Аннотация: The subject of this research is the social-labor sphere, and the objects is the controversial trends in labor relations under the influence of the global sensory culture. The author demonstrates that labor as the integral social institution deflects the accumulated in society controversies, reveals their nature and genesis. It is illustrated that labor is able to raise the spirit and mood of the time, value dominants, prevailing behavioral orientations within it, as well as better understand the behavior of the subject of history, regardless of whether a person is involved into the labor relations or not. The author leans on the methodology of sociocultural fluctuations, which allows establishing the correlation between the dominant values and status of the social institutions. The main conclusion consists in the following: social form of labor at the current point in development of the society, which primarily reflects the values, ideals, and stereotypes of the behavior of sensory culture, is not adequate to the challenges of time or capable of resolving the pressing issue of present time: productive employment of population.

Ключевые слова: attitudes, values, contradictions, employment, sociocultural developmen, sensory culture, social-labor relations, labor, economy, ideals

Библиография:
Il'enkov E.V. Ob esteticheskoy prirode fantazii. Chto tam, v Zazerkal'e? / E.V. Il'enkov. M.: LIBROKOM, 2011. 128 s.
Raynert, E.S. Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi / E.S. Raynert. M. : Izd. Dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2015. 384 s.
Raykh R.B. Posleshok. Ekonomika budushchego / Robert B. Raykh. M.: Kar'era Press, 2012. 208 s.
Okol'skaya L.A. Trudovye tsennosti i normy v soderzhanii uchebnikov dlya nachal'noy shkoly: segodnya i 20 let nazad / L.A. Okol'skaya // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2007. № 2. S. 68-85.
Moyo Dambisa. Kak pogib Zapad. 50 let ekonomicheskoy nedal'novidnosti i surovyy vybor vperedi / Dambisa Moyo. M.: ZAO Izdatel'stvo Tsentrpoligraf, 2012. 287 s.
Markuze G. Eros i tsivilizatsiya. Odnomernyy chelovek / G. Markuze. M.: AST, 2003. 528 s.
Semenov V.E. Tsennostnye orientatsii sovremennoy molodezhi / V.E. Semenov // Sotsis. 2007. № 4. S. 37-43.
Berdyaev N.A. Dukhovnye osnovy russkoy revolyutsii / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: AST, 2006. 444 s.
Bodriyyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konets sotsial'nogo / Zh. Bodriyyar. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2000. 96 s.
Astaf'ev P.E. Filosofiya natsii i edinstvo mirovozzreniya / P.E. Astaf'ev. M., 2000. 538 s.

References (transliteration):
Il'enkov E.V. Ob esteticheskoy prirode fantazii. Chto tam, v Zazerkal'e? / E.V. Il'enkov. M.: LIBROKOM, 2011. 128 s.
Raynert, E.S. Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi / E.S. Raynert. M. : Izd. Dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2015. 384 s.
Raykh R.B. Posleshok. Ekonomika budushchego / Robert B. Raykh. M.: Kar'era Press, 2012. 208 s.
Okol'skaya L.A. Trudovye tsennosti i normy v soderzhanii uchebnikov dlya nachal'noy shkoly: segodnya i 20 let nazad / L.A. Okol'skaya // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2007. № 2. S. 68-85.
Moyo Dambisa. Kak pogib Zapad. 50 let ekonomicheskoy nedal'novidnosti i surovyy vybor vperedi / Dambisa Moyo. M.: ZAO Izdatel'stvo Tsentrpoligraf, 2012. 287 s.
Markuze G. Eros i tsivilizatsiya. Odnomernyy chelovek / G. Markuze. M.: AST, 2003. 528 s.
Semenov V.E. Tsennostnye orientatsii sovremennoy molodezhi / V.E. Semenov // Sotsis. 2007. № 4. S. 37-43.
Berdyaev N.A. Dukhovnye osnovy russkoy revolyutsii / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: AST, 2006. 444 s.
Bodriyyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konets sotsial'nogo / Zh. Bodriyyar. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2000. 96 s.
Astaf'ev P.E. Filosofiya natsii i edinstvo mirovozzreniya / P.E. Astaf'ev. M., 2000. 538 s.

Аннотация: The discussion of cultural pluralities causes difficulties in cultural philosophy, as well as philosophical anthropology, because the ontological status of plurality eludes the explaining and understanding examination. In such case, the criticism remains comprehensible. The positive interpretation will be considered accomplished, if concentrate on the boundaries of cultural pluralities. Explication of the phenomenon of boundary in the space of cultural pluralities is associated with understanding of interrelation between the sacral and technical spaces. They are subject to examination in the post-historical horizon, which change the ontological status of their boundary if compared to the classical culture. The two given by Aristotle fundamental definitions of boundary (boundary as differentiation-synthesis and boundary-limit) transform the connection between the technique and sacral into the hybrid unity. The scientific novelty consists in the attempt of a positive review of the cultural pluralities, formed by the intersection of sacral and technical spaces within modern culture. Such original spaces require the determination of a specific scale of their analysis. As the scale and simultaneously mechanism of the analysis, the author uses the concept of boundary. The work provides the description of a number of phenomenological signs of the boundary between the sacral and technical.

Ключевые слова: Post-apocalypse, Post-history, Technical, Sacral, Cultural plurality, Plurality, Machine and apparatus, Ontological status of the boundary, Phenomenology of the boundary, Boundary

Библиография:
Steinbock A. Limit-Phenomena and the Liminality of Experience. Thopos. 2009. no 2-3, pp. 192-213.
Aristotle. Metaphysics. M.: Exmo. 2006. 608p.
Nancy J.-L. Being Singular Plural. Mn.: Logvinov. 2004. 272p.
Gehlen A. On Cultural Crystallization (electronic book) Available at: socionavtika.narod.ru/Staty/Methodologos/gelen1.htm (accessed 17 January 2016)
Bultmann R. History and Eschatology: The Presence of Eternity. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatcia». 2012. 208p.
Bibikhin V. The philosophy language. M.: Yazyki slavianskoy kultury. 2002. 416p.
Agamben G. The Open: Man and Animal. M.: RSUH. 2012. 112p.
Kassung Ch. The device-is not a hock. Logos. no 1(74). 2010. pp. 164-172.
Marion J.-L. The Idol and Distance. Symbol. no 56. 2009. pp. 1-290.
Bataille G. Inner Experience. SPb.: Axioma, Mythril. 1997. 336p.
Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. M.: Ves Mir. 2003. 416p.
Zenkin S. Undivine sacred: Theory and artistic practice. M.: RSUH. 2012. 537p.
Samsonow E. Body, machine and art. Interview with Prof. Elisbeth von Samsonov. Chora. no 1-2. 2010. pp. 150-156.
Foucault M. Intellectuals and power. Selected Political articles, speeches and interviews. M.: Praxis. 2006. 320p.
Kris Kuksi official site (electronic resource) Available at: http://kuksi.com/ (accessed 15 January 2016).
Estetico (electronic journal) Available at: estetico.me/posts/view/mrachnyj-assambljazh (accessed 15 January 2016).

References (transliteration):
Steinbock A. Limit-Phenomena and the Liminality of Experience. Thopos. 2009. no 2-3, pp. 192-213.
Aristotle. Metaphysics. M.: Exmo. 2006. 608p.
Nancy J.-L. Being Singular Plural. Mn.: Logvinov. 2004. 272p.
Gehlen A. On Cultural Crystallization (electronic book) Available at: socionavtika.narod.ru/Staty/Methodologos/gelen1.htm (accessed 17 January 2016)
Bultmann R. History and Eschatology: The Presence of Eternity. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatcia». 2012. 208p.
Bibikhin V. The philosophy language. M.: Yazyki slavianskoy kultury. 2002. 416p.
Agamben G. The Open: Man and Animal. M.: RSUH. 2012. 112p.
Kassung Ch. The device-is not a hock. Logos. no 1(74). 2010. pp. 164-172.
Marion J.-L. The Idol and Distance. Symbol. no 56. 2009. pp. 1-290.
Bataille G. Inner Experience. SPb.: Axioma, Mythril. 1997. 336p.
Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. M.: Ves Mir. 2003. 416p.
Zenkin S. Undivine sacred: Theory and artistic practice. M.: RSUH. 2012. 537p.
Samsonow E. Body, machine and art. Interview with Prof. Elisbeth von Samsonov. Chora. no 1-2. 2010. pp. 150-156.
Foucault M. Intellectuals and power. Selected Political articles, speeches and interviews. M.: Praxis. 2006. 320p.
Kris Kuksi official site (electronic resource) Available at: http://kuksi.com/ (accessed 15 January 2016).
Estetico (electronic journal) Available at: estetico.me/posts/view/mrachnyj-assambljazh (accessed 15 January 2016).

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the memory as a part of public consciousness. The article examines its formations on the example of the works of one of the most renowned poets of the Soviet era Vladimir Mayakovsky. The author raises the question, how objectively does the poet reflect the historical reality, social phenomena, and events in his poetic ideas? We must acknowledge that the latest generations often base their perception about the revolution on his oeuvres and assessment of the events, and thus form their own. The main conclusion of the conducted research consists in the following: the topics, precise storylines, and created images in Mayakovsky’ poetry in best case scenario have emerged based on the slogans and promises, which accompanied the revolutionary October. The further practice of the Bolshevik reformations was far from the, and at times antithetical. However, the poet preferred not noticing it, having lived his life with wide shut.

Ключевые слова: Man, Public consciousness, People, Power, Philosophy of culture, History, Culture, Poetry, Literature, Memory

Библиография:
Repina L.P. Pamyat' o proshlom kak yabloko razdora, ili Eshche raz o (mezh)distsiplinarnosti // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. № 1. C. 25-32. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.01.3.
Antonova E.M. Ad Libitum: Filosofiya i poeziya. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2011. № 2. C. 24-29.
Tsvetaeva Marina. Polnoe sobranie poezii, prozy, dramaturgii v odnom tome. M.: AL'FA-KNIGA, 2010. 1314 c.
Chelyapov I. Pochemu partiya provodila politiku voennogo kommunizma. M.: «Gospolitizdat», 1959. C. 18-20.
Sovetskie khudozhestvennye fil'my. Annotirovannyy katalog. T. 1. M.: «Izdatel'stvo Iskusstvo», 1961. 527 s.
Mikhaylov Al. Mayakovskiy. ZhZL. M.: «Molodaya gvardiya», 1988. 558 c.
Nikol'skiy S.A Agrarnyy kurs Rossii. Mirovozzrenie reformatorov i praktika agrarnykh reform v sotsial'no-istoricheskom, ekonomicheskom i filosofskom kontekstakh. M: «KolosS», 2003. 375 c.
Mayakovskiy Vladimir. Polnoe sobranie stikhotvoreniy, poem i p'es v odnom tome. M.: Al'fa-kniga, 2011. 1327 c.
Mandel'shtam Osip. Polnoe sobranie poezii i prozy v odnom tome. M.: AL'FA-KNIGA, 2010. 1182 c.
Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. M.: «Izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury», 1970. T. 44. C. 157-159; 472-473.
Kantor K.M. Trinadtsatyy apostol. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2008. 368 c.
Larin Yu., Kritsman L. Ocherk khozyaystvennoy zhizni i organizatsiya narodnogo khozyaystva Sovetskoy Rossii. M.: (bez izdatel'stva), 1920. C. 14-15.
Esipov Valeriy. Chto zaveshchal Lenin i chto – Shalamov? // http://shalamov.ru/ru/critique/152/
Istoriya Rossii. KhKh vek. T. 1. 1894-1939. M.: Astrel': AST, 2009. 1023 c.
Davydov M.I. Bor'ba za khleb. M.: «Mysl'», 1971. 219 c.
Gural'nik U.A. Russkaya literatura i sovetskoe kino. Ekranizatsiya klassicheskoy prozy kak literaturovedcheskaya problema. M.: «Nauka», 1968. 431 c.
Bykov Dmitriy. Trinadtsatyy apostol. Mayakovskiy. Tragediya-buff v shesti deystviyakh. M.: «Molodaya gvardiya», 2016. 827 c.
Vyshinskiy A. Tseli i zadachi gosudarstvennogo plana snabzheniya // Chetyre goda prodovol'stvennoy raboty. M.: (bez izdatel'stva), 1922. C. 60-61.
Bykov Dmitriy. Boris Pasternak. ZhZL. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2006. 893 c.
Bibikhin V.V. Grammatika poezii. Novoe russkoe slovo. SPb.: «Izdatel'stvo Ivana Limbakha», 2009. 590 c.
Bakhtin M.M. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 5. M.: «Russkie slovari», 1997. 731 c.
Anninskiy Lev. Krasnyy vek. Epokha i ee poety. T. 1. M.: «PROZAiK», 2009. 429 c.
Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. 504 c.

References (transliteration):
Repina L.P. Pamyat' o proshlom kak yabloko razdora, ili Eshche raz o (mezh)distsiplinarnosti // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. № 1. C. 25-32. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.01.3.
Antonova E.M. Ad Libitum: Filosofiya i poeziya. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2011. № 2. C. 24-29.
Tsvetaeva Marina. Polnoe sobranie poezii, prozy, dramaturgii v odnom tome. M.: AL'FA-KNIGA, 2010. 1314 c.
Chelyapov I. Pochemu partiya provodila politiku voennogo kommunizma. M.: «Gospolitizdat», 1959. C. 18-20.
Sovetskie khudozhestvennye fil'my. Annotirovannyy katalog. T. 1. M.: «Izdatel'stvo Iskusstvo», 1961. 527 s.
Mikhaylov Al. Mayakovskiy. ZhZL. M.: «Molodaya gvardiya», 1988. 558 c.
Nikol'skiy S.A Agrarnyy kurs Rossii. Mirovozzrenie reformatorov i praktika agrarnykh reform v sotsial'no-istoricheskom, ekonomicheskom i filosofskom kontekstakh. M: «KolosS», 2003. 375 c.
Mayakovskiy Vladimir. Polnoe sobranie stikhotvoreniy, poem i p'es v odnom tome. M.: Al'fa-kniga, 2011. 1327 c.
Mandel'shtam Osip. Polnoe sobranie poezii i prozy v odnom tome. M.: AL'FA-KNIGA, 2010. 1182 c.
Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. M.: «Izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury», 1970. T. 44. C. 157-159; 472-473.
Kantor K.M. Trinadtsatyy apostol. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2008. 368 c.
Larin Yu., Kritsman L. Ocherk khozyaystvennoy zhizni i organizatsiya narodnogo khozyaystva Sovetskoy Rossii. M.: (bez izdatel'stva), 1920. C. 14-15.
Esipov Valeriy. Chto zaveshchal Lenin i chto – Shalamov? // http://shalamov.ru/ru/critique/152/
Istoriya Rossii. KhKh vek. T. 1. 1894-1939. M.: Astrel': AST, 2009. 1023 c.
Davydov M.I. Bor'ba za khleb. M.: «Mysl'», 1971. 219 c.
Gural'nik U.A. Russkaya literatura i sovetskoe kino. Ekranizatsiya klassicheskoy prozy kak literaturovedcheskaya problema. M.: «Nauka», 1968. 431 c.
Bykov Dmitriy. Trinadtsatyy apostol. Mayakovskiy. Tragediya-buff v shesti deystviyakh. M.: «Molodaya gvardiya», 2016. 827 c.
Vyshinskiy A. Tseli i zadachi gosudarstvennogo plana snabzheniya // Chetyre goda prodovol'stvennoy raboty. M.: (bez izdatel'stva), 1922. C. 60-61.
Bykov Dmitriy. Boris Pasternak. ZhZL. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2006. 893 c.
Bibikhin V.V. Grammatika poezii. Novoe russkoe slovo. SPb.: «Izdatel'stvo Ivana Limbakha», 2009. 590 c.
Bakhtin M.M. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 5. M.: «Russkie slovari», 1997. 731 c.
Anninskiy Lev. Krasnyy vek. Epokha i ee poety. T. 1. M.: «PROZAiK», 2009. 429 c.
Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. 504 c.

Аннотация: The object of this research is the transformations that take place with the notion of “mass culture” in the era of total digitalization. The subject of this research is the ecosystem of Twitter microblogging network as the space for formation of the new sociocultural and communicative paradigms. The author gives special attention to the complex analysis of the approaches of various scientific schools towards the definition of “mass culture”, as well as subjects to a detailed examination the influence of the means of mass communication upon it. The article reviews such aspects of the topic as preservation of individuality in the digital communicative environment, trend towards establishment of the sociocultural clusters in digital environment, as well as transformation of mass culture into the mass of parallel cultures. The scientific novelty consists in the initial level of development of the topic of formation of a specific communication sociocultural ecosystem in the Twitter microblogging network. Author’s special contribution lies in the analysis of the Russian language segment of Twitter particularly in sociocultural context, because the scientific research of this phenomenon are mostly dedicated to the examination of the linguistic and philological aspects.

Ключевые слова: defragmentation, clusterization, cross-cultural communication, Twitter, mass communication, mass culture, microblogging, digitalization, media, culture

Библиография:
Owens T. “Digital Culture is Mass Culture”: An interview with Digital Conservator Dragan Espenschied. [Tekst] / T. Owens // Digital Preservation.-2014. (https://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2014/03/digital-culture-is-mass-culture-an-interview-with-digital-conservator-dragan-espenschied)
Bachi V., Fresa A., Pierotti C., Prandoni C. The Digitization Age: Mass Culture is Quality Culture. Challenges for cultural heritage and society // Promoter srl, 2014. (http://www.digitalmeetsculture.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/The-Digitization-Age-Mass-Culture-is-Quality-Culture.pdf)
Adam K. 'Twitterdammerung: the Twitter Opera' Debuts at the Royal Opera House. [Tekst] / K. Adam // The Washington Post.-2009. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/06/AR2009090602317.html)
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vosstanie mass [Tekst]: monografiya.-Moskva, 1991.-(http://lib.ru/FILOSOF/ORTEGA/ortega15.txt_with-big-pictures.html)
McLuhan M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man [Tekst]: monografiya.-University of Toronto Press, 2011. - s. 5
Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Gl. red. A. M. Prokhorov - Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. - M., SPb., 2000. S. 76.
Kartseva E.N. Massovaya kul'tura v SShA i problema lichnosti [Tekst]: monografiya. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1974. S. 10-14.
Petrov L.V. Massovaya kommunikatsiya i kul'tura [Tekst]: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filosofskikh nauk / L.V. Petrov. Leningradskiy ordena Druzhby narodov Gosudarstvennyy institut kul'tury im. N.K. Krupskoy. L., 1991. S. 3.
Ter-Minasova S.G. Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Tekst]: monografiya. M., 2000. S. 10.
Litvinova E.N. Massovaya kul'tura i massovaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennom informatsionnom prostranstve: k probleme vzaimodeystviya [Tekst ] / E.N. Litvinova // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2010. No 1. C. 197-198.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya / M.: Mysl', 2010. - T. 2 - 634 s.
V. V. Vanslov Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i kul'tura // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 27 - 33.
Dunyaeva M.M. Rol' i znachenie sredstv massovoy kommunikatsii v sovremennykh politicheskikh protsessakh // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 1. - C. 116 - 120. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.1.12017.
Do Museums Worldwide form a true Community on Twitter? // La Magnetica communications agency.-2014. (http://www.lamagnetica.com/twitter-museum-study/download/museums-worldwide-community-twitter.pdf)
Anderson C. The Long Tail. [Tekst] / C. Anderson // WIRED Magazine.-2004. (http://www.wired.com/2004/10/tail)
Kelly J., Barash V., Alexanyan K., Etling B., Faris R., Gasser U., Palfrey J. Mapping Russian Twitter // Berkman Center Research Publication.-No. 2012-3, 2012. (https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Mapping_Russian_Twitter_2012.pdf)

References (transliteration):
Owens T. “Digital Culture is Mass Culture”: An interview with Digital Conservator Dragan Espenschied. [Tekst] / T. Owens // Digital Preservation.-2014. (https://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2014/03/digital-culture-is-mass-culture-an-interview-with-digital-conservator-dragan-espenschied)
Bachi V., Fresa A., Pierotti C., Prandoni C. The Digitization Age: Mass Culture is Quality Culture. Challenges for cultural heritage and society // Promoter srl, 2014. (http://www.digitalmeetsculture.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/The-Digitization-Age-Mass-Culture-is-Quality-Culture.pdf)
Adam K. 'Twitterdammerung: the Twitter Opera' Debuts at the Royal Opera House. [Tekst] / K. Adam // The Washington Post.-2009. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/06/AR2009090602317.html)
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vosstanie mass [Tekst]: monografiya.-Moskva, 1991.-(http://lib.ru/FILOSOF/ORTEGA/ortega15.txt_with-big-pictures.html)
McLuhan M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man [Tekst]: monografiya.-University of Toronto Press, 2011. - s. 5
Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Gl. red. A. M. Prokhorov - Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. - M., SPb., 2000. S. 76.
Kartseva E.N. Massovaya kul'tura v SShA i problema lichnosti [Tekst]: monografiya. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1974. S. 10-14.
Petrov L.V. Massovaya kommunikatsiya i kul'tura [Tekst]: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filosofskikh nauk / L.V. Petrov. Leningradskiy ordena Druzhby narodov Gosudarstvennyy institut kul'tury im. N.K. Krupskoy. L., 1991. S. 3.
Ter-Minasova S.G. Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Tekst]: monografiya. M., 2000. S. 10.
Litvinova E.N. Massovaya kul'tura i massovaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennom informatsionnom prostranstve: k probleme vzaimodeystviya [Tekst ] / E.N. Litvinova // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2010. No 1. C. 197-198.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya / M.: Mysl', 2010. - T. 2 - 634 s.
V. V. Vanslov Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i kul'tura // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 27 - 33.
Dunyaeva M.M. Rol' i znachenie sredstv massovoy kommunikatsii v sovremennykh politicheskikh protsessakh // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 1. - C. 116 - 120. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.1.12017.
Do Museums Worldwide form a true Community on Twitter? // La Magnetica communications agency.-2014. (http://www.lamagnetica.com/twitter-museum-study/download/museums-worldwide-community-twitter.pdf)
Anderson C. The Long Tail. [Tekst] / C. Anderson // WIRED Magazine.-2004. (http://www.wired.com/2004/10/tail)
Kelly J., Barash V., Alexanyan K., Etling B., Faris R., Gasser U., Palfrey J. Mapping Russian Twitter // Berkman Center Research Publication.-No. 2012-3, 2012. (https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Mapping_Russian_Twitter_2012.pdf)

Аннотация: In the current situation, it seems difficult to identify the underground culture of the Russian regions. At the same time, the underground culture is active and simultaneously coexists with the officially established by the cultural policy vector. Shifting away from the usual division of the "official/unofficial", the focus in determination of the underground culture was being switched onto spatial-timely perception of the modern representatives of the underground culture of Russian regions. This work used the methods of bibliographical analysis of the texts and scientific materials in the area of the underground art, deduction of the presented terminology, and based on this, synthesis of the new definition of the “underground” pertaining to the Russian regional culture as a whole. The author comes to a conclusion that the notion of “timelessness” in situation of the “era of transformation” becomes one of the defining aspects of the term “underground culture”, while the modern representative of the underground culture “goes into shadows” due to a strong persuasion that he is not capable of changing anything within the timely paradigm; however, the regional difference will consists just in the traditional understanding of time.  

Ключевые слова: philosophy of culture, chronotope of the modernity, underground, cultural marginality, cultural and historical memory, culture of Russian regions, cultural policy, theory of culture, casual culture, underground culture

Библиография:
Bober Zh. Kul'turnaya marginal'nost' i ee mesto v razvitii kul'tury. Vestnik Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im. A.S.Pushkina. № 4, 2009g. S. 136-143
Zhitenev A.A. Al'ternativnye modeli vremeni v samosoznanii «neofitsial'noy» kul'tury. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (Moskva). № 135, 2015g. S. 279-288.
Yankovskaya G.A. Sovremennoe iskusstvo v Permi: ustnye istorii. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Vypusk 2(14), 2010g. S. 116-124.

References (transliteration):
Bober Zh. Kul'turnaya marginal'nost' i ee mesto v razvitii kul'tury. Vestnik Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im. A.S.Pushkina. № 4, 2009g. S. 136-143
Zhitenev A.A. Al'ternativnye modeli vremeni v samosoznanii «neofitsial'noy» kul'tury. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (Moskva). № 135, 2015g. S. 279-288.
Yankovskaya G.A. Sovremennoe iskusstvo v Permi: ustnye istorii. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Vypusk 2(14), 2010g. S. 116-124.

Аннотация: The object of this research is the religious culture and peculiarities of its implementation within the framework of such essential components as value, creative work, and freedom. The subject is the creative process and hierarchy of values in a specific form of their existence in the context of this type of culture. Creative work and value are examined as the fundamental components of culture as a whole and religious culture in particular. The author demonstrates the conditionality of the creative and value components of religious culture by the religious faith. Religious work in Christianity is represented in two of its varieties the divine and the human, the common essence of which is marked as the nearing of the divine and the human, their correlation based on the New Testament axiom “in His image and His likeness”. In creative process, a human who continues the work of the Creator, expands the limits of the being he is accustomed to, and determines the anthropomorphical essences of “universal doing”. The values of religious culture are imperative and ostensive, but can also have an axiological form of “eternal and saving soul” values as orienteers of structuring the work based on the unconditional requirements of the Absolute. The definition of specificity of religious culture through substantiation of the specific existence of the creative and value components within it, comprises the scientific novelty of this research. The specificity is religious culture is being clarified on the example of Christian Orthodox culture, which gives the key towards understanding the peculiarities of Russian culture.

Ключевые слова: basic components of culture, levels of freedom, freedom, creation, value, Catholicism, Orthodoxy, religious culture, culture, religious dogma

Библиография:
Chelovek v mire kul'tury (kul'tura, chelovek, obrazovanie: uch. posobie dlya studentov gumanitarnogo profilya / V. Konev. Samara, 1999. 53 s.
Luk A.N. Myshlenie i tvorchestvo / A.N. Luk. M.: Politizdat, 1976. 144 s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [Elektronnyy resurs]: internet-versiya izdaniya Instituta Filosofii RAN. – Elektron. tekstovye dan. – M.: [b.i.], 2015. – Rezhim dostupa: http://iph.ras.ru, svobodnyy
Leybin V.M. Psikhoanaliz: uchebnoe posobie / V.M. Leybin. SPb.: Piter, 2008. 177 s.
Losskiy N.O. Tsennost' i bytie. Bog i Tsarstvo Bozhie kak osnova tsennostey. [Elektronnyy resurs]: Elektronnaya biblioteka RoyalLib.com-Elektron. tekstovye dan. M.: [b.i.], 2016.-Rezhim dostupa: http://royallib.com/book/losskiy_nikolay/tsennost_i_bitie.html, svobodnyy
Komlev N.G. Slovar' inostrannykh slov / N.G. Komlev. M.: Eksmo, 2000. 1308 s.
Informatsionnoe agentstvo Rossii. Papa rimskiy Frantsisk nazval internet bozh'im darom. [Elektronnyy resurs]: ITAR-TAAS Obshchestvo.-Elektron. tekstovye dan. M.: [b.i.], 2015. – Rezhim dostupa: http://tass.ru/obschestvo/2610603, svobodnyy
Il'in I.A. Odinokiy khudozhnik / I.A. Il'in. M.: Iskusstvo, 1993. 348 s.
Buber M. Dva obraza very / M. Buber. M.: Respublika, 1995. 464 s.
Bychkov V.V. Teurgicheskaya estetika Nikolaya Berdyaeva [Elektronnyy resurs]: internet-versiya izdaniya Instituta Filosofii RAN. – Elektron. tekstovye dan. M.: [b.i.], 2015. – Rezhim dostupa: http://iph.ras.ru, svobodnyy
Bibliya / Bibliya. Knigi svyashchennogo pisaniya Vetkhogo i Novogo Zaveta. M.: RBO, 2015. 311 s.
Berdyaev N.A. Dukh i real'nost' / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: AST, 2007. 688 s.
Berdyaev N.A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: AST, 2011. 416 s.
Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie (opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii) / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1990. 336 s.

References (transliteration):
Chelovek v mire kul'tury (kul'tura, chelovek, obrazovanie: uch. posobie dlya studentov gumanitarnogo profilya / V. Konev. Samara, 1999. 53 s.
Luk A.N. Myshlenie i tvorchestvo / A.N. Luk. M.: Politizdat, 1976. 144 s.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [Elektronnyy resurs]: internet-versiya izdaniya Instituta Filosofii RAN. – Elektron. tekstovye dan. – M.: [b.i.], 2015. – Rezhim dostupa: http://iph.ras.ru, svobodnyy
Leybin V.M. Psikhoanaliz: uchebnoe posobie / V.M. Leybin. SPb.: Piter, 2008. 177 s.
Losskiy N.O. Tsennost' i bytie. Bog i Tsarstvo Bozhie kak osnova tsennostey. [Elektronnyy resurs]: Elektronnaya biblioteka RoyalLib.com-Elektron. tekstovye dan. M.: [b.i.], 2016.-Rezhim dostupa: http://royallib.com/book/losskiy_nikolay/tsennost_i_bitie.html, svobodnyy
Komlev N.G. Slovar' inostrannykh slov / N.G. Komlev. M.: Eksmo, 2000. 1308 s.
Informatsionnoe agentstvo Rossii. Papa rimskiy Frantsisk nazval internet bozh'im darom. [Elektronnyy resurs]: ITAR-TAAS Obshchestvo.-Elektron. tekstovye dan. M.: [b.i.], 2015. – Rezhim dostupa: http://tass.ru/obschestvo/2610603, svobodnyy
Il'in I.A. Odinokiy khudozhnik / I.A. Il'in. M.: Iskusstvo, 1993. 348 s.
Buber M. Dva obraza very / M. Buber. M.: Respublika, 1995. 464 s.
Bychkov V.V. Teurgicheskaya estetika Nikolaya Berdyaeva [Elektronnyy resurs]: internet-versiya izdaniya Instituta Filosofii RAN. – Elektron. tekstovye dan. M.: [b.i.], 2015. – Rezhim dostupa: http://iph.ras.ru, svobodnyy
Bibliya / Bibliya. Knigi svyashchennogo pisaniya Vetkhogo i Novogo Zaveta. M.: RBO, 2015. 311 s.
Berdyaev N.A. Dukh i real'nost' / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: AST, 2007. 688 s.
Berdyaev N.A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: AST, 2011. 416 s.
Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie (opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii) / N.A. Berdyaev. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1990. 336 s.

Аннотация: In the context of polarization of the modern scientific discourse with regards to the assessment of the historical roles and prospects of culture, this article examines the problematics related to the explication of essence and meaning of culturocentrism. Based on the critical analysis of the existing points of view, an idea is formed that in the scale of the global-historical trajectory of humanity – Syncretism of Primordiality – Cosmocentrism of Antiquity – Theocentricism of Medieval Times – Anthropocentrism of Renaissance – Naturocentrism of New Time – Sociocentrism Modern Time – Culturocentrism of Postmodern Time –, the latter can be understood as a quite regularly maturing in this list era of the positioning of culture as a constituting center of the belief system “human-world”. Based on the idea about the structural-functional homology of “rough cores” of the established “centrisms”, the author makes an attempt to model the attributive content of the culturocentric imperatives in ontological, methodological, anthropological, existential, practical, axiological, gnoseological, epistemological, and culturological projections. It is possible that at the present time, “history draws culture” towards where it itself “is being drawn” by culture; thus, each of us unaffected by the level and form of understanding, can be a participant or a creators of the extremely complicated and contradictory phenomena and processes that objectively take place  within the space of namely this attractor. The conclusion is made that the conceptual context of the discussed problematics includes a significant scientific, as well as practically life interest; and the problematics itself requires a serious conceptual study.

Ключевые слова: Prospects of culture, Humanity, Projections, Imperative, Explication, Worldview, Historical experience, Attractor, Culturocentrism, Culture

Библиография:
Yarkova E.N., Larin Yu.V., Pavlov A.V. Epistemologiya kul'tury kak napravlenie issledovaniy // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2013. — № 10. — S. 91-99.
Flier A.Ya. Ponimanie istorii v kontekste kul'tury// Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. — 2014 — №3 — S. 58-67.
Flier A.Ya. Obshchestvo kak kul'turnaya sistema [Elektronnyy resurs] // Kul'tura kul'tury. — 2015 —№ 3. http://cult-cult.ru/society-as-a-cultural-system/ (data obrashcheniya 25. 01.2016)
Flier A.Ya. Evolyutsiya kul'tury kak sotsial'no-regulyativnoy sistemy // Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii kul'tury i iskusstv. 2014 / 4 (40). — S.33-39
Aleksandrov V.B. Formy sushchestvovaniya i priroda kul'tury // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. — 2010. — № 2 (38). — S. 191-221.
Lapina T.S. Filosofiya kul'tury: variant ponimaniya. Monografiya. — M.: Profobrazovanie, 2003. — 255 s.
Motroshilova N.V. Bytie // Vvedenie v filosofiyu: ucheb. dlya vuzov / I.T. Frolov i dr. — M.: Politizdat, 1989. — Ch.2. — S. 14-48.
Frobenius L. Detstvo chelovechestva: Pervobytnaya kul'tura aborigenov Afriki i Ameriki. Per. s nem. Izd. 2-e. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. — 368 s.
Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. — S.-Peterburg: «Iskusstvo—SPB», 2000. — 704 s.
Kagan M.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. — Sankt-Peterburg, TOO TK «Petropolis», 1996. — 416 s.
Laletin D.A. Possibil'no-deyatel'nostnyy podkhod v poznanii kul'tury / Observatoriya kul'tury. — 2011. — № 2. — S.19-27
Tkhagapsoev Kh.G. K problemam i perspektivam razvitiya rossiyskoy kul'turologii / Voprosy kul'turologii. — 2012. — № 8. — S.6-13.
Kul'turologiya vs filosofiya kul'tury (beseda A.S. Nilogova s V.M. Mezhuevym) // Voprosy kul'turologii. — 2015. — № 4. — S. 34-38.
Morozova O.F. Kul'turotsentrizm v upravlenii kul'turnymi protsessami // Psikhologiya i upravlenie kul'turnymi kommunikatsiyami. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 140-144.
Semernik S.Z. Kul'turotsentrizm kak antiteza ekonomotsentrichnomu razvitiyu sotsiuma // Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika global'nykh protsessov: Nauchnye trudy kafedry globalistiki i geopolitiki (k 25-letiyu). — S-Peterburg: [B. i.], 2014. — S. 49-57.
Artanovskiy S.N. Kul'tura dlya cheloveka ili chelovek dlya kul'tury? Kritika kontseptsii kul'turotsentrizma // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv. — 2004. — № 1. — S. 165-166.
Markaryan E.S. Teoriya kul'tury i sovremennaya nauka: (logiko-metodologicheskiy analiz). — M.: Mysl', 1983. — 284 s.
Savin M.G. Kul'turon — kosmicheskiy nositel' kul'tury // Chelovek. — 2002. — № 5. — S. 165-172.
Pushkar' A.I. Kul'tura kak samovyrazhenie cheloveka v mire // Deyatel'nostnoe ponimanie kul'tury kak vida chelovecheskogo bytiya: Materialy I Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Nizhnevartovsk, 17-18 dekabrya 2003 goda) / Otv. red. V.I. Polishchuk. — Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevart.gos.ped.in-t, 2003. — S. 37-41.
Sladkova A.A. Al'ternativa deontologizma i kul'turotsentrizma v istolkovanii sotsial'noy legitimatsii // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 212-216.
Orlova E.A. Teoriya kul'tury kak nauchnaya distsiplina// «Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo». — 2000. — T. 2. Vyp. 4 (6). — S. 178-196.
Somkin A.A. Kul'turotsentrizm kak osnovnoe napravlenie formirovaniya sovremennoy sotsiogumanitarnoy paradigmy //Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennom obshchestve». Saransk, 26.09.-31.10.2011 g. (Yazyk. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. Vypusk 3. 2011 g.) http://yazik.info/2011-21.php (data obrashcheniya 20.01. 2016 g.)
Osipova N.O. Kul'turotsentrizm kak aspekt metodologii sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya // Vysshee obrazovanie dlya XXI veka: V mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya. Moskva, 13–15 noyabrya 2008 g.: doklady i materialy. Sektsiya 9. Vysshee kul'turologicheskoe obrazovanie. Chast' II / otv. red. Kostina A.V. (izd. 2-e., ispravlennoe) — M.: Izd-vo Mosk. gumanit. un-ta, 2008. — S. 19-23.
Fedotova V.G. Kul'turotsentrizm // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t. / In-t filosofii RAN, Nats. obshch-nauchn. fond; Nauchno-red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin, zamestiteli preds.: A.A. Guseynov, G.Yu. Semigin, uch. sekr. A.P. Ogurtsov. — T.2. — M., Mysl', 2001. — 634 s. http://library.plankion.kz/index.php?Itemid=40&func=fileinfo&id= 999 &option=comremository (data obrashcheniya 06.01.2016).
Polishchuk V.I. Istoriya i kul'tura v filosofii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014. — № 5. — S. 754-759. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.5.11856.
Gurevich P.S. Kul'turologiya. Uchebnoe posobie. — M.: Znanie, 1996. — 288 s.
Kostina A.V., Flier A.Ya. Kuda istoriya vlechet kul'turu? (Ot «obshchestva kontsertiruyushchikh» k «obshchestvu repetiruyushchikh») // Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii kul'tury i iskusstv. — 2009. — T. 20. — № 4. — S .27-37.
Vizgin V.P. Poststrukturalistskaya metodologiya istorii: dostizheniya i predely // Odissey. Chelovek v istorii. 1996. — M.: Coda, 1996. — S. 39-59.
Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya — k logike kul'tury: dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat' pervyy vek. — M.: Politizdat, 1990. — 413 s.
Richerson P., Boyd R. Kul'tura — chast' biologii cheloveka: pochemu ponyatie superorganicheskogo sosluzhilo plokhuyu sluzhbu naukam o cheloveke // Vyzov poznaniyu. Strategii razvitiya nauki v sovremennom mire. – M.: Nauka, 2004. — S. 344-373.
Bertil'sson M. Vtoroe rozhdenie prirody: posledstviya dlya kategorii sotsial'noe // Sotsis. — 2002. — № 9. — S. 118-128.
Bodriyyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konets sotsial'nogo. Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2000. — 96 s.
Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let. Per. s frants. — M., Kastal', 1996. — 448 s.
Alieva O.G. Politika mul'tikul'turalizma i vyzov natsional'noy samobytnosti // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 61-67.
Abramyan E.G. Kul'turologiya i problemy vyzhivaniya // Filosofskie nauki. — 2000. — № 4. — S. 53-57.
Antologiya issledovaniy kul'tury. T.1. Interpretatsii kul'tury. Sankt-Peterburg. — Universitetskaya kniga, 1997. — 728 s.
Sapronov P.A. Kul'turologiya: kurs lektsiy po teorii i istorii kul'tury. — SPb.: SOYuZ, 1998. — 560 s.
Yarkova E.N. Istoricheskiy opyt kak sotsiokul'turnyy institut // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. — 2014. — № 3. — S. 67-78.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Puti istorii i obrazy budushchego chelovechestva: sinergetika global'nykh protsessov v istorii. Chast' 1. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2008. — № 10. — S.28-49.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Puti istorii i obrazy budushchego chelovechestva: sinergetika global'nykh protsessov v istorii. Chast' 2. Okonchanie. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2008. — № 11. — S. 31-50.

References (transliteration):
Yarkova E.N., Larin Yu.V., Pavlov A.V. Epistemologiya kul'tury kak napravlenie issledovaniy // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2013. — № 10. — S. 91-99.
Flier A.Ya. Ponimanie istorii v kontekste kul'tury// Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. — 2014 — №3 — S. 58-67.
Flier A.Ya. Obshchestvo kak kul'turnaya sistema [Elektronnyy resurs] // Kul'tura kul'tury. — 2015 —№ 3. http://cult-cult.ru/society-as-a-cultural-system/ (data obrashcheniya 25. 01.2016)
Flier A.Ya. Evolyutsiya kul'tury kak sotsial'no-regulyativnoy sistemy // Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii kul'tury i iskusstv. 2014 / 4 (40). — S.33-39
Aleksandrov V.B. Formy sushchestvovaniya i priroda kul'tury // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. — 2010. — № 2 (38). — S. 191-221.
Lapina T.S. Filosofiya kul'tury: variant ponimaniya. Monografiya. — M.: Profobrazovanie, 2003. — 255 s.
Motroshilova N.V. Bytie // Vvedenie v filosofiyu: ucheb. dlya vuzov / I.T. Frolov i dr. — M.: Politizdat, 1989. — Ch.2. — S. 14-48.
Frobenius L. Detstvo chelovechestva: Pervobytnaya kul'tura aborigenov Afriki i Ameriki. Per. s nem. Izd. 2-e. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. — 368 s.
Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. — S.-Peterburg: «Iskusstvo—SPB», 2000. — 704 s.
Kagan M.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. — Sankt-Peterburg, TOO TK «Petropolis», 1996. — 416 s.
Laletin D.A. Possibil'no-deyatel'nostnyy podkhod v poznanii kul'tury / Observatoriya kul'tury. — 2011. — № 2. — S.19-27
Tkhagapsoev Kh.G. K problemam i perspektivam razvitiya rossiyskoy kul'turologii / Voprosy kul'turologii. — 2012. — № 8. — S.6-13.
Kul'turologiya vs filosofiya kul'tury (beseda A.S. Nilogova s V.M. Mezhuevym) // Voprosy kul'turologii. — 2015. — № 4. — S. 34-38.
Morozova O.F. Kul'turotsentrizm v upravlenii kul'turnymi protsessami // Psikhologiya i upravlenie kul'turnymi kommunikatsiyami. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 140-144.
Semernik S.Z. Kul'turotsentrizm kak antiteza ekonomotsentrichnomu razvitiyu sotsiuma // Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika global'nykh protsessov: Nauchnye trudy kafedry globalistiki i geopolitiki (k 25-letiyu). — S-Peterburg: [B. i.], 2014. — S. 49-57.
Artanovskiy S.N. Kul'tura dlya cheloveka ili chelovek dlya kul'tury? Kritika kontseptsii kul'turotsentrizma // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv. — 2004. — № 1. — S. 165-166.
Markaryan E.S. Teoriya kul'tury i sovremennaya nauka: (logiko-metodologicheskiy analiz). — M.: Mysl', 1983. — 284 s.
Savin M.G. Kul'turon — kosmicheskiy nositel' kul'tury // Chelovek. — 2002. — № 5. — S. 165-172.
Pushkar' A.I. Kul'tura kak samovyrazhenie cheloveka v mire // Deyatel'nostnoe ponimanie kul'tury kak vida chelovecheskogo bytiya: Materialy I Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Nizhnevartovsk, 17-18 dekabrya 2003 goda) / Otv. red. V.I. Polishchuk. — Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevart.gos.ped.in-t, 2003. — S. 37-41.
Sladkova A.A. Al'ternativa deontologizma i kul'turotsentrizma v istolkovanii sotsial'noy legitimatsii // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 212-216.
Orlova E.A. Teoriya kul'tury kak nauchnaya distsiplina// «Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo». — 2000. — T. 2. Vyp. 4 (6). — S. 178-196.
Somkin A.A. Kul'turotsentrizm kak osnovnoe napravlenie formirovaniya sovremennoy sotsiogumanitarnoy paradigmy //Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennom obshchestve». Saransk, 26.09.-31.10.2011 g. (Yazyk. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. Vypusk 3. 2011 g.) http://yazik.info/2011-21.php (data obrashcheniya 20.01. 2016 g.)
Osipova N.O. Kul'turotsentrizm kak aspekt metodologii sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya // Vysshee obrazovanie dlya XXI veka: V mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya. Moskva, 13–15 noyabrya 2008 g.: doklady i materialy. Sektsiya 9. Vysshee kul'turologicheskoe obrazovanie. Chast' II / otv. red. Kostina A.V. (izd. 2-e., ispravlennoe) — M.: Izd-vo Mosk. gumanit. un-ta, 2008. — S. 19-23.
Fedotova V.G. Kul'turotsentrizm // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t. / In-t filosofii RAN, Nats. obshch-nauchn. fond; Nauchno-red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin, zamestiteli preds.: A.A. Guseynov, G.Yu. Semigin, uch. sekr. A.P. Ogurtsov. — T.2. — M., Mysl', 2001. — 634 s. http://library.plankion.kz/index.php?Itemid=40&func=fileinfo&id= 999 &option=comremository (data obrashcheniya 06.01.2016).
Polishchuk V.I. Istoriya i kul'tura v filosofii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014. — № 5. — S. 754-759. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.5.11856.
Gurevich P.S. Kul'turologiya. Uchebnoe posobie. — M.: Znanie, 1996. — 288 s.
Kostina A.V., Flier A.Ya. Kuda istoriya vlechet kul'turu? (Ot «obshchestva kontsertiruyushchikh» k «obshchestvu repetiruyushchikh») // Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii kul'tury i iskusstv. — 2009. — T. 20. — № 4. — S .27-37.
Vizgin V.P. Poststrukturalistskaya metodologiya istorii: dostizheniya i predely // Odissey. Chelovek v istorii. 1996. — M.: Coda, 1996. — S. 39-59.
Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya — k logike kul'tury: dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat' pervyy vek. — M.: Politizdat, 1990. — 413 s.
Richerson P., Boyd R. Kul'tura — chast' biologii cheloveka: pochemu ponyatie superorganicheskogo sosluzhilo plokhuyu sluzhbu naukam o cheloveke // Vyzov poznaniyu. Strategii razvitiya nauki v sovremennom mire. – M.: Nauka, 2004. — S. 344-373.
Bertil'sson M. Vtoroe rozhdenie prirody: posledstviya dlya kategorii sotsial'noe // Sotsis. — 2002. — № 9. — S. 118-128.
Bodriyyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konets sotsial'nogo. Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2000. — 96 s.
Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let. Per. s frants. — M., Kastal', 1996. — 448 s.
Alieva O.G. Politika mul'tikul'turalizma i vyzov natsional'noy samobytnosti // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 61-67.
Abramyan E.G. Kul'turologiya i problemy vyzhivaniya // Filosofskie nauki. — 2000. — № 4. — S. 53-57.
Antologiya issledovaniy kul'tury. T.1. Interpretatsii kul'tury. Sankt-Peterburg. — Universitetskaya kniga, 1997. — 728 s.
Sapronov P.A. Kul'turologiya: kurs lektsiy po teorii i istorii kul'tury. — SPb.: SOYuZ, 1998. — 560 s.
Yarkova E.N. Istoricheskiy opyt kak sotsiokul'turnyy institut // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. — 2014. — № 3. — S. 67-78.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Puti istorii i obrazy budushchego chelovechestva: sinergetika global'nykh protsessov v istorii. Chast' 1. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2008. — № 10. — S.28-49.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Puti istorii i obrazy budushchego chelovechestva: sinergetika global'nykh protsessov v istorii. Chast' 2. Okonchanie. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2008. — № 11. — S. 31-50.

Аннотация: The subject of this research is the texts of traditional folklore in its anthropological aspects, which reveal ontological-conceptual, symbolic-conceptual, and procedural-conceptual sides. Special attention is given to the analysis of specific position of the traditional folklore in the history of culture and contemporary cultural space, as well as to the description of various points of view upon this problem, which confirm the tendency of complication of the sociocultural existence. The author provides argumentation that the traditional folklore with regards to the modern culture, represents a rather controversial, complex, multi-aspect, and accelerated in its history phenomenon. The major goal of the article consists in the following: to prove the polysymbolic content of folklore actions and possibility of their realization under the conditions of modern culture, using the exemplificative approach. The author underlines the importance of using the methods of cultural anthropology. This article reveals the cultural concepts of the traditional folklore through the prism of anthropological constants and description of its symbolic sound.

Ключевые слова: Procedural-conceptual aspects, Symbolic-conceptual aspects, Ontological-conceptual aspects, Tradition, Traditional culture, Traditional folklore, Cultural concepts, Symbols, Customs, Initiations

Библиография:
Zenin S. N. Traditsionnyy slovesnyy fol'klor i mass-media: tendentsii vzaimodeystviya v sovremennom prostranstve: avtoreferat diss. … kand. filos. nauk po spets-ti 24.00.01. Belgorod. 2009. 23 s.
Kaminskaya E. A. Mekhanizmy vyyavleniya kul'turnykh smyslov traditsionnogo fol'klora // Vestnik slavyanskikh kul'tur. 2014. № 33. S. 77-89
Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani Mudrost' vymysla. URL: http://lukianpovorotov.narod.ru/Orbeliani_Mudrost_vymysla.htm (data obrashcheniya 20.11.2015)
Khomenko V.L. Narodnye pesni Chelyabinskoy oblasti: metod. rek. dlya rukovoditeley samodeyatel'nykh khorov narodnoy pesni. Chelyabinsk, 1980.60 s.
Akh ty, step' shirokaya. URL: http://pesni.retroportal.ru/np1/03.shtml (data obrashcheniya 27.11.2015)
Spirova E. M. Universal'nyy yazyk globalistiki // Vek globalizatsii. 2012. № 1. S. 34-45.
Neklyudov S.Yu. K voprosu o fol'klore i obryade // Mif, simvol, ritual. Narody Sibiri. [Sb. statey v chest' E.S. Novik.]. Moskva, RGGU. 2008. S. 11-22. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/folklore/neckludov33.htm
Fundamental'naya elektronnaya biblioteka: «Russkaya literatura i fol'klor». URL: http://feb-web.ru/feb/litenc/encyclop/leb/leb-7751.htm (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2012)
Kruglyy stol «Chto takoe fol'klor?» (navstrechu pervomu vserossiyskomu kongressu fol'kloristov) // Traditsionnaya kul'tura. 2005. № 2, 3,4.
Putilov B. N. Fol'klor i narodnaya kul'tura: monogr. / Otv. red. A. S. Myl'nikov. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka, 1994. 239 s.
Kaminskaya E. A. K sporam ob opredelenii termina «fol'klor» // Shestye Lazarevskie chteniya «Liki traditsionnoy kul'tury nachala XXI stoletiya: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Chelyabinsk, 26-27.02.2013. S. 282-285.
Konson G. R. Metod tselostnogo analiza khudozhestvennykh tekstov. Moskva, Kniga po Trebovaniyu, 2012. 419 s.
Gurevich P. S. Filosofiya kul'tury: uchebnik dlya vysshey shkoly. Moskva, izdatel'skiy dom Nota Bene, 2001. 352 s.
Kuts V. A. Kul'turnaya identichnost' kak sposob realizatsii zashchitnykh funktsiy kul'tury // Kul'tura kul'tury: elektronnyy zhurnal. 2015. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/cultural-identity-as-a-way-of-realization-of-protective-functions-of-culture/ (data obrashcheniya 28.10.2015).
Varlamov D. Narodnye traditsii v kontekste evolyutsii natsional'nogo instrumentalizma v muzykal'nom iskusstve Rossii XIX-XX vekov: avtoref. diss. …doktora iskusstvovedeniya: 17.00.09. Saratov, 2009. 339 s.: il.
Tatarinova T. L. Evolyutsiya i involyutsiya zhanrov muzykal'nogo fol'klora na primere eposa i obryadovykh pesen // Dom Burganova. Prostranstvo kul'tury. 2015. №
S. 202-207. 3. Flier, A.Ya. Sovremennaya kul'tura kak tendentsiya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2012. № 1. URL: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2012/1/Flier_Contemporary-Culture/ (data obrashcheniya 27.10.2015)
Sedukhin Boris Vasil'evich. Narodnaya muzykal'naya kul'tura: sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya : diss. ... kand. kul'turologicheskikh nauk: 24.00.01. Moskva, 2004. 131 c.
Khakimov A. Fol'klor i traditsionnaya kul'tura. URL: http://sanat2013.orexca.com/rus/archive/1-01/akbar_khakimov.shtml (data obrashcheniya 25.10.2015)
Khrenov N.A. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostey // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-5.-C. 544-555. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
Semchenko O. A. Mezhdunarodnyy forum «Traditsionnaya kul'tura kak strategicheskiy resurs ustoychivogo razvitiya obshchestva» (17–20 aprelya 2012 goda; Mogilev, Respublika Belarus') // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-4.-C. 109-110.
Lyubimova T.B. Chto peredaetsya v traditsii? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2014.-5.-C. 501-513. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.5.12587.
Spirova E.M. Simvolika zhizni i smerti // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-5.-C. 75-82.

References (transliteration):
Zenin S. N. Traditsionnyy slovesnyy fol'klor i mass-media: tendentsii vzaimodeystviya v sovremennom prostranstve: avtoreferat diss. … kand. filos. nauk po spets-ti 24.00.01. Belgorod. 2009. 23 s.
Kaminskaya E. A. Mekhanizmy vyyavleniya kul'turnykh smyslov traditsionnogo fol'klora // Vestnik slavyanskikh kul'tur. 2014. № 33. S. 77-89
Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani Mudrost' vymysla. URL: http://lukianpovorotov.narod.ru/Orbeliani_Mudrost_vymysla.htm (data obrashcheniya 20.11.2015)
Khomenko V.L. Narodnye pesni Chelyabinskoy oblasti: metod. rek. dlya rukovoditeley samodeyatel'nykh khorov narodnoy pesni. Chelyabinsk, 1980.60 s.
Akh ty, step' shirokaya. URL: http://pesni.retroportal.ru/np1/03.shtml (data obrashcheniya 27.11.2015)
Spirova E. M. Universal'nyy yazyk globalistiki // Vek globalizatsii. 2012. № 1. S. 34-45.
Neklyudov S.Yu. K voprosu o fol'klore i obryade // Mif, simvol, ritual. Narody Sibiri. [Sb. statey v chest' E.S. Novik.]. Moskva, RGGU. 2008. S. 11-22. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/folklore/neckludov33.htm
Fundamental'naya elektronnaya biblioteka: «Russkaya literatura i fol'klor». URL: http://feb-web.ru/feb/litenc/encyclop/leb/leb-7751.htm (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2012)
Kruglyy stol «Chto takoe fol'klor?» (navstrechu pervomu vserossiyskomu kongressu fol'kloristov) // Traditsionnaya kul'tura. 2005. № 2, 3,4.
Putilov B. N. Fol'klor i narodnaya kul'tura: monogr. / Otv. red. A. S. Myl'nikov. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka, 1994. 239 s.
Kaminskaya E. A. K sporam ob opredelenii termina «fol'klor» // Shestye Lazarevskie chteniya «Liki traditsionnoy kul'tury nachala XXI stoletiya: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Chelyabinsk, 26-27.02.2013. S. 282-285.
Konson G. R. Metod tselostnogo analiza khudozhestvennykh tekstov. Moskva, Kniga po Trebovaniyu, 2012. 419 s.
Gurevich P. S. Filosofiya kul'tury: uchebnik dlya vysshey shkoly. Moskva, izdatel'skiy dom Nota Bene, 2001. 352 s.
Kuts V. A. Kul'turnaya identichnost' kak sposob realizatsii zashchitnykh funktsiy kul'tury // Kul'tura kul'tury: elektronnyy zhurnal. 2015. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/cultural-identity-as-a-way-of-realization-of-protective-functions-of-culture/ (data obrashcheniya 28.10.2015).
Varlamov D. Narodnye traditsii v kontekste evolyutsii natsional'nogo instrumentalizma v muzykal'nom iskusstve Rossii XIX-XX vekov: avtoref. diss. …doktora iskusstvovedeniya: 17.00.09. Saratov, 2009. 339 s.: il.
Tatarinova T. L. Evolyutsiya i involyutsiya zhanrov muzykal'nogo fol'klora na primere eposa i obryadovykh pesen // Dom Burganova. Prostranstvo kul'tury. 2015. №
S. 202-207. 3. Flier, A.Ya. Sovremennaya kul'tura kak tendentsiya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2012. № 1. URL: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2012/1/Flier_Contemporary-Culture/ (data obrashcheniya 27.10.2015)
Sedukhin Boris Vasil'evich. Narodnaya muzykal'naya kul'tura: sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya : diss. ... kand. kul'turologicheskikh nauk: 24.00.01. Moskva, 2004. 131 c.
Khakimov A. Fol'klor i traditsionnaya kul'tura. URL: http://sanat2013.orexca.com/rus/archive/1-01/akbar_khakimov.shtml (data obrashcheniya 25.10.2015)
Khrenov N.A. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostey // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-5.-C. 544-555. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
Semchenko O. A. Mezhdunarodnyy forum «Traditsionnaya kul'tura kak strategicheskiy resurs ustoychivogo razvitiya obshchestva» (17–20 aprelya 2012 goda; Mogilev, Respublika Belarus') // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-4.-C. 109-110.
Lyubimova T.B. Chto peredaetsya v traditsii? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2014.-5.-C. 501-513. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.5.12587.
Spirova E.M. Simvolika zhizni i smerti // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-5.-C. 75-82.

Аннотация: This article is prepared based on the report made on the First Altai Forum “Codevelopment of the Society, Human, and Nature in the Context of Dialogue of Civilizations” (Altai Republic, May of 2014). This research discusses the principles of the attitude towards the environment and ecological problematics, contained in the foundations of the Christian doctrine, as well as those established in the world of Eastern Christianity. The reframing and reconceptualization of the notion of anthropocentrism in its correlation with the notion of theocentricism and christocentricism is being conducted. The precise identification within the range of all types of anthropocentrism of those which corresponds with Christianity and Orthodoxy, leads to a new perspective on the issue of “Christianity and ecology”. It is demonstrated that in the paradigm of Christian anthropocentrism, designation of a human includes a certain cosmic mission – activeness, turned onto the entire created world and aimed at transformation of its being. Further analysis reveals that this cosmic mission is isomorphic in its essence towards the ministry of a priest who performs liturgy, and therefore can be interpreted as a “cosmic liturgy”, the ideas of which were expressed by Maximus the Confessor back in the VII century. Based on that, the conceptual links between the ecology and asceticism are being determined.

Библиография:
Ikeda D. Buddizm i problemy global'noy etiki: dialogi Ikedy Daysaku s deyatelyami evropeyskoy kul'tury // Global'nye problemy i budushchee chelovechestva. Vyp. 6. M., 1987.
Uayt-ml. L. Istoricheskie korni nashego ekologicheskogo krizisa // Global'nye problemy i obshchechelovecheskie tsennosti. M., 1990.
Khaydegger M. Vopros o tekhnike // Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie. M., 1993.
Balthasar H.U. von. Liturgie cosmique. Maxime le Confesseur. Paris, 1947.
Akhutin A.V. Eksperiment i priroda. SPb., 2012.
Torgashev A. Zaglyanut' kleshchu v mozg // Russkiy reporter. № 34(312). Sent. 2013.
Khoruzhiy S.S. Ekologicheskaya problema s pozitsiy sinergiynoy antropologii // Chelovek.RU. Gumanitarnyy al'manakh. 2014. № 9

References (transliteration):
Ikeda D. Buddizm i problemy global'noy etiki: dialogi Ikedy Daysaku s deyatelyami evropeyskoy kul'tury // Global'nye problemy i budushchee chelovechestva. Vyp. 6. M., 1987.
Uayt-ml. L. Istoricheskie korni nashego ekologicheskogo krizisa // Global'nye problemy i obshchechelovecheskie tsennosti. M., 1990.
Khaydegger M. Vopros o tekhnike // Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie. M., 1993.
Balthasar H.U. von. Liturgie cosmique. Maxime le Confesseur. Paris, 1947.
Akhutin A.V. Eksperiment i priroda. SPb., 2012.
Torgashev A. Zaglyanut' kleshchu v mozg // Russkiy reporter. № 34(312). Sent. 2013.
Khoruzhiy S.S. Ekologicheskaya problema s pozitsiy sinergiynoy antropologii // Chelovek.RU. Gumanitarnyy al'manakh. 2014. № 9

Аннотация: Concept of fractality in the post-nonclassical philosophy of culture This article suggests a concept of cultural fractality as a theoretical instrument of description and modelling of the “chaotic” dynamics of sociocultural processes. The subject of this research is the culture, which is examined from the perspective of post-nonclassical philosophy as a complicated linear system that is based on the principles of self-similarity and autopoiesis. The goal of this work is the determination of the evristical abilities of the developed by the author concept, according to which the fundamental definitions of the fractal geometry – fractal, fractal patterns, multifractal, strange attractors – in their philosophical reasoning can be used in the explanatory model for a number of sociocultural phenomena. From the perspective of the concept of fractality, the observed on different levels of cultural system repeating patterns of the ancient and modern sociocultural practices, are interpreted as a part of a conceptual (multi) fractal of the entire local, and even world culture. The main conclusion consists in the fact that within the terms of fractal patterns and strange attractors we can analyze separate cultural phenomena (for example, modern urban culture), sociocultural processes, which simultaneously carry “chaotic” and “cyclic” character (sociocultural transmission, “algorithms” of spread and changes of fashion, etc.), as well as the entire historical dynamics of culture in both, its local versions, as well as in the most broad dimension of the global sociocultural development. The concept of fractality explains the variety of local cultures in the world, and the simultaneous stability and uncertainty of the cultural-historical process, as well as periodic reproduction within culture and society of the symbolic patterns of previous eras.

Ключевые слова: Sociocultural attractors, Order parameters, Historical cultural dynamics, Sociocultural transmission, Fractal cultural patterns, Conceptual fractals, Fractality of culture, Digital humanities, Transdisciplinary cultural researches, Post-nonclassical philosophy of culture

Библиография:
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M.: Izd-vo «AST»; «Ermak», 2003. 365 s.
Snow C.P. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 1959. 107r.
Chirollet J.-C. Digital Humanities et Philosophie fractaliste. 2012. URL: http://www.jean-claude-chirollet.fr/blog/lire-article-546167-9567215-digital_humanities_et_philosophie_fractaliste.html. (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016).
Dacos M. Manifeste des Digital humanities. 2011. URL: http://tcp.hypotheses.org/411 (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016).
Postneklassicheskie praktiki. Opyt kontseptualizatsii/ V.I. Arshinov, O.N. Astaf'eva (red.). M.: Mir', 2012. 536 c.
Nauki o kul'ture v perspektive «Digital Humanities». Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii/ Pod red. L.V. Nikiforovoy, N.V. Nikiforovoy. SPb.: Asterion, 2013. 600 s.
Khaken G. Mozhem li my primenyat' sinergetiku v naukakh o cheloveke?// Sinergetika i psikhologiya. Teksty. Vyp. 2. Sotsial'nye protsessy. M.: «YaNUS-K», 1999. S. 11-33.
Jackson W.J. Heaven’s fractal net: retrieving lost visions in the humanities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004. 311 p.
Urry J. Complexity of the global. Theory, Culture & Society. 2005. Vol. 22, N. 5. P. 235-254.
Astaf'eva O.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovaniya kul'turnoy politiki: ot teorii k praktike // Sinergetika: Budushchee mira i Rossii /Malinetskiy G.G. (red.). M.: LKI, 2008. S. 194-222.
Budanov V.G. Metodologiya ritmokaskadnogo podkhoda// Problemy matematicheskoy istorii: Istoricheskaya rekonstruktsiya, prognozirovanie, metodologiya. M.: «Librokom», 2009. S. 137-153.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Osnovaniya sinergetiki: Sinergeticheskoe mirovidenie. M.: «Librokom», 2010. 272 s.
Mandelbrot B. B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1982. 465 p.
Feder E. Fraktaly. M.: Mir, 1991. 254 s.
Martynovich K.A. Nelineyno-dinamicheskaya kartina mira: ontologicheskie smysly i metodologicheskie vozmozhnosti. Avtoreferat diss. …kand. filosof. nauk. Saratov, 2011. 25 s.
Khaytun S.D. Ot ergodicheskoy gipotezy k fraktal'noy kartine mira. M.: Komkniga, 2007. 256 c.
Downton P.F. Ecopolis – Architecture and Cities for a Changing Climate. Dordrecht: Springer Press, 2008. 607 r.
Nikolaeva, E.V. Kontseptual'nyy fraktal v kul'turnykh sistemakh// Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Kul'turologiya». 2013. № 13 (304). S. 68-70.
Eglash R. African Fractals: modern computing and indigenous design. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press, 1999. 258 p.
Voloshinov A.V. Matematika i iskusstvo. M: Prosveshchenie, 2000. 400 s.
Zhukov D.S., Lyamin S.K. Zhivye modeli ushedshego mira: fraktal'naya geometriya istorii. Tambov: Izd-vo TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2007. 176 s.
Nikolaeva E.V. Fraktaly gorodskoy kul'tury. SPb.: Strata, 2014. 264 s.
Nikolaeva E.V. Fraktal'naya dinamika mody// Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie. 2013. № 4(29). S. 26-30.
Mandel'brot B., Khadson R.L. (Ne)poslushnye rynki. Fraktal'naya revolyutsiya v finansakh. M.: «Vil'yams», 2006. 400 s.
Taylor R. Ph. Nature, chaos and fractals. A new look at Jackson Pollock. Eugene, USA: Fractals Research, 2006. 170 r.
Pelipenko A.A., Yakovenko I.G. Kul'tura kak sistema. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1998. 376 s.
Isopeskul' O.Yu. Fraktal'naya priroda organizatsionnoy kul'tury// Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2012, № 11. URL: http://www.uecs.ru/marketing/item/1638-2012-11-07-07-25-16 (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016).
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 1993. 640 s.
Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 s.
Tarasenko V.V. Fraktal'naya semiotika: «slepye pyatna», peripetii i uznavaniya. M.: «Librokom», 2009. 232s.
N. B. Kirillova Medialogiya kak sintez nauk // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 71 - 83.

References (transliteration):
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M.: Izd-vo «AST»; «Ermak», 2003. 365 s.
Snow C.P. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 1959. 107r.
Chirollet J.-C. Digital Humanities et Philosophie fractaliste. 2012. URL: http://www.jean-claude-chirollet.fr/blog/lire-article-546167-9567215-digital_humanities_et_philosophie_fractaliste.html. (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016).
Dacos M. Manifeste des Digital humanities. 2011. URL: http://tcp.hypotheses.org/411 (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016).
Postneklassicheskie praktiki. Opyt kontseptualizatsii/ V.I. Arshinov, O.N. Astaf'eva (red.). M.: Mir', 2012. 536 c.
Nauki o kul'ture v perspektive «Digital Humanities». Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii/ Pod red. L.V. Nikiforovoy, N.V. Nikiforovoy. SPb.: Asterion, 2013. 600 s.
Khaken G. Mozhem li my primenyat' sinergetiku v naukakh o cheloveke?// Sinergetika i psikhologiya. Teksty. Vyp. 2. Sotsial'nye protsessy. M.: «YaNUS-K», 1999. S. 11-33.
Jackson W.J. Heaven’s fractal net: retrieving lost visions in the humanities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004. 311 p.
Urry J. Complexity of the global. Theory, Culture & Society. 2005. Vol. 22, N. 5. P. 235-254.
Astaf'eva O.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovaniya kul'turnoy politiki: ot teorii k praktike // Sinergetika: Budushchee mira i Rossii /Malinetskiy G.G. (red.). M.: LKI, 2008. S. 194-222.
Budanov V.G. Metodologiya ritmokaskadnogo podkhoda// Problemy matematicheskoy istorii: Istoricheskaya rekonstruktsiya, prognozirovanie, metodologiya. M.: «Librokom», 2009. S. 137-153.
Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Osnovaniya sinergetiki: Sinergeticheskoe mirovidenie. M.: «Librokom», 2010. 272 s.
Mandelbrot B. B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1982. 465 p.
Feder E. Fraktaly. M.: Mir, 1991. 254 s.
Martynovich K.A. Nelineyno-dinamicheskaya kartina mira: ontologicheskie smysly i metodologicheskie vozmozhnosti. Avtoreferat diss. …kand. filosof. nauk. Saratov, 2011. 25 s.
Khaytun S.D. Ot ergodicheskoy gipotezy k fraktal'noy kartine mira. M.: Komkniga, 2007. 256 c.
Downton P.F. Ecopolis – Architecture and Cities for a Changing Climate. Dordrecht: Springer Press, 2008. 607 r.
Nikolaeva, E.V. Kontseptual'nyy fraktal v kul'turnykh sistemakh// Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Kul'turologiya». 2013. № 13 (304). S. 68-70.
Eglash R. African Fractals: modern computing and indigenous design. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press, 1999. 258 p.
Voloshinov A.V. Matematika i iskusstvo. M: Prosveshchenie, 2000. 400 s.
Zhukov D.S., Lyamin S.K. Zhivye modeli ushedshego mira: fraktal'naya geometriya istorii. Tambov: Izd-vo TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2007. 176 s.
Nikolaeva E.V. Fraktaly gorodskoy kul'tury. SPb.: Strata, 2014. 264 s.
Nikolaeva E.V. Fraktal'naya dinamika mody// Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie. 2013. № 4(29). S. 26-30.
Mandel'brot B., Khadson R.L. (Ne)poslushnye rynki. Fraktal'naya revolyutsiya v finansakh. M.: «Vil'yams», 2006. 400 s.
Taylor R. Ph. Nature, chaos and fractals. A new look at Jackson Pollock. Eugene, USA: Fractals Research, 2006. 170 r.
Pelipenko A.A., Yakovenko I.G. Kul'tura kak sistema. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1998. 376 s.
Isopeskul' O.Yu. Fraktal'naya priroda organizatsionnoy kul'tury// Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2012, № 11. URL: http://www.uecs.ru/marketing/item/1638-2012-11-07-07-25-16 (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016).
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 1993. 640 s.
Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 s.
Tarasenko V.V. Fraktal'naya semiotika: «slepye pyatna», peripetii i uznavaniya. M.: «Librokom», 2009. 232s.
N. B. Kirillova Medialogiya kak sintez nauk // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 71 - 83.

Аннотация: The article considers the synthesis of arts as a phenomenon that has spread to different areas of culture and art in the second half of the XIXth — early XXth centuries. It was during that period when the other visual language and new forms of perception of art were formed. In her article Nikiforova analyzes the basic sources of the idea of Gesamtkunstwerk and various forms of its realization: mythologizing as a special way of thinking, ontologization of art, the desire to go beyond the purely artistic imagery, aesthetic dimension of humanism, synthetic thinking and universalism of the artist. Particular attention is given to the historical and cultural context throughout the XIXth century, beginning with the views of the Jena Romantics, Wagner’s theory of music and ending address to the creativity of Art Nouveau artists and innovators of the theater scene. The investigation also considers the problem of emergence of new forms of artistic creation. The analysis of the key trends reveals the importance of the idea of synthesis of arts for culture in a broad perspective: from philosophy, poetry and literature, architecture and fine art to design, new trends in the theatre research and cinematography.

Ключевые слова: symbolism, Richard Wagner, German Romanticism, philosophy of culture, synthesis of arts, Art Nouveau, myth, synesthesia, cinematography, design

Библиография:
Sviderskaya M.I. Istoriya, istoricheskoe, «istorizm» v kul'ture XIX stoletiya// Liki istorii v evropeyskom iskusstve XIX veka. Katalog vystavki v GMII im. A.S.Pushkina. 30 noyabrya 2009 — 8 fevralya 2010. M., «Tri kvadrata», 2009. S.10 — 34
Shelling F.V. Filosofiya iskusstva / Per. s nem. P.S. Popova, pod obshch. red. M.F. Ovsyannikova. M.: Mysl', 1966. 496 s.
Vagner R. Izbrannye raboty / Sost. i komment. I.A. Barsovoy i S.A. Osherova. Vstupit. stat'ya A.F. Loseva. Per. s nem. M.:Iskusstvo,1978. 695 s.
Mazaev A. I. Problema sinteza iskusstv v estetike russkogo simvolizma. M.: Nauka, 1992. 325 s.
Donington R. Wagner's «Ring» and its symbols. The music and the myth. L.: Faber and Faber, 1969. 304 p.
Sologub F.K. Teatr odnoy voli// «Teatr». Kniga o novom teatre: Sbornik statey. SPb.: Shipovnik, 1908. S. 177—198
Kryuchkova V. A. Simvolizm v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve. Frantsiya i Bel'giya 1870 — 1900. M.: Izobrazit.iskusstvo, 1994. 274 s.
Sarab'yanov D.V. Stil' modern. Istoki. Istoriya. Problemy. M.: Iskusstvo, 1989. 294 s.
Simvolizm i modern — fenomeny evropeyskoy kul'tury: Sb. statey. SPb., M.: Sputnik, 2008. 380 s.
Sternin G.Yu. Dva veka. Ocherki russkoy khudozhestvennoy kul'tury. M.: Galart, 2007. 384 s.
Jullian Ph. Dreamers of Decadence. Symbolist Painters of the 1890s. New York — Washington: Phaidon, 1974. 272 p.
Huyghe R.La Relève du Réel, la peinture française au XIXe siècle, impressionnisme, symbolism. Paris: Flammarion, 1974. 478 p.
Hofstutter H.H. Symbolismus und die Kunst der Jahrhundertwende. Köln, 1965. S. 241
Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 c.
Goldwater R. Symbolism.London: Westview Press, 1979. 300 p.
Novalis. Fragmenty / Per. s nem. A.L. Vol'skogo. Spb.: Vladimir Dal', 2014. 320 s.
Sabaneev L. L. Vospominaniya o Skryabine. M.: Klassika-XXI, 2000. 391 s.
Bobyleva A. L. Khozyain spektaklya. Rezhisserskoe iskusstvo na rubezhe XIX — XX vekov. M.: Editorial URSS, 2000. 168 s.
Sirotkina I. Svobodnoe dvizhenie i plasticheskiy tanets v Rossii. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012. 328 s.
Bobyleva A.L. Stil' i ritmika Emilya Zhak-Dal'kroza // Bobyleva A. L. Zapadnoevropeyskiy i russkiy teatr XIX-XX vekov. M.: Rossiyskiy universitet teatral'nogo iskusstva — GITIS, 2011. S. 174 — 216
Zhak-Dal'kroz E. Ritm i ego vospitatel'noe znachenie dlya zhizni i dlya iskusstva. SPb.: Izd. zhurn. «Teatr i iskusstvo», 1913. 156 s.
Mikhaylov A.V. Vil'gel'm Genrikh Vakenroder i romanticheskiy kul't Rafaelya // Mikhaylov A.V. Yazyki kul'tury. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1997. S.655—682.
Koss J. Modernism after Wagner. L.: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. 392 p.
Zemper G. Prakticheskaya estetika / per. s nem. V.G. Kalish; sost., vstup. st. i komment. V.R. Aronov. M.: Iskusstvo, 1970. 320 s.
Murina E.B. Problema sinteza prostranstvennykh iskusstv M.: Iskusstvo, 1982. 192 s.
Morris U. Budushchee arkhitektury v usloviyakh tsivilizatsii // Morris U. Iskusstvo i zhizn' / per. s angl., predislovie A. A. Aniksta. M.: Iskusstvo, 1973. S. 352 — 387
Mastera arkhitektury ob arkhitekture. Zarubezhnaya arkhitektura. Konets XIX — XX vek. / Sost. i red. A.V. Ikonnikova. M.: Iskusstvo, 1972. 591 s.
Bozhovich V.I. Traditsii i vzaimodeystvie iskusstv. Frantsiya, konets XIX — nachalo XX veka. M.: Nauka, 1987. 320 s

References (transliteration):
Sviderskaya M.I. Istoriya, istoricheskoe, «istorizm» v kul'ture XIX stoletiya// Liki istorii v evropeyskom iskusstve XIX veka. Katalog vystavki v GMII im. A.S.Pushkina. 30 noyabrya 2009 — 8 fevralya 2010. M., «Tri kvadrata», 2009. S.10 — 34
Shelling F.V. Filosofiya iskusstva / Per. s nem. P.S. Popova, pod obshch. red. M.F. Ovsyannikova. M.: Mysl', 1966. 496 s.
Vagner R. Izbrannye raboty / Sost. i komment. I.A. Barsovoy i S.A. Osherova. Vstupit. stat'ya A.F. Loseva. Per. s nem. M.:Iskusstvo,1978. 695 s.
Mazaev A. I. Problema sinteza iskusstv v estetike russkogo simvolizma. M.: Nauka, 1992. 325 s.
Donington R. Wagner's «Ring» and its symbols. The music and the myth. L.: Faber and Faber, 1969. 304 p.
Sologub F.K. Teatr odnoy voli// «Teatr». Kniga o novom teatre: Sbornik statey. SPb.: Shipovnik, 1908. S. 177—198
Kryuchkova V. A. Simvolizm v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve. Frantsiya i Bel'giya 1870 — 1900. M.: Izobrazit.iskusstvo, 1994. 274 s.
Sarab'yanov D.V. Stil' modern. Istoki. Istoriya. Problemy. M.: Iskusstvo, 1989. 294 s.
Simvolizm i modern — fenomeny evropeyskoy kul'tury: Sb. statey. SPb., M.: Sputnik, 2008. 380 s.
Sternin G.Yu. Dva veka. Ocherki russkoy khudozhestvennoy kul'tury. M.: Galart, 2007. 384 s.
Jullian Ph. Dreamers of Decadence. Symbolist Painters of the 1890s. New York — Washington: Phaidon, 1974. 272 p.
Huyghe R.La Relève du Réel, la peinture française au XIXe siècle, impressionnisme, symbolism. Paris: Flammarion, 1974. 478 p.
Hofstutter H.H. Symbolismus und die Kunst der Jahrhundertwende. Köln, 1965. S. 241
Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 c.
Goldwater R. Symbolism.London: Westview Press, 1979. 300 p.
Novalis. Fragmenty / Per. s nem. A.L. Vol'skogo. Spb.: Vladimir Dal', 2014. 320 s.
Sabaneev L. L. Vospominaniya o Skryabine. M.: Klassika-XXI, 2000. 391 s.
Bobyleva A. L. Khozyain spektaklya. Rezhisserskoe iskusstvo na rubezhe XIX — XX vekov. M.: Editorial URSS, 2000. 168 s.
Sirotkina I. Svobodnoe dvizhenie i plasticheskiy tanets v Rossii. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012. 328 s.
Bobyleva A.L. Stil' i ritmika Emilya Zhak-Dal'kroza // Bobyleva A. L. Zapadnoevropeyskiy i russkiy teatr XIX-XX vekov. M.: Rossiyskiy universitet teatral'nogo iskusstva — GITIS, 2011. S. 174 — 216
Zhak-Dal'kroz E. Ritm i ego vospitatel'noe znachenie dlya zhizni i dlya iskusstva. SPb.: Izd. zhurn. «Teatr i iskusstvo», 1913. 156 s.
Mikhaylov A.V. Vil'gel'm Genrikh Vakenroder i romanticheskiy kul't Rafaelya // Mikhaylov A.V. Yazyki kul'tury. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1997. S.655—682.
Koss J. Modernism after Wagner. L.: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. 392 p.
Zemper G. Prakticheskaya estetika / per. s nem. V.G. Kalish; sost., vstup. st. i komment. V.R. Aronov. M.: Iskusstvo, 1970. 320 s.
Murina E.B. Problema sinteza prostranstvennykh iskusstv M.: Iskusstvo, 1982. 192 s.
Morris U. Budushchee arkhitektury v usloviyakh tsivilizatsii // Morris U. Iskusstvo i zhizn' / per. s angl., predislovie A. A. Aniksta. M.: Iskusstvo, 1973. S. 352 — 387
Mastera arkhitektury ob arkhitekture. Zarubezhnaya arkhitektura. Konets XIX — XX vek. / Sost. i red. A.V. Ikonnikova. M.: Iskusstvo, 1972. 591 s.
Bozhovich V.I. Traditsii i vzaimodeystvie iskusstv. Frantsiya, konets XIX — nachalo XX veka. M.: Nauka, 1987. 320 s

Аннотация: The conversation with Alexander Lyusiy has been recorded within the framework of the editorial project 'Contemporary Russian Philosophy' and devoted to the modern trends in Russian philosophy and cultural studies. The culture expert Alexander Lyusiy offers his own research methodology - textological concept of Russian culture or the theory of local texts/supertexts. The aim of the concept is to create an important way of socio-cultural personality and society identification at the modern stage of Russia's history, i.e. to arrange for the 'search of models to structure the reality and creation of new entrances into this reality, which would allow to solve important tasks for human and society'. In his conversation Nilogov has used the methods of textological analysis offered by Lyusiy as well as the hermeutical approach allowing to interpet the current situation in Russian philosophy and cultural studies. Alexander Lyusiy proves his textological concept of Russian culture based on the examples of Crimean, Moscow, Siberian, Altai, Ural, Volzhsk, Samara and other regional supertexts. Thus, a text becomes a synonym of 'readability' of this or that cultural environment. Gnoseological (cognitive) metaphor of a text/supertext allows to analyze the human habitat as the sign-oriented sybmolic reality called semiosis, or, more properly, semiocenosis. 

Ключевые слова: Lyusiy, cultural studies, Russian philosophy, Crimean text, Moscow text, philosophy of culture, elitocracy, semiosis, semiocenosis, geosophy

Библиография:
Lyusyy A. P. Krymskiy tekst v russkoy literature. SPb., 2003.
Lyusyy A. P. Nasledie Kryma: geosofiya, tekstual'nost', identichnost'. M., 2007.
Lyusyy A. P. Nashestvie kachestv: Rossiya kak avtoperevod. M., 2008.
Lyusyy A. P. Poetika predvoskhishcheniya: Rossiya skvoz' prizmu literatury, literatura skvoz' prizmu kul'turologii. M., 2011.
Lyusyy A. P. Moskovskiy tekst: tekstologicheskaya kontseptsiya russkoy kul'tury. M., 2013

References (transliteration):
Lyusyy A. P. Krymskiy tekst v russkoy literature. SPb., 2003.
Lyusyy A. P. Nasledie Kryma: geosofiya, tekstual'nost', identichnost'. M., 2007.
Lyusyy A. P. Nashestvie kachestv: Rossiya kak avtoperevod. M., 2008.
Lyusyy A. P. Poetika predvoskhishcheniya: Rossiya skvoz' prizmu literatury, literatura skvoz' prizmu kul'turologii. M., 2011.
Lyusyy A. P. Moskovskiy tekst: tekstologicheskaya kontseptsiya russkoy kul'tury. M., 2013

Аннотация: Cultural policy is an integral part of Russia's development as a local independent civilization. The civilizational approach to the development of culture in Russia qualitatively alters the research of these processes and enables scenarios of its development. The author of the article provides a complete analysis of the civilizational approach in the form of tables. Trofimova also provides a comparative research of the differences between the civilizational and formational approaches and their application to civilization studies and cultural policy. The results of this analysis allow to foresee the development of the three scenarios: progression, retrogression and stagnation. This research examines the development of these scenarios in the cultural policy of the Russian civilization in the post-Soviet period. First the author suggests that we should research different scenarios of the development of the Russian civilization. Based on the results of that analysis, the author provides a detailed description of different scenarios of the development of cultural policy in Russia. Due to the fact that Russian civilization is now in the process of selecting a preferred scenario, in the coming years cultural policy will develop contradictionary and will aim at a more stable line of development. The novelty of the civilizational approach described and used by the author of the article is caused by the fact that the author views cultural policy as a special algorithm of local civilization. According to the author, this algorithm defines the further development of Russian civilization in many ways. 

Ключевые слова: cultural heritage, development scenarios, civilizational approach, algorithm of local civilization, cultural and economic systems, innovative local civilization, traditional civilization, culture, cultural policy, globalization

Библиография:
Osnovy gosudarstvennoy kul'turnoy politiki. Proekt .-M., 2014.
Kontseptsiya dolgosrochnogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda.-M. 2009., c.17.
Gurevich P.S. Plenitel'noe mertsanie tsivilizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2014. – № 10. – S. 1389-1392. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.10.13119
Gurevich P.S. Reforma vs revolyutsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 883-888. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.7.9059
Trofimova R.P. Metafizika tsivilizatsiologii.-M.: Finansovyy universitet. 2011., 167s.
Trofimova R.P. Filosofiya tsivilizatsiy.-Charleston, SC., USA. 2014. 195s.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa: vzglyad na kul'turnye i politicheskie otnosheniya slavyanskogo mira k greko-romanskomu. — M.: Kniga, 1991.
Trofimova R.P. Kul'turologiya: teoriya i praktika.-M.: FA.,1997., 214s.
Toynbi A. Postizhenie istorii-M., 1991.
Toynbi A. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii.-M., 2003.
Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy.-M., 2003.
Korolev S.A. Fundamental'nye istoricheskie protsessy v Rossii: retro-i perspektiva // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 907-925. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.7.8790.
Chumakov A. N. Kul'tura i vyzovy globalizatsii: novye podkhody // Vek globalizatsii. 2011., № 2(8).
Chumakov A. N. Globalizatsiya. Kontury tselostnogo mira. – M.: Prospekt. 2011.

References (transliteration):
Osnovy gosudarstvennoy kul'turnoy politiki. Proekt .-M., 2014.
Kontseptsiya dolgosrochnogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda.-M. 2009., c.17.
Gurevich P.S. Plenitel'noe mertsanie tsivilizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2014. – № 10. – S. 1389-1392. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.10.13119
Gurevich P.S. Reforma vs revolyutsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 883-888. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.7.9059
Trofimova R.P. Metafizika tsivilizatsiologii.-M.: Finansovyy universitet. 2011., 167s.
Trofimova R.P. Filosofiya tsivilizatsiy.-Charleston, SC., USA. 2014. 195s.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa: vzglyad na kul'turnye i politicheskie otnosheniya slavyanskogo mira k greko-romanskomu. — M.: Kniga, 1991.
Trofimova R.P. Kul'turologiya: teoriya i praktika.-M.: FA.,1997., 214s.
Toynbi A. Postizhenie istorii-M., 1991.
Toynbi A. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii.-M., 2003.
Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy.-M., 2003.
Korolev S.A. Fundamental'nye istoricheskie protsessy v Rossii: retro-i perspektiva // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 7. – S. 907-925. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.7.8790.
Chumakov A. N. Kul'tura i vyzovy globalizatsii: novye podkhody // Vek globalizatsii. 2011., № 2(8).
Chumakov A. N. Globalizatsiya. Kontury tselostnogo mira. – M.: Prospekt. 2011.

Аннотация: It is Georgy Fedotov's idea that just like a philosopher and historian, a poet performs educating and identifying functions and often appears to be a messenger of approaching changes. To what degree does this statement deserve to be treated seriously? It would be obviously unscientific to admit that a poet can play a role of a medium. On the other hand, many literary geniuses have been prophets. A good example is Lermontov and his poem 'Prophecy' written in 1830 when Lermontov spoke of a 'dreadful year of Russia' when 'the crown of Russia shall fall'. The subject of the present research article is Alexander Blok's poetic heritage, its conceptual and prophetic potentials. The method of analysis is Sergey Bulgakov's statement that a teacher can create his own interpretation of a poem through 'summarizing thoughts and impressions thereof' as well as Mikhail Bakhtin's idea that a person who perceives a poetical work also perceives its 'rhythm, intonation, articulatory tension, and internal gestures' and, thus, starts to 'think and live according to culture'. The novelty of the article (and the main conclusion) is that the author emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary research in the integrated analysis of Alexander Blok's poetical writing who, as he said himself, felt the future in the music of his poems. According to the author, such analysis could have been made by literary critics, poets and experts in musical creativity. 

Ключевые слова: history, philosophy, music, creativity, government, poetry, people, poet, Blok, social consciousness

Библиография:
Berdyaev N.A. V zashchitu A. Bloka // Aleksandr Blok: Pro et Contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo Aleksandra Bloka v kritike i memuarakh sovremennikov. Antologiya / Podgot. N.Yu. Gryakalova. SPb.: Izd-vo Rus. Khristian. gumanit. in-ta, 2004. 535 s. S. 452-456.
Orlov V. Aleksandr Blok. Predislovie // Blok Aleksandr. Izbrannoe: stikhotvoreniya i poemy / Sost., predisl. i primech. V. Orlova. 7-e izd. M.: Det. lit., 1978. 191 s.
Nikol'skiy S.A. Poet i Vlast'. (Zametki o vospriyatii Osipom i Nadezhdoy Mandel'shtam «vremeni bol'shevikov») // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 6(66). S. 806-815.
Nikol'skiy S.A. Golos i molchanie. Anna Akhmatova // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 6(78). S. 841-848.
Nikol'skiy S.A. Zhivoe i mertvoe: puteshestvie Andreya Platonova po tsarstvu smerti // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 9. S. 110-120.
Fedotov G.P. Na pole Kulikovom // Aleksandr Blok: Pro et Contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo Aleksandra Bloka v kritike i memuarakh sovremennikov. Antologiya / Podgot. N.Yu. Gryakalova. SPb.: Izd-vo Rus. Khristian. gumanit. in-ta, 2004. 535 s. S. 537-558.
Lermontov M.Yu. Poln. sobr. soch.: v 10 t. M.: Voskresen'e, 2001. T. 1.
Akhmatova Anna. Poln. sobr. poezii i prozy v odnom tome. M.: Al'fa-kniga, 2010. 1007 s.
Platonov Andrey. «…ya prozhil zhizn'». Pis'ma (1920–1950 gg.). M.: Astrel', 2013. 685 s.
Varlamov A. Andrey Platonov. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, ZhZL, 2011. 560 s.
Annenkov A.P. Dnevnik moikh vstrech: tsikl tragediy. M.: Vagrius, 2005. 732 s.
Pushkin A.S. Sobr. soch.: v 10 t. M.: Pravda, 1981. T. 2.
Stepun F. Istoriosofskoe i politicheskoe mirosozertsanie Bloka // Aleksandr Blok: Pro et Contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo Aleksandra Bloka v kritike i memuarakh sovremennikov. Antologiya / Podgot. N.Yu. Gryakalova. SPb.: Izd-vo Rus. Khristian. gumanit. in-ta, 2004. 535 s. S. 595-608.
Bulgakov S.N. Chekhov kak myslitel' // Puteshestvie k Chekhovu / Sost. V.B. Korobov. M.: Shkola-Press, 1996. S. 590-621.
Tolstoy L.N. Tak chto zhe nam delat'? // Tolstoy L.N. Sobr. soch.: v 22 t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1983. T.
S. 166-395. 16. Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. 504 s.
Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Vremya kul'tury. SPb.: Izd-vo RKhGI, 2000. 344 s.
Blok Aleksandr. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura: Leningr. otd-nie, 1980. T. 1.
Blok Aleksandr. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura: Leningr. otd-nie, 1980. T. 2.
Novikov V. Aleksandr Blok. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, ZhZL, 2010. 368 s.
Berberova N. Blok i ego vremya. M.: Astrel', 2012. 252 s

References (transliteration):
Berdyaev N.A. V zashchitu A. Bloka // Aleksandr Blok: Pro et Contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo Aleksandra Bloka v kritike i memuarakh sovremennikov. Antologiya / Podgot. N.Yu. Gryakalova. SPb.: Izd-vo Rus. Khristian. gumanit. in-ta, 2004. 535 s. S. 452-456.
Orlov V. Aleksandr Blok. Predislovie // Blok Aleksandr. Izbrannoe: stikhotvoreniya i poemy / Sost., predisl. i primech. V. Orlova. 7-e izd. M.: Det. lit., 1978. 191 s.
Nikol'skiy S.A. Poet i Vlast'. (Zametki o vospriyatii Osipom i Nadezhdoy Mandel'shtam «vremeni bol'shevikov») // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 6(66). S. 806-815.
Nikol'skiy S.A. Golos i molchanie. Anna Akhmatova // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 6(78). S. 841-848.
Nikol'skiy S.A. Zhivoe i mertvoe: puteshestvie Andreya Platonova po tsarstvu smerti // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 9. S. 110-120.
Fedotov G.P. Na pole Kulikovom // Aleksandr Blok: Pro et Contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo Aleksandra Bloka v kritike i memuarakh sovremennikov. Antologiya / Podgot. N.Yu. Gryakalova. SPb.: Izd-vo Rus. Khristian. gumanit. in-ta, 2004. 535 s. S. 537-558.
Lermontov M.Yu. Poln. sobr. soch.: v 10 t. M.: Voskresen'e, 2001. T. 1.
Akhmatova Anna. Poln. sobr. poezii i prozy v odnom tome. M.: Al'fa-kniga, 2010. 1007 s.
Platonov Andrey. «…ya prozhil zhizn'». Pis'ma (1920–1950 gg.). M.: Astrel', 2013. 685 s.
Varlamov A. Andrey Platonov. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, ZhZL, 2011. 560 s.
Annenkov A.P. Dnevnik moikh vstrech: tsikl tragediy. M.: Vagrius, 2005. 732 s.
Pushkin A.S. Sobr. soch.: v 10 t. M.: Pravda, 1981. T. 2.
Stepun F. Istoriosofskoe i politicheskoe mirosozertsanie Bloka // Aleksandr Blok: Pro et Contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo Aleksandra Bloka v kritike i memuarakh sovremennikov. Antologiya / Podgot. N.Yu. Gryakalova. SPb.: Izd-vo Rus. Khristian. gumanit. in-ta, 2004. 535 s. S. 595-608.
Bulgakov S.N. Chekhov kak myslitel' // Puteshestvie k Chekhovu / Sost. V.B. Korobov. M.: Shkola-Press, 1996. S. 590-621.
Tolstoy L.N. Tak chto zhe nam delat'? // Tolstoy L.N. Sobr. soch.: v 22 t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1983. T.
S. 166-395. 16. Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. 504 s.
Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Vremya kul'tury. SPb.: Izd-vo RKhGI, 2000. 344 s.
Blok Aleksandr. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura: Leningr. otd-nie, 1980. T. 1.
Blok Aleksandr. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura: Leningr. otd-nie, 1980. T. 2.
Novikov V. Aleksandr Blok. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, ZhZL, 2010. 368 s.
Berberova N. Blok i ego vremya. M.: Astrel', 2012. 252 s

Аннотация: According to the author of the article, it is impossible to obtain a complete understanding of the essence of a socio-cultural phenomenon without answering the question about what needs this or that phenomenon satisfies. The solution of that issue with reference to the institution of celebration would allow to define all kinds of functions performed thereby.  It is quite obvious that the aesthetic sphere, being successfully included in such a cultural institution as celebration, does not only perform direct functions (enjoyment, education of taste, etc.) but also directly or indirectly contribute to the development of the political culture and impose ideological standards. In her research Lavrikova has ued the general scientific methods including typological and textual methods and systems approach for defining functions of celebration as a cultural institution. Based on the analysis of the key functions of celebration, the author establishes the main provisions to systematize concepts of celebration offered by different authors. As a result of studying functions of celebration, the author have defined 1) factors contributing to the implementation of the communicative function of a holiday as well as a political holiday, and 2) a special function of a political holiday based on which the author describes the main targets and tasks for a political holiday facilitator. 

Ключевые слова: nature of a holiday, needs, politics, aesthetic sphere, culture, communication, ideology, up-bringing, consciousness, functions

Библиография:
A.A. Razin Tipologiya lyudey: interesy
i potrebnosti // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 338 - 344. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.4.
Kuchinov A.M. Podkhod k analizu politicheskogo protsessa cherez ego vzaimosvyaz' s sotsiokul'turnoy dinamikoy – al'ternativa podkhodu «politicheskoy kul'tury» // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva. - 2013. - 4. - C. 43 - 52. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.4.5567. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_5567.html
Borisenkov A.A. O politicheskoy kul'ture kak sposobe politicheskogo bytiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 102 - 128. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_69.html
Kerenui La Religion autique. Sess Lignes fondamentales. Geneva, 1957.
Cox H.G. Feast of fools. A theological essay on festiviti and fantasy. Har-vard univ. press, 1969.
Bollnow O.F. Neue Geborgenheit. Das Problem einer Überwindung des Existentialismus. Stuttgart, 1960.
Maslou A.G. Motivatsiya i lichnost'. Perevod s angl. Tatlybaevoy A.M. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya Akulinoy N.N. – SPb.: Evraziya, 1999.
Marks K., Engel's F. – Soch., M.: Politizdat, 1-e izd. T. 2.
Mazaev A.I. Prazdnik kak sotsial'no-khudozhestvennoe yavlenie. Opyt is-toriko-teoret. issled. M.: Nauka, 1976.
Lapteva L.S. Sotsial'no-esteticheskaya priroda i funktsii massovogo prazdnik. M., 1975.
Kul'turologiya: lyudi i idei. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt; RIK. 2006.
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. – 2-e izd. – M.: «Aspekt Press», 1995.
Genkin D.M. Massovye prazdniki. M., «Prosveshchenie», 1975.
Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Prognozirovanie sotsial'nykh potrebnostey molodezhi. Opyt sotsiolog, issled. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Benifand A.V. Prazdnik, sushchnost', istoriya, sovremennost'. – Krasno-yarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoyar. un-ta, 1986.

References (transliteration):
A.A. Razin Tipologiya lyudey: interesy
i potrebnosti // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 338 - 344. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.4.
Kuchinov A.M. Podkhod k analizu politicheskogo protsessa cherez ego vzaimosvyaz' s sotsiokul'turnoy dinamikoy – al'ternativa podkhodu «politicheskoy kul'tury» // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva. - 2013. - 4. - C. 43 - 52. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.4.5567. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_5567.html
Borisenkov A.A. O politicheskoy kul'ture kak sposobe politicheskogo bytiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 102 - 128. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_69.html
Kerenui La Religion autique. Sess Lignes fondamentales. Geneva, 1957.
Cox H.G. Feast of fools. A theological essay on festiviti and fantasy. Har-vard univ. press, 1969.
Bollnow O.F. Neue Geborgenheit. Das Problem einer Überwindung des Existentialismus. Stuttgart, 1960.
Maslou A.G. Motivatsiya i lichnost'. Perevod s angl. Tatlybaevoy A.M. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya Akulinoy N.N. – SPb.: Evraziya, 1999.
Marks K., Engel's F. – Soch., M.: Politizdat, 1-e izd. T. 2.
Mazaev A.I. Prazdnik kak sotsial'no-khudozhestvennoe yavlenie. Opyt is-toriko-teoret. issled. M.: Nauka, 1976.
Lapteva L.S. Sotsial'no-esteticheskaya priroda i funktsii massovogo prazdnik. M., 1975.
Kul'turologiya: lyudi i idei. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt; RIK. 2006.
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. – 2-e izd. – M.: «Aspekt Press», 1995.
Genkin D.M. Massovye prazdniki. M., «Prosveshchenie», 1975.
Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Prognozirovanie sotsial'nykh potrebnostey molodezhi. Opyt sotsiolog, issled. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Benifand A.V. Prazdnik, sushchnost', istoriya, sovremennost'. – Krasno-yarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoyar. un-ta, 1986.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the transformation of the form and style of philosophical writing in culture over the past two centuries. The author of the article demonstrates the crucial importance of appealing to the experience of discussing the relationship between thought and word in philosophy after Kant, describes new factors influencing philosophical provisions in culture and emphasizes the need for the analysis of the relationship between conceptual and expressive means in the philosophy of Kant, German romanticists and Hegel. In his research the author has used the methods of historical and philosophical reconstruction and analysis, comparative historical and sociological methods and defined the main trends in the evolution of philosophical methods and the means of their expression in philosophical texts. The researcher proves the methodological and stylistic singularity of the Phenomenology of Spirit where the search for a new image of the authentic language of philosophy is based on studying the 'experience of mind' synthesizing the material obtained through spiritual human activity. The author underlines that these are the nettlesome issues for the philosophical community today due to the changed social and information environment as well as the need to find a new image of philosophical writing and communication within the philosophical community. 

Ключевые слова: nature of philosophy, concept of philosophy, thought expression problem, means of artistic expression, aesthetics of German romanticism, philosophy and poetry, 'The Phenomenology of Spirit' method, contemporary information environment, social context of philosophy, individual nature of thought expression

Библиография:
Gegel' G. V. F. Fenomenologiya dukha // Sochineniya. T. IV. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy literatury, 1959. 440 s.
Vasil'eva T. V. Afinskaya shkola filosofii. Filosofskiy yazyk Platona i Aristotelya.-M.: Nauka, 1985. 160 s.
Vaynshteyn O. B. Yazyk romanticheskoy mysli. O filosofskom stile Novalisa i Fridrikha Shlegelya.-M.: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarnyy universitet, 1994. 80 s.
Mamardashvili M. K. Kantianskie variatsii. – M.: «Agraf», 2002. 320 s.
Vlasov A. D. Slovar' po filosofii Gegelya (Fenomenologiya dukha). – M.: MIFI, 1997. 540 s.
Losev A. F. Problema khudozhestvennogo stilya. – Kiev: «Collegium», «Kievskaya Akademiya Evrobiznesa», 1994. 288 s.
Novalis. Genrikh fon Ofterdingen. Fragmenty. Ucheniki v Saise. – Spb.: «Evraziya», 1995. 240 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Pis'ma // Raboty raznykh let. T. 2. – M.: Mysl', 1973. S. 211-528.
Shpet G. G. Ot perevodchika // Gegel' G. V. F. Soch., t. IV. S. XLVI–XLVIII.
Gegel' G. V. Fenomenologiya dukha. – SPb.: Tipografiya Akts. Ob-va «Brokgauz'-Efron'», 1913. 377 s.
Ovsyannikov M. F. Filosofiya Gegelya. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy literatury, 1959. 305 s.
Avtonomova N. S. Zametki o filosofskom yazyke: traditsii, problemy, perspektivy // Voprosy filosofii. 1999. №11.
Alekseev A. P. Obraznaya tkan' filosofskogo proizvedeniya (k voprosu o sopostavlenii filosofii i literatury) // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. №11.
Novalis. Fragmenty v perevode Grigoriya Petnikova. I. – M.: «Liren'», 1914. 32 s.
Rozanov V. V. O Konst. Leont'eve // V. V. Rozanov i K. N. Leont'ev. Materialy neizdannoy knigi «Literaturnye izgnanniki». Perepiska. Neopublikovannye teksty. Stat'i o K. N. Leont'eve. Kommentarii / Sost. E. V. Ivanovoy. – SPb.: Rostok, 2014. 1182 s.
Antonova E.M. Ad libitum: filosofiya i poeziya. // Litera. - 2013. - 1. - C. 222 - 242. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8698.2013.1.63. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_63.html

References (transliteration):
Gegel' G. V. F. Fenomenologiya dukha // Sochineniya. T. IV. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy literatury, 1959. 440 s.
Vasil'eva T. V. Afinskaya shkola filosofii. Filosofskiy yazyk Platona i Aristotelya.-M.: Nauka, 1985. 160 s.
Vaynshteyn O. B. Yazyk romanticheskoy mysli. O filosofskom stile Novalisa i Fridrikha Shlegelya.-M.: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarnyy universitet, 1994. 80 s.
Mamardashvili M. K. Kantianskie variatsii. – M.: «Agraf», 2002. 320 s.
Vlasov A. D. Slovar' po filosofii Gegelya (Fenomenologiya dukha). – M.: MIFI, 1997. 540 s.
Losev A. F. Problema khudozhestvennogo stilya. – Kiev: «Collegium», «Kievskaya Akademiya Evrobiznesa», 1994. 288 s.
Novalis. Genrikh fon Ofterdingen. Fragmenty. Ucheniki v Saise. – Spb.: «Evraziya», 1995. 240 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Pis'ma // Raboty raznykh let. T. 2. – M.: Mysl', 1973. S. 211-528.
Shpet G. G. Ot perevodchika // Gegel' G. V. F. Soch., t. IV. S. XLVI–XLVIII.
Gegel' G. V. Fenomenologiya dukha. – SPb.: Tipografiya Akts. Ob-va «Brokgauz'-Efron'», 1913. 377 s.
Ovsyannikov M. F. Filosofiya Gegelya. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy literatury, 1959. 305 s.
Avtonomova N. S. Zametki o filosofskom yazyke: traditsii, problemy, perspektivy // Voprosy filosofii. 1999. №11.
Alekseev A. P. Obraznaya tkan' filosofskogo proizvedeniya (k voprosu o sopostavlenii filosofii i literatury) // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. №11.
Novalis. Fragmenty v perevode Grigoriya Petnikova. I. – M.: «Liren'», 1914. 32 s.
Rozanov V. V. O Konst. Leont'eve // V. V. Rozanov i K. N. Leont'ev. Materialy neizdannoy knigi «Literaturnye izgnanniki». Perepiska. Neopublikovannye teksty. Stat'i o K. N. Leont'eve. Kommentarii / Sost. E. V. Ivanovoy. – SPb.: Rostok, 2014. 1182 s.
Antonova E.M. Ad libitum: filosofiya i poeziya. // Litera. - 2013. - 1. - C. 222 - 242. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8698.2013.1.63. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_63.html

Аннотация: The article conciders the processes taking place in the European culture of the second half of XIX — early XX centuries. Particular attention is given to the various manifestations of the crisis of the old system of art forms and gradual search for other ways except for established ways of reality transmission. Impressionist painters, French writers and poets developed a new understanding of art and its role in human life. During that period aesthetic appreciation and creative intuition rose to the level of the leading means of knowledge of reality. The present study has been carried out through successive selection of various cultural phenomena that allowed to describe changes not only in the arts but also in philosophy as artistic creativity of that period was closely related to the interest demonstrated by philosophers towards consciousness, intuition and new understanding of the category of time. The novelty of this study is caused by the fact that the researcher has identified what caused the failure of the previous model of reality perception when reality lost its unchanging and solid status and the boundary between the internal feelings and external reality increasingly blurred. From this point of view, philosophical concepts of Ernst Cassirer and Maurice Merleau-Ponty can be considered as the final stages of the process that orignated from the «impressionist» vision of the world.

Ключевые слова: poetry, intuition, impressionism, realism, philosophy of culture, art, European culture, synthesis of the arts, subjectivization, philosophy of life

Библиография:
Krauss R. The Optical Unconscious. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press, 2003. P. 1-27.
Buck-Morss S. Aesthetics and Anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin's Artwork Essay Reconsidered. October 62, Fall 1992. MIT Press. P. 3-41
Kreri Dzh. Tekhniki nablyudatelya. Videnie i sovremennost' v XIX veke / Per. s angl. D. Potemkina. M.: V-A-C press, 2014. 249 s.
Merlo-Ponti M. Vidimoe i nevidimoe / Per. s frants. O.N. Shparagi. Mn.: Logvinov, 2006. 400 s.
Merleau-Ponty M. Le doute de Cézanne // Merleau-Ponty M. Sens et non-sense. P., 1996. P.13-33
Merlo-Ponti M. Oko i dukh / Per. s frants. A.V. Gustyrya. M.: Iskusstvo, 1992. 63 s.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. V 3-kh t. T.1. / Per. s nem. S. A. Romashko. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002. 272 s.
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya / Per. s frants. D. Kalugina, L. Karyagina, A. Markova, A. Shestakova, pod red. I.S. Vdovinoy, S.L. Fokina. M.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999. 608 s.
Valeri P. Ob iskusstve. M.: Iskusstvo, 1993. 523 s.
Bergson A. Tvorcheskaya evolyutsiya. Materiya i pamyat'. Mn.: Kharvest, 1999. 1408 s.
Bergson A. Dlitel'nost' i odnovremennost' / Perevod s frants. A. A. Frankovskogo. Pg.: Academia, 1923. 154 s.
Dil'tey V. Vvedenie v nauki o dukhe. Sobr. soch. v 6 t. T. 1. M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 2000. 760 s.
Makh E. Analiz oshchushcheniy i otnoshenie fizicheskogo k psikhicheskomu. M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2005. 304 s.
Delez Zh. Marsel' Prust i znaki / Per. s frants. E.G. Sokolova. SPb.: Aleteyya, 1999. 190 s.
Prust M. Po napravleniyu k Svanu / Per. s frants. N. Lyubimova. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1973. 464 s.
Ten I. Filosofiya iskusstva / Per. s frants. A. N. Chudinova. M.: Respublika, 1996. 351 c.
Mikhaylov A.D. Poetika Prusta. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2012. 504 s.
Verlen P. Izbrannoe / Per. s frants. G. Shengeli. M.: Mosk. rabochiy, 1996. 238 s.
Rembo A. Stikhi. Poslednie stikhotvoreniya. Ozareniya. Odno leto v adu. M.: Nauka, 1982. 507 s.
Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla. M.: Nauka, 1970. 479 s.
Bodler Sh. Rikhard Vagner i «Tangeyzer» v Parizhe // Muzykal'naya zhizn'. 1988. N12. S.19 — 21.
Vipper B.R. Stat'i ob iskusstve. M.: Iskusstvo, 1970. 591 s.
Prokof'ev V. N. Postimpressionizm. M.: Iskusstvo, 1973. 184 s.
M.: Pravda, 1958. 500 s. 8. Yavorskaya N.V. Peyzazh Barbizonskoy shkoly. M.: Iskusstvo, 1962. 348 s.
Mopassan G. de. Polnoe sobr. soch. v 12 t. T.
Gonkur E. i Zh. de. Dnevnik. Zapiski o literaturnoy zhizni. Izbrannye stranitsy. V 2-kh t. T.1. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1964. 709 c.
Gonkur E. i Zh. de. Zhermini Laserte. Brat'ya Zemgano. Aktrisa Fosten / Perevod s frants.E. Linetskoy. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. 494 s.
Bakhtin M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. 504 s.
Bozhovich V.I. Traditsii i vzaimodeystvie iskusstv. Frantsiya, konets XIX — nachalo XX veka. M.: Nauka, 1987. 320 s.
Morris U. Budushchee arkhitektury v usloviyakh tsivilizatsii // Morris U. Iskusstvo i zhizn'. Izbrannye stat'i, lektsii, rechi, pis'ma / Per.s angl. R. F. Usmanovoy. M.: Iskusstvo, 1973. S. 352 — 387
Zemper G. Prakticheskaya estetika / Per s nem. yaz. V.G. Kalisha. M.: Iskusstvo, 1970. 320 s.

References (transliteration):
Krauss R. The Optical Unconscious. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press, 2003. P. 1-27.
Buck-Morss S. Aesthetics and Anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin's Artwork Essay Reconsidered. October 62, Fall 1992. MIT Press. P. 3-41
Kreri Dzh. Tekhniki nablyudatelya. Videnie i sovremennost' v XIX veke / Per. s angl. D. Potemkina. M.: V-A-C press, 2014. 249 s.
Merlo-Ponti M. Vidimoe i nevidimoe / Per. s frants. O.N. Shparagi. Mn.: Logvinov, 2006. 400 s.
Merleau-Ponty M. Le doute de Cézanne // Merleau-Ponty M. Sens et non-sense. P., 1996. P.13-33
Merlo-Ponti M. Oko i dukh / Per. s frants. A.V. Gustyrya. M.: Iskusstvo, 1992. 63 s.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. V 3-kh t. T.1. / Per. s nem. S. A. Romashko. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002. 272 s.
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya / Per. s frants. D. Kalugina, L. Karyagina, A. Markova, A. Shestakova, pod red. I.S. Vdovinoy, S.L. Fokina. M.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999. 608 s.
Valeri P. Ob iskusstve. M.: Iskusstvo, 1993. 523 s.
Bergson A. Tvorcheskaya evolyutsiya. Materiya i pamyat'. Mn.: Kharvest, 1999. 1408 s.
Bergson A. Dlitel'nost' i odnovremennost' / Perevod s frants. A. A. Frankovskogo. Pg.: Academia, 1923. 154 s.
Dil'tey V. Vvedenie v nauki o dukhe. Sobr. soch. v 6 t. T. 1. M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 2000. 760 s.
Makh E. Analiz oshchushcheniy i otnoshenie fizicheskogo k psikhicheskomu. M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2005. 304 s.
Delez Zh. Marsel' Prust i znaki / Per. s frants. E.G. Sokolova. SPb.: Aleteyya, 1999. 190 s.
Prust M. Po napravleniyu k Svanu / Per. s frants. N. Lyubimova. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1973. 464 s.
Ten I. Filosofiya iskusstva / Per. s frants. A. N. Chudinova. M.: Respublika, 1996. 351 c.
Mikhaylov A.D. Poetika Prusta. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2012. 504 s.
Verlen P. Izbrannoe / Per. s frants. G. Shengeli. M.: Mosk. rabochiy, 1996. 238 s.
Rembo A. Stikhi. Poslednie stikhotvoreniya. Ozareniya. Odno leto v adu. M.: Nauka, 1982. 507 s.
Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla. M.: Nauka, 1970. 479 s.
Bodler Sh. Rikhard Vagner i «Tangeyzer» v Parizhe // Muzykal'naya zhizn'. 1988. N12. S.19 — 21.
Vipper B.R. Stat'i ob iskusstve. M.: Iskusstvo, 1970. 591 s.
Prokof'ev V. N. Postimpressionizm. M.: Iskusstvo, 1973. 184 s.
M.: Pravda, 1958. 500 s. 8. Yavorskaya N.V. Peyzazh Barbizonskoy shkoly. M.: Iskusstvo, 1962. 348 s.
Mopassan G. de. Polnoe sobr. soch. v 12 t. T.
Gonkur E. i Zh. de. Dnevnik. Zapiski o literaturnoy zhizni. Izbrannye stranitsy. V 2-kh t. T.1. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1964. 709 c.
Gonkur E. i Zh. de. Zhermini Laserte. Brat'ya Zemgano. Aktrisa Fosten / Perevod s frants.E. Linetskoy. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. 494 s.
Bakhtin M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. 504 s.
Bozhovich V.I. Traditsii i vzaimodeystvie iskusstv. Frantsiya, konets XIX — nachalo XX veka. M.: Nauka, 1987. 320 s.
Morris U. Budushchee arkhitektury v usloviyakh tsivilizatsii // Morris U. Iskusstvo i zhizn'. Izbrannye stat'i, lektsii, rechi, pis'ma / Per.s angl. R. F. Usmanovoy. M.: Iskusstvo, 1973. S. 352 — 387
Zemper G. Prakticheskaya estetika / Per s nem. yaz. V.G. Kalisha. M.: Iskusstvo, 1970. 320 s.

Аннотация: The subject of research in the article is the philosophical analysis of the axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia. Axiodynamic processes of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia are presented in accordance with their phenomenological and mental grounds and social conditions. A significant aspect of the study is the philosophical analysis of the "diffusion of values": the loss of old values and the emergence of new values, distorted perception of westernized values, etc. The subject of the research is specified in the following sections of the article: "Social conditions of axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia" and " Axiological crisis in terms of transformation of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia. "The research methodology involves the combination of axiological, socio-cultural and socio-ontological approaches. The content and structural processes of axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia are analyzed by using the combination of philosophical research methodology and the framework of categories and concepts and methods of social psychology and social cognitive science.The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the researcher identifies the following particula features of axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia: 1) Axiological crisis has led to phenomenological, socio-gnoseogenic and structure-functional transformations of public consciousness in post-Soviet Russia those transformations in many respects reached crisis proportions; 2) all the basic axiological crises of modern Western culture were immanent for the post-Russian public consciousness although they gain the features of the socio-cultural environment and the cousrse of social transformations happening in post-Soviet Russia of those times; 3) from the point of view of structural and functional terms, the following four main processes occur in the axiological matrix: devaluation of traditional values; establishment of destructive values because of their roots in the unconscious mental formations; heavy structural assimilation of new values and fast adoption of new destructive values. 

Ключевые слова: social conditions, axiodynamics, value, public (social) consciousness, post-Soviet Russia, culture, society, human, westernization, transformation

Библиография:
Baeva, L. V. Istochniki stanovleniya tsennostey// [Elektronnyy resurs] / L. V. Baeva. – Rezhim dostupa : http://www.polygnozis.ru/default.asp?num=6&num2=79, svobodnyy. – Zaglavie s ekrana. – Yaz. rus.
Dinamika sotsial'noy struktury i transformatsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya (kruglyy stol) [Tekst] // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – M. : Nauka, 1998.-№ 12. – S. 48-61.-ISSN 0132-1625.
Zaslavskaya, T. I. Sotsietal'naya transformatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva: deyatel'nostno-strukturnaya kontseptsiya [Tekst] : monografiya / T. I. Zaslavskaya. — Moskva : Delo, 2002. — 568 s.
Rassadina, T. A. Transformatsiya traditsionnykh tsennostey rossiyan v post perestroechnyy period [Tekst] / T. A. Rassadina // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. — M. : Nauka, 2006. — № 9. — S. 95-101.
Fedotova, V. G. Faktory tsennostnykh izmeneniy na Zapade i v Rossii [Tekst] / V. G. Fedotova // Voprosy filosofii. — M. : Nauka, 2005. — № 11. — S. 3-23.
Khrapov, S. A. Antropologicheskiy faktor stanovleniya potrebitel'skoy napravlennosti obshchestvennogo soznaniya sovremennoy Rossii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii.-Volgograd : Izdatel'stvo GOU VPO VolGU,-2009.-№ 1 – S. 52-57.
Khrapov, S. A. Sovremennyy sotsiokul'turnyy kontekst deval'vatsii klassicheskikh aksiologicheskikh modeley «Bytie» i «Bog». // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014.-№ 8.-S.1208-1215. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.8.12486
Khrapov, S. A. Transformatsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya sovremennoy Rossii: sotsiokul'turnye osnovaniya i krizisnye tendentsii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya. – M.: ORPI RGSU, 2008.-№ 3 – S. 231-245.
Khrapov, S. A. Stanovlenie predstavleniy o krizisnykh tendentsiyakh obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Uchenye zapiski RGSU. – M.: ORPI RGSU, 2009.-№ 3 – S. 164-172.
Khrapov, S. A. Vzaimodeystvie sotsial'noy pamyati i obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii: sotsial'no-filosofskiy podkhod [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii.-Volgograd : Izdatel'stvo GOU VPO VolGU,-2010.-№ 2 – S. 38-43.
Khrapov, S. A. Kontseptualizatsiya ponyatiya «sotsial'naya pamyat'» v sisteme sotsial'no-gumanitarnogo znaniya // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Zhurnal fundamental'nykh i prikladnykh issledovaniy pod. red. Isaeva, G. G. – Astrakhan' : Izdatel'skiy dom «Astrakhanskiy universitet».-2010. – №3. – S. 10–14.
Khrapov, S. A. Kontseptualizatsiya ponyatiya «sotsial'naya pamyat'» v sisteme filosofskogo znaniya // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Zhurnal fundamental'nykh i prikladnykh issledovaniy pod. red. Isaeva, G. G. – Astrakhan' : Izdatel'skiy dom «Astrakhanskiy universitet». – 2010. – №4. – S. 23–26.
Emel'yanov A.V. "Chelovek gedonisticheskiy" v aspekte konstruirovaniya sushchnostnykh obrazov cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 725 - 730. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.5.9818.
N.A. Ivan'ko Traditsionnye tsennosti Rossii
kak sotsial'nyy kontsept. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 11. - C. 25 - 31.
E.A. Popov Kul'tura i obshchestvo v ipostasyakh dukhovno-bezdukhovnogo // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 4. - C. 56 - 59.
Popov E.A. Kul'tura, obshchestvo i chelovek v ob'ektno-predmetnom pole sovremennoy sotsial'noy kul'turologii i sotsiologii kul'tury // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 170 - 204. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.3.415. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_415.html
Popov E.A., Bobina G.S. Sotsial'no-pravovye fenomeny i ikh osmyslenie v tsennostno-normativnoy sisteme rossiyskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 4 - 10. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.8968.
N.N. Paleeva Tsennosti i situatsii riska // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 11. - C. 50 - 57.
Khorina G.P. Demokratiya v sovremennoy rossiyskoy kul'ture: ideal i real'nost'
// Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 15. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2013.4.6973. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_6973.html

References (transliteration):
Baeva, L. V. Istochniki stanovleniya tsennostey// [Elektronnyy resurs] / L. V. Baeva. – Rezhim dostupa : http://www.polygnozis.ru/default.asp?num=6&num2=79, svobodnyy. – Zaglavie s ekrana. – Yaz. rus.
Dinamika sotsial'noy struktury i transformatsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya (kruglyy stol) [Tekst] // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – M. : Nauka, 1998.-№ 12. – S. 48-61.-ISSN 0132-1625.
Zaslavskaya, T. I. Sotsietal'naya transformatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva: deyatel'nostno-strukturnaya kontseptsiya [Tekst] : monografiya / T. I. Zaslavskaya. — Moskva : Delo, 2002. — 568 s.
Rassadina, T. A. Transformatsiya traditsionnykh tsennostey rossiyan v post perestroechnyy period [Tekst] / T. A. Rassadina // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. — M. : Nauka, 2006. — № 9. — S. 95-101.
Fedotova, V. G. Faktory tsennostnykh izmeneniy na Zapade i v Rossii [Tekst] / V. G. Fedotova // Voprosy filosofii. — M. : Nauka, 2005. — № 11. — S. 3-23.
Khrapov, S. A. Antropologicheskiy faktor stanovleniya potrebitel'skoy napravlennosti obshchestvennogo soznaniya sovremennoy Rossii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii.-Volgograd : Izdatel'stvo GOU VPO VolGU,-2009.-№ 1 – S. 52-57.
Khrapov, S. A. Sovremennyy sotsiokul'turnyy kontekst deval'vatsii klassicheskikh aksiologicheskikh modeley «Bytie» i «Bog». // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014.-№ 8.-S.1208-1215. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.8.12486
Khrapov, S. A. Transformatsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya sovremennoy Rossii: sotsiokul'turnye osnovaniya i krizisnye tendentsii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya. – M.: ORPI RGSU, 2008.-№ 3 – S. 231-245.
Khrapov, S. A. Stanovlenie predstavleniy o krizisnykh tendentsiyakh obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Uchenye zapiski RGSU. – M.: ORPI RGSU, 2009.-№ 3 – S. 164-172.
Khrapov, S. A. Vzaimodeystvie sotsial'noy pamyati i obshchestvennogo soznaniya postsovetskoy Rossii: sotsial'no-filosofskiy podkhod [Tekst] / S. A. Khrapov // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii.-Volgograd : Izdatel'stvo GOU VPO VolGU,-2010.-№ 2 – S. 38-43.
Khrapov, S. A. Kontseptualizatsiya ponyatiya «sotsial'naya pamyat'» v sisteme sotsial'no-gumanitarnogo znaniya // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Zhurnal fundamental'nykh i prikladnykh issledovaniy pod. red. Isaeva, G. G. – Astrakhan' : Izdatel'skiy dom «Astrakhanskiy universitet».-2010. – №3. – S. 10–14.
Khrapov, S. A. Kontseptualizatsiya ponyatiya «sotsial'naya pamyat'» v sisteme filosofskogo znaniya // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Zhurnal fundamental'nykh i prikladnykh issledovaniy pod. red. Isaeva, G. G. – Astrakhan' : Izdatel'skiy dom «Astrakhanskiy universitet». – 2010. – №4. – S. 23–26.
Emel'yanov A.V. "Chelovek gedonisticheskiy" v aspekte konstruirovaniya sushchnostnykh obrazov cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 725 - 730. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.5.9818.
N.A. Ivan'ko Traditsionnye tsennosti Rossii
kak sotsial'nyy kontsept. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 11. - C. 25 - 31.
E.A. Popov Kul'tura i obshchestvo v ipostasyakh dukhovno-bezdukhovnogo // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 4. - C. 56 - 59.
Popov E.A. Kul'tura, obshchestvo i chelovek v ob'ektno-predmetnom pole sovremennoy sotsial'noy kul'turologii i sotsiologii kul'tury // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 170 - 204. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.3.415. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_415.html
Popov E.A., Bobina G.S. Sotsial'no-pravovye fenomeny i ikh osmyslenie v tsennostno-normativnoy sisteme rossiyskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 4 - 10. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.8968.
N.N. Paleeva Tsennosti i situatsii riska // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 11. - C. 50 - 57.
Khorina G.P. Demokratiya v sovremennoy rossiyskoy kul'ture: ideal i real'nost'
// Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 15. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2013.4.6973. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_6973.html

Аннотация: "Humanity" doesn't descend from heavens with the Holy Spirit but comes through real animals (ancestors of the mankind) led by instincts. Humanity developed as a result of the need to release from total domination of reflex reactions, on the one hand, and opportunities predetermined by their phenotype, on the other hand. These were the real conditions of creation of the first historical form of culture – the cult. Involvement in cult actions transformed our ancestor into human, consciousness being one of his attributes.  Reconstruction of the initial forms of cult is based on successive comparison of ritual practices with the sensuality genesis separating human from animal as a being with a completely different perception of the world and feelings. As a new form of experience, cult (of motives, values, and derived emotions) sets priorities for the relations above material communications (thus creating its own "virtuality") and is a result of the defensive instinct when man began to focus on community values (as the way to general survival) and was deprived of established mechanisms of behavior, and therefore had to be based on common reactions and community relations. 

Ключевые слова: cult, culture, affects, emotions, Numinosum, archaic thinking, magic, sacral, the unconscious, homo sentiens

Библиография:
Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i «stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-8.-C. 117-146. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.662. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_662.html.
Koptseva N.P. Sovremennye kul'turnye praktiki sokhraneniya etnicheskoy identichnosti korennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka v Respublike Buryatiya // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2014.-1.-C. 17-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.1.10989. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10989.html
Weidkuhn P. Aggressivität und Normativität//Anthropos. 1968—1969. Vol. 63/64. Fasz. 3-4.
Firth R. Essays on social organization and values. London, 1964.
Reimann R. Der Schamane sieht eine Hexe – der Ethnologe sieht nichts. Frankfurt/ Main., 1998.
Durkheim E. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. – L., 1915.
Yung K. G. Eon. Issledovanie o simvolike samosti. – M.; 2009.
Bourguignon E. Psychological anthropology. – N.Y.; 1979.
Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. – M.; 1999.
Freska E., Kyul'sar S. Sotsial'nye svyazi v modulyatsii fiziologii ritual'nogo transa // Lichnost', kul'tura, etnos: sovremennaya psikhologicheskaya antropologiya. – M.; 2001.
Frezer Dzh. Zolotaya vetv'. – M.; 2006.
Tsiv'yan T. V. K semantike prostranstvennykh i vremennykh pokazateley v fol'klore // Sb. statey po vtorichnym modeliruyushchim sistemam. – Tartu.; 1973.
Spektor D.M. Vlast' vremeni. – M.; 2009.
Spektor D.M. Istoricheskie korni dramaticheskoy poetiki. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-№ 4.-S.100-135.
Tokarev S. A. Rannie formy religii. – M.; 1990.
Teylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. – M.; 1989.
Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. – Moskva.; 1966.
Saringulyan K. S. O regulyativnykh aspektakh kul'turnoy traditsii // SE. 1981. № 2.
Saringulyan. K. S. Kul'tura i regulyatsiya deyatel'nosti. – Erevan, 1986.
Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. – M.; 1989.
Materialisty Drevney Gretsii. – M.; 1955.
Pershits, A. I. Problemy normativnoy etnografii // Issledovaniya po obshchey etnografii. M., 1979.
Marett R. Formula tabu-mana kak minimum opredeleniya religii // Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. M., 1998.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka, religiya. – M. 1996.
Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M.; 1988.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. – M.; 1994.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T.2. Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. – M.; 2001.
Vul'f K. K genezisu sotsial'nogo. Mimezis, performativnost', ritual. SPb.; 2009.
Godel'e M. Zagadka dara. – M.; 2007.
Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti severnoy Evrazii). – Ekaterinburg.; 2009.
Antropologicheskie matritsy KhKh veka. L.S. Vygotskiy – P.A. Florenskiy. Nesostoyavshiysya dialog. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007.
Boroday Yu. M. Ot fantazii k real'nosti. – M.; 1995.
Shazhinbatyn A.. Etnoantropologicheskaya kontseptsiya Zh.-Zh. Russo. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 123-131. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10103.
Tkhor V.V.. Britanskaya musul'manskaya identichnost' v usloviyakh mul'tikul'turalizma. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 89-98. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.9815.
Gurevich P.S.. Pervoobrazy kul'tury. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-№ 4.-C. 335-343. DOI: .10.7256/2305-6177.2013.4.10480.
Kiyashchenko N.I.. Nulevaya identichnost'. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-№ 12.-C. 1747-1756. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.12.10317.

References (transliteration):
Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i «stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-8.-C. 117-146. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.662. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_662.html.
Koptseva N.P. Sovremennye kul'turnye praktiki sokhraneniya etnicheskoy identichnosti korennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka v Respublike Buryatiya // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2014.-1.-C. 17-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.1.10989. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10989.html
Weidkuhn P. Aggressivität und Normativität//Anthropos. 1968—1969. Vol. 63/64. Fasz. 3-4.
Firth R. Essays on social organization and values. London, 1964.
Reimann R. Der Schamane sieht eine Hexe – der Ethnologe sieht nichts. Frankfurt/ Main., 1998.
Durkheim E. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. – L., 1915.
Yung K. G. Eon. Issledovanie o simvolike samosti. – M.; 2009.
Bourguignon E. Psychological anthropology. – N.Y.; 1979.
Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. – M.; 1999.
Freska E., Kyul'sar S. Sotsial'nye svyazi v modulyatsii fiziologii ritual'nogo transa // Lichnost', kul'tura, etnos: sovremennaya psikhologicheskaya antropologiya. – M.; 2001.
Frezer Dzh. Zolotaya vetv'. – M.; 2006.
Tsiv'yan T. V. K semantike prostranstvennykh i vremennykh pokazateley v fol'klore // Sb. statey po vtorichnym modeliruyushchim sistemam. – Tartu.; 1973.
Spektor D.M. Vlast' vremeni. – M.; 2009.
Spektor D.M. Istoricheskie korni dramaticheskoy poetiki. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-№ 4.-S.100-135.
Tokarev S. A. Rannie formy religii. – M.; 1990.
Teylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. – M.; 1989.
Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. – Moskva.; 1966.
Saringulyan K. S. O regulyativnykh aspektakh kul'turnoy traditsii // SE. 1981. № 2.
Saringulyan. K. S. Kul'tura i regulyatsiya deyatel'nosti. – Erevan, 1986.
Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. – M.; 1989.
Materialisty Drevney Gretsii. – M.; 1955.
Pershits, A. I. Problemy normativnoy etnografii // Issledovaniya po obshchey etnografii. M., 1979.
Marett R. Formula tabu-mana kak minimum opredeleniya religii // Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. M., 1998.
Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka, religiya. – M. 1996.
Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M.; 1988.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. – M.; 1994.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T.2. Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. – M.; 2001.
Vul'f K. K genezisu sotsial'nogo. Mimezis, performativnost', ritual. SPb.; 2009.
Godel'e M. Zagadka dara. – M.; 2007.
Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti severnoy Evrazii). – Ekaterinburg.; 2009.
Antropologicheskie matritsy KhKh veka. L.S. Vygotskiy – P.A. Florenskiy. Nesostoyavshiysya dialog. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007.
Boroday Yu. M. Ot fantazii k real'nosti. – M.; 1995.
Shazhinbatyn A.. Etnoantropologicheskaya kontseptsiya Zh.-Zh. Russo. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 123-131. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10103.
Tkhor V.V.. Britanskaya musul'manskaya identichnost' v usloviyakh mul'tikul'turalizma. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 89-98. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.9815.
Gurevich P.S.. Pervoobrazy kul'tury. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-№ 4.-C. 335-343. DOI: .10.7256/2305-6177.2013.4.10480.
Kiyashchenko N.I.. Nulevaya identichnost'. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-№ 12.-C. 1747-1756. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.12.10317.

Аннотация: In his article Kuznetsov studies Leslie White's concept of culture and the definitions of civilization and culture offered by a Russian philosopher Merab Mamardashvili. The analysis of these authors' opinions make modern specialists pay attentino to the difference in the analysis levels. Kuznetsov discovers the main contradiction of Leslie White's theory (universal and multilineal cultural evolution). This conclusion as well as the results of the analysis of 'culture' and 'civilization' definitions offered by different authors have created grounds for the author's approach to the analysis of culture and civilization as a multilevel form of the anthropological universum. The research is based on the principles of complementarity, classification strategy and the main provisions of the systems paradigm including the classical definition of the structure and a number of provisions of social constructivism. The author's special contribution to the research of the topic is the deconstruction of the practice of using the concepts of 'culture' and 'civilization', discovery of their contradictions and ways to overcome these contradictions. 
The novelty of the article is caused by the fact that the author analyzes Leslie White's theory of culture from the point of view of the systems paradigm, compares Leslie White's theory to Merab Mamardashvili's concepts of civilization and culture and offers to return the initial integrative meaning to the concepts of culture and civilization but also to compare these concepts at the different levels of interdisciplinary research. 

Ключевые слова: interdisciplinarity, culture, civilization, concept, Leslie White, Merab Mamardashvili, cultural studies, systems paradigm, multilineal, consciousness

Библиография:
Pigalev A.I. Kul'tura kak bytie: istoki i granitsy paradigmy v kontekste tsivilizatsii // Tsivilizatsiya. Voskhozhdenie i slom. M. Nauka. 2003. S. 147-195.
Mostova L.A. Uayt Lesli // Kul'turologiya KhKh vek. Entsiklopediya. M.1996. T. 2. S. 272-275.
Markaryan E.S. Kul'turologicheskaya teoriya L. Uayta i istoricheskiy materializm // Voprosy filosofii. 1986. № 2. S. 78-88.
Markaryan E.S. Kul'turologicheskaya teoriya Lesli Uayta i istoricheskiy protsess // Voprosy filosofii. 1966. № 2. S. 104-105.
Malinovskiy B. Nauchnaya istoriya kul'tury. O.G.I. M. 1999. 136 s.
Mamardashvili M.K. Soznanie i tsivilizatsiya // Priroda. 1988. № 11 S. 57-68.
Komadorova I.V. Kul'tura kak sotsial'nyy fenomen v simvolicheskoy antropologii Lesli A. Uayta. Diss. kand. filosof. n. Naberezhnye Chelny. 1999. 201 s.
Lynsha V.A. Gordon Chayld i amerikanskiy neoevolyutsionizm // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2001. № 5. S. 3-17.
Klassen Kh. Dzh. M. Problemy, paradoksy i perspektivy evolyutsionizma internet-resurs www.abuss.narod.ru
Diligenskiy G.G. «Konets istorii» smena tsivilizatsiy? // Tsivilizatsii. M. 1993. Vyp. 2. S. 44-52.
Girts K. Kak my segodnya dumaem. K etnografii sovremennoy mysli // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 2007. № 2. S. 3-16.
Barne G. E. Moya druzhba s Lesli Uaytom // Lesli Uayt. Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M. ROSSPEN. 2004. S. S. 5-46
Artanovskiy S. N. Marksistskoe uchenie ob obshchestvennom progresse i "evolyutsiya kul'tury" L. Uayta // Sovremennaya amerikanskaya etnografiya, M., 1963. S. 50-64
Averkieva Yu. P. Istoriya teoreticheskoy mysli v amerikanskoy etnografii. M.: Nauka. 1979. 288 s.
Ryabova A.L. Kul'turologiya Lesli Uayta v kontekste amerikanskoy kul'turantropologii. Diss. na soisk. uch. stepeni kand. filosof. n. Sankt-Peterburg, 2008. 187 s.
Uayt L. Istorizm, evolyutsionizm i funktsionalizm kak tri tipa interpretatsii kul'tury // Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M. ROSSPEN. 2004. S. 473-504.
Uayt L. Nauka o kul'ture // Uayt Lesli. Izbrannoe: nauka o kul'ture. M.: ROSSPEN. 2004. S.5-462.
Uayt L. Evolyutsionizm i antievolyutsionizm v amerikanskoy etnologicheskoy teorii // Lesli Uayt. Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M. ROSSPEN. 2004. S. 573-606.
Uayt L. Evolyutsiya kul'tury. Razvitie tsivilizatsii do padeniya Rima // Uayt Lesli. Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M.: ROSSPEN. 2004. S. 47-606.
Fevr L. Tsivilizatsiya: evolyutsiya slova i gruppy idey // Boi za istoriyu. M.: Nauka. 1991. S. 239-281.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. T. 1: Geshtal't i deystvitel'nost' / Per. s nem. K.A. Svas'yan. M.: Mysl', 1998. 606 s.
Elias N. O protsesse tsivilizatsii: sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya. T. 1. M., SPb.: 2001. 332 s.
Barrett R.A. The Paradoxical Anthropology of Leslie White // American Anthropologists. 1989. v. 9. P. 986-999.
Beardsley R. An Appraisal of Leslie A. White’s Scholarly Influence // American Anthropologist. 1976. 91. P. 986-999.
Carneiro R.L. Leslie A. White // Totems and Teachers: Perspectives on the History of Anthropology / Ed. S. Silverman. New York: Columbia University Press: 1981. P. 208-252.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. A History of Anthropological Thought. André Singer, ed. London: Faber and Faber. 1981.218 r.
Hatch E. Theories of Man and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press. 1973. 384 r.
Kroeber A.L., Kluckhohn C. Culture: a critical review of concepts and definition. Papers of the Peabody museum of American archaeology and ethnology 47. Cambridge (Mass.), 1952.
Service E. R. Leslie Alvin White (1900-1975}. American Anthropologist. 1976. 78. R. 612-617.
White L. The Evolution of Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1959
White L. The Concept of Cultural Systems: A Key to Understanding Tribes and Nations. Columbia University Press, 1975. 192 r
Peace W.J. Leslie A. White. Evolution and Revolution in Anthropology. Board of Regents University of Nebraska. 2004. 278 r.
Service E.R. Leslie Alvin White 1900-1975 // American Anthropologist. 1976. V. 78. P. 612-617 (www.aaanet.org).
Schoenmarkers H. The Power of Culture. A Short History of Anthropological Theory about Culture and Power. 2012 (www.rug.nl).
Steward J.H. Theory of Culture Change: the Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana, 1955. 244 r.
Williams R. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. NY. Oxford University Press. 1983. 343 p.

References (transliteration):
Pigalev A.I. Kul'tura kak bytie: istoki i granitsy paradigmy v kontekste tsivilizatsii // Tsivilizatsiya. Voskhozhdenie i slom. M. Nauka. 2003. S. 147-195.
Mostova L.A. Uayt Lesli // Kul'turologiya KhKh vek. Entsiklopediya. M.1996. T. 2. S. 272-275.
Markaryan E.S. Kul'turologicheskaya teoriya L. Uayta i istoricheskiy materializm // Voprosy filosofii. 1986. № 2. S. 78-88.
Markaryan E.S. Kul'turologicheskaya teoriya Lesli Uayta i istoricheskiy protsess // Voprosy filosofii. 1966. № 2. S. 104-105.
Malinovskiy B. Nauchnaya istoriya kul'tury. O.G.I. M. 1999. 136 s.
Mamardashvili M.K. Soznanie i tsivilizatsiya // Priroda. 1988. № 11 S. 57-68.
Komadorova I.V. Kul'tura kak sotsial'nyy fenomen v simvolicheskoy antropologii Lesli A. Uayta. Diss. kand. filosof. n. Naberezhnye Chelny. 1999. 201 s.
Lynsha V.A. Gordon Chayld i amerikanskiy neoevolyutsionizm // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2001. № 5. S. 3-17.
Klassen Kh. Dzh. M. Problemy, paradoksy i perspektivy evolyutsionizma internet-resurs www.abuss.narod.ru
Diligenskiy G.G. «Konets istorii» smena tsivilizatsiy? // Tsivilizatsii. M. 1993. Vyp. 2. S. 44-52.
Girts K. Kak my segodnya dumaem. K etnografii sovremennoy mysli // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 2007. № 2. S. 3-16.
Barne G. E. Moya druzhba s Lesli Uaytom // Lesli Uayt. Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M. ROSSPEN. 2004. S. S. 5-46
Artanovskiy S. N. Marksistskoe uchenie ob obshchestvennom progresse i "evolyutsiya kul'tury" L. Uayta // Sovremennaya amerikanskaya etnografiya, M., 1963. S. 50-64
Averkieva Yu. P. Istoriya teoreticheskoy mysli v amerikanskoy etnografii. M.: Nauka. 1979. 288 s.
Ryabova A.L. Kul'turologiya Lesli Uayta v kontekste amerikanskoy kul'turantropologii. Diss. na soisk. uch. stepeni kand. filosof. n. Sankt-Peterburg, 2008. 187 s.
Uayt L. Istorizm, evolyutsionizm i funktsionalizm kak tri tipa interpretatsii kul'tury // Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M. ROSSPEN. 2004. S. 473-504.
Uayt L. Nauka o kul'ture // Uayt Lesli. Izbrannoe: nauka o kul'ture. M.: ROSSPEN. 2004. S.5-462.
Uayt L. Evolyutsionizm i antievolyutsionizm v amerikanskoy etnologicheskoy teorii // Lesli Uayt. Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M. ROSSPEN. 2004. S. 573-606.
Uayt L. Evolyutsiya kul'tury. Razvitie tsivilizatsii do padeniya Rima // Uayt Lesli. Izbrannoe: evolyutsiya kul'tury. M.: ROSSPEN. 2004. S. 47-606.
Fevr L. Tsivilizatsiya: evolyutsiya slova i gruppy idey // Boi za istoriyu. M.: Nauka. 1991. S. 239-281.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. T. 1: Geshtal't i deystvitel'nost' / Per. s nem. K.A. Svas'yan. M.: Mysl', 1998. 606 s.
Elias N. O protsesse tsivilizatsii: sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya. T. 1. M., SPb.: 2001. 332 s.
Barrett R.A. The Paradoxical Anthropology of Leslie White // American Anthropologists. 1989. v. 9. P. 986-999.
Beardsley R. An Appraisal of Leslie A. White’s Scholarly Influence // American Anthropologist. 1976. 91. P. 986-999.
Carneiro R.L. Leslie A. White // Totems and Teachers: Perspectives on the History of Anthropology / Ed. S. Silverman. New York: Columbia University Press: 1981. P. 208-252.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. A History of Anthropological Thought. André Singer, ed. London: Faber and Faber. 1981.218 r.
Hatch E. Theories of Man and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press. 1973. 384 r.
Kroeber A.L., Kluckhohn C. Culture: a critical review of concepts and definition. Papers of the Peabody museum of American archaeology and ethnology 47. Cambridge (Mass.), 1952.
Service E. R. Leslie Alvin White (1900-1975}. American Anthropologist. 1976. 78. R. 612-617.
White L. The Evolution of Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1959
White L. The Concept of Cultural Systems: A Key to Understanding Tribes and Nations. Columbia University Press, 1975. 192 r
Peace W.J. Leslie A. White. Evolution and Revolution in Anthropology. Board of Regents University of Nebraska. 2004. 278 r.
Service E.R. Leslie Alvin White 1900-1975 // American Anthropologist. 1976. V. 78. P. 612-617 (www.aaanet.org).
Schoenmarkers H. The Power of Culture. A Short History of Anthropological Theory about Culture and Power. 2012 (www.rug.nl).
Steward J.H. Theory of Culture Change: the Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana, 1955. 244 r.
Williams R. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. NY. Oxford University Press. 1983. 343 p.

Аннотация: This article is the continuation of Kudaev's previous work "Nikolay Berdyaev’s Philosophy of Culture in Terms of His Concept of Tragedy" (published in 'Philosophy and Culture' Journal, Issue 1, 2015) in which Kudaev analyzes one of the most important topics in Berdyaev's creative heritage - his philosophy of culture. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that this subject is viewed in terms of Berdyaev’s concept of tragedy which allows  to understand metaphysical grounds of being and existence including being and existence of culture. This is the subject of the present research article. The article is focused on one of the most paradoxical contradictions of culture: the ontological conflict with life itself, tragic opposition to existence and inevitable transition of culture into civilization. Kudaev shows their internal relationship and tragic antagonism which Berdyaev considered to be inevitable and which could be worded as follows: when society, represented by its prominent representatives, directs the creative energy to create cultural values, it is forced to restrict and even to suppress the will to live, to sacrifice the "thirst for life" to culture. On the contrary, when the society has the "will to live" and the thirst for power and strength, then culture is sacrificed. This antagonism can't be overcome and generates, in its turn, a whole number of contradictions (between goals and means, the meaning of life and the meaning of existence, the creator and his creation) with all the ensuing consequences for the development of culture, civilization and the entire creative fate of human. The research is of integrated nature at the confluence of cultural studies, philosophy, esthetics, religious studies and history which, in its turn, has determined a complex historical-philosophical and philosophical-cultural methodology. The scientific novelty of the article is caused by the fact that the author reconstructs the basic provisions of Berdyaev’s philosophy of culture exclusively from the point of view of Beryaev’s concept of tragedy. 

Ключевые слова: creation versus creator, technology and human, popular culture, means and goals, civilization, tragedy of culture, victim, will to live, culture, bad luck of culture

Библиография:
Podrobnee o dannoy probleme sm.: Bychkov V. V. Teurgicheskaya estetika Nikolaya Berdyaeva // Estetika: Vchera. Segodnya. Vsegda. Vyp. 1. M.: IF RAN, 2005. S. 39–67. On zhe. Krizis kul'tury i iskusstva v eskhatologicheskom svete filosofii Nikolaya Berdyaeva // N. A. Berdyaev i edinstvo evropeyskogo dukha / Pod red. V. Porusa (Seriya «Religioznye mysliteli»). M.: Bibleysko-bogoslovskiy institut sv. apostola Andreya, 2007. S. 207–229. Ili po: Bychkov V. V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. M.: Ladomir, 2007. S. 632–711. Kudaev A. E. Tragediya tvorchestva v estetike Nikolaya Berdyaeva. M.: IF RAN, 2014. S. 167–204.
Berdyaev N. A. Tragediya i obydennost' // Berdyaev N.A. Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 277–309.
Berdyaev N. A. K filosofii tragedii. Moris Meterlink // Berdyaev N. A. Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 44–69.
Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 288–356.
Berdyaev N. A. Ya i mir ob'ektov. Opyt filosofii odinochestva i obshcheniya // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 230–316.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 37–341.
Gete I. V. Faust / Per. N. A. Kholodkovskogo. SPb.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Kristall», 2003. 480 s.
Merezhkovskiy D. S. Stikhotvorenie i poemy. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000. 620 s.
Gertsen A. I. Estetika. Kritika. Problemy kul'tury. M.: Iskusstvo, 1987. 603 s.
Tsveyg S. Frants Anton Mesmer // Tsveyg S. Sobr. soch.: V 9 t. M.: Bibliosfera, 1996. T. 8. S. 21–96.
Turgenev I. S. Nov' // Turgenev I. S. Dym. Nov'. Veshnie vody. M.: Khudozh. lit., 1986. 558 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Iz zapisnoy tetradi // Dmitrieva N., Moiseeva A. Filosof svobodnogo dukha (N. Berdyaev: zhizn' i tvorchestvo). M.: Vyssh. shk., 1993. S. 247–262.
Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie. Opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii // Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie: Sochineniya. M.: EKSMO-Press; Khar'kov: Folio, 1999. S. 251–604.
Berdyaev N. A. Khristos i mir (Otvet V. V. Rozanovu) // Berdyaev N. A. Dukhovnyy krizis intelligentsii. M.: Kanon+, 1998. S. 230–247.
Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 5–155.
Berdyaev N. A. Dukhovnoe sostoyanie sovremennogo mira // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 485–499.
Berdyaev N. A. Sud'ba cheloveka v sovremennom mire // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 318–362.
Berdyaev N. A. Na poroge novoy epokhi // Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 156–326.
Voronin A. A. Otvetstvennost' cheloveka i bezotvetstvennost' tekhniki // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2011. № 1. C. 92–100. Sm. takzhe: Kozlovski P. Kul'tura postmoderna: Obshchestvenno-kul'turnye posledstviya tekhnicheskogo razvitiya. M., 1997. Agatstsi E. Moral'noe izmerenie nauki i tekhniki. M.: Mosk. filosofskiy fond, 1998. Dreksler E. Mashiny sozdaniya // httpFilosofhistoric.ru. Mamford L. Mif mashiny. Tekhnika i razvitie chelovechestva. M.: Logos, 2001.
Berdyaev N. A. Novoe srednevekov'e. Razmyshlenie o sud'be Rossii i Evropy // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 406–485.
Flober G. O literature, iskusstve, pisatel'skom trude: Pis'ma; Stat'i. V 2 t. T. 2. M.: Khudozh. lit., 1984. 503 s.
Vanslov V. V. Kul'tura i iskusstvo v sovremennom mire // Kul'tura i iskusstvo, 2012. № 3. C. 99–103.
Berdyaev N. A. Sud'ba russkogo konservatizma // Berdyaev N. A. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 255–265.
Berdyaev N. A. Dukh i real'nost'. Osnovy bogochelovecheskoy dukhovnosti // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 363–462.
Berdyaev N. A. Chelovek i mashina (Problema sotsiologii i metafiziki tekhniki) // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 499–523.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. Problematika i apologiya khristianstva. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 14–228.
Berdyaev N. A. Predsmertnye mysli Fausta // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 376–392.
Berdyaev N. A. Varvarstvo i upadnichestvo // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 371–376.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya neravenstva. M.: IMA-press, 1990. 288 s.
Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal'noy etiki. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 19–252.
Gurevich P. S. Paradoks N. A. Berdyaeva: «Kul'tura – velikaya neudacha» // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2010. № 3 (27). S. 5–8. Sm. takzhe: Gurevich P. S. Plenitel'noe mertsanie tsivilizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2014. №
C. 1389-1392. On zhe. Globalizatsiya i mul'tikul'turalizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2012. № 8. C. 4–5. Dolgov K. M. Kul'tura v epokhu globalizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2011. № 9. C. 38-43. 10. Berdyaev N. A. Ekzistentsial'naya dialektika bozhestvennogo i chelovecheskogo // Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal'noy etiki. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 254–357.
Berdyaev N. A. Opyt eskhatologicheskoy metafiziki. Tvorchestvo i ob'ektivatsiya // Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 163–286.
Berdyaev N. A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. Opyt personalisticheskoy filosofii // Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 4–162.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoy sud'by. M.: Mysl', 1990. 175 s.

References (transliteration):
Podrobnee o dannoy probleme sm.: Bychkov V. V. Teurgicheskaya estetika Nikolaya Berdyaeva // Estetika: Vchera. Segodnya. Vsegda. Vyp. 1. M.: IF RAN, 2005. S. 39–67. On zhe. Krizis kul'tury i iskusstva v eskhatologicheskom svete filosofii Nikolaya Berdyaeva // N. A. Berdyaev i edinstvo evropeyskogo dukha / Pod red. V. Porusa (Seriya «Religioznye mysliteli»). M.: Bibleysko-bogoslovskiy institut sv. apostola Andreya, 2007. S. 207–229. Ili po: Bychkov V. V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. M.: Ladomir, 2007. S. 632–711. Kudaev A. E. Tragediya tvorchestva v estetike Nikolaya Berdyaeva. M.: IF RAN, 2014. S. 167–204.
Berdyaev N. A. Tragediya i obydennost' // Berdyaev N.A. Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 277–309.
Berdyaev N. A. K filosofii tragedii. Moris Meterlink // Berdyaev N. A. Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 44–69.
Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 288–356.
Berdyaev N. A. Ya i mir ob'ektov. Opyt filosofii odinochestva i obshcheniya // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 230–316.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 37–341.
Gete I. V. Faust / Per. N. A. Kholodkovskogo. SPb.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Kristall», 2003. 480 s.
Merezhkovskiy D. S. Stikhotvorenie i poemy. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000. 620 s.
Gertsen A. I. Estetika. Kritika. Problemy kul'tury. M.: Iskusstvo, 1987. 603 s.
Tsveyg S. Frants Anton Mesmer // Tsveyg S. Sobr. soch.: V 9 t. M.: Bibliosfera, 1996. T. 8. S. 21–96.
Turgenev I. S. Nov' // Turgenev I. S. Dym. Nov'. Veshnie vody. M.: Khudozh. lit., 1986. 558 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Iz zapisnoy tetradi // Dmitrieva N., Moiseeva A. Filosof svobodnogo dukha (N. Berdyaev: zhizn' i tvorchestvo). M.: Vyssh. shk., 1993. S. 247–262.
Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie. Opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii // Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie: Sochineniya. M.: EKSMO-Press; Khar'kov: Folio, 1999. S. 251–604.
Berdyaev N. A. Khristos i mir (Otvet V. V. Rozanovu) // Berdyaev N. A. Dukhovnyy krizis intelligentsii. M.: Kanon+, 1998. S. 230–247.
Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 5–155.
Berdyaev N. A. Dukhovnoe sostoyanie sovremennogo mira // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 485–499.
Berdyaev N. A. Sud'ba cheloveka v sovremennom mire // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 318–362.
Berdyaev N. A. Na poroge novoy epokhi // Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 156–326.
Voronin A. A. Otvetstvennost' cheloveka i bezotvetstvennost' tekhniki // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2011. № 1. C. 92–100. Sm. takzhe: Kozlovski P. Kul'tura postmoderna: Obshchestvenno-kul'turnye posledstviya tekhnicheskogo razvitiya. M., 1997. Agatstsi E. Moral'noe izmerenie nauki i tekhniki. M.: Mosk. filosofskiy fond, 1998. Dreksler E. Mashiny sozdaniya // httpFilosofhistoric.ru. Mamford L. Mif mashiny. Tekhnika i razvitie chelovechestva. M.: Logos, 2001.
Berdyaev N. A. Novoe srednevekov'e. Razmyshlenie o sud'be Rossii i Evropy // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 406–485.
Flober G. O literature, iskusstve, pisatel'skom trude: Pis'ma; Stat'i. V 2 t. T. 2. M.: Khudozh. lit., 1984. 503 s.
Vanslov V. V. Kul'tura i iskusstvo v sovremennom mire // Kul'tura i iskusstvo, 2012. № 3. C. 99–103.
Berdyaev N. A. Sud'ba russkogo konservatizma // Berdyaev N. A. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 255–265.
Berdyaev N. A. Dukh i real'nost'. Osnovy bogochelovecheskoy dukhovnosti // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 363–462.
Berdyaev N. A. Chelovek i mashina (Problema sotsiologii i metafiziki tekhniki) // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 499–523.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. Problematika i apologiya khristianstva. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 14–228.
Berdyaev N. A. Predsmertnye mysli Fausta // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 376–392.
Berdyaev N. A. Varvarstvo i upadnichestvo // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 371–376.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya neravenstva. M.: IMA-press, 1990. 288 s.
Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal'noy etiki. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 19–252.
Gurevich P. S. Paradoks N. A. Berdyaeva: «Kul'tura – velikaya neudacha» // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2010. № 3 (27). S. 5–8. Sm. takzhe: Gurevich P. S. Plenitel'noe mertsanie tsivilizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2014. №
C. 1389-1392. On zhe. Globalizatsiya i mul'tikul'turalizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2012. № 8. C. 4–5. Dolgov K. M. Kul'tura v epokhu globalizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2011. № 9. C. 38-43. 10. Berdyaev N. A. Ekzistentsial'naya dialektika bozhestvennogo i chelovecheskogo // Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal'noy etiki. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 254–357.
Berdyaev N. A. Opyt eskhatologicheskoy metafiziki. Tvorchestvo i ob'ektivatsiya // Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 163–286.
Berdyaev N. A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. Opyt personalisticheskoy filosofii // Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 4–162.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoy sud'by. M.: Mysl', 1990. 175 s.

Аннотация: In his article Kudaev examines one of the most important topics in Berdyaev’s creative heritage – philosophy of culture. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that this subject is viewed in terms of Berdyaev’s concept of tragedy which was the ‘first phenomenon’ for the philosopher and allowed him to understand metaphysical grounds of being and existence including being and existence of culture. This is the subject of the present research article. Kudaev demonstrates that Berdyaev’s tragedy of culture was not only related to creativity in general and the tragedy of creativity in particular but was also determined by those. Kudaev also analyzes the main internal contradictions between culture and the cult that were viewed by Berdyaev as a source of culture and a reason of its religious tragedy at the same time as well as contradictions between culture and life in general. The research is of integrated nature at the confluence of cultural studies, philosophy, esthetics, religious studies and history which, in its turn, has determined a complex historical-philosophical and philosophical-cultural methodology. The scientific novelty of the article is caused by the fact that the author reconstructs the basic provisions of Berdyaev’s philosophy of culture exclusively from the point of view of Beryaev’s concept of tragedy.

Ключевые слова: culture, creativity, tragedy of creativity, tragedy of culture, fatal dialectics of culture, sources of culture, religious tragedy of culture, feeling unsatisfied with culture, culture and life, decline of culture.

Библиография:
Gurevich P. S. Paradoks N. A. Berdyaeva: «Kul'tura – velikaya neudacha» // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 3. S. 5–8.
Kudaev A. E. Tragediya tvorchestva v estetike Nikolaya Berdyaeva. M.: IF RAN, 2014. 256 s.
Gurevich P. S. Dukhovnyy opyt natsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2013. № 7. S. 1020-1027.
Gurevich P. S. Vliyanie N. A. Berdyaeva na evropeyskuyu filosofiyu // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2014. № 6. S. 787–792.
Bychkov V. V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. M.: Ladomir, 2007. 743 s.
Bychkov V. V. Krizis kul'tury i iskusstva v eskhatologicheskom svete filosofii Nikolaya Berdyaeva // N. A. Berdyaev i edinstvo evropeyskogo dukha / Pod red. V. Porusa (Seriya «Religioznye mysliteli»). M., 2007. S. 207–229.
Andriyauskas A. A. Problema degumanizatsii kul'tury i iskusstva v kontseptsii «khristianstvo gumanizma» N. Berdyaeva // Filosofskie nauki. 1988. № 3. S. 42–50.
Andreeva V. A. Berdyaev: volya k zhizni i volya k kul'ture // Polignozis, 1998. № 2. S. 140–146.
Andreev A. L. Iskusstvo, kul'tura, sverkhkul'tura (Filosofiya iskusstva N. A. Berdyaeva). M.: Znanie, 1991. 64 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Ya i mir ob'ektov. Opyt filosofii odinochestva i obshcheniya // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 230–316.
Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 288–356.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobody. M.: Pravda, 1989. S. 9–250.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya neravenstva. M.: IMA-press, 1990. 288 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. Problematika i apologiya khristianstva. – M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 14–228.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka // Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 37–341.
Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie. Opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii // Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie: Sochineniya. M.: EKSMO-Press; Khar'kov: Folio, 1999. S. 249–603.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoy sud'by. M.: Mysl', 1990. 175 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Predsmertnye mysli Fausta // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 376–392.
Berdyaev N. A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka // Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 4–162.
Berdyaev N. A. Opyt eskhatologicheskoy metafiziki. Tvorchestvo i ob'ektivatsiya // Berdyaev N.A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 163–286.
Berdyaev N. A. Na poroge novoy epokhi // Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 215–326.
Berdyaev N. A. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obshchestvennost'. M.: Kanon+, 1999. S. 5–290.
Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal'noy etiki. – M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 19–252.
Berdyaev N. A. O novom religioznom soznanii // Berdyaev N. A. Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 348–418.
Berdyaev N. A. Mutnye liki (Tipy religioznoy mysli v Rossii). M.: Kanon, 2004. 448 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: v 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 2. S. 7–151.
Berdyaev N. A. Moe filosofskoe mirosozertsanie // N. Berdyaev o russkoy filosofii: V 2 t. Sverdlovsk: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1991. T. 2, ch. 1. S. 23–28.
Berdyaev N. A. Krizis iskusstva // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 2. S. 399–419.
Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 5–155.
Berdyaev N. A. Dukh i real'nost'. Osnovy bogochelovecheskoy dukhovnosti // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 363–462.
Berdyaev N. A. Varvarstvo i upadnichestvo // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 343–367.

References (transliteration):
Gurevich P. S. Paradoks N. A. Berdyaeva: «Kul'tura – velikaya neudacha» // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 3. S. 5–8.
Kudaev A. E. Tragediya tvorchestva v estetike Nikolaya Berdyaeva. M.: IF RAN, 2014. 256 s.
Gurevich P. S. Dukhovnyy opyt natsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2013. № 7. S. 1020-1027.
Gurevich P. S. Vliyanie N. A. Berdyaeva na evropeyskuyu filosofiyu // Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2014. № 6. S. 787–792.
Bychkov V. V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. M.: Ladomir, 2007. 743 s.
Bychkov V. V. Krizis kul'tury i iskusstva v eskhatologicheskom svete filosofii Nikolaya Berdyaeva // N. A. Berdyaev i edinstvo evropeyskogo dukha / Pod red. V. Porusa (Seriya «Religioznye mysliteli»). M., 2007. S. 207–229.
Andriyauskas A. A. Problema degumanizatsii kul'tury i iskusstva v kontseptsii «khristianstvo gumanizma» N. Berdyaeva // Filosofskie nauki. 1988. № 3. S. 42–50.
Andreeva V. A. Berdyaev: volya k zhizni i volya k kul'ture // Polignozis, 1998. № 2. S. 140–146.
Andreev A. L. Iskusstvo, kul'tura, sverkhkul'tura (Filosofiya iskusstva N. A. Berdyaeva). M.: Znanie, 1991. 64 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Ya i mir ob'ektov. Opyt filosofii odinochestva i obshcheniya // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 230–316.
Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 288–356.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobody. M.: Pravda, 1989. S. 9–250.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya neravenstva. M.: IMA-press, 1990. 288 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. Problematika i apologiya khristianstva. – M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 14–228.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka // Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 37–341.
Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie. Opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii // Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie: Sochineniya. M.: EKSMO-Press; Khar'kov: Folio, 1999. S. 249–603.
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoy sud'by. M.: Mysl', 1990. 175 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Predsmertnye mysli Fausta // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 376–392.
Berdyaev N. A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka // Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 4–162.
Berdyaev N. A. Opyt eskhatologicheskoy metafiziki. Tvorchestvo i ob'ektivatsiya // Berdyaev N.A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995. S. 163–286.
Berdyaev N. A. Na poroge novoy epokhi // Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 215–326.
Berdyaev N. A. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obshchestvennost'. M.: Kanon+, 1999. S. 5–290.
Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal'noy etiki. – M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 19–252.
Berdyaev N. A. O novom religioznom soznanii // Berdyaev N. A. Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial'nye i literaturnye. M.: Kanon+, 2002. S. 348–418.
Berdyaev N. A. Mutnye liki (Tipy religioznoy mysli v Rossii). M.: Kanon, 2004. 448 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: v 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 2. S. 7–151.
Berdyaev N. A. Moe filosofskoe mirosozertsanie // N. Berdyaev o russkoy filosofii: V 2 t. Sverdlovsk: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1991. T. 2, ch. 1. S. 23–28.
Berdyaev N. A. Krizis iskusstva // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 2. S. 399–419.
Berdyaev N. A. Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1996. S. 5–155.
Berdyaev N. A. Dukh i real'nost'. Osnovy bogochelovecheskoy dukhovnosti // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 363–462.
Berdyaev N. A. Varvarstvo i upadnichestvo // Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. T. 1. S. 343–367.

Аннотация: This is the afterword to the translation of the article written by an American sociologist and cultural philosopher Edward Tiryakian ‘Three metacultures of modernity: Cristian, Gnostic, Chthonic’. The author of the afterword analyzes views of an American scientist on the role of religion in a modern society. He also provides an insight into the content and problem points of his concept of three metacultures and discusses functional features of religious metacultures of Christianity, Gnosticism and Paganism, relations of ‘unorthodox’ religious views to the Orthodox Christian metaculture that caused internal contradictions in the Western civilization and made it susceptible to changes. The author analyzes philosophical and anthropological aspects of Edward Tiryakian’s concept. According to Edward Tiryakian, dynamics and variety of different cultures I a modern society should be viewed from the point of view the cultural-historical, functional-conceptual and structural-analytical approaches. Based on the author of the present article, the concept of three metacultures offered by Edward Tiryakian has certain limits because it does not take into account all the variety of religious and cultural movements (in particular, Manichaeism and Hermeticism) and completely ignores the secular culture with all its natural scientific, social and historical elements. Tiryakian’s analysis of three metacultures is clearly based on philosophical and anthropological grounds. Accordig to Tiryakian, human is an element of the socio-cultural structure and actor of the socio-cultural development, this is the peculiarity of his dual nature when the physical is accompanied with the social. Culturalization has the main meaning for formation and development of human nature. Accompanied by the process of socialization, culturalization creates the two main aspects of the secondary, social-historical nature of human, but at the same time it has an essential impact on the primary, physical nature of human. Under the influence of the socio-cultural environment, particular manifestations of human physicality appear. An individual identifies himself with a particular metaculture and at the same time gets involved into contradictory relations between different metacultures.

Ключевые слова: Edward Tiryakian, society of post-modern, metaculture, Christianity, Gnosticism, paganism, unorthodox religious views, human nature, culturalization, identification.

Контактная информация: Balagushkin Yuriy Evgenievich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Volkonka 14/1, bld. 5, room No. 432.

Библиография:
Abu-Lughod, Janet (1989) Before European Hegemony: The World System AD 1250-1350. New York: Oxford University Press.
Adams, Carol J. (1993) Ecofeminism and the Sacred. New York: Continuum.
Arrighi, Giovanni (1994) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of our Times. London and New York: Verso.
Barker, Eileen (1982) New Religious Movements: A Perspective for Understanding Society. New York: Edwin Mullen Press.
Bellah, Robert N. (1970) 'Religious Evolution', pp. 20-50 in Robert N. Bellah, Beyond Belief. Essays on Religion in a Post-traditional World. New York: Harper &Row.
Berger, Helen A. (1995) The Routinization of Spontaneity', Sociology of Religion 56(1): 49-61.
Brandon, George (1993) Ceinture from Africa to the New World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Brown, David Hilary (1992) Garden in the Machine: Afro-Cuban Sacred Art and Per¬formance in Urban New Jersey and New York. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
Chadwick, Owen (1975) The Secularization of the European Mind. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher and Thomas D. Hall (1993) 'Comparing World-systems: Concepts and Working Hypotheses', Social Forces 71(4): 851-86.
Drinnon, Richard (1968) 'Introduction' to Mother Earth Bulletin. New York: Green¬wood Reprint Corporation.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1992) Jewish Civilization. The Jewish Historical Experience in a Comparative Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1984) 'Heterodoxies and Dynamics of Civilization', Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 128(2): 104-13.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (ed.) (1986) The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Finley, Nancy J. (1991) 'Political Activism and Feminine Spirituality', Sociological Analysis 52(4): 349-62.
Griffin, Wendy (1995) 'The Embodied Goddess: Feminist Witchcraft and Female Divinity', Sociology of Religion 56(1): 35-48.
Hobsbawm, Eric and Terence Ranger (eds) (1992) The Invention of Tradition. Cam¬bridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karenga, Maulana (1988) The African American Holiday of Kwanzaa: A Celebration of Family, Community and Culture. Los Angeles: University of Sankore Press.
Kirckpatrick, R. George, R. Rainey and K. Ruhi (1986) 'An Empirical Study of Wiccan Religion in Postindustrial Society', Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology 14: 33-8.
Leo, John (1995) 'The Modern Primitives', US News and World Report, 31 July: 16.
Madhubuti, Haki R. (1993) Kwanzaa: An African-American Holiday that is Progres¬sive and Uplifting. Chicago: Third World Press.
Marie-Daly, Bernice (1991) Ecofeminism: Sacred Matter/Sacred Mother. Chambers-burg, PA: Anima Books.
McGaa, Ed (1990) Mother Earth Spirituality: Native American Paths to Healing Our¬selves and Our World. San Francisco: Harper.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964) Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Murphy, Joseph M. (1988) Santeria: An African Religion in America. Boston: Beacon Press.
Murray, Margaret A. (1967) The Witch-cult in Western Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Murray, Margaret A. (1974) The God of the Witches. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Neitz, Mary Jo (1991) 'In Goddess We Trust', p. 353-72 in T. Robbins and D. Anthony (eds) In Gods We Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
Robertson, Roland (1992) Globalization, Social Theory and Global Culture. London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Roof, Wade Clark and William McKinney (1987) American Mainline Religion. Its Changing Shape and Future. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.
Ruether, Rosemary R. (ed.) (1974) Religion and Sexism. Images of Woman in the Jewish and Christian Traditions. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ruyer, Raymond (1974) La Gnose de Princeton: des savants a la recherche d'une religion. Paris: Fayard.
Ruyer, Raymond (1977) Les Cents Prochains Siecles: le destin historique de Vhomme selon la nouvelle gnose americaine. Paris: Fayard.
Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1962) Social and Cultural Dynamics, 4 Vols. New York: Bed-minster Press.
Tiryakian, Edward A. (1981) 'Sexual Anomie, Social Structure, Societal Change', Social Forces 59(4): 1025-53.
Tiryakian, Edward A. (1984) 'L'Anomie sexuelle en France avant la Revolution', Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 76:161—84.
Turner, Bryan (1984) The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974-1984) The Modern World-System, 3 Vols. New York: Academic Press.
Warner, R. Stephen (1993) 'Work in Progress toward a New Paradigm for the Socio¬logical Study of Religion in the United States', American Journal of Sociology 98(5): 1044-93.
Weber, Max (1958a) 'Religious Rejections of the World and their Directions', in Hans Gerth and C. W. Mills (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, Max (1958b) The Religion of India. The Sociology of Hinduism and Budd¬hism, transl. and ed. by Hans Gerth and Don Martindale. New York: Free Press

References (transliteration):
Abu-Lughod, Janet (1989) Before European Hegemony: The World System AD 1250-1350. New York: Oxford University Press.
Adams, Carol J. (1993) Ecofeminism and the Sacred. New York: Continuum.
Arrighi, Giovanni (1994) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of our Times. London and New York: Verso.
Barker, Eileen (1982) New Religious Movements: A Perspective for Understanding Society. New York: Edwin Mullen Press.
Bellah, Robert N. (1970) 'Religious Evolution', pp. 20-50 in Robert N. Bellah, Beyond Belief. Essays on Religion in a Post-traditional World. New York: Harper &Row.
Berger, Helen A. (1995) The Routinization of Spontaneity', Sociology of Religion 56(1): 49-61.
Brandon, George (1993) Ceinture from Africa to the New World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Brown, David Hilary (1992) Garden in the Machine: Afro-Cuban Sacred Art and Per¬formance in Urban New Jersey and New York. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
Chadwick, Owen (1975) The Secularization of the European Mind. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher and Thomas D. Hall (1993) 'Comparing World-systems: Concepts and Working Hypotheses', Social Forces 71(4): 851-86.
Drinnon, Richard (1968) 'Introduction' to Mother Earth Bulletin. New York: Green¬wood Reprint Corporation.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1992) Jewish Civilization. The Jewish Historical Experience in a Comparative Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1984) 'Heterodoxies and Dynamics of Civilization', Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 128(2): 104-13.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (ed.) (1986) The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Finley, Nancy J. (1991) 'Political Activism and Feminine Spirituality', Sociological Analysis 52(4): 349-62.
Griffin, Wendy (1995) 'The Embodied Goddess: Feminist Witchcraft and Female Divinity', Sociology of Religion 56(1): 35-48.
Hobsbawm, Eric and Terence Ranger (eds) (1992) The Invention of Tradition. Cam¬bridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karenga, Maulana (1988) The African American Holiday of Kwanzaa: A Celebration of Family, Community and Culture. Los Angeles: University of Sankore Press.
Kirckpatrick, R. George, R. Rainey and K. Ruhi (1986) 'An Empirical Study of Wiccan Religion in Postindustrial Society', Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology 14: 33-8.
Leo, John (1995) 'The Modern Primitives', US News and World Report, 31 July: 16.
Madhubuti, Haki R. (1993) Kwanzaa: An African-American Holiday that is Progres¬sive and Uplifting. Chicago: Third World Press.
Marie-Daly, Bernice (1991) Ecofeminism: Sacred Matter/Sacred Mother. Chambers-burg, PA: Anima Books.
McGaa, Ed (1990) Mother Earth Spirituality: Native American Paths to Healing Our¬selves and Our World. San Francisco: Harper.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964) Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Murphy, Joseph M. (1988) Santeria: An African Religion in America. Boston: Beacon Press.
Murray, Margaret A. (1967) The Witch-cult in Western Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Murray, Margaret A. (1974) The God of the Witches. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Neitz, Mary Jo (1991) 'In Goddess We Trust', p. 353-72 in T. Robbins and D. Anthony (eds) In Gods We Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
Robertson, Roland (1992) Globalization, Social Theory and Global Culture. London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Roof, Wade Clark and William McKinney (1987) American Mainline Religion. Its Changing Shape and Future. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.
Ruether, Rosemary R. (ed.) (1974) Religion and Sexism. Images of Woman in the Jewish and Christian Traditions. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ruyer, Raymond (1974) La Gnose de Princeton: des savants a la recherche d'une religion. Paris: Fayard.
Ruyer, Raymond (1977) Les Cents Prochains Siecles: le destin historique de Vhomme selon la nouvelle gnose americaine. Paris: Fayard.
Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1962) Social and Cultural Dynamics, 4 Vols. New York: Bed-minster Press.
Tiryakian, Edward A. (1981) 'Sexual Anomie, Social Structure, Societal Change', Social Forces 59(4): 1025-53.
Tiryakian, Edward A. (1984) 'L'Anomie sexuelle en France avant la Revolution', Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 76:161—84.
Turner, Bryan (1984) The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974-1984) The Modern World-System, 3 Vols. New York: Academic Press.
Warner, R. Stephen (1993) 'Work in Progress toward a New Paradigm for the Socio¬logical Study of Religion in the United States', American Journal of Sociology 98(5): 1044-93.
Weber, Max (1958a) 'Religious Rejections of the World and their Directions', in Hans Gerth and C. W. Mills (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, Max (1958b) The Religion of India. The Sociology of Hinduism and Budd¬hism, transl. and ed. by Hans Gerth and Don Martindale. New York: Free Press

Аннотация: There have been many researches of all kinds of notions and categories analyzing the role of these notions and categories in cognition and practical activity. However, not so much attention has been paid to measure although the importance of measure and proportion were recognized by philosophers long time ago. Ancient philosophers associated measure with the hidden feeling of the singularity of all. In the 20th century philosophers studied measure and focused on the quality and quantity, similarities and differences between them and assumed that the quantity and quality constituted the measure. When the measure as itself was analyzed, it was mostly the measures of object but not the category ‘measure’ itself being studied. The present article provides the results of the historical and cultural research based on analytical, diachronic and comparative research methods. The measure has a double nature if we view it as the principle of human activity. On the one hand, measure is what is described by the quantity according to Aristotle. This is the metric function of measure. The other aspect of measure is the quality with reference to these or those features. This is the evaluation or axiatic function. Both of these functions, metric and evaluation ones, expressed different opinions of human on the surrounding world.

Ключевые слова: measure, quality, quantity, proportion, human as a measure, axiatic function, metric function, activity, sense of proportion, immensity.

Контактная информация: Polischuk Viktor Ivanovich, 627750, Russia, Tyumen Region, Ishim, str. Lenina 1.

Библиография:
Aristotel'. Soch.: V 4 t. M., 1975. T. 1. S. 253.
Gegel' G. V. F. Nauka logiki: V 3 t. M., 1970. T. 1. S. 422.
Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. M., 1974. T. 1. S. 262.
Gurevich A. Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoy kul'tury. M., 1972. S. 50.
Gurevich P. S. Raskolotost' chelovecheskogo bytiya. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 5.
Larin Yu.V. Problema genezisa kul'tury // Problemy istorii kul'tury: Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 5. Nizhnevartovsk, 2008. S. 3—12.
Losev A. F., Shestakov V. P. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategoriy. M., 1964.
Materialisticheskaya dialektika: V 5 t. M., 1980. T. 1. S. 165—167.
Polishchuk V. I. Kul'tura skvoz' prizmu ponyatiya «mera» // Kul'tura kak vid chelovecheskogo bytiya i poznaniya: sb. materialov Vserossiyskoy nauch. konf. s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem v IGPI im. P.P. Ershova. Ishim, 2013. S. 54—57.
Romanova G. Ya. Naimenovanie mer dliny v russkom yazyke. M., 1975. S. 7—8.
Spirkin A. G. Soznanie i samosoznanie. M., 1972. S. 111.
Timofeev I. S. Operatsii scheta i izmereniya kak perekhody ot kachestva k kolichestvu v poznanii // Filosofskie nauki. 1962. № 4. S. 69.
Filosofiya kul'tury. Stanovlenie i razvitie. SPb., 1998. S. 416.
Bollnow O. F. Mass und Vermessenheit des Menschen. Göttingen, 1962.
V.M. Rozin analiz skhem v filosofii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh (na materiale knigi E. svedenborga) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-1.-C. 9-16.
I.A. Nedugova Dialektika kul'tury i soznaniya: predmetnyy podkhod // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-5.-C. 52-60.
E.N. Struk Eksplikatsiya kategorii predel v sovremennoy filosofii // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-8.-C. 1077-1082. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.8.4883.
Yu.B. Mindlin Upravlenie sistemoy kachestva
na predpriyatii sfery uslug // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 1. - C. 111 - 114. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.01.12.

References (transliteration):
Aristotel'. Soch.: V 4 t. M., 1975. T. 1. S. 253.
Gegel' G. V. F. Nauka logiki: V 3 t. M., 1970. T. 1. S. 422.
Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. M., 1974. T. 1. S. 262.
Gurevich A. Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoy kul'tury. M., 1972. S. 50.
Gurevich P. S. Raskolotost' chelovecheskogo bytiya. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 5.
Larin Yu.V. Problema genezisa kul'tury // Problemy istorii kul'tury: Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 5. Nizhnevartovsk, 2008. S. 3—12.
Losev A. F., Shestakov V. P. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategoriy. M., 1964.
Materialisticheskaya dialektika: V 5 t. M., 1980. T. 1. S. 165—167.
Polishchuk V. I. Kul'tura skvoz' prizmu ponyatiya «mera» // Kul'tura kak vid chelovecheskogo bytiya i poznaniya: sb. materialov Vserossiyskoy nauch. konf. s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem v IGPI im. P.P. Ershova. Ishim, 2013. S. 54—57.
Romanova G. Ya. Naimenovanie mer dliny v russkom yazyke. M., 1975. S. 7—8.
Spirkin A. G. Soznanie i samosoznanie. M., 1972. S. 111.
Timofeev I. S. Operatsii scheta i izmereniya kak perekhody ot kachestva k kolichestvu v poznanii // Filosofskie nauki. 1962. № 4. S. 69.
Filosofiya kul'tury. Stanovlenie i razvitie. SPb., 1998. S. 416.
Bollnow O. F. Mass und Vermessenheit des Menschen. Göttingen, 1962.
V.M. Rozin analiz skhem v filosofii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh (na materiale knigi E. svedenborga) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-1.-C. 9-16.
I.A. Nedugova Dialektika kul'tury i soznaniya: predmetnyy podkhod // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-5.-C. 52-60.
E.N. Struk Eksplikatsiya kategorii predel v sovremennoy filosofii // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-8.-C. 1077-1082. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.8.4883.
Yu.B. Mindlin Upravlenie sistemoy kachestva
na predpriyatii sfery uslug // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 1. - C. 111 - 114. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.01.12.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the relation between violence and literature. The purpose of creative writing is, if not to overcome, then at least to define and describe the causes of violence that intertwined with all layers of social life from economy and politics to visual art and sexuality. Noteworthy that violence is viewed not as an ephemeral quality that can be controlled and regulated by law, morals, social mechanisms or ideology but as an immanent anthropological experience or internal quality of social life. The experience of violence determines social life from the bottom layers to the upper layers, from the violence in images and discursive violence to sexual harassment and using bodies for economic purposes. Based on the examples from Russian literature, first of all, Lev Tolstoy and Fedor Dostoevsky, the author of the article compares different theoretical approaches to the relation between creative writing and violence offered by T. Adorno, Yu. Kristva, V. Podoroga and others. In the article the author uses the method of the anthropological analysis of literature and art developed in the division of analytical anthropology at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences as well as the textual and comparative analysis of literary writings. The novelty of the research is in viewing the Russian literature as the anthropological experience of image production in response to violence and persecution in society. Literature and art interest the author because they are part of the modern socio-political process they do not only entertain or comfort or please us but also change us and the surrounding social reality.

Ключевые слова: disgust, horror, creative writing, violence, Russian literature, art, politics, philosophy, sensuality, left-hand avant-garde.

Контактная информация: Chubarov Igor Mikhailovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Volkhonka str., h. 14/1, bld. 5, room No. 429.

Библиография:
Chuzhak N. Literatura zhiznestroeniya. Literatura fakta. Pervyy sbornik materialov rabotnikov LEFa. M., 1929.
Podoroga V. Mimesis. T.1. M., 2006.
Podoroga V. Fenomenologiya tela. M., 1998.
Kristeva Yu. Sily uzhasa: esse ob otvrashchenii. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2003.
Adorno T. Esteticheskaya teoriya. M., 2001.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. M., Ekaterinburg, 1998.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya. SPb., 1998.
Belyy A. Dusha samosoznayushchaya. M., 1999.
Shiller F. Pis'ma ob esteticheskom vospitanii cheloveka. Sobr. soch. T. VI. M. 1957
Marks K., Engel's F. Sochicheniya, Izd. 2. T. 42. M., 1974

References (transliteration):
Chuzhak N. Literatura zhiznestroeniya. Literatura fakta. Pervyy sbornik materialov rabotnikov LEFa. M., 1929.
Podoroga V. Mimesis. T.1. M., 2006.
Podoroga V. Fenomenologiya tela. M., 1998.
Kristeva Yu. Sily uzhasa: esse ob otvrashchenii. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2003.
Adorno T. Esteticheskaya teoriya. M., 2001.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. M., Ekaterinburg, 1998.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya. SPb., 1998.
Belyy A. Dusha samosoznayushchaya. M., 1999.
Shiller F. Pis'ma ob esteticheskom vospitanii cheloveka. Sobr. soch. T. VI. M. 1957
Marks K., Engel's F. Sochicheniya, Izd. 2. T. 42. M., 1974

Аннотация: The author of the present research article raises a question about the concurrence or nonoccurrence of historical development and cultural development. The author shows that history is a natural and rather spontaneous process of human development while culture is an associated type of being. Creating his own species, human eliminates spontaneity and naturality in his own development, creates the visibility of being and therefore turns history into culture. Human is not always satisfied with the culture because he does not have so much power to change the culture. In the article the author uses general scientific methods, in particular, hypothetical-deductive, analytical and comparative analysis methods. The author shares his own views on culture as something created by a subject. Creating his own species, human eliminates spontaneity and naturality in his own development, creates the visibility of being and therefore turns history into culture. Human is not always satisfied with the culture because he does not have so much power to change the culture. The author also shows that history is a natural and rather spontaneous process of human development while culture is an associated type of being.

Ключевые слова: history, culture, being, knowledge, freedom, form, visibility, philosophy of history, philosophy of culture, totality.

Контактная информация: Polischuk Viktor Ivanovich, 627750, Russia, Tyumen Region, Ishim, ul. Lenina 1.

Библиография:
Gurevich P.S. Otchego umerlo vashe telo? // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2012. № 3 (42). S. 39.
Turovskiy M.B. O ponimanii istorii // Filosofskie osnovaniya kul'turologii. M., 1997. S. 52.
Larin Yu.V. Problema istinnosti teoriy istiny // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 10. Seriya «Filosofiya». S. 50.
Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. № 1. S.98.
Polishchuk V.I. Ideya kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 204 - 217. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_87.html
Prokhorov M.M. Bytie i istoriya: vzaimosvyaz' i opredelenie // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 1 - 71. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.113. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_113.html

References (transliteration):
Gurevich P.S. Otchego umerlo vashe telo? // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2012. № 3 (42). S. 39.
Turovskiy M.B. O ponimanii istorii // Filosofskie osnovaniya kul'turologii. M., 1997. S. 52.
Larin Yu.V. Problema istinnosti teoriy istiny // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 10. Seriya «Filosofiya». S. 50.
Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. № 1. S.98.
Polishchuk V.I. Ideya kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 204 - 217. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_87.html
Prokhorov M.M. Bytie i istoriya: vzaimosvyaz' i opredelenie // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 1 - 71. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.113. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_113.html

Аннотация: The article is the attempt to explain contradictions of practice of preservation of a cultural heritage by the fact of existence of ideology of a cultural heritage. However, the concept of a cultural heritage can be considered through a prism of one of the most significant constants of culture: division of the world on visible and invisible, or on material and spiritual. On the basis of this approach the attempt to correct a modern view on the past can be made.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, heritage, ideology, ideologeme, past, history, authenticity, progress, globalization, personality.

Контактная информация: Makovetsky Evgeny Anatolievich, 199034, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya naberezhnaya 7/9.

Библиография:
Svetlov R.V. Gnozis i ekzegetika. SPb., 1998;
Sloterdayk P. Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma. Ekaterinburg, 2001.
Sarkisyan G., Khudaverdyan K., Yuzbashyan K. Potomki Khayka: Ocherk istorii i kul'tury Armenii. Erevan. 1998. Ss.183-184.
Rybak K.E. Muzey v normativnoy sisteme (istoriko-kul'turologicheskiy analiz): dis. … d-ra kul'turologii. SPb., 2006.
Prokhorov G. M. Isikhazm i obshchestvennaya mysl' v Vostochnoy Evrope v XIV v. / Trudy otdela drevnerusskoy literatury, t. 23, L. 1968
Panchenko A.M. Ya emigriroval v Drevnyuyu Rus'. Rossiya: istoriya i kul'tura. SPb., 2008;
Korsunskiy I. Novozavetnoe tolkovanie Vetkhogo Zaveta. M., 1885;
Mad'yari-Bek Ishtvan. Budushchee kak kul'turnoe nasledie: doklad na kruglom stole «Kul'turnoe nasledie kak obrazovatel'nyy resurs» v ramkakh Dney filosofii v Peterburge-2012. Sankt-Peterburg, 16.11.2012 g.
Makovetskiy E.A. Ideologiya kul'turnogo naslediya.//Voprosy kul'turologii. 2012. № 3.
O pessimizme grekov pisali, v chastnosti sleduyushchie avtory: Ya. Burkkhardt, Fr. Nitsshe, E. Rode, A.I. Zaytsev.
Klimov L.A. Muzey v sokhranenii i prezentatsii nematerial'nogo kul'turnogo naslediya: dis. … kand. kul'turologii. SPb., 2012.
Zamaleev A.F., Ovchinnikova E.A. Eretiki i ortodoksy: ocherki drevnerusskoy dukhovnosti. L., 1991).
Kazakova N.A., Lur'e Ya.S. Antifeodal'nye ereticheskie dvizheniya na Rusi XIV-nachala XVI v. M.-L. 1955,
Drikker A.S. Fizicheskie aspekty metafizicheskoy transformatsii. SPb., 2012.
Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyy ob'ekt ideologii. M., 1999. S. 28.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya: Anti-Edip. M., 1990.
Galkova O.V. Rossiyskie traditsii okhrany kul'turnogo naslediya: dis. … d-ra ist. nauk. Volgograd, 2012.
Bolotov V.V. Lektsii po istorii Drevney Tserkvi. T.1. SPb., 1907. S. 118 i dalee.
URL:http://icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Key_Concepts_of_Museology/Museologie_Angl ais_BD.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 06.10.2013).
Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. //Ben'yamin V. Izbrannye esse. M. 1996.
Key Concepts of Museology. Ed. by André Desvallées and François Mairesse. Paris, 2010.
Blum R. Kallimachos. The Alexandrian Library and the Origins of Bibliography. Translated from the German by Hans H. Wellisch. The University of Wisconsin Press. 1991.
Kannengiesser Ch. Handbook of Patristic Exegesis. The Bible in Ancient Christianity. Leiden, 2006.

References (transliteration):
Svetlov R.V. Gnozis i ekzegetika. SPb., 1998;
Sloterdayk P. Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma. Ekaterinburg, 2001.
Sarkisyan G., Khudaverdyan K., Yuzbashyan K. Potomki Khayka: Ocherk istorii i kul'tury Armenii. Erevan. 1998. Ss.183-184.
Rybak K.E. Muzey v normativnoy sisteme (istoriko-kul'turologicheskiy analiz): dis. … d-ra kul'turologii. SPb., 2006.
Prokhorov G. M. Isikhazm i obshchestvennaya mysl' v Vostochnoy Evrope v XIV v. / Trudy otdela drevnerusskoy literatury, t. 23, L. 1968
Panchenko A.M. Ya emigriroval v Drevnyuyu Rus'. Rossiya: istoriya i kul'tura. SPb., 2008;
Korsunskiy I. Novozavetnoe tolkovanie Vetkhogo Zaveta. M., 1885;
Mad'yari-Bek Ishtvan. Budushchee kak kul'turnoe nasledie: doklad na kruglom stole «Kul'turnoe nasledie kak obrazovatel'nyy resurs» v ramkakh Dney filosofii v Peterburge-2012. Sankt-Peterburg, 16.11.2012 g.
Makovetskiy E.A. Ideologiya kul'turnogo naslediya.//Voprosy kul'turologii. 2012. № 3.
O pessimizme grekov pisali, v chastnosti sleduyushchie avtory: Ya. Burkkhardt, Fr. Nitsshe, E. Rode, A.I. Zaytsev.
Klimov L.A. Muzey v sokhranenii i prezentatsii nematerial'nogo kul'turnogo naslediya: dis. … kand. kul'turologii. SPb., 2012.
Zamaleev A.F., Ovchinnikova E.A. Eretiki i ortodoksy: ocherki drevnerusskoy dukhovnosti. L., 1991).
Kazakova N.A., Lur'e Ya.S. Antifeodal'nye ereticheskie dvizheniya na Rusi XIV-nachala XVI v. M.-L. 1955,
Drikker A.S. Fizicheskie aspekty metafizicheskoy transformatsii. SPb., 2012.
Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyy ob'ekt ideologii. M., 1999. S. 28.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya: Anti-Edip. M., 1990.
Galkova O.V. Rossiyskie traditsii okhrany kul'turnogo naslediya: dis. … d-ra ist. nauk. Volgograd, 2012.
Bolotov V.V. Lektsii po istorii Drevney Tserkvi. T.1. SPb., 1907. S. 118 i dalee.
URL:http://icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Key_Concepts_of_Museology/Museologie_Angl ais_BD.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 06.10.2013).
Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. //Ben'yamin V. Izbrannye esse. M. 1996.
Key Concepts of Museology. Ed. by André Desvallées and François Mairesse. Paris, 2010.
Blum R. Kallimachos. The Alexandrian Library and the Origins of Bibliography. Translated from the German by Hans H. Wellisch. The University of Wisconsin Press. 1991.
Kannengiesser Ch. Handbook of Patristic Exegesis. The Bible in Ancient Christianity. Leiden, 2006.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to conceptual grounds of biography as a cultural text. The author of the article analyzes provisions of E. Levinas’ social ontology, the latter being an essential method of research of biography as a cultural text. Levinas’ methodology allows to conduct phenomenological assessment of sociality based on the attitude to the Other. The author of the article also analyzes such terms as ‘event’, ‘act’ and ‘acting/participating thinking’ offered by Mikhail Bakhtin in his theory of subjectivity. The author of the present article proves that it is possible to view the above mentioned problem from the point of view of the concept of the Other and philosophy of the act. The concept of ‘existence and co-existence’ offered by Mikhail Bakhtin as a method of viewing biography from the point of view of the ethic beginning. The author also concludes that Bakhtin’s philosophy of the act and Levinas’ social ontology as the main methods of analysis of biography as a cultural text. Addressing to Bakhtin’s and Levinas’ methods provide grounds for defining principles of mutual complementarity of the phenomenology of individual memory and sociology of collective memory. The author of the article also offers a strategy for analyzing biography as a cultural text.

Ключевые слова: biography, deed, event, the Other, text, sociality, phenomenology, intersubjectivity, culture, memory.

Контактная информация: Artamoshkina Lyudmila Egorovna, 199034, Russia, St. Petersburg, Mendeleevskaya linia 5.

Библиография:
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa; Nauka, 1999. s.597
Mandel'shtam O. E. Stikhi o neizvestnom soldate // Mandel'shtam O. E. Sobr.soch.: v 4 t. T. 1. M.: Terra, 1991. 684 s.
Levinas E. Ot sushchestvovaniya k sushchestvuyushchemu// Levinas E. Izbrannoe: Total'nost' i beskonechnoe. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 416 s.
Levinas E. Vremya i drugoy. Gumanizm drugogo cheloveka. SPb.: Vysshaya religioznaya filosofskaya shkola, 1999. 265 s.
Dostoevskiy F. M. Prestuplenie i nakazanie. Roman v shesti chastyakh s epilogom.. M.: Gos. izd-vo Khudozhestvennoy literatury, 1959. 543 s.
Dali S. Dnevnik odnogo geniya. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. 270 s.
Gurevich A. Ya. «Edda» i saga. M.: Nauka,1979. 192 s.
Bakhtin M. M. K filosofii postupka // Filosofiya i sotsiologiya nauki i tekhniki. Ezhegodnik. 1984–1985. M.: Nauka, 1986. 150 c.
Nansi Zh.-L. «V otvete za sushchestvovanie» // Intentsional'nost' i tekstual'nost'. Filosofskaya mysl' Frantsii KhKh veka. Tomsk: Vodoley, 1998. 320 c
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. M.: Ad Marginem, 1997. 451 c.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Natsional'no-kul'turnaya identichnost' v kontekste filosofskoy traditsii dialoga kul'tur // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 183 - 244. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_8848.html

References (transliteration):
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa; Nauka, 1999. s.597
Mandel'shtam O. E. Stikhi o neizvestnom soldate // Mandel'shtam O. E. Sobr.soch.: v 4 t. T. 1. M.: Terra, 1991. 684 s.
Levinas E. Ot sushchestvovaniya k sushchestvuyushchemu// Levinas E. Izbrannoe: Total'nost' i beskonechnoe. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 416 s.
Levinas E. Vremya i drugoy. Gumanizm drugogo cheloveka. SPb.: Vysshaya religioznaya filosofskaya shkola, 1999. 265 s.
Dostoevskiy F. M. Prestuplenie i nakazanie. Roman v shesti chastyakh s epilogom.. M.: Gos. izd-vo Khudozhestvennoy literatury, 1959. 543 s.
Dali S. Dnevnik odnogo geniya. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. 270 s.
Gurevich A. Ya. «Edda» i saga. M.: Nauka,1979. 192 s.
Bakhtin M. M. K filosofii postupka // Filosofiya i sotsiologiya nauki i tekhniki. Ezhegodnik. 1984–1985. M.: Nauka, 1986. 150 c.
Nansi Zh.-L. «V otvete za sushchestvovanie» // Intentsional'nost' i tekstual'nost'. Filosofskaya mysl' Frantsii KhKh veka. Tomsk: Vodoley, 1998. 320 c
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. M.: Ad Marginem, 1997. 451 c.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Natsional'no-kul'turnaya identichnost' v kontekste filosofskoy traditsii dialoga kul'tur // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 183 - 244. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_8848.html

Аннотация: The author of the article defines determinants of the problem situation around the mentioned topic such as contradictory definitions of culture, insufficient development of the framework of categories of philosophical reflection over culture, lack of description of particular patterns of cultural development and the need to clarify the difference between ‘civilization’ and ‘culture’, unsatisfactory researches of the influence of social practices on culture. As a solution of the aforesaid problems, the author answers the question whether philosophy of culture advances the idea of culture or utopia of the latter? From the axiological point of view, culture is viewed as the process of production and development of values and positive province of mankind. The moral idea of true humanity is presented by the author of the article as the sovereign ‘governess’ of culture. The author offers a definition of the subject of philosophy of culture and describes philosophical grounds, invariants and universals of philosophy of culture. The author also describes social culture and views introduction of the basic principle of explanation and production of culture and explication of cultural patters listed herein as the main contribution of philosophy to cultural studies.

Ключевые слова: culture, culturized, value, spirituality, philosophy of culture, grounds, universals, invariants, cultural patterns, human.

Контактная информация: Lapina Tatyana Sergeevna, 111111, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya — Kurdinskaya 9.

Библиография:
Vyzhletsov G.P. Aksiologiya kul'tury. – Spb., 1996.
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. – M., 1995.
Zapesotskiy A.S., Markov A.P. Stanovlenie kul'turologicheskoy paradigmy. – SPb., 2007.
Lapina T.S. Filosofiya kul'tury: variant ponimaniya. Monografiya. – M., 2003.
Larin Yu.V. Onto-logika kul'tury: Monografiya. – Tyumen', 2004.
Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul'tury. Ocherki po filosofii kul'tury. – M., 2006.
Neretina S., Ogurtsov A. Vremya kul'tury. – SPb., 2000.
Rozin V.M. Teoriya kul'tury. – M., 2005.
Stepin V.S. Tsivilizatsiya i kul'tura. – SPb., 2011.
Turovskiy M.B. Filosofskie osnovaniya kul'turologii. – M., 1997.
Chelovek kak sub'ekt kul'tury. – M., 2002.
Chumakov A.N. Metafizika globalizatsii. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnyy kontekst. Monografiya. – M., 2006.

References (transliteration):
Vyzhletsov G.P. Aksiologiya kul'tury. – Spb., 1996.
Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. – M., 1995.
Zapesotskiy A.S., Markov A.P. Stanovlenie kul'turologicheskoy paradigmy. – SPb., 2007.
Lapina T.S. Filosofiya kul'tury: variant ponimaniya. Monografiya. – M., 2003.
Larin Yu.V. Onto-logika kul'tury: Monografiya. – Tyumen', 2004.
Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul'tury. Ocherki po filosofii kul'tury. – M., 2006.
Neretina S., Ogurtsov A. Vremya kul'tury. – SPb., 2000.
Rozin V.M. Teoriya kul'tury. – M., 2005.
Stepin V.S. Tsivilizatsiya i kul'tura. – SPb., 2011.
Turovskiy M.B. Filosofskie osnovaniya kul'turologii. – M., 1997.
Chelovek kak sub'ekt kul'tury. – M., 2002.
Chumakov A.N. Metafizika globalizatsii. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnyy kontekst. Monografiya. – M., 2006.

Аннотация: Carlos Castaneda, the author of the Teachings of Don Juan, presented the teaching about the world and human which hasn’t been viewed as a philosophy yet due to its exoticism and intentional academicism. The world of Castaneda creates the ‘meta-reality’ that has a complex interaction structure, both internal and external. Similar to exoteric and mystic teachings, human is shown as a knower of unknown Transcendental Reality (nagual). Using special methods such as stalking (hunting), i.e. tracing back defects of one’s perception in order to get closer to nagual and therefore expend and extent our consciousness, and dreaming, i.e. unconsciously entering nagual for the same purpose by controlling one’s dreams, human gain control over himself and his perception which is, according to Castaneda, interpretation of existing energetic reality. These two methods, in their turn, include a number of other techniques such as inaction, erasing personal history, recapitulation, controlled stupidity and etc.). Castaneda’s ideas are somewhat similar to Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, Meister Eckhart, Jakob Böhme, George Berkeley and others. The author of the article allows himself a comparative analysis. The analysis shows some similarities between ancient Indian wisdom partly adopted by Castaneda and famous Western and Eastern philosophies.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, Castaneda, mysticism, esotericism, magic, transcendence, nagualism, apophatic theology, absolute, spiritualism.

Контактная информация: Rusakov Yury Alexandrovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie gory 1.

Аннотация: The author of the article views the term ‘symbol’ as a philosophical category included in semiotic space of culture. The author also analyzes how the term developed in that space and discovers the differences and similarities between a sign and a symbol. Based on the analysis of differences between these two terms according to the leading philosophers, it is noted that the term ‘symbol’ has many meanings. At the same time, the term ‘sign’ has only one meaning. Symbol is good for creating a full picture while sign is better for creating a more accurate and precise picture. Based on examples from different spheres of human activity including speech, advertising, fine arts, and examples from Russian history, it is noted that during the periods of cultural crisis, sign is ‘exalted’ to symbol while previous symbols gain new contents. The author also describes different forms of reinterpretation of old symbols in a new environment.

Ключевые слова: symbol, sign, image, picture, symbolization, exaltation of a meaning, reinterpretation of a symbol, symbol in semiotics, cultural definitions, new culture.

Контактная информация: Kovalchuk Anton Mikhailovich, 680045, Russia, Khabarovsk, ul. Krasnorechenskaya 112.

Библиография:
1. Azarenko A.A. Simvol // Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / pod obshch. red. d.f.n., professora
V.E. Kemerova. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004. S. 613-616.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M.: Pravda, 1989.
3. Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po estetike. Ch. 2. Razvitie ideala v osobennye formy prekrasnogo v iskusstve //
Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika. Estetika. T. 2. M.: Nauka, 1969.
4. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Soch.: v 8 t. T. 5. M.: Choro, 1994.
5. Knabe G.S. Materialy k lektsii po obshchey teorii kul'tury i kul'ture antichnogo Rima. M.: Indrik,
1994.
6. Kovalenko E.M. Kontseptsii simvola v filosofii kul'tury XX v. Rostov-n/D: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh
APSN, 2006.
7. Koval'chuk A.M. Simvoly russkoy (etnokul'turnoy) identichnosti v pechatnoy reklame sooteche-
stvennikov v Kitae // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. № 1. S. 140-146.
8. Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995.
9. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1982.
10. Lotman Yu.M. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya. M.: Yazyki rus-
skoy kul'tury, 1996.
11. Mamardashvili M.K. Simvol i soznanie / M.K. Mamardashvili, A.M. Pyatigorskiy. SPb: Azbuka,
Azbuka-Attikus, 2011.
12. Pelipenko A.A. Kul'tura kak sistema / A.A. Pelipenko, I.G. Yakovlev. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury,
1998.
13. Pirs Ch.S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. M.: Logos, 2000.
14. Rubtsov N.N. Simvol v iskusstve i zhizni: filosofskie razmyshleniya. M.: Nauka, 1991.
15. Tsareva E.A. Simvol v usloviyakh izmeneniya sotsiokul'turnogo bytiya. Kursk, 2006.
16. Yakovleva E.L. Mif i ego tekhnologii v sovetskom prostranstve // Sovetskoe obshchestvo i sovetskiy
chelovek: mify i real'nost'. Sb. dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii.
Kazan': KGASU, 2012.

References (transliteration):
1. Azarenko A.A. Simvol // Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / pod obshch. red. d.f.n., professora
V.E. Kemerova. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004. S. 613-616.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M.: Pravda, 1989.
3. Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po estetike. Ch. 2. Razvitie ideala v osobennye formy prekrasnogo v iskusstve //
Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika. Estetika. T. 2. M.: Nauka, 1969.
4. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Soch.: v 8 t. T. 5. M.: Choro, 1994.
5. Knabe G.S. Materialy k lektsii po obshchey teorii kul'tury i kul'ture antichnogo Rima. M.: Indrik,
1994.
6. Kovalenko E.M. Kontseptsii simvola v filosofii kul'tury XX v. Rostov-n/D: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh
APSN, 2006.
7. Koval'chuk A.M. Simvoly russkoy (etnokul'turnoy) identichnosti v pechatnoy reklame sooteche-
stvennikov v Kitae // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. № 1. S. 140-146.
8. Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995.
9. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1982.
10. Lotman Yu.M. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya. M.: Yazyki rus-
skoy kul'tury, 1996.
11. Mamardashvili M.K. Simvol i soznanie / M.K. Mamardashvili, A.M. Pyatigorskiy. SPb: Azbuka,
Azbuka-Attikus, 2011.
12. Pelipenko A.A. Kul'tura kak sistema / A.A. Pelipenko, I.G. Yakovlev. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury,
1998.
13. Pirs Ch.S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. M.: Logos, 2000.
14. Rubtsov N.N. Simvol v iskusstve i zhizni: filosofskie razmyshleniya. M.: Nauka, 1991.
15. Tsareva E.A. Simvol v usloviyakh izmeneniya sotsiokul'turnogo bytiya. Kursk, 2006.
16. Yakovleva E.L. Mif i ego tekhnologii v sovetskom prostranstve // Sovetskoe obshchestvo i sovetskiy
chelovek: mify i real'nost'. Sb. dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii.
Kazan': KGASU, 2012.

Аннотация: There have been obvious ups and downs in the development of the Russian culture. But despite discrete and catastrophic character of culture admitted by almost all researchers, Russian culture remains united and unique. The author of the article advances an idea that such unity is caused by the expansion of the central, ‘core’ ideals to the most of cultural spheres. Such ideals provide exceptional stability and sustainability. For Old Russia such ‘core’ ideals were based on Orthodoxy. However, along with Orthodoxy, Byzantium also gave Russia the theory and practice of Hesychasm –mystical and ascetic Orthodox tradition. Synergism is one of the main concepts of Hesychasm. Introducing the term ‘Synergism’ in his study, the author makes an attempt to describe the periods of golden age of the Russian culture from the point of view of the fullest expression of Hesychastic and Synergistic ideals. One of such periods fell upon the Old Russian culture, in particular, the XIV–XV centuries. It was the period when Russia adopted most of Hesychastic ideas form Byzantium which resulted in formation of a monastic culture, spread of the starets movement and expression of Hesychastic ideals in Andrey Rublev’s and Theophanes the Greek’s works, fresco painting, architecture of religious buildings and literature.

Ключевые слова: Russian culture, Orthodoxy, core of culture, Hesychasm, Synergism, Hesychastic-Synergetic core, Asceticism, icon painting, starets (eldership), monarchism.

Контактная информация: Berseneva Tatiana Pavlovna, 644009, Russia, Omsk, ul. Maslennikova 144.

Библиография:
1. Alpatov M.V. Freski khrama Uspeniya na Volotovom pole // Pamyatniki iskusstva, razrushennye ne-
metskimi zakhvatchikami v SSSR: Sb. statey. M.-L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1948. S. 103-148.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya // Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie: Sochineniya. M.: Eksmo, 2005. 640 s.
3. Berseneva T.P. Kategoriya sinergii v teologicheskoy traditsii // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Seriya:
Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost'. 2012. № 4 (111). S. 116-120.
4. Berseneva T.P. Sinergiya i sinergetika: kategoriya isikhazma i sovremennaya nauka // Vestnik Tom-
skogo gos. universiteta. 2013. № 369. S. 41-47.
5. Berseneva T.P. Sinergiya i dialekticheskoe protivorechie // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta
im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya «Sotsial'nye nauki». 2012. № 3 (27). S. 102-108.
6. Billington D.Kh. Ikona i topor [Elektronnyy resurs] // Elektronnaya biblioteka Yakova Krotova.
(URL: http://krotov.info/library/02_b/il/lington_00.htm (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2013)).
7. Bychkov V.V. Russkaya srednevekovaya estetika. XI–XVII veka. M.: Mysl', 1995. 637 s.
8. Kondakov I.V. «Novaya Rus'» i sud'ba chelovechestva: russkaya kul'tura v kontseptsii L.N. Gumileva //
Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2013. № 1. C. 7-20. (DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.1).
9. Likhachev D.S. Izbrannye trudy po russkoy i mirovoy kul'ture. SPb: Izd-vo SPbGUP, 2006. 416 s.
10. Pivovarov D.V. Sinteticheskaya kontseptsiya kul'tury. Problema sinteza osnovnykh definitsiy kul'-
tury // Pivovarov D.V. Sinteticheskaya paradigma v filosofii: izbr. stat'i. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo
Ural. un-ta, 2011. S. 5-19.
11. Poddubnyy N.V. Samoorganizuyushchiesya sistemy: ontologicheskiy i metodologicheskiy aspekty: dis. …
d-ra filos. nauk. Rostov-n/D, 2000. 335 s.
12. Trubetskoy E.N. Umozrenie v kraskakh. Voprosy o smysle zhizni v drevnerusskoy religioznoy zhi-
vopisi. M.: Tip. T-va I.D. Sytina, 1916. 46 s.
13. Uspenskiy L.A. Bogoslovie ikony Pravoslavnoy tserkvi [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://
pravbeseda.ru/library/index.php?page=book&id=746 (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2013)].
14. Filosofskiy slovar' [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://mirslovarei.com/content_fil/sinergija-5058.
html#ixzz2PsOdOF70 (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2013)].
15. Khoruzhiy S.S. Isikhazm v Vizantii i Rossii: istoricheskie svyazi, antropologicheskie problemy
[Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://www.xpa-spb.ru/libr/Horuzhij/isihazm.html (data obrashcheniya
01.08.2013)].

References (transliteration):
1. Alpatov M.V. Freski khrama Uspeniya na Volotovom pole // Pamyatniki iskusstva, razrushennye ne-
metskimi zakhvatchikami v SSSR: Sb. statey. M.-L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1948. S. 103-148.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya // Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie: Sochineniya. M.: Eksmo, 2005. 640 s.
3. Berseneva T.P. Kategoriya sinergii v teologicheskoy traditsii // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Seriya:
Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost'. 2012. № 4 (111). S. 116-120.
4. Berseneva T.P. Sinergiya i sinergetika: kategoriya isikhazma i sovremennaya nauka // Vestnik Tom-
skogo gos. universiteta. 2013. № 369. S. 41-47.
5. Berseneva T.P. Sinergiya i dialekticheskoe protivorechie // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta
im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya «Sotsial'nye nauki». 2012. № 3 (27). S. 102-108.
6. Billington D.Kh. Ikona i topor [Elektronnyy resurs] // Elektronnaya biblioteka Yakova Krotova.
(URL: http://krotov.info/library/02_b/il/lington_00.htm (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2013)).
7. Bychkov V.V. Russkaya srednevekovaya estetika. XI–XVII veka. M.: Mysl', 1995. 637 s.
8. Kondakov I.V. «Novaya Rus'» i sud'ba chelovechestva: russkaya kul'tura v kontseptsii L.N. Gumileva //
Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2013. № 1. C. 7-20. (DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.1).
9. Likhachev D.S. Izbrannye trudy po russkoy i mirovoy kul'ture. SPb: Izd-vo SPbGUP, 2006. 416 s.
10. Pivovarov D.V. Sinteticheskaya kontseptsiya kul'tury. Problema sinteza osnovnykh definitsiy kul'-
tury // Pivovarov D.V. Sinteticheskaya paradigma v filosofii: izbr. stat'i. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo
Ural. un-ta, 2011. S. 5-19.
11. Poddubnyy N.V. Samoorganizuyushchiesya sistemy: ontologicheskiy i metodologicheskiy aspekty: dis. …
d-ra filos. nauk. Rostov-n/D, 2000. 335 s.
12. Trubetskoy E.N. Umozrenie v kraskakh. Voprosy o smysle zhizni v drevnerusskoy religioznoy zhi-
vopisi. M.: Tip. T-va I.D. Sytina, 1916. 46 s.
13. Uspenskiy L.A. Bogoslovie ikony Pravoslavnoy tserkvi [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://
pravbeseda.ru/library/index.php?page=book&id=746 (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2013)].
14. Filosofskiy slovar' [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://mirslovarei.com/content_fil/sinergija-5058.
html#ixzz2PsOdOF70 (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2013)].
15. Khoruzhiy S.S. Isikhazm v Vizantii i Rossii: istoricheskie svyazi, antropologicheskie problemy
[Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://www.xpa-spb.ru/libr/Horuzhij/isihazm.html (data obrashcheniya
01.08.2013)].

Аннотация: The article contains analysis and critical evaluation of the worldview situation, which is supported by the government structures of the state. Among the dismaying worldview quillets, the author views the lowering of the role of philosophy as responsible free thinking in favor of dogmatism of religion; declarative objectivism of science and utilitarian — commercial type of thinking; introduction of elements of secular eschatology; the government favoring the efficiency principle in the issues of organization of social life. With the reference to the authentically philosophical worldview, as provided for by the expression of Heraclithus, the author formulates and provides basis for a number of specific challenges towards religious and churchly Christian views and practices, alliance of the church and government. The author supports the need and desirable character of metaphysically correct discussions between philosophers and theologians. It is pointed out that it is not acceptable and harmful to have a vulgar pragmatic approach to education and science. The text contains a number of references to the ideas of Niccolo Machiavelli with his non-servile and realistic view of human being and world.

Ключевые слова: human being, worldview, philosophy, religion, science, ideology, ideocracy, Russia, eschatology, efficiency.

Контактная информация: Fatenkov, Aleksey Nikolaevich, 603000, Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Universitetskiy per. d. 7.

Библиография:
1. Geraklit Efesskiy: vse nasledie na yazykakh originala i v rus. per.; krat. izd. / podgot. S.N. Mura-
v'ev. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2012. 416 s.
2. Doklad o chelovecheskom razvitii 2011. Ustoychivoe razvitie i razvitie vozmozhnostey: Luchshee
budushchee dlya vsekh / per. s angl. D. Golosnogo, N. Zaborina, A. Skobelkina; PROON. M.: Ves' Mir,
2011. 188 s.
3. Makiavelli N. Gosudar' / per. M.S. Fel'dshteyna // Makiavelli N. Gosudar'. Rassuzhdeniya o pervoy
dekade Tita Liviya. O voennom iskusstve. M.: Mysl', 1996. S. 37-108.
4. Makiavelli N. Rassuzhdeniya o pervoy dekade Tita Liviya / per. N. Kurochkina // Makiavelli N. Go-
sudar'. Rassuzhdeniya o pervoy dekade Tita Liviya. O voennom iskusstve. M.: Mysl', 1996. S. 109-398.
5. Tokarev S.A. Religiya v istorii narodov mira. 5-e izd. M.: Respublika, 2005. 543 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Geraklit Efesskiy: vse nasledie na yazykakh originala i v rus. per.; krat. izd. / podgot. S.N. Mura-
v'ev. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2012. 416 s.
2. Doklad o chelovecheskom razvitii 2011. Ustoychivoe razvitie i razvitie vozmozhnostey: Luchshee
budushchee dlya vsekh / per. s angl. D. Golosnogo, N. Zaborina, A. Skobelkina; PROON. M.: Ves' Mir,
2011. 188 s.
3. Makiavelli N. Gosudar' / per. M.S. Fel'dshteyna // Makiavelli N. Gosudar'. Rassuzhdeniya o pervoy
dekade Tita Liviya. O voennom iskusstve. M.: Mysl', 1996. S. 37-108.
4. Makiavelli N. Rassuzhdeniya o pervoy dekade Tita Liviya / per. N. Kurochkina // Makiavelli N. Go-
sudar'. Rassuzhdeniya o pervoy dekade Tita Liviya. O voennom iskusstve. M.: Mysl', 1996. S. 109-398.
5. Tokarev S.A. Religiya v istorii narodov mira. 5-e izd. M.: Respublika, 2005. 543 s.

Аннотация: The article is devoted to the problem of symbol and myth in Vyacheslav Ivanov’s philosophy. The author of the article defines peculiarities of philosophy of a Russian symbolist conditioned by his believing in the priority of belief and the second role of the rational thinking. The author describes peculiarities of the Medieval perception of the world that was reflected in Ivanov’s philosophy, too. The author also studies Vyacheslav Ivanov’s definition of symbol and the difference between Ivanov’s philosophy and French symbolism. The author describes several features of Friedrich Schelling’s works which made a considerable influence on Vyacheslav Ivanov as well. Studying Ivanov’s interpretation of myth from the point of view of its relation to a symbol, the author makes a hypothesis about special antinomic unity of symbol and myth. The author describes Ivanov’s thoughts on communicative features of myth and views the problem of the language expression of symbol as well as symbolic features of language.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, symbolism, theurgy, esthetics, beauty, myth, art, mystery, language, artist.

Контактная информация: Bliskavitsky Alexander Andreevich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5.

Библиография:
1. Averintsev S.S. «Skvoreshnits vol'nykh grazhdanin...». Vyacheslav Ivanov. Put' poeta mezhdu mirami.
SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001.
2. Bychkov V.V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. M.: Ladomir, 2007.
3. Berd R. Simvol i pechat' u Vyach. Ivanova // Memento vivere. Sbornik pamyati L.N. Ivanovoy / sost. i
red. K.A. Kupman, E.R. Obatini. SPb.: Nauka, 2009. S. 231-245.
4. Bliskavitskiy A.A. Filosofsko-esteticheskie osnovy russkogo simvolizma // Vestnik slavyanskikh
kul'tur. 2011. № 1. S. 31-43.
5. Bliskavitskiy A.A. Epistemologicheskiy kontekst v russkom simvolizme // Filosofiya i kul'tura.
2011. № 6. S. 162-169.
6. Bliskavitskiy A.A. Fenomen Krasoty i kategoriya bezobraznogo v estetike Vyacheslava Ivanova //
Estetika: Vchera. Segodnya. Vsegda. Vyp. 5 / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii; otv. red.: V.V. Bychkov,
N.B. Man'kovskaya. M.: IF RAN, 2010. S. 31-43.
7. Ivanov Vyach.I. Vagner i dionisovo deystvo // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel':
Foyer Oriental Chrétien, 1974. S. 83-85.
8. Ivanov Vyach.I. Dve stikhii v sovremennom simvolizme // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2.
Bryussel': Foyer Oriental Chrétien, 1974. S. 536-561.
9. Ivanov Vyach.I. Zavety simvolizma // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental
Chrétien, 1974. S. 588-603.
10. Ivanov Vyach.I. Nitsshe i Dionis // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental
Chrétien, 1974. S. 715-726.
11. Ivanov Vyach.I. Poet i chern' // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental
Chrétien, 1974. S. 709-714.
12. Ivanov Vyach.I. Simvolizm // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental Chrétien,
1974. S. 652-669.
13. Neretina S.S. Vozmozhnosti ponimaniya // Antologiya srednevekovoy mysli. Teologiya i filosofiya
evropeyskogo srednevekov'ya. T. 1 / pod red. S.S. Neretinoy. SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. S. 5-18.
14. Shelling F.V.Y. Istoriko-kriticheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu mifologii // Shelling F.V.Y. Soch.
v 2-kh t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 159-374.
15. Shelling F.V.Y. Filosofiya iskusstva. M.: Mysl', 1966.

References (transliteration):
1. Averintsev S.S. «Skvoreshnits vol'nykh grazhdanin...». Vyacheslav Ivanov. Put' poeta mezhdu mirami.
SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001.
2. Bychkov V.V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. M.: Ladomir, 2007.
3. Berd R. Simvol i pechat' u Vyach. Ivanova // Memento vivere. Sbornik pamyati L.N. Ivanovoy / sost. i
red. K.A. Kupman, E.R. Obatini. SPb.: Nauka, 2009. S. 231-245.
4. Bliskavitskiy A.A. Filosofsko-esteticheskie osnovy russkogo simvolizma // Vestnik slavyanskikh
kul'tur. 2011. № 1. S. 31-43.
5. Bliskavitskiy A.A. Epistemologicheskiy kontekst v russkom simvolizme // Filosofiya i kul'tura.
2011. № 6. S. 162-169.
6. Bliskavitskiy A.A. Fenomen Krasoty i kategoriya bezobraznogo v estetike Vyacheslava Ivanova //
Estetika: Vchera. Segodnya. Vsegda. Vyp. 5 / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii; otv. red.: V.V. Bychkov,
N.B. Man'kovskaya. M.: IF RAN, 2010. S. 31-43.
7. Ivanov Vyach.I. Vagner i dionisovo deystvo // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel':
Foyer Oriental Chrétien, 1974. S. 83-85.
8. Ivanov Vyach.I. Dve stikhii v sovremennom simvolizme // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2.
Bryussel': Foyer Oriental Chrétien, 1974. S. 536-561.
9. Ivanov Vyach.I. Zavety simvolizma // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental
Chrétien, 1974. S. 588-603.
10. Ivanov Vyach.I. Nitsshe i Dionis // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental
Chrétien, 1974. S. 715-726.
11. Ivanov Vyach.I. Poet i chern' // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 1. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental
Chrétien, 1974. S. 709-714.
12. Ivanov Vyach.I. Simvolizm // Ivanov V.I. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Bryussel': Foyer Oriental Chrétien,
1974. S. 652-669.
13. Neretina S.S. Vozmozhnosti ponimaniya // Antologiya srednevekovoy mysli. Teologiya i filosofiya
evropeyskogo srednevekov'ya. T. 1 / pod red. S.S. Neretinoy. SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. S. 5-18.
14. Shelling F.V.Y. Istoriko-kriticheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu mifologii // Shelling F.V.Y. Soch.
v 2-kh t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 159-374.
15. Shelling F.V.Y. Filosofiya iskusstva. M.: Mysl', 1966.

Аннотация: The research is focused on the phenomenon of authorship and transformation of this phenomenon in modern culture as a result of appearance of a new information-based type of culture and virtual environment. These cultural changes including new textual methods and methods of text reproduction, new writing resources, electronic texts and Internet hypertexts, new reading habits and etc. allow to see the authorship in a different light. Even though this can be considered to be an author’s ‘philosophical death’, modern culture still views an author as a creator and demiurge and, at the same time, it has a tendency to deprive of personal character and erase the uniqueness and authenticity of writing as well as dependence of text on virtual mediators. Modern information civilization has changed writing resources, reading habits and the dialogue ‘author-text-reader’ which led not only to transformation of the author’s function but also to appearance of new multi-media forms of virtual self-expression and creativity.

Ключевые слова: philosophy, author, virtual world, text, hyper-text, transformation, moderator, copywriter, free-lancer, culture, world perception, society, human, development.

Контактная информация: Shichanina Yulia Vladimirovna, 344000, Russia, South Russian Institute, Rostov-on-Don, ul. Pushkinskaya 70 kab. 111.

Библиография:
1. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika: Per. s fr. / Sost., obshch. red. i vstup. st. G.K. Kosi-
kova. M.: Progress, 1989.
2. Zakon RF “Ob avtorskom prave i smezhnykh pravakh” ot 09.07.1993 N 5351-1 [Elektronnyy resurs] //
URL: http://www.consultant.ru/popular/avtorpravo/65_2.html (data obrashcheniya 12.09.2011).
3. Mil'chin A.E. Avtor // Izdatel'skiy slovar'-spravochnik. Izd. 3-e, ispr. i dop., elektronnoe. M.:
OLMA-Press, 2006.
4. Mozheyko M.A. Avtor // Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar'. 3-e izd., ispravl. Mn.: Knizhnyy Dom,
2003. 1280 s. (Mir entsiklopediy).
5. Reale D., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney. T. 4. Ot romantizma do nashikh
dney. SPb: Petropolis, 1997. 880 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika: Per. s fr. / Sost., obshch. red. i vstup. st. G.K. Kosi-
kova. M.: Progress, 1989.
2. Zakon RF “Ob avtorskom prave i smezhnykh pravakh” ot 09.07.1993 N 5351-1 [Elektronnyy resurs] //
URL: http://www.consultant.ru/popular/avtorpravo/65_2.html (data obrashcheniya 12.09.2011).
3. Mil'chin A.E. Avtor // Izdatel'skiy slovar'-spravochnik. Izd. 3-e, ispr. i dop., elektronnoe. M.:
OLMA-Press, 2006.
4. Mozheyko M.A. Avtor // Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar'. 3-e izd., ispravl. Mn.: Knizhnyy Dom,
2003. 1280 s. (Mir entsiklopediy).
5. Reale D., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney. T. 4. Ot romantizma do nashikh
dney. SPb: Petropolis, 1997. 880 s.