Аннотация: The subject of this research Is the main approaches to the problem of truth and their correlation with the works of the Russian religious philosophers. The following approaches are being determined: ontological, gnoseological, existential, and relativistic (nihilistic). The ontological approach is based on the principle of oneness of reasoning and being, where the truth is authentic being. Such approach emerges on the basis of mythological reasoning.  Gnoseological approach lies in contraposition of the subject and object of cognition. Existential approach is established on the so-called reference to the circumstances preceding the subject-object demarcation. The truth is being understood as the existence or value.  Relativistic approach in its development balances the definition of truth, eventually seeing it as fiction. In the works of the Russian religious philosophers we can observe an ontological trend, in which the truth is understood as “omnibeing”. According to V. S. Solovyev, the truth is perceived in “mystical” unity of rational and irrational aspects of a subject, in unity of the subject and object of cognition. In order to reveal the inner logic of such unity, A. F. Losev refers to the neo-Platonic dialectics. At the same time, Russian religious philosophers criticize the gnoseological approach, subjective-idealistic trends of existential approach, as well as relativistic (nihilistic) approach. The conclusion is made that the Russian religious philosophy is a peculiar continuation of the ancient and medieval ontological tradition. We can also observe mythological foundations of the specificity of Russian religious philosophy.

Ключевые слова: Myth, Cathedral consciousness, Omnibeing, Living knowledge, Truth as fiction, Existential understanding of the truth, Gnoseological understanding of the truth, Ontological understanding of the truth, Russian religious philosophy, Truth

Библиография:
Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny: Opyt pravoslavnoy teoditsei / P.A. Florenskiy. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2003. S. 42
Denisov S.F. Bibleyskie i filosofskie strategemy spaseniya: antropologicheskie etyudy / S.F. Denisov. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2004. S. 7
Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Rannyaya klassika / A.F. Losev. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1963. S. 327
Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Chast' 1. Ot epicheskikh teokosmogoniy do vozniknoveniya atomistiki / pod izd. A.V. Lebedeva. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 534
Plotin Enneady / Plotin [sost. i otv. red. S.I. Eremeev]. Kiev: UTsIMM-Press, 1995. S. 171
Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Ranniy ellinizm / A.F. Losev. Khar'kov: Folio; M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2000. S. 821
Kyrlezhev A.I. Troitsa / A.I. Kyrlezhev // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. T. 4. pod red. V.S. Stepina. M.: Mysl', 2010. S. 112-113.
Aristotel'. Metafizika / Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1975. S. 186.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma / I. Kant. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh, T. 3 M.: Mysl', 1964. S. 160.
Dekart R. Rassuzhdenie o metode / R. Dekart. M.: Izd-vo akademii nauk SSSR, 1953. S. 22.
Gusserl' E. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii. Kniga pervaya. Obshchee vvedenie v chistuyu fenomenologiyu / E. Gusserl'. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2009. 489 s.
Mamardashvili M.K. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya / M.K. Mamardashvili. M.: Progress, 1993. 352 s.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / M. Khaydegger. M.: Ad Marginem, 1997. 452 s.
Puankare A. O nauke / A. Puankare. M.: Nauka. Gl. red, fiz.-mat. lit., 1990. 736 s.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy / T. Kun. M.: Progress, 1977. 300 s.
Nitsshe F. Ob istine i lzhi vo vnenravstvennom smysle / F. Nitsshe // O pol'ze i vrede istorii dlya zhizni. Sumerki kumirov, ili Kak filosofstvovat' molotom. Minsk: Kharvest, 2003. S. 355-374.
Khomyakov A.S. Po povodu otryvkov, naydennykh v bumagakh I.V. Kireevskogo // Khomyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya na Strastnom bul'vare, 1900. S. 268.
Khomyakov A.S. Vtoroe pis'mo o filosofii k Yu.F. Samarinu // Khomyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya na Strastnom bul'vare, 1900. S. 327.
Khomyakov A.S. Neskol'ko slov pravoslavnogo khristianina o zapadnykh veroispovedaniyakh // Khomyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya na Strastnom bul'vare, 1886. S. 54.
Kireevskiy I.V. O neobkhodimosti i vozmozhnosti novykh nachal dlya filosofii // Kireevskiy I.V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. M.: Tipografiya imperatorskogo moskovskogo universiteta, 1911. S. 239.
Solov'ev V.S. Kritika otvlechennykh nachal / V.S. Solov'ev // Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. M.: Knigoizdatel'skoe tovarishchestvo «Prosveshchenie», 1911. S. 331.
Trubetskoy S.N. O prirode chelovecheskogo soznaniya / S.N. Trubetskoy // Sochineniya. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 564.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa / A.F. Losev. M.: Mysl', 2001. S. 44.
Losev A.F. Antichnyy kosmos i sovremennaya nauka / A.F. Losev // Bytie – imya – kosmos. M.: Mysl', 1993. S. 72.
Losev A.F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya / A.F. Losev. M.: Mysl', 1982. S. 120.
Bulgakov S.N. Filosofiya khozyaystva / S.N. Bulgakov. M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2009. 464 s.
Vaneev A.A. Dva goda v Abezi; V pamyat' o L.P. Karsavine / A.A. Vaneev. Bryussel': Zhizn' s Bogom; La Presse Libre, 1990. S. 64.
P.S. Gurevich Didakticheskie idei Sokrata // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2011. - 3. - C. 50 - 61.

References (transliteration):
Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny: Opyt pravoslavnoy teoditsei / P.A. Florenskiy. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2003. S. 42
Denisov S.F. Bibleyskie i filosofskie strategemy spaseniya: antropologicheskie etyudy / S.F. Denisov. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2004. S. 7
Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Rannyaya klassika / A.F. Losev. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1963. S. 327
Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Chast' 1. Ot epicheskikh teokosmogoniy do vozniknoveniya atomistiki / pod izd. A.V. Lebedeva. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 534
Plotin Enneady / Plotin [sost. i otv. red. S.I. Eremeev]. Kiev: UTsIMM-Press, 1995. S. 171
Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Ranniy ellinizm / A.F. Losev. Khar'kov: Folio; M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2000. S. 821
Kyrlezhev A.I. Troitsa / A.I. Kyrlezhev // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. T. 4. pod red. V.S. Stepina. M.: Mysl', 2010. S. 112-113.
Aristotel'. Metafizika / Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1975. S. 186.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma / I. Kant. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh, T. 3 M.: Mysl', 1964. S. 160.
Dekart R. Rassuzhdenie o metode / R. Dekart. M.: Izd-vo akademii nauk SSSR, 1953. S. 22.
Gusserl' E. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii. Kniga pervaya. Obshchee vvedenie v chistuyu fenomenologiyu / E. Gusserl'. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2009. 489 s.
Mamardashvili M.K. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya / M.K. Mamardashvili. M.: Progress, 1993. 352 s.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / M. Khaydegger. M.: Ad Marginem, 1997. 452 s.
Puankare A. O nauke / A. Puankare. M.: Nauka. Gl. red, fiz.-mat. lit., 1990. 736 s.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy / T. Kun. M.: Progress, 1977. 300 s.
Nitsshe F. Ob istine i lzhi vo vnenravstvennom smysle / F. Nitsshe // O pol'ze i vrede istorii dlya zhizni. Sumerki kumirov, ili Kak filosofstvovat' molotom. Minsk: Kharvest, 2003. S. 355-374.
Khomyakov A.S. Po povodu otryvkov, naydennykh v bumagakh I.V. Kireevskogo // Khomyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya na Strastnom bul'vare, 1900. S. 268.
Khomyakov A.S. Vtoroe pis'mo o filosofii k Yu.F. Samarinu // Khomyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya na Strastnom bul'vare, 1900. S. 327.
Khomyakov A.S. Neskol'ko slov pravoslavnogo khristianina o zapadnykh veroispovedaniyakh // Khomyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya na Strastnom bul'vare, 1886. S. 54.
Kireevskiy I.V. O neobkhodimosti i vozmozhnosti novykh nachal dlya filosofii // Kireevskiy I.V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. M.: Tipografiya imperatorskogo moskovskogo universiteta, 1911. S. 239.
Solov'ev V.S. Kritika otvlechennykh nachal / V.S. Solov'ev // Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. M.: Knigoizdatel'skoe tovarishchestvo «Prosveshchenie», 1911. S. 331.
Trubetskoy S.N. O prirode chelovecheskogo soznaniya / S.N. Trubetskoy // Sochineniya. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 564.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa / A.F. Losev. M.: Mysl', 2001. S. 44.
Losev A.F. Antichnyy kosmos i sovremennaya nauka / A.F. Losev // Bytie – imya – kosmos. M.: Mysl', 1993. S. 72.
Losev A.F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya / A.F. Losev. M.: Mysl', 1982. S. 120.
Bulgakov S.N. Filosofiya khozyaystva / S.N. Bulgakov. M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2009. 464 s.
Vaneev A.A. Dva goda v Abezi; V pamyat' o L.P. Karsavine / A.A. Vaneev. Bryussel': Zhizn' s Bogom; La Presse Libre, 1990. S. 64.
P.S. Gurevich Didakticheskie idei Sokrata // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2011. - 3. - C. 50 - 61.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the analysis of the value modalities within the information-communicative paradigm of science. It is underlined that genesis (ontology) of science in the area of culture is not only an example and model of the information-communicative innovative processes in all spheres of human activity, but also possesses the essential  ethical characteristics.  The author claims that the newest discoveries in physics, cosmology, and especially biology, not only significantly affect the information resources and worldview attitudes, but also touch upon the in-depth, existential characteristics of the scholars, as well as the entire population of the Earth. The scientific novelty consists in the following statement: the relevance of the value problematics of science is tightly connected with the solution of the question about the methodology of research of the values from the perspective of their information-communicative importance. The author determines the main value modalities of science on the three principal levels of the system of scientific activity within the conceptual contexts of sociocultural historical process. It is stated that the universal human values of solidarity, information awareness, communication skills, integrity, tolerance, and humanism are more carefully expressed through the ethical norms and ideals of scientific community.

Ключевые слова: Culture, Sociology, Ethics, Principles, Binarity, Scholars, Science, Communicativeness , Information, Value

Библиография:
Yakovlev V.A. Innovatsii v nauke. M.: RAN INION, 1997. S.26-51.
Viner N. Ya-matematik. M., 1964. S.344. Malkey M. Nauka i sotsiologiya znaniya. M., 1983.
Khoking St. Kratchayshaya istoriya vremeni / Stiven Khoking, Leonard Mlodinov ; [per. s angl. B. Oralbekova pod red. A. G. Sergeeva]. — SPb. : Amfora. TID Amfora, 2006. S. 72.
Vindel'band Vil'gel'm. Istoriya filosofii. – K.: Nika-Tsentr, 1997. S.
297.
Gurevich P.S. Vektory sovremennogo postizheniya cheloveka // Filosofskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2 (11). S. 95.
Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnaya programma novoy epistemologii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 10.-S. 1460 – 1470.
Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnoe edinstvo bytiya: soznanie, zhizn', materiya // «Filosofskie issledovaniya». — 2013.-№ 10.-S. 1 – 57.
Yakovlev V.A. Bytie informatsii ili informatsionnoe bytie? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 2.-S. 173 – 182.
Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnye programmy bytiya // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2015.-№ 1.-S. 93 – 147.
K.Popper. The Myth of the Framework. London-New York. 1996. P.195-198.
Malkey M. Nauka i sotsiologiya znaniya. M., 1983.Blur D. Sil'naya programma v sotsiologii znaniya / Logos. 2002. № 5-6. S. 162 – 186
Gilbert Dzh., Malkey M. Otkryvaya yashchik Pandory. M., 1987.
Blur D. Sil'naya programma v sotsiologii znaniya / Logos. 2002. № 5-6. S. 162 – 186
Kasavin I.T. Sotsial'naya epistemologiya. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye problemy. M.: Al'fa – M, 2013.
H.Lacey. Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London: Rontledge, 1999. C. 241.

References (transliteration):
Yakovlev V.A. Innovatsii v nauke. M.: RAN INION, 1997. S.26-51.
Viner N. Ya-matematik. M., 1964. S.344. Malkey M. Nauka i sotsiologiya znaniya. M., 1983.
Khoking St. Kratchayshaya istoriya vremeni / Stiven Khoking, Leonard Mlodinov ; [per. s angl. B. Oralbekova pod red. A. G. Sergeeva]. — SPb. : Amfora. TID Amfora, 2006. S. 72.
Vindel'band Vil'gel'm. Istoriya filosofii. – K.: Nika-Tsentr, 1997. S.
297.
Gurevich P.S. Vektory sovremennogo postizheniya cheloveka // Filosofskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2 (11). S. 95.
Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnaya programma novoy epistemologii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 10.-S. 1460 – 1470.
Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnoe edinstvo bytiya: soznanie, zhizn', materiya // «Filosofskie issledovaniya». — 2013.-№ 10.-S. 1 – 57.
Yakovlev V.A. Bytie informatsii ili informatsionnoe bytie? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 2.-S. 173 – 182.
Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnye programmy bytiya // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2015.-№ 1.-S. 93 – 147.
K.Popper. The Myth of the Framework. London-New York. 1996. P.195-198.
Malkey M. Nauka i sotsiologiya znaniya. M., 1983.Blur D. Sil'naya programma v sotsiologii znaniya / Logos. 2002. № 5-6. S. 162 – 186
Gilbert Dzh., Malkey M. Otkryvaya yashchik Pandory. M., 1987.
Blur D. Sil'naya programma v sotsiologii znaniya / Logos. 2002. № 5-6. S. 162 – 186
Kasavin I.T. Sotsial'naya epistemologiya. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye problemy. M.: Al'fa – M, 2013.
H.Lacey. Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London: Rontledge, 1999. C. 241.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the opera libretto, its importance, role and place in the process of staging a spectacle. The author emphasizes that opera libretto cannot contend for priority in interpretation of the initial literary material, or life story, because it is created only under the influence of a composer who writes the music for the opera. The opera libretto in the literary text is oriented on the idea of a composer, rather than a librettist, the idea that is placed in the score. Thus libretto can never become an independent carries of the opera plot, and the director of a play cannot base on the storyline captured in the libretto. For preparation of this research the author studied a large volume of literature dedicated to the issue of libretto writing, as well as the problem of realization of composer’s idea in opera theatre. The growing trend towards modernization of libretto via rewriting of the historical classical text, created in union with the composer, can result in the perishing of the very form of the art of “opera spectacle”. In an attempt to make the opera “more acceptable” for the modern audience, the librettists strive to endow the plot with “modern” “entertainment”, and in doing so, destroy the very goal and purpose of the opera work.  

Ключевые слова: Libretto, Opera directing, Opera, Acting analysis, Storyline, Action, Theory of directing, Directing, Theatre, Music

Библиография:
Struve Aleks. Ob opernykh «libretto» // Muzyka: Al'manakh. M., 1912. 29 dek. № 110. S. 1120-1129.
Shaverdyan A. Opera i ee literaturnyy pervoistochnik// Sovetskaya opera: Sb. kritich. statey / Red.-sost. M. Grinberg i N. Polyakova. M.: Muzgiz, 1953. S. 132-144.
Kazantseva L. P. Avtor v muzykal'nom soderzhanii: Avtoref. dis. d-ra iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1998. 40 s.
Pekelis M. Dramaturgiya Pushkina i russkaya opera // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1937. № 5. S. 45-60
Rakum. G. «Avtorskoe slovo» v opernoy dramaturgii: Dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1993. 179 s.
Ruch'evskaya E.A. «Ruslan» Glinki, «Tristan» Vagnera, «Snegurochka» Rimskogo-Korsakova: Stil', Dramaturgiya, Slovo i muzyka. SPb.: Kompozitor, 2002. S. 96-97.
Polyakova L. O sovremennom opernom libretto // Sov. muzyka. 1959. № 8. S. 11-17.
Fedicheva O.V. Mekhanizm vzaimodeystviya muzykal'nogo i rechevogo ritmov: Dis. kand. filol. nauk. M., 1995. 241 s.
Chernaya E.S. Libretto // Muz. entsiklopediya. T. 3. M.: Sov. entsiklopediya. S. 262-263.
Chernova T.Yu. Teoreticheskie problemy muzykal'noy dramaturgii: Dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1979. 225 s.
Pokrovskiy B.A. Stupeni professii. M.: Vserossiyskoe teatral'noe obshchestvo, 1984, 344 s.
Lukashev V. Libretto: algebra i garmoniya // Muz. zhizn'. 1985. № 15. S. 5.
Pivovarova I.L. Libretto otechestvennoy opery: aspekty interpretatsii literaturnogo pervoistochnika: Avtoref kandid na soisk uch st kand. iskusstvoved. Magnitogorsk, 2002. 256 s.
Korobkov S. «Pikovaya dama oznachaet taynuyu nedobrozhelatel'nost'» («Pikovaya dama» Vs. Meyerkhol'da) // Muz. akademiya. 1995. № 4-5. S. 104-110.
Ansimov G.P. Rezhisser v muzykal'nom teatre. M.: VTO, 1980. 319 c.
Freudenberger H., North G. Burn-out bei Frauen. 2-nd ed. Frankfurt, 1992.
Lengle A. Emotsional'noe vygoranie s pozitsii ekzistentsial'nogo analiza // Voprosy psikhologii, 2008. № 2. S. 3-12.
Voprosy opernoy dramaturgii: Sb. statey / Sost. i obshch. red. Yu. N. Tyulina. M.: Muzyka, 1975. 315 s.
Ganzburg G. O librettologii // Sov. muzyka. 1990. № 2. S. 78-79.
Ganzburg G. Shubertovedenie i librettologiya // Frants Shubert: K 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya: Materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konferentsii/ Mosk. gos. konservatoriya, Shubert, o-vo. M.: Prosv., 1997. S. 111-115.
Gurenko E. Spetsifika khudozhestvennoy interpretatsii: Opyt logicheskogo analiza // Voprosy ispolnitel'skogo iskusstva. Novosibirsk, 1974. S. 17-42.
Dimitrin Yu.G. Popytka metodologii. / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/konlan/metod.shtml#top
Dimitrin Yu.G. Opernaya reforma XVIII veka. Chto reformirovalos'? Kto reformator? / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/sleep/reform.shtml
Dimitrin Yu.G. Rondo-kaprichchiozo vokrug libretto / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/sleep/rondo.shtml
Dzhagatspanyank A. O zakonomernostyakh vozdeystviya ritma slovesnoy rechi na vokal'nuyu i instrumental'nuyu melodiku: Dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1981. 199 l.
Kuleshova G.G. Voprosy dramaturgii opery / G.G. Kuleshova. Mn.: Nauka i tekhnika, 1979. 231 s.
Vanslov V. Kontseptsiya spektaklya v opernom teatre // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1970. № 1. S. 59-68.
Nilova T.V. Tipologiya stsenicheskikh situatsiy v russkoy klassicheskoy opere. Metodika morfologicheskogo analiza: Avtoref. dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1993. 24 s.
Bubennikova L. K probleme khudozhestvennogo vzaimodeystviya muzykal'nogo i dramaticheskogo teatrov // Problemy muzykal'noy nauki. Vyp. 3. M.: Muzyka, 1975. S. 38-63.
Vaydman P. Rabota P. I. Chaykovskogo nad rukopis'yu libretto «Pikovaya dama» // Chaykovskiy i russkaya literatura. Izhevsk: Udmurtiya, 1980. 232 s.
Vanslov V.V. Sintez iskusstv v opernom spektakle: Avtoref. na soisk. uch. stepeni doktora iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1964. 28 s.
Belyaev V. K voprosu o sovetskom opernom libretto // Zhizn' iskusstva, 1929. № 5. 27 yanvarya. S. 2-3.
Bonfel'd M. Problema dvuyazychiya v opere P. I. Chaykovskogo «Pikovaya dama» // Chaykovskiy i russkaya literatura. Izhevsk: Udmurtiya, 1980. 232 s.
Dimitrin Yu.G. Dvukh muz soyuz prekrasnyy / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/sleep/musy.shtml
Sollertinskiy I. Izbrannye stat'i o muzyke M.-L.: Iskusstvo, 1946, 144 s.
Belenkova I. Ya. K probleme dialoga v opere (na materiale liriko-psikhologicheskoy opery P.I. Chaykovskogo): Diss. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. 1983. 206 s.
Pokrovskiy B.A. Stupeni professii. M.: Vserossiyskoe teatral'noe obshchestvo, 1984. 344 s.
Sollertinskiy I. I. Dramaturgiya opernogo libretto // Kriticheskie stat'i. M.: Muzgiz, 1963. S. 91-107.
Markaryan N.A. Problemy poetiki sovremennogo opernogo spektaklya // Avtoref. diss. na soisk. uch. st. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. L., 1994. 16 s.
Mikhaylov L.D. Sem' glav o teatre. Razmyshleniya, vospominaniya, dialogi. M.: Iskusstvo, 1985. 336 s.
Pokrovskiy B. A. Razmyshleniya ob opere. M., Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1979. 280 s.
Akulov E.A. Opernaya muzyka i stsenicheskoe deystvie / E.A. Akulov. M., Vserossiyskoe teatral'noe obshchestvo, 1978. 455 s.
Lapteva E. R. Poetika literaturnogo libretto na syuzhety proizvedeniy A. S. Pushkina v russkoy opere rubezha XIX-XX vekov: avtoref na soisk uch. step kandid. iskusstvov. Ekaterinburg, 2002. S. 2.
Dimitrin Yu.G. Opera. Libretto. Zritel' / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Teatr. 1971. № 1 // ceo.spb.ru/libretto/docs/operalibretto.shtml.
Spasskiy S. Zametki ob opernom libretto // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1948. № 8. S. 43.
Gur'ev G. Temporitm v opernoy dramaturgii // Voprosy opernoy dramaturgii: Sb. statey. M.: Muzyka, 1975. S. 36-66.
Yarustovskiy B.M. Dramaturgiya russkoy opernoy klassiki: Rabota russkikh kompozitorov-klassikov nad operoy / B.M. Yarustovskiy. M.: Gosudarstvennoe Muzykal'noe Izdatel'stvo, 1953. 403 s.

References (transliteration):
Struve Aleks. Ob opernykh «libretto» // Muzyka: Al'manakh. M., 1912. 29 dek. № 110. S. 1120-1129.
Shaverdyan A. Opera i ee literaturnyy pervoistochnik// Sovetskaya opera: Sb. kritich. statey / Red.-sost. M. Grinberg i N. Polyakova. M.: Muzgiz, 1953. S. 132-144.
Kazantseva L. P. Avtor v muzykal'nom soderzhanii: Avtoref. dis. d-ra iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1998. 40 s.
Pekelis M. Dramaturgiya Pushkina i russkaya opera // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1937. № 5. S. 45-60
Rakum. G. «Avtorskoe slovo» v opernoy dramaturgii: Dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1993. 179 s.
Ruch'evskaya E.A. «Ruslan» Glinki, «Tristan» Vagnera, «Snegurochka» Rimskogo-Korsakova: Stil', Dramaturgiya, Slovo i muzyka. SPb.: Kompozitor, 2002. S. 96-97.
Polyakova L. O sovremennom opernom libretto // Sov. muzyka. 1959. № 8. S. 11-17.
Fedicheva O.V. Mekhanizm vzaimodeystviya muzykal'nogo i rechevogo ritmov: Dis. kand. filol. nauk. M., 1995. 241 s.
Chernaya E.S. Libretto // Muz. entsiklopediya. T. 3. M.: Sov. entsiklopediya. S. 262-263.
Chernova T.Yu. Teoreticheskie problemy muzykal'noy dramaturgii: Dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1979. 225 s.
Pokrovskiy B.A. Stupeni professii. M.: Vserossiyskoe teatral'noe obshchestvo, 1984, 344 s.
Lukashev V. Libretto: algebra i garmoniya // Muz. zhizn'. 1985. № 15. S. 5.
Pivovarova I.L. Libretto otechestvennoy opery: aspekty interpretatsii literaturnogo pervoistochnika: Avtoref kandid na soisk uch st kand. iskusstvoved. Magnitogorsk, 2002. 256 s.
Korobkov S. «Pikovaya dama oznachaet taynuyu nedobrozhelatel'nost'» («Pikovaya dama» Vs. Meyerkhol'da) // Muz. akademiya. 1995. № 4-5. S. 104-110.
Ansimov G.P. Rezhisser v muzykal'nom teatre. M.: VTO, 1980. 319 c.
Freudenberger H., North G. Burn-out bei Frauen. 2-nd ed. Frankfurt, 1992.
Lengle A. Emotsional'noe vygoranie s pozitsii ekzistentsial'nogo analiza // Voprosy psikhologii, 2008. № 2. S. 3-12.
Voprosy opernoy dramaturgii: Sb. statey / Sost. i obshch. red. Yu. N. Tyulina. M.: Muzyka, 1975. 315 s.
Ganzburg G. O librettologii // Sov. muzyka. 1990. № 2. S. 78-79.
Ganzburg G. Shubertovedenie i librettologiya // Frants Shubert: K 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya: Materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konferentsii/ Mosk. gos. konservatoriya, Shubert, o-vo. M.: Prosv., 1997. S. 111-115.
Gurenko E. Spetsifika khudozhestvennoy interpretatsii: Opyt logicheskogo analiza // Voprosy ispolnitel'skogo iskusstva. Novosibirsk, 1974. S. 17-42.
Dimitrin Yu.G. Popytka metodologii. / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/konlan/metod.shtml#top
Dimitrin Yu.G. Opernaya reforma XVIII veka. Chto reformirovalos'? Kto reformator? / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/sleep/reform.shtml
Dimitrin Yu.G. Rondo-kaprichchiozo vokrug libretto / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/sleep/rondo.shtml
Dzhagatspanyank A. O zakonomernostyakh vozdeystviya ritma slovesnoy rechi na vokal'nuyu i instrumental'nuyu melodiku: Dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1981. 199 l.
Kuleshova G.G. Voprosy dramaturgii opery / G.G. Kuleshova. Mn.: Nauka i tekhnika, 1979. 231 s.
Vanslov V. Kontseptsiya spektaklya v opernom teatre // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1970. № 1. S. 59-68.
Nilova T.V. Tipologiya stsenicheskikh situatsiy v russkoy klassicheskoy opere. Metodika morfologicheskogo analiza: Avtoref. dis. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1993. 24 s.
Bubennikova L. K probleme khudozhestvennogo vzaimodeystviya muzykal'nogo i dramaticheskogo teatrov // Problemy muzykal'noy nauki. Vyp. 3. M.: Muzyka, 1975. S. 38-63.
Vaydman P. Rabota P. I. Chaykovskogo nad rukopis'yu libretto «Pikovaya dama» // Chaykovskiy i russkaya literatura. Izhevsk: Udmurtiya, 1980. 232 s.
Vanslov V.V. Sintez iskusstv v opernom spektakle: Avtoref. na soisk. uch. stepeni doktora iskusstvovedeniya. M., 1964. 28 s.
Belyaev V. K voprosu o sovetskom opernom libretto // Zhizn' iskusstva, 1929. № 5. 27 yanvarya. S. 2-3.
Bonfel'd M. Problema dvuyazychiya v opere P. I. Chaykovskogo «Pikovaya dama» // Chaykovskiy i russkaya literatura. Izhevsk: Udmurtiya, 1980. 232 s.
Dimitrin Yu.G. Dvukh muz soyuz prekrasnyy / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Libretto vo sne i nayavu: Internet stranitsa Yuriya Dimitrina //ceo.spb.ru/libretto/sleep/musy.shtml
Sollertinskiy I. Izbrannye stat'i o muzyke M.-L.: Iskusstvo, 1946, 144 s.
Belenkova I. Ya. K probleme dialoga v opere (na materiale liriko-psikhologicheskoy opery P.I. Chaykovskogo): Diss. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. 1983. 206 s.
Pokrovskiy B.A. Stupeni professii. M.: Vserossiyskoe teatral'noe obshchestvo, 1984. 344 s.
Sollertinskiy I. I. Dramaturgiya opernogo libretto // Kriticheskie stat'i. M.: Muzgiz, 1963. S. 91-107.
Markaryan N.A. Problemy poetiki sovremennogo opernogo spektaklya // Avtoref. diss. na soisk. uch. st. kand. iskusstvovedeniya. L., 1994. 16 s.
Mikhaylov L.D. Sem' glav o teatre. Razmyshleniya, vospominaniya, dialogi. M.: Iskusstvo, 1985. 336 s.
Pokrovskiy B. A. Razmyshleniya ob opere. M., Sovetskiy kompozitor, 1979. 280 s.
Akulov E.A. Opernaya muzyka i stsenicheskoe deystvie / E.A. Akulov. M., Vserossiyskoe teatral'noe obshchestvo, 1978. 455 s.
Lapteva E. R. Poetika literaturnogo libretto na syuzhety proizvedeniy A. S. Pushkina v russkoy opere rubezha XIX-XX vekov: avtoref na soisk uch. step kandid. iskusstvov. Ekaterinburg, 2002. S. 2.
Dimitrin Yu.G. Opera. Libretto. Zritel' / Yu.G. Dimitrin // Teatr. 1971. № 1 // ceo.spb.ru/libretto/docs/operalibretto.shtml.
Spasskiy S. Zametki ob opernom libretto // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1948. № 8. S. 43.
Gur'ev G. Temporitm v opernoy dramaturgii // Voprosy opernoy dramaturgii: Sb. statey. M.: Muzyka, 1975. S. 36-66.
Yarustovskiy B.M. Dramaturgiya russkoy opernoy klassiki: Rabota russkikh kompozitorov-klassikov nad operoy / B.M. Yarustovskiy. M.: Gosudarstvennoe Muzykal'noe Izdatel'stvo, 1953. 403 s.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the relationship between the concept of truth and the concept of the sacral including the relationship between these concepts through history. In his research Turkin touches upon the origin of the concept of truth in Parmenides' philosophy and further development of this concept in Plato's works. In this regard, the researcher analyzes etymology of the Greek word ἀλήθεια (truth) and how definitions of truth are related to properties of the sacral. Special attention is paid to similar properties of the sacral and truth, mutual influence of these two concepts in relation to the modern processes of the world's 'unspelling' and development of quasi-religions and para-religions. In his research Turkin has used the phenomenological approach. In addition, he has aplied traditional philosophical and linguistic methods including abstraction, comparison, generalization, analogy, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, modelling, language analysis, comparative and historical methods. It is shown that there has been a close relationship between the concept of truth and the concept of the sacral since the moment when the concept of truth was first created. The author of the article defines the most essential properties that these two concepts have in common. He concludes that each truth is either sacral or quasi-sacral. He also establishes that changes in the definition of one concept have had a direct influence on the definition of the other concept. In this regard, the researcher also analyzes the relationship between narcissism as the utmost subjectivization of the sacral and solipsism as the utmost subjectivization of truth. 

Ключевые слова: Durkheim, Plato, Parmenides, narcissism, quasi-religion, ambivalency, secular, sacral, false, truth

Библиография:
Veber Maks. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://krotov.info/library/03_v/eb/er_m_1.htm
Grintser N.P. Grecheskaya ἀλήθεια: ochevidnost' slova i tayna znacheniya // Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Kul'turnye kontsepty. M.: 1991,-s.38-44
Dyurkgeym E. Elementarnye formy religioznoy zhizni. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://sbiblio.com/BIBLIO/archive/durkgeym_elementarnie/
Kayua, Rozhe Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe / Per. s fr. i vstup. st. S.N. Zenkina. — M.: OGI, 2003-296 s
Levi-Stross K. Totemizm segodnya. Nepriruchennaya mysl' / Per. s fr. A.B. Ostrovskogo. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. — 520 s.
Levi-Stross K. Mifologiki. T. 4.-M.: ID «Flyuid», 2007. — s. 659
Morris Tomas. Nasha ideya Boga. Vvedenie v filosofskoe bogoslovie / Per. s angl. (Seriya «Sovremennoe bogoslovie»)-M.: Izdatel'stvo BBI, 2011. – s. 37
Moss M. Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost'. Trudy po sotsial'noy antropologii. – M.: KDU, 2011. – 416 s.
Platon. Gosudarstvo. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/plato/01/resp5.htm
Platon. Pir. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/shest/09.php
Platon. Sofist. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://psylib.org.ua/books/plato01/23sofis.htm
Platon. Timey. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/plato/tim.html
Riker P. Manifestatsiya i proklamatsiya / per. s fr. Il'i Itkina // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. T. 10. № 1-2. 2011. S. 178-196
Tillikh P. Sistematicheskaya teologiya.-M.; SPb. Universitetskaya kniga, 2000.-463 s.
Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Izdanie podgotovil A.V. Lebedev. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.nsu.ru/classics/plato/vorsokratiker2.htm#28
Khaydegger M. O sushchnosti istiny. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL:http://philosophy.ru/library/heideg/verit.html
Khaydegger M. Uchenie Platona ob istine // Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik. 1986. M.: 1986,-s. 255-275
Eliade Mircha. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe.-M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1994. – 144 s.

References (transliteration):
Veber Maks. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://krotov.info/library/03_v/eb/er_m_1.htm
Grintser N.P. Grecheskaya ἀλήθεια: ochevidnost' slova i tayna znacheniya // Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Kul'turnye kontsepty. M.: 1991,-s.38-44
Dyurkgeym E. Elementarnye formy religioznoy zhizni. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://sbiblio.com/BIBLIO/archive/durkgeym_elementarnie/
Kayua, Rozhe Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe / Per. s fr. i vstup. st. S.N. Zenkina. — M.: OGI, 2003-296 s
Levi-Stross K. Totemizm segodnya. Nepriruchennaya mysl' / Per. s fr. A.B. Ostrovskogo. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. — 520 s.
Levi-Stross K. Mifologiki. T. 4.-M.: ID «Flyuid», 2007. — s. 659
Morris Tomas. Nasha ideya Boga. Vvedenie v filosofskoe bogoslovie / Per. s angl. (Seriya «Sovremennoe bogoslovie»)-M.: Izdatel'stvo BBI, 2011. – s. 37
Moss M. Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost'. Trudy po sotsial'noy antropologii. – M.: KDU, 2011. – 416 s.
Platon. Gosudarstvo. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/plato/01/resp5.htm
Platon. Pir. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/shest/09.php
Platon. Sofist. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://psylib.org.ua/books/plato01/23sofis.htm
Platon. Timey. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/plato/tim.html
Riker P. Manifestatsiya i proklamatsiya / per. s fr. Il'i Itkina // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. T. 10. № 1-2. 2011. S. 178-196
Tillikh P. Sistematicheskaya teologiya.-M.; SPb. Universitetskaya kniga, 2000.-463 s.
Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Izdanie podgotovil A.V. Lebedev. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.nsu.ru/classics/plato/vorsokratiker2.htm#28
Khaydegger M. O sushchnosti istiny. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL:http://philosophy.ru/library/heideg/verit.html
Khaydegger M. Uchenie Platona ob istine // Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik. 1986. M.: 1986,-s. 255-275
Eliade Mircha. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe.-M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1994. – 144 s.

Аннотация: The paper follows E. Cassirer’s exemplary study (Philosophy of the Enlightenment, 1932) of classical aesthetics making in the 18th century as a kind of a pattern, a model of forming of a branch in the humanities. Philosophical experience of that time is valuable and interesting because it had been formed before the emergence of positivism and the specific “matrix” that became later a notorious concept of science and “the unified scientific method”. During the Enlightenment the priority of rational knowledge is being established and the humanities, aesthetics in particular, do not loose their value as an independent, special type of scholarship. This considerably enriches the category of “subject” in the theory of cognition where it is for ages considered as an utmost abstraction — the transcendental subject — the main condition of true knowledge. Classical aesthetics aim to turn the very sensory into an object deserving cognition along with rational knowledge. This lays the foundations of knowledge in the humanities as an independent type of learning which has its own ontology and, as a consequence, its own principles, methods, methodology, philosophical premises and history. First of all, it is an interpretation of a special role and the nature of subject and object as abstractions of another level, a philosophic-empirical one, where they are presented in cultural, historical and social contexts, in the system of values and social norms. Cassirer’s views are under scrutiny to see how he treats ideas of N. Boileau-Despréaux, J. Goethe, Voltaire, D. Diderot, G. Lessing, I. Kant, A. Shaftesbury, and also an explanation of systematic aesthetics by A. Baumgarten who turns to G. Leibniz’s and Ch. Wolff’s ideas.

Ключевые слова: cultural and historical epistemology, the humanities, systematic aesthetics, classical aesthetics, philosophy of the Enlightenment, philosophy, scientific method, subject, transcendental subject, empirical subject

Библиография:
Kassirer E. Filosofiya Prosveshcheniya / Per. s nem. V.L. Makhlin. M., 2004.
Friche V. Bualo-Depreo N. // Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' Granata. T. 7. Izd. 7-e. M.-L., 1910-1948. (Sm. takzhe: http://17v-euro-lit.niv.ru/17v-euro-lit/articles/sigal-bualo.htm).
Sheftsberi A. Esteticheskie opyty. M., 1975.
Dyubo Zh.B. Kriticheskie razmyshleniya o poezii i zhivopisi. M., 1976.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 8-i tt. M., 1994. T. 5.
Berk E. Filosofskoe issledovanie o proiskhozhdenii nashikh idey vozvyshennogo i prekrasnogo. M., 1979.
Asmus V.F. Nemetskaya estetika XVIII veka. M., 1963.
Baumgarten A. Estetika // Istoriya estetiki. Pamyatniki mirovoy esteticheskoy mysli. T. 2 / Per. V. Zubova. M., 1964.
Gilbert K.E., Kun G. Istoriya estetiki / Per. s angl. V.V. Kuznetsova, I.S. Tikhomirovoy. SPb., 2000.
Gete I.V. Poeziya i pravda. M., 1969.
Reale Dzh., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney. T. 4. Ot romantizma do nashikh dney. M., 1997. Gl. 7

References (transliteration):
Kassirer E. Filosofiya Prosveshcheniya / Per. s nem. V.L. Makhlin. M., 2004.
Friche V. Bualo-Depreo N. // Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' Granata. T. 7. Izd. 7-e. M.-L., 1910-1948. (Sm. takzhe: http://17v-euro-lit.niv.ru/17v-euro-lit/articles/sigal-bualo.htm).
Sheftsberi A. Esteticheskie opyty. M., 1975.
Dyubo Zh.B. Kriticheskie razmyshleniya o poezii i zhivopisi. M., 1976.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 8-i tt. M., 1994. T. 5.
Berk E. Filosofskoe issledovanie o proiskhozhdenii nashikh idey vozvyshennogo i prekrasnogo. M., 1979.
Asmus V.F. Nemetskaya estetika XVIII veka. M., 1963.
Baumgarten A. Estetika // Istoriya estetiki. Pamyatniki mirovoy esteticheskoy mysli. T. 2 / Per. V. Zubova. M., 1964.
Gilbert K.E., Kun G. Istoriya estetiki / Per. s angl. V.V. Kuznetsova, I.S. Tikhomirovoy. SPb., 2000.
Gete I.V. Poeziya i pravda. M., 1969.
Reale Dzh., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney. T. 4. Ot romantizma do nashikh dney. M., 1997. Gl. 7

Аннотация: The drivers of human evolution are still one of the darkest points in the anthropogenesis theory. From the point of view of the representatives of positive science, human is a part of nature and therefore unconditionally obeys the laws of nature. The obvious axiom of philosophy is that human has a single essence. In his article Spektor raises the following question: what are the reasons why human has such an essence? Therefore, the research subject of the present article is a theoretical justification of the reasons of the unity of humankind. Noteworthy that such reasons can be found in actual conditions of the descent of man. The research methodology involves monism as the most general principle as well as methods of dialectical logic combined with the analysis or critics of references. The author shows that a sucessive scientific interpretation of the question about the unity of the mankind brings us to the following conclusion: human has to adjust to a very singular environment. This is the kind of environment that has a high level of the internal coherence so all the living creatures have to mutually adjust to one another. So human evolution is a type of specific universalization and constant competition inside their environmental niche. These are the external drivers of 'hominization'. The internal drivers include the initiation of the defensive insinct that have been going on for thousands of years. 

Ключевые слова: anthropogenesis, evolution, mankind unity, adaptation, homo sapiens sapiens, evolutionism, initiation, cult, sacrifice, culture

Библиография:
Kanasz T.. Rol' nadezhdy i optimizma v sovremennoy kul'ture // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-5.-C. 47-69. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10114.html
Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i kul'turnye remissii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 580-617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_557.html
Belyaev V.A. K idee interkul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-5.-C. 309-346. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_443.html
Zuckerman S. The Social Life of Monkeys and Apes. L., 1932.
Lovejoy S. O. 2009. Reexamining Numan Origins in Light of Ardipithecus ramidus // Science. V. 326.
Serge Moscovici, La societe contre nature; UGE 10/18, Paris., 1972. Moskovichi, v chastnosti, dokazyvaet, chto «okhotnik stanovitsya chelovekom, no ne chelovek – okhotnikom»,
Franz M. Evolution. Die Entwicklung des Lebens. – München., 2002.
Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. – Moskva, 1966.
Tokarev S. A. Rannie formy religii. – M. 1990.
Christoph Wulf. Anthropologie. Geschichte. Kultur. Philosophie. – Hamburg., 2004. „Die Hominisation ist das Ergebnis des Zusammenwirkens einer Reihe von Faktoren, in denen sich natürliche und kulturelle Elemente überlagern und sich so eng miteinander verschränken, dass eine neue, für den Menschen charakteristische Komplexität entsteht“, zu der folgende Faktoren beitragen: Gehirn, Hände und Werkzeuge, Nahrung und Lebensraum, Feuer und Jagd, Sprache und Kultur“.
Blaisdell A . R., Sawa K., Leising K. J . , Waldmann M. R . 2006. Causal Reasoning in Rats // Science. V. 311.
Reznikova Zh. I. 2009. Kognitivnoe povedenie zhivotnykh, ego adaptatsionnaya funktsiya i zakonomernosti formirovaniya. – // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. T.3.• Vyp. 2. http://www.reznikova.net/Psyo9.pdf
Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. – M., 1989, S.71.
Koshman L.V. Kul'turnoe prostranstvo russkogo goroda XIX – nachala XX vv. K voprosu o kreativnosti istoricheskoy pamyati. // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-2.-C. 42-115. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_639.html
Rapoport A. Mir — sozrevshaya ideya. Darmshtadt: «Darmshtadt Bletter», 1993. S. 88.
Propp V. Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki. – Leningrad, 1986.
Palmer D., Palmer L. Evolyutsionnaya psikhologiya. Sekrety povedeniya Homo sapiens.
Nazaretyan A. P.. «Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste universal'noy istorii».– M., 2004.
Markov A. Evolyutsiya cheloveka. Kn. 1. Obez'yany, kosti i geny. – M., 2011.
Moos M. Sotsial'nye funktsii svyashchennogo. – Sankt-Peterburg, 2000.
Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M., 1988.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. M., 1993.
Darvin Ch. Sochineniya. M., 1953. T. V.
Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Obshchie voprosy. Problemy antroposotsiogeneza. M., Nauka, 1983.
Boroday Yu. M. Ot fantazii k real'nosti. M., 1995. S. 205.
Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti severnoy Evrazii). Ekaterinburg, 2009.
Alekseev V. P. Stanovlenie chelovechestva. – Moskva., 1984.
Anikovich M. V., Anisyutkin N. K., Vishnyatskiy L. B. Uzlovye problemy perekhoda k verkhnemu paleolitu v Evrazii. – SPb., 2007.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Natsional'no-kul'turnaya identichnost' v kontekste filosofskoy traditsii dialoga kul'tur // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 183-244. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_8848.html .
V.V. Kornil'ev. Ot besporyadka k kollektivnomu bessoznatel'nomu. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-№ 4.-C. 360-370. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.7.
I.K. Asadullaev. Totem the Donkey. A hypothesis About Unification of Aryan Clans and Tribes is Confirmed?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 102-113. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.2.9433.
Gurevich, P. S.. The phenomenon of spirit in philosophical understanding of man. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 4-842. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.8932.
Spirova, E.M.. Why do we need history?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 23-27. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.9019.

References (transliteration):
Kanasz T.. Rol' nadezhdy i optimizma v sovremennoy kul'ture // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-5.-C. 47-69. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10114.html
Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i kul'turnye remissii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 580-617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_557.html
Belyaev V.A. K idee interkul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-5.-C. 309-346. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_443.html
Zuckerman S. The Social Life of Monkeys and Apes. L., 1932.
Lovejoy S. O. 2009. Reexamining Numan Origins in Light of Ardipithecus ramidus // Science. V. 326.
Serge Moscovici, La societe contre nature; UGE 10/18, Paris., 1972. Moskovichi, v chastnosti, dokazyvaet, chto «okhotnik stanovitsya chelovekom, no ne chelovek – okhotnikom»,
Franz M. Evolution. Die Entwicklung des Lebens. – München., 2002.
Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. – Moskva, 1966.
Tokarev S. A. Rannie formy religii. – M. 1990.
Christoph Wulf. Anthropologie. Geschichte. Kultur. Philosophie. – Hamburg., 2004. „Die Hominisation ist das Ergebnis des Zusammenwirkens einer Reihe von Faktoren, in denen sich natürliche und kulturelle Elemente überlagern und sich so eng miteinander verschränken, dass eine neue, für den Menschen charakteristische Komplexität entsteht“, zu der folgende Faktoren beitragen: Gehirn, Hände und Werkzeuge, Nahrung und Lebensraum, Feuer und Jagd, Sprache und Kultur“.
Blaisdell A . R., Sawa K., Leising K. J . , Waldmann M. R . 2006. Causal Reasoning in Rats // Science. V. 311.
Reznikova Zh. I. 2009. Kognitivnoe povedenie zhivotnykh, ego adaptatsionnaya funktsiya i zakonomernosti formirovaniya. – // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. T.3.• Vyp. 2. http://www.reznikova.net/Psyo9.pdf
Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. – M., 1989, S.71.
Koshman L.V. Kul'turnoe prostranstvo russkogo goroda XIX – nachala XX vv. K voprosu o kreativnosti istoricheskoy pamyati. // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-2.-C. 42-115. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_639.html
Rapoport A. Mir — sozrevshaya ideya. Darmshtadt: «Darmshtadt Bletter», 1993. S. 88.
Propp V. Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki. – Leningrad, 1986.
Palmer D., Palmer L. Evolyutsionnaya psikhologiya. Sekrety povedeniya Homo sapiens.
Nazaretyan A. P.. «Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste universal'noy istorii».– M., 2004.
Markov A. Evolyutsiya cheloveka. Kn. 1. Obez'yany, kosti i geny. – M., 2011.
Moos M. Sotsial'nye funktsii svyashchennogo. – Sankt-Peterburg, 2000.
Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M., 1988.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. M., 1993.
Darvin Ch. Sochineniya. M., 1953. T. V.
Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Obshchie voprosy. Problemy antroposotsiogeneza. M., Nauka, 1983.
Boroday Yu. M. Ot fantazii k real'nosti. M., 1995. S. 205.
Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti severnoy Evrazii). Ekaterinburg, 2009.
Alekseev V. P. Stanovlenie chelovechestva. – Moskva., 1984.
Anikovich M. V., Anisyutkin N. K., Vishnyatskiy L. B. Uzlovye problemy perekhoda k verkhnemu paleolitu v Evrazii. – SPb., 2007.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Natsional'no-kul'turnaya identichnost' v kontekste filosofskoy traditsii dialoga kul'tur // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 183-244. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_8848.html .
V.V. Kornil'ev. Ot besporyadka k kollektivnomu bessoznatel'nomu. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-№ 4.-C. 360-370. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.7.
I.K. Asadullaev. Totem the Donkey. A hypothesis About Unification of Aryan Clans and Tribes is Confirmed?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 102-113. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.2.9433.
Gurevich, P. S.. The phenomenon of spirit in philosophical understanding of man. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 4-842. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.8932.
Spirova, E.M.. Why do we need history?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 23-27. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.9019.

Аннотация: The author of the article makes an attempt to carry out the philosophical analysis of the heraldic symbols in the Rus during the ruling of Ioann III and Ioann IV. The object of the philosophical interpretation is the symbols of the double-headed eagle, the rider (Saint George) and the unicorn. The authors of the article specify that it is semiotics that allow to discover and analyze signs and symbols of the social life of those times which included, on the one hand, various practical collaborative activities performed by individuals and, on the other hand, their symbolic expressions. The research is based on the semiotic approach as a heuristic method of philosophical interpretation of heraldic tributes of the aforesaid period in history. The standard semiotic analysis describing the meaning, the meant and the reviewer (according to Umberto Eco’s methodological scheme) is completed with the Jung’s theory of archetypes. The authors conclude that philosophical interpretation of heraldic symbols allow to prove their importance as a symbolic mean of expressing the autocratic status of reign of the tsar, the ‘Great’ tsar at first and then the ‘Terrible’ tsar. Back in those times the state institution consisting of a great number of territories needed a powerful and authoritative government. Therefore, heraldic symbols served as a symbolic mean for upholding and reinforcing the imperious status of tsars. In fact, being a symbolic aspect of the social life, heraldic images upheld and supported the status of the government trough creating the radiance of glory, wisdom and heroism around the governors.

Ключевые слова: heraldry, semiotics, double-headed eagle, rider, unicorn, statehood, Ioann IV (the Terrible), symbol, the Rus, tsar.

Контактная информация: Shipovskaya Lyudmila Pavlovna, 127550, Russia, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya str. 49.

Библиография:
Beletskiy S.D. Drevneyshaya geral'dika Rusi // «Povest' vremennykh let». SPb., Vita Nova, 2012. str. 431 – 463.
Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya-M.: «Medium», 1995 g.-323 s.
Kozhinov V. Grekh i svyatost' russkoy istorii. – M.: Eksmo, Yauza, 2006. – 480 s. – S. 7.
Zhigunova G.V. Natsional'noe samosoznanie russkogo naroda v filosofii slavyanofil'stva // Vestnik MGTU, tom 9, № 1, 2006 g. s.53
Zen'kovskiy V.V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii [sost. A. V. Polyakov].-(Filosofskoe nasledie Rossii). T. I . ch. 1-L.: Ego, 1991. 280 s. s. 47-48
Ivanov M.K. Obraz vsadnika v iskusstve: ikonograficheskiy arkhetip. Internet-resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ibif.org.ru/articles/nachalo01/01-03.pdf S. 32
Samokhvalov V. P. Psikhoanaliticheskiy slovar' i rabota s simvolami snovideniy i fantaziy. — Simferopol': SONAT, 1999. — s. 175
Silaev A.G. Istoki russkoy geral'diki – M.: FAIR-PRESS, 2003. 240 s.
Chumakova T.V. Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi: opyt filosofsko-antropologicheskogo analiza: dis. ..kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.13. – SPb., 2002. – S. 14.
Shipovskaya L.P., Gemonov A.V. Fenomenologiya russkoy geral'diki IX-XIV vekov. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. – M.: 2013. s. 41-51
Shipovskaya L.P., Gemonov A.V. Filosofskaya interpretatsiya geral'dicheskikh simvolov domongol'skoy Rusi. Politika i obshchestvo. – M.: 2013. s. 1429-1452
Shipovskaya L.P., Gemonov A.V. Filosofskaya interpretatsiya geral'dicheskikh simvolov Rusi perioda mongolo-tatarskogo iga. M.: 2013. s. 1707-1718
Shyuts A. O mnozhestvennosti real'nostey // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie Tom 3. № 2. 2003. S. 2-34.
Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Per. s angl.– K.: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996. – 384 s
Ottfried Neubecker Heraldry: Sources, Symbols and Meaning. Tiger Books International (1997). 288 pages.
Schütz Alfred Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego» // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, March, 1942, c. 323—347
Shipovskaya L.P. Gemonov A.V. Phänomenologie des russischen Heraldik IX-XIV Jahrhundert. Science and education. P. 284-293.
«The quest for meaning». University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2007, Toronto Buf-folo London. S. 153

References (transliteration):
Beletskiy S.D. Drevneyshaya geral'dika Rusi // «Povest' vremennykh let». SPb., Vita Nova, 2012. str. 431 – 463.
Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya-M.: «Medium», 1995 g.-323 s.
Kozhinov V. Grekh i svyatost' russkoy istorii. – M.: Eksmo, Yauza, 2006. – 480 s. – S. 7.
Zhigunova G.V. Natsional'noe samosoznanie russkogo naroda v filosofii slavyanofil'stva // Vestnik MGTU, tom 9, № 1, 2006 g. s.53
Zen'kovskiy V.V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii [sost. A. V. Polyakov].-(Filosofskoe nasledie Rossii). T. I . ch. 1-L.: Ego, 1991. 280 s. s. 47-48
Ivanov M.K. Obraz vsadnika v iskusstve: ikonograficheskiy arkhetip. Internet-resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ibif.org.ru/articles/nachalo01/01-03.pdf S. 32
Samokhvalov V. P. Psikhoanaliticheskiy slovar' i rabota s simvolami snovideniy i fantaziy. — Simferopol': SONAT, 1999. — s. 175
Silaev A.G. Istoki russkoy geral'diki – M.: FAIR-PRESS, 2003. 240 s.
Chumakova T.V. Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi: opyt filosofsko-antropologicheskogo analiza: dis. ..kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.13. – SPb., 2002. – S. 14.
Shipovskaya L.P., Gemonov A.V. Fenomenologiya russkoy geral'diki IX-XIV vekov. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. – M.: 2013. s. 41-51
Shipovskaya L.P., Gemonov A.V. Filosofskaya interpretatsiya geral'dicheskikh simvolov domongol'skoy Rusi. Politika i obshchestvo. – M.: 2013. s. 1429-1452
Shipovskaya L.P., Gemonov A.V. Filosofskaya interpretatsiya geral'dicheskikh simvolov Rusi perioda mongolo-tatarskogo iga. M.: 2013. s. 1707-1718
Shyuts A. O mnozhestvennosti real'nostey // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie Tom 3. № 2. 2003. S. 2-34.
Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Per. s angl.– K.: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996. – 384 s
Ottfried Neubecker Heraldry: Sources, Symbols and Meaning. Tiger Books International (1997). 288 pages.
Schütz Alfred Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego» // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, March, 1942, c. 323—347
Shipovskaya L.P. Gemonov A.V. Phänomenologie des russischen Heraldik IX-XIV Jahrhundert. Science and education. P. 284-293.
«The quest for meaning». University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2007, Toronto Buf-folo London. S. 153

Аннотация: The purpose of philosophical research is to view philosophy of religion as a special form of philosophical knowledge that differs from history of religion, psychology of religion and religious studies. Analyzing the development of philosophy of religion from Immanuel Kant to adepts of social anthropology, we can define the main problems and definitions associated with philosophy of religion. Philosophy of religion has its own way of viewing and solving the classical philosophical problem of truth. It is the philosophy of religion which views truth as part of the absolute. In philosophy of religion revelation in a particular branch of religion is viewed as the representation of the absolute. Description of peculiarities of definition of truth in philosophy of religion is completed with the insight into Buddhist philosophy. Mahayana philosophy of Nagarjuna and Yogacara school provide examples of modeling the absolute unique for religious culture of the Asian Pacific countries. It is expected that apophatic modeals of truth in Orthodox theology can encourage efficient communication between Russian intellectual community and intellectual communities of the Asian Pacific just like Buddhist Mahayana schools.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, truth, value, religion, revelation, philosophy of religion, Buddhism, Mahayana, apophatic theology, Nagarjuna.

Контактная информация: Koptseva Natalya Petrovna , 660041, Russia, Krasnoyarsk, pr. Svobodny 82.

Библиография:
Prokhorov M.M. Smysly i tsennost' modeli otnosheniya cheloveka s mirom // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 136-240. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_369.html
Omarova Z.U. Transformatsiya religioznogo soznaniya: sovremennyy aspekt // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-3.-C. 160-183. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.3.185. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_185.html
Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: «bytie i nebytie» ili «bytie i sushchee»? // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-5.-C. 1-102. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html
Prokhorov M.M. Istina i deystvitel'nost' // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 293-387. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_333.html
Torchinov E.A. Vvedenie v buddologiyu. Kurs lektsiy. SPb.: Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo, 2000.
Khetcher U.S. Pivovarov D.V. Vzaimodopolnenie nauchnogo i religioznogo poznaniya //Bytie kul'tury: sakral'noe i svetskoe: Sb. st. /Otv. Red. A.V. Medvedev. – Ekaterinburg: izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1994. – S. 19-29.
Rudoy V.I. Vvedenie v buddiyskuyu filosofiyu //Vasubandkhu. Abkhidkharmakosha. – M.: Nauka, 1990. – S. 8-42.
Tillikh P. Izbrannoe. Teologiya kul'tury. – M.: Yurist', 1995.
Ostrovskaya E.P., Rudoy V.I. Klassicheskie buddiyskie praktiki: Vstuplenie v Nirvanu. — SPb.: «Azbuka-klassika»; «Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie», 2006.
Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii. – M.: Agraf, 1997.
Lyubutin K.N., Pivovarov D.V. Dialektika sub'ekta i ob'ekta. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1993.
Losev A.F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura. – M.: Respublika, 1989.
Koptseva N.P., Semenova A.A. Istina kak forma modelirovaniya tselostnosti na urovne sotsial'nogo bytiya /Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». – 2009. – T.2.-№ 1. – S. 31-55.
Dkhammapada. – Riga: Uguns, 1992.
Koptseva N.P. Reznikova K.V. Vybor metodologicheskikh osnovaniy dlya sovremennykh kul'turnykh issledovaniy /Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». – 2009. – T.2.-№ 9. – 491-506.
Gurevich P. S. Filosofskaya antropologiya: istoricheskiy ocherk i aktual'nye problemy: monografiya. — Germany, Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBER Academic Publishing, 2011.
Gurevich P. S. Apofaticheskiy proekt cheloveka // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. № 8. S. 42-53.
Gurevich P. S. Netraditsionnye religii na Zapade i vostochnye religioznye kul'ty / P. S. Gurevich. — M. : Znanie, 1985.
Voprosy Milindy. – M.: Nauka, 1989.
Gegel' G.V. F. Filosofiya religii. //Soch. V 2 t. – M.: Mysl',1974-1977.

References (transliteration):
Prokhorov M.M. Smysly i tsennost' modeli otnosheniya cheloveka s mirom // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 136-240. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_369.html
Omarova Z.U. Transformatsiya religioznogo soznaniya: sovremennyy aspekt // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-3.-C. 160-183. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.3.185. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_185.html
Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: «bytie i nebytie» ili «bytie i sushchee»? // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-5.-C. 1-102. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html
Prokhorov M.M. Istina i deystvitel'nost' // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 293-387. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_333.html
Torchinov E.A. Vvedenie v buddologiyu. Kurs lektsiy. SPb.: Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo, 2000.
Khetcher U.S. Pivovarov D.V. Vzaimodopolnenie nauchnogo i religioznogo poznaniya //Bytie kul'tury: sakral'noe i svetskoe: Sb. st. /Otv. Red. A.V. Medvedev. – Ekaterinburg: izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1994. – S. 19-29.
Rudoy V.I. Vvedenie v buddiyskuyu filosofiyu //Vasubandkhu. Abkhidkharmakosha. – M.: Nauka, 1990. – S. 8-42.
Tillikh P. Izbrannoe. Teologiya kul'tury. – M.: Yurist', 1995.
Ostrovskaya E.P., Rudoy V.I. Klassicheskie buddiyskie praktiki: Vstuplenie v Nirvanu. — SPb.: «Azbuka-klassika»; «Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie», 2006.
Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii. – M.: Agraf, 1997.
Lyubutin K.N., Pivovarov D.V. Dialektika sub'ekta i ob'ekta. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1993.
Losev A.F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura. – M.: Respublika, 1989.
Koptseva N.P., Semenova A.A. Istina kak forma modelirovaniya tselostnosti na urovne sotsial'nogo bytiya /Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». – 2009. – T.2.-№ 1. – S. 31-55.
Dkhammapada. – Riga: Uguns, 1992.
Koptseva N.P. Reznikova K.V. Vybor metodologicheskikh osnovaniy dlya sovremennykh kul'turnykh issledovaniy /Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». – 2009. – T.2.-№ 9. – 491-506.
Gurevich P. S. Filosofskaya antropologiya: istoricheskiy ocherk i aktual'nye problemy: monografiya. — Germany, Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBER Academic Publishing, 2011.
Gurevich P. S. Apofaticheskiy proekt cheloveka // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. № 8. S. 42-53.
Gurevich P. S. Netraditsionnye religii na Zapade i vostochnye religioznye kul'ty / P. S. Gurevich. — M. : Znanie, 1985.
Voprosy Milindy. – M.: Nauka, 1989.
Gegel' G.V. F. Filosofiya religii. //Soch. V 2 t. – M.: Mysl',1974-1977.

Аннотация: The author of the article raises a question whether it is actually possible to create a general theory of human behavior, and makes an attempt to outline the area of valid analysis of such a theory. Choice is viewed as a concrete union of external conditions and internal motives. Conscious choice is not the same as the rational choice because consciousness is not the same as rationality. The author of the article focuses on the analysis of organization of consciousness in mass culture and its relation with the socio-cultural environment. A classical dilemma of the rational (Kant) and fideistic (Kierkegaard) grounds of moral choice does not work in a modern situation. Differentiation of rationality and philosophizing is interpreted as a deep socio-cultural shift that caused changed in social mind along with the other factors such as forced inconsistency and axiological reorientation of the society. The author also developed the definitions of ‘identification matrix’ as a ‘cell’ of self-consciousness of homo-demos and offered particular terms for describing true collisions of human facing the problem of choice.

Ключевые слова: choice, environment, motive, rationality, values, self-consciousness, identity, identification matrix, mass society, philosophizing.

Контактная информация: Voronin Andrey Alekseevich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 206.

Библиография:
1. Andreev I.L. Ritual'nyy ukhod iz zhizni kak moral'nyy vybor // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2013.
№ 1. C. 35-51.
2. Gritsanov A.A. Chelovek i ego identichnost' v sovremennoy kul'turologii // Voprosy sotsial'noy
teorii: Nauchnyy al'manakh. 2010. Tom IV. Chelovek v poiskakh identichnosti / pod red. Yu.M. Reznika
i M.V. Tlostanovoy. M.: Assotsiatsiya «Mezhdistsiplinarnoe obshchestvo sotsial'noy teorii», 2010.
3. Grushin B.A. Massovoe soznanie. M.: Politizdat, 1987.
4. Kant I. Soch.: V 6 t. M., 1995.
5. K'erkegor S. Strakh i trepet / Per. s dat. M.: Respublika, 1993.
6. Parkhomenko T.A. Prelyudiya stalinskoy epokhi: bor'ba za vlast' i vybor vozhdya v 1922-1925 godakh //
Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. № 2. C. 168-180.
7. Filosofiya, psikhologiya i pedagogika F.T. Mikhaylova / sost., predisl. L.K. Arsenkiina, A.A. Vo-
ronin, A.F. Mikhaylova. M.: Indrik, 2009.

References (transliteration):
1. Andreev I.L. Ritual'nyy ukhod iz zhizni kak moral'nyy vybor // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2013.
№ 1. C. 35-51.
2. Gritsanov A.A. Chelovek i ego identichnost' v sovremennoy kul'turologii // Voprosy sotsial'noy
teorii: Nauchnyy al'manakh. 2010. Tom IV. Chelovek v poiskakh identichnosti / pod red. Yu.M. Reznika
i M.V. Tlostanovoy. M.: Assotsiatsiya «Mezhdistsiplinarnoe obshchestvo sotsial'noy teorii», 2010.
3. Grushin B.A. Massovoe soznanie. M.: Politizdat, 1987.
4. Kant I. Soch.: V 6 t. M., 1995.
5. K'erkegor S. Strakh i trepet / Per. s dat. M.: Respublika, 1993.
6. Parkhomenko T.A. Prelyudiya stalinskoy epokhi: bor'ba za vlast' i vybor vozhdya v 1922-1925 godakh //
Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. № 2. C. 168-180.
7. Filosofiya, psikhologiya i pedagogika F.T. Mikhaylova / sost., predisl. L.K. Arsenkiina, A.A. Vo-
ronin, A.F. Mikhaylova. M.: Indrik, 2009.

Аннотация: Based on the analysis of Plato’s dialogues, the author describes Plato’s idea of truth that is directly related to such philosophical category as ‘being’. Plato was the first philosopher to distinguish the three definitions of truth: 1) truth as the feature of being; 2) truth as the feature of human knowledge; 3) truth as the feature of human existence. In Plato’s dialogues love for truth determines all the aspects of true existence of human. Dialectics of search for truth cause the tripartite interpretation of the term: 1) truth is the content like the ‘pure’ (self-identical and everlasting) being; 2) truth is the feature of knowledge aimed at either this ‘pure’ being (when the truth is knowledge) or appearing and disappearing (formation) of items (opinion); 3) truth is the feature of human existence in the world as shown in Plato’s philosophy of state. Plato’s philosophical concept of truth serves as an example for further search for truth at all stages in history of Western philosophy.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, truth Plato, dialogues, ontology, gnoseology, being, value, absolute truth, dialectics.

Контактная информация: Koptseva Natalya Petrovna, 660041, Russia, Krasnodar, pr. Svobodny 79.

Библиография:
1. Asmus V.F. Antichnaya filosofiya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2005. 408 s.
2. Vasil'eva T.V. Afinskaya shkola filosofii. Filosofskiy yazyk Platona i Aristotelya. (Seriya «Iz
istorii mirovoy kul'tury»). M.: Nauka, 1985. 161 s.
3. Gurevich P.S., Shokuev K.B. Filosofskaya antropologiya. Nal'chik: El'brus, 1996. 317 s.
4. Gurevich P.S. Filosofskoe postizhenie cheloveka: problemy, tendentsii i novye temy filosofskoy
antropologii: monografiya. Germany, Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBER Academic Publishing, 2011. 664 s.
5. Dobrokhotov A.L. Kategoriya bytiya v zapadnoevropeyskoy klassicheskoy filosofii. M.: izd-vo MGU,
1986. 245 s.
6. Koptseva N.P. Vvedenie v aletologiyu. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyar. gos. un-t, 2002. 342 s.
7. Koptseva N.P., Semenova A.A. Istina kak forma modelirovaniya tselostnosti na urovne sotsial'no-
go bytiya // Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2009.
T. 2. № 1. S. 31-55.
8. Losev A.F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura. M.: Respublika, 1989. 525 s.
9. Lyubutin K.N., Pivovarov D.V. Dialektika sub'ekta i ob'ekta. Ekaterinburg: izd-vo Ural. un-ta,
1993. 412 s.
10. Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii. M.: Agraf, 1977.
11. Platon. Sobr. soch. v 3 t. M.: Mysl', 1968-1979.
12. Rakcheeva N. E. Gosudarstvo. Platon. M.: MAKS Press, 2001. 202 s.
13. Khaydegger M. Uchenie Platona ob istine // Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik-86 / Pod red. N.V.
Motroshilovoy. M.: Nauka, 1987. S. 255-275.
14. Chanyshev A.N. Filosofiya drevnego mira. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1999. 703 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Asmus V.F. Antichnaya filosofiya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2005. 408 s.
2. Vasil'eva T.V. Afinskaya shkola filosofii. Filosofskiy yazyk Platona i Aristotelya. (Seriya «Iz
istorii mirovoy kul'tury»). M.: Nauka, 1985. 161 s.
3. Gurevich P.S., Shokuev K.B. Filosofskaya antropologiya. Nal'chik: El'brus, 1996. 317 s.
4. Gurevich P.S. Filosofskoe postizhenie cheloveka: problemy, tendentsii i novye temy filosofskoy
antropologii: monografiya. Germany, Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBER Academic Publishing, 2011. 664 s.
5. Dobrokhotov A.L. Kategoriya bytiya v zapadnoevropeyskoy klassicheskoy filosofii. M.: izd-vo MGU,
1986. 245 s.
6. Koptseva N.P. Vvedenie v aletologiyu. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyar. gos. un-t, 2002. 342 s.
7. Koptseva N.P., Semenova A.A. Istina kak forma modelirovaniya tselostnosti na urovne sotsial'no-
go bytiya // Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2009.
T. 2. № 1. S. 31-55.
8. Losev A.F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura. M.: Respublika, 1989. 525 s.
9. Lyubutin K.N., Pivovarov D.V. Dialektika sub'ekta i ob'ekta. Ekaterinburg: izd-vo Ural. un-ta,
1993. 412 s.
10. Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii. M.: Agraf, 1977.
11. Platon. Sobr. soch. v 3 t. M.: Mysl', 1968-1979.
12. Rakcheeva N. E. Gosudarstvo. Platon. M.: MAKS Press, 2001. 202 s.
13. Khaydegger M. Uchenie Platona ob istine // Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik-86 / Pod red. N.V.
Motroshilovoy. M.: Nauka, 1987. S. 255-275.
14. Chanyshev A.N. Filosofiya drevnego mira. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1999. 703 s.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to analyzing Descartes’ cogito conception by comparing it with Husserl’s phenomenology. The author compares these two philosophical conceptions because he believes it to be possible to build the ontological theory based on transcendental subjectivity. Detailed analysis of the teaching about innate ideas allows to define Descartes’ basic conception equating cogitation and existence.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Descartes, Husserl, cogitation, existence, ego, idea, subjectivity, transcendency, phenomenology.

Контактная информация: Koval, O. A., Universitetskaya Embankment 7-9, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.

Библиография:
1. Garntsev M.A. Problema samosoznaniya v zapadnoevropeyskoy filosofii (ot Aristotelya do Dekarta).
M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1987.
2. Gusserl' E. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Izd. dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2005.
3. Gusserl' E. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. SPb: Nauka, 2001.
4. Dekart R. Soch.: V 2 t. M.: Mysl', 1989-1994.
5. Mamardashvili M.K. Filosofskie chteniya. SPb: Azbuka-klassika, 2002.
6. Molchanov V.I. Issledovaniya po fenomenologii soznaniya. M.: Izd. dom «Territoriya budushchego»,
2007.
7. Slinin Ya.A. Transtsendental'nyy sub'ekt. Fenomenologicheskoe issledovanie. SPb: Nauka, 2001.
8. Khaydegger M. Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni. Tomsk: Vodoley, 1997.
9. Heidegger M. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 23: Geschichte der Philosophie von Thomas von Aquin bis Kant. Frankfurt
a. M.: Klostermann, 2006.
10. Herrmann F.-W. Husserl und die Meditationen des Descartes. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann, 1971.
11. Kemmerling A. Ideen des Ichs. Studien zu Descartes’ Philosophie. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann, 2005.

References (transliteration):
1. Garntsev M.A. Problema samosoznaniya v zapadnoevropeyskoy filosofii (ot Aristotelya do Dekarta).
M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1987.
2. Gusserl' E. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Izd. dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2005.
3. Gusserl' E. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. SPb: Nauka, 2001.
4. Dekart R. Soch.: V 2 t. M.: Mysl', 1989-1994.
5. Mamardashvili M.K. Filosofskie chteniya. SPb: Azbuka-klassika, 2002.
6. Molchanov V.I. Issledovaniya po fenomenologii soznaniya. M.: Izd. dom «Territoriya budushchego»,
2007.
7. Slinin Ya.A. Transtsendental'nyy sub'ekt. Fenomenologicheskoe issledovanie. SPb: Nauka, 2001.
8. Khaydegger M. Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni. Tomsk: Vodoley, 1997.
9. Heidegger M. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 23: Geschichte der Philosophie von Thomas von Aquin bis Kant. Frankfurt
a. M.: Klostermann, 2006.
10. Herrmann F.-W. Husserl und die Meditationen des Descartes. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann, 1971.
11. Kemmerling A. Ideen des Ichs. Studien zu Descartes’ Philosophie. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann, 2005.

Аннотация: The author of the article studies the leading concepts in S. Frankl’s teaching about a soul: spiritual life, soul, consciousness and subconsciousness. The author makes an attempt to describe certain features of the aforesaid terms and describe the relation between them. The author compares Frankl’s definitions with some modern psychological terms.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, soul, psychology, Frankl, consciousness, subconsciousness, spiritual lie, desire, will, psyche.

Библиография:
1. Batuev A.S. Soznanie i podsoznanie / A.S. Batuev // Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosu-
darstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsial'noy raboty. 2009. № 2. S. 7-11.
2. Il'in I.A. Semen Lyudvigovich Frank i ego mesto v russkoy filosofii / I.A. Il'in // Vestnik
Russkogo studencheskogo khristianskogo dvizheniya. 1966. № 172. S. 59-65.
3. Kol'tsova V. A. Istoriya psikhologii: Problemy metodologii / V. A. Kol'tsova. M.: In-t psikhologii
RAN, 2008. 512 s.
4. Simonov P.V. Motivirovannyy mozg / P.V. Simonov. M.: Nauka, 1987. 215 s.
5. Frank S.L. Predmet znaniya. Dusha cheloveka / S.L. Frank. Minsk: Kharvest; M.: AST, 2000. 990 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Batuev A.S. Soznanie i podsoznanie / A.S. Batuev // Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosu-
darstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsial'noy raboty. 2009. № 2. S. 7-11.
2. Il'in I.A. Semen Lyudvigovich Frank i ego mesto v russkoy filosofii / I.A. Il'in // Vestnik
Russkogo studencheskogo khristianskogo dvizheniya. 1966. № 172. S. 59-65.
3. Kol'tsova V. A. Istoriya psikhologii: Problemy metodologii / V. A. Kol'tsova. M.: In-t psikhologii
RAN, 2008. 512 s.
4. Simonov P.V. Motivirovannyy mozg / P.V. Simonov. M.: Nauka, 1987. 215 s.
5. Frank S.L. Predmet znaniya. Dusha cheloveka / S.L. Frank. Minsk: Kharvest; M.: AST, 2000. 990 s.

Аннотация: The article studies the theoretical and methodological grounds for ontological approach to faith. It is shown how history of philosophy formed the attitude to faith as the characteristics of human existence. It is proved that faith should not be viewed only as the phenomenon of religion or knowledge theory because it is closely connected to the process of personal growth. The present article will be of interest not only to philosophers but also to all those who are interested in topical issues of human life and existence.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, faith, truth, value, system, personality, ontology, existence, methodology.

Библиография:
1. Baryshkov V.P. Aksiologiya lichnostnogo bytiya / V.P. Baryshkov; pod red. prof. V.B. Ust'yantseva.
Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2001. 188 s.
2. Bakhtin M.M. Avtor i geroy v esteticheskoy deyatel'nosti / M.M. Bakhtin // Raboty 20-kh godov. Kiev,
1994. C. 69-256.
3. Buber M. Dva obraza very / M. Buber; pod red. P.S. Gurevicha, S.Ya. Levit, S.V. Lezova. M.: Respublika,
1995. 464 s.
4. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki / Kh.-G. Gadamer; obshch. red. i vstup.
st. B.N. Bessonova. M.: Progress, 1988. 704 s.
5. Gusserl' E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i
transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya. Krizis evropeyskogo chelovechestva i filosofiya. Filosofiya
kak strogaya nauka / E. Gusserl'. Mn.: Kharvest, M.: AST, 2000. 752 s.
6. Istoriya sovremennoy zarubezhnoy filosofii: komparativistskiy podkhod / A.S. Kolesnikov [i
dr.]; otv. red. M.Ya. Korneev. SPb: Lan', 1997. 480 s.
7. Pelipenko A.A. Zakat logotsentrizma / A.A. Pelipenko // Chelovek. 2005. № 5. S. 44-55.
8. Mamardashvili M.K. Transtsendentsiya i bytie / M.K. Mamardashvili // Moy opyt netipichen. SPb,
2000. S. 54-73.
9. Mamardashvili M.K. Soznanie-bytie / M.K. Mamardashvili // Moy opyt netipichen. SPb, 2000.
S. 132-149.
10. Nekrasova E.N. Zhivaya istina. Metafizika chelovecheskogo bytiya v russkoy religioznoy filosofii
KhKh v. / E.N. Nekrasova. M.: Martis, 1997. 160 s.
11. Nizhnikov S.A. Metafizika very v russkoy filosofii / S.A. Nizhnikov. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2001. 355 s.
12. Frank S.L. Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva / S.L. Frank. M.: Respublika, 1992. 511 s.
13. Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya / M. Khaydegger; per. s nem. M.: Respublika,
1993. 447 s.
14. Khaydegger M. O sushchnosti istiny / M. Khaydegger // Filosofskie nauki. 1989. № 4. S. 91-104.

References (transliteration):
1. Baryshkov V.P. Aksiologiya lichnostnogo bytiya / V.P. Baryshkov; pod red. prof. V.B. Ust'yantseva.
Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2001. 188 s.
2. Bakhtin M.M. Avtor i geroy v esteticheskoy deyatel'nosti / M.M. Bakhtin // Raboty 20-kh godov. Kiev,
1994. C. 69-256.
3. Buber M. Dva obraza very / M. Buber; pod red. P.S. Gurevicha, S.Ya. Levit, S.V. Lezova. M.: Respublika,
1995. 464 s.
4. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki / Kh.-G. Gadamer; obshch. red. i vstup.
st. B.N. Bessonova. M.: Progress, 1988. 704 s.
5. Gusserl' E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i
transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya. Krizis evropeyskogo chelovechestva i filosofiya. Filosofiya
kak strogaya nauka / E. Gusserl'. Mn.: Kharvest, M.: AST, 2000. 752 s.
6. Istoriya sovremennoy zarubezhnoy filosofii: komparativistskiy podkhod / A.S. Kolesnikov [i
dr.]; otv. red. M.Ya. Korneev. SPb: Lan', 1997. 480 s.
7. Pelipenko A.A. Zakat logotsentrizma / A.A. Pelipenko // Chelovek. 2005. № 5. S. 44-55.
8. Mamardashvili M.K. Transtsendentsiya i bytie / M.K. Mamardashvili // Moy opyt netipichen. SPb,
2000. S. 54-73.
9. Mamardashvili M.K. Soznanie-bytie / M.K. Mamardashvili // Moy opyt netipichen. SPb, 2000.
S. 132-149.
10. Nekrasova E.N. Zhivaya istina. Metafizika chelovecheskogo bytiya v russkoy religioznoy filosofii
KhKh v. / E.N. Nekrasova. M.: Martis, 1997. 160 s.
11. Nizhnikov S.A. Metafizika very v russkoy filosofii / S.A. Nizhnikov. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2001. 355 s.
12. Frank S.L. Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva / S.L. Frank. M.: Respublika, 1992. 511 s.
13. Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya / M. Khaydegger; per. s nem. M.: Respublika,
1993. 447 s.
14. Khaydegger M. O sushchnosti istiny / M. Khaydegger // Filosofskie nauki. 1989. № 4. S. 91-104.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to axiological grounds of justice. In order to understand axiological aspects and paradigms better, the author of the article describes formation of justice as a value and defines why it is included in the hierarchy of values. The author also analyzes and classifies the concept of justice and its conventional value in different epochs and types of culture, interprets the value of justice for a modern human and defines the main problems of interpretation of axiological grounds of justice.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, justice, axiological, grounds, ideal, spiritual, value, idea, modern, human.

Библиография:
1. Vyzhletsov G.P. Aksiologiya: stanovlenie i osnovnye etapy razvitiya // Sotsial'no-politicheskiy
zhurnal. 1995. № 6.
2. Kant I. Osnovopolozhenie k metafizike nravov. M.: Direktmedia Pablishing, 2002.
3. Kravtsov R.V. Pravovye i nravstvennye tsennosti v vospitanii lichnosti // Vestnik YuUrGU. 2006. № 5.
4. Martin G.-P., Shumann X. Zapadnya globalizatsii. Ataka na protsvetanie i demokratiyu. M.: Al'pina,
2001.
5. Maslou A. Psikhologiya bytiya: Per.s angl. M.: REFL-book; Kiev: Vakler, 1997.
6. Nitsshe F. Volya k vlasti: opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostey: Per. s nem. M.: REFL-book, 1994.
7. Piontkevich L.Yu. Problema spravedlivosti v sotsial'noy filosofii // Filosofiya i obshchestvo.
2009. № 2.
8. Platon. Izbrannye dialogi. M.: EKSMO, 2009.
9. Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoy filosofii: v 2-kh tt. M.: Mif, 1993. T. 2.
10. Rolz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti / per. s angl. i nauch. red. V.V. Tselishcheva. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGU,
1995.
11. Yanitskiy M.S. Tsennostnye orientatsii lichnosti kak dinamicheskaya sistema. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvu-
zizdat, 2000.

References (transliteration):
1. Vyzhletsov G.P. Aksiologiya: stanovlenie i osnovnye etapy razvitiya // Sotsial'no-politicheskiy
zhurnal. 1995. № 6.
2. Kant I. Osnovopolozhenie k metafizike nravov. M.: Direktmedia Pablishing, 2002.
3. Kravtsov R.V. Pravovye i nravstvennye tsennosti v vospitanii lichnosti // Vestnik YuUrGU. 2006. № 5.
4. Martin G.-P., Shumann X. Zapadnya globalizatsii. Ataka na protsvetanie i demokratiyu. M.: Al'pina,
2001.
5. Maslou A. Psikhologiya bytiya: Per.s angl. M.: REFL-book; Kiev: Vakler, 1997.
6. Nitsshe F. Volya k vlasti: opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostey: Per. s nem. M.: REFL-book, 1994.
7. Piontkevich L.Yu. Problema spravedlivosti v sotsial'noy filosofii // Filosofiya i obshchestvo.
2009. № 2.
8. Platon. Izbrannye dialogi. M.: EKSMO, 2009.
9. Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoy filosofii: v 2-kh tt. M.: Mif, 1993. T. 2.
10. Rolz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti / per. s angl. i nauch. red. V.V. Tselishcheva. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGU,
1995.
11. Yanitskiy M.S. Tsennostnye orientatsii lichnosti kak dinamicheskaya sistema. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvu-
zizdat, 2000.

Аннотация: Aron’s work ‘History and the Dialectic of Violence. Analysis of Sartre’s ‘Critics of Dialectical Reason’ is a serous research of Sartre’s late philosophy which was viewed by Aron from the sociological point of view. Aron’s analysis of Sartre’s philosophy also casts light on Aron’s own views on freedom and violence.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, existentialism, human, consciousness, freedom, violence, practice, action, totality.

Библиография:
1. Aron R. Istoriya i dialektika nasiliya. Analiz sartrovskoy «Kritiki dialekticheskogo razuma»» /
Perevod s angl. yaz. G.A. Novichkovoy. — M.: IF RAN, 1999.
2. Filippov L.I. Filosofskaya antropologiya Zhan-Polya Sartra. — M., 1977.
3. Aron R. History and the Dialectic of Violence. An Analysis of Sartre’s Critique de la Raison Dialectique. —
New York, 1975.

References (transliteration):
1. Aron R. Istoriya i dialektika nasiliya. Analiz sartrovskoy «Kritiki dialekticheskogo razuma»» /
Perevod s angl. yaz. G.A. Novichkovoy. — M.: IF RAN, 1999.
2. Filippov L.I. Filosofskaya antropologiya Zhan-Polya Sartra. — M., 1977.
3. Aron R. History and the Dialectic of Violence. An Analysis of Sartre’s Critique de la Raison Dialectique. —
New York, 1975.

Аннотация: The article discusses whether it is possible to have thoughts which are not liberal while referring oneself to the liberal camp. The author disputes with Vadim Belyaev and shares his views on modern social skills and social actions. The article also shows how he puts all his principles to life.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, doctrine, liberal, salvation, practice, activity, personality, effectiveness, nature, scheme.

Библиография:
1. Belyaev V.A. Liberalizirovannaya Rossiya v poiskakh nravstvennoy osnovy. M., 2011.
2. Zimmel' G. Krizis kul'tury // Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe. V 2-kh tt. M., 1996.
3. Marks K. Kapital. T. 1. M., 1978.

References (transliteration):
1. Belyaev V.A. Liberalizirovannaya Rossiya v poiskakh nravstvennoy osnovy. M., 2011.
2. Zimmel' G. Krizis kul'tury // Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe. V 2-kh tt. M., 1996.
3. Marks K. Kapital. T. 1. M., 1978.

Аннотация: As the basic methodological guides for viewing the mechanisms of interaction between science and religion it is important to consider the binary oppositions ‘naturalism- creationism’ and ‘critical rationalism – sacral nature of orthodoxy’. Christianity outlines the block of gnoseological, ontological and moral metaphysical concepts. Science as a novation in the sphere of realization of human creative potentials is possible only on the basis of a certain level of thinking activity which is achieved, particularly, in the course of development of a religious consciousness – an ability to make references, form abstract and general notions, carry out experiments and etc. Based on the idea of ecocentrism, it is quite topical today to substantially fill in the spiritual concepts with philosophical, scientific and religious components as a part of starvation for the ideal universal knowledge introduced by V. S. Solovyev.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, spirituality, Christianity, science, metaphysics, values, communication, innovation, knowledge, ecocentrism.

Библиография:
1. Bernulli Ya. O zakone bol'shikh chisel. M., 1986.
2. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990.
3. Gaydenko P.P. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya nauki. M., 1980.
4. Ginzburg V.L. Razum i vera (Zamechaniya v svyazi s entsiklikoy papy Ioanna Pavla II «Vera i razum») //
«O nauke, o sebe i o drugikh». M.: «FML» 2001. Stat'ya 27. S. 449.
5. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1983.
6. N'yuton I. Optika. M.; L., 1923.
7. Otkrytoe pis'mo akademikov RAN prezidentu RF V.V. Putinu // Ginzburg V.L. Ob ateizme, religii
i svetskom gumanizme. Izd. 2-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. M.: Fizicheskiy institut im. P.N.
Lebedeva RAN, 2009. C. 129-132.
8. Pruzhinin B.I. Ratsional'nost' i istoricheskoe edinstvo nauchnogo znaniya. M., 1986.
9. Surkova L.V., Yakovlev V.A. Katolicheskie uchenye o metafizike // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta.
Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2008. № 2. S. 71-81.
10. Treder G.Yu. Evolyutsiya osnovnykh fizicheskikh idey. Kiev, 1988.
11. Uaytkhed A.N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii. M., 1990.
12. Chanyshev A.N. Kurs lektsiy po drevney filosofii. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1981.
13. Yakovlev V.A. Metafizika kreativnosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. № 6. S. 44-54.
14. Yakovlev V.A. Nauka. Filosofiya. Obshchestvo. V Rossiyskiy filosofskiy kongress. 25-28 avgusta 2009 g.
Novosibirsk: Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2009 (Analiticheskiy obzor) // Sotsial'nye
i gumanitarnye nauki. Ser. 3. Filosofiya: RZh / AN. M.: Izd-vo INION, 2010. № 1.

References (transliteration):
1. Bernulli Ya. O zakone bol'shikh chisel. M., 1986.
2. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990.
3. Gaydenko P.P. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya nauki. M., 1980.
4. Ginzburg V.L. Razum i vera (Zamechaniya v svyazi s entsiklikoy papy Ioanna Pavla II «Vera i razum») //
«O nauke, o sebe i o drugikh». M.: «FML» 2001. Stat'ya 27. S. 449.
5. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1983.
6. N'yuton I. Optika. M.; L., 1923.
7. Otkrytoe pis'mo akademikov RAN prezidentu RF V.V. Putinu // Ginzburg V.L. Ob ateizme, religii
i svetskom gumanizme. Izd. 2-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. M.: Fizicheskiy institut im. P.N.
Lebedeva RAN, 2009. C. 129-132.
8. Pruzhinin B.I. Ratsional'nost' i istoricheskoe edinstvo nauchnogo znaniya. M., 1986.
9. Surkova L.V., Yakovlev V.A. Katolicheskie uchenye o metafizike // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta.
Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2008. № 2. S. 71-81.
10. Treder G.Yu. Evolyutsiya osnovnykh fizicheskikh idey. Kiev, 1988.
11. Uaytkhed A.N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii. M., 1990.
12. Chanyshev A.N. Kurs lektsiy po drevney filosofii. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1981.
13. Yakovlev V.A. Metafizika kreativnosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. № 6. S. 44-54.
14. Yakovlev V.A. Nauka. Filosofiya. Obshchestvo. V Rossiyskiy filosofskiy kongress. 25-28 avgusta 2009 g.
Novosibirsk: Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2009 (Analiticheskiy obzor) // Sotsial'nye
i gumanitarnye nauki. Ser. 3. Filosofiya: RZh / AN. M.: Izd-vo INION, 2010. № 1.

Аннотация: Trying to understand the meanings of culture, cultural studies address to literature for general readers as an art form of a society’s system of value. The goal of this article is to find out how the value of socially useful labor was reflected in literature for general readers during the time of the ‘Thaw’. What role did the socially useful labor play in everyday life? How important motivation for such labor was? What meanings of the Soviet culture hid behind it?

Ключевые слова: cultural studies, value, labor, literature for general readers, meaning, Soviet, tradition, culture, ‘thaw’.

Библиография:
1. Berdyaev N. Sud'ba Rossii. M.: Sovetskiy pisatel', 1990. 346 s.
2. Grushin B.A. Chetyre zhizni Rossii v zerkale oprosov obshchestvennogo mneniya. M.: Institut filosofii
RAN, 2001. Kniga 1. 624 s.
3. Zarubina N.N. Sotsial'no-kul'turnye osnovy khozyaystva i predprinimatel'stva. M.: Magistr, 1998. 369 s.
4. Kagan M.S. Iskusstvo kak fenomen kul'tury // Iskusstvo v sisteme kul'tury / Sost. i otv. red.
M.S. Kagan. Leningrad: Nauka, 1987.
5. Kolotaev V.A. Bytovanie real'nosti v zerkale iskusstva // Tretiy Rossiyskiy kul'turologicheskiy
kongress. Tezisy dokladov i soobshcheniy. SPb.: EYDOS, 2010.
6. Kondakov I.V. Obshcherossiyskiy mentalitet / I.V. Kondakov // Kul'turologiya: istoriya kul'tury
Rossii: Kurs lektsiy. M.: Vyssh. shk., 2003. 616 s.
7. Kondakov I.V. «Tayanie l'dov»: missiya «ottepeli» / I.V. Kondakov, L.B. Brusilovskaya // Vestnik
Udmurtskogo universiteta. 2006. № 12.
8. Konev V.P. Sovetskaya khudozhestvennaya kul'tura perioda 30-kh — 80-kh gg. KhKh veka: teoretiko-metodologi-
cheskiy analiz. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora kul'turologii. Novosibirsk, 2004.
9. Kochetkov V.V. Russkiy natsional'nyy kharakter / V.V. Kochetkov // Psikhologiya mezhkul'turnykh raz-
lichiy. M.: PER SE, 2002. 416 s.
10. Lotman Yu.M. Semiotika kul'tury i ponyatie teksta / Yu. M. Lotman // Istoriya i tipologiya russkoy
kul'tury. SPb.: Iskusstvo SPb., 2002. 768 s.
11. Mogil'ner, M. Mifologiya «podpol'nogo cheloveka»: radikal'nyy mikrokosm v Rossii nachala KhKh v. kak
predmet semioticheskogo analiza / M. Mogil'ner // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. M., 1999. Vyp. XVI.
12. Khalizev V.E. Kul'turologiya v ee znachimosti dlya sovremennogo literaturovedeniya // Literaturove-
denie na poroge XXI veka: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. M.: Randevu-AM, 1998.
13. Chernyak M.A. Fenomen massovoy literatury KhKh veka: problemy genezisa i poetiki: Dissertatsiya.
SPb., 2005.
14. Shvedov S. Knigi, kotorye my vybirali (Vcherashnie bestsellery i segodnyashnie chitateli) // Po-
gruzhenie v tryasinu: (Anatomiya zastoya) / Sost. i obshch. red. T.A. Notkinoy. M.: Progress, 1991. 704 s.
15. Shishkina L.I. Khudozhestvennoe proizvedenie kak «kod kul'tury» / L.I. Shishkina // Tretiy Ros-
siyskiy kul'turologicheskiy kongress. Tezisy dokladov i soobshcheniy. SPb.: EYDOS, 2010.

References (transliteration):
1. Berdyaev N. Sud'ba Rossii. M.: Sovetskiy pisatel', 1990. 346 s.
2. Grushin B.A. Chetyre zhizni Rossii v zerkale oprosov obshchestvennogo mneniya. M.: Institut filosofii
RAN, 2001. Kniga 1. 624 s.
3. Zarubina N.N. Sotsial'no-kul'turnye osnovy khozyaystva i predprinimatel'stva. M.: Magistr, 1998. 369 s.
4. Kagan M.S. Iskusstvo kak fenomen kul'tury // Iskusstvo v sisteme kul'tury / Sost. i otv. red.
M.S. Kagan. Leningrad: Nauka, 1987.
5. Kolotaev V.A. Bytovanie real'nosti v zerkale iskusstva // Tretiy Rossiyskiy kul'turologicheskiy
kongress. Tezisy dokladov i soobshcheniy. SPb.: EYDOS, 2010.
6. Kondakov I.V. Obshcherossiyskiy mentalitet / I.V. Kondakov // Kul'turologiya: istoriya kul'tury
Rossii: Kurs lektsiy. M.: Vyssh. shk., 2003. 616 s.
7. Kondakov I.V. «Tayanie l'dov»: missiya «ottepeli» / I.V. Kondakov, L.B. Brusilovskaya // Vestnik
Udmurtskogo universiteta. 2006. № 12.
8. Konev V.P. Sovetskaya khudozhestvennaya kul'tura perioda 30-kh — 80-kh gg. KhKh veka: teoretiko-metodologi-
cheskiy analiz. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora kul'turologii. Novosibirsk, 2004.
9. Kochetkov V.V. Russkiy natsional'nyy kharakter / V.V. Kochetkov // Psikhologiya mezhkul'turnykh raz-
lichiy. M.: PER SE, 2002. 416 s.
10. Lotman Yu.M. Semiotika kul'tury i ponyatie teksta / Yu. M. Lotman // Istoriya i tipologiya russkoy
kul'tury. SPb.: Iskusstvo SPb., 2002. 768 s.
11. Mogil'ner, M. Mifologiya «podpol'nogo cheloveka»: radikal'nyy mikrokosm v Rossii nachala KhKh v. kak
predmet semioticheskogo analiza / M. Mogil'ner // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. M., 1999. Vyp. XVI.
12. Khalizev V.E. Kul'turologiya v ee znachimosti dlya sovremennogo literaturovedeniya // Literaturove-
denie na poroge XXI veka: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. M.: Randevu-AM, 1998.
13. Chernyak M.A. Fenomen massovoy literatury KhKh veka: problemy genezisa i poetiki: Dissertatsiya.
SPb., 2005.
14. Shvedov S. Knigi, kotorye my vybirali (Vcherashnie bestsellery i segodnyashnie chitateli) // Po-
gruzhenie v tryasinu: (Anatomiya zastoya) / Sost. i obshch. red. T.A. Notkinoy. M.: Progress, 1991. 704 s.
15. Shishkina L.I. Khudozhestvennoe proizvedenie kak «kod kul'tury» / L.I. Shishkina // Tretiy Ros-
siyskiy kul'turologicheskiy kongress. Tezisy dokladov i soobshcheniy. SPb.: EYDOS, 2010.

Аннотация: The author of the article studies the problem of faith and views it not as a religious or a gnoseological phenomenon but as an everyday life value. The author describes the mechanism of faith as an ontological phenomenon and its functions. It is proved that faith is not only a revelation of personality and its genuineness. According to the author, an efficient instrument to solve the problem of human existence would be to develop the ontological approach to faith which would combine precious ideas of both Martin Heidegger’s fundamental ontology and P. A. Florensky’s Russian religious philosophy. The article will be of interest not only to philosophers, but also to everyone interested in the challenges of human.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, faith, ontology, phenomenology, symbol, symbolism, adherence to pluralism, repetition, relationship, unity.

Библиография:
1. Afanas'eva A.P. Poznanie tsennostno-smyslovoy sfery lichnosti posredstvom simvola / A.P. Afa-
nas'eva. M.: IITs MGUDT, 2006. 207 s.
2. Voronina N.N. Ekzistentsial'no-ontologicheskoe osoznanie simvola / N.N. Voronina // Vestnik
NNGU. Seriya Sotsial'nye nauki. 2008. №4 (12). S. 95-99.
3. Gurevich P.S. Bytie cheloveka / P.S. Gurevich // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 8 (32). S. 5–8.
4. Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T. 2. Mifologicheskoe myshlenie / E. Kassirer. M.,
SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002. 280 s.
5. Katyukhina T.V. «Do‑slovnaya» priroda cheloveka. Priroda mysli / T.V. Katyukhina // Filosofiya i
kul'tura. 2010. № 8 (32). S. 28–35.
6. K'erkegor S. Strakh i trepet: per. s dat. / S. K'erkegor. M.: Respublika, 1993. 383 s.
7. Levinas E. Izbrannoe. Total'nost' i Beskonechnoe / E. Levinas. M.; SPb.: Universit. kn., 2000. 416 s.
8. Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo / A.F. Losev. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Iskusstvo,
1995. 320 s.
9. Makovskiy M.M. Sravnitel'nyy slovar' mifologicheskoy simvoliki v indoevropeyskikh yazykakh:
Obraz mira i mir obrazov / M.M. Makovskiy. Vlados, 1996. 416 s.
10. Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu… / M.K. Mamardashvili; sost. i predisl. Yu.P. Se-
nokosova. M.: Progress, 1990. 368 s.
11. Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii / M.K. Mamardashvili. M.: Agraf, 1997. 320 s.
12. Mamardashvili M.K. Estetika myshleniya / M.K. Mamardashvili. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh
issledovaniy, 2000. 416 s.
13. Mamardashvili M.K., Pyatigorskiy A.M. Simvol i soznanie (Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii,
simvolike i yazyke) / M.K. Mamardashvili, A.M. Pyatigorskiy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, Fond Meraba
Mamardashvili, 2009. 287 s.
14. Marsel' G. Prisutstvie i bessmertie. Izbrannye raboty / M.: Institut filosofii, teologii i
istorii sv. Fomy, 2007. 328 s.
15. Men' A. Radostnaya vest' (Lektsii) / A. Men'. M.: Vita-tsentr, 1992. 320 s.
16. Omel'chuk R.K. Na puti k ontologii very / R.K. Omel'chuk. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGU, 2010. 193 s.
17. Spirova E.M. Simvol kak klyuch k razgadke chelovecheskoy prirody / E.M. Spirova // Chelovek-nauka-
gumanizm: K 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika I.T. Frolova / Otv. red. A.A. Guseynov; In-t filo-
sofii RAN. M.: Nauka, 2009. S. 179-196.
18. Uaytkhed A.N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii / A. Uaytkhed. M.: Progress, 1990. 720 c.
19. Ukolov K.I. Predstavlenie o religioznom simvole v filosofii Paulya Tillikha / K.I. Ukolov //
Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. 2008. Vyp. 1 (21). S. 43-60.
20. Florenskiy P.A. Izmenenie imen kak vneshniy znak peremen v religioznom soznanii / P.A. Floren-
skiy. M.: Izd-vo khrama sv. muchenitsy Tatiany, 2006. 360 s.
21. Florenskiy P.A. Sochineniya: V 4-kh tt. / P.A. Florenskiy; sost. A.S. Trubacheva, V.P. Florenskogo,
M.S. Trubachevoy; red. A.S. Trubacheva. M.: Mysl', 1999. T. 3 (1). 621 s.
22. Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie Istiny: Opyt pravoslavnoy teodetsii / P.A. Florenskiy. M.:
Pravda, 1990. T. 1 (I). 490 s.
23. Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie Istiny: Opyt pravoslavnoy teodetsii / P.A. Florenskiy. M.:
Pravda, 1990. T. 1 (II). S. 491–840.
24. Florenskiy P.A. Filosofiya kul'ta (Opyt pravoslavnoy antropoditsei) / P.A. Florenskiy; sost. i
komment. S.M. Polovinkin, igumen Andronik (Trubachev). M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. 568 s.
25. Shestov L.I. Afiny i Ierusalim / L.I. Shestov // Sochineniya: v 2-kh tt. M., 1993. T. 1. S. 317-664.
26. Eliade M. Izbrannye sochineniya: Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii; Obrazy i simvoly; Svyashchennoe i
mirskoe / M. Eliade; per. s fr. A.A. Vasil'evoy, Yu.N. Stefanova, N.K. Garbovskogo. M.: Ladomir,
2000. 414 s.
27. Yung K. G. Otvet Iovu / K.G. Yung. M.: Kanon, 1995. 352 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Afanas'eva A.P. Poznanie tsennostno-smyslovoy sfery lichnosti posredstvom simvola / A.P. Afa-
nas'eva. M.: IITs MGUDT, 2006. 207 s.
2. Voronina N.N. Ekzistentsial'no-ontologicheskoe osoznanie simvola / N.N. Voronina // Vestnik
NNGU. Seriya Sotsial'nye nauki. 2008. №4 (12). S. 95-99.
3. Gurevich P.S. Bytie cheloveka / P.S. Gurevich // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 8 (32). S. 5–8.
4. Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T. 2. Mifologicheskoe myshlenie / E. Kassirer. M.,
SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002. 280 s.
5. Katyukhina T.V. «Do‑slovnaya» priroda cheloveka. Priroda mysli / T.V. Katyukhina // Filosofiya i
kul'tura. 2010. № 8 (32). S. 28–35.
6. K'erkegor S. Strakh i trepet: per. s dat. / S. K'erkegor. M.: Respublika, 1993. 383 s.
7. Levinas E. Izbrannoe. Total'nost' i Beskonechnoe / E. Levinas. M.; SPb.: Universit. kn., 2000. 416 s.
8. Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo / A.F. Losev. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Iskusstvo,
1995. 320 s.
9. Makovskiy M.M. Sravnitel'nyy slovar' mifologicheskoy simvoliki v indoevropeyskikh yazykakh:
Obraz mira i mir obrazov / M.M. Makovskiy. Vlados, 1996. 416 s.
10. Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu… / M.K. Mamardashvili; sost. i predisl. Yu.P. Se-
nokosova. M.: Progress, 1990. 368 s.
11. Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii / M.K. Mamardashvili. M.: Agraf, 1997. 320 s.
12. Mamardashvili M.K. Estetika myshleniya / M.K. Mamardashvili. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh
issledovaniy, 2000. 416 s.
13. Mamardashvili M.K., Pyatigorskiy A.M. Simvol i soznanie (Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii,
simvolike i yazyke) / M.K. Mamardashvili, A.M. Pyatigorskiy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, Fond Meraba
Mamardashvili, 2009. 287 s.
14. Marsel' G. Prisutstvie i bessmertie. Izbrannye raboty / M.: Institut filosofii, teologii i
istorii sv. Fomy, 2007. 328 s.
15. Men' A. Radostnaya vest' (Lektsii) / A. Men'. M.: Vita-tsentr, 1992. 320 s.
16. Omel'chuk R.K. Na puti k ontologii very / R.K. Omel'chuk. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGU, 2010. 193 s.
17. Spirova E.M. Simvol kak klyuch k razgadke chelovecheskoy prirody / E.M. Spirova // Chelovek-nauka-
gumanizm: K 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika I.T. Frolova / Otv. red. A.A. Guseynov; In-t filo-
sofii RAN. M.: Nauka, 2009. S. 179-196.
18. Uaytkhed A.N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii / A. Uaytkhed. M.: Progress, 1990. 720 c.
19. Ukolov K.I. Predstavlenie o religioznom simvole v filosofii Paulya Tillikha / K.I. Ukolov //
Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. 2008. Vyp. 1 (21). S. 43-60.
20. Florenskiy P.A. Izmenenie imen kak vneshniy znak peremen v religioznom soznanii / P.A. Floren-
skiy. M.: Izd-vo khrama sv. muchenitsy Tatiany, 2006. 360 s.
21. Florenskiy P.A. Sochineniya: V 4-kh tt. / P.A. Florenskiy; sost. A.S. Trubacheva, V.P. Florenskogo,
M.S. Trubachevoy; red. A.S. Trubacheva. M.: Mysl', 1999. T. 3 (1). 621 s.
22. Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie Istiny: Opyt pravoslavnoy teodetsii / P.A. Florenskiy. M.:
Pravda, 1990. T. 1 (I). 490 s.
23. Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie Istiny: Opyt pravoslavnoy teodetsii / P.A. Florenskiy. M.:
Pravda, 1990. T. 1 (II). S. 491–840.
24. Florenskiy P.A. Filosofiya kul'ta (Opyt pravoslavnoy antropoditsei) / P.A. Florenskiy; sost. i
komment. S.M. Polovinkin, igumen Andronik (Trubachev). M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. 568 s.
25. Shestov L.I. Afiny i Ierusalim / L.I. Shestov // Sochineniya: v 2-kh tt. M., 1993. T. 1. S. 317-664.
26. Eliade M. Izbrannye sochineniya: Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii; Obrazy i simvoly; Svyashchennoe i
mirskoe / M. Eliade; per. s fr. A.A. Vasil'evoy, Yu.N. Stefanova, N.K. Garbovskogo. M.: Ladomir,
2000. 414 s.
27. Yung K. G. Otvet Iovu / K.G. Yung. M.: Kanon, 1995. 352 s.

Аннотация: The article considers some aspects of the process of infl uence of ideology, social cultural values, standards of ethics and esthetics and etc. on the process of history reconstruction. It is noted that ideology infl uence is one of the most strongly marked and the most distorting the entire process and outcomes of the history reconstruction. The author insists on the thesis that the implicit form of basic cultural values and social norms is refl ected in reconstructive ‘historical knowledge’. Moreover, when the former changes, it makes the historical knowledge to change, too. As a result, any society would inevitably have its own history based on the values and norms generally accepted in this society. The author of the article also raises a question about moral and ethical responsibility of a historian for results of such reconstruction.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, history reconstruction, historical knowledge, culture, axiological approach, objectivity, values, morals, ethics, esthetics

Контактная информация: Davydov Vyacheslav Alexandrovich, v.davidov@bk.ru

Библиография:
Antipov G. A. Prisushche li nauke nravstvennoe nachalo? // Nauka i tsennosti. Novosibirsk, 1987.
– S. 50.
Buller A. O predmete i metode teorii istoricheskogo poznaniya // Logos, 2001. №5-6. URL: http://
www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2008).
Buller A. Ukaz. soch. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashche-
niya: 23.10.2008).
Gobozov I. A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. M., 1999.
Gurevich A. Ya. Dvoyakaya otvetstvennost' istorika // Problemy istoricheskogo poznaniya.
Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. Moskva, 19-21 maya 1996 g. M., 1999. – S. 11-12.
Doroshenko N. M. Edinstvo nauchnogo i vnenauchnogo v istoricheskom poznanii // Nauchnye i vne-
nauchnye formy v sotsial'nom poznanii. M., 1985. – S. 165-166.
Krauze G. Razvitie ponimaniya istorii do Karla Marksa. SPb, 1906.
Loseva O. A. Aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya. Saratov, 2000.
Loseva O. A. Metodologicheskie i aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya.
Saratov, 2004.
Mikeshina L. A. Epistemologiya tsennostey. M., 2007.
Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A. V. Znanie o proshlom: teoriya i istoriya. V 2-kh tt. T. 1. SPb, 2003.
Timofeeva O. G. Tsennosti kul'tury: sotsiologicheskiy aspekt // Problema tsennostey v gumani-
tarnykh distsiplinakh. M., 2009. – S. 107-108.
Beard Ch. A. An Economis Interpretation of Constitution of the United States. New York, 1913.

References (transliteration):
Antipov G. A. Prisushche li nauke nravstvennoe nachalo? // Nauka i tsennosti. Novosibirsk, 1987.
– S. 50.
Buller A. O predmete i metode teorii istoricheskogo poznaniya // Logos, 2001. №5-6. URL: http://
www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2008).
Buller A. Ukaz. soch. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashche-
niya: 23.10.2008).
Gobozov I. A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. M., 1999.
Gurevich A. Ya. Dvoyakaya otvetstvennost' istorika // Problemy istoricheskogo poznaniya.
Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. Moskva, 19-21 maya 1996 g. M., 1999. – S. 11-12.
Doroshenko N. M. Edinstvo nauchnogo i vnenauchnogo v istoricheskom poznanii // Nauchnye i vne-
nauchnye formy v sotsial'nom poznanii. M., 1985. – S. 165-166.
Krauze G. Razvitie ponimaniya istorii do Karla Marksa. SPb, 1906.
Loseva O. A. Aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya. Saratov, 2000.
Loseva O. A. Metodologicheskie i aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya.
Saratov, 2004.
Mikeshina L. A. Epistemologiya tsennostey. M., 2007.
Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A. V. Znanie o proshlom: teoriya i istoriya. V 2-kh tt. T. 1. SPb, 2003.
Timofeeva O. G. Tsennosti kul'tury: sotsiologicheskiy aspekt // Problema tsennostey v gumani-
tarnykh distsiplinakh. M., 2009. – S. 107-108.
Beard Ch. A. An Economis Interpretation of Constitution of the United States. New York, 1913.

Аннотация: The article covers the studies of the scientific community from R. Merton up to the present as well as contains conclusions regarding further development of ethics of the scientific community. Special attention is drawn to existing mechanisms of ethical regulation not only within the community but also in related spheres such as education and entrepreneurship. In the end the author concluded that it was possible to borrow certain mechanisms of ethical regulation from corporate governance and business ethics.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, scientific community, applied ethics, ethics of science, university, institution of higher education, ethical regulation, ethical codex, corporation, science

Контактная информация: Ivanova Olga Vladimirovna, olgaivanova05@mail.ru

Библиография:
Allakhverdyan A.G., G.Yu. Moshkova, A.V. Yurevich, M.G. Yaroshevskiy. Psikhologiya nauki. http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Psihol/Allahv/intro_2.php
Burd'e P. Struktura, gabitus, praktika // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii 1998 god. t. I. vypusk 2.
Vedomosti №33 pod red. Bakshtanovskogo V.I., Karnaukhova N.N., NII Prikladnoy etiki, Gosudarstvennoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya «Tyumenskiy gosudarstvennyy neftegazovyy universitet» — 272 s.
Vedomosti №34 pod red. Bakshtanovskogo V.I., Karnaukhova N.N., NII Prikladnoy etiki, Gosudarstvennoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya «Tyumenskiy gosudarstvennyy neftegazovyy universitet» — 264 s.
D'yui Dzh. // Demokratiya i obrazovanie: M.: Pedagogika-Press, 2000. S. 270-321.
D'yui Dzh. // Rekonstruktsiya v filosofii. Problemy cheloveka. M.: Respublika, 2003.
Konovalova L.V. Prikladnaya etika: M.:IFRAN, 1998 — 214.
Kun T. // Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy: M.: AST, 2003. S. 4-608.
Merton R. // Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura: M.: AST, 2006. S. 4-576.
Popanek Viktor Dizayn dlya real'nogo mira M.: D. Andronov, 2008. — 413 s.
Tishchenko P. Bio-vlast' v epokhu biotekhnologiy: M.: IFRAN, 2001
Etos nauki / Pod red. Kiyashchenko L.P., Mirskoy E.Z. M.: Academia, 2008. S. 87-107.
Code of Ethics of The University of Southern California http://www.usc.edu/about/core_documents/usc_code_of_ethics.html
Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research // Council of American Survey Research Organizations www.casro.org
Conflicts of Interest in Engeniring // Paula Wells, Hardy Jones, Michael Davis // USA: Hunt Pablishing Company, 1986.
Kaptein, Muel. «Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?» Journal of Business Ethics 50.1 (March 2004): 13–31
Research Code of Ethics // University of Derby http://www.derby.ac.uk/
University Code of Ethics University of Virginia www.virginia.edu
University Guaide to the State Codes of Ethics // University of Connecticut www.audit.uconn.edu/doc/codeofethics.pdf
Ziman // Real Science — What It is and what it means. 2000.

References (transliteration):
Allakhverdyan A.G., G.Yu. Moshkova, A.V. Yurevich, M.G. Yaroshevskiy. Psikhologiya nauki. http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Psihol/Allahv/intro_2.php
Burd'e P. Struktura, gabitus, praktika // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii 1998 god. t. I. vypusk 2.
Vedomosti №33 pod red. Bakshtanovskogo V.I., Karnaukhova N.N., NII Prikladnoy etiki, Gosudarstvennoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya «Tyumenskiy gosudarstvennyy neftegazovyy universitet» — 272 s.
Vedomosti №34 pod red. Bakshtanovskogo V.I., Karnaukhova N.N., NII Prikladnoy etiki, Gosudarstvennoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya «Tyumenskiy gosudarstvennyy neftegazovyy universitet» — 264 s.
D'yui Dzh. // Demokratiya i obrazovanie: M.: Pedagogika-Press, 2000. S. 270-321.
D'yui Dzh. // Rekonstruktsiya v filosofii. Problemy cheloveka. M.: Respublika, 2003.
Konovalova L.V. Prikladnaya etika: M.:IFRAN, 1998 — 214.
Kun T. // Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy: M.: AST, 2003. S. 4-608.
Merton R. // Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura: M.: AST, 2006. S. 4-576.
Popanek Viktor Dizayn dlya real'nogo mira M.: D. Andronov, 2008. — 413 s.
Tishchenko P. Bio-vlast' v epokhu biotekhnologiy: M.: IFRAN, 2001
Etos nauki / Pod red. Kiyashchenko L.P., Mirskoy E.Z. M.: Academia, 2008. S. 87-107.
Code of Ethics of The University of Southern California http://www.usc.edu/about/core_documents/usc_code_of_ethics.html
Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research // Council of American Survey Research Organizations www.casro.org
Conflicts of Interest in Engeniring // Paula Wells, Hardy Jones, Michael Davis // USA: Hunt Pablishing Company, 1986.
Kaptein, Muel. «Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?» Journal of Business Ethics 50.1 (March 2004): 13–31
Research Code of Ethics // University of Derby http://www.derby.ac.uk/
University Code of Ethics University of Virginia www.virginia.edu
University Guaide to the State Codes of Ethics // University of Connecticut www.audit.uconn.edu/doc/codeofethics.pdf
Ziman // Real Science — What It is and what it means. 2000.

Аннотация: Abstract: Valentin Ivanovich Tolstyh’s article about the “soviet person” phenomenon, its nature, peculiarities and general personal traits.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, culture, society, soviet person.

Контактная информация: Tolstyh, V. I.., nb-media@mail.ru

Аннотация: Abstract: Editorial Board is greeting Valentin Ivanovich Tolstyh, PhD in philosophy, professor, chief researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, editor and author of numerous works in philosophy, on his 80th birthday.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, culture, intelligentsia, Valentin Ivanovich Tolstyh.

Контактная информация: Gurevich Pavel Semenovich, gurevich@rambler.ru

Аннотация: Scientists who adopted Kuhn’s methodology as a powerful tool for understanding scientific developmental processes have been quite interested in applying the same methods to philosophy of technology. Below you shall find the brief summaries of the Western discussions on using Kuhn’s model for interpretation of changes in technics and technology.