Languages and Linguistics
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Mel'dianova A.V., Pomerantsev S.V. —
Functional peculiarities of complex sentences in English aviation texts
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
– 2019. – № 4.
– С. 33 - 39.
DOI: 10.25136/1339-3057.2019.4.31021 URL: https:// nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31021
Читать статью
Аннотация:
This article is devoted to the peculiarities of functioning composite sentences in English aviation texts. The subject matter of this research is types of complex sentences in modern English and the means of connecting main and subordinate parts of these sentences. Research in the article is done on the basis of scientific and journalistic styles. Special attention is paid to the general characteristics of lexical and grammatical features of these two text styles. In the article, a comparative analysis of different types of subordinate clauses is made and difficulties in translating them from English into Russian are analyzed. In her research, Meldianova applies the following research methods: description used to define, interpret and classify complex sentences; and comparison used to analyze types of syndetic words and subordinating conjunctions in complex sentences. The novelty of this research consists in the conducted for the first time complex study of means of connecting sentences within a composite sentence on the basis of English aviation texts of scientific and journalistic styles.
Ключевые слова:
syndetic word, subordinate clause, journalistic style, scientific style, asyndetic connection, syndetic connection, complex sentence, composite sentence, subordinating conjunction, means of connection
Библиография :
Pilling M., Kingsley-Jones M. A 380: A Flight Group Special Report, June, 2005 – 40 p.
Hill A. Introduction to Linguistic Structures.-N.Y., 1985. – 454 p.
Адмони В.Г. Основы теории грамматики. – М. –Л.,1968. – 106 с. 2.
Арутюнова Н.Д. Предложение и его смысл. – М., 1976. – 383 с.
Бархударов Л.С. Структура простого предложения современного английского языка. – М., 1975. – 200 с.
Слюсарева Н.А. Проблемы функционального синтаксиса современного английского языка. – М., 1981. – 206 с.
Blokh M.Y. Course in Theoretical English Grammar. – M., 2003. – 423 p.
Bryant M. A Functional English Grammar. – N.Y.,1945. – 326 p.
Chomsky N. Aspects on the Theory of Syntax.-Cambridge, Mass., 1965. – 251 p.
Drugoveiko N.A., Meldianova A.V. Syntax of Modern English. – M.: Moscow Aviation University, 2016. – 92 p.
Francis W. The structure of American English. – N.Y., 1958. – 614 p.
Harris Z. Structural Linguistics.-Chicago, 1960. – 850 p.
References (transliterated):
Pilling M., Kingsley-Jones M. A 380: A Flight Group Special Report, June, 2005 – 40 p.
Hill A. Introduction to Linguistic Structures.-N.Y., 1985. – 454 p.
Admoni V.G. Osnovy teorii grammatiki. – M. –L.,1968. – 106 s. 2.
Arutyunova N.D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl. – M., 1976. – 383 s.
Barkhudarov L.S. Struktura prostogo predlozheniya sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka. – M., 1975. – 200 s.
Slyusareva N.A. Problemy funktsional'nogo sintaksisa sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka. – M., 1981. – 206 s.
Blokh M.Y. Course in Theoretical English Grammar. – M., 2003. – 423 p.
Bryant M. A Functional English Grammar. – N.Y.,1945. – 326 p.
Chomsky N. Aspects on the Theory of Syntax.-Cambridge, Mass., 1965. – 251 p.
Drugoveiko N.A., Meldianova A.V. Syntax of Modern English. – M.: Moscow Aviation University, 2016. – 92 p.
Francis W. The structure of American English. – N.Y., 1958. – 614 p.
Harris Z. Structural Linguistics.-Chicago, 1960. – 850 p.