicheskoy filologii. Vyp. II. M., 1969.
Gasparov M. L. Marina Tsvetaeva: ot poetiki byta k poetike slova // Russkaya slovesnost'. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta. Antologiya / Red. V. P. Neroznak. M., 1997.
Meyendorf I. Vizantiyskoe bogoslovie. Istoricheskie napravleniya i veroucheniya. M., 2001.
Arendt Kh. Vita activa, ili o deyatel'noy zhizni. SPb., 2000.
Zakharov V. Zolotaya kniga moskovskogo kontseptualizma // Moskovskiy kontseptualizm / Sost. Ekaterina Degot', Vadim Zakharov. M., 2005
Nilogov A.S. Etos filosofii nauki (beseda A. S. Nilogova s A. P. Ogurtsovym v ramkakh proekta "Kto segodnya delaet filosofiyu v Rossii") // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 7. - C. 992 - 999. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.7.12308.

References (transliteration):
Malevich K. S. Ot kubizma i futurizma k suprematizmu. Novyy zhivopisnyy realizm. M. 1916.
Gete I. V., Shiller F. Perepiska v 2-kh tomakh. T. II. M., 1988.
Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. T. II. Vremya lzheprorokov. M. 1992.
Takho-Godi A. A. Ioniysko-atticheskoe ponimanie termina «istoriya» // Voprosy klassicheskoy filologii. Vyp. II. M., 1969.
Takho-Godi A. A. Ellinskoe ponimanie termina «istoriya» // Voprosy klassicheskoy filologii. Vyp. II. M., 1969.
Gasparov M. L. Marina Tsvetaeva: ot poetiki byta k poetike slova // Russkaya slovesnost'. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta. Antologiya / Red. V. P. Neroznak. M., 1997.
Meyendorf I. Vizantiyskoe bogoslovie. Istoricheskie napravleniya i veroucheniya. M., 2001.
Arendt Kh. Vita activa, ili o deyatel'noy zhizni. SPb., 2000.
Zakharov V. Zolotaya kniga moskovskogo kontseptualizma // Moskovskiy kontseptualizm / Sost. Ekaterina Degot', Vadim Zakharov. M., 2005
Nilogov A.S. Etos filosofii nauki (beseda A. S. Nilogova s A. P. Ogurtsovym v ramkakh proekta "Kto segodnya delaet filosofiyu v Rossii") // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 7. - C. 992 - 999. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.7.12308.

Аннотация: The article presents philosophical and cultural analysis of esthetical content of such a topical phenomenon in modern culture as martial arts. Great interest towards traditions of marital arts cannot be explained only because they teach self-defense and health improvement or because Eastern martial arts are quite an exotic phenomenon in new European culture. According to the author, esthetics of martial arts plays an important role, too, and it is an essential element of both martial arts and psychophysical practices based on the former. The fight himself is the esthetical demonstration of ontological, theoretical and philosophical grounds of martial arts. The key to understanding esthetical symbolism of martial arts is the game or agon. Features of the agon and competition are preserved and codified in martial arts and their rules. From the point of view of phenomenology of culture, esthetical symbols of martial arts are expressed in different ways. It is not only the beauty of human bodies or music but the esthetics of the fight itself including the greeting rituals and special martial art costumes. Moreover, esthetical aspects are closely interweaved with ethical moments. Esthetical content of martial arts and fight in different nations and cultures allowed to martial arts to go beyond the limits of a particular cultural tradition and be spread all over the world because the need in esthetics and esthetical experience is universal. Esthetical elements of martial arts define polarization of plots devoted to martial arts in literature, cinematograph, other branches of art and modern culture in general.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, culture, martial arts, ritual, agon, esthetics, kata, traditions, art, game.

Контактная информация: Selivanov Oleg Ivanovich, 344002, Russia, Rostov Region, Rostov-on-Do9n, Budennovsky 20, kab. 502 T.