Правильная ссылка на статью:
Grudtsyna, L.Y..
Philosophical and legal concept of civil society as a self-organizing social system from Hegel to our days.
// Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 4.
– С. 392-397.
DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11370.
рубрика Административное и муниципальное право и институты гражданского общества
DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11370
Читать статью
Аннотация: The object of studies in this article concerns nature of civil society as a self-organizing complicated social
system, for which the development and quality transformation of elements (institutions) of this system causes new
quality of the system itself according to the laws of synergy. If we suppose (within the Hegel interpretation) that the
society includes the civil society institution plus state (generally interpreted), then everything, which is not state (its
bodies, structures guaranteeing functioning of the state coercion mechanism, etc.) is civil society. And vice versa.
What is not civil society is state. However, it is not the case in Russia. In our opinion there is now the third elements,
which Hegel did not include into his formula by overly generalizing the construction in general. Everything outside
the scope of state and civil society is a passive mass. Let us call it the “pre-level of civil society development”, which
is mostly the object of state manipulation, and the state rules due to its silent consent. The author attempts to use
scientific methods of synergy in order to provide an alternative to Hegel’s formula for distinguishing civil society and
state, them being necessary complicated elements of a single social system, rather than two opposed systems differing
in size. If one finds an antithesis to the Hegel’s formula (providing for the opposition between state and civil society
as two opposing poles balancing each other in pursuit of harmony), the state shall be not a constituent element in a
formula, but a result, a next stage of development of the self-organizing civil society as a dynamical system. The idea is
imagined as an arithmetical progression, where the pre-level of the civil society is “mass”, the next level is civil society,
which understands itself, develops and becomes more complicated, and the next level is the rule of law state as an
ideal, which needs to be strived for. In this case the state becomes a result, and not an element in a formula. But such
a formula should be more than just a simple sum of constituent element, but an arithmetical progression.
Ключевые слова: rule of law state, civil society, social system, state government, administration, constitution, law, democracy, freedom, politics.
Контактная информация: Grudtsyna Lyudmila Yurievna, 125993, Russia, GSP-3, Moskva, Leningradsky pr-t, 49.
Библиография:
Abdulatipov R.G. Natsional'nyy vopros i gosudarstvennoe ustroystvo Rossii. – M.: Slavyanskiy dialog, 2000. – S. 33.
Afanas'ev V.G. Obshchestvo: sistemnost', poznanie i upravlenie. – M.: Politizdat, 1981.-S. 23.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M., 1990. S. 225.
Grudtsyna L.Yu. Razvitie institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v aspekte chastnogo i publichnogo prava // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2013. № 7(47).
Grudtsyna L.Yu. Chastnaya sobstvennost' i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii // Advokat. 2009. № 8.
Lagutkin A.V. Rossiya na rasput'e: kuda poydem?-M.: Yurkompani, 2013.-S. 3.Grudtsyna L.Yu. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i chastnoe pravo // Novyy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2.
Marks K. K evreyskomu voprosu // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 1. S. 390-391.
Pozdnyakov E.A. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe obshchestvo. Illyuzii i real'nost' // Politicheskiy klass. 2006. № 22. – S. 6-7.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Konstitutsionnye osnovy informatsionnoy svobody v Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 10. - C. 35 - 92. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.10.9617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9617.html
Lapin A.E., Petrova Yu.A. K voprosu o realizatsii polnomochiy predstavitel'nykh organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 24 - 33.
Grudtsyna L.Yu., Petrov S.M. Vlast' i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: vzaimodeystvie i protivo-
stoyanie // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 19 - 29.
Bondarchuk I.V. Legalizatsiya obshchestvennykh organizatsiy i politicheskikh partiy v mekhanizme zashchity konstitutsionnogo stroya Ukrainy // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 135 - 151. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.6292. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_6292.html
I. D. Koroeva Filosofiya vzaimodeystviya vlasti i naroda // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 18 - 24.
Trofimov V.V. Uchastie struktur grazhdanskogo obshchestva v pravoobrazuyushchikh pravootnosheniyakh kak forma vyrazheniya narodovlastiya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 5. - C. 147 - 170. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_364.html
References (transliteration):
Abdulatipov R.G. Natsional'nyy vopros i gosudarstvennoe ustroystvo Rossii. – M.: Slavyanskiy dialog, 2000. – S. 33.
Afanas'ev V.G. Obshchestvo: sistemnost', poznanie i upravlenie. – M.: Politizdat, 1981.-S. 23.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M., 1990. S. 225.
Grudtsyna L.Yu. Razvitie institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v aspekte chastnogo i publichnogo prava // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2013. № 7(47).
Grudtsyna L.Yu. Chastnaya sobstvennost' i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii // Advokat. 2009. № 8.
Lagutkin A.V. Rossiya na rasput'e: kuda poydem?-M.: Yurkompani, 2013.-S. 3.Grudtsyna L.Yu. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i chastnoe pravo // Novyy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2.
Marks K. K evreyskomu voprosu // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 1. S. 390-391.
Pozdnyakov E.A. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe obshchestvo. Illyuzii i real'nost' // Politicheskiy klass. 2006. № 22. – S. 6-7.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Konstitutsionnye osnovy informatsionnoy svobody v Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 10. - C. 35 - 92. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.10.9617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9617.html
Lapin A.E., Petrova Yu.A. K voprosu o realizatsii polnomochiy predstavitel'nykh organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 24 - 33.
Grudtsyna L.Yu., Petrov S.M. Vlast' i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: vzaimodeystvie i protivo-
stoyanie // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 19 - 29.
Bondarchuk I.V. Legalizatsiya obshchestvennykh organizatsiy i politicheskikh partiy v mekhanizme zashchity konstitutsionnogo stroya Ukrainy // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 135 - 151. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.6292. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_6292.html
I. D. Koroeva Filosofiya vzaimodeystviya vlasti i naroda // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 18 - 24.
Trofimov V.V. Uchastie struktur grazhdanskogo obshchestva v pravoobrazuyushchikh pravootnosheniyakh kak forma vyrazheniya narodovlastiya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 5. - C. 147 - 170. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_364.html