Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêàÿ ïñèõîëîãèÿ
Ïðàâèëüíàÿ ññûëêà íà ñòàòüþ:
Õàùåíêî Ò.Ã.
Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè â ïðîöåññå ïðîôåññèîíàëèçàöèè â âóçå: îñîáåííîñòè ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêîãî ñîïðîâîæäåíèÿ
// Ïåäàãîãèêà è ïðîñâåùåíèå.
2016. ¹ 3.
Ñ. 281-295.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=68216
Àííîòàöèÿ:
Ïðåäìåòîì èññëåäîâàíèÿ âûñòóïàþò îñîáåííîñòè ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêîãî ñîïðîâîæäåíèÿ ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè â ïðîöåññå ïðîôåññèîíàëèçàöèè â âóçå.  ñâÿçè ñ ÷åì àíàëèçèðóþòñÿ ñòðóêòóðíî-ñîäåðæàòåëüíûå ñîñòàâëÿþùèå ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè êàê ñèñòåìíîãî ëè÷íîñòíîãî îáðàçîâàíèÿ, âûñòóïàþùåãî âíóòðåííåé ìîòèâàöèîííîé îñíîâîé ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé àêòèâíîñòè, ïðîÿâëÿþùåéñÿ íå òîëüêî â âûáîðå ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîãî âàðèàíòà ïðîôåññèîíàëüíîé êàðüåðû, íî è â ïîñëåäñòâèÿõ ýòîé àêòèâíîñòè äëÿ îêðóæàþùåãî ìèðà (ñîöèàëüíûõ, íðàâñòâåííî-ïðàâîâûõ, ýêîëîãè÷åñêèõ è ò.ä.). Îñîáîå âíèìàíèå óäåëÿåòñÿ ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèì ìåõàíèçìàì ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè â ïðîöåññå ïðîôåññèîíàëèçàöèè â âóçå, êîòîðûå äîëæíû íàõîäèòü îòðàæåíèå â ñîäåðæàíèè ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêîé ïîääåðæêè ýòîãî ïðîöåññà. Ìåòîäîëîãè÷åñêîå îñíîâàíèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ îáðàçóþò ìåæäèñöèïëèíàðíûé (À.Ë. Æóðàâëåâ, Ò.Ä. Ìàðöèíêîâñêàÿ), ñèñòåìíûé (Â.À. Áàðàáàíùèêîâ, Á.Ô. Ëîìîâ, Â.Ä. Øàäðèêîâ), ïñèõîñîöèàëüíûé (À.Ê. Àáóëüõàíîâà, Ì.È. Âîëîâèêîâà), ýêîïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèé (Â.È. Ïàíîâ), ñèñòåìíûé ëè÷íîñòíî-ðàçâèâàþùèé (Ë.Ì. Ìèòèíà) è êîíòåêñòíûé (À.À. Âåðáèöêèé) ïîäõîäû.  ïðîöåññå èññëåäîâàíèÿ èñïîëüçîâàëèñü êàê òåîðåòè÷åñêèå, òàê è ýìïèðè÷åñêèå ìåòîäû (âêëþ÷àÿ ôîðìèðóþùèé ýêñïåðèìåíò), ìåòîäû ñòàòèñòè÷åñêîé îáðàáîòêè è àíàëèçà ðåçóëüòàòîâ (Ìàííà-Óèòíè U-êðèòåðèé, Sign-òåñò). Íîâèçíà îïóáëèêîâàííûõ äàííûõ ñîñòîèò â îïèñàíèè ðàçðàáîòàííîé è ýìïèðè÷åñêè âåðèôèöèðîâàííîé àâòîðîì òåîðåòè÷åñêîé ìîäåëè ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè êàê ñèñòåìíîãî ëè÷íîñòíîãî îáðàçîâàíèÿ, îáúÿñíåíèè ñâÿçè ýòîãî ïîíÿòèÿ ñ ïîíÿòèÿìè «íàïðàâëåííîñòü ëè÷íîñòè» è «ïðîôåññèîíàëüíàÿ íàïðàâëåííîñòü», â ïîäõîäå ê ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè êàê ðåçóëüòàòó ñëîæíîãî âçàèìîîïîñðåäîâàíèÿ ïðîöåññîâ å¸ ýêîíîìè÷åñêîãî è ïðîôåññèîíàëüíîãî ñàìîîïðåäåëåíèÿ, êàæäûé èç êîòîðûõ íóæäàåòñÿ â ñïåöèôè÷åñêèõ ñðåäñòâàõ ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêîé ïîääåðæêè. Îñîáûì âêëàäîì ÿâëÿåòñÿ îïèñàíèå ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèõ ìåõàíèçìîâ ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè, êîòîðûå áûëè ðåàëèçîâàíû â àâòîðñêîé ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêîé òåõíîëîãèè, ýôôåêòèâíîñòü êîòîðîé ïîëó÷èëà ïîäòâåðæäåíèå â ôîðìèðóþùåì ýêñïåðèìåíòå.  ñòàòüå ïðèâîäÿòñÿ ðàçðàáîòàííûé àâòîðîì âàëèäèçèðîâàííûé äèàãíîñòè÷åñêèé èíñòðóìåíòàðèé è îïèñûâàþòñÿ ðåçóëüòàòû ýêñïåðèìåíòàëüíîé àïðîáàöèè àâòîðñêîé ïñèõîòåõíîëîãèè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêîé íàïðàâëåííîñòè ëè÷íîñòè â ðàìêàõ ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêîãî ñîïðîâîæäåíèÿ.
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà:
ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêîå ñîïðîâîæäåíèå, ïðîôåññèîíàëèçàöèÿ ëè÷íîñòè, ýêîíîìè÷åñêîå ñàìîîïðåäåëåíèå, ïðîôåññèîíàëüíîå ñàìîîïðåäåëåíèå, ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëüñêàÿ íàïðàâëåííîñòü ëè÷íîñòè, ýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ ñóáúåêòíîñòü, ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêàÿ äèàãíîñòèêà, ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèå ìåõàíèçìû, ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèå òåõíîëîãèè, ïðîôåññèîíàëüíîå îáðàçîâàíèå
Abstract:
The subject of the research is features of psychological support of developing the entrepreneurial orientation in the process of professional development at a University. For this purpose, the author of the article analyzes structural components of the entrepreneurial orientation as a systemic personality construct which is the internal motivational basis of entrepreneurial activity manifested not only in choosing the business option of a professional career but also in consequences of this activity for the surrounding world (social, moral, legal, environmental, etc.). Special attention is paid to psychological mechanisms of developing the entrepreneurial orientation of personality in the process of professional development which should be considered in terms of psychological support. The methodological basis of research includes interdisciplinary approaches (L. Zhuravlev, T. D. Martsinkovskaya), systems approach (V. A. Barabanshchikov, B. F. Lomov, V. D. Shadrikov), psychosocial approach (K. A. Abulkhanova, M. I. Volovikova), ecopsychological approach (V. I. Panov), systems personality-developing approach (L. M. Mitina), and contextual approach (A. A. Verbitsky). In the course of this research the author has used both theoretical and empirical methods (including formative experiment), statistical treatment and analysis of the results (Mann-Whitney U-criterion, Sign test). The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author provides a description of developed and empirically verified theoretical model of entrepreneurial orientation as a systemic personality construct, explains the connection of this concept with the concepts of "personality orientation" and "professional orientation" , approach to the entrepreneurial orientation of the personality as a result of a complex interaction of processes of economic and professional self-determination, each of which requires specific means of psychological support. A special contribution is the description of psychological mechanisms of developing entrepreneurial orientation of the personality that were implemented in the author's psychological technologies which proved to be efficient in the process of the formative experiment. The article presents the author's validated diagnostic tools and describes the results of experimental approbation of the author's psychological technologies of developing the entrepreneurial orientation of the individual within the framework of psychological support.
Keywords:
professional self-determination, entrepreneurial orientation of personality, economic subjectness, psychological diagnostics, psychological mechanisms, psychological technologies, professional education, professional development of an individual, economic self-determination, psychological support