Аннотация: The object of this article is the phenomenon of cosmopolitanism, while the subject is the cosmopolitan vision in interpretation of U. Beck. The author examines the content of the phenomena and varieties of cosmopolitanism and nationalism, as well as correlation between the processes of globalization and cosmopolitanization. The attention is given to the process of formation of cosmopolitan outlook, and its correspondents to the modern imperatives. The author analyzes the social conditions and object factors affecting the process of institutionalization of cosmopolitanism. The article follows the influence of cosmopolitanism upon the area of ethnicity, reaction of national identity and national tradition to the challenges of cosmopolitanism. The scientific novelty consists in substantiation of the number of positions that give specific relevance to the analyzed problematic: 1) under the conditions of globalizing world, cosmopolitanism and the adjacent to it phenomena are in ideological and practical demand; 2) existing in space of the national, cosmopolitanism acts in multiple ethnical guises, encouraging its transformation into cosmopolitanisms.

Ключевые слова: national identity, nationalism, universalization, cosmopolitan vision, cosmopolitanization, cosmopolitanism, globalization, local, tradition, multiculturalism

Библиография:
Chumakov A.N. Globalizatsiya i kosmopolitizm v kontekste sovremennosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2009. № 1. S. 32-40.
Minenkov G. Kosmopolitizm i kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http: // cosmopol.narod. ru/articles/minenkov.htm (data poseshcheniya: 28.02.2016).
MakKormik P. Globalizatsiya i kosmopolitizm: kriterii, podkhody i zhiznennyy opyt // Vek globalizatsii. 2009. № 2. S. 61-70.
Mazlish B. Global'noe i lokal'noe: ponyatiya i problemy [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http: sotsis_5_06_p23-31[1]. pdf-Adobe Reader (data obrashcheniya: 24.08. 2016).
Dal'mayr F. Kosmopolitizm: v poiskakh kosmosa // Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2012. № 5. S. 59-77.
Avanesova E.G. Transformatsiya funktsiy gosudarstvennoy vlasti v mirovom kosmopoliticheskom soobshchestve // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2015. № 4(20). S. 73-78.
Napso M.D. Kosmopolitizm i natsionalizm v prostranstve idey // Sotsiodinamika. 2016. № 5. S. 90.
Bek U., Kosmopoliticheskoe obshchestvo i ego vragi [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http: // Bek_2003_1[1]. pdf-Adobe Reader (data obrashcheniya: 16. 08. 2016).
Bek U. Kosmopoliticheskoe mirovozzrenie [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http: // padaread.com/book=227055 (data poseshcheniya: 17.08.2016).
Shebanova M.A. Kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' kak odna iz form transnatsional'nykh identichnostey // Politika i obshchestvo. 2013. № 8. S. 1039-1051.

References (transliteration):
Chumakov A.N. Globalizatsiya i kosmopolitizm v kontekste sovremennosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2009. № 1. S. 32-40.
Minenkov G. Kosmopolitizm i kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http: // cosmopol.narod. ru/articles/minenkov.htm (data poseshcheniya: 28.02.2016).
MakKormik P. Globalizatsiya i kosmopolitizm: kriterii, podkhody i zhiznennyy opyt // Vek globalizatsii. 2009. № 2. S. 61-70.
Mazlish B. Global'noe i lokal'noe: ponyatiya i problemy [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http: sotsis_5_06_p23-31[1]. pdf-Adobe Reader (data obrashcheniya: 24.08. 2016).
Dal'mayr F. Kosmopolitizm: v poiskakh kosmosa // Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2012. № 5. S. 59-77.
Avanesova E.G. Transformatsiya funktsiy gosudarstvennoy vlasti v mirovom kosmopoliticheskom soobshchestve // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2015. № 4(20). S. 73-78.
Napso M.D. Kosmopolitizm i natsionalizm v prostranstve idey // Sotsiodinamika. 2016. № 5. S. 90.
Bek U., Kosmopoliticheskoe obshchestvo i ego vragi [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http: // Bek_2003_1[1]. pdf-Adobe Reader (data obrashcheniya: 16. 08. 2016).
Bek U. Kosmopoliticheskoe mirovozzrenie [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http: // padaread.com/book=227055 (data poseshcheniya: 17.08.2016).
Shebanova M.A. Kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' kak odna iz form transnatsional'nykh identichnostey // Politika i obshchestvo. 2013. № 8. S. 1039-1051.

Аннотация: Analyzing the specificity of perception of the Slavic world, this article demonstrates that after accepting Christianity, the Russian culture as if froze in the religious captivity. All the development was taking place within the framework of the religious, namely Christian Orthodox tradition. The authors examine the shift of the spiritual dominants in transition from Paganism to Christianity. If Paganism taught a man to live in harmony with nature, Christianity teaches how to live in society. Christianity has its own peculiarities; it was never abstract or theoretical, but practical, ethical, and educational. The work also reviews the human relation to nature and society in the context of Eastern and Western worldview paradigms. For East it is characteristic to be in accordance with the voice of nature, while the West struggles against the nature, and imposes a feeling of a supernatural being. Rationalism dominates in the West, and irrationalism – in the East. The authors attempt to determine to which type of world and life perception the Eastern Slavic community can be referred to. Based on the views of C. Jung and A. Schweitzer, the conclusion is made that the Western culture is more extravert, while the Eastern culture is introvert. The West is progressive, and the East is conservative. For Orthodoxy, it is more characteristic to deny the world and life; it is more valuable to realize how to live a life properly, understanding the meaning and goal of life, rather than study the question of how this world is structured. Analyzing the dispute between the Westerners and Slavophiles, we should note that the viewed the dilemma of East and West in the context of differences between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, and not in a broader sense as the differences between the Eastern and Western worldview paradigms.

Ключевые слова: Irrationalism, Rationalism, Extraversion, Introversion, Spiritual life, Worldview, Christianity, Paganism, Cataphatic theology , Apophatic theology

Библиография:
Shveytser A. Mirovozzrenie indiyskikh mysliteley. Mistika i etika // Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii.-M.: Nauka, 1988. – S.209-233.
Berdyaev N.A. Novoe srednevekov'e. Razmyshlenie o sud'be Rossii i Evropy.-Berlin, 1924. – 421 c.
Berdyaev N.A. Chelovek i mashina // Voprosy filosofii. —1989. – № 2. – S. 147-162.
Yung K.G. O psikhologii vostochnykh religiy i filosofii.– M.: Medium, 1994. – 255 s.
Gesse G. K moim yaponskim chitatelyam //Vostok-Zapad: Issle¬¬¬dovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii. – M.: Progress, 1982. – S.214-223.
Glushak A.S., Naumova N.V. Slavyanskiy pir kak slagaemoe dukhovnoy kul'tury// Kul'tura narodov Prichernomor'ya. — 2013. – № 260. – S.29-31.
Zhirtueva N. S. Modifikatsii vizantiyskogo isikhazma v kul'ture Kievskoy Rusi, Moskovskoy Rusi i Kryma // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 6. – S.843-852. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.6.14070
Ilarion. Slovo o zakone i blagodati// Pamyatniki drev¬¬-nerusskoy tserkovno–uchitel'noy literatury. – SPb.,1894.– Vyp.1. – S. 59–78.
Florovskiy G. V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Vil'nyus, 1991. – 601 s.
Likhachev D. Velikiy put': stanovlenie russkoy literatury XI-XVII vekov.-M.: Sovremennik, 1987. – 301 s.
Pouchenie Vladimira Monomakha// // Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi. XI-nachalo XII veka. – M.: Khud.lit., 1978. – S.393-413.
P.S. Gurevich Arianizm kak mifologiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 6. - C. 525 - 528. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.6.8909.
E. V. Pavlova Ponimanie nravstvennoy otvetstvennosti vlasti v trudakh drevnerusskikh mysliteley // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 4. - C. 767 - 772.

References (transliteration):
Shveytser A. Mirovozzrenie indiyskikh mysliteley. Mistika i etika // Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii.-M.: Nauka, 1988. – S.209-233.
Berdyaev N.A. Novoe srednevekov'e. Razmyshlenie o sud'be Rossii i Evropy.-Berlin, 1924. – 421 c.
Berdyaev N.A. Chelovek i mashina // Voprosy filosofii. —1989. – № 2. – S. 147-162.
Yung K.G. O psikhologii vostochnykh religiy i filosofii.– M.: Medium, 1994. – 255 s.
Gesse G. K moim yaponskim chitatelyam //Vostok-Zapad: Issle¬¬¬dovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii. – M.: Progress, 1982. – S.214-223.
Glushak A.S., Naumova N.V. Slavyanskiy pir kak slagaemoe dukhovnoy kul'tury// Kul'tura narodov Prichernomor'ya. — 2013. – № 260. – S.29-31.
Zhirtueva N. S. Modifikatsii vizantiyskogo isikhazma v kul'ture Kievskoy Rusi, Moskovskoy Rusi i Kryma // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 6. – S.843-852. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.6.14070
Ilarion. Slovo o zakone i blagodati// Pamyatniki drev¬¬-nerusskoy tserkovno–uchitel'noy literatury. – SPb.,1894.– Vyp.1. – S. 59–78.
Florovskiy G. V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Vil'nyus, 1991. – 601 s.
Likhachev D. Velikiy put': stanovlenie russkoy literatury XI-XVII vekov.-M.: Sovremennik, 1987. – 301 s.
Pouchenie Vladimira Monomakha// // Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi. XI-nachalo XII veka. – M.: Khud.lit., 1978. – S.393-413.
P.S. Gurevich Arianizm kak mifologiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 6. - C. 525 - 528. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.6.8909.
E. V. Pavlova Ponimanie nravstvennoy otvetstvennosti vlasti v trudakh drevnerusskikh mysliteley // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 4. - C. 767 - 772.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the semiotics of images traditionally identifies as the Scythians (existed in Greek, mostly Attic, vase painting during the period of 570-470 BC, which were most numerous among the present in Greek art of the Others), as well specific aspects of their look (tall hat, pants, bow, gorytos), storylines in which they are represented (associated with war or preparation to it alongside the mythology: Trojan War and mythological characters), and connection with the historical events and cultural phenomena. The author makes an attempt of a comprehensive historical-culturological, iconological and semiotic analysis of the images (primarily Attic) vase painting, traditionally identified as “Scythians” during the period of 570-470 BC. The author reviews the main approaches towards identification of their ethnicity, as well as correlation to the specific historical characters and/or events. Scientific novelty consists in the analysis of the images of Scythians in the extensive cultural-historical context, with regards to the specificity of visual arts as a whole and Greek art in particular, seeing it as a certain semiotic environment and means of cognition of the phenomena of reality. The main conclusion is the presence of the following traits in the images of the proverbial Scythians:

Ключевые слова: mythology, syncretism, Ancient Greece, visual art, vase painting, Scythians, The Other, Trojan War, culture, Persian wars

Библиография:
Volkov N.N. Kompozitsiya v zhivopisi. M.: Iskusstvo, 1977. 264 s.
Vos M.F. Scythian Archers in Archaic Attic Vase-Painting. Groningen: J.B. Walters, 1963. 142 p.
Tsiafakis D. 2000: The Allure and Repulsion of Thracians in the Art of Classical Athens // B. Cohen (ed.). Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2000. P. 364-389.
Studniczka F. Ein Denkmal des Sieges bei Marathon // Jahrbuch des Deutschen archäologischen Instituts. Bd. VI. 1891. 239 p.
Sparkes B. A. Some Greek Images of Others // B. Molyneaux (ed.), The Cultural Life of Images: Visual Representation in Archaeology. London et. al.: Routledge, 1997. P. 130-158.
Shapiro H. A. Amazons, Thracians, and Scythians. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies. 1983, Vol. 24. # 2. P. 105-114.
Snowden F. M. Jr. Iconographical Evidence on the Black Populations in Greco-Roman Antiquity // D. Bindman (ed.). The Image of the Black in Western Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2010. P. 143-250.
Raeck W. Zum Barbarenbild in der Kunst Athens im VI und V Jahrhundert vor Christ. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag, 1981. 337 p.
Schoppa H. Die Darstellung der Perser in der griechischen Kunst bis zum Beginn des Hellenismus. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Hohen Philosophischen Fakultät der Karl-Rupprechts Universität. Heidelberg: Tageblatt-Haus Coburg, 1933. 85 p.
Plassart A. Les archers d’Athens // Revue des études grecques, 1913. № 26. P. 152-214.
Osborne R. Images of a Warrior. On a Group of Athenian Vases and Their Public // C. Marconi (ed.). Greek Vases: Images, Contexts, and Controversies. Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by The Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23-24 March 2002. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2004. P. 41-54.
Miller M.C. “Foreigners at the Greek Symposium?” // Dining in a Classical Context. W.J. Slater (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991. P. 61–64.
Marconi C. Images for a Warrior. On a Group of Athenian Vases and their Public // C. Marconi (ed.). Greek Vases: Images, Contexts, and Controversies. Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by The Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23-24 March 2002. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2004. P. 27-40.
Lissarrague, F. 1990. The World of the Warrior: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. P. 39–51.
Lissarrague F. L'autre guerrier: Archers, peltastes, cavaliers dans l'imagerie antique. Paris, Rome: Editions La Découverte / Ecole française de Rome, 1990. 328 p.
Helbig W. Eine Heerschau des Peisistratos oder Hippias auf einer schwarzfigurigen Schale // Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München. Philosoph.-philolog. und historische Klasse. 1897. Bd. II. P. 259-320.
Hölscher T. Myths, Images, and the Typology of Identities in Early Greek Art // E.S. Gruen (ed.). Cultural Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2010. P. 47-66.
Hall E. Inventing the Barbarian. Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. 277 p.
Dümmler F. Über eine Classe griechischer Vasen mit schwarzen Figuren // Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung. 1887. # 2. P. 171-192.
Ferrari Pinney G. Achilles Lord of Scythia // W.G. Moon (ed.). Ancient Greek Art and Iconography. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983. P. 127-146.
DeVries K. The Nearly Other: the Attic vision of Phrygians and Lydians // B. Cohen (ed.). Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2000. P. 338-363.
Cohen A. The Self as Other. Performing Humor in Ancient Greek Art // E.S. Gruen (ed.). Cultural Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2010. P. 465-490.
Bérard C. The Image of the Other and Foreign Hero // B. Cohen (ed.). Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2000. P. 390-412.
Frolov E.D. Skify v Afinakh // Vestnik drevney istorii. 1998. № 1. S. 135-152.
Barringer J. Two Scythian Hunters on Attic Vases // C. Marconi (ed.). Greek Vases: Images, Contexts, and Controversies Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by The Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23-24 March 2002. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2004. P. 13-26.
Skrzhinskaya M.V. Skifiya glazami ellinov. SPb.: Aleteyya. 2001. 304 s.
Losev. A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. T. 8. M.: Iskusstvo-SPb., 1992. 688 s.
Lotman Yu.M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo testa // Ob iskusstve. SPb: Iskusstvo-SPb., 1998. 14-285 s.
Ivanchik A.I.: Kem byli "skifskie" luchniki na atticheskikh vazakh epokhi arkhaiki? Vestnik drevney istorii. 2002. № 4. S. 23-42.
Ivanchik A.I. Kem byli "skifskie" luchniki na atticheskikh vazakh epokhi arkhaiki? Vestnik drevney istorii. 2002. № 3. S. 33-55.
Welwei K. Unfreie im antiken Kriegsdienst. Band 1: Athen und Sparta. Wiesbaden: Steiner Verlag, 1974. 210 p.
Wernicke K. Die Polizeiwache auf der Burg von Athen // Hermes. Band 26. 1891. P. 51–75.
Zahn R. Die Darstellung der Barbaren in griechischer Litteratur und Kunst der vorhellenischer Zeit. Erster Teil. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde einer Hohen Philosophischen Fakultät der Ruprecht-Karls Universität zu Heidelberg. Heidelberg: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von J.-Hörning. 1896. 81 p.

References (transliteration):
Volkov N.N. Kompozitsiya v zhivopisi. M.: Iskusstvo, 1977. 264 s.
Vos M.F. Scythian Archers in Archaic Attic Vase-Painting. Groningen: J.B. Walters, 1963. 142 p.
Tsiafakis D. 2000: The Allure and Repulsion of Thracians in the Art of Classical Athens // B. Cohen (ed.). Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2000. P. 364-389.
Studniczka F. Ein Denkmal des Sieges bei Marathon // Jahrbuch des Deutschen archäologischen Instituts. Bd. VI. 1891. 239 p.
Sparkes B. A. Some Greek Images of Others // B. Molyneaux (ed.), The Cultural Life of Images: Visual Representation in Archaeology. London et. al.: Routledge, 1997. P. 130-158.
Shapiro H. A. Amazons, Thracians, and Scythians. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies. 1983, Vol. 24. # 2. P. 105-114.
Snowden F. M. Jr. Iconographical Evidence on the Black Populations in Greco-Roman Antiquity // D. Bindman (ed.). The Image of the Black in Western Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2010. P. 143-250.
Raeck W. Zum Barbarenbild in der Kunst Athens im VI und V Jahrhundert vor Christ. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag, 1981. 337 p.
Schoppa H. Die Darstellung der Perser in der griechischen Kunst bis zum Beginn des Hellenismus. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Hohen Philosophischen Fakultät der Karl-Rupprechts Universität. Heidelberg: Tageblatt-Haus Coburg, 1933. 85 p.
Plassart A. Les archers d’Athens // Revue des études grecques, 1913. № 26. P. 152-214.
Osborne R. Images of a Warrior. On a Group of Athenian Vases and Their Public // C. Marconi (ed.). Greek Vases: Images, Contexts, and Controversies. Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by The Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23-24 March 2002. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2004. P. 41-54.
Miller M.C. “Foreigners at the Greek Symposium?” // Dining in a Classical Context. W.J. Slater (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991. P. 61–64.
Marconi C. Images for a Warrior. On a Group of Athenian Vases and their Public // C. Marconi (ed.). Greek Vases: Images, Contexts, and Controversies. Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by The Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23-24 March 2002. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2004. P. 27-40.
Lissarrague, F. 1990. The World of the Warrior: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. P. 39–51.
Lissarrague F. L'autre guerrier: Archers, peltastes, cavaliers dans l'imagerie antique. Paris, Rome: Editions La Découverte / Ecole française de Rome, 1990. 328 p.
Helbig W. Eine Heerschau des Peisistratos oder Hippias auf einer schwarzfigurigen Schale // Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München. Philosoph.-philolog. und historische Klasse. 1897. Bd. II. P. 259-320.
Hölscher T. Myths, Images, and the Typology of Identities in Early Greek Art // E.S. Gruen (ed.). Cultural Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2010. P. 47-66.
Hall E. Inventing the Barbarian. Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. 277 p.
Dümmler F. Über eine Classe griechischer Vasen mit schwarzen Figuren // Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung. 1887. # 2. P. 171-192.
Ferrari Pinney G. Achilles Lord of Scythia // W.G. Moon (ed.). Ancient Greek Art and Iconography. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983. P. 127-146.
DeVries K. The Nearly Other: the Attic vision of Phrygians and Lydians // B. Cohen (ed.). Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2000. P. 338-363.
Cohen A. The Self as Other. Performing Humor in Ancient Greek Art // E.S. Gruen (ed.). Cultural Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2010. P. 465-490.
Bérard C. The Image of the Other and Foreign Hero // B. Cohen (ed.). Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2000. P. 390-412.
Frolov E.D. Skify v Afinakh // Vestnik drevney istorii. 1998. № 1. S. 135-152.
Barringer J. Two Scythian Hunters on Attic Vases // C. Marconi (ed.). Greek Vases: Images, Contexts, and Controversies Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by The Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23-24 March 2002. Leiden et. al.: Brill, 2004. P. 13-26.
Skrzhinskaya M.V. Skifiya glazami ellinov. SPb.: Aleteyya. 2001. 304 s.
Losev. A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. T. 8. M.: Iskusstvo-SPb., 1992. 688 s.
Lotman Yu.M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo testa // Ob iskusstve. SPb: Iskusstvo-SPb., 1998. 14-285 s.
Ivanchik A.I.: Kem byli "skifskie" luchniki na atticheskikh vazakh epokhi arkhaiki? Vestnik drevney istorii. 2002. № 4. S. 23-42.
Ivanchik A.I. Kem byli "skifskie" luchniki na atticheskikh vazakh epokhi arkhaiki? Vestnik drevney istorii. 2002. № 3. S. 33-55.
Welwei K. Unfreie im antiken Kriegsdienst. Band 1: Athen und Sparta. Wiesbaden: Steiner Verlag, 1974. 210 p.
Wernicke K. Die Polizeiwache auf der Burg von Athen // Hermes. Band 26. 1891. P. 51–75.
Zahn R. Die Darstellung der Barbaren in griechischer Litteratur und Kunst der vorhellenischer Zeit. Erster Teil. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde einer Hohen Philosophischen Fakultät der Ruprecht-Karls Universität zu Heidelberg. Heidelberg: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von J.-Hörning. 1896. 81 p.

Аннотация: Abstract. The culture of consumption in recent years has become the dominant type of culture in Russia and in Western countries. Accordingly, it is the object of study of sociologists and philosophers. Culturologists, psychologists. However, so far not established a unified theory of consumerism and not understood that a wide array of risks and threats to humans and society, which are the result of the spread of consumer culture. The problem of the article is associated with the comprehension of values impact of consumerism on the rise of individualism and the weakening of political activity. This influence is the subject of the research. As a theoretical-methodological basis of the study used the theory of the sociology of consumption, philosophy of culture and social philosophy of modern Russian and foreign authors. Scientific novelty is expressed in the following provisions. Social atomization and de-politicization associated with an increase in consumer values. The consumer is limited to interests that relate to his personal life. Is rejection of membership in the unifying political General. Place moral obligations, social relations is autonomy. The culture of consumption performs a call to an individual activity but a social inaction. The deconsolidation and individualization are associated with the loss of ideological, political and civil installations. The permanent revolution of individualism, expressed in the relevant changes of culture and values, eliminates political activism, political discourse displaces from consciousness. Global social projects and metanarratives prefer micronarrative and microprojects personal fate. "Social person" gives way to the "individual person", a politically active citizen surrenders to consumers, civil society – in front of the consumer. When the deconsolidation becomes widespread, there is a paradoxical phenomenon of "social exclusion of the majority".

Ключевые слова: atomization, solidarity, individualism, consumer society, deconsolidation, political apathy, consumer culture, micronarrative, value orientation, project

Библиография:
Žižek S. Against Human Rights // New Left Review, 34, July-August 2005. Pp. 115–131.
Golenok G.V. Individualizm kak mifologiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-1.-C. 73-78.
Shikhardin N.V. Anri Lefevr o byurokraticheskom obshchestve, kontroliruemom kons'yumerizmom // Real'nost'. Chelovek. Kul'tura: transformatsiya bytiya cheloveka v obshchestve potrebleniya. VI Orekhovskie chteniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. (Omsk, 24 oktyabrya 2014 g.). Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. S. 173–176.
Tabachkov A.S. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo v kontekste istorii // Voprosy filosofii №10, 2014. S. 37–45.
Sanina A.G. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i gosudarstvennaya identichnost' // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo №6, 2013. S. 9–15.
Semenov E.V., Prokop'eva M.Yu. Patriotizm i potreblenie // Real'nost'. Chelovek. Kul'tura: transformatsiya bytiya cheloveka v obshchestve potrebleniya. VI Orekhovskie chteniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. (Omsk, 24 oktyabrya 2014 g.). Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. S. 133–137.
Pavlova O.N. Tsivilizatsionnyy fenomen nartsissizma: vektory ob'ektivatsii v paradigme psikhoanaliza // Voprosy filosofii №6, 2010. S. 20–32.
Naumenko L.K. B.F. Slavin. Ideologiya vozvrashchaetsya // Voprosy filosofii 9, 2010. S. 184–188.
Nosov D.M. Khanna Arendt – filosof? // Voprosy filosofii №4, 2014. S. 25–31.
Lipovetski Zh. Era pustoty. SPb.: «Vladimir Dal'», 2001. – 332 s.
Kukartseva M.A., Dmitrieva I.A. Politicheskoe kak esteticheskoe // Voprosy filosofii 7, 2015. S. 17-27.
Interv'yu redaktsii zhurnala «Voprosy filosofii» s N.I. Lapinym v svyazi s 80-letiem // Voprosy filosofii №12, 2011. S. 3–9.
Kaminskaya I. Kak nam ne razrushit' Rossiyu, kotoruyu my ne poteryali. URL: http://www.yburlan.ru/biblioteka/kak-nam-ne-razrushit-rossiyu-kotoruyu-my-ne-poteryali (data obrashcheniya: 17.11.2014)
Il'in A.N. Kul'tura obshchestva massovogo potrebleniya: kriticheskoe osmyslenie: monografiya. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. – 208 s.
Il'in A.N. Sotsial'naya dekonsolidatsiya i depolitizatsiya v epokhu potrebleniya // Uchenye zapiski Komsomol'skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Nauki o cheloveke, obshchestve i kul'ture № 1(17), 2014. T.2. S. 71–77.
Voskanyan M.V. Igra v individualizirovannom obshchestve // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' №2, 2009. S. 170–176.
Votintseva N.N., Il'in A.N. Kul'tura potrebleniya i reklama: monografiya. Perm': PIEF, 2014. – 132 s.
Deviantnost' v obshchestve potrebleniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya. Pod red. Ya.I. Gilinskogo i T.V. Shipunovoy. SPb.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Alef-Press», 2012. – 464 s.
Evlampiev I.I. Aktual'nye uroki russkogo liberalizma. Stat'ya pervaya: kritika zapadnoy traditsii // Voprosy filosofii №6, 2015. S. 90–99.
Il'in A.N. Kul'tura, stremyashchayasya v nikuda: kriticheskiy analiz potrebitel'skikh tendentsiy: monografiya. Nauch. red. D.M. Fedyaev. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2012. – 266 s.
Il'in A.N. Dekonsolidatsiya i depolitizatsiya, kharakternye dlya obshchestva potrebleniya // Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal №3, 2014. S. 101–115.
Ivanov P.V. Potreblenie kak agent legkoy sotsial'nosti v gorodskom prostranstve // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii №5 (58), 2011. Tom XIV. S. 142–147.
Zinov'ev A.A. Russkaya tragediya. – M.: Algoritm, 2014. – 464 s.
Zvezdkina E.F. Rets. na kn. A.A. Guseynov. Velikie proroki i mysliteli. Nravstvennye ucheniya ot Moiseya do nashikh dney // Voprosy filosofii №11, 2010. S. 173–178.
Vizgin V.P. Russkaya filosofiya segodnya (Razmyshleniya o seminare i knige) // Voprosy filosofii №12, 2014. S. 118–129.
Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost' / Per. s angl. pod red. Yu. V. Asochakova. SPb.: Piter, 2008. – 240 s.
Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo / Per. s angl. pod red. V.L.Inozemtseva. M.: Logos, 2005. – 390 s.
Bauman Z. Rasskazannye zhizni i prozhitye istorii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya №1, 2004. S. 5–14.
Balatskiy E.V. Kontseptsiya tekuchey real'nosti Z. Baumana i ee prilozheniya // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' №3, 2011. S. 134–146.
Arendt Kh. Chto est' svoboda? // Voprosy filosofii №4, 2014. S. 32–49.

References (transliteration):
Žižek S. Against Human Rights // New Left Review, 34, July-August 2005. Pp. 115–131.
Golenok G.V. Individualizm kak mifologiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-1.-C. 73-78.
Shikhardin N.V. Anri Lefevr o byurokraticheskom obshchestve, kontroliruemom kons'yumerizmom // Real'nost'. Chelovek. Kul'tura: transformatsiya bytiya cheloveka v obshchestve potrebleniya. VI Orekhovskie chteniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. (Omsk, 24 oktyabrya 2014 g.). Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. S. 173–176.
Tabachkov A.S. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo v kontekste istorii // Voprosy filosofii №10, 2014. S. 37–45.
Sanina A.G. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i gosudarstvennaya identichnost' // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo №6, 2013. S. 9–15.
Semenov E.V., Prokop'eva M.Yu. Patriotizm i potreblenie // Real'nost'. Chelovek. Kul'tura: transformatsiya bytiya cheloveka v obshchestve potrebleniya. VI Orekhovskie chteniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. (Omsk, 24 oktyabrya 2014 g.). Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. S. 133–137.
Pavlova O.N. Tsivilizatsionnyy fenomen nartsissizma: vektory ob'ektivatsii v paradigme psikhoanaliza // Voprosy filosofii №6, 2010. S. 20–32.
Naumenko L.K. B.F. Slavin. Ideologiya vozvrashchaetsya // Voprosy filosofii 9, 2010. S. 184–188.
Nosov D.M. Khanna Arendt – filosof? // Voprosy filosofii №4, 2014. S. 25–31.
Lipovetski Zh. Era pustoty. SPb.: «Vladimir Dal'», 2001. – 332 s.
Kukartseva M.A., Dmitrieva I.A. Politicheskoe kak esteticheskoe // Voprosy filosofii 7, 2015. S. 17-27.
Interv'yu redaktsii zhurnala «Voprosy filosofii» s N.I. Lapinym v svyazi s 80-letiem // Voprosy filosofii №12, 2011. S. 3–9.
Kaminskaya I. Kak nam ne razrushit' Rossiyu, kotoruyu my ne poteryali. URL: http://www.yburlan.ru/biblioteka/kak-nam-ne-razrushit-rossiyu-kotoruyu-my-ne-poteryali (data obrashcheniya: 17.11.2014)
Il'in A.N. Kul'tura obshchestva massovogo potrebleniya: kriticheskoe osmyslenie: monografiya. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. – 208 s.
Il'in A.N. Sotsial'naya dekonsolidatsiya i depolitizatsiya v epokhu potrebleniya // Uchenye zapiski Komsomol'skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Nauki o cheloveke, obshchestve i kul'ture № 1(17), 2014. T.2. S. 71–77.
Voskanyan M.V. Igra v individualizirovannom obshchestve // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' №2, 2009. S. 170–176.
Votintseva N.N., Il'in A.N. Kul'tura potrebleniya i reklama: monografiya. Perm': PIEF, 2014. – 132 s.
Deviantnost' v obshchestve potrebleniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya. Pod red. Ya.I. Gilinskogo i T.V. Shipunovoy. SPb.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Alef-Press», 2012. – 464 s.
Evlampiev I.I. Aktual'nye uroki russkogo liberalizma. Stat'ya pervaya: kritika zapadnoy traditsii // Voprosy filosofii №6, 2015. S. 90–99.
Il'in A.N. Kul'tura, stremyashchayasya v nikuda: kriticheskiy analiz potrebitel'skikh tendentsiy: monografiya. Nauch. red. D.M. Fedyaev. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2012. – 266 s.
Il'in A.N. Dekonsolidatsiya i depolitizatsiya, kharakternye dlya obshchestva potrebleniya // Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal №3, 2014. S. 101–115.
Ivanov P.V. Potreblenie kak agent legkoy sotsial'nosti v gorodskom prostranstve // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii №5 (58), 2011. Tom XIV. S. 142–147.
Zinov'ev A.A. Russkaya tragediya. – M.: Algoritm, 2014. – 464 s.
Zvezdkina E.F. Rets. na kn. A.A. Guseynov. Velikie proroki i mysliteli. Nravstvennye ucheniya ot Moiseya do nashikh dney // Voprosy filosofii №11, 2010. S. 173–178.
Vizgin V.P. Russkaya filosofiya segodnya (Razmyshleniya o seminare i knige) // Voprosy filosofii №12, 2014. S. 118–129.
Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost' / Per. s angl. pod red. Yu. V. Asochakova. SPb.: Piter, 2008. – 240 s.
Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo / Per. s angl. pod red. V.L.Inozemtseva. M.: Logos, 2005. – 390 s.
Bauman Z. Rasskazannye zhizni i prozhitye istorii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya №1, 2004. S. 5–14.
Balatskiy E.V. Kontseptsiya tekuchey real'nosti Z. Baumana i ee prilozheniya // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' №3, 2011. S. 134–146.
Arendt Kh. Chto est' svoboda? // Voprosy filosofii №4, 2014. S. 32–49.

Аннотация: In his research Golovushkin reveals the meaning and historical definition of the socio-political projects of the two brightest forms of Russian Orthodox reformation - the movement of Old Believers of the mid XVIIth century and Orthodox Renovationism of the early XXth century. Researchers traditionally view these phenomena as opposite vectors: Renovationism is usually associated with novations and modernization and Old Believers are associated with fundamentalism and commitment to doniconian Russian Orthodoxy. However, despite these beliefs, their historical path, religious projects and socio-political concepts have much in common which points to some important intersection points and regular patterns of the Russian church and socio-political history. Methodologically, the research is based on historical phenomenology of religion which considers history of religions (discriptive discipline) and phenomenology of religion (comparative and interpretative disciplien) as the two interdependent aspects of religious science combining the methods of empirical study and theoretical analysis of collected empirical data. This approach demonstrates that the movement of Old Believers in the mid XVIIth century and Orthodox Renovationism of the Early XXth century are the expression of not only a new type of religion, religious ethics and morals but also transformation of the political culture of the Russian society and crisis of the theocratic paternalist model of the Russian government. Developing the concept of the 'free theocracy' state where church, government and society are an entity and participate in creation of the Kingdom of God on earth, Old Believers and Renovationists tried to find both the civil way to legitimize the ruling power and the algorithm for building the 'true Orthodox civilization' in Russia. Double failure of that socio-political project had a significant impact on the following civilizational development of the Russian society. The result was the crucial church dissents and reinforcement of the vertical structure of the paternalist secular power, for church schisms do not only initiate changes but also bring traumatic experience, make people fear transformations and encourage political and religious conservatism and anti-dynamism attitudes. 

Ключевые слова: Old Believers, Orthodox Renovationism, religious fundamentalism, theocracy, 'free theocracy', Old Believer schism, Renovationist schism, Christian state, secular state, paternalism

Библиография:
Stankevich G.V. Religioznye faktory v politike sovremennykh gosudarstv // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 7. – S. 1096 – 1100.
Novikov O. A. Tsivilizatsionnyy vybor Rossii i ideya teokratii // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 11. – S. 2029 – 2036.
Svetlov P.Ya. Ideya tsarstva Bozhiya v ee znachenii dlya khristianskogo mirosozertsaniya: (Bogoslovsko-apologeticheskoe issledovanie) // Bogoslovskiy vestnik. – 1903. – T. 1. – № 2. – S. 247 – 277.
Kapterev N.F. Patriarkh Nikon i tsar' Aleksey Mikhaylovich. – T.1. – Sergiev Posad: tip. Svyato-Troitskoy Sergievoy lavry, 1909.
Zen'kovskiy S.A. Russkoe staroobryadchestvo. V dvukh tomakh / Obshch. red. V.V. Nekhotina. – M.: Institut DI-DIK, Kvadriga, 2009.
Zen'kovskiy S.A. Tam zhe.
Florovskiy G.V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. – M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2009.
Florovskiy G.V. Tam zhe.
Kartashev A.V. Tserkov'. Istoriya. Rossiya. Stat'i i vystupleniya. – M.: «Probel», 1996.
Glinchikova A.G. 2009. Raskol i nezavershennost' russkogo Moderna // Mir Rossii. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 66 – 88.
Kartashev A. V. Tserkov'. Istoriya. Rossiya. Stat'i i vystupleniya. – M.: «Probel», 1996.
Sventsitskiy V. K voprosu o tserkovnoy reforme // Voprosy zhizni. – 1905. – № 4 – 5. – S. 267 – 274.
Ern V. Khristianskoe otnoshenie k sobstvennosti. – M.: «Trud i volya», 1906.
Kartashev A.V. Tserkov'. Istoriya. Rossiya. Stat'i i vystupleniya. – M.: «Probel», 1906.
Ob otnoshenii Tserkvi i svyashchenstva k sovremennoy obshchestvenno-politicheskoy zhizni. «Zapiska Soyuza revniteley Tserkovnogo obnovleniya» (Gruppy peterburgskikh svyashchennikov) // Tserkovnyy vestnik. – 1906. – № 11. – Stb. 321 – 331.
Svetlov P.Ya. Ideya tsarstva Bozhiya v ee znachenii dlya khristianskogo mirosozertsaniya: (Bogoslovsko-apologeticheskoe issledovanie) // Bogoslovskiy vestnik. – 1903.-T. 1. – № 2. – S. 247 – 277.
Berdyaev N.A. Rasprya Tserkvi i gosudarstva v Rossii // Dukhovnyy krizis intelligentsii: Sobranie sochineniy / Otv. red., sost. i komment. V.V. Sapov. – M.: Kanon+ ; ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. – S. 218 – 229.
Kudryashova I.V. Fundamentalizm v prostranstve sovremennogo mira // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 2002. – № 1. – S. 66 – 77.
Mezhuev V.M. Traditsiya samovlastiya v sovremennoy Rossii // Svobodnaya mysl'. – 2000. – № 4. – S. 81 – 92.
Gurevich P. Fundamentalizm i modernizm kak kul'turnye orientatsii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 1995. – № 4. – S. 154 – 162.
Novikov O.A. Religioznoe obosnovanie prava i ideya prav cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 822 – 824. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.6443

References (transliteration):
Stankevich G.V. Religioznye faktory v politike sovremennykh gosudarstv // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 7. – S. 1096 – 1100.
Novikov O. A. Tsivilizatsionnyy vybor Rossii i ideya teokratii // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 11. – S. 2029 – 2036.
Svetlov P.Ya. Ideya tsarstva Bozhiya v ee znachenii dlya khristianskogo mirosozertsaniya: (Bogoslovsko-apologeticheskoe issledovanie) // Bogoslovskiy vestnik. – 1903. – T. 1. – № 2. – S. 247 – 277.
Kapterev N.F. Patriarkh Nikon i tsar' Aleksey Mikhaylovich. – T.1. – Sergiev Posad: tip. Svyato-Troitskoy Sergievoy lavry, 1909.
Zen'kovskiy S.A. Russkoe staroobryadchestvo. V dvukh tomakh / Obshch. red. V.V. Nekhotina. – M.: Institut DI-DIK, Kvadriga, 2009.
Zen'kovskiy S.A. Tam zhe.
Florovskiy G.V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. – M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2009.
Florovskiy G.V. Tam zhe.
Kartashev A.V. Tserkov'. Istoriya. Rossiya. Stat'i i vystupleniya. – M.: «Probel», 1996.
Glinchikova A.G. 2009. Raskol i nezavershennost' russkogo Moderna // Mir Rossii. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 66 – 88.
Kartashev A. V. Tserkov'. Istoriya. Rossiya. Stat'i i vystupleniya. – M.: «Probel», 1996.
Sventsitskiy V. K voprosu o tserkovnoy reforme // Voprosy zhizni. – 1905. – № 4 – 5. – S. 267 – 274.
Ern V. Khristianskoe otnoshenie k sobstvennosti. – M.: «Trud i volya», 1906.
Kartashev A.V. Tserkov'. Istoriya. Rossiya. Stat'i i vystupleniya. – M.: «Probel», 1906.
Ob otnoshenii Tserkvi i svyashchenstva k sovremennoy obshchestvenno-politicheskoy zhizni. «Zapiska Soyuza revniteley Tserkovnogo obnovleniya» (Gruppy peterburgskikh svyashchennikov) // Tserkovnyy vestnik. – 1906. – № 11. – Stb. 321 – 331.
Svetlov P.Ya. Ideya tsarstva Bozhiya v ee znachenii dlya khristianskogo mirosozertsaniya: (Bogoslovsko-apologeticheskoe issledovanie) // Bogoslovskiy vestnik. – 1903.-T. 1. – № 2. – S. 247 – 277.
Berdyaev N.A. Rasprya Tserkvi i gosudarstva v Rossii // Dukhovnyy krizis intelligentsii: Sobranie sochineniy / Otv. red., sost. i komment. V.V. Sapov. – M.: Kanon+ ; ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. – S. 218 – 229.
Kudryashova I.V. Fundamentalizm v prostranstve sovremennogo mira // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 2002. – № 1. – S. 66 – 77.
Mezhuev V.M. Traditsiya samovlastiya v sovremennoy Rossii // Svobodnaya mysl'. – 2000. – № 4. – S. 81 – 92.
Gurevich P. Fundamentalizm i modernizm kak kul'turnye orientatsii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 1995. – № 4. – S. 154 – 162.
Novikov O.A. Religioznoe obosnovanie prava i ideya prav cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 822 – 824. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.6443

Аннотация: The subject of the study is the rational reconstruction of a meaningful sense of ownership in the category of European social studies and philosophy. Particular attention is given to clarify the scope of "philosophy of economy", "philosophy of economy", "property" and "ownership". Zorina reveals the development logic and socio-cultural environment of philosophical projects of ownership at different periods in history. The researcher also differentiated scenarios and policy approaches to the philosophical concept of ownership the difference between which shows the objectives and specificity of changes in the concept of ownership. Tradition and modern concepts of ownership are analyzed from the point of view of their unity and specific features. In her research Zorina has used the methods of rational reconstruction, comparative philosophy and systems analysis. Rational reconstruction has provided for the understanding of the ideas of ownership in the history of social studies and philosophy; comparative method has allowed to compare traditional and modern definitions of ownership; systems approach has helped to justify the unity of the ontological and epistemological aspects of the phenomenon of ownership. The main conclusions made within the framework of the current hypothesis are the following. Firstly, philosophical definition of ownership that appeared before the economic definition has distinct rational and value attributes. Secondly, the tendency to change definitions of ownership was caused by global and technology factors, and thus included the non-economic context as well. Thirdly, ownership as a theoretical phenomenon of the modern civilization exhausts traditional development resources and raises the problem of transformation of the post-global world. 

Ключевые слова: philosophy of ownership, networked economy, globalization, property, philosophy and economics, philosophy of economy, transformation, meanings, tradition, modern age

Библиография:
Erkhard L. Polveka razmyshleniy. Rechi i stat'i-M.: Nauka; TOO «Ordynka»-1996 – C.30
Tsagolov G.N. Model' dlya Rossii – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya – 2008 – S.309
Orekhov A.M. Spravedlivost' kak bazisnyy printsip ustroystva obshchestva: put' k ochevidnosti. – Voprosy filosofii. – 2010.-№ 9
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov I.I. Global'nyy kapital. – M.: Editorial URSS . 2007
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Ekspluatatsiya KhKh1 veka-http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/svobodnay_misl/2012_7_8/11.pdf-S. 125
Vasil'ev N.A. Tretiy Mezhdunarodnyy filosofskiy kongress v Geydel'berge. Materialy.-SPb.,-1909-S.29
Grossman V. Misteriya tsentra: identichnost' i organizatsiya sotsial'nogo prostranstva v sovremennykh i traditsionnykh obshchestvakh. // Voprosy filosofii-2008-№2
Toffler E., Toffler Kh. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo: kak ono budet sozdano i kak izmenit nashu zhizn'.-M. – 2008
Marks K., Eengel's F. Sobr soch. v 50 TT. Vtoroe izdanie – M.: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury. – 1955 – 1981 – T.42 – S.120
Marks K., Engel's F. Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii // Marks K., Engel's F.-Sobr soch. 2-e izd.-T. 4.-S. 438 – S.303
Kireevskiy I.V. O kharaktere prosveshcheniya Evropy i ego otnoshenii k prosveshcheniyu Rossii. –http://russzastava.narod.ru/kireevskiy1.html
Kozlovskiy P. Printsipy eticheskoy ekonomiki. Per. s nemetskogo. – SPb. – 2001 – S.311
Kamenetskiy V.A., Patrikeev V.P. Sobstvennost' v KhKh1 stoletii. – M.: Ekonomika. – 2009 – S.16
Prigozhin A.I. Dezorganizatsiya: Prichiny, vidy, preodolenie. – M. – 2007-S.35, 301
Grechko P.K. Sotsial'noe: istoki, strukturnye profili, sovremennye vyzovy. – M. – 2009 – S.13
Kovalev T.B. Religiya i ekonomika. Trud, sobstvennost', bogatstvo. – M.: Izd. Dom NI UVShE – 2014 – S.5
Shulevskiy N.B. Vstrechi s inym. O filosofii khozyaystva Yu.M. Osipova.-M: MGU – 2007 – S.20
Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra: Nravstvennaya filosofiya. – M. – 1996-S.313
Bulgakov S.N. Filosofiya khozyaystva. – M.: Nauka. – 1990
Anan'in O.I. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya: krizis paradigmy i sud'ba nauchnogo soobshchestva. – M. – 1992
Fedotova V.G. Rossiyskaya istoriya v zerkale modernizatsii. // Voprosy filosofii – 2009. – № 12 – S.17
Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. Global'nyy kapitalizm: tri velikie transformatsii. — M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2008-http://iph.ras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/kapitalizm_2008.pdf-S.20

References (transliteration):
Erkhard L. Polveka razmyshleniy. Rechi i stat'i-M.: Nauka; TOO «Ordynka»-1996 – C.30
Tsagolov G.N. Model' dlya Rossii – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya – 2008 – S.309
Orekhov A.M. Spravedlivost' kak bazisnyy printsip ustroystva obshchestva: put' k ochevidnosti. – Voprosy filosofii. – 2010.-№ 9
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov I.I. Global'nyy kapital. – M.: Editorial URSS . 2007
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Ekspluatatsiya KhKh1 veka-http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/svobodnay_misl/2012_7_8/11.pdf-S. 125
Vasil'ev N.A. Tretiy Mezhdunarodnyy filosofskiy kongress v Geydel'berge. Materialy.-SPb.,-1909-S.29
Grossman V. Misteriya tsentra: identichnost' i organizatsiya sotsial'nogo prostranstva v sovremennykh i traditsionnykh obshchestvakh. // Voprosy filosofii-2008-№2
Toffler E., Toffler Kh. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo: kak ono budet sozdano i kak izmenit nashu zhizn'.-M. – 2008
Marks K., Eengel's F. Sobr soch. v 50 TT. Vtoroe izdanie – M.: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury. – 1955 – 1981 – T.42 – S.120
Marks K., Engel's F. Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii // Marks K., Engel's F.-Sobr soch. 2-e izd.-T. 4.-S. 438 – S.303
Kireevskiy I.V. O kharaktere prosveshcheniya Evropy i ego otnoshenii k prosveshcheniyu Rossii. –http://russzastava.narod.ru/kireevskiy1.html
Kozlovskiy P. Printsipy eticheskoy ekonomiki. Per. s nemetskogo. – SPb. – 2001 – S.311
Kamenetskiy V.A., Patrikeev V.P. Sobstvennost' v KhKh1 stoletii. – M.: Ekonomika. – 2009 – S.16
Prigozhin A.I. Dezorganizatsiya: Prichiny, vidy, preodolenie. – M. – 2007-S.35, 301
Grechko P.K. Sotsial'noe: istoki, strukturnye profili, sovremennye vyzovy. – M. – 2009 – S.13
Kovalev T.B. Religiya i ekonomika. Trud, sobstvennost', bogatstvo. – M.: Izd. Dom NI UVShE – 2014 – S.5
Shulevskiy N.B. Vstrechi s inym. O filosofii khozyaystva Yu.M. Osipova.-M: MGU – 2007 – S.20
Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra: Nravstvennaya filosofiya. – M. – 1996-S.313
Bulgakov S.N. Filosofiya khozyaystva. – M.: Nauka. – 1990
Anan'in O.I. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya: krizis paradigmy i sud'ba nauchnogo soobshchestva. – M. – 1992
Fedotova V.G. Rossiyskaya istoriya v zerkale modernizatsii. // Voprosy filosofii – 2009. – № 12 – S.17
Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. Global'nyy kapitalizm: tri velikie transformatsii. — M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2008-http://iph.ras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/kapitalizm_2008.pdf-S.20

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the definitions of criteria of civilization. According to the author, this criteria include driving values of man. Depending on the level of acceptance of these values, a partiular profile of civilizations is created. Initial values are the same for all civilizations. It is only the extent to whih the society accepts them which differs. The profile of the Russian civilization described by the author is compared to the graph of the country's vitality. The comparison of these parameters proves that at the moments of spiritual growth of Russia when the Russian nation get close to categorial man, the power and influence of Russia grow as well. The quantitative profile of the Russian civilization has been created based on surveys and expert evaluation. In his research Sulakshin uses historical and comparative approaches to compare values of different civilizations. The author offers a quantitative evaluation of civilizations which is a totally new approach to civilization studies. Based on this approach, Sulakshin provides a quantitative proof that Russia is not Europe but a completely different civilization. 

Ключевые слова: humanification (anthropomorphization), Russia, quantitative profile, expert evaluation, driving values, categorial man, values, civilization, ideal, vitality

Библиография:
Bagdasaryan V.E. Aksiologiya Rossii v perspektive mirovogo razvitiya // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 7. - C. 837 - 854. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.7.12485.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Konstitutsiya i tsennosti// Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya. 2013. № 3. S. 5-12.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Mirovoy paraziticheskiy tsentr: istoricheskie voploshcheniya// Global'nyy sotsial'nyy parazitizm (k 100-letiyu Federal'noy Rezervnoy Sistemy SShA) Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-obshchestvennoy konferentsii. Tsentr nauchnoy politicheskoy mysli i ideologii. Moskva, 2014. S. 25-59.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Servis i konsyumerizm: vyzov obshchestva neogranichennogo potrebleniya// Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma. 2014. T. 8. № 2. S. 10-19.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Natsiestroitel'stvo ili imperie-stroitel'stvo: razvilka podkhodov// Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. 2014. T. 7. № 1 (33). S. 47-50.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Global'nye posledstviya raspada SSSR v sotsial'nom razvitii chelovechestva. Doklad. URL.: http://rusrand.ru/docconf/globalnye-posledstvija-raspada-sssr-v-sotsialnom-razvitii-chelovechestva
Bagdasaryan V.E., Sulakshin S.S Prevoskhodstvo, prisvoenie, neravenstvo. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013.-304 s.
Sulakshin S. S. Sovremennaya gosudarstvennaya politika i upravlenie. Kurs lektsiy. ‒ M.: Direkt-Media, 2013. ‒ 386 str.
Sulakshin S.S. Kolichestvennaya teoriya tsivilizatsionogeneza i lokal'nykh tsivilizatsiy. M., Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013 g. s. 172.
Sulakshin S.S. Ot razlichiya tsivilizatsiy — k ikh konvergentsii // Mekhanizmy vzaimodeystviya tsivilizatsiy: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. Tsentr problemnogo analiza i gosudarstvenno upravlencheskogo proektirovaniya. Materialy nauchnogo seminara. — Vyp. № 7. — M. : Nauchnyy ekspert, 2009.
Sulakshin S.S. Kategorial'naya sushchnost' i evolyutsiya chelovechestva v megaistorii i v beskonechnom budushchem. Materialy nauchnogo seminara. Vyp. No 1. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2011. — 144 s.
World Values Survey (2005-2008) URL.: www.worldvaluessurvay.org
Sulakshin S.S. Kolichestvennaya teoriya tsivilizatsionogeneza i lokal'nykh tsivilizatsiy. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013 g. – 172 s.
Medvedev D. Interv'yu nemetskomu zhurnalu «Shpigel'», 07.11.2009
Sedov L. Zapad vnutri nas // Nezavisimaya gazeta, 22.12.2006
Toynbi A. Dzh. Postizhenie istorii. M.: Progress, 1991. — 736 s.
Bagdasaryan V.E., Sulakshin S.S. Slozhnaya sotsial'naya sistema v vital'nom podkhode. — M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013. — 392 s.
S.S.Sulakshin. Gumanitarnye nauki kak fabriki mysli // Rossiyskaya gumanitarnaya nauka: genezis i sostoyanie. Materialy nauchnogo seminara. Vypusk No 2. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2007. — 336 s.
Manoylo A.V. Tsennostnye osnovy upravleniya mezhtsivilizatsionnymi konfliktami: rossiyskaya model' // Mirovaya politika. - 2012. - 1. - C. 32 - 43. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_279.html
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Aksiologicheskoe osoznanie idei rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti v kontekste natsional'nogo kharaktera // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 12. - C. 135 - 194. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.12.9902. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9902.html

References (transliteration):
Bagdasaryan V.E. Aksiologiya Rossii v perspektive mirovogo razvitiya // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 7. - C. 837 - 854. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.7.12485.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Konstitutsiya i tsennosti// Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya. 2013. № 3. S. 5-12.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Mirovoy paraziticheskiy tsentr: istoricheskie voploshcheniya// Global'nyy sotsial'nyy parazitizm (k 100-letiyu Federal'noy Rezervnoy Sistemy SShA) Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-obshchestvennoy konferentsii. Tsentr nauchnoy politicheskoy mysli i ideologii. Moskva, 2014. S. 25-59.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Servis i konsyumerizm: vyzov obshchestva neogranichennogo potrebleniya// Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma. 2014. T. 8. № 2. S. 10-19.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Natsiestroitel'stvo ili imperie-stroitel'stvo: razvilka podkhodov// Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. 2014. T. 7. № 1 (33). S. 47-50.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Global'nye posledstviya raspada SSSR v sotsial'nom razvitii chelovechestva. Doklad. URL.: http://rusrand.ru/docconf/globalnye-posledstvija-raspada-sssr-v-sotsialnom-razvitii-chelovechestva
Bagdasaryan V.E., Sulakshin S.S Prevoskhodstvo, prisvoenie, neravenstvo. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013.-304 s.
Sulakshin S. S. Sovremennaya gosudarstvennaya politika i upravlenie. Kurs lektsiy. ‒ M.: Direkt-Media, 2013. ‒ 386 str.
Sulakshin S.S. Kolichestvennaya teoriya tsivilizatsionogeneza i lokal'nykh tsivilizatsiy. M., Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013 g. s. 172.
Sulakshin S.S. Ot razlichiya tsivilizatsiy — k ikh konvergentsii // Mekhanizmy vzaimodeystviya tsivilizatsiy: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. Tsentr problemnogo analiza i gosudarstvenno upravlencheskogo proektirovaniya. Materialy nauchnogo seminara. — Vyp. № 7. — M. : Nauchnyy ekspert, 2009.
Sulakshin S.S. Kategorial'naya sushchnost' i evolyutsiya chelovechestva v megaistorii i v beskonechnom budushchem. Materialy nauchnogo seminara. Vyp. No 1. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2011. — 144 s.
World Values Survey (2005-2008) URL.: www.worldvaluessurvay.org
Sulakshin S.S. Kolichestvennaya teoriya tsivilizatsionogeneza i lokal'nykh tsivilizatsiy. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013 g. – 172 s.
Medvedev D. Interv'yu nemetskomu zhurnalu «Shpigel'», 07.11.2009
Sedov L. Zapad vnutri nas // Nezavisimaya gazeta, 22.12.2006
Toynbi A. Dzh. Postizhenie istorii. M.: Progress, 1991. — 736 s.
Bagdasaryan V.E., Sulakshin S.S. Slozhnaya sotsial'naya sistema v vital'nom podkhode. — M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013. — 392 s.
S.S.Sulakshin. Gumanitarnye nauki kak fabriki mysli // Rossiyskaya gumanitarnaya nauka: genezis i sostoyanie. Materialy nauchnogo seminara. Vypusk No 2. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2007. — 336 s.
Manoylo A.V. Tsennostnye osnovy upravleniya mezhtsivilizatsionnymi konfliktami: rossiyskaya model' // Mirovaya politika. - 2012. - 1. - C. 32 - 43. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_279.html
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Aksiologicheskoe osoznanie idei rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti v kontekste natsional'nogo kharaktera // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 12. - C. 135 - 194. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.12.9902. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9902.html

Аннотация: The author of the present article analyzes the political philosophy of a French intellectual and state activist Francois Guizot (1787 – 1874), its sources, methodological bases, key principles and central issues considering the socio-political environment in France after Napoleon. The autho of the present article analyzes the main approaches of the philosopher to the key issues of the philosophical discourse at the age of Restoration (1814 0 1830) such as the sovereignty issue, the balance between freedom and order, legacy of the Revolution and its role in the political system of France, contradiction between freedom and equality. The methodology of the article is based on the history of ideas which principles allow to reconstruct Guizot’s intellectual style as well as to discover the influence of his ideas on succeeding philosophers. Analysis of the theoretical heritage of Guizot has allowed to re-integrate his philosophical concept into the modern political-philosophical discourse which may help to reveal the philosophical sources of French liberalism and demonstrate the relation between this ideology and democratic tradition as well as to see a complex reflection on the status of philosophical issues in the political practice.

Ключевые слова: Fracois Guizot, political philosophy, Restoration, sovereignty, freedom, power, political theory, France, state institution.

Контактная информация: Matveev Sergey Rafisovich, 107031, Russia, Moscow, Petrovka str. 12, of. 302.

Библиография:
Dannoe nauchnoe issledovanie (№ 13-05-0037) vypolneno pri podderzhke Programmy «Nauchnyy fond Natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo universiteta Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki» v 2013-2014.
Ankersmit F. Politicheskaya reprezentatsiya. M., 2012.
Gizo F. O sredstvakh pravleniya i oppozitsii v sovremennoy Frantsii // Klassicheskiy frantsuzskiy liberalizm. M., 2000. S. 263–506.
Gizo F. Istoriya tsivilizatsii v Evrope. M., 2007.
Gizo F. Politicheskaya filosofiya: o suverenitete // Klassicheskiy frantsuzskiy liberalizm. M., 2000. S. 507–588.
Dement'ev I.O. Politicheskaya teoriya Aleksisa de Tokvilya i frantsuzskiy liberalizm pervoy poloviny XIX v. : dis. ... kand. ist. nauk : 07.00.03 / Dement'ev Il'ya Olegovich. – Kaliningrad, 2004.
Kimlika U. Sovremennaya politicheskaya filosofiya: vvedenie. M., 2010.
Krasheninnikova Yu.A. Publichnost' i parlamentarizm v politicheskoy teorii F. Gizo // Polis (Politicheskie issledovaniya). 2002. №3 (68). S. 163–174.
Montesk'e Sh.L. Dukh zakonov. SPb., 1839.
Reizov B.G. Frantsuzskaya romanticheskaya istoriografiya (1815–1830). M., 1956.
Russo Zh.-Zh. Obshchestvennyy dogovor ili Nachala politicheskogo prava // Russo Zh.-Zh. Politicheskie sochineniya. SPb., 2013.
Savel'eva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Klassicheskoe nasledie. M., 2010.
Taleyran Sh.M. Memuary. M., 1959.
Shatobrian F.R. Bonaparte i Burbony. SPb., 1814.
Shmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. M., 2000.
Ancillon F. Essais philosophiques, ou nouveaux mélanges de littérature et de philosophie. Vol. 1. Paris, 1816.
Arnhart L. Political Questions. N.Y., 1987.
Craiutu A. Tocqueville and the Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires (Guizot, Royer-Collard, Rémusat) // History of Political Thought. 1999, vol. XX. №3. P. 456–493.
Craiutu A. Liberalism Under Siege: The Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires. Oxford, 2005.
Diez del Corral L. Tocqueville et la pensée politique des Doctrinaires // Alexis de Tocqueville. Livre de Centenaire. Paris, 1960. P. 57–70.
Guizot F. Nouveau Dictionnaire universel des synonymes de la langue française. Paris, 1809.
Guizot F. Quelques idées sur la liberté de la presse. Paris, 1814.
Guizot F. Du gouvernement représentatif et de l’état actuel de la France. Paris, 1816.
Guizot F. Des moyens de gouvernement et d’opposition dans l’état actuel de la France. Paris, 1821.
Guizot F. De la peine de mort en matière politique. Paris, 1822.
Guizot F. Histoire de la Révolution d’Angleterre depuis l’avènement de Charles I, jusqu’à la restauration de Charles II. 2 vol. Paris, 1826–1827.
Guizot F. Collection des Mémoires relatifs à l’histoire de France, depuis la fondation de la monarchie jusqu’au 13e siècle, avec une introduction, des suppléments, des notices et des notes. 8 vol. Paris, 1823–1835.
Guizot F. Méditations sur l’essence de la religion chrétienne. Paris, 1864.
Guizot F. L’Histoire parlementaire de la France. Vol. 5. Paris, 1864.
Guizot F. Méditations sur l’état actuel de la religion chrétienne. Paris, 1866.
Guizot F. Méditations sur la religion chrétienne dans ses rapports avec l’état actuel des so-ciétés et des esprits. Paris, 1868.
Guizot F. Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire de mon temps. Vol. 1-8. Paris, 1858-1867.
Johnson D. Guizot: Aspects of French History, 1787–1874. L., 1963.
Macfarlan L. Modern Political Theory. Oxford, 1970.
Manent P. Histoire intellectuelle du libéralisme. Paris, 1987.
McClelland J.S. A History of Western Political Thought. L., 1996.
Miller D., Coleman J., Connolly W., Ryan A. (Eds.). The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought. Oxford, 1987
Matveev S.R. Kontseptsiya suvereniteta v politicheskoy filosofii Fransua Gizo // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 689 - 699. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12364.
R. A. Aliev Zarozhdenie idei natsional'nogo suvereniteta // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 9. - C. 1466 - 1470.

References (transliteration):
Dannoe nauchnoe issledovanie (№ 13-05-0037) vypolneno pri podderzhke Programmy «Nauchnyy fond Natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo universiteta Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki» v 2013-2014.
Ankersmit F. Politicheskaya reprezentatsiya. M., 2012.
Gizo F. O sredstvakh pravleniya i oppozitsii v sovremennoy Frantsii // Klassicheskiy frantsuzskiy liberalizm. M., 2000. S. 263–506.
Gizo F. Istoriya tsivilizatsii v Evrope. M., 2007.
Gizo F. Politicheskaya filosofiya: o suverenitete // Klassicheskiy frantsuzskiy liberalizm. M., 2000. S. 507–588.
Dement'ev I.O. Politicheskaya teoriya Aleksisa de Tokvilya i frantsuzskiy liberalizm pervoy poloviny XIX v. : dis. ... kand. ist. nauk : 07.00.03 / Dement'ev Il'ya Olegovich. – Kaliningrad, 2004.
Kimlika U. Sovremennaya politicheskaya filosofiya: vvedenie. M., 2010.
Krasheninnikova Yu.A. Publichnost' i parlamentarizm v politicheskoy teorii F. Gizo // Polis (Politicheskie issledovaniya). 2002. №3 (68). S. 163–174.
Montesk'e Sh.L. Dukh zakonov. SPb., 1839.
Reizov B.G. Frantsuzskaya romanticheskaya istoriografiya (1815–1830). M., 1956.
Russo Zh.-Zh. Obshchestvennyy dogovor ili Nachala politicheskogo prava // Russo Zh.-Zh. Politicheskie sochineniya. SPb., 2013.
Savel'eva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Klassicheskoe nasledie. M., 2010.
Taleyran Sh.M. Memuary. M., 1959.
Shatobrian F.R. Bonaparte i Burbony. SPb., 1814.
Shmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. M., 2000.
Ancillon F. Essais philosophiques, ou nouveaux mélanges de littérature et de philosophie. Vol. 1. Paris, 1816.
Arnhart L. Political Questions. N.Y., 1987.
Craiutu A. Tocqueville and the Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires (Guizot, Royer-Collard, Rémusat) // History of Political Thought. 1999, vol. XX. №3. P. 456–493.
Craiutu A. Liberalism Under Siege: The Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires. Oxford, 2005.
Diez del Corral L. Tocqueville et la pensée politique des Doctrinaires // Alexis de Tocqueville. Livre de Centenaire. Paris, 1960. P. 57–70.
Guizot F. Nouveau Dictionnaire universel des synonymes de la langue française. Paris, 1809.
Guizot F. Quelques idées sur la liberté de la presse. Paris, 1814.
Guizot F. Du gouvernement représentatif et de l’état actuel de la France. Paris, 1816.
Guizot F. Des moyens de gouvernement et d’opposition dans l’état actuel de la France. Paris, 1821.
Guizot F. De la peine de mort en matière politique. Paris, 1822.
Guizot F. Histoire de la Révolution d’Angleterre depuis l’avènement de Charles I, jusqu’à la restauration de Charles II. 2 vol. Paris, 1826–1827.
Guizot F. Collection des Mémoires relatifs à l’histoire de France, depuis la fondation de la monarchie jusqu’au 13e siècle, avec une introduction, des suppléments, des notices et des notes. 8 vol. Paris, 1823–1835.
Guizot F. Méditations sur l’essence de la religion chrétienne. Paris, 1864.
Guizot F. L’Histoire parlementaire de la France. Vol. 5. Paris, 1864.
Guizot F. Méditations sur l’état actuel de la religion chrétienne. Paris, 1866.
Guizot F. Méditations sur la religion chrétienne dans ses rapports avec l’état actuel des so-ciétés et des esprits. Paris, 1868.
Guizot F. Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire de mon temps. Vol. 1-8. Paris, 1858-1867.
Johnson D. Guizot: Aspects of French History, 1787–1874. L., 1963.
Macfarlan L. Modern Political Theory. Oxford, 1970.
Manent P. Histoire intellectuelle du libéralisme. Paris, 1987.
McClelland J.S. A History of Western Political Thought. L., 1996.
Miller D., Coleman J., Connolly W., Ryan A. (Eds.). The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought. Oxford, 1987
Matveev S.R. Kontseptsiya suvereniteta v politicheskoy filosofii Fransua Gizo // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 689 - 699. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12364.
R. A. Aliev Zarozhdenie idei natsional'nogo suvereniteta // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 9. - C. 1466 - 1470.

Аннотация: The author of the article substantiates the thesis that creation of the philosophy of technology and development of the theory of industrial civilization are a determinative form of expression of the significance and growing attention towards the research-and-technological, technical, technological and technology-related elements of modern culture. Orientation at innovations and exponential speed of research-and-technology transformations in the industrial civilization explicitly state that soontrans-humanistic and post-human ideas will be possibly put into life (i.e. the transfer from human to post-human will occur). The subject/purpose of the present research is to specify and systematize post-human trends of industrial civilization. The general methodological base of research is the dialectics accompanied with modern achievements in the sphere of the systems approach and synergetic view on the world. At the beginning of research the author intensively uses the method of the unity of the historical and logical and in conclusion the author uses the scenario approach. The scientific novelty of research is determined by the fact that the process of post-human transformations is described from the point of view of specific and general (system-related) development and interaction of high technologies: nanotechnology, biotechnology, cybertechnology, artificial intelligence technology and information and virtual technology. The author of the article describes the single interchange line of post-human development from biotechnology, cybertechnology and artificial intelligence technology to information and virtual technology. The author also points out the emerging opportunity of a powerful artificial intelligence being created which would be a challenge for both human and post-human development. The author also describes other scenarios of the post-human future such as: competitive struggle between item-specific (biotechnology, cybertechnology, artificial intelligence technology ) and information and virtual (information and virtual technology) directions of post-human transformations; and rather independent development of each post-human trend as they are or in a form of a combination of related technologies. The author focuses on a special ‘post-human’ role of nanotechnologies. Nanotechnologies are presented as a modern form of fundamental, basic technology allowing the industrial civilization to possess and control all what it needs to function and develop. Throughhightechnologiesindustrialcivilizationpresents itself as n independent artificial, technology-related phenomenon outside and besides the initial natural or bio-social or human origin. Growing post-human orientation of industrial civilization raises a sharp question whether this post-human and trans-humanistic movement actually has a meaning from the point of view of humans and preservation of human values in general.

Ключевые слова: social philosophy, futurology, philosophy of technology, industrial civilization, focus on innovation, technological determinism, post-human, trans-humanism, high tech solutions, technology-related risks.

Контактная информация: Maslov Vadim Mikhailovich, 603950, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast, Nizhni Novgorod, ul. Minina 24.

Библиография:
Apokin I. A. Sovremennaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya: ee soderzhanie i perspek-tivy // Priroda. 1981. № 4. S. 66-73.
Bolonkin A. Bessmertie lyudey i elektronnaya tsivilizatsiya (Sbornik statey, inter-v'yu, diskussiy o putyakh dostizheniya bessmertiya lyudey i budushchem chelovechestva). URL: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24052811 / Bessmertie-lyudey-i-elektronnaya-tsivilizatsiya.
Bostrom N. FAQ po transgumanizmu // www.transhumanism.org/translations/russian/ faq.html.
Vishev I. V. Na puti k prakticheskomu bessmertiyu. M., 2002. 534 s.
Gorokhov V. G. Novyy trend v filosofii tekhniki // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. №. 1. S. 178-183.
Gurevich P. S. Novye temy filosofskoy antropologii. Ocherk 1. Fenomen deantropo-logizatsii cheloveka // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2009. T. XI. Vyp. 1. №№ 45-46. S. 236-250.
Zhukova E. A. Hi-tech: fenomen, funktsii, formy. Tomsk, 2007. 376 s.
Kolmogorov A. Avtomaty i zhizn' // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo: Sb. M., 2004. S. 285-312.
Kurtsveyl' R. Sliyanie cheloveka s mashinoy: dvizhemsya li my k «Matritse»? // Primi krasnuyu tabletku: Nauka, filosofiya i religiya v «Matritse»: Sb. M., 2005. S. 219-234.
Kutyrev V. A., Nilogov A. S. Pro et contra innovatsionizma: za sokhranenie antropo-morfnoy realizatsii vozmozhnykh mirov // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 2. S. 180-189. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.10515.
Lektorskiy V. A. Ratsional'nost' kak tsennost' kul'tury // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 5. S. 26-34.
Maslov V. M. Postchelovecheskoe kak paradigma sovremennoy kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 11. S. 1523-1531. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.10005.
Maslov V. M. Istoriko-ideologicheskoe opredelenie postchelovecheskogo // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2013. T. 15. № 3-4 (79-80). S. 146-153.
Mitchem K. Chto takoe filosofiya tekhniki?. M., 1995. 149 s.
Narin'yani A. S. Mezhdu evolyutsiey i sverkhnovymi tekhnologiyami: novyy chelovek blizhayshego budushchego // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. № 4. S. 3-17.
Sachkov Yu. V. Razvitie nauchnogo metoda i virtualistika // Virtualistika: ekzisten-tsial'nye i epistemologicheskie aspekty. M., 2004. S. 186-207.
Stepin V. S. Tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya tipy // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya v 4 t. T. 4. M., 2001. S. 435-436.
Sterledeva T. D. Elektronno-virtual'naya real'nost' kak novaya nisha chelovecheskogo sushchestvovaniya // Vyzovy sovremennosti i filosofiya: materialy «Kruglova stola» posvyashchennogo dnyu filosofii YuNESKO. – Bishkek, 2004. S. 164-167.
Tishchenko P. V. Konstruirovanie cheloveka kak re-de-kon-struirovanie // Konstruiro-vanie cheloveka: sbornik trudov III Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhduna-rodnym uchastiem. Tomsk, 2009. S. 24-28.
Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy re-volyutsii. M., 2004. 349 s.
Khoruzhiy S. S. Problema postcheloveka ili problema transformativnoy antropolo-gii glazami sinergiynoy antropologii // Filosofskie nauki. 2008. № 2. S. 10-31.
Drexler K. E. Engines of Creation 2.0: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. Updated and Expanded URL: http://www// // http: // www.appstate.edu/dept/ physics/nanotech/ Engine-sofCreation2_ 8803267.pdf.
Transhumanist FAQ. URL: http://www// www.humanityplus.org/learn/transhumanist-faq_answer_28.

References (transliteration):
Apokin I. A. Sovremennaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya: ee soderzhanie i perspek-tivy // Priroda. 1981. № 4. S. 66-73.
Bolonkin A. Bessmertie lyudey i elektronnaya tsivilizatsiya (Sbornik statey, inter-v'yu, diskussiy o putyakh dostizheniya bessmertiya lyudey i budushchem chelovechestva). URL: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24052811 / Bessmertie-lyudey-i-elektronnaya-tsivilizatsiya.
Bostrom N. FAQ po transgumanizmu // www.transhumanism.org/translations/russian/ faq.html.
Vishev I. V. Na puti k prakticheskomu bessmertiyu. M., 2002. 534 s.
Gorokhov V. G. Novyy trend v filosofii tekhniki // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. №. 1. S. 178-183.
Gurevich P. S. Novye temy filosofskoy antropologii. Ocherk 1. Fenomen deantropo-logizatsii cheloveka // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2009. T. XI. Vyp. 1. №№ 45-46. S. 236-250.
Zhukova E. A. Hi-tech: fenomen, funktsii, formy. Tomsk, 2007. 376 s.
Kolmogorov A. Avtomaty i zhizn' // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo: Sb. M., 2004. S. 285-312.
Kurtsveyl' R. Sliyanie cheloveka s mashinoy: dvizhemsya li my k «Matritse»? // Primi krasnuyu tabletku: Nauka, filosofiya i religiya v «Matritse»: Sb. M., 2005. S. 219-234.
Kutyrev V. A., Nilogov A. S. Pro et contra innovatsionizma: za sokhranenie antropo-morfnoy realizatsii vozmozhnykh mirov // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 2. S. 180-189. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.10515.
Lektorskiy V. A. Ratsional'nost' kak tsennost' kul'tury // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 5. S. 26-34.
Maslov V. M. Postchelovecheskoe kak paradigma sovremennoy kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 11. S. 1523-1531. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.10005.
Maslov V. M. Istoriko-ideologicheskoe opredelenie postchelovecheskogo // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2013. T. 15. № 3-4 (79-80). S. 146-153.
Mitchem K. Chto takoe filosofiya tekhniki?. M., 1995. 149 s.
Narin'yani A. S. Mezhdu evolyutsiey i sverkhnovymi tekhnologiyami: novyy chelovek blizhayshego budushchego // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. № 4. S. 3-17.
Sachkov Yu. V. Razvitie nauchnogo metoda i virtualistika // Virtualistika: ekzisten-tsial'nye i epistemologicheskie aspekty. M., 2004. S. 186-207.
Stepin V. S. Tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya tipy // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya v 4 t. T. 4. M., 2001. S. 435-436.
Sterledeva T. D. Elektronno-virtual'naya real'nost' kak novaya nisha chelovecheskogo sushchestvovaniya // Vyzovy sovremennosti i filosofiya: materialy «Kruglova stola» posvyashchennogo dnyu filosofii YuNESKO. – Bishkek, 2004. S. 164-167.
Tishchenko P. V. Konstruirovanie cheloveka kak re-de-kon-struirovanie // Konstruiro-vanie cheloveka: sbornik trudov III Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhduna-rodnym uchastiem. Tomsk, 2009. S. 24-28.
Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy re-volyutsii. M., 2004. 349 s.
Khoruzhiy S. S. Problema postcheloveka ili problema transformativnoy antropolo-gii glazami sinergiynoy antropologii // Filosofskie nauki. 2008. № 2. S. 10-31.
Drexler K. E. Engines of Creation 2.0: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. Updated and Expanded URL: http://www// // http: // www.appstate.edu/dept/ physics/nanotech/ Engine-sofCreation2_ 8803267.pdf.
Transhumanist FAQ. URL: http://www// www.humanityplus.org/learn/transhumanist-faq_answer_28.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the role of Transhumanistic and Post-Human concepts in the culture of industrial civilization. The methodological basis of the research consists of modern definitions of the ‘paradigm’ that expand the term and make it apply to all forms and representations of cultural phenomena. Post-Human cultural testing shows how many facilities of spiritual and mental culture require a new conceptualization (some personality theories and sociobiology) and are starting to be interpreted from the point of view of Post-Humanism (Humanism, Post-Modernism and Friedrich Nietzsche’s super-human). The concept of universal evolutionism appears to be the form of accumulation of all implicit and explicit post-human aspirations and opportunities of modern industrial civilization. In some cases, the relation between the theory of universal evolutionism and Post-Humanism tasks is conditioned by scientific and technological development. Modern quantitative improvements in the sphere of high tech directly leads to implementation of Post-Humanistic orientation at overcoming well-known limits of human as biological species called homo sapiens. All that allows to state that Post-Humanistic ideas can actually become dominating in the spheres of philosophy and ideology of mankind.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, futurology, post-human, transhumanism, high technologies, paradigm, humanism, super human, universal evolutionism, technology-related risks.

Контактная информация: Maslov Vadim Mikhailovich , 603950, Russia, Nizhegoroskaya oblast, Nizhny Novgorod, ul. Minina 24.

Библиография:
Bolonkin A. Bessmertie lyudey i elektronnaya tsivilizatsiya (Sbornik statey, interv'yu, diskussiy o putyakh dostizheniya bessmertiya lyudey i budushchem chelovechestva) // http://www.scribd.com/doc/24052811 / Bessmertie-lyudey-i-elektronnaya-tsivilizatsiya.
Gilbert K.E., Kun G. Istoriya estetiki. M., 2000.
Grekhem L.R. Estestvoznanie, filosofiya i nauka o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Soyuze. M., 1991.
Gurevich P.S. Novye temy filosofskoy antropologii. Ocherk 1. Fenomen deantropologizatsii cheloveka // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2009. T. XI. Vyp. 1. №№ 46-47.
Delez Zh. O smerti cheloveka i o sverkhcheloveke // http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/ Delez/sm_chel.php.
Derrida Zh. Shpory: stili Nitsshe // Filosofskie nauki. 1991. № 2.
Zhabina V.V. Riski innovatsionnoy transformatsii obshchestva v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. № 6.
Il'in I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm. M., 1996.
Itskov D. Put' k neochelovechestvu kak osnova ideologii partii «Evolyutsiya 2045» // www.2045/articls/30840.html.
Ichas M. O prirode zhivogo: mekhanizmy i smysl. M., 1994.
Karpinskaya R.S. Sotsiobiologiya // Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya: Slovar'. M., 1991.
Kirilyuk I.L. Seminaru po transgumanizmu – pyat' let // Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2010. № 2 (54).
Kutyrev V.A. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm ili koevolyutsiya // Priroda. 1988.
Kutyrev V.A. Filosofiya postmodernizma. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2006.
Letov O.V. Chelovek i «sverkhchelovek»: eticheskie problemy transgumanizma // Chelovek. 2009. № 1.
Makarenya A.A. Obukhov V.L. Yavlyaetsya li razvitie atributom bytiya? // Priroda i dukh: Mir filosofskikh problem: Uchebno-nauch. posobie. V 2-kh kn. Kn. 1. SPB., 1995.
Maslov V.M. Postchelovecheskoe v mifologii i iskusstve: spetsifika i znachenie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 5 (65).
Mozheyko M.A. Sverkhchelovek // Istoriya filosofii. Entsiklopediya. Mn.: Interprsssservis; Knizhnyy Dom, 2002.
Moiseev N.N. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm (Pozitsiya i sledstviya) // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 3.
Nitsshe F. Antikhrist. Proklyatie khristianstvu // Sochineniya. V 2-kh t. T. 2. M., 1990.
Nitsshe F. Ecce Homo // Sochineniya. V 2-kh t. T. 2. – M., 1990.
Progress // Biologiya: Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M., 1999.
Rikkert G. Filosofiya zhizni. Mn., M., 2000.
Sartr Zh.P. Bodler / Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla. Stikhotvoreniya v proze. M., 1993.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M., 2003.
Sukhovo-Kobylin A.V. O edinstve chelovechestva vo Vselennoy // Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli. M., 1993.
Ursul D.A., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy (universal'nyy) evolyutsionizm: predmetnoe pole i problemnaya orientatsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 2.
Filosofiya nauki v voprosakh i otvetakh: Ucheb. posobie dlya aspirantov. Rostov n/D., 2006.
Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii. M., 2004.
Khaytun S.D. Fenomen cheloveka na fone universal'noy evolyutsii. M., 2009.
Chernyak V.S. Paradigma // Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya. Slovar'. M., 1991.
Fuller S. Humanity 2.0 // http://iph.ras.ru/27_06_fuller.htm.
Transhumanist FAQ // www.humanityplus.org/learn/transhumanist-faq?answer_28. References (transliteration): 1.Bolonkin A. Bessmertie l'udey i electronnaja tsivilizatsija (Sbornik statej, intervju, diskussij o putijah doctizhenija bessmertija lyudey i buduschem chelovechestva) // http://www.scribd.com/doc/24052811 / Bessmertie-lyudey-i-electronnaja-tsivilizatsija. 2.Hilbert K.E., Kun H. Istorija estetiki. M., 2000. 3.Grehem L.R. Esrestvoznanie, philosophija i nauka o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Souze. M., 1991. 4.Gurevich, P.S. Novye temy philosophskoj antropologii. Ocherk 1. Phenomen deantropologizatsii cheloveka // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obschestvo. 2009. T. XI. Vup. 1. №№ 46-47. 5.Delez Zh. O smepti cheloveka i o sverhcheloveke // http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/ Delez/sm_chel.php. 6.Derrida Zh. Shporu: stili Nitsche // Philosovskije nauki. 1991. № 2. 7.Zhabina V.V. Riski innovatsionnoj transphormatsii obschestva v uslovijah globalizatsii // Philosophija i kul'tura. 2011. № 6. 8.Il'in I.P. Postsrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm. M., 1996. 9.Itskov D. Put' k neochelovechestvy kak osnova ideologii partii «Evol'utsii 2045» // www.2045/articls/30840.html. 10.Ichac M. O prirode zhivogo: mehanizmu i smuslu. M., 1994. 11.Karpinskaja R.S. Sotsiobiolodija // Sovremennaja zapadnaja philosophija: Slovar'. M., 1991. 12.Kiril'uk I.L. Seminaru po transgumanizmu – p'jat' let // Vestnik Rossijskogo philosophskogo obschestva. 2010. № 2 (54). 13.Kutyrev V.A. Universal'nuj evel'utsuonizm ili koevol'utsia // Priroda. 1988. 14.Kutyrev V.A. Philosophija postmodernizma. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2006. 15.Letov O.V. Chelovek i «sverhchelovek»: eticheskie problemu transh'umanismaa // Chelovek. 2009. № 1. 16.Makaren'a A.A. Obuhov V.L. Ijavl'aets'a li razvitije atributom butija? // Priroda I duh: Mir philosophskih problem: Uchebno-nauch. posobije. V 2-kh Kn. Kn. 1. SPB., 1995. 17.Maslov V.M. Postchelovecheskoe v miphologii i iskustve: spetsiphica i znachenie // Philosophija i kul'tura. 2013. № 5 (65). 18.Mozhejko M.A. Sverhchelovek // Istorija philosophii. Enthiklopedija. Mn., 2002. 19.Moisejev N.N. Universal'nuj evel'utsuonizm (Pozitsija I sledstvija) // Vorrosy philosophii. 1991. № 3. 20.Nitsche F. Antihrist. Prokl'atija hristiansvu // Sochinenija. V 2-kh t. T. 2. M., 1990. 21.Nitsche F. Esse Homo // Sochinenija. V 2-kh t. T. 2. – M., 1990. 22.Progress // Biologia: Bol'shoj enthiklopedicheskij slovar'. M., 1999. 23.Rikkert G. Philosophija zhizni. Mn., M., 2000. 24.Sartr Zh.P. Bodler / Bodler Sh. Thvetu zla. Stihotvorenija v proze. M., 1993. 25.Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanije. M., 2003. 26.Suhovo-Kobulin A.V. O edinstve chelovechestva vo Vselennoj // Russkij kosmizm: Antologija philosophskoj musli. M., 1993. 27.Ursul D.A., Ursul T.A. Global'nuj (universal'nuj) evel'utsuonizm: predmetnoe pole i problemnaja orientathija // Philosophija i kul'tura. 2012. № 2. 28.Philosophija nauki v voprosah i otvetah: Ucheb. Posobije dl'a aspirantov. Rostov n/D., 2006. 29.Phukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe buduschee: Posledstvija biotehnologicheskoj revol'ushii. M., 2004. 30.Hajtun S.D. Phenomen cheloveka na phone universal'noj evel'utsii. M., 2009. 31.Chernijak V.S. Paradigma // Sovremennaja zapadnaja philosophija. Slovar'. M., 1991. 32.Phuller S. Humanity 2.0 // http://iph.ras.ru/27_06_fuller.htm. 33.Transhumanist PhAKu // www.humanityplus.org/learn/transhumanist-faq?answer_28.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Evolyutsionnye paradigmy i modeli obrazovaniya XXI veka // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2012. - 1. - C. 1 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2012.1.59. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_59.html
Polishchuk V.I. Ideya kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 204 - 217. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.1.87. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_87.html

References (transliteration):
Bolonkin A. Bessmertie lyudey i elektronnaya tsivilizatsiya (Sbornik statey, interv'yu, diskussiy o putyakh dostizheniya bessmertiya lyudey i budushchem chelovechestva) // http://www.scribd.com/doc/24052811 / Bessmertie-lyudey-i-elektronnaya-tsivilizatsiya.
Gilbert K.E., Kun G. Istoriya estetiki. M., 2000.
Grekhem L.R. Estestvoznanie, filosofiya i nauka o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Soyuze. M., 1991.
Gurevich P.S. Novye temy filosofskoy antropologii. Ocherk 1. Fenomen deantropologizatsii cheloveka // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2009. T. XI. Vyp. 1. №№ 46-47.
Delez Zh. O smerti cheloveka i o sverkhcheloveke // http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/ Delez/sm_chel.php.
Derrida Zh. Shpory: stili Nitsshe // Filosofskie nauki. 1991. № 2.
Zhabina V.V. Riski innovatsionnoy transformatsii obshchestva v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. № 6.
Il'in I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm. M., 1996.
Itskov D. Put' k neochelovechestvu kak osnova ideologii partii «Evolyutsiya 2045» // www.2045/articls/30840.html.
Ichas M. O prirode zhivogo: mekhanizmy i smysl. M., 1994.
Karpinskaya R.S. Sotsiobiologiya // Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya: Slovar'. M., 1991.
Kirilyuk I.L. Seminaru po transgumanizmu – pyat' let // Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2010. № 2 (54).
Kutyrev V.A. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm ili koevolyutsiya // Priroda. 1988.
Kutyrev V.A. Filosofiya postmodernizma. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2006.
Letov O.V. Chelovek i «sverkhchelovek»: eticheskie problemy transgumanizma // Chelovek. 2009. № 1.
Makarenya A.A. Obukhov V.L. Yavlyaetsya li razvitie atributom bytiya? // Priroda i dukh: Mir filosofskikh problem: Uchebno-nauch. posobie. V 2-kh kn. Kn. 1. SPB., 1995.
Maslov V.M. Postchelovecheskoe v mifologii i iskusstve: spetsifika i znachenie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 5 (65).
Mozheyko M.A. Sverkhchelovek // Istoriya filosofii. Entsiklopediya. Mn.: Interprsssservis; Knizhnyy Dom, 2002.
Moiseev N.N. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm (Pozitsiya i sledstviya) // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 3.
Nitsshe F. Antikhrist. Proklyatie khristianstvu // Sochineniya. V 2-kh t. T. 2. M., 1990.
Nitsshe F. Ecce Homo // Sochineniya. V 2-kh t. T. 2. – M., 1990.
Progress // Biologiya: Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M., 1999.
Rikkert G. Filosofiya zhizni. Mn., M., 2000.
Sartr Zh.P. Bodler / Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla. Stikhotvoreniya v proze. M., 1993.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M., 2003.
Sukhovo-Kobylin A.V. O edinstve chelovechestva vo Vselennoy // Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli. M., 1993.
Ursul D.A., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy (universal'nyy) evolyutsionizm: predmetnoe pole i problemnaya orientatsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 2.
Filosofiya nauki v voprosakh i otvetakh: Ucheb. posobie dlya aspirantov. Rostov n/D., 2006.
Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii. M., 2004.
Khaytun S.D. Fenomen cheloveka na fone universal'noy evolyutsii. M., 2009.
Chernyak V.S. Paradigma // Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya. Slovar'. M., 1991.
Fuller S. Humanity 2.0 // http://iph.ras.ru/27_06_fuller.htm.
Transhumanist FAQ // www.humanityplus.org/learn/transhumanist-faq?answer_28. References (transliteration): 1.Bolonkin A. Bessmertie l'udey i electronnaja tsivilizatsija (Sbornik statej, intervju, diskussij o putijah doctizhenija bessmertija lyudey i buduschem chelovechestva) // http://www.scribd.com/doc/24052811 / Bessmertie-lyudey-i-electronnaja-tsivilizatsija. 2.Hilbert K.E., Kun H. Istorija estetiki. M., 2000. 3.Grehem L.R. Esrestvoznanie, philosophija i nauka o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Souze. M., 1991. 4.Gurevich, P.S. Novye temy philosophskoj antropologii. Ocherk 1. Phenomen deantropologizatsii cheloveka // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obschestvo. 2009. T. XI. Vup. 1. №№ 46-47. 5.Delez Zh. O smepti cheloveka i o sverhcheloveke // http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/ Delez/sm_chel.php. 6.Derrida Zh. Shporu: stili Nitsche // Philosovskije nauki. 1991. № 2. 7.Zhabina V.V. Riski innovatsionnoj transphormatsii obschestva v uslovijah globalizatsii // Philosophija i kul'tura. 2011. № 6. 8.Il'in I.P. Postsrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm. M., 1996. 9.Itskov D. Put' k neochelovechestvy kak osnova ideologii partii «Evol'utsii 2045» // www.2045/articls/30840.html. 10.Ichac M. O prirode zhivogo: mehanizmu i smuslu. M., 1994. 11.Karpinskaja R.S. Sotsiobiolodija // Sovremennaja zapadnaja philosophija: Slovar'. M., 1991. 12.Kiril'uk I.L. Seminaru po transgumanizmu – p'jat' let // Vestnik Rossijskogo philosophskogo obschestva. 2010. № 2 (54). 13.Kutyrev V.A. Universal'nuj evel'utsuonizm ili koevol'utsia // Priroda. 1988. 14.Kutyrev V.A. Philosophija postmodernizma. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2006. 15.Letov O.V. Chelovek i «sverhchelovek»: eticheskie problemu transh'umanismaa // Chelovek. 2009. № 1. 16.Makaren'a A.A. Obuhov V.L. Ijavl'aets'a li razvitije atributom butija? // Priroda I duh: Mir philosophskih problem: Uchebno-nauch. posobije. V 2-kh Kn. Kn. 1. SPB., 1995. 17.Maslov V.M. Postchelovecheskoe v miphologii i iskustve: spetsiphica i znachenie // Philosophija i kul'tura. 2013. № 5 (65). 18.Mozhejko M.A. Sverhchelovek // Istorija philosophii. Enthiklopedija. Mn., 2002. 19.Moisejev N.N. Universal'nuj evel'utsuonizm (Pozitsija I sledstvija) // Vorrosy philosophii. 1991. № 3. 20.Nitsche F. Antihrist. Prokl'atija hristiansvu // Sochinenija. V 2-kh t. T. 2. M., 1990. 21.Nitsche F. Esse Homo // Sochinenija. V 2-kh t. T. 2. – M., 1990. 22.Progress // Biologia: Bol'shoj enthiklopedicheskij slovar'. M., 1999. 23.Rikkert G. Philosophija zhizni. Mn., M., 2000. 24.Sartr Zh.P. Bodler / Bodler Sh. Thvetu zla. Stihotvorenija v proze. M., 1993. 25.Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanije. M., 2003. 26.Suhovo-Kobulin A.V. O edinstve chelovechestva vo Vselennoj // Russkij kosmizm: Antologija philosophskoj musli. M., 1993. 27.Ursul D.A., Ursul T.A. Global'nuj (universal'nuj) evel'utsuonizm: predmetnoe pole i problemnaja orientathija // Philosophija i kul'tura. 2012. № 2. 28.Philosophija nauki v voprosah i otvetah: Ucheb. Posobije dl'a aspirantov. Rostov n/D., 2006. 29.Phukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe buduschee: Posledstvija biotehnologicheskoj revol'ushii. M., 2004. 30.Hajtun S.D. Phenomen cheloveka na phone universal'noj evel'utsii. M., 2009. 31.Chernijak V.S. Paradigma // Sovremennaja zapadnaja philosophija. Slovar'. M., 1991. 32.Phuller S. Humanity 2.0 // http://iph.ras.ru/27_06_fuller.htm. 33.Transhumanist PhAKu // www.humanityplus.org/learn/transhumanist-faq?answer_28.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Evolyutsionnye paradigmy i modeli obrazovaniya XXI veka // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2012. - 1. - C. 1 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2012.1.59. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_59.html
Polishchuk V.I. Ideya kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 204 - 217. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.1.87. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_87.html

Аннотация: Futurologists consider the future to be the result of logical development of the past and present which deprives them of the opportunity to see qualitative changes in the future. Both Russian and foreign futurologists traditionally rely on thermonuclear synthesis like stellarator and tokamaks. In the meantime, there are doubts that the aforesaid devices are not possible. Futurologists have other romantic hopes (such as building the post-industrial ‘society of services’, global warming up to fusion of low-melting metal and etc.). At the same time, it would be very interesting to see the future in a completely different light. For instance, great hopes are laid on composite materials. However, their capabilities are limited to specific properties of components. Already today we can offer a ‘magic’ technology of producing materials and energy supplies with desired properties based on the theory of so called ‘superstring matrix’ which continues the classical superstring theory. As far as the global warming is being concerned, futurologists should advise the governments of lower regions to re-locate their industry and agriculture in upper regions, which, of course, no government would do.

Ключевые слова: acceleration, anthropic principle, demography, infantilism, climate, computer mind, migration, neoteny, thermonuclear reaction, technological and cultural revolution.

Контактная информация: Klyagin Nikolay Vasilievich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 432.

Библиография:
Ainsa F. Rekonstruktsiya utopii: Esse. M.: Nasledie – Editions UNESCO, 1999. 207 c.
Aksenov D. Predskazaniya budushchego – shokiruyushchaya pravda ot Sergeya Luk'yanenko, Vladimira Levi, Sergeya Kapitsy. M.: RIPOLklassik PRESTIZh KNIGA, 2006. 314 s.
Altukhov Yu.P. Biokhimicheskaya genetika populyatsiy i evolyutsiya // Molekulyarnye mekhanizmy geneticheskikh protsessov. Molekulyarnaya genetika, evolyutsiya i geneticheskaya inzheneriya. M.: Nauka, 1982. 261 s. S. 89–112.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya: 2 izd., ispr., dop. M.: Academia, 2004. CLXX, 788 s.
Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Krizis burzhuaznykh kontseptsiy budushchego chelovechestva. M.: Znanie, 1979. 64 s.
Biologiya cheloveka / Kharrison Dzh., Uayner Dzh., Tenner Dzh., Barnikot N., Reynolds V. M.: Mir, 1979. 611 s.
Bredli A. K istokam zhizni // V mire nauki. 2010. № 2. S. 36–41.
Grav Zh. Budushchee obshchestvo: 2 izd., dop. M.: LIBROKOM, 2009. 226 s.
Grin B. Elegantnaya Vselennaya: Superstruny, skrytye razmernosti i poiski okonchatel'noy teorii. 4 izd. M.: LKI, 2008. 288 s.
Ermalavichyus Yu.Yu. Budushchee chelovechestva. 2 izd., dop. M.: Korina-ofset, 2010. 528 s.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira: Ucheb. posobie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, Logos, 2007. 264 s.
Klyagin N.V. Filosofiya i «problema Ferma» // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2008. № 1. S. 113–128.
Klyagin N.V. V ozhidanii superkollaydera // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2009. № 6. S. 14–23.
Klyagin N.V. Superkollaydery i filosofiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 11 (23). S. 57–75.
Klyagin N.V. Chto my deystvitel'no znaem o NLO? // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2010. № 3. S. 42–50.
Muravykh A.I. Model' budushchego: sistemno-ekologicheskiy podkhod. M.: INFOKOR, 2007. 159 s.
Nikonov A.P. Dialogi o budushchem. M.: Galaktika, 2005. 208 s. 18. Novikov I.D. i dr. Chislennye znacheniya fundamental'nykh postoyannykh i antropnyy printsip // Problema poiska zhizni vo Vselennoy: Tr. Tallinskogo simpoziuma. M.: Nauka, 1986. 256 c. S. 36–40.
Ono S. Geneticheskie mekhanizmy progressivnoy evolyutsii. M.: Mir, 1973. 227 s.
Porshnev B.F. O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii. (Problemy paleopsikhologii). M.: Mysl', 1974. 487 s.
Uil'yams Dzh.E. Solnechnyy tsikl v dokembrii // V mire nauki. 1986. № 10. S. 62–71.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Evolyutsiya, kosmos, chelovek (obshchie zakony razvitiya i kontseptsiya antropokosmizma). Kishinev: Shtiintsa, 1986 . 268 s.
Utkin A.I. Mirovoy poryadok XXI veka. M.: EKSMO: Algoritm, 2002. 509 s.
Utkin A.I. Pod'em i padenie Zapada. M.: AST, 2008. 761 s.
Feller V.V. Novyy mif o budushchem. Samara – Ural'sk: Samarskiy dom pechati, 2000. 256 s.
Finogeev V. Obshchaya teoriya budushchego. M.: OAO Tip. Novosti, 2004. 162 s.
Chernobrov V.A. Predskazaniya budushchego: Versii, prorochestva, gipotezy. M.: GRAND: Fair-press, 2001. 378 s.
Cayrel R. et al. Measurement of stellar age from uranium decay // Nature. 2001. Vol. 409, № 6821. R. 691–692.
Chaboyer B. et al. Lower Limit on the Age of the Universe // Science. 1996. Vol. 271, № 5251. R. 957–961.
Cowan J.J., Sneden C. Heavy element synthesis in the oldest stars and the early Universe // Nature. 2006. Vol. 440, № 7088. R. 1151–1156.
Day S. Hot bacteria and other ancestors // New scientist. 1994. Vol. 142, № 1920. R. 21–25.
Duve C. de. The second genetic code // Nature. 1988. Vol. 333, № 6169. R. 117–118.
Gaucher E.A. et al. Inferring the palaeoenvironment of ancient bacteria on the basis of resurrected proteins // Nature. 2003. Vol. 425, № 6955. R. 285–288.
Harris W.E. et al. Constraints on the Hubble constant from observations of the brightest red-giant stars in a Virgo-cluster galaxy // Nature. 1998. Vol. 395, № 6697. R. 45–47.
Hellemans A. Galaxy’s Oldest Stars Shed Light on Big Bang // Science. 1998. Vol. 281, № 5382. R. 1428–1429.
Holland H.D. Evidence for Life on Earth More Than 3850 Million Years Ago // Science. 1997. Vol. 275, № 5296. R. 38–39.
Huber C., Wächtershäuser G. Peptides by Activation of Amino Acids with CO on (Ni, Fe)S Surfaces. Implications for the Origin of Life // Science. 1998. Vol. 281, № 5377. R. 670–672.
Joyce G. Hydrothermal vents too hot? // Nature. 1988. Vol. 334, № 6183. R. 564.
Kelley D.S. et al. A Serpentenite-Hosted Ecosystem: The Lost City Hydrothermal Field // Science. 2005. Vol. 307, № 5714. R. 1428–1434.
Kerr R.A. Early Life Thrived Despite Earthly Travails // Science. 1999. Vol. 284, № 5423. R. 2111–2113.
Krauss L.M., Chaboyer B. Age Estimates of Globular Clusters in the Milky Way: Constraints on Cosmology // Science. 2003. Vol. 299, № 5603. R. 65–69.
Lake J.A. Origin of the eukaryotic nucleus determined by rateinvariant analysis of rRNA sequences // Nature. 1988. Vol. 331, № 6152. R. 184–186. 44. Maber K.A., Stevenson D.J. Impact frustration of the origin of life // Nature. 1988. Vol. 331, № 6157. R. 612–614.
Matthews J. Good vibrations from the stars // New scientist. 1990. Vol. 125, № 1701. R. 46–50.
Nisbet E.G., Sleep N.H. The habitat and nature of early life // Nature. 2001. Vol. 409, № 6823. R. 1083–1091.
Raymo M.E., Mitrovica J.X. Collapse of polar ice sheets during the stage 11 interglacial // Nature. 2012. Vol. 483, № 7390. R. 453–456.
Sneden C. The age of the Universe // Nature. 2001. Vol. 408, № 6821. R. 673–675.
Sneden C., Cowan J.J. Genesis of the Heaviest Elements in the Milky Way Galaxy // Science. 2003. Vol. 299, № 5603. R. 70–75.
Watson A. The Universe Shows Its Age // Science. 1998. Vol. 279, № 5353. R. 981–983.
Wilde S.A. et al. Evidence from detrital zircons for the existence of continental crust and oceans on the Earth 4.4 Gyr ago // Nature. 2001. Vol. 409, № 6817. R. 175–178.

References (transliteration):
Ainsa F. Rekonstruktsiya utopii: Esse. M.: Nasledie – Editions UNESCO, 1999. 207 c.
Aksenov D. Predskazaniya budushchego – shokiruyushchaya pravda ot Sergeya Luk'yanenko, Vladimira Levi, Sergeya Kapitsy. M.: RIPOLklassik PRESTIZh KNIGA, 2006. 314 s.
Altukhov Yu.P. Biokhimicheskaya genetika populyatsiy i evolyutsiya // Molekulyarnye mekhanizmy geneticheskikh protsessov. Molekulyarnaya genetika, evolyutsiya i geneticheskaya inzheneriya. M.: Nauka, 1982. 261 s. S. 89–112.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya: 2 izd., ispr., dop. M.: Academia, 2004. CLXX, 788 s.
Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Krizis burzhuaznykh kontseptsiy budushchego chelovechestva. M.: Znanie, 1979. 64 s.
Biologiya cheloveka / Kharrison Dzh., Uayner Dzh., Tenner Dzh., Barnikot N., Reynolds V. M.: Mir, 1979. 611 s.
Bredli A. K istokam zhizni // V mire nauki. 2010. № 2. S. 36–41.
Grav Zh. Budushchee obshchestvo: 2 izd., dop. M.: LIBROKOM, 2009. 226 s.
Grin B. Elegantnaya Vselennaya: Superstruny, skrytye razmernosti i poiski okonchatel'noy teorii. 4 izd. M.: LKI, 2008. 288 s.
Ermalavichyus Yu.Yu. Budushchee chelovechestva. 2 izd., dop. M.: Korina-ofset, 2010. 528 s.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira: Ucheb. posobie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, Logos, 2007. 264 s.
Klyagin N.V. Filosofiya i «problema Ferma» // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2008. № 1. S. 113–128.
Klyagin N.V. V ozhidanii superkollaydera // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2009. № 6. S. 14–23.
Klyagin N.V. Superkollaydery i filosofiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 11 (23). S. 57–75.
Klyagin N.V. Chto my deystvitel'no znaem o NLO? // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2010. № 3. S. 42–50.
Muravykh A.I. Model' budushchego: sistemno-ekologicheskiy podkhod. M.: INFOKOR, 2007. 159 s.
Nikonov A.P. Dialogi o budushchem. M.: Galaktika, 2005. 208 s. 18. Novikov I.D. i dr. Chislennye znacheniya fundamental'nykh postoyannykh i antropnyy printsip // Problema poiska zhizni vo Vselennoy: Tr. Tallinskogo simpoziuma. M.: Nauka, 1986. 256 c. S. 36–40.
Ono S. Geneticheskie mekhanizmy progressivnoy evolyutsii. M.: Mir, 1973. 227 s.
Porshnev B.F. O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii. (Problemy paleopsikhologii). M.: Mysl', 1974. 487 s.
Uil'yams Dzh.E. Solnechnyy tsikl v dokembrii // V mire nauki. 1986. № 10. S. 62–71.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Evolyutsiya, kosmos, chelovek (obshchie zakony razvitiya i kontseptsiya antropokosmizma). Kishinev: Shtiintsa, 1986 . 268 s.
Utkin A.I. Mirovoy poryadok XXI veka. M.: EKSMO: Algoritm, 2002. 509 s.
Utkin A.I. Pod'em i padenie Zapada. M.: AST, 2008. 761 s.
Feller V.V. Novyy mif o budushchem. Samara – Ural'sk: Samarskiy dom pechati, 2000. 256 s.
Finogeev V. Obshchaya teoriya budushchego. M.: OAO Tip. Novosti, 2004. 162 s.
Chernobrov V.A. Predskazaniya budushchego: Versii, prorochestva, gipotezy. M.: GRAND: Fair-press, 2001. 378 s.
Cayrel R. et al. Measurement of stellar age from uranium decay // Nature. 2001. Vol. 409, № 6821. R. 691–692.
Chaboyer B. et al. Lower Limit on the Age of the Universe // Science. 1996. Vol. 271, № 5251. R. 957–961.
Cowan J.J., Sneden C. Heavy element synthesis in the oldest stars and the early Universe // Nature. 2006. Vol. 440, № 7088. R. 1151–1156.
Day S. Hot bacteria and other ancestors // New scientist. 1994. Vol. 142, № 1920. R. 21–25.
Duve C. de. The second genetic code // Nature. 1988. Vol. 333, № 6169. R. 117–118.
Gaucher E.A. et al. Inferring the palaeoenvironment of ancient bacteria on the basis of resurrected proteins // Nature. 2003. Vol. 425, № 6955. R. 285–288.
Harris W.E. et al. Constraints on the Hubble constant from observations of the brightest red-giant stars in a Virgo-cluster galaxy // Nature. 1998. Vol. 395, № 6697. R. 45–47.
Hellemans A. Galaxy’s Oldest Stars Shed Light on Big Bang // Science. 1998. Vol. 281, № 5382. R. 1428–1429.
Holland H.D. Evidence for Life on Earth More Than 3850 Million Years Ago // Science. 1997. Vol. 275, № 5296. R. 38–39.
Huber C., Wächtershäuser G. Peptides by Activation of Amino Acids with CO on (Ni, Fe)S Surfaces. Implications for the Origin of Life // Science. 1998. Vol. 281, № 5377. R. 670–672.
Joyce G. Hydrothermal vents too hot? // Nature. 1988. Vol. 334, № 6183. R. 564.
Kelley D.S. et al. A Serpentenite-Hosted Ecosystem: The Lost City Hydrothermal Field // Science. 2005. Vol. 307, № 5714. R. 1428–1434.
Kerr R.A. Early Life Thrived Despite Earthly Travails // Science. 1999. Vol. 284, № 5423. R. 2111–2113.
Krauss L.M., Chaboyer B. Age Estimates of Globular Clusters in the Milky Way: Constraints on Cosmology // Science. 2003. Vol. 299, № 5603. R. 65–69.
Lake J.A. Origin of the eukaryotic nucleus determined by rateinvariant analysis of rRNA sequences // Nature. 1988. Vol. 331, № 6152. R. 184–186. 44. Maber K.A., Stevenson D.J. Impact frustration of the origin of life // Nature. 1988. Vol. 331, № 6157. R. 612–614.
Matthews J. Good vibrations from the stars // New scientist. 1990. Vol. 125, № 1701. R. 46–50.
Nisbet E.G., Sleep N.H. The habitat and nature of early life // Nature. 2001. Vol. 409, № 6823. R. 1083–1091.
Raymo M.E., Mitrovica J.X. Collapse of polar ice sheets during the stage 11 interglacial // Nature. 2012. Vol. 483, № 7390. R. 453–456.
Sneden C. The age of the Universe // Nature. 2001. Vol. 408, № 6821. R. 673–675.
Sneden C., Cowan J.J. Genesis of the Heaviest Elements in the Milky Way Galaxy // Science. 2003. Vol. 299, № 5603. R. 70–75.
Watson A. The Universe Shows Its Age // Science. 1998. Vol. 279, № 5353. R. 981–983.
Wilde S.A. et al. Evidence from detrital zircons for the existence of continental crust and oceans on the Earth 4.4 Gyr ago // Nature. 2001. Vol. 409, № 6817. R. 175–178.

Аннотация: While globalization makes the global community into the united global economic complex, it shall not be able to totally level out the cultural and philosophical differences between the East and the West, since these differences root in thousands years of history, they are supported at the genetic level as matrixes of two ethnic and social systems (Mongoloid, Caucasoid), and the confrontation between these two systems may end in racial war.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, East, West, Mongoloids, Caucasoid, globalization, racial war, culture, philosophy, culture, matrix.

Контактная информация: Gaikin, Viktor Alekseevich, 690950, Russia, Vladivostok, ul. Pushkinskaya, d. 89.

Библиография:
1. Asakhi. 4.06.1998.
2. Gaykin V.A. Tumangan // Rossiya i ATR. Vladivostok, 1994. № 2. S. 52.
3. Gegel' G. Filosofiya religii. M.: Mysl', 1977. T. 2.
4. Iordanskiy V.B. O nachalakh drevney estetiki // Vostok. 2006. № 6. S. 14.

References (transliteration):
1. Asakhi. 4.06.1998.
2. Gaykin V.A. Tumangan // Rossiya i ATR. Vladivostok, 1994. № 2. S. 52.
3. Gegel' G. Filosofiya religii. M.: Mysl', 1977. T. 2.
4. Iordanskiy V.B. O nachalakh drevney estetiki // Vostok. 2006. № 6. S. 14.