Аннотация: The subject of this research is the role of culture in emergence of the “South Korea’s economic miracle”, which can be viewed as rapid change in the economic sphere of social life during the process of modernization of society. M. Weber, whose research laid foundation for the cultural determinism, signified the impact of culture upon the economic activity of society in the beginning of the XX century. However, by the end of the century it became evident that endowing culture with special role in the process of modernization of society, distorts the picture of the reality. The concept of R. Inglehart on the complementary nature of correlations between the various spheres of social life comprises the methodology of this work. Examination of “South Korea’s economic miracle” confirms the relevance of the proposed theory, demonstrating how within the specific historical period, all of the spheres of social life (economic, political, social, and spiritual) interacted, complemented, and enriched each other, which led to the emergence of the aforementioned phenomenon.

Ключевые слова: Confucianism, mentality, religion, culture, politics, nation, economic miracle, South Korea, modernization, Christianity

Библиография:
Vassiliev K,”Industrialization and Christianity: The Twin Engines of Korean Modernity” URL:http://gsis.korea.ac.kr/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/8-06-vassiliev.pdf (data obrashcheniya 09.01.2017).
Gi Wook Shin, “The Paradox of Korean Globalization” (APARC Working Paper, January 2003), p.8, http://aparc.fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Shin.pdf (data obrashcheniya 09.01.2017).
Golubitskiy S. «Otsutstvie vody v krane» URL:http://sgolub.ru/archive/otsutstvie-vody-v-krane/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.12.2016).
Torkunov A.V., Denisov V.I., Li V.F. Koreyskiy poluostrov. Metamorfozy poslevoennoy istorii. OLMA Media Grupp, 2008 g. 541s.
Pak Ch. Kh. Vozrozhdennaya Koreya: model' razvitiya: Perevedeno po izdaniyu: Park Chung Hee, Korea Reborn. A Model for Development, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1979.
Tolstokulakov I.A. Posttraditsionnoe obshchestvo Yuzhnoy Korei i problemy politicheskoy modernizatsii // Izvestiya Vostochnogo instituta, Vladivostok, 2010, №16. C. 54-70.
Kim A. Korean Religious Culture and its Affinity to Christianity: The Rise of Protestant Christianity in South Korea.-Sociology of Religion, 2000, 61(2). P.117-133.
Chan D. Pervomartovskoe dvizhenie 1919 goda i koreyskaya protestantskaya tserkov'/ Per. s koreyskogo // M. Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1997. 182s.
Buswel, R.E., Lee T.S. Christianity in Korea.-University of Hawaii Press, 2006. 408p.
Pak E.G. Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz istorii formirovaniya mentaliteta koreyskogo naroda/ E.G. Pak // Vestnik Kemerovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 2015, №1 (61), t.2. S.151-156.
Inglkhart R., Vel'tsel' K. Modernizatsiya, kul'turnye izmeneniya i demokratiya: Posledovatel'nost' chelovecheskogo razvitiya.-M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2011. 462s.
Inglegart R. Modernizatsiya i postmodernizatsiya // Novaya postindustrial'naya volna na Zapade. Antologiya/ Pod redaktsiey V. L. Inozemtseva. M.: Academia, 1999. 640 s.
Granato J., Inglehart R., Leblang D. The Effect of Cultural Values on Economic Development: Theory, Hypotheses, and Some Empirical Tests.-American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 40, No. 3 (Aug., 1996). R. 607-631.
Kharrison L. Evrei, konfutsiantsy i protestanty: kul'turnyy kapital i konets mul'tikul'turalizma/ Lourens Kharrison; per.s angl.Yu.Kuznetsova. –Moskva: Mysl', 2014. 286s.
Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial'nye dobrodeteli i put' k protsvetaniyu: Per. s angl. / F. Fukuyama. — M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo ACT»: ZAO NPP «Ermak», 2004. 730s.
Veber M. Izbrannoe. Obraz obshchestva.: Per. s nem. – M.: Yurist, 1994. 704 s.
Mazurov V.M. Ot avtoritarizma k demokratii (praktika Yuzhnoy Korei i Filippin). – M. : Izd-vo vost. lit., 1996. 199s.
Kul'tura imeet znanie. Kakim obrazom kul'turnye tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu. (Lawrence Harrison, Samuel Huntington (eds.) Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. — New York: Basic Books, 2000.) — M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2002. 310s.
Suslina S.S. Respublika Koreya na postindustrial'noy stadii razvitiya (konets 80-kh-nachalo 90-kh godov). – M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1997. 222s.
Lukas R.E. Lektsii po ekonomicheskomu rostu [Tekst]/per.s angl.D.Shestakova. – M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara, 2013. 281c.
Kim N.N Kritika teorii kolonial'noy modernizatsii Korei: podkhody i otsenki v sovremennoy yuzhnokoreyskoy istoriografii. – M: Vostok (Orient), №3, 2014.C.178-185.

References (transliteration):
Vassiliev K,”Industrialization and Christianity: The Twin Engines of Korean Modernity” URL:http://gsis.korea.ac.kr/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/8-06-vassiliev.pdf (data obrashcheniya 09.01.2017).
Gi Wook Shin, “The Paradox of Korean Globalization” (APARC Working Paper, January 2003), p.8, http://aparc.fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Shin.pdf (data obrashcheniya 09.01.2017).
Golubitskiy S. «Otsutstvie vody v krane» URL:http://sgolub.ru/archive/otsutstvie-vody-v-krane/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.12.2016).
Torkunov A.V., Denisov V.I., Li V.F. Koreyskiy poluostrov. Metamorfozy poslevoennoy istorii. OLMA Media Grupp, 2008 g. 541s.
Pak Ch. Kh. Vozrozhdennaya Koreya: model' razvitiya: Perevedeno po izdaniyu: Park Chung Hee, Korea Reborn. A Model for Development, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1979.
Tolstokulakov I.A. Posttraditsionnoe obshchestvo Yuzhnoy Korei i problemy politicheskoy modernizatsii // Izvestiya Vostochnogo instituta, Vladivostok, 2010, №16. C. 54-70.
Kim A. Korean Religious Culture and its Affinity to Christianity: The Rise of Protestant Christianity in South Korea.-Sociology of Religion, 2000, 61(2). P.117-133.
Chan D. Pervomartovskoe dvizhenie 1919 goda i koreyskaya protestantskaya tserkov'/ Per. s koreyskogo // M. Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1997. 182s.
Buswel, R.E., Lee T.S. Christianity in Korea.-University of Hawaii Press, 2006. 408p.
Pak E.G. Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz istorii formirovaniya mentaliteta koreyskogo naroda/ E.G. Pak // Vestnik Kemerovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 2015, №1 (61), t.2. S.151-156.
Inglkhart R., Vel'tsel' K. Modernizatsiya, kul'turnye izmeneniya i demokratiya: Posledovatel'nost' chelovecheskogo razvitiya.-M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2011. 462s.
Inglegart R. Modernizatsiya i postmodernizatsiya // Novaya postindustrial'naya volna na Zapade. Antologiya/ Pod redaktsiey V. L. Inozemtseva. M.: Academia, 1999. 640 s.
Granato J., Inglehart R., Leblang D. The Effect of Cultural Values on Economic Development: Theory, Hypotheses, and Some Empirical Tests.-American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 40, No. 3 (Aug., 1996). R. 607-631.
Kharrison L. Evrei, konfutsiantsy i protestanty: kul'turnyy kapital i konets mul'tikul'turalizma/ Lourens Kharrison; per.s angl.Yu.Kuznetsova. –Moskva: Mysl', 2014. 286s.
Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial'nye dobrodeteli i put' k protsvetaniyu: Per. s angl. / F. Fukuyama. — M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo ACT»: ZAO NPP «Ermak», 2004. 730s.
Veber M. Izbrannoe. Obraz obshchestva.: Per. s nem. – M.: Yurist, 1994. 704 s.
Mazurov V.M. Ot avtoritarizma k demokratii (praktika Yuzhnoy Korei i Filippin). – M. : Izd-vo vost. lit., 1996. 199s.
Kul'tura imeet znanie. Kakim obrazom kul'turnye tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu. (Lawrence Harrison, Samuel Huntington (eds.) Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. — New York: Basic Books, 2000.) — M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2002. 310s.
Suslina S.S. Respublika Koreya na postindustrial'noy stadii razvitiya (konets 80-kh-nachalo 90-kh godov). – M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1997. 222s.
Lukas R.E. Lektsii po ekonomicheskomu rostu [Tekst]/per.s angl.D.Shestakova. – M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara, 2013. 281c.
Kim N.N Kritika teorii kolonial'noy modernizatsii Korei: podkhody i otsenki v sovremennoy yuzhnokoreyskoy istoriografii. – M: Vostok (Orient), №3, 2014.C.178-185.

Аннотация: The goal of this work is to determine the place of post-industrial society in evolution of the planetary socio-natural Universe from the position of the prospects for future development of humanity. According to the formational concept, the post-industrial society is a capitalist society at the stage of change of productive forces that are adequate for the era of classic capitalism. The replacement of the mechanical working tools by the objects and processes of nanolevel leads to the establishment of a qualitatively new technological way of production, which drastically changes the place and role of a modern human in nature and society, space and time. Because of nanotechnologies, a separate person becomes a factor that is able to change the evolution of planetary whole, and the society attains ability to ensure its limitless existence in space and time. However, the fundamental constants of capitalist society (private ownership of the means of production, trade and financial relations, surplus value as the goal of production, etc.) subject the use of nanotechnologies to the purpose for making profit, which questions their humanistic potential and justifies the escalation of global issues, provokes alienation and infantile existence of people, as well as limits the achievement of the ideals of the Modernity and Enlightenment. In light of the establishing of the new worldview paradigm and formation methodology, the future of humanity is seen not on the path of post-industrial modernization, but is associated with a fundamental transformation of social mode of production. Such vision of the future of post-industrial society targets social science towards searching the actual ways of humanistic orientation evolution of the planetary socio-natural whole.

Ключевые слова: development, evolution, modernization, Postmodernism, Modernity, nanotechnology, society, people, crisis, Outlook

Библиография:
Ovchinnikov V. Poltora milliarda «cheloveko-rtov» //Rossiyskaya gazeta. ot 13.02.2014. S. 25.
Safranski R. Khaydegger: germanskiy master i ego vremya. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2002. S. 475.
Moiseev N.N. Rasstavanie s prostotoy. M.: «Agraf», 1998. S. 324;
Soros Dzh. Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. Otkrytoe obshchestvo v opasnosti // Mirovaya mysl' skvoz' prizmu vekov. V 5 t. T. 5. M.: Mysl', 2004.-S.901-902.
Dugin A.G. Logos i mifos. Sotsiologiya glubin. M.: Triksa, 2010. S. 201-215.
Smirnov S.A. Antropologiya namadizma (Antropologicheskie trendy i severnyy kul'turnyy kod) // Chelovek. 2014. № 3. S. 5.
Andreev I.L., Nazarova L.N. Antropogenez i arkhitektonika mozga // Chelovek. 2014. № 2. S. 20-21.
Global'noe budushchee 2045: Antropologicheskiy krizis. Konvergentnye tekhnologii. Transgumanisticheskie proekty: Materialy Pervoy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii. Belgorod, 11-12 aprelya 2013 / Pod red. D.I. Dubrovskogo, S.M. Klimovoy. M.: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2014. 352 s.
Gachev G.D. Russkaya dusha. Portrety russkikh mysliteley. M.: Izd-vo «Novosti», 1981. S. 243.
Markuze G. Kriticheskaya teoriya obshchestva: Izbrannye raboty po filosofii i sotsial'noy kritike. M.: AST: Astrel', 2011. S. 101-102.
Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya. M., 1929. T. 2. S. 32.
Man'kovskaya N.B. Fenomen postmodernizma. Khudozhestvenno-esteticheskiy rakurs. – M., SPb.: Izd-vo «Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. Universitetskaya kniga», 2009. S. 377.
Vizgin V.P. Na puti k drugomu. Ot shkoly podozreniya k filosofii doveriya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004. S. 224, 228.
Lyubarskiy G.Yu. Mifologiya istorii: sravnitel'nyy metod i istoricheskoe razvitie. M.: Izd-vo KMS, 2000. S. 44.
Orudzhev Z.M. Formirovanie prirody cheloveka i naznachenie istorii. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2014. S. 149.
Kozhevnikov N.N. Sistema koordinat mira na osnove predel'nykh dinamicheskikh ravnovesiy. Yakutsk: ID SVFU, 2014. S. 127.
Dil'man V.M. Bol'shie biologicheskie chasy (Vvedenie v integral'nuyu meditsinu). M.: Znanie, 1981. S. 22-51.

References (transliteration):
Ovchinnikov V. Poltora milliarda «cheloveko-rtov» //Rossiyskaya gazeta. ot 13.02.2014. S. 25.
Safranski R. Khaydegger: germanskiy master i ego vremya. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2002. S. 475.
Moiseev N.N. Rasstavanie s prostotoy. M.: «Agraf», 1998. S. 324;
Soros Dzh. Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. Otkrytoe obshchestvo v opasnosti // Mirovaya mysl' skvoz' prizmu vekov. V 5 t. T. 5. M.: Mysl', 2004.-S.901-902.
Dugin A.G. Logos i mifos. Sotsiologiya glubin. M.: Triksa, 2010. S. 201-215.
Smirnov S.A. Antropologiya namadizma (Antropologicheskie trendy i severnyy kul'turnyy kod) // Chelovek. 2014. № 3. S. 5.
Andreev I.L., Nazarova L.N. Antropogenez i arkhitektonika mozga // Chelovek. 2014. № 2. S. 20-21.
Global'noe budushchee 2045: Antropologicheskiy krizis. Konvergentnye tekhnologii. Transgumanisticheskie proekty: Materialy Pervoy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii. Belgorod, 11-12 aprelya 2013 / Pod red. D.I. Dubrovskogo, S.M. Klimovoy. M.: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2014. 352 s.
Gachev G.D. Russkaya dusha. Portrety russkikh mysliteley. M.: Izd-vo «Novosti», 1981. S. 243.
Markuze G. Kriticheskaya teoriya obshchestva: Izbrannye raboty po filosofii i sotsial'noy kritike. M.: AST: Astrel', 2011. S. 101-102.
Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya. M., 1929. T. 2. S. 32.
Man'kovskaya N.B. Fenomen postmodernizma. Khudozhestvenno-esteticheskiy rakurs. – M., SPb.: Izd-vo «Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. Universitetskaya kniga», 2009. S. 377.
Vizgin V.P. Na puti k drugomu. Ot shkoly podozreniya k filosofii doveriya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004. S. 224, 228.
Lyubarskiy G.Yu. Mifologiya istorii: sravnitel'nyy metod i istoricheskoe razvitie. M.: Izd-vo KMS, 2000. S. 44.
Orudzhev Z.M. Formirovanie prirody cheloveka i naznachenie istorii. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2014. S. 149.
Kozhevnikov N.N. Sistema koordinat mira na osnove predel'nykh dinamicheskikh ravnovesiy. Yakutsk: ID SVFU, 2014. S. 127.
Dil'man V.M. Bol'shie biologicheskie chasy (Vvedenie v integral'nuyu meditsinu). M.: Znanie, 1981. S. 22-51.

Аннотация: This article is dedicated to the examination of the modern bioethics from the perspective of its methodology and public practice. The author briefly describes the history of emergence of bioethics and gives characteristic to its current state. Initially, bioethics was forming as an area of knowledge tightly linked to the academic philosophy, philosophy of medicine and natural science, and in addition to that based on the practices of discussion. However, in the last two decades bioethics is substantially growing under the influence of new actors – socio-political and economic structures. The discussion processes become a dominant way of solution of the acute problems of biomedicine, being realized among broadest audience. The author illustrates how the socio-political procedure of deliberation becomes a methodology of the modern bioethics and supersedes its philosophical concept.  At the same time, two modi of deliberation established within the socio-political sphere, are suggested for the interpretation of the processes in the modern bioethics: “democratic deliberation” and “authoritarian deliberation”. The author demonstrates what flaws are hidden in the “democratic deliberation” and the ideology of consensus, promoted in bioethics.

Библиография:
Khabermas Yu. Otnosheniya mezhdu sistemoy i zhiznennym mirom v usloviyakh pozdnego kapitalizma// THESIS, 1993, VYP. 2. S. 128.
Tishchenko P.D. Ugroza mnozhestvennosti i ideya gumanitarnoy ekspertizy//Bioetika i gumanitarnaya ekspertiza. Vyp. 2. M.: IFRAN, 2008. S. 112.
Griffin Trotter. Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy: Five Warnings from Hobbes. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2006, 31, p. 238.
A companion to bioethics/edited by Helga Khuse and Peter Singer. – 2nd ed. 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. P. 3.
Tsit. po: Bioetika. Voprosy i otvety. M.: Izdatel'stvo Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. S. 5.
Abelson, Julia; Blacksher, Erika A.; Li, Kathy K.; Boesveld, Sarah E.; and Goold, Susan D. (2013) Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field// Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 9: Iss. 1, Article5. URL: http//www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss1/art5 (data obrashcheniya:25.05.2015)
Kurlenkova A.S. Meditsinskaya antropologiya i bioetika v SShA i Rossii: istoriograficheskiy i sotsiokul'turnyy analiz. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata istoricheskikh nauk. M., 2013. S. 122.
Progress in Bioethics: science, policy and politics/ ed. by Jonathan D. Moreno and Sam Berger. London: MIT press, 2012. P. 219.
Tishchenko P.D. Bio-vlast' v epokhu biotekhnologiy. M.: IFRAN, 2001. S. 126.
Baogang He and Mark E. Warren (2011). Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in the Chinese Political Development// Perspectives on Politics, 9, pp. 269-289 URL: http://journals.cambrige.org/article_S1537592711000892 (data obrashcheniya: 06.06.2015)
Khabermas Yu. Tekhnicheskiy progress i sotsial'nyy zhiznennyy mir/ Khabermas Yu. Tekhnika i nauka kak «ideologiya». M.: Praksis, 2007. S. 126.
Savvina O.V. Eticheskie problemy klonirovaniya cheloveka i zhivotnykh // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2015. - 3. - C. 304 - 312. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.3.14456.

References (transliteration):
Khabermas Yu. Otnosheniya mezhdu sistemoy i zhiznennym mirom v usloviyakh pozdnego kapitalizma// THESIS, 1993, VYP. 2. S. 128.
Tishchenko P.D. Ugroza mnozhestvennosti i ideya gumanitarnoy ekspertizy//Bioetika i gumanitarnaya ekspertiza. Vyp. 2. M.: IFRAN, 2008. S. 112.
Griffin Trotter. Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy: Five Warnings from Hobbes. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2006, 31, p. 238.
A companion to bioethics/edited by Helga Khuse and Peter Singer. – 2nd ed. 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. P. 3.
Tsit. po: Bioetika. Voprosy i otvety. M.: Izdatel'stvo Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. S. 5.
Abelson, Julia; Blacksher, Erika A.; Li, Kathy K.; Boesveld, Sarah E.; and Goold, Susan D. (2013) Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field// Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 9: Iss. 1, Article5. URL: http//www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss1/art5 (data obrashcheniya:25.05.2015)
Kurlenkova A.S. Meditsinskaya antropologiya i bioetika v SShA i Rossii: istoriograficheskiy i sotsiokul'turnyy analiz. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata istoricheskikh nauk. M., 2013. S. 122.
Progress in Bioethics: science, policy and politics/ ed. by Jonathan D. Moreno and Sam Berger. London: MIT press, 2012. P. 219.
Tishchenko P.D. Bio-vlast' v epokhu biotekhnologiy. M.: IFRAN, 2001. S. 126.
Baogang He and Mark E. Warren (2011). Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in the Chinese Political Development// Perspectives on Politics, 9, pp. 269-289 URL: http://journals.cambrige.org/article_S1537592711000892 (data obrashcheniya: 06.06.2015)
Khabermas Yu. Tekhnicheskiy progress i sotsial'nyy zhiznennyy mir/ Khabermas Yu. Tekhnika i nauka kak «ideologiya». M.: Praksis, 2007. S. 126.
Savvina O.V. Eticheskie problemy klonirovaniya cheloveka i zhivotnykh // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2015. - 3. - C. 304 - 312. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.3.14456.

Аннотация: The subject of the article is the research of the process of developing new cultural policy which is a component of the transition period of Russian society from socialism to capitalism. The research reveals illustration and consequences of the transition period in policy, economy, and culture. The researcher observes general decline in the cultural level, bringing down of the high level of culture to the level of service sector and consumption, degradation of moral, aesthetic and legal environments in society. Social and economic context of developoing a new cultural policy is also analyzed in the article. The negative consequences of culture and art commercialization are given. The legal basis of cultural policy is shown. The basic models of cultural policy are described. The author of the article researches cultural policy in individual sectors of culture. The author also focuses on the analysis of cultural and business partnership. The methodology of the research is based on the systems approach that allows a comprehensive consideration of the object under study and on the comparative analysis of cultural policy of the post-Soviet Russia versus cultural policy of the previous Soviet period. The scientific novelty of the article is caused by the fact that, first of all, the author represents one of the first researches in that field in which the development of tje new cultural policy in the post-Soviet Russia is considered comprehensively and profoundly. The scientific novelty is also determined by the fact that the research is conducted in a wide international context considering and at the same time enriching accumulated theoretical groundwork in that field. The author of the article also provides an original and partially new definition of cultural policy. The researcher comes to the conclusion that so far the transition period has been causing more losses than benefits and that the efficiency of the cultural policy will depend on the attraction of new business entities. At the end of the article the author concludes that commercialization is the main threat for culture and art. 

Ключевые слова: commercialization of culture, culture and economy, cultural policy, Constitution and culture, culture and government, culture, transition period, subject of culture, legislation and culture, social partnership

Библиография:
Bogolyubova N.M., Nikolaeva Yu.V. Vneshnyaya kul'turnaya politika Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2008. 317 s
Kuznetsova A. «Medeya» dlya yunogo zritelya // Literaturnaya gazeta. 14.05.2014. № 19(6462).
Lipatov A.T. «My vse govorim telegraf-yazykom…» Mir abbreviatur vchera, segodnya, zavtra: monografiya. Yoshkar-Ola: Mar. gos. un-t, 2011. 204 s.
Alekhin A. «Poeziya – eto lyubov' v shirokom smysle slova» // Voprosy literatury. 2012. № 1.
Polyakov Yu. Pisateli i pipy // Literaturnaya gazeta. 14.12.2005. № 52(6051).
Dmitriev S. Strashno predstavit' Rossiyu bez knizhnykh magazinov // Literaturnaya gazeta. 18.02.2015. № 7(6497).
Sidorov E.Yu. Kul'tura mira i kul'tura Rossii // Polis. 1998. № 5.
Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Osnovy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o kul'ture». 2-e izd. M.: Os'-89, 2008. 32 s.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. S izm. i dop. na 2015 g. s kommentariyami yuristov. M.: Eksmo, 2015. 80 s.
Abakina T.V., Kushtanina E.V., Romanova V.V., Rudnik B.L. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka kul'tury v Rossii: nauchnyy doklad. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. 181 s.
Berdyaev N. Filosofiya neravenstva. M.: AST: Khranitel', 2006. 347 s.
Belozor A.F., Belozor F.I. Kul'turnaya politika Rossii: Vzaimodeystvie gosudarstva i biznesa. Bryansk: Izd-vo Bryanskiy filial ORAGS, 2009. 168 s.
Kutsenko V.A., Popova Yu.V. Kul'tura i kul'turnaya politika Rossii v usloviyakh sistemnoy transformatsii i modernizatsii: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Voronezh: FGBOU VPO Voronezhskiy GAU, 2014. 419 s.
Kul'turnaya politika Rossii. Istoriya i sovremennost'. Dva vzglyada na odnu problemu / Otv. red.: I.A. Butenko, K.E. Razlogov. M.: Libereya, 1998. 296 s.

References (transliteration):
Bogolyubova N.M., Nikolaeva Yu.V. Vneshnyaya kul'turnaya politika Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2008. 317 s
Kuznetsova A. «Medeya» dlya yunogo zritelya // Literaturnaya gazeta. 14.05.2014. № 19(6462).
Lipatov A.T. «My vse govorim telegraf-yazykom…» Mir abbreviatur vchera, segodnya, zavtra: monografiya. Yoshkar-Ola: Mar. gos. un-t, 2011. 204 s.
Alekhin A. «Poeziya – eto lyubov' v shirokom smysle slova» // Voprosy literatury. 2012. № 1.
Polyakov Yu. Pisateli i pipy // Literaturnaya gazeta. 14.12.2005. № 52(6051).
Dmitriev S. Strashno predstavit' Rossiyu bez knizhnykh magazinov // Literaturnaya gazeta. 18.02.2015. № 7(6497).
Sidorov E.Yu. Kul'tura mira i kul'tura Rossii // Polis. 1998. № 5.
Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Osnovy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o kul'ture». 2-e izd. M.: Os'-89, 2008. 32 s.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. S izm. i dop. na 2015 g. s kommentariyami yuristov. M.: Eksmo, 2015. 80 s.
Abakina T.V., Kushtanina E.V., Romanova V.V., Rudnik B.L. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka kul'tury v Rossii: nauchnyy doklad. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. 181 s.
Berdyaev N. Filosofiya neravenstva. M.: AST: Khranitel', 2006. 347 s.
Belozor A.F., Belozor F.I. Kul'turnaya politika Rossii: Vzaimodeystvie gosudarstva i biznesa. Bryansk: Izd-vo Bryanskiy filial ORAGS, 2009. 168 s.
Kutsenko V.A., Popova Yu.V. Kul'tura i kul'turnaya politika Rossii v usloviyakh sistemnoy transformatsii i modernizatsii: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Voronezh: FGBOU VPO Voronezhskiy GAU, 2014. 419 s.
Kul'turnaya politika Rossii. Istoriya i sovremennost'. Dva vzglyada na odnu problemu / Otv. red.: I.A. Butenko, K.E. Razlogov. M.: Libereya, 1998. 296 s.

Аннотация: In her article Tsvetkova analyzes the influence of the most popular English-speaking author and a major prose writer of the XIX century Charles Dickens (1812 – 1870) on the shaping of public opinion regarding social reformation processes. Social reformation was one of the most acute issues for Victorian England, the country that surprised people of those times with the social, political and economic development, ‘shadow sides’ and social contradictions that were concentrated in Victorian England like nowhere else in the world. At the same time, despite the serious situation, Victorian society did not seem to focus on the need to resolve the situation by the means of systemic social reforms instead of local actions and encouragement of self-help ideas. The terms ‘social welfare state’ and ‘class solidarity’ were associated with radical attitudes and the revolution. Transformation of public opinion towards paternalism and refusal of the principle of laissez-faire was in many ways encouraged by English literature and publicistic writing of that period. According to one of the first Oxford professors in English literature George Gordon, the purpose of that literature was not only to enlighten and educate but also ‘to save our souls and to heal the country’, in other words, to create an ideology which could replace a religion. In her research Tsvetkova has used general scientific methods including the method of ascension from the abstract to the concrete, method of idealization, method of formalization as well as methods of literary research such as the biographic method, psychoanalytical method, formal method, structural method and cultural historical method. According to Tsvetkova, Charles Dickens’ creative work was too politicized. Soviet researchers saw only one side of Dickens as a ‘progressive writer’, defender of national democratic culture, a man of the people and a friend of ‘the diminished and unfortunate’ while English critics on the contrary emphasized Dickens’ sympathy for the small bourgeoisie social groups.

Ключевые слова: English literature, social reforms, Charles Dickens, social utopia, public opinion, social responsibility, paternalism, individualism, laissez-faire, critical realism.

Библиография:
A.V. Dicey. Lectures on the Relations between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. London. 1905.
Shchuplenkov N.O. K voprosu soderzhaniya ponyatiya estestvennogo prava v trudakh otechestvennykh mysliteley vtoroy poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-4.-C. 170-207. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.4.11649. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11649.html
Orwell G. Dickens, Dali and Others. Studies in Popular Culture. New York. 1946.
Sil'man T.A. Dikkens. Ocherki tvorchestva.M,1958
Seliverstov M.L. Dikkens i Tekkerey v otsenke Chernyshevskogo. Frunze,1954.
Prokhorov M.M. Smysly i tsennost' modeli otnosheniya cheloveka s mirom // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 136-240. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.7.369. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_369.html
Pirson Kh., Dikkens M.:Izdatel'stvo Molodaya gvardiya,1963
Nabokov V.V. Zhestokost' i mistifikatsiya Perevod N.G. Krotovskoy // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-1.-C. 19-30
Kornil'ev V.V. Formirovanie printsipa real'nosti // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-2.-C.63-77
Katarskiy I.M. Dikkens v Rossii. Seredina XIX veka.-M.,1966
Ivasheva V.V. Tvorchestvo Dikkensa.M.:Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1954.
Alekseev M.P. Belinskiy i Dikkens. (K istorii angliyskogo vliyaniya v russkoy literature). — V kn. Venok Belinskomu. Sbornik pod red. N.K. Piksanova. M.:Novaya Moskva, 1924 C. 152—204
Iglton T. Teoriya literatury. Vvedenie.M,2010.
Grazhdanskaya Z.T. Dikkens v russkoy revolyutsionno-demokraticheskoy kritike // Uchenye zapiski Mosk., obl. pedagogich. in-ta.-1953, T.XXVI, trudy kafedry zarubezhnoy literatury. S 33-44
Alekhina E.V. Kosmologicheskiy aspekt smysla zhizni v russkoy religioznoy filosofii (konets XIX – pervaya polovina KhKh veka) // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 545-589. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.624. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_624.html

References (transliteration):
A.V. Dicey. Lectures on the Relations between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. London. 1905.
Shchuplenkov N.O. K voprosu soderzhaniya ponyatiya estestvennogo prava v trudakh otechestvennykh mysliteley vtoroy poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-4.-C. 170-207. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.4.11649. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11649.html
Orwell G. Dickens, Dali and Others. Studies in Popular Culture. New York. 1946.
Sil'man T.A. Dikkens. Ocherki tvorchestva.M,1958
Seliverstov M.L. Dikkens i Tekkerey v otsenke Chernyshevskogo. Frunze,1954.
Prokhorov M.M. Smysly i tsennost' modeli otnosheniya cheloveka s mirom // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 136-240. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.7.369. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_369.html
Pirson Kh., Dikkens M.:Izdatel'stvo Molodaya gvardiya,1963
Nabokov V.V. Zhestokost' i mistifikatsiya Perevod N.G. Krotovskoy // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-1.-C. 19-30
Kornil'ev V.V. Formirovanie printsipa real'nosti // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-2.-C.63-77
Katarskiy I.M. Dikkens v Rossii. Seredina XIX veka.-M.,1966
Ivasheva V.V. Tvorchestvo Dikkensa.M.:Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1954.
Alekseev M.P. Belinskiy i Dikkens. (K istorii angliyskogo vliyaniya v russkoy literature). — V kn. Venok Belinskomu. Sbornik pod red. N.K. Piksanova. M.:Novaya Moskva, 1924 C. 152—204
Iglton T. Teoriya literatury. Vvedenie.M,2010.
Grazhdanskaya Z.T. Dikkens v russkoy revolyutsionno-demokraticheskoy kritike // Uchenye zapiski Mosk., obl. pedagogich. in-ta.-1953, T.XXVI, trudy kafedry zarubezhnoy literatury. S 33-44
Alekhina E.V. Kosmologicheskiy aspekt smysla zhizni v russkoy religioznoy filosofii (konets XIX – pervaya polovina KhKh veka) // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 545-589. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.624. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_624.html

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the basic Russian social and philosophical concepts that demonstrate peculiarities and factors of conflictogenity of the Russian society. The authors of the article demonstrate that historical paradigms of the Russian social thought including conservatism, radicalism and liberalism offered different explanations of the phenomenon of conflictogenity of the Russian society based on studying its historical and cultural grounds and peculiarities of the Russian mentality. Special emphasis is made on determination of both general approaches of Russian philosophers to the analysis of political, socio-cultural and mental grounds of conflictogenity and social conflicts of the Russian society and description of original concepts and models of conflictogenity in liberalism, conservatism and radicalism. Historical-philosophical and dialectical approaches have proved to be especially important methods to be used in the analysis. The historical-philosophical method has allowed to define approaches that exist in the history of Russian social philosophy and the dialectical approach has given an opportunity to view conflictogenity not as an absolute givenness but a heterogeneous and constantly developing element of social reality. In their article Aleynikov and Osipov have also described differences between axiological grounds for Russian philosophical concepts of ‘non-conflict nature’ or conflictogenity of Russians and moral principles of preventing political conflicts. The authors of the article demonstrate that Russian philosophers introduced concepts regarding not only a specific form and content of national conflictogenity of Russians but also peculiarities of the Russian perception of conflict situations.

Ключевые слова: conflictogenity, conflict, Russia, Russian society, Russian nation, Russian philosophy, liberalism, conservatism, radicalism, socialism.

Библиография:
Aksakov K.S., Aksakov I.S. Literaturnaya kritika. M.: Sovremennik,1981.
Alekseev N.N. Russkiy narod i gosudarstvo. M.: Agraf,1998.
Bakunin M.A. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politika.M.: Izd-vo «Pravda»,1989.
Berdyaev N.A. Sud'ba Rossii. M.:AST,2010.
Gertsen A.I. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. V 2-t. Tom 2. M.: OGIZ,1946.
Delevskiy Yu. Sotsial'nye antagonizmy i klassovaya bor'ba v istorii. M.:Librikom,2011.
Derlug'yan G. Kak ustroen etot mir. Nabroski na makrosotsiologicheskie temy. M.: Izd.-vo Instituta Gaydara, 2013/
Doklad Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valday»Natsional'naya identichnost' i budushchee Rossii. Moskva, fevral' 2014. [Elektronnyy resurs].URL: Http://vid1.rian.ru/ig/valdai/doklad_identichnost_RUS_ISBN.pdf(data obrashcheniya: 16.05.2014).
Dostoevskiy F.M. Politicheskoe zaveshchanie. Sbornik statey za 1861-1881.M.: Algoritm,2006.
Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe. Sozertsanie zhizni. M., SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Universitetskaya kniga, 2014,S.330
Kireevskiy I.V. Kritika i estetika. M.: Iskusstvo,1979.
Magun V., Rudnev M. Zhiznennye tsennosti rossiyskogo naseleniya: skhodstva i otlichiya v sravnenii s drugimi evropeyskimi stranami // Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya,2008,№;1.
Narochnitskaya N. A. Russkiy kod razvitiya. M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2013
Nechiporenko L.A. Burzhuaznaya sotsiologiya konflikta. M.: Politizdat, 1982.
Nikonov V. A. Rossiyskaya matritsa. M.: Russkoe slovo, 2014.
NisnevichYu.A.Postsovetskaya Rossiya: dvadtsat' let spustya.//Polis,2013,№1.
Novgorodtsev P.I. Ob obshchestvennom ideale. M.: Izd-vo «Pressa»,1991.
Nravstvennost' sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva: psikhologicheskiy analiz. M.: IP RAN, 2013
Putin V. Vstrecha s predstavitelyami neparlamentskikh partiy // Prezident Rossii. Ofitsial'nyy sayt. 20 noyabrya 2013 g. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/news/19659 (data obrashcheniya: 14.07.2014).
Rudnev M., Magun V.Tsennostnyy konsensus i faktory tsennostnoy differentsiatsii naseleniya Rossii i drugikh evropeyskikh stran// Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya,2011,№;4.
Svetlov, V. A., Semenov V. A. Konfliktologiya: Uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Piter, 2011
Sotsiologiya istorii Nikolaya Kareeva: mezhvuz. sb. / Pod red. A.O. Boronoeva, V.V. Kozlovskogo, I.D.Osipova. SPb. : Izd-vo S.-Peterburg. un-ta , 2000.
Tikhomirov L.A. Monarkhicheskaya gosudarstvennost'. SPb.: GPP im. Ivana Fedorova, 1992.
Chicherin B.N. Filosofiya prava. SPb. : Nauka,1998.

References (transliteration):
Aksakov K.S., Aksakov I.S. Literaturnaya kritika. M.: Sovremennik,1981.
Alekseev N.N. Russkiy narod i gosudarstvo. M.: Agraf,1998.
Bakunin M.A. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politika.M.: Izd-vo «Pravda»,1989.
Berdyaev N.A. Sud'ba Rossii. M.:AST,2010.
Gertsen A.I. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. V 2-t. Tom 2. M.: OGIZ,1946.
Delevskiy Yu. Sotsial'nye antagonizmy i klassovaya bor'ba v istorii. M.:Librikom,2011.
Derlug'yan G. Kak ustroen etot mir. Nabroski na makrosotsiologicheskie temy. M.: Izd.-vo Instituta Gaydara, 2013/
Doklad Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valday»Natsional'naya identichnost' i budushchee Rossii. Moskva, fevral' 2014. [Elektronnyy resurs].URL: Http://vid1.rian.ru/ig/valdai/doklad_identichnost_RUS_ISBN.pdf(data obrashcheniya: 16.05.2014).
Dostoevskiy F.M. Politicheskoe zaveshchanie. Sbornik statey za 1861-1881.M.: Algoritm,2006.
Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe. Sozertsanie zhizni. M., SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Universitetskaya kniga, 2014,S.330
Kireevskiy I.V. Kritika i estetika. M.: Iskusstvo,1979.
Magun V., Rudnev M. Zhiznennye tsennosti rossiyskogo naseleniya: skhodstva i otlichiya v sravnenii s drugimi evropeyskimi stranami // Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya,2008,№;1.
Narochnitskaya N. A. Russkiy kod razvitiya. M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2013
Nechiporenko L.A. Burzhuaznaya sotsiologiya konflikta. M.: Politizdat, 1982.
Nikonov V. A. Rossiyskaya matritsa. M.: Russkoe slovo, 2014.
NisnevichYu.A.Postsovetskaya Rossiya: dvadtsat' let spustya.//Polis,2013,№1.
Novgorodtsev P.I. Ob obshchestvennom ideale. M.: Izd-vo «Pressa»,1991.
Nravstvennost' sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva: psikhologicheskiy analiz. M.: IP RAN, 2013
Putin V. Vstrecha s predstavitelyami neparlamentskikh partiy // Prezident Rossii. Ofitsial'nyy sayt. 20 noyabrya 2013 g. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/news/19659 (data obrashcheniya: 14.07.2014).
Rudnev M., Magun V.Tsennostnyy konsensus i faktory tsennostnoy differentsiatsii naseleniya Rossii i drugikh evropeyskikh stran// Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya,2011,№;4.
Svetlov, V. A., Semenov V. A. Konfliktologiya: Uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Piter, 2011
Sotsiologiya istorii Nikolaya Kareeva: mezhvuz. sb. / Pod red. A.O. Boronoeva, V.V. Kozlovskogo, I.D.Osipova. SPb. : Izd-vo S.-Peterburg. un-ta , 2000.
Tikhomirov L.A. Monarkhicheskaya gosudarstvennost'. SPb.: GPP im. Ivana Fedorova, 1992.
Chicherin B.N. Filosofiya prava. SPb. : Nauka,1998.

Аннотация: The subject of the present research founded by the Russian Foundation for Humanities (Project No. 14 – 03 - 00683a) is the new identity of young people from contemporary youth subcultures that explores forbidden urban spaces. This refers to the phenomenon of youth counterculture in the 1960th as the opposition to urban industrialism and to new generations of subcultures. The author studies the role of megalopolises in the formation of subcultures and the importance of the theories of post-industrial society for creating social utopia. Therefore, the subject under research is the transformation of the views of the ‘alternative culture’ and the meaning of the industrial and eschatological themes and anti-utopias for contemporary followers. Special attention is paid to such forms of exploring abandoned urban spaces as squatting, urban exploration movement and industrial subcultures. Since these are very complex and diversified phenomena, in order to study them it is necessary to use a wide range of research methods. This includes social-historical, descriptive and typological approaches as well as qualitative methods of social researches. The research is based on analyzing the main sources of ‘alternative culture’ from canonical works written by Theodore Roszak and Charles Reich to Internet resources and other self-representations of the contemporary representatives of subcultures. Theoretical base of the research includes concepts of the post-industrial society offered by Daniel Bell and Alvin Toffler and particular researches within the framework of ‘urban studies’ and urban sociology, Western and Russian researches on the youth sociology, counterculture and subcultures. Moreover, the activity approach and the closely connected theory of practices are also taken into account. The method of involved observation and interviews of the representatives of ‘urban exploration’ have been also used. This is an interdisciplinary research. It touches upon the phenomenon of urban abandonment and focuses on the exploration of ‘diminishing’ industrial cities by modern youth subcultures. The author of the article shows that these subcultures appeared as a result of urbanization processes, however, demonstrate a very negative attitude towards urbanization. In big industrial cities theorists of the youth counterculture create the evil image of technocracy. The uprise of technocracy at the end of the 1960th – beginning of the 70th coincided with creation of concepts of the transfer from the industrial society to the post-industrial society and growing popularity of social utopias. However, the following decades emptied mystical-chiliast expectations of the counterculture and the eschatology of the counterculture was filled with industrial topics which resulted in new models of youth identity. For the communities like urban exploration and industrial subcultures, this relates to the exploration, acquisition and re-encoding abandoned urban spaces which correlates to anti-utopianism and the concepts of the ‘ending’ of the industrial civilization.

Ключевые слова: city, abandoned, youth, counterculture, subculture, urban exploration, urbanization, industrialization, identity, values.

Контактная информация: Bokov German Evgenievich, 198255, Russia, St. Petersburg, u. Pr. Veteranov, 48, ap. 50.

Библиография:
Abramov R. «Zabytye v proshlom»: osvoenie zabroshennykh prostranstv i fenomen novogo gorodskogo turizma // Mikrourbanizm. Gorod v detalyakh / Sb. statey; pod otv. redaktsiey O. Brednikovoy, O. Zaporozhets. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. S. 231-251.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. Per. s angl. M.: Academia, 1999.
Boeva G. Transformatsiya fenomena stalkerstva v postsovetskom kul'turnom prostranstve // Stereotipy i natsional'nye sistemy tsennostey v mezhkul'turnoy kommunikatsii: Sb. statey. Vyp. 1 / Pod red. V. Shaydurova, A. Kiklevicha. SPb. – Ol'shtyn: Izd-vo Nevskogo in-ta yazyka i kul'tury, 2009. S. 149-156.
Golova T. Skvotery v Peterburge: praktika zakhvata i obraz zhizni // Molodezhnye dvizheniya i subkul'tury Sankt-Peterburga (sotsiologicheskiy i antropologicheskiy analiz) / Otv red. V.V. Kostyushev. SPb.: Norma, 1999. S. 128-153.
Gromov D.V. Subkul'tury bol'shogo goroda // Molodezhnye subkul'tury Moskvy / Sost. D.V. Gromov, otv. red. M.Yu. Martynova. M.: IEA RAN, 2009. S. 5-25.
Gurevich P.S. Subkul'tura // Kul'turologiya. KhKh vek. Entsiklopediya: v 2 t. / Pod red. S.Ya. Levita. T. 2. SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. S. 236-237.
Zdravomyslova E.A. Paradigmy zapadnoy sotsiologii obshchestvennykh dvizheniy. SPb.: Nauka, 1993.
Zdravomyslova E.A. Sotsiologiya obshchestvennykh dvizheniy – stanovlenie novogo napravleniya // Sotsiologiya v Rossii / Pod red. V.A. Yadova. M.: Izd-vo IS RAN, 1998.
Myalo K. Pod znamenem bunta. (Ocherki po istorii i psikhologii molodezhnogo protesta 1950-1970-kh godov). M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1985.
Omel'chenko E.L. Molodezhnye kul'tury i subkul'tury. M.: Izd-vo IS RAN, 2000.
O’Khara K. Filosofiya panka: Bol'she chem shum. Per. s angl. M.: Nota-R, 2008.
Sergeev V.K. Molodezhnaya subkul'tura v usloviyakh megapolisa. M.: INFRA-M, 2003.
Sokolov M. Subkul'turnoe izmerenie sotsial'nykh dvizheniy: kognitivnyy podkhod // Molodezhnye dvizheniya i subkul'tury Sankt-Peterburga (sotsiologicheskiy i antropologicheskiy analiz) / Otv red. V.V. Kostyushev. SPb.: Norma, 1999. S. 9-23.
Sultanova M.A. Kontrkul'tura – tip tsennostnogo radikalizma (Vudstoku 40 let – kakovy itogi?) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. № 8. 2009. S. 9-18.
Sultanova M.A. Filosofiya kul'tury Teodora Rozzaka: (Ocherk filosofskoy publitsistiki). M.: IF RAN, 2005.
Toffler E. Shok budushchego. Per. s angl. M.: OOO «Izd-vo AST», 2002.
Shevelev E. Gorod (bez) cheloveka: praktiki osvoeniya pustykh i zabroshennykh prostranstv // Mikrourbanizm. Gorod v detalyakh / Sb. statey; pod otv. redaktsiey O. Brednikovoy, O. Zaporozhets. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. S. 43-63.
Khiz Dzh., Potter E. Bunt na prodazhu. Per. s angl. M.: Izd-vo «Dobraya kniga», 2007.
Ferguson M. The Aquarian Conspiracy: Personal and Social Transformation in the 1980’s. London-Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
Garrett B. L. Cracking the Paris Sarrières: Corporal Terror and Illicit Encounter // An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies. 2011. № 10 (2). P. 270-277.
Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: A Division of Random House, 1961.
Reich Ch. The Greening of America. New York: Random House, 1970.
Roszak Th. The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, 1969. P. XII.
Roszak Th. Where the Wasteland Ends: Politics and Transcendence in Postindustrial Society. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, 1972.
Stevens J. Storming Heaven: LSD and the American Dream. New York: Grove Press, 1998.

References (transliteration):
Abramov R. «Zabytye v proshlom»: osvoenie zabroshennykh prostranstv i fenomen novogo gorodskogo turizma // Mikrourbanizm. Gorod v detalyakh / Sb. statey; pod otv. redaktsiey O. Brednikovoy, O. Zaporozhets. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. S. 231-251.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. Per. s angl. M.: Academia, 1999.
Boeva G. Transformatsiya fenomena stalkerstva v postsovetskom kul'turnom prostranstve // Stereotipy i natsional'nye sistemy tsennostey v mezhkul'turnoy kommunikatsii: Sb. statey. Vyp. 1 / Pod red. V. Shaydurova, A. Kiklevicha. SPb. – Ol'shtyn: Izd-vo Nevskogo in-ta yazyka i kul'tury, 2009. S. 149-156.
Golova T. Skvotery v Peterburge: praktika zakhvata i obraz zhizni // Molodezhnye dvizheniya i subkul'tury Sankt-Peterburga (sotsiologicheskiy i antropologicheskiy analiz) / Otv red. V.V. Kostyushev. SPb.: Norma, 1999. S. 128-153.
Gromov D.V. Subkul'tury bol'shogo goroda // Molodezhnye subkul'tury Moskvy / Sost. D.V. Gromov, otv. red. M.Yu. Martynova. M.: IEA RAN, 2009. S. 5-25.
Gurevich P.S. Subkul'tura // Kul'turologiya. KhKh vek. Entsiklopediya: v 2 t. / Pod red. S.Ya. Levita. T. 2. SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. S. 236-237.
Zdravomyslova E.A. Paradigmy zapadnoy sotsiologii obshchestvennykh dvizheniy. SPb.: Nauka, 1993.
Zdravomyslova E.A. Sotsiologiya obshchestvennykh dvizheniy – stanovlenie novogo napravleniya // Sotsiologiya v Rossii / Pod red. V.A. Yadova. M.: Izd-vo IS RAN, 1998.
Myalo K. Pod znamenem bunta. (Ocherki po istorii i psikhologii molodezhnogo protesta 1950-1970-kh godov). M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1985.
Omel'chenko E.L. Molodezhnye kul'tury i subkul'tury. M.: Izd-vo IS RAN, 2000.
O’Khara K. Filosofiya panka: Bol'she chem shum. Per. s angl. M.: Nota-R, 2008.
Sergeev V.K. Molodezhnaya subkul'tura v usloviyakh megapolisa. M.: INFRA-M, 2003.
Sokolov M. Subkul'turnoe izmerenie sotsial'nykh dvizheniy: kognitivnyy podkhod // Molodezhnye dvizheniya i subkul'tury Sankt-Peterburga (sotsiologicheskiy i antropologicheskiy analiz) / Otv red. V.V. Kostyushev. SPb.: Norma, 1999. S. 9-23.
Sultanova M.A. Kontrkul'tura – tip tsennostnogo radikalizma (Vudstoku 40 let – kakovy itogi?) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. № 8. 2009. S. 9-18.
Sultanova M.A. Filosofiya kul'tury Teodora Rozzaka: (Ocherk filosofskoy publitsistiki). M.: IF RAN, 2005.
Toffler E. Shok budushchego. Per. s angl. M.: OOO «Izd-vo AST», 2002.
Shevelev E. Gorod (bez) cheloveka: praktiki osvoeniya pustykh i zabroshennykh prostranstv // Mikrourbanizm. Gorod v detalyakh / Sb. statey; pod otv. redaktsiey O. Brednikovoy, O. Zaporozhets. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. S. 43-63.
Khiz Dzh., Potter E. Bunt na prodazhu. Per. s angl. M.: Izd-vo «Dobraya kniga», 2007.
Ferguson M. The Aquarian Conspiracy: Personal and Social Transformation in the 1980’s. London-Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
Garrett B. L. Cracking the Paris Sarrières: Corporal Terror and Illicit Encounter // An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies. 2011. № 10 (2). P. 270-277.
Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: A Division of Random House, 1961.
Reich Ch. The Greening of America. New York: Random House, 1970.
Roszak Th. The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, 1969. P. XII.
Roszak Th. Where the Wasteland Ends: Politics and Transcendence in Postindustrial Society. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, 1972.
Stevens J. Storming Heaven: LSD and the American Dream. New York: Grove Press, 1998.

Аннотация: The purpose of the present research article is to provide a critical evaluation of John Rawls’ theory of justice. The first part of the article is devoted to the main tasks and goals set by John Rawls at the moment of him writing his main work as well as the description of John Rawls’ method of ‘reflective equilibrium’. The second part of the article is aimed at studying arguments used by Rawls when proving his principles of justice, from intuitive arguments to Ralws’ attempt to revive the social contract. The third part of the article is focused on criticizing weak points in Rawls’ theory. In his research the author uses the method called ‘constructive interpretation’ offered by Ronald Dworkin. The goal of this method is to present a subject under research from the best side in order to increase the efficiency of expected criticizing. The present article is devoted to the critical review of one of the most powerful theories of justice that have been created lately. Today this theory of justice is taken by the majority as common sense. The goal of the author is to prove that Rawls’ theory does not quite follow the principles that were developed based on that theory.

Ключевые слова: justice, Rawls, social contract, reflective equilibrium, Dworkin, freedom, equality, principles, social inequality, natural inequality.

Контактная информация: Churnosov Ivan Mikhailovich, 123995, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya — Kudrinskaya 9.

Библиография:
Dworkin, R. “A matter of principle”, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985
Kymlicka, W. “Contemporary political philosophy an introduction”, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press
Rawls, J. “The Basic structure as subject”, in Goldman, A. and Kim, J.”Values and Morals”, 1978
Rawls, J. “A theory of Justice”, revised edition, the Belknap press of Harvard university press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England, 1999
Ross, A. “On Law and justice”, London, 1974
Dworkin, R. “Taking rights seriously”, Duckworth, London, 1977
Parkhomenko R.N. Diskursivnaya kontseptsiya svobody Khabermasa // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 117 - 148. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.4.170. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_170.html
R.N. Parkhomenko Yu. Khabermas o ponyatii idei svobody // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 641 - 648. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.13.
G.Yu. Kanarsh Teoriya spravedlivosti v zerkale
natsional'nogo kharaktera (o nekotorykh
zapadnykh i rossiyskikh osobennostyakh moral'nogo myshleniya). // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 11. - C. 93 - 102.

References (transliteration):
Dworkin, R. “A matter of principle”, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985
Kymlicka, W. “Contemporary political philosophy an introduction”, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press
Rawls, J. “The Basic structure as subject”, in Goldman, A. and Kim, J.”Values and Morals”, 1978
Rawls, J. “A theory of Justice”, revised edition, the Belknap press of Harvard university press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England, 1999
Ross, A. “On Law and justice”, London, 1974
Dworkin, R. “Taking rights seriously”, Duckworth, London, 1977
Parkhomenko R.N. Diskursivnaya kontseptsiya svobody Khabermasa // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 117 - 148. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.4.170. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_170.html
R.N. Parkhomenko Yu. Khabermas o ponyatii idei svobody // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 641 - 648. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.13.
G.Yu. Kanarsh Teoriya spravedlivosti v zerkale
natsional'nogo kharaktera (o nekotorykh
zapadnykh i rossiyskikh osobennostyakh moral'nogo myshleniya). // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 11. - C. 93 - 102.

Аннотация: Today society is the target of different social and humanitarian researches studying this or that aspect of social development. Meanwhile, science studies different types of societies and defines their special features and regular patters of functioning. The author of the present research article focuses o the cultural nature of the society and problems of socio-cultural determination of the social development. The main question of the article is ‘If there is a society, then what kind of society is it?’. The author offers the following answer to this question: this is the type of ‘culturally prepared’ society that is limited only to social functions and meanings. The systems approach to studying socio-cultural phenomena and processes allow to trace the relation between society and culture. The author of the article also describes different types of society and social development from the point of view of their ‘sociality’ and socio-cultural dynamics. The author stresses out that social determination cannot be the preferred direction of the development of societies. The main trend in their development should be connected with the processes of cultural dynamics. The main conclusion is that the modern reality forms the ‘culturally prepared’ type of society and the type of society that is being formed in the process of exchange of cultural meanings and codes between different generations of culture bearers.

Ключевые слова: society, culture, multiculturalism, civil society, community, cultural dynamics socio-cultural processes, social studies of life, cultural system, social development.

Контактная информация: Popov Evgeny Alexandrovich, 656049, Russia, Barnaul, pr. Lenina 61.

Библиография:
Gudkov L.D. Sotsiologiya kul'tury: nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor tematicheskogo nomera «Kel'nskogo zhurnala po sotsiologii i sotsial'noy psikhologii» // Kul'turologiya: Daydzhest. M., 2012. № 1 (60).
Gurevich P.S. Problemy elity nashego vremeni // Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo: sbornik statey. Vyp. 5 / pod red. Kolesnikovoy O.N., Popova E.A. Barnaul, 2013.
Zaslavskaya M.I. Mezhdistsiplinarnaya paradigma v svete perspektiv razvitiya sovremennoy sotsiologii // Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo: sbornik statey. Vyp. 5 / pod red. Kolesnikovoy O.N., Popova E.A. Barnaul, 2013.
Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe. Tom I: Filosofiya kul'tury. M., 1996.
Ivanov D.V. Etapy evolyutsii sotsiologii i dominantnye tipy teoretizirovaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 9.
Losev A.F. Strast' k dialektike. M., 1990.
Mikhaylenok O.M., Malysheva G.A. Politicheskaya modernizatsiya v diskurse o perspektivakh razvitiya Rossii // Sots.-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2012. № 5.
Moskvichev L.N. Etapy institutsionalizatsii rossiyskoy sotsiologii // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2006. № 7.
Orlova O.V. Ponyatie i predposylki vozniknoveniya i razvitiya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2013. № 7.
Osin V.N. Obshchepriznannye sotsial'nye tsennosti (svoboda, pravo, prava i svobody, gosudarstvo) i pravovoy mentalitet // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 9.
Pogrebnyak A.A., Raskov D.E. Ekonomika kak kul'tura: vozvrashchenie k «sporu o metodakh» // Obshchestv. nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 2.
Popov E.A. Diversifikatsiya sotsiogumanitarnogo znaniya: smysly sotsial'nogo i apologiya supersotsial'nogo // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2012. № 11.
Popov E.A. Kul'tura i dukhovnaya zhizn' cheloveka i obshchestva v sisteme sovremennogo sotsiologicheskogo znaniya i v usloviyakh rossiysko-aziatskogo polikul'turnogo vzaimodeystviya: monografiya. Barnaul, 2013.
Sledzevskiy I.V. Mul'tikul'turalizm: khrupkiy balans mezhdu integratsiey i dezintegratsiey // Obshchestv. nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 2.
Smirnov I.P. Istoriya mysli – istoriya filosofii: problema differentsiatsii // Filosofskie nauki. 2013. № 4.
Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo: sbornik statey. Vyp. 5 / pod red. Kolesnikovoy O.N., Popova E.A. Barnaul, 2013.
Shevchenko V.N. O perspektivakh reformirovaniya rossiyskogo gosudarstva: sovremennye diskussii v nauke i za ee predelami // Filosofskie nauki. 2013. № 7.
Shtompka P. Desyat' tezisov o statuse sotsiologii v neravnom mire // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 9.
Shcherbina V.V. Sushchestvuet li segodnya nauka sotsiologiya? // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2012. № 8.

References (transliteration):
Gudkov L.D. Sotsiologiya kul'tury: nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor tematicheskogo nomera «Kel'nskogo zhurnala po sotsiologii i sotsial'noy psikhologii» // Kul'turologiya: Daydzhest. M., 2012. № 1 (60).
Gurevich P.S. Problemy elity nashego vremeni // Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo: sbornik statey. Vyp. 5 / pod red. Kolesnikovoy O.N., Popova E.A. Barnaul, 2013.
Zaslavskaya M.I. Mezhdistsiplinarnaya paradigma v svete perspektiv razvitiya sovremennoy sotsiologii // Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo: sbornik statey. Vyp. 5 / pod red. Kolesnikovoy O.N., Popova E.A. Barnaul, 2013.
Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe. Tom I: Filosofiya kul'tury. M., 1996.
Ivanov D.V. Etapy evolyutsii sotsiologii i dominantnye tipy teoretizirovaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 9.
Losev A.F. Strast' k dialektike. M., 1990.
Mikhaylenok O.M., Malysheva G.A. Politicheskaya modernizatsiya v diskurse o perspektivakh razvitiya Rossii // Sots.-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2012. № 5.
Moskvichev L.N. Etapy institutsionalizatsii rossiyskoy sotsiologii // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2006. № 7.
Orlova O.V. Ponyatie i predposylki vozniknoveniya i razvitiya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2013. № 7.
Osin V.N. Obshchepriznannye sotsial'nye tsennosti (svoboda, pravo, prava i svobody, gosudarstvo) i pravovoy mentalitet // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 9.
Pogrebnyak A.A., Raskov D.E. Ekonomika kak kul'tura: vozvrashchenie k «sporu o metodakh» // Obshchestv. nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 2.
Popov E.A. Diversifikatsiya sotsiogumanitarnogo znaniya: smysly sotsial'nogo i apologiya supersotsial'nogo // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2012. № 11.
Popov E.A. Kul'tura i dukhovnaya zhizn' cheloveka i obshchestva v sisteme sovremennogo sotsiologicheskogo znaniya i v usloviyakh rossiysko-aziatskogo polikul'turnogo vzaimodeystviya: monografiya. Barnaul, 2013.
Sledzevskiy I.V. Mul'tikul'turalizm: khrupkiy balans mezhdu integratsiey i dezintegratsiey // Obshchestv. nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 2.
Smirnov I.P. Istoriya mysli – istoriya filosofii: problema differentsiatsii // Filosofskie nauki. 2013. № 4.
Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo: sbornik statey. Vyp. 5 / pod red. Kolesnikovoy O.N., Popova E.A. Barnaul, 2013.
Shevchenko V.N. O perspektivakh reformirovaniya rossiyskogo gosudarstva: sovremennye diskussii v nauke i za ee predelami // Filosofskie nauki. 2013. № 7.
Shtompka P. Desyat' tezisov o statuse sotsiologii v neravnom mire // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 9.
Shcherbina V.V. Sushchestvuet li segodnya nauka sotsiologiya? // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2012. № 8.

Аннотация: The present article continues the discussion of historical and cultural peculiarities of the genesis of Russian entrepreneurship at different levels of the business-government-society relations. In the previous article, the authors viewed the reasons of disharmony between entrepreneurship and political authority. Based on the analysis of rich historical materials, the authors prove the Russian government itself creates certain obstacles for the development of private enterprises. In pre-revolutionary Russia, the close connection between entrepreneurship and state authority had rather questionable consequences. The main target of the economic strategy and the main success criterion was the absorption of someone else’s property instead of establishment and efficient management of one’s own property. Excess richness and power at certain periods of Russian history created obstacles for formation of self-identity of the Russian entrepreneurial class in general. The problem of formation and development of the Russian model of relations between business and government can be well understood through the analysis of particular cases by using the integrated cultural and historical approach. This approach involves the system method, i.e. viewing entrepreneurship as a part of a big institutional and socio-cultural system. The problem is being analyzed at the two levels, the level of the ‘reality’ and the level of the ‘actual practice’. The archaic form of government, the institution of support, defined the development of entrepreneurship. Formation of some kind of ‘incomplete property’ even of the major Russian entrepreneurs, dependence of economic agents on the government and government as the main access to resources significantly slow down the processes of social, economic and political development of the society.

Ключевые слова: Russia, government, entrepreneurship, institutional trap, patrimonialism, political capitalism, government, property, culture, society.

Контактная информация: Aleynikov Andrey Viktorovich, 199034, Russia, St. Petersburg, Mendeleevskaya linia 5.

Библиография:
Solov'ev V.R. Putin. Putevoditel' dlya nerav¬nodushnykh. M.:«EKSMO», 2008.
Struve P.B. Patriotica. Politika. Kul'tura. Religiya. Sotsializm. SPb., 1911.
Payps R.Rossiya pri starom rezhime. M.: «Zakharov»,2012.
Trudy po rossievedeniyu.M.:RAN.INION,2009,vyp.2.
Radaev V.V.Dva kornya rossiyskogo predprinimatel'stva: fragmenty istorii//Mir Rossii,1995,№1.
Rozanov V.V. Uedinennoe. [Elektronnyy resurs] // Biblioteka russkoy religioznoy filosofskoy i khudozhestvennoy literatury «Vekhi» URL:http://www.vehi.net/rozanov/(data obrashcheniya: 04.12.2012).
Pompeev Yu.A. Istoriya i filosofiya otechestvennogo predprinimatel'stva. SPb:Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet kul'tury i iskusstv ,2003.
Pososhkov I.T. Kniga o skudosti i bogatstve.M.:Sotsekgiz,1937.
Pivovarov Yu.S. “…I v razvalinakh vek”//Polis,2011,№6.
Petrov Yu. Predprinimateli i rossiyskoe obshchestvo v nachale XX veka // Svobodnaya mysl'..1992. № 17.
Khirshman A.O. Vykhod, golos i vernost': Reaktsiya na upadok firm, organizatsiy i gosudarstv .M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2009
Pashin V.P., Bogdanov S.V. Ot kommunarii k bezrabotitse. Gosudarstvo i trudovye resursy v Rossii (konets Kh1Kh-konets KhKh veka). Kursk, : KurskGTU ,2003.
Oleynik A.N. Vlast' i rynok: Sistema sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo gospodstva v Rossii «nulevykh» godov.M.:ROSSPEN, 2011.
Nort D., Uollis D., Vayngast B.Nasilie i sotsial'nye poryadki. Kontseptual'nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis'mennoy istorii chelovechestva. M.: Izd.Instituta Gaydara,2011.
Makarenko V.P.Nauchno-obyvatel'skoe znanie-intellektual'no-politicheskie mody.//Politicheskaya kontseptologiya,2009,№2.
May V.A. Reformy i dogmy. 1914–1929.Ocherki istorii stanovleniya khozyaystvennoy sistemy sovetskogo totalitarizma M.:Delo,1993.
Lukin A.V.,Lukin P.V.Ekonomicheskaya politika v postsovetskoy Rossii i rossiyskaya istoriya.//Polis,2011,№4.
Istoriya predprinimatel'stva v Rossii. Kn. 1. M.: ROSSPEN, 2000.
Kordonskiy S.G. Resursnoe gosudarstvo. M.:«REGNUM», 2007.
Zaytseva L.I. Pervyy russkiy ekonomist i myslitel'-Ivan Tikhonovich Pososhkov. M.: In-t ekonomiki Ros. akad. nauk,1995.
Gor'kiy M.Savva Morozov . [Elektronnyy resurs] // Maksim Gor'kiy URL: http://www.m-g-p.ru/index420f.html (data obrashcheniya: 04.12.2012).
Gogol' N.V. Mertvye dushi. [Elektronnyy resurs] // Fundamental'naya elektronnaya biblioteka «Russkaya literatura i fol'klor».URL:http://feb-web.ru/feb/gogol/texts/ps0/ps7/ps7-129-.htm( data obrashcheniya: 04.12.2012).
Buryshkin P.A. Moskva kupecheskaya. Memuary. M,:Stolitsa1990.
Veber M. O Rossii: izbrannoe. M.: ROSSPEN, 2007.
Vitte S.Yu. O polozhenii nashey promyshlennosti. Vsepoddanneyshiy doklad ministra finansov.// Istorik-marksist, 1932, № 2/3.
Baryshnikov M.N. Politika i predprinimatel'stvo v Rossii (iz storii vzaimodeystviya v nachale KhKh veka).. SPb. : Nestor, , 1997.
Anisimov E.V. Rossiya v seredine XVIII veka. Bor'ba za nasledie Petra. M.:Mysl',1986.
Afanas'ev M.N. Klientelizm i rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost'. M.: Moskovskiy obshchestvennyy nauchnyy fond, 2000.

References (transliteration):
Solov'ev V.R. Putin. Putevoditel' dlya nerav¬nodushnykh. M.:«EKSMO», 2008.
Struve P.B. Patriotica. Politika. Kul'tura. Religiya. Sotsializm. SPb., 1911.
Payps R.Rossiya pri starom rezhime. M.: «Zakharov»,2012.
Trudy po rossievedeniyu.M.:RAN.INION,2009,vyp.2.
Radaev V.V.Dva kornya rossiyskogo predprinimatel'stva: fragmenty istorii//Mir Rossii,1995,№1.
Rozanov V.V. Uedinennoe. [Elektronnyy resurs] // Biblioteka russkoy religioznoy filosofskoy i khudozhestvennoy literatury «Vekhi» URL:http://www.vehi.net/rozanov/(data obrashcheniya: 04.12.2012).
Pompeev Yu.A. Istoriya i filosofiya otechestvennogo predprinimatel'stva. SPb:Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet kul'tury i iskusstv ,2003.
Pososhkov I.T. Kniga o skudosti i bogatstve.M.:Sotsekgiz,1937.
Pivovarov Yu.S. “…I v razvalinakh vek”//Polis,2011,№6.
Petrov Yu. Predprinimateli i rossiyskoe obshchestvo v nachale XX veka // Svobodnaya mysl'..1992. № 17.
Khirshman A.O. Vykhod, golos i vernost': Reaktsiya na upadok firm, organizatsiy i gosudarstv .M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2009
Pashin V.P., Bogdanov S.V. Ot kommunarii k bezrabotitse. Gosudarstvo i trudovye resursy v Rossii (konets Kh1Kh-konets KhKh veka). Kursk, : KurskGTU ,2003.
Oleynik A.N. Vlast' i rynok: Sistema sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo gospodstva v Rossii «nulevykh» godov.M.:ROSSPEN, 2011.
Nort D., Uollis D., Vayngast B.Nasilie i sotsial'nye poryadki. Kontseptual'nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis'mennoy istorii chelovechestva. M.: Izd.Instituta Gaydara,2011.
Makarenko V.P.Nauchno-obyvatel'skoe znanie-intellektual'no-politicheskie mody.//Politicheskaya kontseptologiya,2009,№2.
May V.A. Reformy i dogmy. 1914–1929.Ocherki istorii stanovleniya khozyaystvennoy sistemy sovetskogo totalitarizma M.:Delo,1993.
Lukin A.V.,Lukin P.V.Ekonomicheskaya politika v postsovetskoy Rossii i rossiyskaya istoriya.//Polis,2011,№4.
Istoriya predprinimatel'stva v Rossii. Kn. 1. M.: ROSSPEN, 2000.
Kordonskiy S.G. Resursnoe gosudarstvo. M.:«REGNUM», 2007.
Zaytseva L.I. Pervyy russkiy ekonomist i myslitel'-Ivan Tikhonovich Pososhkov. M.: In-t ekonomiki Ros. akad. nauk,1995.
Gor'kiy M.Savva Morozov . [Elektronnyy resurs] // Maksim Gor'kiy URL: http://www.m-g-p.ru/index420f.html (data obrashcheniya: 04.12.2012).
Gogol' N.V. Mertvye dushi. [Elektronnyy resurs] // Fundamental'naya elektronnaya biblioteka «Russkaya literatura i fol'klor».URL:http://feb-web.ru/feb/gogol/texts/ps0/ps7/ps7-129-.htm( data obrashcheniya: 04.12.2012).
Buryshkin P.A. Moskva kupecheskaya. Memuary. M,:Stolitsa1990.
Veber M. O Rossii: izbrannoe. M.: ROSSPEN, 2007.
Vitte S.Yu. O polozhenii nashey promyshlennosti. Vsepoddanneyshiy doklad ministra finansov.// Istorik-marksist, 1932, № 2/3.
Baryshnikov M.N. Politika i predprinimatel'stvo v Rossii (iz storii vzaimodeystviya v nachale KhKh veka).. SPb. : Nestor, , 1997.
Anisimov E.V. Rossiya v seredine XVIII veka. Bor'ba za nasledie Petra. M.:Mysl',1986.
Afanas'ev M.N. Klientelizm i rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost'. M.: Moskovskiy obshchestvennyy nauchnyy fond, 2000.