Правильная ссылка на статью:
Apaeva, A. Yu..
The Discussion Between Martin Heidegger
and Emil Staiger
// Philosophy and Culture. – 2014. – № 10.
– С. 1470-1477.
DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.10.12496.
рубрика Смысл и безмолвие
DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.10.12496
Читать статью
Аннотация: The subject studied in the present article is the correspondence of a philologist Emil Staiger and philosopher
Martin Heidegger discussing Eduard Morike’s poem ‘To a Lamp’. The author of the article focuses on both the poem
and different interpretations of the poem offered by Heidegger and Staiger and methodological grounds of the difference
in their interpretations. Analyzing the difference in interpretation techniques used by Heidegger and Staiger,
the author describes the difference between philosophical and philological approaches to a literary text in general. To analyze the difference in Heidegger’s and Staiger’s interpretations of the poem, the author uses not only the method
of comparative analysis but also a hermeneutic insight into intentions of each interpreter. The scientific novelty of the
research is in viewing this particular discussion between Heidegger and Staiger as the part of a wider discussion between
the two branches of science that have different strategies of interpreting poetic works. Trying to be objective in
her analysis of each researcher’s position, the author of the article, however, arrives to a conclusion that Heidegger’s
interpretation was closer to the true poetic meaning of the poem studied.
Ключевые слова: Heidegger, Staiger, Morike, ‘To a Lamp’, Goethe, lucet, videtur, style, ‘the art of interpretation’, phenomenology.
Контактная информация: Apaeva Alyona Yurievna, 109028, Russia, Moscow, Maliy Trekhsvyatitelsky per. 8/2.
Библиография:
Wild, Markus. Heidegger, Staiger, Muschg. Warum lesen wir? / Heidegger und die Literatur. – Herausgegeben von Günter Figal und Ulrich Raulff. – 2012. 160 S.
Wild, Markus. “Schon unser Briefwechsel hat das Gedicht allzu schwer belastet”. Staiger und Heidegger über Mörikes „Auf eine Lampe“ / Kontroversen in der Literaturtheorie/ Literaturtheorie in der Kontroverse. – Publikationen zur Zeitschrift für Germanistik. Band 19. – Peter Lang, 2007. 514 p.
Wögerbauer, Werner. Der Briefwechsel zwischen Martin Heidegger und Emil Staiger // Geschichte der Germanistik. – 2004. – 25/26. – S. 34-79.
Staiger, Emil; Spitzer, Leo; Lang, Berel; Ebel, Christine. A 1951 Dialogue on Interpretation: Emil Staiger, Martin Heidegger, Leo Spitzer // PMLA. – May, 1990. – Vol. 105. – No. 3, Special Topic: The Politics of Critical Language. – P. 409-435.
Wallace, Martin. The Hermeneutic Circle and the Art of Interpretation // Comparative Literature. – Spring, 1972. – Vol. 24. – No. 2. – P. 97-117.
Po povodu odnogo stikhotvoreniya Merike (Perepiska Emilya Shtaygera s Martinom Khaydeggerom) / Khaydegger M. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2008. 528 c.
Holschuh, Albrecht; Lang, Berel; Lindenberger, Herbert. Interpreting a Pronoun in Mörike // PMLA. – Mar., 1991. – Vol. 106. – No. 2. – P. 312-314.
Appelbaum Graham, Ilse. Zu Mörikes Gedicht "Auf Eine Lampe" // Modern Language Notes. – May, 1953. – Vol. 68. – No.5. – P. 328-334.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. – S.-Peterburg: «Nauka», 2006. 450, [1] c.
Ivanova E.R. Predmetnyy mir v poezii Eduarda Merike // Vestnik udmurtskogo universiteta. 2013. – Vyp.4. – S. 88-92.
References (transliteration):
Wild, Markus. Heidegger, Staiger, Muschg. Warum lesen wir? / Heidegger und die Literatur. – Herausgegeben von Günter Figal und Ulrich Raulff. – 2012. 160 S.
Wild, Markus. “Schon unser Briefwechsel hat das Gedicht allzu schwer belastet”. Staiger und Heidegger über Mörikes „Auf eine Lampe“ / Kontroversen in der Literaturtheorie/ Literaturtheorie in der Kontroverse. – Publikationen zur Zeitschrift für Germanistik. Band 19. – Peter Lang, 2007. 514 p.
Wögerbauer, Werner. Der Briefwechsel zwischen Martin Heidegger und Emil Staiger // Geschichte der Germanistik. – 2004. – 25/26. – S. 34-79.
Staiger, Emil; Spitzer, Leo; Lang, Berel; Ebel, Christine. A 1951 Dialogue on Interpretation: Emil Staiger, Martin Heidegger, Leo Spitzer // PMLA. – May, 1990. – Vol. 105. – No. 3, Special Topic: The Politics of Critical Language. – P. 409-435.
Wallace, Martin. The Hermeneutic Circle and the Art of Interpretation // Comparative Literature. – Spring, 1972. – Vol. 24. – No. 2. – P. 97-117.
Po povodu odnogo stikhotvoreniya Merike (Perepiska Emilya Shtaygera s Martinom Khaydeggerom) / Khaydegger M. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2008. 528 c.
Holschuh, Albrecht; Lang, Berel; Lindenberger, Herbert. Interpreting a Pronoun in Mörike // PMLA. – Mar., 1991. – Vol. 106. – No. 2. – P. 312-314.
Appelbaum Graham, Ilse. Zu Mörikes Gedicht "Auf Eine Lampe" // Modern Language Notes. – May, 1953. – Vol. 68. – No.5. – P. 328-334.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. – S.-Peterburg: «Nauka», 2006. 450, [1] c.
Ivanova E.R. Predmetnyy mir v poezii Eduarda Merike // Vestnik udmurtskogo universiteta. 2013. – Vyp.4. – S. 88-92.