Аннотация: The object of this article is the Russian philosophical community, which includes the character thinks and their groups who claim the orientation towards the native culture and peculiarities of Russian mentality as their identifying distinction. The subject of this research is the history of emergence of these thinkers and groups in post-Soviet Russia, their forming institutions, and history of relations with the other intellectual groups. The author carefully examines such aspects of the topic as the historical roots of these newly established traditions, their representation within the academic and educational institutions, as well as specificities of theoretical platforms of their leaders. The methodology is based on the approach, according to which the network structure of relationship between the intellectuals defines the generally important space of intellectual attention, which is structured upon several competitive positions. The main result of the conducted research consists in description of history, theoretical peculiarities, composition and institutional representation of the three intellectual directions among the “contextualist thinkers” – “conservative revolutionaires”, “Orthodox immanenists”, and “existentialists of tradition”.

Ключевые слова: archeomodernism, Russian mentality, historiosophy, existentialists of tradition, Orthodox immanentists, conservative revolutionaries, Slavophilism, Contextualists, synergetic anthropology, existential cultural studies

Библиография:
Varava V.V. "Yazyki russkoy filosofii". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 3 aprelya 2009 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/varava.php (Data dostupa 26.11.2016).
Girenok F. Iz otvetov na voprosy po dokladu "Kto my? O russkom i sovetskom diskursakh i razryve mezhdu nimi". "Russkaya mysl'". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 21 yanvarya 2011 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/fedor_girenok.php (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Khoruzhiy S.S. Sinergiynaya antropologiya v kontekste russkoy religioznoy filosofii. Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA "Russkaya mysl'". 21 dekabrya 2007 g. http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/horuzhy_synerg_athrop.php
Khoruzhiy S.S. Sovremennaya antropologicheskaya situatsiya v svete sinergiynoy antropologii. Vystuplenie na nauchnom seminare filosofskogo fakul'teta Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta v aprele 2006 g. http://synergia-isa.ru/?page_id=3602
Sinergiynaya antropologiya: vekhi razvitiya. http://synergia-isa.ru/?page_id=3611
Russkoe samosoznanie, filosofsko-istoricheskiy zhurnal. Soderzhanie Ezhegodnika RFO im. N. N. Strakhova za 2001 god. №8. Il'in N. Lozh' pod treli Solov'eva. Russkiy natsionalizm i Aleksandr Isaakovich Solzhenitsyn. Il'in N. Kosa na kamen'. O ponimanii kollektivizma i egoizma. http://russamos.narod.ru/contents-07.htm
Kazin A.L. "Osnovnoy vopros russkoy filosofii". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 21 oktyabrya 2007 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/main_question.php (Data dostupa 25.11.2016).
Prezentatsiya knigi Borisa Georgievicha Dvernitskogo "Russkiy chelovek: Razmyshleniya pravoslavnogo natsionalista" (SPb, 2008) na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare "Russkaya mysl'" v RKhGA. 14 noyabrya 2008 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/dvernitskii.php (Data dostupa 20.11.2016).
Russkoe samosoznanie, filosofsko-istoricheskiy zhurnal, izdanie Russkogo filosofskogo obshchestva im. N.N. Strakhova. URL: http://russamos.narod.ru/ (Data dostupa 20.11.2016).
"Ofilosofit' nel'zya tol'ko uchebniki po filosofii". Interv'yu s Fedorom Ivanovichem Girenkom. "Russkiy zhurnal", 17 marta 2008 g. URL: http://www.russ.ru/Mirovaya-povestka/Ofilosofit-nel-zya-tol-ko-uchebniki-po-filosofii (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Iovlev B.V. Vystuplenie posle doklada F. Girenka "Kto my? O russkom i sovetskom diskursakh i razryve mezhdu nimi". "Russkaya mysl'": Istoriko-metodologicheskiy seminar v RKhGA. 21 yanvarya 2011 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/fedor_girenok.php (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Girenok F. "Kto my? O russkom i sovetskom diskursakh i razryve mezhdu nimi". "Russkaya mysl'". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 21 yanvarya 2011 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/fedor_girenok.php (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Aleksandr Sekatskiy o vlasti nad mirom. URL: http://wap.newruslit.borda.ru/?1-2-0-00000025-000-0-0 (Data dostupa 14.11.2016).
Fedor Girenok – russkiy filosof. URL: http://fedorgirenok.narod.ru/ (Data dostupa 19.11.2016)
Sekatskiy A.K. Vystuplenie na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA "Russkaya mysl'", 12 marta 2010 g. po dokladu Kantora V.K. "Imperiya kak put' Rossii k evropeizatsii". URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/kantor.php (Data dostupa 14.11.2016).
Krusanov P. Legionery Nezrimoy imperii. Predislovie k publikatsii arkhiva Peterburgskikh fundamentalistov. URL: http://www.kultpro.ru/item_67/ (Data dostupa 9.11.2016).
Bol'shev A. O. Postmodernistskiy imperializm peterburgskikh fundamentalistov (k voprosu o roli eklektiki v sovremennoy russkoy kul'ture) // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A.S. Pushkina. Seriya Filologiya 2015 t.1, № 02. Nauchnyy zhurnal. — SPb.: LGU imeni A.S. Pushkina. — S. 47-56.
Rozov N.S. Russkaya filosofiya v povorotakh istorii: fatal'na li periferiynost'? // Filosofiya i obshchestvo, 2016, № 3, S. 96-115.
Arkheomodern. V poiskakh tochki, gde i modern, i arkhaika yasny kak paradigmy. URL: http://www.arcto.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1472 (Data dostupa 6.11.2016).
Savchenkova N.M. Voin bleska. URL: http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/savchenkova-nm/voin-bleska (Data dostupa 7.11.2016).

References (transliteration):
Varava V.V. "Yazyki russkoy filosofii". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 3 aprelya 2009 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/varava.php (Data dostupa 26.11.2016).
Girenok F. Iz otvetov na voprosy po dokladu "Kto my? O russkom i sovetskom diskursakh i razryve mezhdu nimi". "Russkaya mysl'". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 21 yanvarya 2011 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/fedor_girenok.php (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Khoruzhiy S.S. Sinergiynaya antropologiya v kontekste russkoy religioznoy filosofii. Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA "Russkaya mysl'". 21 dekabrya 2007 g. http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/horuzhy_synerg_athrop.php
Khoruzhiy S.S. Sovremennaya antropologicheskaya situatsiya v svete sinergiynoy antropologii. Vystuplenie na nauchnom seminare filosofskogo fakul'teta Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta v aprele 2006 g. http://synergia-isa.ru/?page_id=3602
Sinergiynaya antropologiya: vekhi razvitiya. http://synergia-isa.ru/?page_id=3611
Russkoe samosoznanie, filosofsko-istoricheskiy zhurnal. Soderzhanie Ezhegodnika RFO im. N. N. Strakhova za 2001 god. №8. Il'in N. Lozh' pod treli Solov'eva. Russkiy natsionalizm i Aleksandr Isaakovich Solzhenitsyn. Il'in N. Kosa na kamen'. O ponimanii kollektivizma i egoizma. http://russamos.narod.ru/contents-07.htm
Kazin A.L. "Osnovnoy vopros russkoy filosofii". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 21 oktyabrya 2007 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/main_question.php (Data dostupa 25.11.2016).
Prezentatsiya knigi Borisa Georgievicha Dvernitskogo "Russkiy chelovek: Razmyshleniya pravoslavnogo natsionalista" (SPb, 2008) na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare "Russkaya mysl'" v RKhGA. 14 noyabrya 2008 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/dvernitskii.php (Data dostupa 20.11.2016).
Russkoe samosoznanie, filosofsko-istoricheskiy zhurnal, izdanie Russkogo filosofskogo obshchestva im. N.N. Strakhova. URL: http://russamos.narod.ru/ (Data dostupa 20.11.2016).
"Ofilosofit' nel'zya tol'ko uchebniki po filosofii". Interv'yu s Fedorom Ivanovichem Girenkom. "Russkiy zhurnal", 17 marta 2008 g. URL: http://www.russ.ru/Mirovaya-povestka/Ofilosofit-nel-zya-tol-ko-uchebniki-po-filosofii (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Iovlev B.V. Vystuplenie posle doklada F. Girenka "Kto my? O russkom i sovetskom diskursakh i razryve mezhdu nimi". "Russkaya mysl'": Istoriko-metodologicheskiy seminar v RKhGA. 21 yanvarya 2011 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/fedor_girenok.php (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Girenok F. "Kto my? O russkom i sovetskom diskursakh i razryve mezhdu nimi". "Russkaya mysl'". Doklad na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA. 21 yanvarya 2011 g. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/fedor_girenok.php (Data dostupa 19.11.2016).
Aleksandr Sekatskiy o vlasti nad mirom. URL: http://wap.newruslit.borda.ru/?1-2-0-00000025-000-0-0 (Data dostupa 14.11.2016).
Fedor Girenok – russkiy filosof. URL: http://fedorgirenok.narod.ru/ (Data dostupa 19.11.2016)
Sekatskiy A.K. Vystuplenie na istoriko-metodologicheskom seminare v RKhGA "Russkaya mysl'", 12 marta 2010 g. po dokladu Kantora V.K. "Imperiya kak put' Rossii k evropeizatsii". URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/kantor.php (Data dostupa 14.11.2016).
Krusanov P. Legionery Nezrimoy imperii. Predislovie k publikatsii arkhiva Peterburgskikh fundamentalistov. URL: http://www.kultpro.ru/item_67/ (Data dostupa 9.11.2016).
Bol'shev A. O. Postmodernistskiy imperializm peterburgskikh fundamentalistov (k voprosu o roli eklektiki v sovremennoy russkoy kul'ture) // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A.S. Pushkina. Seriya Filologiya 2015 t.1, № 02. Nauchnyy zhurnal. — SPb.: LGU imeni A.S. Pushkina. — S. 47-56.
Rozov N.S. Russkaya filosofiya v povorotakh istorii: fatal'na li periferiynost'? // Filosofiya i obshchestvo, 2016, № 3, S. 96-115.
Arkheomodern. V poiskakh tochki, gde i modern, i arkhaika yasny kak paradigmy. URL: http://www.arcto.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1472 (Data dostupa 6.11.2016).
Savchenkova N.M. Voin bleska. URL: http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/savchenkova-nm/voin-bleska (Data dostupa 7.11.2016).

Аннотация: The author of the present research article studies the history of the development of philosophical thought of ancient slavs. The author provides key historical and cultural facts of its development and underlines the original nature of the philosophical ideas of the ancient slavs. Chorniy also touches upon the relations between protoslavs thinkers and the philosophy and culture of the ancient greeks. Based on the analysis of the historiographic sources, he focuses on the specifics of the philosophical ideas and problems of the ancient slavs.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, culture, slavs, greeks, education, history, literature, fact, idea, thought.

Контактная информация: Chorniy Alexander Alekseevich, 14027, Ukraine, Chernigov, ul. Akademika Pavlova 53.

Библиография:
Nakhov I.M. Filosofiya kinikov. – M., 1982. – S. 195-196.
Kralyuk P.M. «Belye pyatna» v istorii ukrainskoy filosofii. – Lutsk., 2007. – 164 s. References 1. Gimbutas M. Slavs. Sons of Perun / Per. from English. F.S.Kapitsy.-Moscow: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf, 2003.-216 p. 2. Diogenes Laertius. On the life, teachings and sayings of famous philosophers / Red. Tom and region. entered. Art. A.F.Losev; Translation M.L. Gasparova.-2nd ed.-Moscow: Thought, 1986-571 p. 3. Nakhov M. Cynic philosophy.-M., 1982.-P. 195-196. 4. Kraliuk P.M. «White spots» in the history of Ukrainian philosophy.-Luck., 2007.-164 p.
Diogen Laertskiy. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov /Red. Toma i avt. vstup. st. A.F.Losev; Perevod M.L. Gasparova. – 2-e izd. – M.: Mysl', 1986 – 571 s.
Gimbutas M. Slavyane. Syny Peruna / Per. s angl. F.S.Kapitsy. – M.: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf, 2003. – 216 s.

References (transliteration):
Nakhov I.M. Filosofiya kinikov. – M., 1982. – S. 195-196.
Kralyuk P.M. «Belye pyatna» v istorii ukrainskoy filosofii. – Lutsk., 2007. – 164 s. References 1. Gimbutas M. Slavs. Sons of Perun / Per. from English. F.S.Kapitsy.-Moscow: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf, 2003.-216 p. 2. Diogenes Laertius. On the life, teachings and sayings of famous philosophers / Red. Tom and region. entered. Art. A.F.Losev; Translation M.L. Gasparova.-2nd ed.-Moscow: Thought, 1986-571 p. 3. Nakhov M. Cynic philosophy.-M., 1982.-P. 195-196. 4. Kraliuk P.M. «White spots» in the history of Ukrainian philosophy.-Luck., 2007.-164 p.
Diogen Laertskiy. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov /Red. Toma i avt. vstup. st. A.F.Losev; Perevod M.L. Gasparova. – 2-e izd. – M.: Mysl', 1986 – 571 s.
Gimbutas M. Slavyane. Syny Peruna / Per. s angl. F.S.Kapitsy. – M.: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf, 2003. – 216 s.

Аннотация: Emphasis on theory in Wittgenstein’s philosophy in terms of natural practices (language-games and life forms) places it in close relations with Heidegger’s normative pragmatism. In particular, Heidegger focuses on the term «use», too. However, a French philosopher Jocelyn Benoist disputes that the analogy between Wittgenstein’s and Heidegger’s definitions of «use» has such a close nature. The author of the present article comes back to the question about this analogy and tries to clarify whether theorization of Wittgenstein’s term «use» is actually possible. The research was carried out based on the synthesis of hermeneutic and analytical methods in analyzing Heidegger’s and Wittengstein’s texts from the point of view of modern analytical philosophy and, in particular, analytical pragmatism. The author of the article tries to outline a closer relation between Wittengstein’s and Heidegger’s philosophies within the framework of normative pragmatism and naturalism. The author also offers analytical interpretation of certain Wittengstein’s terms such as rules, use, family resemblance, aspect and others). The author of the article establishes that Wittengstein’s philosophy contains implicit metaphysics that is turned into explicit metaphysics by Heidegger.

Ключевые слова: use, meaning, language-game, Dasein, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, pragmatism, naturalism, aspect, rule.

Контактная информация: Pris Igor Evgenievich, 44 287, Germany, Dortmund, Schlagbaum str, 25 (Francois-Igor PRIS).

Библиография:
Zhirar Rene. Kozel otpushcheniya / Per. s fr. Grigoriy Dashevskiy; Predisl. A. Etkinda. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Ivana Limbakha, 2010. 11 Lakan Zhak. Seminary. Kniga 7. Etika psikhoanaliza (1959-60) Per. s fr. Aleksandr Chernoglazov-M.: Gnozis, Logos, 2006. 12. Andrey Zorin. Pokhod v bordel' v yanvare 1800 goda / NLO № 92 2008 g. 13. Fuk Mishel'. Rozhdenie kliniki / Per. s fr. Aleksandr Tkhostov – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2010. 14. Fuko Mishel'. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk / Per. s fr. – M.: A-cad, 2004. 15. Khabermas Yurgen. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie / Per. s nem. S . Shachin, D. Sklyadnev. Pod red. Boris Markov – M.: Nauka, 2006. 16. Burd'e P'er. Politicheskaya ontologiya Martina Khaydeggera / Per. s fr. A. Bikbov, T. Anisimova – M.: Praksis, 2003. 17. Luman Niklas. Obshchestvo obshchestva. Tom 1. Obshchestvo kak sotsial'naya sistema. Media kommunikatsii. Evolyutsiya / Per. s nem. Aleksandr Antonovskiy. Olek Nikiforov, Aleksey Glukhov – M.: Logos, 2011. 18.Kollinz Rendall. Sotsiologiya filosofiy. Global'naya teoriya intellektual'nogo izmeneniya / Per. s nem. N.S.Rozova-Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf, 2002. 19. Pavlenko A.N. Yavlyaetsya li kommunikativnaya programma obosnovaniya znaniya universal'noy? // Voprosy filosofii, 2009 god № 11 20. Kun Tomas. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy / Per. s angl. I. Naletov – M.: AST, 2009.
Religioznye praktiki v sovremennoy Rossii: Sbornik statey / Pod red. K. Russele, A. Agadzhanyana. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2006. — 400 s. — (Novye materialy i issledovaniya po istorii russkoy kul'tury. Vyp. 3)
Kant, Immanuil. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. M., “Mysl'”, 1966.-(Filosof. nasledie). T. 6.-1966.
D. Yum. Sochineiya 2 t. T. 2/ Per. s angl. S. I. Tsereteli i dr.; Vstup. st. A. F. Gryaznova; Primech. I. S. Narskogo. – 2-e izd. Dopoln. i ispr. – M.: Mysl', 1996.
Kozhev Aleksandr. Ateizm i drugie raboty / Per. s fr. A.M. Rutkevicha i dr. – M.: Praksis, 2006.
Kozhev Aleksandr. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya i drugie raboty / Per. s fr. – M.: Nauka, 2003.
Safranski Ryudiger. Martin Khaydegger: germanskiy master i ego vremya germanskiy master i ego vremya / Per. s nem. – M.: Molodaya Gvardiya, 2005.
Le College de Sociologie: 1937-1939 / Sost. Deni Ol'e. Per. s fr. Yu. Bessonova – M.: Nauka. 2004.
Tanatografiya Erosa. Zhorzh Batay i frantsuzskaya mysl' serediny XX veka / Per. s fr. – M.: Mifril, 1994.
Zhirar Rene. Nasilie i svyashchennoe / Per. s fr. Grigoriy Dashevskiy – M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2000.

References (transliteration):
Zhirar Rene. Kozel otpushcheniya / Per. s fr. Grigoriy Dashevskiy; Predisl. A. Etkinda. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Ivana Limbakha, 2010. 11 Lakan Zhak. Seminary. Kniga 7. Etika psikhoanaliza (1959-60) Per. s fr. Aleksandr Chernoglazov-M.: Gnozis, Logos, 2006. 12. Andrey Zorin. Pokhod v bordel' v yanvare 1800 goda / NLO № 92 2008 g. 13. Fuk Mishel'. Rozhdenie kliniki / Per. s fr. Aleksandr Tkhostov – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2010. 14. Fuko Mishel'. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk / Per. s fr. – M.: A-cad, 2004. 15. Khabermas Yurgen. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie / Per. s nem. S . Shachin, D. Sklyadnev. Pod red. Boris Markov – M.: Nauka, 2006. 16. Burd'e P'er. Politicheskaya ontologiya Martina Khaydeggera / Per. s fr. A. Bikbov, T. Anisimova – M.: Praksis, 2003. 17. Luman Niklas. Obshchestvo obshchestva. Tom 1. Obshchestvo kak sotsial'naya sistema. Media kommunikatsii. Evolyutsiya / Per. s nem. Aleksandr Antonovskiy. Olek Nikiforov, Aleksey Glukhov – M.: Logos, 2011. 18.Kollinz Rendall. Sotsiologiya filosofiy. Global'naya teoriya intellektual'nogo izmeneniya / Per. s nem. N.S.Rozova-Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf, 2002. 19. Pavlenko A.N. Yavlyaetsya li kommunikativnaya programma obosnovaniya znaniya universal'noy? // Voprosy filosofii, 2009 god № 11 20. Kun Tomas. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy / Per. s angl. I. Naletov – M.: AST, 2009.
Religioznye praktiki v sovremennoy Rossii: Sbornik statey / Pod red. K. Russele, A. Agadzhanyana. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2006. — 400 s. — (Novye materialy i issledovaniya po istorii russkoy kul'tury. Vyp. 3)
Kant, Immanuil. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. M., “Mysl'”, 1966.-(Filosof. nasledie). T. 6.-1966.
D. Yum. Sochineiya 2 t. T. 2/ Per. s angl. S. I. Tsereteli i dr.; Vstup. st. A. F. Gryaznova; Primech. I. S. Narskogo. – 2-e izd. Dopoln. i ispr. – M.: Mysl', 1996.
Kozhev Aleksandr. Ateizm i drugie raboty / Per. s fr. A.M. Rutkevicha i dr. – M.: Praksis, 2006.
Kozhev Aleksandr. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya i drugie raboty / Per. s fr. – M.: Nauka, 2003.
Safranski Ryudiger. Martin Khaydegger: germanskiy master i ego vremya germanskiy master i ego vremya / Per. s nem. – M.: Molodaya Gvardiya, 2005.
Le College de Sociologie: 1937-1939 / Sost. Deni Ol'e. Per. s fr. Yu. Bessonova – M.: Nauka. 2004.
Tanatografiya Erosa. Zhorzh Batay i frantsuzskaya mysl' serediny XX veka / Per. s fr. – M.: Mifril, 1994.
Zhirar Rene. Nasilie i svyashchennoe / Per. s fr. Grigoriy Dashevskiy – M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2000.

Аннотация: The purpose of the present article is to prove the point of view based on which the industrial world initially has two opposite yet interconnected development trends. One of them is shown as global processes including socio-economic transformations and phenomena of social massification and the other one is presented as the growth of individual role in social activities. The author of the article tries to describe the two poles of the industrial world through antithesis of the two types of philosophical and historical vision. The author offers a classification of concepts of history typical for industrial societies. One of them includes Auguste Comte’s and Karl Marx’ concepts of history. Comte was against metaphysical abstraction of individuals and offered to focus on the phenomenon of the mankind and human experience. He described a major cycle of European history from the stage of feudal religious society to the stage when individual was the priority and, finally, the third stage of the industrial society and social solidarity which are only starting to form now. Marx also introduced the idea that European history had a triad structure. The second type of concepts of history in industrial societies is base on the principle of individualism. Max Weber presented the most founded concept. Weber admitted the role of science in history, however, he believed that individual had a priority in determination of purposes of human activities. Unlike historical optimism of triad concepts, followers of individualism talked about the relative character of history. At the end of the article the author puts forward arguments for bipolarity of the industrial world.

Ключевые слова: philosophy of history, industrial society, historical triads, production, science, general population, individual, principle of understanding, truth, value.

Контактная информация: Samarskaya Elena Alexandrovna, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 412.

Библиография:
Tam zhe. S.41
Aron R. Kriticheskaya filosofiya istorii.//Aron R. Izbrannoe. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. S.27
Tam zhe. S.19
Aron R. Kriticheskaya filosofiya istorii. //Aron R. Izbrannoe.Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. SPb.,2000. S.11.
Tam zhe, T.42. S.88-89
Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.T.1. S.447
Kont Ogyust. Sistema pozitivnoy politiki.//Rodonachal'niki pozitivizma. Vypusk vtoroy. SPb., 1910. S.135
Kont Ogyust. Kurs pozitivnoy filosofii.//odonachal'niki pozitivizma. SPb., 1912. S.73
Kont Ogyust. Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii. SPb., 1910. S.27
Kont Ogyust.Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii.//Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii. SPb.,1910. S.71
Tam zhe. S.46
Tam zhe. S.59
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990. S.90
Tam zhe. S.183-184
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.S.507
Tam zhe. S.506
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.S.614
Tam zhe. S.350
Tam zh

References (transliteration):
Tam zhe. S.41
Aron R. Kriticheskaya filosofiya istorii.//Aron R. Izbrannoe. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. S.27
Tam zhe. S.19
Aron R. Kriticheskaya filosofiya istorii. //Aron R. Izbrannoe.Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. SPb.,2000. S.11.
Tam zhe, T.42. S.88-89
Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.T.1. S.447
Kont Ogyust. Sistema pozitivnoy politiki.//Rodonachal'niki pozitivizma. Vypusk vtoroy. SPb., 1910. S.135
Kont Ogyust. Kurs pozitivnoy filosofii.//odonachal'niki pozitivizma. SPb., 1912. S.73
Kont Ogyust. Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii. SPb., 1910. S.27
Kont Ogyust.Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii.//Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii. SPb.,1910. S.71
Tam zhe. S.46
Tam zhe. S.59
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990. S.90
Tam zhe. S.183-184
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.S.507
Tam zhe. S.506
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.S.614
Tam zhe. S.350
Tam zh

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the issues of singular terminology of Slavophilism and Neoslavophilism. The author of the article describes how these two movements developed and were related to each other. The author describes the general features as well as the main, fundamental difference in theoretical heritage of the main founders of early Slavophilism, late Slavophilism, Pochvennichestvo and modern Neoslavophilism of the XXI century. The author of the article underlines that today it is impossible to solve the main problems and key issues of history and culture raised by the first Slavophiles in the XIX century. The author of the article formulates a series of general provisions of early Slavophilism that are mandatory for all modern Slavophilism theories (critics of mindless imitation of Western experience, idea of the distinctive character and origin of the Russian culture, acceptance of Orthodoxy as the spiritual basis for our national culture and etc.). The author shows how topical and important these ideas are for today’s society and how these ideas can be used for formation of a perspective model of Russia’s future development.

Ключевые слова: slavophiles, neoslavophiles, distinctive character, culture, tradition, succession, world view, perspective, Orthodoxy, modern age.

Контактная информация: Zalozhnykh Yulia Sergeevna, 248600, Russia, Kaluga, ul. Lenina 104.

Библиография:
1. Belinskiy V.G. Izbrannye filosofskie sochineniya. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1957. T. 2. 594 s.
2. Belov V.N. Nasledie slavyanofil'stva: proshloe i nastoyashchee // Materialy VII Vserossiyskikh
chteniy, posvyashchennykh brat'yam Kireevskim “Optina pustyn' i russkaya kul'tura”. Kaluga: KGPU
im. K.E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2009. S. 16-23.
3. Ermichev A.A. Lad'ya u podnozh'ya kresta. O probleme razuma u P.Ya. Chaadaeva // Voprosy filosofii.
2000. № 12. S. 171-179.
4. Levitskiy S.A. Ocherki po istorii russkoy filosofii. M.: Kanon, 1996. 494 s.
5. Popov E.A. Kul'tura, obshchestvo i chelovek v ob'ektno-predmetnom pole sovremennoy sotsial'noy
kul'turologii i sotsiologii kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 3. C. 170-204.
[Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_415.html].
6. Russkaya filosofiya: entsiklopediya / pod obshch. red. M.A. Maslina; sost. P.P. Apryshko, A.P. Polyakov.
M.: Algoritm, 2007. 736 s.
7. Strel'tsov A.S. Russkaya filosofsko-religioznaya shkola: Opyt gnoseoditsii russkoy filosofii.
Kaluga: Eydos, 2000. 179 s.
8. Teslya A.A. Neoslavyanofil'stvo v period pervoy russkoy revolyutsii i stanovleniya «dumskoy mo-
narkhii» (po materialam dnevnika A.A. Kireeva 1905-1910 gg.). [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://
rummuseum.ru/portal/node/2224/ (data obrashcheniya: 14.07.2013)].
9. Fateev V.A. V sporakh o samobytnom puti Rossii // Slavyanofil'stvo: Pro et contra. SPb: RKhGA, 2006. 1056 s.
10. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 5 t. / pod red. F.V. Konstantinova. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1960-
1970. [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/ (data obrashcheniya:
01.08.2013)].
11. Florovskiy G.V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya / otv. red. O.A. Platonov. M.: Institut russkoy tsivi-
lizatsii, 2009. 848 s.
12. Tsimbaev N.I. Slavyanofil'stvo. Iz istorii russkoy obshchestvenno-politicheskoy mysli XIX v. M.:
MGU, 1986. 272 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Belinskiy V.G. Izbrannye filosofskie sochineniya. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1957. T. 2. 594 s.
2. Belov V.N. Nasledie slavyanofil'stva: proshloe i nastoyashchee // Materialy VII Vserossiyskikh
chteniy, posvyashchennykh brat'yam Kireevskim “Optina pustyn' i russkaya kul'tura”. Kaluga: KGPU
im. K.E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2009. S. 16-23.
3. Ermichev A.A. Lad'ya u podnozh'ya kresta. O probleme razuma u P.Ya. Chaadaeva // Voprosy filosofii.
2000. № 12. S. 171-179.
4. Levitskiy S.A. Ocherki po istorii russkoy filosofii. M.: Kanon, 1996. 494 s.
5. Popov E.A. Kul'tura, obshchestvo i chelovek v ob'ektno-predmetnom pole sovremennoy sotsial'noy
kul'turologii i sotsiologii kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 3. C. 170-204.
[Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_415.html].
6. Russkaya filosofiya: entsiklopediya / pod obshch. red. M.A. Maslina; sost. P.P. Apryshko, A.P. Polyakov.
M.: Algoritm, 2007. 736 s.
7. Strel'tsov A.S. Russkaya filosofsko-religioznaya shkola: Opyt gnoseoditsii russkoy filosofii.
Kaluga: Eydos, 2000. 179 s.
8. Teslya A.A. Neoslavyanofil'stvo v period pervoy russkoy revolyutsii i stanovleniya «dumskoy mo-
narkhii» (po materialam dnevnika A.A. Kireeva 1905-1910 gg.). [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://
rummuseum.ru/portal/node/2224/ (data obrashcheniya: 14.07.2013)].
9. Fateev V.A. V sporakh o samobytnom puti Rossii // Slavyanofil'stvo: Pro et contra. SPb: RKhGA, 2006. 1056 s.
10. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 5 t. / pod red. F.V. Konstantinova. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1960-
1970. [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/ (data obrashcheniya:
01.08.2013)].
11. Florovskiy G.V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya / otv. red. O.A. Platonov. M.: Institut russkoy tsivi-
lizatsii, 2009. 848 s.
12. Tsimbaev N.I. Slavyanofil'stvo. Iz istorii russkoy obshchestvenno-politicheskoy mysli XIX v. M.:
MGU, 1986. 272 s.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the Russian nativist movement founded by the brothers Dostoevsky, Grigoriev and Strakhov, - pochvennichestvo or ‘returning to soil’. The author revealed the conception of ‘soil’ in pochvenniks’ point of view and underlined the traditional nature of pochvennichestvo. Based on Orthodox culture, pochvenniki established the conception of the ‘national soil’ as a storage of national and cultural archetypes and harmonic development of culture.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, pochvenniki, traditions, soil, mentality, harmony, Orthodoxy, conciliarity, art, national character

Контактная информация: Vasilyev Anton Alexandrovich, antoshka_1998@mail.ru

Библиография:
Bogdanov A.V. Politicheskaya filosofiya pochvennichestva. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk. Moskva, 2002.
Grigor'ev A. Kriticheskoe obozrenie // Vremya. 1861. № 4. S. 173.
Grigor'ev A. Estetika i kritika. M.: Iskusstvo, 1980.
Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. V 4-kh tt. t. 3. M., 1880-1882.
Dostoevskiy F.M. Brat'ya Karamazovy. M.: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2003.
Dostoevskiy F.M. Sobranie sochineniy: v 9 t. T.9. V 2 kn. Kn.2.: Dnevnik pisatelya. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo Astrel'», 2004.
Egorov B.F. Apollon Grigor'ev. M.: Mol. Gvardiya, 2000.
Zen'kovskiy V.V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. M.: Izd-vo Eksmo-Press, 2001.
Kaysarov A.S., Glinka G.A., Rybakov B.A. Mify drevnikh slavyan. Velesova kniga. Saratov: «Nadezhda», 1993.
Kozhinov V.V. Sud'ba Rossii: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. M.: Mol. gvardiya, 1990.
Lazari Andzhey de. V krugu Fedora Dostoevskogo. Pochvennichestvo. M.: Nauka, 2004.
Muzhaylova E.A. F.M. Dostoevskiy i M.A. Osorgin: tipologiya pochvennichestva. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata fil. nauk. Magnitogorsk, 2008.
Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1992.
Slavyanofily. Istoricheskaya entsiklopediya / sost. i otv. redaktor O. A. Platonov. M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2009.
Strakhov N.N. Iz istorii literaturnogo nigilizma. SPb., 1890.
Fasmer, M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 4-kh tt. T. 4. M., 2004.
Sharapov A.V. Klassicheskoe slavyanofil'skoe pochvennichestvo v kontekste russkoy istorii 1850-1860-kh gg. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2009.

References (transliteration):
Bogdanov A.V. Politicheskaya filosofiya pochvennichestva. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk. Moskva, 2002.
Grigor'ev A. Kriticheskoe obozrenie // Vremya. 1861. № 4. S. 173.
Grigor'ev A. Estetika i kritika. M.: Iskusstvo, 1980.
Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. V 4-kh tt. t. 3. M., 1880-1882.
Dostoevskiy F.M. Brat'ya Karamazovy. M.: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2003.
Dostoevskiy F.M. Sobranie sochineniy: v 9 t. T.9. V 2 kn. Kn.2.: Dnevnik pisatelya. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo Astrel'», 2004.
Egorov B.F. Apollon Grigor'ev. M.: Mol. Gvardiya, 2000.
Zen'kovskiy V.V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. M.: Izd-vo Eksmo-Press, 2001.
Kaysarov A.S., Glinka G.A., Rybakov B.A. Mify drevnikh slavyan. Velesova kniga. Saratov: «Nadezhda», 1993.
Kozhinov V.V. Sud'ba Rossii: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. M.: Mol. gvardiya, 1990.
Lazari Andzhey de. V krugu Fedora Dostoevskogo. Pochvennichestvo. M.: Nauka, 2004.
Muzhaylova E.A. F.M. Dostoevskiy i M.A. Osorgin: tipologiya pochvennichestva. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata fil. nauk. Magnitogorsk, 2008.
Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1992.
Slavyanofily. Istoricheskaya entsiklopediya / sost. i otv. redaktor O. A. Platonov. M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2009.
Strakhov N.N. Iz istorii literaturnogo nigilizma. SPb., 1890.
Fasmer, M. Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 4-kh tt. T. 4. M., 2004.
Sharapov A.V. Klassicheskoe slavyanofil'skoe pochvennichestvo v kontekste russkoy istorii 1850-1860-kh gg. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2009.

Аннотация: the article is devoted to the first philosophical school in Russian history, the school of Slavophiles. The author covered the main achievements of Slavophiles in founding the Russian idea, such as collegiality, Orthodoxy, wholeness of spirit, Russian freedom from nationalism and strives for higher moral and Orthodox imperatives.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Slavophiles, collegiality, Orthodoxy, wholeness of spirit, community, inner truth, political indifference, the Russian idea.

Контактная информация: Vasiliev Anatoli Anatolievich, vasiliev@mail.ru